Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CC-1994-10-05October 5, 1994 COMMON COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK Regular Meeting7:00 p.m. October 5, 1994 PRESENT: Mayor Nichols Alderpersons (10) - Booth, Johnson, Efroymson, Hanna, Shenk, Sams, Thorpe, Schroeder, Mackesey, Gray OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney - Guttman City Controller - Cafferillo City Clerk - Paolangeli Superintendent of Public Works - Gray Building Commissioner - Eckstrom Youth Bureau Director - Cohen Planning and Development Director - VanCort Fire Chief - Wilbur Police Chief - McEwen Board of Public Works Commissioner - Reeves PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nichols led all present in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag. MINUTES: 2.1 Approval of Minutes of the September 7, 1994 Common Council Meeting By Alderperson Efroymson: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk RESOLVED, That the Minutes of the September 7, 1994 Common Council meeting be approved. Carried Unanimously ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA: Youth Committee Alderperson Shenk requested the addition of an announcement. No Council member objected. New Business Mayor Nichols requested an Executive Session to discuss the possible acquisition of property. No Council member objected. MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS: Board of Fire Commissioners Mayor Nichols requested Council approval for the appointment of Robert Romanowski, 160 Bundy Road, to serve as a Town Representative on the Board of Fire Commissioners with a term to expire June 30, 1997. Resolution By Alderperson Shenk: Seconded by Alderperson Mackesey RESOLVED, That this Council approves the appointment of Robert Romanowski to serve as a Town Representative on the Board of Fire Commissioners with a term to expire June 30, 1997. Carried Unanimously Rental Housing Advisory Commission Mayor Nichols requested Council approval for the appointment of Kimberly Esterman, 609 North Tioga Street, to fill a vacancy created by the resignation of Carl Kadlic, to the Rental Housing Advisory Commission with a term to expire December 31, 1994. October 5, 1994 Resolution By Alderperson Efroymson: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk RESOLVED, That this Council approves the appointment of Kimberly Esterman to the Rental Housing Advisory Commission with a term to expire December 31, 1994. Carried Unanimously Ithaca Housing Authority Mayor Nichols announced that he has appointed Judith Van Allen, 109 Llenroc Court to the Ithaca Housing Authority with a term to expire October 17, 1999. COMMUNICATIONS: Fire Prevention Week Proclamation Mayor Nichols read the following Proclamation: "WHEREAS, more than 4,000 people die from fire each year in the United States, and WHEREAS, eighty percent of all U.S. fire deaths occur in our homes, and WHEREAS, every day of the year home smoke detectors save lives by warning people of a fire while they still have time to escape, and WHEREAS, while seven out of eight homes have at least one smoke detector, these detectors may not be installed in the right places or kept in good working order, leaving those homes unprotected, and WHEREAS, this summer a malfunctioning smoke detector ignored by residents at 126 Westbourne Lane in Ithaca delayed notification of the fire department and contributed significantly to the fire that destroyed the building, and WHEREAS, the Tompkins County Fire Service, the Tompkins County Chapter of the American Red Cross, and other concerned local organizations and businesses have joined together through the Tompkins County Fire Prevention Task Force to urge all citizens to act now to protect themselves from the devastating effects of fire; Now, therefore, I, Benjamin Nichols, Mayor of the City of Ithaca, do hereby proclaim the week of October 9 - 15, 1994 as FIRE PREVENTION WEEK in the City of Ithaca. This week commemorates the great Chicago Fire of 1871, which killed 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings. I call upon all citizens to participate in fire prevention activities at home, work and school; to heed the message: "Test Your Smoke Detector for Life"; and to practice fire safety, not only during this one week, but throughout the year. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the great seal of the CITY OF ITHACA this 5th day October, 1994." PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL: AIDS Work Ms. Marge Dill, representing the Human Services Coalition, reported to Council on AIDS Work activities since August when the City allocated emergency funds for their operation if certain conditions were met. October 5, 1994 Mayor Nichols stated that on the basis of Ms. Dill's report, it is his opinion that AIDS Work has met the conditions that the City set for releasing the money from unrestricted contingency and he will recommend these funds be released as soon as possible. Route 13 Ms. Dooley Kiefer, 629 Highland Road, spoke to Council regarding the proposed Route 13 project. She is in opposition to any four- lane highways that cause the loss of wetlands and green space. Canal Recreationway/Steamboat Landing Dock Ms. Anna Steinkraus, President of the Farmer's Market, spoke to Council regarding the possibility of a dock being built at Steamboat Landing. She urged Council, on behalf of the Farmer's Market to support the building of such a dock. Canal Recreationway Ms. Doria Higgins, representing Citizens to Save Our Parks, addressed Council regarding agenda item 14.2 - City Recommendations for Canal Recreationway Plan. She commented on the 11 items listed in this resolution. She stated that Citizens to Save Our Parks are mainly objecting to items 6, 9, and 10. She requested that in the resolution the words "except for the land past Treman Marina" be added to each of the items she has referred to (6, 9, and 10). Fall-in for Aids Work Day Mr. Clay Hamilton informed the Council that on Saturday, October 22, USA Today/Gannett is sponsoring "Make a Difference Day" and they are encouraging communities to work together on joint activities, document these activities and submit them. Sixty communities will receive $2,000 each. In conjunction with this several activities have been planned for the date of Saturday, October 22. It is being called "Fall-In For Aids Work Day". He explained what some of the activities planned for Ithaca will be. Nuisance Abatement Law Mr. Mark Finkelstein, 210 Lake Street, spoke to Council in opposition to the Nuisance Abatement Law which is on the agenda this evening as a report. Route 13 Project/Bicycle Safety Mr. David Nutter, Chair of the Bicycle Advisory Council, addressed Council regarding safety concerns for bicyclists in connection with the Route 13 project. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC: Nuisance Abatement Law Alderperson Efroymson stated that there will be a hearing on October 11 at the Inter-Institutional Committee meeting regarding the Nuisance Abatement issue. Mayor Nichols stated that what we have heard from other communities which have enacted a Nuisance Abatement Law is that the threat of this kind of closing makes the landlords more responsible for keeping up their property and making sure that drugs and other illegal activities are not taking place at their properties. He stated that as for the civil liberties issue, he does not see this issue as a threat to civil liberties in any way. Route 13/Bicycle Safety Alderperson Efroymson stated that he has concerns regarding bicycle safety in regard to the Route 13 project and he will be offering an amendment to the resolution to try to insure that there is safe passage across Route 13 or that we should not go ahead with the plan as proposed. October 5, 1994 Alderperson Schroeder stated that he thinks that we absolutely should proceed with the city bikeway proposal between the Black Diamond Trail and the Town of Ithaca's South Hill Recreationway as soon as possible. He stated that a component would be building the bridge that would allow safe passage over Route 13 and he does think that should be a city priority. Mayor Nichols stated that he believes the city has no authority whatsoever to deal with what happens on Route 13 outside the boundaries of the City and as far as he knows the Town of Ithaca has not voted to oppose the construction. Canal Recreationway Alderperson Schroeder, in response to Ms. Higgin's comments on the Canal Recreationway, stated that the three items she mentioned as being part of yet another attempt to establish roads and pavement in Allen Treman State Park is just not true. He believes the natural state and tranquility of Allen Treman State Park will be preserved. REPORT OF CITY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES: Board of Public Works Commissioner Reeves reported to the Council on the following items: Recycle Ithaca Bicycles - In August RIBS, which is using one of the city buildings, requested use of more space at the old sludge dryer building and that was denied because of continued use by the Department of Public Works. The Board will be continuing discussions with RIBS regarding their needs. Cemetery Plantings - The residents of DeWitt Place asked for permission to do some plantings in the City Cemetery and a resolution was passed granting that request. The Board suggested that they apply for a planting grant that Council had authorized earlier in the year. Community Gardens Signage - In August the Board received a request from the Community Gardens Association for signs and other measures to help protect pedestrians from traffic going into the Carpenter Business Park. After much discussion, the association members agreed to work with business owners and the Department of Public Works staff to help solve these problems related to pedestrians, the road, and the layout of the gardens. Route 96 Project - The Board passed a resolution regarding the relocation of the Seneca Street bridge. Of the several options that were presented to the Board by Jon Meigs of the Planning Department, the Board concluded that the most desirable location for the bridge was the Black Diamond Trail to cross the Inlet at the fish ladder. The Superintendent was directed to work with State Parks on the feasibility of the project and to pass the recommendation on to Council for consideration. Southwest Park Alienation - The Board has endorsed the proposed alienation of Southwest Park as it was proposed by the Parks Commission and the Southwest Area Land Use Study Committee. Cass Park Rink Repairs - In September the Board awarded consulting services to Davis Mechanical in regard to the Cass Park Rink repairs. Inventory for Six Mile Creek - The Board passed a resolution concerning funding and work with other municipalities, committees and government agencies in a project to identify and inventory problems in the Six Mile Creek Watershed. Elmira Road Sidewalks Maintenance and Canal Recreationway Resolutions - On tonight's Council agenda there are two October 5, 1994 resolutions that have Public Works implications. The Board would appreciate having more information and more time to comment on these two resolutions. Alderperson Schroeder responded that he feels attempts have been made to keep the Board apprised of the first of these two items. Board of Fire Commissioners Commissioner Hamilton thanked the Council for the designation of Fire Prevention Week and reported on the history of #9 Fire Station and their upcoming 100th anniversary celebration. REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company City Attorney Guttman reported that the M & T Bank of Buffalo has filed the appropriate applications to acquire ownership of the Ithaca Bank Corporation, which is the holding company for Citizens Savings Bank. A citizen's coalition, known as the Coalition for Community Re-investment, questioned the propriety of this acquisition and filed challenges with the Federal and State Regulatory authorities. Negotiations took place between members of the coalition and representatives of M & T Bank. The Mayor, members of Council and Attorney Guttman were involved in these negotiations. One of the primary efforts of the negotiations was to have M & T Bank enter into a written agreement in which they would specify what services they would be providing for the community and how they would meet the requirements of the Federal Community Re-investment Act. As a result of negotiations there is now a rider to that document which contains clarifications and additions. The July 19 document with that rider is written in the form of an agreement between the M & T Bank and the coalition and members of the coalition have signed that document agreeing to withdraw their challenge to the merger application. Mayor Nichols stated that he feels that this has been a very positive experience, particularly with the involvement of so many members of the community in this effort, as well as the city's support and he thinks we've really learned how much we are able to do under the provisions of the Community Re-investment Act. He said that we should now be looking at the other banks to see to what extent they are fulfilling their obligations. PLANNING COMMITTEE: * 14.1 Route 13 Project: Final Approval Resolutions for 500 ft. of Project Inside City A. Approval of Arterial Plans and Specifications By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk WHEREAS, the N.Y.S. Department of Transportation has proposed a state arterial project called "Route 13 Bridge Replacement Project, SH 454 Ithaca Road Over Conrail/Cayuga Inlet and Over Buttermilk Creek, City and Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, PIN 3057.28.123", and WHEREAS, this project involves the rebuilding of two deteriorated bridges and eight-tenths of a mile of Route 13 south of the City, beginning just within City limits, and WHEREAS, D.o.T. has decided the entire stretch of this project outside the City will be four lanes wide, and D.o.T. is now asking the City to approve a four-lane width for the approximately 500 feet of the project within the City, and WHEREAS, Common Council by resolution on December 5, 1990, February 6, 1991 and November 3, 1993 urged the D.o.T. to replace these deteriorated bridges and to retain the essential existing two-lane width of Route 13 along the entire project length, the 1993 resolution particularly stressing potential negative environmental consequences of a four-lane solution, and October 5, 1994 WHEREAS, in response to environmental concerns raised by both the City of Ithaca and the Town of Ithaca, D.o.T. subsequently added the following mitigation measures to the project: (1) The implementation of a landscape plan calling for the planting or saving of hundreds of tall evergreen trees, tall deciduous trees and small ornamental trees and shrubs along the entire length of the project, to preserve the sense of driving through a forested preserve south of the City; (2) The construction (as part of this project) of abutments on the N.Y.S. Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation owned right-of-way at the City line, such abutments to be suitable for a specific bicycle/pedestrian bridge schematic design; these abutments will facilitate the future construction of a grade-separated crossing over Route 13 for a bicycle/pedestrian path along the old South Hill Lehigh Valley Railroad spur, such path to connect Fingerlakes State Parks' Black Diamond Trail with the Town of Ithaca's South Hill Recreationway; (3) The establishment of an attractive "gateway" where Route 13 enters the City, created by a concentration of plantings and the placement of the new abutments, the latter having been designed to support a gently arched future bicycle/pedestrian bridge which -- when built -- will complement and enhance the "gateway" effect; (4) The provision of sidewalks -- separated from the road by curblawns -- leading from the City to Buttermilk Falls Road and Buttermilk Falls State Park, such sidewalks to connect with future sidewalks the City intends to build along both sides of Elmira Road; (5) The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Routes 13 and 13A south of the City, and WHEREAS, other environmental impact mitigation measures now incorporated in the project include: (1) The construction of a topographically difficult section of the Black Diamond Trail passing under and beside the northeast approach to the new Route 13 bridge over Conrail/Cayuga Inlet; (2) The construction of abutments for a future Black Diamond Trail bridge over the Cayuga Inlet; (3) The purchase of substitute park land providing rights- of-way for future segments of the Black Diamond Trail; (4) The creation of new wetlands near the Cayuga Inlet; and WHEREAS, the City only has control over the approximately 500- foot portion of the project within City limits, this portion consisting now of a tapered transition between four-lane and two- lane sections of Route 13, and WHEREAS, City refusal to approve a four-lane width along these 500 feet would result in an extremely short two-lane constriction between the long four-lane (and sometimes five-lane) section of Route 13 within the City and the new four-lane section of Route 13 to be built as part of this project outside the City, and WHEREAS, such a brief, irrational highway constriction would constitute a hazard to motorists; now, therefore, be it October 5, 1994 RESOLVED, That in consideration of the above, including each listed environmental mitigation measure, and pursuant to subdivision 2.5 of Section 349-c of the Highway Law, the designs, plans and specifications for the work of construction, reconstruction or improvement of the above described arterial highway, as authorized in Section 349-c of the Highway Law, are hereby approved, and be it further RESOLVED, That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit five (5) certified copies of the foregoing resolution to the N.Y.S. Department of Transportation. Extensive discussion followed on the floor. Amending Resolution By Alderperson Efroymson: Seconded by Alderperson Sams RESOLVED, that the last two Whereas clauses be stricken from the resolution and that the first Resolved clause be changed to read as follows: "RESOLVED, That in consideration of the above, including each listed environmental mitigation measure, the City requests that the eventual full cost of the bike/pedestrian bridge for the Black Diamond Trail be paid for by the D.o.T and upon agreement of this condition and pursuant to subdivision 2.5 of Section 349- c of the Highway Law, the designs, plans and specifications for the work of construction, reconstruction or improvement of the above described arterial highway, as authorized in Section 349-c of the Highway Law, are hereby approved, and be it further " Alderperson Efroymson explained the reason for the amending resolution. Mayor Nichols suggested that the amendments be made in two parts. Amending Resolution #1 "RESOLVED, That in consideration of the above, including each listed environmental mitigation measure, the City requests that the eventual full cost of the bike/pedestrian bridge for the Black Diamond Trail be paid for by the D.o.T. and upon agreement of this condition and pursuant to subdivision 2.5 of Section 349- c of the Highway Law, the designs, plans and specifications for the work of construction, reconstruction or improvement of the above described arterial highway, as authorized in Section 349-c of the Highway Law, are hereby approved, and be it further " Discussion followed on amending resolution #1. A vote on the amending resolution resulted as follows: Ayes (5) - Gray, Booth, Johnson, Efroymson, Sams Nays (6) - Schroeder, Hanna, Mackesey, Shenk, Thorpe, Nichols Motion Fails Amending Resolution #2 Alderperson Efroymson withdrew the second amendment which would remove the last two Whereas clauses from the resolution. Discussion continued on the Main Motion. Amending Resolution By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Mackesey RESOLVED, That a new Resolved clause be added between the existing two Resolved clauses to read as follows: "RESOLVED, That the City strongly recommends that a traffic light be established at the intersection of Route 13 and the entrance to Buttermilk State Park." Carried Unanimously Discussion followed on the floor on the Main Motion as Amended. October 5, 1994 Alderperson Schroeder stated, for the record, that he is not happy about it being a four-lane road and if we had the power to control this whole project, he would vote for a two-lane solution but that is not what we are voting on and that is why he will vote to approve the resolution. Main Motion as Amended A vote on the Main Motion as Amended resulted as follows: Ayes (7) - Schroeder, Mackesey, Sams, Hanna, Thorpe, Shenk, Gray Nays (3) - Booth, Johnson, Efroymson Carried (7-3) B. Agreement by City to Maintain Sidewalks By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk WHEREAS, the New York State Department of Transportation proposes the replacement of Route 13 Bridges over Conrail/Cayuga Inlet and over Buttermilk Creek, SH 454 Ithaca Road, in the Town and City of Ithaca, New York, and WHEREAS, the State will include in the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of the above-mentioned project the construction of sidewalks pursuant to Section 10, subdivision 22, Section 46, or Section 349-c of the Highway Law, as shown on the contract plans relating to the project, and WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation has agreed that these contract plans (unlike the "Advance Detail Plans") will show and specify that all sidewalks to be constructed as part of this project will be placed as far back from the highway as practicable, such that a curblawn will separate these sidewalks from the road; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Common Council of the City of Ithaca approve the proposed sidewalks shown on the contract plans relating to the project and that the City of Ithaca will maintain or cause to be maintained the newly constructed sidewalks shown on the contract plans, including the control of snow and ice, and be it further RESOLVED, That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit five (5) certified copies of the foregoing resolution to the State Department of Transportation. Discussion followed on the floor. A vote on the resolution resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously C. Agreement by City Not to Permit Encroachment Upon the Right- of-Way By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation has notified the Common Council of the City of Ithaca of the preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of the State Highway 454, Ithaca Road, for a total length of 0.8 miles beginning at Route Marker 13 36031120 and ending at Route Marker 13 36031128, including replacement of the two bridges over Conrail/Cayuga Inlet and Buttermilk Creek, and has made known its intention of advertising a contract for the improvement of the same and has requested an agreement from the Council to the effect that, in the future, authorities of this municipality will not permit an encroachment upon the right-of-way of said highway or street within the corporate limits of the City of Ithaca, and WHEREAS, such agreement will not prevent the City or any private entity from applying to the Department of Transportation for encroachment agreements in the future; now, therefore, be it October 5, 1994 RESOLVED, That the Common Council of the City of Ithaca does hereby agree with the State Department of Transportation that the authorities of the City will not in the future permit any encroachment upon the right-of-way of said highway, and be it further RESOLVED, That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit five (5) certified copies of the foregoing resolution to the State Department of Transportation. Carried Unanimously * 14.2 City Recommendations for Canal Recreationway Plan By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature in 1992 transferred the New York State Barge Canal System from the Department of Transportation to the New York State Thruway Authority and established the Canal Recreationway Commission as a subsidiary of the Thruway Authority, and WHEREAS, the Canal Recreationway Commission is charged with preparation of a statewide Canal Recreationway Plan, and WHEREAS, under mandate from the Governor and the Legislature, this plan is to be sensitive and responsive to the needs of the people in the communities bordering the canal system, and WHEREAS, the Commission has requested that the City of Ithaca provide a list of recommendations for the proposed Canal Recreationway Plan, and WHEREAS, under the Canal Recreationway Plan, any future decision to implement recommendations on this list will reside with the City of Ithaca, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee has considered such issues and made the following recommendations; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the following items be included as recommendations for the Canal Recreationway Plan: Construction of a dock for transient boaters at the Farmer’s Market at Steamboat Landing Construction of attractive bank stabilization along the length of the flood control channel, possibly including seating along the channel. The bank of the flood control channel is seriously deteriorated along almost its entire length. Periodic dredging of flood channel and construction of a permanent dredge-spoil site. This site would be used to de- water the dredge-spoils and dispose of them in an environmentally appropriate and economical manner. Reorganization of land uses on Inlet Island, including building a public walkway along the island’s west edge and encouraging waterfront-related development on the island’s interior. Establishment of public walkway around the DoT highway division site and encouraging DoT to leave this site in favor of a more appropriate waterfront land use. Establishment of a bicycle/pedestrian trail system linking Ithaca’s entire waterfront (including Cayuga Lake, the old Cayuga Inlet, and the Flood Control Channel). Accomplishment of the goals for Stewart Park adopted by Ithaca’s Common Council on February 3, 1988. These goals October 5, 1994 include preserving historic structures and beautifying and protecting the shoreline in Stewart Park. One of several resources for the implementation of these goals is Chapter III of the “Stewart Park: 1987 Preservation Goals and Guidelines.” Needed work includes stabilization and restoration of the Cascadilla boathouse as well as the two pavilions in the park. Consideration should also be given to the construction of a public pier which might include a mooring for a dinner boat. Improvements to the Newman Golf Course, possibly including construction of moorings along the shore of the golf course. Enhancement of public access to the waterfront. Attempt to establish public swimming on the lake within the City. Assistance to the Cascadilla Boat Club in finding a permanent home. Motion to Postpone By Alderperson Schroeder: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson RESOLVED, That the resolution on the City recommendations for Canal Recreationway Plan be postponed for one month so that the Board of Public Works may comment on these recommendations. Carried Unanimously Route 96 Project Update - Report Alderperson Schroeder reported that on the list of 29 remaining unresolved issues between the City and D.o.T., the City is not asking for that 100 feet the D.o.T. had claimed to be measured from the center of the road but rather we are saying we should control the streets that are city owned. In addition, last week D.o.T. agreed that in the contract drawings, Buffalo Street east of Meadow will be shown as is, with two travel lanes, and two parking lanes. Police Chief McEwen commented that he and Mr. Van Cort met with the project engineer last week and real progress was made as it relates to some of the issues that will need to be addressed as to traffic flow during the construction project. Recess Common Council recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened in regular session at 8:55 p.m. INTER-INSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE: Nuisance Abatement Ordinance - Report Alderperson Efroymson announced that there will be a meeting on Tuesday, October 11th, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers regarding the proposed Nuisance Abatement Ordinance. He stressed the importance of public input regarding this ordinance. YOUTH COMMITTEE: Youth Curfew Ordinance Alderperson Shenk announced that on Thursday, October 13th, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers the Youth Committee will be holding a public meeting regarding the Youth Curfew Ordinance. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: B.T. Glass Building Alderperson Mackesey reported that at the committee's meeting last month, the Economic Development Committee directed staff to put together bid proposals for the B.T. Glass building. That package should be out by October 19th so that we can move toward selling that building. Feasibility Analysis of the Upper Stories of the Buildings on the Commons October 5, 1994 Alderperson Mackesey reported that staff is going to put together an outline for a grant application to the New York State Urban Development Corporation for feasibility analysis of the upper stories of the buildings on the Commons. City Hall Annex/Ithaca Hours Alderperson Mackesey stated that in regard to the Annex, there is a proposal from Ithaca Hours to renovate and use the first floor of that building. The City is viewing this as a proposal for the value of the renovations in exchange for a negotiated short-term lease. Plans are being prepared by Ithaca Hours for that process. BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE: * 18.1 Finance/Clerk - Request to Approve City of Ithaca Records Management Program By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Gray WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca has undertaken the initial steps of a Records Management Program, benefitting from four Grants-In-Aid Projects totaling $125,809. from the New York State Education Department, and State Archives and Records Administration (SARA), and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca would benefit from a Records Management Program through increased accessibility to City records, reduced record storage costs, and a significant reduction in staff research time; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the City of Ithaca hereby adopts the Records Management Program and Procedures on file in the City Clerk's Office. Carried Unanimously * 18.2 Youth Bureau - Request to Approve Joint Recreation Pilot Program By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson WHEREAS, the Inter-Municipal Recreation Task Force has worked for more than two years to develop a proposal for a joint recreation partnership agreement for the provision of recreation services to youth and families in the area, and WHEREAS, the proposed joint recreation partnership agreement will involve a two-year pilot program, which will serve as the foundation for a long-range partnership program, and WHEREAS, this proposed pilot program will be established based upon a joint recreation partnership budget, with net program costs of $427,273., that would be implemented in the interest of providing the most cost effective participation to the area municipalities in order to make this partnership program work, and WHEREAS, pursuant to this proposal a Joint Recreation Commission will be created, which includes all full-partnership municipalities to oversee the operation of the two-year pilot program, including the approval of recreation programs, budget and fees to be offered in future years and to review the two-year program and determine actual program participation and costs, and WHEREAS, all existing programs will be provided to all of the participating youth, and new programs will be developed and established; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Common Council approves the proposed Joint Recreation Partnership Agreement (dated 8/31/94) in principle, for a 2-year pilot effort, contingent upon recognition of the following: October 5, 1994 - All Youth Bureau employees are City employees, and not employees of the Commission. - All the City's costs of running these recreation programs that the intermunicipal program will utilize have not been assigned by the City, and the joint recreation partnership budget reflects only attributed costs at a discounted rate to each participating municipality. - Tompkins County must fully participate in the Joint Recreation Program as proposed by the Inter-Municipal Task Force. - The Town of Ithaca must fully participate in the Joint Recreation Program as proposed by the Inter-Municipal Task Force. - Funding the contemplated Inter-Municipal recreation program will require modest program fee increases for existing City recreation programs. - The financial structure of the recreation program for 1995 will be based upon the City's approved 1995 budget. - Program fees charged for the City's various recreation programs do not cover all operating costs. Discussion followed on the floor with Youth Bureau Director Cohen explaining how the process evolved for this program. Alderperson Booth stated for clarification that when we determined what went into this net number of $427,273., we did not include all the costs that the City incurs from operating Cass Park. He also stated for the record that it is the city's understanding that in case of a deadlock with the other municipalities involved, the city would go ahead and run recreation programs on its own. Further discussion followed on the floor. A vote on the resolution resulted as follows: Carried Unanimously * 18.3 Youth Bureau/GIAC - Request to Amend Capital Project for Boiler Replacement By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Mackesey WHEREAS, a portion of the GIAC boiler recently failed, and it has been determined that it would take three weeks to repair the boiler, and it would cost $10,000 to replace the existing portion of the boiler with no guarantee against future failure, and WHEREAS, the heating season begins shortly and heat has already been needed in the building for various programs, and WHEREAS, the cost of a new steam boiler has been estimated at $19,724 and will take two weeks to order and install; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That Capital Project #248 be amended by an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the purpose of purchasing and installing said boiler, and be it further RESOLVED, That this amendment shall be funded by advancing the monies from the General Fund until financing can be established from Serial Bonds in 1995. Carried Unanimously * 18.4 DPW/Water & Sewer - Request to Provide Capital Reserve Funds for Watershed Expenditure By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson October 5, 1994 WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, Tompkins County Soil and Water Conservation District, Ithaca Subdistrict USGS, and Town of Dryden, have entered into an agreement to establish a monitoring and sampling station on Six Mile Creek, and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca's contribution of $10,000 cash is required in 1994 to cover costs of the station start-up and to help fund and leverage additional funds to study erosion and control measures in the entire Six Mile Creek Watershed, and WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has determined that the information gained from this monitoring and sampling station will be vital to future land purchase and control decisions involving the Six Mile Creek Watershed; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That $10,000 of Capital Reserve #26 will be used for this purpose because the information gained will be key to land purchase and control decisions in the future. Carried Unanimously * 18.5 DPW/Water & Sewer - Request To Transfer Funds for Various Equipment Repairs By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Gray WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Water and Sewer Division has undertaken intensive sewer construction and water construction activities, and extraordinary maintenance has resulted from this construction, and general maintenance has been deferred the past five years, and WHEREAS, the unanticipated repairs to the John Deere Loader, Vehicle #448 in the amount of $9,312.85; to the John Deere 710 Backhoe, #385 in the amount of approximately $5,000; and to the Caterpillar D-611 Bulldozer in the amount of approximately $15,000 exceed the budgeted amount; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the 1994 Water and Sewer Budget be amended as follows: TRANSFER FROM TRANSFER TO APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT: APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT: F-17-5-8341-435 - $24,000 F-15-5-8316-477 - $24,000 G12-5-8121-435 - 5,300 G-10-5-8116-477 - 5,300 Carried Unanimously * 18.6 DPW - Request To Provide Contingency Funds for Transit Budget Amendment By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson WHEREAS, the 1994 Transit Budget has been reviewed by staff, and it has been revealed that a number of unanticipated and unbudgeted items will need to be funded for the remainder of the year, and WHEREAS, the following unanticipated expenses have been determined, and will be made during 1994: General Service Increase to cover Gadabout share of facility $ 37,339 Engine Overhaul/Transmission Repairs 31,905 ADA Program cost increase 7,000 Share of Shop Truck 4,244 Various decreases in other Transit accounts (31,488) Total increase required $ 49,000 now, therefore, be it October 5, 1994 RESOLVED, That an amount not to exceed $49,000 be transferred from Account A1990 Unrestricted Contingency to Account A5630-435 Transit Contractual for the purposes of funding the various unanticipated Transit expenses. Carried Unanimously * 18.7 DPW - Request To Amend City Court Architectural Contract By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk WHEREAS, on July 1, 1992, Common Council approved an amendment to the City's Court Facility Architectural Contract for a total construction cost of $45,000, and WHEREAS, the contract for architectural services with Perkins Eastman and Partners of New York, NY for construction of the City Court requires an amendment to provide for increased construction phase services in the amount of $15,000 and additional design phase reimbursables in the amount of $13,000; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the existing agreement with Perkins, Eastman and Partners be amended to include additional construction phase services at a cost not to exceed $60,000 and additional design phase reimbursables at a cost not to exceed $13,000 for a total contract cost of $73,000, and be it further RESOLVED, That the source of funds be derived from existing monies in Capital Project #242 City Court Facility, and be it further RESOLVED, That the Mayor, Chair of Budget and Administration Committee, the Superintendent of Public Works, City Attorney and City Controller be authorized to sign the amendment to the agreement. Carried Unanimously * 18.8 DPW - Personnel Item - Executive Session This item was removed from the agenda. * 18.9 An Ordinance Amending Section 210-32.3 "Fire Protection Systems" of Article V, Chapter 210 Entitled "Housing Standards" of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code - Call for Public Hearing By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson RESOLVED, That the Common Council shall hold a Public Hearing in the Common Council Chambers in City Hall, 108 East Green Street, Ithaca, New York on Wednesday, November 2, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. to hear all interested parties for or against an Ordinance entitled "Fire Protection Systems", Section 210-32.E of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code. Carried Unanimously The Ordinance to be considered shall be as follows: ORDINANCE 94-_____ An ordinance deleting Section 210-32.E in its entirety and replacing it with the following language: BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, that the current Section 210-32.E entitled 'Fire Protection Systems' be deleted in its entirety and the following language be inserted in the Municipal Code: 210-32.E Fire Protection Systems 1. Required Smoke /Heat Detectors (a) Objective and Intent - This section is intended to provide for a higher level of life safety in residential buildings in the City. These are buildings in which the early warning of fire would provide for a reduction in the potential October 5, 1994 for loss of life in a fire and reduce the amount of property loss by earlier notification of the Fire Department of fire events. (b) Smoke/Heat Detectors Mandatory in All Structures Used for Residential Purposes - The owner of any structure used wholly or partially for residential purposes within the City of Ithaca is required to install and maintain a smoke/heat detector or system in the structure in accordance with the requirements set forth below. 2. General Equipment, Installation, and Maintenance Requirements for Smoke/Heat Detectors and Smoke/Heat Detection Systems (a) Installation and Maintenance - All heat, fire, or smoke detection or alarm equipment installed in the City of Ithaca must meet either the Underwriters Laboratory, Factory Mutual, or other testing laboratory specifications approved by the Building Commissioner and must be installed and maintained in conformance with the requirements of this Section, the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code, the applicable generally accepted standards and the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Records of systems in multiple dwellings shall be kept as required by the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code. (b) Operational Maintenance Required - The property owner shall ensure that all systems, devices and equipment to detect a fire, actuate an alarm, or suppress or control a fire or any combination thereof, are maintained in operating condition at all times. 3. Required Installation Types (a) Charts of Installation Type - The charts appearing below, entitled respectively, "One Family [Household] dwelling Smoke/Heat Detector Minimum Requirements", "Two Family [Household] Dwelling Smoke/Heat Detector Minimum Requirements" and "Multiple Dwelling Smoke/Heat Detector Minimum Requirements" are incorporated into this municipal code for the purpose of describing the type and degree of smoke/heat detectors and systems that are required to be installed by this section [part]. The type of smoke/heat detector or system [fire protection] required varies with the intensity of the building's use, whether the owner occupies the building and the building's height in stories. Owners of buildings of the use and height as described in each of the top rows of the chart or charts shall install and maintain the type of smoke/heat [fire protection] detector(s) or system described in each [the] column immediately below the described use and height of the building. Wherever in this ordinance the owner is required to install a smoke/heat detector a smoke detector shall be installed unless the Building Commissioner has granted written permission to substitute [or required] a heat detector for a required smoke detector [to be installed]. For the purposes of applying the chart(s), the number of dwelling units shall be the number of dwelling units in a building, except that if an owner or person responsible for a building can present evidence that their building is divided into separate fire area(s) as defined by the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code, then the number of unit(s) within each fire area shall be applied to the chart(s) to determine the appropriate column(s). Notwithstanding the above, the installation of additional Smoke/Heat detectors or system required by this section shall not apply to buildings which were constructed or converted as defined by the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code between January 1 1984 and December 31, 1993 and which between January 1 1984 and December 31, 1993 received a certificate of occupancy certifying that the building met all applicable building and fire codes in effect at the time the certificate of occupancy was issued; provided however, if the Building Commissioner shall later determine that, October 5, 1994 for whatever reason, the building does not meet such codes and requirements, the Building Commissioner shall have the authority to require that the building be brought into compliance with such codes and requirements. This exemption does not relieve an owner from the requirements for maintenance and testing as required herein. (b) Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors - (1) Self-Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors - Where self-contained (battery powered) independent smoke/heat detectors are required by the chart, they shall be located to provide smoke detection coverage within each residential unit, so that at least one detector is installed on each floor level where there is habitable space or mechanical equipment other than electrical wiring and lighting, gas piping or plumbing without any connected energy utilization equipment or overcurrent devices. Each such detector shall provide an alarm where installed, and a detector shall be located within ten (10) feet of the entrance to every bedroom or other room used for sleeping purposes. Where detectors cannot be located as required above because of nuisance alarms, an exception to this location requirement may be approved in writing by the Building Commissioner. In determining whether to grant such an exception the Building Commissioner shall consider alternate arrangements that will provide adequate audibility and safety. (2) Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current - Where independent smoke/heat detectors which are connected to a building's electrical system are required by the chart, they shall be located to provide smoke detection coverage within each residential unit, so that at least one detector is installed on each floor level where there is habitable space or mechanical equipment other than electrical wiring and lighting, gas piping or plumbing without any connected energy utilization equipment or overcurrent devices. Each such detector shall provide an alarm where installed, and a detector shall be located within ten (10) feet of the entrance to every bedroom or other room used for sleeping purposes. Where detectors cannot be located as required above because of nuisance alarms, an exception to this location requirement may be approved in writing by the Building Commissioner. In determining whether to grant such an exception the Building Commissioner shall consider alternate arrangements that will provide adequate audibility and safety. (c) Interconnected, Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current - Where required by the chart, a system of interconnected independent smoke/heat detectors shall be installed to provide smoke detection coverage in the common areas of the [building] dwelling unit or lodging unit at each level that contains habitable space, as well as in basements, cellars and attics which contain mechanical equipment other than electrical wiring and lighting, gas piping or plumbing without any connected energy utilization equipment or overcurrent devices. Such interconnected detectors shall also include an interconnection to all detectors required by subsection 3(b)(2) of this section within the individual dwelling unit or lodging unit. Detectors shall contain an audible alarm or be connected to an audible alarm. These audible alarms must be capable of being heard within all habitable spaces in the building with the doors closed. When, in the opinion of the Building Commissioner, smoke detectors are located or are to be located in areas where conditions exist that have the potential to cause or have been demonstrated to cause nuisance alarms, the smoke detectors shall be replaced with heat detectors located in the required detector locations. If the Building Commissioner determines that the detectors will not be heard in all habitable spaces, an interconnection shall be made from a smoke/heat detector to a device or detector producing an audible sound which is located within the dwelling or lodging unit that will provide adequate October 5, 1994 audibility. Audibility will be determined as provided in generally accepted standards. Interconnected, independent smoke/heat detectors are not required in any [building] dwelling unit or lodging unit which has an approved complete-coverage, fire-suppression, sprinkler system that also sounds an alarm to warn building occupants of its activation; provided however, Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current or Self-Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors as described by subsection 3(b)(1) or 3(b)(2) of this section or by other applicable laws, codes or ordinances shall be installed in such dwelling unit or lodging unit. (d) Interconnected, Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors - Where required by the chart interconnected, supervised smoke/heat detectors shall be installed to provide smoke/heat detection coverage within all rooms and spaces in each non-residential unit, as well as in basements, utility, heating, and storage rooms, and other similar spaces except those spaces which have been designated by the Building Department as not requiring protection and shall provide smoke/heat [fire] detection coverage in the common areas of the building at each level that contains habitable space, as well as in basements, cellars and attics which contain mechanical equipment other than electrical wiring and lighting, gas piping or plumbing without any connected energy utilization equipment or overcurrent devices. All detectors shall contain an audible alarm or be connected to an audible alarm. These audible alarms must be capable of being heard within all rooms in the building with the doors closed. Detectors of this type shall also be provided with a manual means of activating the alarm devices. A [The] manual activation means must be located at all primary exits at grade from the structure and at such locations as the Building Commissioner determines are appropriate to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building. When, in the opinion of the Building Commissioner, smoke detectors are located or are to be located in areas where conditions exist that have the potential to cause or have been demonstrated to cause nuisance alarms, the smoke detectors shall be replaced with heat detectors located in the required detector locations. If the Building Commissioner determines that the detectors will not be heard in all sleeping rooms, an interconnection shall be made from a smoke/heat detector to a device or detector producing an audible sound which shall be located to provide adequate audibility within all rooms. Audibility will be determined as provided in generally accepted standards. The system shall sound an audible signal which indicates a malfunction of the system. The audible trouble indication system may be supplemented with a visible signal that gives a continuing indication of the malfunction after the audible signal is silenced. This system shall also provide [be capable of providing] standby power to continue operation of the system on battery power when the building's electrical system is temporarily de-energized, as required by generally accepted standards. Interconnected, supervised smoke/heat detectors are not required in any building which has an approved complete-coverage, fire-suppression, sprinkler system that also sounds an alarm to warn building occupants of its activation; provided however, Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current or Self- Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors as described by subsection 3(b)(1) or 3(b)(2) of this section or by other applicable laws, codes or ordinances shall be installed in such a building. (e) Interconnected, Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors with Automatic Fire Department Notification - Where required by the chart interconnected, supervised smoke/heat detectors shall be installed to provide smoke/heat detection coverage within all rooms and spaces in each non-residential unit, as well as in basements, utility, heating, and storage rooms, and other similar spaces except those spaces which have been designated by the Building Department as not requiring protection and shall provide smoke/heat [fire] detection coverage in the common areas of the October 5, 1994 building at each level that contains habitable space, as well as in basements, cellars and attics which contain mechanical equipment other than electrical wiring and lighting, gas piping or plumbing without any connected energy utilization equipment or overcurrent devices. [Where interconnected, supervised smoke/heat detectors are required by the chart they shall be installed in such a way as to provide smoke detector coverage in the common areas of the building, as well as in basements, utility, heating, and storage rooms, and other similar spaces except those spaces which have been designated by the Building Department as not requiring protection.] One detector shall also be located within each dwelling or lodging unit within ten feet of any grade level entrance door or any entrance door to a common means of exit. All detectors shall contain an audible alarm or be connected to an audible alarm. [The detection system shall be connected to an] These audible alarms must be capable of being heard within all habitable spaces and common areas with the doors closed. When, in the opinion of the Building Commissioner, smoke detectors are located or are to be located in areas that have the potential to cause or have been demonstrated to cause nuisance alarms, the smoke detectors shall be replaced with heat detectors located in the required detector locations. All detection systems required by this section shall be provided with approved zone reporting capacity to ensure rapid and efficient location of the source of the alarm by the Fire Department. The Fire Department shall approve the system's zone reporting assignments before any system is installed. This type of detection equipment shall also include a manual means of activating the alarm devices. A [The] manual activation means shall be located at all primary exits at grade from the structure and at such locations as the Building Commissioner determines are appropriate to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building and shall also be wired in such a way to provide automatic notification to the Fire Department when activated. If the Building Commissioner determines that the detectors will not be heard in all sleeping rooms, an interconnection shall be made from a smoke/heat detector to a device or detector producing an audible sound which shall be located to provide adequate audibility within all rooms. Audibility will be determined as provided in Generally Accepted Standards. The system shall sound an audible signal which indicates a malfunction of the system. The audible trouble indication system may be supplemented with a visible signal that gives a continuing indication of the malfunction after the audible signal is silenced. This system shall provide [be capable of providing] standby power to continue operation of the system on battery power when the building's electrical system is temporarily de-energized, as required by generally accepted standards. Interconnected, supervised smoke/heat detectors are not required in any building which has an approved complete- coverage, fire-suppression, sprinkler system that also sounds an alarm to warn building occupants of its activation; provided however, Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current or Self-Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors as described by subsection 3(b)(1) or 3(b)(2) of this section or by other applicable laws, codes or ordinance shall be installed. (f) Additional Non-required Detector coverage - Nothing in this section shall prevent an owner from installing a greater degree of smoke/heat detection than required by this ordinance so long as the additional equipment is installed and maintained as required by the manufacturer's specifications and generally accepted standards. Specifically permitted in lieu of the lesser requirements are the following: i. The substitution of Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current or Interconnected, Independent October 5, 1994 Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current for Self- Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors; ii. The substitution of Interconnected, Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors or Interconnected, Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors with Automatic Fire Department Notification for Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors Operating on Household Current or Self-Contained (Battery powered), Independent Smoke/Heat Detectors as long as the system of detectors is designed to minimize nuisance alarms. (g) Existing Smoke/Heat Detectors - Smoke/Heat Detection Systems installed in Multiple Dwellings prior to the enactment of this section shall be maintained, replaced or upgraded as required [in such a way as to continue] to provide the smoke/heat detection coverage previously required for multiple residences and to provide the smoke/heat detection [shall be extended or enhanced, as needed, to provide the additional fire detection coverage as] required by this section [ordinance] and any other applicable section of law. Freon based systems do not meet the requirements of this section and shall be replaced with systems which meet the requirements of this section and other applicable sections of law. [These systems shall be replaced or upgraded to provide for supervisory functions in accordance with generally accepted standards.] 4. Smoke/Heat Detector requirements (a) Smoke Detector Types - Smoke detectors required under this section [ordinance] shall be of a type approved by the Building Commissioner as capable of sensing visible or invisible particles of combustion and providing a suitable audible alarm in response to sensed particles. (b) Heat Detector Types - Heat detectors required under this ordinance shall be of a type approved by the Building Commissioner as capable of sensing an abnormal rise in temperature and providing a suitable audible alarm in response to the sensed rise in temperature. (c) Detector Location - Every detector required to be installed and maintained by this ordinance must be installed, maintained, and located in accordance with generally accepted standards and manufacturer's installation instructions, or in a manner otherwise approved by the Building Commissioner. Every such detector shall also be located in such a manner that the detector will be reasonably free from false alarms and provide visible indication that the alarm is energized, except that, [.] a battery operated smoke detector need not provide a visible indication that the detector is energized, as long as the detector visibly or audibly indicates the loss of battery power. (d) Detector Power Source - Each detector required by this section [ordinance] to be installed in existing one and two- story, one family dwellings household [structures and side by side two household structures] and existing three (3) story owner-occupied one family dwellings household [structures] structures may be powered either by battery or by household current derived from a lighting circuit. In order to prevent disablement of the detector [,] or system, in all other dwellings [types of structures], independent detectors or interconnected detectors shall be powered by household current derived from a lighting circuit and must be installed without an intervening wall switch and may not be connected to a separate breaker or fuse of the electrical system. Cord connected installations are not permitted. Detectors and related smoke/heat warning equipment shall be installed and wired in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and [the] applicable generally accepted standards. October 5, 1994 5. Inspection/Certification Requirements for Smoke Detection Systems (a) Certification of Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors - Once each calendar year, the owner or person responsible for a structure protected by supervised smoke/heat detectors and/or systems, shall provide the Building Department with a Certificate of Approval, prepared by a licensed electrician or an individual approved by either the Building Commissioner or the Examining Board of Electricians, on a form supplied by the Building Department, certifying that the [detector or system has been tested by a licensed electrician and that the detector and all components of the] system [are] is in working order and maintaining the [detector or system's] intended level of fire safety. (b) Certification of Non-supervised Interconnected Smoke/Heat Detectors - Once each calendar year, the owner or person responsible for a structure protected by required non-supervised interconnected smoke/heat detectors and/or systems, excluding one and two family dwellings, shall provide the Building Department with a Certificate of Approval [Certification], on a form supplied by the Building Department, certifying that the system has been tested by a licensed electrician, an individual approved by either the Building Commissioner or the Examining Board of Electricians, or the owner or person responsible for the structure, and that the system is [all detectors in the structure are] in working order and [are] maintaining the [their] intended level of fire safety, provided however, that for good cause the Building Commissioner may, with respect to a particular structure or an individual, require that the system be certified by a licensed electrician or an individual approved by the Building Commissioner or the Examining Board of Electricians. (c) Inspection [Testing] of One and Two Family Dwelling [Structure] Detectors The owner, or person responsible, for any non-owner occupied one and two family structure which is not covered under section (a) or (b) above ((a) Certification of Supervised Smoke/Heat Detectors, (b) Certification of Non- supervised Interconnected Smoke/Heat Detectors) shall inspect the smoke/heat detectors installed in the dwellings [their structures] at least once each calendar year to verify that said detectors are in working order and are maintaining the [their] intended level of fire safety. (d) Certification After Repair - Any repair, alteration or modification to a supervised or non-supervised system shall necessitate a re-certification as provided above (sections 5(a) or 5(b)) of all circuits affected by such repair, alteration, or modification [of said system] upon the completion of the repair, alteration, or modification. The replacement of batteries in self contained independent (battery powered) smoke/heat detectors or the replacement of self contained independent (battery powered) smoke/heat detectors [battery operated units] shall not constitute a repair. (e) Additional Requirements - The certification requirements of this section are in addition to the installation and maintenance requirements of section 2(a) of this section and the requirements of section 146-7 of the Municipal Code. Certification performed pursuant to this section does not relieve the owner or person responsible from the obligations to properly install and maintain the equipment. 6. Word usage. For the purposes of this section, words in the present tense shall also imply the future tense; the singular includes the plural; and the plural includes the singular. October 5, 1994 7. [6.] Effective Dates (a) Effective Date - This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon publication of a notice as required by the City Charter. (b) New and Converted Structures - All new or converted residential or mixed use structures shall comply with the provisions of this section upon construction or conversion of the structure. For the purposes of this section [ordinance], conversion shall mean that alterations have been made to a structure which is now covered by a column in the attached charts which was not previously applicable to the structure. (b) Existing Structures - Existing one and two-family structures, multiple dwellings, and mixed use structures shall comply with the provisions of this section by August 15, 1996, provided that the requirements of section 5 regarding Inspection/Re-certification Requirements shall be effective as of January 1, 1995. ORDINANCE NO. 94 -_____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 210-5: BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, that the following definitions found in Section 210-5 of the Municipal Code be amended as follows: Dwelling Unit - One or more rooms designed or used for living quarters by one household, including provisions for living, cooking, sanitary and sleeping facilities and having a separate entrance from the outside of the building or through a common hall. [For purposes of this chapter, a dwelling unit includes those portions of the building used for access to the living quarters and any ancillary spaces, such as laundry rooms, mechanical rooms and similar spaces with the building that are used by or support the occupants of the unit.] Generally Accepted Standard - A specification, code, rule, guide or procedure in the field of construction and fire prevention or related thereto, recognized and accepted as authoritative, which includes the list of reference standards in Title 9 New York Code Rules and Regulations (New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code) as of September 1, 1994 [December 1, 1993]. [Side by side, Two Family dwelling - A building containing two dwelling units which are separated from each other by a vertical wall without openings. In this type of building there are no habitable spaces which are under the sole control of one of dwelling units located above another space under the sole control of the other dwelling unit.] Effective date: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon publication of a notice as required by the City Charter. * 18.10 Finance/Chamberlain - Request to Allow City to Purchase All Tax Sale Liens at 1994 City Tax Sale By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson RESOLVED, That pursuant to the Ithaca City Charter, the City Chamberlain is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City of Ithaca to purchase all liens at the 1994 City Tax Sale, without competitive bidding, for the gross amount due. Carried Unanimously * 18.11 Attorney - Request to Amend the 1994 Authorized Personnel Roster By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Gray RESOLVED, That the Personnel Roster of the City Attorney's Office be amended as follows: Add: One (1) Legal Assistant October 5, 1994 Delete: One (1) Confidential Secretary to the City Attorney and be it further RESOLVED, That the position of Legal Assistant be and hereby is designated as confidential and be and hereby is assigned to the Confidential Employees' Compensation Plan at Grade 6 ($19,711 - $22,623), and be it further RESOLVED, That Gen Smith be provisionally appointed to the position of Legal Assistant at an annual salary of $20,875 effective October 10, 1994. Carried Unanimously * 18.12 Attorney - Request to Establish Capital Project for Acquisition of Property - Executive Session Alderperson Booth noted that this matter will be discussed in Executive Session at the end of the meeting. * 18.13 Finance/Controller - Request to Approve Ithaca Housing Authority Salaries Comparability to City Salaries By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Shenk WHEREAS, the Ithaca Housing Authority is mandated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to demonstrate that the salaries and wages of the employees of said Housing Authority are comparable with the practices of the local governing body for all positions of similar responsibility and required competence; and WHEREAS, the IHA will be negotiating a Contract with the IHAMEU Local 2300 UAW for maintenance employees, and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca authorized cost of living increases for 1994, including step increases for qualified employees, and WHEREAS, the Ithaca Housing Authority authorized an increase not to exceed 5% for all qualified employees to bring the IHA employees closer to parity, and comparability with City of Ithaca employees, and WHEREAS, the IHA has established the following positions, comparability and salary ranges for its Public Housing Section and covered by its Operating Budget: Position Comparable Position Salary Executive Director Director of Planning & $55,614 (Oper.) (17 years) Development/Controller 6,179 (Sec.8) Salary $61,793 Family Self- Supervisor of Caseworkers Sufficiency Tompkins County DSS Coordinator (1 year) Salary $28,088 Principal Account City of Ithaca CSEA Clerk/Fiscal Officer (40 hours) Salary $37,277 (17 years) Administrative City of Ithaca CSEA Secretary (15 years) Salary $28,133 Site Manager Planner II (4 years) (40 hours) Salary $24,905 October 5, 1994 Tenant Relations Administrative Assistant Assistant (1 year) (40 hours) Salary $16,538 Sr. Account Clerk- City of Ithaca CSEA Typist (9 years) (40 hours) Salary $21,231 Principal Account City of Ithaca Clerk (4 years) CSEA (35 hours) $16,380(Oper.) (40 hours) 8,820(Sec.8) Salary $25,200 Director of Resident Recreation Supervisor Services (1 year) CSEA (40 hours) Salary $24,600 Resident Initiatives Recreation Supervisor Coordinator (1 year) CSEA (35 hours) Salary $30,816 CIAP Program Assistant Civil Engineer Coordinator (1.5 years) Salary $31,143 Working Foreman Ithaca City School District (17 years) (40 hours) Salary $35,294 Storekeeper City of Ithaca CSEA (3 yrs.) (40 hours) Salary $20,436 Building Maintenance Maintainer CSEA Salary $35,306* Mechanic (21 years) (40 hours) Building Maintenance Maintainer CSEA Mechanic (16 years) (40 hours) Salary $26,732* Maintenance Worker City of Ithaca CSEA (13 years) (40 hours) Salary $21,840* Maintenance Worker City of Ithaca CSEA (9 years) (40 hours) Salary $19,569* Maintenance Worker City of Ithaca CSEA (8 years) (40 hours) Salary $19,175* Maintenance Worker City of Ithaca CSEA (8 years) (40 hours) Salary $19,175* Laborer City of Ithaca CSEA (8 years) (40 hours) Salary $19,023* Laborer City of Ithaca CSEA (4-l/2 years) (40 hours) Salary $15,943* *Overtime guaranteed SECTION 8/VOUCHER Position Comparable Position Salary Section 8 Administrator Planner II - CSEA (3 years) (40 hours) (35 hours) Salary $24,150 Tenant Selector Administrative Assistant (40 hours) CSEA (35 hours) Salary $18,375 Account Clerk/Typist City of Ithaca CSEA (5 years) (40 hours) (35 hours) Salary $18,145 Tenant Selector (In- City of Ithaca $14,175(Oper.) house As (5 yrs./40 hrs.) Salary $28,350 October 5, 1994 Sr. Account Clerk City of Ithaca CSEA (40 hours) (35 hours) Salary $17,325 Typist City of Ithaca CSEA (1 year) (40 hours) (35 hours) Salary $15,055 now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That pursuant to its responsibilities under Section 3, Article 32(1) of the New York State Housing Law the Common Council agrees that the salaries and wages of the employees of the IHA are comparable to those paid by the City for all positions of similar responsibility and required competence. Carried Unanimously Youth Bureau Building Renovations - Report Alderperson Booth reported that there is discussion underway regarding the proposed costs to the acoustics and HVAC systems in the Youth Bureau building. The matter will be coming to Common Council at a later date. EXECUTIVE SESSION: By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson RESOLVED, That this Council adjourn into Executive Session to discuss the purchase of property. Carried Unanimously Common Council came out of Executive Session at 9:50 p.m. and reported that a sum of money had been appropriated to purchase a piece of property. Due to the nature of the negotiations this transaction will be made public at a later date. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion the meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Callista F. Paolangeli Benjamin Nichols City Clerk Mayor