HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-17-04 Planning & Economic Develoment Committee Meeting Agenda MEETING NOTICE
City of Ithaca
Planning,Neighborhoods & Economic Development Committee
Wednesday,November 17,2004
Common Council Chambers
City Hall-- 108 East Green Street
7:30 p.m.
Agenda
A. Agenda Review
B. Public Comment and Response
C. Announcements, Reports and Presentations
1. Deputy Director of Economic Development- Status Report 5 minutes
2. Access Management- Report 10 minutes
D. Action Items:
1. Planned Unit Development(PUD) -Resolutions (materials enclosed) 15 minutes
2. City Trails Master Plan -Resolutions (materials enclosed) 15 minutes
3. Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan - Resolution (materials enclosed) 10 minutes
E. Other Items:
1. Transportation Demand Management(TDM) - Presentation and Discussion 15 minutes
(materials enclosed)
2. Green Garage - Discussion 30 minutes
3. West End Parking- Discussion and Possible Motion to Enter into 10 minutes
Executive Session (materials enclosed)
F. Approval of Minutes - October 20, 2004 (materials enclosed)
G. Adjournment
Questions about the agenda should be directed to Mary Tomlan,Chairperson(272-9481)or to the appropriate staff person at
the Department of Planning&Development(274-6550). Back-up material is available in the office of the Department of
Planning&Development. Please note that the order of agenda items is tentative and subject to change.
If you have a disability and require accommodations in order to fully participate, please contact the City
Clerk at 274-6570 by 12:00 noon on Tuesday,November 16, 2004.
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
Planning,Neighborhoods & and Economic Development Committee
Minutes
November 17,2004
Committee Members Attending: Mary Tomlan, Chair; Michelle Berry; Dan Cogan; Pam
Mackesey; Gayraud Townsend
Other Elected City Officials Attending: Mayor Carolyn Peterson; Alderperson Joel Zumoff
City Staff Attending: Tim Logue, Department of Planning& Development; H. Matthys Van
Cort,Director of Planning&Development; Steve Thayer, Controller
Others Attending: Katie Borgella, Principal Planner, Tompkins County Planning Dept.
Meeting was called to order by Mary Tomlan at 7:30 p.m.
A. Agenda Review
There were no changes to the agenda.
B. Public Comment and Response
Guy Gerard questioned the potential for economic success of the multiplex theater that has
been proposed as a part of the Cayuga Green project.
Joel Harlan decried the fact that no decision had yet been made regarding the proposed repair
or replacement of the Green Garage.
C. Announcements, Reports and Presentations
1. Deputy Director of Economic Development—Status Report
H. Matthys Van Cort reported that the advertisement for the job has been posted. Staff
members from the Department of Human Resources and the Department of Planning&
Development will begin to review applications in January 2005. The expectation is that
the position will be filled by March 2005.
2. Access Management—Report
Tim Logue reported that a proposal has been made for an access management study, to
cost$100,000. Consensus of the Committee was that the proposed cost was too great and
that staff should discuss reducing the cost with the consultant or talk to a new consultant.
- 1 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
D. Action Items
1. Planned Unit Development(PUD)—Resolutions
Tomlan reported on the work of the PUD subcommittee. Logue explained the changes
that were made to the proposed ordinance by the Committee.
Pam Mackesey said she felt the changes made the ordinance much better, and that she
could now strongly support the ordinance.
Tomlan spoke in favor of the ordinance. She noted that the ordinance would allow mixed
use and would allow the Common Council greater control over proposed new projects.
Mayor Carolyn Peterson mentioned that comments were received from Planning and
Development Board as well as from others. Peterson asked whether those comments
were taken into consideration by the Committee. Tomlan responded that the
subcommittee did review and consider the comments.
Dan Cogan also spoke in favor of the PUD. On a motion by Cogan, seconded by
Gayraud Townsend, the following resolutions were unanimously approved (5-0-0):
WHEREAS, State Law and Section 176.6 of the City Code require that a lead agency be
established for conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and state
environmental law,and
WHEREAS, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review,the lead
agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or
carrying out the action,and
WHEREAS,the proposed amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to establish Planned Unit
Development(PUD)district regulations is a Type I action pursuant to the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance(CEQR)and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQR)which requires review under CEQR and SEQR;now,therefore,be it
RESOLVED,that the Common Council of the City of Ithaca does hereby declare itself lead
agency for the environmental review of the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to establish
Planned Unit Development(PUD)district regulations.
And also,
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is proposing a zoning amendment which would create a new zone
to be known as the Planned Unit Development district(PUD),and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the preparation of a
Long Environmental Assessment Form(LEAF),including Parts I and II,and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type I action under the City Environmental Quality Review
Ordinance and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act,and
-2 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca,acting as Lead Agency,has reviewed the
LEAF prepared by City of Ithaca Planning&Development Department staff,and it appears that
the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment;now,therefore,be it
RESOLVED, that this Common Council,as lead agency,hereby determines that the proposed
action at issue will not have a significant effect on the environment,and that further environmental
review for the adoption of this plan is unnecessary,and be it further
RESOLVED,that this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that the City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same,together with any attachments,in the City
Clerk's Office,and forward the same to any other parties as required by law.
2. City Trails Master Plan—Resolution
Logue explained why the Department of Planning &Development staff were proposing
to develop a trails master plan for the City, one that could be adopted as an amendment to
the City's comprehensive plan. There is a good deal of work being done on trails by the
City, and a trails master plan would assist in this work. One of the reasons was to make
the trails "grant ready."
Peterson spoke strongly in favor of preparing a trails master plan.
Michelle Berry suggested including the Tompkins County Chamber of Commerce in
discussions and preparations for a trails master plan, and in marketing such a plan. She
also mentioned that the Southside African-American Heritage Walking Tour should be
combined with some of the historic sites in Northside.
Mackesey thanked Logue for his work on this project.
On a motion by Townsend, seconded by Berry, the following resolution was unanimously
approved(5-0-0):
WHEREAS,the City of Ithaca has the potential to develop a network of trails that would support
recreation,alternate modes of transportation,economic development,tourism,and healthy
lifestyles,and
WHEREAS,the Department of Planning&Development has outlined a planning process that
would formulate a master plan for such a trail system,and
WHEREAS, such a master plan would assist in the development of grant applications,capital
project budgeting,and in securing other funding sources;now,therefore,be it
RESOLVED,that the Planning,Neighborhoods,and Economic Development Committee directs
the Department of Planning and Development to commence action on the City Trails Master Plan
as generally outlined by the department,and be it further
RESOLVED,that Common Council authorizes the Mayor to appoint a Client Committee to assist
in the development of the City Trails Master Plan.
- 3 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
3. Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan—Resolution
Tomlan introduced Katie Borgella, Principal Planner in the Tompkins County Planning
Department. Tomlan noted that the full plan was not part of the Committee's packet, but
it is available on line. Borgella stated that the final draft of the plan was at the printer's.
Cogan and Mackesey thanked the County for their good work on the comprehensive plan.
Mackesey expressed concern about the development of farmland and sprawl, an
inefficient way to develop housing that is destructive of open space.
Joel Zumoff asked how the priority items had been identified.
Peterson asked whether the issue of sustainability was a major consideration in
preparation of the plan and selection of the action items. Borgella said that the plan and
sustainability had many interlocking actions. She said that calling for clustered
development in transit-accessible nodes promoted the goal of sustainability.
On a motion by Mackesey, seconded by Townsend, the following resolution was
unanimously approved(5-0-0):
WHEREAS,the Tompkins County Planning Department,with guidance,advice,and
recommendation from the Tompkins County Planning Advisory Board,has developed a Tompkins
County Comprehensive Plan that addresses regional and inter-municipal issues that affect the
daily lives of Tompkins County residents,such as housing,transportation,jobs,the environment,
and neighborhoods and communities,and
WHEREAS,the Draft Comprehensive Plan was presented at 17 community groups and advisory
board meetings,and 14 open houses and public meetings in all municipalities in the county, for
feedback and comments,and
WHEREAS,an over-arching principle of the Draft County Comprehensive Plan is that Tompkins
County will work proactively with towns,villages,the City of Ithaca,and State and Federal
agencies to cooperatively address regional issues,and
WHEREAS,the County recognizes that while New York State clearly places land use authority in
the hands of its towns,villages,and cities,it also specifically recognizes that inter-municipal
planning is needed to cooperatively address regional issues and encourages the development of
county comprehensive plans to address development and preservation issues that transcend local
political boundaries,and
WHEREAS,the Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan provides a strategic framework for
addressing issues of mutual concern to municipalities throughout the County;now,therefore be it
RESOLVED,that the Common Council of the City of Ithaca supports the adoption of the
Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan by the Tompkins County Legislature.
- 4 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
E. Other Items:
1. Transportation Demand Management(TDM)—Presentation and Discussion
Logue summarized a report that was completed by Cornell University graduate school
intern, Gloria Lau. Lau was hired as a summer 2004 intern through funds received from
the Robert S. Smith Grant. Lau spent much time researching transportation demand
management that is offered by other cities. She then prepared a typed report that will be
duplicated and given to members of Common Council.
Townsend mentioned that there are "slugging"programs in Virginia for commuters to the
DC metro area, under which people in cars pick up riders at designated locations in the
commuter-shed area. Cogan said that such programs are called"casual car pooling" in
the San Francisco area. It was noted that these programs may work better in areas where
there are High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes or tolls. It was also noted that such
programs might involve crime or liability problems.
Tomlan said that the Committee could make suggestions for action once it had received
and had the opportunity to review the report.
2. Green Garage—Discussion
Tomlan told the Committee members that Controller Steve Thayer had integrated the
Green Garage repair/replacement alternatives into his five-year budget projections.
Thayer explained his work, noting that the projections are based on staffs best estimates
of costs and revenues,but that they are only estimates. He also said that the further into
the future the projections are made, the lower their reliability would be. In explaining the
spreadsheets, Thayer noted that the interest rates used by him and city planning staff
member, Jennifer Kusznir, were worst case assumptions at 5.75 and 6%. He said the
rates of interest would probably be lower.
In response to a question from Peterson, Thayer said that the revenues from the project
were taken into consideration in his projections.
Thayer said that it would be preferable to make the decision on the garage later rather
than sooner because of the uncertainty about the City's revenues from business in the
southwest area and other sources. Thayer said he recognized that the City could not
delay so long that we lose the Cayuga Green project.
Cogan suggested that the Committee should move ahead with Option 2 at an upcoming
meeting. Cogan said that a decision should be made before the end of the year.
Mackesey said that she was not ready to make a decision. Cogan said that waiting could
cost us more money.
- 5 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
Approved on December 15,2005
at the
Planning,Neighborhoods&Economic Development Committee Meeting
Berry asked about Cinemapolis and the possibility of competition from the Cayuga Green
project's multiplex movie theater. Peterson pointed out the proposed theater would show
first run movies. She hoped there could be some collaboration between the various
entertainment providers in downtown.
Mackesey asked how long the existing repairs would hold before a substantial additional
investment would have to be made in the garage. Berry said she did not want to do
repeated repairs on the garage if the repairs would have no value in a short amount of
time.
Tomlan asked whether the next consideration of this issue should be at a Planning,
Neighborhoods & Economic Development(PNED) Committee or at a Committee of the
Whole (COW). Townsend suggested that it since it started at a COW, it might best be
decided at a COW. Peterson suggested that a special meeting be called to make this
decision.
Van Cort suggested that the Cayuga Garage capital project be increased so that design of
the garage alternatives could be started.
Cogan suggested that there should be a special voting meeting of Common Council and
staff should prepare the necessary resolutions for funding and process for reconstruction
of the garage. It was suggested that the December 6th Committee Chairs meeting with
the Mayor would be a good time to decide the date for a COW.
3. West End Parking—Discussion and Possible Motion to Enter into Executive Session
Tomlan referred committee members to the memo that explained the work that has been
done on parking in the West End. The committee unanimously voted to enter into
Executive Session to discuss the possible acquisition of real property.
The committee returned to open session, and Tomlan reported that no action had been
taken.
F. Approval of Minutes
(Per committee request, this item was acted on immediately prior to E.3.) On a motion by
Townsend, seconded by Cogan, the minutes of the October 20, 2004 meeting were
unanimously approved(5-0-0).
G. Adjournment
On a motion by Cogan, seconded by Mackesey, the meeting was adjourned at 10:02 p.m.
- 6 -
q:\planning\groups\planning,neighborhoods and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1117.doc
�o�j'• CITY OF ITHACA
Vie 108 East Green Street— 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
`'_aPFT''irff411 '
�
07 11171
► ,�, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
R ` H. MATTHYS VAN CORT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning@cityofithaca.org Email: iuraCcityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558,
To: Planning, Neighborhoods & Economic Development Committee
From: Tim Logue, Neighborhood 86 Economic Development Planner
Date: November 9, 2004
RE: Planned Unit Development (PUD)
For the past three months, a subcommittee has been discussing the proposed
PUD ordinance. After a series of changes, they are ready to bring the PUD back
to the committee level. A public hearing is being scheduled for the December
1st Common Council meeting. At the committee's direction, the PUD could then
be put on the Council's January agenda. Please find attached: 1) a revised PUD
ordinance (with subcommittee changes tracked); 2) a Full Environmental
Assessment Form (FEAF); 3) comments from the Conservation Advisory
Council, the Planning 86 Development Board, and the Tompkins County
Planning Department; 4) a resolution for Lead Agency; 5) a resolution for a
negative declaration of significant environmental impact.
A note on the FEAF: the FEAF has already been circulated to City department
heads, the County Planning Department, the Conservation Advisory Council,
and the Planning 86 Development Board. You will notice that most entries state
"N/A" or non-applicable. The first creation of the PUD as a floating zone does
not effect any change in the physical world, so most environmental review
categories do not apply. A second action of"landing" a PUD on a specific parcel
will also have an environmental review component, but it will be much more
relevant because it will be for an actual project.
Below is a summary of the subcommittee's changes to the PUD ordinance:
• Section A., pages 2-3: minor changes meant to clarify the City's intent
• Section B., page 3: clarifying language
• Section C(3), page 5: additional language requiring applicant to post
notice on the property; language is from site plan review ordinance.
• Section C(4a), page 6: additional language to help guide Planning Board
in their report
• Section D(4), page 7: addition of a list of questions that Common Council
must address when considering a PUD application. These questions form
the basis of a report that must be issued by Common Council as part of
the approval process, as noted in the following sub-section.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 0
ORDINANCE NO. OF 2004
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
ITHACA, CHAPTER 325, ENTITLED "ZONING" TO ESTABLISH PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT REGULATIONS.
WHEREAS the Common Council of the City of Ithaca would like to promote the
public health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and
WHEREAS the Common Council wishes to promote the most desirable use of
land within the city limits in order to conserve the value of buildings, and to enhance the
value and appearance of land throughout the City, and
WHEREAS to achieve these objectives the Common Council of the City of Ithaca
is amending the Zoning Ordinance Chapter 325 to insert a new section 325-27 providing
for a new Zoning District known as the"Planned Unit Development" (PUD) District, and
WHEREAS this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the authority conferred on
municipalities pursuant to New York State General City Law, Section 81-f1, and
WHEREAS consequently, sections 325-3 and 325-4 entitled "Definitions and
word usage" and "Establishment of Districts" respectively need to be amended to reflect
the creation of this new zoning district,
BE IT NOW ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City
of Ithaca as follows:-
Section 1. Definitions.
Chapter 325, Section 325-3(B) of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby
amended to add the definition of Planned Unit Development as follows, "One or more
lots, tracts, or parcels of land to be developed as a single entity, the plan for which may
propose density or intensity transfers, density or intensity increase, mixing of land uses,
or any combination thereof, and which may not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of
dwelling or building, use, density, intensity, lot coverage, parking, required common
open space, or other standards to zoning use district requirements that are otherwise
applicable to the area in which it is located."
Section 2.
Section 325-4 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca entitled "Establishment of
Districts" is hereby amended to insert the new PUD zoning district as follows:-
'Passed on July 29,2003,effective July 1,2004.
Proposed new Language is underlined;language to be deleted(if any)is stFuelabfeugh
(} ! i ANN Nti.t'ROU( 1 s,/, Nvlc( Pk, 7 pL t l,�� i"t). ^�t't i .3t(}'.P .14N'-INN.)P0.`I c it.;)-A1 ,l?:(.,€)t't;I? 1
"ARTICLE II, Zoning Districts
§ 325-4. Establishment of districts. For the purposes specified in Article I of this chapter,
the city is hereby divided into the following districts:
R-la Residential
R-lb Residential
R-2a Residential
R-2b Residential
R-2c Residential
R-3a Residential
R-3b Residential
R-U Residential
B-la Restricted Business
B-lb Restricted Business
B-2a General Business
B-2b General Business
B-2c General Business
B-2d General Business
B-4 Service Business
B-5 Service Business
CBD Central Business
I-1 Industrial
M-1 Marine Commercial
PUD Planned Unit Development
P-1 Public and Institutional
MH-1 Residential-Mobile Home
C-SU Courthouse Special Use
U-1
WF-1 Waterfront
WEDZ-1 West End Development
CPOZ Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone
SW-1 Southwest".
Section 3. A new section 325-27 is inserted as follows:
"§325-27. Planned Unit Development.
"A. Declaration of Legislative Authority;-Fine and Purpose. This ordinance is
enacted pursuant to the authority and provisions of the New York State General City Law
to promote public health, safety and welfare and the most desirable use of land, to
conserve the value of buildings, and to enhance the value and appearance of land
throughout the city. This ordinance is also enacted pursuant to the authority and
provisions of New York State General City Law §81-f, Planned Unit Development
Zoning Districts, which was enacted by the State Legislature on July 29, 2003. The
I Common Council finds-intends that this Ordinance:
Proposed new Language is underlined;language to be deleted(if any)is streekthr-eugh
2
(2 1,1 v\ I?(RO,[ { if"J\C P€, }}'4 )/AL,: { E7 °iran,:E Co'()=1' 1'k'vi?ftt ,dd€C(S,I0:\4-N4;-41 e}"'}'{?{ct1+'F`
1. Will permit flexibility in the application of land development regulations that
will encourage innovative development and redevelopment for residential and
nonresidential purposes so that a growing demand for other housing and other
development and land use may be met by variety in type, design, and layout of
dwellings and other buildings and structures, including traditional
neighborhood development and appropriate mixed-use.
2. Will provide permit flexibility in architectural design, placement, and
clustering of buildings, use o en-areas, provision of open space and
circulation facilities, including pedestrian and bicycle facilities and parking,
and related site and design considerations.
3. Will encourage the conservation of natural features, preservation of open
space and critical and sensitive areas, and protection from natural hazards.
4. Will provide for efficient use of public facilities.
5. Will encourage and preserve opportunities for energy-efficient development
and redevelopment.
6. Will promote attractive and functional environments for residential and
nonresidential areas that are compatible with surrounding land use.
"B. The application of the Planned Unit Development ordinance to a proposed
development:
1. Shall be sought by the owner of the property or properties, or shall be made
sought with the approval of the owner or owners of the property or properties,
as demonstrated by submission to the City of Ithaca of a signed "Owner's
Authorization"by the applicant;
2. Shall be limited to development that issites that are:
a. Equal to or greater in land area than 60,000 square feet for sites without
structures or
b. Equal to or greater in land area than 20.000 square feet for sites with
existing structures or for vacant sites that were previously developed.
3. Shall be consistent with and work towards the implementation of the City of
Ithaca Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time to time.
"C. Application procedure; zening- ppreval pre essrevicw by City staff and the
Planning and Development Board.
Whenever any Planned Unit Development is proposed, before any permit for the erection
of a permanent building in such Planned Unit Development shall be granted, the
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is struelEtlifough
( 1 I ,\AN �.i, €'1Z(S.� ;S JO}\,/\G P4 .3 PI 1 t.}, !t F} �n.i J ,i ' 1> A:\\I''.0 't{ )( 1S-7t-}�:1'rxr'-;;),i'1 { ;/ fili=, 3
developer or the developer's authorized agent shall apply for and secure approval of such
Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following procedures:
1. Application for sketch plan approval.
a) A pre-submission conference between the applicant and staff of the
Department of Planning and Development may be held to discuss the
proposal, outline the review procedure and required submissions and
inform the applicant of minimum standards and potential city concerns of
the conceptual project. This step may be beneficial because the applicant
will learn about his or her responsibilities before expending significant
resources regarding the project.
b) The developer shall submit a sketch plan of the proposal to the Planning
and Development Board. The sketch plan shall be approximately to scale,
though it need not be to the precision of a finished engineering drawing,
and it shall clearly show the following information:
i) The boundaries and included tax parcels in the proposed Planned Unit
Development.
ii) The location of the various uses and their areas in square feet.
iii) The general outlines of the interior roadway system, including parking
and service/delivery areas, and all existing rights-of-way and
easements, whether public or private.
iv) Delineation of the various residential areas indicating for each such
area its general extent, size and composition in terms of total number
of dwelling units, approximate percentage allocation by dwelling unit
type (e.g., single-family detached, duplex, townhouse, garden
apartments, etc.); and general description of the intended market
structure (e.g. luxury, middle income, low and moderate income,
elderly, family, student, etc.) plus a calculation of the residential
density in dwelling units per gross acre (total area including roadways)
for each such area.
v) The interior open space system.
vi) The overall drainage system.
vii)If grades exceed 3% or portions of the site have a moderate to high
susceptibility to erosion, flooding and/or ponding, a topographic map
showing contour intervals of not more than five feet of elevation, or as
may be reasonably required by the Planning & Development Board,
along with an overlay outlining the above susceptible soil areas, if any.
viii) €fieip-le-Principal ties to the community at large with respect to
transportation,water supply and sewage disposal.
ix) General description of the provision of fire protection services.
x) A location map showing general location within the City of Ithaca
(e.g., a City-wide map or a USGS quadrangle map highlighting the
proposed development site would be acceptable).
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is str uektbriattgli
4
(2 Pt,1 \:\ti E'R(?.I,t :' /(;\I\t_ N,.)J )/a> t ).;r.r.. (};'=}' NN,I?a(,71,)/)I('I ):\4\;t- 1
xi) A context map showing building footprints, uses and ownership of all
properties within 200 feet of the boundaries of the proposed PUD site.
2. In addition, the following documentation shall accompany the sketch plan
at the request of the Planning and Development Board:
a) Evidence that the proposal is compatible with the goals of the City
Comprehensive plan, as amended from time to time.
b) A general statement as to how common open space is to be owned
and maintained.
c) If the development is to be staged, a general indication of how the
staging is to proceed. Whether or not the development is to be staged,
the sketch plan shall show the intended total project.
d) Other plans, drawings or specifications as may be required for an
understanding of the proposed development.
3. The Planning and Development Board shall hold a public hearing on the
proposal within thirty-hive (350) days of receipt of an application for sketch plan
approval. Notice of the hearing shall be served by the city to the public at least ten
(10) days before the date of such hearing,by means of a legal notice in the official
newspaper of the City of Ithaca, and by the applicant to each owner of real estate
within a distance of two hundred(200) feet from the exterior boundaries of the
proposed PUD district by means of a letter addressed to the owner of record of
such real estate delivered by first class mail. The applicant shall also post a public
notice of the PUD proposal at the project site for a minimum of 10 days before the
public hearing. This notice must remain in place at least until the Planning and
Development Board has rendered its report on the application or until the 65 day
period of review has expired (see#5 below). The notice shall specify the type and
size of the development project; the time and place of the public hearing; and to
whom and by when any public comments are to be communicated. The notice
must be placed at or near the property line in the front yard so that it will be
plainly visible from the street, and, in cases where a property has frontage on
more than one street, an additional sign must be placed at or near the property line
on any additional street frontage so that the sign will be plainly visible from the
street on which it has such additional frontage. The costs of notification, including
but not limited to publishing,posting and mailing costs, shall be paid by the
applicant prior to the issuance of any building permit.
4. The Planning and Development Board shall review the sketch plan and its
related documents and shall render either a favorable report to the Common
Council or an unfavorable report to the applicant.
a) A favorable report shall be based on the following findings which
shall be included as part of the report:
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is struel h
(1 E [ NNiss,( €>Rt? C TsZONIVijI'LlY. 1 ) 0,:;r.3;t.2 0t() P ?\ 't-qtr 5
i. the proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, as amended
from time to time
ii. the proposal meets the intent and objectives of a Planned Unit
Development as expressed in Section 3(A)-1-(above) and is a
desirable way to regulate the development of the site
iii. the proposal is conceptually sound in that it conforms to
accepted design principles in the proposed functional roadway
and pedestrian system, land use configurations, neighborhood
context, open space system, drainage system and scale of the
elements both absolutely and in relation to one another
iv. there are adequate services and utilities available or proposed
to be made available for the development
b) An unfavorable report shall state clearly the reasons therefore and, if
appropriate, point out to the applicant what might be accomplished in
order to receive a favorable report. The applicant may, within 10 days
after receiving an unfavorable report, file an application (an appeal)
for PUD districting (an appeal) with the City Clerk, who shall notify
the Mayor to bring the matter to the next Common Council meeting.
5. The Planning and Development Board shall submit its report within sixty-
five (65) days of a submittal of a sketch plan application to the Department of
Planning and Development. If no report has been rendered after sixty-five (65)
days, the applicant may proceed as if a favorable report were given to Common
Council.
"D. Application procedure; fer-PUD zoning approvaldistricting
1. Common Council shall receive a PUD report from the Planning and
Development Board or an applicant's appeal at a duly convened Common
Council meeting. Upon receipt of a favorable report from the Planning and
Development Board, or upon an appeal from an unfavorable report, Common
Council shall conduct a public hearing for the purpose of considering PUD
districts€g for the applicant's plan, said public hearing to be held within 35 days
of the receipt of a favorable report or the decision on an appeal from an
unfavorable report. Notice of this hearing shall be served by the city to the public
at least fifteen (15) days before the date of such hearing, by means of a legal
notice in the official newspaper of the City of Ithaca. The public hearing shall be
held by the Common Council in accordance with its own rules and General City
Law §83.
2. Common Council shall refer the application to the Tompkins County
Planning Department for its analysis and recommendation pursuant to the
provisions of §239-1 and §239-m of the General Municipal Law, if applicable.
Proposed new Language is underlined;language to be deleted(if any)is dough
6
(2 PI,tNN \ti i'12(si ( ,'S_1'(?\IV'(.J,)'LIT P(,' tontlIL f}i!.^awt :cl ii-I?i_A)4,I.?-/(.14+g
Common Council shall give the Tompkins County Planning Department 30 days
to render its report.
3. In considering an application for a Planned Unit Development district,
Common Council shall comply with the provisions of the New York State
Environmental Quality Review Act and the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality
Review Ordinance.
4. In considering an application for a Planned Unit Development district,
particularly as regards the intensity of land use, Common Council shall consider
the following factorsquestions:
a) Is there a need for theWhat are the proposed land uses in the proposed
location?
b) Is the PUD a desirable way to regulate the development of the
proposed site?
c) What are the heights of buildings? How do building masses and
locations compare to each other and to other structures in the vicinity?
d) Are there available and adequate transportation systems within the
PUD for pedestrians,bicycles, and motor vehicles, including transit?
What is the impact on the external transportation network?
e) What is the character of the neighborhood in which the PUD is being
proposed? Are there safeguards provided to minimize possible
detrimental effects of the proposed use on adjacent properties and the
neighborhood in general?
f) How do the proposed open space and recreational systems function
within the PUD and in relation to the City's overall open space and
recreational systems?
g) What is the general ability of the land to support the development,
including such factors as slope, depth to bedrock, depth to water table
and soil type?
h) What potential impacts are there on environmental, historical, and
architectural resources? Does the proposed PUD serve to protect these
resources?
i) What potential impacts are there on local government services?
4)0 Is there available and adequate water service?
e-)k)Is there available and adequate sewer service?
1) Other questions as may be deemed appropriate by the Common
Council.
(4)Are.._t ere-available-al-adequate-transp* atien-syste'&..-W=hat-i•s--the
i npacesew he--oe -netwoi--k`?
structures? f ,
)-What...is tl e -ar-ael -.. -S'- he- -igfiberl gel-i }wi-ieh-the-1'-1 D is bei.g
prepe,e<1.?. ...tl+er-e—sa egtra d wE ided-te-rni i n+e-pos It 1et-rin-ien-tai
Proposed new Language is underlined;language to be deleted(if any)is stfuelcthreui
(2 I \:Nti P1<0'.Fr i's zo\Iv;1' , ){' t I} E);inane oc():`-1'.ANN-41\6 P c},-,t :Y-/,} ;{ r ..}'2 <?,>'1'{ .fFt i.=.,, 7
of eets of thenprops^e4useon a_j-aeent-pro ies and--1 e-+ gl}bosh -i-ti
general?
g)What are the heights of buildings? How do building masses compare to
h)What potential impacts are-there-on local government servicesq
j)What is the general ability of the land to support the development,
including suc . . ;., . . .-. ; T
soil type?
k)Other questions as may be deemed appropriate by the Common Council.
5. Within 45 days of the public hearing, Common Council shall render its
decision on the application. Common Council shall state at this time its findings with
respect to the questions listed in Section D (4) above and the land use intensity and/or
dwelling unit density. Common Council may, if it feels it necessary in order to fully
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community, attach to its zoning
resolution any additional conditions or requirements for the applicant to meet. Such
requirements may include,but are not limited to:
-1-,a) visual and acoustical screening
2b)land use tnixescombinations
3.c) sequence of construction and/or occupancy
4.d) circulation systems (vehicular,bicycle, and pedestrian), including
parking and service/delivery areas
ire) the amount, location, and proposed use of common open space;
7f the location and physical characteristics of the proposed Planned Unit
Development;
Via;)the location, design, type, height, and use of structures proposed;
9,h)traditional neighborhood development provisions intended to ensure:
a)i. The creation of compact neighborhoods oriented toward
pedestrian activity and including an identifiable neighborhood
center, commons or square;
b)ii. a variety of housing types,jobs, shopping, services, and public
facilities;
e j ii-.__residences, shops, workplaces, and public buildings interwoven
within the neighborhood, all within close proximity;
d-iv. a pattern of interconnecting streets and blocks, preferably in a
rectilinear- or---grid -patter=n; that encourages multiple routes from
origins and destinations;
ely,__a coordinated transportation system with appropriately
designed facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, public transit, and
automotive vehicles;
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is stfuektlifough
8
() f l 1NN \t; f'R(?€ { ,5'I()1I G ;I)1'! );,;().1::n;t)rchna�c.dY,P
,3.( ;4441 art,'I i-:1,t'I'4= t.1 I'z-:,)„al;{ /c ,,.r
f vi. preservation, restoration, and maintenance of historic buildings
that physically express the history of the City of Ithaca unless it is
shown that the building's condition prohibits preservation,
restoration, renovation, or reuse;
vii.natural features and undisturbed areas are incorporated into the
open space of the neighborhood;
well-configured squares, greens, landscaped streets, and
parks are woven into the pattern of the neighborhood;
i3ix. public buildings, open spaces, and other visual features act as
landmarks, symbols, and focal points for community identity;
compatibility of buildings and other improvements as
determined by their arrangement, bulk, form, character, and
landscaping to establish a livable, harmonious, and diverse
environment; and
k3xi. public and private buildings that form a consistent, distinct
edge, are oriented towards streets, and define the border between
the public street space and the private block interior.
"E. Zoning for Planned Unit Development. If Common Council grants the PUD
districting, by an ordinance duly adopted, the Zoning Map shall designate the proposed
area as "Planned Unit Development (PUD) District Number ." The Common Council
ordinance shall stand as the zoning requirements for the PUD district.
"F. Site Plan Review. Site plan approval for all Planned Unit Developments shall be
obtained in accordance with Chapter 276 of the City Code, Site Plan Review.
"G. Regulation after initial construction and occupancyPUD or Site Plan Approval. For
the purposes of regulating development and use of property after initial construction and
oceupefieyPUD or Site Plan Approval, the approved final site plan shall serve in lieu of
other provisions of this chapter as the use, space and bulk, yard, parking and other land
use regulations applicable to the Planned Unit Development district. Any changes, other
than use changes (see below), shall be processed as a change to an approved site plan, in
accordance with §276-6 (C). In addition to the three possible determinations listed in
§276-6, the Building Commissioner, in consultation with the Director of Planning and
Development, may determine that the proposed changes are substantially different from
the Planned Unit Development district approved by Common Council and that a new
PUD application is required. Use changes shall also be in the form of a change to an
approved site plan except that the Planning and Development Board shall have the
opportunity to make a recommendation to Common Council and that Common Council
approval shall be required. It shall be noted, however, that properties lying in Planned
Unit Development districts are unique and shall be so considered by the Planning and
Development Board or Common Council when evaluating these requests; maintenance of
the intent and function of the planned unit shall be of primary importance.
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is struelEthr-ougli
9
Q PI ANN Nt; PROP .,,5="l,0v1v'(; 131,.3 P )/,)] 1 sz 0,'jra9.2. , t�:P. l,t I4-/t}N4N4i};'-t., ,+} {_/c}lr
"H. Expiration of permit. All permits shall become null and void, and the Zoning Map
amendment revoked and restored to the zoning designation to which the district had been
prior to the PUD application, if construction has not started within three (3) years of the
date of final site plan approval. However, the applicant may petition the Planning and
Development Board before the expiration date for an extension of no more than two (2)
years. If the applicant can demonstrate substantial investment or reasonable progress
towards construction to the Planning and Development Board, the extension shall not be
unreasonably denied. Additional extensions may also be granted by the Planning &
Development Board."
Section 4. Severability. Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of
the ordinance. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect in accordance with law upon
publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter;-preY ided ho ,
Proposed new Language is underlined; language to be deleted(if any)is stfuek eugh
10
( PI Ntr PRO E.( :S if}^.IVF_3 Pi, )PI )ti).]-1 0 irtta,:c,kc 'aP .... 7i'^:t:.'(i k-1 CIS, ,(;}v.I`,cr,i l,{L.'11)-701 13T
D1
City of Ithaca Long Environmental Assessment Form
Project Information by Applicant
Notice: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed
may have a significant effect on the environment. Answers to these questions will be
considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further
verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be
needed to complete parts 2 and 3.
Name and Location of Project: Planned Unit Development Ordinance
Name and Address of Applicant: City of Ithaca
Street: 108 East Green Street
City/Town/Village: Ithaca State: NY ZIP: 14850
Business Phone: 607-274-6550
g
A � I Name' s am ss k
Street s ref ▪ ,
%r1 tk a
_mom _,. m e - em. „, .,;,a o
Business �� �� r '_ :.'- ,,.. E ,an. : a,.. u ▪ :'
Type of Project: Proposal to create a planned unit development
!ordinance
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
(Physical setting of overall project,both developed and undeveloped areas.)
1. Character or the Ceneral.ly worm slope N/ v
i -, .' ,
Generally i i �and rollingor x gala.. ,: 4:f-'- ,:g.°'
_
a��
2. Present Land Use: Urban Industrial Commercial Public Forest
Agricultural Other: N/A
Acres , square.feet( en units ply to f X n seaman
3 Tc�l area&of pro r
�, im ct i4,00 SF�for°a develo edk ink =r
a tea' X 1 f'9 MUM of�� k' for redeveloped land '
4
I
1
Approximate Area (Units in question 3 apply to this =Presently After Completion
section) N/A
la.Meadow or hland" N/A N/A
b. Wooded N/A N/A
e.;Agricultural N/A" N/A
d. Wetland(as per Articles 24 of ECL) N/A N/A
e.Water Surface Area N/A I N/A
Page 1 of 12
f. Public I N/A j N/A
g. Water Surface Area N/A N/A
h. Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) . N/A 1 N/A
i. Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces N/A �N/A
l.j. Other (indicate type) 1
4a. What is predominant soil type(S)on N/A
project site? e.g. HdB, silty loam, etc. . .
4b. Percentage well drained: Moderately:
well drained: Poorly drained: N/A
15a. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site'? N/A.
[5b. What is depth of bedrock? (feet) N/A 1
1
15e. What is depth to the water table? (feet) N/A
6. Approximate percentage of proposed project site ' 0-10%: N/A 10-15%: N/A 15% or
with slopes: greater: N/A
7. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist N/A
in the project area?
—
8. Does project site contain any species of plant or N/A
animal life that is identified as threatened or Identify each species: N/A
endangered?
9. Are there any unique or unusual landforms on the N/A
project site? (i.e.. cliffs, other geological formations'? Describe: N/A
10. Is project within or contiguous to a site N/A
designated a unique natural area or critical Describe: N/A 1
environmental area by a local or state agency?
11. Is the project site presently used by the N/A
community or neig hborhood as an open space or
recreation area?
12. Does the present site offer or include scenic N/A
views known to be important to the community?
13. is project contiguous to, or does it contain a N/A
building or site listed on or eligible for the National if Yes, Explain: N/A
or State Register of Historic.Places?
or designated a local landmark or in a local
landmark district?
14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ,a. Names of stream or name of river
N/A to which it is tributary: N/A
15. Lakes,ponds,wetland areas within or contiguous la. Name: N/A
to project area: N/A
b. Size (in acres): N/A
Page 2 of 12
16. What is the dominant land use and zoning N/A
classification within a 1/4-mile radius of the project?
(e.g. single family residential, R-la or R-lb) and the
scale of development (e.g. 2 story)
17: Has the site been used for land disposal of solid N/A 1
or hazardous wastes? if Yes, Describe: N/A l
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
�l. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions a aappropriate)
1. a. Total contiguous area owned by project sponsor in acres: N/A or square feet: N/A
1.b..Proj t:acreage developed: Acres initially: N/A Acres ultimately: N/A
1. c. Project acreaLe to remain undeveloped: 0
1. d. Length of project in miles: (if appropriate)or feet: N/A
1. e. If project is an expansion or demolition of existing building or use, indicate percent of
change proposed: N/A
building square footage: developed acreage: .
1. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing:proposed: N/A
1. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per day: and per hour: (upon completion of
i project). N/A
1. h. If residential: Number and type of housing units(not structures): N/A
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initial
Ultimate
If non-residential, Orientation: Commercial:Industrial
Neighborhood City Regional --Estimated Employment N/A
1. i. Total height of tallest proposed structure: feet. N/A
2. Specify:what type of natural material (i.e.rock, earth, etc.) and how much will be
removed from the site: or added to the site . N/A
3. Specify what type or vegetation(trees, shrubs, ground cover) and how much will be
removed from the site:
acres, what type? N/A
4. Will any mature trees or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project?
N/A
j5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? N/A
6. If single-phase project: N/A
Page 3of12
Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition)N/A
7. If multi-phased project
7. a. Total number of phases anticipated: N/A
7. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase one month year, (including demolition N/A
7. a. Approximate completion date of finalphase month year. N/A
7. d. Is phase one financially dependent on subsequent phases? N/A
8. Will blastingoccur during construction? N/A if Yes, explain N/A
19. Number of jobs generated: during construction after project is completed ". N/A
10.Number of jobs eliminated by this project: N/A Explain.:N/A
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? No; if Yes, explain N/A
12. a. Is surface or sub-surface liquid waste disposal involved?N/A
112. b. If Yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) N/A
12. c. If surface disposal,where.specifically will effluent be discharged?N/A
• 13. Will surface area of existing lakes,ponds, streams, or other surface waterways be
increased or decreased by proposal? N/A
14. a. Will project or any portion ofproject:occur wholly or partially within or contiguous
to the:100 year flood plain? No
14. b. Does project or any portion of project occur wholly or partially within or contiguous
to: Cayuga Inlet, Fall Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Cayuga Lake, Six Mile Creek, Silver
Creek? N/A
14. c. Does project or any portion of project occur wholly or partially within or contiguous
to wetlands as described in Article 24 or the ECL? Yes No N/A
—
14. d. If Yes for a, b, or c, explain: N/A
15. a. Does project involve disposal or solid waste? N/A
15.b. If Yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? N/A
15. c. If Yes give name: ; location:"N/A
15. d. Will any wastes Not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
N/A; if Yes, explain N/A
15 e. Will any solid'waste be disposed of onsite? Yes No N/A if Yes, explain N/A
16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes No N/A ; if Yes, specify N/A
17. Will project affect a building or site listed on or eligible for the National or State
Register of Historic Places? Or designated a local landmark or in a landmark district?
1 Yes No; if Yes, explain N/A
118. Will project produce odors? N/A if Yes, describe N/A
119. Will oroiect produce operating Noise exceed the local ambient Noise level during
Page 4 of 12
construction? N/A
After Construction?N/A
20. Will project result in an increase of energy use? N/A
if Yes, indicate type(s)
21 ' ` I` nticipa ed wat r usage per daY,ga
Source of Water }y,
..<r, �. .. . . ...��� .,:...,, rvadv..o,..w`r�C....,... ,,,,.a.,..n,� � xxv� w .FU U„x „„vx .,x w..r ..,... .,...,
22. Zoning:
22 a: What is domtn.ant � '.�' sificttoixf£site' NSA , '
22. b. Current specific zoning classification of site? N/A
'with 1-0,11‘116%pxsent ot NSA sk...... ,„ `
(22 d. If No, indicate desired zoning: N/A
I g.
ti
23 A rf' °G tt�� tan • c
23. a. Is any Federal permit required? 2. Specify No
fi o ��ct io ve Ia e or der iudo t�f n� ye + � Y 1
23. c. Local and Regional approvals:
(Yes- Approval Submittal Approval Date
No) Required (type) Date
Council Yes Adoption
BZA No
P&D Board No
Landmarks No
BPW No
Fire Department No
Police No
Department
IURA No
Building
Commissioner No
City of Ithaca Long Environmental Assessment Form
Page 5 of 12
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART 2
IMPACT ON LAND
. i
Small to 'Potential I Can Impact
1.Will there be ant effect as a result.of a physical ■ be Reduced
change to project site? Na Moderate Large by Project
Impact Impact Change?
i
Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater, (15 foot
rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slope
in the project exceeds 10%.
Construction on land where the depth to the water table
is less than 3 feet.
_ xti
Construction of parking facility/area for 50 or more
vehicles. E
Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ' ! r----
generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface.
Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or
involve more than one phase or stage.
Evacuation for mining purposes that would remove i i
more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or
soil) per year. ',
Construction of any new sanitary landfill.
Clearcutting or removal of vegetation other than
agricultural crops from more than one-half acre. F.—
Construction in a designated floodway. I [
Permanent removal of topsoil from more than one-half
acre.
Other impacts:
2. Will there be an effect on any unique laridforms I Can Impact
found on the site? (i.e. cliffs,gorges, geological Small to Potential be Reduced
Moderate. Large
formations, etc.) by Project `'
Impact Impact
N/A 1 Change?
Specific land forms: I J
3. Will there be an effect on any site designated as a
unique natural area or a critical environmental area by
a local or state agency?
aN/A
Page 6 of 12
IMPACT ON WATER
4. Will project affect any water body designated as Can Impact be
protected? (Under article 15 or 24 of the Environmental. Small to Potential Reduced by
Moderate Large
Conservation Law,E.C.L.) Project
N/A Impact Impact Change?
Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from
channel of a protected stream.
Construction in a designated freshwater wetland.
Other impacts:
5. Will project affect any non-protected existing or ':Small to Potential. Can Impact be
new body of water? Moderate Large Reduced by
Project
N/A Impact Impact Change?
A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any
body of water or more than a 10,000 sq. ft. of surface
area.
Construction, alteration,or conversion of a body of
water that exceeds 10,000 sq: ft. of surface,area. .
Fall Creek, Six Mile Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Silver
Creek, Cayuga Lake or the Cayuga Inlet?
_ E
'Other impacts: I
Small to Potential Can.Impact be
6. Will project affect surface or groundwater Moderate Large Reduced by
quality?—N/A Project
Impact :. Impact Change?
Project will require a discharge permit.
Project requires use of a source of water that does 1
not have approval to serve proposed project.
Construction or operation causing any
contamination of a public water supply system.
Project will adversely affect:groundwater. I
Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to
facilities which presently do not exist or have
inadequate capacity.
!Project requiring a facility that would use water in ? .
excess of 20,000 gallons per day or 500 gallons per
minute.
Page 7of12
Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge 1
into an existing body of water to the extent that
there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural
conditions.
I -.
... .... .. .
Other impacts: I
DRAINAGE
7. Will project alter drainage flow, drainage . Small to Potential Can Impact be
;patterns or surface water runoff? Moderate) Large Reduced by
1N/A Impact Impact 1 Project Change?
;Project would impede floodwater flows. — ��� 1
Project is likely to cause substantial erosion.
Project is incompatible with existing drainage
patterns.
[Other impacts: I
IMPACT ON AIR
Small to Potential Can Impact 1 8. Will project affect air quality? . € be Reduced
NlA Moderate , Large by Project
Impact 3 Impact Change?
Project will induce 500 or more vehicle trips in
any 8-hour period per day. 1
Project will result in the incineration of more I
than 2.5 tons of re fuse per 24-hour day.
Project emission rate of all contaminants will
exceed 5 lbs per hour or a heat source
producing more than 10 million BTUs per ;,
hour. j
Other impacts:
IMPACTS ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
9. Will project affect any threatened or I Small to Potential Can Impact
endangered species? 1 Moderate Large ( be Reduced
N/A Impact Impact , by Project '
1 _ _ ' _ Change?-
Reduction of any species listed on the New I_
York or Federal list. using the site found
Page 8 of 12
over, on, or near site.
_.._...._....___--._......_______._..___
._..-.. _..._...._..._....._._..____._ ,_.—._._._.__.........._......_.—._..._.....____ _...._..—_ _ - -
Removal of any portion of a critical or
significant wildlife habitat. 1
Application of pesticide or herbicide more
than twice a year other than for agricultural
purposes.
Other impacts:
Project occurring wholly or partially within
or contiguous to any facility or site listed on
or eligible for the National or State Register
of Historic Places.
Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil
bed located within the project site. 1
Project occurring wholly or partially within
or contiguous to any site designated as a local
landmark or in a landmark district. 1
Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION j'
13.Will the project affect the quantity or Can Impact
quality of existing or future open spaces or Small to Potential be Reduced
recreational opportunities? oderata i Larde by Project
N/A Impact Impact
Change?
,
The permanent foreclosure of a future
recreational opportunity.
E i
A major reduction of an open=space I
important to the community. I
Other impacts: I'
1
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
14. Will there be an effect to existing "Small to ` Potential Can Impact be
transportation systems? Moderate Large , Reduced by Project
N/A Impact Impact Change?
Alteration of present patterns of movement
of people and/or goods.
Project will result in traffic problems. I f
Project will result in [dual wheel] truck
traffic (three axle or more of more than
Page 9 of 12
10 vehicles per eight-hour period per day. I
Other impacts: 1 ■ J
I
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will project affect the community's I Small to I Potential I Can Impact be
' sources of fuel or energy supply? Moderate Large Reduced by Project
I N/A . Impact e Impact Change?
I]
Project causing greater than 5% increase
in any form of energy used in
municipality.
Project requiring the creation or
extension of an energy transmission or
supply system to serve more than 50
single or two family residences.
Other impacts: j
1
IMPACT ON QUALITY OF DAILY LIFE
16. Will there be objectionable odors,
noise,glare,vibration or electrical Small to Can Impact be
disturbance during construction of or Moderate Potential Large Reduced by Project
after completion of this project? Impact pact . Change?
'N/A
Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,
school, or other sensitive facility?
Odors will occur routinely(more than
one hour per day} .
Project will produce operating noise
exceeding the local ambient noise
levels for noise outside of structure.
Project will remove natural barriers
that would act as a noise screen. .
Other impacts: j
IMPACT ON HEALTH AND HAZARDS
17. Will project affect public health ` Small to ° Can Impact be
and safety? ( Potential
Moderate Reduced by Project
Large Impact
I N/A Impact Change?
Project will cause a risk of explosion
or release of hazardous substances (i.e. I
Page 10 of 12
oil, pesticides, chemicals,radiation,
etc.) in the event of accident or upset I'.
conditions, or there will be a chronic
low-level discharge or emission. f
Project will result in the handling or !
disposal or hazardous wastes:(i.e.
toxic, poisonous,highly reactive,
radioactive,irritating, infectious, etc., . .. 4
including wastes that are solid, semi-
.:.
solid, liquid or contain gases.)
Storage facilities for 50,000 or more
1 gallons of any liquid fuel.
Use of any chemical for de-icing, soil
stabilization or the control of
vegetation, insects or animal life on the
premises of anyresidential,
commercial or industrial property in
excess of 30,000 square feet.
Other impacts: I
i
;IMPACT GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR
NEIGHBORHOOD
18. Will project affect the character of Small to Potential I
I Can Impact be Reduced
the existing community? Moderate Large by Project Change?
Yes: Impact Impact
1 The population of the City in which
the project is located is likely to grow
by more than 5%of resident human
population. I j
i
The municipal budgets for capital
expenditures or operating services will
;increase by more than 5%per year as a
result of this roject.
The project will replace or eliminate
existing facilities, structures, or areas f.
of historic importance to the
community.
Development will induce an influx of a;
particular age group with special
I needs.
____________
Proiect will set an important precedent X
Page 11 of 12
for future projects.
Project will relocate l S or more
employees i one or more businesses.
Other impacts:
19.1s there lt blic* an�ersy Sma lFto Potential Can Impact be
•oncer� Pr y �" Mode�ra Reduced by Project
#r , y ... �ge?
arge
I�lp� Irpc � � �� ��
Either government or citizens of
adjacent communities have
expressed opposition or rejected the !'
project or have not been contacted.
e
If any action in part 2 is identified as a potential large impact, or if you cannot
determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to part 3.
Determination
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2, and 3) and considering
both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonable determined that:
A. The project will result in no major impacts and, X PREPARE A NEGATIVE
therefore, is one which may not cause significant DECLARATION
damage to the environment.
B. Although the project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there will not be a significant
PREPARE A NEGATIVE?
effect in this case because the mitigation measures DECLARATION
described in PART 3 have been included as part of the
proposed project.
C. The project will result in one or more major impacts PREPARE A POSITIVE
that cannot be reduced and may cause significant DECLARATION,
damage to the environment. PROCEED WITH EIS
Date: November 9, 2004 Signature of Responsible
Official in Lead Agency
Print or Type name of
Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible Responsible Official in lead
officer) Agency:
Title/Position: Economic Development Planner Lead Agency's Name:
Page 12 of 12
D 1
From: Michael Culotta <mculotta @alternatives.org>
To: "Tim Logue" <timlo @cityofithaca.org>
Date: 6/10/2004 9:30:32 AM
Subject: Re: PUD
Tim:
CAC comments on the PUC are re-interated as follows.
CAC sees the positive aspects of the PUD ordinance that it a can be project
specific with control and oversight of legislature throughout the
design/build process. Used properly, the Ordinance seems to allow more
flexibility for both developers, planners and community interests.
Threshold levels seemed reasonable.
Submitted 6-10-04
Michael Culotta
CAC chair
: f ,,, CITY OF ITHACA
V�F"'f'•"=''• s 108 East Green Street— 3`d Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
17711
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
H. MATTHYS VAN CORT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DOUGLAS B. McDONALD, DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning@?>cityofiithaca.org Email: iura(d?cityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558
TO: Mayor Carolyn Peterson
Members, Planning,Neighborhood, and Economic Development Committee
FROM: Members, Planning and Development Board
DATE: May 10, 2004
RE: Preliminary Comments–Proposed Planned Unit Development Ordinance
At the April 27, 2004 meeting of the Planning and Development Board, the Proposed Planned Unit
Development Ordinance was discussed and the Board had the following comments:
• Page 3, A. 6. "Will promote attractive and functional environments for nonresidential
areas that are compatible with surrounding land use." Members of the Planning
Board feel this may be confusing and interpreted to mean that residential use is not
allowed or encouraged in the PUD.
• Page 3, B. 2. "Shall be limited to development that is equal to or greater in land area
than 60,000 square feet for undeveloped land or 20,000 square feet for redeveloped
land. " Members of the Planning Board question how these sizes were determined?
• Page 5, 3. "...Notice of hearing shall be served by the city to the public at least ten
(10) days before the date of such hearing, by means of a legal notice in the official
newspaper of the City of Ithaca, and by the applicant to each owner of real estate
within a distance of two hundred (200)feet from the exterior boundaries... "Since a
PUD has the potential to be relatively large in both land area (greater than 60,000
square feet) and impacts on nearby properties,members of the Planning Board question
how the 200 feet was determined and whether or not this is sufficient given the
possibility of far reaching impacts if a PUD is being considered.
In addition, members of the Planning Board would like information on where a PUD ordinance is
currently in place, examples of projects that have been approved in accordance with the PUD and
the success of the PUD projects.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." ��
O CITY OF ITHACA
�I •_/`�ryw 1111
Vhf 'fl`'" r4 108 East Green Street— 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
.t.„1. r-rmm ,.lam
p �, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
H. MATTHYS VAN COAT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DOUGLAS B. McDONALD, DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning @cityofithaca.org Email: iura @cityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning,Neighborhoods, and Economic Development Committee
FROM: Planning and Development Board
DATE: June 10,2004
RE: Comments,Planned Unit Development
At the May 25, 2004 meeting of the Planning and Development Board, the Proposed Planned Unit
Development Ordinance was discussed and the Board had the following comments:
The PUD process would require the Planning Board and staff to do the initial groundwork in sifting
through applications (not including environmental review, which, in accordance with the proposed
ordinance, would be done later by Common Council),but the criteria for the Board's yes-or-no vote
on applications,relying on such phrases as"conceptually sound"are vague. If applicants get turned
down and decide to sue,would such votes hold up in court?
By definition, PUD applications may not correspond (and probably don't) with regulations of the
zoning district where they are to be located, and yet the Planning Board must certify them to be in
accord with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Isn't there a basic contradiction here?
Common Council, after granting a PUD district, may attach conditions and requirements (see
Section E on pages 6-7) to a project, although review of such topics as building height, protection
of natural and historic sites, parking and traffic circulation, etc. is not specifically required. This
seems late in the game to raise such issues – which the usual Planning Board process would have
raised from the start.
The PUD process, if it were approved, might be OK for non-controversial projects with no
downside. How well will it work for others, such as the Gun Co.redevelopment plan?
Does the city need an alternative process? How many 60,000 square foot spaces have we got left?
If the goal is to facilitate mixed-use development, mixed use is already in practice downtown
(Cayuga/Green, Gateway) through use or modification of existing laws and procedures. How will
the PUD better the process that has been in place?
How have other cities used PUDs? Is Ithaca's proposed ordinance based on theirs? How has their
experience clarified the advantages and drawbacks?
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." ��
Tompkins County
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING •
121 East Court Street
Ithaca, New York 1.850
Edward C. Marx, AICP Telephone (607) 274-5560
Commissioner of Planning Fax (607) 274-5373
September 12, 2003
Ms. Jennifer Kusz-.iir, Economic Development Planner
City of Ithaca
103 East Green Street
Ithaca, NY 14350
Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -land-m of the New York State General Municipal Law
Action Zoning Ordinance Amendment to add a Planned'nit Development{Ordii ance
1 z r ,4"a" tL 1 7c s: t ^r �' r� ��• zf ° +61 } s '3 '46k�'r^7 r
Dear Ms Kusznir 1
This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by the
Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to §239 -1 and -m of the New York State General
Municipal Law.Tne Department has reviewed the proposal, as submitted,and has determined that it may `
have negative inter-community, or county-wide impacts as described below. We recommend modification
of the proposal. If the Board does not incorporate these recommendations into its approval, such approval
will require a vote of a supernajority(meaning a majority plus one) of all members of the decision-
making body.
The Department offers the following recommendation on this proposal:
You should include _re:ii. .;.^. that the proposed density is compatible with _..:'r the un=-:: in_g
zo,- ' dtsrr'_C 0: ..._ iL' n'..-..'r !:SCS. T:'.!S OOI. be 3 to c:i:eria for a Or_.'.e r°PO`
ou.d Pe isst: _ P:_n: ., and Development Eon (Section 5). The PL'D .- to provide
flex:;,ili • in r_d _:Jpin:z ---rtdoite pro. --es. -owe••'er. «'e • &„iev,, rTh -`-- :n_i:`'
ns,.:re :tint ... -0; '::?e scale tlt .ie
Please infor n us of your decision _J that we can make 7. a par: oC record.
Tompkins County
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNI1■ .2-
121 East Court Street
Ithaca, New York 14850
Edward C.Marx,AICP Telephone (607) 274-5560
Commissioner of Planning Fax (607) 274-5578
November 18, 2003
Mr. Tim Logue, Neighborhood and Economic Development Planner
City of Ithaca
108 East Green Street
Ithaca,NY 14850
Re: Review Pursuant to §239-1 and-m of the New York State General Municipal Law
Action: Clarification of September 12,2003 comments on Planned Unit Development Ordinance
Dear Mr.Logue:
In response to your request for clarification,the department offers the following comments:
. We intended the term`compatible' in this context to mean that the PUD density be `the same as' the
underlying zoning or that allowed on surrounding properties (if the zoning is different). If a higher
density is desired, a zone change should be sought in addition to the PUD.
. The density requirement should be a binding requirement of the PUD ordinance.
Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record.
Sincerely,
Edward C. Marx, AICP
Commissioner of Planning
D 1
Draft Resolution -November 17, 2004
Planned Unit Development(PUD) District-Declaration of Lead Agency Status for
Environmental Review
WHEREAS, State Law and Section 176.6 of the City Code require that a lead agency be
established for conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and state
environmental law, and
WHEREAS, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the
lead agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and
funding or carrying out the action, and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to establish Planned Unit
Development(PUD) district regulations is a "Type I" Action pursuant to City's Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance (CEQR) and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQR) which requires review under CEQR and SEQR; now,therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that Common Council of the City of Ithaca does hereby declare itself lead agency
for the environmental review of the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to establish Planned
Unit Development(PUD) district regulations.
q:\planning\projects\zoning\pud\lead agency pud nov 2004.doc 11/10/04
Draft Resolution-November 17, 2004
Planned Unit Development(PUD) District-Declaration of No Significant Environmental
Impact
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is proposing a zoning amendment which would create a new zone
to be known as the Planned Unit Development district(PUD), and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the preparation of
a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF), including Parts I and II, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is an Type I action under the City Environmental Quality
Review Act and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as Lead Agency, has reviewed
the LEAF, prepared by City of Ithaca Planning &Development Department staff, and it appears
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment; now,therefore, be
it
RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency, hereby determines that the proposed
action at issue will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that further
environmental review for the adoption of this plan is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that the City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same,together with any attachments, in the City
Clerk's Office, and forward the same to any other parties as required by law.
q:\planning\projects\zoning\pud\negdec pud nov 2004.doc 11/10/04
;,y _`••.. ', ,, CITY OF ITHACA
V} "=^7 4s, 108 East Green Street— 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-56
Irm.l7
. 0m DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
A .. `" H. MATTHYS VAN CORT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
°"- JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning@)cityofithaca.org Email: iura @cityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558
To: Planning, Neighborhoods 86 Economic Development Committee
From: Tim Logue, Neighborhood 86 Economic Development Planner rj___
Date: November 9, 2004
RE: City Trails Master Plan
Over the years, a number of trail projects in the City has been discussed or
pursued. However, the City has not yet compiled these various concepts or
plans into one master plan document. A planning process that brings these
projects together into one document has the potential to coordinate and further
bolster trail development activities, to support grant applications, and to
highlight trail opportunities within the City. To this end, please find attached
three items: 1) a general outline for a planning process to develop a master
plan for trails in the City of Ithaca; 2) a map of potential trails to be included in
such a plan; and 3) a resolution for your consideration.
•
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." �a
City of Ithaca Trails Master Plan
Outline of Work and Approximate Schedule
1. Outline concept, map trail routes generally—September& October
2. Bring to Planning,Neighborhoods & Economic Development(PNED) Committee for
direction—November
3. Concept memo to Planning Board, Conservation Advisory Council (CAC), Town of
Ithaca, Tompkins County, Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council (I-TCTC)
4. Form client committee—December and January
5. Client Committee meets. May include in-house workshops with staff, client committee
and invited landscape architects—January& February 2005
6. First Public Hearing—March Common Council meeting
7. Site planning issues—develop each trail segment to grant application level: scope of
work, grading, bridges, materials, signage/interpretation, budget—February through May
8. Phasing plan for different trails—May& June
9. Work through policy issues, e.g., lighting, maintenance, liability. —February- June
10. Final draft document and maps—July and August
11. Conduct environmental review, referral to CAC & County—August/September
12. Circulate plan for comment, hold second public hearing, get approvals, publish plan—
October 2005
Trails (in no particular order)
• Cayuga Waterfront Trail (CWT)
• Six Mile Creek—from Wildflower Preserve to Meadow Street(includes Winter Village,
Cayuga Green Creekwalk, and Southside Creekwalk)
• Cascadilla Creek—from Collegetown to Farmer's Market/CWT
• Fall Creek—from Stewart Park to Suspension Bridge
• Gateway Bridge Trail—connect South Hill Rec Way to Gateway Bridge over Rte 13
• South Hill Recreation Way
• Black Diamond Trail through the City
• Circle Greenway
• ACS/West Hill Bike Path
• Inlet Island Promenade
• Cliff Street to Cass Park trail
• Cornell walking tour routes in City?—Cascadilla Creek& Founder's Loop
• Southside African-American Heritage Walking Tour
• Fuertes Bird Sanctuary Trails
Potential Trails for City Trails Master Plan
g
;.�'/, aY : rte" j � 3./
v� y
--,' ,*:Vetillr. Cayuga isuikkirr:- 1-1
Waterfront
Trail �„ Fuertes
II I
\--.. I Bird Sanctuary
Trails
i/
j
ilpi _ -
> T
I � ;1 1.�..._.�� >. -f
2
� � 1
TM'ff, ,,h -7-c- _-:-- .L....._. \1..---1,-21!----}-;',',--BaiL.-, \ L-3: 15' . tit'-----4 ' I,
1 Creek f- 1. ai -,
~! r F oStreet , � t Trail ci �I
1/41 i ,
3
.. ,, % � . ' .''��` � ;i Circle (` ,..I Inlet / s� .: ® ���� Greenway ,z I�: Island I^x r �.��� �� `� � � i• I• g Promenade ' .. "w s ` 1S � � -:,I v' �1 J—f'-
_ ; 1. Southside `� . . . . ,t. }\ ...)
` 4 African-American �I '�� + `-° -"
r.I✓T 4 Heritage �ti �
N Y ACS •L. Walking Tour Cascadilla Creekwalk $ ``' a� �e '
7 Bike 1 e•
Mr:- Path ,� L �fw�r. �ii�a, O i r.f I' �elk bi motor
1,-71.__ .L.. / cif /R1. 7 �. ,' `s't4�j 5 -S - \1 � } -+uns .ILe.=jib!
.. J `'•\ :; \ 5�i toy ....
-1. I • I C f -v 4,, ,tin
IF ���
L
_ _ �, fi ..
r y 7�.�., r� �� ,\` I lit= Vh f _ '.." ,' y,• ,a'''',, /^li
\
`' ,/,14 rfi ice a Cr' im i
f
Black z ,�
\ q-s-e , / C y - F. 7°ice
Diamond r j A ._
•
. ,\ ,
q
r.r rya �, '�.a.---rr+-�-
}t •N South Hill
Legend
•-:0Recreation Way
s Nodes Trails
i ,� :✓" T ' wC !•\\ South Hit Recreation Way
�i'r�' Cliff Street footpath
•� �� \;;%;<,,--
/,r(V�\_ , I Cayuga Waterfront Trail-Phase l
\i. '` `��� ■CWT-Phase3
' : Gateway
`� a \=� CWT-Phase 4
— i% ` \\'�
■Inlet Island Promenade
Bridge ■Black Diamond Trail
Trail ACS Bike Path
/� � ■Gateway Bridge Trail
`•.1 Fell Creek Trail
Cascadilla Creekwalk
I N Six Mile Creekwalk
i.� \ •Souths de A/rlcen Amencan Heritage Walking Tour
ttfr'
jw 1w �) E . Circle Greenway
i \III J MI Waterways
S ._............._streets
1 inch equals 2,000 feet Map prepared by the City of Ithaca Department of Planning and Development,Oct 2004
Proposed Resolution-November 17,2004
CITY TRAILS MASTER PLAN—A Resolution to Direct the Department of Planning&
Development
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca has the potential to develop a network of trails that would support
recreation, alternate modes of transportation, economic development, tourism, and healthy
lifestyles, and
WHEREAS,the Department of Planning & Development has outlined a planning process that
would formulate a master plan for such a trail system, and
WHEREAS, such a master plan would assist in the development of grant applications, capital
project budgeting, and in securing other funding sources; now,therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Planning,Neighborhoods, and Economic Development Committee directs
the Department of Planning and Development to commence action on the City Trails Master
Plan as generally outlined by the department, and be it further
RESOLVED, that Common Council authorizes the Mayor to appoint a Client Committee to
assist in the development of the City Trails Master Plan.
q:\planning\projects\trails\trail master plan\res city trails master plan.doc 11/10/04
Action Items Page 1 of 6
Tompkins County-Comprehensive Plan 1)3
PLANNING FOR OUR FUTURE . . .
PRINCIPLES, POLICIES,AND ACTION ITEMS
October 4,2004
The Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan is organized around ten basic principles.These principles
incorporate elements of the Vital Communities Initiative,adhere to the values expressed in the County's
mission statement,and reflect the wisdom gathered from many community opinions.Corresponding to
the principles are various working policies of Tompkins County government that can be applied to meet
many of the community goals expressed in this plan. The accompanying action items represent those
activities that should be undertaken,or at least begun,during the first five years after adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan.The adopted version of the Comprehensive Plan will identify those organizations
responsible for each action item.
♦ A principle is a comprehensive and fundamental doctrine,or assumption.
• A policy is a definite course or method of action to guide and determine present and future decisionmaking.
A policy reflects a high-level overall plan embracing general goals and acceptable procedures.
• An action item is a specific activity that an individual or organization is committed to undertake.
L Regional Cooperation
PRINCIPLE—Tompkins County will work proactively with towns,villages,the City of Ithaca,
adjoining counties,and State and Federal agencies to cooperatively address regional issues,such as
natural resources,public infrastructure,and consumer,employment,and housing markets.
HOUSING,TRANSPORTATION AND JOBS
IL Housing Choices
PRINCIPLE —Housing in Tompkins County should be affordable and appealing to all residents,
regardless of their income or whether they rent or own their homes.
POLICIES
• Provide for a variety of quality living experiences,including rural,suburban,hamlet,village,
and urban.
• Protect consumers'housing options throughout the County by providing a mix of choices of
location,accessibility,housing types,and neighborhood character.
• Provide and encourage more quality rental and owner-occupied affordable housing options for
very-low-, low-,and moderate-income residents.
• Promote increased owner-occupied housing in the County.
• Maintain an adequate supply of affordable housing options for people with special needs,
including seniors who wish to remain in their homes and persons requiring health care,custodial
care,or supportive services.
• Promote housing opportunities for locally-employed persons who would prefer to live in
Tompkins County.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Produce a three-to five-year affordable-housing needs assessment to use as a basis to guide
development of appropriate subsidized rental and ownership housing to meet local needs.
2. Conduct a survey of in-commuters to determine the reasons they live outside of Tompkins
County.
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Action Items Page 2 of 6
3. Develop or identify model provisions for land development regulations that encourage
affordable housing.
4. Provide education and training programs for elected officials,board members,community
leaders,developers and builders,and the general public on the need for and benefits of
affordable-housing development.
5. Identify subsidized affordable housing units and determine when subsidies expire and if the units
are likely to remain affordable.Establish a program to monitor the status of those units to
anticipate impending deficiencies.
6. Build a new Community Residence—Single Room Occupancy mental health facility.
7. Develop plans to meet the housing needs of segments of the population that require supportive
services,including seniors, independent(or at-risk)youth,and the homeless.
M. Transportation Chokes
PRINCIPLE—The efficiency of the highway system should be enhanced and use of public transit,
walking,and bicycling should be increased.
POLICIES
• Enhance the design function and safety of the existing road network while making investments
in technology and design that increase its operation efficiency.
• Make selective additions or modifications to the highway network to address capacity
limitations that cannot otherwise be addressed.
• Coordinate land use and infrastructure planning to meet the needs of drivers,pedestrians,
bicyclists,transit riders,and community residents.
• Enhance and promote the use of bicycles and walking as viable forms of transportation by
supporting the provision of safe public facilities,including multi-use trails,bicycle routes,
bicycle lanes,and sidewalks.
• Enhance transportation options and provide facilities that allow passengers to transfer easily and
safely from one mode of transportation to another(e.g.,biking to bus service).
• Provide affordable and accessible public transportation to important destinations,hamlets and
villages,the Ithaca urban area,and points outside the County.
• Promote a transportation system that supports nodal,compact development patterns and reduces
negative environmental impacts.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Develop a bicycle suitability map for Tompkins County.
2. Identify infill opportunities at nodes along transit lines.
3. Develop a countywide State Route 13 Corridor Management Plan.
4. Complete a traffic signal upgrade and intersection evaluation program.
5. Develop a centralized,uniform accident reporting system.
6. Work with municipalities to assess transportation infrastructure needs,including roadways,
transit,bicycles,and pedestrians,to support local planning efforts.
7. Facilitate municipal review of local development regulations to address future performance of
the transportation system.
8. Implement recommendations in the Freight Transportation Study to minimize negative aspects
of freight transportation,while increasing safety.
9. Develop a countywide comprehensive park and ride plan.
IV.Jobs and Business
PRINCIPLE—The local economy should be enhanced by building on important community assets,
such as a highly educated workforce,an entrepreneurial spirit,dynamic academic institutions,and a
high quality of life.
POLICIES
• Provide a setting where businesses,particularly locally owned ones,can flourish by enhancing
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Action Items Page 3 of 6
the County's natural resources,arts and culture, lively urban core,and vital neighborhoods.
• Support economic development that provides quality employment opportunities to local
residents,good wages and benefits,and affordable goods and services.
• Encourage the procurement of goods and services from local farms,businesses,and service
providers.
• Support tourism in the area by encouraging local institutions,businesses,and facilities to better
plan,coordinate,and expand tourism-related activities locally and regionally.
• Enhance transportation options,including freight and air service,to support business
development,while preserving the integrity of existing communities.
• Work closely with the local institutions of higher learning to enhance those institutions'
significant and integral contributions to the local economy and community life.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Complete and implement the workforce development plan,striving to meet the needs of
unemployed and underemployed through job creation activities,and the needs of employers
through employment and training programs.
2. Enhance the ability to analyze costs and benefits of projects as well as improve post-project job
data collection to determine whether the public purpose of projects is realized.
3. Continue to lobby for State Empire Zone status and explore regional partnerships to share
underutilized economic development resources.
4. Continue to explore ways to improve the cost and convenience of air service for County
employers,visitors and local residents.
5. Utilize Cornell University's resources to greater advantage,including: work with Cornell to
improve technology transfer;study feasibility of a business attraction initiative using specific
Cornell research and development programs as the key element.
6. Promote and develop the county's tourism attractions,including cultural,natural,and
commercial attractions
7. Develop a strategy to promote local use and consumption of locally produced goods.
8. Encourage the formation,retention,and expansion of manufacturing and high tech businesses.
V. Rural Resources
PRINCIPLE—A diversified rural economy centered around the working rural landscapes of farms
and forests,and the livelihoods of those who depend upon them,should be preserved and enhanced.
POLICIES
• Enhance the viability of existing farming operations and agricultural businesses,and encourage
new ones to be formed.
• Support sustainable formal and informal resource-based,economic development activities,such
as forest management,timber harvesting,and agri-tourism,which support a rural way of life.
• Sustain and enhance the agricultural activities and working farms within the Agricultural
Resources Focus Areas identified in the Plan,and within locally designated important
agricultural areas.
• Encourage development that is designed to preserve open space and valuable agricultural and
forest land.
• Protect prime agricultural land for agricultural use.
• Support community and economic development efforts that enhance the incomes of,or provide
services primarily to,rural residents.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Determine the feasibility of a rural micro-enterprise program,including adding a component to
the County's Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund.
2. Update the Agriculture and Farmland Protection Plan with a particular focus on promoting the
viability and profitability of agriculture within the County.
3. Establish a program to protect and manage land for agricultural and forestry use in the focus
areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan using tools appropriate to the functions of those
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Action Items Page 4 of 6
resources.
4. Develop or identify model performance standards to preserve agriculture and forest land.
THE ENVIRONMENT
VI. Water Resources
PRINCIPLE—Water resources provide drinking water,recreational opportunities,and environmental
benefits,and should be protected and used appropriately.
POLICIES
• Promote appropriate development of waterfront lands for water-dependent or water-enhanced
uses,including enhancing public access to Cayuga Lake.
• Protect water quality and quantity in the County's streams,lakes,and groundwater.
• Protect drinking water supplies from contamination.
• Protect stream corridors,wetlands,and land areas that are seasonally inundated by water.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Complete watershed assessments for the Fall Creek and Six Mile Creek drinking water sources.
2. Continue to conduct aquifer studies.
3. Initiate inspection and maintenance requirements for individual on-site wastewater treatment
systems.
4. Update the county flood hazard mitigation program to incorporate watershed-based approaches
to reducing the risk of flood damages.
5. Update floodplain maps.
6. Develop or identify model stream buffer ordinances.
7. Develop a system to provide for regular maintenance of existing drainage systems and use of
appropriate road ditching techniques on County maintained roads,and encourage the use of such
techniques on other roads in the County.
8. Develop boat docking,boat service areas,and waterfront commercial district on,and in the
vicinity of,Inlet Island in the City of Ithaca.
9. Redevelop the NYSDOT Maintenance Facility site with water-dependent and/or water-enhanced
projects to provide economic benefits to the City and the County and provide public access to the
water's edge.
10. Dredge Cayuga Inlet and fmd an appropriate method for disposal of dredge spoil material,for
example,using dredged material to create new,functioning wetlands at the south end of Cayuga
Lake.
11. Prepare a Cayuga Lake water quality and quantity monitoring plan.
VII. Natural Features
PRINCIPLE—Natural features that define our community,and form the foundation of our local and
regional ecological systems,should be preserved and enhanced.
POLICIES
• Preserve the natural features,ecosystems,and forest lands within the Natural Resources Focus
Areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Preserve and protect scenic views,areas of natural beauty,and the rural character of Tompkins
County.
• Protect the ecological,economic,and recreational functions and beauty of Cayuga Lake.
• Preserve and enhance existing parks,hiking trails,active and passive recreation facilities,and
historic resources,and foster the creation of new recreational amenities.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Establish an open-space program to protect or preserve natural resources and recreational
amenities in the focus areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan using tools appropriate to the
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Action Items Page 5 of 6
functions of those resources.
2. Define stream corridor buffers for the major tributaries to Cayuga Lake and encourage use of
appropriate measures to preserve the designated stream corridors.
3. Develop and disseminate educational information tailored to each natural features focus area and
each agricultural resources focus area.
4. Conduct a Scenic Resources Inventory and prepare a Scenic Resources Preservation Plan.
5. Develop or identify model performance standards to preserve natural resources.
6. Develop or obtain a system to track land use changes and preservation efforts.
7. Complete the Cayuga Waterfront Trail and the Black Diamond Trail.
NEIGHBORHOODS&COMMUNITIES
VIIL Strong Communities
PRINCIPLE—Tompkins County residents should be safe,healthy,and comfortable with the
aesthetics of their communities,and have daily opportunities to interact with neighbors and
community members to build strong,cohesive communities.
POLICIES
• Facilitate the creation and maintenance of a safe,appealing,and efficient multi-purpose network
for walking and enhance the pedestrian environment through appropriate design.
• Locate county facilities and encourage other community facilities to be located within
population centers,particularly those facilities that provide opportunities for social interaction,
group activities,community events,and meeting spaces.
• Encourage the development of diverse communities that provide a mix of uses,a variety of
employment options,social and recreational opportunities,and an assortment of amenities within
walking distance of residential development.
• Enhance the quality of communities by improving the character of the built environment,
including visually appealing architectural elements and streetscapes that encourage pedestrian
travel,facilitate community interaction,and promote public safety.
• Preserve and enhance the distinct identities and historic character of existing neighborhoods and
structures,and encourage the development of new neighborhoods that possess their own special
sense of place,through attractive design of public places;proximity to schools,parks and other
services;and community festivals and events.
• Improve transportation options for people who need access to employment,schools,shopping,
health facilities,and community services.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Advance implementation of a County-wide multiuse trail network.
2. Conduct pedestrian level-of-service and walkability studies in neighborhoods,villages,and
hamlets throughout the County.
3. Provide pedestrian connections between the waterfront and downtown through urban creek
corridors.
IX. Centers of Development
PRINCIPLE—The development patterns reflected in the existing villages,hamlets,and the City of
Ithaca's downtown area and neighborhoods should be promoted as key components of the built
environment that greatly contribute to the vitality of the local economy and community life.
POLICIES
• Strengthen and enhance the City of Ithaca's downtown area as the urban center of the County.
• Strengthen and enhance the villages and hamlets of the County as vital service and community
centers.
• Increase the amount and density of housing and business space in the central business districts
throughout the County.
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Action Items Page 6 of 6
• Promote greater density by encouraging development of existing"gaps"left by abandoned
buildings and vacant parcels.
• Concentrate appropriate commercial,industrial,and retail development onto relatively small
amounts of land,in close proximity to housing and consumers,in existing areas of concentrated
development.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Work with municipalities to identify and map areas appropriate for infill development.
2. Develop or identify model development design standards that address how to maintain a distinct
edge between the urban/village areas and the rural countryside.
3. Evaluate and modify the following programs for consistency with and furtherance of the nodal
development patterns:review of development proposals under GML 239,Economic
Development Revolving Loan Fund,Agricultural Districts,and advisory boards'work programs.
4. Work with municipalities to develop land use scenarios consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and with local land use plans and policies.
X. Efficient Use of Public Funds
PRINCIPLE—The effectiveness of taxpayer dollars should be maximized by investing government
funds in public infrastructure and facilities in the most efficient manner possible.
POLICIES
• Maintain County facilities to protect the public's investment,to effectively serve residents,and
to provide an efficient working environment for employees now and in the future.
• Optimize the value of community investments in water treatment and distribution facilities and
in sewer collection and treatment facilities by encouraging higher density in areas served by these
facilities.
• Save public costs by encouraging new development to locate in places contiguous to existing
development where sewer,water,roads,and other infrastructure already exist,or are planned as
part of a comprehensive plan to accommodate projected growth.
• Consider intermunicipal alternatives when addressing issues related to water supply and
wastewater disposal.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Develop or identify model land development regulations and design standards that support
denser development in areas with water and sewer services(including residential, infill and
mixed-use)and limited development in areas without such services.
2. Review highway jurisdiction patterns in Tompkins County.
3. Evaluate a downtown office plan for future County facility needs.
4. Determine the location of future Health Department facility and the future use of Biggs B
building.
5. Implement the Public Safety Communications System project.
6. Evaluate the need to renovate or expand the County Public Safety building to meet projected
needs.
7. Conduct regular meetings with officials from adjacent counties to focus on ways to reduce
overall costs to taxpayers.
8. Explore the feasibility of developing an Official County Map.
For more information about this effort,please visit our website at
www.tompkins-co.org/planning/compplan
Tompkins County Planning Department
274-55601 planning@tompkins-co.org
http://owasco.co.tompkins.ny.us/planning/compplan/policiesandactions.htm 11/11/04
Major Changes Page 1 of 2
Summary of Significant Changes D3
Draft County Comprehensive Plan
October 2004
In April 2004, the Draft Comprehensive Plan was printed, distributed, and posted on the County
Planning Department's website in order to elicit public input. Staff presented the key elements and
findings of the plan at 17 community group and advisory board meetings, and 14 open houses and
public meetings in all municipalities in the county. Informational displays were set-up at 19
locations, including libraries, banks, senior centers, and community halls.All comments were
gathered and reviewed, and during the summer and fall of 2004, staff worked with the Tompkins
County Planning Advisory Board to revise the text, tables, and maps in the Plan based on public
comments and feedback Below is a summary of significant changes made to the County
Comprehensive Plan as a result of the public input process.
Introduction and Overview
To clarify why the Plan focuses on the issues included,information was added describing how the
elements of the plan were selected and identifying noteworthy issues that were not included in the
2004 County Comprehensive Plan
To address the need to better highlight the importance of local institutions of higher education and
Cayuga Lake in our community,large text boxes were added entitled The Quintessential College
Town and Cayuga Lake:Shaping Our Community.
Housing,Transportation,and Jobs
To better explain the state of housing in our community,a new section was added describing the age
and condition of the existing housing stock in Tompkins County. More detailed census data related
to non-student housing and income was also added.
To reduce the use of planning jargon and clarify the meaning,wording changes were made to the
principle,and several policies and action items, in the transportation section.
A new action item was added to develop a countywide comprehensive park and ride plan.
To better acknowledge the important role of tourism in the county's economy,a new paragraph
discussing tourism was added.
A new policy was added to encourage the procurement of goods and services from local farms,
businesses,and service providers. A corresponding new action item was added to develop a strategy
to promote local use and consumption of locally produced goods.
A new action item was added to encourage the formation,retention,and expansion of manufacturing
and high tech businesses.
To better reflect the broad nature of the topic,the title of the Rural Economy section was changed to
Rural Resources,and the policy was expanded to focus on a diversified rural economy centered
around the working rural landscapes of farms and forests,and the livelihoods of those who depend
upon them.Also,an introductory paragraph was added to clarify why rural resources had its own
section,beyond the general issues identified for both rural and urban areas in the Jobs and Business
section.
The discussion of agricultural resources was consolidated by moving information and policies on
farming and agricultural soils from the Finite Resources section to the Rural Resources section.
Additionally,the discussion on farming,loss of farmland,and the agricultural economy was
strengthened,and the agricultural resources focus areas and future agriculture protection efforts were
more clearly described.Also,information was added to the map of agricultural resources focus areas
http://www.tompkins-co.org/planning/compplan/summaryofsignifchanges.htm 11/11/04
Major Changes Page 2 of 2
to include locally identified important agricultural areas,as identified in plans produced by the Towns
of Danby and Ithaca.
Environment
To better focus on the frequently identified key natural resource of water,the Finite Resources
section was reorganized and the title was changed to Water Resources.The principle was revised,to
highlight the importance of water resources in providing drinking water,recreational opportunities,
and environmental benefits.
A new action item was added to prepare a Cayuga Lake water quality and quantity monitoring plan.
The natural features principle was expanded to clarify that the natural features that define our
community form the foundation of our local and regional ecological systems.
To address the key role played by the four state parks in the county,a new paragraph was added
identifying issues and concerns associated with those parks.
Neighborhoods and Communities
A paragraph was added discussing the impact of the built environment on residents' sense of
community identity and personal well-being.
Based on work done by Planning staff over the summer of 2004 to identify future development
scenarios,an action item was added to work with municipalities to develop land use scenarios
consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and with local land use plans and policies.
Added a paragraph discussing one way in which the County is currently working to promote efficient
use of funds through reducing energy costs for County facilities.
Added new information on how comprehensive planning can help ensure that infrastructure
investments are made in an efficient and thoughtful manner. Correspondingly,action items were
added to explore the feasibility of developing an official county map,and to conduct regular meetings
with officials from adjacent counties to focus on ways to reduce overall costs to taxpayers.
http://www.tompkins-co.org/planning/compplan/summaryofsignifchanges.htm 1 1/1 1/04
•
•
- t�
D3
(October 25, 2004)
Implementation of Priority Actions
The Comprehensive Plan identifies 61 priority actions to be initiated in the next five years to advance the
Plan's principles and policies and the County's vision and mission. Very few action items on this list can
be undertaken and completed exclusively by one agency, and successful implementation will require
public-private partnerships, intermunicipal efforts, or inter-agency coordination and cooperation. A
number of agencies both from within County government and from the larger community have agreed to
play leadership roles. For example,the Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council will take on most
of the responsibility for implementation in the area of transportation, and Tompkins County Area
Development has agreed to be the leader in implementation in the area of jobs and business. We also
anticipate, and have already had responses of interest from, a number of partners in local municipalities,
the private sector, and among State and Federal agencies and are confident that this will grow over the
next five years. A cooperative, collaborative approach is essential for the Plan to be successful.
Principal Local Agencies
To assure accountability and commitment to timely implementation, a primary agency has been identified
and has agreed to serve in that role. In the attached table,these agencies are referred to as "Principal Local
Agencies." The implementation plan does not identify every agency or organization that needs,or might
want,to be involved in an action. In a few cases more than one principal local agency has been identified.
When particularly disparate steps need to be undertaken to complete the action,more than one agency
would need to take the lead. In some cases Federal and/or State agencies will need to take on major
responsibility for implementing an action, and the identified principal local agency needs to continue to
work with these agencies.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Within five years following adoption of the Plan, an assessment will be undertaken to evaluate the success
in implementing the actions and their effectiveness in moving the County toward realizing the Plan's
policy objectives. It is expected that the evaluation will result in some actions being dropped as less
effective or feasible and others being added. Any amendments to the Plan must undergo a formal review
process and be adopted by the County Legislature in the same manner as the original Plan.
At ten-year intervals a more complete review of the Plan's principles,policies, and the underlying analysis
will also be undertaken. The Plan's time horizon is intended to be twenty years, at which time a new or
updated Plan should be developed.
The Planning Commissioner will report annually to the County Legislature on progress in implementing
the Plan. This will include identification of action items that have been initiated and the results of those
actions. The appropriate measurement tools will be developed and the Commissioner's report will include
measures of success by which to monitor the Plan's progress and any barriers to implementation that have
been encountered.
Resources
Resources for implementing the Plan will come from a number of sources. Initially,much of the effort will
involve a redirection of existing resources. We are also confident that the Plan will draw interest and
Page 1 of 6
resources from State and Federal funding agencies and private foundations that support the development of
sustainable,healthy communities. For every area that the Plan addresses,there are established, though
competitive, funding programs that can assist with implementation. Any additional Tompkins County
resources that are needed will be subject to review and approval by the County Legislature through the
County's budget process.
Housing Choices
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
1 Produce a three-to five-year affordable-housing needs assessment Tompkins County Planning Department
to use as a basis to guide development of appropriate subsidized
rental and ownership housing to meet local needs.
2 Conduct a survey of in-commuters to determine the reasons they Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
live outside of Tompkins County. Council,Tompkins County Planning
Department
3 Develop or identify model provisions for land development Tompkins County Planning Department
regulations that encourage affordable housing.
4 Provide education and training programs for elected officials,board Better Housing for Tompkins County,
members,community leaders,developers and builders,and the Tompkins County Planning Department
general public on the need for and benefits of affordable-housing
development.
5 Identify subsidized affordable housing units and determine when Tompkins County Planning Department
subsidies expire and if the units are likely to remain affordable.
Establish a program to monitor the status of those units to anticipate
impending deficiencies.
6 Build a new Community Residence—Single Room Occupancy Tompkins County Mental Health
mental health facility. Department
7 Develop plans to meet the housing needs of segments of the Tompkins County Office for Aging,
population that require supportive services,including seniors, Tompkins County Department of Youth
independent(or at-risk)youth,and the homeless. Services,American Red Cross
Page 2 of 6
D3
(October 25, 2004)
Implementation of Priority Actions
The Comprehensive Plan identifies 61 priority actions to be initiated in the next five years to advance the
Plan's principles and policies and the County's vision and mission. Very few action items on this list can
be undertaken and completed exclusively by one agency, and successful implementation will require
public-private partnerships, intermunicipal efforts, or inter-agency coordination and cooperation. A
number of agencies both from within County government and from the larger community have agreed to
play leadership roles. For example,the Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council will take on most
of the responsibility for implementation in the area of transportation, and Tompkins County Area
Development has agreed to be the leader in implementation in the area of jobs and business. We also
anticipate, and have already had responses of interest from, a number of partners in local municipalities,
the private sector, and among State and Federal agencies and are confident that this will grow over the
next five years. A cooperative, collaborative approach is essential for the Plan to be successful.
Principal Local Agencies
To assure accountability and commitment to timely implementation, a primary agency has been identified
and has agreed to serve in that role. In the attached table,these agencies are referred to as"Principal Local
Agencies." The implementation plan does not identify every agency or organization that needs,or might
want,to be involved in an action. In a few cases more than one principal local agency has been identified.
When particularly disparate steps need to be undertaken to complete the action,more than one agency
would need to take the lead. In some cases Federal and/or State agencies will need to take on major
responsibility for implementing an action, and the identified principal local agency needs to continue to
work with these agencies.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Within five years following adoption of the Plan, an assessment will be undertaken to evaluate the success
in implementing the actions and their effectiveness in moving the County toward realizing the Plan's
policy objectives. It is expected that the evaluation will result in some actions being dropped as less
effective or feasible and others being added. Any amendments to the Plan must undergo a formal review
process and be adopted by the County Legislature in the same manner as the original Plan.
At ten-year intervals a more complete review of the Plan's principles,policies, and the underlying analysis
will also be undertaken. The Plan's time horizon is intended to be twenty years, at which time a new or
updated Plan should be developed.
The Planning Commissioner will report annually to the County Legislature on progress in implementing
the Plan. This will include identification of action items that have been initiated and the results of those
actions. The appropriate measurement tools will be developed and the Commissioner's report will include
measures of success by which to monitor the Plan's progress and any barriers to implementation that have
been encountered.
Resources
Resources for implementing the Plan will come from a number of sources. Initially,much of the effort will
involve a redirection of existing resources. We are also confident that the Plan will draw interest and
Page 1 of 6
resources from State and Federal funding agencies and private foundations that support the development of
sustainable,healthy communities. For every area that the Plan addresses, there are established,though
competitive, funding programs that can assist with implementation. Any additional Tompkins County
resources that are needed will be subject to review and approval by the County Legislature through the
County's budget process.
Housing Choices
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
1 Produce a three-to five-year affordable-housing needs assessment Tompkins County Planning Department
to use as a basis to guide development of appropriate subsidized
rental and ownership housing to meet local needs.
2 Conduct a survey of in-commuters to determine the reasons they Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
live outside of Tompkins County. Council,Tompkins County Planning
Department
3 Develop or identify model provisions for land development Tompkins County Planning Department
regulations that encourage affordable housing.
4 Provide education and training programs for elected officials,board Better Housing for Tompkins County,
members,community leaders,developers and builders,and the Tompkins County Planning Department
general public on the need for and benefits of affordable-housing
development.
5 Identify subsidized affordable housing units and determine when Tompkins County Planning Department
subsidies expire and if the units are likely to remain affordable.
Establish a program to monitor the status of those units to anticipate
impending deficiencies.
6 Build a new Community Residence—Single Room Occupancy Tompkins County Mental Health
mental health facility. Department
7 Develop plans to meet the housing needs of segments of the Tompkins County Office for Aging,
population that require supportive services,including seniors, Tompkins County Department of Youth
independent(or at-risk)youth,and the homeless. Services,American Red Cross
Page 2 of 6
/
Transportation Choices
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
8 Develop a bicycle suitability map for Tompkins County. Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
Council
9 Identify infill opportunities at nodes along transit lines. Tompkins County Planning Department
10 Develop a countywide State Route 13 Corridor Management Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
Plan. Council,Tompkins County Planning
Department
11 Complete a traffic signal upgrade and intersection evaluation Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
program. Council,City of Ithaca Department of
Public Works
12 Develop a centralized,uniform accident reporting system. TC Administration
13 Work with municipalities to assess transportation infrastructure Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
needs,including roadways,transit,bicycles, and pedestrians,to Council
support local planning efforts.
14 Facilitate municipal review of local development regulations to Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
address future performance of the transportation system. Council
15 Implement recommendations in the Freight Transportation Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
Study to minimize negative aspects of freight transportation, Council
while increasing safety. _
16 Develop a countywide comprehensive park and ride plan. Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
Council
Jobs and Business
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
17 Complete and implement the workforce development plan, Tompkins Workforce NY
striving to meet the needs of unemployed and underemployed
through job creation activities,and the needs of employers
through employment and training programs.
18 Enhance the ability to analyze costs and benefits of projects as Tompkins County Area Development
well as improve post-project job data collection to determine
whether the public purpose of projects is realized.
19 Continue to lobby for State Empire Zone status and explore Tompkins County Area Development
regional partnerships to share underutilized econ.development
resources.
20 Continue to explore ways to improve the cost and convenience Ithaca-Tompkins Regional Airport
of air service for County employers,visitors and local residents.
21 Utilize Cornell University's resources to greater advantage, Tompkins County Area Development
including: work with Cornell to improve technology transfer;
study feasibility of a business attraction initiative using specific
Cornell research and development programs as the key element.
22 Promote and develop the county's tourism attractions,including Tompkins County Convention&
cultural,natural, and commercial attractions. Visitors Bureau
23 Develop a strategy to promote local use and consumption of Cornell Cooperative Extension—
locally produced goods. Tompkins,Tompkins County Chamber
of Commerce
24 Encourage the formation,retention,and expansion of Tompkins County Area Development
manufacturing and high tech businesses.
Page 3 of 6
Rural Resources
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
25 Determine the feasibility of a rural micro-enterprise program, Tompkins County Planning Department
including adding a component to the County's Economic
Development Revolving Loan Fund.
26 Update the Agriculture and Farmland Protection Plan with a Tompkins County Agriculture&
p promoting the viability and profitability of Farmland Protection Board
agriculture within the County.
27 Establish a program to protect and manage land for agricultural Tompkins County Planning Department
and forestry use in the focus areas identified in the
Comprehensive Plan using tools appropriate to the functions of
those resources.
28 Develop or identify model performance standards to preserve Tompkins County Planning Department
agriculture and forest land.
Water Resources
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
29 Complete watershed assessments for the Fall Creek and Six Tompkins County Planning Department
Mile Creek drinking water sources.
30 Continue to conduct aquifer studies. Tompkins County Planning Department
31 Initiate inspection and maintenance requirements for individual Tompkins County Health Department
on-site wastewater treatment systems.
32 Update the county flood hazard mitigation program to Tompkins County Planning Department
incorporate watershed based approaches to reducing the risk of
flood damages.
33 Update floodplain maps. Tompkins County Planning Department
34 Develop or identify model stream buffer ordinances. Tompkins County Planning Department
35 Develop a system to provide for regular maintenance of existing Tompkins County Highway Division
drainage systems and use of appropriate road ditching
techniques on County maintained roads,and encourage the use
of such techniques on other roads in the County.
36 Develop boat docking,boat service areas,and waterfront City of Ithaca Planning&Development
commercial district on,and in the vicinity of,Inlet Island in the
City of Ithaca.
37 Redevelop the NYSDOT Maintenance Facility site with water- Tompkins County Planning Department
dependent and/or water-enhanced projects to provide economic
benefits to the City and the County and provide public access to
the water's edge.
38 Dredge Cayuga Inlet and fmd an appropriate method for City of Ithaca Planning&Development
disposal of dredge spoil material, for example,using dredged
material to create new,functioning wetlands at the south end of
Cayuga Lake.
39 Prepare a Cayuga Lake water quality and quantity monitoring Cayuga Lake Watershed Network
plan.
Page 4 of 6
Natural Features
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
40 Establish an open-space program to protect or preserve natural Tompkins County Planning Department
resources and recreational amenities in the focus areas identified
in the Comprehensive Plan using tools appropriate to the
functions of those resources.
41 Define stream corridor buffers for the major tributaries to Tompkins County Planning Department
Cayuga Lake and encourage use of appropriate measures to
preserve the designated stream corridors.
42 Develop and disseminate educational information tailored to Tompkins County Planning Department
each natural features focus area and each agricultural resources
focus area.
43 Conduct a Scenic Resources Inventory and prepare a Scenic Tompkins County Planning Department
Resources Preservation Plan.
44 Develop or identify model performance standards to preserve Tompkins County Planning Department
natural resources.
45 Develop or obtain a system to track land use changes and Tompkins County Planning Department
preservation efforts.
46 Complete the Cayuga Waterfront Trail and the Black Diamond Tompkins County Chamber of
Trail. Commerce, Ithaca-Tompkins County
Transportation Council,Tompkins
County Planning Department
Strong Communities
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
47 Advance implementation of a County-wide multiuse trail Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
network. Council
48 Conduct pedestrian level-of-service and walkability studies in Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation
neighborhoods,villages,and hamlets throughout the County. Council,Tompkins County Planning
Department
49 Provide pedestrian connections between the waterfront and City of Ithaca Planning&Development
downtown through urban creek corridors.
Centers of Development
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
50 Work with municipalities to identify and map areas appropriate for Tompkins County Planning Department
infill development.
51 Develop or identify model development design standards that Tompkins County Planning Department
address how to maintain a distinct edge between the urban/village
areas and the rural countryside.
52 Evaluate and modify the following programs for consistency with Tompkins County Planning Department
and furtherance of the nodal development patterns:review of
development proposals under GML 239,Economic Development
Revolving Loan Fund,Agricultural Districts, and advisory boards'
work programs.
53 Work with municipalities to develop land use scenarios consistent Tompkins County Planning Department
with the Plan and with local land use plans and policies.
Page 5 of 6
Efficient Use of Public Funds
Action Item Description Principal Local Agency(ies)
54 Develop or identify model land development regulations and Tompkins County Planning Department
design standards that support denser development in areas with
water and sewer services(including residential,infill and mixed-
use)and limited development in areas without such services.
55 Review responsibility for highway management and Tompkins County Highway Division,
maintenance based on the function of the highways. Intermunicipal Hwy Group
56 Evaluate a downtown office plan for future County facility Tompkins County Facilities Division
needs.
57 Determine the location of future Health Department facility and Tompkins County Facilities Division
the future use of Biggs B building.
58 Implement the Public Safety Communications System project. Tompkins County Administration,
Tompkins County Department of
Emergency Response
59 Evaluate the need to renovate or expand the County Public Tompkins County Facilities Division
Safety building to meet projected needs.
60 Conduct regular meetings with officials from adjacent counties Tompkins County Planning
to focus on ways to reduce overall costs to taxpayers. Department,Tompkins County
Administration
61 Explore the feasibility of developing an Official County Map. Tompkins County Planning Department
Page 6 of 6
D3
Proposed Resolution—November 17,2004
RESOLUTION: Support for Adoption of Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan
WHEREAS,the Tompkins County Planning Department,with guidance,advice,and
recommendation from the Tompkins County Planning Advisory Board,has developed a
Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan that addresses regional and intermunicipal issues
that affect the daily lives of Tompkins County residents, such as housing,transportation,
jobs,the environment,and neighborhoods and communities,and
WHEREAS,the Draft Comprehensive Plan was presented at 17 community groups and advisory
board meetings, and 14 open houses and public meetings in all municipalities in the county,
for feedback and comments, and
WHEREAS, an over-arching principle of the Draft County Comprehensive Plan is that
Tompkins County will work proactively with towns,villages,the City of Ithaca,and State
and Federal agencies to cooperatively address regional issues, and
WHEREAS,the County recognizes that while New York State clearly places land use authority
in the hands of its towns,villages, and cities, it also specifically recognizes that
intermunicipal planning is needed to cooperatively address regional issues and encourages
the development of county comprehensive plans to address development and preservation
issues that transcend local political boundaries, and
WHEREAS,the Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan provides a strategic framework for
addressing issues of mutual concern to municipalities throughout the County,now
therefore be it
RESOLVED,That the Common Council of the City of Ithaca supports the adoption of the
Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan by the Tompkins County Legislature.
CITY OF ITHACA
v~
/4"'�`'• ', 108 East Green Street— 3`d Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-56
I I(TT1 BITE
1 '117107I
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
',, 1"' H. MATTHYS VAN CORT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
""- JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning @cityofithaca.org Email: iura @cityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558
To: Planning, Neighborhoods and Economic Development Committee
From: Tim Logue, Neighborhood and Economic Development Planner-17/
Date: November 9, 2004
Re: Transportation Demand Management Report
Please find enclosed the cover page, table of contents and executive summary
of a report entitled, "Fewer Cars in Ithaca!: Recommendations for
Transportation Demand Strategies for Ithaca, NY." This report was written by
Gloria Lau, a Cornell University student intern, over the past summer. Her
internship had three major phases: research on TDM practices, interviews with
local interested parties, and the final written report. A complete copy of the
report will be published in the very near future and will be available on the
Planning Department's webpage. The executive summary should give you a
short overview and I will be available at your meeting to discuss the report
further.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." et
Fewer C as in Ithaca! ^F
, r
,
Recommendations for
Transportation Demand Management
Strategies for Ithaca, NY
�. I.
�'J
OR g
' ! PERSONS
- i' FER VEHICLE
lc� , r..
. ..,,,:- i ....._ ,
�r'tten by Gloria Lau
Under the direction of Department of Planning & Development,
4 City of Ithaca
.Ns
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
Introduction 3
Transportation Demand Management 5
The Ithaca Context 7
Transportation Problems
Objectives for an Ithaca TDM Program
Recommendations 12
Recommended Strategies for the Present
1. Commuter Incentives
2. Ridesharing
3. Park&Ride
4. Parking Management and Evaluation
5. Transit Improvement
6. Education and Marketing
Existing/Ongoing Strategies
Appropriate Strategies for the Future
Inappropriate Strategies for Ithaca
Concerns and Feedback from Interview 26
Conclusion 28
Appendix A Other Cities' TDM Program 29
Appendix B Table and Maps 33
Annotated Bibliography 36
Acknowledgement
Thanks to the Tompkins Trust Company and the Community and Rural Development Institute at
Cornell University for awarding the Robert S. Smith grant to the City. This grant made this
report possible. Also,thanks to all the people who we have interviewed, for taking their time and
for providing us with information and comments. In addition, I want to thank my supervisor Tim
Logue for all his guidance and help in editing the report.
Executive Summary
The purpose of this transportation demand management(TDM) study is to identify the
transportation problems, objectives, and strategies for a possible Ithaca program. The study is
divided into three phases: research, interviews,and the written report. TDM is a term for a set of
various strategies that aim to prevent and solve different transportation problems by moving
people and goods in an efficient and cost effective transportation system,while achieving social,
economic and environmental goals. These strategies can be separated into the following
categories: improve transportation options, incentives, land use management,policies and
regulations,parking management, education and marketing. TDM implementation involves the
public, employer/employees,municipalities,transit providers, and related organizations.
It is important to first identify transportation problems within the City of Ithaca, and then identify
the appropriate objectives for an Ithaca TDM program. The biggest transportation problems in
the City are related to congestion,parking, and the cost of transportation projects. During peak
hours,there is considerable congestion along the Route 13 corridor,both in the Southwest area
and in the West End; the number of shopping trips is also very high on Saturday afternoon. The
City has spent a lot of time and money on downtown parking improvements,maintenance, and
rehabilitation. Inadequate parking in Collegetown, West End, and Inlet Island also causes
problems and inhibits further development. Lastly, several capital transportation projects that the
City has adopted are very expensive. The objectives for an Ithaca TDM program should be to
reduce congestion, to manage parking efficiently,to implement cost-effective transportation
projects, to improve and encourage alternative modes of transportation, and to strengthen the
connection between sustainable transportation and efficient land use.
After a month of research and interviews,recommendations were formulated and separated into
first and second phases. For the beginning phase,the City should target commuters, since they
contribute to congestion at peak hours,have more predictable and homogenous travel patterns,
and can be easily reached through their employers. The City has the greatest opportunity to
influence employers and employees in the downtown for a number of reasons. The City can
work with individual employers to custom-craft suitable incentives, like travel allowances or
flextime, and to persuade their employees to commute by alternative modes. A guaranteed ride
home program should be set up to provide TDM participants the security to commute without
their personal vehicle. An internal audit and set of policies would allow the City to serve as a
role model for other employers.
A rideshare(carpool or vanpool)program can also be organized in the early phase of a TDM
program,because there is a receptive market(12% of Tompkins County commuters already
carpool). A ride matching system can help interested commuters find suitable partners,but other
incentives may be needed to make ridesharing more appealing. It is important to weigh the pros
and cons of implementation as a City program or as part of an employers' program.
There is considerable attention to establishing an urbanized area Park&Ride system through the
Ithaca Tompkins County Transportation Council,which has created a Park&Ride
subcommittee. The City should continue to participate in this group. Park&ride lots should be
positioned at critical places where congestion starts to get heavy, as an incentive for people to
1
exchange their car for a transit ride. For this reason,park&ride lots also need to be at nodes of
bus service, where there is frequent and convenient transit. A guaranteed ride home program is
essential for both a rideshare and a Park&Ride program.
Excessive or inadequate parking supply leads to different problems in the City. It is very difficult
to find the balance between supply and demand,but certainly an oversupply of inexpensive
parking is an incentive to drive. From a TDM perspective,the City can look to two strategies to
better manage public and private parking facilities. First,the City can encourage more shared
parking between new developments or existing buildings. Second,parking pricing can be set at a
rate that acts as an incentive to take transit,rideshare,walk or bicycle. However, some
limitations will make ideal parking pricing difficult: the City is currently building a new 700
space parking garage, the City does not have a system of remote parking lots, and there is
overflow parking available in nearby neighborhoods. More transit-oriented development and
bicycle facilities can also encourage people to leave their car behind and ride the bus,bike, or
walk to places nearby.
Transit is an integral part of a TDM program and transit improvements can make the system
more appealing. The NESTS transit study recommended various modifications to TCAT routes
and proposed a transit hub at Pyramid Mall. TCAT has expressed interest in improving service
along Route 13 and in the Southwest part of the City,perhaps including a transit hub in the
further development of that area. However, since TCAT is under reorganization and capital and
operating budgets are tight, these improvements may not take place soon. Besides transit
improvements, there is always a need for a strong marketing and educational campaign in order
to raise public awareness of TDM and to encourage participation.
Other TDM strategies can be implemented in a later phase. These could include carsharing,
evaluation and survey, financial analysis, campus transport management, school transport
management, special event management,tourist transport management,telework, and car-free
planning. In addition, the City has several existing strategies and programs that fulfill some TDM
objectives: the Bike Plan,trail construction, and sidewalk mandates address biking and
pedestrians concerns,but more attention and staff time are needed. It is also important to note
that other TDM strategies, like High Occupancy Vehicle lanes and distance-base pricing, which
can be successful in large metropolitan areas, are not appropriate for small city like Ithaca.
A number of concerns were raised in the interviews, including the potential lack of interest from
employers and the impact on downtown commerce (such as reducing the number of people
downtown by allowing employees to work from home). Another concern is that targeting
downtown employees may not produce a large enough impact to justify the staff or program
costs. About 3,500 people work downtown; if 10%or about 350 people were to shift to an
alternative mode, this would produce a significant impact, considering that there are about 2,600
vehicles circulating around the Commons on an average weekday morning. Ithaca has a strong
potential for a TDM program; therefore, it is important to identify the suitable organizations and
funding sources for implementation.
2
CITY OF ITHACA
V~ "'R' ¢ ', 108 East Green Street— 3`d Floor Ithaca, New York 1485
-' Irmn�r=_ml
Fn1 rji-_T]
�► DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
gPo� o _ H. MATTHYS VAN CORT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
JOANN CORNISH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: Planning & Development - 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA - 607-274-6559
Email: planning @cityofithaca.org Email: iura @cityofithaca.org
Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning,Neighborhoods, and Economic Development Committee
From: JoAnn Cornis :-puty Director of Planning and Development
Date: November 10,2004
Re: West End Parking, Summary of Issues and Proposal
Over the past four months, City staff and elected officials have been meeting to discuss parking
issues and concerns raised by merchants and property owners in the west end.
Short Term Solution
After several meetings, including the June 16, 2004 Board of Public Works meeting,property and
business owners agreed that there is a need to free up the city owned lot at the corner of Fulton
and Court Streets for short-term parking. Overnight storage of delivery vehicles for Finger Lakes
Fabricating, Hearth and Home, Ithaca Bakery, and Verizon employees that drive Verizon trucks
and leave their personal vehicles for the day in the city lot will need to be accommodated off site.
To do this, the Abel's (owners of 531 Esty Street, The Miller Building), have agreed to allow
parking on a vacant piece of land owned by Arche LLC, located just north of Bistro Q. (See
attached map.)
Additionally, there is a responsibility on the part of the city to provide parking for neighborhood
residents that lost parking during the Route 96 improvements. It has been suggested that they use
the city owned lot on Buffalo Street across the street from Joe's Restaurant and that a space on
Court Street be signed for handicapped use in the event a neighborhood resident requires a
handicapped space.
To free up the lot for patrons of nearby businesses, it has been suggested that as a first step, this
public lot be signed for a three-hour parking maximum, from 9:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday with the regulations for parking on Court and Esty Streets remaining unchanged.
Those businesses using the parking lot for long-term parking have agreed to remove their
employee and delivery trucks out of the public lot, which will free up approximately 30 spaces.
The group realized that this recommendation is not standard for the city and that enforcement
may be difficult and a low priority for the police department. The three hour length and the 9:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m. is to allow time enough for restaurant patrons to have a meal and to discourage
overnight parking. The three-hour limit is generous for patrons of the other businesses in the area
and should accommodate their needs as well. This recommendation was approved by the Board
of Public Works at the November 3, 2004 meeting and the Department of Public Works has been
instructed to post the signs.
"An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." •
Additionally, Verizon has offered to improve the strip of land between the Friends of the Library
building and 531 Esty Street (The Miller Building), known as Allen Street (owned by Seany). In
order for this to be done, curb cuts will need to be approved and placed at each end of Allen
Street to allow for a one way traffic flow. (See attached map.) To date the approval process has
not been initiated.
Long Term Solution
As the City's vision for the west end comes to fruition, parking demands will continue to
increase. It is recommended that the city establish a capital project to purchase land in the area to
create an additional parking area. To support this project, it is suggested that a parking district be
established and property owners that benefit from the parking lot would be charged a special
assessment to cover the capital and operating costs incurred by the city. In discussions with area
merchants and property owners they agreed in concept to this recommendation.
West End Parking Supply ti
( / f.___ — _ ____ _
, I ----T
i I ---- I —7---Ni
i II /
,__ if 1 , /
A ..
._., I--,A' fill01 E 1
/ iii0111111.-...41441 I i 1111 1117*4
1
CASCADILLA STREET CASCADILLA STREET
Ti— LJ
II
IL
.., Al° m
o ,_ , I 1---
il
-1-1---Li- [1] n 1 Lt-_)
15 Minute4Parkin'g,4,Spaces,\\\\\\'On_Street'P arking.LSpacess, `_. ' ESTY STRFET
r_11.91ELLC Z
1 ffifice Building , v 1
Atli
1116 II III-
* Ithaca O* 0
Citti3Oamed Bakery to
Parking Cot k n__10
f
(-34 Sp```aces k- 1 `L f1 j C
r 1_ _�
6\\\\\\ \ w Vn Street Paking=12:Spaes)\
COUR STREET
❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ E. j L i o
�1 s �i❑ ❑ — o� --� �i
r i = Z
z
L ' m �L L° 0 ❑ 0 riTi
i L J I
r
rJ 1 (i ces
I
Legend FALOSTREET WESTBUFFALe
1 Tr- F - =T I � IT
—i Propery ' 1, 1 i 1 ,I
� I� C
Boundaries - ..vii J
L❑ 4 - ZParlung.Lot [_ 1 I I. I
i ', -, _ _r - 1 j, \ --_
Buildings I- I 1 r
\ Parking Areas 1 1 � -1 1 I 1 7I 11
j, r Il i-T j I`I . 1
— — I j I 1I III I. 1 a l H
1
I _
-
Scale: 1"=200' STATE RTE 79
City of Ithaca
Green Street Garage Options
Impacts on 5 Year Projections
11/17/2004
Assumptions/Notes for 5 year proiections:
Used information as provided to me by Planning Department
If we borrow in 2006 first debt payment is in 2007 Interest only, 2008 full debt payment of principal & interest
Feel interest rate of 5.75 %and 6%used may be high, but should be worst case scenario
We normally would borrow with BANS for first 5 years of project life at less interest rate
Projections are best estimate today based on all facts we have currently
Do not put much credit in 2007-2009 amounts-long ways out
Many assumptions built into these projections are subject to change significantly
like sales tax revenue, parking rate structure, interest rates,economy, assessments
For overall cumulative difference of each option see page 4 of expense projections
The cumulative difference is the budget gap the city will face to balance the budget during that 5 year period
Current cumulative difference without Green Garage work $ (2,791,281.00)
Green Garage Option 1 Rehab only
Cumulative difference for 5 year period 2005-2009 is $ (3,259,177.00)
Green Garage Option 2 Partial Construction
Cumulative difference for 5 year period 2005-2009 is $ (2,623,755.00)
Green Garage Option 4 Total Construction
Cumulative difference for 5 year period 2005-2009 is $ (2,781,875.00)
Summary
What does the projection tell me-based on information provided and estimates made,the options 2 and 4 make the most
financial sense. However, all of the options rely on the fact that the City must be able to afford this cost. We will be able to
have some of the debt exempt from the city's debt limit. How much of an exemption remains to be seen. We will have to
apply to the State Comptroller's Office for the exemption.
Again, my pitch would be if we can buy some time to see how revenues from the Southwest area come in;find out what the
demands of parking are after rates for parking are changed; keep the developer for the Theatre and Housing moving forward with
construction;find out where we stand financially after the all is said and done;find out the status of the Empire Zone; then,
the project makes sense.
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
LEGISLATIVE A1010 $ 95,847.00 $ 109,127.00 $ 83,134.00 $ 89,649.00 $ 91,441.98 $ 93,234.24 $ 95,061.63 $ 96,924.84
HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES A1011
OTHER SERVICE AGENCIES A1012 $ - $ 3,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
HUMAN SERVICES COALITION A1013 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00
TCAD A1014 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00
Communi Police Board A1015 $ 9,100.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,100.00 $ 10,201.00 $ 10,303.01 $ 10,406.04
CITY PROSECUTER A1110 $ - $ 6,200.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DRUG COURT A1111 $ 19,800.00 $ 12,915.00 $ 19,800.00 $ - $ -
DRUG FREE COMMUNITY PROGRAM $ 92,032.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00
FINANCE(Controller's Office) A1315 $ 259,818.00 $ 274,587.00 $ 269,814.00 $ 281,201.00 $ 286,825.02 $ 292,561.52 $ 298,412.75 $ 304,381.01
PURCHASING A1345 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CLERK'S OFFICE A1316 $ 117,926.00 $ 112,862.00 $ 116,058.00 $ 129,932.00 $ 132,530.64 $ 135,181.25 $ 137,884.88 $ 140,642.58
ELECTIONS A1450 $ 16,000.00 $ 15,799.00 $ 21,700.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00
RECORDS MANAGEMENT A1460 $ - $ 1,090.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE A1317 $ 218,240.00 $ 225,586.00 $ 239,074.00 $ 258,615.00 $ 263,787.30 $ 269,063.05 $ 274,444.31 $ 279,933.19
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS A1130 $ 61,582.00 $ 79,055.00 $ 104,373.00 $ 113,830.00 $ 116,106.60 $ 118,428.73 $ 120,797.31 $ 123,213.25
HUMAN RESOURCES A1430 $ 343,322.00 $ 366,191.00 $ 335,915.00 $ 350,111.00 $ 357,113.22 $ 364,255.48 $ 371,540.59 $ 378,971.41
INFORMATION SERVICES A1320 $ 305,706.00 $ 313,802.00 $ 462,860.00 $ 478,740.00 $ 488,314.80 $ 498,081.10 $ 508,042.72 $ 518,203.57
MAYOR'S OFFICE A1210 $ 82,088.00 $ 87,129.00 $ 146,460.00 $ 79,109.00 $ 80,691.18 $ 82,305.00 $ 83,951.10 $ 85,630.13
CITY ATTORNEY A1420 $ 276,282.00 $ 277,243.00 $ 276,494.00 $ 285,914.00 $ 291,632.28 $ 297,464.93 $ 303,414.22 $ 309,482.51
CITY HALL BUILDING COSTS COMBINED
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED INSURANCE A1910 $ 340,899.10 $ 341,146.00 $ 392,033.97 $ 427,000.00 $ 465,430.00 $ 502,664.40 $ 542,877.55 $ 586,307.76
MUNICIPAL ASSOC.DUES A1920 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,413.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 4,100.00
JUDGEMENT AND CLAIMS A1930 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 18,750.00
TAXES ON CITY PROPERTY A1950 $ 5,628.07 $ 2,640.00 $ 5,796.92 $ 5,970.82 $ 6,149.95 $ 6,334.45 $ 6,524.48 $ 6,720.22
REFUND OF PROP.TAXES A1964 $ - $ 42,635.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
PROVISION OF UNCOLL.TAXES A1984 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
MISCELLANEOUS A1989 $ 3,000.00 $ 15,878.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 14,230.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00
CONTINGENCY A1990 $ 130,944.00 $ - $ 182,000.00 $ 480,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
Pa ment to Coun for Di.atchers one-time
$ 287,195.00
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.:
ENGINEERING A1440 $ 173,275.00 $ 97,245.00 $ 180,360.00 $ 230,026.00 $ 234,626.52 $ 239,319.05 $ 244,105.43 $ 248,987.54
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN A1490 $ 122,349.00 $ 123,707.00 $ 125,384.00 $ 129,313.00 $ 131,899.26 $ 134,537.25 $ 137,227.99 $ 139,972.55
STREETS ADMIN. A5010 $ 212,150.00 $ 214,336.00 $ 217,346.00 $ 226,532.00 $ 231,062.64 $ 235,683.89 $ 240,397.57 $ 245,205.52
BLDG.SYSTEMS A1620 $ 157,030.00 $ 130,993.00 $ 158,321.00 $ 169,828.00 $ 173,224.56 $ 176,689.05 $ 180,222.83 $ 183,827.29
CITY HALL A1621 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BT-GLASS A1628 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL A3311 $ 132,975.00 $ 124,444.00 $ 135,205.00 $ 138,108.00 $ 140,870.16 $ 143,687.56 $ 146,561.31 $ 149,492.54
2005expgoodoptlgreenrampl1/17/2004 Page 1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActualProjections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRAFFIC SIGNALS A3312 $ 202,446.00 $ 201,272.00 $ 205,268.00 $ 219,551.00 $ 223,942.02 $ 228,420.86 $ 232,989.28 $ 237,649.06
TRANSPORTATION MAINT.
MAINT.OF ROADS A5111 ' $ 503,977.00 $ 637,980.00 $ 822,511.00 $ 939,000.00 $ 1,057,780.00 $ 1,178,935.60 $ 1,202,514.31 $ 1,226,564.60
ST.&RD.PATCHING A5112 $ 66,977.00 $ 18,268.00 $ 44,036.00 $ 45,082.00 $ 45,983.64 $ 46,903.31 $ 47,841.38 $ 48,798.21
SURFACE TREATMENT A5113 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BRIDGE MAINT. A5120 $ - $ 95.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 41,750.00 $ 57,585.00 $ 73,736.70 $ 85,211.43
STREET LIGHTING A5182 $ 370,000.00 $ 327,821.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 362,048.00 $ 365,668.48 $ 376,638.53 $ 387,937.69 $ 399,575.82
SNOW REMOVAL A5142 $ 201,117.00 $ 216,655.00 $ 204,541.00 $ 214,818.00 $ 216,966.18 $ 221,305.50 $ 225,731.61 $ 230,246.25
STREET CLEANING A8170 $ 81,413.00 $ 59,081.00 $ 83,321.00 $ 83,748.00 $ 85,422.96 $ 87,131.42 $ 88,874.05 $ 90,651.53
STORM SEWER MAINT. A8141 $ 51,667.00 $ 33,991.00 $ 27,011.00 $ 26,950.00 $ 27,489.00 $ 28,038.78 $ 28,599.56 $ 29,171.55
GARAGE A5132 $ 331,125.00 $ 308,678.00 $ 340,242.00 $ 349,496.00 $ 356,485.92 $ 363,615.64 $ 370,887.95 $ 378,305.71
COMMONS/SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALKS A5410 $ 800.00 $ - $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00
COMMONS MAINT. A5411 $ 91,400.00 $ 96,668.00 $ 88,331.00 $ 92,340.00 $ 94,186.80 $ 96,070.54 $ 97,991.95 $ 99,951.79
TRANSIT SYSTEM
BUS OPERATION A5630 $ 1,198,760.00 $ 880,870.00 $ 1,234,207.00 $ 510,369.00 $ 201,137.00 $ 207,171.11 $ 213,386.24 $ 219,787.83
NORTHEAST TRANSIT A5631 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PARKING SYSTEMS
LOT D A5651 $ 74,436.00 $ 62,050.00 $ 75,859.00 $ 77,325.00 $ 78,871.50 $ 80,448.93 $ 82,057.91 $ 83,699.07
SENECA ST.RAMP A5652 $ 79,531.00 $ 80,004.00 $ 79,372.00 $ 84,974.00 $ 86,673.48 $ 88,406.95 $ 90,175.09 $ 91,978.59
GREEN ST.RAMP A5653 $ 42,673.00- $ 66,142.00 $ 43,108.00 $ 66,017.00 $ 67,337.34 $ 68,684.09 $ 70,057.77 $ 71,458.92
DRYDEN RD.RAMP A5654 $ 118,838.00 $ 127,610.00 $ 122,835.00 $ 123,239.00 $ 125,703.78 $ 128,217.86 $ 130,782.21 $ 133,397.86
Cayuga Garage A5655 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Fin.Assistance Cayuga Green A5655-5435 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,050,000.00 $ 800,000.00
PARKS SYSTEMS
PARKS&FORESTRY A7111 $ 327,365.00 $ 341,110.00 $ 334,695.00 $ 350,618.00 $ 357,630.36 $ 364,782.97 $ 372,078.63 $ 379,520.20
STEWARTPARK A7112 $ 74,811.00 $ 75,156.00 $ 75,824.00 $ 80,766.00 $ 82,381.32 $ 84,028.95 $ 85,709.53 $ 87,423.72
SIX MILE PARK A7113 $ 10,240.00 $ 7,612.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,444.80 $ 10,653.70 $ 10,866.77 $ 11,084.11
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A7114 $ 10,950.00 $ 9,781.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 11,169.00 $ 11,392.38 $ 11,620.23 $ 11,852.63
BEACH&POOLS A7181 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK POOL&RINK A7182 $ - . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK FIELDS A7183 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
GOLF COURSE A7250 $ 186,430.00 $ 182,410.00 $ 197,792.00 $ 194,956.00 $ 198,855.12 $ 202,832.22 $ 206,888.87 $ 211,026.64
REFUSE&GARBAGE• A8160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
RECYCLING PROGRAM* A8161 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
FLOOD&EROSION CONTROL
FALL CREEK STATION A8142 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,334.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,958.00 $ 3,017.16 $ 3,077.50 $ 3,139.05
FLOOD CONTROL A8745 $ 33,392.00 $ 63,515.00 $ 33,212.00 $ 34,073.00 $ 34,754.46 $ 35,449.55 $ 36,158.54 $ 36,881.71
CITY CEMETERY A8810 $ 8,750.00 $ 7,070.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,925.00 $ 9,103.50 $ 9,285.57 $ 9,471.28
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
POLICE DEPT. A3120 $ 5,678,423.00 $ 5,687,060.00 $ 5,754,074.00 $ 5,832,055.00 $ 5,948,696.10 $ 6,067,670.02 $ 6,189,023.42 $ 6,312,803.89
FIRE DEPT. A3410 $ 4,376,639.00 $ 4,393,975.00 $ 4,551,708.00 $ 4,924,292.00 $ 5,022,777.84 $ 5,123,233.40 $ 5,225,698.06 $ 5,330,212.03
CONTROL OF DOGS A3510 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,677.75 $ 41,084.53 $ 41,495.37 $ 41,910.33
BUILDING DEPT. A3620 $ 596,444.00 $ 579,921.00 $ 606,798.00 $ 644,216.00 $ 657,100.32 $ 670,242.33 $ 683,647.17 $ 697,320.12
CONTRIBUTION TO BID A6995 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00
2005expgoodoptlgreenramp11/17/2004 Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActuaVProjections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
YOUTH BUREAU:
YOUTH BUREAU A7310 $ 1,897727.00 $ 1,895,657.00 $ 1,868,639.00 $ 2,054,960.00 $ 2,096,059.20 $ 2,137,980.38 $ 2,180,739.99 $ 2,224,354.79
GIAC A7311 $ 768,200.00 $ 731,744.00 $ 781,995.00 $ 809,365.00 $ 825,552.30 $ 842,063.35 $ 858,904.61 $ 876,082.71
SOUTHSIDE CENTER-Maint A7312 $ 105,915.00 $ 119,349.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 55,517.58 $ 56,627.93 $ 57,760.49 $ 58,915.70
SSCC funding A7312-5435 $ 126,380.00 $ 128,907.60 $ 131,485.75 $ 134,115.47 $ 136,797.78
CELEBRATIONS A7550 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT A8020 $ 440,396.00 $ 452,325.00 $ 389,134.00 $ 473,981.00 $ 483,460.62 $ 493,129.83 $ 502,992.43 $ 513,052.28
COMMONS ADVISORY A8510 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
LOW&MOD.INCOME HOUSING A8515 $ 13,750.00 $ - $ 6,600.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00
ENERGY COMM. A8570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT A9010 $ 409,963.00 $ 336,597.00 $ 884,435.00 $ 832,578.00 $ 849,229.56 $ 866,214.15 $ 883,538.43' $ 901,209.20
POLICE&FIRE RETIREMENT A9015 $ 602,857.00 $ 453,924.00 $ 1,147,997.00 $ 1,380,000.00 $ 1,407,600.00 $ 1,435,752.00 $ 1,464,467.04 $ 1,493,756.38
SOCIAL SECURITY A9030 $ 1,280,453.00 $ 1,267,526.00 $ 1,320,397.00 $ 1,345,466.00 $ 1,406,011.97 $ 1,476,312.57 $ 1,520,601.95 $ 1,566,220.00
WORKERS COMPENSATION A9040 $ 476,621.00- $ 388,440.00 $ 560,003.00 $ 590,750.00 $ 620,287.50 $ 651,301.88 $ 683,866.97 $ 718,060.32
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE A9050 $ 116,788.00 $ 27,530.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
HEALTH INSURANCE A9060 $ 4,223,058.00 $ 4,464,606.00 $ 4,862,131.00 $ 5,046,116.00 $ 5,651,649.92 $ 6,103,781.91 $ 6,408,971.01 $ 6,729,419.56
DENTAL INSURANCE A9070 $ 74,089.00 $ 64,923.00 $ 76,311.67 $ 76,312.00 $ 77,075.12 $ 78,616.62 $ 80,975.12 $ 83,404.37
DAY CARE PROGRAM A9080 $ 82,500.00-' $ 61,838.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,700.00 $ 71,407.00 $ 72,121.07 $ 72,842.28
SUPP.BENEFIT DISABLED FIRE A9085 $ 32,834.00 $ 30,241.00 $ 35,646.00 $ 30,443.00 $ 31,356.29 $ 32,296.98 $ 33,265.89 $ 34,263.86
UNDISTRIBUTED BENEFITS ABSENCES A9088 $ - $ -
EMPLOYEE TUITION A9089 $ 15,000.00 $ 19,408.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 29,250.00 $ 30,127.50 $ 31,031.33 $ 31,962.26 $ 32,921.13
SERIAL BONDS A9710 - $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,314,465.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00
INT.ON SERIAL BONDS A9711 $ 523,969.00 $ 524,865.00 $ 446,906.00 $ 1,064,417.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,357,921.00 $ 1,297,808.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.BONDS A9720 $ 701,374.00 $ 701,374.00 $ 725,121.00 3 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.INT. A9721 $ 259,760.00 -$ 259,760.00 $ 227,026.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES A9730 $ 1,726,783.00- 1,726,783.00 $ 2,151,769.00 $ 1,122,343.00 $ 1,649,408.00 $ 1,527,717.00 $ 1,712,903.00 $ 2,023,523.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE INT. A9731 $ 425,384.00_ $ 437,788.00 $ 383,292.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00
$ 253,345.00 $ 336,522.00 $ 336,522.00
PAYING AGENT FEE A9795 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,337.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL FUND A9950 $ - $ - $ -
$ -
2005expgoodoptlgreenrampl1/17/2004 Page 3
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActuaVProjections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
•
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL RESERVE A9951 $ - $ - $ -
$
TRANSFERS TO SOLID WASTE A9952 $ - $ - $ 39,895.00 $ 71,572.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 33,490,883.17 $ 33,018,496.00 $ 36,559,637.55 $ 38,432,337.82 $ 40,394,678.44 $ 41,809,831.44 $ 43,208,225.79 $ 43,895,068.21
TOTAL REVENUES : $ 33,490,883.00 $ 33,133,783.00' $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,495,338.06 $ 39,579,381.69 $ 40,934,804.67 $ 42,157,254.67 $ 43,314,185.72
ACTUAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
POTENTIAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE
PROJECTED/Actual DIFFERENCE $ (0.17) $ 115,287.00 $ (0.30) $ 63,000.23 $ (815,296.75) $ (875,026.78) $ (1,050,971.12) $ (580,882.49)
PROJECTED CUMULATIVE DIFFERENCE $ - $ (3,259,176.90)
2005expgoodoptlgreenrampl1/17/2004 Page 4
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
r
19 20 21 22 23 ff_ 24_ 24
Adopted Adopted - PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION -ACCOUNT NO. BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
COLLEGETOWN ASSES. A1022 $ 38,980 00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ - 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ -- 38,980 00 S 38 980.00 $ -
--. - -- -
COMMONS ASSES. _ A1003 $
BID A_SSESSMENT A1004 $
UNNEEDED RESERVE FOR TAXES A1050 $ - _ _ ---- _ _ _
PAYMENTS IN
&PEN.ON O TAX A1090 $ 155,000.00 $ 85515.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 119,600.00 $ 124,384 00 $ 129,359.36 i$ 1.34 533 73_
__ $ 206,000.00 $ 118 247.00 $ 206,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 128,750.00 $ 132,612.50 $ 136,590.88
PENALTIES ON ASSES __ A1091 $ 50.00 $
$ .__---- 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ - 50.00 $ 50.00 I $ _ 50.00
_PROPERTY TAX ITEMS _
SALES&USE TAX __ A1101 $ - 7,832,329 00 $ 7,998,704.00 $ 8,391,727.65 $ 9,117,400.00 $ 9,535564,00 $ 9,862,373 56 $ 10107002 77 _ $ 10A27,040.88
UTILITIES GROSS REC.TAX -I A1131 -330,000.00 $ 307,466.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 306,000.00 $ 312,120.00 $ $ 324,729.65 j $ 331,224.24
FRANCHISES _ A1170 $ 185,000.00 $ 215,519.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 226,600.00 $ 237,930.00 $ 249,826 50 $ 262 317.83 i $ 275,433.72
NON PROPERTY TAX ITEMS__
CITY CHAMBERLAIN FEES I _A1230 $ 65,000.00 $ 65 112.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70 000.00 I $ 70,000.00
TAX SALE ADVERTISING A1235 $_ 2,000.00 $ 982.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ _ 2,000.00
CITY CLERK FEES A1255 $ 11,750.00 $ 15,424.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12500.00 12500.00
- - - 00 $ 12
Other General Dept Income A1289 $ - $ 5,720 00 $
POLICE DEPT.FEES A1520 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,683.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
DOG CONTROL FEES 1 A1550 _ $ 1,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
SAFETY INSPEC.FEES A1560 $ 90,340.00 $ 65,785.00 $ 90,340.00 $ _ 92,598.50 $ 94,913.46 $ 97,286.30 $ 99,718.46 $ 102,211.42
Electical Inspections_ A1561 $ - $ 53511.00 $ 55500.00 $ 60500.00 $ 61,500.00 $ $ 64513.44 $ 66,228.77
--
FIRE INSPEC.FEES __A1565 _ $ 35,000 00 $ 32 774.00 $ -_- 50,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 54,080.00 $ 56,243.20 $ 58 492.93 $ 60,832.65
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES A1710 $ 60,000.00 $ 34,71350 $ 60500.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 6050050 $ 60,000 00J $ 6050050 y $ 60 000.00
PARKING LOTS&GARAGES A1720 $ 685,000.00 $ 805,040.00 $ 810,000.00 $ _ 880,000.00 $ 880,000.00 $ 897,600.00 $ 906,576.00_ $ 915 641.76
Cayuga_Garage _ _ $ - $ - $
METERED PARKING A1740 $ 430,000.00 $ 523,211.00 $ 505,000.00 $ 736,000.00 $ 736,000.00 $ 743,360.00 $ 750,793.60 $ 848,925.00
BUS OPERATIONS - - A1750 $ $ - $ $ - - $ - $ - - _ $ _ $ -
NORTHEAST TRANSIT -- - - A1751 $ _ - $ $ - $ $ - $ • $ - - $
TRANSPORTATION FEES
PARKS&_REC.CHARGES A2001 $ 330,565.00 $ 246,673.00 $ 348,157.00 $ 356,387.00 $ 359,950.87 $ 363,550.38 $ 367,185.88 $ 370,857.74
REC.CONCESSION A2012 $ 111,110.00 $ 78508.00 $ 91,11050 $ 91,11050 $ 92521.10 $ 92,941.31 $ 93,870.72 $ 94,809.43
GOLF COURSE CONCESSIONS __ ___ A2013_ $ 2,000.00 $ 3,766.00 2,000.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00
GOLF COURSE PRO SHOP A2014 $ _10,000.00 $ 9,474.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ $ 10,000.00
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A2015 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,625.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.001$ 15,000.00
BEACH &POOL CHARGES _A2025 $ 54,500.00 $ 47,642.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,860.00 $ 87,728.60 $ 88,605.89 $ 89,491.94
ALEX HALEY POOL CHARGES $ 7,500.00 $ 5,312.00 $ _ 7,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00
GOLF COURSE CHARGES A2050 ___ $ 169,950.00 $ 151,360.00 $ 175,048.50 $ 180,299.96 $ 185,708.95 $ 191,280.22 $ 197,018.63 $ -202,929.19
ICE RINK_C_HARGES _ A2065_ $ - 158,100.00 $ 160,297.00 $ 177,000.00 $ 177,000.00 $ 182,310.00 $ 187,779.30 $ 193Al2.68 $ 199215.06
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR YOUTH A2070 $ 153,055.00 $ 138,798.00 $ 159581.00 $ 143,172.00 $ 147,467.16 $ 151591.17 $ 156,447.91 $ 161,141.35
RECREATION PROGRAM FEES __ __
ZONING FEES_ --- - 82110 - $ -_ 2,300.00 $ 6,425.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,296.00 $ 3,394.88 $ - 3,496.73 $ 3,601.63
SITE DEVEL.FEES _ _ A2111 $ _ 210500.00 $ 63,467.00 $ __ 190,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60500.00 $ 60,00050
SUBDIVISION&_SIGN FEES $ 500.00 $ 5,702.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
CEMETERY SERVICES A2192 $ 250050 $ 175.00 $ $ 2,000.00 i$ 2500.00 $ 2500.00 $ 2500.00 $ 2500.00
HOME&COMMUNITY SERVICE FEES __
CIVIL SERVICE CHARGES _ A2220 _ $ 40500.00 $ 39,920.00 $ 40500.00 $ 4250050 $ 43260.00 $ 44557.80 $ 45,894.53 $ 47,271 37
PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE/SCHOOL DIST. A2260 $ -
TRANSIT PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT __ A2261 $ 1,031,578 00 $ 961,767.00 $ 1,190,037.00 $ 315,090.00 $ _ - $ _ -
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE A2262 ' $ 2,001,464.00 $ 1,907,693.00 $- - 2,176,063.00 _$ _2,438,769.00 $ 2,499,738.23 2,562,231.68 ' $ - 2,626,287A7 $ 2,691,944.66
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES , A2300 I $ 128,000.00 $ _ 128,000.00 $ 128,000.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00
DWI PROGRAM TO.CO A2310 _ $ - - $ 8,471.00 $ - $ 9500.00 $ 9500.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00
YOUTH_SERVICES Other Governments A2350 $ 633,854.00 $ 682,218.00 $ 496,337.00 $ 565,914.00 $ 582,891.42 $ 600378.16 $ 618,389.51 $ 636 941.19
INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGES _ I A2375 $ 151250.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 141,250.00 $ 53,190.00 $ _ 53,190.00 $ _53,190.00 $ __ 53,190.00} $ _ 5319050
BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT OTHER _ , A2376 $ 1500.00 $ 1568.00 $ 1590.00 $ 150050 $ 1532.50 $ 1565.81 $ 1,399.96 $ 1A34.96
COUNTY CO_ NRTIBUTION/CELEBRATIONS A2377 $ - $__ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
INTEREST&EARNINGS _ A2401 $ 250500.00 $ 51,830.00 $ 200500.00 $ 250500.00 $ 380500.00 $ 400,00050 $ 450500.00 $ 450,000.00
RENTAL OF PROPERTY A2410 $ 100,000.00 $ 116,808.00 $ 117,000.00 $ 141,000.00 $ 195,000.00 $ 250,350.00 , $ 307,084.00 365,236.00
2005revsoptlgreenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
t 9 20 21 22 23 2
- - - -
1 - 4 i 24
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED I PROJECTED PROJECTED
- -__ _ 2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N O j BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET I BUD GET BUD GET
RENT GOLF CART QRENTAL T A2415 $ 40,000.00 $ _-_31,598.00 $ 40,000 00 $ 38,000 00 $ 41,000.00 $ 41A00.00 $ 41,000.00
I $ 41,000.00
TELEPHONE COMMISSION A2450 $ 2,500.00 $ 54.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00_$ 200.00 $ 200.00_
USE OF MONEY&PROPERTY _
BUSINESS&OCC.LICENSES A2501 $ 1,500.00 $ 565.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
BINGO LIC.AND FEES A2540 $ 1,200.00 $ 221.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
DOG LICENSES _ A2542_ $ __ 5,000.00 $ 5,567.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
BICYCLE LICENSES A2545 $ 100.00 $ 28,00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
PUBLIC SAFETY PERMITS A2550 1 $ _ 7,700.00 $ 5,178.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00
BUILDING&ALTER.PERMIT A2555 384,000.00 $ 514,170.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 584,961.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175 000.00
STREET OPEN PERMITS A2560 $ 1,000.00 $ 963.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ _ 1 000.00
OTHER PERMITS A25
OT90 $ _ 22,000.00 $_ _3,175.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
}
LICENSES&PERMIT FEES_
FINES&FORFEITED BAIL A2610 $ 800,000.00 $ 760483.00+$ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,180,433.46 $ 1,192,237.79 $ 1,204 160 17 i $ 1,216 201 77
DOG FINES T A2611 $ _ 800.00 $ 470.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1 00000 $ 1,000.00
FINES&FORFEITURES
- --- -. -_ --- - --- --- - -.- -
MINOR SALES I A2655 $_._ 4,000.00 $ 4,729.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 ' $ 4,000.00
SALE OF PROPERTY _ A2660 $ 296,318.00-}$ 251,073.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 I $
1 27 700.00
SALE OF EQUIPMENT A2665 $ 20,000.00 I $ 7,608.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10,000.00
INSURANCE RECOVERIES A2680 - $ 100,000.00 ' $ 68,326.00 $ 100,000.00 $ _80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00
OTHER COMP.FOR LOSS A2690 $ 1,000.00 $ 22,634.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,00050 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
SALE OF PROP.&COMP.FOR LOSS _ __
REFUND OF PRIOR YR.EXP. A2701_ $ 1,000.00 $ 45,146.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
GIFTS&DONATIONS A2705 $ 710000.00 $ 742,089.00 $ 1,266,000.00 $ 1,210A00 AO $ 1,160000.00 $ 1,110,000.00 $ 1,143,300.00 $ 1,177,599.00
CONT.LOW&MOD.HOUSING A2706 $ 22,350.00 $ _ 10,797.00 $ 44,700.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 16,000.00
UNCLASSIFIED REVENUES A2770 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,602.00 $ 3,569.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS
TRANS.FROM WATER FUND A2801 _ $ 288,590.64 $ 288,591.00 $ 293,501.00 $ 318,056.00 $ 327597.68 $ 337,425.61 $ 347,548.38 $
TRANS.FROM SEWER FUND A2802 $ 271,054.80 $ 271,055.00 $ 327,933.00 $ 365,000.00 $ 375,950.00 $ 387,228.50 $ 398,845.36 $ 410,810.72
TRANS.FROM CAPITAL FUND A2803 $ 1,908,851.00 $ 1,529,321.00 $ 1,493,851.00 $ 1,209,932.00 $ 1,100000.00 $ 725,915.00 $ 560,000.00 $ 560,000.00
TRANS.FROM JOINT ACTIVITY A2804 $ 262,846.00 $ 203,788.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 225,500.00 $ 231,137.50 $ 236,915.94 $ 242,838.84 $ 248,909.81
TRANS.FROM SOLID WASTE --_ A2805- $ 19,915.00 $ $ $ _ $ $ $ - $ -
TRANS.FROM T&A FUND A2807 _ $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ _ $
TRANS.FROM DEBT SERVICE $ 225,512.00 $ 253564.00 $ 254,704.00 $ 280,728.00 $ 240000.00 $ 210000.00 $ 210000.00 $ 210000.00
INTERFUND REVENUES
STATE AID PER CAPITA A3001 _ $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,682.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00
STATE AID-MORTGAGE TAX A3005 $ 265,000.00 $ 504,337.00 $ 265,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00
STATE AID-COURT FACILITY A3021 $ 64,000.00 $ 59,148.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00
STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM A3089 $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $
STATE AID-RECORDS MANAGE. A3060 $ - $ - $ - $ _ - $ - $ - $ - $
STATE AID-SECURITY SERVICE A3330 $ 75,140.00 $ 85,770.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 82,400.00 $ 84,872.00 $ 87,418.16 $ 90,040.70 $ 92,741.93
STATE AID-PUBLIC SAFETY A3389 $ _ 10,000.00 $ 9,894.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
STATE AID-C.H.I.P.S _ A3501 $ ___ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM REIMB A3589 $ 3,768 07 $ 1,044.00 $ 3556.47 $ 4,154.30 $ 4562.01 $ 4580.11 $ 4509.12 $ 5 A49.57
STATE AID REC.FOR ELDERLY A3801 $ $ $ - $ $ - - $ - $ $
STATE AID YOUTH PROGRAM I A3820 $ 134,824 00 $ 146,007.00 $ 135,147.00$ 138,769.00 $ 135,147.00 $ 135 14700 $ 135,147.00 $ 135,147.00
STATE AID-HOME&COM.SER.\STATE AID A3989 _ $ _ - $ _ $ __ • $ - $ - $ 1 $
_
STATE AID-CODE ENFORCEMENT A3995 $ $ 4,859.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ $ -
STATE AID - - - - -- - - - --- -
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY A4320 $__ -- - - - ---- - - $
$ 50000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50 000 00 50,000.00
FEDERAL AID-DRUG COURT/DOMIST.VIOL A4350 $ _- 50000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 59,575.00 $ 19575.00 $ 19,575.00 1 $ 19,575.00_1_1 $ _ 19,575.00
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY OTH DRUG A4389 $ - $ 108 700.00 $ $ - $ $ -- - f$ - I $ -
2005revsopt1greenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 1 Rehab Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:50 AM
. I
19 20 --_21 22 23 24 24
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO --_BUDGET i ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET _. BUDGET
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY HEALTH A4489 $ - $ - $ $ $ __-- L$ $ -
FEDERAL AID-YOUTH PROG. A4820 $ ___ - $ 3,404.00 $ - $ 76,846.0.0 $ 50,000.00 $ - $ $ -
FEDERAL AID-TRANSPORTATION A4589 $ - $ - $ - $ --- - $ $ - $ $
FEDERAL AID-DISASTER ASSISTANCE A4960 $ - $-_.--_ - $ - $ - $ - $ $
-FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4989 $ - $ $ 126,950.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 30,000.00 7 $ 20,000.00 $ -
------------- — ------- -
---- -----
FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4991 $ - $ 48,500.00 $ - $ _ $ - $ - $ -
FEDERAL AID
SUB-TOTAL $ 23,370,325.51 $ 22,956,825.00 $ 24,830,509.62 $_ 24,982,558.75 $ 24,709,919.34 $ 24,791,029.40 $ 25,196,604.37 $ 25,844,715.91
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE i $ 10,120,557.20 $ 10 176,958.00 $ 11,729,127.63 $ 13,512,779.31 $ 14,869,462.35 $ 16,143,775.27 $ 16,960,650.30 ! $ 17,469,469.81
TOTAL REVENUE i $ 33,490,882.71 $ 33,133,783.00 $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,495,338.06 $ 39,579,381.69 $ 40,934,804.67 $ 42,157,254.67 F$ 43,314,185.72
/o_increase(decrease)OVER PREVIOUS YEAR
$ 0.06331 $ --__ 1.04161 $ 0.09163 $ 0.05295 $ 0.02816 $ 0.03425 $ 0.02986 1$ 0.02744
ASSESSED VALUE AT BUDGET ADOPTION $ 865,744,842.00 J
$ 918,490,809.00 $ 1,023,695,402.00 $ 1,072,832,781.30 $ 1,109,309,095 86 $ 1 131 495 277 78 I $ 1 131,495,277 78
% Change from PREVIOUS YEAR add 30%development add 40%development add 25%development'add 5%development
NET% increase(reduction)from PREVIOUS YEAR_ 1 2.95% 6.09% 11.45% 4.8%INCR.ASSES. 3.4%INCR.ASSES. 2%INCR.ASSES. 0%INCR.ASSES.
TAX RATE PER$1000 1 $11.69/$1000 __$12.77/_$1000 $13.20/$1000 $14.0789/$1000 $14.7829/$1000 _ $15.2264/$1000 $15.68.31/$1000
PROJECTED INCREASE IN RATE over 5s OF 337 %,5,5,3,3 $ 11.690000 $ __ 12.7700 $ 13.2000 $ 13.8600 $ — 14.5530 $ 14.9896 $ 15.4393
2005revsoptlgreenrampl 1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 3
1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActuaVProjections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
LEGISLATIVE A1010 ' $ 95,847.00 $ 109,127.00 $ 83,134.00 $ 89,649.00 $ 91,441.98 $ 93,234.24 $ 95,061.63 $ 96,924.84
HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES A1011
OTHER SERVICE AGENCIES A1012 $ - $ 3,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
HUMAN SERVICES COALITION A1013 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00
TCAD A1014 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00
Community Police Board A1015 $ 9,100.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,100.00 $ 10,201.00 $ 10,303.01 $ 10,406.04
CITY PROSECUTER A1110 $ - $ 6,200.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DRUG COURT A1111 $ 19,800.00 $ 12,915.00 $ 19,800.00 $ - $ -
DRUG FREE COMMUNITY PROGRAM $ 92,032.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00
FINANCE(Controller's Office) A1315 $ 259,818.00 $ 274,587.00 $ 269,814.00 $ 281,201.00 $ 286,825.02 $ 292,561.52 $ 298,412.75 $ 304,381.01
PURCHASING A1345 $ - $ - $ ' - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CLERK'S OFFICE A1316 $ 117,926.00 $ 112,862.00 $ 116,058.00 $ 129,932.00 $ 132,530.64 $ 135,181.25 $ 137,884.88 $ 140,642.58
ELECTIONS A1450 $ 16,000.00 $ 15,799.00 $ 21,700.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00
RECORDS MANAGEMENT A1460 $ - $ 1,090.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE A1317 $ 218,240.00 $ 225,586.00 $ 239,074.00 $ 258,615.00 $ 263,787.30 $ 269,063.05 $ 274,444.31 $ 279,933.19
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS A1130 $ 61,582.00 $ 79,055.00 $ 104,373.00 $ 113,830.00 $ 116,106.60 $ 118,428.73 $ 120,797.31 $ 123,213.25
HUMAN RESOURCES A1430 $ 343,322.00 $ 366,191.00 $ 335,915.00 $ 350,111.00 $ 357,113.22 $ 364,255.48 $ 371,540.59 $ 378,971.41
INFORMATION SERVICES A1320 $ 305,706.00 $ 313,802.00 $ 462,860.00 $ 478,740.00 $ 488,314.80 $ 498,081.10 $ 508,042.72 $ 518,203.57
MAYOR'S OFFICE A1210 $ 82,088.00 $ 87,129.00 $ 146,460.00 $ 79,109.00 $ 80,691.18 $ 82,305.00 $ 83,951.10 $ 85,630.13
CITY ATTORNEY A1420 $ 276,282.00 $ 277,243.00 $ 276,494.00 $ 285,914.00 $ 291,632.28 $ 297,464.93 $ 303,414.22 $ 309,482.51
CITY HALL BUILDING COSTS COMBINED
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED INSURANCE A1910 $ 340,899.10 $ 341,146.00 $ 392,033.97 $ 427,000.00 $ 465,430.00 $ 502,664.40 $ 542,877.55 $ 586,307.76
MUNICIPAL ASSOC.DUES A1920 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,413.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 4,100.00
JUDGEMENT AND CLAIMS A1930 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 18,750.00
TAXES ON CITY PROPERTY A1950 $ 5,628.07 $ 2,640.00 $ 5,796.92 $ 5,970.82 $ 6,149.95 $ 6,334.45 $ 6,524.48 $ 6,720.22
REFUND OF PROP.TAXES A1964 $ - $ 42,635.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PROVISION OF UNCOLL.TAXES A1984 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
MISCELLANEOUS A1989 $ 3,000.00 $ 15,878.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 14,230.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00
CONTINGENCY A1990 $ 130,944.00 $ - $ 182,000.00 $ 480,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
Payment to County for Dipatchers(one-time) $ 287,195.00
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.:
ENGINEERING A1440 $ 173,275.00 $ 97,245.00 $ 180,360.00 $ 230,026.00 $ 234,626.52 $ 239,319.05 $ 244,105.43 $ 248,987.54
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN A1490 $ 122,349.00 $ 123,707.00 $ 125,384.00 $ 129,313.00 $ 131,899.26 $ 134,537.25 $ 137,227.99 $ 139,972.55
STREETS ADMIN. A5010 $ 212,150.00 $ 214,336.00 $ 217,346.00 $ 226,532.00 $ 231,062.64 $ 235,683.89 $ 240,397.57 $ 245,205.52
BLDG.SYSTEMS A1620 $ 157,030.00 $ 130,993.00 $ 158,321.00 $ 169,828.00 $ 173,224.56 $ 176,689.05 $ 180,222.83 $ 183,827.29
CITY HALL A1621 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BT-GLASS A1628 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL A3311 $ 132,975.00 $ 124,444.00 $ 135,205.00 $ 138,108.00 $ 140,870.16 $ 143,687.56 $ 146,561.31 $ 149,492.54
2005expgoodopt2greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRAFFIC SIGNALS A3312 $ 202,446.00 $ 201,272.00 $ 205,268.00 $ 219,551.00 $ 223,942.02 $ 228,420.86 $ 232,989.28 $ 237,649.06
TRANSPORTATION MAINT.
MAINT.OF ROADS A5111 $ 503,977.00 $ 637,980.00 $ 822,511.00 $ 939,000.00 $ 1,057,780.00 $ 1,178,935.60 $ 1,202,514.31 $ 1,226,564.60
ST.&RD.PATCHING A5112 $ 66,977.00 $ 18,268.00 $ 44,036.00 $ 45,082.00 $ 45,983.64 $ 46,903.31 $ 47,841.38 $ 48,798.21
SURFACE TREATMENT A5113 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BRIDGE MAINT. A5120 $ - $ 95.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 41,750.00 $ 57,585.00 $ 73,736.70 $ 85,211.43
STREET LIGHTING A5182 $ 370,000.00 $ 327,821.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 362,048.00 $ 365,668.48 $ 376,638.53 $ 387,937.69 $ 399,575.82
SNOW REMOVAL A5142 $ 201,117.00 $ 216,655.00 $ 204,541.00 $ 214,818.00 $ 216,966.18 $ 221,305.50 $ 225,731.61 $ 230,246.25
STREET CLEANING A8170 $ 81,413.00 $ 59,081.00 $ 83,321.00 $ 83,748.00 $ 85,422.96 $ 87,131.42 $ 88,874.05 $ 90,651.53
STORM SEWER MAINT. A8141 $ 51,667.00 $ 33,991.00 $ 27,011.00 $ 26,950.00 $ 27,489.00 $ 28,038.78 $ 28,599.56 $ 29,171.55
GARAGE A5132 $ 331,125.00 $ 308,678.00 $ 340,242.00 $ 349,496.00 $ 356,485.92 $ 363,615.64 $ 370,887.95 $ 378,305.71
COMMONS/SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALKS A5410 $ 800.00 $ - $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00
COMMONS MAINT. A5411 $ 91,400.00 $ 96,668.00 $ 88,331.00 $ 92,340.00 $ 94,186.80 $ 96,070.54 $ 97,991.95 $ 99,951.79
TRANSIT SYSTEM
BUS OPERATION A5630 $ 1,198,760.00 $ 880,870.00 $ 1,234,207.00 $ 510,369.00 $ 201,137.00 $ 207,171.11 $ 213,386.24 $ 219,787.83
NORTHEAST TRANSIT A5631 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PARKING SYSTEMS
LOT D A5651 $ 74,436.00 $ 62,050.00 $ 75,859.00 $ 77,325.00 $ 78,871.50 $ 80,448.93 $ 82,057.91 $ 83,699.07
SENECA ST.RAMP A5652 $ 79,531.00 $ 80,004.00 $ 79,372.00 $ 84,974.00 $ 86,673.48 $ 88,406.95 $ 90,175.09 $ 91,978.59
GREEN ST.RAMP A5653 $ 42,673.00 $ 66,142.00 $ 43,108.00 $ 66,017.00 $ 67,337.34 $ 68,684.09 $ 70,057.77 $ 71,458.92
DRYDEN RD.RAMP A5654 $ 118,838.00 $ 127,610.00 $ 122,835.00 $ 123,239.00 $ 125,703.78 $ 128,217.86 $ 130,782.21 $ 133,397.86
Cayuga Garage A5655 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Fin.Assistance Cayuga Green A5655-5435 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,050,000.00 $ 800,000.00
PARKS SYSTEMS
PARKS&FORESTRY A7111 $ 327,365.00 $ 341,110.00 $ 334,695.00 $ 350,618.00 $ 357,630.36 $ 364,782.97 $ 372,078.63 $ 379,520.20
STEWART PARK A7112 $ 74,811.00 $ 75,156.00 $ 75,824.00 $ 80,766.00 $ 82,381.32 $ 84,028.95 $ 85,709.53 $ 87,423.72
SIX MILE PARK A7113 $ 10,240.00 $ 7,612.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,444.80 $ 10,653.70 $ 10,866.77 $ 11,084.11
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A7114 $ 10,950.00 $ 9,781.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 11,169.00 $ 11,392.38 $ 11,620.23 $ 11,852.63
BEACH&POOLS A7181 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK POOL&RINK A7182 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK FIELDS A7183 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
GOLF COURSE A7250 $ 186,430.00 $ 182,410.00 $ 197,792.00 $ 194,956.00 $ 198,855.12 $ 202,832.22 $ 206,888.87 $ 211,026.64
REFUSE&GARBAGE• A8160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
RECYCLING PROGRAM• A8161 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
FLOOD&EROSION CONTROL
FALL CREEK STATION A8142 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,334.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,958.00 $ 3,017.16 $ 3,077.50 $ 3,139.05
FLOOD CONTROL A8745 $ 33,392.00 $ 63,515.00 $ 33,212.00 $ 34,073.00 $ 34,754.46 $ 35,449.55 $ 36,158.54 $ 36,881.71
CITY CEMETERY A8810 $ 8,750.00 $ 7,070.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,925.00 $ 9,103.50 $ 9,285.57 $ 9,471.28
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
POLICE DEPT. A3120 $ 5,678,423.00 $ 5,687,060.00 $ 5,754,074.00 $ 5,832,055.00 $ 5,948,696.10 $ 6,067,670.02 $ 6,189,023.42 $ 6,312,803.89
FIRE DEPT. A3410 $ 4,376,639.00 $ 4,393,975.00 $ 4,551,708.00 $ 4,924,292.00 $ 5,022,777.84 $ 5,123,233.40 $ 5,225,698.06 $ 5,330,212.03
CONTROL OF DOGS A3510 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,677.75 $ 41,084.53 $ 41,495.37 $ 41,910.33
BUILDING DEPT. A3620 $ 596,444.00 $ 579,921.00 $ 606,798.00 $ 644,216.00 $ 657,100.32 $ 670,242.33 $ 683,647.17 $ 697,320.12
CONTRIBUTION TO BID A6995 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00
2005expgoodopt2greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
YOUTH BUREAU:
YOUTH BUREAU A7310 $ 1,897,727.00 $ 1,895,657.00 $ 1,868,639.00 $ 2,054,960.00 $ 2,096,059.20 $ 2,137,980.38 $ 2,180,739.99 $ 2,224,354.79
GIAC A7311 $ 768,200.00 $ 731,744.00 $ 781,995.00 $ 809,365.00 $ 825,552.30 $ 842,063.35 $ 858,904.61 $ 876,082.71
SOUTHSIDE CENTER-Maint A7312 $ 105,915.00 $ 119,349.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 55,517.58 $ 56,627.93 $ 57,760.49 $ 58,915.70
SSCC funding A7312-5435 $ 126,380.00 $ 128,907.60 $ 131,485.75 $ 134,115.47 $ 136,797.78
CELEBRATIONS A7550 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT A8020 $ 440,396.00 $ 452,325.00 $ 389,134.00 $ 473,981.00 $ 483,460.62 $ 493,129.83 $ 502,992.43 $ 513,052.28
COMMONS ADVISORY A8510 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
LOW&MOD.INCOME HOUSING A8515 $ 13,750.00 $ - $ 6,600.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00
ENERGY COMM. A8570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT A9010 $ 409,963.00 $ 336,597.00 $ 884,435.00 $ 832,578.00 $ 849,229.56 $ 866,214.15 $ 883,538.43 $ 901,209.20
POLICE&FIRE RETIREMENT A9015 $ 602,857.00 $ 453,924.00 $ 1,147,997.00 $ 1,380,000.00 $ 1,407,600.00 $ 1,435,752.00 $ 1,464,467.04 $ 1,493,756.38
SOCIAL SECURITY A9030 $ 1,280,453.00 $ 1,267,526.00 $ 1,320,397.00 $ 1,345,466.00 $ 1,406,011.97 $ 1,476,312.57 $ 1,520,601.95 $ 1,566,220.00
WORKERS COMPENSATION A9040 $ 476,621.00 $ 388,440.00 $ 560,003.00 $ 590,750.00 $ 620,287.50 $ 651,301.88 $ 683,866.97 $ 718,060.32
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE A9050 $ 116,788.00 $ 27,530.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
HEALTH INSURANCE A9060 $ 4,223,058.00 $ 4,464,606.00 $ 4,862,131.00 $ 5,046,116.00 $ 5,651,649.92 $ 6,103,781.91 $ 6,408,971.01 $ 6,729,419.56
DENTAL INSURANCE A9070 $ 74,089.00 $ 64,923.00 $ 76,311.67 $ 76,312.00 $ 77,075.12 $ 78,616.62 $ 80,975.12 $ 83,404.37
DAY CARE PROGRAM A9080 $ 82,500.00 $ 61,838.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,700.00 $ 71,407.00 $ 72,121.07 $ 72,842.28
SUPP.BENEFIT DISABLED FIRE A9085 $ 32,834.00 $ 30,241.00 $ 35,646.00 $ 30,443.00 $ 31,356.29 $ 32,296.98 $ 33,265.89 $ 34,263.86
UNDISTRIBUTED BENEFITS ABSENCES A9088 $ - $
EMPLOYEE TUITION A9089 $ 15,000.00 $ 19,408.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 29,250.00 $ 30,127.50 $ 31,031.33 $ 31,962.26 $ 32,921.13
SERIAL BONDS A9710 $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,314,465.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00
INT.ON SERIAL BONDS A9711 $ 523,969.00 $ 524,865.00 $ 446,906.00 $ 1,064,417.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,357,92t00 $ 1,297,808.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.BONDS A9720 $ 701,374.00 $ 701,374.00 $ 725,121.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.INT. A9721 $ 259,760.00 $ 259,760.00 $ 227,026.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES A9730 $ 1,726,783.00 $ 1,726,783.00 $ 2,151,769.00 $ 1,122,343.00 $ 1,649,408.00 $ 1,527,717.00' $ 1,712,903.00 $ 2,023,523.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE INT. A9731 $ 425,384.00 $ 437,788.00 $ 383,292.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00
$ 447,780.00 $ 542,179.00 $ 542,179.00
PAYING AGENT FEE A9795 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,337.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL FUND A9950 $ - $ - $ -
$ -
2005expgoodopt2greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 3
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActuaVProjections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL RESERVE A9951 $ - $ - $ -
$
TRANSFERS TO SOLID WASTE A9952 $ - $ - $ 39,895.00 $ 71,572.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 33,490,883.17 $ 33,018,496.00 $ 36,559,637.55 $ 38,432,337.82 $ 40,394,678.44 $ 42,004,266.44 $ 43,413,882.79 $ 44,100,725.21
TOTAL REVENUES $ 33,490,883.00 $ 33,133,783.00 $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,516,338.06 $ 39,704,981.69 $ 41,198,438.67 $ 42,541,704.19 $ 43,760,673.58
ACTUAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
POTENTIAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE
PROJECTED/Actual DIFFERENCE $ (0.17) $ 115,287.00- $ (0.30) $ 84,000.23 $ (689,696.75) $ (805,827.78) $ (872,178.60) $ (340,051.63)
PROJECTED CUMULATIVE DIFFERENCE $ - $ (2,623,754.52)
2005expgoodopt2greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 4
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
i
----- - - - -- 19 20 21 22 23- -- 24 24
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED---PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
COLLEGETOWN ASSES. A1022 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 S 38,980.00 $ -
-
--- --- --..---------------
COMMONS ASSES. - -- - __ A1003 $ - -- - -- - -
Green Property Tax Revenue _ A1004 $ - - $ - $ 39,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $__ - 143_100.00- $ _ _146,678.00
UNNEEDED RESERVE FOR TA XES A1050 $
PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAX A1081 $ 155,000.00 $ 85515.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 119,600.00 $ 124,384.00 , $ 129 359.36 $ 134,533.73
INT.&PEN.ON TAXES A1090 $ 206,000.00 $ 118,247.00 $ 206,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 128,750.00 $ 132,612.50 $ 136,590.88 $ 140,688.60
PENALTIES ON ASSES. L A1091 $ 50.00 $ $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $- 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 i$ 50.00
PROPERTY TAX ITEMS _ __ _ ___ ___ __ __ _
SALES&USE TAX A1101 $ 7,832,329.00 $ 7,998,704 00 $ 8,391,727.65 $ 9,129,400.00 $ _9,594,664.00 $ 9577,357.56 $ 10 235 436.29 $ 10,570 611 74
UTILITIES GROSS REC.TAX A1131 _ $ $ 307,466.00 $ 300,000.00 $_ 306,000.00 $ 312,120.00 $ 318,362.40 $ 324,729.65 $ 331 224.24
FRANCHISES A1170 $ 185,000.00 $ 215,519.00 $ 220,000 00 $ 226,600.00 $ 237,930.00 $ 249,826.50 $ 262 317.83 i $ 275 433.72
NON-PROPERTY TAX ITEMS _ _ _ _
CITY CHAMBERLAIN FEES A1230 $ 00 $ 65,112.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 70,000.00-$ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 7.0 000.00
TAX SALE ADVERTISING A1235 $ 2,000.00 $ 982.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
CITY CLERK FEES A1255 $ 11,750.00 $ 15,424.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
Other General Dept Income A1289 $ $ 5,720.00 $ -
POLICE DEPT.FEES A1520 1,500 00 $ 6,683.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
DOG CONTROL FEES A1550 $___ 1,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
SAFETY INSPEC.FEES A1560 $ 90,340.00 $ 65,785.00 $ 90,340.00 $ 92,598.50 $ 94,913.46 $ 97,286.30 $___99,718.46 $ 102,211.42
Electical Inspections j _ A1561 $ - $ 53,811.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 61,500.00 $ 63,037.50 $ 64,613.44 $ 66,228.77
FIRE INSPEC.FEES A1565 $ 35,000.00 $ 32,774.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 54,080.00 $ 56,243.20 $ 58,492.93 $ 60,832.65
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES _-_A1710 $ 60,000.00 $ 34,713.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
PARKING LOTS&GARAGES Al 20 $ 685,000.00 $ 805,040.00 $ 810,000.00 $ 880,000.00 $ 880,000.00 $ 897,600.00 $ 906,576.00 $ 915,641.76
CayugaGarage $ --- $ $ -- - - $ - _ $ - $ - $ $METERED PARKING A1740 $ 430,000.00 $ 523,211.00 . $ 505,000.00 $ 736,000.00 $_ 736,000.00 $ 743,360.00 $ 750 793.60 $ 848,925.00
BUS OPERATIONS i A1750 $ - $ - $ _. - $ - $ -- -- $ - S $ -
NORTHEAST TRANSIT A1751 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ $
TRANSPORTATION FEES _ _ _
PARKS&REC.CHARGES _ A2001_ $ 330,565.00 $ 246,673.00$ 348,157.00 $ 356,387.00 $ 359,950.87 $ 38 $ 367 185.88 $ 370 857.74
REC.CONCESSION - A2012 $ 111,110.00 $ 78,608.00 $ 91,110.00 $ 91,110.00 $ 92,021.10 $ 92,941.31 $ 93,870.72 $ 94,809.43
GOLF COURSE CONCESSIONS A2013 250050 $ 3,766.00 $ 250050 $ 2200.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00
------------------
GOLF COURSE PRO SHOP A2014 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,474.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $_ _ _10,000.00
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A2015 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,625.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $
BEACH &POOL CHARGES A2025 $ 54,500.00 $ 47,642.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,860.00 $ 87,728.60 $ 88,605.89 $ 89,491.94
-ALEX S
HALEY POOL CHARGE A2026 $ 7,500.00 $ 5,312.00 $ _ _ 7,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00_
GOLF_COURSE CHARGES P2050 $ 169,950.00 $ 151,360.00 $ 175,048.50 $ 180,299.96 $ 185,708.95 $ 191,280.22 $ 197,018.63 $ 202,929.19
ICE RINK CHARGES A2065 _ $ 158,100.00 $ 160,297.00 $ 177,000.00 $ _177,000.00 $ 182,310.00 $ 187,779.30 $ 193,412.68 $ 199,215.06
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR YOUTH A2070 $ 153,055.00 $ 138,798.00 $ 159,381.00 '$ 143,172.00 $ 147,467.16 $ 151,891.17 $ 156,447.91 $ 161,141.35
RECREATION PROGRAM FEES
ZONING FEES A2110 $ 2,300.00 $ _ 6,425.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,296.00 $ 3,394.88 $ 3,496.73 $ _ 3,601.63
SITE DEVEL.FEES A2111 $__ 210,000.00 $ 63,467.00 $ 190,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ - 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00__$__ 60,000.00 $ __-60,000.00_
SUBDIVISION&SIGN FEES A2112 $ 500.00 $ 5,702.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
CEMETERY SERVICES 1 A2192 $ 2,000.00 $ 175.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
HOME&COMMUNITY SERVICE FEES
CIVIL SERVICE CHARGES A2220 $ 40,000.00 $ 39,920.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 43,260.00 $ 44,557.80 $ 45,894.53-$ 47,271.37
PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE/SCHOOL DIST. A2260 $ -
TRANSIT PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT r A2261 $ 1,031,578.00 $ 961,767 00 $ 1,190,037.00 $ 315,090.00 $ - $ _ -_ $ _ _ - $ _
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE A2262 $ 2,001,464.00 $ 190769300_$ _2,176,063.00 $ 2,438,769.00 $ 2,499,738.23 I $ 2,562,231.68 $ 2,626,287.47 $ 2,691 944 66
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES -A2300 $ 128,000.00 $ 128,000 00?$ 128,000.00 $ 127,200.00 r$ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00_$ 127,200.00
- -
DWI PROGRAM TO.CO A2310 $ • $ 8,471.00 $ $ 9,00000 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00
YOUTH SERVICES Other Governments A2350 _ $- - 633,854.00 $ 682,218.00 $ 496,337.00 $ _565,914.00 $ --_582,891.42 $ 600,378.16 $ 618,389.51 $ _6.36 941.19
INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGES A2375 $ 151,250 00 $ 80,000.00 $_ 141,250.00 $ 53,190.00 $ 53,190.00 $ 53,190.00 $ 53,190.00 ; $ 53,190.00
OTHER REIMBURSEMENT OTR A2376 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,568.00 $ 1,090.00
8.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,332.50 $ 1,365.81 $ 1,399.96 $ 1,434.96
COUNTY CONRTIBUTION/CELEBRATIONS A2377 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $
INTEREST&EARNINGS A2401 i $ 250,000.00 $ 51,830.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 380,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ __450,000,00__
RENTAL OF PROPERTY 1 A2410 I $ 100,000.00 $ 116,808 00 $ 117,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 222,000.00 $ 321,000.00 $ 420,000 00 $ 521,475.00
2005revsopt2greenrampl 1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
19 -_-_ 20 21 22 23 24 24
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED , PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 -__ 2007 2008 i 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET I BUDGET
RENT OF EQUIPMENT --A2414 $ - $ - I $ -- - $ --- $ - $ - $ _ 1-$ -
GOLF CART RENTAL A2415 $ 40,000.00 $ 3.1,598.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $_ 41,000.00 $ 41,000.00i $ 41000 00
TELEPHONE COMMISSION .02450 $ _ 2,500.00 $ 54.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 20050 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 1 $ 200.00
USE OF MONEY&PROPERTY _
BUSINESS&OCC.LICENSES A2501 $ 1,500.00 $ 565.00 $ 1,50050 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1500.00 $ 1500.00 1 $ 1,000.00
BINGO LIC.AND FEES A2540 $ _ 1,200.00 $ 221.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 j$ 1500.00
DOG LICENSES A2542 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,567.00 $ _ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ - 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 ; $ 5,000.00
BICYCLE LICENSES A2545 $ 100.00 $ ___ 28.00 $ _ 100.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 I $ 50.00 $ 50.00
PUBLIC SAFETY PERMITS A2550 $ 7,700.00 $ 5,178.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 ' $ 7,700.00
BUILDING&ALTER.PERMIT A2555 $ 384,000.00 $ 514,170.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 584,961.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000,00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00
STREET OPEN PERMITS $ 1,000.00 $ 963.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
OTHER PERMITS A2590 $ 22500.00 $ 3,175.00 $ 2550050 $ - 2550050 $ 2550050 $ 25500.00 $ 25500.00 $ 25 000.00
LICENSES&PERMIT FEES J---
_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _
FINES&FORFEITED BAIL A2610 $ 800,000.00 $ 760,483.00 $ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,180,433.46 $ 1,192,237.79 $ 1,204,160.17±$ 1,216 201.77
DOG FINES A2611 $ 800.00 $ 470.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 I $ 1,000.00
FINES&FORFEITURES
MINOR SALES A2655 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,729.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
SALE OF PROPERTY A2660 $ 296,318.00 $ 251,073.00 $ _ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 `$ 27,700.00
SALE OF EQUIPMENT A2665 $ 20,000.00 $ 7,608.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ _ 10,000.00
INSURANCE RECOVERIES _ A2680 $ 100,000.00 $ 68,326.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80000.00 $_-_ 80,000.00 $ 80500:00
OTHER COMP.FOR LOSS A2690 $ 1,000.00 $ 22,634,00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
SALE OF PROP.&COMP.FOR LOSS
REFUND OF PRIOR YR.EXP. A2701 $ 1,000.00 $ 45,146.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000 00 $ 2,000.00 -$ 2 000.00
GIFTS&DONATIONS A2705 $ 7.10,000.00 $ 742,089.00 $ 1_266,000.00 $ 1,210,000.00 $ 1,160000.00 $ 1,110000.00 $ 1,143,300.00 � $ 1,177 599.00
CONT.LOW&MOD.HOUSING A2706 $ 22,350.00 $ 10,79750 $ 44,700.00 $ 13500.00 $ 1550050 $ 16,000 00 $ 15500.00 ! $ 16500.00
UNCLASSIFIED REVENUES t A2770 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,60250 $ 3,569.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5500.00 $ 5500.00 $ 5500.00 $ 5500.00
MISCELLANEOUS ,
TRANS.FROM WATER FUND I_ A2801 $ 288,590.64 $ 288,591.00 $ 293,501.00 $ 318,056.00 $ 327597.68 $ 337,425.61 ' $ 347,548.38 ' $ 357,974.83
TRANS.FROM SEWER FUND � A2802 $ 271,054.80 $ 271,055.00 $ 327,933.00 $ 365,000.00 $ 375,950.00 $ 387,228.50 $ 398,845.36 $ 410,810.72
TRANS.FROM CAPITAL FUND A2803 $ 1,908,851.00 $ 1,529,321.00 $ 1,493,851.00 $ 1,209,932.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 725,915 00 $ 560,000.00 1 $ 560,000.00
TRANS.FROM JOINT ACTIVITY A2804 $ 262,846.00 $ 203,788.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 225,500.00 $ 231,137.50 $ 236,915.94 $ 242 838.84 I $ 2.48 909.8.1
TRANS.FROM SOLID WASTE --- A2805 $ 19,915.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ ------ 1$_.-_.._ ..------
TRANS.FROM T&A FUND P2807 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TRANS.
TRANS.FROM DEBT SERVICE - A2808 $ 225,512.0$ 253,864.00 $ 254,704.00 $ 280,728.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 210,000.00
INTERFUND REVENUES
STATE AID PER CAPITA A3001 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,682.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589581.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00_
STATE AID-MORTGAGE TAX A3005 $ 265,000.00 $ 504,337.00 $ 265,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00
STATE AID-COURT FACILITY A3021 $ 84,000.00 $ 59,148.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00
STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM _ A3089 $ - $ - $ - $ $ _ $ - $ - $ _ -
STATE AID-RECORDS MANAGE. A3060 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $
.
STATE AID-SECURITY SERVICE _ A3330 $ 75,140.00 $ 85,770.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 82,400.00 $ 84,872.00 $ 87,418.16 $ 90,040.70 $ 92,741
C 92,741.93
STATE AID-PUBLIC SAFETY A3389 $ 10,000.00 $-__- 9,894.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
STATE AID-C.H.I.P.S A3501 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM REIMB. A3589 _ $ 3,768.07 $ 1,044.00 $ 3,956.47 $ 4,154.30 $ 4,362.01 $ 4,580.11 $ 4,809.12 $ 5,049.57
STATE AID REC.FOR ELDERLY A3801 $.* - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ _ $ - $
STATE AID YOUTH PROGRAM A3820 $ 134,824.00 $ $ 135,147.00 $ 138,769.00 $ 135,147.00 $ 135,147.00 $ 135,147.00_$ 135,147.00
STATE AID-HOME&COM.SER.\STATE AID A3989 $ - $ --- $ $ -_ $ - I $_
STATE AID-CODE ENFORCEMENT A3995 -1 $ $ 4,859.00 $ - $ - $ $ $ $
STATE AID -� -- -- -- - - I
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY f - A4320 _, $ __ � $ _ 50000 00 $ 50000.00 $ _ 50000 00 $ 50,000.00 $ _ 50500.00 ' $ 50500.00
FEDERAL AID-DRUG COURT/DOMIST.VIOL. A4350 $ 50,000.00I $ 95,000.00 I $ 59,575.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19 575.00 $ 19 575.00
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY OTH DRUG I A4389 $ $ 108,700.00 $ 1 $ $ $ $ - $ -
2005revsopt2greenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 2 Partial Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:46 AM
- -- - - ---1-- 19 - — —— 20 21 22 23 —--- Z4 24
--- Adopted Adopted — PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO 1 BUDGET -1 ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY HEALTH A4489 _.._ $ $ $ _-- $ _-_ - $ $ $
FEDERAL AID-YOUTH PROG. __. A4820 !$ $ 3,404.00 $ - $ 76,846.00 $ 50,000.00 $ r$ $
FEDERAL AID-TRANSPORTATION A4589 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ • $ - $ -
FEDERAL AID-DISASTER ASSISTANCE A4960 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ -
FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4989 $ - $ - $ 126,950.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ -
FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4991 $ - $ 48,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- FEDERAL AID - -- -- -- - ---------------'— --------__.
SUB-TOTAL $ 23,370,325.51 $ 22,956,825.00 $ 24,830,509.62 $ 25,003,558.75 $ 24,835,519.34 $ 25,054,663,40 $ 25,581,053.89 $ 26291,203.77
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE J $ 10,120,557.20 $ 10,176,958.00 $ 11,729,127.63 $ 13,512,779.31 $ 14,869,462.35 $ 16,143,775.27 $ $ 17,469,469.81
TOTAL REVENUE $ 33,490,882.71 $ 33,133,783.00 $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,516,3.38.06 $ 39,704,981.69 $ 41,198,438.67 -$ 42,541,704.19 1 $ 43,760,673.58
increase(decrease)OVER PREVIOUS YEAR $0.06331 $ 1.04161 $ 0.09163 $ 0.05352 $ 0.03086 $ 0.03761 $ 0.03260 , $ 0.02865
ASSESSED VALUE AT BUDGET ADOPTION $ 865,744,842.00 $ 918,490,809.00 $ 1,023,695,402.00 $ 1,072,832,781.30 $ 1,109,309,095.86 $ 1,131,495,277.78 '$ 1,131,495277.78
°/O-Change from PREVIOUS YEAR 1 add 30%development add 40%development add 25%development add 5%development-
- --- -- --- - --- - — _— --- --- -- - -- ---
NET% Increase(reduction)from PREVIOU S YEAR __ 2.95% 6.09% _ 11.45% _ 4.8%INCR.ASSES. 3.4%INCR.ASSES. _ 2%INCR.ASSES. 0%INCR.ASSES.
TAX RATE PER$1000 T $11.69/$1000 $12.77/$1000 $13.20/$1000 $14.0789/$1000 $14.7829/$1000 $15.2264/$1000 $15683.1/$1000
PROJECTED INCREASE IN RATE over 5 yrs OF 3.37%,5,5,3,3 $ - 11.690000 $ 12.7700 $ 13.2000 $ 13.8600 $ 14.5530 $ 14.9896 I$ 15.4393
T
--- — 1
2005revsopt2greenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 3
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:39 AM
— —--- -- - --•— _. -- — — -- —
____ 19 — —— --- 20 21 22 23 24 !}
- 24
I Adopted — Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
COLLEGETOWN ASSES. A1022
} $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.03$ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $ 38,980.00 $
COMMONS ASSES. 1 A1003 $ -
Green Property Tax Revenue A1004 $ $ $ 39,000.00 $ 78,000.00 $ 143,100.00 $ 146 678.00
UNNEEDED RESERVE FOR TAXES A1050 $ __
PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAX A1081 $ 155,000.00 $ 85,615.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 119,600.00 $ 124,384.00 1 $ 129,359.36 1 $ 134,533.73
INT.&PEN.ON TAXES A1090 $ 206,000.00 $ 118,24.7.00 $ 206,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 128,750.00 $ 132,612.50 I $ 136,590.88 $ 140,688,60
PENALTIES ON ASSES. A1091 $ 50.00 $ - $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
-----------
PROPERTY TM ITEMS _
_--_ - - - -- - -- _ __
SALES&USE TAX A1101 $ 7,832,329.00 $ 7,998,704.00 $ 8,391,727.65 5 9,129,400.00 $ 9,594,664.00 $ 9,999,357.56 $ 10,258,096.29 $ 10,594,178.14
UTILITIES GROSS REC.TAX __ $ 330,000.00 $ 307,466.00_ $ 300,000.00 $ 306,000.00 $ 312,120.00 $ 318,362.40 $ - 324,729.65 $-_ 331,224.24
FRANCHISES A1170 $ 185,000.00 $ 215,519.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 226,600.00 $ 237,930.00 $ 249,826.50 $ 262,317.83 $ 275,433.72
NON-PROPERTY TAX ITEMS
CITY CHAMBERLAIN FEES _____ _ A1230__ $ _65,000.00 $ --65,112.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $- 70_000.00_
TAX SALE ADVERTISING A1235 $ 2,000.00 $ 982.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00_
CITY CLERK FEES A1255 $ 11,750.00 $ 15,424.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
Other General Dept Income _A1289 _-_$--- - $ 5,720.00 $ — --_------_ ------- --___--------------------
_
POLICE DEPT.FEES A1520 - $ 1,500.00 $ - 6,683.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
DOG CONTROL FEES A1550 $ _ 1,000.00 $ $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
---------------------------------
SAFETY INSPEC.FEES A1560 $ 90,340.00 $ 65,785.00 $ 90,340.00 $ 92,598.50 $ 94,913.46 $ 97,286.30 $ 99,718.46 $ 102,211 42
Electical Inspections A1561 $ - $ 53,811.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 61,500.00 $ 63,037.50 $ 64,613.44 $ 66,228.77
FIRE INSPEC.FEES A1565 $ 35,000.00 $ 32,774.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 54,080.00 $ 56,243.20 $ 58,492.93 $ 60,832 65
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES A1710 $ 60,000.00 $ 34,713.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.0C $ _ 60,000.00
----- -- ----
PARKING LOTS&GARAGES A1720 $ 685,000.00 $ 805,040.00 $ 810,000.00 $ 880,000.00 $ 880,000.00 $ 897,600.00 ; $ 906,576.00 $ 915,641.76
Cayuga Garage --- -- $ -- - $ $ - $ -- • $ - $ - - — $ - -- $
METERED PARKING A1740 $ 430,000.00 $ 523,211.00 $ 505,000.00 $ 736,000.00 $ 736,000.00 $ 743,360.00 $ 750,793.60 $ 848,925.00
BUS OPERATIONS A1750 $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ $ $
NORTHEAST TRANSIT A1751 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
TRANSPORTATION FEES
PARKS&REC.CHARGES A2001 $ 330,565.00 $ 246,673.00 $ 348,157.00 $ 356,387.00 $ 359,950.87 $ 363,550.38 $ 367,185.88 $ 370,857.74
REC.CONCESSION A2012 $ 111,110.00 $ 78,608.00 $ 9.1,110.00 $ 91,110.00 $ 92,021.10 $ 92,941.31 $ 93,870.72 $ 94,809.43
GOLF COURSE CONCESSIONS A2013 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,766.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00
GOLF COURSE PRO SHOP A2014 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,474.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000,00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A2015 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,625.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 i $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00
BEACH &POOL CHARGES A2025 $ 5.4,500.00 $ 47,642.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 86,860.00 $ 87,728.60 $ 88,605.89 $ 89,491.94
ALEX HALEY POOL CHARGES A2026 $ 7,500.00 $ 5,312.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00
GOLF COURSE CHARGES A2050_ $ 169,950.00 $ 151 360.00 $ 175,048.50 $ 180,299.96 $ 185,708.95 $ 191,280.22 $ 197 018.63 $ 202 929.19
-I-
ICE RINK CHARGES A2065 $__ 158,100.00 $ 160,29700 $ 177,000.00 $ 177,000.00 $ 182,310.00 $ 187,779.30 $ 193,412.68-1 $ 199,215.06
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR YOUTH 1 A2070 $ 153,055.00 $ 138,798.00 $ 159,381.00 $ 143,172.00 $ 147,467.16 $ 151,891.17 $ 156,447.91 $ 161,141.35
RECREATION PROGRAM FEES _ _ _ _ _
ZONING FEES A2110 $ 2,300 00 $ 6 425 00 $ 3,000.001 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,296.00 $ 3,394 88 $ 3,496.73 $ 3,601.63
SITE DEVEL.FEES A2111 $ 210,000 00 1 $ 63,467.00 $ 190,000.00 i $ 90,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00
SUBDIVISION&SIGN FEES A2112 $ 500.00i $ 5,702.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
CEMETERY SERVICES A2192 $ __ 2,000.00 $ 175.00 $ 2,000,00 $ 2,000.00 $_ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00+$ 2,000.00 r$ 2,000.00
HOME&COMMUNITY SERVICE FEES -- _ _ _ __ --- -------- - — -
CIVIL SE RVICE CHARGES A2220 $ 40,000.00 $ 39,920.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 43,260.00 $ 44,557.80 $ 45 894.53 $ 47 271.37
--- -----
PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE/SCHOOL DIST. A2260 $ -
TRANSIT PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT i A2261 $ 1,031,578.00 $ 961,767.00 $ 1,190,037.00 $ 315,090.00 $ - $ $ 1.$
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE + A2262 $ 2,001,464.00 $ 1,907,693.00 $ 2,176,063.00 $ 2,438,769.00 $ 2,499,738.23 $ 2,562,231 68 $ 2,626 287 47 1 $ 2,69194466
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES A2300 $ 128,000.00 $ 128,000.00 $ 128,000.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127,200.00 $ 127 200.00 f$ 127,200.00
DWI PROGRAM TO.CO. A2310 $ - $ 8,471.00 $ - $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00
YOUTH SERVICES Other Governments A2350 $ 633,854.00 $ 682,218.00 $ 496,337.00 $ 565,914.00 $ 582,891.42 $ 600,378.16 ' $ 618,389.51 $ 636,941.19
INTERGOVERNMENTAL CHARGES A2375 $ 151,250.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 141,250.00 $ 53,190.00 $ 53,190.00 , $ 53,190.00 $ 53,190.00 $ 53 190.00
BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT OTHER _ A2376 $ _ 1,000.00 $ _ 1,568.00 $ 1,090.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,332.50 $ 1,365.81 $ 1,399 96 $ 1,43.4.96_
COUNTY CONRTIBUTION/CELEBRATIONS A2377 $ - $ - _$ _ - $ - $ - $ - _ $ $
INTEREST&EARNINGS _ A2401 $ 250,000.00 $ 51,830.00 $ _ 200,000.00 $ _ 250,000.00 $ 380,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ _450,000.00_
,RENTAL OF PROPERTY A2410 1 $ 100,000.00 $ 116,808.00 $ 117,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 222,000.00 $ 354,000.00 $ 48000.00-1-i 621,300.00
2005revsopt3greenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 1
■
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:39 AM
19 20 21 22 23 24 1 24_
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET j_ BUDGET
RENT OF EQUIPMENT A2414 $ $ $ ------- $ $ $ $ .------ - $
1
GOLF CART RENTAL A2415 _,$ 40,000.00 $ 31,598.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ __--_41,000.00 $ 41 000.00 I $ 41 000.00
TELEPHONE COMMISSION � A2450 $ --2,500.00 $ 54.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00
USE OF MONEY&PROPERTY
BUSINESS&OCC.LICENSES A2501 $ 1,500.00 $ 565.00 $ 1500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
BINGO LIC.AND FEES A2540 $ 1,200.00 $ 221.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $_ 1,000.00
DOG LICENSES A2542 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,567.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
- --- -----
BICYCLE LICENSES A2545 $ 100.00 $ 28.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
PUBLIC SAFETY PERMITS A2550 $ 7,700.00 $ 5,178.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 I$ 7,700.00
BUILDING&ALTER.PERMIT A2555 $ 384,000.00 $ 514,170.00 $ 370,000.00 S 584,961.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00_$ 175,000.00
STREET OPEN PERMITS A2560 $ 1,000.00 $ 963.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $_ 1,000.00_
OTHER PERMITS A2590 $ 22,000.00 $ 3,175.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
LICENSES&PERMIT FEES
FINES&FORFEITED BAIL _ _ A2610 $ 800,000.00 $ _760,483.00 $ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,168,746.00 $ 1,180,433.46 $ 1,192,237.79 $ 1,204,160.17 $ 1,216,201.77
DOG FINES A2611 $ 800.00 $ 470.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
FINES&FORFEITURES _ i
MINOR SALES 4 A2655 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,729.00 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
$ 296,318.00--- 7 - ---
--_- - - $ 10 27,700.00
SALE OF PROPERTY A2660 $ $ 251,073 00 $ _27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00 $ 27,700.00
INSURANCE RECOVERIES A2680 --$ 100,000.00 $ 68,326.00 $ 100,000.00 $ --__ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 f $ 80,000.00 0 000 00
SALE OF EQUIPMENT A2665 $ 20,000.00 $__ 7,608.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
� $ _ ____
OTHER COMP.FOR LOSS A2690 $ 1,000.00 $ _ 22,634.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000 00 $ 3,000.00
SALE OF PROP.&COMP.FOR LOSS
REFUND OF PRIOR YR.EXP. A2701 $_ _ 1,000.00 $ 45,146.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 1-5: 2,000.00
'GIFTS&DONATIONS A2705 $ 710,000.00 $ 742,089.00 $ 1,266,000.00-$ 1,210,000.00 $ 1,160,000.00 $ 1,110,000 00 $ 1,143 300.00 $ 1,177 599.00
CONT.LOW&MOD.HOUSING A2706 $ 22,350.00 $ 10,797.00 $ 4.4,700.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 16,000.00
UNCLASSIFIED REVENUES A2770 $ 5,000.00 $ 6,602.00 $ 3,569.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,00050 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
MISCELLANEOUS
TRANS.FROM WATER FUND A2801 $ 288,590.64 $ 288,591.00 $ 293,501.00 $ 318,056.00 $ 327,597.68 $ 337,425.61 $ 347,548.38 $ 357,974.83
TRANS.FROM SEWER FUND rt A2802 $ ___ 271,054.80 $ 271,055.00 $ 327,933.00 $ 365,000.00 $ 375,950.00 $ _ 387,228.50 $ 398,845.36 $ 410,810.72
TRANS.FROM CAPITAL FUND A2803 $ 1,908,851.00 $ 1,529,321.00 $ 1,493,851.00 $ 1,209,932.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 725,915.00 $ 560,000.00 $ _560,000.00_
TRANS.FROM JOINT ACTIVITY A2804 $ 262,846.00 $ 2.03,788.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 225500.00 $ 231,137.50 $ 236,915.94 $ 242,838.84 $ 248,909.81
TRANS.FROM SOLID WASTE A2805 $ 19,915.00 $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ $
TRANS.FROM T&A FUND A2807 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ _-_ $ -__ $ $ $ - $ -
TRANS.FROM DEBT SERVICE A2808 $ 225,512.00 $ 253,864.00 $ 254,704.00 $ 280,728.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 210,000.00
INTERFUND REVENUES
STATE AID PER CAPITA _ -A3001 _,_$ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,682.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ _ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00 $ 1,589,681.00
STATE AID-MORTGAGE TAX I A3005 $ _265,000 00 $ 504,337.00 $ 265,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240 000.00 $ 240,000.00
_ $ 64,000 00 $ 59 148.00 I$ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64,000.00 $ 64 000.00 1-$ 64,000.00
STATE AID-COURT FACILITY A3021 1
STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM � A3089 $ $ $ $ - $ - $ $ -- --$
STATE AID-RECORDS MANAGE j A3060 $ $ $ _ - $ - $ - $ - $ - i $
STATE AID-SECURITY SERVICE A3330 $ 75,140 00 $ 85,770.00 $ 80,000.00 $ _ 82,400.00 $ 84,872.00 $ 87,418.16 $ 90,040.70 92,741 93
I -- 1 $ - 9 8 - - -- - _ 0- $
STATE AID-PUBLIC SAFETY A3389 $ 10,000.00 $ 9,894.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 I $ 10,000 00_
_ I $ 3,768.07 $ 1,044 00$ 3,956.47 $ 4,154.30 $ 4,362.01 $ 4,580 11 $ 4,809.12 $1.STATE AID-STAR PROGRAM REIMB. A3589 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ $ $ _ - $ l $ 5,049.5'7
STATE AID REC.FOR ELDERLY , A3801 $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ -
STATE AID YOUTH PROGRAM A3820__-1 $ 134,824.00 $ 146,007.00 '$ 135,147.00 $ 138,769.00 $ 135,147.00 $ 135,147.00 $ 135 147.00 t$ 135 147.00
STATE AID-HOME&COM.SER.\STATE A ID A3989 I $
STATE AID-CODE ENFORCEMENT A3995 $ - $ 4,859.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ $
STATE AID FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY A4320 $ - $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ _ 50,000.00_$ ___ 50,00_0.0_0_
FEDERAL AID-DRUG COURT/DOMIST.VIOL. A4350 $ 50,000.00 _ $ 95,000.00 $ 59,575.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 1.9,575.00 $ 19,575.00 $ 19,575.00
,FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY OTH DRUG A4389 $ - $ 108,700.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
I
2005revsopt3greenrampl 1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Revenue Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:39 AM
_ 19 _ --- 20 _ 21 _ 22 23 24 1 24
-------- ---
Adopted Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED j PROJECTED
2003 2003 _ 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
DESCRIPTION _ACCOUNT NO. BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET L BUDGET
FEDERAL AID-PUBLIC SAFETY HEALTH A4489 $ - $ $ $ - $ ---- $ ---..._ _ $ -
FEDERAL AID-YOUTH PROG. A4820 $ - $ 3,404.00 $ - $ 76,846.00 $ 50,000.00 $ $ - $ -
FEDERAL AID-TRANSPORTATION A4589 $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ $
- $ -
FEDERAL AID-DISASTER ASSISTANCE A4960 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $
FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4989 $ - $ $ 126,950.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00_ $ 30,000.00 $ 20,000 00 $ _
FEDERAL AID-Other Home&Comm Services A4991 $ - $ 48,500.00 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $
FEDERAL AID __ — — -_.._.
SUB-TOTAL $ 23,370,325.51 $ 22,956,825.00 $ 24,830,509.62 $ 25,003,558.75 $ 24,835,519.34 $ 25,109,663.40 $ 25,669,713.89 a $ 26,414,595.17
----- - -- -
PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $ 10,120,557.20 $ 10,176,958.00 $ 11,729,127.63 $ 13,512,779.31 $ 14,869,462.35 $ 16,143,775.27 $ 16,960,650.30 $ 17,469,469.81
TOTAL REVENUE $ 33 490,882.71 $ 33,133,783.00 $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,516,338.06 $ 39,704,981.69 $ 41,253,438.67 $ 42,630 364.19 $ 43,884 064 98
-------- --
% increase(decrease)OVER PREVIOUS YEAR $ 0.06331 $ 1.04161 $ 0.09163 $ 0.05352 $ 0.03086 $ 0.03900 $ 0.03338 $ 0.02941
ASSESSED VALUE AT BUDGET ADOPTION 1 $ 865,744,842.00 I $ 918,490,809.00 $ 1,023,695,402.00 $ 1,072,832,781 30 $ 1 109 309,0.95 86 1 $ 1,131,495.277 78
c Change --- — -- ° development P a development— ,$ 1 131,495 277.78
NET%nincrease(reduction)f omP PREVIOUS YEAR 2.95% __________.,___,_—..._„ _ _6_09% add 30,1 development a4.8%OINCR.ASSES. a3 4%INCR.ASSES 2%!NCR.ASSES. - 0%INCR.ASSES.
TAX RATE PER$1000 i $11.69/$1000 $12.77/$1000 $13.20/$1000 $14.0789/$1000__$14.7829/$1000 $15.2264/$1000 $15.6831/$1000
PROJECTED INCREASE IN RATE over 5 yrs OF 3.37°/0,5,5,3,3 $ 11.690000
— ---- _- ----- _.__— --- - -- _$ .._.. --_ 12.7700.--$ -...__..— 13.2000- $— --13.8600 $--- ----14.5530 $- -. ..._.._14.9896 .$ ... 15.4393_
_ .-_.___—__._
2005revsopt3greenrampl1/17/2004 City of Ithaca Prepared by Steven P.Thayer Page 3
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:38 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
LEGISLATIVE A1010 $ 95,847.00 $ 109,127.00 $ 83,134.00 $ 89,649.00 $ 91,441.98 $ 93,234.24 $ 95,061.63 $ 96,924.84
HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES A1011
OTHER SERVICE AGENCIES A1012 $ - $ 3,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
HUMAN SERVICES COALITION A1013 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 32,257.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00 $ 33,386.00
TCAD A1014 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00 $ 7,210.00
Community Police Board A1015 $ 9,100.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,100.00 $ 10,201.00 $ 10,303.01 $ 10,406.04
CITY PROSECUTER A1110 $ - $ 6,200.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
DRUG COURT A1111 $ 19,800.00 $ 12,915.00 $ 19,800.00 $ - $ -
DRUG FREE COMMUNITY PROGRAM $ 92,032.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00
FINANCE(Controller's Office) A1315 $ 259,818.00 $ 274,587.00 $ 269,814.00 $ 281,201.00 $ 286,825.02 $ 292,561.52 $ 298,412.75 $ 304,381.01
PURCHASING A1345 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CLERK'S OFFICE A1316 $ 117,926.00 $ 112,862.00 $ 116,058.00 $ 129,932.00 $ 132,530.64 $ 135,181.25 $ 137,884.88 $ 140,642.58
ELECTIONS A1450 $ 16,000.00 $ 15,799.00 $ 21,700.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00 $ 18,500.00
RECORDS MANAGEMENT A1460 $ - $ 1,090.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE A1317 $ 218,240.00 $ 225,586.00 $ 239,074.00 $ 258,615.00 $ 263,787.30 $ 269,063.05 $ 274,444.31 $ 279,933.19
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS A1130 $ 61,582.00 5 79,055.00 $ 104,373.00 $ 113,830.00 $ 116,106.60 $ 118,428.73 $ 120,797.31 $ 123,213.25
HUMAN RESOURCES A1430 $ 343,322.00 $ 366,191.00 $ 335,915.00 $ 350,111.00 $ 357,113.22 $ 364,255.48 $ 371,540.59 $ 378,971.41
INFORMATION SERVICES A1320 $ 305,706.00 $ 313,802.00 $ 462,860.00 $ 478,740.00 $ 488,314.80 $ 498,081.10 $ 508,042.72 $ 518,203.57
MAYOR'S OFFICE A1210 $ 82,088.00 $ 87,129.00 $ 146,460.00 $ 79,109.00 $ 80,691.18 $ 82,305.00 $ 83,951.10 $ 85,630.13
CITY ATTORNEY A1420 $ 276,282.00 $ 277,243.00 $ 276;494.00 $ 285,914.00 $ 291,632.28 $ 297,464.93 $ 303,414.22 $ 309,482.51
CITY HALL BUILDING COSTS COMBINED
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
UNDISTRIBUTED INSURANCE A1910 $ 340,899.10 $ 341,146.00 $ 392,033.97 $ 427,000.00 $ 465,430.00 $ 502,664.40 $ 542,877.55 $ 586,307.76
MUNICIPAL ASSOC.DUES A1920 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,413.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 4,100.00
JUDGEMENT AND CLAIMS A1930 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 18,750.00
TAXES ON CITY PROPERTY A1950 $ 5,628.07 $ 2,640.00 $ 5,796.92 $ 5,970.82 $ 6,149.95 $ 6,334.45 $ 6,524.48 $ 6,720.22
REFUND OF PROP.TAXES A1964 $ - $ 42,635.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PROVISION OF UNCOLL.TAXES A1984 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
MISCELLANEOUS A1989 $ 3,000.00 $ 15,878.00 $ 10,000.00 S 14,230.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00
CONTINGENCY A1990 $ 130,944.00 $ - $ 182,000.00 5 480,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00
Payment to County for Dipatchers(one-time) $ 287,195.00
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.:
ENGINEERING A1440 $ 173,275.00 $ 97,245.00 $ 180,360.00 $ 230,026.00 $ 234,626.52 $ 239,319.05 $ 244,105.43 $ 248,987.54
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN A1490 $ 122,349.00 $ 123,707.00 $ 125,384.00 $ 129,313.00 $ 131,899.26 $ 134,537.25 $ 137,227.99 $ 139,972.55
STREETS ADMIN. A5010 $ 212,150.00 $ 214,336.00 $ 217,346.00 $ 226,532.00 $ 231,062.64 $ 235,683.89 $ 240,397.57 $ 245,205.52
BLDG.SYSTEMS A1620 $ 157,030.00 $ 130,993.00 $ 158,321.00 $ 169,828.00 $ 173,224.56 $ 176,689.05 $ 180,222.83 $ 183,827.29
CITY HALL A1621 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BT-GLASS A1628 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL A3311 $ 132,975.00 $ 124,444.00 $ 135,205.00 $ 138,108.00 $ 140,870.16 $ 143,687.56' $ 146,561.31 $ 149,492.54
2005expgoodopt3greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 1
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:38 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRAFFIC SIGNALS A3312 $ 202,446.00 $ 201,272.00 $ 205,268.00 $ 219,551.00 $ 223,942.02 $ 228,420.86 $ 232,989.28 $ 237,649.06
TRANSPORTATION MAINT.
MAINT.OF ROADS A5111 $ 503,977.00 $ 637,980.00 $ 822,511.00 $ 939,000.00 $ 1,057,780.00 $ 1,178,935.60 $ 1,202,514.31 $ 1,226,564.60
ST.&RD.PATCHING A5112 $ 66,977.00 $ 18,268.00 $ 44,036.00 $ 45,082.00 $ 45,983.64 $ 46,903.31 $ 47,841.38 $ 48,798.21
SURFACE TREATMENT A5113 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
BRIDGE MAINT. A5120 $ - $ 95.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 41,750.00 $ 57,585.00 $ 73,736.70 $ 85,211.43
STREET LIGHTING A5182 $ 370,000.00 $ 327,821.00 $ 370,000.00 $ 362,048.00 $ 365,668.48 $ 376,638.53 $ 387,937.69 $ 399,575.82
SNOW REMOVAL A5142 $ 201,117.00 $ 216,655.00 $ 204,541.00 $ 214,818.00 $ 216,966.18 $ 221,305.50 $ 225,731.61 $ 230,246.25
STREET CLEANING A8170 $ 81,413.00 $ 59,081.00 $ 83,321.00 $ 83,748.00 $ 85,422.96 $ 87,131.42 $ 88,874.05 $ 90,651.53
STORM SEWER MAINT. A8141 $ 51,667.00 $ 33,991.00 $ 27,011.00 $ 26,950.00 $ 27,489.00 $ 28,038.78 $ 28,599.56' $ 29,171.55
GARAGE A5132 $ 331,125.00 $ 308,678.00 $ 340,242.00 $ 349,496.00 $ 356,485.92 $ 363,615.64 $ 370,887.95 $ 378,305.71
COMMONS/SIDEWALKS _
SIDEWALKS A5410 $ 800.00 $ - $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00
COMMONS MAINT. A5411 $ 91,400.00 $ 96,668.00 $ 88,331.00 $ 92,340.00 $ 94,186.80 $ 96,070.54 $ 97,991.95 $ 99,951.79
TRANSIT SYSTEM
BUS OPERATION A5630 $ 1,198,760.00 $ 880,870.00 $ 1,234,207.00 $ 510,369.00 $ 201,137.00 $ 207,171.11 $ 213,386.24 $ 219,787.83
NORTHEAST TRANSIT A5631 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PARKING SYSTEMS
LOT D A5651 $ 74,436.00 $ 62,050.00 $ 75,859.00 $ 77,325.00 $ 78,871.50 $ 80,448.93 $ 82,057.91 $ 83,699.07
SENECA ST.RAMP A5652 $ 79,531.00 $ 80,004.00 $ 79,372.00 $ 84,974.00 $ 86,673.48 $ 88,406.95 $ 90,175.09 $ 91,978.59
GREEN ST.RAMP A5653 - $ 42,673.00 $ 66,142.00 $ 43,108.00 $ 66,017.00 $ 67,337.34 $ 68,684.09 $ 70,057.77 $ 71,458.92
DRYDEN RD.RAMP _ A5654 ' $ 118,838.00 $ 127,610.00 $ 122,835.00 $ 123,239.00 $ 125,703.78 $ 128,217.86 $ 130,782.21 $ 133,397.86
Cayuga Garage A5655 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Fin.Assistance Cayuga Green A5655-5435 $ - $ - $ - $ 480,000.00 $ 1,100,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,050,000.00 $ 800,000.00
PARKS SYSTEMS _
PARKS&FORESTRY A7111 $ 327,365.00 $ 341,110.00 $ 334,695.00 $ 350,618.00 $ 357,630.36 $ 364,782.97 $ 372,078.63 $ 379,520.20
STEWART PARK A7112 $ 74,811.00 $ 75,156.00 $ 75,824.00 $ 80,766.00 $ 82,381.32 $ 84,028.95 $ 85,709.53 $ 87,423.72
SIX MILE PARK A7113 $ 10,240.00 $ 7,612.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,240.00 $ 10,444.80 $ 10,653.70 $ 10,866.77 $ 11,084.11
STEWART PARK CAROUSEL A7114 $ 10,950.00 $ 9,781.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 10,950.00 $ 11,169.00 $ 11,392.38 $ 11,620.23 $ 11,852.63
BEACH&POOLS A7181 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK POOL&RINK A7182 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
CASS PARK FIELDS A7183 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
GOLF COURSE A7250 $ 186,430.00 $ 182,410.00 $ 197,792.00 $ 194,956.00 $ 198,855.12 $ 202,832.22 $ 206,888.87 $ 211,026.64
REFUSE&GARBAGE• A8160 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
RECYCLING PROGRAM• A8161 _$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
FLOOD&EROSION CONTROL
FALL CREEK STATION A8142 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,334.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,958.00 $ 3,017.16 $ 3,077.50 $ 3,139.05
FLOOD CONTROL A8745 $ 33,392.00 $ 63,515.00 $ 33,212.00 $ 34,073.00 $ 34,754.46 $ 35,449.55 $ 36,158.54 $ 36,881.71
CITY CEMETERY A8810 $ 8,750.00 $ 7,070.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,750.00 $ 8,925.00 $ 9,103.50 $ 9,285.57 $ 9,471.28
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
POLICE DEPT. A3120 $ 5,678,423.00 $ 5,687,060.00 $ 5,754,074.00 $ 5,832,055.00 $ 5,948,696.10 $ 6,067,670.02 $ 6,189,023.42 $ 6,312,803.89
FIRE DEPT. A3410 $ 4,376,639.00 $ 4,393,975.00 $ 4,551,708.00 $ 4,924,292.00 $ 5,022,777.84 $ 5,123,233.40 $ 5,225,698.06 $ 5,330,212.03
CONTROL OF DOGS A3510 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,275.00 $ 40,677.75 $ 41,084.53 $ 41,495.37 $ 41,910.33
BUILDING DEPT. A3620 $ 596,444.00 $ 579,921.00 $ 606,798.00 $ 644,216.00 $ 657,100.32 $ 670,242.33 $ 683,647.17 $ 697,320.12
CONTRIBUTION TO BID A6995 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00
2005expgoodopt3greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 2
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses ActuaVProjections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:38 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
YOUTH BUREAU:
YOUTH BUREAU A7310 $ 1,897,727.00 $ 1,895,657.00 $ 1,868,639.00 $ 2,054,960.00 $ 2,096,059.20 $ 2,137,980.38 $ 2,180,739.99 $ 2,224,354.79
GIAC A7311 $ 768,200.00 $ 731,744.00 $ 781,995.00 $ 809,365.00 $ 825,552.30 $ 842,063.35 $ 858,904.61 $ 876,082.71
SOUTHSIDE CENTER-Maint A7312 $ 105,915.00_$ 119,349.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 54,429.00 $ 55,517.58 $ 56,627.93 $ 57,760.49 $ 58,915.70
SSCC funding A7312-5435 $ 126,380.00 $ 128,907.60 $ 131,485.75 $ 134,115.47 $ 136,797.78
CELEBRATIONS A7550 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT A8020 $ 440,396.00 $ 452,325.00' $ 389,134.00 $ 473,981.00 $ 483,460.62 $ 493,129.83 $ 502,992.43 $ 513,052.28
COMMONS ADVISORY A8510 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
LOW&MOD.INCOME HOUSING A8515 $ 13,750.00 $ - $ 6,600.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00 $ 13,125.00
ENERGY COMM. A8570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT A9010 $ 409,963.00 $ 336,597.00 $ 884,435.00 $ 832,578.00 $ 849,229.56 $ 866,214.15 $ 883,538.43 $ 901,209.20
POLICE&FIRE RETIREMENT A9015 $ 602,857.00 $ 453,924.00 $ 1,147,997.00 $ 1,380,000.00 $ 1,407,600.00 $ 1,435,752.00 $ 1,464,467.04 $ 1,493,756.38
SOCIAL SECURITY A9030 $ 1,280,453.00 $ 1,267,526.00 $ 1,320,397.00 $ 1,345,466.00 $ 1,406,011.97 $ 1,476,312.57 $ 1,520,601.95 $ 1,566,220.00
WORKERS COMPENSATION A9040 $ 476,621.00 $ 388,440.00 $ 560,003.00 $ 590,750.00 $ 620,287.50 $ 651,301.88 $ 683,866.97 $ 718,060.32
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE A9050 $ 116,788.00 $ 27,530.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00
HEALTH INSURANCE A9060 $ 4,223,058.00 $ 4,464,606.00 $ 4,862,131.00 $ 5,046,116.00 $ 5,651,649.92 $ 6,103,781.91 $ 6,408,971.01 $ 6,729,419.56
DENTAL INSURANCE A9070 $ 74,089.00 $ 64,923.00 $ 76,311.67 $ 76,312.00 $ 77,075.12 $ 78,616.62 $ 80,975.12 $ 83,404.37
DAY CARE PROGRAM A9080 $ 82,500.00 $ 61,838.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,700.00 $ 71,407.00 $ 72,121.07 $ 72,842.28
SUPP,BENEFIT DISABLED FIRE A9085 $ 32,834.00 $ 30,241.00 $ 35,646.00 $ 30,443.00 $ 31,356.29 $ 32,296.98' $ 33,265.89 $ 34,263.86
UNDISTRIBUTED BENEFITS ABSENCES A9088 $ - $ -
EMPLOYEE TUITION A9089 $ 15,000.00 $ 19,408.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 29,250.00 $ 30,127.50 $ 31,031.33 $ 31,962.26 $ 32,921.13
SERIAL BONDS A9710 $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,298,765.00 $ 1,314,465.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00 $ 1,922,844.00
INT.ON SERIAL BONDS A9711 $ 523,969.00 $ 524,865.00 $ 446,906.00 $ 1,064,417.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,311,592.00 $ 1,357,921.00 $ 1,297,808.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.BONDS A9720 $ 701,374.00 $ 701,374.00 $ 725,121.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00 $ 786,665.00
STATUTORY INSTALL.INT. A9721 $ 259,760.00 $ 259,760.00 $ 227,026.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00 $ 223,513.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES A9730 $ 1,726,783.00 $ 1,726,783.00 $ 2,151,769.00 $ 1,122,343.00 $ 1,649,408.00 $ 1,527,717.00 $ 1,712,903.00 $ 2,023,523.00
BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE INT. A9731 $ 425,384.00 $ 437,788.00 $ 383,292.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00 $ 276,376.00
$ 572,040.00 $ 692,635.00 $ 692,635.00
PAYING AGENT FEE A9795 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,337.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL FUND A9950 $ - $ - $ -
$ -
2005expgoodopt3greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 3
City of Ithaca
Summary of Expenses Actual/Projections OPT 4 Total Construction Green Garage
2003-2009
11/17/200410:38 AM
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ACCOUNT NO.# Adopted ACTUAL Adopted PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
TRANSFERS TO CAPITAL RESERVE A9951 _ $ - $ - $ -
$
TRANSFERS TO SOLID WASTE A9952 $ - $ - $ 39,895.00 $ 71,572.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 33,490,883.17 -$ 33,018,496.00' $ 36,559,637.55 $ 38,432,337.82 $ 40,394,678.44 $ 42,128,526.44 $ 43,564,338.79 $ 44,251,181.21
TOTAL REVENUES $ 33,490,883.00 $ 33,133,783.00 $ 36,559,637.25 $ 38,516,338.06 $ 39,704,981.69.$ 41,253,438.67 $ 42,630,364.19 $ 43,884,064.98
ACTUAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
•
POTENTIAL IMPACT ON FUND BALANCE
APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE
PROJECTED/Actual DIFFERENCE $ (0.17) $ 115,287.00 $ (0.30) $ 84,000.23 $ (689,696.75) $ (875,087.78) $ (933,974.60) $ (367,116.23)
PROJECTED CUMULATIVE DIFFERENCE $ - $ (2,781,875.12)
2005expgoodopt3greenramp 11/17/2004 Page 4
DRAFT COPY-- NOT YET APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING, NEIGHBORHOODS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Planning,Neighborhoods & and Economic Development Committee
Minutes
October 20, 2004
Committee Members Attending: Mary Tomlan, Chair; Dan Cogan; Pam Mackesey; Gayraud
Townsend
Other Elected City Officials Attending: Alderpersons Maria Coles and Joel Zumoff, Mayor
Carolyn Peterson
City Staff Attending: Nels Bohn, Director of Community Development; Leslie Chatterton,
Department of Planning & Development; JoAnn Cornish, Deputy Director of Planning &
Development; Jennifer Kusznir and Tim Logue, Department of Planning & Development; and
H. Matthys Van Cort, Director of Planning & Development
Others Attending: Gary Ferguson, Executive Director of the Ithaca Downtown Partnership;
Steve Bloomfield and Ken Schon of Bloomfield Interests (Preferred Developer for the Cayuga
Green II project)
Meeting was called to order by Mary Tomlan at 7:30 p.m.
A. Agenda Review
B. Public Comment and Responses
There were no comments from the public and therefore no response from Committee
members.
C. Announcements, Reports, and Presentations
1. Cayuga Green Project—Presentation
Steve Bloomfield and Ken Schon showed the Committee images of a selection of their
past projects elsewhere and then gave an update on the local project's status. An operator
has been selected for the multiplex. The operator and the developer are in the latter
stages of negotiating a lease for the project.
The first phase of their project now includes 20 to 25 units of condominium housing that
would be located next to the Cayuga Garage now under construction min addition to the
multiplex theater and the retail on the ground floor of the Cayuga Garage. They will
begin marketing the Cayuga Garage retail as soon as possible. The developer, in
cooperation with City staff, is working on the financing package for the project.
During question and answers it was suggested that City staff and the developer meet with
representatives of both the Tompkins County Public Library and Tompkins Consolidated
Area Transit (TCAT).
- 1
q:\planning\groups\planning, neighborhood and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1020.doc
DRAFT COPY-- NOT YET APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING, NEIGHBORHOODS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
D. Action items
1. Neighborhood Improvement Incentive Fund—Resolution
After a brief presentation by Leslie Chatterton and on a motion by Pam Mackesey,
seconded by Dan Cogan, the Committee unanimously voted in favor of the proposed
$300 reimbursement of expenses by the Latino Civic Association. (4-0-0)
WHEREAS,the City of Ithaca Common Council established the Neighborhood Improvement
Incentive fund in 1995 to provide financial assistance to city residents seeking to improve the
quality of life in their neighborhoods,and
WHEREAS,the fund is intended to support residents' interest in community improvement and to
encourage, not replace volunteerism,and
WHEREAS,the funds are intended to be used for projects or events that provide a general
neighborhood benefit and not for the limited benefit of individuals or a select few residents,and
WHEREAS,activities specified by the Council as eligible for the funding include but are not
limited to items such as neighborhood clean-ups,planting in public places,and organizing
neighborhood events like neighborhood block parties or meetings,and
WHEREAS, neighborhood groups are required to submit a completed application specifying other
project donations, estimated volunteer hours,estimated costs to be covered by the fund and
signatures of residents in the immediate neighborhood,and
WHEREAS,to streamline the process the Council has delegated authority to approve
applications to the Planning,Neighborhoods and Economic Development Committee, and
WHEREAS,each neighborhood group is eligible to receive up to$300 per year as a
reimbursement award payable on the submission of original receipts for approved activities,and
WHEREAS,the City cannot reimburse residents for sales tax expenses, and
WHEREAS,the Latino Civic Association has submitted a completed application for
reimbursement funds to cover cost of food, and music associated with their annual program
entitled Latino Heritage Month Celebration,now,therefore,be it
RESOLVED,that the Planning,Neighborhoods and Economic Development Committee
approves the request in an amount up to$300.00, and be it further
RESOLVED,that the Committee commends the volunteer activity of the Latino Civic
Association to spotlight Latino arts and culture for the benefit of the Ithaca community.
2. Preserve America Community Designation - Resolution
Chatterton addressed the Committee about the City's opportunity to apply for status as a
Preserve America Community. After some discussion concerning the origins and
benefits of this program and on a motion by Mackesey, seconded by Cogan, the
committee unanimously voted in favor of having, the City apply for such designation.
(4-0-0)
WHEREAS. Preserve America is a White House initiative developed in cooperation with the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the U.S.
Department of Commerce;and
- 2
q:\planning\groups\planning, neighborhood and eco dev committee 2004\minutes`,1020.doc
DRAFT COPY-- NOT YET APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING, NEIGHBORHOODS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS,the goals of this initiative include a greater shared knowledge about our Nation's
past,strengthened regional identities and local pride,increased local participation in preserving the
country's irreplaceable cultural and natural heritage assets,and support for the economic vitality
of communities;and
WHEREAS,this initiative is compatible with our community's interests and goals related to
historic preservation;and
WHEREAS,designation as a Preserve America Community will improve our community's ability
to protect and promote its historical resources;now,therefore be it
RESOLVED,that the Ithaca Common Council will apply for the designation of the City of Ithaca
as a Preserve America Community;and be it further
RESOLVED,that the Ithaca Common Council will seek to protect and celebrate our heritage,use
our historic assets for economic development and community revitalization,and encourage people
to experience and appreciate local historic resources through education and heritage tourism
programs.
3. Southwest Area Development Process—Resolution
Tim Logue presented a proposed outline for a Southwest development process.
Discussion followed. In accordance with a suggestion from Mackesey, the proposal was
amended to include approval by Common Council of committees to be appointed by the
Mayor to help guide the development process.
On a motion by Gayraud Townsend, seconded by Cogan,the Committee unanimously
voted in favor of the proposed outline as amended for developing Southwest and directed
that the process be referred to Common Council for Action. (4-0-0)
WHEREAS,Common Council desires to develop the City-owned land in the Southwest Area in a
manner that is responsive to both public interests and the private development market,and
WHEREAS,the Department of Planning&Development has outlined a development process that
would help formulate a vision for the land and lead to the selection of a preferred developer,and
WHEREAS,the City will require continuing oversight and opportunities for input during the
development phase; now,therefore,be it
RESOLVED,that Common Council approves the development process outlined by the
Department of Planning and Development as a guideline for pre-development,and be it further
RESOLVED,that Common Council directs the Department of Planning and Development to take
the necessary steps to pursue this course of action,and be it further
RESOLVED,that the Mayor,with the advice and approval of Common Council, will appoint a
Client Committee, to assist in the development of a vision for the area and in the preparation of a
Request for Qualifications for a developer;and be it further
RESOLVED,that the Department of Planning and Development shall bring the vision statement
and Request for Qualifications to Common Council for approval before issuance,and be it further
RESOLVED,the Mayor, with the advice and approval of Common Council,will appoint a
Selection Committee to read and rank qualification statements from respondents to the Request for
Qualifications.
- 3
q:\planning\groups\planning, neighborhood and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1020.doc
DRAFT COPY--NOT YET APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING, NEIGHBORHOODS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
E. Other Items
1. Possible Motion to Enter into Executive Session -to Discuss Proposed Acquisition of
Property
At 9:25 p.m., on a motion by Mackesey, seconded by Townsend, the Committee
unanimously voted to enter into Executive Session to discuss possible acquisition of real
property. (4-0-0) In attendance were committee members Tomlan, Cogan, Mackesey,
and Townsend; Mayor Carolyn Peterson; Alderperson Joel Zumoff; and staff members
Nels Bohn and H. Matthys Van Cort.
Committee returned to open session at 9:50 p.m. Chair Tomlan reported that no action
was taken.
F. Approval of Minutes—September 22, 2004
On a motion by Cogan, seconded by Townsend, the September 22, 2004 minutes were
unanimously approved(4-0-0)with the following revision:
D. 1 Acceptance of Sculpture
Dan Cogan asked if this acceptance was in accordance with the City of Ithaca Public
Art Plan. JoAnn Cornish explained that the Public Art Commission had
recommended the acceptance of the workproposed acceptance of art to the
Committee. Gary Ferguson added that the funds for the purchase of the piece came
mostly from the Tompkins County Room Tax.
G. Adjournment
On a motion by Cogan, seconded by Townsend, the meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
-4
q:\planning\groups\planning, neighborhood and eco dev committee 2004\minutes\1020.doc