HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-PDB-1962 PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF IT�1kCA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting January At 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs. Rogalaky, Canfield, Hines, F4W
and Ceracche.
ALSO: Director Niederkorn, Bonner, Mrs. Rogers, Mrs. Andrae, Massrs. Marren
and Cr.arey.
MEETING called to order at 4:00 p.m.
MINUTES OF De-.ember 18 meeting duly approved.
CCItKETTEE APPOINTAK?ITS Mr. Burns reported that five committees have been formed
to carry out the work of the Board in specific matters.
These five committees are: Mnecutive and Liaison, General Plan, Codes and Ordi-
nances, HouFir_g and Redevelo- meet, arA Community Facilitiee and services. The
following appointments to these committees were made by the Chairman:
Ere_'ative and Liaison Burns, Chm., Hines, Egan
General Plan Canfield, Chm., Rogalsky, Hines
Codes and Ordinances Ceracche, Cbm., Harrison, Hines
Housing and Redevelopment Rogalsky, Chm., Burns, Canfield
C^mminity Facilities and Services Harrison, Ohm.., Ceracche, Egan
Director Niederkorn pointed out that in the past it has been the tradition of
the Board to ack comrLttee members for a good deal of direction and cooperation in
the preparation of studies and reports by the staff in their particular areas of
concern. He expressed the hope that this practice would continue.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:
F.1e cticn of. Vice-Chairman - Chairman Burns asked that this business be postponed
the February mee ing of the Board. He felt that other matters were more
pressing at the time and wanted the Board to consider this election before that
meeting.
Ithaca School Board Delegates - Chairman Burns read a communication from the Ithaca
School Board asking the Boaard to select two members to participate in the election
of members of the School Board nomination committee. Mr. Burns asked for volunteers
and Mr. Hines indicated that he would be glad to attend. Wo .Burns also intended to ge
Redevel� ent Coordinati Committee - R resentative - Mr. Niederkorn informed the
Board that one of the members should be chosen gs the Planning Board's represents-
Live on the Redevelopment Coordinating Committee. This Committee is the coordinate
ing and steering committee set up to include all official and unofficial groups in
the City concernid with urban renewal. The Director pointed out that it has been
the policy in the past to send the Chairman of the Housing and Redevelopment Commit-
tee as the Board's representative to this committee. Chairman Burns appointed Mr.
Rogalsky as the Board's representative.
Staff Permanenth2ointaments - Mr, Niederkorn informed the Board that two staff
members were a igibleo�r permanent appointment, having passed the 8ivil Service
examination required with a satisfactory score. Prof. Canfield moved that Mr.
Thomas Niederkora, City Planner and Mr. Ernest R. Bonner, Asst, City Planner be
made permanent appointees in the office of City Planner and Asst. City planner re-
spectively* Seconded by Mr. Egan. CARRIED.
STAFF REPORTS:
Review of Work Ubderway - Insomuch as the present Planning Board is, an the whole,
a new , the Director reviewed the mark underway now by the planning staff. In
this review Mr.. Niederkorn outlined progress in five main areas: Regional Planning,
General Plan, Housing, Capital Improvements Programdng and Urban Renewal..
Regional Planning - The Greater Ithaca Regional Planning Board is now making road
studies in t e Forest Home and West Hill areas. The 1962 work program for this
Board includes a population analysis of the Urban Area, a study of South Hill
development, study of Route 96 relocation and the recent concern of the Board in
the problem of Town of Ithaca needs for water and sewer.
awwral Plan - The Director informed the Board that the staff had been proceeding
®tens of the General Plan and that the completion of this Plan would be of
top priority for the coming year. Prel.W'wry studies of a major thoroughfares
plan have been formulated. Some work on cc=unity facilities and services has
been done.
fur na - The N. Y, S. Division of Housing and Community Renewal is making progress
'ot—a'Fio"using survey to be conducted here in the City sometime in February. This
will be a survey of housing needs in the community and will be the basis of future
housing programs.
Capital Improvements Prop - Preparation of the Capital Improvements Program
oX the City Is an annum task of the Planning Board. Mr. Niederkorn outlined the
main points of the 1962-66 program recently submitted to Common Council by the Board.
Urban Renewal - The Director gave a brief history of the urban renewal program now
M the iUFffand planning stage here in Ithaca. In his outline he pointed out the
preliminary steps that have been taken and the possible favorable results of this
urban renewal program. He further stated that the presentation of the General Neigh-
borhood Renewal Plan would be aoccWlished during the month of February by the con-
sulting firm doing the report. Several members of the Board questioned the Director
about various aspects of the program,
TENTATIVE 1962 WORK PROGRAM: Mr. Niederkorn outlined the tentative mork program
scheduled for the staff in 1962. This work program
includes:
1/15/62 - 2 ..
1. General Plan - A concentrated effort will be made to accelerate progress
on this mosF vital and fundamental document.
2. Subdivision Regulations Review - This review is long overdue and the need
or R receives added impetus as it is a portion of the community's work-
able program, which must be recertified prior to continued Federal support
under urban renewal provisions.
S. Housing - As soon as the state finishes its survey and evaluation of hous-
ng needs in the community, the staff and the Board will proceed Vith
those housing programs as are justified.
4. Inlet Valley - This area shows a great deal of potential for development
and f'ad itiarial studies will be made to determine feasible land uses,
development incentives and possible development costs.
METING adjourned at Ss30 p.m.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
i
1/15/62 - -
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting February 19, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs, Ceraeche, Egan and Canfield,
ALSO: Director Niederkorn, Mrs. Rogers, Mrs. Andrae, Mrs. Sharp and Assistant
Planner Bonner.
METING called to order at 4:00 p.m,
MINUTES of January 15, 1962, meeting were duly approved.
ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIWAN: Eleeti an postponed until the March meeting, at the
suggestion of the Chairman.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT: Chairman Burns stated there were several areas of immediate i
concern to the Board and thought these matters should be studiod
in further detail by the committees of the Board. Initial study would be directed
to the task of formulating a program for investigation and analysis.
The areas considered of primary importance were: Inlet Valley development, Route
13 Arterial Visual Effects and Subdivision Regulations.
The study of the subdivision regulations was referred to the Codes and Ordinances
Committee. Once the committee becomes familiar it th the theory of these regulati one
and Ithaca's present ordinance, meetings will be held for review of -the present
ordinance and recommended modifications where necessary.
The study of present, potential and feasible development in the Melet Valley area
was also referred to the committee on Community Facilities and Services,
In addition to the three areas of concern referred to committees above, Chairman
Burns felt that a great deal more coordination between the various departm'ntc of
the City should be encouraged. In line with this feeling, a study of this coordi-
nation was referred to the Executive and Liaison Committee.
The various committees affected by these referrals will be calling meetings soon
to get their respective studies underway.
ANNUAL R&PORT : Director Niederkorn presented to the Board a rough draft of tre
City Planning Board's first annual report, The report imlixlsa a
discussion of the work done by the Planning Board during 19C1; also a rc-%r.cw _f '*-he
urban renewal program since its inception early in 1960. Two appendixes :^la,'e r.
review of the zoning ordinance of the City (adopted by Council in Jule of !S!31` wrd
a review of the procedure for formulating the City's Capital Improvements Program.
Chairman Burns asked about the amendment to Subdivision C of the zoning ordinancl,
Prodedure. He felt that notice to all property owners within 2001 of property
under study for variance of use would be impractical in some cases. Mir, Niederkorn
thought that any reasonable efforts to notify adjacent property owners would be
sufficient.
Professor Canfield felt that same performance standards would be needed to
legally regulate Aare, noise, odor and vibration.
Mrs. Harrison suggested that a note be included in the report mentioning that
the recently adapted Sousing Code will also be .reviewed annually by the Planning Bd.
Professor Canfield moved that the report be submitted to Common Council as the
Planning Board's report of activities for the year 1961. Seconded by Mr. Egan,
CSA .
STAFF RSPORTSt
Traffic and Circulation Section of general Plan - Assistant Planner Bonner presented
a review of progress to e on the traffic and circulation plan for the City. He
informed the Board that the staff was working in close cooperation with the 'traffic
Engineer in t his study..
Mr. Bonner stated the purpose and objectives of the planned transportation
system as teeU as a number of principles, to be used in the design of the syat=,, NO
further outlined the information which has been collected and presented a prelimi-
nary plan. A meeting of the General Plan committee Bill be held shortly to review
the proposal.
Housing SLI= - Mr. fl ederkorn informed the Board that the housing survey directed
by the state Is underway. 75 volunteer enumerators are now in the field. The
Director stated that son are needed at this point to canvas the Flood Control. A.r_a.
Chairman Burns asked what would happen if the survey was not canpleted in this area?
The Director answered that the informatton gained from the remainder of the City
would be valuable; batt with no information from the area to be affected by flood
control, the board would not be in as good a position to predict the demand arising
frca displacement in that area in the near future.
Chairman Burns *Fged the Board to help with this matter in any Ray possible.
Mr. Burns also suggested that the Senior Citisens in the com nndty may be able to
help, as well as the rest End Businessmen's Association.
Air Photos:- The Diroctor stated that the air photo coverage of the County is roux
available from the Reg .oanal Planning Board.
Urban Renewal - Mr. Niederkorn informed the Board that a draft of the repot or. rh
.N:R:F:�sMd be presented to the Board by the end of the month. This draft wi11
be modified and corrected as the City dictates, and then be published ac a
for public presentation.
w
2/19/62 2 -
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:
Permanent Staff appointments - Professor Canfield intruduced the following
—' rssolutiont
Mi EREAS, the City Planner and Assistant City Planner are eligible for permanent
appointments and have been made permanent appointees by Planning Board resolution
on January 15, 1962; and
TWREAS, the records of the City Controller and the City of Ithaca requ;re
that all resolutions of appointment include the annual salary of the appointee;
NOJ, THEREFORE be it resolved that the Planning Board resolution of January
15, 1962 be amended to include the annual salaries of$8208.00 (Grade No. 5E) a:d
$ 5545.00 (Grade No. 25 - first increment) for the City Planner and Assistant City
Planner respectively.
Seconded by Bars. Harrison. CARRIED.
Meeting warn adjourned at 5t30 p.m.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
2/19/62 .. 5 +«
t
i PLAN14ING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular luieeting March 19, 1962
i
P .S':IITs Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs. Hines, Egan, Ceracche, Rogalsky.
ALSO: Director Niederkorn, Assistant Planner Bonner and Mrs. Rogers.
ivF,RRTING called to order at 4:00 p.m.
MINUTES of February 19 meeting duly approved.
APPOINTIiENT OF VICE-CHAIRMM : Chairman Burns announced his appointment of Pair.
Ceracche as vice-chairman.
C%,TTITTEE REPORT:
Community Facilities & Services - The chairman of the committee, Mrs. Harrison,
reported that it ad been impossible for the entire committee to meet before this
meeting but that she and Mr. Niederkorn had formulated an outline of study for the
committee. Two studies would be made by the committee - one concerning the Inlet
Valley and the other concerning the visual and relocation aspects of relocated
Route 13. Several members of the Board questioned the status of the two pryposals
most affecting the Inlet Valley - the flood control project and proposed relocated
Route 96. Mfrs. Harrison reported that there was no indication of any progress on
either of these projects as yet. She suggested the committee confer with the Board
of Public Works on any information they might have.
A general discussion of cooperation and communication among departments of the
city was held. Mr. Niederkorn felt that the staff should be given some indication
as to what the planning board's role should be in the planning of the flood control
and Route 96 relocation. Members of the Board agreed that to study the area without
coordination may result in costly duplication of effort.
It was the general feeling of the Board that Mayor Ryan be invited to attend i
planning board meetings in an effort to coordinate all aspects of city projects.
To assist the Mayor, the Board agreed to hold executive meetings prior to regular
meetings to set up an agenda and define areas where communication is needed. In
this way all concerned boards, officials and departments of the city would be
apprised of the progress accomplished by each on various projects.
ANNUAL REPORT: The Planning Director presented the annual report of the City Plan-
ning Board to the Common Council. He stated that the Board's
recommendations to council on the zoning ordinance and the capital improvements
program were included as an appendix to the report.
Mr. Hines felt that these recommendations could be raised at a future council
meeting. They vt ll then probably be referred to a council committee for study. j
y4rs. Harrison moved that the staff be commended for a fine job on the report.
Seconded by Nr. Hines. CARRIED.
01
T.' FIC STUDY: Assistant Planner Bonner reviewed the progress on a major thox:� h-
fare plan as an element of the General Plan. He suggested that the
closing of the Stewart Avenue bridge over Cascadilla Creek may be an opportunity to
study the traffic situation in this area of the city. The analysis of traffic move-
ment in the vicinity of the bridge .�efore, during and after the closing could
furnish valuable information on the�,: alternative routes available for present as well
as future traffic volumes. P.2r. Niederkorn felt that the Board of Public Works could
probably furnish much-needed help and advice on the project and recommended that the
matter be referred to them for consideration. Chairman Burns thought this was a
proper action and agreed to communicate with them.
STAFF REPORTS:
Housing Survey - Mr. Niederkorn informed the Board that the housing survey is near-
ing completion. About 3/4 of the interview forms have been returned to the office.
Preliminary analyses of the questionnaires should be completed in a month or so.
Urban Renewal - The Director outlined to the Board a time-table for presentation of
the urban renewal plan. During the latter half of the week of March 26 the consult-
ing team will be in Ithaca to present a rough draft of the report to the officials
of the city and the citizens' committee. After consideratLon of the report by these
groups the report will be amended where necessary and probably presented to Council
at their April meeting.
Mr. Niederkorn outlined the form of the report and the nature of the presenta-
tion, reminding the Board this plan is only a general framework (G.N.R.P.) within
which to build. Puny modifications may be necessary with more detailed study in
the Project I area.
MEETING adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
SII
3/19/62 - 2 -
I PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS vv
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Special Meeting April 2, 1962
PZ]SENT: Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs Ceracche, Egan, Canfield, Rogalsky.
ALSO: Ivirs. Rogers, Messrs Clarey, Thor, Hannan, Melchen, Golder, Director
Niederkorn and Asst. Planner Bonner.
MEETING called to order at 4:00 p.m.
URBAN RENP17AL: Chairman Burns informed the Board that this meeting had been called
in order to present the General Neighborhood Renewal Plan to the
entire Board and to ask for consideration of and action on future steps in the
effectuation of the plan.
Director Niederkorn then reviewed the plan for the Board essentially as it was
presented at an earlie_^ meeting by Mr. Rogers of the planning firm and Mr. Foden of
the economics consulting firm. This plan included the goals of the downtown program,
the translation of these goals into a general land use plan a schematic site plan
for the G.N.R.P., a possible staging of Project I, and some financial analysis.
During the course of the review the Director pointed out several basic con-
clusions:
1. The Downtown program as envisioned by the planning consultants is considered
economically feasible by the economic consultant at this time.
2. Continued delay and indecision on the part of city residents may see this
present feasibility nullified by the entrenchment of similar facilities in
outlying parts of the area.
3. The general plan, if approved, is only a framework within which to proceed
with detailed studies. Unrealistic aspects of the plan as they become known
through detailed planning may force major changes in the present plan.
4. The whole idea of renewal in the downtown area is not proposed as a deterrant
to shopping center development. Rather it is a conscious effort on the part
of the city to reinforce the Downtown's competitive position. Renewal will no'
guarantee the Downtown's position but if nothing is done the Downtown will
surely slip backward.
5. No clearance in the area will result unless and until a purchaser for the land
has been found.
6. The renewal of the Downtown area could be a tremendous incentive to additional
development throughout the City. The amenities and facilities offered there
would be an attraction to industries, tourists and students and local residen-
At the conclusion of the review Professor Canfield moved that the Board go
record as approving the General Neighborhood Renewal Plan as presented and proceed
to further detailed project planning. Seconded by Mrs. Harrison.
General discussion of the plan followed this motion. Mr. Golder felt that
mutual benefit could be derived from cooperation between the City and Cornell.
Chairman Burns thought that some aspects of the plan might be unrealistic. He
wanted to know how citizens of the city could make their comments known. The
Director pointed out that the site plan was a suggestion only and that more detailed
study and public presentation would reveal unrealistic portions of the plan which
could then be changed.
Mr. Rogalsky thought the bowling alley proposed below the theater may be unfeas-
ible. I@?. Ceracche informed the Board he had recently visited Miami, pointing out
that merchants on the mall there were not entirely satisfied with their business.
He also stated that new shopping centers were opening up outside Miami. He felt
that periphery business in Ithaca was on the rise, but that the downtown had reached
its peak.
Chairman Burns prz=nted out that the mall had been considered optional by the
planning consultants. Mr. Ceracche thought small businesses should be encouraged
in the area. Professor Canfield agreed that this would be a consideration,.
The Planning Director pointed out to the Board that the economic consultant
from Arthur D. Little, Inc. had informed the earlier meeting that the nation-wide
trend in shopping center development had not yet occurred in Ithaca as a serious
threat to downtown, but that this could be expected in the future, if downtown did
nothing to reinforce its position.
Professor Canfield remarked that his major interest in the ur#an renewal
project was not from an economic point of view. He did view the program as one
providing a chance for the Dommtown to become visually attractive at a price they
could pay. He wanted Ithaca to become a little less of an "eyesore"o
Mrs. Harrison painted out that a great deal of the success of the project
depends upon the facilities afforded in the Downtown area.
Mr. Ceracche advocated a quick means of access from both East and. South Hill
into the downtown -- possibly a cable car -- as something both -wiique and func-
tional. Professor Canfield agreed wholeheartedly with this. I1r. Egan stated that
most of his questions had been answered in the review and succeeding discussion
but wanted to make sure the plan remained flexible enough to permit changes.
Mr. Golder wondered if anybody had contacted Cornell with the thought that
maybe a branch of the Statler could be located downtown.
Chairman Burns stated that a major concern of the Board should be in the area
of citizen understanding and participation. He felt that the citizens should hhve
some way to express their views. He said he respected the Board's earlier motion
but would like to read into the minutes a resolution containing soiree further ideas
After reading the resolution Professor Canfield felt that it shou'_c become part of
his earlier motion. The Board agreed. The new resoltuion was made by Professor
Canfield and follows:
4/2/62 - 2 -
i
J
f v iEREAS, the General Neighborhood Renewal Plan for Downtown Ithaca has been
presented and explained in detail to this Board; and
iREAS, this plan appears to be economically feasible and in conformance
with the general development pattern and plan for the City and the Urban
Area as a whole; and
'd�REAS, it is recognized that, if renewal is to continue in any form, an
additional period of detailed survey and analysis will be necessary to
provide specific and conclusive data with regard to economics and financing,
relocation, and redevelopment potential in the project I area:
NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ITHACA:
1, That said General Neighborhood Renewal Plan is accepted as an
adequate outline of the urban renewal activities proposed for the
area involved and as a framework for detailed study and preparation
of specific urban renewal plans;
2. That the Common Council is urged to accept this renewal plan as a
possible means of improving the economic and physical vitality of
downtown and to proceed with survey and planning for project I as
expeditiously as possible;
S. That the Common Council is urged to set policy for establishing,
dir cti ng and financing a program of public informat.i-)n so -::hat
the objective-: proposals and methods of the renewal program can
be kept constantly and clearly be fore the citizens of Ithaca.
Seconded by firs. Harrison, CARRIED, unanimously.
MEETING adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
l / ,
Ernest R, Borr-ier
Asst. Planner
4/262 3
I
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHWA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting April 16, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs. Rogalsky, Hines, Egan and Ceracche
ALSO: Mr. Golder, Greet, Clarey, Director Niederkorn, and Asst. Planner Bonner.
MEETING called to order at 4:00 p.m.
MINUTES of the March 19 regular meeting and the April 2 special meeting were duly
approved.
COMMITTEE REPORT: (Southwest Park Application)
Mrs. Harrison, chairman of the Committee on Community Facilities
and Services reported to the Board that the committee had reviewed the appli_—ot Lon
for state funds in the acquisition of land for development of the Southwest Park.
She stated the committee wished to recommend to the Board that the application be
upheld with one significant change - an amendment of the original application to
acquire only 59 acres rather than 100. She then moved that the Board accept this
recommendation. Mr. Hines seconded the motion.
Mr. Niederkorn then outlined the reasons for the committee's recommendations.
The park as proposed TL11 be a playfield of approximately 59 acres.0utdoor recrea-
tion facilities will be located here, including softball diamonds, tennis courts,
basketball courts, horseshoe courts, open play areas for football, etc. This park
is not meant to be a small neighborhood park. It will serve the entire community.
1. There will be a need fora park of this size and nature in the future. Increased
population in the urban area plus increaseU use of recreational acssties may well
double the space needed for recreation by 1980.
2. The Inlet Valley is the best location for this park in the City. Aside from
West Hill the Inlet Valley site is the only location in the City. The proposed swta
is bordered by population centers and its location in the valley makes it faJ..7.-`s:y
accessible to a great many people. The proposed site is an integral part of t1li
Ithaca Urban Area general plan. The provision of a park in this location would d,
much to enhance both the prestige and land values of the area.
The proposed site is now used partly as a city dump. If present leasing
arrangements are discontinued, the city will be without a dump.
After general discussion of the proposal Chairman Burns called for a vote.
CARRIED.
STAFF REPORTS:
Housing Survey - The Director informed the Board that the state is now making an
analysis of the data recently acquired in the housing survey. He stated that addi-
tional contacts may have to be made in those areas of "spotty" coverage, He expects
the results of the survey late in May.
Urban Renewal - The Director mentioned that Arch Rogers is now preparing a brochure
for public dissemination outlining the proposals of the recently approved G.N.R.P.
He also noted that recertification of the workable program of the community will
need to be accomplished soon and the staff is now preparing this.
Chairman Burns wanted to know if the Planning Board would be able to partici-
pate in the formulation of specific plans. Mr. Niederkorn felt that possibly a
committee of the Board could start work on that right a gray.
Chairman Burns thought that some type of machinery should be set up whereby the
provisions of the plan could be studied and reviewed by the locality.
The Director asked the Board for any suggestions they might have regarding
distribution of the recently completed news letter on urban renewal.
Re 'onal Planning Board - Mr. Niederkorn informed the Board that the greater Ithaca
Regonal Planning Board was presently studying the by-pass around Forest Home. The
Regional Board was also negotiating for a re-flight of the air photos.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSIlNESSs
Publicity - Mrs. Harrison brought up the subject of publicity, stating that nobody
had done anything about it except talk. She felt that some type of program to
inform the citizenry of the principles and methods of urban renewal was absolutely
necessary; and that the Planning Board should undertake this in the absence of any
other help.
Chairman Burns asked if the Council had set up any money or organization to
handle this matter as asked for in a recommendation by the Planning Board. Mr. Hines
stated that the City Attorney was studying this in an attempt to prove the legality
of this type of authorization of funds.
Mr.Ceracche felt that the facts should be given, whether "good" or "bad". The
general feeling of the Board was that the dissemination of all information on the
program was essential to public understanding and support.
Chairman Burns stated he would meet with the Director to set up some way to
achieve more comprehensive distribution of information on the program.
Meeting with Mayor- Mr. Burns stated to the Board that his impression of the
results of a meeting with Mayor Ryan on more communication and cooperation between
departments varied somewhat with the press report of this meeting. He said that
there was general agreement that good cooperation at the staff level had been
exhibited in the past and that this would continue in the future.
MEETING adjourned 5:30 p.m.
LP
Ernest Bonner
Asst. Planner
4/16/62 - 2
y
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting May 21, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Burns, Airs. Harrison, Messrs.Cerache, Hines and Egan.
ALSO: Mrs. Rogers, Mrs. Nordheimer, Mr. Clarey, Representatives of Cornell
Daily Sun & 13VBRV also Planner Niederkorn and Aspt. Planner Bonner.
MWING called to order 4:15 p.m.
MINUTES of April 16, 1962 meeting duly approved.
COMMITTEE REPORT: Mrs Harrison, Chairman of the community Facilities and Services
Committee reported that a renewed study of the Southwest Park
is now.being undertaken. The Common Council has directed the Planning Board to
pick a specific site and obtain reliable appraisals onthe cost of gcquiring this
site.
STAFF REPORTS:
Housing Survey - The Director informed the Board that the statistical sample of
housing i'�n t e City has been completed. The data has been forwarded to the State
Division of Housing and Community Renewal and a preliminary analysis of this data
should be completed within a month. A report will then be issued tothe Planning
Board. This report will become the basis for further Planning Board recommenda-
tions as to housing needs in the City and the means whereby these needs can be met.
Mr. Burns thought that the committee should begin work on this matter right
away.
Relocation Assistance - Mr. Niederkorn stated that there are a number of programs
now underway or in advanced planning stages that win cause some dislocation of
residents and business in the city. Furthermore. these programs do not call for
efforts on the part of the City to help these people. He felt that some agency
or organization should be established to provide this relocation assistance.
The Director pointed out that there are approximately 15 families which will
be displaced from 'the new Route 13 by-pass and about 23 families from the Flood
Control path.
Mrs. Harrison stated that the Cowittee on Municipal Facilities and Services
had discussed this problem at length and felt something should be done.
Chairman Burns thought that some communication with the Mayor might reveal
programs he has instigated or serve to bring this matter to his attention. It was
agreed that Mr. Burns and Mrs. Harrison would meet with the Mayor soon.
General Plan Report - The Director outlined progress to date on the General Plan,
stating that studies into land use and circulation facilities were proceeding.
Assistant Planner Bonner outlined a pilot study to be made by the staff shortly
concerning the origin and destination of residents and workers in the city.
The Director also pointed out that this origin-destination study would be
reinforced with a study of through traffic within the City.
Urban Renewal -
1. Mr. Niederkorn informed the Board that the application for funds with which to
pursue survey and planning activities in the Project I area is now being reviewed
by the Housing and Home Finance Agency. It is hoped the approval of this applica-
tion will be accomplished within a month or so. He also stated that the brochure
for public distribution will be ready in a month.
2. The Director further noted that the report on progress under the workable pro-
gram for Community Improvement is now being compiled. This program is an effort
by the City to improve itself on a city-wide basis. Each year the community must
show progress in this effort as a pre-requisite to the receipt of funds for urban
renewal from the Federal Government, The City has met requirements of the program
in some respects but has not fully improved itself in others.
The program includes community effort in the enforcement of codes and ordi-
nances,, the preparation of a general plan, the evidence of financial ability to
carry out renewal programs, the constant upgrading of administrative efficiency,
the continuing analysis of neighborhood units for blight &deterioration, the pro-
vision of housing for displaced families as a result of governmental action, and
the establishment and perpetuation of citizen participation in all aspects of plan-
ning.
Mrs. Harrison felt that some positive measure for publicity and education must
be made to insure citizen participation. Mr. Burns felt that impetus for informa-
tion should come from the citizens - that the Board could not invite itself to talk
at meetings, etch Mr. Burns asked that the Executive Committee work out a plan of
action for a positive information program.
11r. Niederkorn stated that one of the aspects of the Workatrle Program was an
analysis of neighborhoods within the City. He said this analysis had been com-
pleted and that other areas in the City need some type of renewal treatment. He
then wondered if the Board would like to recommend areas for further urban renewal
projects. Mr. Ceracche felt that the Board must consider the affect of DowntaAmn
redevelopment upon the remainder of the City. He felt the Board should consider
renewing all commercial areas of the City at once. The Director stated that a lot
of background information must be gained before planning on any other renewal pro•
Sect could commence. He said that we could do that now. A general discussion
followed on the need for further renewal projects and the affect of Downtown I
renewal on these programs.
5/21/62 - 2
i
I
V
CAPITAL 12TROVEMENT PROGRAM: Mr. Niederkorn informed the Board that preliminary
forms for department requests will be sent out some-
time in Junes The Common Council has asked that the Capital Improvements Program
be presented the last of November and this will necessitate a somewhat accelerated
schedule this year.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: Mr. Burns stated he hoped the members of the Board had had
the opportunity to watch the television show recently aired
ori the local television channel involving a debate between Jane Jacobs and local
and regional officials and citizens. He also said that Mrs. Jacobs had presented
some good ideas to the community but hoped the Mayor's Committee would take the
time to bring others into the community to give other viewpoints on the program.
)..EETING ADJOURNED AT 5:45 p,m.
06
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
i
i
i
i
i
i
5/21/62 •• 5 ••
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, Nola
Regular Meeting June 18, 1962
PRESENTs Chairman Burns, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs. Ruses and Egan.
ALSO: Mrs, Rogers, Mr. Clarey, Mr. Gowen, Mr. Niederkorn and Mr. Bonner*
MEETING called to order at 4:10 p.m.
MINUTES of May 21 meeting duly approved.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT: Chairman Burns reported that he had contacted Mayor Ryan about
the possibility of organizing an official agency or committee
to assist those families and businesses who are to be displaced by the impending
flood control and Route 13 projects. Mr. Burns felt that it was important to
initiate this agency or committee now to start work in the relocation as soon as
possible inasmuch as the time and effort required may be substantial. He reported
that the Mayor would consider it.
REPORT ON RE WTAL STUDY: Director Niederkorn informed the Board that the applica—
tion for funds with which to pursue detailed studies in
the Project I area had not yet been approved by HIDA. Noting that time was of the
essence if the November deadline on completion of the plan was to be met, he further
stated that the Citizens' Committee on Urban Renewal had pledged $7500 to initiate
a series of interviews by the economic consultants. This series of interviews will
be the first step inthe total economic study necessary in the area. The Director
then introduced Mr. Jeff Gowen, a representative of the Arthur D. Little, Inc. firm,
who is in the city to accomplish these interviews.
Mr. Gowen explained the reason for his presence at the meeting and briefly
discussed the nature of the interviews. He stated that the interviews are being
conducted for 8 reasons:
1. They will assist Vie planners in an intelligent formulation of the plan,
especially as pertains to relocation planning,
2. They will help in later marketability studies of Project 4 and
3. The presence of an interviewer to talk with each merchant will serve to
enlighten owners and tenants in the area of their role and responsibilities
in the plan.
We Gowen stated that an effort will be made to contact every business man in
the project area plus some in outlying areas which may wish to move into the down—
town, He informed the Board that the interviews should be completed ttv the middle
of July.
Mr. Burns asked if Mr. Gowents job would be easier if people in the area had
been more .informed? W. Gowen stated that although a great deal of information had
been disseminated in the way of press releases, etc. some of the interviewees lacked
- I
knowledge of the program. If this knowledge had been apparent it imuld take less
time with interviews. Mrs. Harrison asked if Ithaca was unique inthis aspect and
Mr. Gowen thought not. Mr. Egan asked if the murchants had been cooperative in
his interviews thus far and Mr. Gowen assured him that they had been.
Mr. Hines felt that with detailed studies now being undertaken by the consult-
ants, some system should be organized to assure the closest possible coordination
between the officials of the City of Ithaca and the consultants. This would insure
community participation in the basic formulation of programs and plans and would
allow the community an opportunity to direct the consultants in their day-to-day
studies and analyses. qtr. Hines then moved that the Planning Board request the
Mayor to appoint four members of the Common Council as a bi-partisan committee to
be called the Urban Renewal Committee -to act as a liaison between the City of Ithaca
and the consultants in the study and preparation of plans for the Project I area.
Seconded by Mrs. Harrison.
During discussion it was brought out that this committee would only be author-
ized to give direction and make such decisions as may be necessary to expedite
completion of the Project 1 studies and plan. Decisions of major importance would
be referred to the Council for action. Motion CARRIED unanimously-
APPROVAL OF STAFF APPOINTMENTS: The Director asked approval of two new employees
on the staff- Mrs. Mary Manaster and Mr. Fred
Klein. These employees will be engaged in both city and regional work, but primar-
ily in the preparation of a general plan for the City.
Mr. Hines moved that the appointment of Fred Klein and Mary Manaster to the
staff of the City Plainning Board at the rate of $2.03 per hour be approved.
Seconded by Mr. Egan. CARRIED.
STAFF REPORTS:
Schedule of Ca ital I rovements Program - Assistant Planner Bonner outlined the
proposed schedule of dates in the preparation of the 1963-67 Capital Improvements
Program. He stated that a meeting of the Finance Committee Co-Chairman and mem- I
bers of the Department of Public Works and the City Controller will be held with
the planning staff to coordinate all efforts on the program.
Major Thoroughfare Plan - The Director stated that a preliminary major thorough-
fare plana for the city of Ithaca will be presented at the July meeting of the
Board. This is an important element of the general plan now being completed.
Consultation with other departments of the city will precede this presentation.
Workable Program - The Director informed the Board that the document describing
comm�uni yt progress in self-improvement has been submitted to HHFA as proof of the
City's willingness to guide and enhance its development. .This documentation is a
prerequisite to local expenditure of Federal funds on urban renewal.
NEW BTJS S: Chairman Burns read a letter he had submitted to Mayor Ryan resign-
ing his position as chairman and as member of the Board effective Julyl. He stated
that business commitments have made his tenure impossible. The Board expressed their
concern with his departure, but commended his efforts as a member and chairman.
MEETING ADJOURNED 5:00 p.m. � i
Ernest R. Bonner, Asst. Planner
6/18/62
V
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N.Y.
Regular Meeting July 16, 1962
PITT: Chairman Ceracche, Mrs. Harrison, Dr. Hall and Mr. Egan,
ALSO: Mrs. Rogers, Mrs. Manaster, Mr. Clarey, Asst. Eng. Melchen, Planning
Director Niederkorn, Asst. Planner Bonner, Senior Draftsman Peters.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:30 p.m.
INTRODUCTION OF EMT MEMBERS: Chairman Ceracche introduced Dr. Edward Hall to the
members of the board. Dr. Ha11 was recently appoin -.
to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of former Chairman John Charles Burns,
MINUTES of June 18 meeting were duly approved.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS3 Chairman Ceracche announced the appointment of new commi1-'--
tees. The revised list of con dttees and their respective
members is as follows:
Executive & Liaison Ceracche, Hines and Egan
General Plan Canfield, Hall and Hines
Codes & Ordinances Hines, Ceracche and Harrison
Housing & Redevelopment Rogalsky, Hall and Egan
Comm. Facilities and Services Harrison, Rogalsky and Egan
Note: The chairman of each ccmmi.ttee is listed first among the members.
CORRESPONDENCE: The Director reported that Mr. J. Carmly Miller, an alderman from
the sixth ward, had expressed his interest in the review of the
present zoning ordinance as pertains to the R-2 classification. His contention was
that the R-2 zone as presently recognized was not restrictive enough to discourage
the encroachment of high-density residential uses (fraternity and sorority houses)
into existing single-family areas. At the time the present ordinance was prepared
he feared the effect of these less restrictive provisions on certain areas of the
city, notably South Hill, A:s Itha0a College begtts its -move to a new campus on
South HL11, fraternities and sororities contingent to the College are seeking
accommodations there also. Some specific interest has already been shown in acquir-
ing large single family dwellings in an R--2 zone on South Hill, Mr. Miller hoped
that the planning board would consider this matter in their annual review of the
ordinance.
Mr. Niederkorn stated that a series of recammendations were submitted to the
Common Council in the annual report as a result of the last annual review. This
particular matter was not covered in these recommendations.
The letter was referred to the Codes and Ordinances Cammi.ttee for study and
review.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM: Assistant Planner Bonner informed the board that
department heads have received request forms and
instructions as a first step in the preparation of the 1968-67 Opital improvements
Program. Prior to September first these request forms will be completed and sub-
mitted by dept. heads to a Capital Improvements Review Committee, newly formed this
year. The Director stated that the request forms for the 1964-68 program will
probably be distributed to dept. heads in February of next year so that they may
take advantage of the winter months to complete the forms.
Mr. Niederkorn reported the recent formation of Capital Improvement Review
Committee by the Common Council upon the recommendation of the Finance Committee.
He stated that this committee was set up to coordinate and review all requests from
the various city departments; and submit a single recommendation to the Finance
Committee. This would help the committee in their deliberations and also aid in
greater citizen understanding of the capital budgeting process.
The review committee will be composed of 5 members — one from the Public
Safety Com. of the Common Council, two from the planning board, to be appointed by
the Mayor or upon the recommendation of the respective groups and the approval of
the Common Council,
Dr. Hall recommended the appointment of Mr. Ceracche and Mr. Canfield by the
MWr. Seconded by Mrs. Harrison. CARRIED.
COMWITTEE REPORTS:
Community Facilities and Services - Mrs. Harrison presented the following resolu-
tions*
"RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommend to the Common Council that approximately
60 acres of land in the southwest section of the city, and rights-of-way for access
thereto, be acquired for future recreation purposes in accordance with the land
acquisition bond act of New York State."
Seconded by Mr.. Egan,
Mr. Niederkorn outlined the specific proposal as envisioned by the committee.
The plan calls for acquisition of the Knight property (59 acres) in the Inlet Vauey.
This property is presently lowland and could be used for dump purposes until such
time as the level is suitable for park purposes. The park would be mainly devoted
to active recreational facilities -- basebpll and football fields, ice skating,
tennis, etc.
Dr. Hall wondered if it would be possible to locate the park closer to Butter-
milk Falls and thereby provide recreational facilities to an existing picsit area.
He also thought West Hill residents would then gain better access to the new park
and its recreation areas. Mr. Niederkorn stated two points of access involving 601
right-of-way were provided from both Meadow St. and Elmira Road. He also said it
might be possible to afford some access to the park from Vest Hill off Floral Ave.
This access would be contingent upon flood control purposes.
The Director stated that qualified appraisers had valued the property at
$250000 to 0263,800. Mr. Ceracche felt it was important to note that the site was
suitable , for dumping purposes and could be used for this until filled. He felt
7/16/62 .. 2 -
IN ,
the property was valuable from -was point of view alone, with the added advantage
of becoming a park in the future as recreation demand increased.
With no further discussion the resolution was unanimously CARRIED.
STAFF REPORTS:
Preliminary Report - Major Thorohfare Plan - Mr. Niederkorn presented each member
of the board with a preliminary report on one section of the comprehensive General
Plan -- the Major Thoroughfare Plan, This preliminary report covered the goals of
a primary street system, the principles which would be used to attain these goals,
and several major problems of traffic movement in the Ithaca urban area. He pointed
out that future reports would cover other areas at the General Plan - recreation,
population, land use, and community facilities. In the final presentation the
separate reports would be adjusted to each other to form a recommended comprehen-
sive General Plan for the community.
Assistant Planner Bonner reviewed the report with the board, finally pointing
out the problems encountered in the movement of traffic in the city and preenting
some ideas of the staff on eventual solution of these problems.
Mrs. Harrison moved that . the report be submitted to the General Plan Commit-
tee for their study and evaluation. Seconded by Cdr. Egan. CARRIM
Urban Renewal_ - The Director informed the board that the popular brochure outlining
concepts objectives of the urban renewal program would be sent to the printers
in a week or so. He presented a letter of transmittal, addressed to the Kayor and
the- Cemtmon 0ovacil to be incorporated.into the broehure for the boardf s approval.
General agreement on the context of the letter was expressed by members of the
board.
Mr. Niederkorn stated that the brochure would probably be available to the
board at the next regular meeting.
SETING adjourned ourned 61lO p.m.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
9/16/62 - g -
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N.Y.
Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. August 20, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Caracche, Dr. Hall., Messrs, Egan, Hines and Prof. Peabody.
ALSO: Mr. Clarey and planners Niederkorn, Maanaster and Peters.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:10 P.M.
CHAIFOTIAN Ceracche, speaking for the entire board, expressed regret at the death of
Fred A. Rogalsky. He said that while Mr. Rogalskyls time on the board had
been short his contribution in terms of ad-a ce and experience had been great. The
board has lost an able and respected member.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBER: Chairman Cerac:he introduced Prof. G. Eric Peabody to
the other present. Prof. Peabody was appointed
by Mayor Ryan to serve the unexpired tenni c)f Thr. Rogalsky.
MINUTES of July 16 meeting were duly approved.
CHAIRMAN Ceracche was instructed by Mayor Ryan to submit the following questions to
the board for consideration:
1. Where are the answers to questions submitted by four Councilmen to the A. D
Little firm?
2. 'iffio authorized appointment of advisors to the Common Councilfs urban renewal
liaison committee?
3. Under whose authority did this committee decide to interview candidates for
an urban renewal administrator?
In response to the first of these questions a letter was read from Harry Foden
of the A. D. Little firm. This letter was sent to Mayor Ryan on July 9, 1962 and
said in part "With regard to the questions themselves we feel that they are
generally very perceptive. Some, of course, go well beyond the scope of this
initial phase of relocation interviews. However, since this interviewing program
is only a relatively small portion of the market and feasibility work to be com-
pleted in the Project One planning, we believe that by the time the Project One
planning is complete, we should be in a position to give answers to most of the
questions asked."
In conclusion Mr. Foden stated ITiie feel strongly that upon completion of the
total scope of Project One services requested from HHFA, the Common Council will
have sufficient information to enable it to decide Wiether to proceed further with
downtown renewal and on what basis."
Questions 2. and 3. dealt with matters in which the planning board has no
responsibility. It was suggested that these questions be directed to the Councills
urban renewal committee. Mr. Egan felt the planning board was receiving undue
criticism for actions in which it has had no part.
COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Capital improvements Review Committee - Mr. Egan explained to the board members the
purpose or We newly created api a Improvements Review Committee and how it was
going to work. He said that the next meeting was to be on Sept. 18. At that time
all capital improvements requests are to be submitted to the Committee for review
and subsequent recommendation to Council.
STAFF REPORTS:
Preliminary Population Report - Staff planner Manaster presented a detailed report
on the number, characteristics and geographic distribution of population in the city
and the urban area. Most of the technical data for this report was derived from the
1960 Census and from numerous local interviews.
Mrs. Manaster concluded her presentation with a series of projections for the
year 1980. General conclusions were that the area as a whole would experience
growth but the city's resident population (exclusive of students) would continue
to decline.
The population report is to be reproduced and distributed to board members for
comment.
Urban Renewal - Planning director Niederkorn explained that the Federal Government
had not approved the application for survey and planning funds as yet. Therefore
the consultants could not begin their work as early as was originally hoped. He
stated that the Council's Renewal Committee recognized this and realized that the
Nov. 1 deadline mould have to be extended.
MEETING adjourned at 5:55 p.m.
Philip Peters
Senior Draftsman
I
8/20/62 _ 2 _
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. September 17, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Ceracche, Mrs. Harrison, Messrs. Canfield, Hall, Hines & Peabody.
ALSO: Building Commissioner Golder, Mr. Niederkorn, Mr. Bonner Mr. Peters, and j
Mrs. Manaster.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:00 P.M.
Iv'INUTES of August 20 meeting duly approved.
CHAIR14AN'S REPORT- OPERATING BUDGET: Mr. Ceracche reported to the Board that the
Executive Committee had reviewed the proposed
operating budget prepared by Mr. Niederkorn and found it satisfactory. Several items
in the proposed budget have been reduced from the 1962 approved budget. As a whole,
the proposal reflects a 2% increase over the year 1962.
Mr. Canfield moved that the proposed budget be approved. W. Peabody seconded
the motion. CARRIED. I
CC04ITTEE REPORT-- 1963 to 1967 C. I. P. PROJECT REQUESTS: W. Canfield, Chairman of
the General Plan and
Capital Improvements Committee reported that the committee had considered several
projects at length for inclusion in the 1963-67 Capital Improvements Program. Asst.
Planner Bonner reviewed the requests before the Board. After discussion Mr. Peabody
moved that the requests be forwarded to the C.I.P. Review Committee for their con-
sideration. Seconded by Mrs. Harrison. CARRIED.
STAFF REPORTS:
Urban Renewal - Mr. Niederkorn reported that the Common Council's Committee on Urban
Renews is still reviewing applications for the position of Renewal Administrator.
I
General Plan Reports - Mr. Peters, a member of the planning staff, presented a
general plan repoPEconcerning land use requirements for primary and secondary edu-
cation in the City of Ithaca. This is the third report in a series dealing with all
aspects of the general plan now in preparation.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:
Rezoning Request - Building Commissioner Arthur Golder appeared before the Board to
ask them to consider the rezoning of that parcel of land bordered by Meadow Streetp
Elmira Road and Spencer Road. The parcel is presently zoned commercial except for
a 50' strip of residential use along Spencer Road. Mr. Golder stated the 50' depth
of the residential lots required 100' of frontage on Spencer Road to meet minimum
square footage requirements for residential lots. Other provisions in the ordinance
allow encroachment of one use into the other district, and this further complicates
the situation. He felt the entire parcel should be zoned commercial.
i
f `
r
Paramount in his request was a consideration of the problems of a potential
commercial user in this area. Present zoning restrictions will make it impossible
for this growing use to develop an expanded facility inside the City.
Mrs. Harrison stated that in the original zoning ordinance the 501 strip of
residential use along Spencer Road was adopted to discourage heavy traffic along
this narrow road and therefore discourage danger to the children of the neighborhood
who must walk along this road to school, play, etc.
Mr. Ceracche felt the matter should be referred to the Codes and Ordinance
Committee for detailed study and report. Mr. Hines stated he would be in conflict
of interest on this committee as he represents a client in that area. Mr. Ceracche
then appointed Afar. Peabody to that committee to deliberate with the other two members
on the problem.
Ithaca College TV - The Chairman read a note from Mr. Colle of Ithaca College asking
the Board if they would consent to the televising of a board meeting during the firsi
part of 1963. The Board was strongly in favor of this type of public presentation
but wished to reserve judgment on the exact date of the meeting until the next meet-
ing. Mr. Canfield moved that the matter be postponed until the October 15 meeting.
Seconded by Mr. Hall. CARRIED.
MEETING ADJOURNED 6;15 P,M.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
i
i
f
r
i
9/17/62 - 2 -
/1
PLANNING BOARD PROCFEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting 4:00 p.n. October 15, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Ceracche, Mrs, Harrison, Mrs.Angell, Messrs. Hines, Peabody,
Hall and Egan.
ALSOs Mr. Egner, Mr. Niederkorn, Mr. Bonner and Mrs. Rogers.
MEETING icalled to order at 4:00 p.m.
MINMS: of September 17 meeting duly approved.
CANFIEW �WIGNATION: The chairman read a letter from W. Canfield concerning his
resignation from the Board. Mr. Canfield stated that increas-
ing university commitments had forced him to retire from his position. Mr. Ceracche
then reported that Mrs. Jean Angell had been appointed to serve out Mr. Canfield's
position end introduced her tb the members.
COMMITTW REORGANIZATION2 The Chairman presented his new committee organization:
Executive & Liaison - Ceracchs, Hines, Egan
Genual Plan - Hall, Peabody, I Angell
Codes & Ordinances - Hines, Ceracche, Harrison
Housing & Redevelopment - Peabody, Angell, Egan
Community Facilities & Services - Harrison, Hall, Egan
The first one named on each committee is chairman.
CO1VIDtITTEE REPORTS:
Codes & Ordinances - Mr. Peabody reported that the committee had met and discussed
eng�ssioner's request that the area between Elmira Rd. and Spencer Rd.
to Meadow St. be re-zoned as commercial throughout. Mr. Peabody stated that the
couni.ttee felt this matter was not primarily one for the Board. Ordinary procedures
directed that the question should be aired before the Common Council and that body
could in turn refer it to the Planning Board. After sone discussion on the city's
commitment to the Spencer Rd. residents at the time of annexation, Mr. Peabody moved
that the matter be..referred back to Mr. Golder with the note that this should be
brought to the Common Council's attention for referral to the Planning Board if so
desired. Seconded by Mr. Egan. CARRIED.
Mr. Peabody wanted to know whir action had not been taken on the planning boardk
recommendations to the Common Council contained in the annual report- especially
those dealing with variances to the zoning ordinance. Mr. Hines said he was unaware
of the report and would look into these matters for future council action.
Mr. Niederkorn mentioned to the Board that the Coddi.ngton Road area is now
considering annexation and steps should be taken to insure a satisfactory amendment
to the zoning map.
i
Capital Improvements - Mr. Ceracche reported that the Capital Improvements Review
committee a is deliberating on the 1963--67 Capital Improvements Program. The
Committee's final recommendations vd l be presented to Common Council at their
November meeting.
STAFF REPORTS:
Review o Urban Renewal - Mr. Niederkorn gave a brief resume of urban renewal prog..
rams—W e. The Fe eral Government has approved the city's request for $$159,527
to pursue detailed studies in the Project I area. At their October meeting the
Common Council voted to accept the money that the Federal Government had offered and
proceed to study Project I. Mayor Ryan then vetoed the action.
Mr. Niederkorn then outlined several basic points about the present project and
the urban renewal process about which there has been considerable misunderstandings
1. Acceptance of the grant does not force the city to hire any particular con-
sultant to conduct the studies. There are no contracts at present for this work and
the city lis at liberty to hire any qualified person or persons to do the job.
i
2. The money offered by the Federal Government was tendered for study of Pro-
ject I o y. No part of this money may be spent outside of the present boundaries
of Proje t T unless justifiable amendments to the original area are passed by the
Common Council.
3. Any area contiguous to the present Project I area and wholly within the
G,N.R.P. boundary is eligible as an inclusion for study with this $159,527 grant.
i
4. All other areas of the city must be studied separately. This involves
separate applications for funds to study these areas,
5. There is no obligation on the part of the city to continue id.th urban
renewal past the reit stage of study if they accept the offered grant.
6. If the present grant is turned down by the city there is little or no
chance t include further projects in other areas of the city under the urban renew-
al program.
Mr. Ceracche said that the maximum flexibility of the program was important to
note. He also stated that if we dontt accept we are out of business in dealing with
the Federal Goverment on future programs. After extensive further discussion on
the matter, Mr. Hall offered the following resolutions
"WHEREAS, the Federal Government has offered the city $1.59,527 to undertake
detailed renewal studies in downtown Ithaca, and
the planning board is dissatisfied with the design sketches shown
far, but feels that the principle involved warrants more sketches and
Tr ideas, and
'SEAS, the acceptance of these Federal, funds in no way implies acceptance
or approval of the design sketches presently shown, and
1,WREAS, the acceptance of these Federal funds in no way stipulates who is to
undertake the detailed studies, and
10/15/62 - 2 -
WHEREAS# it is recognized that urban renewal in the downtown and other areas
of the city could be extremely beneficial to this community, and withdrawal
from the program at this time would be very harmful to the long-range economic
and physical structure of this community in that renewal funds would not be
forthcoming for other projects in the future, and
MNMW, acceptance of these Federal hinds in no way commits this comtaunity
to continue beyond the detailed renewal studies,
Be it RESOLVED that, the planning board, in the interest of this community
and its citizens, requests the Mayor and Common Council to accept the Federal
Hinds to continue detailed studies of the downtown renewal project, and be it
further
RESOLVED that the planning board is willing to assist the Mayor and the Common
Council in any way possible to assure that these studies are undertaken in the
most effective and expeditious way."
Seconded by Mr. Egan. CARRIED unanimously.
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS=
Planning Conferences - The Director informed the Board that the Sth Annual Con-
erence or tHe uriMization of Cornell Planners was to be held on Nov. 2 and 3. The
topic of the conference was, The Future of Central City. Mr. Peabody moved that
one staff member and one board member be au o zed o attend this conference with
attendants' expenses paid by the Board. Seconded by Dr. Hall CARRIED.
T.V. Meeting - The Board agreed to hold their March meeting in front of the WICB -
Tcameras. All members felt this would be a worthy attempt at better community
understanding of the functioning of local government.
MEETING ADJOURNED 6:10 P.M.
Ernest R, Bonner
Asst. Planner
101.5/62 - 5 -
v v
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. November 21, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Ceracche, Mrs. Harrison, Mrs. Angell] Messrs, Egan, HaU Hinss
and Peabody.
ALSO: Mrs. Rogers, Mrs. Hoefer, Mrs. Manaster, Messrs. Chatfield, Golder, Egner,
Clarey, Weinstein, Hanna, Kilby, Niederkorn and Bonner.
MEETING called to order at 4:05 p.m.
MINUTES of October 15 meeting duly approved.
DEATH OF MRS. D. BOARDMAN LEE: The Chairman voiced the regrets of the Hoard on the
death of Mrs.D. Boardman Lee, a past member of the
planning board.
COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Niederkorn read the directive and subsequent resolution of the
Common Council asking that the City Planning Board make a determi-
nation of those areas presently outside the city limits which would be most suitable
for drn--cation to the city. The Board asked for the Director's advice on the matter.
Mr, Niederkorn suggested a Joint study with the Greater Ithaca Regional Planning
Board. Mr, Hines asked if the Pennsylvania Avenue area could be studied immediately
as some residents of this area have expressed interest in annexing to the City. The
Director thought this would be possible. Mr. Hines moved that the City Planning I
Board seek the advice of the Greater Ithaca Regional Planning Board on areas most
suitable for annexation to the City of Ithaca, and request that they direct their
immediate attention to the Pennsylvania Avenue area. Seconded by Professor
Peabody. CARRIED.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS REVIEtf COMMITTEE MEMBER: The Chairman vt th the consent of the
Board recommended that the Mayor appoint Mr. Hines to replace
Mr. Canfield on the Capital Budget and Capital Improvements Review Committee.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT: Mr. Ceracche read the following statement to the Bo4rd:
"Mayor John F. Ryan and nine other City Officials conferred with Jason Nathan, Assis-
tant Regional Commissioner of H.H.F.A. in New York City yesterday concerning the
City of Ithaca's application for Federal funds to make further Urban Renewal studies.
The following information was obtained after a lengthy conference.
1. The City of Ithaca received a final extension of time to December 20th, 1962 to
act on the acceptance of the study grant of approximately $160,000.
2. Project funds may be used outside the project area for the purposes of studying
residential and business relocation needs of people now located within the pro-.
ject one area, but who may have to be relocated outside the project one area.
5. The project area may not be changed appreciably prior to the acceptance of the
federal study grant, but if in the course of the study it is indicated that
certain changes in the project boundaries are necessary and practical then the
boundaries can be amended by the Comon Council with the consent of the Federal
Government.
r
4. The City of Ithaca is not bound by any of the specific recommendations contained
in prior studies and reports.
5. The City of Ithaca is not bound to carry out any Urban Renewal program by accept-
ing the federal study grant of $160,000' nor would the City of Ithaca be required
to repay study advances made by the Federal Government if the renewal program
were terminated at the conclusion of the study period.
6. If the study grant is accepted, and the project study is started, the Federal
Government will entertain new applications for studies in other areas of the
Cityp Mr, Nathan made special note that the City has an excellent potential of
undertaking a renewal project in an area adjacent to Cornell University where
the cost of construction undertaken by the University could be credited toward
the local share of project costs.
7. The Federal Official stated that if the City is interested in exploring Urban
Renewal possibilities for other areas in the City on a city wide basis, that
the vehicle for making such a study is the relatively new Community Renewal
Program. An application for this type of study could be made at any time. He
informed the city officials that both New York City and the City of Syracuse had
filed C.R.P. applications after they had already initiated a renewal project for
a specific area.
9. It was emphasised to the City Officials that if the City rejects this federal
study grant, the City's ability to obtain any further federal renewal financial
aid is questionable. The Federal Government has many applications for renewal
funds and the City of Ithaca's rejection of this advance, in addition to the
withdrawal in 1859 of the Poral Island project, coupled with the expenditure
of $60,000 for the initial study of the business area would place the City of
Ithaca in an extremely unfavorable competitive position for future federal
renewal aid."
The Director outlined the intent and mechanics of the Community Renewal Program
hentioned in the statement read by Mr. Ceracche. He stated that the program had
been initiated by the Federal Government to allow localities to survey the entire
city for areas of blight and deterioration. The program may point out other areas
of the city needing same type of renewal. action. After the survey is completed a
priority is assigned to each project. If the community can establish its financial
ability to carry out this program the city officials are at liberty to submit appli-
cations for money to accomplish detailed studies of those am" vWL highest priorftyr
The Director noted that the Community Renewal. Plan would resemble a general
plan in that it concerned itself with the entire community in mach less detail than
a project plan. After completion of C.R.P. studies the City would then have to sub-
mit separate applications for money to study in greater detail each separate project
area. Implementation could be carried out only within the boundary limits of a
specific prosect,
i
Mr, Bines stated that the Federal Government has set aside in a reserve approzir
mately $5,000,000, all or any part of which may be used by the City of Ithaca in
carrying out some form of renewal in the Project I area. The H.H.F*Ao represents-
tines who spoke with the group in New York were anxious to point out that if the
City of Ithaca does not proceed soon with detailed studies and planning of the
Project I area with the $1.60,000 advance offered, this reserve fund of $5000,000
will be taken away from the City and given to other communities which have requested
Federal renewal aid, Mr. Hines also noted that if the community refused to accept
1/�z -
2 -
V
further fluids to re-study the Project I area that the Federal Government would hesi-
tate to approve any further applications for Federal renewal assistance from the
City of r harm,
Cha.'.rm^.n Ceraoche stated that Mr. Nathan, one of the representatives of H.H.F.A.
who spoke with city officials, felt that the central city project was best for the
whole cityfs sake and was probably the only area in the city which, when redeveloped,
would afford benefits to the entire city. bar. Nathan also said that H.H.F.A, experi-
ence in both the success and failure of urban renewal projects had shown that most
failures occur as a result of local problems -- an administration in opposition,
financial i-aability of the community., poor local direction, etc.
Mr, Hines stated that the H.H.F.A. is becoming extremely reluctant to invest in
our pecu7j.?.,- Und of local indecision. He informed the Board that the Federal
0ovenmEq.z0: had -witladravrn over $22,000x000 from the City of Cambridge because local
ind sc sion n,--.de them so hesitant in their program.
i
X-, +0.3a ey of tate Syracn-se Post-Standard stated that the community had already
indi.catec crprsitton to Protect I. Mr. Hanna of WHO felt that a true indication
Of ccr"rninii.l approval or die-approval had not yet been gained. He also felt Mr.
Clarey had beei biased in his reporting of the urban renewal program. Mr. Clarey
felt that 'tie whole story had not been told and that he wanted to report the facts.
He said he was not opposed to urban renewal or to the study area but to the proposed
plan.
Mr. lb.nes felt that a great deal of confusion clouds the whole program. He
He fur-the- thought much of this confusion had been induced and deliberate. He
reiterate: the fact that the community has complete local control over the program.
I
Dr, HAU felt there was considerable opposition to the present plan for the
Project I .area, even on the Planning Board, but felt further studies and plans
could be macre vd ieh would final far greater acceptance. He felt the officials of
the community had a tremendous selling job to accomplish.
i
Mrs. Harrison said that the idea of public relations has been a primary concern
of the Planning Board since the initiation of urban renewal. She felt positive
action should be taken now.
I
Mr. Hines said he hoped the community would accept the money for re-planning
Project I and then make a concerted and positive effort to formulate a workable plan
acceptable to all.
Mr, Ceracche asked the City Controller if he could ccubant on the City's ability
to redevelop more than one area at a time. Mr. Weinstein stated that the City could
not afford another large project at this time.
Mr. Weinstein thought there were three important points which the City must
consider now:
1. Is the renewal in the Downtown area practical and feasible?
2. If it is feasible, are we willing to accept the grant offered by the Federal
Government and proceed to formulate a satisfactory urban renewal 1plan in
Project I area?
yes
3. If we cannot answer/to the above, we should forget about urban renewal
altogether.
1121/62 .. 3 ..
r
Professor Peabody moved that the Planning Board reaffirm its resolution to the
Common Council, passed October 15, recommending acceptance of the Project I study
grant. Seconded by We. Angell. CARRIED.
CM MITTEE REPORTS
Capital Im rovements Review Committee » Asst, Planner Bonner reported that the Cap.
NF. Review committee had completed Ne deliberations on the 1963-67 Capital Improve.
ments Program and copies of the recommendation to Common Council would be mailed to
the Board members with the minutes of the November 21 meeting.
Codes and Ordinances - W. Hines read the following report to the Board:
"It is the opinion of this committee that the area in question should, if amex
ed, be classified as "R-3" in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Ithaca, except for the small portion of the area now zoned "Light Iricdustrial" under
the Town of Ithaca ordinance, which should become an "I-1" zone.
"1h the R-5 zone, lot regulations such as area, set-back, and frontage are less
restrictive than the regulations of the present Town of Ithaca zoning ordinance.
R-S Use regulations are also more permissive except in the case of keeping horses*
fowl and other farm animals vh ich are not provided for in any residential zone withr-
in the city limits;. It should be pointed out that these "non-permitted" uses (its.
keeping of horses, fowl and other farm animals) which now exist in the area may be
continued in the R-3 zone as non-conforming uses. Since a rejilaMone of an RPS
zone can only be imposed on new development in the Coddington Road Annexation area,
the R--3 classification does not appear to cause any undue hardship,
"This reecammendation is forwarded with the firm understanding that it is not to
be construed as final sad immutable. The Coddington Road Annexation area should
logically be studied as a part of a greater area of potential annexation, This
would produce a broad, integrated picture of future development possibilities for
the whole area adjacent to our boundaries and provide a basis for making rational
zoning decisions in the future. If upon further study of this particular area and
surrounding areas, it seems in the judgment of this committee that a different zon-
ing would be more suitable the committee reserves full freedom to recommend the
appropriate changes."
Mr, Hines moved that the report and recomtaendations be forwarded to the Common
Council along with the outcome of the required public hearing. Seconded by Woo
Harrison. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING: Mr, Niederkorn reminded the Board that a public hearing on the
Coddington Rd. Area re-zoning recommendation would be held in the
offices of the City Planning Board at 7180 p.m. on November 29, 1962
MTING ADJOURNED at 5:45 p.m.
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
11/21/82
V
PLANNING BOARD PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, N. Y.
Regular Meeting 4:00 p.m. December 17, 1962
PRESENT: Chairman Ceracche, Mesdames Angell and Harrison; Messrs. Egan, Hall,
Hines and Peabody.
ALSO: Mrs. Rogers, Mr. Chatfield, Bldg. Comm. Golder, Alderman Kilby, and
Citizen Miscall9 Director Niederkorn, Asst. Planner Bonner
MEETING called to order at 4:05 p.m.
NINUTES of Nov. 21 meeting duly approved.
i
CCNMUNICATIONS:
Board of Education - The Director read a letter from the Ithaca City School District
Board of Education requesting the appointment of two members of the City Planning
Board to sit on the School Board Nominating Committee. Mr. Ceracche appointed Mrs.
Angell and Mr. Hines as representatives of the Board.
Greater Ithaca Reonal Planning Board - The Director reported that the Regional
Board-Fiad approvedthe City Board's recommendation on the re-zoning of the Codding-
ton Rd. annexation area with the suggestion that the portion zoned industrial within
the City be amended to residential. It was the Regional Board's considered opinion
that if the small area in question were continued in an industrial zone the present
residences in the area would be non-conforming and would be excluded from this zone
under the City ordinance in the event they ever had to be improved or rebuilt.
Mr. Peabody moved that the City Planning Board accept the recommendation of
the Regional Board and amend their original recommendation to the Common Council
so as to zone all presently built upon lots in the previous industrial district as
R-2. The remainder of the industrial district will remain as such. Seconded by
Mrs. Angell. CARRIED.
CITIZEN MISCALL REPORT: Mr. Leonard Miscall of 114 Parker St. appeared before the
Board with ideas on the future plan for urban renewal.
He stated there were 5 areas in which he felt the City Planning Board could initiate
immediate action:
1. Parking is of primary importance. He suggested selective clearance in the
block bounded by Tioga, Green, Cayuga, Clinton and Six•gile Creek to provide
parking. A new bus terminal might also be located here. He also stated that
local realtors had informed him that both Montgomery;Ward and Kresgets wished
to expand toward Green St. and that if parking were provided south of Green
St., the present city parking lot on Green St. could be used for this commer-
cial expansion. Mr. Miscall felt this provision of parking should be done on
a *crash program* basis. `
2. A comprehensive housing survey of the entire city should be undertaken imme-
diately. This basic data could then be used to formulate a city housing plan,
which could be carried out by the local Housing Authority.
S. The City Planning Board should do everytbing possible to encourage the relo-
cation of the Lehigh Valley Railroad out of the west end of the city.
Negotiations are now being carried on between the Lehigh Talley and the State
of New York on this subject.
Mr. Ceracche thanked Mr. Miscall for attending the meeting and presenting
his views.
URBAN RE OVAL: The Chairman informed the Board that a meeting of the Mayor, Com-
mittee of the Common Council on Urban Renewal, the City Attorney,
the Planning Director and himself had been held recently. At the meeting it was
decided to review all interviews and applications for the position of Urban Renewal
Administrator. Additional interviews will be held, if necessary, to choose a man
for the job.
The Board engaged in a general discussion of the steps to be taken next in
getting the downtown urban renewal project underway. Members of the Board felt
that a concrete program for planning should be drawn up and then expeditiously
carried out.
Mr. Niederkorn stated that there were five main areas of study and action
which must be accomplished in the next phase of planning in the downtown projects
1. Administration, $.Relocation, S. Land Appraisals, 4. Planning & Design,
S. Economics.
It was the general consensus of opinion among members of the Board that some
steps should be taken immediately. Mr. Ceracche called a special meeting of the
Board for 4:00 p.m. on Jan. 7, 1963 to pursue the matter further.
Commutzity Renewal Pro rara_m - The Director presented a report to the Board outlining
the scope and content'oma Cormwzdty Renewal Program. He also reported that the
Common Council had requested the Planning Board to apply for Federal funds with
which to assist in the preparation of this Community Renewal Program.
Discussion centered around the actual intent of the Mayor and Common Council-
in their request. .In the absence of the Mayor action was delayed until more speciftc
information was obtained. Mr. Cerseche noted that this topic would also be con-
sidered at the Jan. 7, meeting.
REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD REPORT: The Director presented a report concerning the
annexation policy of the City to the Board. This
report was prepared by the Regional Board and forwarded to the City Planning Board
in answer to their request for a study of possible areas for annexation.
STAFF REPORT:
Cost-Revenue Study - This matter was deferred to future meetings.
I
MWING adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
IT-V 1_41
Ernest R. Bonner
Asst. Planner
12/17/62 .. 2 •.