HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-06-16 Common Council Meeting Agenda OFFICIAL NOTICE OF MEETING
A Regular meeting of the Common Council will be held on Wednesday, July 6, 2016, at
6:00 p.m. in the Common Council Chambers at City Hall, 108 East Green Street, Ithaca,
New York. Your attendance is requested.
AGENDA
1 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
2. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA:
3. PROCLAMATIONS/AWARDS:
3.1 'Ithaca Is Love' - Sending Support to Orlando — Proclamation
4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
6. PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
7. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR — COMMON COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR:
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
Department of Public Information and Technology:
8.1 Simeon's Alcohol Permit Request — Resolution
8.2 Mia Noodle Bar and Restaurant Alcohol Permit Request - Resolution
City Administration Committee:
8.3 Ithaca Police Department — Amendment to 2016 Budget - Resolution
8.4 Approval of Installation of Friends of Ithaca Youth Bureau Donor Wall -
Resolution
8.5 Request for Permanent Easement for 400-404 Stewart Avenue - Proposed
Encroachment - Resolution
9. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
9.1 Ithaca Fire Department - Amendment to Capital Project #821 for Fire Vehicle
Acquisition — Resolution
9.2 Department of Public Works — Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment Facility
(IAWWTF) — Request to Establish A Capital Project for A Microgrid Feasibility
Study
9.3 Approval and Authorization to Execute CSEA Administrative Unit Contract
(Proposed Motion to Enter Into Executive Session To Discuss Matters Relating to
Collective Negotiations with Bargaining Units) - Resolution
Common Council Meeting Agenda
July 6, 2016
Page 2
9. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (CONTINUED):
9.4 Approval and Authorization of Compensation for Confidential Employees
Not Included Under the CSEA Administrative Contract (Proposed Motion to Enter
Into Executive Session To Discuss Matters Relating to Collective Negotiations
with Bargaining Units) — Resolution
9.5 Update Regarding Request for Proposals for Study of Law Enforcement
Consolidation
9.6 City Controller's Report
10. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
10.1 First Amendment to City-Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) Professional
Services Agreement - Resolution
11 . REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES:
12. NEW BUSINESS:
13. INDIVIDUAL MEMBER — FILED RESOLUTIONS:
14. MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Reappointment to Cable Access Oversight Committee —Resolution
15. REPORTS OF COMMON COUNCIL LIAISONS:
16. REPORT OF CITY CLERK:
17. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY:
18. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
18.1 Approval of the May 4, 2016 Common Council Meeting Minutes — Resolution
18.2 Approval of the June 1 , 2016 Common Council Meeting Minutes — Resolution
18.3 Approval of the June 29, 2016 Common Council Meeting Minutes - Resolution
19. ADJOURNMENT:
If you have a disability that will require special arrangements to be made in order for you
to fully participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 at least 48
hours before the meeting.
iul/M-4/1014_e_eyy
lie Conley Holcomb, CMC
City Clerk
Date: June 30, 2016
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
Department of Public Information and Technology:
8.1 Simeon's Alcohol Permit Request — Resolution
WHEREAS, since 1987 the City of Ithaca has issued a license to Simeon's Restaurant
allowing that restaurant to utilize certain areas along Aurora Street and on the Ithaca
Commons for outdoor dining; and
WHEREAS, this use of public property has generally been deemed proper and
successful; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca wishes to promote diverse uses of the Ithaca Commons,
including outdoor dining; and
WHEREAS, it is Common Council's responsibility to determine whether or not to allow
the serving and consumption of alcohol on the Ithaca Commons; and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that the use of this public property for
outdoor dining at Simeon's Restaurant, including the responsible sale and consumption
of alcohol, is desirable; and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that any use of this or similar public
property involving the same and consumption of alcohol should be covered by a
minimum of $1 ,000,000 insurance under the Dram Shop Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, For the year 2016, Common Council hereby approves a revocable
Alcoholic Beverage Permit for the outdoor sale and consumption of alcohol for Simeon's
Restaurant that includes the sale of alcohol in accordance with the terms and conditions
set forth in the application therefore, including minimum Dram Shop coverage in the
amount of $1 ,000,000 and the approval of an outdoor dining permit.
8.2 Mia Noodle Bar and Restaurant Alcohol Permit Request — Resolution
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has received a request to allow Mia Noodle Bar and
Restaurant to utilize certain areas along the Primary Commons for outdoor dining; and
WHEREAS, this use of public property has been deemed proper and successful; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca wishes to promote diverse uses of the Primary and
Secondary Commons, including outdoor dining; and
WHEREAS, it is Common Council's responsibility to determine whether or not to allow
the serving and consumption of alcohol on the Primary and Secondary Commons; and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that the use of this public property for
outdoor dining at Mia Noodle Bar and Restaurant, including the responsible sale and
consumption of alcohol, is desirable; and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that any use of this or similar public
property involving the same and consumption of alcohol should be covered by a
minimum of $1,000,000 insurance under the Dram Shop Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, For the year 2016, Common Council hereby approves a revocable
Alcoholic Beverage Permit for the outdoor sale and consumption of alcohol for Mia
Noodle Bar and Restaurant that includes the sale of alcohol in accordance with the
terms and conditions set forth in application therefore, including minimum Dram Shop
coverage in the amount of $1 ,000,000 and the approval of an outdoor dining permit.
City Administration Committee:
8.3 Ithaca Police Department— Amendment to 2016 Budget - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Police Department (IPD) hosted a New York State
Department of Criminal Justice Services Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
Operator Course at IPD facilities; and
WHEREAS, the fees collected for this training were $5,400 and will be used to offset the
cost of instructors for the training; and
WHEREAS, as a benefit of hosting the training, IPD SWAT personnel were able to take
the training at no cost to the City; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council approves the amendment of the 2016 City of
Ithaca Budget to accommodate the increase in revenue collected and the related
increase in training expenses as follows:
Increase Revenue:
A3120-1520-5022 Police Fees $5,400
Increase Expenditures:
A3120-5440-5022 Staff Development $5,400
Budget Adjust
BACK-UP ITEM 8.3
Budget Adjust
iacob Young
it:Thursday, May 19,2016 1:37 PM
Scott Andrew
Cc: Jamie Ramirez
Hi Scott,
As we discussed earlier today on the phone, we are running a NYS DCJS SWAT Operator Course at our facility in June of this
year. We will be bringing in just over $5000 in registration costs, but will be paying those funds back out to Instructors that we will
be bringing in for the course. If we could get the budget adjusted so that our income can pay off the cost for instructors that would
be great. Jamie Ramirez already has some of the payments made for the course. Here is the breakdown:
Income From the Course (Registration Fees: 9 @ $600 Each) = $5400
Sub-Contracting Instructional Payments To Be Made after Course: 1.) Fundamentals 4: $4500
2.) Medicine in Bad Places: $900
Please let me know if you need anything further to set this up. Thank you again for all your help! -Jake
Jacob A. Young
Lieutenant - B Platoon
Patrol Division
Ithaca Police Department
120 E. Clinton St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
Cell: 607-279-7930
https://mail.cityofithaca.org/...AAJfLJAACX4A2DetppRpvnL%2fETKBsHAABwcXGJAAAJ&a=Print&pspid=_1465322217245_546423476[6/7/2016 1:59:23 PM]
8.4 Approval of Installation of Friends of Ithaca Youth Bureau Donor Wall -
Resolution
WHEREAS, the City is currently proceeding with Phase II, Year 1 of 2 of the Cass Park
Ice Rink Renovations project; and
WHEREAS, Phase II, Year 2 of the project contemplates enclosure of the Cass Park
Arena and improvements for the conditioned air system, ventilation, and spectator and
skater areas; however, at this time, the City has not appropriated funding for Year 2
project goals; and
WHEREAS, in support of the Phase II, Year 2 plans, Friends of the Ithaca Youth Bureau
has offered to fundraise and donate towards this project; and
WHEREAS, Friends of Ithaca Youth Bureau has recommended that the Youth Bureau
create wall space no larger than eight (8) feet by twelve (12) feet within the renovated
Cass Park Ice Rink to display the names of donors for a term of twenty (20) years, and
the Youth Bureau and Board of Public Works is supportive of the proposal; and
WHEREAS, General City Law §20(3) empowers the City to accept gift, grants, or
donations upon terms and conditions between the donor and City; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council authorizes the City to accept donations from the
Friends of Ithaca Youth Bureau conditioned on recognition of donors to this project on a
donor wall as described above; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That Common Council authorizes the City's placement of a donors' wall
no larger than eight (8) feet by twelve (12) feet within the renovated Cass Park Ice Rink
to display the names of donors for a term of twenty years (20).
BACK-UP ITEM 8.4
-�o`'th BurQOG Ithaca Youth Bureau 4.•ov1z
a 1 James L. Gibbs Drive =�,,`� 1-y=
Ithaca, New York 14850 a IFJJ1[!]11j1 8'�i
1 B Phone: 607
( ) 273-8364
Fax: (607) 273-2817 '=� �.me.-��`b,J
"Building a foundation for a lifetime." tio,;
To: City Administration Committee
From: Suki Tabor, Deputy Director
Liz Vance, Director
Re: Youth Bureau Budget Amendment
Date: June 8, 2016
We have been advised, by the Tompkins County Workforce Investment Board that we will receive
$152,247.86 in funding for Tompkins Summer Youth Employment Program. Although we are awaiting final
confirmation, we are pleased that we may be able to offer summer employment to additional teens this
summer.
We would like to amend the 2016 Youth Bureau budget, contingent upon confirmation of funding, as
follows:
Increase anticipated revenue from Tompkins County Workforce Investment Board
Account #A7310-4820-1200 Youth Development Administration $3,000.00
Account #A7310-4820-1202 Youth Employment Service $144,903.36
Account #A7310-4820-1400 Administration $4,344.50
Total $152,247.86
Increase expenses:
Account #A 7310-5440-1200 Staff Development $2,000.00
Account #A 7310-5460-1200 Program Supplies $1,000.00
Account #A 7310-5120-1202 Part time/Seasonal $121,035.76
Account #A 7310-5425-1202 Office Supplies $2,531.35
Account #A 7310-5445-1202 Travel &Mileage $1,000.00
Account #A 7310-5460-1202 Program Supplies $4,400.00
Account #A 7310-5420-1400 Gas & Oil $500.00
Account #A 7310-5425-1400 Office Expense $3,000.00
Account #A 7310-5476-1401 Equipment Maintenance $844.50
YES Fringe Benefits Participants $101,250.00 x 12.65% $12,808.12
Other PTS (Staff) $19,785.76 x 15.81% $3,128.13
Total $152,247.86
Thank you.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification."
8.5 Request for Permanent Easement for 400-404 Stewart Avenue - Proposed
Encroachment - Resolution
WHEREAS, Jason Demarest, as representative for the owner of 400-404 Stewart
Avenue in the City of Ithaca (Tax Map Parcel No. 63-1-6, MSW Management, LLC
owner of record), hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has requested a permanent
easement from the City into the adjacent Stewart Avenue and Osmun Place rights-of-
way; and
WHEREAS, Applicant requests an easement to permit the following encroachment into
the City's right-of-way:
An encroachment for installation of footers and awnings extending into City-
owned subsurface and airspace from the building located on 400-404 Stewart
Avenue no more than two feet as follows: to the south and running parallel to the
building face and Osmun Place for 51 feet and to the east running parallel to the
building face and Stewart Avenue for 64.50 feet, and as depicted in the drawing
attached and included by reference as Exhibit A.
; and
WHEREAS, City of Ithaca Municipal Code Chapter 170 entitled "Use of City Real
Property; Section 170-5 entitled "Authority to Grant Approval for Use of City Property;
No Entitlement to Approval" vests Common Council with the authority to convey a
permanent easement across City property; and
WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed encroachment into City property will not
interfere with the right-of-way as currently constituted; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Superintendent of Public Works does not anticipate any
conflicts in the near future with public works uses or needs and the Board of Public
Works, by resolution, recommended that Common Council authorize granting this
easement under the terms described in this resolution; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the fee for this permanent easement shall be $18,666.77, based on
the Pomeroy appraisal value of $833.47 for one year of use at the current appraisal rate
in Collegetown of $2.87 per square foot, calculated out for a thirty (30) year depreciation
period and 2% rate of inflation; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor, in consultation with the City Attorney, and upon payment
of the fee set forth in this resolution, is hereby authorized to execute all necessary
documents to grant the easement requested by Applicant and described above.
BACK-UP ITEM 8.5
CITY OF ITHACA
pfITH 108 East Green Street Ithaca,New York 14850-5690
�y"` •• = OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
1[U][ a : Aaron O. Lavine, City Attorney Telephone: 607/274-6504
J1IJ]1
:° Robert A. Sarachan, Assistant City Attorney Fax: 607/274-6507
\caqp m..� " •
���° Krin Flaherty, Assistant City Attorney
• RAS,,, Jody Andrew, Executive Assistant
MEMORANDUM
i0: City Administration Committee
From: City Attorney's Office
Date: June 1, 2016
Subject: Request for permanent easement into Stewart Ave and Osmun Place rights of way
The owner of the property located at 400-404 Stewart Avenue,has requested a permanent
easement into the City's right of way to accommodate the installation and placement of footers
and awnings.
Attached as Exhibit A to the proposed resolution,you will find a depiction of the proposed
encroachments.
Public Works staff and the Board of Public Works have concluded that this proposal would not
impede the City's use or planned use of its right of way.
The fee proposed in this resolution, $18,666.77, is based on the Pomeroy appraisal values for
Collegetown square footage, which the City uses to assess annual license fees. In collaboration
with the Office of the City Controller,we estimated a future value of license payments calculated
out for 30 years,the standard depreciation period used by the City for buildings under State
Finance Law. To factor in the yearly adjustments the City makes for consumer price index
increases on a yearly license fee, we assumed a two percent rate of inflation.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification."
--
-di x•
S'I
om
m-I
om
0o
AD
Drr
<m
D
A
fnm
I s
�
- 1 m •r'2_
,_,,
q 1
I
I
I
1
I
111
s
' I'.G k 4
-ti I
$y
I Qe
1 e
I
1
1
1
N
I
q v
6 i g',_ __ 3 Sebastian Mascaro's G
y 'g E m EFig- I' CHAPTER HOUSE RECONSTRUCTION ,,:N§
O @@,e .w E '°°'°' °~° COORDINATION DOCUMENT s n
4 S 6 m�a. we"a,n�.v",k i+eso -1g
9.8 Wall do-Nov
9. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
9.1 Ithaca Fire Department - Amendment to Capital Project#821 for Fire
Vehicle Acquisition - Resolution
WHEREAS, Common Council authorized Capital Project#821 for the fiscal year 2016,
in the amount of$455,000, to replace the truck chassis and refurbish the body of the
Fire Department's Heavy Rescue Truck, which was purchased new in 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City's Fleet Manager has determined that a Pumper Truck that was
purchased in 2000, needs the vehicle's frame replaced due to deformity and severe
corrosion; and
WHEREAS, the Manufacturer of the Pumper Truck has estimated the cost of the frame
replacement to be at least $49,000; and
WHEREAS, the replacement of the Pumper Truck is scheduled to be in 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Chief and the City's Fleet Manager recommend postponing the
Heavy Rescue Chassis Replacement and Refurbishment and purchase a replacement
Pumper Truck at a cost of $555,000; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council approves the amendment of Capital Project#821
to increase the project funding by $100,000 for the purchase of a new Pumper Truck
giving a total project authorization of$555,000; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That funds needed for said new Pumper Truck shall be derived from the
issuance of Serial Bonds.
BACK-UP ITEM 9.1
cifCITY OF ITHACA
�, 310 West Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5497
I"Tf"•7-
%141111111,,.. OFFICE OF THE FIRE CHIEF
Telephone: 607/272-1234 Fax: 607/272-2793
Memo
To: Common Council
From: Tom Parsons, Fire Chief
Date: May 27, 2016
Re: Amendment of Capital Project#821
On June 12th, 2015, I submitted a Capital Project request to the Capital Project Review Committee for the
replacement of the truck chassis and to refurbish the body of the fire department's heavy rescue truck.
The chassis and body were purchased new as one unit in 1990. The cost of the project was not to
exceed $455,000. Common Council approved the project for FY 2016.
Within my capital project proposal, I also indicated that between the years 2017 and 2021, there would be
four capital project requests to replace two 20-year-old pumper trucks, one 20-year-old ladder truck, and
refurbishing one 16-year-old pumper truck. The estimated cost for all four projects was over 2.5 million
dollars.
During some recent maintenance and repairs of one of your 16-year-old pumper trucks, the City's DPW
Mechanics found significant deformity and corrosion of the vehicle's frame. The frame is in such poor
condition that it will fail before the vehicle is due for replacement, with the very possibility of failure within
the next year. The pumper truck was purchased new in 2000. The frames of two other pumper trucks
purchased in 2000 and 2001 were also inspected. Those trucks have chassis by the same manufacturer.
They were also found with frame corrosion, and with some deformity. The chassis manufacturer
estimates the cost of the frame replacement for one truck to be at least$49,000. The truck would be out
of service for several months while the truck is disassembled and reassembled.
After discussions with Brian Carmen, City Fleet Manager, and a local truck repair center, it is the
collective opinion that it is impractical to invest any significant amount of money to refurbish any of the
three trucks if it involved the replacement of the frame. All three pumper trucks have over 72,000 miles.
Due to their age, the maintenance costs for all three vehicles has been increasing over the past five
years. All three trucks are on a twenty-year replacement schedule. The expected useful service life of a
pumper truck used in a municipal fire department is between 15 and 20 years.
Page 1 of 2
Fire Department—Capital Project 821 May 27th, 2016
Since the issue with the frame of the pumper trucks was identified, I have had an independent fire truck
service center provide an assessment of the Heavy Rescue Truck, and estimate the cost of refurbishing
the truck, without replacing the truck chassis. The goal of restoring the truck is to extend it is useful
service time for another ten years. The cost to refurbish the heavy rescue truck was estimated at
$75,000. If the chassis were replaced, the expected useful service time would be for at least 20 years.
After analysis of the current situation with the department's older pumper trucks, I am requesting that
Capital Project 821 be amended to replace a 16-year-old pumper truck, instead of the chassis
replacement and body refurbishment of the department's heavy rescue truck. I am also requesting that
Capital Project 821 be increased by$100,000, for a total amount of$555,000 to fund the pump truck's
replacement.
The refurbishment of the heavy rescue truck will be partially funded out of the 2016 Fire Department
Operating Budget, and with additional funding that I will be requesting in the 2017 Fire Department
Operating Budget.
Thank you for consideration of my request.
Page 2 of 2
9.2 Department of Public Works — Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment Facility
(IAWWTF) — Request to Establish A Capital Project for A Microqrid Feasibility
Study - Resolution
WHEREAS, the staff of the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility (IAWWTF)
applied for and received a New York State Energy Research and Development
Authority (NYSERDA) Grant for $100,000; and
WHEREAS, NYSERDA, in conjunction with the New York State Governor's Office of
Storm Recovery, offered the grant as part of the three-stage NY Prize Community Grid
Competition to support the development of Community Microgrids, with the objective of
the program to promote the design and build of community grids that improve local
electrical distribution system performance and resiliency in both a normal operating
environment as well as during times of electrical grid outages; and
WHEREAS, the NYSERDA $100,000 grant for Stage 1 includes Feasibility Assessment
of the Development of the Microgrid Capabilities and Analysis; and
WHEREAS, if the Microgrid Feasibility Study deems the Microgrid Project viable, other
stages of the grant competition will be applied for; and
WHEREAS, a Capital Project will need to be established to account for the NYSERDA
NY Prize Microgrid Program Stage 1 revenue and expense; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby establishes Capital Project #421J IAWWTF
Microgrid for Electrical Power Feasibility in an amount not to exceed $100,000; and, be
it further
RESOLVED, That funds needed for said Capital Project shall be derived from
NYSERDA and the NY Prize Community Grid Competition Grant.
BACK-UP ITEM 9.2
Article IV
Payment
Section 4.01. Payment Terms. In consideration for this Agreement and as NYSERDA's
full payment for the costs of the performance of all Work,and in respect of all other direct and
indirect costs,charges or expenses incurred in connection therewith,NYSERDA shall pay to the
Contractor amounts not to exceed the maximum amount set forth in Item 5,Page One of this
Agreement,subject to the provisions and restrictions contained herein,including,without
limitation,the Prompt Payment Policy Statement attached hereto as Exhibit D.
Subject to any applicable provisions set forth in Exhibit A, Statement of Work, at the
completion of each Milestone Event so identified,the Contractor may submit invoices,including
documentation reasonably sufficient to demonstrate completion,requesting payment by
NYSERDA of the amounts corresponding to the amounts indicated in Exhibit A, Statement of
Work,including evidence of the Contractor's cost share,if applicable.
Section 4.02. Progress Payments.
(a) Invoicing: The Contractor may submit invoices for Milestone payments no more
than once each month and no less than once each calendar quarter for Work performed during
such period. Invoices shall be addressed to NYSERDA,"Attention: Accounts Payable,"or
submitted electronically to invoices@nyserda.ny.gov. Such invoices shall make reference to the
Agreement number shown at Item 1 on page 1 of this Agreement. Invoices shall be inclusive of
�./ the total project costs incurred,delineated into NYSERDA's Funding share and the Cost-Share
and Other Co-funding share,if applicable.
Section 4.03. Final Payment. Upon final acceptance by NYSERDA of all deliverables
contained in Exhibit A,Statement of Work,pursuant to Section 6.02 hereof,the Contractor shall
submit an invoice for final payment with respect to the Work,together with such supporting
information and documentation as,and in such form as,NYSERDA may require. All invoices
for final payment hereunder must,under any and all circumstances,be received by NYSERDA
within six(6)months following Acceptance of Work pursuant to Section 6.02 hereof. In
accordance with and subject to the provisions of NYSERDA's Prompt Payment Policy
Statement,attached hereto as Exhibit D,NYSERDA shall pay to the Contractor within the
prescribed time after receipt of such invoice for fmal payment,the total amount payable pursuant
to Section 4.01 hereof,less all progress payments/milestone payments previously made to the
Contractor with respect thereto and subject to the maximum commitment set forth in Section
4.06 hereof.
Section 4.04. Release by the Contractor. The acceptance by the Contractor of final
payment shall release NYSERDA from all claims and liability that the Contractor,its
representatives and assigns might otherwise have relating to this Agreement.
Section 4.05. Maintenance of Records. The Contractor shall keep,maintain,and
preserve at its principal office throughout the term of the Agreement and for a period of three
20
years after acceptance of the Work,full and detailed books,accounts,and records pertaining to
this Agreement,including without limitation,all bills,invoices,payrolls,time records,expense
reports,subcontracting efforts and other data evidencing,or in any material way related to,the
direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred by the Contractor in the course of its performance
under this Agreement.
Section 4.06. Maximum Commitment. The maximum aggregate amount payable by
NYSERDA to the Contractor shall be the amount appearing at Item 5 of page one of this
Agreement. NYSERDA shall not be liable for any costs or expenses in excess of such amount
incurred by the Contractor in the performance and completion of the Work.
Section 4.07. Audit. NYSERDA shall have the right from time to time and at all
reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and for the maintenance period set forth in
Section 4.05 hereof to inspect and audit any and all books,accounts and records related to this
Agreement or reasonably necessary to the performance of an audit at the office or offices of the
Contractor where they are then being kept,maintained and preserved pursuant to Section 4.05
hereof. Any payment made under the Agreement shall be subject to retroactive reduction for
amounts included therein which are found by NYSERDA on the basis of any audit of the
Contractor by NYSERDA,the State of New York or an agency of the United States not to
constitute an allowable charge or cost hereunder.
Article V
Assignments,Subcontracts and Purchase Orders
Section 5.01. General Restrictions. Except as specifically provided otherwise in this
Article,the assignment,transfer,conveyance,subcontracting or other disposal of this Agreement
or any of the Contractor's rights,obligations, interests or responsibilities hereunder,in whole or
in part,without the express consent in writing of NYSERDA shall be void and of no effect as to
NYSERDA.
Section 5.02. Subcontract Procedures. Without relieving it of,or in any way limiting,its
obligations to NYSERDA under this Agreement,the Contractor may enter into Subcontracts for
the performance of Work or for the purchase of materials or equipment. Except for a
subcontractor or supplier specified in a team arrangement with the Contractor in the Contractor's
original proposal,and except for any subcontract or order for equipment,supplies or materials
from a single subcontractor or supplier totaling less than$50,000,the Contractor shall select all
subcontractors or suppliers through a process of competitive bidding or multi-source price
review. A team arrangement is one where a subcontractor or supplier specified in the
Contractor's proposal is performing a substantial portion of the Work and is making a substantial
contribution to the management and/or design of the Project. In the event that a competitive
bidding or multi-source price review is not feasible,the Contractor shall document an
explanation for,and justification of,a sole source selection. The Contractor shall document the
process by which a subcontractor or supplier is selected by making a record summarizing the
nature and scope of the work,equipment, supplies or materials sought,the name of each person
or organization submitting,or requested to submit,a bid or proposal,the price or fee bid,and the
21
Milestone Payment Schedule
NYSERDA
Milestone Project#66455 Month Milestone External
Number Milestone Description Completion Payment Cost Share
0 Project Management and Reporting On-going
1 Develop Microgrid Capabilities 2 15,000
2 Develop Technical Deign Costs&Configuration 4 $ 35,000
3 Assessment of Microgrid Commercial&Financial Feasibility 5 $ 15,000
4 Develop Information for Costs&Benefit Analysis 6 $ 15,000
5 Accepted Final Written Document 7 $ 20,000
Total $ 100,000 50
Total Cost 100,000
16
IAWWTF ID 15-6000407 INVOICE
525 THIRD ST
ITHACA, NY 14850 Invoice Number: 20102559
USA Invoice Date: Apr 6,2016
Page: 1
Voice: 607-273-8381
Fax: 607-273-8433
NYSERDA CONTROLLER OFFICE NYSERDA CONTROLLER OFFICE
Attention:Accounts Payable Attention:Accounts Payable
17 COLUMBIA CIRCLE 17 COLUMBIA CIRCLE
ALBANY,NY 12203 ALBANY,NY 12203
NYSERDA Net 30 Days
Airborne 5/6/16
'NYSERDA AGREEMENT#66455 NY
PRIZE RFP STAGE 1 -FEASIBILITY
ASSESSMENT
MILESTONE#1 -Develop Microgrid 15,000.0000
Capabibties
MILESTONE#2-Develop Technical Design 35,000.0000
Costs&Configuration
MILESTONE#3-Assessment of Feasibility 15,000.0000
MILESTONE#4-Develop Info Cost& 15,000.0000
Benefit Analysis
Subtotal 80,000.00
Sales Tax
Total Invoice Amount 80,000.00
Check/Credit Memo No: Payment/Credit Applied
IAWWTF ID 15-6000407 INVOICE
525 THIRD ST
ITHACA, NY 14850 Invoice Number. 20102585
USA Invoice Date: May 24,2016
Page: 1
Voice: 607-273-8381
Fax: 607-273-8433
•
NYSERDA CONTROLLER OFFICE NYSERDA CONTROLLER OFFICE
Attention:Accounts Payable Attention:Accounts Payable
17 COLUMBIA CIRCLE 17 COLUMBIA CIRCLE
ALBANY,NY 12203 ALBANY,NY 12203
NYSERDA Net 30 Days
Airborne 6/23/16
1.0000 NYSERDA AGREEMENT#66455 NY 20,000.0000 ! 20,000.0000
PRIZE REP STAGE 1 -FEASIBILITY
ASSESSMENT
r6r° 6(6,61 '316/
Subtotal 20,000-00
Sales Tax
Total Invoice Amount 20,000.00
Check/Credit Memo No: Payment/Credit Applied
9.3 Approval and Authorization to Execute CSEA Administrative Unit Contract
-- — (Proposed Motion to Enter Into Executive Session To Discuss Matters Relating
to Collective Negotiations with Bargaining Units) — Resolution
RESOLVED, That Common Council approves the agreement between the City of Ithaca
and the CSEA Administrative Unit for a four-year term commencing January 1 , 2016
and expiring December 31 , 2019; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor is authorized to fully execute the agreement on behalf of
the City.
_ 9.4 Authorization and Approval of Compensation for Confidential Employees
Not Included Under the CSEA Administrative Contract — (Proposed Motion to
Enter Into Executive Session To Discuss Matters Relating to Collective
Negotiations with Bargaining Units) — Resolution
RESOLVED, That for the period of January 1 , 2016 through December 31, 2019, all
employees not covered by a formal labor contract, excluding positions designated as
management, be granted salary increases and fringe benefits in accordance with the
provisions of the CSEA Administrative Unit contract.
9.5 Update Regarding Request for Proposals for Study of Law Enforcement
— Consolidation
SEE ATTACHED BACK-UP INFORMATION
8.a
WORKING DRAFT v4.1 (Post 6/16/16 PSC Meeting)
\,...,... BACK-UP ITEM 9.5
Otis CO c
4' '' 4: G4. co
0 ‘:// A 0
f-
O
•
•
.< •
• st ! * Cl)
c
0
O
M
c
O
Request for Proposals
0
ara
Tompkins County Law Enforcement Shared Services Initiative re
co
L
6
�,,, Release Date: et
TBD
c
m
E
Proposal Response Due Date: E
0
TBD
a
E.
0
a
a.
u.
re
1-
1
0
w
c
E
co
Q
Packet Pg.4
8.a
[The TOC will be completed when the RFP content is final. Once RFP is
complete, click on the table, and select the "update Table of contents" button on
the top left-hand corner, the click OK. This will update the page numbers.'
4c
Table of Contents
0
1. OVERVIEW 3 v
2. RFP SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS 4
0
.11
3. SCOPE OF WORK 5 0
A. OBJECTIVES 6
B. DELIVERABLES 6 -6
d
4. PROPOSAL PROCEDURES 7
co
co
A. TECHNICAL. NARRATIVE 7
N
M
B. COST OF PROPOSAL 8
4,
C. ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE FOR RFP PROCESS,PROPOSAL REVIEW,AND AWARD 9
E
D. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 9 0
c)
E. ELIGIBILITY 10
0.
F. MODIFICATION/ADDENDA 10
G. EXCEPTIONS 10
a
a
a
5. CONSIDERATION OF RESPONSES 10 �I
A. SELECTION PROCESS 10 CI
4—
c
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA 11
Page 2 of 11
Packet Pg.5
8.a
�.J 1. OVERVIEW
Tompkins County Government, in cooperation with the City of Ithaca and the villages of
Cayuga Heights, Groton, and Dryden, is inviting all interested and qualified consulting firms
to submit proposals for a feasibility study of the realignment of County and City Law
enforcement law enforcement services, which may include the services of other local law
enforcement agencies; enhanced shared services agreements between these agencies; or the
consolidation of services by all participating law enforcement agencies in the County. The
intent for such a study is to gain an in-depth understanding of various realignment options up
to and including full consolidation, and the governance structures, service delivery structures,
financial and staffing considerations, and facility and equipment requirements related to each
option.
BACKGROUND
Tompkins County is located in the Central Finger Lakes region of upstate New York and ci
hosts a population of 104,926. Within Tompkins County, there are seventeen (17)
municipalities, including the County,the City of Ithaca, nine (9)towns, and six(6)villages.
Tompkins County is currently served by no fewer than six separate law enforcement u_
agencies: four (4) village law enforcement departments, one (1) city law enforcement
department, and one (1) county sheriff's office. The combined cost of operating these six
municipal agencies approaches $19 million annually. Tompkins County and the City of M
Ithaca have allocated a combined $16,780,212 in their respective 2015 budgets, representing CD
25% of the combined property tax levies of the City and County to support their respective
law enforcement agencies
[Need to confirm with JM data shown in chart below]
Number of Law Enforcement Officers Per Agency/Participating Partner a
Tompkins County Sheriff's Office 40
City of Ithaca Police Department 64 >
a
u_
Village of Cayuga Heights Police Department 16 cc
u_
Village of Dryden Police 15
Village of Groton 15
c
New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo is strongly encouraging communities to identify
and implement shared-service and realignment opportunities, including mergers and
consolidations, and has established various grant programs to support these efforts. The
Tompkins County Law Enforcement Shared Services Initiative meets the criterion for one of
Li
Page 3of11
Packet Pg. 6
these programs: the Governor's Municipal Restructuring Fund Program (MRF). The MRF is
supported by a one-time $150 million allocation and is managed by the New York State
Department of State. MRF program requirements call for projects that are transformative,
have substantial impact on governmental operations and functions, and that lessen taxpayer
burden by yielding permanent property tax reductions. In terms of implementation, the MRF
program operates in various stages. The Tompkins County Law Enforcement Shared
Services initiative is in the early stages of this funding program, having received an initial
grant to conduct the feasibility study. Beyond the feasibility study, bidders may have the
opportunity to receive as much as $1.1 million for additional services that include the 0
development of a comprehensive implementation plan for the law enforcement services En
option mutually agreed upon by all participating partners. o
(a
As counties and cities throughout the state of New York begin to recognize the opportunity
for improved quality, operating efficiencies, and cost savings that may be afforded by a
transformation in law enforcement service delivery, many municipalities have begun
comprehensive feasibility studies to support informed decision making on next steps.
Tompkins County, the City of Ithaca, and several of the surrounding villages are very °
interested in the possibilities revealed through such a study. In particular, the City and LL
ce
County maintain a long-standing history of working together—in concert with other local
agencies—in an ongoing effort to ensure cost-effective operations. This has been achieved by
reducing redundancies through various shared-service agreements and by persistently
seeking new approaches to alleviating taxpayer burden while continuing to provide the high-
CD
quality service that all County residents have come to expect.
2. RFP SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS c)
0
All proposals are due by August 1, 2016, no later than 12:00p.m./noon EST.
Proposals submitted in reply to this RFP shall respond to the specifications stated herein.
Failure to respond to the specifications may be result in disqualification. Submittal of c
alternate solutions in additions to requested specification is allowed.
If the execution of the work to be performed requires the hiring of sub-contractors, this must a
be clearly stated in the proposal. Sub-contractors must be identified and the work they will cc
perform must be defined. In your proposal please provide the name, address, and EIN of the u.
sub-contractor. Qualified bidders will not be refused a proposal based upon the use of sub-
contractors; however we retain the right to refuse the sub-contractors selected.
All proposals must contain the signature of a duly authorized officer or agent of the bidding E
firm submitting the proposal.
Tompkins County is serving as the lead agency for the Tompkins County Law Enforcement
Shared Services Initiative and the RFP process. Tompkins County reserves the right to reject
any or all proposals and any part of a given proposal and to negotiate with any respondent to
the Request for Proposals. Tompkins County may waive formalities or technicalities in
Page 4 of 11
Packet Pg. 7
8.a
proposals as the interest of County may require. Tompkins County may waive minor
differences in the proposal provided these differences do not violate the proposal intent.
Provision of this RFP and the contents of the successful responses may be included in final
contractual obligations.
3. SCOPE OF WORK co
Tompkins County government, represented by the Department of County Administration, o
and working in cooperation with four other law enforcement agencies within Tompkins
County, desires to contract with a single bidder to provide the services described below.
cn
Bidders' proposals should fully address the Scope of Work and include descriptions of all
activities and deliverables needed to complete the work.
Tompkins County and the City of Ithaca, potentially joined by other area municipalities, 75—
share
share a common desire to reduce the cost of providing law enforcement protection within
Tompkins County without diminishing the quality of service. The participants believe that
efficiency-based savings can be produced through organizational realignment ranging from —`-'
the realignment of certain functions to the establishment of a single law enforcement service
agency holding countywide authority. a
cc
The purpose of the feasibility study is to better identify possible costs and benefits caused by
restructuring and strengthening law enforcement services and other non-emergency
functions. The study will help determine if realignment of law enforcement service agencies v
will yield improved service delivery (as well as reduction in service redundancy) and tD
improved cost containment. The study will identify cost savings or potential increases in
costs to the respective participating law enforcement service agencies and their constituents.
This includes costs and savings in the area of law enforcement operations; staffing; overtime
and pension costs; and logistical efficiencies, such as administrative and purchasing
expenses. The feasibility study should also analyze different structural options, including: a
• Functional Consolidation: Areas identified by the bidder that would lend themselves
to the consolidation of functions such as,training or investigations.
• Full Consolidation: A fully consolidated law enforcement organization via LL
1. Achieved through an attrition-based process in which police officer positions cci
in the City and/or villages would be filled by County personnel as they a
become vacant; or
2. Achieved through the dissolution of City and/or village police agencies and
the expansion of the County law enforcement agency.
• Other: Any other model the bidder believes superior to the aforementioned structural
options that will provide similar savings and cost efficiencies, and that will contribute a
to the vitality of the community.
Page 5 of 11
Packet Pg. 8
8.a
The Law Enforcement Shared Services Steering Committee was created to oversee the initiative.
The Steering Committee will review all bidder proposals. Tompkins County, with support from
the Steering Committee, expects to award a contract for 6 months that will require the following:
A. OBJECTIVES
1. Improved Service Outcomes: Help identify improvements to response time and
number of proactive community engagements, including resolution of quality of life u
issues, as these affect respective county jurisdictions. The bidder must also show
possible jurisdictional limitations and inefficiencies before and after possible
realignment. .2
0
2. Substantial Cost Savings: Help identify (a) ways in which potential realignment
structures can result in constrained staffing growth and overtime costs; (b) more cost-
efficient beat maps; (c) potential transition cost considerations associated with each
realignment option proposed; and (d) other savings that may be identified by the
bidder throughout the analysis process.
In demonstrating cost savings, the bidder should calculate a minimum and a d_
maximum savings using current County and City costs in determining the range of
savings potential.
3. Governance Structure: Help identify potential staffing models and the "span of
control."
4. Public Engagement: Help identify initial steps for engaging the public and gathering �,
public perceptions and concerns pertaining to the realignment of the local law
enforcement services agencies. E
5. Other Challenges: Help list possible challenges, opportunities, weaknesses and/or
strengths that could affect realignment or alternate recommendation.
a
B. DELIVERABLES [Schedule/Dates will be adjusted according Award Date.]
1. To be completed no later than October 15, 2016—Meet with all participating law
enforcement service agencies to identify organizational needs, structural and cost u_
saving opportunities,and governance concerns agencies may have;
u_
2. To be completed no later than December 15, 2016—Design and conduct a public 0
input session for the purpose of gathering feedback from the local community about
the law enforcement services most valued. The Law Enforcement Shared Services
Steering Committee will have the opportunity to review the bidder's approach to the
public input session prior to implementation.
3. To be completed no later than January 15, 2017—Develop and implement an
efficiency-based feasibility study of organizational realignments of up to 6 local law
Page 6 of 11
Packet Pg. 9
8.a
enforcement service agencies within Tompkins County that may range from
expanded shared services agreements to the realignment of certain functions to the
establishment of a single law enforcement agency with countywide authority;
4. To be completed no later than February 15, 2017—Meet with and present preliminary
finding before the Shared Law Enforcement Services Steering Committee. The cc
committee will provide insight, recommendations, and revisions before the
completion and submittal of final feasibility study document. ci
5. To be completed no later than March 1, 2017—Complete documentation of the in
feasibilitystudyexercise that will include, but not limited to,the following:
g
a. Executive Summary. -0
b. Profile of Tompkins County, the City of Ithaca, and any other law
enforcement service agency that is, or may become, interested in possible
realignment.
c. General Overview of study including a background on the study method. -6-
d.
d. Content descriptions and summaries of each study topic.
e. Copy of and instruments (i.e., survey questions,etc.)used in study.
f. Analysis of study results including graphs, raw data, and any other
information that will be beneficial to Tompkins County.
g. A list of possible options, including pros and cons, for realignment, such as:
• Functional Consolidation for reducing redundancy; t°
• Gradual Full Consolidation achieved through an attrition-based approach
or through dissolution of all agencies and expansion of county law
enforcement department; °
• Alternative realignment structures deemed more beneficial.
6. To be completed no later than March 31, 2017—A presentation to County officials
and stakeholders on the results of the study, including findings, restructuring options,
recommendations, and the advantages and disadvantages of each recommendation, a.
including cost and service benefits to the taxpayer.
ce
The final scope of deliverables will be negotiated and modified as necessary with the firm a
deemed most qualified. o
The selected firm must deliver on the above-mentioned requirements while demonstrating
the utmost in professionalism and integrity. Specific communications with designated
County staff or survey participants will remain confidential.
4. PROPOSAL PROCEDURES
A. TECHNICAL NARRATIVE
♦i
Page 7 of 11
Packet Pg. 10
8
�1 1. The proposal must include a statement clearly articulating the understanding of the
work to be performed and must specify the intended scope of work.
2. The proposal must describe the bidder's qualifications for professionally and expertly
conducting the work as understood, including a track record relating to shared
services between law enforcement service agencies and the bidder's ability to carry
out the project specifications.
3. The proposal must describe the instrument(s) proposed to assess the feasibility study 0
and must describe, specifically,the approach used in the development of the study.
4. The proposal must describe the bidder's protocols to protect the confidentiality of cn
participating law enforcement service agencies.
5. The proposal must describe the qualifications of all personnel who are to be assigned
to or are proposed for this feasibility study. Documentation should include resumes o
with relevant background, such as professional experience, education, training, and U
certifications.
6. The proposal must indicate the firm's anticipated availability for the project and an
estimated time line and performance schedule, if selected for this project. cc
7. The proposal must include a minimum of two (2)and a maximum of three (3)
examples of similar projects that reflect similar work scope and cost parameters. The
proposal must include client contact information for each of the examples provided.
8. The proposal must clearly identify the bidder's contact person concerning the E'
proposal, the bidder's main address, telephone number, and email address; and where E
the contact person can be reached. 0
B. COST OF PROPOSAL
1. The cost portion must be provided as a separate document from the technical
41-2
proposal. Do not make references to costs anywhere else in the proposal.
2. The cost portion should contain all pricing information relative to performing the LL
work described in the Technical Narrative. cci
F-
L
3. The cost portion should include a statement of your bidder's basis for compensation. o
For basic services offered in this proposal, the bidder shall provide a lump sum, all-
inclusive maximum price, including direct and indirect costs, as well as a summary of
percentage of estimated professional costs, total anticipated hours to complete the
work, and the wage rates applied.
\.O
Page 8 of 11
Packet Pg. 11
as
I
4. The cost quoted for performing the work should be inclusive. If cost excludes certain
fees or charges, the bidder must provide a detailed list of excluded fees with a
complete explanation of the nature of those fees.
5. Tompkins County may request additional services outside of the scope of the
proposal. The selected bidder must be available to perform these additional services
at the same rates detailed in the cost portion.
0
U
6. Tompkins County will not be responsible for expenses incurred by the bidder in
preparing and submitting the proposal package. Such costs should not be included in c"n
the proposal.
C. ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE FOR RFP PROCESS,PROPOSAL REVIEW,AND AWARDcn
The following schedule is tentative. Tompkins County reserves the right to amend this 0
schedule at any time. [Dates TBD]
Activity Date a
RFP Released June 30, 2016 u_
Questions Due from Bidders July 12, 2016
Responses to Questions Posted July 20, 2016
Bidder Proposals Due August 1, 2016
�./ City/County Panel Meeting to Screening Proposals August 8 -August 9, 2016
Bidder Finalists Presentations August 17-August 19, 2016
Award Determined and Confirmed August 26, 2016
Award Announced August 29, 2016 E
Start of Work September 1, 2016
D. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS a
1. All proposals are to be submitted in accordance with this Request for Proposal
document.
2. Bids and any other required documents shall be submitted online at the following a.
LL
location: www.tompkinscountyny.gov/purchase (see instructions for online bid cc
submission below). Bidders who do not have, or cannot obtain interne access must u.
contact the Purchasing Division at (607) 274-5500 for further bid submission o
instructions. Bidders should add contracts@a,tompkinscountyny.gov to your email
address book to ensure timely notifications regarding the project(s) you have
requested.
3. The Technical Narrative portion of the proposal is limited to ten (10) pages, 12-pt
font. Examples will not be counted in the 10-page limit. Staff resumes will not be
counted in the 10-page limit.
4. All Proposals must be signed by an authorized signatory of the proposer.
Li
Page 9 of 11
Packet Pg. 12
{
The complete RFP response package, including Technical Narrative, and separately
sealed Cost of Proposal are due to Tompkins County by August 1, 2016, no later than
12:00 p.m./noon EST. The Cost of Proposal must either be mailed or hand-delivered to:
Tompkins County Finance Department
c/o Lisa Hall
Purchasing Division
125 East Court Street
Old Jail Building, 2nd Floor
Ithaca,NY 14850
Questions Regarding the RFP should be submitted no later than July 12, 2016. Official4705
responses to all questions will be published no later than July 20, 2016. Questions
concerning the RFP should be sent via email to pyounger(a,tompkins-co.org. When
sending the email, please prepare the SUBJECT LINE as follows: "RFP Questions: Law
Enforcement Realignment Study." °;
0
E. ELIGIBILITY
0
Prospective bidders are not eligible to submit a proposal if current or past corporate cc
and/or other interests may in the opinion of Tompkins County give rise to conflict of
interest in connection with this project. Proponents are to submit with their proposal
esi
documents any issue that may constitute a conflict of interest violation for review by the
Department of County Administration. The Department of County Administration's t°
decision on this matter will be final.
E
F. MODIFICATION/ADDENDA o
Tompkins County Department of Administration may, at any time prior to the closing
date and time, issue additional information, clarifications or modifications to the RFP by a
written addenda issued by the County Administrator or his/her designee only. It is the
proposer's sole responsibility to ensure they have received all addenda prior to submitting
a proposal.
a
G. EXCEPTIONS re
H
The submission of a proposal shall be considered an agreement to all the terms and a
conditions provided herein and in the various proposal documents, unless specifically
noted otherwise in the proposal.
5. CONSIDERATION OF RESPONSES
ca
A. SELECTION PROCESS
1. The Shared Law Enforcement Service Steering Committee will review and evaluate
the proposals submitted. The committee will take into account the bidder's
understanding of the project, demonstrated experience on similar projects and the
Page 10 of 11
Packet Pg. 13
approach to this project request. Cost will be reviewed after initial analysis of
submissions. Points will be distributed to each proposal based on the submission
criteria identified above.
2. A short list of potential bidders submitting proposals deemed responsive to this
Request for Proposals will be developed and those bidders may be asked to attend an
interview before the committee. Though it is expected that only one interview will be co
necessary, the committee reserves the option of calling for a second interview,
presentation and/or additional follow up via phone, email, or Web-based platform, o
such as Skype.
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Qualifications and past experience of the bidder in doing the Work and 25%
demonstrated competence in performing the Work. o
2. Responsiveness to the requirements of the RFP. 25%
3. The completeness of the proposal including scope, project approach 25%
detailed work plan, and overall understanding of the Work.
4. Qualifications of staff that would be assigned to do the work, u_
including education and experience, as described in the Technical 25%
Narrative T.
M
Proposals will NOT be publicly opened. Bidders will be advised of the results after evaluations
of all proposals have been completed and a successful bidder has been determined.
E
E
O
U
Q
I-
O
w
>
a
U-
H
U-
Q
d
E
U
\I
Page 11 o1 I I
Packet Pg. 14
10. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
10.1 First Amendment to City-Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) Professional
Services Agreement— Resolution
WHEREAS, in 2012 the IURA and City of Ithaca executed an agreement clarifying roles
and responsibilities of each party regarding administration of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) Entitlement funds awarded to the City of Ithaca; and
WHEREAS, from time to time the IURA staff may be available to assist the City
complete other activities that are related to, or support the mission of the IURA; and
WHEREAS, such assistance shall be offered at the sole discretion of the IURA; and
WHEREAS, Plan Ithaca, the City's Comprehensive Plan, recommends preparation of a
housing strategy to identify specific ways to increase the housing supply and decreasing
housing costs; and
WHEREAS, the IURA's mission is to improve the social, physical and economic
characteristics of the City of Ithaca by expanding access to quality affordable housing,
strengthening neighborhoods and the local economy, and supporting other community
development activities; and
WHEREAS, since 1975 the IURA has secured and successfully administered over $60
million in funding on behalf of the City of Ithaca to complete projects to expand
affordable housing and revitalize urban neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, at their meeting on May 26, 2016, the IURA approved the First Amendment
to the City-IURA Professional Services Agreement; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Mayor is authorized, subject to review by the City Attorney, to
execute an amendment to the City-IURA Professional Services Agreement to authorize
IURA staff to assist the City complete IURA-authorized activities that are related to, or
support the mission of the IURA.
BACK-UP ITEM 10.1
4.24441-12471-12-46 5/26/16
CITY-IURA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Made this day of ,2013 2016 by and between The CITY OF ITHACA,a municipal corporation
with offices at 108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York, hereinafter called the"City",and the ITHACA URBAN
RENEWAL AGENCY, an urban renewal agency formed pursuant to the provisions of General Municipal Law,
having its principal office at 108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York, 14850, hereinafter called "IURA",
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is a recipient of certain Entitlement Grants ("CPD Formula Grant
Funds")through the Community Planning and Development(hereinafter"CPD") program office of the U.S.
Department of Housing& Urban Development ("HUD"), including the Community Development Block Grant
("CDBG") program and the Housing Investment Partnership Program ("HOME");and
WHEREAS, to access CPD Formula Grant Funds the City must prepare and submit to HUD each year
either a Consolidated Plan or an Action Plan (the section of the Consolidated Plan that is updated each year)
prepared in accordance with applicable regulations and comply with reporting and accomplishment
requirements; and
WHEREAS, by annual resolution,the City of Ithaca has duly authorized the IURA to administer its
CDBG and HOME programs each year since the City was designated as a CPD formula grant recipient in
2004; and
WHEREAS, the IURA has been administering the City's CDBG program continuously since 1975; and
WHEREAS, HUD correspondence dated August 27, 2012, requests that an agreement between the
City and the IURA be executed clarifying the roles and responsibilities for administering CPD Formula Grants
awarded as the City is the legal applicant and recipient under applicable HUD rules;and
WHEREAS, HUD correspondence acknowledges the existing operational structure has allowed the
City to successfully administer and implement CPD Formula Grants and that the request for an agreement
between the City and the IURA does not result from any performance deficiency;and
WHEREAS, in addition to the administration of the City's CDBG and HOME programs, IURA staff may
from time to time be available to assist the City with the completion of other activities that are related to, or
support, the mission of the IURA;
NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto
do mutually agree as follows:
Section 1. Definitions
Unless specifically provided otherwise or the context otherwise requires, when used in this Agreement:
"CAPER" means Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, an annual document
reporting on how CPD Formula Grant Funds have been used to carry out the community's housing
and community development strategies, projects and activities, including a summary of
accomplishments.
"CDBG" means Community Development Block Grant, a program of the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
"CPD" means the Community Planning and Development program office of the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development that oversees CDBG and HOME programs.
"HOME" means HOME Investment Partnerships Program, a grant program of the Unites States
Department of Housing and Urban Development designed to help communities expand the supply
of decent and affordable rental and ownership housing for low-income families.
"HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
"Program Income" means gross income received by IURA from its use of CPD Formula Grant Funds
and shall further have the meaning defined at 24 CFR 570.500(a)for income generated from the use
of CDBG funds, and 24 CFR 570.92.2 for income generated from the use of HOME funds.
Section 2. Overall Roles and Responsibilities
2.1 IURA shall act as the City's lead agency to plan, administer, implement and monitor CPD formula
grants awarded to the City in accordance with all program requirements, including but not limited
to the following regulations:
• 24 CFR 570.200- 570.309—CDBG Eligible Activities and Entitlement Grants;
• 24 CFR 570.500-513—CDBG Grant Administration;
• 24 CRF 570.600-614—Crosscutting Program Requirements;
• 24 CFR Part 91—Consolidated Submissions for Community Planning and Development
Programs;and
• 24 CFR Part 92— HOME Regulations.
2.2 City retains overall responsibility for ensuring that CPD formula funds are used in accordance with
all program requirements.
2.3 City is responsible for determining the adequacy of performance by the IURA of its duties pursuant
to this Agreement.
2.4 City is responsible to adopt the Consolidated Plan,the Annual Action Plan, the Citizen Participation
Plan, including any significant amendment to the above documents,and execute the CAPER.
5_ IURA shall submit adopted plans to HUD to access CPD Formula Grant funds.
2 52.6 In addition to the forgoing, IURA may assist the City with other activities that are directly related to,
or support, the mission of the IURA. Such assistance will be offered at the sole discretion of the IURA
based upon the availability of staff to complete the task.
Section 3. Statement of Work
Action Plans
3.1 IURA shall prepare and submit to the City the following required recipient submissions to HUD to
access CPD Formula Grant Funds:
(a) Consolidated Plan—A 5-year strategic community development plan that identifies community
needs, resources, and priorities,and establishes goals and objectives for use of CPD formula
funds to address priority community needs.
(b) Annual Action Plan—A one-year plan that provides a description and budget of the activities the
City will undertake to address specific local objectives and priority needs that will be addressed
using CPD formula grant funds and program income.
(c) CAPER—An annual document reporting on progress made in carrying out the Consolidated Plan
and the Annual Action Plan.
(d) Citizen Participation Plan —This plan sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen
participation in the development,and any amendment of,the Consolidated Plan, the Annual
Action Plan,the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, and establishes a
procedure to receive complaints.
3.2 IURA shall make its best effort to implement eligible activities included in City-Adopted Action Plans
in accordance with applicable regulations through loan and or grant agreements, procurement
contracts,through the City or other public agencies,or by the IURA's employees and/or contractors.
Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund
3.3 IURA shall make its best effort to implement the Community Development Revolving Loan Program
and the Priority Business Loan Program (collectively known as the"ED Revolving Loan Program") by
using CDBG Funds to make loans consistent with the goals and objectives of the ED Revolving Loan
Program as set forth in the "IURA Economic Development Financing Policy Guidelines and Operating
Plan"and any subsequent revisions thereto, such plan being incorporated by reference and made a
part hereof.
3.4 In implementing the ED Revolving Loan Program,the IURA shall be responsible for the following
activities as appropriate:
(a) Documentation of CDBG underwriting process consistent with the regulations at 24 CFR 570.209
and Appendix A to 24 CFR 570" Guidelines and Objectives for Evaluating Project Costs and
Financial Requirements";
(b) Performance of a written credit analysis and presentation of loan applications to the IURA;
(c) Maintenance of relevant information regarding the loan review;
(d) All actions necessary to effect ED Loan Program loan closings including, but not limit to,the
preparation of loan agreements,security agreements, promissory notes,guarantees, and other
legal documents as appropriate and in a form consistent with standard commercial lending
practices and with applicable rules, regulations, and policies of the CDBG program;
(e) Performance of all administrative activities required pursuant to the use of CDBG funds
including, but not limited to,environmental review requirements, maintenance of book of
account, procurement and maintenance of statistical information including job
creation/retention;and
(f) Monitoring loan repayment and borrower's compliance with loan terms,and enforcing security
agreements and guarantees.
Housing Revolving Loan Fund
3.5 IURA shall administer and monitor program income derived from CPD Formula Grant Funds in
possession of Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. ("INHS") in the Housing Revolving Loan
Fund for compliance with applicable regulations.
Environmental Review
3.6 With respect to environmental review requirements,the parties hereto acknowledge that City shall
retain the ultimate responsibility for compliance, but that IURA shall cooperate with City in
conducting environmental reviews and preparing proposed environmental determinations, notices
and requests in compliance with environmental responsibilities described at 24 CFR 570.604 and 24
CFR 92.352.
General
3.7 All activities undertaken by IURA with CPD Formula Grant Funds pursuant to this agreement shall be
eligible activities pursuant to the regulations at 24 CFR Part 570 and 24 CFR Part 92.
3.8 IURA shall make its best efforts to accomplish its duties in an expeditious manner pursuant to this
Agreement.
Section 4. Integrated Disbursement and Information System(IDISI
IDIS is a web-based system that provides financial disbursement, tracking, and reporting activities for CPD
Formula Grant Fund programs. Information about each activity funded with CPD Formula Grant funds,
including the estimated budget,expected accomplishments and beneficiaries is uploaded into the IDIS.
4.1 IURA is responsible for completing all IDIS grantee functions and submissions except for drawdown
approval authority,which is retained by the City. IURA responsibilities include set up of the adopted
Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan, set up of projects, set up of activities to implement projects,
activity funding, prepare drawdown vouchers and accomplishment reporting.
4.2 City is responsible for approving drawdown vouchers.
Section 5. Disbursements and Management of CPD Formula Grant Funds
5.1 IURA is responsible for disbursing and managing CPD Formula Grant Funds to make grants,
forgivable loans, deferred loans and amortizing loans and other third party costs incurred by the
IURA to carry out eligible activities included in an adopted Action Plan in accordance with policies
governing such financial assistance pursuant to the regulations at 24 CFR Part 570 and 24 CFR Part
92.
5.2 IURA may use CPD Formula Grant Funds to pay for its reasonable and eligible planning and
administrative costs pursuant to the regulations at 24 CFR 570.205 and 506.206 and 24 CFR 92.207.
No more than 20%of the sum of any CDBG grant awarded plus program income shall be expended
for planning and administrative costs. Not more than 10%of the sum of any HOME funds awarded
plus program income shall be expended for reasonable administrative and planning costs.
5.3 IURA may use CPD Formula Grant Funds for reasonable staff and overhead costs directly involved in
carrying out eligible CDBG activities included in an adopted Action Plan referred to as "activity
delivery costs", which are eligible as part of such activities.
5.4 The IURA shall document general administrative, program delivery and revolving loan program costs
of CPD Formula Grant Funds as follows:
(a) Direct costs of IURA shall be documented by timesheets, invoices,or other appropriate
information to evidence the nature and reasonableness of the cost. Such costs may include, but
are not limited to employee salaries, benefits,and other compensation at rates not to exceed
those paid by IURA for work not provided pursuant to this Agreement; and actual costs of
materials, equipment, bonding, insurance and services incurred by IURA;
(b) Indirect costs of IURA shall be reimbursed only where a written plan for the charging of such
costs has been approved by HUD. Such costs are those which are charged as a percentage of
direct costs and may include occupancy and equipment costs(including depreciation),
maintenance, repair, and similar costs which are charged on a prorated basis;and
(c) All costs charged by IURA pursuant to this section shall be consistent with the provisions of
OMB Circular A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments".
5.5 IURA may retain and use CDBG program income on hand that is deposited in a separate Revolving
Fund in accordance with regulations contained at 24 CFR 570.504 for the purpose of carrying out
specific eligible activities, such as making certain loans to small businesses,which, in turn,generate
payments to the fund for use in carrying out the same activities. IURA may use CDBG program
income to make loans and to pay program delivery and general administrative costs consistent with
the goals and objectives of the ED Revolving Loan Program as described in Section 3.3 of this
Agreement.
5.6 To access CPD Formula Grant Funds awarded to the City, IURA shall submit a City voucher to the
City Controller for eligible costs to accomplish the Statement of Work,along with supporting cost
documentation.
5.7 IURA shall prepare a web-based IDIS voucher, pursuant to the City voucher, to draw CPD Formula
Grant Funds awarded to the City.
5.8 Upon City Controller approval of the City voucher,an authorized City employee shall timely approve
the IDIS voucher to draw CPD Formula Grant Funds into the City's grant account.
5.9 City shall timely transfer CPD formula Grant Funds received in the City's grant account to the IURA
account upon receipt of CPD Formula Grant Funds.
5.10 All cash balances of CPD Formula Grant Funds shall be maintained by IURA in an interest bearing
account pursuant to the provisions of 24 CFR 570.500(b)and 24 CFR 92.502(c). Consistent with the
�-�' provisions of 24 CFR 85.21(i), any bank interest oaid on such account shall be paid to HUD no less
than annually.
Section 6. Financial Management and Administrative Requirements
6.1 IURA shall maintain a financial management system of CPD Formula Grant funds in accordance with
24 CFR 85.20 to ensure a financial system is in place that provides effective control over and
accountability for all CPD Formula Grant Funds, property, and other assets, and includes a
comparison of financial information reported on IDIS with financial records of actual assets and
liabilities.
6.2 Parties hereto acknowledge that the IURA will maintain financial records to comply with audit
requirements of OMB Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations" and City will integrate IURA finances into the City's annual audit.
6.3 IURA shall comply with OMB Circular A-110"Standards for Financial Management Systems",
Attachment F, subparagraphs 2a.through 2d., 2f. and 2g.
6.4 Where costs incurred by IURA are to paid with CPD Formula Grant Funds, such costs shall be
charged in conformance to OMB Circular A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal
Governments".
6.5 IURA shall comply with administrative requirements of 24 CFR Part 85 that are set forth at 24 CFR
570.502(a)_
�-' 6.6 IURA shall comply with the above-listed rules, regulations,and requirements as now in effect and
any future additions or revisions to such rules, regulations,and requirements as may be applicable:
Section 7. Monitoring
7.1 IURA agrees to monitor all activities carried out with CPD Formula Grant Funds to ensure long-term
compliance with program requirements and to timely gather information required for reporting to
HUD.
Section 8. Reports and Information
8.1 In addition to items identified is section 3.1, IURA agrees to submit the following information to the
City Controller:
(a) Bi-weekly
• City voucher and IDIS voucher including an expense report detailing requested funds to be
drawn down from the City's line of credit with HUD
(b) Monthly
• A CPD Formula Grant Summary including budgeted amounts for each activity contained in
current adopted Action Plans and the unexpended amounts remaining
• A Loan Repayment Report on loans issued with CPD Formula Grant Funds that tracks
repayment status and reports loan balances
(c) Quarterly
• The Federal Financial Report that details receipts and disbursements of CPD Formula Grant
Funds, program income, and beginning and ending cash on hand
• IDIS entries to recognize disbursements of program income for eligible expenses such as
disbursement of loan funds and administrative and delivery expenses incurred
• IDIS entries to recognize receipt of program income such as loan repayments
(d) Annually
• Balance sheet and income and expense statement of IURA finances
• Year end audit work papers prepared to meet City auditor requirements for preparation of
the City's annual financial audit
Section 9. Records to be Maintained
9.1 IURA shall establish and maintain records required at 24 CFR 570.506 and 24 CFR 92.508 to
demonstrate compliance with applicable requirements for CPD Formula Grant Funds, which
includes the following information for each activity assisted:
(a) A full description, including its location;
(b) Eligibility pursuant to applicable provisions of 24 CFR 570 and 24 CFR 92;
(c) Amount of CPD Formula Funds budgeted, obligated and expended;
(d) Cost documentation for disbursement of CPD Formula Funds;
(e) Project beneficiary income eligibility and demographic characteristics; and
(f) Match funding.
9.2 IURA shall retain all records pertinent to this Agreement for six(6)years after completion of each
activity.
Section 10. Inspection of Records
10.1 At any time during normal business hours and as often as City may deem necessary, IURA shall
make available to City or its agent all of its HUD records with respect to matters covered by this
Agreement, and TURA shall permit City or its agent to audit,examine and make excerpts or
transcripts from such records, and to perform audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, reports of
personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this
Agreement.
Section 11. Program Income
11.1 City and IURA acknowledge and agree that the following CPD Formula Grant assets were in
possession of IURA as of October 30, 2012 and shall be used by IURA in implementing the Economic
Development Revolving Loan Program as set forth in Section 2.4 of this Agreement or otherwise
used in accordance with an adopted Action Plan:
(a) CDBG Formula Grant Funds in the form of Program Income cash-on-hand in the amount of
$442,299.12; and
(b) CPD Formula Grant Funds in the form of Program Income notes receivable, payable to and in
possession of IURA, and all program income derived therefrom, as identified in Schedule A
attached herein. Following is the total amount of principal balance outstanding of all such
Program Income as of October 30, 2012:
CDBG: $1,449,541.15
HOME: $397,358.08
Total: $1,846,899.23
11.2 Future Program Income generated from use of CDBG funds shall be used by IURA in implementing
the Economic Development Revolving Loan Program or other CDBG projects contained in an Action
Plan. Future Program Income generated from use of HOME funds and received by IURA shall be
used for additional HOME projects contained in an Action Plan.
Section 12 Assistance with Other Activities
12.1 From time to time, IURA staff may have availability to assist the City with planning or other activities
that are directly related to,or would support the mission of the IURA to"improve the social, physical, and
economic characteristics of the City of Ithaca by expanding access to quality affordable housing,
strengthening neighborhoods and the local economy,and supporting other community development
activities." Toward that end the IURA may offer, and the City may accept by mutual agreement, IURA staff
assistance with such activities. IURA staff will make best efforts to complete agreed upon tasks in a timely
manner; however,activities related to administration of CPD funds will take priority and any consequent
delay in completion of other activities will not be cause for termination of this agreement.
Section 133. Term of Agreement
12413.1 This Agreement shall become effective as of the date first above written and shall remain in
effect until terminated pursuant to the terms of this section.
4-2413.2 This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time without cause to be effected
by written notification of such termination. Such termination shall become effective 180 days after
delivery of such notice.
13.3 This Agreement may be terminated by City for cause upon IURA's failure to comply with any
provision of this Agreement. City shall effect such termination in the following manner:
(a) City shall provide written notice to IURA stating the specific instance(s)of noncompliance. Such
notice shall specify a date that is not less than thirty(30)days after the date of delivery of such
notice(the"Response Date") by which IURA may cure, mitigate, or otherwise address the
instance(s)of noncompliance.
(b) Upon IURA's failure to cure, mitigate, or otherwise address the instance(s)of noncompliance to
the satisfaction of City by the Response Date, City may, at its option, provide written notice to
IURA effecting termination immediately upon the delivery of such notice.
4.2.413.4 Upon a termination of this Agreement, IURA shall not obligate or expend CPD Formula
Grant Funds.
12413.5 Upon a termination of this Agreement,City shall be obligated to pay from CPD Formula
Grant Funds costs resulting from any obligations of CPD Formula Grant Funds made by IURA
pursuant to this Agreement where such obligations were made prior to the date of termination and
in a manner consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
I Section 143. Reversion of Assets
4-3-114.1 Upon termination of this Agreement, and in accordance with the provisions at 24 CFR
570.503(b)(8), IURA shall transfer to City any CPD Formula Grant Funds on hand and any notes and
accounts receivable attributable to the use of CPD Formula Grant Funds. Such transfer of CPD
Formula Grant Funds, notes and accounts receivable shall be made no later than thirty(30) business
days after the termination date. Any real property under IURA's control that was acquired or
improved in whole or in part with HUD CDBG Funds in excess of$25,000 shall be either:
(a) Used to meet one of the national objectives in 24 CFR 570.208 until at least five years after the
expiration of this Agreement; or
(b) If the use of the property ceases to conform to the provisions of Section 13.1(a)of this
Agreement prior to the expiration of the five-year period, IURA shall pay to City an amount
equal to the current market value of the property less any portion of the value attributable to
expenditures of non-CDBG Funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the property. Such
payment shall be made in full no later than one hundred eighty(180)calendar days after the
date that the use of the property ceases to conform to the provisions of Section 13.1(a)of this
Agreement.
13.214.2 Upon termination of this Agreement, IURA shall transfer to City any furnishings,fixtures,
and equipment purchased in whole with CPD Formula Grant Funds. Such transfer shall be made no
later than five(5) business days after the termination date and shall be made at City's expense in a
manner prescribed by City. For furnishings,fixtures, and equipment purchased in part with CPD
Formula Grant Funds, IURA shall either:
(a) Pay to City an amount equal to the fair market value, as determined by mutual agreement, of
such furnishings,fixtures, and equipment at the time of termination, less any portion of the
value attributable to expenditures of non-CPD Formula Grant Funds for acquisition of such
assets,such payment to be made by IURA no later than thirty(30)calendar days after the
termination date;or
(b) Transfer such furnishings,fixtures, and equipment to City no later than five(5) business days
after the termination date.
Section 154. Amendments
44415.1 This Agreement may be amended only by the mutual written consent of City and TURA.
Section 166. Notices
15.116.1 Any notice,or request taken,given, or made by the City Mayor(or such other person or
persons as City may, by written notice to IURA designate for such purpose)to IURA shall be deemed
to be duly and properly given or made if mailed, postage prepaid,to: IURA Executive Director, 108
East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, or delivered personally to IURA offices. Any notice, or
request taken,given,or made by the Chairperson of IURA(or such other person or persons as IURA
may, by written notice to City,designate for such purpose)to City hereunder shall be deemed to be
duly and properly given or made if mailed, postage prepaid,to: Mayor,City of Ithaca, 108 East
Green Street, Ithaca, NY 14850,or delivered personally to the City of Ithaca Mayor's office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this Amended Agreement to be duly executed and
delivered by their proper and duly authorized offices as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF ITHACA
By:
Svante L. Myrick, Mayor
ITHACA URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY
By:
Svante L. Myrick,Chairperson
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SIGNATORY
State of New York
County of Tompkins
On the day of in the year 2013 before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said
state,personally appeared Svante L. Myrick,to me known or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the
same in her capacity,and that by her signature on the instrument,the individual,or the person upon behalf of which
the individual acted,executed the instrument.
Signature of Notary Public
(Seal)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SIGNATORY
State of New York
County of Tompkins
On the day of in the year 2013 before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said
state, personally appeared Svante L. Myrick,to me known or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she/he executed the
same in her/his capacity,and that by her/his signature on the instrument,the individual,or the person upon behalf of
which the individual acted,executed the instrument.
Signature of Notary Public
(Seal) l:\community development\policy\city-lura agreement\city-lura agree revisions draft*16-8-16 corrected 6-23-16.doc
14. MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Reappointment to Cable Access Oversight Committee —Resolution
RESOLVED, That Wies vanLeuken be reappointed to the Cable Access Oversight
Committee with a term to expire December 31, 2018.