HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CC-1988-01-06Regular Meeting
PRESENT:
Mayor Gutenberger
Alderpersons (10)
473
COMMON COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK
7:30 P.M. January 6, 1988
- Booth, Cummings, Johnson, Nichols, Hoffman,
Killeen, Lytel, Peterson, Romanowski, Schlather
OTHERS RPESENT:
City Attorney - Nash
City Controller - Spano
Deputy City Controller- Cafferillo
City Clerk - Paolangeli
Planning & Development Director - Van Cort
Youth Bureau Acting Director - Wilson
Personnel Administrator - Baker
Building Commissioner - Hoard
Fire Chief - Olmstead
Police Chief - Page
Planning & Development Deputy Director - Mazzarella
Superintendent of Public Works - Dougherty
I. Personnel Associate - Walker
City Engineer - Gray
LD Board of Public Works Commissioner - Daley
= Preservation /Neighborhood Planner - Chatterton
m Planning � Development Board Chairperson - Blumenthal
Q PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Gutenberger led all present in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the American flag.
MINUTES:
Approval of Minutes of December 2, 1987 Council Meeting
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Schlather
RESOLVED, That the Minutes of the December 2, 1987 Common
Council be meeting be approved as published.
Carried Unanimously
Annroval of Minutes of Reconvened Council Meeting of December
7, 1987
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Lytel
RESOLVED, That the Minutes of the reconvened Council meeting
of December 7, 1987 be approved as published.
Carried Unanimously
DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA:
Budget and Administration Committee
Alderperson Schlather requested that Item 16.6, Sidewalk
Assessments, be deleted from the agenda.
No Council member objected.
Report of Special Committees and Council Liaisons
Alderperson Killeen requested the addition of Item 18.5,
a report on the New Fire Stations Committee.
No Council member objected.
New Business
Alderperson Killeen requested that the title of Item 20.2
be changed to read "Director of Parks and Recreation ".
No Council member objected.
Alderperson Nichols requested that Item 20.1, regular meeting
hours for Common Council meetings be moved up in the order
of the agenda.
Mayor Gutenberger, as Chair,objected to the request and the
order of the agenda was not changed.
474 -2- January 6, 1988
PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
ACC Franchise
Edward Humulock, 308 North Titus Avenue, spoke to Council
regarding the ACC franchise. He objects to the franchise
being for 1S years.
Task Force for the Homeless
Anne Hales, 12 Burns Road, Brooktondale, a member of the
Task Force for the Homeless, spoke to Council regarding the
resolution on tonight's agenda. The Task Force has identified
61 homeless people in Ithaca. She urged Council members
to open up buildings for emergency use for our homeless in
Ithaca. I )
ACC Franchise
Earl Roe, 420 North Geneva Street, spoke to Council regarding
the ACC franchise. He read the following statement:
"To lock the City of Ithaca into a IS year contract without
provisions of reducing it to 10 years or to be unable to
re- negotiate in the event of a scientific technical develop-
ment in the TV electronic field borders on the irresponsible
and short - sightedness. A new break through, and they are coming
about regularly, would leave the city's TV subscribers locked
into the cost of an obsolete and costlier system without
provision to be able to share in the reduction of cost that
a new break through could provide. The Common Council is
duty bound to protect its subscribers with some provisions
that would be most desirable and beneficial to its citizens."
Ithaca Farmers' Market
Anna Steinkraus, 345 Shaffer Road, Newfield, President of
Ithaca Farmers' Market, gave an update on the Ithaca Farmers'
Market to Council. She stated that the market did submit
an Environmental Assessment Form and it was passed by the
Conservation Advisory Council on December 16th, and it should
now be at the Charter and Ordinance Committee for review.
A packet of materials from the Ithaca Farmers' Market,
including a copy of a letter that the Market sent to the
NYS Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation trying to
help clarify the legal issue of the Market has been sent
to Council members and the Mayor. Included in that packet
is a response from the Director of Green Market for New York
City. She read the following paragraph from that correspon-
dence:
"Our history regarding use of parkland for Farmers' Markets
has been positive. We operate on the 7 park sites out of
19, often at the request of local community groups. The
Department of Parks and Recreation has found that this seasonal,
weekly use is compatible with its recreation policy; the
activity is festive, joyful and educational."
Ms. Steinkraus further stated that the Market has contacted
the Community Dispute Resolution Center and are planning
to work out something through them to try to meet with West -
End merchants. She urged Council to as quickly as possible
help the Market get a final agreement for the 1988 season.
Citizens to Save Stewart Park
Doria Higgins, 2 Hillcrest Drive, read the following statement
to Council:
"As you know, we have spoken to you on several occasions
about the legal propriety of various city actions concerning
park lands.
On December 9, 1987 we sent a letter to Mayor Gutenberger
- asking for a moratorium on the city's deci --ion to make
Park available to the Chamber of Commerce until the legalities
-3- January 6, 1988
of that action had been more throughly studied. We cited
a number of court decisions which we have been told by lawyers
had bearing and which suggested that the city may have acted
without proper authority.
In reply we received, on December 15th, a letter from City
Attorney Nash enclosing an abstract of a 1980 opinion from
the NYS Attorney General's Office concerning the leasing
of waterfront property in Kingston, New York on which opinion
Mr. Nash said he had "relied ".
Since receiving that letter we have talked to the lawyer
who was City Attorney in Kingston at the time and to a
lawyer at the NYS Parks and Recreation but it was not clear
to them that this opinion about waterfront property in
Kingston applied to our local situation.
We think the best way for Ithaca to get an answer to this
question is for the city to ask the Attorney General's Office
for an opinion about our local situation.
ri We have drafted a letter, hopefully for the city's signature
Iq asking the Attorney General's Office to address the question
Lo of whether the City of Ithaca has the authority to license
= the use of a part of Stewart Park land for non -park purposes
m and under circumstances which seem to indicate a longer period
than the one year term of the revocable license.
Q
We have discussed our letter with people at the Attorney
General's Office and even read the letter to one lawyer there.
We told him that we did not want to question this matter
if it was clear that the city did have authority for their
action. He said it was a "worthwhile question" in that the
answer is not immediately clear. He saw the "operative factors"
as less than the details we had given but said that leaving
them in would give them a clearer picture of the overall
situation. Therefore, we ask that you not cut the letter
if you do send it.
So Mr. Mayor, we ask you to send this letter. If indeed
the city does have the authority for the Stewart Park action,
the city will be vindicated and you will have gained an
increase in public good will by responding to and reassuring
a community which has become increasingly concerned over
recent procedures and decisions about park lands. And if
it turns out that the city does not have authority for the
Stewart Park action, the sooner we learn so the better."
Ms. Higgins presented the following draft of a letter for
possible signature by Ralph Nash, City Attorney:
"Mr. Peter Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General
Attorney General Department of Law
Room 220
Albany, New York 12224
Dear Mr. Schiff:
We would like your opinion on the following licensing
action by the City of Ithaca.
The city is making available to Tompkins County Chamber
of Commerce, a private non- profit organization, a portion
of city Stewart Park land for the purpose of constructing
an asphalt parking lot and an asphalt access road to serve
the new office and visitors center building which the Chamber
plans to build on a town lot contiguous to the city park
land. The Chamber has not yet acquired this lot.
475
476 -4- January 6, 1988
Because the town lot is too small (only 60' wide) to
contain the parking (up to 81 vehicles per hour) and access
road necessary for the Chamber- purposes, and because no other
land is presently available for these purposes, this lot
can only be made workable for the Chamber if the city makes
some of the park land available to them.
This single lot is now in the process of being rezoned,
for the Chamber by the Town of Ithaca, from R -15 to a "Special
Land Use District ", a category devised by the Town in 1984.
The area of the park land involved is on the periphery
of the park and not part of the main recreational area, but
it does serve as a green buffer zone from a local thoroughfare.
The park land is being made available by the City to
the Chamber by means of a revocable one year license. But
the City will be under moral obligation to renew yearly since
the Chamber will have gone to considerable expense in buying
the lot, removing several buildings now on it, and constructing
a new building. For the City to deny renewing the license
under such conditions would be in effect to waste the money
the Chamber will have expended.
One other factor which may be considered relevant to
your opinion is that there has been considerable protest
by the public against what they see in this plan as both
a diminishment of and an intrusion upon a much loved public
park. In fact it was in response to protest from the community
that the city decided to relinquish its earlier plan to let
the Chamber build the office building itself in the park.
The question we would like to have addressed is does
the City of Ithaca have the authority to license park land
to a private organization for non -park purposes and under
circumstances which seem to involve a longer period than
the one year term of the license?
We will appreciate receiving your opinion on this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Ralph Nash
City Attorney"
Northside Re- zoning (Watts lot)
Tia Rudd, 513 Willow Avenue, spoke to Council regarding the
"Watts lot" in the Northside neighborhood. She commented
on a survey that has been made in the neighborhood surrounding
the "Watts lot" site. There were 53 households interviewed
and the results were that 76.40 of the Northside residents
prefer a zoning change to R -2b. She passed out copies of
the survey to Council members and the press.
Sarah Adams, 112 West Marshall Street, spoke to Council urging
them to vote for the R -2b re- zoning.
Stewart Park Resolutions
Betsy Darlington, 205 Fairmount Avenue, representative to
Stewart Park Advisory Group from the Conservation Advisory
Council, and member of the SPAG Subcommittee read the following
statement to Council:
"I would like to briefly comment on the resolutions from
SPAG that are on tonight's agenda.
First, I hope that you will approve the creation of a Parks'
Commission. Such a body of experts is badly needed, not
just for Stewart Park but for all of the City's parks. As
1 see it, such a commission would take a close look at all
-5-
January 6, 1988 477
the city parks, set policy for them, and oversee planning
and major maintenance issues in them. Their first task,
of course, would be to address problems with Stewart Park.
It has been pointed out to me that the wording of this particular
resolution (18.2) may need some clarification. The Stewart
Park Goals and Guidelines (p.6) recommends that the commission
be made up of about 7 members, each with professional expertise
in a particular area relavent to park policies. (Suggested
areas are listed on page 6 of the Stewart Parks Goals and
Guidelines. I would urge you to include such a list in your
resolution. It may not be clear from the wording of our
resolution that this was out intent when we wrote, "..
as mentioned in Goal #1 of the ...Goals and Guidelines, page
6." The commission must be comprised of individuals with
real expertise.
Second, the first SPAG resolution (18.1) should make very
clear that it is only the Goals, as listed in the resolution,
and not the various proposals that accompany these goals
in Chapter 2, (p.6 and following) that SPAG is recommending
that you adopt. Since our meeting, people have expressed
'q to me the feeling that the resolution, as we worded it, does
LO not make this clear.
Thirdly, my notes from our meeting indicate that the final
m resolution (18.4) should read, "...be reviewed by a qualified
a preservation architect, and acted on as soon as practicable."
(Underlined words are not on tonight's resolution, and should
be included.)"
Ms. Darlington further commented on resolution 20.2. She
has concerns about combining the Youth Bureau Director position
with a Parks Manager position. She urged Council to have
a Youth Bureau Director and a Parks Commissioner and separate
them.
Mayor Gutenberger stated that Betsy Darlington, Barbara Ebert,
LaMoyne Farrell, and Leslie Chatterton have spent a lot of
time working on the whole Stewart Park issue. It started
out as the Stewart Park Master Plan, then was the Trowbridge
Plan and is now the Stewart Park Goals and Guidelines. A
debt of gratitude is owed to these people for the hundreds
of hours that they have spent on this matter.
Beatrice McLeod, 9S7 East State Street, stated to Council
that a letter was recently delivered to our Mayor over some
200 signatures from every Ward in the City urging him to
make good on his pre - election assurances that he would heed
the community's desire for a more open government and more
consideration of neighborhood interest by making committee
appointments which would ease the strangle hold of a planning
administration responsible for so much unhappiness and protest.
Mayor Gutenberger commented that he has made a conscious
effort to listen to and respond to the concerns that were
raised during the Democratic primary.
Environmental Quality Review Ordinance
Joel Rabinowitz, 312 Farm Street, spoke to Council regarding
the Environmental Quality Review Ordinance. fie asked Council
to revise the ordinance.
Northside Re- zoning (Watts lot)
The following persons spoke to Council asking them to post-
pone the decision on the Watts lot re- zoning in the Northside:
Herman Sieverding, 114 Monroe Street
Bonnie Blanding -May, 407 Second Street
-6- Janaury 6, 1988
Stewart Park Resolutions
Barbara Ebert, 120 North Cayuga Street, Director of Historic
Ithaca, spoke to Council regarding the Stewart Park Advisory
Group's resolutions that are on the agenda this evening.
On the first resolution, the Stewart Park Advisory Group
voted to approve the goals of that document and to use the
guideline as a resource. That is the wording and the intent
of the resolution. The fourth resolution recommends to Common
Council that stablization of the Stewart Park buildings as
suggested on page 17 and 18 of the "Stewart Park 1987 Preser-
vation Goals and Guidelines ", did not unfortunately state
the qualifications of any particular persons who might be
involved in that stabilization but the intent and the discussion
were that pages 17 and 18 would serve as a resource and they
may indeed provide further clarification.
Watt lot Re- zoning Issue
Cathy Tucker, 305 Willow Avenue, spoke to Council regarding
the Watt lot re- zoning issue. She stated the perhaps re- zoning
that lot as R -2b could ensure some higher quality, lower -
income housing for people who really need it.
REPORT OF CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS
Planning and Development Board
Susan Blumenthal, Chair of the Planning and Development Board,
presented to Council a report on "Strategic Mousing and Neigh-
borhood Plan ".
Board of Public Works
Joseph Daley, Commissioner of the Board of Public Works reported
on the following items:
�Hangar Theatre - Commissioner Daley reported that the
Hangar Theatre has come before the Board to ask for a twenty
year lease. They have recently been in a position to get
a substantial grant to help them with their renovations of
the theatre but there is a stipulation on the grant that
they have to have a lease of at least 20 years. The feeling
of the Board of Public Works is that they would like to give
them that lease. The terms have not been worked out yet
but with the tripartite agreement that is in effect the Hangar
Theatre really is the only group for that site so the Board
is going to be asking the Mayor to grant the lease for that
period of time.
Dryden Road Parking Ramp - Commissioner Daley reported
that the Committee of the Whole has taken action on the permits
at the Dryden Road Parking Ramp. They received an extensive
report on the ramp. It has not been nearly as used as the
Committee of the Whole expected it to be. However, the
trends are good. One area that has not been utilized at
all is the long -term parking permit system so the Committee
of the Whole has lowered the fees for permits at night from
$40.00 to $25.00 and the day time fees have been lowered
from $40.00 to $35.00. Hopefully this will help bring people
into the garage. If this is passed by the Board of Public
Works it will become effective February 1, 1988 on a six -month
trial basis.
Alderperson Schlather asked Commissioner Daley if, as a matter
of practice, the Board will require the Hangar Theatre to
conduct environmental review before the Board passes on the
decision to extend their lease. He stated that, in his opinion,
the city ought to be conducting environmental reviews before
it issues permits or leases. The environmental review need
not be an exhaustive Environmental Impact Statement but at
least in the first instance there ought to be the filing
of an Environmental Assessment Form. He requested that
Commissioner Daley take that message back to the Board of
Publi_e. and try to implement it as a regular u curse.
in those kinds of decisions.
-7- January 6, 1988
Commissioner Daley responded that he would do this. He further
stated that the Board is partly under the gun in this instance.
The Hangar Theatre came to the Committee of the Whole saying
that they had to have a decision by January 12, otherwise
they were going to lose all this money. The Board took an
informal action, and are going to have to ask the Mayor
to give a sense of the Board in the form of a letter going
to the state. The Board can, as part of the formal lease
which has not been drawn up yet,incorporate this requirement,
but in this instance the Board is already committed.
Alderperson Schlather asked that Commissioner Daley talk
to the City Attorney about working environmental review into
these decisions, whether it's on a routine basis or not.
Even at this point there is no reason why the Hangar could
not complete the Short Environmental Assessment Form or the
LEAF as may be appropriate and tender it along with their
application as part of this process.
Commissioner Daley stated that he will pass this along to
the Board of Public Works.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR:
Welcome to New Alderpersons
LO Mayor Gutenberger welcomed to Common Council the new Alder-
= persons, John Johnson and Benjamin Nichols.
m Ithaca Gun Company
Q Mayor Gutenberger discussed the Ithaca Gun issue. It looks
like the company will have to vacate the premises where they
now are sometime in July 1988. Ithaca Gun Company has talked
with the City of Ithaca about the possibility of going into
our Industrial Park on Route 13. The discussions at this
point are very preliminary. However, there is interest on
behalf of other communities to have them leave Ithaca and
go someplace outside of Tompkins County. He wished to bring
(awo,i it to the attention of Council because if, in fact, the Ithaca
Industrial Park is an appropriate place for them to be we
will have to, in all likelihood, spend a lot of time very
quickly in making the provisions for Ithaca Gun to get into
the Industrial Park.
MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS
Conservation Advisory Council
Mayor Gutenberger requested approval of Council for the appoint-
ment of Eric Broberg, 423 East Lincoln Street, and Kathy
Emilian, 218 South Albany Street to the Conservation Advisory
Council for terms to expire December 31, 1989.
Resolution
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
RESOLVED, That this Council approves the appointment of Eric
Broberg and Kathy Emilian to the Conservation Advisory Council
for terms to expire December 31, 1989.
Carried Unanimously,
Mr. Broberg took the oath of office and was sworn in by City
Clerk Paolangeli.
Television Cable Commission
Mayor Gutenberger reported that he has appointed William
Demo, 119 Auburn Street, to fill out the unexpired term of
Robert Fletcher, who resigned, whose term expires July 30,
1990.
Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency
Mayor Gutenberger requested approval of Council for the appoint-
ment of Susan Cummings, 214 Fayette Street, for an indefinite
term of office to replace William Bennett, who resigned.
479
PAM
-8-
January 6, 1988
Resolution
By Alderperson Lytel: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
RESOLVED, That this Council approves the appointment of Susan
Cummings to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency for an indefinite
term of office to replace William Bennett, who resigned.
Mayor Gutenberger outlined the reasons for this appointment.
Discussion followed on the role of the IURA, the importance
of the agency and how vacancies are filled.
Susan Cummings spoke to Council regarding her qualifications
to serve on this agency.
Tabling Resolution
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson
RESOLVED, That the matter of the appointment of Susan Cummings
to the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency be tabled.
Ayes (S) - Nichols, Johnson, Booth, Peterson, Hoffman
Nays (6) - Cummings, Romanowski, Killeen, Schlather, Lytel
Mayor Gutenberger voted Nay breaking the tie
Motion Defeated
Mayor Gutenberger stated for the record that according to
the laws established by the State of New York governing the
IURA the members of the agency serve at the pleasure of the
Mayor.
Main Motion
A vote on the Main Motion resulted as follows:
Ayes (S) - Schlather, Romanowski, Lytel, Cummings, Killeen
Nays (2) - Peterson, Hoffman
Absention (3) - Nichols, Johnson, Booth
Motion Defeated
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ACC Franchise
City Attorney Nash updated the Council regarding the ACC
franchise. Copies of the current draft of the agreement
had been sent to the ACC representatives the week of December
28th. He is hopeful of receiving their comments on that
draft in the next couple of days. The current agreement
technically runs out on January 22nd. He expects that a
special Council meeting will be called before that time.
Discussion followed on the floor regarding the length of
time of the franchise. Alderperson Schlather asked that
Council members please read the agreement carefully and if
they have questions they should try to get them answered
before the special Council meeting.
Ronsville Sub - division Lawsuite Against Planning Board
City Attorney Nash reported that the Ronsville lawsuit is
scheduled in court for January 2Sth. A decision should be
made before the end of February or possibly March.
Issue of Lease or License to the Chamber of Commerce for
Use of Stewart Park Land
Alderperson Hoffman asked Atty. Nash if, on the issue of the
legality of granting a lease or a license to the Chamber
of Commerce for use of Stewart Park land would he consider
it useful to have the kind of response from the State that
was requested tonight.
City Atty. Nash responded that the state legislature considered
last year an amendment to the state law which would require
leases in excess of 10 }rears to _get state approval, which
is a pretty good indication that they don't consider them
January 6, 1988 481
to need it at this point. In his opinion the documentation
is fairly clear. Atty.Nash stated that if Council wishes
further documentation he would prefer to draft the letter
himself.
Permit for Farmers' Market
Alderperson Killeen asked City Attorney Nash if he has heard
anything from the state on the legal determination regarding
the Farmers' Market use of the Inlet Island.
City Atty. Nash responded that he has not heard anything.
The indications are now that the determination is still weeks
(move, away. Alderpersons Schlather and Booth stated that the Charter
and Ordinance Committee would be meeting Wednesday, January
20 and the Farmers' Market will be discussed at that meeting.
CHARTER AND ORDINANCE COMMITTEE:
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 31 Entitled "Sub- division
Regulations" of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Schlather
ri ORDINANCE NO. 87 -
LO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 31 ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS" OF THE CITY OF ITHACA MUNICIPAL CODE.
m BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the
Q City of Ithaca, New York, as follows:
Section 1. That Chapter 31, entitled "Subdivision Regula-
tions", of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code is amended as
follows:
1. That a new Section, to be known and designated as
Section 31.6, entitled "Environmental Review" is hereby added
to said Chapter to read as follows:
"Section 31.6 Environmental Review
1. Unless otherwise specified by Common Council, the
Planning Board shall be the Lead Agency in all necessary
environmental review of any proposed subdivision, in accordance
with State Environmental Quality Review regulations and the
City Environmental Quality Review ordinance, as provided
under this code. No application for Conditional Approval
of a subdivision plat shall be considered complete in the
absence of a final determination as to the effect of a pro-
posed subdivision on the environment."
2. That Section 31.23, entitled "Conditional Approval
of Plat ", is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 31.23. Conditional Approval of Plat
A. Required documents and information.
For conditional approval, the subdivider shall submit
to the Planning Board, in triplicate, all the documents
and information called for in Section 31.24. All the infor-
mation presented shall be as accurate and up -to -date as possible,
and all drawings or other graphic material shall be of a
kind and quality approved by the Planning Board. The Planning
Board shall then study the preliminary plat and proposed
street design, in connection with the topography of the land,
the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the master
plan and the official map insofar as they exist and apply,
and shall take into consideration the general needs of the
community and the best uses of the land to be subdivided.
Particular attent.ion shall be given to the matters enumerated
in Section 33 of the General City Law, and to specific require-
ments for parks, playgrounds, school or other building sites,
adequacy of the street layout and general suitability of
the development.
- 10 -
4821 B. Public Notice.
January 6, 1988
1. By mail. At least ten (10) days before the first
meeting of the Planning Board at which either a determination
of significance of environmental effect of a proposed sub-
division, or conditional approval of a proposed subdivision,
whichever occurs first, is to be considered, the subdivider
shall provide the Board with certification that notice of
the proposed action has been mailed to the record owners
of all properties within two hundred (200) feet of the parcel(s)
to be subdivided. Such notice shall be in a form approved
by the Board, briefly stating essential facts about the pro-
posal and informing recipients of the date, time and place
of the meeting and the place where further information about
the proposal and the review process may be obtained.
2. By posting. At least ten (10) days and not more
than twenty (20) days before the first meeting of the Planning
Board at which either a determination of significance of
environmental effect of a proposed subdivision, or Conditional
Approval of a proposed subdivision, whichever is applicable,
is to be considered, the subdivider shall post a sign at
the center of each of the property lines of the property
to be subdivided which fronts on a public or private roadway,
to inform the public of the proposed subdivision. Such signs
shall be continuously maintained and displayed facing the
roadway until final action has been taken by the Board to
approve or deny the subdivision. The required signs shall
be obtained from the Department of Planning and Development,
and a non - refundable fee paid for each sign or replacement
obtained. At the time such signs are obtained, the subdivider
or subdivider's representative shall indicate in writing
the date on which the signs are to be erected.
C. Conference with subdivider.
The preliminary conclusions reached by the Planning
Board, together with any recommended revisions, shall be
discussed with the subdivider or authorized representative
at a regular meeting of the Board not less than ten (10)
days nor more than six (6) weeks after receipt by the Board
of a complete application for subdivision approval, including
preliminary plat with required accompanying data and a final
Lead Agency determination as to the significance of any effect
which the proposed subdivision will or may have on the environ-
ment. No approval action will be taken in the absence of
such discussion.
D. Findings of Planning Board; effect of approval.
Within thirty (30) days after this discussion the
Planning Board shall submit its findings in writing to the
subdivider, citing the specific changes it will require in
the preliminary layout or, if approved, shall endorse such
approval thereon, as conditional approval. The action of
the Planning Board shall be noted on two copies of the plat
and supporting documents, one copy being returned to the
subdivider and one retained by the Planning Board. Conditional
approval of a preliminary plat shall not constitute final
approval of the final plat, but merely tentative approval
of the general layout submitted on the preliminary plat
as a guide to the preparation of the final plat, which shall
be submitted later to the Planning Board for approval and
for recording, upon fulfillment of the requirements of these
regulations and the conditions, if any, of the conditional
approval."
3. That Section 31.24, entitled "Minimum preliminary
information ", is hereby amended by redesignating subsections
A through C as B through D, and adding new subsections A
and P. to read as follows:
IR]
483
-11-
"A. Generally.
January 6, 1988
Basic information describing the property to be subdivided,
nature and purpose of subdivision, its relationship to and
potential effects on the neighborhood in which it is located,
and other data serving to explain the extent, character and
intent of the proposal. Such information shall be supplied
in a form approved by the Planning Board, and shall be sub-
mitted, together with the required application fe;:, at least
ten (10) days before the date of any regular meeting of the
(WWI, Board at which the application is to be considered for
Conditional Approval."
"E. Environmental data.
The applicant shall submit all documents and information
necessary for full environmental review of the proposed sub-
division by the Lead Agency."
4. That Subdivision C. entitled "Formal hearings; findings ",
S. That a new Section to be known and designated as
Section 31.29, entitled "Fees ", is hereby added to said
chapter to read as follows:
"Section 31.29 Fees
1. Application fee. In order to defray the costs of
subdivision application processing and review by city staff
and agencies, an initial application fee will be charged
according to the following schedule:
Subdivision size Fee
fewer than 3 lots $ 25
3 -10 lots 100
more than 10 lots 100 plus $10
for each additional
lot over 10
2. Sign fee. A fee shall be charged for each sign
obtained from the Department of Planning and Development
for public notice of proposed subdivision required in
accordance with Section 31.23B2 above, which fee shall re-
flect the City's cost for the sign.
3. Payments of fees. Payment for application and sign
fees shall be by check payable to the City of Ithaca.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
and in accordance with law upon publication of a notice as
provided in Section 3.11 (B) of the Ithaca City Charter.
of Section 31.25 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Iq
LO
"C. Formal hearings; findings.
=
Before the Planning Board acts on the final plat and
m
related matters, it shall hold a formal hearing thereon,
Q
in accordance with Section 32 of the General City Law. The
presence of the subdivider or authorized representative at
such hearing is recommended, to facilitate resolution of any
issues raised that may affect the Board's decision. The
Planning Board shall, within forty -five (45) days from the
date of submission of the formal plat, approve, modify, and
approve, or disapprove such plat. Such approval shall, how-
ever, not be deemed final until the subdivider has complied
with the provisions of Section 31.27, and such requirements
as are prescribed by the Board of Public Works relative to
the improve;nent: of new streets and offered the streets to
the Common Council for dedication."
S. That a new Section to be known and designated as
Section 31.29, entitled "Fees ", is hereby added to said
chapter to read as follows:
"Section 31.29 Fees
1. Application fee. In order to defray the costs of
subdivision application processing and review by city staff
and agencies, an initial application fee will be charged
according to the following schedule:
Subdivision size Fee
fewer than 3 lots $ 25
3 -10 lots 100
more than 10 lots 100 plus $10
for each additional
lot over 10
2. Sign fee. A fee shall be charged for each sign
obtained from the Department of Planning and Development
for public notice of proposed subdivision required in
accordance with Section 31.23B2 above, which fee shall re-
flect the City's cost for the sign.
3. Payments of fees. Payment for application and sign
fees shall be by check payable to the City of Ithaca.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
and in accordance with law upon publication of a notice as
provided in Section 3.11 (B) of the Ithaca City Charter.
HE
-12-
Janaury 6, 1988
Alderperson Booth gave background information on the ordinance.
Tabling Resolution
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Romanowski
RESOLVED, That the ordinance amending Chapter 31 entitled
"Subdivision Regulations" of the City of Ithaca Municipal
Code be tabled.
Carried Unanimously
An Ordinance Amending Section 60.59 of Chapter 60 Entitled
"Traffic and Vehicles" of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
(Raising Parking Fines ) - Lift From Table
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Schlather
RESOLVED, That an ordinance amending Section 60.59 of Chapter
60 entitled "Traffic and Vehicles" of the City of Ithaca
Municipal Code be lifted from the table.
Carried Unanimously
Ordinance No. 87 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 60.59 OF CHAPTER 60 ENTITLED
"TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES" OF THE CITY OF ITHACA MUNICIPAL CODE.
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the
City of Ithaca, New York as follows:
Section 1. That Section 60.59 of Chapter 60 entitled
"Traffic and Vehicles" of the Ithaca City Municipal Code
be and it is hereby amended to read as follows:
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 60.100 and in full
acquittance of any violation for parking for a longer period
of time than is permitted, a civil penalty in the sum of
Three Dollars ($3.00) may be paid if such sum is paid within
twenty -four (24) hours of such violation.
Section 2. Effective date
This ordinance shall take effect on February 1, 1988 upon
publication of a notice as provided in § 3.11 (B) of the
Ithaca City Charter.
The Mayor asked that the re- ticketing policy be given a chance
before parking fines are raised.
Alderperson Schlather gave background information on the
ordinance.
Disucssion followed on the floor.
A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Ayes (4) - Schlather, Romanowski, Killeen, Hoffman
Nays (6) - Johnson, Nichols, Cummings, Peterson, Lytel,
Booth
Motion Defeated
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
Finkelstein Presentation
Alderperson Cummings reported on Mark Finkelstein's presentation
on a housing project on the Watts lot in the Northside. She
stated that it' was an interesting and impressive presentation.
There was a range of options for structures on the site.
The main concern of the public present seemed to be how many
people and how many cars would this project bring into the
neighborhood. On January 12 there will be another presentation
at the Northside Community Center for people to respond to.
It
-13-
Janaury 6, 1988 485
CHARTER AND ORDINANCE COMMITTEE:
An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of Chapter 30 Entitled
'Zoning' of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code Northside
Rezoning - including Watts lot - Lift From Table
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
RESOLVED, That an ordinance amending the zoning map of Chapter
30 entitled 'Zoning' of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code
(Northside Rezoning - including Watts lot) be lifted from
the table.
Carried Unanimously
ORDINANCE NO. 87 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF CHAPTER 30 ENTITLED
'ZONING' OF THE CITY OF ITHACA MUNICIPAL CODE
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the
City of Ithaca, New York as follows:
SECTION 1. AMENDING ZONING MAP
1. That the "Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca,
1' New York" as last amended, is hereby amended and changed
(o so that all that tract or parcel of land within the following
described areas presently located in the R -3a, Residential
m District are reclassified and changed to the R -2b, Residential
Q District:
A. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 50 -4 -1, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 400 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a point on the northeast corner of
tax parcel number 50 -4 -9, thence southerly a distance of
approximately 99 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of North Cayuga Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number SO -4 -11, thence westerly a dis-
tance of approximately 198 feet along the southern boundary
of tax parcel number SO -4 -11 to the southwest corner of tax
parcel number 50 -4 -11, thence northerly a distance of approxi-
mately 19 feet to a point on the northeast corner of tax
parcel number SO -4 -37, thence westerly a distance of approxi-
mately 199 feet along the north boundary of tax parcel 50 -4 -37
to the northwest corner of tax parcel 50 -4 -37, thence northerly
a distance of approximately 81 feet along the east boundary
of th right -of -way of North Geneva Street to the point of
beginning. The above described area shall include all of
the following tax parcels: 50 -4 -1 through SO -4 -11, inclusive
and SO -4 -38.
B. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 50 -3 -1, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 198 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a point on the northeast corner of
tax parcel number SO -3 -S, thence southerly a distance of
approximately 590 feet to a point on the southeast corner
of tax parcel number 50 -3 -14, thence westerly a distance
of approximately 132 feet along the south boundary of tax
parcel number SO -3 -14 to a point on the southwest corner
of tax parcel number 50 -3 -14, thence northerly a distance
of approximately 24 feet along the west boundary of tax par-
cel number SO -3 -14 to a point on the southeast corner of
tax parcel number SO -3 -18, thence westerly a distance of
approximately 66 feet along the south boundary of tax parcel
number 50 -3 -18 to a point at the southwest corner of tax
parcel number SO -3 -18, thence northerly a distance of approxi-
mately S6S feet along the east boundary of the right -of -way
of North Albany street to the point of beginning. The above
described area shall include all of the following tax parcels:
SO -3 -1 through 50 -3 -14, inclusive, aiid 50.3 -18 through 50 -3 -31,
inclusive.
4 Sfa -14- January 6, 1988
C. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 45 -4 -16, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 142 feet along the north boundaries of tax
parcel number 45 -4 -16 and 45 -4 -15 to a point on the north-
east corner of tax parcel number 45 -4 -15, thence southeasterly
a distance of approximately 90 feet along the east boundary
line of tax parcel number 45 -4 -15 to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 45 -4 -10, thence northeasterly
a distance of approximately 123 feet along the south boundary
of tax parcel 45 -4 -10 to a point at the southeast corner
of tax parcel 45 -4 -10, thence southeasterly a distance of
approximately 116 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of Lake Avenue to a point on the southeast coiner
of tax parcel number 45 -4 -12, thence westerly a distance
of approximately 298 feet along the north boundary of the
right -of -way of Cascadilla Street to a point on the southwest
corner of tax parcel number 45 -4 -16, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 64 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of First Street to the point of beginning.
The above description includes all of the following tax parcel
numbers: 45 -4 -11, 45 -4 -12, 45 -4 -14, 45 -4 -15, and 45 -4 -16.
2. That the "Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca,
New York" as last amended, is hereby amended and changed
so that all that tract or parcels of land within the following
described areas presently located in the R -3b, Residential
District are reclassified and changed to the R -2b, Residential
District.
A. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 50 -1 -1, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 528 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a point on the northeast corner of
tax parcel number 50-1 -12, thence southerly a distance of
approximately 163 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of North Albany Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number SO -1 -15, thence westerly a dis-
tance of approximately 528 feet along the southern boundaries
of tax parcel numbers 50 -1 -15, 50 -1 -6, SO -1 -5, 50 -1 -4, 50 -1 -3
and 50 -1 -31 to a point on the southwest corner of tax parcel
number SO -1 -31, thence northerly a distance of approximately
165 feet along the east boundary of the right -of -way of North
Plain Street to the point of beginning. The above described
area shall include all of the following tax parcel numbers:
50 -1 -1 through SO -1 -15 inclusive, 50 -1 -31 and 50 -1 -32.
B. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 51 -3 -1, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 403 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a. point on the northeast corner of
tax parcel number 51 -3 -8, thence southerly a distance of
approximately 161 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of North Plain Street to a point on the east boundary
of tax parcel number 51 -3 -12, thence westerly in a straight
line a distance of approximately 201 feet until it reaches
the south boundaries of tax parcel numbers 51 -3 -26, 51 -3 -2
and 51 -3 -3, said line being the easterly extension of the
south boundaries of those parcels and continuing approximately
202 feet along said boundaries to a point on the southwest
corner of tax parcel numbers 51 -3 -26, thence northerly a
distance of approximately 162 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Park Place to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: SO -3 -1 through 50 -3 -11, inclusive, 50 -3 -26,
SO -3 -27 and 50 -3 -28, and a portion of 51 -3 -12.
487
-15- January 6, 1988
C. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number S1- 2 -1.2, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 199 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a point on the northeast corner of
tax parcel number S1 -2 -S, thence southerly a distance of
approximately 163 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of Park Place to a point on the southeast corner of
tax parcel number S1 -2 -8, thence westerly a distance of approxi-
mately 199 feet along the south boundaries of tax parcel numbers
S1 -2 -8, 51 -2 -4, S1 -2 -3 and S1 -2 -17 to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel S1 -2 -17, thence northerly a distance
of approximately 163 feet along the east boundary of the
right -of -way of Washington Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: S1 -2 -1.1 through 51 -2 -8 and S1 -2 -17.
D. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number S1 -1 -3, thence easterly a distance of approxi-
mately 334 feet along the south boundary of the right -of -way
of Cascadilla Street to a point on the northeast corner of
r� of tax parcel number 51 -1 -8, thence southerly a distance
d. of approximately 167 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Washington Street to a point on the south-
LO east corner of tax parcel number 51 -1 -10, thence westerly
Z a distance of approximately 334 feet along the south boundaries
CO of tax parcel numbers S1 -1 -10, S1 -1 -5, S1 -1 -4, and S1 -1 -3
Q to a point on the southwest corner of tax parcel number S1 -1 -3,
thence northerly a distance of approximately 167 feet along
the west boundary of tax parcel number S1 -1 -3 to the point
of beginning. The above described area includes all of the
following tax parcels: 51 -1 -3 through 51 -1 -10, inclusive.
E. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of
tax parcel number 4S -5 -1, thence northeasterly a distance
of approximately 265 feet along the south boundary of the
right -of -way of Monroe Street to a point on the northeast
corner of tax parcel number 4S -5 -3, thence southeasterly
a distance of approximately 323 feet along the west boundary
of the right -of -way of First Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 4S -S -9, thence westerly a distance
of approximately 304 feet along the north boundary of the
right-of -way of Cascadilla Street to a point on the southwest
corner of tax parcel number 45 -S -11, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 180 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Second Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 4S -5-1 through 4S -S -15, inclusive.
F. Beginning at a point on the northeast corner of tax
parcel number 45 -6 -1, thence southeasterly a distance of
approximately 142 feet along the west boundary of the right -
of -way of Second Street to a point on the southeast corner
of tax parcel number 4S -6 -2, thence westerly a distance of
approximately 300 feet along the north boundary of the right -
of -way of Cascadilla Street to a point on the southwest corner
of tax parcel number 4S -6 -6, thence northeasterly a distance
of approximately 26S feet along the south boundary of the
right -of -way of Monroe Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 4S -6 -1 through 4S -6 -6, inclusive.
G. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 34 -9 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 132 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Madison Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 34 -9 -2, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 223 feet along the east boundaries of tax
parcels numbers 34 -9 -2, 34 -9 -16, 34 -9 -1S, and 34 -9 -14 to
a point on the north boundary of tax parcel number 34 -9 -11
that is approximately 19 feet from the northeast corner of
tax parcel number 34 -9 -11, thence easterly a distance of
-16- January 6, 1938
approximately 19 feet along the north boundary of tax parcel
number 34 -9 -11 to a point on the northeast corner of tax
parcel number 34 -9 -11, thence southeasterly a distance of
approximately 100 feet along the east boundary of tax parcel
number 34 -9 -11 to a point on the southeast corner of tax
parcel number 34 -9 -11, thence westerly a distance of approxi-
mately 152 feet along the north boundary of the right -of -way
of Monroe Street to a point on the southwest corner of tax
parcel number 34 -9 -13, thence northwesterly a distance of
approximately 330 feet along the east boundary of the right -
of -way of First Street to the point of beginning. The above
described area shall include all of the following tax parcels:
34 -9 -1, 34 -9 -2, and 34 -9 -11 through 34 -9 -17, inclusive.
H. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 45 -2 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 264 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Madison street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 45 -2 -4, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 325 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of First Street to a point in the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 45 -2 -11, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 267 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Monroe Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 45 -2 -15, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 325 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Second Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 45 -2 -1 through 45 -1 -19, inclusive.
I. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 45 -1 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 264 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Madison Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 45 -1 -2, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 320 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Second Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 45 -1 -9, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 264 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Monroe Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 45 -1 -14, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 320 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Third Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 45 -1 -1 through 45 -1 -14, inclusive.
J. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 44 -6 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 268 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Madison Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 44 -6 -3, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 344 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Third Street to a point at the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 44 -6 -8, thence westerly a distance
of approximately 300 feet along the north boundary of the
right -of -way of Cascadilla Street to a point at the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 44 -6 -14, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 202 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Fourth Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 44 -6 -1 through 44 -6 -16, inclusive.
K. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 34 -1 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 135 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 34 -1 -2, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 70 feet to the point of intersection of
the north boundary of tax parcel number 34 -1 -4, thence south-
westerly a distance of approximately 17 feet along the north
boundary line of tax parcel number 34 -1 -4 to a point on the
-17- January 6, 1988
northeast corner of tax parcel number 34 -1 -17, thence south-
easterly a distance of approximately 2S5 feet along the east
boundaries of tax parcel numbers 34 -1 -17, 34 -1 -16, 34 -1 -15,
34 -1 -14, 34 -1 -13, and the southeasterly extension of that
line to the intersection of the north boundary of the right -
of -way of Madison Street, thence southwesterly a distance
of approximately 120 feet along the north boundary of the
right -of -way of Madison Street to a point at the southwest
corner of tax parcel number 34 -1 -12, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 328 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of First Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 34 -1 -1, 34 -1 -2, 34 -1 -11 through 34 -1 -8, inclusive,
and a portion of 34 -1 -10.
L. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 35 -4 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 266 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 35 -4 -3, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 327 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of First Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 35 -4 -8, thence southwesterly
�, a distance of approximately 270 feet along the north boundary
Rq of the right -of -way of Madison Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 35 -4 -14, thence northwesterly
= a distance of approximately 327 feet along the east boundary
(n of the right -of -way of Second Street to the point of beginning.
Q The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 35 -4 -1 through 35 -4 -18, inclusive.
M. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 35 -5 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 263 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 3S -S -6, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 325 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Second Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 35 -5 -11 thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 26S feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Madison Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 35 -5 -15, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 325 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Third Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 3S -S -1 through 35 -5 -20, inclusive.
N. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 44 -5 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 269 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Morris Avenue to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 44 -5 -6, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 149 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Third Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 44 -5 -8, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 269 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Madison Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 44 -5 -13, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 150 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Fourth Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 44 -5 -1 through 44 -5 -13, inclusive.
0. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 44 -9 -2, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 328 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 44 -9 -6, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 330 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Fifth Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 44 -9 -13, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 83 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Madison Street to its intersection
48-1)
490
-18- January 6, 1988
with the north boundary of the right -of -way of Cascadilla
Street, thence westerly a distance of approximately 275 feet
along the north boundary of the right -of -way of Cascadilla
Street to a point at the southwest corner of tax parcel number
44 -9 -20, thence northwesterly a distance of approximately
200 feet along the west boundaries of tax parcel number 44 -9 -20
and 44 -9 -2 to the point of beginning. The above described
area shall include all of the following tax parcels: 44 -9 -2
through 44 -9 -20, inclusive.
P. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 3S -2 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 26S feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Adams Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 35 -2 -2, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 330 feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of First Street to a point on the southeast
corner of tax parcel number 35 -2 -7, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 265 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 35 -2 -12, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 328 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Second Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 35 -2 -1 through 3S -2 -16, inclusive.
Q. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 35 -1 -3, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 100 feet to the northeast corner of tax parcel
number 3S -1 -2, thence southeasterly a distance of approximately
100 feet along the west boundary of the right -of -way of Second
Street to a point on the southeast corner of tax parcel number
3S -1 -2, thence southwesterly a distance of approximately
100 feet along the north boundary of the right -of -way of
Hancock Street to a point on the southwest corner of tax
parcel number 35 -1 -3, thence northwesterly a distance of
approximately 100 feet along the west boundary of tax parcel
number 35 -1 -3 to the point of beginning. The above described
area shall include all of the following tax parcels: 35 -1 -2
and 3S -1 -3.
R. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 44 -2 -9, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 265 feet along the north boundaries of tax
parcel numbers 44 -2 -9 and 44 -2 -2 to a point on the northeast
corner of tax parcel number 44 -2 -2, thence southeasterly
a distance of approximately 165 feet along the west boundary
of the right -of -way of Fourth Street to a point on the south-
east corner of tax parcel number 44 -2 -3, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 265 feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Hancock Street to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 44 -2 -8, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 165 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of Fifth Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area shall include all of the following
tax parcels: 44 -2 -2 through 44 -2 -9, inclusive.
S. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 25 -4 -4, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 132 feet along the north boundary lines of
tax parcel number 2S -4 -4- and 2S -4 -3 to a point on the north-
east corner of tax parcel number 25 -4 -3, thence southeasterly
a distance of approximately 50 feet to a point on the north-
west corner of tax parcel number 25 -4 -2, thence northeasterly
a distance of approximately 133 feet along the north boundary
line of tax parcel number 25 -4 -2 to a point on the northeast
corner of tax parcel number 25 -4 -2, thence southeasterly
along the west boundary of the right -of -way of First Street
a distance of approximately 40 feet to a point on the south-
west corner of tax parcel number 2S -4 -2, thence southwesterly
a distance of approximately 26:; feet along the north boundary
of the right -of -way of Adams Street to a point on the southwest
J
[P]
-19-
January 6,,1988
491
corner of tax parcel number 25 -4 -4, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 90 feet along the east boundary
of Second Street to the point of beginning. The above des-
cribed area shall include all of the following tax parcels:
25 -4 -2 through 25 -4 -4 -, inclusive.
T. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 45 -4 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 118 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Monroe Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 45 -4 -3, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 230 feet along the east boundaries of tax
parcel number 45 -4 -3, 45 -4 -20, 45 -4 -19 and 45 -4 -18 to a point
on the southwest corner of tax parcel number 45 -4 -6, thence
northeasterly a distance of approximately 18 feet to a point
on the northwest corner of tax parcel 45 -4 -8, thence south-
easterly a distance of approximately 66 feet to a point on
the north boundary of tax parcel 45 -4 -15 that is approximately
10 feet southwest of the northeast corner of tax parcel number
45 -4 -15, thence southwesterly a distance of approximately
133 feet along the south boundary of tax parcel number 45 -4 -17,
to a point on the southwest corner of tax parcel 45- 4 -1.7,
7d thence northwest a distance of approximately 295 feet along
the east boundary of the right -of -way of First Street to
Iq the point of beginning. The above described area includes
LD all of the following tax parcels: 45 -4 -1 through 45 -4 -3,
inclusive and 45 -4 -17 through 45 -4 -21, inclusive.
M 3. That the "Official Zoning Map of the City of Ithaca,
Q New York ", as last amended, is hereby amended and changed
so that all that tract of parcels of land within the following
described areas presently located in the B -2a, Business District
are reclassified and changed to the R -2b, Residential District.
A. Beginning at a point on the northwest corner of tax
parcel number 25 -3 -1, thence northeasterly a distance of
approximately 264 feet along the south boundary of the right -
of -way of Franklin Street to a point on the northeast corner
of tax parcel number 25 -3 -1, thence southeasterly a distance
of approximately 32S feet along the west boundary of the
right -of -way of Lake Avenue to a point on the southeast corner
of tax parcel number 25 -3 -1, thence southwesterly a distance
of approximately 269 feet along the north boundary of the
right -of -way of Adams Street to a point on the southwest
corner of tax parcel number 25 -3 -1, thence northwesterly
a distance of approximately 330 feet along the east boundary
of the right -of -way of First Street to the point of beginning.
The above described area includes all of tax parcel number
25 -3 -1.
4. That in accordance herewith the City Clerk is hereby
directed to make or cause to be made the necessary changes
on said zoning map.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance
with law upon publication of a notice as provided in Section
3.11 (B) of the Ithaca City Charter.
Discussion followed on the floor.
Alderperson Booth asked City Atty. Nash if it is his under-
standing that if the Council adopts this resolution tonight
that it would be proper even though the way it is written
it includes everything else as well as the Watts lot.
City Atty. Nash responded that maybe procedurally we would
want to amend it to remove reference to all the others that
have already been done. There was a public hearing last
month on the proposal, the property owner has been well
advised of the proceedings. In fact, he has lodged a protest
492
-20- January 6, 1988
and he has notified the City Attorney and the City Clerk
that the protest continues regarding any further action.
As long as we respect that protest regarding the action again
tonight Atty. Nash doesn't see any reason why the city would
have to have another public hearing on the matter.
Alderperson Schlather questioned what the effect would be
if Council acts on i:: as it currently is. Wouldn't it by
operation of statutory construction simply take precedence
over the one previously passed?
Atty. Nash responded that if it were left the way it is,
in his opinion, he doesn't think there would be any different
legal effect.
Further discussion followed on the floor.
Alderperson Schlather asked th
only thing we are acting on is
the Chair allow the record to
the floor is the entire area.
ruling of the City Attorney is
of the resolution will require
resolution will only require a
e Chair to not rule that the
the Watts lot. He asked that
stand that the resolution on
He further stated that the
that the Watts lot aspects
8 votes, the rest of the
majority vote.
A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Ayes (7) - Schlather, Nichols, Johnson, Booth, Killeen,
Hoffman, Peterson
Nays (3) - Lytel, Cummings, Romanowski
Motion Fails -';4-
C
vote-s -needed- to %F
tif,�t Ua-Ce cuu.
& 4 t ezone Watts lot)
Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency Nomination
Alderperson Schlather requested that the nomination of Susan
Cummings to the IURA be referred to committee.
Resolution
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
RESOLVED, That the nomination of Susan Cummings to the Ithaca
Urban Renewal Agency be referred to the Budget and Administration
Committee for review and be brought back to the February
Common Council meeting for action.
Discussion followed on the floor.
Mayor Gutenberger requested that at some point the Council
take a look at how appointments are made to the various Boards,
Agencies, Committees, Commissions, etc.
A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
Recess
Common Council recessed at 10:20 P.M. and reconvened in regular
session at 10:40 p.m.
HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE:
Temporary Shelter for Homeless
By Alderperson Lytel: Seconded by Alderperson Peterson
WHEREAS, alleviating homelessness is a priority for the City
of Ithaca, and
WHEREAS, government can make a contribution toward assisting
the homeless, and
WHEREAS, County government historically has had local responsi-
bility for social services and has had greater access to
resources for such services; now, therefore be it
J
J
-21-
January 6, 1988 493
RESOLVED, That the Common Council urges the Tompkins County
Board of Representatives to more fully use its social services
resources to address the problem of homelessness, specifically
the need for additional temporary shelter for this winter,
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the City be willing to cooperate fully to
maximize use of resources, both through funding possibilities
or other assistance, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Common Council shall hereby authorize
and direct the emergency use of Southside Community Center
and /or Greater Ithaca Activities Center buildings during
life threatening weather conditions for provision of temporary
shelter, and does herewith authorize the Task Force for the
Homeless to administer the program.
Discussion followed on the floor on how the program would
be administered.
LaBerta Glasser, Chairperson of the Task Force for the Home-
less, answered questions from Council members.
Eric Datz, Buildings System Manager was named as the contact
Lo person between the city and the Task Force for the Homeless.
m Amending Resolution
< By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
RESOLVED, That the Mayor, Fire Chief, Police Chief, Superin-
tendent of Public Works, and Alderperson Killeen shall
constitute a committee to represent the city to work with
the Task Force in implementing this program.
Carried Unanimously
Main Motion as Amended
A vote on the Main Motion as amended resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
Site Plan Review Ordinance - Report
Alderperson Cummings reported that the Planning Board is
working to bring in assistance from the state and to host
a workshop session with the Planning and Development Board.
Other related groups will be invited to attend, as well as
Council and staff and the public. They will be trying to
pull together into a working form Site Plan Review legislation
and to understand what this mechanism can do for us.
Southwest Park
Alderperson Cummings reported that the Planning and Development
Committee, Planning and Development Board, and the Board
of Public Works have begun to look at that area in relation
to the alienation and environmental review process. Future
and long -term use on this site is being discussed.
BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
Tompkins County S.P.C.A. Agreement
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to execute an Agreement with the Tompkins County
(600.1 S.P.C.A. for the period January 1, 1988 to December 31,1988,
in an amount not to exceed $45,427, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Tompkins County S.P.C.A. be, and it is,
hereby designated the animal control agency for the City
of Ithaca for the year 1988.
Carried Unanimously
Finger Lakes Association Agreement
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Hoffman
RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to execute an Agreement with the Finger Lakes
494 -22- January 6, 1988
Association, Inc., for the period January 1, 1988 to December
31, 1988, in an amount not to exceed $1,207., for rendering
promotional publicity services.
Carried Unanimously
Tompkins County Area Development Corp. Agreement
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Hoffman
RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to execute an Agreement with Tompkins County
Area Development Corp., for the period January 1, 1988 to
December 31, 1988, in an amount not to exceed $7,800., to
be used toward the costs and expenses of the authority in
encouraging and affecting the location and expansion of
industrial research and manufacturing facilities, the creation
of new and improved job opportunities, the reduction of
unemployment and the betterment of individual and community
prosperity within the City of Ithaca and the County of Tompkins.
Carried Unanimously
Human Services Coalition Agreement
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Peterson
RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to execute an agreement with the Human Services
Coalition of Tompkins County, for the period January 1, 1988
to December 31, 1988, in an amount not to exceed $10,084.,
for the furnishing of human services planning and coordination.
Carried Unanimously
Recreation for the Elderly Application
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Hoffman
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is about to submit an application
for continuation of the Recreation for the Elderly, and if
approved, apply subsequently to the State of New York for
partial reimbursement of funds expended on said project,
as provided by Section 541 -546 of Article 19 -J of the
Executive Law of New York entitled "Recreation Programs for
the Elderly "; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That said application is in all respects approved,
and that Mayor John C. Gutenberger is hereby authorized and
directed to duly execute and submit said application to the
New York State Office for the Aging, for its approval.
Carried Unanimously
Police Department Equipment Standardization
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Hoffman
WHEREAS, this Common Council has been requested by the City
of Ithaca Police Department to standardize on Motorola radio
equipment as the type of equipment to be used iii the City
of Ithaca, and to authorize the City to purchase approved
equipment from the manufacturer, or a representative thereof,
and
WHEREAS,
it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City
for reasons
of efficiency, compatibility and economics to
approve
such standardization for the following reasons:
1.
The City of Ithaca Police Department presently has
all Motorola radio equipment and radio console.
2.
This action will minimize the inventory of repair
parts which would have to be maintained for the
service of said radio equipment.
3.
Labor cost for maintenance and service of a standard
type of equipment will be less that if required to
service several different types of equipment.
4.
Present Motorola radio equipment has been satisfactory
to the uses of the City of Ithaca Police Department.
-23-
January 6, 1988 495
S. Standardization provides the need for only one service
contract for its entire radio system, whereas additional
contractual agreements would be required for other
types of equipment;
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That pursuant to Section 103, Subdivision S of
the General Municipal Law of the State of New York, this
Common Council hereby authorizes the standardization of
Motorola radio equipment as the type of such equipment to
(Wwol be used and purchased by the City of Ithaca Police Department
during the year 1988.
Carried Unanimously
Police Department Personnel Roster
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Romanowski
RESOLVED, That 1988 Police Department Personnel Roster be
amended as follows:
Delete - 1 Senior Clerk Position
Add - 1 Senior Account Clerk /Typist Position
Carried Unanimously
Iq
Lo G.I.A.C. Personnel Roster
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Booth
m RESOLVED, That the 1988 G.I.A.C. Personnel Roster for the
Q Bottom Line Program be amended as follows:
Youth Development Program Supervisor position reduced
from full time to three quarter time;
Recreation Assistant position increased from 17 hours
to 30 hours.
Discussion followed on the floor.
(awo� A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
Appraisal of City Owned Buildings
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
RESOLVED, That the Planning Department be authorized and
directed to release the appraisal figures on the City Hall
Annex and Number S Fire Station.
Carried Unanimously
Civil Engineer Salary
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Nichols
RESOLVED, That the 1988 salary for the position of Civil
Engineer be established at $34,000, as requested by the Board
of Public Works, effective January 11, 1988.
Discussion followed on the floor.
City Engineer Gray answered questions- from - Council members.
A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
Youth Bureau Recreation Fees
Alderperson Schlather explained the fee schedule.
Discussion followed on the floor regarding fees for recreation.
Resolution
By Alderperson Schlather: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
RESOLVED, That the policy for setting rates for the recreation
department at the Youth Bureau for 1988 be established as
follows: All non -city residents shall pay three times the
rate charged to city residents in 1988; the rate charged
to city residents in 1988 shall be the same rate charged
to city residents in 1987. This shall take effect March
4 9fi -24- January 6, 1988
1, 1988. Excepted from the foregoing are the rates charged
for open skating and open swimming.
Carried Unanimously
REPORT OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES AND COUNCIL LIAISONS:
Stewart Park Advisory Group
Alderperson Killeen presented the following four resolutions
from the Stewart Park Advisory Group and gave background
information on the resolutions.
"Resolution #1
WHEREAS, Common Council, on April 2, 1986, approved the expendi-
ture of $21,500 for preparation of "design development drawings"
for Stewart Park, and the City subsequently hired Trowbridge
and Trowbridge for this task, and
WHEREAS, the Stewart Park Advisory Group (S.P.A.G.) was re-
activated to provide guidance to the Trowbridge staff, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Board, the S.P.A.G.
and numerous organizations and individuals within the City
have recommended that a principal component of the design
development plan should consist of guidelines for preserva-
tion and maintenance of Stewart Park, and
WHEREAS, at the invitation of Trowbridge and Trowbridge a
S.P.A.G. subcommittee was created to work with the consultant's
staff on preparation of the final draft, and
WHEREAS, the final draft entitled, "Stewart Park Preservation
Goals and Guidelines" has been reviewed in depth by the S.P.A.G.
subcommittee and the subcommittee finds the document meets
the objective of providing preservation and maintenance guide-
lines; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That S.P.A.G. recommends to Common Council the
adoption of all goals stated in the "Stewart Park 1987 Preservation
Goals and Guidelines ", specifically:
Goal
One:
Establish a Park Commission
Goal
Two:
Preserve historic structures and their
landscape setting
Goal
Three:
Preserve and enhance the overall park
landscape
Goal
Four:
Protect and beautify the shoreline
Goal
Five:
Preserve and enhance park road and path
systems
Goal
Six:
Preserve passive and informal recreation
activities, preserve limited active recrea-
tion and enhance water related activities
Goal
Seven:
Coordinate park furnishings;
and be it
further
RESOLVED, That the guidelines stated in Chapter three of
the "Stewart Park 1987 Preservation Goals and Guidelines"
shall serve as one of several resources for implementation
of the goals."
"Resolution #2
WHEREAS, Common Council, on April 2, 1986, approved the expendi-
ture of $21,500 for preparation of "design development drawings"
for Stewart Park and the city subsequently hired Trowbridge
and Trowbridge for this task, and
WHEREAS, in fulfillment of its contract with the city, Trow-
bridge and Trowbridge has prepared the "Stewart Park 1987
Preservation Goals and Guidelines ", and
-2S-
January 6, 1988 497
WHEREAS, the first goal of the Preservation Goals and Guide-
lines calls for the establishment of a Parks Commission to
act as overseer on planning and maintenance issues in the
park, and
WHEREAS, public support and desire for such a Commission
has been strongly expressed by community groups and individuals;
now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the S.P.A.G. recommends to Common Council
the creation of a Parks Commission to be the first action
implemented from the Preservation Goals and Guidelines, and
be it further
RESOLVED, That S.P.A.G. recommends that Common Council arrange
to provide the Parks Commission with adequate staff support,
such as the Parks Manager, as mentioned in Goal #1 of the
"Stewart Park 1987 Preservation Goals and Guidelines ", page 6."
"Resolution #3
WHEREAS, Common Council on January 2, 1985, adopted the Stewart
Park Master Plan as the "official concept plan for that area ",
and
LD
WHEREAS, Common Council on April 2, 1986, approved the expendi-
m ture of $21,500 for preparation of "design development drawings"
Q for Stewart Park, and the city subsequently hired Trowbridge
and Trowbridge for this task, and
WHEREAS, in fulfillment of its contract Trowbridge and Torwbridge
has prepared the "Stewart Park 1987 Preservation Goals and
Guidelines ", and
WHEREAS, the 1987 Preservation Goals and Guidelines reflect
community concerns to restore, preserve and maintain the
character of Stewart Park, and
WHEREAS, the existence of two separate plans can cause con-
fusion and can restrict effective use of the "Stewart Park
1987 Preservation Goals and Guidelines "; now, therefore,
be it
RESOLVED, That S.P.A.G. recommends that Common Council rescind
the Stewart Park Master Plan as the ''official concept plan
for that area' ".
"Resolution #4
RESOLVED, That the S.P.A.G. recommends to Common Council
that stabilization of Stewart Park buildings as suggested
on pages 17 and 18 of the "Stewart Park 1987 Preservation
Goals and Guidelines" be reviewed and acted upon as soon
as practicable."
Resolution
By Alderperson Killeen: Seconded by Alderperson Booth
RESOLVED, That the four (4) resolutions from the Stewart
Park Advisory Group be referred to the Planning and Develop-
ment Committee for review and report back to Council.
Amending Resolution
By Alderperson Nichols: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works is requested to
review the Stewart Park Advisory Group resolutions and offer
their suggestions and comments to the Planning and Development
Committee.
Carried Unanimously
Main Motion as Amended
A vote on the Main Motion as Amended resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
498 -26- January 6, 1988
New Fire Stations Committee
Alderperson Killeen reported that there will be an important
meeting on the New Fire Station at 7:30 P.M. on January 14
in Council Chambers. He invited Council members to attend.
NEW BUSINESS:
Regular Meeting Hours for Common Council Meetings
By Alderperson Nichols: Seconded by Alderperson Johnson
RESOLVED, That the regular meetings of Common Council shall
recess at 11:30 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. of the following day.
At any time after 11:15 p.m. a motion to extend the time
for recess shall be in order. Such. a motion must specify
the new time for recess.
Discussion followed on the floor.
A vote on the resolution resulted as follows:
Ayes (5) - Nichols, Johnson, Booth, Peterson, Hoffman
Nays (6) - Schlather, Romanowski, Lytel, Cummings, Killeen
Mayor Gutenberger voted Nay breaking the tie.
Motion Defeated
Director of Parks and Recreation
By Alderperson Killeen: Seconded by Alderperson Cummings
WHEREAS, the Stewart Park Advisory Group has asked the Common
Council to consider establishing a Parks' Commission and
Parks' Manager position, and
WHEREAS, such a Parks' Commission could include Cass Park
and Six Mile Gorge in its purview, and
WHEREAS, the city is seeking to establish new youth and recreation
relationships with nearby municipalities and school districts,
as well as maintaining on -going relationships with G.I.A.C.
and Southside Community Center; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Common. Council refers to the Planning
and Development Committee and Budget and Administration Committee,
in order, for consideration and report back to the Common
Council at its February 188 meeting on the feasibility of
creating a new position of Director of Parks and Recreation.
Amending Resolution
By Alderperson Booth: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
RESOLVED, That in the last Resolved paragraph the Human Services
Committee be added to the list of committees considering
this resolution.
Carried Unanimously
Main Motion as Amended
A vote on the Main Motion as amended resulted as follows:
Carried Unanimously
ADJOURNMENT:
On a motion the meeting adjourned at 12:35 a.m.
Callista F. Paolanglei
City Clerk
John C. Gutenberg
Mayor
t�
N'