Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MN-B&A-1997-09-22
� CL r ? 2 1997 c - BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1997 7 :30 P.M. COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA A. Statements from the Public B. Amendments to Tonight' s Agenda C. Common Council 1 . Minutes of July 21, Amqmat 2&7 and August 27 me,--Lings 2 . Potential Tax Exemptions for Historic/Landmark Properties - Discussion, possible resolution (material to be delivered separately) C3 . City/Rotary Community Beautification Award - Discussion, possible resolution 4 . Proposed Budget Meetings Schedule 5 . Towing and Taxicab Regulations - Report 6 . Department Head Feedback Instrument - Report 7 . TCAT Consolidation Agreement - Progress report 8 . Vacancy Review Committee - Report 9 . Mayor' s Report 10 . C uncil Members ' Ann(aU,n eme is -I& 11. 1WAXONq C D. Youth Bureau 1 . Review of Cass Park Rink Task Force Report (carried over from August meeting) Building Department/Fire Department Et J 1 . Chapter "C" Committee Conclusions - Report (Material to be delivered separately or at meeting) F. Finance/Chamberlain C1 .- Request for Waiver of Penalty - Resolution c r4A. C-TZ) BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 22, 1997 Page 2 G. Planning Department RS 1. Request to Amend Authorized Personnel Roster - Possible Resolution - Ex ecu ive Se sion H. rney C 1 . Proposed Ordinance to Repeal Section 232-80 of the Municipal Code Regarding Tax Imposed on Transient Businesses 2 . Barol Litigation - Discussion - Executive Session (material to be delivered separately) I . DPW 4= (• &A hekFU ' 1. Items from BPW Meeting on 9/2;;R� A r J. Finance/Controller 1 . General Report on Sales Tax . Revenues & Projections, Health Plan, etc. f r.- '7 30 qld d *3©1) 600 6,p- -7,1000, Zr0001 OBOE Q T*K f�0�_ V-- t 1 vi (gip, - - � 1 � � �J ."WVAV" - ► , ,► ti ?4a,4A IU Ali- q - z - - ► vf 'Aojo - \yof>4 _ o - - � � -341-) bt-4 .. y _ _ __ _ _._ __ __ - - - __ R f - - - I ��� ► s (JV� _ T;I + - - - a� APA&uIr RW44-- f"'4y&- z,--C =::.P/ v/1 WT _ U I l t keep - Zed ��� ��- t.e�.•�l_ _ - w it ( ru��- boy„ �, I r T , __ _ ___ -- -- . __ __ __ _ __ - _ __ __ f � 'VIA Ku /vf(A ctA, ty, ,b r D TkoAd �Ilf PA OC401--, kms►a fi 314 - - Jf NOW ' - _fit ND � '� I VGA q taw -51 474" � m ........ P44-1-h--P- 1 -)aV C-4-1 1"7 �4 - _- To: Carol Shipe From: Mariette Geldenhuys Date: July 23, 1997 Re: August Budget and Administration Meeting Agenda Enclosed is a proposed local law allowing the City Chamberlain to enter into installment agreements for the payment of delinquent taxes pursuant to the newly adopted proceedings to collect unpaid taxes according to the provisions of Article Eleven of New York Real Property Tax Law. Please include this item on the agenda for the August Budget and Administration Meeting. CITY OF ITHACA G, `•rt 108 East Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 OFFICE OF THE CHAMBERLAIN ��RA7f�0 Telephone: 607/274-6580 Fax: 607/272-7348 To: Budget and Administration Committee of Commo Council From: Debra Parsons, City Chamberlain Re: Request for Waiver of Penalty Date: September 2, 1997 Frost Travis is requesting a waiver of penalty on City of Ithaca second installment tax bills,per the attached letter. I recommend that the request be denied,based on New York State Real Property Tax Law, Section 922. It states the failure to receive the bill shall not affect the validity of the tax or the penalty. S ..t "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." �� Frost Travis 323 North Tioga St. Ithaca,NY 14850 Jane Marcham C/O Deborah Parsons Commissioner of Taxes 108 W. Green St. Ithaca NY 14850 August 18, 1997 Dear Ms. Marcham: I am writing regarding tax map parcel# 8.4-6 in the City of Ithaca. We paid our tax when we received the tax bill,but the bill had been sent to the previous owner in New York City and he did not forward the bill until July 27th. Consequently, we did not receive the bill until after the deadline and so were advised to pay the amount of$559.24 plus a 5% late fee of$27.96. It was not our intention to be delinquent in paying our taxes, though when we closed on the house on January 31St, our assumption was that the taxes had been paid for the entire year and that the city had been notified of the correct billing address as of the closing date. Given the circumstances, I would request that you waive the 5% late fee and reimburse us for the amount of$27.96, either as a check or in the form of a credit on our next tax bill. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Frost Travis 4 IT�a 8 CITY OF ITHACA V~" %,rt 108 East Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 8 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Mariette Geldenhuys,City Attorney �PoRATEO Patricia M.Kennedy,Assistant City Attorney TO: Common Council FROM: Mariette Geldenhuys, City Attorney ' V`GJ 1 (COU DATE: September 16, 1997 RE: Transient Merchant Taxes Following a recent Court of Appeals decision involving the City of Albany, the question has arisen whether the provision under chapter 24 of our Municipal Code which requires transient merchants to pay taxes to the City is constitutional. A provision similar to our chapter 24 provision was challenged in the Albany case and the Court of Appeals held that a local law is unconstitutional if it imposes a burden on interstate commerce and affords local merchants an economic advantage. Municipalities have been imposing taxes on transient merchants by virtue of the power conferred by state law - General Municipal Law. Section 85-a. The transient merchant tax provision, contained in section 232-80 of the City Code, provides that all persons conducting retail businesses within the city shall be taxed based upon the gross amount of sales, and at the same aggregate rate as other property is taxed for the year. Therefore, this tax is calculated based on the amount of taxes levied against real property in the city, and applying this rate to the gross amount of sales made by transient merchants. - The Court pointed out that the real property taxes which are levied against local retailers have nothing to do with their sales, but rather are based on their ownership of real estate. There is, therefore, no justification for imposing the same rate on transient merchants and levying the taxes on their gross sales. In the light of the foregoing I recommend that the City repeal the Code provision imposing taxes on transient retail businesses. MG/kms "An Equal Opportunity Employcr with an Affirmative Action Program" Ch1 CITY OF ITHACA V= _� 108 East Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 =per,, •., `� OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER �PoRATEO Telephone: 607/274-6576 Fax: 607/272-7348 MEMORANDUM TO: Common Council FROM: Dominick R. Cafferillo City Controller DATE: October 8, 1997 RE: Positions Proposed for Inclusion in the State Retirement Incentive Program Based on procedures set forth in the 1997 Retirement Incentive Program, pursuant to Chapter 41, Laws of 1997, and by Local Law #7 adopted by Common Council on June 4, 1997, the Mayor, City Controller and applicable departments are proposing that the following eligible employees be offered for inclusion in said program: Department of Planning and Development Planner II, Jonathan Meigs Department of Public Works Bus Driver, Ronald M. Applegarth Building Systems Supervisor, James R. Miller Maintainer, Charles E. Rivers Parking Lot Attendant, Edith M. Rohrer Attached, please find the worksheets showing the plans for continuation of service, while effecting the required fifty percent savings of base salary of the retiring employees . DRC:cs Attachments An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." �� } Prepared by Oomi ick R.Calla ft 10!//97 Page 1 RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROJECTION EMPLOYEE/DEPARTMENT YEAR ONE YEAR TWO YEAR THREE YEAR FOUR YEAR FIVE TOTALS JONATHAN MEIGS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNER II AGE:58 YEARS OF SERVICE 27 YRS. TIER#1 CURRENT SALARY$50577 PROJECTED SALARY 1996-2000 $ 50,577.00 $ 52,094.31 $ 53,657.14 $ 55.266.85 $ 56,924.86 $ 268,520.16 PROJECTED BENEFITS 1996-2000 $ 17,701.95 $ 18,233.01 S 18,780.00 $ 19,343.40 $ 19,923.70 $ 93,982.06 SUB-TOTALS $ 68278.95 $ 70327.32 $ 72,437.14 $ 74,610.25 $ 76,848.56 $ 362,50222 LESS:COST OF RETIREMENT INCENTIVE TO BE PAID TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BASED ON 15%OF FINAL AVERAGE SALARY PAID OVER 5 YEARS+8.5%PER YR. FINAL AVERAGE$52536 PRINCIPAL $ 7,880.85 $ 5,071.35 $ 5,071.36 $ 5,071.35 $ 5,071.35 S 28,166.25 INTEREST $ 3,349.36 $ 1724.26 $ 1,293.19 $ : 662.13 $ 431.06 $ 7,660.01 TOTALS $ 11,23021 $ 6,795.61 $ 6,364.54 $ 5,933.48 $ 5,502.41 $ 35,826.26 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 57,048.74 S 63,531.71 $ 66,07259 $ 68,676.77 S 71,346.15 $ 326.675.96 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF SERVICE WHILE MEETING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO SAVE AT LEAST 50%OF THE ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE'S SALARY FOR TWO YEARS. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNER $ 23,933.00 $ 24,650.99 $ 25,390.52 $ 26,15224 $ 26936.80 $ 103130.55 RELATED BENEFITS $ 8,376 $ 8627.85 $ 8,866.68 $ 9,153 28 $ 9 427.88 S 44.47224 SUB-TOTAL COST OF REPLACEMENT" $ 32,309.55 $ 33,278.84 $ 34,277.20 $ 35,305.52 $ 36,364.68 $ 147,602.79 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 24,739.19 $ 30,25287 $ 31,795.39 $ 33,371.26 $ 34,981.46 $ 179,073.17 TOTAL SAVINGS BASED ON 50%OF SALARY FOR 2 YRS. (1) $ 25288.50 $ 26.047.16 S 51,335.66 NET SAVINGS TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF LAW (2) $ 24,739.19 $ 30,26287 $ 54,99206 TOTAL COST TO OFFER INCENTIVE (3) $ 35,826.26 Page 1 BOOK23.XLS L Prepared by Dominick R.Catla ft 101797 Page 1 RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROJECTION EMPLOYEEIDEPARTMENT YEAR ONE YEAR TWO YEAR THREE YEAR FOUR YEAR FIVE TOTALS JAMES MILLER DPW STREETS d FACILITIES BUILDING SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR AGE:52 YEARS OF SERVICE 27.16 YRS. TIER#1 CURRENT SALARY$45599.00 PROJECTED SALARY 1996.2000 $ 45.5.99.00 $ 46,966.97 $ 48.375.98 $ 49,827.26 $ 51,322.08 $ 242,091.28 PROJECTED BENEFITS 19962000 $ 15,959.65 $ 16.438.44 1 $ 16 931.59 S 17,439.54 $ 17,962.73 S 84,731.95 $ COST OF SIX WEEKS OF ANNUAL LEAVE $ 5,088.0 $ 5,240.64 $ 5,397.86 $ 5,559.79 $ 5,726.59 $ 27.012.88 SUB-TOTALS $ 66,646.65 $ 68.646.05 $ 70,705.43 $ 72,826.59 $ 75,011.39 $ 353,836.12 LESS COST OF RETIREMENT INCENTIVE TO BE PAID TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BASED ON 15%OF FINAL AVERAGE SALARY PAID OVER 5 YEARS+8.5%PER YR. FINAL AVERAGE$41,854 PRINCIPAL $ 6,278.10 $ 6,278.10 $ 6,278.10 S 6,278.10 $ 6,278.10 $ 31,390.50 INTEREST $ 2,668.19 S 2,134.55 $ 1,600.92 $ 1,06728 $ 533.64 $ 8,004.58 TOTALS $ 8.946.29 S 8,412.65 S 7,879.02 S 7,345.38 $ 6,811.74 $ 39,395.08 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS S 57,700.36 $ 60.233.40 $ 62,826.42 S 65,481.22 S 68,199.65 $ 314,441.04 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF SERVICE,WHILE MEETING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO SAVE AT LEAST 50%OF THE ELIGIBLE EMPOYEES SALARY FOR TWO YEARS. PROMOTION!PROVISIONAL APPOINT.SOLID WASTE SUPERVISOR TO BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPER. $ 1,408.00 $ 1,450.24 $ 1,493.75 $ 1,538.56 $ 1,584.72 $ 7,475.26 RELATED BENEFITS S 492.80 $ 507.58 $ 52281 S 538.50 $ 554.65 $ 2,616.34 HIRE MAINTAINER TO ASSIST ELECTRIC AN $ 18,917.00 $ 19.484.51 $ 20,069.05 $ 20,671.12 $ 21,291.25 $ 100,432.92 RELATED BENEFITS $ 6,620.95 $ 6,819.58 S 7,024.17 $ 7,234.89 $ 7,451.94 $ 35,151.52 $ COST OF TWO WEEKS VACATION LEAVE $ 725.00 S 746.75 S 769.15 S 792.23 $ 815.99 $ 3,849.12 SUB-TOTALS COST OF REPLACEMENT $ 28,163.75 $ 29.008.66 $ 29,878.92 $ 30.775.29 $ 31,698.55 $ 149,525.17 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 29,536.61 $ 31,224.73 $ 32 947.49 S 34,705.93 $ 36.501.10 $ 164,915.86 TOTAL SAVINGS BASED ON 50%OF SALARY FOR 2 YRS. $ 22.799.50 $ 23.483.49 $ 46282.99 NET SAVINGS TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF LAW $ 29.536.61 $ 31,224.73 $ 60.761.34 TOTAL COST TO OFFER INCENTIVE $ 39,395.08 Page 1 BOOK23J(LS t Prepared by Dominick R.Catterlb 10/7/97 Page i - RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROJECTION EMPLOYEEIDEPARTMENT YEAR ONE YEAR TWO YEAR THREE YEAR FOUR YEAR FIVE TOTALS RONALD APPLEGARTH DPW STREETS 8 FACILITIES BUS DRIVER AGE:57 YEARS OF SERVICE 29.33 YRS. TIER#1 CURRENT SALARY$36582.00 PROJECTED SALARY 1996.2000 $ 36,582.00 S 37,679.46 $ 38,809.84 $ 39,974.14 $ 41,173.36 $ 194,218.81 PROJECTED BENEFITS 1996.2000 $ 12,803.70 $ 13,187.81 $ 13.583.45 $ 13,990.95 S 14,410.68 $ . 67,976:58 COST OF FIVE WEEKS VACATION LEAVE $ 3,120A0 $ 3,213.60 $ 3,310.01 $ 3,409.31 S 3,511.59 $ 16 564.50 SUB-TOTALS $ 52,505.70 $ 54.080.87 $ 55,703.30 $ 57,374.40 $ 59.095.63 $ 278,759.89 LESS:COST OF RETIREMENT INCENTIVE TO BE PAID TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BASED ON 15%OF FINAL AVERAGE SALARY PAID OVER 5 YEARS♦8.5%PER YR. FINAL AVERAGE$33809 PRINCIPAL $ 5,071.35 $ 5,071.35 $ 5,071.35 $ 5071.35 $ 5,071.35 $ 25,356.75' INTEREST $ 2,155.32 $ 1,724.26 $ 1,293.19 $ 86213 $ 431.06 $ 6,465.97 TOTALS $ 7,226.67 $ 6,795.61 $ 6,364.54 $ 5,933.48 $ 5,502.41 $ 3182272 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 45.279.03 $ 47,285.26 $ 49,338.75 $ 51,440.92 $ 53,593.21 $ 246,937.17 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF SERVICE,WHILE MEETING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO SAVE AT LEAST 50%OF THE ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES SALARY FOR TWO YEARS. HIRE A TEMPORARY BUS DRIVER FOR 14 MONTH PERIOD $ 20.846.00 S 21,471.38 $ 22,520.00 $ 23,421.00 $ 24,358.00 $ 91,770.38 RELATED BENEFITS $ 3,126.90 $ 7514.98 S 3,378.00 $ 3,513.15 $ 3,653.70 $ 21,186.73 COST OF TWO WEEKS VACATION LEAVE $ 742.00 $ 764.26 $ 787.19 $ 810.80 $ 835.13 S 3.939.38 SUB-TOTAL COST OF REPLACEMENT $ 24,714.90 $ 29,750.62 $ 26,685.19 $ 27,744.95 $ 28,846.83 $ 116,896.49 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 20.564.13 $ 17,534.64 $ 22.653.57 $ 23,695.96 S 24,746.39 $ 130,040.68 TOTAL SAVINGS BASED ON 50%OF SALARY FOR 2 YRS. (1) $ 18 1.00 $ 18,839.73 is 37,130.73 NET SAVINGS TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF LAW (2) $ 20,564.13 $ 17,534.64 $ 38,098.77 TOTAL COST TO OFFER INCENTIVE (3) $ 31,822.72 TEMPORARY POSITION BECAUSE OF ON GOING MERGER DISCUSSIONS,ALSO POSSIBLITY OF ADJUSTMENTS IN ROUTING WHICH MAY ALTER DRIVER REQUIREMENTS. Pagel BOOK23XLS Prepared by DorriNdc R.Catterllo 10//l97 Page 1 RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROJECTION EMPLOYEEIDEPARTMENT YEAR ONE YEAR TWO YEAR THREE YEAR FOUR YEAR FIVE TOTALS CHARLES RIVERS DPW STREETS 8 FACILITIES MAINTAINER AGE:55 YEARS OF SERVICE 24 YRS. TIER#1 CURRENT SALARY$29169.00 PROJECTED SALARY 19962000 S 29,169.00 $ 30,044.07 $ 30,945.39 $ 31,873.75 $ 32,829.97 $ 154,862.18 PROJECTED BENEFITS 19962000 $ 10,209.15 $ 10,515.42 $ 10,830.89 $ 11,155.81 $ 11,490.49 $ 54,201.76 COST OF FIVE WEEKS VACATION $ 2.686.00 $ 2,766.58 $ 2,849.58 $ 2,935.06 $ 3,023.12 $ 14,260.34 SUB-TOTALS $ 42,064.15 $ 43.326.07 $ 41,776.28 $ 43,029.57 $ 44.320.45 $ 209.063.95 LESS:COST OF RETIREMENT INCENTIVE TO BE PAID TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BASED ON 15%OF FINAL AVERAGE SALARY PAID OVER 5 YEARS+8.5%PER YR. FINAL AVERAGE$26943 PRINCIPAL $ 4,041.45 $ 4,041.45 $ 4,041.45 $ 4,041.45 $ 4,041.45 $ 20,207.25 INTEREST $ 1,717.62 $ 1,374.09 $ 1,030.57 $ 687.05 $ 343.52 $ 5,152.85 TOTALS $ 5,759.07 $ 5,415.54 $ 5,072.02 $ 4,728.50 $ 4,384.97 $ 25,360.10 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 36,305.08 S 37,910.53 T$ 36.704.26 $ 38,301.07 $ 39,935.48 $ 183 703.85 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF SERVICE,WHILE MEETING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO SAVE AT LEAST 50%OF THE ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE'S SALARY FOR TWO YEARS. HIRE LABORER/BASE LEVEL 0• $ 16,725.00 $ 17,226.75 $ 17,743.55 $ 18,275.86 S 69 971.16 RELATED BENEFITS $ $ 5,352.00 $ 5,512.56 $ 5,677.94 $ 5,848.27 $ 22,390.77 S COST OF TWO WEEKS VACATION S $ 650.00 $ 679.80 $ 700.19 $ 721.20 $ 2,761.19 SUB-TOTAL COST OF REPLACEMENT $ $ 22,737.00 $ 23,419.11 $ 24,121.68 $ 24,845.33 $ 95,123.13 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 36,305.08 $ 15,173.53 $ 13,285.15 $ 14,179.39 S 15,090.15 $ 94 033.30 TOTAL SAVINGS BASED ON 50%OF SALARY FOR 2 YRS. 1 $ 14,58450 $ 15,02204 $ 29.606.54 NET SAVINGS TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF LAW 2 $ 36,305.08 $ 15,173.53 $ 51,478.62 TOTAL COST TO OFFER INCENTIVE 3 $ 25 360.10 9 •POSITION WOULD REMAIN UNFUNDED FOR 1997 TO EFFECT SAVINGS REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Page 1 BOOK23ALS Prepared by Dannick R.Catterib 10/7/97 Page 1 RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROJECTION EMPLOYEBOEPARTMENT YEAR ONE YEAR TWO YEAR THREE YEAR FOUR YEAR FIVE TOTALS _ EDITH ROHRER DPW STREETS 8 FACILITIES PARPGNG LOT ATTENDENT AGE:65 YEARS OF SERVICE 21.25 YRS. TIER#1 CURRENT SALARY$25390.00 PROJECTED SALARY 1996.2000 $ 25.390.00 $ 26,151.70 $ 25,936.25 $ 27,744.34 $ 28,576.67 $ 134,798.96 PROJECTED BENEFITS 1996-2000 $ 8,886.50 $ 9,153.10 $ 9,427.69 $ 9,710.52 $ 10001.83 $ 47,179.64 COST OF FIVE WEEKS OF VACATION $ 2,245.00 $ 2,312.35 S 2,381.72 $ 2,453.17 $ 2,526.77 $ 11,919.01 SUB-TOTALS $ 36,521.50 $ 37,617.15 $ 36,363.94 $ 37,454.86 $ 38.578.50 $ 181,978.59 LESS:COST OF RETIREMENT INCENTIVE TO BE PAID TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BASED ON 15%OF FINAL AVERAGE SALARY PAID OVER 5 YEARS+8.5%PER YR. FINAL AVERAGE$23458 PRINCIPAL $ 3,518.70 $ 3,518.70 $ 3.518.70 $ 3,518.70 $ 3,518.70 $ 17,593.50 INTEREST $ 1,495.45 $ 1196.36 $ 897.27 $ 598.18 $ 299.09 $ 4,486.34 TOTALS $ 5,014.15 $ 4715.06 $ 4,415.97 $ 4,116.88 $ 3817.79 S 22.079.84 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS $ 31,507.35 $ 32,902.09 $ 31,947.97 $ 33,337.98 $ 34,760.71 $ 159,898.75 OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED TO CONTINUE PROVISION OF SERVICE,WHILE MEETING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO SAVE AT LEAST W%OF THE ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES SALARY FOR TWO YEARS. LEAVE POSITION VACANT FOR EIGHT MONTHS HIRE NEW PARKING LOT ATTENDANT THER ER AT ENTRY LEVEL SAVE SALARY FOR EIGHT MONTHS,HIRE NEW ATTENDANT AT ENTRY LEVEL SALARY PLUS BENEFITS. $ 5,714.00 $ 17,571.00 $ 18,098.13 $ 18,641.07 $ 19,200.31 $ 79,224.51 RELATED BENEFITS $ 857.10 $ 2,635.65 $ 2,714.72 $ 2;796.16 $ 2880.05 $ 11,883.68 SUB-TOTAL COST OF REPLACEMENT $ 6,571.10 $ 20,206.65 $ 2,812.85 $ 21,437.23 $ 22.080.35 $ 91,108.19 NET PROJECTED SAVINGS S 24,936.25 $ 32,902.09 $ 31,947.97 $ 33.337.98 $ 34,760.71 $ 159.898.75 TOTAL SAVINGS BASED ON 50%OF SALARY FOR 2 YRS. (1) S 12,895.00 $ 13,075.85 $ 25.770.85 NET SAVINGS TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF LAW (2) $ 24,936.25 $ 32,902.09 $ 57,838.34 TOTAL COST TO OFFER INCENTIVE (3) $ 22,079.84 REQUIRED COVERAGE FROM PART-TIME TEMPORARY, WHILE AUTOMATED SYSTEMS CAN BE INSTALLED AND TRANSITION OCCURS.POSITION IS DESIGNATED FOR ELIMINATION ONCE AUTOMATED SYSTEMS ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL Page 1 BWK23XLS 'i O ITHq > , ,� . �'"•�.,4y CITY OF ITHACA %, 510 First Street Ithaca,New York 14850-3506 s.' f� •00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • WATER AND SEWER DIVISION s_a �O IAT EO Telephone: 607/272-1717 Fax: 607/277-5028. r.; August 26, 1997 q Mr. John Corp, P.E. New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. 50 Wolf Road, Room 502 Albany, New York 12205-2603 :j RE: EFC, IUP 97-98 Inclusion of Projects For Permanent Bonding 97-98 & Multi Year ; j Listing `j Dear Mr. Corn: It seems in talking to Mr. Ronald McKee; the City of Ithaca projects, formerly 6387,01,0 and 6387, 02, 0 were both dropped from the draft IUP for 97-98 financing because of the City failure to respond to questionnaires this past Spring. Please consider this request to reinstate the projects in the Multi Year IUP for 97-98 for financing. Further, we would request an ongoing portion of Inteceptor work be placed on the annual list for long term 11 SRF borrowing prior to September 30, 1998. I have provided updated descriptions of both the Sewer Rehabilitation and I/I Inteceptor Construction/Correction Five Year Programs. The ongoing projects under contract with NYSDOT, Jett Industries, or by force account do not require temporary financing as they are currently funded by City BAN's. All Projects will be ready for permanent financing in your next pool borrowing. We will be interested in discussing both temporary and permanent financing for the upcoming multiyear projects. I am available to clarify anything you find lacking in the attached materials to effect the following: A. Inclusion On Annual SRF Project Priority List 1. Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant (IAWWTP) $ 666,200 2 . Inteceptor/Sewer Collector Rehabilitation/Construction 1, 500, 000 i Inclusion On Multi-Year SRF Project Priority List 6387, 0=, 0 Sewer Rehabilitation/ Reconstruction $2,210,750 6387, 022, 0 I/I Sewer Inteceptor Rehab/Reconstruction 2,587,000 Thank you and your staff for helprthe City rectify and update funding status and intentions at this late date for IUP 97-98 Annual List inclusion. sincer=_1 Tars ence P. Fabbroni, P.E. , L.S. Ass't. Sup't. DPW, Water and Sewer Division CC: William Gray, P.E. , Sup't. DPW Frank Liguori, P.E. , Chair SJS Robert Butterworth, P.E. , Stearns & Wheler R �-4 ITHACA AREA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Attached please find the earlier letter describing the nature and purpose of the wstewater plant improvements currently under municipal contract to Henderson Bros. Contracting Inc. These improvements were reviewed and performance tests are being witnessed and verified by NYSDEC regional personnel as the work progresses. The project includes the full SEQRA process. r OF ZTK9 ��,��.---"•.,., CITY OF ITHACA sett 510 First Street Ithaca,New York 14850-3506 r f DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS • WATER AND SEWER DIVISION �°OQpT�D Telephone: 607/272-1717 Fax: 607/277-5028 i i t t August 8, 1997 Mr. John Corp, P.E. New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation 50 Wolf Road - Room 502 Albany, NY 12205-2603 RE: 1996 Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act Potential Funding for Wastewater Projects Dear Mr. Corp: The Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant, (IAWWTP) is a jointly owned re;_enal wastewater treatment facility that serves the City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca and Town of Dryden. Treated wastewater effluent is discharged from the facility to Cayuga Lake -- one of the Finger Lakes. On behalf of the Joint Owners of the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant, I am writing to express interest in pote-=-a_1 funding opportunities for wastewater projects under the recently approved 19-36 Clean Water/Air Bond Act. The Joint Owners are currently completing a capital project that involves the design and construction of improvements to the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant. The plant improvements will improve wastewater treatment performance during peak flow conditions. During peak flow conditions, hydraulic short-circuiting occurs in the final settling tanks impacting plant performance and causing carry-over of settleable solids to the plant effluent. New effluent weirs and baffles will be installed in the tanks to improve performance. In addition, the project also includes the installation of a new raw wastewater pump and yard piping modifications in connection with the plant process drain system and the influent controlled diversion structure. Installation of the new raw Wastewater pump will incre=ase the plant's capacity for treatment of peak wastewater flows and reduce the frequency, duration, and magnitude of plant bypasses that may occur. The project has peen approved by the NYSDEC and bids have been received for construction contracts. The total project cost is presently estimated at $666,200. On behalf of the Joint Owners of the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plan::, I would like to request that the project be included for consideration of any funding available under the Bond Act. Should ycu have any questions concerning this request, please call. Very truly yours, Larry Fab^=oni, P.E. Assistant Superintendent Public Works Department Water and Sewer Division City of I—aca, New York cc: Mr. Kenneth P. Lynch, Acting Regional Director, NYSDEC - Region 7 Mr. Robert Butterworth, P.E., Stearns & Wheler, LI,C n Clean Water Stat*Rovolving Fund ICWSRF) EFC Use orgy Fre-Application Form ALWaAW 1. --- Nefir unary Prol"t Schodult and Cost Eslinula Date Prepared R/ / Fa h4orwisd Uso Pion(W)L"IM A sposes D:aJu Raca,vud Loan Applicant: T y �,C11Ac�9 Anhcapatod Slwrt•Telm Financing(STFi Arao,mi 15 (� County: 7"nI t*&5 Proleci Description: O57- STFLoan MssrkdBy: 1 i Population Served: Q��O Anted ticipaLono-Tam Finawag tLM Amount. 4O 6949 frl�e�I0 /��J LTF Loran Hooded By: 9 d e),9S Municipal Contact' Phelan d; 647-e�LI 7/7 Other Funcling Sources and Amouata: f•gv ow.RD. } Prapn Coet Estimeu Fax tl:L07—,c�'T7��� ' Cawwrction Coats 1. Coattact,t : Q 9 C 2. caat.aos a Caatact parser►: lCf�'c�.�'-//�/K!!�j� S• Co�ltatl i Phan it. �/ =Rid/ Subtotal(Const.Cots} s Faac M: _ Rr is Mwdclp+uty utodar e40f4sarud is caftshuct aw projw? Yes I 1 No I I �np F 1N Yes.p naw D,oWds s OVY of tee NAMMMO rrsaa,aa Mj Pisam„a Foes i (kM&Uatans ran cwWiv&V"lotlowu,g sdwdab&V arrbaaO ONAOa Foes Twgat J Actual Consiruction fact . i,c�i�/gyp A4ayIt4 Qrl�wr►t �p1al�onData ���tqq� . 1.Sutrait appticsaw�ytom t�As O�f lics. ..................... at ow state Cornp�two fol S,psdal lmptavem"d /�y/) t�t Y Tr^'cabb}: ...........•......... .....................►•.../.I14i.• �� s suaalt a.tlwkal l(s)for awiew araai approwl .. J c Bops co.r+s.t cams : • . .......... ...... ... ................... �«�.uu..r,va cow • s 3.tkii,wM A"aawie"Vos"rv%w delerokwAnn 40a amenb to a*UYSOEC fiplonalFie"Fkpwuw* : P«nMa : .............................................................../0 i/ 196, w....l Duoft COW. $ 4.sul""short-term iam spok:con tit appuclkbwl. ....................................... ._j_A -., M6COMM M4 I— S. S.tint*spoxasm ret"raeeessary 1 costal : u.s.VMS.tasu,wAar w,dwada,un..m.wersf ertica,sotto waste,atc ....................... .. 1 ' Lt.a,ad Atquisitlo,a� f i.swr.dt place and spwikauom for rovi«w andspprov& ................................ 96 C°"-Wrpw�ci.s t�x w�a) I.Submit towerm loan vocation: ................ .... .......... ....! It.Bran raasuucuora(notkci a proceed):..........:..........................................:iLle 1� •,.•- . D"W OMW lamdirop 1�.7! Canplra conatruetwn: . ............ ................................ •................ sowcas Inuo,RD. �Led� ••f Nares •Laod acgwsaiw costs are gonwary,neay,W Jot CWSRF J,nancny Add Est Issuance Calls filmoduld1 "ance coals wa,Wararwlwy 3%4d ADJOd caus SEWER REHABILITATION / 1/1 FOR PERMANENT FINANCING H; S, Over the past two years the City has replaced and refurbished over three miles of sewer inteceptors and collectors. As a betterment to the NYSDOT Route 96 project, the City paid for the State to install over two miles of sewer collectors and inteceptors beneath an eleven square block project area. This work was all performed under NYSDOT boilerplate with full environmental approvals. In addition, the City bid and awarded a contract to Jett Industries Inc. for construction of the inteceptor replacing an insufficient sewer main with a history of backups and sewer overflows at the only City high school. This work is being performed under municipal contract. Finally, the balance of new construction and replacement is being performed as ministerial acts under in-house force account crews with selected rental of equipment, dewatering appurtenances including sheetpiling, and specialty devices and with direct purchase bids or purchase orders. All the above work has been done under NYSDOT design work or with force account engineering and project administration provided by City Water and Sewer and Engineering staff. The City has locally financed these capital improvements through BAN's in the short term. The State SRF with 50% or more interest subsidy including MHI hardship criteria is a very desirable option to permanently finance the above long term wastewater corrective improvements. Clean Water State RevolvinFund(CWSRF) EFC use only • Pre-Applicationform —— Iit�c�(Afu Pr*fiminary Pmisct Schedule and Cost Estintals Dale Prepared Fa Ao4wWed Use Plant(1uP)L4UV Purposes Owe Racowmi Loan A r P�� � QTY �� rrN� . . ----- Cour Anw*ated Shon•Term Futanc+ng(SYF)Amount ,i�-y�yiys • Prr.>lect Descriptiott:�FiJr,S' �FtVAg/�.lTi9rlor,! �2' F��E'�'FRI''1.f1illAlVCIIY� srftoa�H.oaodey: Atttloipaled Lott9•Tenrt Finandttg(LTF)Amount. Pcpulabon Served: c 00 C� Municipal Contact n /�191r) VICE l� F�IigB�'Ol�ll 'S, LTF Doan Needed By: Z1��'- , PtwM I: 07—,,e 7,el 7 Clthsr Funding Sourcats and Arnoustts: Protect Coot Esunw*6 Fax d: cSO-7—X 7 76-6?8 0.11..ttUD,RD.61c.) e�xm.atxA /�mwmt ConsUuction costs i 1. Contract A : �© conatluinp E„�1,,..��5'�'A�'iVSsQ`4)k�Y,��' �. Corgract, : o - coatracta contact P.rso1►:/ iC'fi��% /'9rA�(A P,� �• Contract a s Phony p: SttbWal(ComL Costal S Fax M: a adtwticipality under enforanWA to Cotndrucl OW p9ojae17 Vag.t 1 No i I Eoa4w�naq F (NYaa,plwwprowW ocopyoffM•nlapoonrifwssbwwrrl) Pt+rwW�Foro s (lnatrwd"U for eon "v ON Io www actodub am sncbsaO Osalpa F"s i n 13 C<C Target i AcUW cautructbn fess Attiv)t�Qt IavetK C2=11262090 P as* i.Submit,appticAan to the MAW W the SUZO Compbow(or Special ita avortttstt t�Expeasss i District app mal td Ifoicahla): ................................................. 1/ tlond cownat Costs i sutw►ktarJwJcat rspost[s}for rwi w.na,ow .t: ............................................✓.l�is .�7 leo«.&ZC...w Cost. s neo 7.SCAM%*Anal 0m ronwsaw"Miw dw rams"ft dot:um”"to am ayscec R"wnat Ftscrl EapoMp s Ponrwl AwwYdatralor. ... ...........................................................(!ALn....! kAw*st Dwft CO wt. s a.SuNsit Ntortrt sm lan oappiieatiort(it applicable): .......................................1g�1�� »«,s $ o n0 l4 SP0Eb lnstrnabrwstl++Kb.tt+'saM s1iYstu�itaancs.twtla s+asts.a1c) ...........................J. 1 1 E4 �nlcosta Lt.a++d Ac�tttsicbat� : 4.Swat plans turd sp"llicaumw kw rovisw ands woval:.........................................!�►��r I.Submit toN•to m roan apPQCa U": ................ ............. ,.p... .......... ...14i,-/Y7 _ .. af.Stan eonsuuctlon(notlrw to proes�d).. ......................... q Dwucr Dow ANsdring ICwnpW►constructmm: . ............ .................................. .............. 7 1L6118 sourc—oleo.im t) Add Ess.Issuawe Costs'•f Afetal •t ally a��+mats ere os�srr u»Al1i[afs Inn cws>rF trtarcraD L�trr►.uwl�asuwita culls wr prorwnrirly 1kvfAcyrrtcaais total Amount to Fi�wuo�s._ _ -,_ 1/1 INTECEPTOR CONSTRUCTION/CORRECTION s As part of the sewer collector system inventory, the major inteceptors in the City, also conveying sewage from the Towns of Ithaca and Dryden, were separated out for evaluation of location, capacity, storm flow/overflow occurrences and future needs. Along with 1/1 problems no added capacity of the system had been constructed for forty years, most construction dating back to the 1905 - 1940 time frames. A five year program of improvements is sketched out and estimated. Because inteceptors are typically the deepest (13 feet to 20 feet) sewers under City streets, the program poses some economic and location challenges. Every opportunity to provide new inteceptor in available non-utility encumbered corridors at less than half the cost of replacement of in place has been taken and is projected for work in progress and proposed. Existing inteceptors in dense CBD areas with no alternate corridors will be refurbished by trenchless, e.g. sliplining, cured in place, etc., techniques. L Clean Water Stable Revolving Fund(CWSRF) EfC t!»e only , M era,Appikidlon Form – ` S • liuhx;t AY, W*iminary Protect Schodtda sad Cost Estimate Date Prepared / i Fa Jrri www Usa Atari(rt1Aj"am seat i?;ble Racy vt,t! Loan Applicant: Cl?:2%" 79 Anwipak4 Short•Tttrm F*wz ng(STFI Amount . - Couttty - Proletl Description: Z' /i1lC C'1Q�, ' �'© S%/Q,�C�C,iF� t'�! srFroa,v Needed By. Poixtlabnn served: •� o�o �,R>�1►7�-RIX X38?�� ArAWPOW tong--arm Finanool)tLTF}Amoura./403 , Muntc4W Contact &k,*661/° ��lam taed.a By: �r,�►.� �. Phone I: 7 e Zell/7 Other Funding Sourcas and Amouafa: Fax d:S d�% 7� 0-9Y *MD.RD.etc.} Props Cost Estinws } Pbo.rWal Corbwbcctiot►Costs Nh4s�+� t k /r• �. Contract x : / 7 o O:e Cortsuidt►p EtcpirwK'��r � �Y ����i�."/��� 2• Coasrsct i f ", Contract s Contact Pstoon: >< Phoru F: c7�/�v��J /�� Subtotal(Caas1.Cosec} S Fan S: is WwdcipWry uiWer enforcenwd to costa n,al Ow+xolsctT Yee( I No i I �—MO F.., t; 1N Yak P"MPOwde a C*y of Of*MWOOobsrrt rAsNWASM J a..►pn F«. $_ a q o0 (u�aauctrons for conyyet�np Tarr roroNwq aclbsdbra ar.u�clos.W Torpt I Actual Conwuctien fsss . i�– Acliyrty of EYerK �„Qmdetion t3ats �F.itpergsa� �: 1.Sub"apptks"n to w Onks-of file Stat*C004601w tot Spec,al INWOVOWA �q ?(30 ` tl WICt soproral{if awlic"I.: ................ rte, L+eDat Ebtpsttass �...f l Bond Corneal cast. s< 3 0 I SLAW"4 Awcal mood(s)lar mvww a"approval: .............................................. ��_..L Force Awmw Costs • s /060130 7•Submit anal onvWnmeniat rs Waw dw rwAww m doameats to Ow IIYSWC Rsglottal Fbcal Fapansrs : PonatAomkMakaw: ... ............................................................ �� 'hdsvrsl Durwbp Corot. j ` application( applk l' ......................................./�ly�_.0 alheaNarrous i C'�C S.Sttt�trcil shor4tartrt lona g abM. E nl Costs r S.t+au aaoppllkadon let asir rb.c..sarq o«r+wN a sppYc.hr.I c� gw+a�b• ____1 : �'J. l Is.*.VMS.keshwaw waNsads.strsasb rtlaturbarbcs.solid wsato,sac.}: ...........1................. �t.ria Acqutstti m S 6.Sub"plans ww spKikillons lo.avow anda+Pptowl........................................ r .K Oft 1�9 E C*n"QO bcr..1_%us.a(I: '030 r' I.SuDtltli tw►g-term toa,ta appfJcltElon. ................ ........ ......................... � --. i SWt coRsuuc"n(solid to$WOCsad)•..........:............................A ... ..... �!J 1 �Sub1oW Pnoj!4 Costs �., . ........... . ....... ...............4? s 1 . %`f'`l� ��!«�►co,. .cor+suuchon; � sou,us 11It10,lrv, Autres 'Lw. d scglaw wl ants awe parrryOY 10bLaClo lnr CWSUF INW)CMia Add Est.lssuaneo Coal:••t _ ••E31iawmaAiWH1CY C"s wV.y*#OIM„OIYIY 3%(4p,ojed C"Is i lotat A,nourd to fiamw* r , 1995 -19 99 CAPITAL 1WROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT REQUEST Submitting Agency: CITY OF ITHACA, DPW, WATER & SEWER DIVISION Contact Person: 1. Project title: SEWER INTERCEPTORS - INTERMUNICIPAL 2. Project description and location: UPGRADE INTERCEPTORS TO HANDLE CITY GROWTH OVER PAST 45 YEARS AND GROWTH OF SURROUNDING TOWNS OVER PAST 33 YEARS 3. Project justification(need): SEWERS ARE WITHIN THE CITY VERY DISRUPTIVE TO REPLACE IN CORRECT LOCATIONS. NEW AND LARGER INTERCEPTORS NEED -TO BE ABLE TO RESOLVE MANY LOCAL SEWER PROBLEMS LEFT BY THE HANDWORK OF 1900 - 1943. 4. Relationship to other projects underway,proposed or potential: WILL BE COORDINATED CLOSELY WITH CONRAIL, RTE. 96, NYSEG AND DPW PROJECTS. 5. Project status(circle appropriate category) Previously proposed: New(status of plans/specs): •not funded-rejected by CIRQ/Council •unnecessary(describe why) -deferred by CIRGCouncil •not begun •partially funded,requesting additional funds •preliminary plans underway •funded-not yet begun •plans complete -design stage-prelim/final •specs complete -out to bid •out to bid -under construction -complete 6. Estimated project cost and funding: Total Ca ital Budget& Reserves Other Resources Funded Requested Funded Requested Plans&Specs Land Construction 0©(9 Equipment '/'7O Other C3 ©30 Total Sources of other resources as indicated above: (over) 7. /Basis of project cost(circle) •rough estimate •final plans •construction/equipment costs •bids preliminary plans •other: 8. Estimated future cost/revenue to City resulting from project Additional annual maintenance/repair $ Additional employee salaries $ ,�PA�C� Additional equipment not included in project cost above Sd Other: QM Total cost $ &16 Ek Estimated annual income from project S e Net cost $ k f 9. Funding request schedule(indicate amount requested by year and for what stage of project it is requested,e.g.,planning,design,construction,etc.) Year Amount Project Phase 19, $ Jr 'T 19�. �400 19-7— $-:11-7-400 z� 192 $-V;'40(3 -10. Proposed methods of project implementation(circle) •direct purchase ofmaterial/equipment from existing funds {-� •contract purchase based on anticipated revenue •contract construction •force account construction •other ,o 1 i. Estimated time needed to complete project: �y 4X-S 12. Agency priority to project(circle) Hia Medium Low 1.. Additional remarks (please attach additional sheets if necessary; also attach any supplementary information needed to explain project or components). 0- 9ckev ?'/A/Y s epj-capEorm.doc S-INTER.XLS Cost of Sewer Interceptor Construction (Based on Historical Documentation) ' Street Segment Depth Cost!LF Length Cost .:...........:.. :.:.:.. ...... :::.:........... ............. pipe size: 24 in. First to York 10-15 150 1800 $270,000 2 S H ........... ...:.:...:. trtra . 1v ;..:;:;;::.;;::.:.::::....::... - :......,.......:.................,:.....:..-...-,,...... - :...,.... ... ..,..,.... __ ....... .....:..:1; ..:... 5. ;;.. .. pipe size: 12 in. 625 University to Noyes 00 00 $90,000 3 ............. .. .:...--..:..,.................�:.:.;:�:7oe..s'.::e>::;>;,.... .. . .. :-..-..........-.... ..... ...... :...- .......... ;.;.::.;:1.00:.::::- .:;::._800::.:x:;. ....::.;._.::$:80;;::>:.;. ................... ..........::.: ism= pipe she: 12 in. 207 Linn to University , 4 �Ie?} :.. ............ ....... pipe she:30 in. Treatment Plant to 10-20 200 6000 $1,200,000 Flood Channel Siphon :t:•: t1 t :. ....:.:..::..:............... ::: pipe size: 24 in. Interceptor 5-15 200 4000 $800,000 6 pipe size: 12 in. Pump & Force Main 2500 $451000 7 8; hill'':::<' <' > '}> a > ME 11 ...:....:.:.... ::,:::::::::..:::: XX pipe size: 24-36 in. SlipLining Interceptor 100 6000 $600,000 TOTAL COST $3,490,000 I Notes: I. All distances measurements are in feet. 2. A mobilization base costs ($20001 should be added to each street. 3. Dollar amounts are based on 1994 values. Page 1 r Sewer Rehabilitation Program In 1993 - 1994 as an update to 1/1 and draft SSES studies done in the early 1980's, the City cleaned and televised 80,000 feet or 20% of its sewer system to better quantify problems needing correction. In 1994 this inventory was correlated with fifteen years of service records to develop a problem matrix, prioritize projects, and develop rough cost estimates to budget ongoing improvements for five years. In addition, highway reconstruction projects, particularly the NYSDOT virtual replacement of eleven City blocks and activities of the City DPW, offer opportunities to replace and enlarge old clay tile sewers and manholes with watertight modern facilities. From the time the Federal/State funding program eliminated correction of 1/1 problems little had been done to modernize the City collection system, so an aggressive program of contracts, contract specialties, and force account work is now underway to try to overcome fifteen years or more of deferred problems. While the sewer plant is currently rated at 10 MGD, hydraulic flows have routinely been. 10 - 20 MGD during rainfall peaks and as high as 40 MGD in the historic January 19, 1996 runoff. It is reasonable to expect that this modernization of the sewer collection system will, in time, eliminate as much as half the 1/1 in average rainfall events and ground water at the eight month high lake levels. Attached find the five year program mentioned above that forms the basis for the multiyear request. But, please realize the priorities and project s keep rolling to take best advantage of DOT, DPW, and other major infrastructure replacements and as higher maintenance or replacement priorities are identified. Clow Water Starr Renrolvin Fund(CWSRF) EFC U"only Pro-AppUcatlon Form , Preiiminary Project Sche"and Cost Esthrtate Dale Prepared ,,7Z 97 Fat Ao*wwled Use FVm(WP)tssung,Purposes acrd Racewmi Low App(: C�Ty DF Z7> A�9 - 7'���PKiit!SAnbcoaled Short-7arm Fre)ane+r►g(STf)Amount SF'cJ COX/.rri'rr0/Y 7YO'Cl'7 R 'NAB�J m �cx siF j.oa r►r.wae By. 2r3 93 Proiecl dPve AnWpaled Long-Term Finenctng(t.TF)1lmount. i'apulatwn Served:,.�C'' (��(� 1 > LTF Lam Needed By: �1 1 Municipal Contact•,gwr1yg,-/P rt- Ptwre is 6'o 7` ,e7,'`1717 011m Funding Sourcas and Amouats: Ptolact Cost E%Lkwulu Fax 8: - *g.T�-�oP,R i*•p. ,11D.*W) . C"st"tion C"ts Coatracl e : cwteeCt p.r,o,,:�/cr>'".cAs r �, ,PF s• cwwract a : c«wact e : Phone S: 36 �`,qle/ Suat«w(cee.L Cors) : Fax ti: 'i =- /Q Is WralClpatity w►der ertforre@nont to construct the txojWA'? Yes( 1 No I I Enpltwwrnp F"s� jN Yes.Aws�w D�oradra a taopy of IiBe�rrsmw,�stt J P WwWr�Fwt i (ursJntcrans Wr uon�plobrg Jho lWlow•urp sctrttsJa ere at�lusstJ,? Orra►pn fess 70 Target!Actual Consuac"n feet . i1'4�i d AclivitY a fYent 0g bin Dift pdwfEttpensel S.Submh applkalion to the OW*'ottln Sten CorrrpboW for SpecW iWowrneet ft�7 Leexpense. L. O 6 D Di;Yiclapproval . ............................................ ► t sue..lt lerhdcat apwgs}for rsYl.w,n�,�oPr .l: ' somCowsl cas i- �-�© ......................... .................✓ o F«Ce A",""cow s /©o a o 0 3.5��wil�d/+yu�l Ao�initlralor.eavi�roneNnta)t+aviw�Nartwlt►atiow dou+rewnb to I>,a tiYSOeC AeOfonel Flecel t:ApenNs : P�r+sul ... ...........................................................lZiJ 97 Interest D+rrwnp Const. S 4.SUNM chert-Unn loan applkwm(u&Pplia"). .............. .. .1,e i36 2 »«» : cx is o .. .........0. ........ s ,t,,a v a,eshwa ,,,� •I w• �,Me* . �l ............................ 4.sweat piarn and sowilitatlons mt twvbw a"awowi:.......I............................. lac r�i�7 I.suarnu lore tom wap, wcsaon: ...... ....... 713c� E c°"-"r�°.,►`�` =x—"a.a� 0a .................... Subic"Pwt.0 coos e.Sun canauucUan("Lka to ptoc"d):........................... 1 �---�- cow i COMPW.consuucaon: . ............ ....... .......... �.. ...... 7 art �� ao ::rHuA lr�D.k) i_ A4q Pet.Jssusr+n Costs•'f W&z .1 mnd acgLmwbwr cLmts woo Jot CWSRF kw)CM40 ••Larumurclasu�rK�costa aw�yWratu»atuly�'K vfPra�.rc;t oars �7oW Amount b Fiaat►ce+i._ _..._ .. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) Influent, Total Suspend,Solids(TSS) Influent, and Effluent Flow Trend (Raw Data 1993-1997) 35000 20 r 'rx �,f y�� t # A sv,:'Fi.ew`{' '•he'Y.• . 's�,a:/(:%'rL,'!<:;• ! /3.". '+.'-. % .. 5 •} a � ,f Ss 61-Influent B OD '.. 18 30000 75-Influent TSS Mfr —Effluent Flow 16 2500014 ,�♦ .�3Y: 20000 . 12 10 2 15000 I: - 8 3 10000 6 3 4 5000 2 T <,: M M M M '•7' 0 I• 01 01 01 O> 01 Q1 c 01 01 Q7 OI 07 01 m 07 O> O] 01 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ v zr v' v7 t_ m M N c7 Ci -- c"� In Dates ~ i, E C. Cainpbell-8/19/97 hl ':; '!•-• .tom^ .Z..+r � .. _- ., _ 19 9 19 ?9 CAPITAL UgPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT REQUEST Submitting Agency: CITY OF ITHACA, DPW, WATER & SEWER DIVISION Contact Person: 4010kC 1. Project title: SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION 2. Project description and location: REPLACE FAILED SEWERS IDENTIFIED IN TELEVISING 20% OF SYSTEM IN 1993 OVER THE NEXT FIVE (5) YEARS. 3. Project justification(need): SEWERS ARE COLLAPSING OR LEAKING SUBSTANTIAL GROUNDWATER OR RAINFALL INTO SYSTEM WITH RESULTANT HIGHER TREATMENT COSTS AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS. 4. Relationship to other projects underway,proposed or potential: WILL BE COORDINATED WITH CITY STREETS AND FACILITIES ROAD REHABILITATION, NYSEG GAS MAIN REPLACEMENT, STATE NYS ROUTE 96 CONSTRUCTION AND CO,%n'rLTNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. 5. Project status(circle appropriate category) Previously proposed: New(status of plans/specs): •not funded-rejected by CIRC/Council •unnecessary(describe why) -deferred by CIRC/Council •not begun •partially funded,requesting additional funds •preliminary plans underway •funded-not yet begun •plans complete —design stage-prelim/final •specs complete —out to bid •out to bid —under construction —complete 6. Estimated project cost and funding: Total Capital Budget&Reserves Other Resources Funded Requested Funded Requested Plans&Specs ZD 10'7 2 Land Construction 7�0 fro Equipment /p Other-A C i'l p J p Total x/07 p Sources of other resources as indicated above: (over) 7. alis of project cost(circle) /Basis; estimate •final plans •constructior*quipment costs •bids ✓•preliminary plans •other: 8. Estimated future cost/revenue to City resulting from project: Additional annual maintenance/repair $ Additional employee salaries $ Additional equipment not included in project cost above $ C Other. $ d iJ6R84 Total cost S 4�7 M &XICr Estimated annual income from project $ A�C h Net cost /X� ` 9. Funding request schedule(indicate amount requested by year and for what stage of project it is requested,e.g.,planning,design,construction,etc.) Year Amount Project Phase 1921 1991 S D 19Jq :4r 19Z2 0 / -10. Proposed methods of project implementation(circle) •direct purchase of material/equipment from existing funds 4A •contract purchase based on anticipated revenue PP�Y • contract construction •force account construction •other 11. Estimated time needed to complete project: 12. Ajency priority to project(circle) High Medium Low 1�. Additional remarks(please attach additional sheets if necessary; also attach any supplementary information needed to explain project or components). s�� rgTT�9Cf��} jo,C�9�'i✓ ,t NEWCUST2.XLS Cost of New Sewer Construction # Street Manhole Depth Cost/LF Length Cost 1 Elmira Rd. pipe size Gn.) 123-122 4 60 140 $8,400 . i:.�.,.:'a•.,..•::.,,._,,..!r:...,.!!;.;:« >?x:q}:..r:r;•,:r..a,�...:!�:,'. _,�::a;.�.^•.;kix':..r:•n s-:#w:?,�,rkr,.::r,:::,.::--: ::r"�"-.r°::'•:r`:'•Y.''.'.:.:Myy,:.,,....,::..;.r::..-:..,:,.:: .. r , ::................... ,•::��:•F.•,*-�'i:ri.Fxi:'::::W:iv:=.4;::w 121-120 ISM,. 6 : �}} 60 180 $10,800 yr 1.4b=< .....:::.,,::}:?::,>::-?: .: III 165-164 9 80 260 $20,800 in:'S:?:!Y..F:!.?in?•!-?:M .u}. ,i.}a?•w,v,+?•:.}:vfi••r.:iv:}.,"t,i::::u:FY.•:.?:::{.:.m::..v..: , Z 4 ........:...::..::..:......:::::. ..-....--...... 163-162_. : -�:.....,1 120 .::1.25 $15,000 •:xWwY.tivF:•i:.xn•.,w.,::!.:t}}-w.v}v!.}:!::{;';:i:.vra.:.; am . v}h...:w:.•.v.•" - h '€2Q. :16.1.-..1,60! w„r..:: : :...:;:5 ..a=.Y V60 215 $12,900 'x..\"•;::i•.v.!..n}?i:4: .: :w?JU:•}:tv.,:,-4'+,1,':.F,::}\'.\?;!�?}}y••.::•.>ry ii!�::..v..::-:.w::v:..-::..n. vs.!4x. __ . 0.1.53.;:,!. :::ti2•:<:.yi:.v::.,ti!- ::�(),' .. : ..,:.:.rte.-:??,,:-?..:...... ..-. ::.. xwvw-..vvn:.Nr.:'ri+.X-"wiiditi:i - ,�•:': ,v\xv:ir%i:N,vri•:ii::'••••:taiiixwvh-.",:.F:i-+r:-'+.- �:=.fi%ivv%-0%vi%-1nti-:i+:-tiw�:v..iuv:::i>!: 159-158 6 60 205 $12,300 v:vay.:vva•.vv�wwxvvror:na vxu v:is �. -.�yv •0... :., .--:rUF:.}.ib'y- .vyti!::iy::>':.}i•}:!..:.:af .f� ^} <'::v>*::.y�w�-Q.:-. ::.1.:. -.::.,...--v v.:.--.::?: - .--.,. -,..v n...r.. �:::::v:.•.::.:.v::.,,..:..'-..: �, ii. 'X:;�L.� .:v>:.\-. "'~iniw81•iA'iiJ 'i V.v1{V 4.ti,Y•iinv,•ri- is lV,xvA W,,,,•••• -f.,,:ri:,};v...sWi+v}>-Q+•.•.++:xA„whivivii:::tiJ- 157-156 8 80 135 $10,800 ::.vvr-vr.•.xwa?yn.:w.m.:???a; :.:v,.{.•.:: :::ryvvr:n,v.-:n: \.-... .:..:,. .. �.::: - :..v:: ....:3:78 1Z8::.:�: ,,,•..,,, ::caaiaw:v::,w..�:,a:aw`s.'w,v„:w,.,,ar.:o;:r..:x-:,...::::aw;•-«....:.....,._...,,.:.aa,:: .,,....... •-a::Nxa::::;:a:::..,«.,,,,..,,,,,,,,..;;: 184-183 7 70 90 $6,300 �•^.::: .}}y},ntyt+;n,�;"".}a. .--.:M..;::.�;-,•:---!,' ::,:;.t;,z}z.}?:}.:-.w..�5.,w•--. ,x.:;!�k::g}::K;:!s!!!;::.,...,w,•.., • �'''`;1$�-'182. '' _:7:�;�}�?<: '" v.� :>�`�. F''� 4f� -.'?• Li:.w,,,-..ti:J33.Yi:'w.w",,.w J::c1\1�dw:A•1-'+,,,iLvw,C"vrvr i::i;3r.U3�...:iiw,v' V, n w.w,,.mw•., ",.:Y.fn:,::.':i?n www',{\w,�»,Yw•-•• d.,; � 182-181 7 70 235 $16,450 ib>:h.vw.:.??:.-•Fi-:•v.,::\\\'i!C'v\':R•h-.y'4,,%isnrr•:r-'`:v :!.%My«::r-`.;::ryX.•:2::v.:w::..v�..v....v�-:.,;, i:�::::}?•.vva?u}>:.x:v?y:nS?v :- :::�v. •v.�:v..v..: �y *� ....-i.............. :.::� .a.v..,,. •ixiaiaa'i;,F;,n,::Y:tiy;, e`.Y.i:.; : ;ci: - :ia'�;aa�ia„a,,,,a,,,,,-w,,,,- - '.oxay.,,,-wwaa::;.vwaxi:•a 180-178 - 8 80 140 $11,200 ' ?aha .,}'.viw'!vt'•,:::.v:..:.:v\" :-:'!h?>.la?"!•YC:M;:;{,v.!+.?Ya�v.'.?::i?Y'•Y.,•�..,}?SM•,.v,-::x-:,C,:ii:iti”-:;h:S•:.:..vx.?.::: ?:v�.M.;Y.tii;;:!}«:}.vai>?v:•.wwx .w.,vw,.,..3F,u.,,;::?.-i:A .±.{.:tii-:k11..xv..n„Vsw;i,4.w•:.,.«.:..::}�,:::'rin+w,,,...>;}i :,,.v.:.w. 177-176 8 80 180 $14,400 Base cost $8,000 2 E. York St. ie size in. ::.?•:�:: is -.. . ::;:;<?: :::-.!....::::.:•?}}}::: C ) -nx.w,....t w,....,....,v::.:v �:::v::::::..v:.,•??:iiii-:F w.va a'v..,,.h....,..t.....:.:n .. ....;...v::::::........ai::.:'. s 248-249 4 60 265 $15,900 'Base cost $2,000 3 W. Falls St. pipe st29 (in.) .......:::.......... r:,,:.,...,,,,..r:.:::::::-:a:.:�S- ..,,.-,....::a,;i.::;..,,,:.wa:>::?:::5:::::+:1.:..-....v-...,-.:..,.;:::r.,.«......>::;.>::,.w..:i:<;.: :YakcsaaS::fz}.x:<:.:.•i:.,. .. - 6 202-203 4 60 235 $14,100µ Base cost $2,000 4 S. Corn St. pipe size (in.) 90-91 6 60 285 $17,1_00 :<:,''t3-. 7:.1::08..:: ,:::.??::•::.•::. OM Base cost $2,000 5 N Titus Ave. pipe size tin.) 132-133 8 80 305 $24,400 8 ?:.:fi?:•:1.�3-1::4:1:.:>:;::; .:::::::._::;.:,..i�:.:;� �:��: �:�{� Y`600 Base costj $2,0001 Page 1 NEWCOST2.XLS # Street Manhole Depth Cost/LF Length Cost 6 S. Titus Ave. pipe size (in.) 51-52 6 60 330 $19,800 • -•vA }}:a-:.y.•n;x.. rn:K,vi+lt!':iy-w}iC:Y.:row �.;t-0•::.}`^;'..vv:i,.{ip,Y.w•:}}riv, vnw - v,.}:Ktw;i�.;.wvu »+•Wn}} ' ,;. :�hk;r:?i>:S;mv.�w„-:.:::v'° S{:.\*:�:�::i:ti::- ::i:}?:::ry•tr•n}:.}}'{v'{;vi: iwc:•r:;sw.,,,xx,x.+. �vwrv.r.,•.xtr.:..,..,.,,..,.:},axx,..•r..v...a-.x�::...,uu •:a.{r..,...,,v:}fi,,2•..•:.».• iE.w.., x 53-54 6 60 275 $16,500 .......... :iiW:�•}};.,.};{na.n„ vmy:J, ,xyi.;�:T;nw. xuavfer 45}aw..v.. . _ �y{�. �y jiK Y�� .{?{c:.:-.iv:::4.Y.iiv:-iv?}::•::{v ":-i:��ti-rii�:iri:•i.':irii ".,...na...•.-,...va,.,,n:. .. Base cost $2,000 7 E. Buffalo St. pipe size (in.) 130-131 7 80 215 $17,200 :•'::.7 <:uzi.,- Base cost $2,000 8 E. Court St. pipe size (in.) 144-147 10 120 255 $30,600 s '::.:.147.x3.. >,-::..:.:.:....,:.:.:.7 ........................ ..,.-.-•-:.w- ::.,,..:?, ><::, Base cost $2,000 9 Delaware Ave. pipe size fin.) 159-160 4 60 190 $11,400 }}r.:.«.}•.•....» ,:•?.r?}; .} •�},�.}}....-�.,�,.,x:•..ti:•'c:;�,r}}..y,..,:.-,::.•r ::..}}-rr}:;:}.}r.;.•,.....,; x.,,n.,w...,;fi.:._:Y.,•�:,,.y^::,ti: ,:,sr„i.,,,w.�,,x,u..�;�:v :.�ii,ii..�.,,,�.,,,,�,�: ;x,,.r.;;::...:"'-•..,.,-..w:<.H:: x.:;.:,..x:.,.:..,, ;.?:� :�;,,.,:..,. 161-164 4 60 305 $18,300 Base cost $2,000 10 Cornell St. •;r.:+..x.;q:.,.;c.M,::•ax.+x.;,r,?: .};:ro;: ,}»....}} ;:k?'aw.t�±^.�:pri.:}.,;yyw .:xx:::;} ,y:MY1n'•�'? :?,!KM;::}\'.Q;:.O} ' pipe size on.) ::•:a••ay.,a.,••.,,ace,.-,.,.n.:..,,a.,Yawc:.d:-.,,.,,,,,::, :;cr:::4a;�.,....•,w.w..•:.t• "•.a:i:;.x,•iw:;:a?�.::�azA-x„•:i,;�.-::•} 8 338-336 6 60 160 $9,600 ' wy}'•wn4:wwN,wn}>w ;.}K.>}}}},;:}}}:•}},- xvK.}Y.Y.:.;.1??:. u};{:T}}Y.nv?::�a,.l,:?^': • :}}}}}x? ;;.vn} SAI' ::i;:rh;,,,:,,x,;:.•}..:x..,.:::,, ,�„x:,..,�.::•--::':i:,..:..�:�x:<.v::.•:.r.:-r.:a,:.,-,.,.:,,.>:,,«.::;,::::i;,?::;-:.:,:i,::x,,:i .xa�if=:zxr..x. .,, ?77-324 6 60 80 $4,800 Base cost $2,000 11 Washington St. ::,ut3.},w:x.?vr::n::•}.?;:,. .: .}}}:v:}}}i::.}.,.... •nY.i•\:•?::G::•?:{:.:;?^}?;::Y••,?•",;::i pipe size Fin.) 8 Base cost $2,000 12 N. Geneva St. pipe size fin.) 111-112 7 70 200 $14,000 ter; Base cost $2,000 13 Tioga St. pipe size (in.) 311-309 6 60 _400 $24,000 52 Base cost ME $2,000 Page 2 NEWCOST2.XLS # Street Manhole Depth Cost/LF Length Cost 14 Woodcrest Ave, pipe size fin.) _339-343 5 60 185 ��:i};�::xv.vr w Si\r ..n•(=•T.::�?5!?.7,..K:.K:h•:4:Y:.K{•fi::v i-y-..:•n\.a.v-v;--'y.',,y'.:::-iy.:a;i:. l;:ii^:}y:iM1i::'..y:::::::1i3S:v.a.-:'p",Stv.y`+'.::.5X>•f:${{:,.::e i.;,,•t.,•{Y,:•T..ro:,%i:{:i' 4i:i:•{ $1.•.y11,100 mg, 0 :ry: {-g-ai 8 ..y - � - �� - :.::... ;;:j,:.,;.:..,....=5.s;:;; „a.�.sa..•:A:".:tti, ::.ci,•.,..w»•,,,�;�.�:dao:;-,...x,. :aca•:a:w:;«w»-...:::••,{.:ccafi:;.�:;.-:.,.�,..,...: Base cost $2,000 15 Wyckoff Ave. pipe size {in.) 62-61 3 60 225 $13,500 56-51 3 60 200 $12,000 Base cost $2,000 16 N. Cayuga St. .:......... .:.: ;$ pipe size On.) .... 3-•24"7..::.. ;,.•:.;:•::::.::::.:::•:::3'_�:::.::.:::::. Base cost $2,000 17 N. Tioga St. pipe size fin.)8 130-132 8 80 330 $26,400 Base cost $2,000 18 Linn St. _ .wn�.:�.:ty�x+.:•s,,.�,;.x:,;.r:.:;;;.,::;:;:;.;:`,,:yam••-�'.`-:' ^:.>:r:...;.�.+...x_.,;...w.•i��.•rryy.; :q+`,2Y..-..:�..�y;...-,..ti r,s„•.,::,,:,��y.,��...yfj��x_ pipe sus fn.) 8 345-346 7 70 -330 A $23,100A Base cost $2,000 19 Eastwood Ave.* pipesize (in.) ":-•...,,....,--,,. •i.iz; :,,,,...K;ii;3;,;.:«{i,,;.;.ivii.:i;iix-».�::.w.vk.,. . ,x.,,�„ ;...,. 6 324-335 6 60 250 $15,000 L ”{:: K-' \ ,. Y''M " Base cost $2.000 20 Eastwood Ter, pipe size (in.) 347-350 4 60 115 _...:_............... $•6,900 2<" 00 Base cost $2,000 21 Stewart Ave. pipe size (in.) 359-356 5 60 290 $17,400 7 Base cost � ��m $2,000 22 Hook PI. pipe size (in.) 219-220 4 60 210 $12,600 ...... ♦�':::'::::?1 :.,-.--•:.v-:..v:n:•n:,;: •i:{•'+:'i�iii:9:-::i ti�:::i:-ii .'. is is is i.0::::.:iii:L' 7 Y. ...:::::..:..... .......:�:...............,...... :.:::,}}Y:;;{b'n•\.:,q•.x,�-........,,,... ...... ..:..:.r�:;:v.Y.....,x..v.,v.w.•..w:: <v'':i:;:::::•:;.i-.:'i.::.:A,..::ii�w;.;:.::,vvn!.'. 221-222 4 60 215 x$12,900 Base cost $2,000 Page 3 NEWCOST2.XLS # Street Manhole Depth Cost/LF Length Cost r 23 Bryant Ave. pipe size i xe"...,..,..,.M,...•..w......w r:='•- �'"•..a.3Sl37oc:-3..?.J.w_tt..v.,x....�.a�Su�c�.,a,.�..x:M:w:. :'•:wa:..-...Ydci±:..:..,.. 6 166-167 6 80 165 $13,200 gy ...,.....:..:a.:s....�,::�.....c;,c:; .:..:"Ec;M,sa:,sawW�,,:a:,a,ay.,,,a„,...,taa..aw:-x......w.v„�::• ----•-•' �. ;;::: 175-177 6 80 315 H $25,200 Base cost $2,000 24 Elmwood �4}%nix•.i'.i'-.w:i.<.::::..:.Y..?:{. ,u}M}byM':yv-,?4:C ?:K^N:;}:4i}:nvn..vxwr...} ::\:C?}?:�.±.•:.:...\i..nv.}•m-.•n•:. XX pip 1 e size in _ ::.Fes. ...1•.. :::\•. 6 180-181 6 60 340 $20,400 Base cost $2,000 25 E. Falls ie size (in.) # < ? s 244-221 6 60 265 $15,900 :h:.:.}•.v:.,\.:v-.}vn.•:vn\<^:-> -. };n+%,!h}Yn,:Q,C:..v:.}:?t�\}NJ}}'-;„+^^:{:Y:;.n.::.:” r..J]:^`..x•.v.-n•. n:nX:::.}u±:3':::..}x±eR.•.�,.p,..n•.•,v.. .,,w.,,...x::m,MLCi •. .,,vw.W„Wv:::.w.W1,.,V:-:,1Miti„W.�wiJ.i•v:J\,+„�\`.l:v,,... 227-228 6 60 300 $181000 ..j`..':�::a?:c::.±":,:::u.•:::.-.' :::a::::-,,t..w.aaacka.,a..a:aw'+t�.,V,,,,a,M.,m vcu,:t.,,Aw'a'v-a.ciWa wwa::u. :ua.:c:v.�'A:"±:::`,:oas:....� :. Base cost 52,000 • 26 The Knoll pipe size (in.) 6 380-381 6 60 190 $11,400 (See note 5) Base cost $2,000 TOTAL COST $1,188,300 Notes: 1. A#measurements are in feet. 2. A mobilization base costs ($2000) should be added to each street. 3. When unknown ("), a depth of six feet is assumed. 4. Cost per linear foot (Cost/LF] includes laterals. 5. The Knoll was added to his list because of the high number of calls to #102 (Delta Chi fraternity]. The problem could be in their feeder line, rather than the main. This issue should be further researched prior to construction. Page 4 ,t { Prioritization Matrix PRIORITY STREET PROBLEhIS COST 51004 (INIanhote #) A B C D E F G City Contractor 1 Elmira Rd. (173-158-157- X 156,158-159) 2 E. York St. (247-248-249) X X X X 3 W.Falls St. (201-202-203- X X X X X 204) 4 S. Corn St. (90-91,107-108) X 5 N. Titus Ave. (132-133- X I41) 6 S. Titus Ave. (51-52-53-54) X X X X X 7 E. Buffalo St. (129-130- X X 131) __r 8 E. Court St. (144-I47-148) X 9 Delaware Ave. (159-160- X 161-164) 10 Cornell St. (318-338-336- X X X 337-324) 11 Washington St. (31-33) � X 12 N. Geneva St. (111-112- � X X 113) 13 Tioga St. (311-309-307) X 14 W oodcrest Ave. (339- X 343-347) 15 Wyckoff Ave. (62-61-56- X 51) Problems A: Inadequate slope for drainage/dip in pipe. B: Severly cracked/crushed pipe. C: Open/offset joints. D: Moderately cracked pipe. E: Heavy root build-up. F: Heavy grease/debris build-up. G: Problem evident but cause unknown (no tape). 3 . - �l . Prioritization, page 2 PRIORITY STREET PROBLEMS COST S1000 (Manhole #) A B C D E F G C I Contractor 16 N. Cayuga St. (243-247) X 17 N. Tioga St. (130-132) X 18 Linn St. (3.4A-345-346) X X X 19 Eastwood Ave. (322-324- X 335,347-348) 20 Eastwood Ter. (347-350- X 351) 21 Stewart Ave. (359-356- X 355) 22 Hook Pl. (219-220-221-222) X X 23 Bryant Ave. (168-166-167- X X 175-177) 24 Elmwood (179-180-181) X 25 The Knoll (3s-39-4o41) X Problems A: Inadequate slope for drainage/dip in pipe. B: Severly cracked/crushed pipe. C: Open/offset joints. D: Moderately cracked pipe. E: Heavy root build-up. F: Heavy grease/debris build-up. G: Problem evident but cause unknown (no tape). S-HIST-S.XLS Cost of Supplementary Sewer Construction . ; (Based on Historical Documentation) « Street Segment Depth Cost/LF Length Cost }a• v.:ti}; >w - >.. ::t.•x•..... ...:.......•:.,,.r.•r:a.},;..:::,,,,?. :.r>:e.ty>x}:<>}:,.>}-{.;.x;,.tr,.xrx:,M..,,.h 4•..,: , •x"'`•"=F:"----- 5',`;.',#.g'g. tik. }:a+KC r?.A�h•4C:w.,}.v.}:iM;nnn}:;?:::.v:.v::......:....n. ..n.h r.::v.•.n:.-r...,v:::r.{,?}:::..4-:•x,••::-}....x....v,.v\•:+S.:.w::::::,:.... }.... •;•..., .}.••w:::h•::. n.............t.v..4;T.>.:,..,v.,•}., ..v...... u::}{,Sa.;.:.-v.-Lii:v: Vy/i}vi}•. r ...la :. ......... ::?:::::::::+y::::.x:i•}::.:..... .. ..... ......f.4:•.v:........::.. .. v.4•.:4..r. .. x....,,..:v:v:•.:.:::.......v,.:�..va�S::: :}C.:..:.�,.0 i'}$;l.`:v,K.4;--Kv e.2�,'4 a{v,"wv::. i. ..... .. ..w.r.:.... :......•tr}.v.:............... :vv::a v.-,:}^x•.avv,•};':•u:::::.w::...:.... .:{.}x?:4}:}}:{-:H.rv> ..:::'r�'i v::'vrr},.- ..:�. :................::-Y?.::9..:n>:•t:,..•}�.v ... :v:.vrr.{i v:{.}}Y;.}:!.......r,.......u3%J' ,. {. •k�ia w 1 .�I.«�1V�;.�,V�.}:.}}:iii.:::•>?}::.:,.,..}::.,.<�: <.}x..... r..,..ttr:>tt., � ..;�.:.:.::.:..:........::.....:......................}.�:..a-,.,,:, •::::`:�r..:.....r:.,...:::•:-}.:_::r.:{.;? .....: _}::.:?t.,..-.r.4ir:.•:?::}:' .... G::�'''"',,,�a�,-r:e•;,•:::ri:< :;�aw.,{,-t:�tt;• :-„.w.,�MM.�E's•.M.c�we>"t.�w..: _ .::..,,-::.,:-.a-.,4-::::.,•:.:,•:::.,,.:. .t->,a..._.a.,,.a.afi3`;ta•.t{4t• .. '}'<?=`i;£':: h.:.....::. pipe size: 10 in. Geneva to Plain 6 60 900 $54,000 ..,,:ay..va...,«.n} ,?::•v:::}},{:nn.v. v............. .....}..;..-.. .:;... ........-::...::::::::::.:�}}::r.}•-::::.v::::.v::.v x.;t. .n.................v.. ., ...:....v:.;?•?i::w:::n;v}. .:v.:-:,,....-,.......v:::::r•......... .nv ...... ...,......yv:........ :::::w::•::vn- - ?v. ... .........:.:............. .....,vv:•::,.v. ,}:-.v:...................+:.....•.:.v:::a•::nv.•n:w:v. ... ....... rr-:Ax::. w:.:..:.v:.v:}:(t: :.rah.. _ k�yyr -:. -•.v.vv:;..;:--.:::::•:::,..:.r....,t,?}}$x:-} :xv,.::v::•:::::::::::.::v.`.:,}:_:•vt::;-:.-:, ..v:•.�••:.i.?:n::>v::.:v::.:v:•.....v....x:.vrt-..v 2 :�: :saFS..v�'.t•::nv::;a:r:.::v-.-.,...... }........ ........,vvnv-::.ar:.... v:v:>v:,•:i•:...:vvv::iy:.}v:}},v.: -.- v-l.M:...ti}:?”v,Yaah,-}.,.a.:_SJJ::- ' n.__-}v+]„A'tii{.:..v pipe size:8 in. S. Plain to Albany 6 60 500 $30,000 ....r ......... ,.gin,.: ..t.�.t ....v,...a ........ .t. ... ..::::-n...nvn}.... .........n...n.,....a.4....n,n....., ...:r...}.}::, .x...... ... ...,....................... ...... . . .... .....................................:.....:• ...-.......,.....,:.: ...:.........::..-.:.:}:.,•.:a•::::::;:.,•t:.a-:n•r. :isrr-':•rf;::ik;''t?;:;:?5ry; :: t _.. ...............«.................:,....: n..._.......v............... .........:-::r:...........•:... :.........._........ :v......•.v•--: r.'r}'; :-ri:is;:v:;;:;:ii;vC":ilr`:.`Y'iati-0 a}?: 3 .�}av}���xa..Rd ........... ..::r..........,.,... a-............................. -ra:: . .........., .::::::.....:.::.:�- .::,.r{:i.}..a:..{:;.,.. r..,...�--- n...:•.:!.'...:,..::...t:...+t::.-.v::::.v:L;v....:...,..h..n-..... ,:v::.y.,..:... .,..:.;...:w:.«:v:- a ,,:.:...::r:,tv:.vrl.Li .v.... xs ._.,. i •enaa,Lw•.,v.,..t-.vvattv::.bx.v..:.::::.,-.v.,.•:.,,4x,,:,x„xvr.:.. -nv....:a4.,atii:;:::v....v_vv.n.._a.\:n�:�:::.Jry iaa.,vv .?}•vr-v:;:::::vi{{}+Ti$X :,-.a SaR.+..a;v:::�i: it4:i ::_••�':r ..,W. pipe size:8 in. Behind Ithaca Plaza 8 80 350 $28,000 -:;-}:v::4}}::'•:G:}},};{... }}t:.} xx.;'}t--,?:fi:.:vi'v,aM1:;Krw .vY;ti?}::-'.'v.•^:tw;n}�vn"y,."?�ny_ ••n,•:waaa,•.a„•:.,+:,a•::.,t,+,•.x,:>,:a,^.,:-::•.w:::,,,• •n,:• :v:va}?,n,:.;{.>vw.v.:•:.•.;{.,,,•;.}?},vr{.;wv,,.> •:. ter.:::::v-t�x�,,.e.r. �} M' .,.. ..............,,Y,}.:mac,}} ..::•:.,:}:•}:;•}:^x}:•}:YS•: :.}.:0:8: `,x}Set:•::>}:o-Q}:''ryy,:::}i:x_}}:•;xt-r _ _:r`�;v{x_:;t�:'vr .� :.:..:::-,:.-.......r,:•:{t• ::r:.>a:, ..,........ ..nrrn::x??ri:�:.,:?v:-::..... 'r.:•:-xix::.�.:>.t44..��}+ .. ....... .; .;..., .......:1.,r..................... i•••:... •:n•.,...:._r.,.....n.........:},,:?:::::.,-o:`r:;;-�:t-'#'}:> :...:=53: 2=5i:: � :?i:::� }':- .}>:...:i' 1 :�.::�FQ...i�..,�� :.,....,4...:.r•.;.;:,:,,.,.;;... ...,.......:...t..i:: :.;.? w{>••r ..., ..,.,, r.wa, w..aa,av- a. w}ia .�:..:, �. 8 yaaFiS:ia:/waw. SaUa:,4+u„axa:id:;•:�:ia:::is::::a:{;6�i:�•iay..aws:a;auK..: ,:rc:-0�:.�,�:a:,.\:.;:::;S:i.�:;:a;a?sa;.w.a.''''Cv:.:.i:•o}: ;io:":.xi<.::.:",••: I100 $O { pipe size: 12 in. Cornell to City line 6 M80 ,0t/0 .,~ .,,,t,,.v,x,-w.4,,,. •„>r,>w.::,.,w,,::,•.w ax,44,Mx4 .t 4t 1 - - K,`v..\.v•w.•,a_".,....;,.w...in.:.A.,•..,.._,".,,...v•>x:...\\;;•:.........,.:.:,-:vh.t.r.a...v4....:..n1::v.:.:n..�.x•..::.n:.:v.:,.,.:...:..`,..r..?v....:..vv...v-..nt.r...?...^v...-..h.,.}.{........- ,iv.-i..r-�n..{.:t..n••7v`:.�.J.v>:•.K-..,..:vr.n•vr..,.\a.•v._.'.•..•w..-.,v•.-.-.�...-,.:t.•-{,u.,”;.•?;..:..."::{..:{n.r..!r.ir.}..,}..i.ia}.„:•.}.-r..:,:'-•:.:-::.::::::v::i..x,}a}:..:::e. .v}:::n:r:YJ•?.?ivi}:.G:^i}iv•h:r':} .. : iti}{ aRlxit5 � . \ ; ia :vn pip size:8 in. 300 block (rock) 6 70 v{,�:;.:•}n-:':• >:i:as::vJf-'<::ixtt'v?n:}«:.i.'r.,�F.2.n._i..Svn_?1h:Y..vY1x:3��'...:'?:.-.}{.�?.r..:.;:.aw'•..Y.n.:;W.Y.,id?.J+-h.%%.;}:.i:_ii-- ..� 450 $31,500 v:nw-r,•,•. •.vnv...::::.Y••4Y•ri-}:vn+:,v:*%IX.}nx}}7>. ?}:•{.}-.Y.xriw.v.;.:>v..,...:•:.,,:..a... •xvnw.veyC:; .....tnn�Y-.....{h>.;\ .. t.....x._. w 'Qx:.•:n• w....a:;:-- ::}}n;::}tin•}x-v:}.-v :ri?i::::•fi``::_isYi::4::i;::S4i_:;�:i:} :;:-':}: ..-,-.-...t,.n.a. =•.n, x.v.....n..,....:.. ....... _....-t.. x-,v:-•:�-;.::x}ri:�:'v•. }j;{.} ...................:.....:...,.::.moi}: :?} ............ ............. ....n:...::•.:,..,-:::::::}sx:•t>x:•,�•::,v-:.t_>:••::;n..n:: -..-.-.,n ,•.}:c:,.;?- --}}}r}:}}::<}:>ai�:..:r:a;'y::?}•;`s .................v...........n.....w::::.v.... ,.._.a.::n::::;:.v............” awaKa';;,.,.,., ,,.....:...........:vw::''ii;iiaii 'i:' ;a,xt.,,,�..,a;,a,....+r.,x.,+.,a,,,,,a.,,,,,,,,ti,:aaaxat, .,7a.,,,..�.,x,.,,.,,.,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ii. .,•„ , , ••a•. 4 , ,..,.:.. - .;:`x;i- a,:ii v} :tC::""'tiiiiKw:.x .,.,. pipe size:8 in. 6 60 900 $54,000 i ' „}\:: ;e}}x}};.v.; .ri}\,n,•CpaV'.i}}ate'e" -nwnw�tv., vw. .•::,w:vn:v-xw.t„x-nvw wrn:• :n,,,vnv•:v•:n,•::.,v:.v.vun-w.•a Yr+ty •-•• .},??;+•::,?'::?ti:-::-... .:;?::.v:•:::p?}}x, ............}::....{. ..v.;.....Cv...................+X4•..... .... ..r..v n...........,+.n....>.,n,}.. .,:v;}}}Y•.}%:?..a...v...vv..:::n':-:•i: ........ :}:.,•;.;;.:;:.v:.•, :•:x:`:'•:?}•}:•: � :•:�•xri:::•::vn ....-..v............Nnt......�}..........\.........4...,.....v... ....n,.n...... .........:.::...:.t..}};.�.t^}r\..t ............. ::.x:tnv� .-.. ............. .....................n....\....- ..............xv::.......v ....:v-.v:::•:w.v-:w:.:v::::::•::-p C•;:.,x•.r:, ;eve i;.ht•.v.•.t••.v: :.... :r...:•,..•:.. .........vn„w:^v::n:4::, .,._:,,--1._..,::,,-:h^:.v.:..:?.,-::}i..... , :r\:: ....:.r.,v,4.v:n:::n:,v,a:v.•.,,-:.-x.}.:n•.,t:.:.Y^:i... .:,t;..,}{9,, . ?:,: ,,. .;x-:•::........x„.... ......,n-.}...................a..._..,.._..4,,,n..x:r:..:-.gin........,....,..,. -......a..,..t.....«...- :...:..:}':.r,t?:.:..: :ifi?t:: •.:v;,,}.:}};.},:::.,:2,:}r. t..... ne•..,•. nr 7 x•-xax .x+.• .r.. %:;til:»iivv:::.,..x,\,W.vxlvn4t,a:v2xv,,,.::}:iivi%•:;; {4}waxvn�.,x{vxv«v- nv.. :.... ..a. vva, r., }..:...::r4, pipe ;i' .. ,.,- --:r.,,n:.....;; ...r. ,na,w.n„ 4- a,,, 4 i e size:8 in. 500 block 6 60 500 $30,000 . }::x.}y.. .4a>•r:,x,•.:xv:.;.;;n?ax•.:4,v,,:v.:„vn,tt ..:,,v..r ;?:x;,ax,vt:::.:nyt:vn•.x:4:vna •.i}x... +}ti.. }{� v,:v::w:--:•.:..: u::4•:n:v:::::::n. .•n•::: •:.•rr:::::.:::{::::v�r.v:•.:..t ...-.:.. ........., i,i-:fi:}:}:i ..:.a.:..... :. .. :�,.,..4:x:-:vn.•.,::::............... ...2..,r:•.5.::.:-:::...::..:........ ..._ :,.r'i}ii}:i{iv:?.:ii:}?ti'v: i:}i: Y. ,....::•::::,. ... • F.!.+.. ..............�..►.. .....-................4..........,at..........................t,,.......,,n...t....:::r.....::::::.,.......�:..........:.::.>...:::{...:. ::::K;: 2;:ura:::;r'::,•;•,.<.i<;i±;•,.. .... ,..,,........,•,..,, ......... ....0... .,,.a•,..�:"w.ta.,,'vx,.,;,....K{;... ;;;;;;::r.,....c•:.,.::.:: :'•,,.,, ,.vt „�., a Es: ,:Ka\. ,,,.na xaa;,..av\W�:a,.t -,,:,:,,:,•';'-:.,..;,..a..,,,,,,,,t..w.a,,..v,:. .:.,a.,, o.,,,,:a:,:t•.1...,.•:'",- .,n,,,, ...:...:i... ,,. >,. r ,. pipe size:8 in. 209 Richard 6 60 �80a �$4,800w x;Y.: x}T:^,}};•}}:-}xa:t?4}:•}3}:• - tY.S:;}x}w,.:}\'},;•}}Tx;n«n :r_v::-aa, .v nvwn•.v.Nvvvn v:+>x4.n-:.vx-.v•n,v•:va:•- ?.•w,v::rrx:::v.•.:v,,,,:,,vvv.v.,,,. nvt}v;.v-.:-}},,:4... =,v:::•n..:,v:v::-:}::v+:.:iA•,,}„}};.,:.::1v,4;4. .................. ::,.vn-.a-.xt:v.:.:.ty:r:::n,v:.:::n:-r::u::rrv::.v:.•:n-:::xv::::: :nv:h:.,a.:r:.v:w::::.,w::::::rw:::_,v.:wr:..,..nv.:o ..•••••.. ••....••. •.•.....••tt,:,,ahntiii;inJ:4 pipe size:8 in. 139 Linn 6 60 50 $3.000 .?,vnvvv.n-.xvv.::vnx•... ,w:nw.v:-,..a,t:vv.:a,,,va,,,,ay. -.,,a:-..-:nuavn,a,v-v xv-v - .y ....... .a........... ..}}..... ..-............... ........ ...............,...::.r...::.:vr..,,.wn, w.,w:x, x,att::::;•:•:}}}:}}:••.:v• 1 C ?A gy ;:?:: :ei _,.,a.....,.,,:•;.:..,,.,,,w. ., ... as-...r:..::,- ..a:.„ ,.a,,..:-.,,,t:a,.aa,.a,,,a.,,:..,. ......t ... .....:.,.::..i,>•. - pipe size:8 in. Highland to Dearborn 6 60 650 $39,000 11 . ... ....... ....................:....... .......n,............................a...,._,.,aa,...,..,,..4. .a.a.,a........,.:-......---..,............. ,,,.n ,.:............. .....,. ... ,. -...... i; pipe size:8 in. Ithaca to Elmwood 6 60 850 $51 000 .......... ................................... ..... ..................... ... ..... ... .....::.........:•::v::•e.................: ..;.;....... .-.......::.....-... :ri.:;':rte�' ,a,,, n pipe size: 12 in. Valley to 966 E. State 6 80 700 $56,000 a.. v... .,.v.,.V�v.vv.,..wva.:::.v.n.a•v.,.,,.p..:r•.a«.a.a-..a.,,.t.;n..,ay.}n}w:....x,a,t:.},,•:. :-..,.ax4..w..,:r.vm.::.•.v v.t.•.a,.vnw:n_,,iv,,m...x.,v,vt.v.a.v...,.a{„,,.a.xnnwn..x�.,a:,.:.::.:::.,",:. �}:xmovwn.:.......,.: :.yn>:..}.:}-.}a-. r..,..r..}.a.....a-i} : -...:............ .....— ........ ..a1 : , pipe size: 12 in. Sunrise north 6 70 900 $63,000 ?.r.+vu.,+,v,:avnvw.wrnt};vr::nxy„v>:.:;:.:n':{.;rvnv;,,v•.},•:: w:::•::::v.;:n+a,hvn::;;:va•{.;::;.•n:{x.v:{.:n.:.}:�}:i:,:.vn:.v::.,..v:rw:::..:,}:?tina::,•a?xxt:v:•:}::•• ::.4.:. 14 ......:........:: �J///� ...\ .,..........; aa..n.n,n.v....,........a. .n, C' .........:...::4x:.... .......:::•,.:t.. ,vv'•:J:3: x..,, Im,v:.,.: 'Clinton .:vitt{.;\•4:•{.:;••.;w>MtWiw+'nw.i.Y,,:.>.,,..:i-?'waw,-.:aaw.•.,.... :.:xw,..wr..nway.,.,,. ”,-::-::..rn.. •a:. „�Maw.xax pipe size:8 in. Clintonnorth 8 80 600 $4$,OOOY Page 1 J 7i ! S-HIST-S.XLS .i Street Segment Depth Cost/LF Length Cost ::f.:�34: ,Ct,v.,•., w..:: :..uvuuvv..^.'u:::.v. ^:ww.}Y^:xixd.Y-..a!M}N}: :s. .f.:l.. i 15 ......... ....... � ataaw:ibtiakr vb w:.•ww.,:,-^tu..,.:-w�.uw}:w.......v.,��..�....t„•...:Y.c...aw.,�.a,..:^i'... ,,..�.:„:,�u£o;.fs'6:::;:.:.i:�.:a::jwx:: •:•:i:;;w'G;'f<}•o:}.Mi:: :,iiit<:isL'>cb::':i;i:::c':: :y:>�:�; pipe size:8 in. Aurora up 10 100 900 $90,000 TOTAL COST $670,300 -7 .1- .4. Notes: 1. A#distances measurements are in feet. `J 2. A mobilization base costs ($2000) should be added to each street. 3. When unknown (`), a depth of six feet is assumed. 4. Cost per linear foot (Cost/LFJ includes laterals. 5. Dollar amounts are based on 1994 values. a f j• 1 Page 2 OF IT$q CITY OF ITHACA 1 James L. Gibbs Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 f yc�,�`••.. `00 YOUTH BUREAU �RA7E0 Telephone: 607/273-8364 Fax: 607/273/2817 TO: Members of the Ithaca Youth Bureau Advisory Board, Board of Public Works, Parks Commission, and Common Co�ncil FROM: Sam Cohen, Ithaca Youth Bureau Director ,Os--.-- RE: Cass Park Rink Task Force Report DATE: August 7, 1997 Last year the Ithaca Youth Bureau requested an energy savings capital project at Cass Park Rink. Common Council_ requested that a task force be formed to take a close look at Cass Park and to make recommendations for the future of the rink before making a decision on the energy project. F1lclosed you will find the result of that ef'ort. The Cass Park Rink'Task Force worked long and hard and concluded with the stronll conviction that the rink serves a very important role in the community life and shoufa continue to function as a public rink for the overall good of the community. The Task Force is asking you for fall support of its recommendations and that we move ahead wi;h the energy savings capital project. Task Force members will review the report with each of the groups listed above at the appropriate meetings. We look forward to working with you all on the future of Cass Park Rink. "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." C�� { CASS PARK RINK TASK FORCE REPORT August, 1997 I. Summary The Cass Park Rink Committee strongly and unanimously recommends the continuation of the Cass Park Rink as a public facility. The Cass Park Rink is an important and valuable community resource and as a public facility has the flexibility of fully serving the community. Public skating is very important to the community. It is through public skating that it is possible to reach out to children and families and provide a valuable, healthy, low cost family recreational service. H. Background The Cass Park Rink committee, composed of. Phil Dankert (Recreation Partnership Board); Larry Baum (Ithaca Youth Hockey Association); JoAnn Cornish (Recreation Partnership Board, Ithaca Parks Commission); Al Smith(Board of Public Works); Rick Ferrel (Asst. Superintendent,Department of Public Works); Tim Little (Ithaca City School Board); Michael Thomas (G.I.A.C.);Rich Armstrong (I.H.S. Hockey Coach); David Delchamps (Chair, IYB Board of Advisors);Deb Traunstein (IYB Board of Advisors); and Dale Aumick(Over 30 Hockey)was established by the Ithaca Youth. Bureau Advisory Board in the late fall of.1996. The Committee met over a period of six months to evaluate the operation of the Cass Park Rink and to look at the possibilities of closing the rink, privatizing the rink or recommending changes in the operation of the rink. The people on this committee,representing the interest of the skating community in Ithaca, the taxpayers of Ithaca and the public at large have a very strong interest in meeting the needs of the youth of our community. The charge given to this group was fairly simple. What should the City of Ithaca do with the Cass Park Skating Rink? III. The Value of Cass Park Rink to the Community 1) Use of Cass Park Rink Cass Park Rink has been heavily used by a variety of groups and is able to focus on community needs. Cass Park Rink.supplies free admission to appropriate groups, such as: G.I.A.C., Southside, City Housing projects,Recreation Mainstreaming Services, One- to-One, Paul Scheurs Memorial Program,Northeast Elementary School, Fall Creek Elementary School,Enfield Elementary School, South Hill Elementary School, Beverly J. Martin Elementary School, Cayuga Heights Elementary School; Belle Sherman Elementary School, Alternative Community School, Dewitt Middle School, Boynton Middle School,Caroline Elementary School, Trumansburg Elementary School, L.E.A.H. (homeschoolers), Immaculate Conception School, Trumansburg Elementary School, Montessori, B.O.C.E.S.. -1- P 41,980 people skated at Cass Park Rink during the 1996-97 ice skating season. This included more than 10,000 free admissions, almost 95% of whom were children. The free admission policy has many benefits: a) Introduction to ice skating for those who would otherwise not be able to afford it. Many new users will continue to skate as a life long activity. b) Many families become regular users of Cass Park Rink. c) The City gains revenues through skate rentals and concession purchases. d) Cass Park Rink provides a positive outlet for pre-teens and teens. In addition, tens of thousands of people came to watch the skating, the adult hockey league, and youth hockey and other activities. 2) Because of Cass Park's location, within the City, transportation costs for City groups are minimal. Groups can often make arrangements with TCAT for special bus trips. Local school groups (classes), not having much money for field trips, are able to afford Cass Park. 3) New activities, including Friday night Rock and Skate and birthday parties, have been very popular and bode well for future programming. 4) Improvements at Cass Park, including bleachers and wind screen, combined with its location, will keep Cass Park popular in the future. 5) The Ithaca Youth Bureau and the Ithaca City School District have had non-written informal agreement for more than 25 years which allows both organizations to use each other's facilities at no charge. For example; the I.Y.B. is allowed to use the entire high school facility for its sports camp (6 weeks during summer); the I.Y.B. uses the high school pool for family swim and lifeguard tests, in addition to the gym, space at both Dewitt and Boynton Middle Schools, and the elementary schools for playground programs in the summer. The I.Y.B. also uses the tennis courts at the high school for its annual tennis championships. The list goes on and on. The school district uses the ice rink for their hockey program. If they had to pay for the ice time .they use, this program might be eliminated or reduced. The school district also uses many fields at Cass. However,they also do maintenance on them, which saves the City time in preparing them each spring. If we started to charge each other for facilities, the losers would be children and families. 6) Cass Park Rink is a place where people from different parts of the community come together.. When you sit in the lobby during a prime skating session and look around at the youngsters and adults, you see a great variety of people from the community. 7) With the creation of the Recreation Partnership and its funding of Cass Park, almost the entire county has an interest in Cass Park. 8) Cass Park Rink works. Various users of the Cass Park Rink say that it does a great job.Quote from I.H.S. Hockey Coach: "Cass Park Rink is a first class facility. It's clean, the treatment of people is very good, staff are very helpful and professional, and the ice is very good quality." -2- y IV. Cass Park Rink Financial Situation 1) � 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 Expenses $288,209 $321,377 $325,197 $335,367 $342,114* Revenues $215,345 $243,143 $188,248 $178,041 $194,175 Rec Partnership Share $ 61,180 $ 61,180 $ 61,180 $ 70,200 $ 712400 City Share $ 72,864 $ 17,054 $ 75,769 $ 87,126 $ 76,530 *with energy savings project 2) The Cass Park Rink deficit is the LOWEST of all the rinks which were looked at by the committee. When calculated per capita, the cost is even lower. In conversations with people in the skating community and throughout the industry, it was agreed that ice skating rinks and the programs they offer are community assets, which add to the quality of life within a community. Although each rink and its associated programs are different, most share a common thread. Each rink is serving the needs of the community; subsidizing operations through tax dollars is standard practice. ■ The municipal rink in Massena operates at a deficit of$100,000.00 per-year. (They have municipal electric and pay only$18,000.00 for energy—most rinks spend $50,000.00 - $75,000.00 for energy). ■ The municipal rink in Clayton operates at a deficit of$135,000.00 per year ($78,000 for energy). (See appendix D). ■ The municipal rink in Geneva operates at a deficit of approximately $100,000.00. This figure would be higher if the parks and recreation director's salary was added in since this person is also the rink manager. She has been there more than 25 years(see appendix B). ■ The municipal rink in Auburn (almost identical to.our complex—rink, pool, tennis—built with federal and state dollars in 1973) operates at a deficit. The deficit for both the rink and pool operation is approximately $168,000.00 (See appendix Q. ■ The Ice Skating Institute of America(I.S.I.A.) did a survey of ice skating facilities back in 1989. This survey shows that the vast,majority of skating rinks in the country operated at a deficit in 1989. (Spreadsheet available). ■ "The Rink" in Lansing, as per Andy Sciarabba, is projecting a deficit for 1997 of$70,000.00, with the hope of a lesser deficit by the end of the year. Keep in mind that they are using volunteers instead of paid staff for most positions. 3) The Recreation Partnership and its participating communities (Towns of Ithaca, r. Caroline, Danby, Ulysses, Enfield, Groton, Dryden, Villages of Cayuga Heights and Village of Lansing) now give to the City of Ithaca over $100,000 for the operation of Cass Park, more than $60,000 of which is designated for the ice rink. An agreement has been reached for calendar years 1997, 1998, 1999 for continued funding. 4) The reconstruction of the Octopus intersection has had a negative impact on business and will continue thru 1997. Once completed, access to Cass Park will be markedly improved: 5) The new one year old rink in Lansing has had a short term negative impact on our business. Ultimately it will have a positive effect. The ice skating business is elastic and with more ice time available, business will grow. This is already starting to happen. 6) In April of 1996, the Board of Public Works transferred the maintenance of Cass Park and the maintenance of the Alex Haley Pool to the Youth Bureau. Savings in the operations budget of Cass Park are starting to be seen and will increase. 7) The energy costs associated with the operation of the Cass Park Ice Rink(and the pool indirectly) have risen to the point where something must be done. For calendar year 1997 Cass Park has $80,000 budgeted for utilities. Two options exist for the City-to reduce its energy usage at Cass Park. The first is an energy project consisting of new rink lighting, a few new motors, a smart drive(computerized energy savings device), and a wind screen around the rink. This is projected to save the City approximately$23,000.00 a year in energy costs. The estimated cost of bonding this project over 10 years is $1,8,000 a year. The 2nd possibility is the conversation of our energy usage from electric to natural gas. At this time there are no cost-saving projections, as this possibility has just presented itself. 8), Cass Park faces a major expense in the future for a rink floor chiller replacement of approximately$350,000.00. The rink floor, which is 25 years old, could last another year or another 20. There will be warning signs approximately one year prior to its needing to be replaced: To date, there have been no warning signs: V. New Directions for Cass Park Rink ■ Transportation—more frequent busing would make the Cass Park Rink even more Available to the community. It would be helpful to have regular busing during the week stopping at Cass Park as well as special buses on weekends. ■ Modified Youth Hockey—many youngsters cannot afford the full youth hockey program and are more interested in a less competitive program. The Youth Bureau can work with the Ithaca Youth Hockey Association to make the program more available and less competitive or develop a new modified hockey program and help defray expenses by building sponsorships for the program. ■ Target Middle School and High School students with special programs and special busing arrangements. ■ Continue to develop group events—piggy back on the already successful birthday parties and Friday-night rock with other kinds of parties for groups. Reach out to -4- fraternities and sororities. Generally encourage all kinds of groups to use the facility for special group events at special group prices. ■ Put on special shows and events including a winter carnival, figure skating, fun clown activities, etc. ■ Build early morning and late night usage through college intra murals, close work with senior citizen groups, and other local groups. ■ Work in close cooperation with the new rink including: regularly getting together for brainstorming and cooperative scheduling, renewing figure skating in the community, co-sponsoring tournaments and special activities, co-sponsoring and coordinating instructional activities, and generally working together to build ice skating in the community. ■ Continue improvements to the facility. Look into the possibility of extending the roof line down on the rink,'enclosing the ends and adding more seating around the rink. VI. The Need for Different Rinks ■ A single rink cannot fully serve the entire community(Lynch Rink is not included as a full community provider because of its limited service hours to the community). The reason the second rink was created was because of the increased demand for skating. With two rinks it is possible to serve the community as it needs to be served. Since the creation of a second rink Cass Park Rink has been heavily utilized. ■ The Board of Trustees and staff of The Rink in Lansing strongly support the need for two surfaces and the continuation of Cass Park Rink. The initial effect of the opening of"The Rink in Lansing was a decrease in attendance and revenues. However,there has been an upswing in the second half of the 1996-97 season. For the first time in 20 years ice time was available for group rentals. Of course, it took time to get the word out to the community,but now there is a growing demand_ for ice rentals from groups within the community. All the members of our committee, along with other local skating"experts", hold the view_that the presence of the two rinks, and even the creation of a third surface at the right.time, will have a very positive effect on the interest in skating and hockey. In the case of ice rinks and-skating demand is definitely elastic. More public skating hours leads to more families skating. Time available for figure skating, special.clinics and teaching skills leads to more skaters. Time available for group use leads to increased hockey usage and special events both from within and outside.the community. Many hockey groups have approached both rinks for increased ice time. The.possibility of a third surface: "The Rink" in Lansing has discussed the possibility of building a second surface. They have stated that this project is many years in the future and will come as the result of the natural increase in demand previously discussed. A third surface would be an addition, at the right time, to Ithaca's place in the skating and hockey world, and would not adversely effect either of the existing rinks. -5- VII. Privatization of Cass Park Rink 1. While legally the rink could be privatized, there are many issues which would need to be addressed: a) Negotiations would have to be held with relevant labor unions. b) A law would have to be passed by the state legislature allowing the City to privatize. c) A bidding process would have to be worked out. d) Relationship between the operation of the rink and the pool: (1) The demand on the utility bills is set during the rink season —this bill is charged to the City 12 months a year. The pool utility charges are set by the rink (2) City staff work at Cass Park year round. (3) Maintenance and programs are operated year round. 2. In two cases where public rinks were privatized (Fulton and Rome, NY)the following happened: a) Price of skating dramatically increased b) There was a loss of control over the programming that was made available to the community. c) There was a loss of community involvement and commitment.. 3. If Cass Park were to be privatized, the approximately 10,000 people (mostly children) who now skate at no charge would likely no longer be served. VIII. Recommendations The Cass Park Rink Committee strongly and unanimously recommends that Cass Park Rink be continued asa public facility. Public skating is necessary in the community. It is through public skating that it is most possible to reach out to children and families and provide the best variety of low cost services and be most responsive to community need. A public rink is an important element of a happy healthy community life. In order to continue public skating the committee recommends the following: 1. Pursue the possibility of converting the refrigeration system from electric to natural gas. If this is not feasible, proceed with the cost saving energy project 2. Be prepared to do the full rink floor capital project. 3. Continue working on new program initiatives. 4. Develop a closer working partnership with"The Rink" at Lansing. -6- CITY OF ITHACA 906 EAST GREEN STREET ITHACA,NEW YORK 14860 COMMON COUNCIL TELEPHONE: (607)274-6570 To: Jane Marcham, Chair Budget&Administration Committee From: Susan Blumenthal, Chair Planning and Economic Development Committee Re: City/Rotary Community Beautification Awards Date: August 20, 1997 I have been working with the Rotary Club of Ithaca to develop an award program to recognize property owners who develop projects or take care of their properties in ways that enhance the physical appearance and quality of life in city neighborhoods and commercial areas. While the city currently faces many problems, there are many developers and property owners who are committed to maintaining and improving their properties,and take pride in ownership of buildings that sustain the city and make Ithaca a special place to live and work. These people deserve acknowledgment by our community as a way of expressing our appreciation. I am proposing that a Community Beautification Award program be jointly sponsored by the City of Ithaca and the Ithaca Rotary Club. This would be an annual award for projects in three categories: commercial projects, rental housing, and owner- occupied housing. Nominees will be judged by a joint committee of six persons, with equal membership from the Rotary and City of Ithaca. Possible City members will be drawn from the Common Council, Planning and Development Board, Urban Design Review Board, Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission, other related groups, and individuals who have demonstrated an interest in this type of activity. Award nominees will be solicited through media announcements to the general public and mailings to relevant interest groups such as neighborhood civic associations, the Landlords Association, etc. Optimally, the award would be announced in the spring of each year. This will give a wide field of candidates from the summer construction and home improvement season for the entire.previous calendar year. The goal is to award projects that have been developed during the previous year, but awards can be given for a candidate's consistent accomplishments over a period of years. Historic Ithaca.staff have been contacted and think this is a worthwhile project which will not overlap with their annual preservation awards issued in May. We will work with Historic Ithaca to coordinate scheduling of the awards so that each award program is maximized. 'An Equal Opportunity Employer with an Affirmative Action Program' Recycled Paper r The Rotary Club has enthusiastically endorsed this project. The choice of the Rotary Club as a partner in this endeavor was based on the Rotary's existing experience with their Pride of Workmanship awards which have been handed out for the past three years. Their Community Service Committee has agreed to work with the City in handling many of the details of the program. We envision that the awards will consist of plaques presented to the winners. The winners will be announced to the public and the awards given at a Rotary luncheon meeting. The Community Service Committee suggested that the program would cost approximately$600 to give two awards in the three categories. Therefore,I am requesting that the B and A Committee authorize up to$300 for the City's contribution to this project. This amount can be modified once the program is up and running. I would appreciate if you could put this item on the agenda for the B and A Committee so that the Common Council can discuss funding. This is a subject which has been of interest to me for quite some time and I hope that the committee will agree with the merits of this program. Please let me know if I can answer questions about this subject. cc: Shirley Egan Alan J. Cohen O7 ITt(,Q l/ CITY OF ITHACA 108 EAST GREEN STREET ITHACA,NEW YORK 14850 COMMON COUNCIL TELEPHONE: (607)274-6570 Sept. 2 , 1997 TO: Alan Cohen, mayor Common Council Dominick Cafferillo, city controller Leslie Chatterton, neighborhood planner Thys Van Cort, planning director Mary Tomlan, chair, City Landmarks Commission Patricia Kennedy, assistant city attorney Mariette Geldenhuys, city attorney FROM: Jane Marcham, chair, Budget & Administration Committee. RE: Historic Preservation Tax Exemption On Monday, Sept. 22, Common Council's B & A Committee will discuss adopting a local law that would provide tax exemption for historic properties, as permitted by newly adopted state legislation. This is our regular monthly B & A meeting, at 7:30 p.m. in Council chambers-. Since so many people are involved, the item will be first on our agenda. I 've invited Ed Franquemont of Historic Ithaca to attend and share his considerable knowledge of the issue with us. As Pat Kennedy's July 10 memo explained, we now have the option of passing a local law that allows tax exemptions for any increase in property value attributable to alterations or rehabilitation of landmarked property (including property located in _historic districts, of which our city has several) . Maximum exemptions in the state law are 100 percent for the first five years, then declining to 0 percent in the tenth year. According to the state legislation, a county, city, town, village or school district may (a) reduce these percentages, (b) limit eligibility to certain prescribed forms of alterations, and (c) limit eligibility to historic preservation-related alterations in adopting its own version of the exemption,. but can't exceed the state' s provisions. Your opinions and expertise on this topic will be welcome. 'An Equal Opportunity Employer with an Affirmative Action Program' 0� Recycled Paper CITY OF ITHACA Cr~" 1et 108 East Green Street Ithaca,New York 14850-5690 a °• _ ?85, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY c0, 0� Mariette Geldenhuys,City Attorney Telephone: 607/274-6504 JR4?EO Patricia M.Kennedy,Assistant City Attorney Fax: 607/274-6507 M E M O R A N D U M [FSEP ���— d 2 1997 TO: Alan Cohen, Mayor Members of Common Council By Dominick Cafferillo, Controller Leslie Chatterton Steve Whicher, County Assessor FROM: Patricia M. Kennedy, Assistant City Attorney Pat DATE : September 19, 1997 RE : Real Property Tax Exemption for Historic Properties Please find attached hereto, a rough draft of the Ordinance on the above subject, for discussion at the B & A meeting on September 22, 1997 . a• PK/kms 'An Equal Opportunity Employer with an Affirmative Action Program' �� CERTIFICATE OF RECORDING OFFICER That the attached Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution, as regularly adopted at a legally convened meeting of the (Name of Governing Body of Applicant) duly held on the day of ; and further that such Resolution has been fully recorded in the in my office. (Title of Record Book) In witness thereof I have hereunto set my hand this day of Signature of Recording Officer If the Applicant has an Official Seal, Impress here. Title of Recording Officer 1 k A-38