Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-PRNR-2018-08-13 with attachmentsIT?ITT � PARKS RECREATION AND Date: August 13, 2018 Time: 6:00 PM F° z3 NATURAL RESOURCES Location: Common Council Chambers, COMMISSION MINUTES 3`d Floor, City Hall /yC�gPpRAIE�,eee PRESENT: Chair - Roth Commissioners - (6) Freyburger, Hoffman, Leventry, Moeller, Myers, Shelley OTHERS PRESENT: Common Council Liaisons - Kerslick Financial Management Assistant - Swartz City Forester — Grace Deputy Youth Bureau Director — D'Alterio EXCUSED: Berry, Brock Agenda Review: Two items to add to the Agenda under SEQR review (See attached - Add to Agenda). Monika Roth would like to move the review and approval of minutes after the SEQR review. All in favor of these changes. Statements from the Public: Susan Nassar — The City is not in compliance with state environmental review requirements, which has been confirmed by the DEC. There is a legal risk for using the old forms, the new forms were created in 2012. The Council Members were alerted in June of 2018 and nothing has changed. Every approval by the city using the old forms is vulnerable for litigation. She also recommended replacing one planning board member with an Environmentalist. Need to protect our fragile eco system. The city needs to be in compliance. Kimberly Robison — Interested in using the wall at Wood St. Skate Park to create a mural to honor Dr. Dorothy Foreman Cotton. There is a grant proposal that has been submitted to Catholic Charities and it is under review. Who is responsible for the approval process? Commission Response: Contact Megan Wilson in the City Planning department to ask for direction on the approval process. Presentation: Biophilia City Designation—Nikki Cerra, Erin Marteal, Don Rakow, Rob Ross & David Weinstein Ms. Cerra presented information on becoming a Biophilic City. Biophilia is the innately emotional affiliation of human beings to other living organisms. Innate means hereditary and hence part of ultimate human nature. Biophilic Cities Network: Partner City Requirements - Adopt an official resolution or other instrument - Prepare a Biophilic Cities narrative statement o A statement of ways in which the city is already biophilic (500 words) Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 13, 2018 o A statement of goals and aspirations for the future (500 words) - Select and commit to monitoring a minimum of five indicators o Natural conditions, qualities, infrastructure o Biophilic engagement, participation, activities and knowledge o Biophilic institutions, planning and governance o Human health/well-being indicators Designate a Biophilic Cities contact/coordinator Meet additional expectations They would waive the fee of $250 to become a Biophilic City. Resolution was left with the Commission to review. Contact information for the steering committee of the Biophilia Ithaca citizen's group: Nikki Cerra - hnc24@cornell.edu Erin Marteal - erin@ithacachildrensgarden.org Don Rakow - dr14@cornell.edu Robert M. Ross - rmr16@cornell.edu David Weinstein - daw5@cornell.edu SEQR Reviews: Tom Shelley, Dan Hoffman and Scott Freyburger — subcommittee reviewing projects brought forth these matters: 1) Dan Hoffman presented a list of concerns regarding the proposed extension of Cherry Street, subdivision of City property, sale of a subdivided lot and its proposed development for manufacturing purposes (by Emmy's Organics). After discussion, it was suggested that a memo be sent outlining the concerns. Monika Roth made a motion to send a memo from this Commission (copy to TURA, Planning committee, Planning Board, BPW, Council) to address the Cherry St concerns, second by Scott Freyburger. All in favor. (See attached — Concerns regarding proposed Cherry St. Ext) 2) City Environmental Review Forms are being used by the Planning Department are not in compliance with state mandated forms updated in 2012. The Commissioners agreed that the appropriate action at this time is to ask JoAnne Cornish why the updated forms are not being used. Monika Roth will ask Joanne Cornish and Tom Shelley will ask at the planning meeting. For the record, there is little time to review the Planning Board meeting agendas. It would be helpful to get the agenda sooner from the Planning Board to review the information in a timelier manner. Review and Approval of Minutes: Graham Kerslick commented about the email that was sent regarding the minutes for this Commission. If a Commissioner, staff person or a member of the public wants to put things on the record, they can send an email to the Administrative support staff requesting the item to be added or a document to be attached to the minutes. Changes to the 7/9/18 minutes: Page 2, mid page — add "from the public" after comments in the sentence, Dan Hoffman asked that the comments "from the public........ K Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 13, 2018 Page 3, mid page — change "invited" to "invite" Page 4, top of page — replace "they" with "the owners may" In the sentence, "Dan Hoffman mentioned there is a large lot near Stewart Ave, where the owners may..." Page 6, mid page — change "debarked" to "deparked" Page 6, mid page — add "produced" after plan, "The City paid to have a plan produced" Ellen Leventry made a motion to approve the minutes with the corrections that Dan Hoffman stated and it was seconded by Scott Freyburger. All in favor. Feedback from last meeting — setting PRNR goals to how we approach/ensure feedback from city residents. There is a form (see attached- Equity impact assessment) that is recommended to use as a tool to ensure feedback from city residents on various projects. It was discussed that we use this form as a guide for evaluating projects this commission initiates to ensure equity and inclusion. Working agreements were discussed for this Commission. Previous Commissions never had any issues of working together, so this may not be something that is needed. If this is a tool that will be used, it should be used by all Commissions. Monika will check to see if other commissions have initiated working agreements. Discussions of Parks, Natural Areas & Waterfront set work plan priorities and form action teams (including any changes recommended for Adopt a Park and Donation procedures): Monika Roth proposed to create small sub groups to work on projects. Commissioners volunteered on four different task groups. (See attached — Task group proposal) Park signage —A logo has been created, now need to move forward with creating signs to be installed at city parks. What to include on sign: name of the park and the hours of operation are the minimum requirement for the signs. There are already no smoking signs posted in the parks. Smoking is prohibited in all parks except: Stewart, Cass and the Dog Park. Adopt a Park and friends group — discussed volunteer engagement: Jeanne Grace indicated it is challenging for her to manage volunteers. It would be helpful if there was someone who could organize the volunteers and the parks department could provide the materials for a work group. It was suggested to set up a link on the city website for information and volunteers. Volunteers should sign a liability waiver form. Memorial Policy and marketing parks to generate revenue. City pavilion reservations are handled through the Youth Bureau. The pavilion fee has been raised and is in line with state parks. There was concern expressed about the natural areas not being a specific target of the work plan. Monika mentioned that the planning department may be working on a plan for natural areas in 2019, but there could be a working group established that would address natural areas. This Commission can have advisors or establish a working group that meets regularly, but they would have to keep minutes of their meetings. This Commission is to provide recommendations, then pass it to the appropriate board. 3 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 13, 2018 Announcements: Jeanne Grace announced that there was a successful bicycle tree tour that was held August 4th There will be another one in the Southside Community September 30th with a picnic to follow. Also, at Wood St Park there is a big pile of mulch and volunteers ready to spread it to create a nature play area. Monika Roth met with Mary, Play by Design, who is interested in a community built playground for Wood St. Park to replace the current playground. There is also discussion of moving play equipment from Stewart Park to Wood Street Park. Friends of the Ithaca City Cemetery — Back to school clean-up and a student historic presentation Sunday August 26, 2018 from 10:00 AM —1:00 PM. Friends of Stewart Park — Community build September 11-16, 2018 — can look online for more information. Next Meeting: The next meeting is scheduled for September 10, 2018. Review Agenda items for next meeting: Shade Tree Committee asked for a presentation — they meet with Jeanne Grace every other month. They want to be an official working group of this commission. 10 min presentation. Biophilia follow-up discussion of resolution. City Environmental Review forms — update. Natural areas — what are the needs/priorities? Wood St Park group has interest in a new playground. Add this group to a later meeting after they have the Southside Plan community meeting in September. Adjournment: On a motion the meeting was adjourned at 8:17 PM. Respectfully submitted by, Debbie Swartz Financial Management Assistant .19 .1 E C7 � 5)C) 5° C� o m o a�(a o M ►v ° o O c o OM CD W (o U) N n l< -`�CD '+i CD 3 `GID W C7 (7 O (gyp n � CL '0 C� 0_ = fl n C (<D i FD (D cwn p v `C 3 << 3 O a n' Q CD N O (n �• = n Zr'QCD O Q CD CO (n CD X o (OD 0 '0 CD C) a � � Sy pn + N :; CD CD Q � a' cn O ��' Z � m o r+ 3 O (D -r, O CD (D Q ° CD CD n n Cn n' CD 0 � +0 � 'a (D CD � N O r+ q 0 Cn T.' = w `a' 0 (D n m U) :3 O 3 n. O <' - � �c3nu��o3m�-concno�0 3° � �,�CD �,o (n h (n 3 << p° 0 3 D 0CCDD(DoOo=n�'°aM=3�°u�c -ti m3�,CD -0 CD o .� o o -� <cv :r=30-avN'''CD ao o C7 2) °'(nVin,°o +�rnv��m° C)o o oCD 3 0 ° ° ' � CDD CDD (n CD n -0 Q � fn o � tn cft Q- cn < o CDc-0CD0. CD CDcadcn —o�°'o Q-oCD m°�� <°a cw0w CNCn3�2) cn (D a.o moa 0 chna CD 3 CD 0 CD Q-= o CD— m o i Uyo 3 2 3 3.�cD 3 cD --h CD W�'.a-on.c3no�3°Q.= cn CD - ° ������?0cn(n°�'�°3m 3 3v 3m•c�n• o n 3 3� w o Q- Q. o =r 03 D -a CD a cn CD noMg00- �, Oc��D= °OCD"oo m�� 0W CD 3O-p�CD CD<m(n 0(D a�' V) -a ;U o o cn g (a `<(na)o a°om0,+:r (3n 3 � (n D (On `< * r+ W S p v n p (n "a p 0 -n N CD CCD 3 c '" p CD CD D C2 � O -' -+, ° �- (o cn wl<'a o'a U) D w cn CCU — n acn O wo QO �' on 3 ,ON %. a'aCDZa3 O 3 aN= C -D, '�l7 00C,TO O U) Q.. � ccnn v N c c -,n w CA '-r � (`<n' CD. O 0 CD a- 3 v �' o� � ° c n o = Q �, CD Cnn ° E (D a° a CD �' `� o a- Fn- -0 c9 O� a �' O CCD cnr 8/14/18 Concerns of the City of Ithaca's Parks, Recreation & Natural Areas Commission, as to the proposed extension of Cherry Street and the sale and development of the most southerly portion of the property of the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency At its meeting on August 13, 2018, the City of Ithaca's Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission (PRNRC) agreed to express its concerns (to date) about the set of proposed actions involving: - the extension of Cherry Street approximately 400 feet to the south, through a woodland, - the subdivision of the 6 -acre NRA property immediately south of the existing Cherry Street into 4 parcels, 3 of which would be slated for eventual development, - the sale of the most southerly subdivided parcel ("Lot #3") to Emmy's Organics, and - development of Lot #3 for manufacturing purposes per a proposed site plan. These proposed actions all involve a property that is currently wooded and that is located adjacent to: - a significant waterway (the Flood Control Channel/Cayuga Inlet), - a recreational corridor that will eventually include the Black Diamond Trail, and - land including wetlands that the City has indicated should remain in a natural state and be buffered from potentially damaging impacts . The PRNRC's concerns as to these proposed actions, and the environmental review (so far) of the same, include the following: 1. Before environmental review of these actions is completed, the proposed design of the extension of Cherry Street should specify how many trees and what kind would be planted, in place of the 50+ trees to be removed for the street extension (Drawings and other materials submitted to date defer that information, pending consultation with the City Forester.) 2. The new "turnaround" near the end of the Cherry Street extension would have less impact on the vegetated buffer between the new development and the public, grassy corridor along the east bank of the Flood Control Channel (which already serves as a recreational amenity, the appreciation and use of which will be greatly enhanced once the Black Diamond Trail is extended through this area) if it were built on the east side of the extension (e.g., in the southwest corner of Lot #2), rather than on the west side, as currently proposed. This modification would also avoid having to modify a steep slope at the edge of the filled area. 3. The drawings for the proposed development of Lot #3 appear to indicate an intention to move and otherwise modify the steep slope along the southern edge of the filled area - by making it uniformly straight and even steeper (apparently to maximize the flat land within Lot #3). This would require extensive work within the 25 -foot -wide "wetland buffer" established by the City in 2012 when it deeded the land to the IURA. Such changes are not consistent with the stated terms of that buffer (which are linked to DEC regulations for protection of waterways) and would undoubtedly impose negative impacts on the wetland areas immediately adjacent to and downhill of the existing slope/fill edge. 4. The proposed site plan calls for removal of over 50 trees (over 10 inches, dbh) from the woodland that now covers Lot #3, including those near the southerly slope. Since the possible future expansion of the building (from 14,000 square feet initially, to up to 34,000 square feet, ultimately) is not certain, the existing trees and slope in that area could be left as is until the expansion is actually proposed and approved, at some point in the future. It would appear that a staging area during construction of the initial phase could be accommodated to the north of the proposed building rather than south of it as proposed (where impacts such as from runoff, storage of supplies and heavy equipment activity, and litter would be much closer to and impactful of the wetlands just downhill). However, to avoid segmentation, the impacts of the potentially larger building should be considered now. 5. Planting only 12 trees on Lot #3, after removal of more than 50, seems insufficient. Also, it appears no plans have been made to buffer the proposed large, industrial -style building from the natural area immediately to the south (or from views from the Flood Control Channel and the on -land recreational corridor on its eastern side). 6. As owner and steward of the property, the NRA could apply more progressive energy standards to any prospective buyer (than are required by law for private owners), such as for a green roof, or for the incorporation of solar panels and/or heat pumps. This would be consistent with the energy goals and strategies stated in the City's new comprehensive plan, and the City's endorsement of a Green Building Policy. 7. The parking lots proposed for this development could include porous paving materials. 8. Part 1 of the Full Environmental Assessment for this set of actions uses an out-of-date review form. The form required by the State (since 2013) should be submitted and relied upon, instead. An unsigned "draft" of Part 2 also uses the incorrect form; the correct version should be completed and reviewed, instead. M 1 m h 1 O m O CA � v D 3 m u•• D Z s M = 3- p ap r+ fD S o� S N r+ f7• !v ' M`< O N M _ CL CL G. (D fD a• • t .� ,. f (AD N n OrQ r+ S .< < O N rr010 C to m •< CL (ND .� y !2 O n 2 v me 2 d rD o=N ,2NN o 7 N S N 7 O• DJ N rt Q vii rt NM M 0, O =3rD •• =n rr pCj f D O rt D) CL Q O �' G (D 0�0 X. (n N N S rr (D Q 7-< W N y p Q Lr "O �• rt J Q p Q a lD 3 m r+ n S �, a n '6 rD V1 G <�- (D c N fD Ln OAC rD rt O. O O d rt � N C — Q D7 r+ Ln e+ Q lD v+' =r Ocu �< S �' r Q H Q �• e••F �' rD*. (ND h � Q Q 7 O -moi, C N v rt N fD •CA �, O O =3C`� N (D (D C O rt O Oh rD N O. r QC O7aj <(O cn O' rNCy, _T _Q S• Gq N s r s t D 0' M 1 m h 1 O m O CA � v D 3 m u•• D Z _ rt H (D n cc G CL S r* (D O vii � m r+ y m C :D O \ O X a)'+ '< r* C 'C Oa M O' 0) O O O 7 CL 'a M S M O 7 Q 0) G., H-1. — O d n fD Q. M O �• .0 O 7 n O n Q. r+ M(D --h O H rr O O rF H O• �• of C 7 n r+Q . 0 V)G. fOD (A v o C (A S O � tSo rt S 'O "a r) O S '6n Sn.. 'O f�D O O O CL O n -O (D oO O CD (D 'O 015 D O OL) � DD O 'D"r �,S+ � < O (D C N E N lDO v v (D " C -h C _ 1 c N Q O O (D c -O < C c (D N d n O' �' O O rr S 7 (D Q X '`� O rD Q.. (3D < 7 N rt N n fD 7' n N H NO ''* d "a =OCA vn r3+ O.. S c A R\ O .-j d O O_ 3 Dcq N r° 7 N n 0 a� N Q- cu c (D O n (D rD n Q S T a. '< O c c y 3 .0 (D aq a c '< Q 3:° Ln Ln rD Q o° a O =+ m rD as lu 3 O _ m rt c C O (D 7 O , d X c c —y Ort 3 Q (D 9 v `� (D rr d n a c "O v ,� 3 Q n- c^ O -0 O c ni .0 O r+ O fD O :^ rj " s 0 rD . 0 D) c * S. n c' N O Q— N N O N N 3 rD En rD m N o 0 vii Dq •-j• � �� (D 'OQ O 04 �G Du G c c• c cu v N' (D O -h rD n Q O n .y c. H OA n O ty- D y o Ort � �! S Clci — 3 N n v v -o o o y �,. oq °f+ rD g -0 a� aa) 3 = 0 o �' v v O rC+ C h n rD ° n m o EL NJ fu T 2 7 �• rD rD rD a oQ < -Z ::a3 n C d n UQ 7DC rD rD Di Z rD -a O a Q E N �' c y y v CC� �N O rte+ C rF -0 rD a ' A G rD r+ 7 rD y r+ O 1+ rD al r+ y O 7 n (n m (n Sn con a 7 N -a X p '� n _� Ort ;;0 O S= rD rD C N = N O C - fD v 0 .a -° v N 3 r': n n a UQ rD fDD < v rn+ ii to m a- + O + r3 . v � N rt 3 Q fl r+ O m O — -h rD C) _I v-0 7 -z y O_ O cn n a' d O.. o rD N CD CD 'a m 3 Q N n a C Q � C n r+ S cn m O(D O0 CL S rD O rD N o y I a y N r rt — �' 3 r+ y N -1 O a y a N' y S a O 7' o m r- v ° rr aq rD =r; CD CD n < 3 p� a a to rD n rr r+ O rD N n ami �. M m °� `^ S -yi, � a (D S 'a � `ry+ Q- rD n r+ O O m n O o- v O ami 3 Q OL° o° -o CL Ln C- N N rD (D n' < ai r+ r+ Q- v + ° -h n. -, r+ 00 O+ V1 Q rt I v o m 3 N rr y� Ua O a°j C rt 3 w ' W E Wr+ N 3 Q O lD Ln CL N n y C ai rD -n 3 D n<< d G Dia rD Q N °_ O _. r+ C CU v Q 3 (D rD '� � O 0 Ln W 3 .a._cn Q rr m C rCi• fD 7 UQ• rD C ''�' (D G ° < m -s UQ rD y -a rD rD OQ O O n n < C Q°° ° -r+ O O O v y0 C_ C "a LA ,C CL . I < I O 00 0 TO W�� 3 Q m rt lrtOD rD r+ I Q ( fD p r°DD < n � _+ Q ram+ 0 0CQ Q O< rD r+ rD n o n° rD _S rp 3 v rD 3 v O an � X a rt rt N -h � rt UQ N fD y y 3 in• Q" (D -, O r+ rD N r+ rD N O O S < O O N �_ C a N v N rl• H ° r0+ Fu T� o• N O 7 Dl n N rD _%° y °a Ln°' m =' I r+ r L -Ono v 3 p c N° p� a Op Q QJ �p S c a r+ -s 7� 7 n < Cy. Q S O ami to Cct r�D O rD rD T mO rD N 3' 3 ° F T n Q u QJ (D r+ v, n crQ p y aQ 3 Ln n d G7 o N rt rD d O Q -s N -z f-) Ort o O C r+ S rt r+ `� 3 < C < a < ter O r�i 7 O Ol rD r++ W rD rD CD (D rD o o r+ rw+ o n -, y 0 `n O O ni rai < 7 O va p 3 y n a O Q ---h C rD n� D O n O a 3 r+ r+ O � rnD 3 n rr --h `n f�D p C rDCIJ ° n y N' I o � m �. v a n 3 ;:v 0 y r+ O ai