HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-08-19•
u
•
DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD
AUGUST 19, 1993
AGENDA: ROBERT & EDITH SPAULDING: PUBLIC HEARING deeding of .16
acres of a nonconforming lot - Ringwood Court West.
STEPHEN WHICHER: SKETCH CONFERENCE to modify boundary
Moore Woods Subdivision at Hunt Hill Road.
LUCENTE: MA ZONING DISTRICT - Review
MEMBERS PRESENTS Chair Barbara Caldwell, Claudia Brenner,
John Davis, Robert Fletcher and Joseph
Lalley.
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a. a... a
The meeting
and noted the fi
Edith Spaulding
lot at the end o
an existing appr
unbuiltable, it
therefore has to
was called to order
rst item was a publ
to propose deeding
f Ringwood Court We
oved subdivision, e
becomes a modificat
come back before t
i
5
v
i
h
by Chair Barba
c hearing for
16 acres of a
t. Since this
en though the
on of the subd
e Board.
ra Caldwell
Robert and
nonconforming
is a part of
lot is
ivision and
PUBLIC HEARING - ROBERT & EDITH SPAULDING
Robert and Edith Spaulding were present for the hearing.
The Chair requested that Henry Slater brief everyone on the
road situation.
Mr. Slater stated that the Town looked at
proposal and saw an opportunity to correct an
Town's way of thinking. It is a cul -de -sac an
hoping you would deed, sell, or otherwise turn
amount of that land to make a "T" turn around.
request on their part as the trucks have a pro
would require 180 feet of length by 60 feet of
the Spaulding
error in the
d the the Town was
over a sufficient
This is only a
blem there, it
width.
Mr. Spaulding
stated
that
he assumed
the
individual
that
they were going
to
deed
this
to
is
where
the
additional
"T"
would be and
60
feet
is
almost
the
entire
width
of
the
lot.
John Davis wanted to know if it would be beneficial to make
it an "L ".
Mr. Spaulding said It is an "L ", the trucks pull ahead then
back in along the side of our yard, and hasn't seen them have
any problems.
C
i
At John Davis request t
lot? Mr. Spaulding stated
miscalculation when subdivi
and let it go for tax sale.
who later found out he coul
at preserving a small piece
the yard which we had used
to loose that so we paid $5
land. Now we are paying to
Mr. Spaulding stated he was
to the neighbors.
PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 2
o know why this was an unbuiltable
that they thought it was a
ding and then failed to pay the taxes
It was purchased by an individual
dn't build on it. They were looking
of land that's down at the level of
as a picnic area and we didn't want
00.00 for a very small piece of
give a part of it to someone else.
honoring a commitment his wife made
Mr. Spaulding stated that the Morse property behind his
drops off very steep on the ravine side.
The road conditions /development in the subdivision was
discussed. The Chair stated that the subdivision went into
preliminary before the Town had subdivision regulations. The
roads at that point were shared, they did not meet Town specks,
and are nothing more then private driveways. When it came to
the point of meeting Town specks, it is her understanding, they
formed a special improvement district to pay for the cost of the
road. The road was brought up to basic specks but due to the
location of septic, etc.. the road was built without shoulders
and therefore is accentually still an immediate neighborhood
access.
•Joseph Lalle moved to close the
p y public hearing.
Second by Roert Fletcher
VOTE YES (5) B. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and
J. Lalley.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
SHORT FORM EAF - REVIEW OFFICE JOSEPH LALLEY
Adjacent
to #14
West
- tax
map #65 -3
-4.3
modify
lot
line
parcel
of lot
between
12
& 13.
Amount
of land
affected
.16.
•
a
a
PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 3
JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE SHORT FORM
EAF.
SECOND TO THE MOTION BY CLAUDIA BRENNER
VOTE YES (5) R. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and
J. Lalley.
JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHANGE AS PROPOSED.
SECOND BY ROBERT FLETCHER
VOTE YES (5) B. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and
J. Lalley.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Barbara Caldwell
draft environmental
O was concerned with t
requirement /obligati
Chair this morning t
Attorney Mahlon Perk
reviewing it and his
Attorney Perkins con
extension,
stated that the board had received the
impact statement for Peregrine Hollow and
he timing. Mr. Varn has satisfied the Town
on. Engineer George Schlecht notified the
hat he will not be reviewing this. Town
ins stated that Mr. Herrick will be
report is due September 10, 1993 and that
tacted the developers concerning this
A meeting date was scheduled for September 9, 1993 at 8:00.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SKETCH CONFERENCE - STEPHEN WHICHER
MODIFY BOUNDARY MORE WOODS SUBDIVISION AT HUNT HILL ROAD
Stephen Whicher stated that the reason they were considering
the boundary change is due to the fact they would like to build
near the pond and the drive way from the original site would be
950 feet long. They have spoke with the Moors and they are
willing to make this swap to give a more direct access of about
O500 feet.
It requires sliding lots 2 & 3 down, modifying the size of
lot 2 from 2.49 acres to 2.20 and lot 3 increases from 2.09 to
2.20 acres.
a
•
•
PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 4
The
lots as
building
proposed
site
they
is
are
behind #2,
hoping someone
and
by grouping
will
these two
buy both lots and
keep the
development
down
as much
as possible.
Mr. Whicher stated that the run off problem is on the other
side of the road and this side is flat and has good quality
soil. Everything meets County and Town specks. There is a
creek feeding the pond and comes in at the direct top of the
pond and exits the southwest corner of the pond continuing down
and through lot 5
Discussion ensued to
house /homes would conform
Town and County for the 1
required before the final
scheduling a preliminary/
the adjustment of lot lin
make
wit
ots
hea
fina
es t
h
b
r
1
0
sure septic, well, placement of
the regulations specified by the
eing modified. A survey would be
ing date. Mr. Whicher requested
public hearing for next month for
the three parcels.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STEVE LUCENTE UPDATING
Mr. Lucente stated he had a public meeting (sketch hearing)
with the Town of Ithaca Planning Board Tuesday night.
Mr. Lucente has discussed a
it is not finalized, however ant
happens with the Planning Board.
Lucentes present property as out
transferred from Mrs. Levin to "
discussions with Cornell concern
t
i
1
M
i
ransfer of land with M
cipates it will depend
The request is to rez
ined, including the pi
A ". He has had positi
ng obtaining a right -o
rs. Levin
ing what
one Roco
ece
ve
f -way.
Mr. Fabbroni stated that the Lucente's were exploring
placing an extended care facility on the front lands that they
had originally requested become a part of the "MA" zone. The
neighbors were more comfortable with something more residential"
w#.ka a ter day. There would be access in from this area
(Hanshaw) to the light industrial area and would be more
compatible with the higher density. They have in mind two or
three buildings at the end and not a loading up of the area.
The access to the property would be from 139 approx. 55
feet. Mr. Lucente stated he met with a representative for the
Agriculture School, also the Bird Sanctuary has shown interest,
and was in the process of writing an agreement with Cornell
where he would build the entire road. He would build the curb
cut on the South side of Route 13 and they would like to have a
curb cut on the North side of 13 which they would pay for. As
soon as the agreement is in writing with Cornell they will
request the Town approach DOT. They hope to have this done by
September.
1
. r
FHB 8 -19 -93 FAG. 5
B. Caldwell stated the Route 13 access was critical and Mr.
Lucente said he plans to build the road as soon as they have DOT
approval. The development of the project would /may still begin
from Hanshaw Road due to sewer and water.
B. Caldwell suggested that they apply for a special permit
concerning the senior housing project and if that is not
possible a rezoning of the area.
Noted that the Planning Board had submitted a zoning change
to the Town Board and they are still holding to that
recommendation until or unless they hear otherwise.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r:
ci . 6 10�
•
The board considered
the zone
for senior
housing
being
RBI
with
special permit.
That way if
the senior
housing
were
not
built
/remained would
conform with
the wishes
of
the
present
residence
in the area.
Different
zones
and their
definitions
were
reviewed.
B. Caldwell suggested that they apply for a special permit
concerning the senior housing project and if that is not
possible a rezoning of the area.
Noted that the Planning Board had submitted a zoning change
to the Town Board and they are still holding to that
recommendation until or unless they hear otherwise.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r:
ci . 6 10�
•
14.18.4 (2187) —Text 12
PRO.)ECT I.D. NUMBER 017,21
Appendix C
State Environmental Ouality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I— PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. A PLICANT /SPONSOnR� PROD T NAME
6ri r U l oA
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality � County nr. .
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, Prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:
❑ New ❑ Expansion rgModlficatlonlalteratlon
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
foo
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
Initially _ acres Ultimately (O acres
S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
[Ayes ❑ No If No, describe briefly
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
N Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial
Describe:
❑ Agriculture o ❑ Park/Forest/Open space ❑ Other
SEQR
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FFIOM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL)? ?c�
11 Yes L�l No It yes, list agency(s) and permit /approvals
I
UUts ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT; �fI HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
Byes ❑ NO II yes, list acency name and permitlapproval
I �"101-zj�vyzk s'k,u. ft y p
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL I:EUUIRE MODIFICATION?
El Wo
I CERTIFY THAT THA1T THE INFORMATIO14 PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant /sponsor name:
Date:
Signature:
• '.
If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
i
I