HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAC Minutes - 06_09_20Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 1 of 6
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council (CAC)
Minutes of Video Conference (Zoom) Meeting on
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Danby, New York
Council Members present: Clare Fewtrell (chair), Joel Gagnon, Don
Schaufler, Ruth Sherman, Katharine Hunter, George Adams, Jonathan
Zisk, Mary Woodsen (attended last 40 minutes)
Council Members absent:
Others present: Jason Haremza (Town Planner), Ronda Roaring (Danby
resident and member of Planning Group), Bruce Richards (Planning
Board), Kevin Feeney (Conservation Working Group), Sarah Schnabel
(Town Board)
Zoom Meeting was called to order at 7:02
Deletions or Additions to Agenda
Fewtrell added back to the Agenda a report on articles for the Danby Area
News previously requested removed by Hunter.
Privilege of the Floor (PoF) - None
Approval of Minutes for May 12, 2020 was deferred until Gagnon had
an opportunity to review his report on CAC history given at that
meeting.
REPORTS AND UPDATES
1) Easement signs
There was general discussion of two easement sign options. Camille
Doucet) had designed a rural scene: one contained within a sugar
maple leaf (state tree) and one without a maple leaf. Discussion
followed of what sign should contain: what text, what colors, how big,
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 2 of 6
how legible and at what distance, the length of the URL or alias? We
want something eye-catching for advertising purposes, but not as
large as a historical marker. We are looking for minimal words. Text
was suggested from Sherman’s previous sign suggestion, displayed
in last meeting, especially, “Preserving Danby’s Rural Character.”
The final suggestion was for Doucet to take some of Sherman’s text
and her picture and play with the positioning. She would then send
this out by email for discussion at our next meeting.
2) CAC Column in the Danby Area News (DAN)
Fewtrell suggested an article be submitted every month. She had put
a brief summary about the CAC in the last newsletter. Hunter noted
the idea was to keep people excited and aware of the CAC. Gagnon
might “serialize” his history given in last meeting.
3) Logging Ordinance –Don Schaufler and George Adams
Schaufler reported that both Scott Davis and George Adams had
agreed to rejoin and finish up the work a logging ordinance committee
had started drafting last year, but had left stalled in the change
between Town Planners. They had not yet had their first meeting.
4) Report on Planning Group (PG) and its Working Groups – Joel
Gagnon – see minutes from these meetings on PG website
https://towndanby.digitaltowpath.org:10768/content/Boards/View/5
Tax Abatement Working Group –
The proposal for tax relief is discussed below.
Conservation Working Group -
Is going to divide the town into watersheds as an initial way to make
the project more manageable and more easily identify valuable
wetland areas. Haremza added that they were reviewing a set of
maps. He is coming up with a brief list of preliminary ways of
regulating water resources to use as a springboard for environmental
planning regulations.
Hamlet Working Group –
Had an interesting meeting discussing the core area of Danby on
Haremza’s map. Gagnon noted that a suitability map, which includes
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 3 of 6
the core area of Danby between the creek and a wetlands, showed
septic would be difficult there. This prompted the group to look at
adjoining areas. In addition, they felt the core area wasn’t large
enough. So they began extending the core area south to Michigan
Hollow Rd and Bald Hill Rd junctions with 96B and west to land
owned by Russ Nitchman (who is part of the Hamlet group and open
to development) and east to land owned by Olivia Vent (property
across the street from the town hall and adjoining the park) and north
to Rick Dobson’s land (near East Miller Rd).
Participants are supposed to bring pictures of Hamlets they liked to
the next meeting.
5) Easement – next steps
Fewtrell will do a draft of her initial description for her easement for
next meeting.
Also a potential easement person, Andi Gladstone is looking into a
Humane Society Easement (group also has an easement on Brown
Rd). Fewtrell will check in with her and see how it is going in a few
weeks.
6) Discussion of Proposed Tax Abatement Enabling Legislation
(see copy of it at
https://towndanby.digitaltowpath.org:10768/content/Generic/View/14:field=doc
uments;/content/Documents/File/935.pdf
PoF: Bruce Richards gave a report on his research into Bethlehem,
NY where tax abatement in exchange for conservation easements
have been in effect for several years
Secretary Keokosky has also sent research on Bethlehem via email
before the meeting.
The main discussion focused on the controversial 5-15 year tax
emption category:
• Fewtrell is strongly against it and thinks that it is a disincentive
to a longer easement.
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 4 of 6
• Fisk opined that tax relief should be tied to a serious
commitment to conservation.
• Hunter – even though she totally believes in habitat
preservation – likes the idea of public access and the 5-year
option to try it out.
• Gagnon believes that large landowners need tax relief – why tie
to conservation commitment to preserve open space? Fisk
noted that the view-shed costs should be shared since it is for
the common good. PoF:Keokosky(Sec.) suggested that views
be treated differently from other protected resources. Could
there be some sort of agreement across multiple properties with
related tax relief?
Consensus unanimous that 5-year category in proposal should be
eliminated since it could too easily be abused – even by developers
themselves, who might game the system.
It was agreed that a 30-year easement is useful for generational
objections, which is a common easement deterrent. Fewtrell
suggested that a 100-year easement might actually be better than an
easement in perpetuity - after a 100 years who knows what will be
happening in Danby.
Another objection was that the tax abatements listed were not
proportional to the length of easement and the 75-year easement has
only a 5% smaller tax exemption than a perpetual one.
Fewtrell, Hunter, and Fisk mentioned that the proposed 9% tax
reduction for public use of the property was also tricky to determine.
Gagnon argued that public access is valuable and can be done in a
variety of ways. The general sense was that it would be too
complicated to administer and it might be an impediment to getting
legislation passed (since it would be a variation on the DEC template
used by the 4 towns that succeeded in getting state enabling
legislation passed).
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 5 of 6
Fewtrell moved to support the “Proposed Text of Law to be
enacted by State Legislature and Town Board” submitted by the
Tax Abatement Working Group and approved by the Planning
Group, with the exception of the 5-15 year exemption category
(30% tax reduction) and the Special Condition exemption for
public recreational purposes (9% tax reduction)
Schaufler seconded
Vote was unanimous in favor
7) Management Plans for the Town-Owned Properties on Sylvan
Lane property and Deputron Hollow Rd.
Fewtrell and Roaring summarized their differences about what is a
management plan, what is a proposal, what are the problems.
Gagnon asked what are the management issues? Schaufler said
part of the problem is that information is missing, and he took
responsibility for not having the time to gather this background
information.
Fewtrell explained that she is just interested in seeing what we have
now put down on paper, with the issues to be resolved listed
separately so we have a working document with current information,
that allows us to look at the issues, prioritize them, and resolve them
in a more systematic way later, as necessary.
Fewtrell questioned whether it was worth putting the time into these
plans. Gagnon reminded the group that management plans were
part of the mandate in the original legislation creating the CAC so we
need to complete them. Schaufler noted that the additional issues
just needed to be identified, and then raised for the town board to
approve.
Fisk saw management plans as complex, but Haremza said they
could be as delimited as much as we chose to make them. The
Deputron Hollow Rd property need only be stated briefly as managed
passive open space. One recurring issue brought up by PoF:Roaring
was the cloud surrounding the title of the Deputron Hollow town-
owned land on the other side of the road. The Sylvan Lane property
management is more complicated. Going along with Schaufler’s
suggestion to take the discussion out of meeting, Fewtrell asked Zisk
and Schaufler to work on these management plans with Sherman’s
Town of Danby Conservation Advisory Council Minutes Page 6 of 6
help on Sylvan Lane and Adams’ help on Deputron Hollow. Zisk was
named convener.
Fewtrell set agenda items for next meeting
• Fewtrell bringing draft easement description of her land
• Reports from logging group and planning groups
• Gagnon suggested using the Natural Resources Inventory to
generate another list of landowners.
Two nature issues were reported by Fisk (a bear sighting on Durfee Hill Rd
and a bicyclist who collided with a deer and had to be removed by
ambulance). He encouraged everyone to pass on the bear information and
warn people with bird feeders.
There was no Executive session
Next Meeting through Zoom is on July 14 at 7p.m.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
_____________________________________________
Submitted by Elizabeth Keokosky (Secretary)