HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-25-12 Board of Public Works Meeting Agenda Part3I
:F
i
f
O
N
N
N
}
J
0
N
N
O
N
m
N
E
n l0
m cp
N O
N �
N �2
L
11
H
It
'O U
> N
O
E )
N p_
L CN
O O �
o t`
N O O C,
;fl
to N 11
L
Ca 1�
p N r
N p CA
N X
Q O
,t O N
c O
co O N
O Q
� O �
N � U
pt` L N
T � O
� O C
X N
N -fl M
0 C
p O °O
O @ �
0 Y
O
L O II
°
° m c
�Y 3
c6 N O
o -
6i
2 c Cl)
c Q) m
0 m °
YL c n
in X
W 0 N
LL C/)
_O
N �
a
T °
N — m
6 °p O c0
° N N y 11
N L l0
L m
� N N C
N o O
m O G0
3 Z
O O m N
�
3 N O N
c 3
°
� a
� O C1 O N
X .N .-..O
ul O p @
— U N
® O N .L] O
� N �
LO ° a)
N co
® m N N LO
u-
- Q
Y m c0— O
z m E w 72
C w m 3
® A) ,O O 0
N N V Q o
Lij C
z ., 0
N
t6
4
0
O
m
0)
Y
N N
° O
c �
E'
C � C C
C O TN
J
6i E U �
O O O M O LL
pz `��-z� fl0�
p� a O
V V U L N U
Lo% N 20 C £9 Y
LLj Q N O N O
Y_ _ p _Y -p Y_ J
S Y m_ m O m N
w 3 a3 m m m
:U') 3:
z "CS _ 'O O
®I w m c) 6 — VT b
W N O c,3 ib
V N N �-o iT 7z 6O •-
c_O
N �O d-
M CO M W t- M
s
From:STREETS QND FACILITIES
I�
f
J1
607 +272 +4374 01/20/2012 14 :17 #797 P.001 /001
}S
LtIP
p E
i
I
77tt.
� zs�t)�=
� =,I z
a�
Av
a � K70 C e C
LtIP
From:STREETS QND FACILITIES 607+272+4374 01120/2012 14:19 #798 P.001/001
h,O✓ urn
a;
'Zo I tz,
Tgrk
(5
7
q,4 T, ---------
tt
a;
'Zo I tz,
I
M,
Z
x
aj
to
tio
.R
cu
-5
cu
cli
ai
_0
'0
C:
m
m
O
cu
O
C
Saa
uj
uj
:n
cr
I
lu
m
L ai
iv
m =
to
v 15
-0
W
m m u
C
LY O
:3
m =3
U
ra Q)
m
to
co I_-
m
0
c
ro
m
u
O
-C
0
to la
c
u
8
-0
0
cu
CL)
c
—0
W-
0 10
L
(IJ GJ
, -0
Ll� m
Z-?. 2
m
c w 2
LA "
0
w —
t
Cl c b
>
C:
(U
m m
3
fn
cu
-r_
CL
4,t
m
M>
t
E m
3: 4�
C -0
aj
0)
0 =1
0
c
m c
0)
(1) Gi
U
-Z u
-C
CU
— -5
(u
(U t�z
m
w
o 0
c: cc
c- -0
m
m
aj
0
— —
M
q� :5 M
u
CU
U.0
M
y -1.6 cc
cu
(U
®
E
8 3: t-
o
c
F=
E
-00
aj
"0 CU
o
�? m 5 t
w
2 a�
aj QJ
-0
c
* 0
C, u 0.
r-
M aj
u
-o tLo cu
c
�5 cu aj
aj
-C aj
-C 0
cu
to _0
m
wn E w
CL >
—:3 0Y®
a
m
0 0
—0
0
�c 0
C:
cu no
E
0 1
u u
O
CU
cli
m Y
> 0
-S
m
A u
w w -C
CU -C
a)
m
m
OD
m CL
0
-0
0 >�
12-,
0 t c —
om
, u
>
u
a
J-- M 0
4d
u S) m
0
, :3
_4 -0
a)
-0
0
'Z
L)
Oo
C
ai
m
12
rm
�5
c
m
(U
C)
='!5 3: 0 c
-j�
CCIJ
E
48
m E
-E -0
ai
n
M C) 0
3�
CJ •
�C)
CU :Ll " 0 M =
> U
0
m cu
8 jai
-
-
C
0,:,-
0
2 I
c:
CU 0
CL
C: -0
U
-0
3: -0 w m
aj
0
��o
w
a,
u
m
—(u
0 (D
C
0
w -,,e
'8
to
0 U
M M
E u
t; >
m E
wr-
"J
-a
sc
CJ vi
'2
O
C U >.
0
>
u
m
cli
a,
-
> —
8
�W. > 0
(D c
c
—cu S,
>
C
O 0
-0 3;
0-
0 W CU
m
-0
0) c
4!
c
-0
o OL
u
cu a) tt: -0
CU
>1
(-u
42
(U 0
U
—0 -0 m
0
-0 CL
CL n
Gj c 0
0 CL c 0
si 3� -Z
i 0
o
:5
. 3i
a -, U
a,
(U 5 Qj
-0
E cr u '—
m
E — -0
0 m
0 0)
m
(U
-0
8 —
0
cu CU 0
CL
m
cu aj -M
-0
J- c
-0 :3
'7
ej 0 0
-
M
c 0
(Ij
ai
>
L
<
—
> 8
w 12
v 0
�i w (u
M
u
u
ru_
u ob
>
C >
J- >
- -2
w
— —
(u
'6 e)
• to m
a,
cu
-0 —M
o
75
8 u e E
m u m
(u (u 3: =
i5
m
u
m
m
0
m
4i�
E m
m cr
_0
CL E
cu e-j
a)
CU
2
CU
a)
-0 CL
u ai
cu q; W
0
0
m 0
-0 -C
o
E
0 a'j
-0
z-,
0
C
2 2
3: -0
m
EL E
'81 w 0
S
o
C CO
w
m
- 0 m Ui C
N
u
�5 w M
-,.e
- ,
:3 a) —'::
'a
'A
z
aj -0 c 'a
m cu
a
OD
0 aj -
-Oc ao;
OJ 8 2
:3
w
c '
2� c --2
-0 E
cu
0 o o
=
m
n
0
- . F= . 12 .2
,, =
3
—M w
3: m
0 3:
7,- .�O
0 >
--
w al CU
cu
-
U
0. a-
F=
CL
ci
0
u m
w W
M u 3: cu
a w
C In
w c
W
CL >
E
LU
4t
a,
0
J-5
-0
cu =
-0 3:
= C:
=0 ou
W cu
0
CC
i u
tE
iS
(D m �6 6
6 Ain o
(u
cu
-0
CU
0
-X
ai
(U
(U
u
C
0
0
0
ao -0
0
C
O
OD
C:
u
m a;
IF
cu cu
CL
'F
m
C)
m
o
-0
0
OZ
OD
M
.j
0
'E
L,
E
E
m m
-0 w
-ru aj
cu
a)
>
cu
3:
w
CL
78
0
7.5
x
aj
u
0
C: u
ci
aj
w C:
0
-14 0
m
72 E
WW
-M
M X
. 0
c
cu
>
0
0 -0
(U
CL m
w
(U
4
0)
m c:
r-
0
3�
LU
-Gj
-0
m
a)
cu
(U
I
a
cu
>
0
0
-0
N
:3 a)
M
Ln
ca c.
a;
m
t
(U
C:
0
tj
m
z
>
0
t -Mc
> -5
1
=
(D
-0
CL u
0
0
MI
0
m
-C
C
cu
r- a; C:
cu
Z
0
OZ
W
cu
u
0
cu X,
-
0
:L
C: -0
C)
3:
(U 0)
3:
2
.
i�
Ln
m
aj
E
8 E o
0
o
u aj
C, 0
-0:
0
in 0 0— u
f
m
3: -a -0
'a.
cac,: 10
3: 1
(U cu
co J- -C
m
I
cu
O ai
0
u N 0
0 o M
0
ry 0 0)
04
O
O
to
C:
E o cu (N
C
m
a
:3 1� 0 § -:�� �j a)
m
-C
u
a,
co
CL E
0
2
m
0
>
C cu 0
0 C) cu
0
0
CL 3: m cu
(D m r- aj
a)cjo
J
Q 0 - mmo- L�
3: =0
Lu
Of cc
'o
c = m
u aj
0 u :,
I cu C 0 c E
�6
c 0
0
aj
m
uj Cl,-
cr
0 cc
0
cc E
M 3�
aj
cu >- M C �,z
= >.
0
u
(D
c
Lu 0
U 0 c: t'J
Y
Y v1 to t9
c t7
Lu w co
aj
m (u >- m
I
0
F= 0 E a
>- >- cu -n 6
cr Lu ca m
- (D -
0 Q) >- 119
aj cu (u -E' cu 0- 0
=
.-
cu
V 2 E c c D = c c
U
cl - co -j EL
iA
0
ca cn w c
-- 0 .r 0 0
0 - - - 0 - -
<
>-
cu
z 3: ej z o co c >-
t.LLI� 0 -oc:mo 00-0-08
>. 0 on to 0
CJ > a
-
c > Ln 0 cu m t4 E
C
ii
m c:
O
cc V c 0 w O CJ
O
t; 8 0 c w -V� w
0=1 M: o o o o
0 Q, < (D E
0 'o
Su
7�5 cu a >- >- >- = m
0 -a c c c
— —j = c: N to m
Icu: -m ouj
m cr (u w 2 co w
3: 5; cu c>:. -I-- - ac, -
B c: cu
ry
- c clu
Qj w 0 R >� - , a
u
= -m 2
0
cc
cu -j c c m c
u m -e -0
,z -0 0 >- = >. m -a 0 >. c6
0 E E cu m
0 -0 Lu (u :�d C7 m
fn E E E E
w
a 0
E 0 o o
-0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w
-u
u c`�
2
.0
- w cL (u u --
u
auj 4- (u
f m
u (UD E w
w w
- W = m S u-j E E - - = = c: - 'o
2u m m m
p m m co w m m m m E E
E
cL a; C a :z 9 cL .r m m m m m m "z
op u i L� L w -
-, 0 E E E E
'Y
cn Lu Lu Lu Lu
Lu Lu Lu Lu Lu
0 2
C, -
s Lu Lu
-. �5 2 'o m < w u-, Lu u-, -a 3:
, -1 1 3:
2 E E
— 0 5; ��; 0 �7> <
'=- -o
La .
aj
N w Z5 4�0 E
-0 a- a- a. c- a- a-
=m 7: c- Q- D- < oo m rN
M " r,4 = 0
-6
E= CO to m 01 c14 Ln
0 Lu
aj A Ln r14 m rN oo Ln r- m C) fj r- u
0 C) cu r-I
L, m
"t - E 2 T - m un
Lu t.0
-0 z7i :t-- 1-1 4 4 �t Ln 9 Ln E 9
C, E (;i 4 Lu O. rn rn F= m -4 r4 ri ri
R oll 0 0 (D C) C) CN N Cn M UJ I I dr
uj -i ul ri -i rq --I ri
I- r- CD C) CD -- I -q 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 r4
C)
r-f r-i -q q r-i -J H rq -i r4 rq
-4
eN C) r- "zr r-I oo oo Ln In in rn
Ln '.0 -4 M 4Z C-4 -4 rq rq eq T- r- r, 00 M M M C14
C14 -1 oo oo
M -4 I-q 1-4 N r'4 IH Cq N (N
r- r., r, w to I-i oo cc oo oo oo m a) m 01 m o) 01 m M 1-1
1-1 1-4 r-I 1-4 N N r14 r14 m oo oo oo co oo
4v
LK ! P 0JR, T
LOCC/1,71,1-0,TM- 104 Worth St
R 41 R C! T L.
66.-2-12
NOTICE STAGE:
01
V017,1 -
1,FINA�-A
U-V7T C !VTGl?:
WORK Blr�-
IBOTH
E C4 IRVALK SF
15011
DEBT R
IOWNER
E C4 JWALK S:
$1,713.00 1
I I P IT:
i
iTEMPTREE
E C6 JWA L K Sf
01
OR -ff—C! 7 E,-
ICLOSED
E C 6 UVA 1--K k
$0�00
0 '11,111YEIR-1 n
Brute A. Roebal
E C'GRIA"D.
01
0 l'-'MlVEP.2.
i
E C GPj,,,%fD
7
"A ff L T�
1104 Worth St.
E C S UH —H,
V:
!Ithaca, NY
E'04 W' LK SIP-
501
-A
111 11L Zi;--
%.
E 04 '� LKS.
$571.00
1) J"Ek' L E -7 7 EW:
_6
�4/2ooql
E 06 IWALA SJF
0
DA 4 7E MELD:
8/1112010
06 I&VALK S.
1 $629.00 1
'E
DA. I , Al S S ESS:
E 0 GRIND:
0
j,-)A TE COYIPIE.
E 0 G'R 10,1) -0, $:
0.00 1
i5fAll, 7' 7- 4 s7o
[_V1.421
? TIT S,-
E 0 S UB
1,200.00
,/ Y F T COS T6
TT`J
FIELD STAGE:
i 274.51
s 4 L L 4 P, 7111L A" I,:
$3,134.79j
01
ALL 6
$0.001
ALL GRP,
ALL 6 7167, S:
0 s-nEc
ALLSRAR 7171, S:
Cl GYRUAID MAII-F-
1'4 HIAILK 9
VIVOI 1) T
-17' 6 1 .4-,LK S.
4 i��A LK SJP,-'�
C7,17 4 1 'A LK,�
971
Jf
0111V6 MXLKS,,'�',
(-176 VyALKSF-
0 (4-MVIP DOiNEF:
Al —1, 4 WALKSE.
i 274.51
s 4 L L 4 P, 7111L A" I,:
$3,134.79j
ALL 6 TVAUKSJ
ALL 6
$0.001
ALL GRP,
ALL 6 7167, S:
$0.00]
ALLSRAR 7171, S:
$3,134,79-il
1'4 HIAILK 9
12010
-17' 6 1 .4-,LK S.
$0,00
V 1, A
See previous defect notice.
painted 8/18110
measured 9/23/10
Jqmm,lay, A 21, '011 le " v q'I In qpone
TA'! TTL $:
1 $1,107,74
0111� 4f 1 VALK 1,:
L. $2,027.051
0 P f 6 Of y All L K S:
0 J,
0 H, A,,` S lih, I "I -L S
A,S,',VJf, S'S 5:
$2,533.81
PRA:
12010
SIDEWALK INSPECTION OWNER
ITHACA CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ADDRESS
108 East Green Street PARCEL
Ithaca, NY 14850 INSPECTOR DATE
607-274-6530 FAX 607-272-7348
City Responsibility (Trees/Ramps) Owner Responsibility (Other)
blocks 4" City x 25 sqft blocks 4" Owner x 25 = sq ft
blocks 6" City x 25 = -sq ft blocks 6" Owner x 25 = s q ft
t
-e-
4/7
AV
X
3
S
tc
F Condemnable
U
U Unsatisfactory
T
T Tree Damage
G Grass in Joint
J Joint not Level
R Curb Ramp
Missing Slab
Surface
Deterioration
jrF
7.
Cracking
Re: 104 Worth Street sidewalk
Dear fellow citizens,
|n January/February of this year, | protested my sidewalk bill for 1O4
Worth Street. At question was why | was being charged for over 10Osquare
feet mf concrete while the letter from the City said | was responsible for
only 25 square feet. Unnecessary work was performed.
| received afew weeks ago a statement saying that the entire bill was
due. Having heard nothing regarding rny appeal since that hearing in
February, | had hoped nny request had been honored.
| request once again that this bill be cancelled, or at least adjusted to
only the 25 square feet of concrete.
255-3505 (office)
279-9821 (cell)
104 Worth Street
Ithaca, 0Y14858
Page 2 of 2
Bruce A. Roebal
104 Worth Street
Ithaca, NY 14850
(607) 279 -9821
bar2@cornell.edu
January 14, 2011
Board of Public Works
City of Ithaca
108 East Green Street
Ithaca, NY 14850
Dear Neighbors,
1 WI to protest the blii a received for sidewalk alk repair oi'i my pr oiler t`, at 1 0/1 �s''t orti'i
Street, Ithaca, NY, completed during the summer of 2010. Invoice # 00013987, in the
amount of $2,533.81, and due Monday, January 1.7, 2011.
The work crews singled out and spent half the summer of 201.0 parked on the 100 -block
of Worth Street and ripped up sidewalks that were in far better condition than a great
many sidewalks in Ithaca. I was responsible for four blocks, but only fixed three since
the fourth was only slightly pitted. I expected that the city might charge me for that one
block, not for my entire sidewalk. But the city tore out an entire stretch of sidewalk that
someone had labeled "unsatisfactory," a stretch of sidewalk with extensive, city -owed
tree roots running underneath. This could be considered tree damage. (This section of
sidewalk was much like the existing sidewalk at 321 Ithaca Road. Should that sidewalk
be ripped up? Of course not.) I was billed in December, due in January.
The mission of the Department of public Works includes the phrase, "insuring the
integrity and reasonable use of municipal resources." Is it reasonable to pursue utopian
sidewalks, one block at a time, while ignoring sidewalks desperately in need of repair?
This is akin to feeding some residents seven - course meals while allowing others to go
hungry.
There are so many sidewalks in Ithaca that are in far worse condition than the previous
100 -block of Worth Street, sidewalks which receive massive pedestrian traffic (unlike
Worth Street) such as Mitchell St., Elmwood Ave., Dryden Ave., Fairmount Ave., and
Harvard Place. That's just my neighborhood. Some of these sidewalks are dangerous.
For the past 3 -4 years, I've specifically informed the city about two of these; 413 Dryden
Ave. and the sidewalk at 307 -309 Elmwood. Ave. a look at 413 (corner Dryden and
Fairmount). You'll be stunned by its jagged "mountain peaks." 307 -309 Elmwood'
always has either ice or wet and slippery sections. I hurt myself on that sidewalk several
years ago, hence the reason for my calls to the city. kook also at 106 Harvard Place. The
list goes on.
I did not realize I would receive a bill for the total work done, a bill which includes a
25% surcharge. I thought the city might replace the one block, although it was in good
condition. The city replaced smirch more. I informed Lynne Yost of my concern that my
entire sidewalk was being ripped up on September 9, 2010. 1 received the bill just last
month and now Ms. Yost tells me I must protest this before the Board, a protest that
may take several months. 1 simply can't afford this unjust bill. If 1 could, I would pay it
under protest, but if I pay this, I can't afford my January city and county property taxes.
My hands are tied.
I always pay my taxes and am never late. I keep my property in great shape, shoveling
the entire 100-block of Worth St. each time it snows, including all curb cuts. I do this for
my neighbors and for school kids at the crosswalks at the corner of Ithaca Rd. and
Elmwood. I previously lived on Hancock Street and did likewise on that block. If more
people in the city treated their property and the properties of their neighbors as well as
I do, that would be utopian. I wish the city to treat me as I do my neighbors, with
integrity.
The city should not be creating financial hardships for homeowners whose sidewalks
are not in perfect condition while ignoring the sidewalks in need of immediate repair.
The city has misplaced priorities. It must prioritize what needs to be done; triage, so to
speak. My sidewalk was but a stubbed toe while other sidewalks need a foot
amputated. You should not treat the toe first.
Can the city charge rne the entire amount? Yes. Should the city charge me the entire
amount? No. Will the city charge me the entire amount% 1 hope not.
Sincerely,
V_�47
Bruce A. Roebal
cc: Debra A. Parsons
attachment: Invoice # 00013987
CITY OF ITHACA
108 E GREEN STREET
ITHACA NY 14850
BRUCE A ROEBAL
MARSH MARIANNE R
104 WORTH St
ITHACA, NY 14850
Property -
104 Worth St
Invoice F ruin : City Eneineer
Invoice Date : 12/13/2010
Invoice 4 : 00013987
Account 9 0 00005003
Due Date 01/17/2011
City Engineer
General Billing Information
(607) 274-6580
Information specific to bill
(607)274-6530
Invoice Ref. 2010 SIDEWALK A
Entry Date Item Category Item Description Qty Price Total
12/13/2010 SIDEWALK REPAIR- 4 IN SIDEWALK 4 " SIDEWALK 177.50 $11.42 $2,027.05
Sub-Total: S2,027.05
Surcharge: $506.7-6
Total: %2,533.8I_
Additional Description: 2010 SIDEWALK REPAIR
BILLS NOT PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS ACCRUE A LATE PAYMENT PENALTY AT THE RATE OF TWELVE PERCENT PER ANNUM OR$3.00
PER NIONTH, WHICI-IEVER IS GREATER, PURSUANT TO CITY CODE. BILLS REMAINING UNPAID ON NOVEMBER I ST ARE ADDED 1-0
THE FIRST INSTALLMENT OF THE NEXT CITY TAX BILLING; AND COLLECTED AS A PART THEREOF.
*1T
........
Make check payable to:
CITY OF ITHACA
.
CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE
108 E GREEN STREET
ITHACA NY 14850
Return this portion with your payment
Invoice Date
Invoice 9 .
12/13/2010
00013987
Please Pay on or before S2,533.81
Arnount Paid
INVO0013987
000000000000000001398700000000000004000000010000002�c308l009
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Green Street, lthaea, New York 14850—_`690
OFFICE OF = CITY =HGIN n=
Telephe-ne: f59'7/Z,74-513G Fay-. Bo?r-74-5587
6/24/2009
Bruce A. Roebal
104 Worth St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
k- V, ID E T11A L K NO TIC E OF v D EFF, C T
LOCATT ON:
TAX PARCEL
104 Worth St
10�0
City of Ithaca has inspected the condition of the public sidewalk along the street at tfus
address. At this time of inspection, the following sidewalk was found to be defective,,
zn
TREE DAMAGED WALK:
150 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
0 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
0 grind locations
OTHF-R DAMAGED WALK:
50 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
50 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
0 grind locations
11
This location is on *the City's repair list and will remain on the list until tile repair work is
completed by you or by the City. At the first opportunity, all defective sidewalk found at
this location at the time of the work will be replaced. City of Ithaca ,ode requires that
sidewalk repairs made by City of Ithaca be billed to the owner at cost plus 25%_
You are encouraged to hire a contractor to do your repairs. Obtain a sidewalk permit so
the location can be removed from City of Ithaca's repair list when work is completed.
Please read the attached document and if you still have questions, you may contact the
Office of the City Engineer at 607-274-6532.
City of _11thaca9 NY
Off-ice of the City Engineer
fls: l04 Worth 8t sidewalk c000cm
Lynne Yost - Re: 104 Worth 0t sidewalk concern
Page I of 6
Dear Ms, Parsons,
The status of my bill is quite simple: it is due on Monday, January 17.
What I'm claiming is that the city spent half the summer on the 100 block of Worth Street and ripped up
sidewalks that were in far better condition than most sidewalks in the city of Ithaca. I was responsible for four
blocks, and I should have fixed all four, but I only fixed three. The fourth had a few small pock marks. The city
then ripped out an entire stretch of sidewalk that someone had determined were "unsatisfactory." So I was
billed for everything. |n December. Due January 17.
There are so many sidewalks in Ithaca that are in far worse condition than the 18O block of Worth Street,
sidewalks which have a great deal of pedestrian traffic. Some of these sidewalks are dangerous. Look at 413
Dryden Avenue (|'ve told the city about this one sidewalk and one on the 3OO block of Elmwood for the past
three or four years and nothing has been done). Walk up and down Mitchell Street. Elmwood Avenue, Harvard
Place. That's only myneighborhood.
I did not realize I would receive a bill for the total work done. I thought the city would replace the one block I did
not address. The city replaced much more. I received the bill just last month. Now Lynne talks of a protest that
can take several months. | have less than one week.
The city should not becreating financial hardships for homeowners whose sidewalks are not in perfect condition
while ignoring the many sidewalks which really do need repairs. The city needs to prioritize what needs tobe
done; triage, soto speak. &4y sidewalk was but astubbed toe while others need to have their feet anooutated.
Treat the toe first?
Can the city charge me the entire amount? Yes. Should the city charge me the entire amount. Definitely not. Will
the city charge me the entire amount? That is up to you and others copied on this letter.
All best,
Bruce Roebal
On 1/10/114:26 PM, "Lynne Yost" <LYNN EYocityofithaca.org> wrote:
Hi Ellen
Bruce Roeba| should contact Debra Parsons at274-658O (or bvemail)
Re: ]O4 Worth S1 sidewalk concern
regarding the status of his bill during a protest.
Protest review bystaff and BPVV members, placement on the BPVVagenda,
and a passed resolution byBPVV regarding the protest typically takes
several months.
I've been working dnnoughn�essa�esrece�edduhn�varadonand miUdo
research and address Bruce Roeba|'s questions specific to his property
in the next few days.
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
1D8 Green St. Room 282
Ithaca, NYl4Q5Q
(T) 607-274-6527
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E) |ynoey@cbyofi1hacaorg
vvvvvv.cityofithaca.org
vvxvw.ithacanneps.or0
From: Ellen McCollister <emccn||ister@citvofthaceorg>
To: Bill Gray <biU8@cityofithaca.or0>, Lynne Yost
<LY0NEY@cityo5thaca.or8>
CC: <nnayor@cityofithaca.or8>, Joel Zunooff~jz12@corne||.edu>
Date: 1/10/20113:46 PM
Subject: 104 Worth St sidewalk concern!
| just received an anxious inquiry from my constituent Bruce Roeba|
regarding the status of his sidewalk issue. His bill is due in a
week, and he says he has not received a response from anyone regarding
his December letter.
Asa new Council member, |am still familiarizing myself with
the
City's sidewalk policy. | know there may be changes but inthe
meantime the residual policy has been causing endless concern up here
in the Third VVard—snnneof which could be alleviated through better
communication. Since Joel Z. is the BPVV liaison, | am copying him on
file: 111C: \Documents and S i S C348A— 10/24/2011
Ile: 104 Worth St sidewalk concern
this email aswell.
Could one of you please call Bruce asap and help him resolve the
status of his bill? His office number is25S'3E05 or cell is
279-9821.
Thank you for the attention you can give to this.
Ellen McCollister, 4Jder9ersun
City of Ithaca, Third Ward
607.272.5996
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Bruce ARoebal <bar3@corneU.edu>
> Date: December Z3,3D1OI1:5O:4QAMEST
>To: Lynne Yost «LYN0EY@cityuMthaca.orQ>
>Cc: °].R. Rarnirez"^jrrannirez@dtyofithaca.org>, Ellen McCollister
<emnccn||ister@cityofithaca.ur8
> Subject: Re: Permit Info
> Dear Lynne,
�
> |]ust received a bill for the sidewalk repair/work done at 104
> Worth Street. $2,533.81. Invoice # 00013987.
�
>As you may recall, when ! received, via registered certified mail,
> information concerning the condition ofnoy sidewalk, there were 4
>"b|ucks" which were in need of repair. | repaired three ofthem
and
> did not repair the fourth (since that one only had "pock marks"
and
> was by far in better condition than most sidewalks in Ithaca. The
> only work that remained still todo was the tree-damaged portion.
> That was done. Thank you.
�
> Have you recently walked the sidewalks up Mitchell Street, Elmwood
> Avenue, Fairmont, or Harvard Place, to name only a few? What |find
> incredible is that the work crews were parked on the 108 block of
» Worth Street, all summer it seemed, while streets which actually
> have foot traffic (see above) remain untouched with dangerous
> conditions, not mere "pock rnarkc" Should the city not prioritize
> its actions, especially in these hard financial times?
Page 3 of 6
file: 11C: \Documents and Settings\LYNNEY\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4D2C398A... 10/24/2011
Re: l04 Worth 5t sidewalk concern
�
> Back to my property The workers took out the whole stretch of
>my sidewalk, not the one block which | had not addressed (since the
• pink paint told them to do that). That stretch was not on the
• certified/registered letter | received. And at the point when the
•^paint" went down, su the workers said, | was unable tudoany
work
> myself.
» The segment that was taken out, again not nn the original letter,
> had extensive root activity underneath. The city's trees throw out
> long roots, Pictures were taken.
• Lynne, | claim the following: First that this extra work was not
• necessary, as evidenced by the certified letter. Second, that if
• this worked was deemed necessary, that the tree-damaged provision
• should apply. That the condition ofmy sidewalk was ingood
• condition, again as evidenced by the "|etter." Further, that
since
•no prior warning had been made before the pink paint was applied,
• there should definitely not have been any "surcharge" added to
the
> bill since / never had an opportunity tm respond to this. |sthat
> not why you went through the expense of the original certified
> letter? The second letter, then, was composed of pink spray paint.
> |s this official?
�
> Lynne, | can not afford this "additional" work. |t was not
indicated
> at all. I was prepared tn pay for the one block that | did not
»gddness.
�
> Again, | keep my property in fine shape. And also the entire block.
• For n1y neighbors, for school kids crossing the streets. If more
• people in the city treated their properties and the properties of
• their neighbors as well as| do, vve would all benefit.
�
>| further request that the city look at sidewalks which are in
> severe disrepair, unlike the sidewalks uf Worth Street.
> Any assistance you can provide or lobby for to lower my bill will be
> much appreciated.
> Yours sincerely,
�
file://C���ocuzn�o< ���� co]� � �ao\4�2��340/\ 10/24/20I1
� m o�uu&uu.z��r�/��u�u oo�o�u�/coz�u�r�r�vv ���
Re: 104 Worth St sidewalk concern
> Bruce Roeba|
> 1U4 Worth Street
x Ithaca, NY1485O
�
�
�
�
>On9/9/10I:12 PM, "Lynne Yost" <LYNNEY@citvofithaca.org>vvrote:
»HiBruce,
�
> Bill Gray, the Superintendent of Public Works, has just changed the
> tree damage policy. You will not be charged for tree damage work
> performed by City of Ithaca this year.
>Lynne
�
,
'
> Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
> City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
>1O8 Green St. Room 2U2
x
> Ithaca, NYI4858
>(T)5O7'274'65I7
>(F) 507-274'6587
>([) 6U7-327-O725
>/E\|ynney@cityofithaca.org
>vvvvvv.cityofithaca.org
>wvvvvjthacanoaps.or0
�
�
�
>Fromn: Bruce 4Roeba|<bar2@corneU.edu>
>To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@citvofthaca.org>
> Date: 9/8/2010 9:04AK4
>Suhiect: Re: Permit Info
> Dear Lynne,
�
> The workers are in the process of tearing upu large section ofrny
> sidewalk, "on rnydinne,"as the workers just said. In the letters
' your offices have sent noein the past two years, there were four
> sections for which | was responsible. | paid for the repair ofthree
> and felt the fourth was in, bv far, better shape compared with the
> vast majority of sidewalks in Ithaca.
Page 5of6
Re: I04 Worth St sidewalk concern
>Atthe most, | should be responsible for that one block. Not the
> nest. | can not afford to pay for this as | had planned my expenses
> according to your official, and registered, letter.
• Lynne, | personally shovel snow for the entire 10Q-b|ockofWorth
• Street every time it snows. From curb cut to curb cut, then all
• sides of the four-corners of Elmwood and Ithaca Road for the school
> kids. Ask the crossing guard. | take care ofmy property and my
> neighbors and for people ( never see.
x
>|doso much good for our city. | wish my city todo good bvme.
> All best,
�
* BruceRoeba|
*2S5-35O5(of5ce)
* 279-9821 (cell)
v1U4 Worth Street
»
CITY OF ITHACA
108 East Greern. Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
OFFICE OF THE CITY FNGINEER
Telephone: 607/274-6530 Fax: 607/274-6587
July 6, 2007
Bruce A. Roebal
104 Worth St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
Dear Bruce A. Roebal:
You have probably observed that Ithaca's sidewalks are rebuilt on an ongoing basis. One reason
for this is Ithaca's sidewalk repair and inspection program. At the time of inspection, the
deteriorated sidewalk at 104 Worth St. consisted of the following:
TREE DAMAGED WALK (by current policy, the city assumes expense for this repair):
150 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
0 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
OTHER DAMAGED WALK (for which you are responsible):
50 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
50 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
The City is exercising its option to complete the necessary repairs and has tentatively scheduled
your property for work this year. You will be billed for your portion of the expense plus an
additional 25% administration fee required by the City Engineer. Please note that some
inspections were done several years ago and sidewalk condition will be reevaluated based on
current conditions at the time of construction. It is possible more sidewalk will be replaced than
the quantities listed above.
You may wish to review the enclosed excerpts from the City Charter and City Code. The
complete City Code is available online at www.cliyofithaca.org by clicking on "City Code".
Please be aware that this obligation transfers with the sale,of your property. It is your
responsibility to notify any new owner of this outstanding sidewalk notice.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Ryan Adams at 607-274-6536 or
radamsa,citvofithaea.ora
Very truly yours,
Ryan Adams
Seasonal Engineering Technician
r t -sification.
w ith a comrnitm eru o w orkforce dive n
CO
co
COa�
n
�rD
00 CTI
CD Dig co
ffi
ID
rT
rr
o
Z
V� N
to
>
CD �&
to
o
A;
CO
A
1-71
rvey Map of 104 Worth Street- City of Ithaca-Tompkins County
New York
Lynne Yost ® Re. 104 Worth St®
From: Wade Wykstra <wwlao@lightlink.com>
To: Govind Acharya <govind73@gmail.com>
Date: 3/1/2011 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: 104 Worth St.
CC: Kathrin Gehring <kgehring@cityofithaca.org>, Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@cityofithaca.org>,
William W Goldsmith <wwgl@comell.edu>
My understanding is that it was to be Govind and Bill; I am to attend also in case I may be useful
passing on stuff we have learned re walks. A couple days notice is all I need.
Wade 227-0683
III
111111 P, III;I111111
I thought it was both Bill and I?
On Mon, Feb 2®, 2011 at 15:39, Kathr-In Gehring < 'jy�2��> wrote:
ijig qj
Hello,
I'm finalizing the BPW minutes from January 26th and noticed that the sidewalk sub-committee
was asked to meet to discuss the property owner's protest of the sidewalk assessment at 104
Worth St. Also, since Cynthia is not available anymore, Govind agreed to participate on the
sub-committee,
Thanks,
MY
file://C:\Documents and Settings\LYNNiEY\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4D6CC098... 10/24/2011
Page I of I
Lynne Yost - Re: 104 Worth St.
From: Govind Acharya <govind73Cq)gmail.com>
To: Kathrin Gehring <kgehring@cityofithaca,org>
Date: 2/28/2011 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: 104 Worth St.
CC: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@cityofithaca.org>, Wade Wykstra <wwlao@lightlink.com>,
William W Goldsmith <wwg I Cacomell.edu>
I thought it was both Bill and I?
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 15:39, Kathrin Gehring > wrote:
Hello,
I'm finalizing the 8PW minutes from January 26th and noticed that the sidewalk sub-committee was asked to
meet to discuss the property owner's protest of the sidewalk assessment at 104 Worth St. Also, since Cynthia
is not available anymore, Govind agreed to participate on the sub-committee.
Thanks,
file: 11C: \Documents and Settings\LYNNEY\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4D6BC275... 10/24/2011
Page I of I
Lynne Yost - 104 Worth St.
From, Kathrin Gehring
To, Yost, Lynne
Date: 2/28/20113:39 PM
1O4 Worth St.
CC: Acharya,Guvnd; Wykstra, Wade
I'm finalizing the BPVV minutes from January 26th and noticed that the sidewalk sub-committee was asked to
meet to discuss the property owner's protest of the sidewalk assessment at 104 Worth St. Also, since Cynthia is
not available anymore, Govind agreed to participate on the sub-committee.
file: //C:\Joourneutsand S 0 Cl[F— 10/24/201I
Re: 104 Worth Street sidewalk
Lynne Yost ® Re: 104 Worth Street sidewalk
From:
Ray Benjamin
To,
Acharya, Govind; Goldsmith, Bill;
Wykstra, Wade; Zumoff, Joel
Date.
8/24/2011 12:52 PM
Subject:
Re: 104 Worth Street sidewalk
CCs
Yost, Lynne
Page I of 2
Gray, Bill; Jenkins, Claudia; Morache, Rob; Warden, David;
I seem to remember that he had an issue about a snow removal bill that was upheld by the board.
Ray
>>> Bill Gray Wednesday, August 24, 2011 >>>
I will have Kathy pull up the history here. Like Bill, I thought we had resolved this in front of the BPW. I doubt
that I will h ave anything by this afternoon.
Na
>>> William W Goldsmith <wwgl@cornell.edu> 8/24/2011 12:18 PM >>>
Dear BPW members -
I recall discussing (and voting?) on this matter, but I cannot remember when. Mr. Roebal brought his complaint
to the discussion meeting. I assume we voted long, long ago, and if that is true, I am curious why it may have
taken months for Roebal to be informed. Can we be brought up to date.
On 8/24/11 11:34 AM, "Joel Zurnoff" <_.12@ ell,ed
wrote:
Perhaps you could discuss this issue at this afternoon's meeting.
I will not be attending the meeting today.
Begin forwarded message:
email: i z -12 lsdb co rn e 1. edu <Majlt20Lz.12gLqqrneH.edu>
phone: (607-) 273-8794
file: //C:\Documents and Settings\LYNNEY\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E54F402c... 10/24/2011
Sidewalk Repair atlO4 Worth Street
Lynne Yost -Sidewalk Repair at 104 Worth Street
Fromm: ]3nzce ARoebal<bez2 .sdo>
To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEYCqoihmfithaco.org>
Date: 1/3/2011 11:2I AM
Subject. Sidewalk Repair at 104 Worth Street
Hi Lynne,
Pagel of3
I'm resencling this in hopes you can advocate for me in lowering the amount of my invoice, due January 17th.
Please let me know whom to contact in this regard,
All best,
�rEWITOM��
I just received a bill for the sidewalk repair/work done at 104 Worth Street. $2,533.81. Invoice # 00013987.
As you may recall, when I received, via registered certified mail, information concerning the condition ofmy
sidewalk, there were 4 "blocks" which were in need of repair. I repaired three of them and did not repair the
fourth (since that one only had "pock marks" and was by far in better condition than most sidewalks in Ithaca.
The only work that remained still to do was the tree-damaged portion. That was done. Thank you.
Have you recently walked the sidewalks up Mitchell Street, Elmwood Avenue, Fairmont, or Harvard Place, to
name only a few? What I find incredible is that the work crews were parked on the 100 block of Worth Street,
all summer it seemed, while streets which actually have foot traffic (see above) remain untouched with
dangerous conditions, not mere "pock marks." Should the city not prioritize its actions, especially in these hard
financial times?
Back to my property . . . The workers took out the whole stretch ofmysidewalk, not the one block which | had
not addressed (since the pink paint told them to do that). That stretch was not onthe certified/registered letter
received. And at the point when the "paint" went down, so the workers said, I was unable to do any work
myself.
fiDe:/8C:{0ocnmentu and 8 i IBl38c— I0/24/201I
Sidewalk Repair u1l04Worth Street
Page 2 of 3
The segment that was taken out, again not on the original letter, had extensive root activity underneath. The
city's trees throw out long roots. Pictures were taken.
Lynne, | claim the following: First that this extra work was not necessary, as evidenced by the certified letter.
Second, that if this worked was deemed necessary, that the tree-damaged provision should apply. That the
conditionofnnysidewa|kvvasin800dconditiun,a0ainasevidencedbvthe"|etter."Further,dhatsincenoprior
warning had been made before the pink paint was applied, there should definitely not have been any
"surcharge" added to the bill since I never had an opportunity to respond to this. Is that not why you went
through the expense of the original certified letter? The second letter, then, was composed of pink spray paint.
|s this official?
Lynne, I can not afford this " additional" work. It was not indicated at all. I was prepared to pay for the one block
that | did not address.
Again, I keep my property in fine shape. And also the entire block. For my neighbors, for school kids crossing the
streets. If more people in the city treated their properties and the properties of their neighbors as well as I do,
we would all benefit.
I further request that the city look at sidewalks which are in severe disrepair, unlike the sidewalks of Worth
Any assistance you can provide or lobby for to lower my bill will be much appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
On 9/9/10 3:12 PM, "Lynne Yost" <LYNN EY@cityofithaca.org> wrote:
Bill Gray, the Superintendent of Public Works, has just changed the tree damage policy. You will
not be charged for tree damage work performed by City of Ithaca this year.
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
1O8 Green St. Room 2O2
Ithaca, 0Y1485U
(T) 607-274-6527
(f)6U7'274-65O7
filcHC: \D0000neotuuod S EY\Local8 ac\4I)21Bl38o— 10/24/2011
Sidewalk Repair at 104 Worth Street
([) 607'327-0725
(E)|ynney@cbvofthaca.orB
vvvvwzityoMthaca.org
vvvvvvjthacannapsor8
From: Bruce 4Roeba|<bar3@corneU.edu>
To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@cityohthaca.org>
Date: 9/8/2010 9:04AK4
Subject: Re: Permit Info
Page 3 of 3
The workers are in the process of tearing up a large section of my sidewalk, "on my dime," as the
workers just said. In the letters your offices have sent me in the past two years, there were four
sections for which ! was responsible. i paid for the repair of three and fe|tthe fnurthwas in, by far,
better shape compared with the vast majority uf sidewalks inIthaca.
At the most, I should be responsible for that one block. Not the rest. I can not afford to pay for this
as I had planned my expenses according to your official, and registered, letter.
Lynne, I personally shovel snow for the entire 100-block of Worth Street every time it snows. From
curb cut to curb cut, then all sides of the four-corners of Elmwood and Ithaca Road for the school
kids. Ask the crossing guard. ( take care ofnny property and nny neighbors and for people |never
see.
BruceRueba|
255-3505 (office)
279-9821 (cell)
104 Worth Street
-- End of Forwarded Message
fi\e://C:\Dooucoen1maod Setting ua|S op\4IJ21Bl30o— 10/24/2011
flc: Pennit [otb
Lynne Y\omt - Re: Permit Info
Pagel of3
I just received a bill for the sidewalk repair/work done at 104 Worth Street. $2,533.81. Invoice # 00013987.
As you may recall, when I received, via registered certified mail, information concerning the condition of my
sidewalk, there were 4 "blocks" which were in need of repair. I repaired three of them and did not repair the
fourth (since that one only had "pock marks" and was by far in better condition than most sidewalks in Ithaca.
The only work that remained still to do was the tree-damaged portion. That was done. Thank you.
Have you recently walked the sidewalks up Mitchell Street, EImwood Avenue, Fairmont, or Harvard Place, to
name only a few? What I find incredible is that the work crews were parked on the 100 block of Worth Street,
all summer it seemed, while streets which actually have foot traffic (see above) remain untouched with
dangerous conditions, not mere "pock marks." Should the city not prioritize its actions, especially in these hard
financial times?
Back to my property . . . The workers took out the whole stretch ofmysidewalk, not the one block which | had
not addressed (since the pink paint told them to do that). That stretch was not on the certified/registered letter I
received. And at the point when the "paint" went down, so the workers said, I was unable to do any work
myself.
The segment that was taken out, again not on the original letter, had extensive root activity underneath. The
city's trees throw out long roots. Pictures were taken.
Lynne, | claim the following: First, that this extra work was not necessary, asevidenced by the certified letter.
Second, that if this worked was deemed necessary, that the tree-damaged provision should apply. That the
condition of my sidewalk was in good condition, again as evidenced by the "letter." Further, that since no prior
warning had been made before the pink paint was applied, there should definitely not have been any
"surcharge" added to the bill since I never had an opportunity to respond to this. Is that not why you went
through the expense of the original certified letter? The second letter, then, was composed of pink spray paint.
Is this official?
Lynne, | can not afford this "additional" work. It was not indicated at all. | was prepared to pay for the one block
that | did not address.
Again, I keep my property in fine shape. And also the entire block. For my neighbors, for school kids crossing the
streets. If more people in the city treated their properties and the properties of their neighbors as well as I do,
we would all benefit.
| further request that the city look at sidewalks which are in severe disrepair, unlike the sidewalks of Worth
Street.
fle://C:\Qocuzocotmomd S oa]S ime\4Dl-'13762c— 10/24/20I1
Re: Pcrod1Iofo
Any assistance you can provide or lobby for to lower my bill will be much appreciated.
Yours sincerely,
8ruceRoeba|
104 Worth Street
Ithaca, NYI4850
Dn9/9/103:12 PM, "Lynne Yost" <UN0EY@cityofithaca.org> wrote:
Page 2 of 3
Bill Gray, the Superintendent of Public Works, has just changed the tree damage policy. You will
not be charged for tree damage work performed by City of Ithaca this year.
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
188 Green St. Room 2U2
Ithaca, NY 14850
(T) 607-274-6527
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
From: Bruce ARoeba|<bar2@corneUedu»
To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@dtyofithaca.oqJ>
Date: 9/8/2010 9:04AM
Subject: Re: Permit Info
The workers are in the process of tearing up a large section of my sidewalk, "on my dime," as the
workers just said. In the letters your offices have sent me in the past two years, there were four
sections for which | was responsible. | paid for the repair of three and felt the fourth was in, by far,
better shape compared with the vast majority of sidewalks inIthaca.
Re: Permit Info
Page 3 of 3
A1 the most, | should be responsible for that one block. Not the rest. | can not afford to pay for this
as I had planned,my expenses according to your official, and registered, letter.
Lynne I personally shovel snow for the entire 100-block of Worth Street every time it snows. From
curb cut to curb cut, then all sides of the four-corners of Elmwood and Ithaca Road for the school
kids. Ask the crossing guard. | take care ofmy property and rny neighbors and for people |never
see.
I do so much good for our city. I wish my city to do good by me.
all
BnuceRoeba|
255-3505 (office)
279-9821 (cell)
104 Worth Street
Re: lU4Worth Street sidewalk
J.R.Ramirez - Re: 104 Worth Street sidewalk
From- Bruce /\Roeba]<bor2 .odu>
7Fa: Lynne Yoat<LYNNEY@cityofitbaca.org>
Date: 9/9/20104:07PM
Subject: Re: l04 Worth Street sidewalk
CC: "].Bi. Ramirez" /jrrouoirsz��cityofi[haco.org>
Hi Lynne,
| know the tree damage work will beat the City's cost. Thank you kindly.
Page I of 2
What I ann concerned about is the rest of the work being done, namely the entire section of my sidewalk from
my driveway to the end of my sidewalk (next to the 106 Worth Street line). The last block there was determined
to be in disrepair (my expense), along with the three blocks (driveway plus contiguous block) which I have
already had repaired. 1 did not repair that fourth block as I felt the "disrepair" was so minor compared with
other sidewalks in Ithaca that are so much worse (yet untouched).
What has been torn out are all the blocks in that stretch (if this is not nly expense, please say so, | will bevery
8rutefu|). None of these (other than tree damaged) were listed asneeding tobe replaced in the letters |received
from the City. /tis this potential expense that |anncontesting. Itio this potential expense that | can not afford. it
is this potential expense that was not part uf the certified letters | received. Did the work crew tear mpmore
than they were supposed to? Looks that way tome.
BruceRoeba|
1O4 Worth Street, Ithaca, NY14050
(607) 279-9821
on 9/9/10 3:12 PM, "Lynne Yost" <LYNN EY@cityofithaca.org> wrote:
Bill Gray, the Superintendent of Public Works, has just changed the tree damage policy. You will
not be charged for tree damage work performed by City of Ithaca this year.
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
1O8 Green St. Room 2O2
file: //C:\Dmoocoeutm and 8cttin colS 840654u— 10/27/2011
Re: l04Worth Street sidewalk
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E)|ynney@cityufthacaorg
wvvwzitvofthaca.org
wvvvv.ithacanoapsorg
From: Bruce ARoeba|«bar2@cnrneU.edu>
To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@dtyofithaca.nrg>
Date: 9/8/2010 9:04AM
Subject: Re: Permit Info
Page 2 of 2
The workers are in the process of tearing up a large section of my sidewalk, "on my dime," as the
workers just said. in the letters your offices have sent me in the past two years, there were four
sections for which I was responsible. I paid for the repair of three and felt the fourth was in, by far,
better shape compared with the vast majority nf sidewalks inIthaca.
At the most, | should be responsible for that one block. Not the rest. | can not afford Vo pay for this
as I had planned my expenses according to your official, and registered, letter.
Lynne, | personally shovel snow for the entire 00-blockofWorth Street every time b snows. From
curb cut tu curb cut, then all sides of the four-corners of Elmwood and Ithaca Road for the school
kids. Ask the crossing guard. I take care of my property and my neighbors and for people I never
see.
I do so much good for our city. I wish my city to do good by me.
All best,
BruceRoeba|
255-3505 (office)
279-9821 (cell)
104 Worth Street
Pagel of
Lynne Yost - Re: Sidewalk crew
From,
Ray Benjamin
To,
Yost, Lynne
Date:
9/7/2010 3:57 PM
Subject,
Re: Sidewalk crew
Good, sounds like a plan
RGB
>>> > Lynne Yost 9/7/2010 3:05 PM >>>
>
Hi Ray,
JR & I prepared billing information for all sidewalk work completed this year, however tree damage wasn't
measured out separately. I guess we'll need to redo everything to reflect last week's change in policy, We can
start on that tomorrow.
EM
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
108 Green St. Room 202
Ithaca, NY 14850
(T) 607-274-6527
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E) lynney@cityofithaca.org
www.cityofithaca.org
www.ithacamaps.org
From: Ray Benjamin
To:Yost, Lynne
Date: 9/7/2010 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: Sidewalk crel
Lynne,
Have we started billing for the work we have completed this year, even if we only bill for the estimated amount,
its better than no revenue at all,
Ray
>>> > Lynne Yost 9/7/2010 2:42 PM >>>
>
Hi Ray,
file://C:\Docurnents and Settings\LYNNEY\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C866103c... 10/24/2011
Page 2 of 2
]Rta|ked with the crew and made sure they're set for now.
104 &106 Worth Stare the next stops. 104 Worth has alarge tree fairly close to the sidewalk, so the new
sidewalk will narrow tn4' wide at the tree.
The crew said you have plans to change street grades and fix storm sewer at 105 Worth, Please tell the crew
approximate limits of work for your project so they replace the sidewalk outside the limits at that address, (Or if
you prefer, tell them to skip that address completely.)
Thanks,
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
1U8 Green St. Room 202
Ithaca, NY1485O
(T) 607-274-6527
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E)
file:HC:\]oonzoeotmund S S 866l03u— 10/24/2011
(10/24/2011) Lynne-Yost - RE: Permit Info
From: John A Hoffmann «ja iedu>
To: Lynne Yost <LYNNEY@oityofdhaca.org>. Bruce ARooba|<bar2@bonnoU.ndu>
CC: "J.R. Ramirez"<jrramiraz@oih/nfthama.org>
Date: 8/25/2010 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Permit Info
It looks as if the crew will beat Bruce's house tomorrow and my house the next day not elot of time to
actually complete the work. Bruce said that you had some info on the acceptable method for this. |have
a15|b container of^T{}P'n BOND" 'ia that acceptable to your oiendando?
Thanks for your help.
John
----- Original Message ---
From: Lynne Yost [naiko: LYNN Ef@oih/ofthauaurg]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25.20184:23PM
To: Bruce ARoeba|; John AHoffmann
Co: J.R. Ramirez
Subject: Permit Info
Dear Bruce and Johnn.
After I spoke with Bruce, I was directed by my superior to avoid delaying the sidewalk crew's original
schedule ho accommodate owner work. If you want ho patch your sidewalk, you'll need ho work very
quickly.
To obtain a permit, you need tosubmit:
1. the attached application
2. a notarized copy of the attached worker's compensation form 3. some proof of homeowner's insurance
and then either JR Ramirez or I will issue a permit. Our office is on the second floor of City Hall.
The work will need to be complete before the crew is ready to begin demolition at your property.
Thankm,
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
1O8 Green St. Room 2O2
Ithaca, WY14850
(T)6O7-274-G527
(F)0U7-274-0587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E)|ynney@citvufithaoaorg
vmmwv.uityoftheoa.org
v*xwv.ithaoamepe.org
Page 1
From-
Lynne Yost
To.
J.R. Ramirez
Date-
8/25/2010 11:59 AM
Subject.
104 & 106 Worth St.
I
SIPUZ
The owner of 104 called and said he wants to patch the "pockmarked" sidewalk, which he thinks is one stab. His neighbor at
106 wants to do the same, and has more slabs.
I told Donnie and he asked that you paint out which slabs to leave in place at both properties. (White paint might be good for
that.)
Let me know if you have questions.
Lynne
Lynne Yost, PE, Asst. Civil Engineer
City of Ithaca City Engineer's Office
108 Green St. Room 202
Ithaca, NY 14850
M 607-274-6527
(F) 607-274-6587
(C) 607-327-0725
(E) lynney@cityofithaca.org
www.cityofitnaca.org
www.ithacamaps.org
6/24/2009
Bruce A. Roebal
CITY OF IT CA
108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850-5690
OFFICE OF TBE CITY INGINEEP
TLIephione: 807/274-8520 Fax- 807/274-5587
104 Worth St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
MOWER'
LOCATION',- 104 Worth St
TAX PARCEL 66.-2-12
City of Ithaca has inspected the condition of the public sidewalk along the street at this
address. At this time of inspection, the following sidewalk was found to be defective:
Z")
TREE DAMAGED WALK:
150 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
0 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
0 grind locations
OTHER DAMAGED WALK:
50 square feet of 4" thick sidewalk
50 square feet of 6" thick sidewalk
0 grind locations
This location is on the City's repair list and will remain on the list until the repair work, is
completed by you or City. by the y. At the first opportunity, all defective sidewalk found at
I -
this location at the time of the work will be replaced. City of Ithaca Code requires that
sidewalk valk repairs made by City of Ithaca be billed to the owner at cost plus 25%,
You are encouraged to hire a contractor to do your repairs. Obtain a sidewalk permit so
the location can be removed from City of Ithaca's repair list when work is completed.
Please read the attached document and if you still have questions, you may contact the
Office of the City Engineer at 607-274-6532.
City of Ithaca, NY
Office of the City Engineer
SIDEWALK INSPECTION OWNER C
ITN CA CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ADDRESS
108 East Green Street PARCEL
Ithaca, NY 14850 INSPECTOR DATE h 7
607-274-6530 FAX 607-272-7348
City
City Responsibility (Trees/Ramps) Owner Responsibility (Other)
blocks 4" City x 25 sq ft blocks 4" Owner - 25 I't if
blocks kbiocks 6" (3itv x 25 = sq ft blocks 6" awner x 45 sq ft
7
�7
if
if
---
L
i
L
F Condemnable
'i Unsatisfactory
T Tree Damage
G Grass in, Joint
J Joint not -"Lere
-19 Curb Ramp
MMssing Slab,
Surface
!Deterioration 11
i Cracking
7�) Re:_
./
"Bruce A. Rneba/"
"Lynne Yost" <LYNNEY@citYofithaca.org>
12/11/2006 8:37 AM
jecr/ Re: sidewalk
complaint
aar Bruce,
spent some time with .306 Fairmount - can You confirm that before I proceed further?
maps and / assume that Your complaint refers
There isno house number onthe
�shianex�duorto308Fa�mountPrupa�yye�bu1th�ooundwon�eot
�
>yuu also /menhoneda concern about ao�avva/k2doors
-Cornell. ucon��Qureoutwhatyoumean - hwodoono closer to
"'v«//«^the corner onto Dryden F?uud. north falls
413 Dryden Road, corner house, next to 308 Fairm
of sidewalk is on Fairmount. oumLThmbadaeot�on
> If You meant close�Com���
>�u�n�d����-
� more specific.
>Thenhu.
>Lynne Yost
Thank YOU for all you can do.
All best,
»
�`a""''ionalcontact info: Bruce Roeba/255-350B
>LVnna Yost, Asst. Civil Engineer
>Cihyof Ithaca City Engineer's Oth
>108 Green St. Room 2O2 oe
>/thaoa'NY 14850
>(T) 607-274-6527
>(F) 607-274-6587
>(C) 607-327-0725
>(E)/ynney@u/h«ofithaoa.org
_
Bruce A.Roaba/
Administrative Manager
Departments of Anthropology and Arch
203yWo(�nawHoU aeo/
5-35O5 Attp://Y`a/uon.artn.onrneU'edu/anthro/ / d ex,php
h�p://«ww.aruhaen/ogyoorneU.edu/
-(10/24/201-1)-L,ynne-Yost-- Re: sidewalk complaint
Administrative Manager/Registrar
John S. Knight Institute for Writing in the Disciplines
101 McGraw Hall 5-2955
http://vmxxw.orto.00rneU.edu/knighLjnatitute
Page 2
�
RISC I
AUG 2 5 2010
Office of the
Pqp�. and
Engineering
William J. Gray P.E.
Superintendent of Public Works
108 East Green Street
Ithaca, NY 14850
Dear Mr. Gray:
104 Worth Street
Ithaca, NY 14850
August 25, 2010
I am writing to you to protest the City's intention to bill me for the entire cost of repairing
and replacing the sidewalk in front of my home.
I received a Sidewalk Notice of Defect, as did my neighbors, ce'd below. I am sorry to
say I cannot locate my copy of the letter I received. The notice informed me that a certain
amount of square footage of sidewalk was tree damaged and therefore the City's
responsibility, and that four blocks of sidewalk was my responsibility. I had three of these
blocks replaced. The fourth had, what I considered, small pock marks and unworthy of
replacement, especially while severely damaged sidewalks in this city remain untouched.
I request that the City stand by its word and take responsibility for the cost of replacing
and repairing the sidewalk blocks that have been damaged by city -owned trees.
Homeowners should not be financially responsible for the damage caused by city -owned
trees, especially after the City told the homeowners that this work was the responsibility
of the City. I understand the financial times in which we all live, but a promise is a
promise, is it not?
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely.
—' Bruce A. Roeb/al
CC: Mayor Carolyn Peterson
Carol S. Palmer, 102 Worth Street
John Hoffman & Randi Beckman, 106 Worth Street