HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-PLED-2014-04-09Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
City of Ithaca
Planning & Economic Development Committee
Wednesday, April 9, 2014 – 6:00 p.m.
Common Council Chambers, City Hall, 108 East Green Street
Minutes
Committee Members Attending: Joseph (Seph) Murtagh, Chair; Graham Kerslick, Cynthia
Brock, and Josephine Martell
Committee Members Absent: Mayor Svante Myrick
Other Elected Officials Attending: Alderpersons Fleming and Smith
Staff Attending: JoAnn Cornish, Director, Department of Planning, Building,
and Development; Phyllis Radke, Director of Zoning
Administration; Nels Bohn, Director, Ithaca Urban Renewal
Agency (IURA); and Debbie Grunder, Executive Assistant,
Department of Planning and Development
Others Attending: C.J. Randall and Nick Goldsmith
Chair Seph Murtagh called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order/Agenda Review
Item #6d will not be discussed tonight. It will be discussed at the May 14, 2014 meeting.
2. Special Order of Business
a) Public Hearing – Elimination of Transition Regulations
Alderperson McCollister moved to open the public hearing; seconded by Alderperson Kerslick.
Motion passed unanimously.
There was no one from the public to speak on this topic.
Alderperson McCollister moved to close the public hearing; seconded by Alderperson Kerslick.
Motion passed unanimously.
b) Special Presentation – Unified Solar Ordinance
C.J. Randall, Planning and Development Board Member, and Nick Goldsmith, Energy
Sustainability Coordinator brought this forward. They distributed and reviewed the NYSERDA
Unified Solar Permit Application process and the benefits of such a program. Although this is
a good program, it won’t be needed as the City already has a similar and much simpler
process spelled out in its own City Code.
3. Public Comment and Response from Committee Members
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
Bill Demo, 121 Heights Court, spoke regarding Cornell Heights and quoted the City Code
regarding historic districts. He spoke in opposition of the Cornell Heights Rezoning Proposal.
In addition, he provided a hard copy of his comments which have been added into record and
provided along with these minutes. He is against the application for high- density student
housing on Highland and Ridgewood Road. He suggests a moratorium on such developments
in historic districts. If these are permanent residents instead of student housing he wouldn’t be
here tonight.
Sarah Demo, 121 Heights Court, is opposed to the new student housing development being
proposed for the Cornell Heights area. Nearly four years ago they moved to the historic district.
She stated that living in an historic district, certain changes to the property have to be
approved by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission. A future sale of their property
will be a lot less if the two student housing projects are approved and developed. She strongly
urges the City to put a moratorium in place on any further student housing projects in historic
districts. She also provided a hard copy of her comments which are provided along with these
minutes.
Walter Hang, 218 Wait Avenue, spoke against any Cornell Heights redevelopment. He
provided a very detailed analysis and maps with a total of 979 signatures supporting his
statement. His detailed analysis is provided with these minutes.
Alex Susskind, 102 Triphammer Road, spoke against the Cornell Heights development. He
echoes the previous speakers who spoke before him. He and his wife bought a house in this
historic district and totally renovated it. It was used as tenant housing for ten years and fell to ill
repair.
Kim Weedon, 202 Fall Creek Drive, spoke against the Ridgewood Road project. There is a
huge traffic and parking issue already. It is the fastest way for the police and fire to get to
Cornell Heights. The increase in the substantial amount of individuals needs to be
reassessed. Beautiful historic homes have been forced to turn to tenant housing.
Keily Sturman, 110 Westbourne Lane, spoke against any Cornell Heights Zoning and
Development changes to the Cornell Heights area. There is no comprehensive plan.
Development should not be allowed without a solid comprehensive plan.
Norman Turkolt, 302 Fall Creek Drive, reiterated previous speakers. The City is reverting to
years ago practices. This area is not the area for students. There’s no grocery store. No
parking. No restaurants. The City must consider why this neighborhood was made into an
historic district before changing it.
Mike Decatur, 125 Heights Court, also agrees with the others who have spoke on the Cornell
Heights area development. The current problems have been generated over time. The beauty
of the neighborhood should be considered and restored. He asked what the City is thinking of
doing. A moratorium is needed. We need to set up a dialogue. We need to be able to pause
and reevaluate this area.
Max Weisbrod, 207 Fall Creek Drive, a Cornell student who rides the TCAT bus. He reaffirms
that this area is not a student-housing location. It should remain a residential historical area.
Chair Murtagh stated that the committee doesn’t generally engage in back and forth dialogue
during these meetings, but we are more than willing to meet the residents of this area at a later
date to discuss their concerns.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
Alderperson McCollister stated she has lived for 30 years in the Bryant Park Area that butts up
to Collegetown. She is very familiar with the neighborhood concerns voiced here tonight. She
further stated she will need time to review Walter Hang’s statement.
Alderperson Kerslick commented representing Collegetown and living in Collegetown I know
some of the challenges particularly with blocked driveways and having to fault people. He
responded to Kelly Sturman’s comment stating that he doesn’t know where you got the phrase
“blow back” because I certainly don’t feel that my colleagues on the committee nor myself
respond to “blow back” very well. We are aware of the legitimate concerns of the
neighborhood and as Ellen mentioned, we would have to look through in much more detail to
try to find some kind of better pause in terms of this area. There are definitely inconsistencies
between historic districts and zoning. We have addressed those in other areas of the City. As
Ellen mentioned, she and I were on the Collegetown Working Group. It took a very long time
to come up with a plan that hopefully will address some of the issues in that neighborhood.
Hopefully we will see some good development there as a result of that.
Alderperson Brock asked if our discussion to take place on Cornell Heights be moved up on
the agenda since many of the people in the audience are here for the discussion in regard to
this area. The Committee agreed to this.
Chair Murtagh explained to the group that our thinking is of the changes in zoning. We had
heard the concerns of the neighborhood so it was looked at further. One proposal was to
decrease the height in this area RU zoning four stories to three stories. That would provide a
little bit more protection in that neighborhood. There was a consensus of the committee for
that. He further stated that tonight he was going to propose 1) do we want to move forward
with that making those amendments to the RU zoning, and 2) there’s the question of the
moratorium which has come up. He agrees with both Alderpersons McCollister and Kerslick
that we need to look at that and study it further. He proposed that the committee visit the
Cornell Heights neighborhood and do a site visit tour.
4. Announcements, Updates, and Reports
A public meeting will be held on April 10, 2014 at Cinemapolis regarding the Chain Works
Project (formerly the Emerson site).
Noise Ordinance – the Consultant has provided a working draft which is being reviewed by
relevant City staff and brought back to this committee in May 2014 for approval to circulate.
5. Action Items – Voting to Send on to Council
a) Elimination of Transition Regulations
An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of the City Of Ithaca, Chapter 325, Entitled
“Zoning” To Remove §325-19A Transition Regulations, Lots in Two Districts
– Declaration of Lead Agency for Environmental Review
Moved by Alderperson Brock; seconded by Alderperson McCollister. Passed unanimously.
WHEREAS, State Law and Section 176-6 of the City Code require that a lead agency be
established for conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and state
environmental law, and
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
WHEREAS, State Law specifies that, for actions governed by local environmental review, the lead
agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or
carrying out the action, and
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning amendment is an “Unlisted” Action pursuant to the City
Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Ordinance, which requires environmental review under
CEQR; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Common Council of the City of Ithaca does hereby declare itself lead agency
for the environmental review of the adoption of an ordinance to amend the Municipal Code of the
City of Ithaca, Chapter 325, Entitled “Zoning” to remove §325-19A Transition Regulations, Lots in
Two Districts.
An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Ithaca, Chapter 325, Entitled
“Zoning” to Remove §325-19A Transition Regulations, Lots in Two Districts
– Determination of Environmental Significance
Moved by Alderperson Brock; seconded by Alderperson McCollister. Passed unanimously.
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is considering an amendment to Chapter 325 of the Municipal Code
in order to remove §325-19A, Transition Regulations, Lots in Two Districts, and
WHEREAS, appropriate environmental review has been conducted including the preparation of a
Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), dated February 24, 2014, and
WHEREAS, the zoning amendment has been reviewed by the Tompkins County Planning
Department Pursuant to §239-l–m of the New York State General Municipal Law, which requires
that all actions within 500 feet of a county or state facility, including county and state highways, be
reviewed by the County Planning Department, and has also been reviewed by the City of Ithaca
Conservation Advisory Council and the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is an “Unlisted” Action under the City Environmental Quality
Review Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca, acting as lead agency, has reviewed the
SEAF prepared by planning staff; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby adopts as its own the
findings and conclusions more fully set forth in the Short Environmental Assessment Form, dated
February 24, 2014, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this Common Council, as lead agency in this matter, hereby determines that the
proposed action at issue will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that further
environmental review is unnecessary, and be it further
RESOLVED, that this resolution constitutes notice of this negative declaration and that the City
Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of the same, together with any attachments, in the City Clerk’s
Office, and forward the same to any other parties as required by law.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
Moved by Alderperson Kerslick; seconded by Alderperson McCollister. Passed
Unanimously.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
b) Ordinance Regarding the Termination of Covenants Applicable to 222 South Cayuga
Street
ORDINANCE __-2014
An Ordinance Regarding the Termination of Covenants Applicable to 222 S. Cayuga St
Moved by Alderperson Kerslick; seconded by Alderperson McCollister. Passed unanimously.
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1983, Common Council passed an Ordinance modifying the zoning district applicable
to the property commonly known as 222 South Cayuga St. (the “Property”), on which a Holiday Inn Hotel is
presently located; and
WHEREAS, the re-zoning of the Property was contingent on the then-owners entering into a Declaration of
Covenants (the “Declaration”) that restricted development on terms agreeable to the City, and such
Declaration was recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk’s Office in Liber 595 of Deeds at Page 348;
WHEREAS, a potential lender to the present owner of the Property, Lenroc, L.P. (“Lenroc”), requested that
Lenroc review the restrictions and covenants as contained in the Declaration to determine whether the same
are applicable in light of the passage of time and changed circumstances, in an effort to streamline and
simplify the title to the Property; and
WHEREAS, City staff and Lenroc agree that the restrictions and covenants contained in the Declaration are
no longer applicable or the requirements imposed therein are imposed by other codes and ordinances to
which the Property is subject; in particular, the requirements dealing with the size and dimensions for any
construction and procedures to follow for obtaining requisite municipal consent for any construction which
may have been initially satisfied are now outdated and imposed by other applicable city codes and
ordinances; and provisions for the rental of parking spaces in an adjacent municipal parking lot are no longer
applicable in that the surface lot has been replaced by a parking ramp to which patrons of the hotel have had
access; and
WHEREAS, the City will not incur any costs in terminating the restrictions contained in the Declaration; now
therefore
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1. Findings of Fact. The Common Council finds that the restrictions contained in the Declaration are
either no longer applicable or are imposed on the Property by other codes and/or ordinances, and the City’s
interests thus no longer require the application of the restrictions in the Declaration to the Property.
Section 2. Authorization for Mayor to Sign. The Common Council hereby authorizes the Mayor, upon the
advice of the City Attorney, to execute all documents necessary to terminate the restrictions contained in the
Declaration.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately.
6. Actions Items – Approval to Circulate
a) Establishment of New Waterfront District
Chair Murtagh stated that this has been discussed before. The Committee discussed the
proposal to expand the waterfront zoning districts around the time that the Community
Gardens lease was discussed. The purpose of this rezoning would be to encourage
denser mixed use development along the waterfront and extending out to Route 13. This
land is currently zoned industrial. Given the limited areas in the City that allow industrial
uses, it is important to retain areas where some industrial uses that do not heavily impact
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
surrounding areas are possible. This would extend the waterfront zone by creating a new
WF-3 zone. This zone would have all of the same area restrictions as the WF-2 zone.
However, it would also allow for light industrial uses. Light industrial is not currently a defined use
in our code. The draft ordinance contains a definition for light industrial listed that would
require all of the processing, fabricating, or assembly to take place within an enclosed
building, and would also restrict any external effects of the manufacturing process from
impacting surrounding properties.
The committee could not reach consensus on this proposal, and so it was not circulated for
review. Some committee members wished to preserve space for industrial uses, and there
was concern about quality of life impacts should residential housing be built in these areas.
Planning Director JoAnn Cornish said staff would continue to think of ideas for this part of
the City.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ITHACA,
CHAPTER 325, ENTITLED “ZONING” TO AMEND THE WATERFRONT ZONING
DISTRICT.
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of
Ithaca that Chapter 325, be amended as follows:
Section 1. Declaration of Legislative Findings and Purpose
The Common Council would like to establish a third waterfront
district (WF-3) that will have all of the space requirements
associated with the WF-2 district, however, will allow for a greater
mix of primary uses. Specifically, the WF-3 is expected to do the
following:
1. Expand the waterfront district and encourage dense mixed-use multi-
story development along the waterfront area.
2. Encourage development that incorporates a variety of uses,
including light industrial uses that do not have large
environmental impacts on surrounding commercial or residential
uses.
Section 2. Chapter 325, Section 325-3, entitled Definitions and Word
Usage”, is hereby amended to add the following definition of Light
Industrial Use::
Light Industrial Use - Light industrial uses are defined as having all
processing, fabricating, assembly, or disassembly of items taking place
wholly within an enclosed building. Industries locating in this district
are characterized as being lower in intensity, cleaner, and generally more
compatible when located adjacent to commercial areas than are heavy
manufacturing uses. Light industrial uses will comply with provisions set
forth in section 325-23 of this code, General Standards Applying to all
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
Land Uses, and will not generate unreasonable noise, as defined by section
240-4, Unreasonable Noise Prohibited, or excessive levels of particulate
matter, vibration, smoke, dust, gas, fumes, odors, radiation and other
nuisance characteristics and should be capable of operation in such a
manner as to control the external effects of the manufacturing process.
Typical items for processing, fabricating, assembly, or disassembly under
this use include but are not limited to apparel, food, drapes, clothing
accessories, bedspreads, decorations, artificial plants, jewelry,
instruments, computers, and electronic devices.
Section 3. Chapter 325, Section 325-4 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Ithaca, entitled Establishment of Districts, is hereby amended to add
the WF-2 and the WF-3 districts. In addition corrections have been made
in order to accurately list all of the existing zones in the City, in the
order that they appear on the Official City District Regulations Chart,
and should read as follows:
For the purposes specified in Article I of this chapter, the City
is hereby divided into the following districts:
R-1a Residential
R-1b Residential
R-2a Residential
R-2b Residential
R-2c Residential
R-3a Residential
R-3aa Residential
R-3b Residential
R-U Residential
B-1a Restricted Business
B-1b Restricted Business
B-2a General Business
B-2b General Business
B-2c General Business
B-2d General Business
B-4 Service Business
B-5 Service Business
CBD Central Business
CBD-50 Central Business
CBD-60 Central Business
CBD-85 Central Business
CBD-100 Central Business
CBD-120 Central Business
CBD-140 Central Business
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
C-SU Courthouse Special Use
I-1 Industrial
M-1 Marine Commercial
P-1 Public and Institutional
U-1 University
MH-1 Residential-Mobile Home
WEDZ-1a West End Development
WEDZ-1b West End Development
SW-1 Southwest
SW-2 Southwest
SW-3 Southwest
C-SU Courthouse Special Use
U-1
WF-1 Waterfront
WF-2 Waterfront
WF-3 Waterfront
WEDZ-1 West End Development
GPOZ Gorge Protection Overlay Zone
Historic Districts
CPOZ Collegetown Parking Overlay Zone
SW-1 Southwest
Adult Uses
Section 4. Chapter 325, Section 325-8 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Ithaca, entitled District Regulations, is amended to update the
District Regulations Chart and establish the WF-3 district as follows:
Permitted Primary Uses
1. Any use permitted in B-2 except establishments where food or beverages
are intended to be served or consumed by persons in automobiles.
2. Recreational or cultural facility such as a park, playground, art
museum, fishing pier or yacht club.
3. Public Recreation.
4. Boatel.
5. Sale, rental, repair or storage of marine related recreation equipment
such as boats, marine engines, sails, cabin equipment.
6. Light manufacture of marine recreation related products involving
substantial hand fabrication such as sails, boat hulls, cabin fittings.
By Special Permit of the Board of Appeals
7. Parking Lot
8. Parking Garage
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
9. Light Industrial Uses
Permitted Accessory Uses - Same as WF-2
Off-Street Parking Requirements – None
Off-Street Loading Requirements – None
Minimum Lot Size - Area in Square Feet – same as WF-2
Minimum lot width at street line – same as WF-2
Maximum Building Heights:
Maximum Percent Lot Coverage
Front Yard Setback
Side Yard Setbacks
Rear Yard Setbacks
Minimum Building Height
Section 5. Chapter 325, Section 325-9C.(4)(i) of the Municipal Code of
the City of Ithaca, is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Parking in the Waterfront Zone. Parking areas will be permitted as a
primary use in the Waterfront Zone WF-1, WF-2, and the WF-3 districts by
special permit and only if they are open to the public or if they are
intended to serve the needs of multiple businesses.”
Section 6. Chapter 325, Section 325-16E. of the Municipal Code of the
City of Ithaca, is hereby amended to add the WF-3 and to delete
subsections 325-16E. (2),(3)and(4), which refer to zones that no longer
exist and to renumber subsequent sections accordingly, and should read as
follows:
“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the WF-1,
WF-2, and the WF-3 Districts:
(1) All buildings erected in the WF-1, WF-2, and WF-3 zoning districts
shall have a maximum building height of 63 feet with a minimum of 12 feet
and a maximum of 15 for the first story measured from finished grade, and
a minimum of 10 feet and a maximum of 12 feet for each additional story
measured from floor to floor, with an additional five feet for cornice.
All new construction is subject to a mandatory design review process.
(Refer to Code of the City of Ithaca, Chapter 325, Zoning, § 325-3,
Definitions and word usage, Subsection B, definition of "height of
building.")
[Amended 11-7-2012 by Ord. No. 2012-15]
(2) No building shall be erected that is greater than one-story tall in
any of the areas designated "WF-1b" on the Official City of Ithaca Zoning
Map, a copy of which is on file in the Ithaca City Clerk's office.
(3) No building shall be erected that is less than two stories or greater
than three stories for at least 75% of the building area, in any of the
areas designated "WF-1c" on the Official City of Ithaca Zoning Map, a copy
of which is on file in the Ithaca City Clerk's office.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
(4) No building shall be erected that is less than three stories or
greater than five stories for at least 75% of the building area in any of
the areas designated "WF-1d" on the Official City of Ithaca Zoning Map, a
copy of which is on file in the Ithaca City Clerk's office.
(52) The restrictions contained in this section shall not apply to
buildings less than 15 feet (maximum) in height, which are intended,
designed and maintained as amenities for adjacent trails, such as gazebos
and restrooms.
(63) The restrictions contained in this section shall not apply to
existing buildings within the designated areas. Such existing buildings
may be maintained and repaired, provided their height and footprint are
not altered so as to make the buildings noncompliant with the restrictions
of this subsection.
Section 7. Chapter 325, Section 325-20 of the Municipal Code of the City
of Ithaca entitled “Off-Street Parking” is hereby amended to add the WF-3
District to Section 325-20D.(3)(a) to read as follows:
“(1) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, there
are no requirements as to the minimum number of off-street parking spaces
in the following zoning districts: WEDZ-1a, CBD-60, CBD-85, CBD-100, CBD-
120, B-1b, and B-2c, WF-1 ,WF-2, and WF-3.”
Section 8. The City Planning and Development Board, the City Clerk and the
Planning Department shall amend the zoning map and the district
regulations chart in accordance with the amendments made herewith.
Section 9. Effective date. This ordinance shall take affect immediately
and in accordance with law upon publication of notices as provided in the
Ithaca City Charter.
b) Accessory Parking
The committee heard from Director of Zoning Administration Phyllis Radke about a proposal to
amend the city’s regulations about parking as an accessory use. Radke explained that Planning
board members were concerned when they learned that our zoning ordinance allows a property
owner to develop a parcel of land solely for customer parking as an accessory use, when the
primary use is on another lot and in a different zone. Radke asked the committee’s permission to
work on some amendments to fix this problem, and the committee agreed that it was worthwhile
that she should do so.
c) City Prohibition on Outdoor Wood-Burning Furnaces
Moved by Alderperson Brock; seconded by Alderperson Martell; carried unanimously.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
An Ordinance to Amend The City of Ithaca Municipal Code Chapter 178 In Order to Impose a Total Ban of
Outdoor Wood-Burning Furnaces Within the City
WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that outdoor wood-burning furnaces can provide an alternative to conventional
heating systems, generating hot water heat through the use of onsite wood fires rather than coal or gas, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council also finds that smoke from these outdoor furnaces often contains unhealthy levels of
particulate matter, dioxins, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrochloric acid, formaldehyde, and
other toxic pollutants, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that exposure to smoke from these furnaces can cause adverse effects to
respiratory and cardiovascular systems and exacerbate existing asthmatic sensitivity and lung illness, especially among
children and the elderly, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council finds that outdoor furnaces are intended to burn only natural wood, but homeowners
sometimes add other materials, which when burned can produce toxic air pollutants, and
WHEREAS, the Common Council has determined that the most effective way to ensure the health, safety, and general
welfare of the citizens of the City in this instance is to prevent the construction and operation of outdoor wood-burning
furnaces, therefore
BE IT ORDAINED AND ENACTED by the Common Council as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 178-2, entitled “Definitions,” of the City of Ithaca Code, is hereby amended to include an additional
definition:
“Outdoor Wood-Burning Furnace: an exterior device or structure, designed or intended, through the burning of wood, for
the purpose of heating the principal structure, or any other structure on the premises.”
Section 2. Chapter 178-4, entitled “Standards for exterior structures,” of the City Code is hereby amended through the
addition of a new subsection E, to be read as follows:
“E. No outdoor wood-burning burning furnace be installed, constructed, maintained or operated on the exterior property
of premises within the City.”
Section 3. Severability. Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this ordinance. If any section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of
competent jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
Section 4. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately and in accordance with law upon publication of
notice as provided in the Ithaca City Charter.
Minutes Approved at
August 13, 2014 P&EDC Meeting
7. Review and Approval of Minutes
a) January 2014
With Alderperson Brock’s suggested revisions, Alderperson McCollister moved to approve
the minutes; seconded by Alderperson Brock. Passed unanimously.
8. Adjournment
Moved by Alderperson Martell; seconded by Chair Murtagh. The meeting was adjourned at
8:30 p.m.