Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-28i DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD APRIL 28, 1993 • AGENDA: CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING REQUEST FROM "M.A." TO "R.D." REVIEW ZONING REQUEST FROM " R. P. " TO "M.A." ( LUCENTE SUBDIVIS -ION). SKETCH CONFERENCE FOR WESCOTT DEVELOPMENT • MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell, Mitchell Lavine, Claudia Brenner, Joseph Lal ley and John Davis. AMONG THOSE PRESENT: Donald Wescott, Scott Simpson, Joseph Wissenbach, Steve Lucente, Larry Fabbroni, Mr. R. Lucente and Henry Slater. The Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell. need to be taken. A motion was made by M. Lavine to approve the March 24, 1993 minutes with additions and corrections. Second by John Davis and approved by members present. SKETCH CONFERENCE FOR WESCOTT DEVELOPMENT FACTS AND FINDINGS: 1. Mr. Wissenbach, L. S. stated the grade of the road coming in starts up high on Rt. 13 and goes down towards the low lying stream and goes back Lip again never exceeding ten percent. 2. Nine lot subdivision 3. The area not considered for development should /would become part of a designated lot. 4. A buffer has been placed along the Avery Park property. 5. Henry Slater to verify the significance of the stream and if any considerations need to be taken. 6. On the West side of the property a strip has been designated for a possible road for any future development. The property adjacent may /could be developed by the owner and may /could connect to Annie Lane which is 1600 feet away. I i L 7. The access to the `fellow Frei • Site Flan Review Board. a. Henry Slater stated S ton max. the acce DOT and the Town of Dryden as a Special Freight Terminal sa traffic on Dutcher ght T that ss wa Dryd Perm id th Road. erminal Dutche s disco en prev it agre ere wil PS 4/26/93 Figo, 2 was approved by the r Road is posted for sled by the County, iously. The Town of ement for Yellow 1 be no commercial b. Henry also stated that George Schletch and DOT felt that it was better to get heavy traffic away from the intersection because of the grade issue on Dutcher Road and because you already have a strange intersection with Livermore and Simms Hill Road. c. Mr. Lavine stated that it may advantages to close off the entrance to Dutcher Road at the Rt. 13 intersection and to have the residence access Rt. 13 through the proposed road, straight between lots 3 and 4. d. If Dutcher Road were closed commercial and residential traffic would access Rt. 13 by the same path. e. Mr,. Wescot • Truck Term drive comi 13. He co as it woul didn't wan • t stated inal perm ng off Du uld have d have be t that so t i t b e hat when h t his firs cher Road wilt for a n placed o they moved e appeared t map showe and not ent fraction o n the level it. for the d the eying Rt. f the cost , and they Mr. Lavine stated tie understood that Dutcher Road was can better Kay not still Drive. intended by make moving the to be used curb cut the end of for on Dutcher heavy Rt. trucks. 13 work Road Out to We much Leilani f. Mr. Lalley North of t of the Vil order to d necessary traffic to was he V lage et er- to b use i m U also concern llage from b Would like ine what can ild up Dutch one curb cut ed in ecomi to s /shop_► er Ro keeping Rt. 13 ng like it is West ee the site in ld be done. May be ad in order for all g. To obtain the opinion /comments from George Schletht. i I i1 it PB 4/28/93 Pg. 3 • 8. Lots 3, 4, and 5 may have access on Dutcher Road. These lots may be considered residential lots to conform with the residential area on Dutcher Road. a. Mr De to if co De Wis part m is we this mmerc part m senb ent re s .goe ial ent ach stated would not pecificall s through developmen inspection the Tompkins County Health be involved if four or less y dedicated for residential, as a commercial development. t only requires Health on permit application.. 80 The subdivision is not in an Agricultural District. 9. The road for future use should have a radius cut. y i�. Discussed the buffer strip, which was placed by the Park boundary line as a condition of the Special Permit, who becomes responsible, who should own, deed restrictions, etc.. a. Could the buffer strip be sold to Park? Would require a lot line change review? Would still make the Park residence a non conforming lot and the legality of doing so. 11. Is there a is requirement a little that the lots be designated in as the road where Mrs. Levin comes out of residential property, or commercial? so Issues the may be looked at different • if the Board knew has which would be residential moved. and which would be commercial. This is the first time the Board remembers a mixed subdivision. that would have road frontage SKETCH CONFERENCE PROPOSED TECHNOLOGY PARK (HANSHAW /ROUTE 13) STEVE LUCENTE REVIEW REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE FROM "R. B. —1" TO "M. A. L. Fabbroni stated that the following changes have been considered: 1. There is a little rise in the road where Mrs. Levin comes out of her property, so the entrance to the project has been moved. The properties that would have road frontage on both the Hanshaw and an interior road have been designated as an industrial site. When entering the project there is an industrial site on either side. In consideration of the Levin property the two sites, one on either side of the Levin • property, have been deemed residential. C, • i, RP 4 -28 -93 Pg 4 30 The road has been altered some. Industrial property next to Ludgates. 4. The private drive North "13 -i" between would remain for emergency vehicles should lands it be necessary. stretch Cardinal Drive would be one way in that that vicinity. is now being s. Lots at the North end are now "square ". 60 Two right -of -ways one to the East that could some day line up with the road that comes in from Hanshaw to the U Store It facilities. It would also provide access to the rear of some properties along Hanshaw Road. The one to the North between may 24 -i and 25 -i would access Cornell lands and tie into stretch the drive way access that goes to Rt. 130 that is now being 7. Wet lands immediately adjacent to the Sanctuary have been left as open lands. 8. The requested MA change involves lots 1 through 12, part of 13 -i and lots 47 through 52. 90 Traffic estimated at completion.would add 3,000 trips a day. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Lavine felt that access to the project should be obtained by providing access to the MA Zone that is already there. (Royal Road - the Town would have to map it - and it should be pursued) The Board reviewed the tax map for the site. Mr. Lavine stated it may be difficult to enforce way stretch of road that is now being shown. the short one Mr. Fabbroni objected to the term Spot Zoning as the area would be added to an already existing MA Zone. Consideration and discussion of zoning the whole area MA with existing non conforming residential lots were considered, designating buffer strips along the industrial lots. Ms. Caldwell sugg essentially a con across, leaving t bottom line of th would open up the e t h e i sted h inuati e fron Eight r back aving the MA zon on of the back 1 tage on Hanshaw Square School H portions as MA. e i a 0 go from a line that was ne of the SPICA that went s residential, to the use property. This I i • u FB 4 -`8 -93 Gg. S Mr. S. Lucente stated that in the future opening Lip more lands for an MA Zone might be appropriate, however was concerned with the hardship which he faces with his MA zone land locked. Including property owners now.may have a riling effect which he is trying to avoid. Mr. Lalley wished to know ask the Town Board for th from Royal Road to the pr would /will take responsib undertakene i ei op it f it wa r opini osal fo ity for s appropriate for this Board to on on taking a right -of -way r a future road? Who building if this were The Chair will ask the Town Attorney if the proposal as presented is "spot zoning ". jr• F • • n DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD APRIL 28, 1993 AGENDA: CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING REQUEST FROM "M.A." TO "R.D." REVIEW ZONING REQUEST FROM " R. P. " TO "M.A." ( LUCENTE SUBDIVISION). SKETCH CONFERENCE FOR WESCOTT DEVELOPMENT MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell, Mitchell Lavine, Claudia Brenner,Joseph Lalley and John Davis. AMONG THOSE PRESENT: Donald Wescott, Scott Simpson, Joseph Wissenbach, Steve Lucente, Larry Fabbroni, Mr. R. Lucente and Henry Slater, The to verify the Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell. need the be taken. A motion was made by M. Lavine to approve the March 24, 1993 minutes with additions and corrections. Second by John Davis and approved by members present. SKETCH CONFERENCE FOR WESCOTT DEVELOPMENT FACTS AND FINDINGS: 1. Mr. Wissenbach, to verify the of the L. S. stated need the be taken. grade of the road coming in starts up high on Rt. 13 and goes be developed down towards by the low lying stream and goes back up again never feet away. exceeding ten percent. 2. Nine lot subdivision 3. The area not considered for development should /would become part of a designated lot. 4. A buffer has been placed along the Avery Park property. 5. Henry Slater to verify the of the significance of the stream and if any considerations need to be taken. 6. On the West side of the property a strip has been designated for a possible road for any future development. The property adjacent may /could be developed by the owner and may /could connect to Annie Lane which is 1600 feet away. 9 • • • PB 4/28/93 Pg. S 7. The access to the Yellow Freight Terminal was approved by the Site Flan Review Lavine Terminal Board. he understood his first map showed Dutcher the was can better drive 13. intended by coming He could a. Henry Dutcher Slater heavy Rt. stated not fraction that Dutcher Rt. cost Road it is posted have that for 5 ton max. the level, it. the access and was discussed determine to by the County, DOT /should and the Town of Dryden previously. be all traffic The Town of Dryden one as a Special Permit agreement for Yellow Freight Terminal said there will be no commercial traffic on Dutcher Road. b. Henry a that it the int Dutcher intense lso st was t ersect Road ction at ed that etter to g ion becaus and becaus with Liver Ge et e e mo orge Schletch and DOT felt heavy traffic away from of the grade issue on you already have a strange re and Simms Hill Road. c. Mr. Lavine stated that it may advantages to close off the entrance to Dutcher Road at the Rt. 13 intersection and to have the residence access Rt. 13 through the proposed road, straight between lots 3 and 4. d. If Dutcher Road were closed commercial and residential traffic would access Rt. 13 by the same path. e. Mr. Wescott stated that when he appeared for the Truck Lavine Terminal permit he understood his first map showed Dutcher the was can better drive 13. intended by coming He could off have Dutcher built heavy Rt. Road and for a not fraction entering of the Rt. cost as didn't it would want have that been so they placed on moved the level, it. and they Mr. Lavine stated he understood also that Dutcher Road was can better not still intended by make the moving to be used curb the end cut of for on Dutcher heavy Rt. trucks. 13 work out Road to We much Leilani Kay Drive. Would like to see the site f. Mr. North Lalley of the was Village also concerned from becoming in keeping like it Rt. 13 is West of the Village. Would like to see the site in order necessary to determine to build what can up Dutcher /should Road be in done. order May for be all traffic to use one curb cut. g. To obtain the opinion /comments from George Schlecht. pB 4/28/93 pg. 3 8. Lots 3,4, and 5 may have access on Dutcher Road. These lots • may be considered residential lots to conform with the residential area on Dutcher Road. an Mr. Wissenbach stated the Tompkins County Health Department would not be involved if four or less lots were specifically dedicated for residential, if this goes through as a commercial developmento commercial development only requires Health Department inspection on permit application.. 84 The subdivision is not in an Agricultural District. 9. The road for future use should have a radius cut. r 14Z�. Discussed the buffer strip, which was placed by the park boundary line as a condition of the Special permit, who becomes responsible, who should own, deed restrictions, etc.. a. Could the buffer strip be sold to park? Would require a lot line change review? Would still make the park residence a non conforming lot and the legality of doing so. 11. Is there a requirement that the lots be designated as • residential or commercial? Issues may be looked at different if the Board knew which would be residential and which would be commercial. This is the first time the Board remembers a mixed subdivision. SKETCH CONFERENCE PROPOSED TECHNOLOGY PARK (HANSHAW /ROUTE 13) STEVE LUCENTE REVIEW REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE FROM "R.B. -1" TO "M.A. L. Fabbroni stated that the following changes have been considered: 1. There is a little that rise would in the road where Mrs. Levin comes out of the her property, so the entrance to the project has been moved. Hanshaw `. The properties that would have road frontage on both the Hanshaw and an interior road have been designated as an industrial site. When entering the project there is an industrial site on either side. In consideration of the Levin property the two sites, one on either side of the • Levin property, have been deemed residential. • • • PB 4 -28 -93 Pg 4 3. The private road has been altered some. Industrial property next would remain for to Ludgates. open should 4. The private immediately drive "13 -i" between would remain for emergency vehicles open should lands it be necessary. Cardinal Drive would be one way in that vicinity. that is now 5a Lots at the North end are now "square ". B. Two right -of -ways one to the East that could some day line up with the road that comes in from Hanshaw to the U Store It facilities. It would also provide access to the rear of some properties along Hanshaw Road. The one immediately to the North change between 24 -i and 25 -i would access Cornell open lands. lands and tie into the drive way access that goes to 52. Rt. 130 road that is now 7. Wet lands immediately should MA change adjacent to the Sanctuary have been left as open lands. of 13 -i 8. The requested and discussion should MA change the MA Zone that involves lots 1 through 12, part of 13 -i and lots the short one 47 through stretch 52. of road 90 Traffic estimated at completion would add 3,000 trips a day. . . . . a . a a . . a a . a a . a . a . a . a . a . . . . a a . a . . . . v Mr. Lavine felt that access to the project and discussion should be obtained by providing access to the MA Zone that is already be there. (Royal Road - the Town would have to map it - and it should be pursued) The Board reviewed the tax map for the site. Mr. Lavine and discussion objected stated to it may be difficult designating Spot Zoning as the area would to enforce the short one way stretch existing of road that is now being shown. Mr. Fabbroni and discussion objected the whole area MA with to non the residential term designating Spot Zoning as the area would be added to an already existing MA Zone. Consideration and discussion of zoning the whole area MA with existing non conforming residential lots were considered, designating buffer strips along the industrial lots. Ms. Ca essent across bottom would 1 i s 0 dwell ally leav line pen u suggested having the MA zon a continuation of the back 1 ing the frontage on Hanshaw of the Eight Square School H p their back portions as MA, e go from a line that was ine of the SPCA that went as residential, to the ouse property. This FHB 4 -28 -9 Pg. 5 Mr. S. Lucente stated that in the future opening up more lands 40 for an MA Zone might be appropriate, however was concerned with the hardship which he faces with his MA zone land locked. Including property owners now may have a riling effect which he is trying to avoid. Mr. Lalley wished to know if it was appropriate for this Board to ask the Town Board for their opinion on taking a right -of -way from would/will Royal Road to take responsibility the proposal for a future for building road? if this Who were undertaken. The Chair will ask the Town Attorney if the proposal as presented is "spot zoning ". jr • •