Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CC-2000-12-06 1 COMMON COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK Regular Meeting 7:00 December 6, 2000 PRESENT: Mayor Cohen Alderpersons (10) Pryor, Sams, Blumenthal, Glasstetter, Manos, Farrell, Vaughan, Spielho1z, Taylor, Hershey OTHERS PRESENT: City Clerk – Conley Holcomb City Attorney – Schwab City Controller – Cafferillo Deputy Controller – Thayer Planning and Development Director – Van Cort Superintendent of Public Works – Gray Human Resources Director – Michell-Nunn Director of Community Development - Bohn Acting Building Commissioner – Radke Deputy Police Chief – Sharshon PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Cohen led all present in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag. YOUTH AWARD: Third Ward Alderpersons Blumenthal and Vaughan presented the December 2000 Distinguished Youth Award to the 21 children in the Belle Sherman School Garden Room Kindergarten Class. The children in this class made three baby quilts to donate to the ABC Quilts project that distributes quilts to AIDS/HIV infected, and drug addicted babies. ABC has sent quilts to babies in communities within New York as well as to Romania, Kosovo, and the former USSR. To date, more than 300,000 quilts have been delivered to hospitals, foster homes, and daycare centers. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA: Human Resources Committee Alderperson Manos requested the addition of Item 18.3 – Postponement of the Effective Date of Retirees’ Health Insurance Increases – Resolution. No Council member objected. New Business Alderperson Manos requested the addition of two additional items in the Motion to enter into Executive Session regarding collective bargaining. No Council member objected. Planning and Economic Development Committee Alderperson Blumenthal requested the addition of Item 17.2B – Acquisition and Disposition of the Esty Street Parking Lot – Transfer to IURA and Endorse Sale to Arche, LLC. – Resolution. Alderperson Blumenthal further requested the deletion of Item 17.6 – An Ordinance Amending Section 325-45 Entitled “Amendment December 6, 2000 2 Procedure Outlined” of Chapter 325 Entitled “Zoning” of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code – Call for a Public Hearing – Resolution. No Council member objected. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: Presentation of Pride of Ownership Awards Scott Whitham, Susan Blumenthal, Margaret Hobbie, and Jagat Sharma presented the 3rd Annual Pride of Ownership Awards on behalf of the City of Ithaca and the Rotary Club. The Pride of Ownership Award Program, now in its third year, recognizes property owners who develop projects or take care of their properties in ways that enhance the physical appearance and quality of life in city neighborhoods and commercial areas. The award winners received original drawings of their properties by Ithaca artists Jagat Sharma and John Barradas, who donated their work. Residential Owner-Occupied Properties: Frederick Bouche and Joana Luks - 212 University Avenue The Namgyal Monastery - 412 North Aurora Street Residential Rental property: Richard Holgate - 610 East Seneca Street Commercial/Mixed Use Mack Travis - 407 College Avenue Kevin Matuzsak and Carolyn Roberts - 123 South Cayuga Street Special Recognition Sprouts 4-H Club/Residents of the Northside Neighborhood Posthumous Award: Mark Haag. Cornell CLIPers (Cornell Landscape Improvement Program) Ithaca Downtown Partnership - Commons Sculpture Program Public Hearing to Consider the Proposed Disposition of a 6,395 Square Foot Parcel Located at the Southeastern Corner of Esty and Fulton Streets by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency Resolution to Open Public Hearing By Alderperson Pryor: Seconded by Alderperson Manos RESOLVED, That the public hearing to consider the proposed disposition of a parcel located at the corner of Esty and Fulton Streets to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency be declared open. Carried Unanimously No one appeared to address Common Council on this issue. Resolution to Close Public Hearing By Alderperson Hershey: Seconded by Alderperson Manos RESOLVED, That the public hearing to consider the proposed disposition of a parcel located at the corner of Esty and Fulton Streets to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency be declared closed. Carried Unanimously MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS: Mayor Cohen postponed the approval of Committee appointments pending distribution of applicant resumes. December 6, 2000 3 PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL: Lynn Jackier addressed Council in opposition of large commercial development in the Clinton Street and Cleveland Avenue neighborhood, and the proposed corresponding change in commercial zoning boundaries. Fay Gougakis, addressed Council with concerns regarding the Widewaters development site, and Planning Board procedures. Joel Harlin, addressed Council in favor of commercial development in the City of Ithaca. Rebecca, an Ithaca High School student addressed Council to voice her support of economic development in the City. RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC: Alderperson Blumenthal thanked Rebecca for her comments regarding economic development. Mayor Cohen responded to comments made regarding Planning Board procedures. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: 16.1 Police Department – Request to Amend 2000 Budget By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor WHEREAS, one of the Police Department’s 2000 Impala police vehicles was totally destroyed in a recent accident, and WHEREAS, the City has received $23,976 in insurance reimbursement for the vehicle, and WHEREAS, the Police Department will need to replace the vehicle and related equipment; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the following 2000 Budget amendment for purchase of the replacement police vehicle and equipment with use of insurance reimbursement funds: Increase Revenue Account: A3120-2680-5001 Insurance Recovery $23,976 Increase Appropriation Account: A3120-5215-5001 Vehicles $23,976 Ayes (9) Manos, Pryor, Farrell, Blumenthal, Vaughan, Spielholz, Glasstetter, Hershey, Taylor Nays (0) Abstentions (1) Sams Carried 21.1 Finance/Controller – Request Authorization to Cover Red Accounts By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor RESOLVED, That the City Controller be empowered to make transfers within the 2000 Budget appropriations, as needed, for the remainder of the 2000 Fiscal Year. December 6, 2000 4 Carried Unanimously 16.3 Building Department – Request for Reduction of Hours By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor WHEREAS, Administrative Secretary, Kathleen Boyd has requested that her hours be reduced from forty (40) to thirty-five (35) hours per week, effective January 1, 2001 for personal reasons, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby grants the request to reduce hours for Kathleen Boyd. Carried Unanimously 16.4 Planning and Development – Appointment of Deputy Director By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor RESOLVED, That JoAnn Cornish be and hereby is provisionally appointed to the position of Deputy Director of Planning and Development, effective November 6, 2000 at an annual salary of $50,041, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends the Planning Department Authorized Personnel Roster as follows: Delete: One (1) Senior Environmental Landscape Planner Carried Unanimously REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 17. Planning and Economic Development Committee: 17.1 A) An Ordinance Amending Sections 186-17 entitled “Appeals Board” of Chapter 186 entitled “Flood Damage Prevention” and also Amending Chapter 325 entitled “Zoning” of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code – Declaration of No Significant Environmental Effect - Resolution By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Manos WHEREAS, an Ordinance amending sections 186-17of Chapter 325 entitled "Zoning" of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code, regarding floodplains has been submitted to Common Council for consideration, and WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is an "unlisted" action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and is a Type I action under the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, and WHEREAS, it appears that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby does adopt as its own the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Long Environmental Assessment Form dated September 12, 2000, and be it further RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency, hereby does determine that the proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary under the circumstances, and be it further RESOLVED, that this resolution shall constitute notice of this negative declaration, and the City Clerk be, and hereby is, directed to file a copy of the same, together with the December 6, 2000 5 attachment, in the City Clerk's Office and forward the same to any other parties as required by law. Carried Unanimously 17.1 B)An Ordinance Amending Section 186-17 entitled “Appeals Board” of Chapter 186 entitled “Flood Damage Prevention” and also Amending Chapter 325 entitled “Zoning” of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor ORDINANCE 00 – BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows: Section 1. Chapter 186, Section 186-17 entitled “Appeals Board” of Article VI entitled “Variances” shall be amended as follows: § 186-17. Appeals Board. A. The Building Code Board of Appeals [Board of Zoning Appeals] as established by the City of Ithaca shall hear and decide appeals and requests for variances from the requirements of this chapter. B. The Building Code Board of Appeals [Board of Zoning Appeals] shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision or determination made by the local administrator in the enforcement or administration of this chapter. C. Those aggrieved by the decision of the Building Code Board of Appeals [Board of Zoning Appeals] may appeal such decision to the Supreme Court pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. D. In passing upon such applications, the Building Code Board of Appeals [Board of Zoning Appeals] shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this chapter and: (1) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others. (2) The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage. (3) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. (4) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. (5) The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable. (6) The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage. (7) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development. (8) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and floodplain management program of that area. (9) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. December 6, 2000 6 (10) The cost to local governments and the dangers associated with conducting search and rescue operations during periods of flooding. (11) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site. (12) The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including search and rescue operations, and maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems and streets and bridges. E. Upon consideration of the factors of Subsection D and the purposes of this chapter, the Building Code Board of Appeals [Board of Zoning Appeals] may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this chapter. F. The local administrator shall maintain the records of all appeal actions, including technical information, and report any variances to the Federal Emergency Management Agency upon request. Section 2. Chapter 325 Entitled “Zoning” of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code shall be amended as follows: Section 325-27 entitled “Floodplains” shall be deleted in its entirety from the Code of the City of Ithaca. Section 3. Chapter 325-3 entitled definitions and word usage is amended to delete the following definitions: [FLOOD or FLOODING --A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of streams or rivers or abnormally rising lake waters resulting from severe storms.] [FLOOD HAZARD AREA -- That maximum area of the floodplain that, on the average, is likely to be flooded once every 100 years (i.e., that has a one-percent chance of being flooded each year) and is delineated on the Flood Hazard Boundary Map issued by the Federal Insurance Administrator, Department of Housing and Urban Development.] [FLOODPLAIN or FLOOD-PRONE AREA -- A land area adjoining a river, stream, watercourse, bay or a lake which is likely to be flooded.] [FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT -- The operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood-control works and land use and control measures.] [FLOODPROOFING -- Any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes or adjustments to properties and structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to lands, water and sanitary facilities, structures and contents of buildings.] December 6, 2000 7 [FLOODWAY -- The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas required to carry and discharge the one- hundred-year flood.] Section 4. Section 325-4 entitled “Establishment of districts” shall be amended to delete the FW-1 Floodway Zone district and the FH-1 Flood Hazard Zone district. Section 5. Section 325-5 A shall be amended as follows: § 325-5. Zoning Map. A. Districts are bounded as shown on the map titled, "Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca, New York," which is further defined in "Digital Zoning Map" in § 325-3, and which accompanies in printed format and is hereby made part of this chapter. Hereafter, the former FW-1 zone shall be designated as a P-1 zone on both the official zoning map and the digital zoning map. Any reference to the FH-1 zone on either map shall be deleted. Section 6. Subsection 325-8 B(3) shall be amended to delete the phrase “FW-1” as follows: (3) Regulations, standards and permitted uses are generally cumulative, except for the P-1, [FW-1] and MH-1 Districts and except where otherwise indicated by specific prohibition or omission. Section 7. Subsection 325-8 B(6) shall be deleted and the following subsections renumbered accordingly. [(6) Any use permitted under this chapter shall, if located within the FH-1 Zone, meet the requirements of § 325-27 in addition to those otherwise applicable to it under the district regulations.] [(7)] (6) In R-1 and R-2 Districts, minor dependent children in the care of a parent or relative shall be excluded in determining the number of unrelated occupants in a dwelling unit. [(8)] (7) In all districts where multiple dwellings are permitted, each multiple dwelling shall be required to have a rear yard of at least 20 feet in depth. (This requirement has been imposed so that these structures comply with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code.) [(9)] (8) In all districts, the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code may impose additional requirements pertaining to the location of a structure on a parcel of property, including, for example, additional building setback requirements. [(10)] (9) All columns established by this section are subject to the supplementary regulations stated in Article V of this chapter. Section 8. Section 325-9.C entitled “Special Permits” shall be amended to delete section 325-9.C(1)(i ) and the remaining subsections therein amended to reflect said deletion, as follows: C. Special permits. December 6, 2000 8 (1) Applicability. The uses listed under the district regulations in § 325-8 which require a special permit from the Board of Appeals are as follows: (a) Cemeteries in all districts. (b) Public utility facilities in all residential districts. (c) Private schools in all residential districts. (d) Nursery schools or child day-care centers in R-2 and R-U Districts. (e) Neighborhood retail or service commercial facilities in R-2 and R-3 Districts. (f) Hospitals or sanatoriums in R-3 Districts. (g) In P-1 Districts, within 200 feet of adjoining residential districts, any use other than public recreation, classrooms or living accommodations. In such P-1 Districts, living accommodations within 200 feet of adjoining residential districts shall conform to the use and area regulations applying to the strictest of such adjoining residential districts. (h) Signs in all districts, as provided in the Sign Ordinance. [Amended 4-1-1981 by Ord. No. 81-2] [(i) In FH-1 District, all new construction, improvements, alterations and repairs. (See § 325-27.)] [(j)] (i) [Added 4-1-1981 by Ord. No. 81-2; amended 11-4-1992 by Ord. No. 92-16; 12-2-1998 by Ord. No. 98-30] Home occupations in all Residential Zoning Districts require a temporary special permit unless the home occupation meets all the following criteria: [1] The occupation does not carry a stock of merchandise or store materials for resale or use in the occupation, except a reasonable supply of office supplies customarily incidental to a small office. [2] The occupation does not create traffic or need for parking beyond that which is customarily incidental to the residential use of the property. Factors that are not to be considered incidental to residential use are regularly scheduled events such as deliveries, client or customer visits or similar events. [3] The occupation requires or performs no exterior alterations and maintains no exterior display visible from outside the residence (including vehicles with signage parked outside of the buildings) except a nameplate as permitted by Municipal Code Chapter 272. [4] The occupation does not create any noise, vibration, smoke, dust or objectionable effects not customarily incidental and accessory to the residential use of the property. [(k)] (j) [Added 4-1-1981 by Ord. No. 81-2; amended 11-4-1992 by Ord. No. 92-15] In any district, towers or structures for the transmission or receipt of radio or other electronic communications signals, unless: [1] The towers or structures are antennas or satellite dishes with a maximum dimension of six feet or less; [2] Such antennas or satellite dishes are not in a front yard; [3] The maximum height (top to bottom) of such antenna or satellite dish, when combined with December 6, 2000 9 attached mounting supports, is 10 feet or less, and [4] Such antennas or satellite dishes, if they are to be located where they would ordinarily be visible from a public way adjoining the property, are subject to the following conditions: [a] If in a residential zone or on a lot abutting or across a street or waterway from a residential zone, they shall be screened from such view. [b] In all other locations, they shall be screened from such view or be of a color and/or in a location that will minimize their visual impact. [(l)] (k) Towers or structures intended for use in the generation of electricity for the premises on which such tower is located in any district. [Added 4-1-1981 by Ord. No. 81-2] [(m)] (l) Community or neighborhood gardens in all districts. [Added 7-10-1985 by Ord. No. 85-6] [(n)] (m) (Reserved) [(o)] (n) Group adult day-care facilities in R-2 Districts. [Added 5-6-1987 by Ord. No. 87-13] [(p)] (o) Any use not permitted as of right in the I-1 Zoning District. [Added 11-14-1989 by Ord. No. 89- 16] [(q)] (p) Redemption centers in B-2 Districts. [Added 10-6-1993 by Ord. No. 93-19] [(r)] (q) Bed-and-breakfast homes and bed-and- breakfast inns. [Added 9-6-1995 by Ord. No. 95-10] Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately in accordance with law upon publication of a notice as provided in the Ithaca City Charter. Acting Building Commissioner Radke explained to Council the proposed changes outlined in the Ordinance. Alderperson Pryor asked if Section 8, Subsection C(1) entitled “Special Permits” should clarify which Board of Appeals is being identified. Motion to Table By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Spielholz RESOLVED, That this item be tabled pending further clarification of Section 8. Carried Unanimously Motion to Remove From Table By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Glasstetter RESOLVED, That this item be removed from the table for further discussion. Carried Unanimously December 6, 2000 10 Acting Building Commissioner Radke explained that the Board of Appeals mentioned in Section 8 does not need to be specifically named as it’s placement in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code makes it clear that it is the Board of Zoning Appeals. A vote on the Ordinance resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously 17.2 Acquisition and Disposition of the Esty Street Parking Lot – Determination of Environmental Significance By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Sams WHEREAS, the approximately 6,400 square foot unimproved parking lot parcel located at the southeast corner of Fulton Street and Esty Street in the City’s West End neighborhood was acquired by the State of New York Department of Transportation (NYSDoT) under the Route 96 project, and WHEREAS, during the Route 96 project’s construction phase, the City of Ithaca requested the parcel be deeded to the City for use as public parking and the NYSDoT agreed to this request, but conveyance was never completed, and WHEREAS, if the parcel were transferred to the City as a public parking lot, there would be a 10-year restriction on its resale, and WHEREAS, an alternative method of transferring the property to the City as “excess property” contains no limitations on future use of the property, but requires acquisition of the property from NYDoT at fair market value, and WHEREAS, the City made no commitment in the FEIS for the Route 96 project to maintain this parcel for a public parking use, and WHEREAS, the City has requested the NYDoT to convey the parcel directly to the City as “excess property” to enable resale or lease of the property by the City to an interested party to implement recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan, and WHEREAS, the City proposes to acquire the Esty Street Parking Lot parcel from NYDoT and transfer the parcel to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) for disposition to a qualified and eligible sponsor, at no less than fair market value, for the purpose of implementing recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan and the Urban Renewal Plan, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is classified as an unlisted action under the City Environmental Quality Review Act [CEQR Sec. 176- 12(7)], and WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts as its own, the findings and conclusions more fully set forth on the Environmental Assessment Form dated September 14, 2000, and be it further RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency, hereby determines that the proposed action at issue will not have a December 6, 2000 11 significant effect on the environment, and that further environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further RESOLVED, that this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any attachments, in the City Clerk’s Office, and forward the same to any other parties as required by law. Carried Unanimously Acquisition and Disposition of the Esty Street Parking Lot – Transfer to IURA & Endorse Sale to Arche, LLC By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Hershey WHEREAS, the approximately 6,400 square foot unimproved parking lot parcel located at the southeast corner of Fulton Street and Esty Street in the City’s West End neighborhood was acquired by the State of New York Department of Transportation (NYSDoT) under the Route 96 project, and WHEREAS, during the Route 96 project’s construction phase, the City of Ithaca requested the parcel be deeded to the City for use as public parking and the NYSDoT agreed to this request, but conveyance was never completed, and WHEREAS, if the parcel were transferred to the City as a public parking lot, there would be a 10-year restriction on its resale, and WHEREAS, an alternative method of transferring the property to the City as “excess property” contains no limitations on future use of the property, but requires acquisition of the property from NYDoT at fair market value, and WHEREAS, gaining City control over the future use of this parcel will provide an important tool for the City to support redevelopment projects consistent with the West End Urban Design Plan, and WHEREAS, the City has requested the NYDoT to convey the parcel directly to the City as “excess property” to enable resale or lease of the property by the City to an interested party to implement recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan, and WHEREAS, the NYDoT has indicated they are nearing final action to approve conveyance of the parcel to the City of Ithaca at fair market value, and WHEREAS, the city staff recommends that the Common Council approve a purchase agreement with NYDoT to acquire the Esty Street Parking Lot parcel and further convey the parcel to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) for disposition at no less than fair market value to a qualified and eligible sponsor for the purpose of implementing recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan and the Urban Renewal Plan, and WHEREAS, disposition by the IURA requires public notice, a public hearing, and Common Council endorsement of the proposed conveyance to a qualified and eligible sponsor, and WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been completed, and WHEREAS, the IURA has received a purchase offer from Arche, LLC to acquire the parcel and the IURA has designated Arche, LLC as a December 6, 2000 12 qualified and eligible sponsor to purchase the parcel, now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Common Council of the City of Ithaca does hereby authorize the acquisition of the Esty Street parking lot parcel from the New York State Department of Transportation and transfer of the parcel to the IURA for the purpose of disposition, at no less than fair market value, to a qualified and eligible sponsor to implement the recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan, and be it further RESOLVED, that such qualified and eligible sponsor demonstrate that sufficient permanent financing commitments are available to complete a project that implements the recommendations of the West End Urban Design Plan prior to any conveyance to the sponsor, and be it further RESOLVED, that any expenses associated with the IURA holding and disposing of the property on behalf of the City shall be deducted from the sales price of the parcel to the sponsor, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Common Council hereby endorses the sale of the Esty Street parking lot parcel by the IURA to Arche, LLC for a purchase price equal to the City’s cost of acquiring the parcel from NYDoT plus the projected costs incurred by the IURA for acquisition, interim ownership and disposition of the parcel, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Mayor, upon review by the City Attorney and the Director of the Department of Planning & Development, is hereby authorized to sign any and all instruments necessary to acquire the parcel from the NYSDoT and transfer the parcel to the IURA. Carried Unanimously 17.3 CDBG Program Amendment – Northside Triangle Housing Renovation Program By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Farrell WHEREAS, the City was awarded $230K in the second year increment of the 1996 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) multi-year award from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to implement phase II of a Northside Triangle Housing Renovation Program to rehabilitate 14 substandard, low- and moderate-income owner-occupied houses in a compact target area containing all or portions of eight blocks centered along First Street within the Northside Triangle neighborhood, WHEREAS, the IURA contracted with Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS) to implement this project, and WHEREAS, INHS conducted surveys revealing that 37 owner-occupied homes in the target area were in substandard condition of which 19 homeowners were determined to be income-eligible, and WHEREAS, INHS has completed 11 rehabilitation loans through the program, but have been unable to identify other eligible or willing homeowners within the limited target area after three years of marketing the program to neighborhood residents, and WHEREAS, outreach efforts have included letters mailed to each homeowner in the target area, personal contacts by INHS staff, December 6, 2000 13 presentations at neighborhood civic association meetings and a second round of mailings in 2000, and WHEREAS, INHS requests that the target area be expanded to include the entire Northside Triangle area bounded by Cascadilla Street, Cascadilla Creek and Route 13, which is comprised of 177 owner-occupied homes of which 58 are substandard, based on field survey work conducted in 2000, and WHEREAS, IURA staff has determined that the program cannot be fully implemented within the existing target area on a timely basis, and WHEREAS, at their October 17, 2000 meeting, the IURA recommended the target area be expanded as requested by INHS, now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Common Council hereby authorizes seeking approval from the US Department of Housing & Urban Development for a program amendment to expand the target area for phase II of the Northside Triangle Housing Renovation Program (1996 Year #2 CDBG, Activity 2.2) to include the entire Northside Triangle area bounded by Cascadilla Street, Cascadilla Creek and Rt. 13, and be it further, RESOLVED, that the IURA Executive Director, upon advice from the City Attorney, is authorized to sign any and all documents necessary to carry out this resolution. Carried Unanimously 17.4 Disposition by IURA of 614 W. Clinton Street to INHS – Designation of Lead Agency Status for Environmental Review – Resolution By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Farrell WHEREAS, the conveyance of property by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) to a qualified and eligible sponsor requires public notice, public hearing and endorsement by the Common Council, and WHEREAS, the IURA seeks to sell the an approximately 6,300 sq. ft. property located at 614 W. Clinton Street, previously used as a domestic violence shelter, to a qualified and eligible sponsor for the purpose of rehabilitation of the structure and resale to a low- or moderate-income family to occupy the structure as a single-family dwelling, and WHEREAS, the IURA has determined that INHS is a qualified and eligible sponsor to acquire the property, and WHEREAS, INHS has estimated necessary rehabilitation costs at the property will exceed $48,000, and WHEREAS, INHS has submitted a purchase offer of $8,000 to acquire the property, and WHEREAS, at their 9/19/00 meeting the IURA accepted the purchase offer from INHS to acquire 614 W. Clinton Street (tax parcel # 79.-5-18.3) subject to Common Council approval in accordance with the disposition procedures required by Article 15, Section 507 of General Municipal Law and the following conditions: (1) addition of a condition in the purchase offer requiring the buyer to renovate the property and resell the property to a December 6, 2000 14 low- and moderate-income family to occupy as a single family dwelling; (2) modifications to sections 18 and 21 of the purchase offer regarding “further conditions” and “possession” acceptable to the IURA Executive Director; and (3) legal review and approval of the IURA Attorney, and WHEREAS, the City has begun an environmental review for disposition of the parcel, including the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), dated 11/9/00, and WHEREAS, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the lead agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, and WHEREAS, the proposed action is classified as an unlisted action under the City Environmental Quality Review Act [CEQR Sec. 176- 12(7)], now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, does hereby declare itself lead agency for the disposition of 614 W. Clinton Street (parcel # 79.-5-18.3), and be it further RESOLVED, that staff is hereby directed to proceed with environmental review. Carried Unanimously 17.5 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 181 Entitled “Fire Prevention” of the city of Ithaca Municipal Code, Section 181-13 Entitled “Fire Limits” By Alderperson Blumenthal: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor ORDINANCE 00 - BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows: Section 1. Section 181-13 of the City of Ithaca Code is hereby amended, as follows: A. Fire limits A: those areas of the city which are zoned Industrial I-1 and Business B2-b, CBD-60, CBD-85, CBD-100, and CBD-140 in the City of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 325 of this Code). B. Fire Limits B: those areas of the city which are zoned Business B-2a, B-2c, B-2d, B-4, [or] B-5, WF-1, WEDZ-1a, or WEDZ-1b in the City of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 325 of this Code). Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance with law upon publication of notice as provided in the Ithaca City Charter. Carried Unanimously 17.6 An Ordinance Amending Section 325-45 entitled “Amendment Procedure Outlined” of Chapter 325 entitled “Zoning” of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code – Call for Public Hearing This item was withdrawn from the agenda. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE: December 6, 2000 15 18.1 DPW – Request to Amend Personnel Roster By Alderperson Manos: Seconded by Alderperson Hershey Whereas, the City of Ithaca signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the CSEA DPW unit dated September 21, 2000, and Whereas, this Memorandum of Understanding eliminates the 8% cash up payment for drivers in exchange for paying for actual time worked, and Whereas, this change calls for new shift assignments which incorporate report time until the bus drivers return to the garage at the end of his/her shift, and Whereas, the new shift assignments result in a change in the amount of revenue service for each driver, and Whereas, this change requires adding two full time drivers to pick up the change in revenue service, and Whereas, these positions have been budgeted for in the 2001 budget, now therefore be it Resolved, that Common Council hereby grants approval to DPW to amend the DPW Personnel Roster as follows: Add: Two (2) Full-Time Bus Driver positions and be it further Resolved, that these positions be assigned to the CSEA DPW unit at a salary grade 28. Carried Unanimously 18.2 Youth Bureau – Request to Amend Authorized Personnel Roster By Alderperson Manos: Seconded by Alderperson Taylor Whereas, The Director of the Youth Bureau has announced his anticipated retirement through the early retirement incentive program, and Whereas, the early retirement incentive program requires a 50% savings in order to be eligible, and Whereas, the Youth Bureau has developed a plan to meet the savings by assigning the duties and responsibilities to existing staff in acting capacities, and Whereas, in order to reassign responsibilities, it is necessary to create an additional position, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends the Youth Bureau Authorized Personnel Roster as follows: Add: One (1) Recreation Coordinator And, be it further RESOLVED, That the position of Recreation Coordinator be assigned to the CSEA Administrative Unit, and be it further RESOLVED, That the creation of the position is contingent upon the approval by the Civil Service Commission. Carried Unanimously December 6, 2000 16 18.3 Postponement of the Effective Date of Retirees’ Health Insurance Increases By Alderperson Manos: Seconded by Alderperson Hershey WHEREAS, the Common Council, at its meeting of November 1, 2000, did vote in the affirmative on a resolution, effective January 1, 2001, which both raised the drug co-payment for City retirees to $2 for generic drugs and $10 for name brand drugs, and increased the maximum allowable prescription supply to 90 days, and WHEREAS, subsequent concerns have been raised that input was not sought from City retirees prior to this decision being made, and WHEREAS, the Common Council has determined that such input is important; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the changes approved by Common Council will not take effect until March 8, 2001, in order to give the Human Resources Committee and Common Council the time to solicit input from retirees and gather any other information deemed appropriate, and, be it further RESOLVED, That if the Common Council takes no further action on this issue prior to March 8, 2001, then the resolution approved on November 1, 2000 will take effect. Discussion followed on the floor with Alderperson Pryor requesting a comparison of the City’s retirement insurance benefits to other local programs. A vote on the Resolution resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE: 21.1 Common Council – Request Funds for Touchstone Project By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Manos WHEREAS, the Ithaca Housing Authority Department of Community Services and the Community School of Music and Arts are establishing the Touchstone Project, which is a collaborative, community-wide initiative to provide positive, life-enhancing skills through steel drum music for Ithaca City School District youth ages 12-18, and WHEREAS, the Touchstone Project has been successfully established in other communities with good results, and WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that youth participation in this project will promote scholastic achievement; increase in the high school graduation rate; provide support and direction for youth at risk; reduced gang membership; reduced drug and alcohol use and create opportunities for community involvement and service, and WHEREAS, the request for City involvement is for funding and support in the amount of $9,275, which will assist the project in reaching its matching grant goal of $56,000; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the transfer of funds in the amount not to exceed $9,275 from account A1990 Unrestricted Contingency to account A1012-5435 Community Services to support the Touchstone Project startup. December 6, 2000 17 Discussion followed on the floor with Marcy Hudson, Ithaca Housing Authority, Sam Velasquez, Community School of Music and Arts, and John Bailey, Ithaca Youth Bureau, answering questions from Council members regarding the number of players involved, where the program will be housed, and future funding sources for the program. A vote on the resolution resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously 21.2 Common Council – Authorize Controller to Carry Forward Contingency Balance By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Manos WHEREAS, the City will have $8,900 in Unrestricted Contingency and $17,125 in Restricted Contingency funds remaining at the end of fiscal year 2000 barring any unforeseen needs for the remainder of the year; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby directs the Controller’s Office to make the necessary accounting adjustments at the end of 2000 to allow for the $26,025 in the Contingency Funds to be used in the 2001 Contingency account, and, be it further RESOLVED, That said funds shall be allocated as follows: $8,900 Unrestricted Contingency and $17,125 Restricted Contingency. Carried Unanimously 21.3 Common Council – Request to Establish Capital Project for Neighborhood Housing Initiative – Discussion – Possible Resolution This item was referred to the end of the meeting. 19.4 DPW – Request to Establish Capital Project for Thurston Avenue Bridge over Fall Creek By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor WHEREAS, a Project for the rehabilitation of the Thurston Avenue Bridge over Fall Creek, B.I.N. 2210630, P.I.N. 375322 for $1,210,312 (“the Project”) is eligible for funding under Title 23 U.S. Code as administered by the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), as amended, that calls for the apportionment of the costs of such program to be borne at the ratio of 80% Federal funds and 20% non-federal funds, and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca desires to advance the Project by making a commitment of 100% of the non-federal share of the costs of Scoping, Design (Phases I-VI), Construction, and Construction Inspection; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves Capital Project #428 Thurston Avenue Bridge Reconstruction in the amount not to exceed $1,210,312, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby authorizes the City of Ithaca to pay in the first instance 100% of the federal and non- federal share of the cost of Scoping, Design (Phases I-VI), Construction, and Construction Inspection for the Project or portions thereof, and be it further RESOLVED, That in the event the full federal and non-federal share costs of the project exceeds the amount appropriated above, December 6, 2000 18 Common Council of the City of Ithaca shall convene as soon as possible to appropriate said excess amount immediately upon the notification by the NYSDOT thereof, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council authorizes the Mayor of the City of Ithaca to sign all necessary Agreements with NYSDOT to secure Federal Aid and Marchiselli Aid on behalf of the City of Ithaca and the Superintendent of Public Works be authorized to sign all necessary construction documents, contracts, certifications and reimbursement requests, and be it further RESOLVED, That this project be undertaken with the understanding that the final cost to the City of Ithaca will not exceed five percent (5%) of the final approved project cost, currently estimated at $60,515.60 of the $1,210,312 authorized for this project, in monies and in-kind services as managed by the Superintendent of Public Works and monitored by the City of Ithaca Controller, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby authorizes the Superintendent of Public Works to administer the above project, and be it further RESOLVED, That said project funds shall be derived from the issuance of Serial Bonds, and be it further RESOLVED, That this resolution shall take effect immediately Carried Unanimously 19.5 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 146 Entitled “Building Construction” and Chapter 295 Entitled “Swimming Pools” of the city of Ithaca Municipal Code Relating to Electrical Inspections By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Manos ORDINANCE NO. 00 - BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows: Section 1. Section 146-4 entitled “Administrative Office and Functions” of Chapter 146, Article II, “Administration and Enforcement” shall be amended to delete subsection “D” and a new subsection “D” shall be added. [D. Electrical inspectors. An arrangement with an appropriate electrical inspector for inspection of electrical installations in the City of Ithaca shall be continued. Such inspector shall act under the supervision of the Building Commissioner and shall exercise appropriate portions of his/her powers and duties. There shall be no compensation payable by the city for inspectors under this arrangement.] D. Electrical Inspector. The electrical inspector, under the supervision of the Building Commissioner, shall inspect all electrical installations within the jurisdiction of this Chapter and determine its compliance with all applicable electrical codes and standards in effect in the City of Ithaca. December 6, 2000 19 Section 2. Section 146-7(C)(2) entitled “Permit Fees” shall be amended as follows: (2) Permit fees. (a) Permit fees shall be paid before permit review can commence according to the following schedule: Permit Type Fee Building or demolition permit, where the total valuation of the work is: [$2,000] $5,000 or less [$10] $30 Above[$2,001] $5,001 $6 for each $1,000 or fraction thereof Provided, however, that: [1] The above fee shall be reduced by one-half if the subject property has an exemption pursuant to Article I of Chapter 300 of this Municipal Code (Senior Citizens Exemption). [2] The above fee shall be waived if the permit is for a construction project consisting solely of the installation, repair or modification of a fire protection system or device, such as smoke/heat detectors or systems, sprinkler systems or other fire suppression systems. [3] The above fee shall be waived if the permit is for a maintenance or repair project that is a correction required because of a citation of a Building Department Inspector as a result of a housing inspection and the total valuation of the work is less than $2,000. Section 3. A new subsection [4] shall be added to Section 146-7(C) as a minor corrective action. The sentence “Other inspections and fees related to building construction:” should be placed before “Permit Type” and “Fee.” The Permit Type “Demolition Work” shall be deleted in its entirety. [4] Other inspections and fees related to building construction: Permit Type Fee [Other inspections and fees related to building construction:] Requested inspections outside $45 per hour normal business hours (minimum charge, 2 hours in addition to the permit fee) Plan review for projects 50% of permit fee exceeding $5,000 (where no schedule (amount to permit is requested) be applied to December 6, 2000 20 permit fee) Additional plan review required $35 per hour by changes, additions or [see § 146-7c(3)] revisions to approved plans Building permit renewal $25 or 10% of the original building permit fee, whichever is larger Certificates of occupancy $35 per hour for each hour of inspection, review or analysis Temporary certificates of $35 plus $35 for occupancy each hour of inspection, review or analysis [Demolition work, where the value of the demolition work is: Up to $1,000 $12 $1,001 and above $6 for each $1,000 or fraction thereof over $1,000] Section 4. Section 146-33 of Chapter 146, ARTICLE V, entitled “Electricians” shall be deleted in its entirety and a new Section 146-33 shall be added as follows: § 146-33. Electrical inspector. [A. Until otherwise provided for by the Common Council, the office of electrical inspector for the city shall be held and its duties performed by a representative or representatives of an appropriate electrical inspection agency. B. The electrical inspector's official headquarters shall be in the office of the Building Commissioner, where all records or authentic copies of the same shall be kept. C. Inspection services as required by the city shall be rendered by an appropriate electrical inspection agency at no cost to the city. However, all necessary report forms, clerical and stenographic services and office space shall be supplied by the city.] All electrical installations in the City of Ithaca, including the electrical installation of appliances such as hot water heaters and furnaces, shall come under the provisions of this article and are subject to inspection by the electrical inspector. December 6, 2000 21 Section 5. Subsection 146-35(A) of Section 146-35 entitled “Examinations” shall be shall be deleted and a new subsection 146-35(A) added and Section 146-35(C) shall be amended, as follows: § 146-35. Examinations. [A. Examinations shall be given within 30 days of the date of the first application received in any current month rated; and if a passing grade is attained, a license shall be issued within 15 days of the examination date.] A. Electrical licensing examinations shall be given two times per year. Applications for an electrical license must have a minimum of forty-two (42) months of experience as an electrician or as an electrician’s apprentice. Applications for licensing may be obtained in the Building Department. If an applicant has been accepted as a candidate for examination, he or she will be notified by mail when and where such examination will take place. B. All written examination questions shall be based upon information to be found in the National Electrical Code and principles and practices common to the electrical trade. C. The grading valuation of each question shall be predetermined and the record of this determination shall be on file [with the City Clerk] in the Building Department prior to the examination time and available for the inspection of an examinee following receipt of his/her grade. Section 6. Subsection 146-35(D) shall be amended as follows: D. If an applicant passes the electrical licensing examination, he or she will be notified by mail and an electrical license will be issued within thirty (30) days. Any person denied a license may appeal the decision of the Examining Board of Electricians to the Building Code Board of Appeals. Immediately following a hearing of all evidence, the Building Code Board of Appeals shall either sustain the action of the Examining Board, regrade the examination or order reexamination of the appellant. Section 7. Subsection 146-36 (C) shall be deleted. § 146-36. Licenses. A. No person shall hereafter engage in, carry on or conduct the business of employing or master electrician or undertake or contract to do the work of an electrician within the city unless or until licensed pursuant to this article. B. No license shall be required of any person engaged in the work of electrician who is employed exclusively by one person, firm or corporation to make repairs in or about the premises of said person, firm or corporation by whom he/she is regularly employed. [C. Any electrician having duly qualified for a license during the five-year period immediately preceding the effective date of this article shall, upon proof thereof, be deemed fit and qualified to receive a license without further examination.] December 6, 2000 22 Section 8. Subsection 146-37(C) shall be amended as follows: §146-37. License application and fees; transferability. A. All persons desiring to be examined shall make application to the Building Commissioner of the city in such form and detail as may be required. Such application shall be accompanied by payment of an examination fee of $100 B. The fee for an original license is included in the examination fee. C. Licenses [may] must be renewed annually [upon payment of a fee of as follows: $50 for the year of 1996, $75 for the year of 1997 and $100 in subsequent years]. Each year shall commence in January. Renewal fees are due by February 1st of each year. Renewal fees are one hundred ($100) Dollars. D. Licenses are not transferable. Licenses are revocable for cause adjudged by the Examining Board of Electricians to be in the best interest of the city. Such judgment may be appealed to the Building Code Board of Appeals; and, after hearing, its judgment shall be final. E. Special reciprocal licenses. (Text omitted herein) Section 9. Subsection 146-38(A) shall be amended as follows: § 146-38. Electrical permits; fees. A. No alterations or additions shall be made in or to the existing wiring in any building nor shall any new construction be wired for the use of electric current without first obtaining a [building] Work [p] Permit [or a building permit] for electrical work from the electrical inspector in [office of] the Building Department. Section 10. Subsection 146-38(B) shall be deleted in its entirety, subsection 146-38(C), as amended herein, shall become subsection 146-38(B), and a new subsection 146-38(C) shall be added. [B. When the electrical work is being done as a portion of a construction project covered by a building permit, the fee for a building permit shall cover the fee for the electrical permit. In cases where the electrical installation, addition, repair or alteration is the only work scheduled to be performed, the fee shall be equal to the equivalent building permit fee using the schedule in § 146-7C(2) based on the valuation of the work.] [C] B. Application for such a Work [p]Permit shall be made by a licensed electrician[,]. It shall be in writing[,] on an approved form and shall describe the work to be done. The permit, if issued, shall be in the name of the [applicant] licensed electrician who shall be responsible for the proper installation of the work described. C. Permit fees shall be paid before a Work Permit is authorized. Permit fees shall be accepted by the Building department Permit Clerk by cash or check. The electrical permit December 6, 2000 23 fee schedule shall be posted in the office of the Building department. (1) Any amendment to the application upon which the Work Permit has been issued must be filed and an amended Work Permit obtained. If there is an increase in the value of the project, an additional fee shall be paid for that increase based on the posted Work Permit fee schedule. (2) Work Permit fees shall be set according to the following schedule which shall be subject to modification from time to time as determined by the Building Commissioner. Fee Schedule (see attached) D. This section shall not apply to maintenance and repairs on the premises of a person regularly employing a journeymen electrician for that purpose. Section 11. Subsection 146-39(G) shall be deleted and subsection 146-39(H) renumbered as subsection 146-39(G). § 146-39. Inspections; fees. A. Inspections of all rough wiring installations shall be made before concealment of said wiring, and such concealment shall be made only after approval by the Electrical Inspector. B. A record of such inspection and approval shall be kept on file in the office of the Building Commissioner and shall be available for public inspection upon request. C. The electrical inspector is hereby authorized to make inspections of any and all electric wiring devices and apparatus in the city; and when such installations are found to be in dangerous or unsafe condition, the property owner shall be notified and shall cause the necessary repairs of hazardous conditions to be made within 48 hours and shall cause full compliance with the notification within 30 days from the date of said notice. D. The electrical inspector is hereby empowered to disconnect or to order the discontinuance of electrical service to such wiring, devices and/or material found to be defectively installed or having become damaged or deteriorated to the degree that life and property are endangered. Reconnection of such service shall not be made without the specific approval of the electrical inspector or the Building Commissioner. E. The electrical inspector shall have the right, during reasonable hours, to enter any building or structure in the discharge of his/her official duties. F. The fees for inspection shall be fixed and uniform for all installations in accordance with the schedule filed in the office of the Building Commissioner and available for public inspection. [G. All inspection fees and charges shall be invoiced by an approved electrical inspector direct to the applicant and said organization shall not be otherwise compensated by the city.] December 6, 2000 24 [H] G. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this article for any electrical contractor or electrician to charge collect or transfer fees for electrical inspections greater than the amounts invoiced to him/her by an approved electrical inspector, and proof of violation shall be sufficient cause for revocation of his/her certificate of competency. Section 12. Subsection 146-41(B) shall be amended as follows: § 146-41. Service connections. A. No public service corporation shall install a meter or make a service connection to any installation of electric wiring for which a certificate or memorandum of approval is required by the Building Commissioner until such certificate or memorandum has been issued to such service corporation, except as provided by the issuance of temporary permits. B. The [Building Commissioner] Electrical Inspector may, at his/her discretion, issue a temporary permit for the use of current for lighting and/or construction purposes. Such temporary permit shall be issued for a period not to exceed six months. Section 13. Subsection 146-45(B) of Section 146-45, entitled “ Registration; fees; bonds” shall be amended as follows: § 146-45. Registration; fees; bonds. A. No person shall hereafter engage in, carry on or conduct the business of heating and/or ventilating engineer, contractor or installer within the city unless or until he/she has first obtained a certificate of registration from the office of the Building Commissioner. B. Each application for registration shall be accompanied by payment of a fee of [$10], $50. [and] [r]Registrations [may] must be renewed annually. [for a fee of $5.] Payment for renewal of registration must be received by February 1st. C. All applicants for registration must present evidence of an insurance liability bond, and renewal certificates of such bonds must be filed annually in the office of the Building Commissioner. Section 14. Subsection 146-46(A) and subsection 146-46(B) shall be deleted and a new subdivision 146-46(A) added as follows: § 146-46. Permit applications and fees. [A. Before installing any heat-producing device or apparatus in any building or adjacent thereto or connected therewith, specifications for the installation must be submitted to the Building Commissioner on such forms and in such detail as may be required. Standard forms shall be supplied by the Building Department.] [B. Upon approval by the Building Commissioner and the Fire Chief of the city, a permit for the installation shall be issued. When plans and a description of the proposed heating apparatus are included in the original plans and December 6, 2000 25 specifications for a building or alteration of a building, the building permit shall include the permit for such heating apparatus. When the heating and/or ventilating installation is the only work being done in a building, the permit fee shall be $5.] A. A building permit must be applied for and approved prior to the installation of any heat-producing device or ventilating system, including restaurant hood systems. Applications shall include layout plans, equipment cut sheets, code compliance information and where appropriate, manufacturer’s installation instructions. Additional permits may need to be obtained from the Fire Department or from the Electrical Inspector. Section 15. Section 295-10 entitled “Electrical Work” of Chapter 295 entitled “Swimming Pools” shall be amended as follows: § 295-10. Electrical work. A. Conformance to New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code. All lighting and electrical work shall conform to the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and be inspected and approved by [an approved electrical inspection agency] the electrical inspector. Also, all underground wiring and lighting shall be of low voltage. B. Disturbance of adjoining owners prohibited. No lighting shall be installed in such a manner that it may be an annoyance to the owners of adjacent property. Under normal circumstances, floodlighting, the illumination of adjacent property, among other things, will be sufficient to constitute an annoyance. C. Safety restrictions. No pool shall be erected within 10 feet of existing electrical service lines, nor shall electrical lines be strung over the water surface nor within four feet of the outer edge of the pool. Section 16. For consistency, Section 146-35 entitled “Examinations,” as amended herein, shall be renumbered as Section 146-37 and shall be placed in the position of the current Section 146-37, entitled “License application and fees; transferability,” as amended herein, such that the current Section 146-36, entitled “Licenses,” as amended herein, and the current Section 146-37, entitled “License application and fees; transferability,” as amended herein, shall be renumbered as Sections 146-35 and 146- 36, respectively, as follows: §146-33. Electrical Inspector. §146-34. Examining Board of Electricians. §146-[35] 36. Licenses. §146-[36] 37. License application and fees; transferability. §146-[37] 35. Examinations. December 6, 2000 26 Section 17. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance with law upon publication of notice as provided in the Ithaca City Charter. Discussion followed on the floor with Acting Building Commissioner Radke answering questions from Council members regarding the proposed fee structures. A vote on the Ordinance resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously 21.1 Building Department – Request to Transfer Funds for Equipment By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Manos WHEREAS, in April, 2000, Common Council approved the transfer of $9,000 from Unrestricted Contingency to the Building Department Overtime account to cover needed overtime for the Senior Plan Examiner, and WHEREAS, adjustments to the Building Department staffing schedule made the need for the overtime unnecessary, and WHEREAS, the Building Department is anticipating future staffing additions, which have prompted the need for additional computers, office furniture and office supplies at a cost of $9,000; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the following transfer of funds to accommodate the Building Department’s needs: From Appropriation Account: A3620-5125 Overtime $9,000 To Appropriation Accounts: A3620-5210 Office Equipment – Computers $8,000 A3620-5425 Office Expense 1,000 and, be it further RESOLVED, That the Building Department shall be allowed to encumber the remaining balance of said funds to 2001 if necessary. Carried Unanimously 21.2 Police Department – Request to Amend Capital Project for Administrative Software By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Spielholz WHEREAS, the Police Department has been operating with a manual, antiquated Administrative Personnel time keeping and record keeping system for years, and WHEREAS, this system is cumbersome and inefficient for department staff to maintain, and WHEREAS, the department has done research and found a computerized software package, Our Software Ltd. Administrators pack, that will replace the current manual system and increase department efficiency, at an estimated cost of $30,000 including contingency and financing costs; now, therefore, be it December 6, 2000 27 RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends Capital Project #388 Software Acquisition by an amount not to exceed $30,000 for the purposes of acquiring said software for the Police Department, and be it further RESOLVED, That funds for said software acquisition shall be derived by a General Fund advance and later repaid by the issuance of Serial Bonds. Discussion followed on the floor with Deputy Police Chief Glenn Sharshon answering questions from Council members regarding the stability of the aforementioned software company. A vote on the Resolution resulted as follows: Ayes (9) Manos, Pryor, Farrell, Vaughan, Blumenthal, Spielholz, Glasstetter, Hershey, Taylor Nays (0) Abstentions (1) Sams Carried 19.8 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $3,764,419 SERIAL BONDS OF THE CITY OF ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK, TO PAY COSTS OF VARIOUS OBJECTS OR PURPOSES IN AND FOR SAID CITY. By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Spielholz WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the financing of the capital projects hereinafter described, including compliance with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, have been performed, and WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital projects; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, as follows: Section 1. For the specific objects or purposes or classes of objects or purposes of paying costs of the following objects or purposes in and for the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, there are hereby authorized to be issued $3,764,419 serial bonds of said City pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law, apportioned among such objects or purposes in accordance with the maximum estimated cost of each. Such objects or purposes are as follows: a) To pay costs of the purchase and installation of computer hardware and software, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $346,050. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is five years, pursuant to subdivision 32 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; b) To pay costs of the purchase of a pumper for the City Fire Department, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $385,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is twenty years, pursuant to subdivision 27 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; c) To pay costs of the reconstruction of Lake Source Cooling Street, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $175,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of December 6, 2000 28 the aforesaid specific object or purpose is fifteen years, pursuant to subdivision 20(c) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; d) To pay costs of the purchase, installation and construction of lighting and security improvements to City parking facilities, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $165,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is twenty years, pursuant to subdivision 12(a)(1) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; e) To pay costs of the demolition of the City building located at 402 South Cayuga Street, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $56,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is ten years, pursuant to subdivision 12-a of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; f) To pay costs of the relocation of the fire alarm service to underground, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $30,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 35 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; g) To pay costs of the reconstruction of sidewalks, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $80,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is ten years, pursuant to subdivision 24 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; h) To pay costs of the reconstruction of streets and roads, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $863,269. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is fifteen years, pursuant to subdivision 20(c) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; i) To pay costs of professional services for a traffic study and design for South of the Creek, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $40,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 62 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; j) To pay costs of the purchase of equipment for City playgrounds, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $80,600. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is five years, pursuant to subdivision 32 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; k) To pay costs of the reconstruction of Ithaca Fire Department Station No. 9, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $90,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is twenty years, pursuant to subdivision 12(a)(1) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; l) To pay costs of the purchase of motor vehicles, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $101,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of December 6, 2000 29 objects or purposes is five years, pursuant to subdivision 29 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; m) To pay costs of an assessment study of City buildings, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $171,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is five years, pursuant to subdivision 62 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; n) To pay costs of the purchase of parking meters, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $65,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 50 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; o) To pay costs of the purchase of emergency management communications equipment for the Ithaca Fire Department, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $10,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is ten years, pursuant to subdivision 25 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; p) To pay costs of the reconstruction and construction of improvements to the Commons and peripheral streets, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $250,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is twenty years, pursuant to subdivision 80 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; q) To pay costs of the purchase of equipment for construction and maintenance, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at an aggregate maximum estimated cost of $381,000. It is hereby determined that of said $381,000 $7,000 is for items of equipment each costing $15,000 or less, $40,000 is for items of equipment each costing over $15,000 but less than $30,000 and that $334,000 is for items of equipment each costing more than $30,000. It is hereby further determined that the period of probable usefulness of such equipment costing $15,000 or less is five years, pursuant to subdivision 28 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law, that the period of probable usefulness of such equipment costing over $15,000 but less tan $30,000 is ten years, pursuant to subdivision 28 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law and that the period of probable usefulness of such equipment costing more than $30,000 is fifteen years, pursuant to subdivision 20(c) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; r) To pay costs of the purchase of police vehicles, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $140,500. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid class of objects or purposes is three years, pursuant to subdivision 77 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; s) To pay costs of the acquisition of land for the Cleveland Avenue/Clinton Street Park, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $150,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is thirty years, pursuant to subdivision 21(a) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; t) To pay costs of the purchase and installation of furniture and sound system improvements for the City Council Chambers, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a December 6, 2000 30 maximum estimated cost of $20,000. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 32 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law; u) To pay additional costs of the construction of a new roof in the Streets and Facilities Building, including incidental expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum estimated cost of $258,500 (including the $93,500 serial bonds authorized by bond resolution dated and duly adopted December 2, 1998; revised maximum estimated cost of this specific object or purpose is now $258,500; amount of serial bonds authorized by this bond resolution, $165,000). It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is twenty years, pursuant to subdivision 12(a)(1) of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law, computed from January 21, 1999, the date of issuance of the first obligations issued therefor. Section 2. The aggregate maximum estimated cost of the aforesaid specific objects or purposes and classes of objects or purposes is $3,764,419, and the plan for the financing thereof is by the issuance of the serial bonds authorized by Section 1 hereof, allocated to each specific object or purpose or class of objects or purposes in accordance with the maximum estimated cost or amount of serial bonds authorized therefor of each set forth in Section 1 hereof. Section 3. Subject to the provisions of the Local Finance Law, the power to authorize the issuance of and to sell bond anticipation notes in anticipation of the issuance and sale of the serial bonds herein authorized, including renewals of such notes, is hereby delegated to the City Controller, the chief fiscal officer. Such notes shall be of such terms, form and contents, and shall be sold in such manner, as may be prescribed by said City Controller, consistent with the provisions of the Local Finance Law. Section 4. The faith and credit of said City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on such obligations as the same respectively become due and payable. An annual appropriation shall be made in each year sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such obligations becoming due and payable in such year. There shall annually be levied on all the taxable real property in said City a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such obligations as the same become due and payable. Section 5. The bonds authorized pursuant to this bond resolution shall be in fully registered form and shall be signed in the name of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Controller and a facsimile of its corporate seal shall be imprinted or impressed and may be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk. Section 6. The powers and duties of advertising such bonds for sale, conducting the sale and awarding the bonds, are hereby delegated to the City Controller, who shall advertise such bonds for sale, conduct the sale, and award the bonds in such manner as he shall deem best for the interests of the City; provided, however, that in the exercise of these delegated powers, he shall December 6, 2000 31 comply fully with the provisions of the Local Finance Law and any order or rule of the State Comptroller applicable to the sale of municipal bonds. The receipt of the City Controller shall be a full acquittance to the purchaser of such bonds, who shall not be obliged to see to the application of the purchase money. Section 7. All other matters, except as provided herein relating to such bonds, including determining whether to issue such bonds having substantially level or declining annual debt service, including prescribing whether manual or facsimile signatures shall appear on said bonds, prescribing the method for the recording of ownership of said bonds, appointing the fiscal agent or agents for said bonds, providing for the printing and delivery of said bonds (and if said bonds are to be executed in the name of the City by the facsimile signature of its City Controller, providing for the manual countersignature of a fiscal agent or of a designated official of the City), the date, denominations, maturities and interest payment dates, place or places of payment, and also including the consolidation with other issues, shall be determined by the City Controller. It is hereby determined that it is to the financial advantage of the City not to impose and collect from registered owners of such serial bonds any charges for mailing, shipping and insuring bonds transferred or exchanged by the fiscal agent, and, accordingly, pursuant to paragraph c of Section 70.00 of the Local Finance Law, no such charges shall be so collected by the fiscal agent. Such bonds shall contain substantially the recital of validity clause provided for in section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law and shall otherwise be in such form and contain such recitals in addition to those required by section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law, as the City Controller shall determine. Section 8. The validity of such bonds and bond anticipation notes may be contested only if: 1) Such obligations are authorized for an object or purpose for which said City is not authorized to expend money, or 2) The provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of publication of this resolution are not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the date of such publication, or 3) Such obligations are authorized in violation of the provisions of the Constitution. Section 9. This resolution shall constitute a statement of official intent for purposes of Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-1. Other than as specified in this resolution, no monies are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on long-term basis, or otherwise set aside with respect to the permanent funding of the object or purpose described herein. Section 10. This resolution, which takes effect immediately, shall be published in full in the Ithaca Journal, the official newspaper, together with a notice of the City Clerk in substantially the form provided in Section 81.00 of the Local Finance Law. A roll call vote resulted as follows: Alderperson Manos-absent from vote Alderperson Pryor -Aye Alderperson Sams - Aye Alderperson Farrell -Aye Alderperson Blumenthal - Aye Alderperson Vaughan -Aye December 6, 2000 32 Alderperson Glasstetter - Aye Alderperson Spielholz -Aye Alderperson Hershey - Aye Alderperson Taylor -Aye Carried Unanimously 19.9 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $1,381,000 SERIAL BONDS OF THE CITY OF ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK, TO PAY THE COST OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OF SAID CITY AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PORTIONS OF THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM OF SAID CITY. By Alderperson Vaughan: Seconded by Alderperson Spielholz WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the financing of the capital projects hereinafter described, including compliance with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, have been performed, and WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital projects; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, as follows: Section 1. For the classes of objects or purposes of paying the cost of the reconstruction of portions of the water distribution system, at a maximum estimated cost of $916,000, and the reconstruction of portions of the sewer collection system, at a maximum estimated cost of $465,000, of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, there are hereby authorized to be issued $1,381,000 serial bonds of said City pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law, apportioned among such classes of objects or purposes in accordance with the maximum estimated cost of each. Section 2. The aggregate maximum estimated cost of the aforesaid classes of objects or purposes is $1,381,000, and the plan for the financing thereof is by the issuance of the $1,381,000 serial bonds authorized by Section 1 hereof, allocated to each of the classes of objects or purposes in accordance with the maximum estimated cost of each as stated in Section 1 hereof. Section 3. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid reconstruction of portions of the water distribution system is forty years, pursuant to subdivision 1 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law, and that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid reconstruction of portions of the sewer collection system is forty years, pursuant to subdivision 4 of paragraph a of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law. Section 4. Subject to the provisions of the Local Finance Law, the power to authorize the issuance of and to sell bond anticipation notes in anticipation of the issuance and sale of the serial bonds herein authorized, including renewals of such notes, is hereby delegated to the City Controller, the chief fiscal officer. Such notes shall be of such terms, form and contents, and shall be sold in such manner, as may be prescribed by said City Controller, consistent with the provisions of the Local Finance Law. Section 5. The faith and credit of said City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, are hereby irrevocably pledged for the December 6, 2000 33 payment of the principal of and interest on such obligations as the same respectively become due and payable. An annual appropriation shall be made in each year sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such obligations becoming due and payable in such year. There shall annually be levied on all the taxable real property in said City a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on such obligations as the same become due and payable. Section 6. The bonds authorized pursuant to this bond resolution shall be in fully registered form and shall be signed in the name of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Controller and a facsimile of its corporate seal shall be imprinted or impressed and may be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk. Section 7. The powers and duties of advertising such bonds for sale, conducting the sale and awarding the bonds, are hereby delegated to the City Controller, who shall advertise such bonds for sale, conduct the sale, and award the bonds in such manner as he shall deem best for the interests of the City, including, but not limited to, the power to sell said serial bonds to the New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, provided, however, that in the exercise of these delegated powers, he shall comply fully with the provisions of the Local Finance Law and any order or rule of the State Comptroller applicable to the sale of municipal bonds. The receipt of the City Controller shall be a full acquittance to the purchaser of such bonds, who shall not be obliged to see to the application of the purchase money. Section 8. The power to issue and sell notes to the New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation pursuant to Section 169.00 of the Local Finance Law is hereby delegated to the City Controller. Such notes shall be of such terms, form and contents as may be prescribed by said City Controller consistent with the provisions of the Local Finance Law. Section 9. The City Controller is hereby further authorized, at his sole discretion, to execute a project financing and loan agreement, and any other agreements with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and/or the New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, including amendments thereto, and including any instruments (or amendments thereto) in the effectuation thereof, in order to effect the financing or refinancing of the specific object or purpose described in Section 1 hereof, or a portion thereof, by a serial bond, and, or note issue of said City in the event of the sale of same to the New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation. Section 10. The intent of this resolution is to give the City Controller sufficient authority to execute those applications, agreements, instruments or to do any similar acts necessary to effect the issuance of the aforesaid serial bonds and, or notes without resorting to further action of this Common Council. Section 11. All other matters, except as provided herein relating to such bonds, including determining whether to issue such bonds having substantially level or declining annual debt service, including prescribing whether manual or facsimile signatures shall appear on said bonds, prescribing the method for the recording of ownership of said bonds, appointing the fiscal December 6, 2000 34 agent or agents for said bonds, providing for the printing and delivery of said bonds (and if said bonds are to be executed in the name of the City by the facsimile signature of its City Controller, providing for the manual countersignature of a fiscal agent or of a designated official of the City), the date, denominations, maturities and interest payment dates, place or places of payment, and also including the consolidation with other issues, shall be determined by the City Controller. It is hereby determined that it is to the financial advantage of the City not to impose and collect from registered owners of such serial bonds any charges for mailing, shipping and insuring bonds transferred or exchanged by the fiscal agent, and, accordingly, pursuant to paragraph c of Section 70.00 of the Local Finance Law, no such charges shall be so collected by the fiscal agent. Such bonds shall contain substantially the recital of validity clause provided for in section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law and shall otherwise be in such form and contain such recitals in addition to those required by section 52.00 of the Local Finance Law, as the City Controller shall determine. Section 12. The validity of such bonds and bond anticipation notes may be contested only if: 1) Such obligations are authorized for an object or purpose for which said City is not authorized to expend money, or 2) The provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of publication of this resolution are not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the date of such publication, or 3) Such obligations are authorized in violation of the provisions of the Constitution. Section 13. This resolution shall constitute a statement of official intent for purposes of Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-1. Other than as specified in this resolution, no monies are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on long-term basis, or otherwise set aside with respect to the permanent funding of the object or purpose described herein. Section 14. This resolution, which takes effect immediately, shall be published in full in the Ithaca Journal, the official newspaper, together with a notice of the City Clerk in substantially the form provided in Section 81.00 of the Local Finance Law. A roll call vote resulted as follows: Alderperson Manos-absent from vote Alderperson Pryor -Aye Alderperson Sams - Aye Alderperson Farrell -Aye Alderperson Blumenthal - Aye Alderperson Vaughan -Aye Alderperson Glasstetter - Aye Alderperson Spielholz -Aye Alderperson Hershey - Aye Alderperson Taylor -Aye Carried Unanimously 21.1 Common Council – Request to Establish Capital Project for Neighborhood Housing Initiative By Alderperson Farrell: Seconded by Alderperson Hershey WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca and the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) are establishing a Neighborhood Housing Initiative Program, and December 6, 2000 35 WHEREAS, the program, at an estimated cost of $2 million, will provide funds to perform the following: - Acquire rental residential properties in the City that negatively effect neighborhoods - Renovate acquired properties - Sell renovated properties to owner-occupants - Proceeds from resale of renovated properties will be reinvested back into the program to fund acquisition and renovation of additional properties and WHEREAS, the goal of the housing initiative program is to increase neighborhood stability and improve neighborhood quality of life through the elimination of blighting conditions; increase the number and percentage of homeowners in the City of Ithaca; conversion of rental properties to owner-occupancy status; physically upgrade substandard housing and stimulate private sector investment in neighborhoods, and WHEREAS, the IURA will act as the City’s agent to administer and implement the program, and WHEREAS, the IURA will contract with Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS) to act in the capacity of the City’s developer; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the Neighborhood Housing Initiative as outlined in the document entitled “Mayor Cohen’s Neighborhood Housing Initiative Proposal, City of Ithaca, New York, December 5, 2000”, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign all necessary contract documents for said housing initiative program, and be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the establishment of a Capital Project in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 for the purposes of establishing funds for said housing initiative program, and be it further RESOLVED, That funds necessary for said project will be derived from the issuance of Serial Bonds. Extensive discussion followed on the floor with Mayor Cohen explaining the housing initiative, and Director of Community Development Bohn and INHS Director Paul Mazzarella answering questions from Council members. Director of Community Development Bohn reviewed the changes made to the November 20, 2000 proposal. Common Council members and the City Attorney recommended amendments to the proposal relating to the resale of properties to organizations incorporating a strong component of cooperative ownership, and the make up of the Homeownership Investment Committee. Alderperson Blumenthal voice her discomfort with voting on a proposal that Council members have not had an appropriate amount of time to review. December 6, 2000 36 Mayor Cohen noted that this proposal has been reviewed and discussed by the Budget & Administration Committee, and thanked Alderperson Farrell for her hard work and dedication to this project. A vote on the Resolution resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously (Alderperson Blumenthal absent from vote) NEW BUSINESS: 21.1 Motion to Enter Into Executive Session to Discuss Pending Litigation and Matters of Collective Bargaining By Alderperson Manos: Seconded by Alderperson Pryor RESOLVED, That Common Council adjourn into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation and collective bargaining issues. Carried Unanimously (Alderperson Blumenthal absent from vote) RECONVENE: Common Council reconvened into Regular Session with Mayor Cohen reporting that Common Council took action on the following matter during Executive Session: Route 96 Bridge Sculptures By Alderperson Pryor: Seconded by Alderperson Sams WHEREAS, Common Council, at its June 7, 2000, meeting passed a resolution, resolution 17.1, dealing with various items related to the Route 96 bridge sculpture project, and WHEREAS, that resolution directed that a search be undertaken to ascertain a more suitable location for the Route 96 bridge sculptures, and WHEREAS, to date no suitable alternative location for the bridge sculptures has been identified; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby repeals the second amendment to the June 7, 2000, resolution 17.1, relating to a search for a more suitable location for the Route 96 bridge sculptures, and, be it further RESOLVED, That Common Council specifically retains the resolution as it relates to payment for cost overruns for the Route 96 Bridge Sculpture Project, including the amendment to the third Whereas clause of said June 7, 2000 resolution which states “Whereas, NYS Department of Transportation has agreed to pay for the cost overruns, and”. Ayes (6) Farrell, Hershey Pryor, Sams, Manos, Vaughan Nays (0) Alderpersons Blumenthal, Spielholz, Glasstetter, and Taylor were absent from vote. Carried ADJOURNMENT: On a motion the meeting adjourned at 11:30 P.M. ________________________ _______________________ Julie Conley Holcomb, CMC Alan J. Cohen, December 6, 2000 37 City Clerk Mayor