HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-04-11 Common Council Meeting AgendaOFFICIAL NOTICE OF MEETING
A Regular meeting of the Common Council will be held on Wednesday, May 4, 2011, at
6:00 p.m. in the Common Council Chambers at City Hall, 108 East Green Street, Ithaca,
New York. Your attendance is requested.
AGENDA
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
2. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA:
3. PROCLAMATIONS/AWARDS:
4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
4.1 Launching of New City of Ithaca Website
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
6. PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
7. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR – COMMON COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR:
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no consent items submitted for the agenda
9. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
9.1 Selection of a Consultant for the Preparation of Phase 1 of the Comprehensive
Plan - Resolution
9.2 Establishment of Collegetown Area Form Districts:
A. Determination of Environment Significance – Resolution
B. An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal
Code entitled “Zoning” to Establish the Collegetown Area Form
Districts and Rezoning of Portions of the R-1b, R-2a, R-2b, R-3a, R-3b, B-
2b, and U-1 Districts to Traditional Residential (TR), Village Residential
(VR), and Mixed Use (MU)
9.3 Establishment of Collegetown Overlay Height Incentive District:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance – Resolution
B. An Ordinance to Amender Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal
Code entitled “Zoning” to Establish the Collegetown Overlay Zone
Height Incentive District (COZ-HI)
9.4 Establishment of the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance – Resolution
B. An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal
Code entitled “Zoning” to Establish the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone
Common Council Agenda
May 4, 2011
Page 2
9. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE - CONTINUED:
9.5 Establishment of the Design Review Ordinance:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance – Resolution
B. An Ordinance to Add Chapter 160 to the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
entitled “Design Review”
C. An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 272 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
entitled “Signs” to amend Section 6 entitled “Signs Permitted in All
Districts”
D. An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal
Code entitled “Zoning” Section 10 entitled “Accessory Apartments”,
Section 41 entitled “Design Review”, and Article VIII, Section 44 entitled
“Review of Construction, Demolition, and Alteration”
9.6 Committing Priority Setting for Transportation Measures to be Funded by the
Payment in Lieu of Parking Revenues - Resolution
10. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
10.1 Youth Bureau – Request to Amend 2011 Youth Bureau Budget and Roster –
Resolution
10.2 Department of Public Works – Request to Increase Budget Authorization for the
Ithaca City Court Renovation - Resolution
10.3 City Controller’s Report
11. REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES:
12. NEW BUSINESS:
12.1 Wild Fire Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a Delilah’s On Cayuga - Alcohol Permit Request –
Resolution
13. INDIVIDUAL MEMBER – FILED RESOLUTIONS:
14. MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Appointment to the Board of Public Works
14.2 Appointment to the Community Police Board
14.3 Appointment to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency
Common Council Agenda
May 4, 2011
Page 3
15. REPORTS OF COMMON COUNCIL LIAISONS:
16. REPORT OF CITY CLERK:
17. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY:
18. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
18.1 Approval of the April 6, 2011 Regular Common Council Meeting Minutes –
Resolution
19. ADJOURNMENT:
If you have a disability that will require special arrangements to be made in order for you
to fully participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 at least 48
hours before the meeting.
______________________________
Julie Conley Holcomb, CMC
City Clerk
Date: April 29, 2011
9. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
9.1 Selection of a Consultant for the Preparation of Phase 1 of the
Comprehensive Plan - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca’s existing comprehensive plan was completed in 1971
and has since been amended fourteen times by various targeted neighborhood and
strategic plans, and
WHEREAS, while some objectives of the 1971 plan are still applicable, many are not,
and both local conditions and broader national and world-wide trends that affect Ithaca
have changed dramatically since then, resulting in a need to update the comprehensive
plan to address present-day issues and anticipate future ones, and
WHEREAS, the preparation of a comprehensive plan at this time provides a valuable
opportunity to coordinate with the Town of Ithaca as it updates its comprehensive plan
as well as with Tompkins County, Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit, Ithaca-
Tompkins County Transportation Council, and local employer planning initiatives, either
under way or recently completed, and
WHEREAS, the undertaking of a comprehensive plan at this time comes at the Mayor’s
initiative, first expressed in the 2004 “State of the City” address and later with the
appointment of a “pre-planning” committee in February 2007, consisting of the Mayor,
four Common Council members, Department of Planning and Development staff
members, and, as of January 2008, two members of the Planning and Development
Board, and
WHEREAS, the “pre-planning” committee, convened by the Mayor to discuss issues
related to the preparation of a new comprehensive plan, discussed a two-phase
planning process, where phase 1 would entail the preparation of a city-wide vision
statement that would set forth broad principles to guide future planning and
development throughout the city and its neighborhoods, and where phase 2 would
include the preparation of specific neighborhood plans and other distinct thematically-
based plans, and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 6, 2008, the Common Council approved a
capital project in the amount of $200,000 ($125,000 the first year and $75,000 the
second year) to prepare a comprehensive plan, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the N.Y.S. General City Law §28-a and the City of
Ithaca Municipal Code §4-23, the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board is
responsible for the preparation and recommendation of a new comprehensive plan to
the Common Council, which has the exclusive power to formally adopt the plan for the
City, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Board established the Comprehensive Plan
Committee at its meeting on July 22, 2008 and appointed a group of twenty-three
members which includes representation from the Common Council, the Planning and
Development Board, and the Town of Ithaca, along with representation from established
City advisory boards and from other stakeholder groups intended to reflect a broad and
diverse range of community and neighborhood interests, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Committee, which is to work under the
supervision of the Planning and Development Board (which will provide broad oversight
for the whole comprehensive planning process), was charged by the Planning Board
with several responsibilities regarding the preparation of a new comprehensive plan,
and these overall responsibilities include: (1) preparing and approving a request for
qualifications (“RFQ”) for a consultant team to assist with phase 1 of the development of
the proposed, new City of Ithaca comprehensive plan; and (2) reviewing the responses
to the RFQ, conducting interviews of consultant teams, and making a recommendation
of a consultant team to the Planning and Development Board, Mayor, and Common
Council for their respective approvals, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Committee prepared and approved a RFQ in the
spring of 2009, and the City received responses from 20 consultant firms, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Committee reviewed the responses and
interviewed four firms in October 2009, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Committee recommended the Parsons
Brinckerhoff Team to be the consultant to prepare Phase I of the new comprehensive
plan and the Planning and Development Board, Common Council, and the Mayor
selected that firm in November and December 2009, and
WHEREAS, there was a staffing change within the Parsons Brinckerhoff Team and after
further discussion, there was mutual agreement not to proceed with a contract between
the City and the firm, and
WHEREAS, the consultant selection process was reopened to three top firms identified
by the Comprehensive Plan Committee during the 2009 selection process, and
WHEREAS, a seven-member subcommittee of the Comprehensive Plan Committee
conducted the consultant interviews on March 2-3, 2011 and met again March 31, 2011,
at which time the subcommittee unanimously recommended the Clarion Associates
Team for consideration by the larger committee, and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on April 14, 2011, the Comprehensive Plan Committee
reviewed the subcommittee’s recommendation and, based on the reasons identified in
the “Comprehensive Plan Committee’s Consultant Recommendation to the Planning
and Development Board, Mayor, and Common Council,” dated April 14, 2011, voted
unanimously to recommend that the Clarion Associates Team be selected as the
consultant to prepare phase 1 of the proposed, new comprehensive plan; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Common Council approves the Comprehensive Plan
Committee’s recommendation of the Clarion Associates Team and authorizes the
Mayor to enter into a contract with Clarion Associates for the preparation of phase 1 of
the proposed, new comprehensive plan in an amount not to exceed $200,000.
9.2 Establishment of Collegetown Area Form Districts:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to Chapter 325 of the
Municipal Code in order to (1) establish the Collegetown Area Form Districts and (2)
rezone portions of the R-1b, R-2a, R-2b, R-3a, R-3b, B-2b, and U-1 districts to
Traditional Residential (TR), Village Residential (VR), and Mixed Use (MU), and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the
preparation of a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), dated April 14, 2011 and
as revised at the Planning & Economic Development Committee meeting on April 20,
2011, and
WHEREAS, these zoning amendments have been reviewed by the Tompkins County
Planning Department Pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal
Law, which requires that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including
county and state highways, be reviewed by the County Planning Department, and have
also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the City of
Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a “Type I” Action under the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has
reviewed the FEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts
as its own the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Full Environmental
Assessment Form, dated April 14, 2011 and as revised at the Planning & Economic
Development Committee meeting on April 20, 2011, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby
determines that the proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the
environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that
the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any
attachments, in the City Clerk’s Office, and forward the same to any other parties as
required by law.
B. An Ordinance to Amend the City of Ithaca Municipal Code, Chapter 325,
Entitled “Zoning,” to Establish the Collegetown Area Form Districts and Rezoning
of Portions of the R-1b, R-2a, R-2b, R-3a, R-3b, B-2b, and U-1 Districts to
Traditional Residential (TR), Village Residential (VR), and Mixed Use (MU)
WHEREAS, the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” was
endorsed by the Common Council on August 5, 2009, and the plan recommended the
adoption of a form-based code, a binding design review process, a height incentive
zone, and several essential transportation measures, and
WHEREAS, from the beginning of the Collegetown planning process the adoption of a
form-based code has been considered to be an important implementation measure, and
WHEREAS, a capital project was approved in January 2008 to hire a consultant to
assist with the preparation of the proposed code, and
WHEREAS, the City, with a dollar-for-dollar match from Cornell University, hired Code
Studio of Austin, Texas to begin preparation of the form-based code during the
Collegetown planning process, and
WHEREAS, Lee Einsweiler of Code Studio recommended that the City pursue a hybrid
code rather than a true form-based code because (1) the hybrid code includes
regulations of density and use that are not included in true form-based codes and
density continues to be a critical issue in the Collegetown area and (2) this type of
zoning is new to the city and the hybrid code would ease the transition from traditional
zoning, and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown Zoning Working Group was formed in February 2009 to
focus on the proposed Collegetown zoning changes, and this group included Common
Council representatives, members of the Planning and Development Board,
neighborhood residents, a Collegetown landlord, the editor/publisher of New Urban
News, and staff from the City’s Building and Planning Departments, and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown Zoning Working Group has worked to revise the draft
Collegetown Area Form Districts prepared by Code Studio to better reflect the goals of
the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines,” and
WHEREAS, the proposed Collegetown Area Form Districts were presented at the
Collegetown Neighborhood Council and the Bryant Park Civic Association, and input
from these meetings as well as comments submitted by members of the public have
been incorporated into the proposed zoning, and
WHEREAS, public hearings on the proposed Collegetown Area Form Districts were
held on March 16, 2011 and April 20, 2011, and appropriate environmental review of the
proposed zoning has been completed; now, therefore,
ORDINANCE NO. 2011-
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as
follows:
Section 1:
Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code entitled “Zoning”, Section 41 entitled
“Design Review” is hereby repealed.
Section 2: Declaration of Legislative Findings and Purpose
The “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” identifies several
goals for future development in Collegetown. These goals include:
• To encourage exceptional urban design and high-quality construction
• To regulate elements of building form to ensure a compatible transition between
higher-density and lower-density zoning districts
• To concentrate additional density and growth in the central areas of Collegetown
and protect the character of the established residential neighborhoods
• To promote attractive, walkable neighborhoods that prioritize accommodation of
non-motorized modes of transportation
The “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” recommends the
adoption of a form-based code to regulate elements of building form that are not
addressed under traditional zoning. The Collegetown Area Form Districts is a hybrid
code that combines regulations of physical form with regulations of use and density.
The Common Council finds that the establishment of the Collegetown Area Form
Districts will advance the City’s goals for future development in Collegetown as
specified in the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines.”
Section 3: Chapter 325, Section 325-4 entitled “Establishment of Districts” and 325-5
entitled “Zoning Map” of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca are hereby amended to
add the Collegetown Area Form District which include the following zoning districts:
Traditional Residential 1 (TR-1), Traditional Residential 2 (TR-2), Traditional Residential
3 (TR-3), Traditional Residential 4 (TR-4), Village Residential 1 (VR-1), Village
Residential 2 (VR-2), Village Residential 3 (VR-3), Village Residential 4 (VR-4), Village
Residential 5 (VR-5), and Mixed Use (MU).
Section 4: Chapter 325 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended
to add a new Article to be inserted as Article VIII entitled “Collegetown Zoning”, and all
subsequent articles and sections shall be hereby renumbered accordingly. A new
Section 325-41 entitled “Collegetown Area Form Districts” shall be inserted in its entirety
as §325-41 (see Collegetown Area Form Districts document dated April 20, 2011)
Section 5: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-1b, R-2b, and R-3a to TR-1 for the following tax parcels: 64.-6-1;
64.-6-2.2; 64.-6-3; 64.-7-1; 64.-7-2; 64.-7-3; 64.-7-4; 64.-7-5; 64.-7-6; 65.-2-1; 65.-2-2;
65.-2-3; 65.2-4; 65.-2-5; 67.-2-8; 67.-2-9; 67.-2-10; 67.-2-11; 67.-3-18; 67.-3-19; 67.-3-
20; 67.-3-21; 67.-3-22; 68.-7-9; 68.-7-10; 68.-8-2; 68.-8-3; 68.-8-4; 83.-6-2; and 84.-1-1;
and a portion of 67.-2-5.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 6: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-2a, R-2b, and R-3a to TR-2 for the following tax parcels: 64.-1-
1; 64.-1-2; 64.-1-4; 64.-3-2; 64.-3-3; 64.-3-4; 64.-3-5; 64.-3-6; 64.-4-1; 64.-4-2; 64.-4-3;
64.-4-4; 64.-4-5; 64.-5-1; 64.-5-2; 64.-5-3; 64.-5-4; 64.-8-1; 64.-8-2; 64.-8-3; 64.-8-4; 64.-
8-5; 64.-8-6; 64.-8-7; 64.-8-8; 64.-8-9; 64.-8-10; 64.-8-11; 65.-1-1; 65.-1-2; 65.-1-3; 65.-
1-4; 65.-1-5; 68.-6-12; 68.-6-13; 68.-6-14; 68.-6-15; 68.-7-2; 68.-7-3; 68.-7-3; 68.-7-4;
68.-7-5; 68.-7-6; 68.-7-7; 68.-7-8; 68.-8-6; 68.-8-9; 83.-3-2; 83.-3-3; 83.-3-4; 83.-3-5; 83.-
3-6.1; 83.-3-6.2; 83.-3-7; 83.-3-8; 83.-3-9; 83.-4-1; 83.-4-3; 83.-4-4; 83.-4-5; 83.-4-6; 83.-
6-1; and 83.-6-3.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 7: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-2a, R-2b, R-3a, and R-3b to TR-3 for the following tax parcels:
64.-2-7; 64.-2-8; 64.-2-9; 64.-2-11; 64.-2-13; 64.-2-15; 64.-3-1; 64.-3-7; 64.-3-8; 64.-9-2;
64.-9-3; 64.-9-4; 64.-9-5; 64.-9-7; 64.-9-8; 64.-9-9; 67.-2-3; 67.-2-4; 67.-3-2; 67.-3-3; 67.-
3-23; 67.-3-24; 67.-3-25; 67.-3-26; 68.-5-14; 68.-5-15; 68.-5-16; 68.-5-17; 68.-5-18; 68.-
5-19; 68.-6-1; 68.-6-16; 68.-6-17; 68.-6-18; and 68.-6-19; and portions of 64.-2-33; and
67.-2-5.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 8: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-3a to TR-4 for the following tax parcels: 64.-2-2; 64.-2-4; 64.-2-5;
and 64.-2-6.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 9: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-3a to VR-1 for the following tax parcels: 64.-2-14; 64.-2-17; and
64.-2-19; and a portion of 64.-2-33.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 10: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from U-1 to VR-2 for the following tax parcel: 63.-2-7.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 11: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-3a and R-3b to VR-3 for the following tax parcels: 64.-2-18; 64.-
2-20; 64.-2-22; 64.-9-1; 64.-9-6; 64.-9-10; 67.-1-7; 67.-1-8; 67.-2-1; 67.-2-2; 67.-2-12;
67.-2-13; 67.-2-14; 67.-2-15; 67.-2-16; 67.-2-17; 67.-2-18; 67.-3-1; 67.-3-29; 67.-3-30;
67.-3-31; 68.-4-9; 68.-4-11; 68.-4-12; 68.-4-13; 68.-4-14; 68.-4-15; 68.-5-2; 68.-5-3; 68.-
5-4; 68.-5-5; 68.-5-6; 68.-5-7; 68.-5-8; 68.-5-9; 68.-6-2; 68.-6-3; 68.-6-4; 68.-6-5; 68.-6-6;
68.-6-7; 68.-6-8; 68.-6-9; 68.-6-10; 68.-6-11; and 83.-4-2; and portions of 63.-6-17; 68.-
4-10; and 68.-4-3.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 12: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-3b to VR-4 for the following tax parcels: 64.-10-7; 64.-10-8; 64.-
10-9; 64.-10-10; 64.-10-11; 67.-1-4; 67.-1-5; and 67.-1-6; and portions of 64.-10-13; 64.-
10-15; 67.-1-1; 67.-1-3; and 67.-1-12.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 13: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from R-3b and B-2b to VR-5 for the following tax parcels: 67.-1-9; 67.-1-
10; 67.-1-11; 68.-4-8; 68.-5-10; 68.-5-11; 68.-5-12; and 68.-5-13; and portions of 67.-1-
3; and 67.-1-12.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 14: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended to change
the designation from B-2b, R-3a, and U-1 to MU for the following tax parcels: 63.-5-2;
63.-5-3; 63.-5-5; 63.-5-7; 63.-5-8; 63.-5-9; 63.-6-1; 63.-6-2; 63.-6-3; 63.-6-4; 63.-6-5; 63.-
6-8; 63.-6-14; 63.-6-19; 63.-6-20; 63.-6-21; 63.-6-23; 63.-6-24; 63.-6-25; 63.-6-26; 64.-2-
1; 64.-2-23; 64.-2-24; 64.-2-26; 64.-2-27; 64.-2-28; 64.-2-29; 64.-2-30; 64.-2-31; 64.-2-
32; 64.-10-1; 64.-10-2; 64.-10-3; 64.-10-4; 64.-10-5; 64.-10-6; 64.-10-17.2; 64.-10-18;
64.-10-19; 64.-10-20; 64.-10-21; 68.-4-6; and 68.-4-7; and portions of 63.-6-17; 64.-10-
13; 64.-10-15; 67.-1-1; 68.-4-3; and 68.-4-10.
The boundaries of this amendment are shown on the map entitled “Proposed
Collegetown Area Form Districts-March 2011,” a copy of which shall be on file in the
City Clerk’s office.
Section 15: All applicable sections within the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca shall
be updated in accordance with the amendments made herewith.
Section 16: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 17: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
BACK-UP ITEM 9.2
City of Ithaca
Full Environmental Assessment Form—Part III
Proposed Establishment of the Collegetown Area Form Districts and Rezoning of
Potions of the R-1b, R-2a, R-2b, R-3a, R-3b, B-2b, and U-1 districts to Traditional
Residential (TR), Village Residential (VR), and Mixed Use (MU)
The “Collegetown Area Form Districts” is one of the key recommendations of the “2009
Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines.” The proposed zoning is a
hybrid code in that it is a mix of a form-based code and traditional zoning. It includes
regulation of physical form that is the focus of form-based codes but also includes
regulation of use and density found in traditional zoning. The adoption of the
“Collegetown Area Form Districts” would establish ten new zoning districts and re-zone
approximately 250 properties in the Collegetown area. The ten proposed districts can
be divided into three categories: Traditional Residential, Village Residential, and Mixed
Use. The principal goals of the form based code are a) protection of neighborhood
character in the Traditional Residential districts; b) regulation of the urban form in
anticipated growth areas, the Village Residential and Mixed Use districts; and c)
promotion of a lively, attractive, walkable neighborhood that prioritizes non-motorized
modes of transportation.
The four Traditional Residential (TR) districts are designed to preserve the existing
character of the neighborhoods and either maintain or slightly decrease density. Large-
scale new development is not anticipated in these areas, but the proposed form
requirements would ensure that any new construction is in keeping with the existing
built form. Maximum building height, maximum lot coverage, and minimum lot size are
based on the existing zoning in these areas, with the exception of the TR-4 district. The
proposed TR-4 district is adjacent to the proposed Mixed Use district (currently B-2b)
and has a maximum building height of 4 stories and 42’ with a maximum lot coverage of
50%. This is an additional story and an additional 10% lot coverage over the existing
zoning. The TR-4 district is the only Traditional Residential district that proposes an
increase in maximum building height. In terms of form requirements, all new
construction in a Traditional Residential district will be required to have a pitched roof
and a front porch. There is a required amount of glazing for each story, and all surface
parking must be located at or behind the front façade. There are no significant negative
impacts anticipated by the establishment of the Traditional Residential districts (TR-1,
TR-2, TR-3, and TR-4), and the establishment of the districts will have the positive
impact of protecting the built form of existing neighborhoods.
The five Village Residential (VR) districts are intended to promote redevelopment and
provide a transition between the lower-density Traditional Residential districts and the
higher-density Mixed Use district. The five VR districts range in maximum building
height from 3 stories and 35’ to 5 stories and 53’. The proposed zoning allows for an
increase in developable square footage in most of the VR districts to encourage
redevelopment in these areas. While the proposed VR-2 district will result in a
decrease in maximum building height (existing 55’; proposed 45’), the maximum lot
coverage will increase from 35% to 75%. The proposed VR-3 district will allow for a
10% increase in maximum lot coverage. The maximum building height will remain 4
stories but will increase to 45’ to allow for improved construction quality. The proposed
VR-4 and VR-5 districts will allow a maximum of 5 stories and 53’, which is an additional
story and 13’ over the existing R-3b zoning in these areas. In addition, these proposed
districts allow maximum lot coverage of 70% and 80% respectively, a significant
increase over the 40% allowed under the existing zoning. While the proposed zoning
will allow increased development in the VR districts, these zones were carefully
designed to accommodate the development in a way that will be compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood. The form requirements necessitate that new construction
have either a front porch or a front stoop1 and functioning entries must be located no
more than 50’ apart. The length of building facades are limited to between 100’ and
300’, depending on the district. These requirements work together to break up the
massing and create a more contextual pedestrian-friendly development. Similar to the
TR districts, surface level parking must be located at or behind the front façade. The
setbacks for each VR district were determined based on topography and adjacent
buildings. The establishment of the Village Residential districts (VR-1, VR-2, VR-3, and
VR-5) will likely result in increased density and redevelopment within these zones;
however, it is anticipated that the form regulations that accompany the establishment of
these districts will mitigate any negative impacts to Collegetown’s visual character
associated with additional development.
The Mixed Use (MU) district is proposed for the area that is currently zoned B-2b. The
requirements for the MU district maintain the maximum building height of 6 stories but
increase the maximum height in feet to 65’ to provide adequate room for the ductwork
and mechanicals required for a 6-story mixed-use building. The maximum lot coverage
remains 100%, and the adoption of the new zoning would not result in an increase in
developable square footage within the MU district. The proposed zoning includes
several use and form requirements that will make the central core of Collegetown a
more vibrant and pedestrian-friendly area. Active uses are required on the street-level
story in much of the MU district, and the street-level story must have 65% glazing to
attract the interest of passers by and enliven activity in the commercial core. A deeper
setback along the 100-block of Dryden Road will ultimately allow for wider sidewalks,
and required chamfered corners on buildings at the intersection of Dryden Road and
College Avenue will increase visibility for both pedestrians and drivers and reduce the
“canyon” effect observed on the 100 block of Dryden Road. The establishment of the
Mixed Use district is not anticipated to have any negative impacts and will have the
positive impact of improving the built form and vibrancy of Collegetown’s commercial
core.
The establishment of the Collegetown Area Form Districts would allow approximately
380,000 square feet of additional development. At full build-out, there could be an
1 In the VR-5 district, a front porch, a front stoop, or a recessed front entry is required.
increased demand for fire protection, police, and transit services. The new
development will also provide the City with additional tax revenue to help fund additional
required fire and police services. In terms of transportation, existing parking
requirements will remain in place with the exception of a change to the parking
requirement for office uses within the proposed MU district, which would be reduced to
one space for every 400 square feet of net assignable floor area (existing requirement is
one space for every 250 square feet of net assignable floor area). The majority of the
projected new development is expected to occur in the central areas of Collegetown,
which are well-served by multiple TCAT routes, are heavily traveled by pedestrians, and
can be easily accessed by other alternate modes of transportation. The additional tax
revenues that can be expected from these developments could also be utilized to
finance sidewalk expansions and other improvements to the public realm. The
proposed amendments to the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone (CPOZ), a companion
proposal to this action, could also mitigate transportation impacts through the funding of
transportation improvements throughout Collegetown.
Overall, the establishment of the Traditional Residential, Village Residential, and Mixed
Use districts and the rezoning of approximately 250 properties in the Collegetown area
will not have a significant negative impact. The proposed rezoning is intended to
concentrate growth in the central part of Collegetown and limit further expansion into the
surrounding neighborhoods, one of the key goals of the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan
& Conceptual Design Guidelines.” Under the proposed hybrid code, potential negative
impacts of increased density in the Village Residential districts will be mitigated by the
form requirements that accompany the traditional regulations of use and density. The
form requirements will enhance all of the proposed districts by ensuring the compatibility
of new construction with existing buildings, improving the architectural form of the area,
and promoting a pedestrian friendly environment.
9.3 Establishment of Collegetown Overlay Height Incentive District:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to Chapter 325 of the
Municipal Code in order to (1) establish the Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive
District (COZ-HI) and (2) zone portions of the proposed Mixed Use district (proposed
under a separate action) to be included in the COZ-HI District, and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted, including the
preparation of a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), dated March 9, 2011,
and
WHEREAS, these zoning amendments have been reviewed by the Tompkins County
Planning Department pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal
Law, which requires that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including
county and state highways, be reviewed by the County Planning Department, and have
also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the City of
Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a “Type I” Action under the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has
reviewed the FEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts
as its own the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Full Environmental
Assessment Form, dated March 9, 2011, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby
determines that the proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the
environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that
the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any
attachments, in the City Clerk’s Office, and forward the same to any other parties as
required by law.
B. An Ordinance to Amend The City Of Ithaca Municipal Code, Chapter 325,
Entitled “Zoning” To Establish the Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive
District (COZ-HI)
WHEREAS, the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” was
endorsed by the Common Council on August 5, 2009, and the plan recommended the
adoption of a form-based code, a binding design review process, a height incentive
zone, and several essential transportation measures, and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown Zoning Working Group was formed in February 2009 to
focus on the proposed Collegetown zoning changes, and this group included Common
Council representatives, members of the Planning and Development Board,
neighborhood residents, a Collegetown landlord, the editor/publisher of New Urban
News, and staff from the City’s Building and Planning Departments, and
WHEREAS, the proposed Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive District (COZ-HI)
area, the 300-block of College Avenue in Collegetown’s commercial core, was identified
in the Collegetown plan as a prime location for redevelopment and increased density,
and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown plan identified several possible community benefits, and
the Collegetown Zoning Working Group refined this list to focus on (1) the provision of
uses that will bring people into Collegetown throughout the calendar year and (2) the
provision of a high-quality transit facility within the new building’s footprint, and
WHEREAS, the proposed COZ-HI was presented at the Collegetown Neighborhood
Council and the Bryant Park Civic Association, and input from these meetings as well as
comments submitted by members of the public have been incorporated into the
proposed zoning, and
WHEREAS, public hearings on the proposed COZ-HI were held on March 16, 2011 and
April 20, 2011, and appropriate environmental review of the proposed zoning has been
completed; now, therefore,
ORDINANCE 2011-
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as
follows:
Section 1: Declaration of Legislative Findings and Purpose
With the endorsement of the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design
Guidelines,” the Common Council identified several goals to create an “outstanding
urban environment” in Collegetown. Several aspects of the envisioned environment
already exist; others will be more difficult to realize without incentive. The City’s goals
for Collegetown include:
• To further diversify the Collegetown population to include a greater number of
employees and residents whose presence is not dependent on the academic
calendar
• To sustain a thriving, year-round Collegetown business district
• To encourage strong residential areas to the east and west of the Mixed Use (MU)
District with a mix of owner-occupants and students
• To promote a convenient public transportation system, thus reducing traffic
congestion and parking demand
The “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” recommends the
adoption of an incentive zone to address these desirable but difficult-to-achieve goals.
Pursuant to §81-d of the New York State General City Law, the Common Council is
authorized to “provide for the granting of incentives, or bonuses” for the purpose of
advancing “the city’s specific physical, cultural and social policies in accordance with the
city’s comprehensive plan and in coordination with other community planning
mechanisms or land use techniques.”
The Common Council finds that the establishment of the COZ-HI Ordinance will
advance the City’s physical, cultural, and social policies for Collegetown as specified in
the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines.”
Section 2: Chapter 325, Sections 325-4 entitled “Establishment of Districts” and 325-5
entitled “Zoning Maps” of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca are hereby amended
to create an overlay zone in areas located in the proposed MU district to be entitled
Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive District, the boundaries of which are shown
on the map entitled “Proposed Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive District
(COZ-HI).”
Section 3: Chapter 325 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended
to add Section 325-42 entitled “Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive District” to
read as follows:
§325-42 Collegetown Overlay Zone Height Incentive District (COZ-HI)
§325-42.1 Purpose and Intent.
In accordance with §81-d of the General City Law of the State of
New York, this article authorizes the Planning and Development
Board, during the process of Site Plan Review pursuant to Chapter
276, Site Plan Review, of the Code, to make allowances for
buildings to exceed the maximum allowable height of the MU
district in exchange for the provision of an approved community
benefit, subject to the limitations contained in this section. COZ-HI
height incentives may be approved in order to promote the
following purposes:
A. To encourage development that would increase year-round
activity in the MU district.
B. To encourage the use of public transit through the provision of
enhanced transit facilities.
§325-42.2 Authorization and Minimum Requirements.
A. The Planning and Development Board is authorized, upon
petition by an applicant for Site Plan Review approval, to
approve construction of buildings that exceed the
maximum allowable height of the MU district up to a
maximum of 84' or 7 stories, for buildings located within the
boundaries of the COZ-HI, in accordance with §325-42.2B
and C below.
B. For all building facades that front College Avenue and
Dryden Road and for all building facades that directly abut
a VR-3 district, the seventh story shall be stepped back a
minimum of 12’ from the façade of the sixth story.
C. An applicant must submit a written proposal to the
Planning and Development Board which delineates the
benefit(s) that the project will provide to the community in
exchange for the additional height. In order to be
considered for approval of additional height, the applicant
must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning and
Development Board that at least one of the following
approved community benefits will be provided:
1. The development provides a use for a period of 20
years that will bring people into Collegetown
throughout the calendar year. Acceptable uses
include:
• A Hotel
• At least one story of Class A office space (Class
A office space is assumed to be high quality
office space with high quality finishes, state-of-
the-art systems, and exceptional accessibility).
• At least one story of non-tax-exempt research
and development space
• Other uses that will bring people into
Collegetown throughout the calendar year as
determined by the Planning and Development
Board
2. The development incorporates a high-quality public
bus shelter or facilities within its building footprint at
a location acceptable to the necessary decision-
making bodies. These may include: the Planning
and Development Board, the Board of Public Works,
and Tompkins Consolidated Area Transit.
§325-42.3 Approval Process; Modification of Benefits
In order to be granted approval for the additional permitted height
associated with properties located within the boundaries of the
COZ-HI, an applicant must submit a written proposal to the
Planning and Development Board, as described in §325-42.2
above, as a part of the Site Plan Review process. Approval of the
COZ-HI height incentives shall be conditioned on any necessary
approvals associated with the proposed benefit(s) of the project.
No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted prior to the
completion of the proposed community benefits. No building permit
or Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted if modifications to the
proposed benefits are proposed, are undertaken, or occur without
the approval of the Planning and Development Board. The
Planning and Development Board shall notify the Building
Commissioner of any action taken in regard to COZ-HI height
incentives.
Section 4: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca, New York is hereby amended
as follows:
The zoning district designation for portions of certain tracts of land shall now include the
Collegetown Overlay Zone-Height Incentive District (COZ-HI), which will include the
following tax parcels: 63.-6-14; 68.-4-6; 64.-10-17.2; 64.-10-18; 64.-10-19; 64.-10-20;
64.-10-21; 64.-10-1; 64.-10-2; 64.-10-3; and portions of parcels 63.-6-8, 68.-4-3, and
64.-10-15, as indicated on the map entitled “Proposed Collegetown Overlay Zone
Height Incentive District(COZ-HI),” dated October 2010.
Section 5: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 6: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
9.4 Establishment of the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to Chapter 325 of the
Municipal Code in order to amend the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone to (1)
establish a payment in lieu of parking system; (2) eliminate the option of providing off-
site parking areas within the CPOZ; and (3) reduce the residential parking requirements
for certain zoning districts within the CPOZ, and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted, including the
preparation of a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), dated March 1, 2011,
and
WHEREAS, these zoning amendments have been reviewed by the Tompkins County
Planning Department, pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal
Law, which requires that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including
county and state highways, be reviewed by the County Planning Department, and have
also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the City of
Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is an “Unlisted” Action under the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has
reviewed the FEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts
as its own the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Full Environmental
Assessment Form, dated March 1, 2011, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby
determines that the proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the
environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that
the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any
attachments, in the City Clerk’s Office, and forward the same to any other parties as
required by law.
B. An Ordinance to Amend The City Of Ithaca Municipal Code, Chapter 325,
Entitled “Zoning” To Establish the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone (CPOZ)
WHEREAS, the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” was
endorsed by the Common Council on August 5, 2009, and the plan recommended the
adoption of a form-based code, a binding design review process, a height incentive
zone, and several essential transportation measures, and
WHEREAS, essential transportation measures identified in the “2009 Collegetown
Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” for implementation include (1)
establishment of an in-lieu-of parking fee system; (2) designation of northbound and
southbound transit stop locations along the College Avenue corridor; (3) development of
a schematic design plan that prioritizes pedestrians for the public right-of-way
(streetscape) in the 300 and 400 blocks of College Avenue and the 100 and 200 blocks
of Dryden Road, in relation to expected pedestrian volumes and current and potential
development build-out in the Collegetown Planning Area; (4) implementation of a
remote parking system; and (5) development of a set of alternatives for managing on-
street and other public parking in the core of Collegetown, and
WHEREAS, transportation measures included in the amendment to the Collegetown
Parking overlay Zone include the following: a) establishment of a payment in lieu of
parking system, b) elimination of the option to provide off-site parking areas within the
CPOZ, c) reduction of the residential parking requirement for the proposed VR-4, VR-5,
and MU districts, and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown Transportation Working Group was formed to focus on the
proposed Collegetown transportation improvements, and this group included Common
Council representatives, members of the Planning and Development Board, a
representative of the Board of Public Works, and staff from the City’s Engineering and
Planning Departments, and
WHEREAS, the Collegetown Transportation Working Group and the Collegetown
Zoning Working Group worked collaboratively to address the goals of “2009
Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” through the proposed
amendments to the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone (CPOZ), and
WHEREAS, the (CPOZ) was originally adopted in 2000 to more adequately address the
parking demand of residents and business employees as identified in the Collegetown
Parking Study completed in the summer of 2000, and
WHEREAS, the CPOZ was intended to anticipate future parking needs, and, in
combination with other remedies, do so in a manner that would allow development to
continue and that would protect and improve the visual character of surrounding
neighborhoods, and
WHEREAS, the adoption of the CPOZ has alleviated some of the impact of spillover
parking on surrounding neighborhoods, but the more stringent off-street parking
requirements of the CPOZ have resulted in several negative consequences including
additional curb cuts, large areas of surface parking, and a disincentive to rehabilitate
existing “grandfathered” properties, and
WHEREAS, the proposed payment in-lieu-of parking system would offer an alternative
to providing required off-street parking, but participation in the system would not be a
requirement and a property owner may choose to provide required parking on-site, and
WHEREAS, providing this alternative to constructing on-site parking may promote
development on constrained sites and may also reduce the number of requests for
zoning variances, and
WHEREAS, a reduction in the residential parking requirement in the proposed VR-4,
VR-5, and MU districts would also encourage redevelopment in zones targeted for
increased density, and
WHEREAS, the existing provision that on-site parking requirements may be met with
off-site parking within a specified distance of a proposed development is difficult to
track and enforce, and under the proposed ordinance would be eliminated and replaced
with the payment in lieu of parking option, and
WHEREAS, all revenues collected from the payment in-lieu-of parking system will be
dedicated to transportation improvements in Collegetown with preference given to the
other transportation measures identified in the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan &
Conceptual Design Guidelines,” and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the CPOZ were presented at the
Collegetown Neighborhood Council and the Bryant Park Civic Association, and input
from these meetings as well as comments submitted by members of the public have
been incorporated into the proposed ordinance, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the CPOZ was held on
March 16, 2011, and appropriate environmental review of the proposed zoning has
been completed; now, therefore,
ORDINANCE 2011-
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as
follows:
Section 1:
Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new
Section 325-43 entitled “Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone” as follows:
§325-43. Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone
A. Parking Requirements.
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein, in the CPOZ, as designated on the map
entitled "Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone," dated
June 2000, a copy of which is on file in the Ithaca City
Clerk's Office, required off-street parking for
residential uses in the R-3a, R-3b, TR-3, TR-4, VR-1,
VR-3, and B-2d Zoning Districts shall be one space
for every two resident occupants. In the CPOZ,
required off-street parking for residential uses in the
VR-4, VR-5, and MU Zoning Districts shall be one
space for every three resident occupants. These
requirements shall apply to any new structures or any
modifications to existing structures that result in an
increase in occupancy.
(2) All required parking spaces in the CPOZ must be
provided on the same parcel as the building, use, or
activity that they serve or the parking requirement
may be fulfilled through the payment in lieu of parking
fee option pursuant to §325-43B.
B. Payment in Lieu of Parking Fee Option
(1) Purpose and Intent- In accordance with §81-d of the
General City Law of the State of New York, this article
authorizes the City to accept a payment in lieu of all
or part of a development’s required off-street parking.
Consistent with the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan &
Conceptual Design Guidelines,” the purpose and
intent of the payment in lieu of parking is to:
• Provide funding for multi-modal transportation
improvements that directly benefit the
Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone (CPOZ)
• Promote development on constrained sites
• Reduce the need for zoning variances
• Support historic preservation and rehabilitation of
existing structures by enabling redevelopment of
buildings without requiring the addition of new
parking
• Reduce the negative impacts of parking areas
(2) Requirements- In lieu of providing all or a portion of
the required number of parking spaces for residential
and non-residential uses within the boundaries of the
Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone (CPOZ), a
Payment in Lieu of Parking Fee may be paid, the
amount of which shall be established pursuant to
§325-43B(3) below. The Building Commissioner shall
verify the number of parking spaces required by
zoning for the property.
(3) Establishment of Fees- The payment in lieu fee shall
be a fixed, one-time payment per space in an amount
that balances the objectives of creating an incentive
for property owners to opt in with providing sufficient
revenue to fund transportation improvements within
the CPOZ. The fee shall be less than the cost of
providing structured parking (including land
acquisition, construction, operation, and
management). Based on the approach explained in
the footnote below, the payment in lieu fee shall be
$10,000 per parking space.2
(4) Time of payment. Payments made pursuant to this
section shall be made prior to the issuance of a
building permit for any portion or phase of a
development project for which required parking
spaces are not provided.
(5) Use of Fee. The City shall establish a separate interest-
bearing trust fund exclusively for the deposit of
2 The payment in lieu fee is to be approximately 50 percent of the cost of providing
structured parking, with the figure for the cost of providing structured parking being
derived from a widely-recognized formula such as that established by the Victoria
Transport Policy Institute, or similar respected institution.
payment in lieu of parking fees. Funds deposited into
said account and any interest earned shall be used by
the City for the exclusive purpose of funding
transportation-related improvements that will directly
benefit the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone
(CPOZ). Priority shall be given to transportation
improvements identified in the “2009 Collegetown
Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines.”
(a) Prior to the expenditure of said funds, the
Common Council must approve projects to be
funded by the payment in lieu fee revenues.
Section 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 3: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
9.5 Establishment of the Design Review Ordinance:
A. Determination of Environmental Significance - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to the Municipal Code in
order to add Chapter 160, “Design Review,” and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the
preparation of a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), dated March 1, 2011,
and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has been reviewed by the Tompkins County
Planning Department pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal
Law, which requires that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including
county and state highways, be reviewed by the County Planning Department, and has
also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the City of
Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is an “Unlisted” Action under the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has
reviewed the FEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts
as its own the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Full Environmental
Assessment Form, dated March 1, 2011, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby
determines that the proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the
environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that
the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any
attachments, in the City Clerk’s Office, and forward the same to any other parties as
required by law.
B. An Ordinance to Amend the City Of Ithaca Municipal Code to Add
Chapter 160, Entitled “Design Review”
WHEREAS, the ‘2009” Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines” was
endorsed by the Common Council on August 5, 2009 and the plan recommended the
adoption of a form-based code, a binding design review process, a height incentive
zone, and several essential transportation measures, and
WHEREAS, the City’s current Design Review legislation is limited to an advisory, non-
binding, review process, and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to establish a binding design review process for areas
included in the Collegetown Area Form Districts and to continue the non-binding design
review process in areas already subject to design review, and
WHEREAS, the proposed Design Review Ordinance was presented at the
Collegetown Neighborhood Council, and input from this meeting as well as comments
submitted by members of the public have been incorporated into the proposed zoning,
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed Design Review Ordinance was held on
March 16, 2011, and appropriate environmental review of the proposed zoning has
been completed; now, therefore,
ORDINANCE 2011-
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as
follows:
Section 1:
A new chapter (Chapter 160) entitled “Design Review”, is hereby added to the Municipal
Code of the City of Ithaca, to read as follows:
§ 160-1. Title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “City of
Ithaca Design Review Ordinance.”
§ 160-2. Purpose and Intent.
A. This section is intended to promote the general public
welfare by:
1. Promoting desirable urban growth and
development;
2. Promoting excellence of architectural and urban
design;
3. Preserving and enhancing community resources
such as historic architecture and neighborhood
character;
4. Achieving compatibility with adjacent properties.
B. The intent of this chapter is to provide for the review of
plans for construction, exterior alterations, additions, or
demolition of structures in certain zones of the City or
under certain conditions, which zones and conditions
are hereby deemed special in nature in terms of
architectural character, intensity of existing use and
development, sensitivity to the effect of change in use,
or other reason.
§ 160-3. Applicability.
Proposals subject to either binding or non-binding design
review, depending on the type of proposal and the property’s
zoning district, are as follows:
A. Binding Design Review
1. For any parcel or any portion of any parcel within
the Collegetown Area Form Districts (as defined
in Chapter 325, Article IV), all design review
recommendations shall be binding. Binding
design review shall apply to all proposals for:
a. New construction, exterior alterations, or
additions to any structure.
b. Addition or removal of exterior signs.
c. Changes to the site, such as the addition of
new or alterations to existing hardscape
elements, including but not limited to
paving, retaining walls, or fences.
d. Demolition of any structure or of any
portion thereof.
B. Non-Binding Design Review
1. In all other areas of the city in which design
review is required, design review
recommendations shall not be binding, unless
such recommendation shall also be incorporated
into a decision by the Board of Zoning Appeals
or as a condition of site plan approval by the
Planning and Development Board. Non-binding
design review shall apply to all proposals for:
a. New construction, exterior alterations, or
additions to any structure within the zones
designated B-1b; B-2b; B-2c; B-2d; all
CBD zones, including CBD-60, CBD-85,
CBD-100, and CBD-120; and C-SU.
b. New construction, exterior alterations, or
additions to any structure 60 feet in height
or greater in any zone.
c. Demolition of any primary structure within
any zone, and demolition of any portion of
any structures within the zones
designated B-1b; B-2b; B-2c; B-2d; all
CBD zones, including CBD-60, CBD-85,
CBD-100, and CBD-120; and C-SU.
c. New construction of a primary structure on
a parcel within any zone within two years
following a demolition of a primary
structure on that parcel.
§ 160-4. Exemptions.
Any action pertaining to any structure locally designated as a
landmark or within a locally designated historic district shall be
reviewed by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission,
and is therefore exempt from the requirement for design
review.
§ 160-5. Limited Binding and Non-Binding Design Review
Procedure.
A. The Building Commissioner or his or her designee shall
determine whether binding or non-binding design
review is required when an application for a building
permit or demolition permit is submitted. If the
determination is made that binding or non-binding
design review is required, the Building Commissioner
shall transmit the application to the Director of Planning
and Development.
B. Upon receipt of the application, the Director of Planning
and Development or his or her designee shall
determine whether the proposal shall be subject to a
limited or full design review.
C. For proposals for exterior alterations that require
binding design review, the Director of Planning and
Development or his or her designee shall determine
whether the proposal can have a limited review by staff
or requires full review by the Planning and
Development Board. The Director of Planning and
Development or his or her designee shall have the
authority to review and approve minor exterior
alterations such as in-kind replacements; limited
landscape work; small changes to doors, light fixtures,
paving, steps, or fences; or other similar minor
modifications.
D. For all proposals that require non-binding design
review, the Director of Planning and Development or his
or her designee shall have the authority to conduct a
limited review of proposals that meet the following
thresholds:
1. For modification and expansion of residential
development, an upper threshold of 4,000
square feet (sf) of total affected site area.
2. For new construction, modification or expansion
of nonresidential development in residential
zones, an upper threshold of 3,000 sf of total
affected site area.
3. For modification and expansion of nonresidential
development in nonresidential zones, an upper
threshold of 10,000 sf of total affected site area.
4. All proposals for demolition
E. If a proposal may cause public controversy, the Director
of Planning and Development may refer the proposal to
the Planning and Development Board for full review.
§ 160-6. Full Binding Design Review Procedure.
A. The Building Commissioner or his or her designee shall
determine whether binding or non-binding design
review is required when an application for a building
permit or demolition permit is submitted. If the
determination is made that binding or non-binding
design review is required, the Building Commissioner
shall transmit the application to the Director of Planning
and Development.
B. Upon receipt of the application, the Director of Planning
and Development or his or her designee shall
determine whether the proposal shall be subject to a
limited or full design review.
C. When the proposal is determined to be subject to full
design review, the individual or group making the
proposal shall submit an application to the Department
of Planning and Development with the following
information (as appropriate):
1. Name and contact information of the applicant;
2. Location and photographs of the property;
3. Architectural plans, site plans and drawings of
building facades;
4. Lists and/or samples of materials to be used;
5. Where the proposal includes signs or lettering, a
scale drawing showing the type of lettering to be
used, dimensions, colors, method of illumination,
and a plan showing the sign’s location on the
property;
6. Any other information necessary to visualize the
proposed work.
D. Upon application for full design review, a public notice
of the proposal shall be posted for a minimum of 10
days and must remain in place until the design review
has been completed. The notice shall specify the
proposed work, the time and place of the public
hearing, and to whom and by when any public
comments are to be communicated. The notice must
be placed at or near the property line in the front yard
so that it will be plainly visible from the street, and, in
cases where a property has frontage on more than one
street, so that the sign will be plainly visible from the
street on which it has such additional frontage.
E. The Planning and Development Board shall hold a
public hearing prior to reviewing any proposal. Notice
of the public hearing shall be published at least once in
the City’s official newspaper at least 5 days prior to the
public hearing. The notice shall specify the time and
place of the public hearing, a brief description of the
proposal, and the location where the proposal may be
reviewed prior to the hearing. The public hearing may
be combined with any other public hearing(s) required
for the project.
F. The Planning and Development Board shall reference
the “2009 Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual
Design Guidelines” as a resource during design review.
The Board shall approve, deny, or approve the design
with modifications within 65 days from the completion of
environmental review. The failure of the Planning and
Development Board to act within 65 days of the filing of
an application, unless an extension is mutually agreed
upon by the applicant and the Board, shall be deemed
to constitute approval.
G. All design review recommendations shall be
communicated in writing no later than 10 working days
after the meeting at which the recommendations are
made. A copy shall be sent to the applicant by mail and
a copy filed with the Building Commissioner.
§ 160-7. Full Non-Binding Design Review Procedure
A. The Building Commissioner or his or her designee shall
determine whether binding or non-binding design
review is required when an application for a building
permit or demolition permit is submitted. If the
determination is made that binding or non-binding
design review is required, the Building Commissioner
shall transmit the application to the Director of Planning
and Development.
B. Upon receipt of the application, the Director of Planning
and Development or his or her designee shall
determine whether the proposal shall be subject to a
limited or full design review.
C. Any individual or group proposing new construction or
development anywhere within the City of Ithaca may
request an informal design review and advisory
recommendation.
D. When the proposal is determined to be subject to full
design review, the individual or group making the
proposal shall submit an application to the Department
of Planning and Development with the following
information (as appropriate):
1. Name and contact information of the applicant;
2. Location and photographs of the property;
3. Architectural plans, site plans and drawings of
building facades;
4. Lists and/or samples of materials to be used;
5. Where the proposal includes signs or lettering, a
scale drawing showing the type of lettering to be
used, dimensions, colors, method of illumination,
and a plan showing the sign’s location on the
property;
6. Any other information necessary to visualize the
proposed work.
E. The Planning and Development Board shall review the
proposal and make any recommendations within 45
days from receipt of the completed application. The
failure of the Planning and Development Board to act
within 45 days of the filing of an application, unless an
extension is mutually agreed upon by the applicant and
the Board, shall be deemed to constitute approval.
F. All design review recommendations shall be
communicated in writing no later than 10 working days
after the meeting at which the recommendations are
made. A copy shall be sent to the applicant by mail and
a copy filed with the Building Commissioner.
§ 160-8. Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by any decision made pursuant to this
chapter may apply to the Supreme Court in the State of New
York for review under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and
Rules.
Section 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 3: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided by the Ithaca City Charter.
C An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 272 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
entitled “Signs” to amend Section 6 entitled “Signs Permitted in All Districts”
ORDINANCE 2011-
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as
follows:
Section 1:
Section 272-6 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code, entitled “Signs Permitted in All
Districts”, is hereby amended to read as follows (strikethrough indicates deletion,
underline and bold indicates new language):
§ 272-6(A) Signs Permitted in All Districts. The following signs are permitted in
any use district without a permit as noted:
(6) Murals.
b. Upon receipt of a proposal for a mural for any property subject to
the provisions of Chapter 325, Zoning, § 325-42, Design review, or
Article VIII, Courthouse Special Use Zone, or Chapter 228,
Landmarks Preservation, of this Code or facing such property, the
Building Commissioner shall notify the Design Review Board, the
Public Art Commission and/or the Landmarks Commission, as
applicable, for their information and any appropriate action and
shall so inform the applicant.
(6) Murals.
(b) Upon receipt of a proposal for a mural for any property
subject to the provisions of Chapter 160, Design Review, or
Chapter 325, Zoning, Article VIII Courthouse Special Use Zone,
or Chapter 228, Landmarks Preservation, of this Code or facing
such property, the Building Commissioner shall notify the
Planning and Development Board, the Public Art Commission,
and/or the Landmarks Commission, as applicable, for their
information and any appropriate action and shall so inform the
applicant.
Section 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 3: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided by the Ithaca City Charter.
D An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 325 entitled “Zoning” Section 10 entitled
“Accessory Apartments”, and Section 325-46 entitled “Review of Construction,
Demolition, and Alteration”
ORDINANCE 2011-
BE IT NOW ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca
as follows:
Section 1:
Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code entitled “Zoning”, Section 10D(6),
entitled “Accessory Apartments - Requirements”, is hereby amended to read as follows
(strikethrough indicates deletion, underline and bold indicates new language):
§ 325-10 – Accessory Apartments. In order to be granted a temporary permit, the
following criteria and requirements must be met:
...........
(6) Exterior appearance. If an accessory apartment is located in the main
building, the entry to the building and its design shall be such that the
appearance of the building shall remain as a single-family residence. New
or additional front entrances or windows are discouraged but in any event
must be in keeping with the architectural style of the rest of the structure.
Exterior stairways may only be constructed in the rear, except where an
alternate location would be less publicly visible. Any exterior design
changes may be referred by the Board of Zoning Appeals to the Design
Review Board for its technical advice. New or additional front entrances
must have the approval of the Design Review Board.
(6) Exterior appearance. If an accessory apartment is located in
the main building, the entry to the building and its design shall be
such that the appearance of the building shall remain as a single-
family residence. New or additional front entrances or windows are
discouraged but in any event must be in keeping with the
architectural style of the rest of the structure. Exterior stairways
may only be constructed in the rear, except where an alternate
location would be less publicly visible. Any exterior design changes
may be referred by the Board of Zoning Appeals to the Planning and
Development Board for its technical advice.
Section 2: Chapter 325 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code entitled “Zoning”, Article
IX, entitled “Courthouse Special Use Zone”, Section 46(A)(B) entitled “Review of
Construction, Demolition, and Alteration” is hereby amended to read as follows
(strikethrough indicates deletion, underline and bold indicates new language):
§ 325-46. Review of Construction, Demolition, and Alteration.
A. Demolition, exterior alterations or additions to existing structures and parking
areas and construction of new buildings or parking areas within the C-SU Zone
shall be subject to strict review and approval by the Design Review Board and
the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission within their respective areas of
responsibility. (See Subsection B below and § 325-41, Design review.) Proposals
for demolition of structures within the C-SU Zone but outside designated City
landmark districts shall nonetheless be referred to the Landmarks Preservation
Commission, which shall make its recommendation to the Design Review Board
before the latter takes final action.
B. Demolition, exterior alteration or enlargement of structures or parking areas or
construction of new buildings or parking areas in C-SU Zones shall be subject to
design review as provided in § 325-41 of this chapter. In performing such review
and recommending any modifications to proposed exterior work, the Design
Review Board shall pay particular attention to the visual effect of such work on
the character of the area and adjacent residential zones. In no case shall the
Design Review Board take final action on a proposal for demolition within any
part of the C-SU Zone which is not within a locally designated landmark district
before receiving the recommendation of the Landmarks Preservation
Commission on such proposal. Approval of proposed demolitions, alterations or
new construction within the C-SU Zone by the Design Review Board or the
Landmarks Preservation Commission, as applicable, shall be a prerequisite of
approval of such proposals by the Building Commissioner and the Board of
Zoning Appeals, as appropriate.
A. Demolition, exterior alterations or additions to existing structures and
parking areas and construction of new buildings or parking areas within
the C-SU Zone shall be subject to strict review and approval by the
Planning and Development Board and the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation
Commission within their respective areas of responsibility. (See
Subsection B below and Chapter 160, Design Review.) Proposals for
demolition of structures within the C-SU Zone but outside designated City
landmark districts shall nonetheless be referred to the Landmarks
Preservation Commission, which shall make its recommendation to the
Planning and Development Board before the latter takes final action.
B. Demolition, exterior alteration or enlargement of structures or parking
areas or construction of new buildings or parking areas in C-SU Zones
shall be subject to design review as provided in Chapter 160. In performing
such review and recommending any modifications to proposed exterior
work, the Planning and Development Board shall pay particular attention to
the visual effect of such work on the character of the area and adjacent
residential zones. In no case shall the Planning and Development Board
take final action on a proposal for demolition within any part of the C-SU
Zone which is not within a locally designated landmark district before
receiving the recommendation of the Landmarks Preservation Commission
on such proposal. Approval of proposed demolitions, alterations or new
construction within the C-SU Zone by the Planning and Development Board
or the Landmarks Preservation Commission, as applicable, shall be a
prerequisite of approval of such proposals by the Building Commissioner
and the Board of Zoning Appeals, as appropriate.
Section 3: The City Planning and Development Board, the City Clerk and the Planning
Department shall amend § 325-8, District Regulations Chart, in accordance with the
amendments made herewith.
Section 4: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
Section 5: Effective date. This ordinance shall take affect immediately and in
accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
9.6 Committing Priority Setting for Transportation Measures to be Funded by
the Payment in Lieu of Parking Revenue - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to Chapter 325 of the
Municipal Code in order to amend the Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone to (1)
establish a payment in lieu of parking system; (2) eliminate the option of providing off-
site parking areas within the CPOZ; and (3) reduce the residential parking requirements
for certain zoning districts within the CPOZ, and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted, including the
preparation of a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), dated March 1, 2011,
and
WHEREAS, these zoning amendments have been reviewed by the Tompkins County
Planning Department, pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal
Law, which requires that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including
county and state highways, be reviewed by the County Planning Department, and have
also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the City of
Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is an “Unlisted” Action under the City Environmental
Quality Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has
reviewed the FEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
WHEREAS, there are several transportation measures identified in the "2009
Collegetown Urban Plan & Conceptual Design Guidelines", which are not prioritized in
that document, and are currently in various stages of planning, progress and
completion, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council commits to setting priorities as soon as possible for
implementing transportation improvement measures funded by any payment in lieu of
parking revenues collected, considering their desirability, cost, and feasibility, the likely
amount of funding to be available, and the possible effects of additional residents in the
core of Collegetown without additional parking in this core area.
10. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
10.1 Youth Bureau – Request to Amend 2011 Youth Bureau Budget and Roster -
Resolution
WHEREAS, the Youth Program Assistant position was created in 2005 as a training
position to allow promising job recruits an opportunity to grow into a Youth Program
Leader Position, and
WHEREAS, a Youth Bureau employee has done an exemplary job as a Youth Program
Assistant and is qualified to become a Youth Program Leader, and
WHEREAS it is fiscally prudent for the City to ensure that all employees are working to
their maximum capacity, and
WHEREAS, there is a need for the said employee to carry out the duties of the Youth
Program Leader position,
WHEREAS, the employee is already in a full-time roster position and therefore no
significant increase in fringe benefits will be incurred; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends the 2011 Youth Bureau budget as
follows:
Increase Appropriation Accounts:
A7310-5110-01201 Salary $5,506
A7310-9010 Retirement $870
A7310-9030 Fica/Medicare $422
A7310-9040 Workers’ Comp $248
Decrease Appropriations Accounts:
A7310-5120-01240 Part-time Hourly $3,323
A1990-5000 Unrestricted Contingency $3,323
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the 2011 Authorized Personnel Roster of the Youth Bureau be
amended as follows:
Add: Youth Program Leader (35 hour per week) – Grade 12
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the position of Youth Program Leader shall be filled by promotion
and that the position of the Youth Program Assistant vacated by the promotion shall be
retained in a vacant, unfunded capacity as long as the Youth Program Leader is filled.
10.2 Department of Public Works – Request to Increase Budget Authorization
for the Ithaca City Court Renovation - Resolution
WHEREAS, Capital Projects 747 and 748 were established in 2009 in the amounts of
$460,000 and $285,000 respectively for the preparation of plans and specifications and
construction of renovations to heating, ventilation, air conditioning and the window wall
for the Ithaca City Court building, and
WHEREAS, bids were opened on March 29, 2011, and
WHEREAS, the total project budget is projected to exceed the authorized budget by
$102,853, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the amendments for Capital
Project 747 City Court Window Repair for an amount not to exceed $63,769 for a total
project authorization of $523,769 and Capital Project 748 City Court HVAC
Improvements for an amount not to exceed $39,084 for a total project authorized of
$324,084, and be it further
RESOLVED, That funds necessary for said amendments will be derived from the
issuance of Bonds with up to a 25% reimbursement of cost through the New York State
Office of Court Administration.
12. NEW BUSINESS:
12.1 Wild Fire Restaurant, Inc. d/b/a Delilah’s On Cayuga - Alcohol Permit
Request – Resolution
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has received a request to allow Delilah’s on Cayuga restaurant
to utilize certain areas along Cayuga Street for outdoor dining, and
WHEREAS, this use of public property has been deemed proper and successful, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca wishes to promote diverse uses of the Primary and
Secondary Commons, including outdoor dining, and
WHEREAS, it is Common Council's responsibility to determine whether or not to allow the
serving and consumption of alcohol on the Primary and Secondary Commons, and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that the use of this public property for
outdoor dining at Delilah’s on Cayuga restaurant, including the responsible sale and
consumption of alcohol, is desirable, and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that any use of this or similar public
property involving the same and consumption of alcohol should be covered by a minimum
of $1,000,000 insurance under the Dram Shop Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, For the year 2011, Common Council hereby approves a revocable Alcoholic
Beverage Permit for the outdoor sale and consumption of alcohol for Delilah’s on Cayuga
restaurant that includes the sale of alcohol in accord with the terms and conditions set
forth in application therefore, including minimum Dram Shop coverage in the amount of
$1,000,000 and the approval of an outdoor dining permit.
14. MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Board of Public Works – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Robert F. Morache be appointed to the Board of Public Works to fill a
vacancy with a term to expire December 31, 2012.
14.2 Community Police Board – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Fred Madeo be appointed to the Community Police Board to replace
Kevin E. Smith with a term to expire December 31, 2011.
14.3 Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency Board – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Ayana Richardson be appointed to the Ithaca Urban Renewal
Agency Board to fill a vacancy with an indefinite term.