Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-12-17 Planning and Economic Development Committee Meeting AgendaPEDC Meeting  Planning and Economic Development Committee  Ithaca Common Council        DATE: April 12, 2017  TIME: 6:00 p.m.  3rd floor City Hall  Council Chambers         AGENDA ITEMS  Item Voting  Item?  Presenter(s) Time  Start    1) Call to Order/Agenda Review    2) Special Order of Business  a) Presentation: "Local Enforcement as  the New Frontier:  Making a Case  for Effective Protection of Human Rights  at Home"    3) Public Comment and Response from  Committee Members    4) Updates, Announcements, Reports    5) Action Items (Voting to Send on to Council)  a) Electrical Box Murals    6) Action items (Voting to Circulate)  a) Waterfront Plan    7) Discussion   a) Certificate of Compliance Ordinance    b) Potential Sale of Land in Southwest Park    8) Review and Approval of Minutes  a) March 2017    9) Adjournment    No      No          No      No      Yes      Yes      No  No      Yes    Yes        Seph Murtagh, Chair      Tompkins County Office of Human  Rights                       Megan Wilson, Senior Planner      Jennifer Kusznir, Senior Planner      All  All            6:00      6:05          6:30      6:45      6:50      7:00      7:25  7:50      8:30    8:35          If you have a disability and require accommodations in order to fully participate, please contact the City  Clerk at 274‐6570 by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, April 11, 2017.     TO: Planning & Economic Development Committee FROM: Megan Wilson, Senior Planner DATE: March 29, 2017 RE: Electrical Box Mural Proposals As part of a third installment of the successful 21 Boxes project, the Public Art Commission (PAC) would like to recommend six proposed murals for installation on City-owned electrical boxes around the downtown area. The PAC issued a call for proposals earlier this year and received nearly 30 designs. The selected designs were distributed for public comment, and the response to the proposed artwork has been mostly positive. At its meeting on March 23, 2017, the PAC voted unanimously to recommend that Common Council approve the submitted designs of Anna Adler, Marsha Acerra, and the Ithaca Youth Bureau; Shera D’Elia; McKayla Macomber; Zuri Sabir; Copper Santiago; and Richa Sardana. The project will be funded through a grant from the Community Arts Partnership of Tompkins County. Staff will attend the April 12th Planning & Economic Development Committee to discuss the project and answer any questions. If you have any questions, please contact me at (607) 274-6560 or mwilson@cityofithaca.org. CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning & Economic Development JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 Planning & Economic Development Committee Proposed Resolution April 12, 2017 Resolution to Select Artwork for More Boxes: Another Round of Electrical Box Murals WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Public Art Commission (PAC) has been established to, among other duties, review and advise the Common Council on proposals for the exhibition and display of public art in the City’s public spaces, and WHEREAS, in 2010, the PAC created a mural and street art program to beautify blank walls within the city while providing local artists from all sections of the community an opportunity to showcase their work, and WHEREAS, the Board of Public Works approved several locations for future murals and street art, including municipal electrical boxes throughout the city, by resolution on May 19, 2010, and WHEREAS, in 2012 the PAC launched a project to beautify 21 municipal electrical boxes through the creation of mini-murals, and a second round of the project was completed in 2014, and WHEREAS, due to the success of the first two projects, the PAC initiated a third round of electrical box murals to be completed in 2016-2017, including the three new electrical boxes installed on the Commons and six locations around the downtown area, and WHEREAS, the project will be funded through a grant from the Community Arts Partnership of Tompkins County and will be budget-neutral to the City, and WHEREAS, the PAC issued a Request for Proposals earlier this year and distributed 6 proposals for public comment, and WHEREAS, the PAC reviewed public comment at its meeting on March 23, 2017 and, after considering the community feedback, voted unanimously to recommend that the Common Council select the artwork submitted by Anna Adler, Marsha Acerra, and the Ithaca Youth Bureau; Shera D’Elia; McKayla Macomber; Zuri Sabir; Copper Santiago; and Richa Sardana to be installed on six electrical boxes in the downtown area; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City of Ithaca Common Council selects the submissions of the following artists for More Boxes: Another Round of Electrical Box Murals: Anna Adler, Marsha Acerra, and the Ithaca Youth Bureau; Shera D’Elia; McKayla Macomber; Zuri Sabir; Copper Santiago; and Richa Sardana (as recommended by the Public Art Commission and shown in “More Boxes Mural Proposals (2017)”); and be it further RESOLVED, that the selected artists may proceed with the installation of their murals on their appointed electrical box upon the execution of an agreement with the City (as reviewed by the City Attorney). With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership MORE BOXES: ANOTHER ROUND OF ELECTRICAL BOX MURALS MORE BOXES MURAL PROPOSALS (2017) “Big Little Ithaca: A Kid’s Eye View” by Anna Adler, Marsha Acerra, and the Ithaca Youth Bureau Proposed Location: E. Court Street & N. Aurora Street Description: “Big Brothers Big Sisters of Ithaca and Tompkins County (BBBS) in collaboration with teaching artist Marsha Acerra would like to propose an electrical box mural focused on friendship and community. We envision painting a collective city map generated from the kids and mentors we work with -- marking their most favorite landmarks and characters around town -- places they have enjoyed together, which represent the unique and diverse landscape of Ithaca. The mural will be executed by Marsha Acerra, Anna Adler (Community Outreach Specialist, BBBS andartist) with input and assistance from the community we serve, including Bigs and Littles. This work will energize the imaginations of passerbys, allowing people to see the city from the perspective of local youth, and reimagine what it means for all of us -- our sense of home, belonging, and place.” With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership “Better Together” by Shera D’Elia Proposed Location: E. Court Street & N. Tioga Street Description: “My intention with this design is to take the energy from the recent women's march and the North Dakota water protectors and create a hopeful, empowering, beautiful image that expresses our responsibility to work together on behalf of the water, the earth, and each other. The piece will be painted in my typical style, using bright, bold colors. The figures will be painted in different colors to express diversity. The concept sketch shows two sides of a box, with layered waves along the bottom and female figures rising out from the waves, while holding hands and circling below the earth which is above them. The top line of figures appear to be supporting the earth with their hands.” With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership “A Box of Strawberries” by McKayla Macomber Proposed Location: E. State Street & N. Aurora Street Description: “For my proposal I submit what would be an all-over, wrap around pattern of the strawberries with foliage on top of a black background. I believe it would be a simple and polished design that would bring some lively energy with it. The strawberries would be adjusted and fitted to work best with the shape of the electric boxes.” With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership “Ithaca IS Magnetic” by Zuri Sabir Proposed Location: W. State Street & S. Cayuga Street Description: “There’s a running joke amongst us native Ithacans that one can’t get away from Ithaca, no matter how hard one tries. You’ll travel to the most gorgeous, farthest reaches of the planet and nothing compares to her simple charm. Hence, monochrome graphic shapes of people falling back into magnet Ithaca.” With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership “In Land Stars” by Copper Santiago Proposed Location: W. Buffalo Street & N. Geneva Street Description: “I spent a long time thinking about what I would paint on a box once I was forward the email asking for applicants. I wanted to paint Ithaca, my new home, as I feel it day to day and no one image I was thinking of could seem to encompass that. I was driving down from the Ithaca mall a week or so ago and I was struck by how much the city lights resembled star s nestled in the hills that are so much a part of Ithaca. There wasn't that much light pollution where I was and I could see the stars above us shining so brightly. Gazing back down, Ithaca looked like someone had gently placed a galaxy in a bowl. As I was still moving in the car, the lights seemed to be spinning slowly, very much alive. The land appeared to be cradling the inland stars as much as they were floating slightly above it, like clouds moving between very tall mountains. I was moved by the idea that I was driving home to those very stars. My painting on the box would try and reflect the feeling one gets looking at their home shining as timeless as the stars above us all. By illustrating this moment, I hope to share the wonderful sensation that comes from feeling tiny and inconsequential yet part of something much bigger. The same thing happens when one sees very tall mountains, or the horizon for the first time. For me, it happens when I look at the stars.” With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership “The Lives We Live” by Richa Sardana Proposed Location: E. Court Street & N. Cayuga Street Description: “The Warli people are an indigenous tribe living in the state of Maharashtra in western India; many still live on the northern outskirts of the city of Mumbai. The brick red and white paintings of the Warli tribe decorate the walls of their houses. The paintings are simple and distinct, and are considered an ancient prevailing art. Basic shapes – triangles, squares, circles, and crooked lines – are used to depict complex scenes, such as wedding, field harvest, celebration, dance, musicians, nature, landscapes, farming, animals, rituals. The art is really a depiction of how the community lives, celebrates, hopes, and supports. There is nothing abstract in the depiction, and still it leaves room for you to recreate the atmosphere of happiness and music in your mind. I was introduced to Warli paintings in a fleeting way several years ago. Riding in an auto-rickshaw that trailed through the traffic in Mumbai, I was looking out in a nonchalant way. Suddenly my eyes caught sight of an old woman painting something in white on a brick red background, while a little child played around her. The traffic suddenly cleared, and the auto-rickshaw accelerated ahead. I looked back, trying to capture more, but neither time nor speed did justice to the scene. There was something about this scene that left a vivid snapshot in my memory – an old woman, painting, two plain colors, simple geometric shapes, the little child, the humid afternoon. It was so plain, and yet so captivating. She was clearly an artist with no recognition – and one who didn’t seek any. Ithaca is home to people from diverse backgrounds and a lot of flux. The beauty and hospitality of the town, and its natural beauty win the hearts of anyone who cross their paths here. At the same time, the town is enriched by the uniqueness of all the people who come and go, and the many who continue to stay on. This sense of community is best felt on the Commons where everyone gets together, whether it is for food, or art or a glass of wine. When I saw the request for proposal for the utility boxes, I felt using Warli art would be a perfect medium to blend the symbolic features of the tribal art while capturing and celebrating the welcoming spirit of Ithaca. To me, there is an unbroken line from early tribal art such as Warli to today’s street art. With grant support by New York State Council on the Arts, administered by the Community Arts Partnership While designing the template for my proposed project, I decided to use the map of downtown Ithaca as my background template (shown in black representing Green and Seneca Street, kissed on the south by the six mile creek). I then tried to use Warli tribal motifs to express the vibrance of the Commons and its surroundings. I have incorporated symbols of several features in the art, and t ried to interact with the viewer who will be able to identify some of these features (such as the Moosewood towards the north, the Tomkins library, Mama goose, waterfall and Cornell’s iconic McGraw tower) while trying to the appreciate a different art form.     To: Planning and Economic Development Committee From: Jennifer Kusznir, Economic Development Planner Date: March 31, 2017 Re: Proposed Waterfront Zoning The purpose of this memo is to provide information regarding proposed new zoning for the waterfront area. In September of 2015, the Common Council adopted Plan Ithaca as Phase I of the City Comprehensive Plan and in November of 2015, staff was directed to begin working on a waterfront development plan as a part of the next phase for the Comprehensive Plan. In March of 2016, the Common Council adopted legislation establishing a Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development (TMPUD) in the waterfront study for a period of 18 months. This was intended to allow the Common Council to have transitional oversight for potential development projects and to ensure that development in this area supports the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, while the plan for the waterfront and the associated new zoning could be established. In order to develop recommendations for the plan and for the zoning a waterfront working group made up of 17 members of the public and City Planning Staff was established. The group began meeting regularly in September of 2016. Given the deadline of establishing new zoning prior to the expiration of the TMPUD, the waterfront working group has focused on completing a land use section of the plan and making recommendations for future zoning for the Waterfront Study Area. In December of 2016 the working group hosted two open houses to solicit additional input from the public. Using feedback from the public and goals from Plan Ithaca the working group has completed the land use section of the draft plan. Enclosed is a draft Land Use Chapter for the Waterfront Plan. This chapter includes goals that were introduced in Phase 1 of the Comprehensive Plan and explains how they are applicable to the waterfront area. When developing this plan, the working group specifically referenced goals regarding protecting view sheds, allowing public access to the waterfront, enhancing pedestrian and bicycle connections, reducing the impacts of parking in CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning & Economic Development JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 2 new developments, and creating a mixed use district, including commercial, and housing, with an emphasis on uses that create an active waterfront environment. This chapter divides the waterfront area into four district character areas. The waterfront working group used these areas to develop a recommendation for zoning for the waterfront. Enclosed is a draft ordinance and summary zoning chart containing the recommended zoning from the working group. If the Committee is in agreement, staff will draft an environmental review of this action and circulate it with the draft ordinance. We will return next month with any comments that are received. If you have any concerns or questions regarding any of this information, feel free to contact me at 274-6410. 4/7/2017  1 | Page PLANNING COMMITTEE: An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of the City Of Ithaca, Chapter 325, Entitled “Zoning” To Establish New Zoning for the Waterfront Area ORDINANCE NO. ____ 1. WHEREAS, on September 2, 2015, the Common Council adopted Plan Ithaca as Phase I of the City Comprehensive Plan, and 2. WHEREAS, this plan identifies the desired future land uses in the City, as well as areas where development is anticipated and encouraged, and identifies community goals and recommendations for the City, and 3. WHEREAS, on August 17, 2015, the City of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan Committee submitted a written recommendation to the City that included developing a plan for the waterfront as a priority for the next phase of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and 4. WHEREAS, in November of 2015, the Planning and Economic Development Committee of the Common Council directed Planning Staff to begin working on a waterfront development plan as a part of the next phase for the Comprehensive Plan, and 5. WHEREAS, on March 2, 2016, the Common Council adopted legislation establishing a Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development (TMPUD), in order to provide the Common Council with transitional oversight for potential development projects in order to ensure that development in the waterfront study area supports the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, while the plan for the waterfront and the associated new zoning could be established, and 6. WHEREAS, the TMPUD was established for a period of 18 months, during which time the Common Council was charged with adopting new zoning regulations for the waterfront area, and 7. WHEREAS, the City Comprehensive Plan identifies the goals for the Waterfront Mixed Use area as the creation of a mixed use district, including commercial, and housing, 4/7/2017  2 | Page with an emphasis on uses that create an active waterfront environment, and 8. WHEREAS, the City Comprehensive Plan further notes that “new development should protect view sheds and allow public access to the waterfront, and pedestrian and bicycle connections should be improved, and reducing the impacts of parking in new development should be carefully considered, and 9. WHEREAS, in order to develop recommendations for the plan and for the zoning, the City established a waterfront working group made up of 17 members of the public and City Planning Staff, and 10. WHEREAS, the waterfront working group began meeting in September of 2016 and in December of 2016 they hosted two open houses in order to solicit additional input from the public, and 11. WHEREAS, given the deadline of establishing new zoning prior to the expiration of the TMPUD in August 2017, the waterfront working group has focused on completing a land use section of the plan and making recommendations for future zoning for the Waterfront Study Area, and 12. WHEREAS, using feedback from the public and goals from Plan Ithaca the working group has completed the land use section of the draft plan and has used this section to make recommendations for changes to the current zoning in the Waterfront Study Area, now therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Common Council does hereby adopt the Land Use Chapter of the Waterfront Plan with the intent that the once the full Waterfront Plan is completed, this chapter will be inserted as a part of the plan, and BE IT NOW ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca that Chapter 325 of the City Code be amended as follows: Section 1. Chapter 325-3B of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca, entitled “Definitions and Word Usage”, is hereby amended to add the following new definitions: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL Fabrication, processing, manufacturing, converting, altering, assembling or other handling of products that: 4/7/2017  3 | Page A. Does not result in1: (1) Dissemination of noise, vibration, odor, dust, smoke, detectable gas or fumes or their atmospheric pollutant beyond the boundaries of the property lines in which such use is conducted; (2) Unusual hazard of fire, explosion or other physical danger to any person, building or vegetation; (3) Radiation or interference with radio or television reception beyond the boundary of the property; (4) A harmful discharge of waste material or any other means of disposal of waste material other than by delivery to an authorized, off-site treatment facility; or HEAVY INDUSTRIAL Fabrication, processing, manufacturing, converting, altering, assembling or other handling of products. Heavy industrial uses may require outdoor storage of raw materials and large equipment. Heavy industrial uses may result in loud noises, vibrations, or odors. These negative effects must be mitigated, so that the impacts do not reach beyond the boundaries of the district where the use is permitted. HEALTH CARE FACILITY Health Care Facilities are places that provide health care services, but are not intended for overnight stay. Health Care Facilities may include, medical offices, clinics, outpatient care centers, and urgent care facilities. FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY Any facility that is used to transform raw ingredients, by physical or chemical means, into food or other items meant for human consumption, or for food into other forms, including the processing and packaging of the food items. Food Production Facilities may include, but are not limited to bakeries, brew pubs, coffee roasters, wineries, food packaging facilities. Section 2. Section 325-4 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca, entitled “Establishment of Districts”, is hereby amended in order to add the following zoning districts: WE/WFD West End/Waterfront District CSD Cherry Street District 4/7/2017  4 | Page ND Newman District MD Market District Section 325-4 is further amended to delete the following zoning districts: M-1 Marine Commercial WF-1 Waterfront 1 WF-2 Waterfront 2 Section 3. Section 325-8 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended as follows to establish district regulations for the new WE/WF District and to amend the District Regulations Chart as follows: West End/Waterfront District (WE/WF) Permitted Primary Uses 1. An y Use Permitted in B-2 Zone, with the exception of 1 and 2 family detached or semi-detached dwellings, fraternity, sorority or group houses, or dormitories, or Bed and Breakfast homes-which are not permitted in the WE-WF District 2. Wa ter Related Light Industrial Uses, including boat fueling stations 3. Sale, rental, repair or storage, of marine related recreational equipment such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment 4. Pa rking Garages-Permitted by Special Permit Specifically Prohibited in the WE/WF District: Specifically Prohibited: Heavy Industrial Uses, Non Water Related Light Industrial, 1 and 2 family detached or semi-detached dwellings, Mobile Homes, Petroleum Storage, Cemeteries, Casinos, Fueling Stations, Single Story Self-Storage Facilities, Big Box Retail, Drive Through Establishments, Large Scale Breweries, Vehicle Sales and Service, Printing, Heating, a/c, etc. Permitted Accessory Uses 1. An y accessory use permitted in the B-2 Zone 2. Bo at fueling station 4/7/2017  5 | Page 3. Sn owmobile sales, service, rental in conjunction with boat sales, rental or service 4. Pa rking lot/parking garage 5. Ou tdoor storage of materials 6. St orage of marine related recreation equipment such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment as it relates to permitted primary uses under zoning Off Street Parking Requirement None Off Street Loading Requirement None Minimum Lot Size (SF) 3000 Minimum Width in Feet at Street Line 30 Maximum Building Height 63’ 5 Stories Maximum Percentage of Lot Coverage by Buildings 100%, Except for Required Setbacks Yard Dimensions Required Minimum Front Yard- No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and an 8' tree lawn Required Minimum Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Other Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Rear Yard- For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 20' from the top of bank. In some areas an additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimum rear yard setback is 10'. Minimum Building Height For Water Dependent Uses there is no minimum building height. For any non-industrial uses buildings must be a minimum of 2 stories in height 4/7/2017  6 | Page Section 4. Section 325-8 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended as follows to establish district regulations for the new Cherry Street District (CSD), and to amend the District Regulations Chart as follows: Cherry Street District (CSD) Permitted Primary Uses 1. An y use permitted in the WE-WF District 2. Li ght Industrial Uses 3. La rge Scale Breweries 4. Fo od Production Specifically Prohibited in the CSD: Specifically Prohibited: Mobile Homes, Petroleum Storage, Casinos, Fueling Stations, Single Story Self-Storage Facilities, Big Box Retail, Drive-thru Establishments, Cemeteries Permitted Accessory Uses Any accessory use permitted in the B-2 Zone Off Street Parking Requirement None Off Street Loading Requirement None Minimum Lot Size (SF) 3000 Minimum Width in Feet at Street Line 30 Maximum Building Height 63’ 5 Stories Maximum Percentage of Lot Coverage by Buildings 100%, Except for Required Setbacks Yard Dimensions Required Minimum Front Yard- No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a 4/7/2017  7 | Page minimum 5' sidewalk and a preferred 8' tree lawn- When an 8’ tree lawn is not feasible, the Planning Board, at their discretion, may reduce the tree lawn requirement to 5’. Required Minimum Side Yard- 10’ Required Minimum Other Side Yard- 10’ Required Minimum Rear Yard- For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 25' from the top of bank. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimum rear yard setback is 10'. Minimum Building Height For Industrial Uses there is no minimum building height. For any non-industrial uses buildings must be a minimum of 2 stories in height Section 5. Section 325-8 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended as follows to establish district regulations for the new Newman District (ND), and to amend the District Regulations Chart as follows: Newman District (ND) Permitted Primary Uses 1. An y Use Permitted in B-1 Zone, with the exception of 1 and 2 Family Detached or Semi-Detached Dwellings, Fraternity, Sorority, or Dormitories, or Bed and Breakfast homes, and Funeral Homes, and Banks or Monetary Institutions, which are not permitted in the Newman District. 2. Re tail store or Service Commercial Facility 3. Re staurants, Fast Food Establishment, Tavern, with the exception of establishments where food or drink is intended to be served to or consumed by persons in automobiles 4. Cl ub, Lodge or Private Social Center 5. Th eater, Bowling Alley, Auditorium or Other Similar Place of Public Assembly 6. Ho tel/Motel/Boatel 7. Re creational or Cultural Facilities such as a Park, Playground, Art Museum, fishing pier, or yacht club 4/7/2017  8 | Page 8. Pu blic Recreation 9. Sa le, Rental, Repair, or Storage of Marine-related Recreational Equipment, such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment Permitted Accessory Uses 1. An y accessory use permitted in the WE/WFD Zone, 2. Co nfectionary, Millinery, dressmaking, and Other Activities involving Light Hand Fabrication, as well as sales. 3. Pa rking Garages Off Street Parking Requirement None Off Street Loading Requirement None Minimum Lot Size (SF) 3000 Minimum Width in Feet at Street Line 30 Maximum Building Height For properties located along the waterfront, the first 12' building facing the water is restricted to have a maximum building height of 2-3 stories after that the building may step up to 5' stories. Properties not located adjacent to the water have a maximum of 5 stories and 63' Maximum Percentage of Lot Coverage by Buildings 100%, Except for Required Setbacks Yard Dimensions Required Minimum Front Yard- No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and a preferred 8' tree lawn. Required Minimum Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Other Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Rear Yard- For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 4/7/2017  9 | Page 20' from the top of bank. In some areas additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimum rear yard setback is 10'. Minimum Building Height 25’ 2 Stories Section 6. Section 325-8 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended as follows to establish district regulations for the new Market District (MD), and to amend the District Regulations Chart as follows: Market District (MD) Permitted Primary Uses 1. An y use permitted in the Newman District 2. He alth Care facilities 3. B& B Inns 4. Co nfectionary, Millinery, dressmaking, and Other Activities involving Light Hand Fabrication, as well as sales. 5. Fo od Production Facilities Permitted Accessory Uses 1. An y accessory use permitted in the ND Zone 2. Dr ive-Thru Banking Services 3. Pa rking Garages Off Street Parking Requirement None Off Street Loading Requirement None Minimum Lot Size (SF) 3000 Minimum Width in Feet at Street Line 30 4/7/2017  10 | Page Maximum Building Height For properties located along the waterfront, the first 12' building facing the water is restricted to have a maximum building height of 2-3 stories after that the building may step up to 5' stories. Properties not located adjacent to the water have a maximum of 5 stories and 63' Maximum Percentage of Lot Coverage by Buildings 100%, Except for Required Setbacks Yard Dimensions Required Minimum Front Yard- No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and an 8' tree lawn Required Minimum Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Other Side Yard- 5’ Required Minimum Rear Yard- For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 20' from the top of bank. In some areas additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimum rear yard setback is 10'. Minimum Building Height 25’ 2 Stories Section 7. The City Planning and Development Board, the City Clerk and the Planning Department shall amend the district regulations chart in accordance with the amendments made herewith. Section 8. Severability. Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this local law. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this local law is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. Section 9. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.  March 23, 2017       1 | Page  March 17, 2017 2. Land Use 2.1 Introduction The Ithaca Waterfront District is bordered to the north by the Newman Golf Course, to the south by Cecil Malone Drive and the City border, to the west by the Flood Control Channel, and to the east by Route 13/Fulton and Meadow Streets.  March 23, 2017       2 | Page  Poor Soils  Most of the  waterfront area  contains soils made  up of sand, silt, and  clay.  These poor  soils make it  difficult to support  structures because  of the irregular  settlement that  occurs.  This poses a  significant challenge  to the financing and  construction of new  projects.  In order to  overcome this  challenge, new  construction must  either be limited in  height, or must  have very expensive  foundations.  The Ithaca Waterfront District is home to a vast array of uses including a state of the art health care facility, restaurants, bars, industrial uses, and the Ithaca Farmer’s Market. However, there is still much underdeveloped land that could be a potential area of growth for the City. Plan Ithaca, the City’s recently adopted comprehensive plan, categorized the waterfront study area as predominantly mixed use and enterprise areas intended to encourage higher density growth in the form of well- designed, compact, mixed use development. These areas are located on or adjacent to major transportation corridors within the City, making it easy for residents to get to jobs and services and for visitors to access local businesses. Additionally, there are some areas classified as environmentally sensitive and important locations where special consideration must be given to preserve unique natural features. Future Considerations As this district grows there are considerations to address in order to encourage positive development trends:  Building Water Frontages – Opportunities exist to encourage businesses along the waterfront to develop inviting water frontages. A 25 foot maintenance easement exists along the Flood Control Channel in order for the Department of Environmental Conservation to protect the water edge and have access for care of the channel itself. However, beyond the easement, developers have the opportunity to treat the water and the water’s edge as a front yard.  District Identity – Opportunities exist to develop cohesive signage art, and landscape elements that will help create an identify for the district.  Housing – The City has a documented need for increased housing that is located on public transit routes and within walking distance to desirable amenities. The waterfront area has several locations that would be ideal for additional housing and that would provide easy pedestrian, bike, and bus access to parks, the Farmer’s Market, and downtown retail centers.  Business Improvement District – There is an opportunity to develop a business improvement district that can provide a platform for a unified vision for commercial and residential activity in the area.  March 23, 2017       3 | Page  Dredging   After the Flood Control Project was completed in 1970, responsibility for periodic and emergency maintenance  dredging was transferred to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC).  Portions of  the channel were dredged by the Army Corps of Engineers in 1973 and 1999, and the lower channel was dredged by  the New York State Department of Transportation in the early 1980’s. Since the mid‐1990’s, the City has been working  with responsible agencies to designate a dewatering site that would allow dredging to take place. The delay in  maintenance dredging has made the lower channel inaccessible to larger boats.  This challenge pertains to all areas  where commercial activity exists along the waterfront.     Limited Season – Ithaca’s climate does not provide a lengthy season for water-dependent uses. Any development options that rely on the water as an amenity could suffer during the winter months and should consider how to overcome the economic challenges of the off-season.  Develop Financial and Management Resources – Unlike the downtown area this area does not have an established Business Improvement District, or any sense of established identity. Merchants, property owners, and business owners lack any organized structure for addressing concerns in this district or planning for future needs. Developing these resources would aid future planning initiatives and could also provide assistance for new and existing businesses.  Potential Flooding – Potential flooding is a challenge for all portions of the waterfront area. Any new construction has to consider and be prepared for potential flooding. Similar to the accommodations that must be made for poor soils, special construction techniques must be used, which may result in higher building costs.  March 23, 2017       4 | Page  Plan Ithaca Land Use Goals‐Not  Specific to the  Waterfront     Neighborhood  CHARACTER will  be preserved and enhanced.   Green space surrounding the  city will be preserved to  minimize sprawl and protect  open space and agricultural  lands.   Housing will be located so  that jobs and services are easily  accessible.    Permitted land uses will  promote business expansion  and job growth within the city.   New development will be  consistent with the City’s land  use goals and map and will be  of high‐quality design.    Land use planning decisions  and investments will be  coordinated with the goals of  the Mobility & Transportation  chapter.  Goals The following are Land Use goals outlined in the City of Ithaca’s Comprehensive Plan, “Plan Ithaca: A Vision for our Future” that are specifically applicable to the Waterfront Area. Goals that are specific to the Waterfront Area Plan are bolded and explained. 1. The city’s role as the economic, social, and cultural center of Tompkins County will be strengthened by attracting and retaining a larger proportion of the County population, reversing a half-century trend of population loss to the County. –The Waterfront District provides the City with a unique opportunity for a space that the City can encourage additional growth and retention of people looking to live in the City. 2. Additional housing will provide opportunities for people of all incomes, ages, and abilities to live in the city. —The Waterfront District should be developed to include additional housing opportunities for people of all incomes, ages and abilities. 3. As the city continues to develop, green spaces will be enhanced and located to best serve residents and visitors. —As the waterfront develops, the green spaces should be maintained and enhanced to serve the growing population in this area. 4. Transportation and housing options will reduce commuter traffic. —Housing along the waterfront provides opportunities for people to live within walking distance of major employers and to public transit, which may reduce commuter traffic into the City 5. An increased the tax base will reduce the tax  March 23, 2017       5 | Page  burden for residents. —The Waterfront District there is ample opportunity for new development, which will increase the tax base and reduce the tax burden on others. 6. The community will be economically vibrant and offer a high quality of life. —Encouraging mixed use development in the Waterfront District will create an economically vibrant residential and commercial district.  March 23, 2017       6 | Page  Land Use Recommendations A. Encourage Mixed Use Development. The City should encourage and support mixed-use development in the entire waterfront area that will grow the existing character in each of the waterfront districts. Development should be sensitive to the predominant use in the district, including the industrial nature of the Cherry Street District, the West End Waterfront District as one of the transportation hubs in the City, the Market District as the food production district, and the Newman District as a recreational/residential district. B. Encourage Housing Opportunities for all Income Levels. The City should encourage residential opportunities for people of all income levels to be developed in the waterfront area. This can be accomplished by offering zoning incentives or tax abatements that encourage the inclusion of lower income housing opportunities along with market rate development. C. Encourage Public Access to the Waterfront. As the waterfront develops great care should be taken by the City to assure that the area does not become exclusive and limit access by all members of the public to enjoy the waterfront. The City should ensure that all new development opportunities reserve space for public walkways along the waterfront. D. Encourage Better Multi Modal Connections. The City should encourage development at the waterfront to have better multi modal connections to all areas. New development should consider pedestrian, bike, and public transit connections and reserve space for these modes to allow access to all portions of the waterfront. E. Encourage a Vibrant District. The City should encourage development that will result in 24/7/365 activity. Mixed use development that includes commercial and residential uses will allow the waterfront area to be occupied at all times of day throughout the year, resulting in a more vibrant space.  March 23, 2017       7 | Page  F. 2.1 Waterfront Area Map As part of Phase II of the Comprehensive Plan, the Waterfront District can be divided into five character areas that elaborate on Phase I by identifying areas of similar existing and future planned uses. These districts are the Cherry Street District, the West End/Waterfront District, Inlet Island, the Market District, and the Newman District. The trail network throughout this area acts as a link connecting the districts to the waterfront and to each other. Waterfront District –Character Area Boundaries  March 23, 2017       8 | Page  2.2 Character Areas The Cherry Street District Location The Cherry Street District is bordered on the west by the Flood Control Channel, to the north by Six Mile Creek, and to the east by Nate’s Floral Estates. A portion also includes land between Cecil B. Malone Drive and Six Mile Creek. Waterfront Character Areas- Cherry Street District  March 23, 2017       9 | Page  Existing Characteristics This area has an industrial character with several long-standing local businesses, including a metal scrap yard, manufacturing and high-tech businesses, and other commercial uses. There is also a 25 foot permanent maintenance easement between the water and the buildings, prohibiting construction within the easement. Challenges The Cherry Street District has a unique set of challenges that should be addressed in order to facilitate successful new and existing development.  Visibility — Much of the district has little or no visibility from Route 13 and other main roads. This could pose a challenge to some businesses that might require street visibility.  Traffic Circulation — The Cherry Street District has only one through street with no sidewalks. In order to develop this district, a plan for safe multi-modal transportation into and out of this area is needed. Any traffic planning should also consider the opportunities that exist with the planned reconstruction and realignment of the Brindley Street Bridge, as well as a potential pedestrian bridge that crosses the Flood Control Channel and creates a connection to West Hill.  High Development Costs — As this area develops, the demand for waterfront land may drive up the cost of land. This, coupled with the expensive foundations that are required to offset the impacts of poor soils, could pose challenges to development of non-residential uses, which could make it difficult to include a mix of uses. Opportunities This district has several opportunities for development/redevelopment of sites, including the following:  Cherry Street Extension - There is a large section of undeveloped City-owned land at the southern end of Cherry Street. This area contains some wetlands; however, there are approximately 3 acres of land for potential future development.  Infill Opportunities – Throughout this district there are several large underutilized parking lots. There is XX amount of parking,  March 23, 2017       10 | Page  which is more than what is needed to meet the parking demands of today’s businesses. With planning and sharing of parking, there could be several potential infill development sites available. There are also opportunities to increase density on several sites.  Industrial Character — This district has developed with a predominantly industrial base. This industrial base can be used as a guide to develop a cohesive look and to encourage additional development that is compatible with the existing character. The types of buildings include warehouses, factories, and commercial structures. Supporting these and similar uses will foster development creating more jobs and helping the area serve as an economic engine for the City. While industrial uses are desired, businesses that locate in this district must have a low environmental impact, particularly given its proximity to the water. Housing is also a desired use in this area. The district’s character creates an ideal location to encourage alternate types of housing that make use of industrial-style buildings and create spaces for live/work activities.  Future Black Diamond Trail Connection — Portions of the Black Diamond Trail are currently under construction outside of the City. A small segment has been constructed in the city on the western side of the Flood Control Channel between the water and Route 13A/Floral Ave. Current plans are for this segment of the trail to connect to a new bridge over the Flood Control Channel and continue along the eastern side between the water and Cherry Street, in a southerly direction, eventually connecting to a segment ending at Robert H. Treman State Park. The anticipated use of the trail will be for both commuting as well as recreation improving multi- modal transportation opportunities and connecting the district to the regional trail network.  Expansion of Business Opportunities — This district contains several long standing, well-established businesses. The City should encourage new or expanded opportunities to create well-paying jobs. Planned Characteristics  Encourage Mixed-Use and/or Live/Work- The City should encourage and support mixed-use development that is compatible with the existing industrial uses and that allows for live/work opportunities. Mixed-use development can include residential uses and commercial uses. In addition, light industrial and manufacturing uses that encourage job creation and allow for residential uses to coexist are desirable.  March 23, 2017       11 | Page   Retain Industrial Character –The Cherry Street District is one of the few areas in the City that has existing industrial uses. This industrial character defines this district and should be retained and encouraged.  Improve Multi Modal Transportation Connections-Given the limited road network in this district, alternative transportation is critical if development is to expand in this area. The completion of the Black Diamond Trail will provide more opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle transportation. In addition, the planned reconstruction/realignment of the Brindley Bridge will allow for better automotive access into the district.  Seek Development Opportunities that Result in 24/7 Activity- The encouragement of mixed residential/commercial development in this area will also encourage 24/7 activity.    March 23, 2017       12 | Page  The West End/Waterfront District Location The West End/Waterfront District is bordered to the north by Cascadilla Street and by the Flood Control Channel, to the west by the Cayuga Inlet, to the east by Route 13/Meadow Street, and to the south by Six Mile Creek. Waterfront Plan Character Areas-West End/Waterfront District                                                                      March 23, 2017       13 | Page        Existing Characteristics This district is the most developed portion of the waterfront area. It is characterized by several long-standing local businesses and a mix of historic buildings. There are still several areas of underdeveloped land that have potential to be redeveloped. Challenges The following challenges will need to be addressed in order for existing and future development to be successful:  Traffic – One of the largest challenges to existing and future development in this district is traffic. The district is bound on the east by the southbound section of Route 13, which also contains major connections to the east and west. Several times throughout the day this area becomes heavily congested and can cause travel delays and difficulty for cars exiting businesses along Route 13. This results in patrons avoiding this area during peak times and diverting to other routes. In addition, trains can block traffic from turning west out of the district, which further exacerbates the congestion.  Pedestrian and Bike Safety — This area feels unsafe to bicycle and pedestrians. This is due in part to the high levels of traffic, but also to the lack of infrastructure for these modes of travel. Opportunities Despite challenges that exist, the West End/Waterfront District has many attributes that encourage new and existing businesses.  Intercity Bus Station – The Intercity bus station is located in this district. This provides an opportunity to create a welcoming center that is a gateway to the City and to install signage that can direct visitors to local points of interest.  Trail Connections – Connections to the Cayuga waterfront trail. This is the only district not yet connected to the waterfront trail. Planned Characteristics  March 23, 2017       14 | Page   City Gateway and Transportation Hub – Take advantage of the existing bus station and create a welcoming information district for the city. Work with TCAT to develop a direct transport between West End to downtown and college campuses.  Safety – Improve safety perceptions by creating improved consistent lighting  Signage – Create better wayfinding signage, including electronic directory of places around the city.  Connections – Enhanced connections between the waterfront and the Ithaca Commons, particularly across Route 13 (Meadow and Fulton Streets) and along the State Street Corridor.  March 23, 2017       15 | Page  The Newman District Location The Newman District is bordered by the Newman Golf Course to the north, Route 13 to the East, and the Cayuga inlet to the west, and Cascadilla Creek to the South. Waterfront Character Areas-Newman District  March 23, 2017       16 | Page  Existing Characteristics Existing uses on this site include the City’s Streets and Facilities buildings, Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit (TCAT) facilities, and docks. Several existing, long-time businesses are located in this area. The fire training center is located to the north within Stewart Park. Challenges Challenges to development in this area are similar to other areas in the waterfront district, including poor soil conditions and expensive construction costs. In addition, the following challenges exist that are specific to the Newman District:  City and TCAT Facilities – Much of the land is occupied by the City Streets and Facilities building and storage and the Tompkins County Area Transit Facilities. The City and TCAT have discussed the possibility of relocating these facilities in order to preserve prime waterfront land for other development options.  Limited Railroad Crossing – There is only one crossing over the railroad tracks into this district. Since the railroad company is unlikely to grant additional crossings, any development will have to deal with the challenge of having only one point of access into the site. Opportunities While there are challenges that need to be addressed in order to allow for any additional development in this area, there are also several attributes that are unique to this area that make it very desirable for future waterfront development, including the following:  Location – This district is located adjacent to Stewart Park and the Newman Golf Course and overlooks the water.   Trails – The Cayuga Waterfront Trail runs through this district. This allows for easy walking or biking to Stewart Park, the Farmer’s Market, and other points beyond. Planned Characteristics  Relocation of City Facilities – The City should consider the relocation of TCAT, Streets and Facilities, and the Fire  March 23, 2017       17 | Page  Training Center in order to free up prime waterfront land for future development.  Future Development of Water Related/Dependent/Enhanced Uses – This area is ideal to encourage development of condos and townhomes, ground floor retail and/or restaurants and other uses that would be enhanced by their location along the waterfront. In addition, water dependent uses, such as boating centers and docks should also be encouraged.  Encourage Public Access —This area should be developed to allow for full public access and enjoyment of the water. Private housing communities should be discouraged.  Waterfront Trail—The waterfront trail should be realigned to be located along the waterfront at the Newman Golf Course and the Cornell Biological Field Station or a loop trail should be added.  March 23, 2017       18 | Page  The Market District Location The Market District is bordered by Cascadilla Creek to the north, Routh 13 to the east, the Cayuga Inlet to the west and Cascadilla Street to the south. Waterfront Character Areas-Market District  March 23, 2017       19 | Page  Existing Characteristics Existing uses on this site include the Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment Plant, the Ithaca Farmer’s Market, the Community Gardens, parking, the undeveloped Carpenter Business Park, and the Cornell and IC Boathouses Challenges In addition to other challenges that are common throughout the waterfront, the Market District has the following specific challenges: Railroad —The Norfolk Southern Cargo railroad tracks run through the center of the Market District dividing potential development sites. Limited railroad crossings limit entry and exit options into the district. When the trains arrive in the City they are very long and very slow moving and cause traffic to back up while waiting for the train to pass. The trains also create noise and vibrations, which has the potential for creating disturbances to future residential uses. Fuel Storage —Currently there is a fueling station with fuel storage located adjacent to the water. This could cause potential safety risks to future residential uses and could cause environmental concerns for potential leakage in such a close proximity to the water. Power Lines —Currently, high tensioned power lines run down the center of the Market District. This is problematic for any future development, since structures are not permitted beneath the power lines. Any future development will likely relocation of the power lines. Opportunities This district has several opportunities for development/redevelopment of sites, including the following:  Highway Access —The Market District is located along NYS Route 13. The proximity to this highway provides easy access for deliveries and excellent visibility for any future development of this site.  Future Microgrid — The Tompkins County Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) is located in the Market District.  March 23, 2017       20 | Page  This facility provides an excellent opportunity to utilize excess energy to provide alternate sources of electricity. Plans are currently being developed to create a Microgrid system that would distribute electricity to surrounding area.  NY State Department Of Transportation Site (NYSDOT) —A large 7.6 acre site located within the Market District is currently being used as a NYSDOT maintenance facility. The land is valued at approximately $1.5 million. The site is located beside the Farmer’s Market and is adjacent to the waterfront. The City and the County have been working with the NYSDOT to try and re-locate the DOT facility and free up the land for redevelopment. This parcel has tremendous redevelopment potential and has generated a great deal of developer interest over the years. Planned Characteristics  Encourage Mixed Use Development – Future development should include a mix of development types and uses, including commercial and residential uses.  Support Established Uses – Future development should enhance/protect the existing uses, including retaining a space for the Ithaca Farmer’s Market and rowing and boating users.  Encourage Synergistic Uses – This area could benefit by incorporating synergistic uses into planned projects, such as food production and community kitchens, which could enhance the Farmer’s Market.  Make Use of WWTP Excess Heat Energy – Future development opportunities should consider how to incorporate waste heat from the WWTP. \ District Name Permitted Primary Uses Permitted Accessory Uses Off Street parking Requirement Minimum Lot Area Minimum Frontage at Street Maximum Building Stories Maximum Building Height In Feet Maximum Lot Coverage Required Minimum Front Yard Setback Required Minimum Side Yard Setback Required Minimum Other Side Setback Required Minimum Rear Yard Setback Minimum Building Height/ Stories 1. Any Use Permitted in B-2 District, with the exception of 1 and 2 family detached or semi-detached dwellings, fraternity, sorority or group houses, or dormitories, or Bed and Breakfast homes-which are not permitted in the WE-WF District 1. Any accessory use permitted in the B-2 zone 2. Water Related-Light Industrial Uses, inlcuding boat fueling station 2. Boat Fueling Station 3. Parking Garages are permitted with special permit 3. Snowmobile sales, service, rental in conjunction with boat sales, rental or service 4. Sale, rental, repair or storage, of marine related recreational equipment such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment 4. Parking Lot 4. Outdoor Storage of materials 5. Storage of marine related recreation equipment such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment as it relates to permitted primary uses under zoning 1. Any use permitted in the WE-WF District 2. Light Industrial Uses 3. Large Scale Breweries 4. Food Production Specifically Prohibited: Mobile Homes, Petroleum Storage, Casinos, Fueling Stations, Single Story Sotrage Facilities, Big Box Retail, Drive Through Establishments, Cemeteries Recommended Waterfront Zoning Summary Chart 3/27/2017 For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 25' from the top of bank. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimun rear yard setback is 10'. For Industrial Uses there is no minimum building height. For any non-industrial uses buildings must be a minimum of 2 nstories in height 5 63' Required Minimum Front Yard- No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and a preferred 8' tree lawn-When an 8’ tree lawn is not feasible, the Planning Board, at their discretion, may reduce the tree lawn requirement to 5’. 5 5 10 10 For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 20' from the top of bank, except for the eastern side of Inlet Island, which does not have a setback from the water. In some areas an additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimun rear yard setback is 10'. For Water Dependent Uses there is no minimum building height. For any non-industrial uses buildings must be a minimum of 2 stories in height West End Waterfront District(WE-WF) None 3000 30 5 63 No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and an 8' treelawn 100% , except for required setbacks 100% , except for required setbacks 3000 30 Specifically Prohibited: Heavy Industrial Uses, Non Water Related Light Industrial, 1-2 family detached homes, Mobile Homes, Petroleum Storage, cemeteries, Casinos, Fueling Stations, Single Story Self-Storage Facilities, Big Box Retail, Drive Through Establishments, large scale breweries, vehicle sales and service, printing, heating, a/c, etc. NoneCherry Street District (CSD)Same as B-2 1. Any Use Permitted in B-1 Zone, with the exception of 1 and 2 Family Detached or Semi-Detached Dwellings, Fraternity, Sorority, or Dormitories, or Bed and Breakfast homes, and Funeral Homes, and Banks or Monetary Institutions, which are not permitted in the Newman District. 2. Retail Store or Service Commercial Facility 3. Restaurants, Fast Food Establishment, Tavern, with the exception of establishments where food or drink is intended to be served to or consumed by persons in automobiles 4. Club, Lodge or Private Social Center 5. Theater, Bowling Alley, Auditorium or Other Similar Place of Public Assembly 6. Hotel/Motel/Boatel 7. Recreational or Cultural Facilities such as a Park, Playground, Art Museum, fishing pier, or yacht club 8. Public Recreation 9. Sale, Rental, Repair, or Storage of Marine-related Recreational Equipment, such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment 1. Any use permitted in the Newman District 1. Any accessory use permitted in the ND Zone 2. Health Care facilities 3. B&B Inns 4. Confectionary, Millinery, dressmaking, and Other Activities involving Light Hand Fabrication, as well as sales. 5. Food Production facilities 100% , except for required setbacks 100% , except for required setbacks For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 20' from the top of bank. In some areas additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimun rear yard setback is 10'. 2 Stories, and 25' 2 Stories, and 25' 5 For properties located along the waterfront, there is a minimum setback of 20' from the top of bank. In some areas additional setback from the water may be required by the NYS DEC easement. For properties not located directly adjacent to the water the minimun rear yard setback is 10'. No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and an 8' treelawn No front yard setback is required, except as necessary to provide a minimum 5' sidewalk and an 8' treelawn 5 2. Drive Thru banking facilities Newman District (ND) For properties located along the waterfront, the first 12' building facing the water is restricted to have a maximum building height of 2-3 stories after that the building may step up to 5' stories. Properties not located adjacent to the water have a maximum of 5 stories and 63' For properties located along the waterfront, the first 12' building facing the water is restricted to have a maximum building height of 2-3 stories after that the building may step up to 5' stories. Properties not located adjacent to the water have a maximum of 5 stories and 63' Market District None 3000 30 None 3000 30 2. Confectionary, Millinery, dressmaking, and Other Activities involving Light Hand Fabrication, as well as sales. 1. Any accessory use permitted in the WE/WFD Zone, 3. Parking Garages 3. Parking Garages   TO:  Planning and Economic Development Committee Members    FROM:  JoAnn Cornish, Director of Planning and Development    DATE:  April 6, 2017    RE:  Information on City Owned Land in the Southwest Area of the City    Attached please find information on the City’s 60 acres in the southwest area of the city.   In recent months there has been interest in this property for a sediment containment  facility for dewatering of dredge spoils, as a possible site for a consolidated Public Works  Facility – combining Water and Sewer and Streets and Facilities, and for an auto  dealership.  In order to start the conversation for the highest and best use of this land, it is important to  have a basic understanding of the constraints as well as the opportunities. There are many  documents in the Planning Department archives that contain hundreds of pages of  detailed information concerning this site.   Please let me know if you would like more  information and I will direct you where to find it.                           CITY OF ITHACA 108 E. Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, NY 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  Telephone:  Planning & Development – 607‐274‐6550            Community Development/IURA – 607‐274‐6559  Email:  dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email:  iura@cityofithaca.org  Fax:  607‐274‐6558 Fax:  607‐274‐6558    SOUTHWEST SITE CONSTRAINTS AND CONDITIONS             EXPLORATION PLAN, Southwest Park, Ithaca, NY, Drawing No. GT‐2, dated 12‐11‐07    Number 1 – Most desirable for development  Number 7 – Least Desirable for development    From Report of a Reconnaissance Subsurface Exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical  Engineering Evaluation for the Proposed Southwest Park Housing Development for  McCormack Baron Salazar, Prepared by John P. Stopen Engineering Partnership, April 4,  2008 #207338.00      DEC PROPOSED LOCATION FOR SEDIMENT POND                        ITHACA DREDGING BASEMAP 3, VEGETATION                        ITHACA AREA BASEMAP 5 – WETLANDS                        CONCEPT/SPACIAL REQUIREMENT PLANS FOR A NEW CONSOLIDATED DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC  WORKS (WATER AND SEWER AND STREETS AND FACILITIES)    REQUIREMENT +/‐ 11 ACRES    City of Ithaca Planning & Economic Development Committee Wednesday, March 8, 2017 – 6:00 p.m. Common Council Chambers, City Hall, 108 East Green Street Minutes Committee Members Attending: Joseph (Seph) Murtagh, Chair; Josephine Martell, Cynthia Brock, Rob Gearhart, and Steve Smith Committee Members Absent: None Other Elected Officials Attending: None Staff Attending: JoAnn Cornish, Director, Planning and Development Department; Jennifer Kusznir, Senior Planner; Nels Bohn, Director, IURA; Deborah Grunder, Executive Assistant Others Attending: Steve Flash and Noah Demarest Chair Seph Murtagh called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 1) Call to Order/Agenda Review No changes were made to the agenda. 2) Special Order of Business a) Public Hearing – Habitat for Humanity, For-Sale Housing Construction, 402 South Cayuga Street Alderperson Smith moved to open the public hearing; Alderperson Brock seconded the motion. Carried unanimously. No one from the public was present to speak. Alderperson Martel moved to close the public hearing; Alderperson Gearhart seconded the motion. Carried unanimously. b) Public Hearing – Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development, 323 Taughannock Blvd. Alderperson Brock moved to open the public hearing; Alderperson Gearhart seconded the motion. Carried unanimously. Sonny Carubia, 403-415 Taughannock Blvd. stated she is in favor of this project but does have concerns with parking and water and sewer issues. She asks that the City not approve this project. She explained her experience with her tenants having issues with their toilets. There are many things this project doesn’t comply with. She provided a list of things that don’t comply. Fay Gougakis, Center Ithaca, is concerned with Inlet Island. It’s a small island. There is already too much traffic near Island Fitness, etc. As a cyclist, it is very scary. This is a very sensitive area. Good care must be taken when developing anything. Alderperson Brock moved to close the public hearing; Alderperson Smith seconded the motion. Carried unanimously. 3) Public Comment and Response from Committee Members Fay Gougakis spoke on an accident that occurred at the entrance to the Green Street Garage. The painting within the garage is of concern. She recommends the walls within the garage remain white. Painting all over the City is becoming hazardous. Alderperson Brock stated that in future public hearings there should be given more information on the agenda. She thanked Fay for her comments and agrees with her concern regarding the artwork in the garage. Chair Murtagh stated that will be another public information session on the TMPUD later this month prior to the Common Council meeting. He further stated that what the vote is tonight regarding the TMPUD is concept only. He also thanked Fay for her comments and shares her concerns. 4) Updates, Announcements, Reports a) Housing Strategy The IURA is down one staff member, but when that person is hired their main focus will be on this project. The hope is to start this project in the summer. Alderperson Brock would like to see guidelines to help developers through this process. Applicants must know what needs to be completed. It would help to make the project go smoothly. b) Brewpub Legislation There is still more fact finding being done. There are concerns with the silo creating too much dust, bringing rodents, etc. A meeting will be set up with Planning staff, Fire Chief Tom Parsons, and Zoning Administrator Gino Leonardo. 5) Action Items (Voting to send onto Council) a) Habitat for Humanity For-Sale Housing   Conveyance of 402 S. Cayuga Street to Habitat for Humanity – Lead Agency Moved by Alderperson Brock; seconded by Alderperson Smith. Carried unanimously. WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Common Council is considering the proposed sale by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency of vacant property located at 402 S. Cayuga Street, Ithaca, NY (tax map #93.-6-7) to Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc., and WHEREAS, the proposed sale of an approximately 8,000 square foot parcel of land is an Unlisted action under the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (CEQRO), and WHEREAS, State Law and Section 176.6 of CEQRO require that a Lead Agency be established for conducting environmental review of proposed actions in accordance with local and state environmental law, and WHEREAS, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, and WHEREAS, Common Council approval is required for sale of IURA-owned land; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City of Ithaca Common Council does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the proposed sale of vacant property located at 402 S. Cayuga Street, Ithaca, New York. Conveyance of 402 S. Cayuga Street to Habitat for Humanity – Declaration of Environmental Significance (Neg Dec) Moved by Alderperson Gearhart; seconded by Alderperson Martell. Carried unanimously.  WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Common Council is considering the proposed sale by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency of vacant property located at 402 S. Cayuga Street, Ithaca, NY (tax map #93.-6-7) to Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc., and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Common Council declared itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of this proposed action, and WHEREAS, such proposed action for the transfer or sale of less than 2.5 contiguous acres of land is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQR”) and an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQR”), both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS, the Short Environmental Assessment Form (“SEAF”) and supporting information has been provided to the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council for review of the proposed action and no comments have been received to date, and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Common Council, acting as Lead Agency for the environmental review, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 and Part 2, prepared by Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency staff; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the City of Ithaca Common Council hereby determines that the proposed sale of vacant IURA-owned property located at 402 S. Cayuga Street, Ithaca, NY to Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc. will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act.   Conveyance of 402 S. Cayuga Street to Habitat for Humanity – Action Moved by Alderperson Smith; seconded by Alderperson Gearhart. Whereas, the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) is the owner of vacant real property located at 402 South Cayuga Street (tax parcel # 93.-6-7), and Whereas, Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc. (Habitat) seeks to acquire 402 South Cayuga to develop new owner-occupied housing to be sold to low-income homebuyers, and Whereas, the IURA is authorized to dispose of property to a specific buyer at a negotiated price if such buyer is designated as an eligible and qualified sponsor (Sponsor) to carry out an urban renewal project pursuant to section 508 of General Municipal Law and the sale is approved by Common Council following a public hearing, and Whereas, on January 26, 2017, the IURA designated Habitat as a “qualified and eligible sponsor” eligible to acquire 402 S. Cayuga Street for the purpose of undertaking an urban renewal project to develop affordable for-sale housing, and Whereas, the IURA approved entering into a sales agreement for 402 S. Cayuga Street property subject to Common Council approval and the following terms and conditions: Seller: Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency Purchaser: Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc. Sales price: $32,000.00 Outcome: Development of at least 2 new owner-occupied residences to be sold to households earning no more than 80% of area median income Contingencies: 1. Design – Approval of final floor plans and exterior design plans to reasonably maximize accessible design and ensure compatibility with the neighborhood; 2. Project Financing – Submit proof of financing and equity sufficient to construct the project; 3. Site Plan – Submit proof of site plan approval; and 4. Building Permit – Submit proof of issuance of a building permit authorizing at least two dwelling units, and Whereas, a public hearing notice was published in the February 18, 2017 edition of the Ithaca Journal disclosing the essential terms of the proposed sale and a public hearing was held on March 8, 2017, and Whereas, environmental review on the proposed action has been completed, now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that the City of Ithaca Common Council hereby approves the IURA- proposed sales agreement of property located at 402 S. Cayuga Street to Habitat For Humanity of Tompkins and Cortland Counties, Inc. for the purpose of developing affordable for-sale housing. b) Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development – 323 Taughannock Blvd. Alderperson Martell asked about the concerns stated by the landlord in attendance. The project team said that they have talked with City officials regarding what would need to be done to make this project work with the existing utilities or upgrading if needed. Consideration of Common Council Conditional Approval for 323 Taughannock Boulevard Application for Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development (TMPUD) – Resolution Moved by Alderperson Martell; seconded by Alderperson Brock. Carried unanimously. 1. WHEREAS, on March 2, 2016, the Common Council adopted legislation establishing a Temporary Mandatory Planned Unit Development (TMPUD) for a period of 18 months in the Waterfront Study Area, and 2. WHEREAS, on January 16, 2017, Rampart Real, LLC submitted a completed TMPUD application, and 3. WHEREAS, the proposed project involves the subdivision of the parcel and the construction of 8 attached townhomes and 8 parking spaces, on a .242 acre lot on Inlet Island, and 4. WHEREAS, in accordance with the adopted City process for consideration of a planned unit development, the application was circulated to City boards and committees, as well as to the County Planning Department, and 5. WHEREAS, a public information session, hosted by the applicant, was held on February 27, 2017, and 6. WHEREAS, in accordance with the TMPUD adopted process, the meeting was advertised in the Ithaca Journal, signs were posted on the property, and property owners within 500 feet were notified by mail of the meeting, and 7. WHEREAS, a notice was posted in the Ithaca Journal on February 22, 2017, in order to advertise a legal public hearing to be held on March 8, 2017, and 8. WHEREAS, after the public information session was held, it was discovered that while the meeting had been advertised in the paper and to other local media with the correct information, the post cards that were sent to property owners within 500 feet had an incorrect date listed, and 9. WHEREAS, Planning Department staff is working with the applicant to schedule and publicize a second public information session to ensure that there is adequate opportunity for the public to understand the proposed project, and 10. WHEREAS, the second public information session will be held prior to the Common Council meeting to consider this project, and 11. WHEREAS, the process for consideration of an application for a Planned Unit Development requires that the applicant obtain an approval in concept from the Common Council prior to beginning the site plan review process, 12. WHEREAS, the Common Council has reviewed all of the comments that were received and discussed the proposal, and 13. WHEREAS, according to the City Comprehensive Plan future development in the waterfront area should include mixed uses , including commercial and housing, and should maintain access to the water, and 14. WHEREAS, the proposed project contains 16 residential housing units, 8 of which can be used as either studio apartments or rental office space, and maintains public access to the water, now therefore be it 1. RESOLVED, that the Common Council has reviewed the application for the Rampart Real, LLC Inlet Island project and has determined that it does comply with the goals of the City Comprehensive Plan, and therefore the Common Council does hereby grant an approval in concept to Rampart Real, LLC, and be it further 2. RESOLVED, that by granting an approval in concept, the Common Council acknowledges that the applicant is able to begin the site plan review process, despite any zoning-based deficiencies in the application, and, be it further 3. RESOLVED, that this approval in concept is being granted on the condition that a second public information session be held prior to the Common Council meeting to consider this project and property owners within 500 feet of the project be notified prior to the meeting, and, be it further 4. RESOLVED, that the Common Council does hereby request that the City Planning Board update the Common Council after each Planning Board meeting where this project is considered and to request ongoing written comments from the Common Council, and be it further 5. RESOLVED, that if this project receives a negative declaration of environmental significance and contingent site plan approval, the applicant will return to the Common Council for final consideration of the adoption of the Planned Unit Development district. 6) Action Items (Voting to Circulate)     Moved by Alderperson Rob Gearhart; seconded by Alderperson Martell. Carried Unanimously. Site-Plan Review Ordinance Changes – Tree Preservation and Maintenance The ordinance will be circulated for comment and brought back to this committee next month. 7) Review and Approval of Minutes a) January 2017 Moved by Alderperson Smith; seconded by Alderperson Gearhart. Passed unanimously. 8) Adjournment Moved by Alderperson Gearhart; seconded by Alderperson Martell. Passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.