Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-ILPC-2018-11-13Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 1 Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) Minutes — November 13, 2018 Present: Ed Finegan, Chair David Kramer, Vice Chair Stephen Gibian, Member Megan McDonald, Member Katelin Olson, Member Avi Smith, Member Susan Stein, Member Donna Fleming, Common Council Liaison Bryan McCracken, Historic Preservation Planner Anya Harris, City of Ithaca staff Chair E. Finegan called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m. I. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 307 W. State Street, Downtown West Historic District – Proposal to Install an ADA Compliant Ramp along the East Elevation John Barry, executive director of the Southern Tier AIDS Program, appeared on behalf of the building owner (STAP). He said they are currently renting a building at 314 W. State Street and recently purchased the property at 307 W. State Street and are looking to rehab it and add a ramp to make it ADA compliant. He said they considered putting in a lift in the back like the one they have at their current location, but that they would not be able to do so without doing something very radical – like demolishing the garage – which they didn’t think was a good idea (nor do they think the Commission would be in favor). J. Barry said that at some point in the future they would be interested in repairing the stucco and would return for the required approvals when they were ready to proceed. Chair E. Finegan asked him to walk them through the proposal for the ramp. J. Barry referred them to the provided drawings showing the ramp running along the side of the house next to the driveway to an entrance at the rear. M.M. McDonald asked if a decision had been made about the optional wood stairs shown on the drawings. J. Barry said it is his understanding that the stairs will be constructed. S. Gibian said that it occurred to him that if they were not constructed, there would be no way to get to the back yard. J. Barry said it would be a long walk around. S. Gibian said that his two main questions are whether the ramp has to be constructed along the side of the house or if it could be built in the back somehow. He also asked if the selection of Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 2 rough pressure treated wood for railings, etc. is most appropriate or if there is a more refined material that could be used for the detailing. He looked at the drawings further and said that it looks like it would probably take the entire back yard to accommodate the ramp there. J. Barry said accessing the back yard would be an issue, with a fence separating their lot from the DSS building parking lot on one side, and the existing garage on the other, and a chain link fence at the rear. He said it’s tight quarters all the way around. K. Olson said it didn’t seem feasible to her to locate the ramp anyplace other than along the side of the building as proposed. She said the location looks reasonable given the size of the lot and the shape of the existing buildings. She said that her concerns were primarily with the other issue S. Gibian had raised, the materiality and the finishings chosen. She said she thinks materials could be selected to compliment the building. She also noted the ramp would be removable. D. Kramer agreed, and said he would like to see something other than just pressure treated wood, and he asked the Commission members if anyone had ideas for how to make it fit better with the building and be more attractive. S. Gibian said he thinks in general it’s better to keep a ramp as simple as possible, and not get too much into turned balusters or something that would make it stand out more, and anything that’s not treated is going to rot. K. Olson said she thinks the color matters and that it should be stained to recede into the house. Chair E. Finegan asked if they had decided on a metal railing for another recent ramp project at Triphammer Road. Commission members replied yes, and B. McCracken said yes, it was a black metal railing, wooden framing, and a composite material for the decking. Public Hearing On a motion by M.M. McDonald, seconded by S. Stein, Chair E. Finegan opened the Public Hearing. There being no members of the public appearing to speak, Chair E. Finegan closed the Public Hearing on a motion by M.M. McDonald, seconded by K. Olson. Chair E. Finegan said that they generally do not want to design a project, but asked if any of the members had suggestions for the applicant. A. Smith asked if the wooden portions could be stained to match the house. J. Barry said that is something they would look into. K. Olson said they could recommend materials, such as metal railings. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 3 S. Gibian said that there’s an existing round metal railing on the front porch. J. Barry said there are metal railings on the interior as well, in the stairwells. K. Olson asked if they would be amenable to using metal railings. J. Barry said yes. S. Gibian said that painting a wooden rail to match the dark brown trim on the house might blend better than a metal pipe rail. Chair E. Finegan asked about their timeframe for construction. J. Barry said if they get the approvals, they could move forward within the next few weeks. M.M. McDonald asked if the rear stair is something that could be approved at the staff level. B. McCracken said yes, but that for the ramp, if a final design is not yet determined, he would like input from the Commission regarding the rail selection and general materiality. He asked about spindle design if spindles are required and visible from the public ROW. Using simple square balusters was the consensus. S. Gibian said no balusters were shown on Elevation A2.1 on the entire east side. He asked if there was a preference for metal or wood railing. A. Smith asked if the preference was for using metal to match the front railing. Other Commission members agreed. S. Gibian said that in this case it seems like the squareness of the wood matches the squareness of the house trim. After some additional discussion, metal railings were preferred by the majority, with a specific design to be approved by staff. RESOLUTION: Moved by M.M. McDonald, seconded by D. Kramer. WHEREAS, 307 West State Street is located within the Downtown West Historic District, as designated under Section 228-3 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code in 2015, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, an Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, dated October 17, 2018, was submitted for review to the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) by John Barry on behalf of property owner Southern Tier AIDS Program, including the following: (1) two narratives respectively titled Description of Proposed Change(s) and Reasons for Changes(s); (2) six photographs documenting existing conditions; and (3) seven sheets of Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 4 architectural drawings from Chainis Anderson Architects, dated October 2, 2018 and titled “Drawing Standards” (G0.02), “General Information” (G0.03), “Existing Floor Plan – Basement and First Floor” (A1.01), “Existing Floor Plan - Second and Third Floor” (A1.02), “Proposed Plans – Plot Plan” (A2.00), “Proposed Plans – Basement and First Floor” (A2.01), and “Proposed Plans – Second and Third Floor” (A2.02), and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the entry in the annotated list of properties included within the Downtown West Historic District for 307 West State Street, and the City of Ithaca’s Downtown West Historic District Summary Statement, and WHEREAS, as stated in the narrative Description of Proposed Change(s), the project involves installing an Americans with Disabilities Act compliant (ADA) ramp on the east elevation, and WHEREAS, the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing for the purpose of considering approval of the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on November 13, 2018, now therefore be it RESOLVED, that the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: As identified in the City of Ithaca’s Downtown West Historic District Summary Statement, the period of significance for the area now known as the Downtown West Historic District is 1880 - c.1922. As indicated in the individual property entry in the annotated list of properties included within the Downtown West Historic District, the Craftsman-style residence at 307 West State Street was constructed between 1921 and 1923. It also notes that the early automotive garage on the property was constructed c. 1929; however, the garage is depicted in the1924 Sanborn Fire Insurance map for the City of Ithaca, indicating that it was constructed before that time and suggesting it might have been constructed at the same time as the residence. Constructed within the period of significance of the Downtown West Historic District and possessing a high level of integrity, the property is a contributing element of the Downtown West Historic District. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction, or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 5 aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code. In making this determination, the Commission is guided by the principles set forth in Section 228-6B of the Municipal Code, as further elaborated in Section 228-6C, and by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and in this case specifically the following principles and Standards: Principle #2 The historic features of a property located within, and contributing to the significance of, an historic district shall be altered as little as possible and any alterations made shall be compatible with both the historic character of the individual property and the character of the district as a whole. Standard #2 The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property will be avoided. Standard #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Standard #10 New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. With respect to Principle #2, Standard #2, and Standard #9, the installation of an access ramp will not remove distinctive materials and will not alter features and spaces that characterize the property. As noted in the City of Ithaca Historic District and Landmark Design Guidelines, a proposed access feature should be located “where [it] can be least obtrusive and best blend in with the site,” and “the potential for a negative visual impact [of an accessibility feature] will be reduced if the ramp or lift is installed on a non-primary elevation.” The location of the proposed ramp on a secondary elevation minimizes its visual impact on the residence’s primary façade. This location is also the only place on the property with enough space to accommodate a structure of this size due to the restrictions of the site. Also with respect to Principle #2, and Standard #9, the proposed ramp structure is compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features of the property and its environment. As noted in the City of Ithaca Historic District and Landmark Design Guidelines, the materials used to construct access features “should bear some Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 6 relationship to those of the main structure.” When evaluating the compatibleness of the ramp’s design, the ILPC considered the architectural details of the historic property and the proposed ramp and the materials that would be used to construct it. The architecturally simple ramp will not visually compete with the Arts and Crafts detailing of the residence and will allow it to visually recede into its historic environment With respect to Standard #10, the proposed ramp structure can be removed in the future without impairment of the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment. RESOLVED, that, based on the findings set forth above, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Downtown West Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-6, and be it further, RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-6 of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the ILPC approves the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition(s):  Ramp railings shall be metal; the final design for the railings shall be submitted to the ILPC for a staff-level review;  Rear stair railings shall be metal to match those on the ramp; the final design for these railings shall be submitted to the ILPC for a staff-level review. RECORD OF VOTE: Moved by: M.M. McDonald Seconded: D. Kramer In favor: M.M. McDonald, S. Stein, D. Kramer, E. Finegan, A. Smith, K. Olson, S. Gibian Opposed: 0 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 0 Notice: Failure on the part of the owner or the owner’s representative to bring to the attention of the ILPC staff any deviation from the approved plans, including but not limited to changes required by other involved agencies or that result from unforeseen circumstances as construction progresses, may result in the issuance by the Building Department of a stop work order or revocation of the building permit. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 7 B. The former Delaware, Lackawana & Western (DL&W) Railroad Station, 701 W. Seneca Street – Proposed Individual Landmark Designation Historic Preservation Planner B. McCracken explained that the ILPC is reviewing the nomination of the former railroad station per a recommendation from the Waterfront Working Group, which is working to develop a neighborhood plan for the Waterfront. B. McCracken then gave a brief presentation on the former railroad station, which was designed by Frank J. Nies and built in 1912. He said it is a one-story building with a low-pitched, hipped roof. It has segmental arch door and window openings, with most of the windows being casements with divided-light transoms above. The exterior is adorned with some Rookwood tile mosaics that reflect the presence of Cornell University in the community, and were intended to incorporate the feel of the community into the design of the building. The station was designed to be a grand welcoming feature to arriving travelers. He also said that the station has large brackets supporting wide overhanging eaves designed to protect people as they waited. B. McCracken explained some of the history of the DL&W Railroad, saying that the company was part of an extensive rail network that was used to distribute Pennsylvania coal to the broader region. He said that the DL&W company acquired the line that was used to transport coal to Ithaca, from which it was loaded onto barges and transported up Cayuga Lake to the Erie Canal and then on to the entire Northeast. He said coal made the line lucrative and allowed it to operate until the early 20th Century when the Canal fell out of favor. At that time, the company transitioned to primarily offering passenger service. B. McCracken explained that William Truesdale became president of the DL&W Railroad in 1899, and under his leadership the lines were modernized. He added more than 900 new miles of track, standardized the size and gauge of rails, straightened numerous curves for faster transports, and added safety features at crossings. He said his efforts were ambitious and were used as a model by other companies of the era. B. McCracken said that Ithaca’s train station was designed and built as part of that modernization campaign. B. McCracken next discussed the criteria for designating an individual local landmark, saying that he had identified three that applied in this case, but noting that other criteria might also be included in the resolution if the Commission members think they are applicable. Criterion No. 1. is as follows: “Possesses special character or historic or aesthetic interest or value as part of the cultural, political, economic, or social history of the locality, region, state, or nation.” McCracken said that the Ithaca railroad station is significant for its association with the extensive rail network that would have allowed a person in the early part of the 20th Century to travel almost anywhere in the Northeast. He said it is also significant for its association with William Truesdale who was the driving force behind the DL&W Railroad’s improvement campaign. Criterion No. 3 is as follows: “Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style.” B. McCracken said that the building is also significant for its representation of the Prairie Style in Ithaca. The Prairie Style was developed in Chicago by a group of architects looking for a Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 8 way to represent the flatness and the aesthetic of the prairie. It incorporates elements of the Arts and Crafts style, with an emphasis on craftsmanship, detailing, and handwork. The building has a water table and a belt course in a contrasting cast stone material, which emphasizes its connection to the ground and its horizontality. Along the eaves is a soldier course, which further emphasizes its horizontality, as do the wide eaves. The fenestration is also typical of the Prairie Style, with casement windows in ribbons or simple pairs. With respect to ornamentation and detailing, the building gains additional significance from the incorporation of pennants and banners in Rookwood tiles, a reference to Cornell University. Criterion No. 4 is as follows: “Is the work of a designer whose work has significantly influenced an age.” B. McCracken showed a photo of the DL&W Railroad station in Morristown, Pennsylvania alongside a photo of the Ithaca station and said that the two buildings – both designed by Frank Nies – share a number of features: both buildings have a Flemish brick pattern, both are in the Prairie Style with wide overhanging eaves and large brackets, both have belt courses and water tables to emphasize their horizontality, and both use a segmental arch in their doors and windows. He said this designer not only designed Ithaca’s station but also grander stations in more major metropolitan areas. This designer created dozens of stations for the DL&W Railroad, and many of them are on the National Register. His biography is not well known, and there is not an extensive list of his works, but we know he was based out of Hoboken and was hired by the railroad company to design new passenger stations, as well as freight buildings and other railroad resources. Finally, B. McCracken reviewed major alterations to the resource. He said that one piece that is missing is its site, noting that when the building was designed, it was intended to be a grand entrance to the community, and there were elaborate gardens and other features associated with the building. He said that most of those features were subsequently removed, although the flagpole remains. Another major alteration is the roof, formerly a green terra cotta that was removed at some point in the mid-20th Century and replaced with asphalt shingles. He noted that the Morristown, New Jersey station, previously referenced, still has the original glazed tile roof and said that it was a feature common to many of Nies’ designs, but unfortunately, is no longer intact on the Ithaca building. He also said that one other alteration to the site is the removal of the tracks to the west of the station which were the ones associated with the station itself. The tracks to the east of the building that can be seen today were not actually associated with the station. He concluded by saying that the Tompkins Trust Company addition at the north end of the building is another significant alteration to the site, but noted that it’s actually a separate building, connected by a fence and that several windows of the train station were filled in with blocks as part of its construction. B. McCracken then asked the Commission members if anyone had any questions or comments. K. Olson asked if there were any other examples of Prairie Style architecture in Ithaca. B. McCracken said he was not sure. They then directed the question to City Historian Mary Tomlan. M. Tomlan said she was not sure either, and that there was a fraternity house designed by a Prairie School architect, but – other than the DL&W railroad station – there seem to be very few, if any, good examples of the style here. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 9 K. Olson asked if there were any other train stations in the City landmarked. B. McCracken said yes, the former Lehigh Valley Railroad Station has also been landmarked and that that was one of the first properties in the City to be designated (in 1974). Public Hearing On a motion by M.M. McDonald, seconded by S. Stein, Chair E. Finegan opened the Public Hearing. Michael Cannon of 409 W. Buffalo Street said he works for Tompkins Trust Company (business that owns the former train station) and lives just a few blocks away. He said he is proud to say that they did not screw the building up. He said they would like to slow the process of designation, and they are looking for a developer for the site. He said they would take the historic fabric into account in any development that is done. He said he served with Mary [Tomlan] on the ILPC about 20 years ago, and it’s great to see her here tonight. He thanked the ILPC members for their time and asked if they had any questions. D. Kramer asked if plans for redevelopment of the site would include leaving the building. M. Cannon said yes, they would expect that, and they are expecting a designation, but they were hoping to be involved in developing the site without the designation going through as quickly as it is. He said there are no plans currently, and they have not yet found a developer. D. Kramer said the ILPC usually works with developers, and he thinks they would be friendly to the notion. S. Gibian asked if they were planning to keep the West End branch open for the foreseeable future. M. Cannon said yes, they have no plans to remove that. It’s the most trafficked branch in the network. Christine O’Malley of Historic Ithaca said they had submitted a letter from Executive Director Susan Holland earlier in the day expressing support for the designation (attached). She said Historic Ithaca supports the designation for the reasons B. McCracken has previously identified. She also said that many communities across the United States have former railroad stations that have been adaptively reused successfully. She said that in addition to banks and schools, railway stations are probably in the top five of historic structures most often adaptively reused. You see them used as restaurants, bookstores, art galleries, banks, offices, and for other uses. She said she thinks the building is a suitable candidate for successful reuse, and whomever acquires the building could avail themselves of resources like Restore New York grants or historic tax credits. She said that in other locations, train stations have become part of a larger complex of buildings in an appropriate fashion, so they think there are a lot of possibilities for this building, given the size of the site. She said Historic Ithaca supports designation, and they think the site could contribute to the economic development of the West End and of the Waterfront corridor. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 10 Mary Tomlan, City Historian, spoke in favor of the designation of the former DL&W station. She said she supports designation first on the grounds of architectural style. She said she has racked her brain for another good example of the Prairie Style in Ithaca has not come up with one (though she would be happy if somebody could prove her wrong). She said the railroad station seems to be a particularly good example of the style, with its horizontal lines, broad eaves, low pitched, hipped roof, and Craftsman details, with materials being important. She said that though it was not a prominent style in Ithaca and was not a long-lived style before getting merged into “modernist” architecture, it is a style recognized by many, both laypersons and professionals. She said she thinks it’s important to preserve the building as an example of the style. She said she also supports designation because of the building’s use. She said that though there are three former railroad stations in the greater Ithaca area, and one of them is already designated, this one is still worthy of designation. Railroads were historically very important as a means of transportation, and that they were used for shipping goods in and out, as well as serving passengers. Gene Endres of 126 Sears Street also spoke in favor of designation. He said that he is the secretary and historian for the Cornell Railroad Historical Society and that their organization strongly supports designation. He said that they appreciate that the station is still in existence and that it’s actually very close to the location of the very first railroad in Ithaca – and the first railroad in the history of New York, by charter, which went up South Hill. He said that initially the system used inclined planes to haul cars up the hill, and later utilized a series of switchbacks. He said that unfortunately that section of track led to early trains being rather slow to leave Ithaca, which led to the Lehigh Valley Railroad taking over most of the business. He said that even so, at the time this building was built in 1912, the DL&W Railroad styled itself as the most highly-developed railroad in America. The company had made a great deal of money from the anthracite coal business and, thus, built to a very high standard. He said that the building, though for a relatively small-town station, is very well constructed. He said he has traveled much of the DL&W lines from New Jersey to Buffalo, and many later stations were built of cast concrete and nowhere near as handsome as this building. He said that though quite a few of these stations are still standing, very few of this size still exist, so the station in Ithaca is unique. He said the tile accents are very nice, and he noted as well that very few changes were made over the years, so what you see is pretty much what was always there. He said that the bay window on the west wall is where the operator would have worked, and he could have seen a train approaching from far to the south of the site. He said also that many of the interior features are original and said that his organization has long appreciated that it’s still here. He concluded his remarks by thanking the Commission. S. Gibian asked if Ithaca was the end of the line. G. Endres said yes, it ended here, and he added that they stopped passenger service around 1940, and freight service around 1950. He said the zig-zag up South Hill was a bad factor for them. There being no more members of the public appearing to speak, Chair E. Finegan closed the Public Hearing on a motion by M.M. McDonald, seconded by D. Kramer. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 11 S. Gibian asked if the interior is something they can consider. B. McCracken said that it’s not something they can regulate if it’s designated, so he recommends that they just look at the exterior integrity, but it should be noted that the interior of the building has incredible architectural integrity. K. Olson said that Greyhound had operated there since 1967, and she thinks the transition from railroad to an alternate form of mass transit is also notable. M.M. McDonald agreed, saying the building as a train station had a connection to the canal, and that its transition from a railroad station to a bus station is the next chapter of the transportation story. K. Olson said yes, the building provided people going to NYC on the bus much of the same functionality as it did for people traveling via train in the past. It’s lovely for the building to have such a transition to a compatible use. Chair E. Finegan asked if there was anything else the Commission needed to do at that point. B. McCracken said they could consider the draft resolution in front of them and add additional criteria to it if they saw fit to do so. RESOLUTION: Moved by K. Olson, seconded by D. Kramer. RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-3 of the Municipal Code, the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) may recommend the designation of historic landmarks and districts of historic and cultural significance, and WHEREAS, a public hearing held on Tuesday, November 13, 2018, for the purpose of considering a proposal to designate the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western (D.L.&W.) Railroad Station at 701 West Seneca Street as a City of Ithaca landmark has been concluded, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form dated September 1, 2002, including the Narrative Description of Property and the Narrative Description of Significance prepared by Maria K. Meiser, and WHEREAS, the designation of historic landmarks is a "Type II Action" under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (Sec. 617.5(C)(30) and an "Unlisted Action" under the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, (CEQR Sec. 176-2) for which no further environmental review is required, and WHEREAS, consideration of the former D.L.&W. Railroad Station as an historic resource was recommended by the Waterfront Working Group in a resolution dated August 24, 2018, and Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 12 WHEREAS, the Waterfront Working Group’s resolution (attached) states “the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station at 701 West Seneca Street was identified as [a resource that might have historical or architectural value] and the consideration of its local designation is included as a recommendation in the draft plan,” and WHEREAS, Section 228-3 of the Municipal Code defines the criteria for designation of an individual landmark as follows: 1. Possesses special character or historic or aesthetic interest or value as part of the cultural, political, economic, or social history of the locality, region, state, or nation; or 2. Is identified with historically significant person(s) or event(s); or 3. Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style; or 4. Is the work of a designer whose work has significantly influenced an age; or 5. Represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community by virtue of its unique location or singular physical characteristics. RESOLVED, that the Commission adopts as its own the documentation and information more fully set forth in the expanded New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form dated September 1, 2002, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission has made the following findings of fact concerning the proposed designation. As described in the Narrative Description of Significance portion of the New York State Building-Structure Inventory Form prepared by Maria K. Meiser and dated September 1, 2002, the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station is a structure deemed worthy of preservation by reason of its value to the city as enumerated below: Per criterion 1, the former D.L.&W. Railroad Station possesses special historical and aesthetic interest as a part of the development, heritage and cultural characteristics of the City of Ithaca as an intact remnant of a historically significant era of railroad transportation in Ithaca. As noted in the Building-Structure Inventory Form, the D.L.&W. Railroad Company shifted its focus from the transportation of regionally-mined anthracite coal to passenger service in the early-twentieth century. This shift resulted in extensive changes and improvements along the railroad line, including standardized tracks, increased safety through the installation of new signaling devices, modernized trains and stations, and hundreds of miles of new track. Led by William Truesdale, the President of the D.L.&W. Railroad Company between 1899 and 1925, this expansive campaign to modernize the line was one of the most ambitious of the era and resulted in the Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 13 construction of 185 new train stations and freight depots and the installation of over 900 miles of new railroad track. The former D.L.&W. Railroad Station in Ithaca was constructed as part of this campaign and was specifically designed to provide an impressive gateway into the community and to meet the needs of the rapidly expanding Cornell student population. New stations were also built along the mainlines to Buffalo and Syracuse, as well as in Cortland, Owego, Whitney Point and Minetto. The improvements to the D.L.&W. passenger line during this period improved connections to Ithaca from other metropolitan areas and helped secure its status a major regional hub. Per criterion 3, the former D.L.&W. Railroad Station embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style. The railroad station is an excellent, and likely only, local example of the Prairie Style. As noted in the Building-Structure Inventory Form, the Prairie Style developed in Chicago and became popular during the first two decades of the twentieth century. Typical features of this architectural style include: symmetrical, often square or rectangular, heavy massing with a strong emphasis on horizontality; low-pitched, generally hipped roofs with wide eaves; and multi-paned, casement windows and doors. The massing, roof form and fenestration of the former D.L.&W. Railroad Station reflect these important characteristics of the Prairie Style. The one-story, rectangular, brick station is capped by a low-pitched, hipped roof with wide overhanging eaves, creating a sheltered area along all sides of the building. The horizontality of the brick building is emphasized by a water table and belt course in a contrasting, light-colored cast stone material and a brick soldier course along the tops of the doors and windows. The building’s paired casement windows with triple-light transoms are also indicative of this style. The building gains additional architectural significance from its architectural references to Cornell University and Ithaca as a “college city.” Red, white, and green Rookwood tile mosaics on the interior and exterior of the building form small pennants that were intended to reflect the collegiate character of the community. The property’s original “Cornell flagpole” also referenced the university’s colors. Per criterion 4, the former D.L.&W. Railroad Station is the work of a designer whose work has significantly influenced an age. As noted in the Building-Structure Inventory Form, the railroad station is characteristic example of the work of Frank J. Nies, the official architect of the D.L.&W. Railroad Company between 1899 and 1925. As noted in the Building-Structure Inventory Form, Frank J. Nies was a Hoboken-based architect who designed numerous railroad stations and buildings in New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey for the D.L.&W. Railroad Company between 1899 and 1925. While Nies designed buildings in several styles, the small passenger stations he designed for the D.L.&W. Railroad Company are characterized by their distinct Priarie Style, an Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 14 architectural mode that became increasingly popular during his tenure with the company. Examples of his work throughout the region exhibit a low, elongated massing typical of the Prairie Style and detailing borrowed of the Renaissance Revival and Arts and Crafts models. His major works include train terminals in Newark, Morristown and Boonton, New Jersey, and Scranton, Pennsylvania, and small passenger stations in communities throughout New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission, determines that based on the findings set forth above, the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station meets criteria 1, 3 and 4 defining a Local Landmark as set forth in Section 228-3 of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission hereby recommends the designation of the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station at 701 West Seneca Street, and the adjacent areas identified as tax parcel #73.-5-2.1, as a City of Ithaca landmark. RECORD OF VOTE: Moved by: K. Olson Seconded by: D. Kramer In favor: E. Finegan, S. Gibian, D. Kramer, M.M. McDonald, K. Olson, A. Smith, S. Stein Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 0 II. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS OF INTEREST Chair E. Finegan opened the public comment period. There being no members of the public appearing to speak, Chair E. Finegan closed the public comment period. III. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS  Update and Acknowledgement: City Sexual Harassment Policy B. McCracken said the Commission members had received copies of the updated Sexual Harassment Policy in the materials distributed in advance of the meeting. He explained that the policy was updated to reflect State standards, and that all members of boards and committees are now required to sign an acknowledgement that they have received the Sexual Harassment Policy of the municipality upon whose board/s they serve. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 15 All Commission members signed and returned the acknowledgement to staff.  Staff Report: 307 West State Street B. McCracken said that the Commission members might have noticed that they received a staff report on the property at 307 W. State Street in the mailing. He said they had discussed this at their retreat, and this is his first attempt at preparing one. He asked members to let him know what they felt was valuable in it, what was unnecessary, and what additional information they would like to see included. S. Gibian said it seemed to duplicate everything in the Blue Form. B. McCracken said yes, but if they agree to use staff reports going forward, they would not be duplicating that part. K. Olson said she liked the “Issues and Considerations” section, that she found it helpful, as well as information on what standards might be applicable. She said she thought the section on incentive programs available on the first page could be helpful to homeowners. B. McCracken said he included it because the State Historic Preservation Office has indicated that Ithacans don’t utilize the tax credit incentive programs as much as they might, so if the Commission starts discussing that more regularly with applicants, perhaps they can increase participation and more of that money can be brought into the community. M.M. McDonald asked about the necessity of reading the entire resolutions when they are being publicized in advance. She asked if they might be able to streamline the process and focus on the issues and considerations, and the “Resolved” statements. B. McCracken said he would check with the City Attorney’s office and get back to them. B. McCracken asked if they found the date of purchase and property owner information valuable, noting that projects often are begun on a new purchase. Commission members said they did. Chair E. Finegan said he thinks it’s good to know if a current owner has only had the building for a short period of time. S. Gibian asked if the map included is the best quality available. B. McCracken said that this was the best quality that he could produce from the online GIS maps he had access to, but it’s possible others in the Planning Department could produce something better. S. Gibian asked about pulling a survey of the site. Approved by ILPC: 12, December 2018 16 B. McCracken said he could only if it’s listed on the County Assessment site, and he said that the tax map on this parcel didn’t show the paved area, and for this project he thought it important to find a map showing the driveway. He said the tax maps would be of a better quality, but they would not have as much information as the GIS maps. K. Olson said maybe make a choice in the future based on the project and noted that in this case the site was really important to consider. M.M. McDonald said she found it was helpful. K. Olson asked if it took a lot of time. B. McCracken said no. Commission members expressed support, and B. McCracken said he would be preparing them going forward. V. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by M.M. McDonald, seconded by K. Olson, Chair E. Finegan adjourned the meeting at 7:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bryan McCracken, Historic Preservation Planner Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission 212 Center St. Ithaca, NY HistoricIthaca.org (607) 273-6633 November 13, 2018 Bryan McCracken, Historic Preservation Planner and Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission City of Ithaca 108 E. Green Street, 3rd Floor Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Statement of Support for Local Landmark Designation for the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station, 701 West Seneca Street Dear Bryan and ILPC Members: On behalf of Historic Ithaca, I would like to submit this letter of support for the local landmark designation of the former Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Station at 701 West Seneca Street. As outlined in the documentation submitted to the ILPC, this nomination meets the requirements presented in criterion 1, criterion 3 and criterion 4 of our local preservation ordinance. This building was an important piece of the once large railroad network that crossed our state and connected multiple communities and cities. This station played an important and vital role in the development of the modern city of Ithaca in the early twentieth century. This Prairie Style brick station remains in very good condition with its red, white and green Rookwood tile mosaics intact. More than mere decoration, the tile mosaics make a specific connection to Cornell University and the many students who passed through this station. The building is excellent example of the work of architect Frank J. Nies, who designed many railroad stations for the company between 1899 and 1925. Many communities throughout the United States have former railroad stations that have been adaptively reused to serve a new purpose. These buildings now operate as restaurants, banks, art galleries, offices and any number of other viable businesses. This building is a suitable candidate for successful reuse and can continue to contribute to the economic development of the West End and waterfront corridor of Ithaca. We urge the ILPC to support the local landmark nomination of 701 West Seneca Street, allowing this property to be properly recognized for the valuable role it has played in our local history and the history of railroads in New York State and the Northeastern United States. We hope that you will vote for the designation of this worthy property so that it can be recognized as an important part of Ithaca’s built heritage. Respectfully submitted, Susan Holland Executive Director