Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 2018-05-01 TOWN 0FITHACA PLANNING BOARD Shirley A. Raffensperger Board Roorn,Town Hall 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Im-e �may�l -2m AGENDA 7:00 P,M. SEQR Determination: Dienich 4-Lot Subdivision, Orchard Hill Road. 7:,00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 4-lot subdivision located on the north side of Orchard [fill Road(including 10 Orchard Hill Road),'town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 22.-2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6,Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves creating four new parcels out of the two existing parcels. The proposed parcels would consist of a 2.12 +/-acre, vacant Parcel (2-A), a 2.00 +/- acre vacant parcel (2-13), a 3 D3+/- acre parcel containing the existing residence 10 Orchard Hill Road (3-A), and a 1.14+/- acre vacant parcel (3-13).Timothy P. Dietrich and Leslie C, Dietrich, Owners/Applicants. 7:15 PM. SEQR Determination: Reaffirmation of the October 4, 2016 (resolution no. 2016-056) SEAR determination (negative determination of environmental significance)for the Sleep Inn Hotel located at,635 Elmira Road,Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 35.-1-2 1,Neighborhood Commercial Zone, No changes have been made to the:project scope since the 2016 approval. Ahir Hotels Corp., Owner/Applicant; Adarn M, Fishel, PE, Marathon Engineering, Agent, 4. Persons to be heard 5. Approval of Minutes: April 3, 2018 and April 17, 2018 6, Other Business 7, Adjournment Susan Ritter Director of Planning, 273-1747 NOTE:IF AN ry MEMBER OFT PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO A'17TEND,PLEASE NOTIFY SANDY POIXE AT273-1747MirSP()LCE@T()WNXf UACA,NY.US. (A quorum of four(4)members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business:.) Accessing Meeting Materials Online Site Plan and Subdivision applications and associated project materials are accessible electronically on the Town's website under"Planning Board"on the"Meeting Agendas"page Rim TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Tuesday,May 1,2018 By direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board,NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will'be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, May 1, 2018, at.215 North Tioga Street,Ithaca,N.Y.,at the following time and on the following matter: 7:00 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 4-lot subdivision located on the north side of Orchard Hill Road(including 10 Orchard Hill Road),Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 22.-2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6,Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves creating four new parcels out of the two existing parcels. The proposed parcels would consist of a 2.1.3 f/-acre vacant parcel(2-A), a 2.00+/-acre vacant parcel(2-B),a 3.03+/-acre parcel containing the existing residence 10 Orchard Hill Road(3"-A), and a 1.14+/-acre vacant parcel(3-B).Timothy P. Dietrich and Leslie C.Dietrich, Owners/Applicants. Said Planning Board will at said time and said place hear all persons in support of such matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual impairments, hearing impairments or other special needs, wiU be provided with assistance as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to.the time of the public hearing. Susan Ritter Director of Planning 273-1747 Dated:Monday,April 23,2018 Publish:Wednesday,April 25,2018 TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION 1, Sandra Polce, being duty sworn, depose and say that I am a Senior Typist for the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York; that the following Notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town of Ithaca and that said Notice has, been duly published in the local newspaper, The Ithaca Journal. Notice of Public 1-learings, to be held by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in the Town of Ithaca Town Hall, 215 North Tioa,,.Street,..,,Ithaca Flew York, on..Tuesdqy,,.,May 1, 2018 commencing at 7:00P,.M.,,.,as per attached, Location of Sign. Board used for Posting: Town Clerk Sign Board—215 North jrioa Street. Date of Posting: April 23, 2018 Date of Publication: April 25, 2018 Sandra PoIce, Senior Typist Town of Ithaca STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 25"' day of April 2018. Notary Public DFRORAH KELLEY Nolary Flubhc, Stat, of New Ybrk Na, 01KE(3025073 OUE'difk:'d iri Schuy��,-Jr Ccaulty C ComtrJs,sion Expires May 17, 20 Nlo�i, hk fi o G ii F} t Town of Ithaca Planning Board 215 North Tioga Street May 1, 2018 7:00 p.m. PLEASE SIGN-IN Please Print Clearly. Thank You Name Address TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD MEETING Tuesday, May 1, 2018 215 N. Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Town Planning Board Members Present: Fred Wilcox, Linda Collins,Joseph Haefeli,John Beach, Yvonne Fogarty, Liebe Meier Swain, Jon Bosak Town Staff Present: Chris Balestra, Planner; Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Susan Brock,Attorney for the Town; Debra DeAugistine, Deputy Town Clerk Call to Order Mr.Wilcox called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. AGENDA ITEM SEQR Determination: Dietrich 4-Lot Subdivision, Orchard Hill Road Tim Dietrich said he and his sister would like to subdivide the property. His family is interested in moving to Ithaca and might use one of the lots.All lots have road frontage. PB Resolution No. 2018-015: SEQR, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval, Dietrich 4-Lot Subdivision, Orchard Hill Road, Tax Parcel No.'s 22:2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6 Moved by Liebe Meier Swain; Joseph Haefeli WHEREAS: 1. This action is Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision approval for the proposed 4-lot subdivision located on Orchard Hill Road,Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 22.-2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves creating four parcels out of the two existing parcels. The proposed parcels would consist of a 2.13+/-acre vacant lot(2.A), a 2.00+/-acre vacant parcel(2.B), a 3.03+/-acre parcel containing the existing residence at 10 Orchard Hill Road(3-A), and a 1.14+/-acre vacant parcel(3-B). Timothy P.&Leslie C. Dietrich, Owners/Applicants; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is acting as lead agency with respect to Subdivision Approval; 3. The Planning Board on May 1, 2018, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the Town Planning staff, a survey map entitled "Subdivision Plat, Lands Of Timothy P. Dietrich, Part of Military Lot No. 40, Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins, State of New York, Tax Map Nos. 22.4-2.5 & 2.6, Referenced Deed: Instrument No. 520417-003", prepared by Regan Land Surveying, dated Feb. 19, 2018, and other application materials; and 4. Town planning staff has recommended a negative determination of environmental significance with respect to the proposed Subdivision Approval; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 2 of 8 That the Torn of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review for the above referenced action as proposed, based on the information in the EAF Part 1 and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Parts 2 and 3, and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Vote Ayes: Wilcox, Collins, Haefeli, Beach, Fogarty, Meier Swain, Bosak AGENDA ITEM Public Hearing: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 4-lot subdivision located on the north side of Orchard Hill Road (including 10 Orchard Hill Road), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 22.-2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves creating four new parcels out of the two existing parcels. The proposed parcels would consist of a 2.13 +/-acre vacant parcel(2.A), a 2.00 +/-acre vacant parcel(2-B), a 3.03 +/-acre parcel containing the existing residence 10 Orchard Hill Road (3-A), and a 1.14 +/-acre vacant parcel(3-B). Timothy P. Dietrich and Leslie C. Dietrich, Owners/Applicants Mr.Wilcox opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. Ira Wasserman, 2 Orchard Hill Road, said his property abuts Lot 1.The town sewer line runs through his backyard, so it's a matter of considerable concern to him that if the potential three new homes are connected to the sewer, the sewer can accommodate it and that there won't be problems for him. He's spoken with Mr. Dietrich and understands that his need to subdivide and ultimately sell the lots is due, in part, to rising property assessments along Orchard Hill Road. It's a shame that those kinds of considerations become drivers of the evolution of the community. The tax burden is an issue for people in the neighborhood.Another concern is that on the side of Orchard Hill Road his property is on, there are currently only four houses, so adding three more is a considerable increase. The other issue is drainage: water from Dubois Road flows downhill through their proper- ties.Assuming more construction will clear more brush and trees, the water flow needs to be studied. Rich Armstrong, 14 Orchard Hill Road, said he is one of the original owners and builders of the neighborhood. He's concerned about how the neighborhood is going to evolve. He's concerned about what Dubois Road looks like from Orchard Hill Road to Woolf Lane with the addition of some new properties that are out of character with the neighborhood: they're small and not very well kept. When he first bought the property, Rumsey Ithaca Corporation required that he submit an exterior design that also showed the location of the building to be erected. His architectural drawings had to be reviewed, and the materials selected had to be compatible with other homes on the street. There were stringent requirements to meet the overall character of the neighborhood. If the main floor of the structure were to be raised off the existing grade, it couldn't block the neighbor's view. So the initial requirements for buying into the subdivision were important to him, and he expects it to be important to people proposing to build in that area. The construction should fit in with the character of the neighborhood as designed. That's how the town should do things: go through the neighbor- hood and look at some of the new buildings and decide whether that's the character of the torn. He and Mr. Dietrich's father paid$12,000 to have the water line brought down the hill; others can now hook up to it. If the town is going to supply sewer for potential new construction, will it be available Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 3 of 8 to him down the road? He's concerned about the drainage. Sometimes when there's a heavy rain, there's a six-foot-wide swath of water running through the middle his property. Mr. Haefeli asked whether it's a covenant-controlled neighborhood. Ms. Balestra said she did a bit of research a long time ago with the Orchard Hill Road subdivision. She did not see restrictive covenants,but will take a closer look. It wasn't part of the resolution for the planning board, but when the subdivision was approved, restrictive covenants didn't always get filed with the deeds. Ms. Brock stated that we don't enforce restrictive covenants because we don't know whether or not they're valid. If it was required by the planning board, we would,but if the developer just put them in himself without the torn requiring them,we do not get involved. Jeff Silber, 20 Orchard Hill Road, said they have no sewer or water except when the water is coming out of the ground and out of the sky.An area of their lawn, increasingly over the years, is green throughout the year until it freezes. The soil is very wet and there's lots of clay.After two floods in their house, they had excavator work done, and that will hopefully take care of things. So drainage is their biggest concern as properties are built on and improved.The drawings provided in the packet make the seasonal stream look discontinuous - like it runs to a property line and jumps over -but he's not sure it really does that or if it's a cartographer's interpretation.Those seasonal streams are the source of some of the water; one of them bisects the small lot. He understands that the code requires that water be mitigated as part of any development. Ray Small, 3 Orchard Hill Road, said he's also one of the original buyers in the neighborhood. He shares a lot of the concerns his neighbor brought up. They had to go through a lot of approvals; for example, all houses had to have cedar siding. He's not opposed to the project,but is concerned about the character of the homes that might be built. Mr.Wilcox closed the public hearing at 7:39. Mr. Bates explained what happens when someone applies for a building permit to construct a house: we make sure it complies with the building code and the setback requirements within our zoning. Engineering looks at the SWPPP to make sure it's compliant, and the SWPPP needs to be approved before we issue a permit.All issues are considered at the time someone proposes building. Mr. Bosak said this is a good example of a point he's raised before: neighborhood character is a SEQR issue. Having already declared a neg dec, he questions the board's ability to deny a site plan that meets all the code. This is not our fault; it's the way the state has arranged the process. Over and over,we run into the problem of approving the SEQR, and then comments the public raises during the public hearing about SEQR issues are too late to resolve.This is a major flaw in the process. Mr. Haefeli asked what happens if any covenants are at odds with what is being proposed in the subdivision before us. Ms. Brock responded that if the town required the covenants as part of an approval, we might want to know why and whether the torn should be requiring those same covenants for the new action. If the Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 4 of 8 developer wanted to do that on their own,we don't get involved in that.We don't have abstracts of title; we don't know whether, at some point, something happened and those covenants aren't in effect anymore.That's a private transaction that has nothing to do with our zoning or our subdivision law. It's not in our purview to base our decision on whether it complies with a private party's transaction. Private covenants would typically be in the deed. Mr. Dietrich said he read somewhere that this covenant was due to expire in ten years after the initial purchases on the property. He thinks it was part of the original development plan.When he consid- ered doing this subdivision, he searched for the covenant, and found that it expired after ten years. Mr.Wilcox said a covenant or deed restriction may have been filed or may have been enforced by the developer after the initial approval. It may not still have been effect, and the torn may not have any record of it. Ms. Balestra looked at the minutes from the preliminary and final subdivision reviews in the 1970s and didn't see anything related to restrictions. She also read the deed and saw nothing related to restrictions on the location, design, or height of the houses.This was not something our planning board required. It may or may not have been required by the developer. Mr.Wilcox said that although any covenant would be a private matter, it would behoove anyone who buys the lots to check to see if there are covenants or deed restrictions still in place that are enforce- able on the land. If the town approval at the time said, for example, that the lots all had to be two acres, then it would be relevant to the action. Mr. Dietrich said his father did have to submit plans and conform to whatever the developer deemed appropriate for the neighborhood. But he's sure that it expired after ten years. Mr.Wilcox said cedar siding might have been in a covenant, but for this board, to say the houses need to have cedar siding gets into an area he would call "architectural review," and that's not a power given to the planning board. So we don't go there. Mr. Bates wanted people to understand that even if there are covenants or deed restrictions, building department staff have no authority to enforce them. He can only enforce the building code. Cove- nants are often sales tools, and it's up to the neighbors to enforce them.The applicant will have to get with his attorney to make sure when he sells these, they'll be free and clear to do what the buyer wants. If the buyer's attorney is savvy, he or she will do the same. For the benefit of the neighbors who were in attendance, Ms. Balestra explained some of the conditions in the resolution that address drainage.When we did our environmental review, we noted an intermittent drainage stream that crossed almost all of the properties on one side. That particular intermittent stream is not listed on our stream setback law because it doesn't meet the drainage requirements,but we were concerned that future development down the line would impact neighbors to the east downhill, so we passed it by the engineering department. They have to approve stormwater management facilities and erosion and sedimentation controls.We decided to add as a condition of approval that when and if a building permit is submitted, the development would have to adhere to our stream setback requirements and would also have to meet our stormwater management law, Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 5 of 8 which would require the erosion and sedimentation control so any drainage stays on the site and is handled on the site.We don't normally add that as a condition of approval for a subdivision. Ms. Brock added that even though that has to be done anyway as part of the building permit, the planning department felt that if we state it as a condition, it's a reminder that there are concerns with these lots because there's a stream that's regulated and because of the drainage. Hence, condition B. PB Resolution No. 2018.016: Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval, Dietrich 4-Lot Subdivision, Orchard Hill Road, Tax Parcel No.'s 22:2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6 Moved by Linda Collins; seconded by Yvonne Fogarty WHEREAS: 1. This action is Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision approval for the proposed 4-lot subdivision located on Orchard Hill Road,Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 22.-2-2.5 and 22.-2-2.6, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves creating four parcels out of the two existing parcels. The proposed parcels would consist of a 2.13+/-acre vacant lot(2-A), a 2.00+/-acre vacant parcel(2.B), a 3.03+/-acre parcel containing the existing residence at 10 Orchard Hill Road(3-A), and a 1.14+/-acre vacant parcel(3-B). Timothy P.&Leslie C. Dietrich, Owners/Applicants; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as lead agency with respect to Subdivision Approval, has on May 1, 2018, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the Town Planning staff; and 3. The Planning Board, on May 1, 2018, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a survey map entitled "Subdivision Plat, Lands Of Timothy P. Dietrich, Part of Military Lot No. 40, Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins, State of New York, Tax Map Nos. 22.4-2.5 & 2.6, Referenced Deed: Instrument No. 520417-003", prepared by Regan Land Surveying, dated Feb. 19, 2018, and other application materials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby waives certain requirements for Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval, as shown on the Preliminary and Final Subdivision Checklists, hav- ing determined from the materials presented that such waiver will result in a significant alteration of neither the purpose of subdivision control nor the policies enunciated or implied by the Town Board; and 2. That the Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located on Orchard Hill Road, as shown on the survey map noted in Whereas #3 above, subject to the following conditions: a. Revision of the final plat to correct the Tax Parcel numbers associated with the subdivision (22.-2-2.5 & 22.-2-2.6); Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 6 of 8 b. Revision of the final plat to delineate the 35-foot stream setback buffer, measured from the center line of the stream, for the stream that is located along the back of parcels 2.A and 2-B; c. Submission for signing by the Chairperson of the Planning Board of an original and three dark lined prints of the revised final subdivision plat, prior to filing with the Tompkins Coun- ty Clerk Office, and submission of a copy of the receipt of filing to the Torn of Ithaca Plan- ning Department; and d. Upon application for a building permit for any of the lots, the applicant must provide proof that any proposed development complies with the Town's Stream Setback Law and Storm- water Management Law. Vote Ayes: Wilcox, Collins, Haefeli, Beach, Fogarty, Meier Swain, Bosak AGENDA ITEM SEQR Determination: Reaffirmation of the October 4, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016-056) SEQR determination (negative determination of environmental significance) for the Sleep Inn Hotel located at 635 Elmira Road, Torn of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 35.4-2 1, Neighborhood Commercial Zone. No changes have been made to the project scope since the 2016 approval. Ahir Hotels Corp., Own- er/Applicant; Adam M. Fishel, PE, Marathon Engineering, Agent Ms. Fogarty abstained from the action and took a seat in the audience. Ms. Brock explained that this is a Type I action, so we had to do a coordinated review and the planning board was the lead agency for SEQR. The planning board's negative determination is binding on the ZBA when it goes to them for the variances. Even though the site plan approval is still valid and there's no expiration imminent, the variances have a shorter timeframe and are about to expire. For the ZBA to consider issuing them again, they need to have SEQR done, and because the planning board was the lead agency, it's simpler for you to look at it and determine whether to reaffirm the neg dec in light of the fact that there have been no changes. Then the ZBA will be able to act on their variances. Mr. Fishel said they have made no changes to the site plan since the approval. The only changes they've made have been to address the approval conditions.They're working with the DOT, torn staff, the contractor, and the developer to iron out funding. They're hoping it will be kicked off this year, but just in case there's another setback and the variances need to be pushed farther out, they're asking the ZBA to extend the approvals for another 18 months. Mr. Bosak asked whether, absent any significant difference in conditions or plan,we would even have the authority to make a different decision without being arbitrary and capricious. Ms. Brock responded that you'd have to have a rational reason to come out with a different answer. Mr.Wilcox said the law might have changed, or something that we look at as part of SEQR, such as traffic, might have changed significantly, and that may lead us to a different conclusion. Mr. Haefeli pointed out that that's why the environmental review isn't indefinite. Planning Board Minutes 05.01.2018 Page 7 of 8 Mr. Bosak commented that at the case law review session of the Planning Federation meeting this year, it was noted that recently there was a New York court decision that said if you make a ruling different from a ruling you made before on an essentially similar set of circumstances - even if it's a different project - it is ipso facto capricious and arbitrary. Ms. Brock agreed, unless it's a rational reason. PB Resolution No. 2018-017: SEQR- Reaffirmation of Negative Determination, Sleep Inn Hotel, 635 Elmira Road, Tax Parcel No. 35.4-21 Moved by Fred Wilcox; seconded by John Beach WHEREAS: 1. The Planning Board's action is consideration of reaffirmation of the October 4, 2016 (resolution no. 2016-056) SEQR negative determination of environmental significance for the Sleep Inn Hotel located at 635 Elmira Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 35.4-2 1, Neighborhood Com- mercial Zone. No changes have been made to the project scope since the 2016 approval. Ahir Hotels Corp., Owner/Applicant;Adam M. Fishel, PE, Marathon Engineering, Agent, 2. This is a Type I Action pursuant to the Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 148 - Environmental Quality Review, requiring a coordinated environmental review of all actions, 3. The Planning Board granted final site plan approval for this project on March 7, 2017, after establish- ing itself as lead agency in the environmental review on April 19, 2016, and issuing a negative declara- tion of environmental significance and granting preliminary site plan approval and special permit on October 4, 2016, 4. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted area variances for the project on November 21, 2016, 5. Pursuant to Town of Ithaca Code §270-235.J, the variances granted by the Zoning Board will expire on May 21, 2018,which is 18 months after the Zoning Board approval,because the work on the pro- ject has not materially commenced, thus requiring the applicant to return to the Zoning Board for re- consideration of the variances (the Planning Board approvals are not expiring at this time), 6. The Planning Board, as lead agency in the environmental review, on May 1, 2018, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Full Environmental Assessment Form(SEAF) Part 1, submitted by the appli- cant, Parts 2 and 3 prepared by Town Planning staff, along with an applicant narrative and a set of plans prepared by Marathon Engineering, titled "Site Development Plans for Sleep Inn Hotel, 635 Elmira Road(NYS Route 13, 34 &96), Town of Ithaca,Tompkins County, New York," including "Alta NSPS Land Title Survey" and sheets C 1.0-3.0, C3.1, C4.0-6.0, C6.1-6.5, C7.0-7.2 and C8.0, date-stamped April 20, 2018, and other application materials, and 7. The Town Planning staff has recommended the Planning Board reaffirm its negative determination of environmental significance with respect to the proposal; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: Planning Board Minutes 05-01-2018 Page 8 of 8 That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby reaffirms its negative determination of environmental significance that was made on October 4, 2016, in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review for the above referenced proposal,based on the information in the EAF Part I and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Parts 2 and 3, and, therefore, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Vote Ayes: Wilcox, Collins, Haefeli, Beach, Meier Swain, Bosak Abstentions: Fogarty AGENDA ITEM Persons to be heard -No one came forward to address the board. AGENDA ITEM PB Resolution No. 2018-018: Minutes of April 3, 2018 Moved by Fred Wilcox; seconded by John Beach RESOLVED, the Planning Board approves the minutes of April 3, 2018, as amended. Vote Ayes: Wilcox, Collins, Haefeli, Beach, Fogarty, Meier Swain, Bosak PB Resolution No. 2018-019: Minutes of April 17, 2018 Moved by Fred Wilcox; seconded by John Beach RESOLVED, the Planning Board approves the minutes of April 17, 2018, as amended. Vote Ayes: Wilcox, Collins, Haefeli, Beach, Fogarty, Meier Swain, Bosak Adjournment Upon a motion by Liebe Meier Swain, the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra,'DeAugistih� Deputy Town.Clerk