Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-12-04Minutes - Planning Board, Town of Dryden 12/4/84 Present: R. Lampila, J. Hunt, M.B.Lavine, R. Beck, B. Caldwell, G. Evans (Co. Planning • Dept), S. Stewart (Zoning Enf.O.), R. Keech (7 BA), R. Harmon (Dryden Dev. Comm.) Absent: R. Chase, E. Dollaway The notes from the previous meetings and from the working session 11/29 were reviewed. The suggestions to date for the MA and C -B zones have been worked up in rough draft. Using that draft and a facility /activity workbook provided by the County Planning Dept.,reviewed the draft for the M -A zone regarding Section 1200 (intent and purpose - no changes recommended), Section 1201 (Allowed uses - new list developed), Section 1202 (Uses Allowed by Special Permit - new list developed), and Section 1203 Prohibited Uses (Probably no change). There was some discussion on Section 1204 but additional discussion is needed. The proposed C -B draft was not reviewed but will be considered at a subsequent meeting. The areas where` -we still had questions under Section 1200 (Allowed Uses) were: Communication Service, Vehicle Cleaning, and Animal Care. Farming, gardening, nurseries and greenhouses which are not on the allowed uses in the draft form were added. The disposition of the others were: Communication Service Vehicle Cleaning Animal' Care There was a dis It was decided was it compatib an industrial o caretaker capac cussion that ;th i le with r manufa ity, thi of possibly allowing some residen s was not an appropriate use of t the stated purpose of the area. cturing facility requires someone s could not be the legal resident tial use in the MA zone. he limited M -A area nor In the rare instance where to be on premises in a e of said caretaker.' Day care facilities of various sizes were discussed. It was decided that this shoul'd be a special permit /site development review activity only. While we wish to encourage industry and manufacturing to offer day -care on =site for children of their employees, or for several businesses to band together to have day care available for their employees, we have special concerns over the safety and welfare of children. One day care situation in an M -A zone might be highly suitable while another might not. If this were to be handled by Site Development Review, the list of criteria to be used should specify not only concern about the immediate facility but also about current and potential nearby uses. It is also intended that any day care facility in an M -A zone would be intended for use primarily by children of people employed in the M -A zone. G. Evans outlined for the Planning Board the history, current law, and various methods of implementation for what we call a "special permit ". In 1976 the State Legislature changed Sec. 2.74A of the Town Law to clarify this situation. Mr. Evans will get some sample wording for us on this and on Planned Unit Development to go over at our next meeting. B. Caldwell will prepare a draft similar to the one used this evening with the consensus to date for the C -A and R -D zones, the areas where we still have questions, and a compilation of various suggestions and questions we might have. We will try to consider some preliminary mapping at our next meeting, possibly establishing general areas for each of these 4 zones and some rough guidelines. It was felt that with this and our draft material to date it would be appropriate to get reaction and input from the Town Board. We will ask for some time on their agenda of 12/11 and bring them up to date and see if this is the direction they i C (page 2 minutes Planning Board, T. of Dryden 12/4/84) • wish us to go. There was a brief discussion on lot size and frontage. be held later. Next meeting will be Thursday, Dec. 6 at 7:30 P.P9. B. Caldwell • Additional discussion will i