HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-IURANI-2012-03-09It
h
a
c
a
Ur
b
a
n
Re
n
e
w
a
l
Ag
e
n
c
y
Approved: 3/27/12
10
8
E
a
s
t
G
r
e
e
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
It
h
a
c
a
,
N
e
w
Y
o
r
k
1
4
8
5
0
5
0
(6
0
7
)
2
7
4
-
6
5
5
(6
0
7
)
2
7
4
-
6
5
5
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
IU
R
A
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
IU
R
A
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
Ma
r
c
h
9,
20
1
2
Ma
r
c
h
9,
20
1
2
I.
Ca
l
l
to
Or
d
e
r
I.
Ca
l
l
to
Or
d
e
r
Ch
a
i
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
Tr
a
c
y
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
ca
l
l
e
d
th
e
me
e
t
i
n
g
to
or
d
e
r
at
8:
3
5
a.
m
.
wi
t
h
me
m
b
e
r
s
Ca
l
e
b
Th
o
m
a
s
,
Th
e
r
e
s
a
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
,
Susan Cummings and
Fe
r
n
a
n
d
o
de
Ar
a
g
ó
n
(8
:
4
0
a.
m
.
)
pr
e
s
e
n
t
.
St
a
f
f
me
m
b
e
r
s
Jo
A
n
n
Co
r
n
i
s
h
,
Ne
l
s
Bo
h
n
an
d
Su
e
Ki
t
t
e
l
we
r
e
al
s
o
in
at
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
.
Ch
a
i
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
Tr
a
c
y
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
ca
l
l
e
d
th
e
me
e
t
i
n
g
to
or
d
e
r
at
8:
3
5
a.
m
.
wi
t
h
me
m
b
e
r
s
Ca
l
e
b
Th
o
m
a
s
,
Th
e
r
e
s
a
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
,
Susan Cummings and
Fe
r
n
a
n
d
o
de
Ar
a
g
ó
n
(8
:
4
0
a.
m
.
)
pr
e
s
e
n
t
.
St
a
f
f
me
m
b
e
r
s
Jo
A
n
n
Co
r
n
i
s
h
,
Ne
l
s
Bo
h
n
an
d
Su
e
Ki
t
t
e
l
we
r
e
al
s
o
in
at
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
.
II
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
co
m
m
e
n
t
II
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
co
m
m
e
n
t
No
n
e
.
No
n
e
.
II
I
.
Re
v
i
e
w
of
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
– Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
10
,
20
1
2
II
I
.
Re
v
i
e
w
of
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
– Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
10
,
20
1
2
On
a mo
t
i
o
n
by
Cu
m
m
i
n
g
s
an
d
se
c
o
n
d
by
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
,
th
e
mi
n
u
t
e
s
of
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
10
,
20
1
2
we
r
e
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
un
a
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
On
a mo
t
i
o
n
by
Cu
m
m
i
n
g
s
an
d
se
c
o
n
d
by
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
,
th
e
mi
n
u
t
e
s
of
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
10
,
20
1
2
we
r
e
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
un
a
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
IV
.
Ne
w
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
IV
.
Ne
w
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
a)
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Re
v
i
e
w
of
20
1
2
Gr
a
n
t
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a)
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Re
v
i
e
w
of
20
1
2
Gr
a
n
t
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
me
m
b
e
r
s
to
o
k
a pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
lo
o
k
at
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
pu
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
an
d
pu
b
l
i
c
se
r
v
i
c
e
gr
a
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
the following list of
st
r
e
n
g
t
h
s
,
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
an
d
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
jo
b
tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
se
l
e
c
t
ho
u
s
i
n
g
applications were not
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
at
th
i
s
ti
m
e
.
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
me
m
b
e
r
s
to
o
k
a pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
lo
o
k
at
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
pu
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
an
d
pu
b
l
i
c
se
r
v
i
c
e
gr
a
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
ge
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
the following list of
st
r
e
n
g
t
h
s
,
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
an
d
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
jo
b
tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
se
l
e
c
t
ho
u
s
i
n
g
applications were not
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
at
th
i
s
ti
m
e
.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Tr
u
s
t
20
1
2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
St
r
e
n
g
t
h
s
Co
n
c
e
r
n
s
Questions
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Tr
u
s
t
20
1
2
• Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
de
s
i
g
n
se
e
m
s
to
fi
t
we
l
l
wi
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
• Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
an
d
tr
a
c
k
re
c
o
r
d
• So
m
e
me
m
b
e
r
s
di
s
l
i
k
e
d
th
e
ki
t
c
h
e
n
in
th
e
fr
o
n
t
of
th
e
ho
u
s
e
,
ot
h
e
r
s
th
o
u
g
h
t
th
e
de
s
i
g
n
sh
o
u
l
d
be
le
f
t
to
IN
H
S
.
• Th
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
fe
e
se
e
m
s
hi
g
h
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
th
a
t
ma
n
y
so
f
t
co
s
t
s
ar
e
al
s
o
li
s
t
e
d
in
th
e
bu
d
g
e
t
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
l
y
.
• Pe
r
h
a
p
s
th
e
r
e
is
a mi
s
‐ma
t
c
h
be
t
w
e
e
n
wh
o
is
bu
y
i
n
g
ho
m
e
s
(s
i
n
g
l
e
pe
o
p
l
e
or
si
n
g
l
e
pa
r
e
n
t
s
wi
t
h
on
e
ch
i
l
d
)
vs
.
si
z
e
of
th
e
un
i
t
s
be
i
n
g
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
(3
‐be
d
ro
o
m
)
.
Pe
r
h
a
p
s
th
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
no
t
ai
m
e
d
at
th
e
gr
e
a
t
e
s
t
ho
u
s
i
n
g
ne
e
d
in
te
r
m
s
of
un
i
t
si
z
e
an
d
co
s
t
.
•
Wh
a
t
is
included in the developer
fe
e
?
•
Is
Ha
w
t
h
o
r
n
e
Place eligible for the
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Housing Initiative
an
d
sh
o
u
l
d
this money not be
ap
p
l
i
e
d
to these properties?
•
Is
th
i
s
an accessible unit?
•
Ar
e
th
e
s
e
the final designs or
pr
o
t
o
t
y
p
e
s
?
•
Wh
o
at
INHS approves the
de
s
i
g
n
?
•
Co
u
l
d
th
e
r
e
be a full basement at
S.
Pl
a
i
n
St.?
•
Sh
o
u
l
d
S. Plain be a duplex?
•
Wh
a
t
ab
o
u
t
the unit size & cost
vs
.
gr
e
a
t
e
s
t
unmet housing need?
Ho
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
Re
h
a
b
20
1
2
• Go
o
d
va
l
u
e
fo
r
th
e
mo
n
e
y
.
Be
t
t
e
r
th
a
n
th
e
si
z
e
of
su
b
s
i
d
y
be
i
n
g
pu
t
in
t
o
th
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Tr
u
s
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
• Th
i
s
is
th
e
3rd
ye
a
r
of
fu
n
d
i
n
g
an
d
th
i
s
se
e
m
s
to
be
a su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
pr
o
g
r
a
m
th
a
t
is
ru
n
n
i
n
g
we
l
l
.
• Pr
o
j
e
c
t
he
l
p
s
ow
n
e
r
s
an
d
th
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
by
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
de
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
• Pr
o
g
r
a
m
he
l
p
s
ow
n
e
r
s
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
is
s
u
e
s
th
a
t
th
e
y
ma
y
no
t
be
aw
a
r
e
of
an
d
ad
d
r
e
s
s
th
e
m
.
• He
l
p
s
pe
o
p
l
e
st
a
y
in
th
e
i
r
ho
m
e
s
.
• Wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
to
se
e
mo
r
e
re
h
a
b
ac
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
e
d
wi
t
h
th
i
s
bu
d
g
e
t
—
a
c
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
se
e
m
s
lo
w
.
•
Is
th
e
r
e
a current housing
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
study (the one cited is
fr
o
m
20
0
0
)
•
To
wh
a
t
extent has INHS
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
allowing homeowner
re
h
a
b
units be voluntarily entered
in
t
o
th
e
housing trust program?
Mi
n
i
‐Re
p
a
i
r
• Ke
e
p
s
pe
o
p
l
e
in
th
e
i
r
ho
m
e
s
• On
l
y
el
i
g
i
b
l
e
as
a CD
B
G
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
•
Wh
o
is
the individual running this
pr
o
g
r
a
m
?
•
Wh
y
wa
s
a resume of the
ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
not submitted?
•
Ar
e
th
e
r
e
still referrals being
ma
d
e
fo
r
high water bills? If so,
wh
a
t
is
the result?
We
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
• Su
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
id
e
a
of
we
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
i
n
g
re
n
t
a
l
un
i
t
s
.
• Is
th
i
s
HO
M
E
el
i
g
i
b
l
e
?
Ne
e
d
to
cl
a
r
i
f
y
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
pe
r
i
o
d
,
ta
r
g
e
t
i
n
g
so
th
a
t
be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
r
i
e
s
ar
e
10
0
%
lo
w
in
c
o
m
e
,
as
s
u
r
e
th
a
t
re
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
co
n
f
o
r
m
to
HO
M
E
re
g
s
.
• Co
n
c
e
r
n
th
a
t
la
n
d
l
o
r
d
s
wi
l
l
no
t
be
en
t
i
c
e
d
to
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
.
Th
e
r
e
is
no
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
fo
r
la
n
d
l
o
r
d
s
to
we
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
e
.
• Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
a la
r
g
e
in
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
be
i
n
g
ma
d
e
to
re
n
t
a
l
un
i
t
s
wi
t
h
no
mo
n
e
y
be
i
n
g
pu
t
in
fr
o
m
th
e
la
n
d
l
o
r
d
(c
o
u
l
d
be
up
to
$7
5
K
in
a
3‐un
i
t
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
)
• Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
th
e
nu
m
b
e
r
s
ci
t
e
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
ar
e
no
t
th
a
t
so
l
i
d
.
• On
l
y
9 be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
r
i
e
s
.
Me
m
b
e
r
s
wo
u
l
d
ra
t
h
e
r
se
e
a fo
c
u
s
pl
a
c
e
d
on
sm
a
l
l
e
r
ef
f
o
r
t
s
wh
i
c
h
co
u
l
d
pr
o
d
u
c
e
a la
r
g
e
be
n
e
f
i
t
fo
r
th
e
te
n
a
n
t
.
Co
s
t
/
u
n
i
t
is
hi
g
h
.
• Th
i
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
is
al
r
e
a
d
y
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to
la
n
d
l
o
r
d
s
an
d
th
e
y
pe
r
h
a
p
s
sh
o
u
l
d
be
pa
y
i
n
g
a po
r
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
ex
p
e
n
s
e
(i
n
s
t
e
a
d
of
ha
v
i
n
g
th
i
s
po
r
t
i
o
n
su
b
s
i
d
i
z
e
d
vi
a
CD
B
G
)
.
•
Is
th
i
s
project scalable?
•
Is
th
e
r
e
any evidence that
la
n
d
l
o
r
d
s
would participate?
•
Ar
e
n
’
t
there other models where
so
m
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
can be made
to
a pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
without spending so
mu
c
h
per unit? One member
re
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
an EOC program that
wa
s
li
k
e
this.
•
Is
th
e
r
e
still other weatherization
mo
n
e
y
flowing into the
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
from other sources?
2‐1‐1 To
m
p
k
i
n
s
• Su
p
p
o
r
t
s
th
e
wa
y
s
in
wh
i
c
h
2‐1‐1 ha
s
be
c
o
m
e
mo
r
e
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
in
t
o
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
in
wa
y
s
su
c
h
as
sc
h
e
d
u
l
i
n
g
VI
T
A
ta
x
pr
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
ap
p
o
i
n
t
m
e
n
t
s
,
et
c
.
• Ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
of
me
m
b
e
r
s
us
i
n
g
th
e
se
r
v
i
c
e
is
th
a
t
th
e
op
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
ar
e
ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
at
wh
a
t
th
e
y
do
.
• Lo
w
co
s
t
fo
r
a gr
e
a
t
im
p
a
c
t
.
• Su
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
pr
o
g
r
a
m
in
co
n
c
e
p
t
bu
t
so
m
e
me
m
b
e
r
s
ob
j
e
c
t
to
fu
n
d
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
on
a
co
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
ba
s
i
s
.
Ot
h
e
r
s
se
e
it
as
a li
n
k
a
g
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
be
n
e
f
i
t
i
n
g
ma
n
y
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
me
m
b
e
r
s
an
d
se
r
v
i
n
g
ma
n
y
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
•
Wh
a
t
is
the strength of the other
fu
n
d
i
n
g
in this project?
•
Is
th
i
s
sc
a
l
a
b
l
e
?
Se
c
u
r
i
t
y
De
p
o
s
i
t
s
an
d
Pr
o
m
o
t
i
n
g
Ch
a
n
g
e
(r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
to
g
e
t
h
e
r
be
c
a
u
s
e
of
th
e
st
r
o
n
g
re
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
be
t
w
e
e
n
th
e
tw
o
)
• Hi
g
h
im
p
a
c
t
fo
r
th
e
co
s
t
• An
o
t
h
e
r
li
n
k
a
g
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
pe
o
p
l
e
to
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
• Gr
e
a
t
ex
a
m
p
l
e
of
th
e
us
e
f
u
l
n
e
s
s
of
fe
e
d
b
a
c
k
to
se
r
v
i
c
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
.
Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
• On
c
e
th
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
ha
s
th
e
se
c
u
r
i
t
y
de
p
o
s
i
t
it
se
e
m
s
li
k
e
th
e
r
e
is
li
t
t
l
e
mo
t
i
v
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
th
e
m
to
co
m
e
ba
c
k
fo
r
fu
r
t
h
e
r
in
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
/
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
• Ne
e
d
to
cl
a
r
i
f
y
th
e
nu
m
b
e
r
of
ho
u
r
s
an
d
th
e
jo
b
of
th
e
le
a
d
pe
r
s
o
n
in
th
i
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
.
•
Wh
a
t
is
the sustainability of the
pr
o
g
r
a
m
w/o CDBG funds?
•
Wh
o
wi
l
l
be the lead staff person
fo
r
th
i
s
?
If someone has been
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
,
submit a resume.
th
e
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
of
th
e
Ag
e
n
c
y
ha
v
e
be
e
n
he
a
r
d
an
d
ar
e
be
i
n
g
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
.
• Ap
p
r
e
c
i
a
t
e
th
e
fo
c
u
s
on
ta
c
k
l
i
n
g
so
m
e
of
th
e
ca
u
s
e
s
of
cr
i
s
i
s
an
d
no
t
on
l
y
ad
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
th
e
im
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
ne
e
d
.
Se
e
m
s
un
c
l
e
a
r
wh
e
t
h
e
r
th
e
y
ar
e
FT
or
PT
.
• Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
an
ov
e
r
l
y
am
b
i
t
i
o
u
s
nu
m
b
e
r
of
be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
r
i
e
s
in
th
i
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
.
Cl
a
r
i
f
y
ho
w
th
a
t
nu
m
b
e
r
wa
s
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
.
• Me
a
s
u
r
e
s
of
su
c
c
e
s
s
ar
e
no
t
cl
e
a
r
.
•
Ha
v
e
th
e
y
considered the
ne
c
e
s
s
i
t
y
of budgeting training?
•
Ho
w
ha
v
e
they assured
th
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
that the program
ma
n
a
g
e
r
has the capability to
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
the program
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
l
y
?
•
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
some sense of the
pr
o
g
r
a
m
implementation plan—
ho
w
di
d
they arrive at the
nu
m
b
e
r
of beneficiaries and
nu
m
b
e
r
of contact hours, etc.
Ac
a
d
e
m
i
c
Pl
u
s
• Ne
e
d
an
d
ab
i
l
i
t
y
to
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
pr
o
g
r
a
m
we
l
l
de
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
• Be
n
e
f
i
t
to
th
e
en
t
i
r
e
fa
m
i
l
y
,
no
t
ju
s
t
th
e
st
u
d
e
n
t
• Sh
o
u
l
d
th
e
sc
h
o
o
l
or
ot
h
e
r
so
u
r
c
e
s
be
pa
y
i
n
g
fo
r
th
i
s
?
•
Wh
a
t
other funders have been
ap
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
d
about this program’s
ne
e
d
s
?
Im
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
• Pl
e
a
s
e
d
to
se
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
in
ou
t
s
i
d
e
fu
n
d
i
n
g
• No
on
e
el
s
e
do
e
s
th
i
s
or
do
e
s
it
we
l
l
.
Th
i
s
is
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
fo
r
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
• Sh
o
u
l
d
re
w
a
r
d
th
e
i
r
su
c
c
e
s
s
in
fi
n
d
i
n
g
ou
t
s
i
d
e
so
u
r
c
e
s
of
fu
n
d
s
• Pr
o
g
r
a
m
fi
l
l
s
ga
p
s
,
wo
r
k
s
an
d
ha
s
a go
o
d
tr
a
c
k
re
c
o
r
d
• Hi
g
h
im
p
a
c
t
.
An
o
t
h
e
r
li
n
k
a
g
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
•
Ha
s
Co
r
n
e
l
l
been approached
ab
o
u
t
fu
n
d
i
n
g
for this project?
•
Is
th
e
r
e
income being realized
th
r
o
u
g
h
the immigration services
th
a
t
ca
n
now be offered?
Ch
i
l
d
Ca
r
e
Sc
h
o
l
a
r
s
h
i
p
s
• Th
e
co
n
c
e
p
t
is
go
o
d
an
d
we
l
l
un
d
e
r
s
t
o
o
d
• Is
th
e
r
e
a do
c
u
m
e
n
t
e
d
ne
e
d
in
th
e
Ci
t
y
?
Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
th
e
r
e
is
bu
t
th
e
20
1
0
mo
n
e
y
ha
s
be
e
n
sl
o
w
to
be
ut
i
l
i
z
e
d
.
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Na
v
i
g
a
t
o
r
• Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
wa
s
ha
r
d
to
un
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
wi
t
h
th
e
ja
r
g
o
n
an
d
ac
r
o
n
y
m
s
• Un
s
u
r
e
wh
y
Un
i
t
e
d
Wa
y
ne
e
d
s
to
be
c
o
m
e
a
se
r
v
i
c
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
.
• Se
e
m
s
li
k
e
a du
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
be
i
n
g
pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
by
ot
h
e
r
s
.
• Lo
w
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
,
lo
w
im
p
a
c
t
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
Ra
m
p
Lo
a
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
• Pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
sc
a
l
a
b
l
e
• Ra
m
p
s
ar
e
ex
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
co
m
p
a
r
e
d
to
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
a wo
o
d
e
n
on
e
.
•
Wh
o
el
s
e
funds these ramps?
• Go
o
d
pr
o
g
r
a
m
.
Ra
m
p
s
ar
e
re
u
s
a
b
l
e
an
d
co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
to
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
lo
n
g
af
t
e
r
th
e
y
ar
e
pa
i
d
fo
r
.
• Pr
o
g
r
a
m
is
ho
u
s
e
‐fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
,
me
a
n
i
n
g
th
a
t
th
e
in
t
e
g
r
i
t
y
of
a ho
u
s
e
is
no
t
im
p
a
c
t
e
d
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
ne
e
d
to
bu
i
l
d
a pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
ra
m
p
.
•
Co
u
l
d
th
e
r
e
be spill‐over ramps if
th
e
r
e
were a program where
ra
m
p
s
were constructed, similar
to
a jo
b
‐training or apprenticeship
pr
o
g
r
a
m
?
Pa
r
k
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
• Sm
a
l
l
co
s
t
an
d
hi
g
h
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
• St
r
o
n
g
re
c
o
r
d
of
ac
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
• Me
e
t
s
ne
e
d
• De
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
by
DP
W
an
d
Pa
r
k
s
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
•
Co
n
c
e
r
n
s
about why some other
ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
s
have been denied
pl
a
n
t
i
n
g
edibles in the parks
(T
h
o
m
a
s
reports that Gardens for
Hu
m
a
n
i
t
y
was denied permission
to
pl
a
n
t
edibles in come City
pa
r
k
s
.
)
Au
r
o
r
a
St
.
Po
c
k
e
t
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
wa
s
br
i
e
f
l
y
di
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
.
Wi
t
h
o
u
t
ba
n
k
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
no
t
fe
a
s
i
b
l
e
.
Th
e
committee agreed to look at
it
in
mo
r
e
de
t
a
i
l
if
th
e
ba
n
k
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
wa
s
fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
.
In
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
tw
o
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
we
r
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
to
be
in
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
by
th
e
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
Th
e
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Co
‐Ho
u
s
i
n
g
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
proposed new
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
ou
t
s
i
d
e
th
e
Ci
t
y
li
m
i
t
s
.
Ki
t
t
e
l
re
p
o
r
t
e
d
th
a
t
ne
w
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
on
l
y
el
i
g
i
b
l
e
for CDBG funding if the
or
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
un
d
e
r
t
a
k
i
n
g
th
e
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
as
a Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ba
s
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Or
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
wh
i
c
h
this group is not. Also,
HO
M
E
fu
n
d
s
us
e
d
fo
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
mu
s
t
be
ap
p
l
i
e
d
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
Ci
t
y
li
m
i
t
s
.
b)
Ot
h
e
r
No
n
e
.
V.
Re
p
o
r
t
s
a)
IN
H
S
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
as
a Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Or
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
re
p
o
r
t
e
d
th
a
t
IN
H
S
su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
th
e
i
r
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
fo
r
IU
R
A
re
v
i
e
w
,
re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
th
a
t
th
e
y
be
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
as
a CH
D
O
.
The governance
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
th
i
s
pa
p
e
r
w
o
r
k
an
d
se
n
t
it
on
to
th
e
IU
R
A
,
wh
e
r
e
th
e
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
wa
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
.
Wh
i
l
e
th
i
s
would normally be the work of
th
e
NI
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
,
th
e
ti
m
i
n
g
ma
d
e
it
mo
r
e
co
n
d
u
c
i
v
e
fo
r
th
e
go
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
to
lo
o
k
at
th
e
is
s
u
e
an
d
al
l
o
w
e
d
INHS to be properly
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
be
f
o
r
e
th
e
be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
of
th
e
gr
a
n
t
re
v
i
e
w
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
b)
IU
R
A
co
m
m
e
n
t
s
on
th
e
Ci
t
y
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
(s
e
e
th
e
in
t
e
r
i
m
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
re
l
a
t
e
d
to
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
at
ht
t
p
:
/
/
w
w
w
.
c
i
.
i
t
h
a
c
a
.
n
y
.
u
s
/
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
ts
/
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
/
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
/
c
o
m
p
p
l
a
n
.
c
f
m
)
Th
e
le
t
t
e
r
se
n
t
fr
o
m
th
e
IU
R
A
to
th
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
wa
s
di
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
.
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
ex
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
in
being sure that the impacts
of
an
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
be
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
Co
r
n
i
s
h
re
s
p
o
n
d
e
d
th
a
t
sh
e
wo
u
l
d
fo
r
w
a
r
d
th
a
t
co
m
m
e
n
t
an
d
th
a
t
th
e
gr
o
u
p
was already looking at similar
no
i
s
e
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
fr
o
m
ot
h
e
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Sh
e
al
s
o
re
p
o
r
t
e
d
th
a
t
th
e
ne
x
t
st
e
p
in
th
e
pr
o
c
e
s
s
wa
s
th
e
is
s
u
a
n
c
e
of
a summary of comments
he
a
r
d
an
d
a re
v
i
e
w
to
be
su
r
e
th
a
t
th
e
su
m
m
a
r
y
pr
o
p
e
r
l
y
re
f
l
e
c
t
s
th
e
in
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
of
th
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Sh
e
al
s
o
no
t
e
d
that public comments would
be
ac
c
e
p
t
e
d
fo
r
th
e
fu
l
l
du
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
c)
Ot
h
e
r
No
n
e
.
VI
I
.
Mo
t
i
o
n
to
Ad
j
o
u
r
n
On
a mo
t
i
o
n
by
Fa
r
r
e
l
l
an
d
se
c
o
n
d
by
Ha
l
p
e
r
t
,
th
e
me
e
t
i
n
g
ad
j
o
u
r
n
e
d
at
1
1
:
1
0
a.
m
.