Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-17-17 Planning and Development Board Project Review Committee Meeting Agenda
“An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 1 of 2 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD Project Review Committee NOTICE OF MEETING & AGENDA TO: City of Ithaca Project Review Committee (Planning & Development Board) FROM: Lisa Nicholas, Senior Planner DATE: October 11, 2017 SUBJECT: Agenda for Project Review Committee Meeting: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2017 The Project Review Committee Meeting is scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. in the Second Floor Conference Room, City Hall, 108 E. Green St. Please call Lisa Nicholas at 274-6550, if you cannot attend or you require additional information. 8:30 Project: Elm St Apartments (Rebuild) Location: 203-209 Elm Street Applicant: Lynn Truame for Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services Inc. (INHS) Anticipated Board Action(s) in October: Consideration of Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval Project Description: The proposed project consists of the demolition of one single family home and two apartment buildings and the construction of a single 12,585 SF apartment building with 13 dwelling units, parking for six vehicles, and other associated site improvements. Due to the slope of the site, the building will have 2 stories facing Elm Street and three stories in the rear. The project requires the consolidation of three tax parcels. The project is in the R-3a Zoning district and is has received two area variances for relief from rear yard setback and parking requirements. This is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) §176-4 (1)(h)[3], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) § 617.4 (11) for which the Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance on September 26, 2017. 8:50 Project: Apartments Location: 311 College Ave (The Nines) Applicant: Jagat P Sharma for Todd Fox Anticipated Board Action(s) in October: No Action- Update & Discussion Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a six story, 80’ high building plus basement. The first floor will have an approximately 825 SF commercial space and five studio apartments, upper floors will have a combination of 21 studio and 24 loft apartments for a total of 45 dwelling units. The applicant’s intended market is students. Project development will require the removal/ demolition of the existing structure and all associated site features. The existing building incorporates the original Number Nine Fire Station and was identified as a structure worthy of further research in a 2009 study titled Collegetown Historic Resources Worthy or Detailed Research; Icons of Collegetown, Individual Buildings, Architectural Ensembles and Landscape Features. The project is in the MU-2 Collegetown Area Form District (CAFD) and requires Design Review. This is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) §176-4 B.(1)(k) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) § 617.4 (b)(11) and is subject to environmental review. CITY OF ITHACA 108 E. Green St. — Third Floor Ithaca, NY 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING, & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning & Economic Development Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 E-Mail: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 2 of 2 9:10 Project: Bridges Cornell Heights Residence (Senior Housing) Location: 105 Dearborn Place Applicant: Elizabeth Classen Ambrose Anticipated Board Action(s) in October: Determination of Environmental Significance and Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story single family residence with 12 bedrooms to house up to 16 people on the .446 acre lot. The building will have a footprint of approximately 4,150 SF, including porches. Site improvements include a porte cochere, a driveway and parking area for nine cars, three patios, walkways and landscaping plantings. The site is currently vacant. Site development will require the removal of approximately 25 trees of various sizes. The applicant is proposing to use the Landscape Compliance method, which requires Planning Board approval for placement of the parking area. The project is in the R-2a Zoning District and the Cornell Heights Local Historic District and has received a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC). This is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) §176-4 (1)(h)(4) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) § 617.4 (b)(11) and is subject to environmental review. 9:30 Project: Brindley Street Bridge Rebuild and Relocation (Materials attached) Location: Intersection of W State Street and Taughannock Blvd Applicant: Addisu Gebre for the City of Ithaca Anticipated Board Action(s) in October: Consideration of Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval Project Description: The project will relocate current Brindley Street Bridge to align with W. State St./Taughannock Blvd. intersection through the construction of a new single span extending Taughannock Blvd. over the Cayuga Inlet to Taber Street. The project will retain existing Brindley Street Bridge and south approach road for pedestrian and bike use. This is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) §176-4 B.(1)(k) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) § 617.4 (b)(11) for which the Board of Public Works, acting as Lead Agency made a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance in 2016. 9:50 Zoning Appeals (Materials enclosed) #3084, 201 Maple Ave, Sign Variance #3085, 235 S Cayuga St (Coltivare), Sign Variance 10:00 Agenda Review for 10-24-17 10:10 Adjournment cc: Mayor Svante Myrick & Common Council Dr. Luvelle Brown, Superintendent, ICSD Jay Franklin, Tompkins County Assessment If you have a disability & would like specific accommodation to participate, please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 by 12:00 p.m., no later than 2 days (not including weekends and holidays) before the meeting. 203 N. Aurora Street | Ithaca, NY 14850 | phone 607-272-6477 | fax 607-273-6322 | www.tgmillerpc.com David A. Herrick, P.E. Frank L Santelli, P.E. Andrew J. Sciarabba, P.E. Steven R. Rowe, P.E. Dondi M. Harner, P.E. LEED A.P., C.P.E.S.C. Lee Dresser, L.S. Darrin A. Brock, L.S. October 6, 2017 Lisa Nicholas, AICP, Senior Planner Planning Division City of Ithaca 108 E Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Ms. Nicholas, In response to comments received at previous PRC, and Planning Board meetings, we are pleased to submit (1) full size copy and (21) 11”x17” copies of the following supplemental drawings in support of the Site Plan Application for the INHS Elm Street project located at 203-211 Elm Street in the City of Ithaca. 1. Revised Drawings: a. C-102 Demolition, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan i. Added tree protection fencing and detail. Modified west construction fencing location. b. C-103 Layout Plan i. Added bulb-out at crosswalk. c. C-104 Grading and Utility Plan i. Added bulb-out at crosswalk. ii. Added slopes to all walks and ramps. d. L-101 Overall Landscape Plan i. Added bulb-out at crosswalk. ii. Modified plants on terrace and added screening plants to northern walls. e. L-103 Colored Site Plan i. Assigned number L-103 to drawing. ii. Added bulb-out at crosswalk. iii. Modified plants on terrace and added screening plants to northern walls. f. A-200 Exterior Elevations i. Provided color material information. 2. New Drawings: a. C-105 Work Zone Safety Plan i. Plan showing pedestrian and vehicular protections. b. A-401 Misc Details i. Shows retaining wall images/details/section. ii. Shows window and wall penetration images/details/sections. We look forward to reviewing this information with the Board at the upcoming PRC and Planning Board meetings. Respectfully, Andrew J. Sciarabba, P.E. Principal Engineer THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPREXISTINGCONDITIONSPLANC-101 THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPRDEMOLITION, EROSIONAND SEDIMENTCONTROL PLANC-102··· THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPRLAYOUTPLANC-103REVISED 4/3/17 THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPRGRADING ANDUTILITY PLANC-104 THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPRWORK ZONE TRAFFICCONTROL PLANC-105REVISED 4/3/17 THESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNSAND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY AREOWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PARTTHEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, ORCORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THESPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE,ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C..ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R Kdateno.bydescription2/29/2016 11:22:07 AMJ:\2015\15225.00 INHS 203-209 Elm Street Apts\4-CAD\4.01_Revit\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central.rvt E16-12AJSAJSTRTSITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 148501AJS8/16/17UPDATED SPR SET2AJS10/06/17REVISED SPRDETAILSC-201RESERVEDVANACCESSIBLEPARKINGINACCESSRESERVEDPARKINGAISLE 1A-3101A-310125555164412448869999962A-3102A-31041681561121A-3101A-310176999922212A-3102A-31056612CENTERLINE OF STREETTIERED RETANING WALLPLANTING BEDPLANTING BEDELM STREETWOOD LOOK PLANK SIDINGPREFINISHED FIBER CEMENT SIDING(3 DIFFERENT COLORS) MASONRY WATERTABLETHESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY ARE OWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THE SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C.. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R K10/2/2017 9:52:42 AMC:\Users\Walkup\Documents\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central_erikr.rvt15225.00ESREXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEJGESRA-200SITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 14850 1/8" = 1'-0"1EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"2EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/8" = 1'-0"3EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"4EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WESTELEVATION KEY NOTESNO.DESCRIPTION1 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - BASIS OF DESIGN: ALLURA FIBER CEMENT - PACIFIC BLUE2 FIBER CEMENT SIDING - BASIS OF DESIGN: ALLURA FIBER CEMENT - PEWTER4 WOOD PLANK SIDING - BASIS OF DESIGN: GRANDMAS ATTIC MIXED SOFTWOODS - PIONEER MILLWORKS5 MASONRY VENEER BASIS OF DESIGN TAPESTRY STONE BY SHOILDICE - GALAXY6 DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW7 FIXED WINDOW8 ALUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM9 ALUM COPINGno. date bydescription1 8/16/2017UPDATED SPR SET2 10/6/2017REVISED SPR(SECTION THROUGH PARKING LOT) GYP RETURN BEYONDSEE WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTIONFIBER CEMENT PANELS AND ALUM EDGE TRIM1 1/2" (R-6) INSULATED SHEATHING PANEL WITH INTEGRAL WEATHER BARRIER.SELF ADHERING FLEXIBLE FLASHINGMETAL FLASHING WITH DRIPWD STOOL BELOWSEE WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTIONFIBER CEMENT PANELS AND ALUM EDGE TRIM1 1/2" (R-6) INSULATED SHEATHING PANEL WITH INTEGRAL WEATHER BARRIER. SELF ADHERING FLEXIBLE FLASHINGFIBER CEMENT PANELS AND ALUM EDGE TRIMSEE WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTIONGYP BD RETURN BEYONDSELF ADHERING FLEXIBLE FLASHING1x WD STOOL AND WM 324 APRON1 1/2" (R-6) INSULATED SHEATHING PANEL WITH INTEGRAL WEATHER BARRIER. MECHANICAL EXHAUST CAP. PAINT TO MATCH SIDING FIELD COLOR OR PROVIDE PREFINISHED UNIT TO MATCH FACADE SIGINGFIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING5/4 FIBER CEMENT TRIM BOARD. COLOR TO MATCH LAP SIDINGMECHANICAL DUCTWORK. SEAL AT EXTERIOR WALLWALLTYP EXTERIORNOTE: ALL MECHANICAL, ELEC AND PLUMBING PENETRATIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS CLAD WITH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING WILL REQUIRE A SIDING BLOCK. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PENETRATIONS ARE TO BE LOCATED AT SIDE AND REAL WALLS. SWBR PROJECT: ©15225.00ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICESMISC DETAILS10/06/17WINDOW HEAD - FIBER CEMENTWINDOW JAMB - FIBER CEMENTWINDOW SILL - FIBER CEMENTRETANING WALL IMAGES/DETAILSWINDOW AND PENETRATION IMAGES/DETAILSWALL PENETRATION DETAIL TTTTTTTT11MS42AW27AC3MS3MS6AC6AC17AC10MS1AR38LS1JP6AW2RK13IG14AW5RK6AW2RK10QRCONDENSING UNIT, TYP.5PQ16PQTHESE DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS, DESIGNS AND PLANS INDICATED THEREON OR PRESENTED THEREBY ARE OWNED BY AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. AND NO PART THEREOF SHALL BE UTILIZED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT WITH THE SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SWBR ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C.. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©387 East Main StreetRochester, NY 14604-2107Voice: 585.232.8300Fax: 585.232.9221w w w . s w b r . c o mFILE PATH:DRAWING TITLEproj. no.checkedproj. mgr.drawn bySTATUS:DRAWING NO.PROJECT:CLIENT:ISSUE DATE:ROCHESTER, N E W Y O R K10/4/2017 2:25:24 PMC:\Users\Walkup\Documents\15225_Elm Street Apartments_Central_erikr.rvt15225.00DPNOVERALL LANDSCAPEPLANEJGMMFL-101SITE PLAN APPLICATIONITHACA NEIGHBORHOODHOUSING SERVICESINHS ELM STREETAPARTMENTS115 WEST CLINTON STREET ITHACANY, 148506/5/2017203-209 ELM STREET ITHACA, NEWYORK 14850REVISIONSno. date by description1 8/16/2017UPDATED SPR SET2 10/6/2017REVISED SPR 1" = 10'-0"1OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANPLANT SCHEDULEKey Abbreviation No. Scientic Name Common Name Root Size NotesAC 56 Astilbe chinensis 'Visions in Red' Red AstilbeCG No. 1AR1 Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset'Red Sunset Red Maple BB 3"AW68 Astilbe chinensis 'Visions in White' White AstilbeCG No. 1IG13 Ilex glabra 'Shamrock'InkberryCG No. 3JP1 Juniperus x pfitzeriana 'Sea Green' Sea Green JuniperCG No. 3LS38 Liriope spicataLily TurfCG No. 1MS27 Matteuccia struthiopterisOstrich FernCG No. 1PQ21 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia CreeperCG No. 1QR10 Quercus robur x bicolor 'Long'Regal Prince English Oak BB 3"RK9 Rhododendron 'Karens'RhododendronCG No. 3222222 PROPOSED BUILDINGEXISTING TREESPARKING LOTELM STREETTIERED RETANING WALL WITH PLANTINGSRETANING WALLRETANING WALLBIKE RACKBIKE RACKSWBR PROJECT: ©15225.00ITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICESOVERALL SITE PLANN Re: Planning Board Projects for Review and Comment October 2017 Andrew Rappaport [Andrew@chiangobrien.com] Sent:Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:53 PM To:Lisa Nicholas Cc:Larry Roberts [larryeroberts@hotmail.com]; Jody Scriber [jodyscriber@gmail.com]; Sarah Myers Hi Lisa, Before the City Committees are reshuffled next year, please allow me to comment as a member of the Disability Advisory Committee. I looked at the site plans for 105 Dearborn Street and assuming it is a commercial property, it should comply with Title III of the ADA. There does not appear to be any accommodation for wheelchair accessibility into the structure from the sidewalk other than going down the driveway and the grades of the driveway aren’t indicated. Relatedly, of the 9 parked cars shown, no allowance is made for an accessible parking space to be located near to the accessible entrance and the adjacent clear space. Best regards, andrew Member of the City of Ithaca Disability Advisory Council From: Lisa Nicholas <LNicholas@cityofithaca.org> Date: Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 2:50 PM To: Lisa Nicholas <LNicholas@cityofithaca.org> Subject: Planning Board Projects for Review and Comment ‐ October 2017 Dear All, Please find attached a PDF memorandum regarding projects which the Planning and Development Board will be considering at its October 24th 2017 regular meeting. Please submit comments to me no later than noon, October 16th, 2017 if at all possible, so the Planning Board may have the opportunity to fully consider them. The memo with attachments can be viewed here: http://www.cityofithaca.org/DocumentCenter/View/6957 Let me know if you would like to be removed from this distribution list. Lisa Nicholas, AICP, Senior Planner Planning Division 108 E Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850 607-274-6557 “The good we secure for ourselves is precarious and uncertain until it is secured for all of us and incorporated into our common life.” Jane Addams (Settlement house pioneer, Nobel Peace Prize winner, 1860-1935) Planning Board Meeting on 105 Dearborn Sharon Sassler [sharon.sassler@cornell.edu] Sent:Wednesday, September 27, 2017 8:16 AM To:Lisa Nicholas Dear Ms. Nichols – I live across the street from Bridges, and therefore will be neighbors with the new development planned at 105 Dearborn. Both my husband and I were out of town yesterday, traveling for work, and so were unable to attend the planning meeting. As a near neighbor, I am concerned with the amount of traffic that such a large facility would generate. At the moment, the Sysco truck that delivers items to the Current Bridges makes a fair amount of noise, and it disturbs my son’s sleep (his window faces out to the street). And there are the inevitable Garbage trucks making noise (beep beep beep). The truck traffic also sometimes drives the wrong way up the one‐way street – and if it does Back up, has the inevitable beeping (often very early in the morning). Having such a new large structure, right across the street, would compound that problem – and therefore make it hard for us to use two of our bedrooms, given that they face that street. I must say I was also surprised by the scale of the building – it is quite large, much larger than seems appropriate in a neighborhood of small homes, Some of which are smaller than 2000 square feet (right on Heights Court, across from Dearborn). A building with a smaller footprint would worry Neighbors far less, and would fit into the neighborhood scale better. As it stands, the proposed building dwarfs the nearby houses, and even makes The very large homes on Kelvin seem small. That does not seem appropriate for a home in a Historic District. It also will inevitably increase the trucks And traffic in an area that already has a dangerous mix of Cornell students and staff looking for parking, students driving rapidly, and walkers from The frats and sororities, as well as children in the neighborhood who walk to the elementary school. When we bought our house, we did not think we were moving into a small business district, but that does seem to be what it is becoming, with the number of Bridges homes now in the neighborhood (now up to four, soon to be expanded). We are concerned about the resale value of our home – despite having a lovely Craftsman home, who is going to want to purchase a home right across the street from a hotel, given the traffic it will generate and the noise? Especially if two of the bedrooms are just too noisy because of traffic? We had thought we were safe from that purchasing in an historic district, but apparently the strict standards applied to home owners wanting to make repairs do not apply to business owners. I am not an opponent of Bridges. I would like my mother to move there should something happen to my father (though they have not been good at returning Calls requesting information, which is odd). But I selected a small, historic, walkable neighborhood, and it was a conscious choice. I would invite members Of the Planning Board to spend a few hours in the neighborhood some morning and get a sense of the traffic flow, as they might then better understand How such a massive structure would impact our peaceful neighborhood. 1 of 2 City of Ithaca SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR) APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: Addisu Gebre Title/Role: Bridge Systems Engineer Address 1: 108 East Green Street Address 2: City, State, & Zip Code: Ithaca, NY 14850 Telephone: 607-274-6530 Cell Phone:607-279-7386 E‐Mail: agebre@cityofithaca.org CONSULTANT: Name: Dave Kennicutt Title/Role: Sr. Project Manager Address 1: 860 Hooper Road Address 2: City, State, & Zip Code: Endwell, NY 13760 Telephone: 607-231-6606 Cell Phone: E‐Mail: dkennicutt@delta-eas.com PROJECT SPONSOR: Name: Title/Role: (if other than applicant) Address 1: Address 2: City, State, & Zip Code: Telephone: Cell Phone: E‐Mail: ― PROJECT DESCRIPTION ― Project Title: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Project Address: 120 (+/-) Brindley Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Project Type (check one): Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Mixed‐Use Scope of Work (check all that apply & indicate approximate operation/construction cost): Vegetation Removal $ Façade Change $ Demolition $ New Paving $ Earthwork $ New Plantings $ New Structure $ Structure Expansion $ Accessory Structure $ Tree Removal $ New Parking $ Landscaping $ Addition to Building/Structure $ Total Construction Cost: $ Anticipated Construction Period: to (best estimate) (best estimate) ― OWNER INFORMATION ― 1. If the development site is leased property, list the property owner's name and address below: Length of Lease: Note: If property is not owned by Project Sponsor, OWNER’S AUTHORIZATION FORM required. CONTACT: Lisa Nicholas, Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION 108 E. Green St., 3rd Floor Ithaca, NY 14850 │ (607) 274‐6550 lnicholas@cityofithaca.org BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: ____________ (REQUIRED) 2 of 2 2. Please record the application date and approval status of any required federal, state, and/or local permits or approvals for this project: Type Approval Agency Application Date Approval Status Demolition Building Division Building Building Division Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Board of Public Works (BPW) 3. Identify any existing restriction(s) relevant to development of this property: Deed Restriction(s) Lien(s) Easement(s) License Agreement(s) Other: _________________ ― APPLICATION FEE ― Application fee is based on total construction, site work, and landscaping costs, charged in accordance with the following schedule. The fee is payable by check to the “City of Ithaca,” upon submission of this application. Type of Approval Project Cost Application Fee Site Plan Review less than $10,000 $75 $10,000 to $49,999 $150 $50,000 to $100,000 $300 over $100,000 $1.50 per $1,000 * Modified Site Plan Review less than $50,000 $150 $50,000 or more $250 * Modified Site Plan Review fee only applies to modifications to approved site plans that do not trigger reconsideration of Determination of Environmental Significance. Modifications that require additional environmental review should follow fee schedule for full Site Plan Review. This determination will be made at time of application. ― QUICK APPLICATION CHECKLIST ― Item No. of Copies Application Form (completely filled out and signed) 22 Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) (completely filled out and signed)22 Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) ― Part 1 [if required] (completely filled out and signed) 22 Full‐Size Drawings: (1) scalable site survey with building footprint(s); and (2) height elevations 2 Reduced Drawings (11”x17”) [see “Site Plan Review Application Checklist”] 22 Site Plan Review Application Fee Applicant's Signature: Date: By signing this application form, the applicant acknowledges City staff may visit the site in order to fully understand the proposed development. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS: You must provide electronic versions of ALL submitted documents. LARGE FILES: Incoming e‐mails to the City must be under 10 MB in size (incl. message envelope), so please either provide a CD‐ROM, flash/thumb drive, or use a free file‐sharing web site, like: www.hightail.com, www.dropbox.com, www.google.com/drive, etc. You can also split documents into smaller parts and send multiple e‐mails/files to: cpyott@cityofithaca.org and lnicholas@cityofithaca.org. SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (BIN 2210400) OVER CAYUGA INLET PROJECT LOCATION (1) Route Name: Brindley Street (2) BIN Number and Feature Crossed: 2210400 over Cayuga Inlet (3) City/Village/Township: City of Ithaca (4) County: Tompkins (5) Project Length: Approximately 560 ft. (6) Location Map and Aerial Image (See Below) SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW Existing Site Conditions The current Brindley Street Bridge is a single lane structure. The bridge was constructed in 1938 with the last major rehabilitation occurring in 1952. It has been posted for a 20 ton weight limit since January of 1965 and has a general recommendation of 4 and a sufficiency rating of 62.5. The bridge is not historically eligible, and carries gas and water lines as well as vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The motorists, bicyclist and pedestrians using the structure utilize the same lane. There are no traffic signals, pedestrian crossing signals or stop signs to aid in the coordination of movement across this bridge. Crossing of the bridge is dependent upon opposing users indicating to each other when it is safe to cross. This is an unsafe condition and as usage of this road increases it will create a greater potential for head-on collisions or queuing of traffic into the Brindley Street/West State Street intersection. Brindley Street and the adjoining Taber Street provide a second “local street” access to a major shopping center situated approximately 0.6 miles to the south in addition to serving the businesses located along them. Additionally, there have been a significant number of accidents in the immediate vicinity of the bridge. The primary location of the accidents is at the unsignalized intersection of West State Street, West Seneca Street, West Seneca Street Spur, Brindley Street and the Pete’s Grocery drive, which in essence functions as a non - conventional six legged intersection. The thru movement and heaviest traffic flow is along West State Street; traffic along the various side roads is controlled by stop signs. Many of these accidents can be attributed to the skew at which the side streets intersect with West State Street and the inadequate gaps in traffic on West Stat e Street which impedes vehicular movement that involve crossing West State Street. These combined factors create a multitude of traffic conflict points. The right lane of West Seneca Street is currently designated as a thru/right turn lane. Motorists att empting to cross West State Street to reach Brindley Street or the West Seneca Street Spur must contend with heavy traffic flow on West State Street. Finding a gap in this traffic to complete the crossing movement creates additional delay during peak traffic flow. Neither Brindley Street nor the West Seneca Street Spur is directly aligned with the thru movement of West Seneca Street. Field observations found that motorists attempting to cross West State Street are often forced to turn right into the westbound lane on West State Street and wait for a gap in the eastbound traffic to turn left onto Brindley Street or the West Seneca Street Spur. Conflict points are further compounded by the close proximity of the entrance to Pete’s Grocery which, by default, creates in-lane stops and crossing traffic that further impedes eastbound and westbound traffic flows. Brindley Street and the West Seneca Street Spur share the same entrance point to West State Street. Proposed Project Improvements - New Roadway and Bridge Construction on Relocated Horizontal Alignment The project proposes to relocate the Brindley Street Bridge to align with Taughannock Boulevard, connecting the bridge to Taber Street at the south end of the project, and to convert the existing Brind ley Street Bridge to a pedestrian/bicycle path. The Brindley Street access point at East State Street will essentially function as a driveway to the Sign Works property parking lot, with restricted access south of the driveway and over the bridge to non-motorized vehicles. This will significantly decrease, nearly eliminating, the northbound traffic on Brindley Street at the intersection, which is an awkward and confusing intersection that has a crash history. The project will be constructed on City ROW with exception of two property acquisitions: one from The Aeroplane Factory, LLC (0.025± acres) and one from Wallace Industries, Inc. (0.029± acre). SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 3 Relocating the Brindley Street Bridge to a new alignment at the Taughannock Boulevard intersection will provide a number of traffic and pedestrian related benefits. The intersection is signalized and has the capacity to handle the volume of traffic from the bridge. The signal will eliminate some safety concerns from the Brindley/West State/West Seneca/Pete’s driveway intersection, although traffic signals in and of themselves are not necessarily safety improvements. The signal will provide for better accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists trying to cross West State Stre et, compared to Brindley Street. The new alignment for the bridge is not expected to significantly increase traffic along Brindley, Taber or Cherry Streets. For motorists headed southbound across the bridge, there will not be any significant reduction in delay or distance to destinations to the south (Cherry Street, stores in the southwest area, etc.). There is not a significant reduction in delay, if any reduction at all, for southbound traffic on Taughannock Boulevard, using the new bridge compared to using the old bridge or to using West State Street and Route 13 southbound to access the southwest area, due to the circuitous route of Brindley, Taber, and Cherry Streets and Cecil A. Malone Drive. The proposed project satisfies the objectives of replacing the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with a two lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians, restoring the crossing to a condition which provides a minimum 75 year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize the life cycle cost of maintenance and repair, and implementing measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed in the West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/West State Street corridor project. The project is also consistent with the City’s “Six Point Traffic Plan” adopted in 2001. Stormwater Management During preliminary design, the proposed project resulted in an estimated total area of disturbance of 1.21 acres, requiring a SPDES General Permit GP-0-15-002 as well as a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). As design has progressed, a more accurate determination of limits of disturbance has been performed which has reduced the total area of disturbance to less than 1 acre. Therefore, it is not anticipated that a SPDES permit or a SWPPP will be required. During construction, stormwater runoff will be managed in accordance with an erosion and sediment control plan which will be developed during final design. Transportation System Impacts During Construction The existing transportation system will be impacted during construction of the project due to the required tie - in of the new Brindley Street alignment within the existing West State Street and Tabor Street. The existing bridge will be utilized for traffic during construction of the new crossing; the existing structure would then be retrofitted for strictly pedestrian and bicyclist use. Bridge Railing Selection Input provided by the Planning and Development Board during preliminary design indicated a preference for using Texas Aesthetic Railings for the new structure as this is consistent with other structures in the projec t area. However, accommodation for this type of railing system is problematic for this struc ture. The soils on which the bridge will be supported are very weak, necessitating weight savings wherever this can be achieved to reduce the cost of foundation work and the potential for future settlement. Although the adjacent West State Street structure has the Texas Aesthetic Barrier, this bridge also incorporates a relatively lightweight Exodermic® (composite slab with unfilled steel grid) deck system to help counterbalance the additional weight of the concrete railing. In recent discussions with NYDOT Main Office Structures, the use of an Exodermic® SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 4 is prohibited for new structures (the West State Street Bridge was a major rehabilitation). Therefore, in the interest of reducing superstructure weight, an open steel railing system is proposed , identical to that used on the City’s Lake Street Bridge over Fall Creek. This consists of a NYSDOT standard, crash-tested four rail system with a supplementary stainless steel top rail. All the exposed railing components, with the exception of the supplementary top rail, would be painted the same dark green as on the Lake Street structure. The approach railings on the north end of the bridge would also be painted dark green. To provide visual segregation of the structure from the approaches and for gateway effect, concrete pilasters with light standards would be provided in similar fashion to the Lake Street bridge. Plantings are proposed on the north end of the bridge to disguise the approach railing and enhance the visual entrance appeal. Other advantages of using this open railing include: • Less obtrusive to views of the water and surrounding terrain for users (motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians) and on and passing by the bridge • Gives this structure its own uniqueness relative to the West State Street structure, versus the perception of a “canned” City bridge • Much less costly than the Texas Aesthetic Barrier (over $100/ft. less) • Less maintenance cost Schedule Pending approvals and a successful bidding process it is anticipated that project construction will begin in the Spring/Summer of 2018 and be completed in the fall of 2019. Assessment of the Environmental impacts of the proposed project is included in the Full Environment Assessment Form - Part III Appended Drawings The following drawings are included in the site plan review package: • Preliminary Structure Plans (4 sheets) • Context Plan (1 sheet) • Plan, Sections and Bridge Elevation Displays (3 sheets) • Details of railings for retrofitted existing bridge and new structure (2 sheets) • Landscape renderings (2 sheets) • Preliminary Planting Plan (1 sheet) SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 1 LIST OF PROJECT FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (BIN 2210400) OVER CAYUGA INLET The following improvements are proposed on this project: Existing Re-purposed Bridge and Pedestrian/Bicycle Path Bridge • Cleaning and painting the existing structural steel. Finish color will be coordinated with the Planning and Development Board. • Removal of existing railings and curbs, deck patching and installation of NYSDOT standard five -rail steel bridge railing. Railing will be painted with dark green finish coat, Munsell Color Hue 10G, Value Chroma 2/2 (same as used on City’s Lake Street bridge over Fall Creek). This type of railing and end treatment is similar to the multi-rail used on a prior (truss) version of the bridge, as indicated in the following historic photo (compliments of Ryan Wright): SITE PLAN REVIEW OCTOBER 9, 2017 2 Path • A 10’ min. wide paved asphalt path will be provided within the existing Brindley Street corridor from Taber Street to the tie-in to the MLK Boulevard improvement project north of the bridge. The path will be designed to meet current ADA standards. • Areas outside of the paved path will be regraded and planted with turfgrass along the west side and no - mow/meadow mix on the east side. • Bollards will be installed at both ends of the path to restrict the use to bicyclists and pedestrians. The clear width between the bollards will be 5’-0”. • Because this path will be segregated from vehicular traffic and there are sepa rate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations on the relocated roadway and bridge, no pavement markings on this path are proposed. • Signage will be installed at the ends of the path to warn motorists that vehicular use of the path is prohibited. Relocated Brindley Street Bridge and Approaches • Provisions for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians are being provided as detailed on the drawings provided. • A NYSDOT standard four-rail steel bridge railing with supplementary stainless steel top rail is proposed. • Concrete pilasters with street lights (Sternberg Main Street A luminaires) mounted on top are proposed on the new structure. • New cantilever type traffic signal poles are proposed in the southwest and southeast intersection quadrants. • Standard pavement markings (edge lines, centerline, crosswalks, stop bars and symbols, including bicycle lane symbols, meeting the current requirements of the National MUTCD and NYS Supplement are proposed. • The sidewalk on the east side will be adjacent to the curb; the sidewalk on the west side will taper away from the curb on the south approach to provide room for snow storage and plantings. • Trees are proposed along the south approach. These will need to have a high canopy to minimize disruption to sight lines for all users. • Gateway plantings are proposed at the north bridge approach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²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onditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions 1DPHRI$FWLRQ 1DPHRI/HDG$JHQF\ 1DPHDQG7LWOHRI5HVSRQVLEOH2IILFHULQ/HDG$JHQF\ 6LJQDWXUHRI5HVSRQVLEOH2IILFHULQ/HDG$JHQF\ 6LJQDWXUHRI3UHSDUHU 'DWH )8//(19,5210(17$/$66(660(17)250 )($) 3$57²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lease complete each question (indicate N/A, if not applicable) $ 6,7('(6&5,37,21 3K\VLFDOVHWWLQJRIRYHUDOOSURMHFWERWKGHYHORSHGDQGXQGHYHORSHGDUHDV 3UHVHQW/DQG8VH ;8UEDQ,QGXVWULDO;&RPPHUFLDO3XEOLF)RUHVW $JULFXOWXUDO2WKHU 7RWDODUHDRISURMHFWDUHD DFUHVBBBBVTXDUHIHHW Chosen units apply to following section also $SSUR[LPDWH$UHD Units in Question 2 apply to this section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«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ó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ity of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 1 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will there be an effect as a result of a physical change to project site? Yes No Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater (15-foot rise per 100 feet of length) or where general slope in the project exceeds 10%. (Bridge abutment and wingwall construction) Yes No Construction on land where depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. (Roadway embankment construction) Yes No Construction of parking facility/area for 50 or more vehicles. Yes No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Yes No Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Yes No Evacuation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Yes No Construction of any new sanitary landfill. Yes No Construction in designated floodway. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No 2. Will there be an effect on any unique land forms found on the site (i.e., cliffs, gorges, geological formations, etc.)? Yes No Specific land forms (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 2 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will project affect any water body designated as protected (under article 15 or 24 of Environmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.)? Yes No Developable area of site contains protected water body. Yes No Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of protected stream. Yes No Extension of utility distribution facilities through protected water body. Yes No Construction in designated freshwater wetland. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Discharge of Fill below OHWM and Bed / Bank Disturbance (Scour protection and roadway embankment construction) Yes No 4. Will project affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? Yes No A 10% increase or decrease in surface area of any body of water or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Yes No Construction, alteration, or conversion of body of water that exceeds 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Yes No Fall Creek, Six Mile Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Silver Creek, Cayuga Lake, or Cayuga Inlet? (Cayuga Inlet) Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 3 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER (cont.) 5. Will project affect surface or groundwater quality? Yes No Project will require discharge permit. Yes No Project requires use of source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed project. Yes No Construction or operation causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Yes No Project will adversely affect groundwater. Yes No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which do not currently exist or that have inadequate capacity. Yes No Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day or 500 gallons per minute. Yes No Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. (Water siltation from excavation will be contained within turbidity curtain installed around work area) Yes No Proposed action will require storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 4 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER (cont.) 6. Will project alter drainage flow, drainage patterns, or surface water runoff? Yes No Project would impede floodwater flows. Yes No Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Yes No Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Yes No Other impacts (if any New drainage pattern via closed drainage system on relocated Brindley Street. Yes No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will project affect air quality? Yes No Project will induce 500 or more vehicle trips in any 8-hour period per day. Yes No Project will result in the incineration of more than 2.5 tons of refuse per 24-hour day. Yes No Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTUs per hour. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 5 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACTS ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will project affect any threatened or endangered species? Yes No Reduction of any species, listed on New York or Federal list, using the site, found over, on, or near site. Yes No Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Yes No Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year other than for agricultural purposes. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No 9. Will proposed action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Yes No Proposed action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, or wildlife species. Yes No Proposed action requires removal or more than ½ acre of mature woods or other locally important vegetation. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Approximately ¼ acre of wooded area to be removed on south bridge approach. Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 6 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 10. Will proposed action affect views, vistas, or visual character of the neighborhood or community? Yes No Proposed land uses or proposed action components obviously different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Yes No Proposed land uses or proposed action components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of aesthetic qualities of that resource. Yes No Proposed action will result in elimination or major screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Wooded/brush area between railroad bed and relief channel will be largely replaced with new bridge and approach roadway. Yes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric, or paleontological importance? Yes No Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any facility or site listed on or eligible for the National or State Register of Historic Places. Yes No Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Yes No Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any site designated as a local landmark or in a landmark district. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 7 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 12. Will the proposed action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces, or recreational opportunities? Yes No The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Yes No A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Bridge will be located in area used by non-motorized boaters. Yes No IMPACT ON UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS OR CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 13. Will proposed action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a site designated as a unique natural area (UNA) or a critical environmental area (CEA) by a local or state agency? Yes No Proposed action to locate within a UNA or CEA? Yes No Proposed action will result in reduction in the quality of the resource. Yes No Proposed action will impact use, function, or enjoyment of the resource. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 8 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Yes No Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. (Relocated roadway) Yes No Proposed action will result in major traffic problems. Yes No Other impacts: Yes No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Yes No Proposed action causing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Yes No Proposed action requiring creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single- or two-family residences. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 9 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON NOISE AND ODORS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance during construction of, or after completion of, this proposed action? Yes No Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school, or other sensitive facility? Yes No Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Yes No Proposed action will produce operating noise exceeding local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structure. (daytime construction noise) Yes No Proposed action will remove natural barriers that would act as noise screen. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will proposed action affect public health and safety? Yes No Proposed action will cause risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e., oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be chronic low-level discharge or emission. Yes No Proposed action may result in burial of “hazardous wastes” in any form (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Yes No Proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes. Yes No Proposed action will result in handling or disposal or hazardous wastes (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid, or contain gases). Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 10 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH (cont.) Storage facilities for 50,000 or more gallons of any liquid fuel. Yes No Use of any chemical for de-icing, soil stabilization, or control of vegetation, insects, or animal life on the premises of any residential, commercial, or industrial property in excess of 30,000 square feet. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Yes No The population of the city in which the proposed action is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident human population. Yes No The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proposed action. Yes No Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Yes No Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. Yes No Proposed action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. Yes No Development will create demand for additional community services (e.g., schools, police, and fire, etc.) Yes No Proposed action will set an important precedent for future actions. Yes No Proposed action will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 Project Impacts Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 Date Updated: 7/18/2016 11 of 11 7/18/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD (cont.) Other impacts (if any): Yes No 19. Is there public controversy concerning the proposed action? Yes No Unknown — If any action in Part 2 is identified as a potential large impact, or if you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3 — Page 1 of 7 City of Ithaca FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM - Part III Project Name: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge Date Created: 3/28/2016 First Updated: 5/14/2016 Second Updated: 6/9/2016 Third Update: 7/18/2016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will relocate Brindley Street to align with the West State Street/Taughannock Boulevard intersection through construction of a new single span bridge carrying Brindley Street over Cayuga Inlet. The existing structure and south approach will be converted for non- motorized use by pedestrians and bicyclists. For more details on the project description, project context and alternative designs consider for the project, please refer to Chapter 1, 2 and 3 of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. This project is being processed as a CEQR Type I Action in accordance with CEQR Chapter 176, Section 4, and as a SEQR Type I Action in accordance with 6 NYCCR Section 617.4(b)(11). IMPACT ON LAND The proposed project includes bridge relocation; full depth roadway reconstruction; major approach roadway realignment; new sidewalks, and new drainage along Brindley Street. The proposed roadway realignment will provide a tree lawn / snow storage area between the curb and the sidewalk on the west side of the roadway. The roadway re-alignment will increase safety for motor vehicles by providing a new bridge connecting to West State St /Taughannock Blvd and for bicyclists and pedestrians by converting the existing one lane Brindley St Bridge to bicycle pedestrian use. During construction, erosion and sediment potential will be minimized through implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), implementation of soil conservation best management practices (BMPs), minimizing the amount of grading practicable, slope stabilization, and re-vegetation of disturbed areas. Stabilized construction entrances will be provided to minimize tracking of soil onto adjacent road surfaces. Stockpiles of topsoil and other erodible material will be stabilized. The SWPPP will be in conformance with New York’s SPDES General Permit and identify the soil erosion and sediment control measures to be implemented during construction. Implementation of BMPs and post-construction stormwater management practices will avoid and/or minimize adverse impacts to land and surface waters. Therefore, no significant adverse land impacts are anticipated as a result of implementing and monitoring these mitigation measures during pre- and post-construction periods of the proposed project. Construction of the proposed bridge abutments, superstructure, and placement of stone fill protection will not impact the existing water surface elevations. Page 2 of 7 It is anticipated that the project will be constructed in one (1) construction seasons beginning in early spring of 2017. It is anticipated that the project will substantially complete (open to full traffic) by November of 2017. IMPACT ON WATER Installation of the new bridge abutments and placement of stone fill protection will require construction within Cayuga Inlet. Above the water line, adjacent disturbed creekside areas will be graded and vegetated. Proper soil erosion and sediment control measures (cofferdams, stabilized construction entrances, silt fence, turbidity curtains, etc.) will be implemented to minimize impacts to the waterway. A NYSDEC Protection of Waters Permit, NYSDEC State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit, NYSDEC Section 401 Water Quality Certification and USACOE Nationwide Permit 14 will be obtained prior to construction. The relocated Brindley Street will require a new closed storm water drainage system to convey storm water off of the roadway. For more details on the project’s impact on water, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-4 to page 4-8 (4.4.1 Wetlands, 4.4.2 Surface Waterbodies and Watercourses, 4.4. 3.Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers,4.4.4 Navigable Waters, 4.4.5 Floodplains,4.4.6 Coastal Resources, Aquifers, and Reservoirs and 4.4.8 Storm water Management) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON AIR No significant impacts are anticipated. For more details on the project’s impact on Air, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-12(4.4.15 Air Quality) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Approximately ¼ acre of wooded land south of Cayuga Inlet between the old railroad bed and the relief channel will be impacted by the proposed construction. Approximately 40 trees 3” or greater diameter at breast height (DBH) will be removed in this area. In addition, approximately 30 trees 3” or greater DBH will be removed along the north bank of Cayuga Inlet adjacent to the existing City parking lot. Replacement of larger lost trees (over 8” DBH) with native species will be considered and identified in the landscaping plans developed during final design. Any off- road disturbed land areas will be graded and vegetated. Erosion and sediment control practices downstream of project disturbed areas will be installed prior to disturbance and maintained during construction. Page 3 of 7 New trees are proposed on the south side of the inlet on both sides of relocated Brindley Street as mitigation for the lost forest area and as a traffic calming measure. Consultation will be made with the City forester for species selection and density, and the Planning Board will review this landscape plan during Site Plan Review. The USFWS “Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species” list was reviewed for this project. The Northern long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) was identified as a threatened species possibly being present within the vicinity of this project. This project proposes to remove approximately 75 trees larger than 3 inched DBH; removal will occur between October 1 and March 31. Therefore, it is assumed that the proposed construction “May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” Northern longeared Bat populations. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) was contacted for information regarding the presence of state listed threatened, endangered or special concern species that may be impacted by the proposed project. A response from the NYSDEC New York National Heritage Program (NYNHP) was received on September 11, 2015 and indicated the possible presence of the following threatened, endangered or special concern species at or near the project limit. • Kentucky Coffee Tree (Gymnocladus dioicus): NYSDEC listed endangered species. • Tiger Spiketail (Cordulegaster erronea): Unlisted on the NYSDEC listing, but critically imperiled in NY. • Spine-crowned Clubtail (Gomphus abbreviates): Unlisted on the NYSDEC listing, but critically imperiled in NY. • Gray Petaltail (Tachopteryx thoreyi): NYSDEC listed special concern species. • Rapids Clubtail (Gomphus quadricolor): Unlisted on the NYSDEC listing, but critically imperiled in NY. • Swamp Lousewort (Pedeicularis Ianeolata): NYSDEC listed threatened species. • Spreading Chervil (Chaerophyllum procumbens): NYSDEC listed endangered species. • Hill’s Pondweed (Potamogeton hillii): NYSDEC listed threatened species. A site visit conducted by qualified personnel on August 18, 2015 indicated no presence of the above species. The majority of the site consists of developed land, and upland waste area. It is unlikely the proposed project will have a negative impact on these species as the proposed project will not impact the preferred habitat of the state listed species. There are no regulatory requirements associated with the unlisted species under NYSDEC. For more details on the project’s impact on Plants and Animals, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4- 8 and 4-10 (4.4.9 General Ecology and Wildlife Resources and 4.4.9.4 Invasive Species) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES The new bridge location and relocated portion of Brindley Street will provide for a new visual appearance to the existing natural/wooded area. The new structure will provide Texas aesthetic railing and period lighting consistent with other waterfront bridges in the City. The Page 4 of 7 visual quality of the approach railings is also very important and some alternative to standard highway box beams should be considered. For more details on the project’s impact on Aesthetic Resources, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-12 (4.13 Visual Resources) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES A Phase 1 Cultural Resource Study was performed in April 2016. Testing did not locate prehistoric or historic sites within the project area, and no further work is recommended. A Phase 1 Architectural Survey was also performed. No buildings or structures within the architectural project area were identified as eligible for the Historic Register. The results are subject to concurrence from the NYSDOT Regional Cultural Resource Coordinator and the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. For more details on the project’s impact on Historic Resources, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4- 10 (4.11 Historic and Cultural Resources) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS OR CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS No significant impacts are anticipated. The project is not in a Tompkins County Unique Natural Area, and is located approximately 0.15 mile from the nearest UNA (137 – Octopus Cliffs). For more details on the project’s impact on unique natural areas or critical environmental areas, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-10 (4.4.10 Critical Environmental Areas) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON TRANS P ORTATION The project proposes to relocate the Brindley Street bridge to align with Taughannock Boulevard, connecting the bridge to Taber Street at the south end of the project, and to convert the existing Brindley Street bridge to a pedestrian/bicycle path. The Brindley Street access point at East State Street will essentially function as a driveway to the Sign Works property parking lot, with restricted access south of the driveway and over the bridge to non-motorized vehicles. This will significantly decrease, nearly eliminating, the northbound traffic on Brindley Street at the intersection, which is an awkward and confusing intersection that has a crash history. This intersection may further be modified by a separate, but related project: the West Martin Luther King Jr. Corridor Enhancement project, but that work is beyond the scope of the Brindley Street bridge project. Page 5 of 7 Relocating the Brindley Street bridge to a new alignment at the Taughannock Boulevard intersection should provide a number of traffic and pedestrian related benefits. The intersection is signalized and has the capacity to handle the volume of traffic from the bridge. The signal should eliminate some safety concerns from the Brindley/West State/West Seneca/Pete’s driveway intersection, although traffic signals in and of themselves are not necessarily safety improvements. The signal will provide for better accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists trying to cross West State Street, compared to Brindley Street, though it is not clear how many people will go out of their way for this benefit since the old Brindley Street bridge will still be open for walking and biking traffic. The new alignment for the bridge is not expected to significantly increase traffic along Brindley, Taber or Cherry Street. For motorists headed southbound across the bridge, there will not be any significant reduction in delay or distance to destinations to the south (Cherry Street, stores in the southwest area, etc.). There is not a significant reduction in delay, if any reduction at all, for southbound traffic on Taughannock Boulevard, using the new bridge compared to using the old bridge or to using West State Street and Route 13 southbound to access the southwest area, due to the circuitous route of Brindley, Taber, and Cherry Streets and Cecil A. Malone Drive. It is possible that some motorists coming from the southwest area, headed northbound or toward West Hill, may choose to use the new Brindley Street bridge route, particularly because of the signalized intersection at West State Street. Currently these people have to experience significant delays at peak periods at the northbound approach of Brindley/West State, or they take the long way around using Rt 13 and making a way through the west end. Any traffic using the old bridge would presumably use the new bridge, so there should not be an increase of this traffic. Some percentage of people who take the long way around may choose to try the new bridge alignment, but any increase of traffic along the route would be balanced by a decrease in traffic along Route 13 and through the west end of the City. It is not expected that the new bridge alignment will produce the sort of induced demand that highway widenings or capacity improvements often see. Rather it is expected that the project will not have a significant impact on traffic patterns in and of itself. Though the Brindley/Taber/ Cherry/Cecil A. Malone route provides a sort of short cut for some people, shifting the bridge 250 feet to the east does not significantly change the distance of the “short cut,” which is about three quarters of a mile from Brindley/State to Cecil A. Malone/Route 13. If the City is to one day pursue the Taughannock Boulevard Extension project that was considered in the City’s Six Point Traffic Plan (2001), there might be a greater potential to affect traffic patterns in this area; at this time, however, that is beyond the scope of this project. The existing transportation system will be impacted during construction of the project due to the required tie-in of the new Brindley Street alignment within the existing West State Street and Tabor Street. For more details on the project’s impact on transportation, please refer to Chapter 2 page 2-1 to 2-11 (Chapter 2 -Project Context: History, Transportation Plans, Conditions and Needs) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. Page 6 of 7 IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION This area is open space located on a waterway within the larger waterfront district of the City. The immediate setting of the bridge is an area that is used by recreational boaters (non- motorized) and has future potential for improved water-based recreational development. This project also has the potential to increase/improve recreational opportunities through the retention of the existing bridge as a bike/pedestrian amenity. IMPACT ON ENERGY No significant impacts are anticipated. For more details on the project’s impact on energy, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-13 (4.4.16 Energy) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON NOISE AND ODORS Noise levels will be attenuated by distance from the noise sources, intervening topography and vegetation on and off-site. The project is located in an undeveloped area and will introduce some additional traffic noise. However, potentially sensitive noise receptors, such as residential areas, are located a considerable distance from the site. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. Construction activity will be performed using heavy equipment (bulldozers, dump trucks, and cement mixers) that will temporarily generate noise from engines, brakes and back-up warning signals. Exhaust noise usually is the predominant source of engine noise, however the use of functional mufflers on all equipment will be a requirement of project contractors which will help reduce temporary noise levels. Additionally, construction will likely be confined to 7:00 AM to 5:30 PM Monday to Friday. There may be isolated instances when off-hour work is required, but it is expected that these would be very limited. Therefore, the scale and magnitude of the potential temporary noise impacts are minor. With respect to odor, project construction may result in some temporary and localized exhaust odors associated with operation of construction machinery. Such impacts would be minor, mostly confined to areas of on-site construction activity, short term and dissipated by wind. For more details on the project’s impact on noise and odors, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-13 and Page 4-12 (4.4.15 Air Quality and 4.4.17 Noise) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH No significant impacts are anticipated. Page 7 of 7 For more details on the project’s impact on public health, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-14 to page 4-18 (4.4.18 Asbestos, 4.4.19 Hazardous Waste and Contaminated Materials,4.5 Construction Effects and 4.6 Indirect and Secondary Effects) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD This project is essentially an extension of Taughannock Boulevard, which has been identified as an element of the City’s Six Point Traffic Plan Evaluation report, which was adopted on December 5, 2001. The project will provide improved access to the Southwest Development Area. The project is located within the boundary of the Cayuga Lake Waterfront Plan, completed in 2004 - through the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) program. This LWRP has yet to be adopted by the NYS Department of State. Ithaca ’s waterfront is a gateway to the City, so the aesthetic quality of this bridge, its approaches and associated landscaping is of significant community importance. The Planning Board will consider these issues during Site Plan Review. For more details on the project’s impact on growth and character of community or neighborhood, please refer to Chapter 4 page 4-2 to page 4-4(4.2 Social and 4.3 Economic) of Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Draft Design Report. Originally Prepared by: David L. Kennicutt, PE, Sr. Project Manager, Delta Engineers, Architects, & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. Revised by: Addisu Gebre, EIT, Bridge Systems Engineer, City of Ithaca Engineering Department. Revised on 7/18/2016 by: David L. Kennicutt, PE, Sr. Project Manager, Delta Engineers, Architects, & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. April 2017 Final Design Report PIN 3756.11 APPENDIX G INPUT FROM STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDING PUBLIC 860 Hooper Road Endwell, NY 13760 Tel: 607.231.6600 Fax: 607.231.6650 www.deltaengineers.com AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY RE: Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge over Cayuga Inlet CP #764 Delta Project No.: 2013.469.002 DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 2 of 5 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY Alt 1: Traffic Option 1: Alt 2: DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 3 of 5 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY Traffic Option 2: Alt 3: Traffic Option 3: DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 4 of 5 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 5 of 5 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. 860 Hooper Road Endwell, NY 13760 Tel: 607.231.6600 Fax: 607.231.6650 www.delta-eas.com AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY February 27, 2016 (via email) Mr. Addisu Gebre, Bridge Systems Engineer City of Ithaca 108 East Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850-6590 RE: PIN 3756.11, CP #764 Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge over Cayuga Inlet Public Information Meeting Minutes - Final Delta Project No.: 2013.469.002 Dear Mr. Gebre: A public presentation concerning the above referenced project was held at the City of Ithaca offices on at 2:00 pm in the 2nd floor conference room at the City of Ithaca offices on February 10, 2016. Attendees are listed on the attached sign-in sheet. In addition, the following project representatives attended the meeting: David Kennicutt, Joseph Mieczkowski, and Tamer Osman – Delta Engineers, Architects, & Land Surveyors, P.C. (Delta) Annette Marchesseault – Trowbridge Wolf Michaels Landscape Architects, LLP (TWMLA) The purpose of the meeting was to update the public on project progress and solicit comments on the preliminary design. The following posters were set up showing alternatives investigated and associated details: Colored plans with aerial photo backdrop and typical roadway sections – one each of Alt. 1 and 2 Simulations – one each for Alt.1 and 2 Typical bridge sections – existing and proposed (both Alts.), and proposed retrofit of existing (Alt. 2 only) Large scale aerial plans – one each for Alt. 1 and 2 One board with photos showing proposed railing and lighting concepts, and simulated pedestrian railing concept for retrofitted bridge under Alt. 2 One board with photos of existing intersections of West State Street at Brindley Street and Taughannock Boulevard A presentation was made by Mr. Kennicutt that followed the attached outline. In addition, a looped video simulation of Alternative 2 was shown during the comment period following the presentation. Written comments were received (attached), in addition to the following public comments and questions. Answers provided by the design team are noted in bold italics. DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 2 of 3 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY 1. Many that spoke indicated a preference for Alternative 2. No one in the audience expressed a preference for Alternative 1. 2. Several in the audience were concerned that this project would increase traffic and traveling speed on the relocated Brindley Street. 3. Related to comment 2 above, an audience member expressed concern that greater travel speeds on Brindley will affect their ability to exit their business driveway on Taber Street. 4. Also related to comment 2 above, an audience member suggested a stopped condition near the old railroad bed for pedestrian crossing. 5. There is too much traffic on Brindley and Taber Street already. People use this as a short cut to Wegmans to avoid congestion on other main routes. This project will create more traffic on Brindley Street. Is there a way to deter people to take this short cut and reduce traffic? Not really – this is a public road. 6. Striping on Brindley, Taber and Cherry Street will help traffic stay in their proper lanes. 7. There already exists heavy congestion at the intersection of Taughannock Boulevard and West Seneca Street. Those traveling westbound on West Seneca Street often encounter a blocked intersection due to backed up southbound traffic on Taughannock. Has this problem been looked at? Not in detail as part of this project. We will discuss this issue with the City to see how they would like it addressed. 8. What will happen to the existing bridge under Alternative 2? The existing bridge will be closed to motor vehicles with bollards and appropriate signage; it will remain open to pedestrians and bicyclists. 9. What will happen to the existing intersection at Brindley Street and West State Street under Alternative 2? No modifications are proposed under this project; there may be improvements made under the separate Martin Luther King Jr. Street transportation enhancement project. 10. The new Brindley Street configuration at West State Street under Alternative 1 may be difficult to maneuver for eastbound trucks entering from West State Street. 11. I’m concerned that the new bridge will create a lot of noise, perhaps due to the effect of new concrete barriers. Can this be addressed? The concrete barriers shouldn’t exacerbate this problem. Tire noise occurs due to grooving of concrete bridge decks, which has been altered in recent years from transversely, perpendicular to traffic, to longitudinally, or with traffic. This has reduced tire noise considerably. 12. Won’t left turns from West State Street to the relocated Brindley Street cause through traffic to back up worse on West State Street? We don’t believe this will be a significant problem. The traffic studies performed indicate that the new intersection will operate satisfactorily. We will revisit this to be sure. 13. The project should consider enhancing the waterfront area and provide nearby parking for fishing, hiking and other recreational activities. Meeting was closed at approximately 3:30 pm. Followingthemeeting and with Mr. Gebre’sconcurrence, Mr. Kennicutt emailed a pdf file of the Alternative 2 simulation poster to Josh Brokaw of the Ithaca Times. DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 3 of 3 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY Additional written comments received after the meeting have been appended to these final minutes. Respectfully, DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. David L. Kennicutt, PE Senior Project Manager Encl. cc: (all below via email) Lynne Yost, City of Ithaca Richard Sawczak, NYSDOT Region 3 William Balduzzi, NYSDOT Region 3 Annette Marchesseault, TWMLA Peter Trowbridge, TWMLA 860 Hooper Road Endwell, NY 13760 Tel: 607.231.6600 Fax: 607.231.6650 Website: www.delta-eas.com AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY PIN 3756.11 BIN 2210400 BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET OUTLINE – PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1. Welcome 1.1. Thank audience for attending 1.2. Request for attendees to sign-in for the official meeting record 2. Introduction of Project Representatives 2.1. City of Ithaca – Addisu Gebre 2.2. NYSDOT – Rich Sawczak, Local Projects Liaison Region 3 2.3. Delta EA&LS – Dave Kennicutt, Tamer Osman, Joe Mieczkowski 2.4. TWMLA – Annette Marchesseault, Peter Trowbridge 3. Purpose of Meeting 3.1. Inform you about the project and to provide an informal setting for questions, comments and concerns 3.2. Consider feedback provided in progressing the design 4. Project Details 4.1. Project description 4.1.1. Existing bridge built around 1938. Based on inventory data, the last major rehabilitation work occurred in 1952. 4.1.2. Bridge deficiencies 4.1.2.1. Single lane bridge on heavily traveled street 4.1.2.2. No separate provisions for pedestrians 4.1.2.3. Load restriction of 20 tons 4.1.3. Non-standard roadway features include: 4.1.3.1. Inadequate bridge roadway width 4.1.3.2. Inadequate horizontal clearance 4.1.3.3. Inadequate load capacity 4.1.3.4. Sharp horizontal curvature at Taber Street 4.1.3.5. No banking at Taber Street 4.1.4. Other problems DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 2 of 3 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY 4.1.4.1. Poor intersection geometry at W. State Street 4.1.4.2. High accident rate at intersection 4.2. Project objectives 4.2.1. Replace the existing single lane structure with two lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians 4.2.2. Provide a minimum 75 year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize life cycle and maintenance costs 4.2.3. Implement measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed in the West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/West State Street corridor 4.3. Alternatives Evaluated 4.3.1. Do Nothing – doesn’t meet project objectives 4.3.2. Replacement on Existing Alignment (see display) 4.3.2.1. Corrects most non-standard features and improves horizontal curve at Taber Street 4.3.2.2. Addresses completely 2 of the project objectives, and improves safety for users 4.3.2.3. Does little to address accidents at the W. State Street intersection 4.3.2.4. Will require off-site detour during construction 4.3.2.5. Estimated construction cost of $2.4 million 4.3.3. Replacement on Relocated Alignment (see display) 4.3.3.1. Corrects most non-standard features and improves horizontal curve at Taber Street 4.3.3.2. Existing Brindley Street would function as driveway for businesses north of the inlet 4.3.3.3. The entrance to the Aeroplane Factory will be relocated 4.3.3.4. The existing bridge and street south of the inlet will be closed to motor vehicles and street will be utilized for pedestrians and bicyclists only 4.3.3.5. Addresses all project objectives 4.3.3.6. Traffic can use existing bridge during construction 4.3.3.7. Estimated construction cost of $2.6 million 4.3.3.8. This is currently the preferred alternative and will be carried forward for environmental review 4.4. Impacts 4.4.1. Overall project will have positive impact by eliminating bridge deficiencies and improving safety 4.4.2. Strip takings required to provide access for construction and for future maintenance (see display) 4.4.3. Construction impacts 4.4.3.1. Off site detour proposed (see display) DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. Page 3 of 3 AN ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED COMPANY 5. Current Project Schedule 5.1. Environmental review completed in Summer 2016 5.2. Preliminary design completed in Fall 2016 5.3. ROW acquisition completed in Spring 2017 5.4. Final design completed in Summer 2017 5.5. Project award in Fall of 2017 5.6. Construction in 2018 6. Project Funding 6.1. Design and ROW incidentals are being funded by the City 6.2. ROW acquisition 6.2.1. 80% Federal Funding (FWHA Highway Bridge Program) 6.2.2. 15% State Funding (NYSDOT) – not guaranteed but usually available 6.2.3. Remainder – City 6.3. Construction funding – not yet allocated, but federal and State funding being sought 7. Closing 7.1. Thank you for attending. We’ll stick aroundawhileif you want tolook at displaysor ask questions. 7.2. Comment forms are available – you may fill out now or take with you. PLEASE COMPLETE AND RESPOND BY FEBRUARY 19, 2016. 1 David Kennicutt From:Addisu Gebre [AGebre@cityofithaca.org] Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:18 AM To:David Kennicutt Subject:FW: Brindley Street Bridge comment Categories:Filed by Newforma Another public comment for your record and consideration. Addisu Addisu Gebre, EIT, Bridge System Engineer City of Ithaca Engineering Department 108 E Green Street. Ithaca, NY 14850 Office: 607-274-6530 /Mobile: 607-279-7386 /Fax: 607-274-6587 From: Patrick Braga [pcb68@cornell.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 9:12 AM To: Addisu Gebre Subject: Brindley Street Bridge comment Dear Mr. Gebre: As someone who walks, rides my bike, and drives, I would feel comfortable on the Brindley Street bridge with 10-foot-wide vehicular lanes, and a bike lane at 6 or 7 feet, especially if it could be buffered. I saw a rendering for 12-foot lanes on the bridge, but by modern traffic engineering standards that would be excessive for the speed and traffic volume expected here. Let's balance the needs of all modal choices people make. Thank you, Patrick Braga 1 David Kennicutt From:Addisu Gebre [AGebre@cityofithaca.org] Sent:Thursday, February 11, 2016 9:42 AM To:David Kennicutt Cc:Joseph Mieczkowski Subject:FW: Brindley St bridge project feedback Categories:Filed by Newforma See comments below from a member of City of Ithaca Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Council. Thank you,Addisu Addisu Gebre, EIT, Bridge System Engineer City of Ithaca Engineering Department 108 E Green Street. Ithaca, NY 14850 Office: 607-274-6530 /Mobile: 607-279-7386 /Fax: 607-274-6587 From: Dave Nutter [nutter.dave@me.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 11:59 PM To: Addisu Gebre; Cynthia Brock; George McGonigal; Kent Johnson; Tim Logue Subject: Brindley St bridge project feedback I am unable to attend the public information session about the Brindley Street bridge project. However, based on information presented to the BPW meeting and on discussion afterward at the January BPAC meeting, I would like to offer the following as a member of BPAC and resident of the neighborhood who walks, bicycles, and drives on Brindley Street. * I support Alternative 2 which will connect an extension of Taber Street via a bridge in a new location to the intersection of Taughannock Blvd and W State/MLK St. * I urge that right turns on red be prohibited at the intersection of Taughannock Blvd, Taber St, & W State/MLK St. * I urge that the shoulders on the extension of Taber St and the new bridge, whose purpose is to accommodate bicycle traffic, be designed as actual bike lanes, including the way they meet the intersection with W State/MLK St and Taughannock Blvd. * The 12' lanes on the bridge and Taber St are unnecessarily wide, encouraging drivers to speed. I urge that instead they be striped 10' wide, and that the bike lanes be either 7' wide or be 5' wide with a 2' buffer or barrier or that the bike lanes be built above street level. * I support the re-use of the old one-lane bridge for bicycle and pedestrian traffic only with the addition of improved railings for bicycle and pedestrians safety, which are not nearly as expensive as railings for motor traffic. * I urge that, after the new bridge is opened, all of Brindley St be for bicycle and pedestrian traffic only with no motor vehicle traffic permitted. I support motor vehicles using only the new driveway, as shown, on Taber Street to access the buildings south of Cayuga Inlet. I support motor vehicles using only the driveway on Seneca Spur to access the buildings on the north side of Cayuga Inlet, including truck deliveries to Ithaca Grain & Pet Supply. I support making the intersection of Seneca Spur and W State/MLK St more of a right angle intersection either as part of this project or as part of the W State/MLK St project to more safely accommodate this motor traffic, while shortening the pedestrian crossing distance along W State/MLK by eliminating the dangerous Brindley St intersection and its terrible sight-lines on the east side of the building on the corner. 2 * I urge that the informal but well-used pedestrian path directly between the south end of Brindley St and Malone Dr be made an official bicycle and pedestrian path. Pedestrian and bicycle travel on this path can be expected to increase even if it is not made official. * I urge that a mid-block crosswalk be painted across Taber Street where Brindley Street meets it, at the end of the new sidewalks and bike lanes and opposite the above-mentioned path directly to Malone Drive. * I urge that the W State/MLK project accommodate bicycle traffic including good connections with future bicycle accommodations on Hector Street, farther east on W State/MLK St at least to Meadow Street, and south on Brindley Street. These should be planned even if they are beyond the W State/MLK project. BPAC should be involved in plans for these bicycle accommodations within and beyond the W State/MLK project. Thank-you for making a project which accommodates bicycle and pedestrian travel as well as making motor traffic safer. --David Nutter, member of BPAC (City of Ithaca Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Council) DLK AS SHOWN PRELIMINARY PLAN AND ELEVATION 1 P-1TODLKNKLDLKDLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\PSP drawings & reference drawings\375611_cpb_gen_PSP.dgn8:17:02 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA 4 BIN 2210400 OCTOBER 2017CAYUGA I NLETG RI D N O R T H HYDRAULIC DATA RECURRENCY INTERVAL PEAK DISCHARGE HIGH WATER ELEVATION AT POINT OF MAX. BACKWATER EXISTING PROPOSED (YEARS) DRAINAGE AREA X.XX (SQUARE MILES ) (CF/S) FLOOD BASIC 100 50 vFLOOD DESIGN 387.24388.53 387.14388.42 15’0 15’30’ SCALE BAR PLAN DATUM ELEV. 365.0 ELEVATION A-A TO TABER ST. TO W. STATE ST.W. STATE ST. BLVD.TAUGHANNOCK BOUNDARY HIGHWAY EXISTING BRG.c BRG. TO c115’-0" LANE 12’-0" LANE 12’-0" 5’-0" SDWLK. STA. 5+83.50 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END BRIDGE STA. 6+02.75 DEPTH CONSTRUCTION BEGIN PAVEMENT FULL END APPROACH SLAB STA. 6+36.46 DEPTH CONSTRUCTION END PAVEMENT FULL STA. 4+63.50 BEGIN BRIDGE END APPROACH SLAB CURVE 2 RAIL (TYP.) FACE OF APPROACH 2 1 5’-0" 4’-0" BR IND LE Y S T. R EL O C A TE D STA. 4+66.00 BRGS,c STA. 5+81.00 BRGS,c 20’40.6"nAZ. 33 20’40.6"nAZ. 303RAILING, ITEM 568.70 (TYP.) TRANSITION BRIDGE SLEEPER SLAB APPROACH SLAB (TYP.) (TYP.) RAILING, ITEM 606.10 BOX BEAM GUIDE ITEM 568.51 FOUR RAIL (TYP.) STEEL BRIDGE RAILING ITEM 620.03 LIGHT STONE FILLING, ITEM 620.05 HEAVY STONE FILLING, FIX.EXP. 5’-0" SDWLK STA. 4+38.50 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA. 4+36.50 END PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION 48’-2"OUT TO OUTRAIL (TYP.) FACE OF BRIDGE TOP OF CUT STA. 4+70, LT 47’ RT 52’ STA. 5+94, STA. 4+67, RT 50’ TOP OF CUT ELEV. 387.14 UPSTREAM FASCIA D.H.W. (50 YEAR) @ ST 6+00T.G.L. AND STATION LINE cH.C.L., BRINDLEY STREET AA ELEV 384.0 ELEV 379.0 ELEV 374.0 EXISTING GROUND 2:1AVG. VELOCITY THRU STRUCTURE @ DESIGN FLOOD = 3.52 (FT/SEC) 3742 2845 LIGHTING (TYP) ORNAMENTAL BRIDGE SURVEY BASELINEB 3+43.37PT5’-0" SHLDR./BIKE LANE 5’-0" SHLDR./BIKE LANE FASCIA = 0.34’ UPSTREAM MIN. FREEBOARD @ 1. FINAL ORNAMENTAL LIGHT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGNER. NOTES: PILES (TYP.) CONCRETE SEMI-INTEGRAL ABUT. (TYP.)EQNAHDEB 1+00.00EQNBK00+-0.00ST 5+00ST 6+00B 3+00 B 4+00 B 5+00 B 6+00 B 6+60B 3+43.37PTB-3 B-2 B-1 " CONCRETE 20+0021+0029+0030+003 7 5375 3803 8 0 380380 TOE OF FILL (TYP.) WATER EDGE OF 3853 8 5 385 385 385 38 5 LT 43’ STA. 5+57, T 1+00T 1+003903903903 9 0 390 390 390 390390390T CURVE 2 E = 18.22’ T = 95.42’ L = 181.70’ R = 240.77’ 47’50"nDc = 23 14’24" LT.n = 43q PT STA. B 3+43.37 PCC STA. B 1+61.66 0’2’4’6’VERT.10’20’30’ HORZ.8’SCALE BAR10’40’ PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED BRIDGE STA. B 6+36.46 END PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION STA. 4+63.50 BEGIN BRIDGE END APPROACH SLAB 115’-0" STA. 5+83.50 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END BRIDGE STA. 6+02.75 DEPTH CONSTRUCTION BEGIN PAVEMENT FULL END APPROACH SLAB STA. 4+66.00 BRGS,c STA. 5+81.00 BRGS,c OF TRAVEL WAY PROPOSED RIGHT EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY PROPOSED LEFT EDGESTA. B 1+12.60LT. -2.00%STA. B 1+18.46RT. 0.00%STA. B 1+54.46LT. -2.00%STA. B 1+90.46LT. -4.00%RT. +4.00%STA. B 3+14.57LT. -4.00%RT. +4.00%STA. B 3+50.57LT. -2.00%RT. +2.00%STA. B 4+22.57LT. -2.00%RT. -2.00%STA. B 4+36.46LT. -2.30%RT. +2.30% INLET CAYUGA BED OF STA. 4+36.50 END PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH CONSTRUCTION STA. 4+38.50 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB APPROXIMATE EXISTING GROUND 365 370 375 380 385 390 395395 365 370 375 380 385 390 395395 B 1+00 B 2+00 B 3+00 B 4+00 B 5+00 B 6+00 B 7+00 STATIONPVI B 1+00.00ELEV 386.85PVC B 1+15.00ELEV 386.86 PVI B 1+40.00ELEV 386.87PVT B 1+65.00ELEV 387.07 PVC B 2+25.00ELEV 387.55 PVI B 2+50.00ELEV 387.76PVT B 2+75.00ELEV 388.33 PVC B 4+75.03ELEV 392.91 HIGH B 5+11.49ELEV 393.33PVI B 5+25.03ELEV 394.05PVT B 5+75.03ELEV 392.06 PVC B 5+84.32ELEV 391.69 PVI B 6+09.32ELEV 390.69PVT B 6+34.32ELEV 390.44 PVI B 6+59.68ELEV 390.190.04% 0.81% 2.29% -3 .99% -0.99% L = 50.00 FT. G1 = 0.04% G2 = 0.81% E= 0.05 FT. HSD = 309.45 FT. L = 50.00 FT. G1 = 0.81% G2 = 2.29% E= 0.09 FT. L = 100.00 FT. G1 = 2.29% G2 = -3.99% E= -0.78 FT. SSD = 221.84 FT. L = 50.00 FT. G1 = -3.99% G2 = -0.99% E= 0.19 FT. HSD = 220.00 FT.386.9386.9387.1388.6384.1384.0381.7383.1376.8373.3389.4390.3386.85386.96387.35387.85388.90390.05391.19392.34393.29392.86391.14390.29360 355 355 360 -5% 5% DATUM SUPERELEVATION HSD = UNLIMITED PROPOSED BRINDLEY STREET DLK P-2AS SHOWN PROFILE 2DLK/BRTNKLNKLDLKDLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\PSP drawings & reference drawings\375611_cpb_pro1_PSP.dgn8:18:13 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA 4 BIN 2210400 OCTOBER 2017 2 1 TYPICAL BRIDGE AND APPROACH SECTIONS BIKE LANE SHOULDER / 1’-0" T.G.L. WINGWALL (TO REMAIN AS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) BEGIN APPROACHEND APPROACH TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION EXISTING BRIDGE SECTION 5’-0"5’-0"12’-0"12’-0"5’-0"2’-3"5’-0" 12’-0"12’-0"5’-0"5’-0" 5"5" 5’-0"5’-0" 1’-8" 1’-8" 5"5" 1’-8" L SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SIDEWALK 2% (TYP.) 6" C BRINDLEY STREET STATION LINE, H.C.L., & CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB APPROACH RAIL GRANITE CURB TRAVEL LANESIDEWALK L TRAVEL LANE 1.5%1.5% 2%2% SIDEWALK BIKE LANE SHOULDER / T.G.L. (TYP.) 6" 48’-2" (TYP.) SIDEWALK CONCRETE SEE NOTE 1 SIZE AND SPACING OF GIRDERS TO BE DETERMINED IN FINAL DESIGN LOOKING UPSTATION C BRINDLEY STREET STATION LINE, H.C.L., & 1.5%1.5% SHOULDER BIKE LANE / SHOULDER BIKE LANE / 2% 12" SUBBASE DLK 3TODLKNKLDLK P-3 PROPOSED STEEL GIRDER TYPE F1 STONE CURB (TYP.) NONE TYPICAL APPROACH SECTIONS DECK CONCRETE 9" RAIL (TYP.) STAINLESS STEEL TOP SUPPLEMENTAL 4 RAIL WITH STEEL BRIDGE RAILING, DLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\PSP drawings & reference drawings\375611_cpb_typ_appr_PSP.dgn8:19:25 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA 4 BIN 2210400 OCTOBER 2017 FINAL DESIGN. 1. TYPE AND STYLE OF DECORATIVE LIGHTING TO BE DETERMINED DURING NOTES: 10’-9" REPAIR DECK REMOVE CURB AND 12’-6" OUT-OUT (5 RAIL) - TYP. BICYCLE RAILING PEDESTRIAN AND RAIL WITH REPLACE EXISTING ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION UNITS SHARED USE PATH SECTION WIDTH VARIES 0’ TO 9’ SNOW STORAGE / PLANTING AREA 10’-0" EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING EXISTING BRINDLEY STREET VARIES 5’-0"2’-3" 2’-3"5’-0" 5"5" 5’-0"12’-0"12’-0"5’-0" 2" ITEM 402.198902 5" ITEM 402.378902 12" ITEM 304.15 ITEM 609.0201 L SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SIDEWALK 2 1 (TYP.) 6" 1.5%1.5%2% & VARIES 2% & VARIES ITEM 606.10 C BRINDLEY STREET STATION LINE, H.C.L., & EXISTING GROUND 4" ITEM 608.0101 ITEM 610.1601 ITEM 610.15 (4" THICK) GRAVEL AREA ITEM 610.1402 (4" THICK) A.C. PAVEMENT ITEM 608.020102 ITEM 610.1601 (TYP.) ITEM 203.02 ITEM 520.09000010 SAWCUT LINE ’EB’ STATION 1" ITEM 402.098302 T.G.L & P.O.R. BIKE LANE SHOULDER / BIKE LANE SHOULDER / 6%6% 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION 19 F9 BINDER COURSE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION PREPARATION OF SUBSOIL FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT - ROADSIDE610.1601 610.15 402.198902 402.098302 304.15 402.378902 606.10 608.0101 CY LF CY SY SY SUBBASE COURSE, OPTIONAL TYPE 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION BOX BEAM GUIDE RAILING CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS TON TON TON 203.02 CYUNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL CY610.1402 TOPSOIL - ROADSIDE LF520.09000010 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT CONCRETE LF LF609.0201 STONE CURB, GRANITE (TYPE A) 608.020102 TON 568.80010010 ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN RAILING HMA SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS AND BICYCLE PATHS, AND VEGETATION CONTROL STRIPS DLK 4TODLKNKLDLK P-4 LOOKING UPSTATION NONE 2 1 TYPICAL ROADWAY AND PATH SECTIONS EXISTING PARKING LOT DLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\PSP drawings & reference drawings\375611_cpb_typ_rdwy_PSP.dgn8:27:09 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA 4 BIN 2210400 OCTOBER 2017 FEBRUARY 10, 2016 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET ALTERNATIVE 2 Mickey Roof Jewelry TABE R S T R E E T Existing Multi-Use Trail Proposed Future Pedestrian / Bicycle Connection Potential Future Pedestrian / Bicycle Connection Approximate Limits of Vegetation to be Removed Signworks Building Ithaca Feed & Pet Supply Trombley Tire & Auto Ports of New York Pete’s Grocery Cayuga Lumber K&H Bottle&Can Redemption Bus Depot Tompkins Trust IBEW Green Star Cooperative Market Tompkins Employees Federal Credit Union Fingerlakes Electric Supply Laundromat Chemung Canal Trust Company Island Health & Fitness Reamer Recycling Puddledockers Kayak Shop N FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELFLOOD CONTROL CHANNELCAYUGA INLETCAYUGA INLETThe Space @ Green Star Co-op M L K B O U L E V A R D / W S T A T E S T R E E T ( N Y S R T 7 9 ) CLIFF STRE E T ( N Y S R T 9 6 ) CLIFF STREET (NYS RT 96) W SENECA STREET W S T A T E S T R E E T N FULTON STREET (NYS RT 13)TAUGHANNOCK BLVD (NYS RT 89)TAUGHANNOCK BLVD (NYS RT 89)TABER STREETBINDLEY STREETPARK ROADFLORAL AVEW STATE STREETCLIFF STREETTo Cecil Malone Drive and Future Black Diamond Trail To Cecil Malone Drive Actual Intersection Geometry to be Coordinated with MLK/State Street Pedestrian Improvements ProjectETETTTEETEETTET L.805 P.141TA#073-2-1917 STATE STREET(REPUTED OWNERS)JOHN + SHERRY BOREK L.600 P.1010TA#058-1-41006 WEST SENECA STREET(REPUTED OWNERS)MARIA M. PIRROSALVATORE J. PIRRO ANDTA#073-2-3119-139 BRINDLEY STREET(REPUTED OWNER)CITY OF ITHACAL.746 P.54TA#058-7-8WEST BUFFALO STREET(REPUTED OWNER)MARK ZAHRRISTA#073-4-1VANHORN PARK(REPUTED OWNER)CITY OF ITHACAL.467 P.1052TA#073-8-1119-139 BRINDLEY STREET(REPUTED OWNER)CITY OF ITHACAL.CD2507 P.296TA#078-1-1.1110 CHERRY STREET (REPUTED OWNER)WALLACE INDUSTRIES, INC.INSTRUMENT# 2015-05017TA#073-1-111001-1015 WEST SENECA STREET(REPUTED OWNER)DO I HAVE TO DRAW YOU A PICTURE, LLCINST# 555747-003TA#073-3-1912 WEST STATE STREET(REPUTED OWNER)ISHKA ALPERNINST# 555747-003TA#073-3-2910 WEST STATE STREET(REPUTED OWNER)ISHKA ALPERNINST# 555747-003TA#073-3-3900 WEST STATE STREET(REPUTED OWNER)ISHKA ALPERNINST# 593199-001TA#058-7-5902 WEST SENECA STREET(REPUTED OWNER)PETER ZAHRRISL.900 P.222TA#073-9-12120-140 BRINDLEY STREET(REPUTED OWNER)THE AEROPLANE FACTORY, LLCCAYUGA INLETW. SENECA ST.BRI NDLEY ST.W. STATE ST.SPURW. SENECA ST.TABER ST.(TYP.) HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK GRIDNORTHTAUGHANNOCK BLVD. PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK GREEN SPACE NON-VEHICULAR USE BRIDGE REMAINS FOR PROPOSED BRIDGE PETE’S GROCERY RACKER CENTERS ENSR & PET SUPPLY ITHACA GRAIN TWMLA BUSINESSES ON PARCEL: TROMBLEY TIRE & AUTO 5"5" 2 1 MLK/STATE ST. IMPROVEMENTS COORDINATE WORK WITH PROPOSED EXISTING HIGHWAY BOUNDARY 175’ MIN. RADIUS CURVE NON-STANDARD RELOCATED DRIVEWAY 10’ WIDE SHARED USE PATH ITHACA CITY OF CDEPARTMENTOFTRA N SPO R T ATIONUNITE DSTATES OF AMERIA Administration Federal Highway U.S. Department of Transportation PROPOSED ROW TAKINGS PROPOSED CUT/FILL SLOPES REPLACEMENT BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE LIGHTING BRIDGE ORNAMENTAL OCTOBER 2017 1 1 5’ PROPOSED CLEAR SPANCommissoner MATTHEW J. DRISCOLL Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO Transportation Department of c 12’-0"12’-0" 9201AHJ NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION - BRINDLEY STREET SIDEWALK 5’-0"5’-0"5’-0"5’-0" GRANITE CURB 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 12" SUBBASE 5" BASE COURSE HMA 2" BINDER COURSE HMA 1.5" TOP COURSE HMA THE AEROPLANE FACTORY ACQUISITION LINE APPROX. FEE SIDEWALK TRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANESIDEWALK VARIES TO 9’-0" MAX. STORAGE TREE LAWN / SNOW SHOULDER BIKE LANE/ SHOULDER BIKE LANE/ Administration Federal Highway CDEPARTMENTOFTRA N SPO R T ATIONUNITE DSTATES OF AMERIA U.S. Department of Transportation ITHACA CITY OF u11’-6" *= NON-STANDARD FEATURE LOOKING UPSTATION EXISTING BRIDGE SECTION * * TRAVEL LANE EXISTING UTILITIES (TYP.) RAILING SYSTEM NON-CONFORMING FOR 20 TONS BRIDGE IS POSTED LOOKING UPSTATION LOOKING UPSTATION SIDEWALK SIDEWALKTRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANE 9201AHJ PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE BRIDGE VEHICLES MOTOR NO ROADWAY ON APPROACH REGULATORY SIGNAGE PROPOSED BRIDGE SECTION (EXISTING BRINDLEY ST. BRIDGE) PROPOSED BRIDGE SECTION (NEW BRINDLEY ST. BRIDGE) SHOULDER BIKE LANE/ SHOULDER BIKE LANE/ BRIDGE DECK STEEL TOP RAIL (TYP.) WITH SUPPLEMENTAL STAINLESS 4 RAIL BRIDGE RAIL SYSTEM Commissoner MATTHEW J. DRISCOLL Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO OCTOBER 2017 10’-9" AND BICYCLE RAILING (5 RAIL) REPLACE WITH PEDESTRIAN Transportation Department of SPACING BETWEEN. APPROACHES WITH 5’-0" CLEAR BOLLARDS SHALL BE PLACED ON NOTE: REPLACEMENT BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE 867POB 5’-0"5’-0"12’-0"12’-0"5’-0"5’-0" (TYP.) GRANITE BRIDGE CURB LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BRIDGE STREAMBED CAYUGA INLET APPROXIMATE ORDINARY HIGH WATER Commissoner MATTHEW J. DRISCOLL Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO Transportation Department of CDEPARTMENTOFTRA N SPO R T ATIONUNITE DSTATES OF AMERIA U.S. Department of Transportation ITHACA CITY OF BRIDGE ELEVATION LOOKING WEST EXAMPLE RAILING PHOTO 1 EXAMPLE RAILING PHOTO 2 OCTOBER 2017 Administration Federal Highway REPLACEMENT BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE ASSEMBLY (IF REQUIRED) OF FIXED SPLICEc 1’-6" MIN. 1" ELEVATION A A B B OF RAILING ANCHORAGEc 10" 7"AND 4 WASHERS EACH WITH 4 HEAVY HEX NUTS 4v-v1" DIA. ANCHOR STUDS pANCHOR 1’-2"vxv"xv10"8"pBASE 1’-2"vxv1"xv10" TSv5"xv3"xv" W6vxv25 TSv6"xv6"xv" TSv5"xv3"xv" RAILING ANGLE L5"vxv5"xv"6"3"6"6"6"6"6"3"3’-6"SURFACE TOP OF ROADWAY6"7"6"6" 1’-8" 2" SIDEWALK 2% 6" 3" 1" 3" 1" OF POSTc 3"1" 1" LOCK WASHER (TYPICAL) HEX NUT AND SPRING OF " DIA. BOLTS WITHc 1" AND 4 WASHERS EACH WITH 4 HEAVY HEX NUTS 4v-v1" DIA. ANCHOR STUDS SECTION ELEVATION 1" W6vxv25 1’-2" 10"2"2" 3"3"6"10"6"2"2"5"1"1"6"5" DIA. ANCHOR HOLE 2"2"10" 1’-2"5"6"2"2"10"C C 6" 3" 3" 1"1" "2"5"L5"xv5"xv" 5" 2"2"5"3"5" "" SLOT SECTION C-C PLAN 1"" DIA." " HEX NUT SPRING LOCK WASHER "xv2"xv2"vWASHER BRIDGE RAILING DETAILSSMSLOCK WASHER (TYPICAL) WASHER AND SPRING HEAD BOLT WITH HEX NUT, SLOTTED ROUND d OF " c NONE ANCHOR STUD (TYP.) 1" DIA. HOLE FOR 1" DIA. ANCHOR STUD (TYP.) 1" DIA. HOLE FOR 1" DIA.6"p1’-2"xv"xv10" ANCHOR ANCHORAGE OF RAILING c p1’-2"xv1"xv10" BASE HOLES FOR " BOLTS OF " DIA.c NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALESECTION A-A SECTION B-B ROUND HEAD BOLT (FOUR-RAIL WITH SIDEWALK) STEEL BRIDGE RAILING 5"2"1" SEE NOTE 7 STEEL BRIDGE RAILING SPLICE DETAILS ITEM 615.80010005 STAINLESS STEEL RAIL.d2" SIDEWALK RAIL TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.d2" 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPOSED SPLICE DETAILS FOR 6. FOR BRIDGE RAILING LAYOUT PLANS SEE DWG. NO. ST-24. 5. FOR TRANSITION DETAILS, SEE DWG. NOS. ST-25 & ST-26. 4. FOR SPLICE DETAILS, SEE DWG. NO. ST-28. FT-LB.). 3. BOLTS SHALL BE TORQUED SNUG TIGHT (APPROXIMATELY 100 EDGES TO A MINIMUM RADIUS OF ". 2. PRIOR TO GALVANIZING THE ASSEMBLED POST, GRIND ALL TO SECTION 568 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL RAILING IS TO BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED ACCORDING NOTES:----------------RJTRAIL PAINTING NOTES SEE BRIDGE AND APPROACH BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAIL PAINTING NOTES:3’-10"ITEM 615.80010005 ALL RAIL POST LOCATIONS PROVIDE SUPPORT BRACKETS AT STAINLESS STEEL RAIL.d2" BRACKETS, SHALL BE SHOP PAINTED, ITEM 657.020001. THE STAINLESS STEEL TOP RAIL AND TOP RAIL SUPPORT 1. ALL EXPOSED FACES OF THE BRIDGE RAIL COMPONENTS, EXCLUDING DLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\375611_cpb_dtl_rlg_01.dgn8:34:24 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA BIN 2210400 OCT 2017 JJMSMSNONE----------------RJT 4’-6"4"8"4"8"4"6"4"6"4"6"(TYP.)2"4"x4"x" RAIL TUBE (TYP.) SMOOTH (TYP.) SEAL WELD & GRIND (TYPICAL ALL POSTS) DETAIL ON BD-RP4E SEE CAP PLATE 4"x4"x" RAILING POST CUT EXCESS & PEEN (TYP.) HEX NUT AND SPRING LOCK WASHER (TYP.) SQUARE NECK BOLT (CARRIAGE BOLT), " DIA. GALV. ROUND HEAD "2 110 FACE OF RAIL TOP OF SIDEWALK 2"1"1" 1"7"B B CC "4 35 OF RAILING ANCHORAGEc SECTION A-A 4"x4"x" RAILING TUBES (TYP.)7"TOP OF SIDEWALK vOF DECK JOINTc 2’-0" MIN. OF POST & BOLTSc 5’-0" MAX.13’-0" MAXIMUM POST SPACING OF RAILING EXPANSION JOINTc BOLTS (CARRIAGE BOLTS) GALV. ROUND HEAD SQUARE NECK OF " DIA. HOLE FOR " DIA.c ANCHOR BOLTS " DIA. FULLY THREADED pRAILING POST BASE 7v"x"x9" LONG A A DETAIL" ON BD-RP4E SEE "RAIL SPLICE OF LOWER RAILc SEMICIRCULAR HOLE " RADIUS FOR LOWER RAILS TYPICAL WEEP HOLE DETAIL 7"CC "4 35 OF RAILING ANCHORAGEc DETAILS ON SUPERSTRUCTURE CURBLESS RAILING POST ANCHORAGE B B 4" 4"x4"x" TUBE (TYP.) TOP OF PAVEMENT 10"2" OF POST & BOLTSc ROUND HEAD SQUARE NECK BOLTS (CARRIAGE BOLTS) OF "DIA. HOLES FOR " DIA. GALV.c ASTM A500 GR. B 4"x4"x" TUBE DETAIL FOR LOWER RAILS" SEE "TYPICAL WEEPHOLE DETAIL FOR LOWER RAILS" SEE "TYPICAL WEEPHOLE " GRIND SMOOTH (TYP.) SEAL WELD AND p" CAP n45 n45AND FASCIA SIDE (TYP.) GRIND SMOOTH TRAFFIC 4"x4"x" RAIL TUBE (TYP.) END OF STRUCTURE 4"x4"x" RAIL TUBE (TYP.) FINISHED GRADE LINE TOP OF PAVEMENT OR TOP OF SIDEWALK ON BD-RP4E SEE SOIL POST DETAIL G n45 TYPICAL END ELEVATION FOR BICYCLE RAILING6"1" MIN. THICK 9"x11" MORTAR PAD LOWER RAIL TYPICAL OUTSIDE ELEVATION GRIND SMOOTH 2" "8 3 1"1"WEEP HOLE DO NOT BLOCK RAILING POST ANCHOR 7v"x"x9" LONG 4500’00" PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE BRIDGE RAILING DETAILS PAINTING NOTES: SHOP PAINTED, ITEM 657.020001. 1. ALL EXPOSED FACES OF THE BRIDGE RAIL COMPONENTS SHALL BE DLKDRAWING NO.SCALE SHEETT:\2013\2013.469.002 Brindley St Bridge over Cayuga Inlet\Drawings\Structure\375611_cpb_dtl_rlg_02.dgn8:36:15 AM10/9/2017tdonoghueCHECKED BY :DETAILED BY :DESIGNED BY:IN CHARGE OF :CHECKED BY : USER = DATE = FILE NAME =IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR SHALL STAMP THE DOCUMENT AND INCLUDE THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. IF AN ITEM BEARING THE STAMP OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL OF PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET, TOPMKINS COUNTY, NY DATE CITY OF ITHACA BIN 2210400 OCT 2017 West MLK Street Improvements Project Bicycle / Pedestrian Bridge Security Bollards (both ends of bridge) No-Mow / Meadow Mix Turfgrass Relocated Aeroplane Factory Driveway SIGNWORKS BUILDING TROMBLEY TIRE & AUTO K&H REDEMPTION Relocated Brindley Street Bridge Street Trees Gateway Plantings CITY OF ITHACA BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE RELOCATION PROJECT CITY OF ITHACA BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE RELOCATION PROJECT Gateway Plantings Lake Street Bridge Dark Green Finish Coat: Munsell Color Hue = 10G Value Chroma = 2/2 Sternberg Main Street A Luminaire 3MYp1JUh24COs4MYp4RHa2MYp1MYm4RHc12DIk3PRs1JUh2JUh1JUh1MYm3MYp3MYp5MYp12RHa7RHc18DIk3PRs30COs1JUh13WEf13WEf2ULt2ULn3ULg1ULt2ULnLEGENDPROPOSED SHRUB AND/OR PERENNIAL PLANTING++++++++INSETPROPOSED TREE PLANTINGQTKEYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEROOTNOTESTREES6PRsPrunus sargentii ‘JFS-KW58’Pink Flair® Cherry1.75" - 2" CALB&B3ULtUlmus ‘Morton Glossy’Triumph™ Elm2"- 2.25" CALB&B3ULgUlmus davidiana ‘JFS KW2UD’Greenstone™ Elm 2"- 2.25" CALB&B4ULnUlmus japonica × pumila ‘New Horizon’New Horizon Elm2"- 2.25" CALB&BSHRUBS54COsCornus sericea 'Kelseyi'Kelsey's Dwarf Red-Osier Dogwood24" - 30"#3 CONT.30DIkDiervilla 'G2X88544'Kodiak® Orange Bush Honeysuckle18" - 24"#3 CONT.6JUhJuniperus horizontalis 'Prince of Wales'Prince Of Wales Juniper18" - 24"#3 CONT.20MYpMyrica pensylvanica 'Morton'Silver Sprite™ Bayberry3' - 4'#5 CONT.2MYmMyrica pensylvanica 'Morton Male'Morton Male Pollinator Bayberry3' - 4'#5 CONT.16 RHaRhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'Gro-Low Aromatic Sumac18" - 24"#3 CONT.11RHcRhus copallina ‘Morton’Prairie Flame™ Sumac3' - 4'#5 CONT.26WEfWeigela florida 'Bokrasopea'Sonic Bloom® Pearl Reblooming Weigela18" - 24"#3 CONT.BULBS260(12 - 14 BULBS EACH)Allium 'Summer Drummer'Summer Drummer Flowering OnionBULBDURING FALL, PLANT BULBS 6″ DEEPWITH 8" O.C. SPACING. PLANT INDRIFTS OF 12 - 14 BULBS200(7 - 9 BULBS EACH)Narcissus 'Thalia'Thalia Narcissus BULBDURING FALL, PLANT BULBS 6″ DEEPWITH 6" O.C. SPACING. PLANT INDRIFTS OF 7 - 9 BULBSSEED MIX: SHOWY WILDFLOWER MIXSEED MIX: EROSION CONTROL/RESTORATIONSEED MIX: TURF LAWNPOTENTIAL ANNUAL PLANTINGSScale: 1" = 10'PLANTING PLAN: LANDSCAPE BEDS AT INTERSECTION2GENERAL SHEET NOTES - PLANTING1. TOPSOIL MUST BE SCREENED AND AMENDED TO MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.SEE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIREMENTS OF SOIL MIXES.2. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE PREPARED AS SPECIFIED: SHRUB BEDS TO BEPREPARED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH 24" OF PLANTING SOIL MIX. LAWN AREAS TOBE PREPARED WITH 4" OF PLANTING SOIL MIX PER SPECIFICATIONS.3. AFTER BEDS ARE PREPARED, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATESHRUBS AND TREE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SHRUB AND TREE LOCATIONS ARE TO BEAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE THEY ARE PLANTED.4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS PAVED OR PLANTED BED ARE TOBE SEEDED AS LAWN. PREPARE LAWN AS PER SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.5. ALL PLANTS TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI 260.1"AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK".6. MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY ALL LIVING PLANT MATERIAL AS PER SPECIFICATIONS.Scale: 1" = 50'PLANTING PLAN: STREET TREES AND SEED MIXES10010'20'0050'100' PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET BRIDGE SIMULATION - ELEVATION LOOKING WEST PIN 3756.11 REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET BRIDGE SIMULATION - AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST