Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCB Packet 2024-03-07 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tioga St 14850 607.273.1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us TO: CONSERVATION BOARD MEMBERS FROM: MICHAEL SMITH, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 29, 2024 SUBJECT: UPCOMING CONSERVATION BOARD MEETING – MARCH 7, 2024 This is to confirm that the next meeting of the Conservation Board (CB) is Thursday, March 7th at 5:30 p.m. The agenda for this meeting is enclosed (see the back of this memo). The draft minutes from the January 4th and February 1st meetings are attached. Please email me any spelling, grammatical, or other minor edits you have prior to the meeting. At this meeting we will have Katie Borgella (Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability) and Andy Zepp (Finger Lakes Land Trust) join us to discuss the upcoming NYS Open Space Conservation Plan update (https://dec.ny.gov/nature/open- space). The CB will also need to review the nominations received for the 2023 Richard B. Fischer Environmental Conservation Award and select a winner. The nomination material for the three nominations are attached. For those not familiar with the award, additional information about the award, criteria, and previous winners can be found on the Towns website at: http://www.town.ithaca.ny.us/richard-fischer-award. We will also continue the conversation regarding the CB assisting with deer browse monitoring (https://aviddeer.com/) as part of the Town’s Deer Management Program and the conversation on indigenous environmental justice with Mike R. Eva is signed up to take minutes at the March meeting. If you have any questions prior to the meeting or are not able to attend, please contact me at msmith@town.ithaca.ny.us or 607-273-1747. Conservation Board Members and Associates (*) Lori Brewer (Chair), Frank Cantone (Vice-Chair), Lindsay Dombroskie*, James Hamilton, Eva Hoffmann, Michael Roberts, Ingrid Zabel ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ TOWN OF ITHACA CONSERVATION BOARD 5:30 p.m., Thursday, March 7, 2024 ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ Aurora Conference Room 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 (The rear entrance is handicapped accessible) (607) 273-1747 Members of the public are welcome to attend in-person at Town Hall or virtually via Zoom (https://zoom.us/j/6750593272). AGENDA 1. Discussion of upcoming NYS Open Space Conservation Plan Update (5:30 pm) - Katie Borgella, Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability - Andy Zepp, Finger Lakes Land Trust 2. Persons to be heard 3. Members comments / concerns 4. Environmental Review Committee Update (Lori) 5. Chair and Coordinator reports 6. Approval of minutes from January 4, 2024 and February 1, 2024 7. Discussion of the 2023 Richard B. Fischer Environmental Conservation Award nominations and selection of a winner 8. Town’s Deer Management Program – continue browse monitoring discussion 9. Continue discussion of Indigenous Environmental Justice (Mike) 10. Regular reports and updates (6:30 pm) a. Scenic Resources Committee (Eva) b. Communications Committee (James) c. Tompkins County EMC (Ingrid) d. Six Mile Creek Volunteer Monitoring Program (James) e. Cornell Botanic Gardens Natural Areas Program (James) 11. Other Business (6:50 p.m.) 12. Review 2024 Work Goals / Discuss March Agenda 13. Adjourn (7:00 p.m.) 1 Town of Ithaca Conservation Board (CB) Meeting January 4, 2024, 5:30pm (In Person at Town Hall and via Zoom Video Conference) Draft Minutes Members present: Lori Brewer (Chair), Frank Cantone (Vice-Chair), James Hamilton, Ingrid Zabel. Quorum was not established. Staff present: Michael Smith (Senior Planner) 1. Persons to be heard: None 2. Members comments/concerns: None 3. Environmental Review Committee Update: (Lori) • Sub-division of 160 Seven Mile Drive. The owner wishes to divide their 52-acre parcel into three parcels. The existing parcel contains some regulated streams. Proposals include the construction of permanent residences, connected to municipal water, sewer, and electric, logging, and the building of stream crossings. This project is tentatively scheduled for the 6 February Planning Board meeting. • Cornell Meinig Fieldhouse, Indoor Sports and Recreation Facility, proposal. The project would be located off Tower Road, with the majority of the project within the City of Ithaca, as well as a portion within the Town. The City will take the lead on the environmental review, whereas each municipality will conduct their own building review. The project is tentatively scheduled for the 16 January Planning Board meeting. 4. Chair & Coordinator Reports: a. Chair Report: (Lori) contacted Katie Borgella of Tompkins County Planning and Sustainability Department to come to our 7 March meeting to discuss the NYS open space planning update. b. Coordinator report: (Mike S) • The Town re-authorized the deer management permit and submitted it to the DEC. • The DEC is seeking comments on a proposed rulemaking regarding new freshwater wetland regulations. Among the major changes are a regulation of smaller wetlands of “unusual importance” if they meet one of 11 newly established statutory criteria, and the decrease in regulatory threshold from 12.4 to 7.4 acres, beginning in 2028. 5. Approval of minutes from June 2023 meeting: Tabled 6. Continued discussion of Indigenous Environmental Justice: (Mike R) 2 Tabled since Mike Roberts was unable to attend the meeting, though Mike R is working on examples of plant labels. 7. Continued discussion of deer browsing monitoring: AVID (Assess Vegetation for Impacts from Deer) is a project that monitors and evaluates the impact of deer browsing (https://aviddeer.com/). Lori inquired of Kristie Sullivan about conducting a hands-on workshop that we can co-sponsor and invite the public. It is difficult to identify areas that have not already had an impact on native plants. Consequently, how would we assess deer damage on impacted areas? Could we engage with other conservation boards? How would we recruit an audience? The Board would work with Ms. Sullivan to identify appropriate locations for monitoring, though such locations may not necessarily align with areas included in our culling program. James suggested other monitoring strategies such as dung collection to estimate deer abundance. James posted photos on Facebook of dung harvest from his backyard. James referenced an article in the British Ecological Society’s Journal of Applied Ecology, “Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland” (https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365- 2664.2001.00584.x). James is commencing a twice monthly dung assessment, though not necessarily posting regularly on Facebook. Trying to balance the awareness of deer impacts as a way to support deer management. 8. Discussion of Work Goals 2024: • Conduct and improve environmental review process, site visits - Lori • Promote awareness and importance of scenic resources, update scenic views map, signage on Cornell land at corner of Snyder Hill and Pine Tree roads - Eva • Communications via traditional and social media, solicit input and foster public participation in resource and environmental conservation, outreach events (e.g., pollinator gardens) - Ingrid • Fischer award, earth day, invasive species week, update Conservation Board brochure - James • Recruitment and public engagement (i.e., host public events) - Lori • Tutelo Park improvements, installation of plant labels - Mike R • Quarterly and year-end review of goals and accomplishments - Frank 9. Committee Reports: a. Scenic Resources: (Eva). No report at this time. b. Communications Committee: (James) James was locked out of Facebook again and is hoping that Ingrid will take over as chair. c. EMC: (Ingrid) Update on natural areas. Presentation on the Tompkins Pollinator Pathway (https://blogs.cornell.edu/tompkinspollinatorpathway/). d. Six Mile Creek Volunteer Monitoring Program: (James) 3 • Adrianna Hirtler and six volunteers started analyzing a September sample from the first decent riffle upstream of Brooktondale in Six Mile Creek. So far they’ve identified over 400 organisms, with 23 different families in that fraction. Finding over 13 families often proves a stream healthy, though other metrics need to be applied. • Open lab nights at Community Science Institute have been moved from Thursday to Wednesday evenings, 6-9 pm at CSI’s Langmuir Lab Suite 283. I got a precision rain gauge through a CSI grant program and have been reporting daily precipitation to the Community Collaborative rain, Hail and Snow Network since 12/11/23. e. Cornell Botanic Gardens Natural Areas Program: (James) Volunteers weeded woody invasives from south bank of Beebe Lake below Toboggan Lodge, and from south bank of Fall Creek gorge below Fiji and Chi Psi: jetbead (Rhodotypos scandens) and wineberry (Rubus phoenicolasius) were thick there, with the usual honeysuckle, bittersweet, buckthorn, privet, and multiflora rose. 9. Other Business: Mike S to distribute the press release requesting nominations for the Fischer Award. 10. February Agenda: • Deer management • Environmental Justice • Wetlands 11. Adjourn: 6:46pm Minutes drafted by Frank A. Cantone. 1 Town of Ithaca Conservation Board (CB) Meeting February 1, 2024 5:30 pm (In-Person at Town Hall and via Zoom Video Conference) Draft Minutes Members Present: Lori Brewer, Frank Cantone (via Zoom), Lindsay Dombroskie (via Zoom), James Hamilton, Eva Hoffmann, Mike Roberts, Ingrid Zabel Staff Present: Michael Smith, Senior Planner Guest: Yayoi Koizumi, Zero Waste Ithaca 1. Persons to be heard: Yayoi Koizumi, the founder of Zero Waste Ithaca, wanted us to help oppose Cornell’s plan to install artificial turf on an outdoor field hockey field and in an Indoor Sports and Recreation Center between Bartels Hall and Tower Road. She said this plan not only contradicts the wishes of 85% of Ithacans responding to an Ithaca Times poll in May 2023, but also raises significant environmental and health concerns. When Ithaca College installed artificial turf recently, they faced a backlash from students who noted the toxic and polluting nature of synthetic turf. Its contribution to micro-plastic pollution is comparable to that of car tires, and poses risks to our environment and to public health. There are higher injury rates to athletes playing on synthetic turf; the NFL Players Association is opposed to it. Even the fossil fuels used to produce it are polluting, and their use is in conflict with Cornell’s commitment to sustainability. New York State’s recent carpet recycling law A9279A that passed both Senate and Assembly last year prohibits the sale of carpets, including artificial turf, containing PFAS. NYS Senate Bill S7239 calls for a moratorium on installing artificial turf. Yayoi urged us to oppose Cornell’s plans to install plastic turf that not only goes against our environmental conservation values, but against Cornell’s pledges to promote sustainability. Yayoi provided a handout from Beyond Plastics (www.BeyondPlastics.org) explaining “Synthetic Turf is HAZARDOUS,” and linking to more information at www.safehealthyplayingfields.org. Lori noted that our Environmental Review Committee agreed with her, and had recently submitted a letter objecting to the environmental risks of plastic turf in Cornell’s proposed athletics facility project. The Planning Board has been advised of our opposition. The state regulations on artificial turf have not been passed, however, and are still in committee. Mike R asked if worn out fake turf can be recycled. Yayoi said a Pennsylvania documentary showed one instance in which old astroturf that was supposed to be recycled, but simply got disposed of somewhere else. Lori noted that there is yet no Town regulation to back up our advice. Eva wanted us to resolve that the Town regulate a ban on artificial turf sports fields. As there will be a public comment period on an environmental review of Cornell’s construction project, we assured Yayoi that the CB would try to help oppose plastic turf, even though the sports fields in this project are located in the City, and only a portion of the proposed field house in the Town. The importance of Town/City cooperation made us wonder if we should advise the City to be equally opposed to plastic playing fields; we hope that a full environmental review will show the many problems with plastic grass. 2. Member comments/concerns: James wanted the agenda corrected to reflect Ingrid’s now chairing the Communications Committee. Ingrid heard from Brandon Hoak of Pollinator Pathways, who wanted to know if the Town of Ithaca had any pollinator gardens in its parks or preserves. No one knew of any. Frank asked how we would resolve to regulate a code banning artificial turf on sports fields if we were to do so. As an advisory board, we’d have to advise the Town Board of the 2 importance of doing so. Mike S noted we’d need to refer to credible findings in environmental science to support this advice. Yayoi says some California towns have banned plastic turf, as has the City of Boston. 3. Environmental Review Committee Update: Lori noted that the ERC’s letter opposing plastic turf had been recently sent to the Planning Board, with CB’s objections to plastic playing fields made clear. 4. Chair and Coordinator reports: Lori had no further report. Mike is getting the Deer Management shooting over bait program ready (starts February 1st), with some changes over previous season’s bait stations. He reported two farmers applied to have agricultural easements for conservation on their property. Soon the Town will move its website and emails to a new dot.gov address. 5. The December 7, 2023 minutes were approved (Ingrid moved; Mike R. Seconded), with minor corrections. We don’t have a draft of the January 2, 2024 minutes yet. 6. Members discussed the invitation for public comments regarding new NYS freshwater wetland regulations. Mike S, Lori, and Lindsay had attended the DEC’s webinar about the proposed changes. All of us found them extremely technical and hard to follow, though the general idea of regulating smaller wetlands has our approval. Mike S summarized the change as extending controls for wetlands from the current 12.4 acres down to smaller ones of at least 7.4 acres. When a wetland is found to be of special local significance, for instance as habitat for rare species, even smaller wetlands could be protected. There will also be a change from paper maps to Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping technology. Lindsay wondered if local laws could be established to elevate tiny crucial wetlands to special protected status. Mike S noted that Coy Glen is the Town’s only official Critical Environmental Area so far, though Tompkins County GIS maps have a lot of fine details such as Unique Natural Areas and wetland and stream maps. None of the CB members felt competent to answer the particular questions posed in the NYS DEC Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making, due February 17, 2024, but we’re glad to see the rules getting closer to the fine details of freshwater wetland ecology. 7. Monitoring Browse for the Town’s Deer Management Program: Lori found that Kristi Sullivan could lead a workshop on AVID (Assessing Vegetation Impacts from Deer), if we could find 15 CB members and/or volunteers willing to monitor 6 plots with 5 to 6 woody species of native saplings on them. We should set up such sites in late May when their leaves would help identify the plants that deer had not yet killed by over-browsing. James thought it might be hard to find such sites, as every place he’d been in Ithaca’s natural areas had their young native saplings eaten, leaving mostly invasives. We hope Ms. Sullivan can find sites suitable for the AVID deer management protocol. 8. Mike R reported he’d be meeting Steve Henhawk next week. He expects to get a list of plants and their Gayogo̱hó꞉nǫʼ names for a guided plant walk at Tutelo Park. He hopes that the Town’s paying Henhawk $1000 for 20 hours of his consulting work will result in a project they can install in Tutelo Park this year. 9. Regular reports and updates: a) Scenic Resources Committee is still waiting for Cornell permission to install a view sign at the Pine Tree/Snyder Hill Roads intersection. Eva noted we’ve been waiting since May 18, 2022 for Cornell’s 3 Real Estate and lawyers to give us a license to plant the 3rd interpretive sign there. We don’t want to fabricate a sign or pay for its professional design until we’re sure Cornell will allow it on its property there. b) Communications Committee: Ingrid, Lindsay and James met 1/13/24 to discuss its work plans. They’ll ask Mike S to print a new draft of the CB brochure with some revised work priorities and photos. Ingrid will email everyone a more detailed update. c) Tompkins County’s EMC wants to have an outdoor meeting at Stewart Park in May, to which all the County’s conservation boards or councils will be invited. The chair of the EMC is considering the formulation of a source water protection plan. d) Six Mile Creek Volunteers at CSI’s Langmuir Lab have analyzed two new BMI samples upstream and downstream of Brooktondale, finding some interesting new results. All samples analyzed so far show 6MC is healthy, though in some riffles it varies moderately from the DEC model BMI community. Only one summer sample, preserved in alcohol, is yet to be analyzed. A summer synoptic water sample of Six Mile taken 8/16/23 has been entered on CSI’s database: it shows elevated E. coli, turbidity, phosphorus, suspended solids and conductivity similar to a stormwater event even though the creek flow was not very high. Previous dry weather interrupted by a half-inch rainfall the day before sampling suggests this sample found the creek between base-flow and stormwater, though making a new in-between category for such a flow would probably make the database too complicated. 6MC water monitors will meet at Langmuir, with a Zoom connection option, at noon, Friday Feb 9th to arrange sample times for 2024. Volunteers will meet at James’s house Feb 3 to analyze the last 2023 preserved summer sample from 600 Rd riffle in Slaterville Springs. e) Cornell Botanic Gardens Natural Area Program volunteers meet less often in this off- season, and one scheduled job was cancelled by rain, but they did meet once to again weed woody invasives from a Groton fen, where a rare American globeflower needs more space and less shade to thrive. 10. Other Business: Ingrid wondered if CSI’s lab examined monitored water for microplastics. None of the regular parameters measured in chemical water sampling includes such analyses, though Yayoi believes microplastics have been found in Cayuga Lake. 11. For March, we’ll have Katie Borgella and Andy Zepp, Regional Advisory Committee Members, visiting to discuss New York State’s new Open Space Conservation Plans. We’ll choose a 2023 Fischer Award winner from nominees received by the February 28, 2024 deadline. 12. We adjourned at 7:03 PM. Meeting minutes submitted by James Hamilton. 1 MikeSmith From:GrascenShidemantle<gshidemantle@communityscience.org>Sent:Tuesday,February27,20244:21PMTo:ConservationBoard Subject:RichardFischerConservationAwardNominationforAdriannaHirtlerAttachments:RichardFischerConservationAwardNomination.pdf;Richard-Fischer-Award-Nomination-AdriannaHirtler2024.pdf;Final-2022-Water-Bulletin.pdf **WARNING**Thisemailcomesfromanoutsidesource.Pleaseverifythefromaddress,anyURL links,and/orattachments.AnyquestionspleasecontacttheITdepartment  DearTownofIthacaConservationBoard,  PleaseacceptthisemailasCommunityScienceInstitute'sofficialnominationofAdriannaHirtlerforthe RichardFischerConservationAward.Ihaveattachedthenominationformaswellasthreeadditional attachmentstothisemail.OneofthoseattachmentsisaPDFwiththeformresponsesasthefirsttwo answersappearquitesmallontheform.PleasenotethattheMonitoringSitesmapisattachedasa GoogleDrivelinkasitwastoolargetoattachtothisemail.  ThankyouinadvanceforyourconsiderationandforprovidingthisopportunitytorecognizeAdrianna's manyyearsofservicetotheTownofIthacaandtheCayugaLakewatershed.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsor hesitationsregardingournomination,pleasefeelfreetocontactmedirectly. CSIMonitoringSitesMap.jpg Thelink edimagecannotbedisplayed.Thefilemay havebeenmoved,renamed,or deleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothe correctfile andlocation. Kindregards,  GrascenShidemantle,Ph.D. (she/her/hers) Executive Director Community Science Institute gshidemantle@communityscience.org 607-257-6606 Richard Fischer Award Nomination Form Background: The Richard Fischer award is presented annually to those who help improve the Town of Ithaca’s natural environment. Richard B. Fischer spent decades advocating for the conservation of the natural environment. He worked to conserve habitats for the State Bird of New York (Eastern Bluebird), he led a campaign which successfully gained State legislation mandating bottle return deposits, he taught at Cornell University and wrote hundreds of articles for both scientific and popular publications. The award is presented to people or organizations in the Town of Ithaca community who carry on his legacy through similar environmental action. More about Dr. Fischer can be found in his obituary at https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2005/08/conservationist- and-educator-richard-b-fischer-dead-86. Submission Details: The nomination deadline for each award is February 28 th of the following year. We invite supplemental materials, such as news articles, photos etc. to be submitted along with the form. Each March, the Conservation Board will review nominations and select awardees based on the following criteria: o The nature of the project, be it physical, educational or research based. o The size, scope, location and ultimate potential of the project. o Cost-effectiveness. o Applicability of the project, whether it is reproducible or meant for widespread use. o Level of public awareness or visibility of the project. o Impact on the Town of Ithaca and its public image. o The type of benefit produced (preservation, restoration, creation, protection, etc.) o Potential negative outcomes offsetting benefits. The final decision will be made during the March Conservation Board meeting. Please fill out and return the form on the subsequent pages to be considered. The form can be filled out electronically or printed and the return email and address are listed at the bottom of the form. Nominator Contact: Name: ________________ E-mail: __________________ Phone Number: _________________ Nominee Contact: Name/Group: __________________________________ E-mail: _________________________ Phone Number: _________________ Address: _______________________________________ Website: _________________________ Group Leader: ________________________________ Size, scope, and location:What size area and/or audience? What ultimate potential scope? Is the area affected fully or partially in the Town? Does it aim to provide Town-wide benefits, or focused more specifically? Summary of project/action prompting nomination: Grascen Shidemantle gshidemantle@communityscience.org 607-257-6606 Adrianna Hirtler adrianna@communityscience.org 607-257-6606 319 Center Street Ithaca, NY 14850 http://www.communityscience.org/biological-monitoring-2/ It is my pleasure to nominate Adrianna Hirtler for the Town of Ithaca’s Richard Fischer Award on behalf of Community Science Institute (CSI). Adrianna possesses a unique combination of being a curious naturalist, disciplined scientist, and public educator making her well-suited for this award. CSI’s board of directors voted unanimously to nominate Adrianna to recognize her many years of leadership in CSI’s biomonitoring program and vital contributions to our Cayuga Lake Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) monitoring program and 4-H2O youth education program, all of which serve residents of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding Cayuga Lake watershed. Adrianna has served as CSI’s biomonitoring coordinator since 2011. In this role she leads volunteers in the collection and analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI, aquatic insects and other stream-dwelling organisms) samples from local streams in an effort to understand the ecological health of these waterbodies. Adrianna is largely responsible for designing the program and making it into the success that it is today. In this program, Adrianna provides an opportunity for volunteers to get outside and become acquainted with the incredible aquatic biodiversity living in our streams. She leads volunteers through sample collection using a kick net and stream characterization using accessible field worksheets. One of the strengths of this program is that Adrianna not only helps volunteers collect samples, but she also facilitates volunteer participation in sample analysis. In the winter, Adrianna holds BMI Open Lab Nights where volunteers sort through the samples collected in the summer to identify the organisms that are present. Various metrics are applied to BMI organism counts which are used to characterize the stream segment as having “no impact”, “slight impact,” “moderate impact,” or “severe impact” – corresponding to water quality categories developed by the NYSDEC. The data collected by CSI volunteers under Adrianna’s leadership are posted on CSI’s database at this link: http://www.communityscience.org/bmi-results/. You can read more about the biomonitoring program by visiting this link: http://www.communityscience.org/biological-monitoring-2/. As CSI’s resident biologist, Adrianna has also played a pivotal role in the development and implementation of CSI’s Cayuga Lake HAB monitoring program. When HABs began appearing on Cayuga Lake in unprecedented numbers in 2018, Adrianna and the rest of CSI’s team leapt into action to create a coordinated monitoring effort around the lake. Adrianna serves two major roles in our HABs program. First, she examines every HAB sample that passes through CSI’s laboratory doors under a microscope to determine the genera of cyanobacteria present in the bloom samples. This work has revealed important information about the seasonality of cyanobacteria in blooms throughout Cayuga Lake. Second, Adrianna led the Cayuga Lake Plankton Project (2019-2023) in which she collected samples of plankton and cyanobacteria from around Cayuga Lake to characterize the communities of planktonic life around the lake. This project allowed us to understand cyanobacteria diversity and abundance under non-bloom conditions on Cayuga Lake. In 2022 and 2023, Adrianna also investigated reports of strange clumps of floating cyanobacteria that appeared on Cayuga Lake and Cayuga Inlet. She presented this work at the 2024 Finger Lakes Research Conference. You can access her presentation at this link: http://www.communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-FLRC-Poster_BenthicCyanos_FINALsmallerfile.pdf. In addition to her official role as biomonitoring coordinator, Adrianna also co-leads CSI’s 4-H2O youth education program. This is one of the only free summer youth education programs in Tompkins County. Through our 4-H2O program for kids and their families, CSI aims to foster and support the next generation of scientists and environmental stewards through hands-on water science and engaging activities that allow children to “dip their toes” into the world of water. In 2022, Adrianna conceptualized the Journey of Water series for our 4-H2O program. This series of events provides children and their families with hands-on water science education, covering topics such as the water cycle, basic water chemistry, BMI water quality monitoring, and more. The events in this series also provide a unique opportunity for kids to connect to the journey of water right here in the Cayuga Lake watershed, from streams like Six Mile Creek, to the faucet in their homes, and eventually to Cayuga Lake. Adrianna’s Journey of Water concept was so successful that it continued in 2023 and is slated to continue in 2024 and 2025. She has designed a number of outreach materials to complement the program including the Journey of Water Passport, the Cyanobacteria of Cayuga Lake Guide, and field notebooks for water quality cruises. You can read more about the 4-H2O program by visiting this link: http://www.communityscience.org/4h2o/. Adrianna’s pursuit of the protection of our natural world and community engagement is not limited to her work at Community Science Institute. She regularly leads informative walking tours of Ithaca including creek walks along Six Mile Creek. Adrianna also serves on the steering committee of the Finger Lakes Native Plant Society. In this role, she designed a beautiful pictorial key titled “Goldenrods of the Finger Lakes”, a user-friendly identification tool for local goldenrods (https://flnps.org/sites/default/files/newsletters/Solidago%2019(3)%20September%202018%20final%20color%20to%20post_Redacted.pdf see page 16). Finally, Adrianna serves as an advisory board member for the Gayogo̱hó:nǫˀ Learning Project. Adrianna’s work as CSI’s biomonitoring coordinator has an impact in the Town of Ithaca and throughout the Cayuga Lake watershed. She currently oversees BMI sampling at nine monitoring locations in the Town of Ithaca on streams such as Fall Creek, Six Mile Creek, Cascadilla Creek, and Buttermilk Creek. In the entire Cayuga Lake watershed, Adrianna oversees over 50 active biomonitoring sites (see yellow circles on attached map). Her work not only benefits the Town of Ithaca, but the entire Cayuga Lake watershed as well. In addition to leading the data collection, she provides a unique educational experience to the roughly 50 volunteers who participate in biomonitoring each year. Volunteers had this to say when asked about Adrianna’s impact through the biomonitoring program: David Weinstein: “She has done a terrific job in organizing the whole BMI sampling strategy and implementation, and has made it easy for us to help participate in this program to identify the conditions of our streams. She has a deep interest in researching the stream biology, making the laborious task of identifying and sorting through the wide array of critters that we haul up in our nets into a great fun and learning experience.” Lucy Gagliardo: “Before joining this CSI program I knew little about the freshwater BMI. Now I am always curious to see what I will find in the creeks.” Paul Allderige: “I will say that at bug lab her cheerful enthusiasm, positive encouragement and friendly instruction make lab nights fun, enjoyable, educational, and very worthwhile for me as someone with no background in science. I probably wouldn't have started coming to lab nights if not for her good work and good cheer.” River Santina: “She gives 100% of her energy, has countless ideas and a willingness to seriously listen and discuss the ideas of others, patience with all age groups, and always a gracious smile throughout.” Adrianna’s work for CSI’s 4-H2O program also has a tremendous impact on our future water stewards. Adrianna is incredibly skilled at working with young people. She embraces their curiosity and never talks down to them, instead treating them as equal collaborators in their shared pursuit of scientific knowledge. In 2023 alone, Adrianna was able to reach over 120 kids and over 90 adults through the 4-H2O program. In 4-H2O, Adrianna leads Biomonitoring Fun! picnics and assists with tours of the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility and Bolton Point Drinking Water Facility. CSI volunteer, Diane Chu, had this to say about Adrianna’s work in the 4-H2O program: “Adrianna has been especially good with the youngest naturalists (i.e. children), including them in collection forays to local streams and welcoming them to sort and identify the creatures at the lab.” Another CSI volunteer, Marie Eckhardt, who works closely with Adrianna on phytoplankton identification shared, “Adrianna provides a pivotal role in increasing public awareness of what’s in the lake through her extension programs - especially to children who may never have looked through a microscope before. The magic of seeing a rotifer scoot across a microscope slide, or seeing a star-like bright green diatom for the first time opens a whole new world to young eyes. Looking at a water sample under the microscope is kin to birdwatching....you never know what you might see.” Overall, Adrianna leads critical data collection that helps us understand the health of our waters in the Town of Ithaca and the surrounding Cayuga Lake watershed. Through this, she provides valuable education to watershed residents that empowers them to protect our shared water resources. Finally, her thoughtful approach to youth education and infectious enthusiasm for our natural world prepares the next generation of water stewards to commit to protecting the unique environment of the Cayuga Lake watershed. Cost-effectiveness:Does it achieve much for little expense? Applicability:Is this easily reproduced, or is it applicable for widespread use? Is this likely to encourage other beneficial actions for the Town? Awareness/Visibility:If a project is physical, how obvious/visible is it? If not, how has the public been made aware? The biomonitoring program that Adrianna has developed at CSI is incredibly cost-effective compared to other water quality monitoring programs. It requires no expensive or specialized equipment beyond a simple dissecting microscope. This contrasts with monitoring water chemistry which requires expensive testing equipment and reagents. While water chemistry monitoring provides a snapshot of water quality during one moment in time, biomonitoring for benthic macroinvertebrates gives an overall sense of water quality in a stream segment over the preceding year or so as it takes time for the biological communities to respond to changes in water chemistry. In one year, Adrianna, alongside the biomonitoring volunteers, is typically able to collect 20 samples throughout the watershed. Because the monitoring is done largely by volunteers under Adrianna’s leadership, the cost of the program is lower than if professionally trained scientists were to perform the work. In addition, CSI’s 4-H2O youth education program, co-led by Adrianna, is incredibly cost effective to its participants as all activities are offered free of charge thanks to a generous grant from the Park Foundation and reduced rates for boat charters offered by Discover Cayuga Lake. The entire body of Adrianna’s work would be difficult for another individual to independently reproduce. However, Adrianna has provided volunteers with the tools and the confidence to sample benthic macroinvertebrates independently. For example, there is a dedicated team of volunteers on Six Mile Creek who not only are skilled in independent sample collection but are also able to sort and identify organisms on their own (under all the proper collection permits, of course). In this way Adrianna has empowered these volunteers to take data collection into their own hands. During the Covid-19 pandemic, Adrianna developed a Water Quality Report Card to keep folks engaged with CSI’s mission when we could not be together. The Water Quality Report Card is an educational tool that guides kids and families through a self-led exploration of the aquatic life found in streams and what different types of life indicate about water quality. The report card is a wonderful tool for outdoor and at-home education, providing children and families with the opportunity to learn more about environmental sciences. These guides are made free to our community. Adrianna’s work is highly likely to encourage beneficial actions for the Town of Ithaca and the surrounding watershed by building care and interest in our local streams. CSI volunteer, Marie Eckhardt shared “Adrianna’s enthusiasm and curiosity is contagious!” That enthusiasm and curiosity are what we need to inspire the next generation to care for our unique local freshwater resources. The public has been made aware of Adrianna’s work through various media including: - CSI’s Annual Water Bulletin Newsletters: http://www.communityscience.org/outreach-and-education/newsletters-annual-reports/ - CSI’s Annual Reports which highlight yearly progress within the Biomonitoring Program, HABs Monitoring Program, and 4-H2O Program: http://www.communityscience.org/annualreports/ - CSI’s social media (Facebook and Instagram): https://www.facebook.com/CommunityScience, https://www.instagram.com/communityscienceinstitute/?hl=en - CSI’s monthly email updates which feature calls for volunteer opportunities and descriptions of the latest BMI and HABs results: http://www.communityscience.org/outreach-and-education/csinews/ - Flyers for the 4-H2O Youth Education Program posted in local libraries, laundromats, and community centers. Adrianna designs these flyers each year. - Ads for the 4-H2O Youth Education Program featured on the TCAT bus line. - Presentations for research conferences, town board meetings, and local non-profits: http://www.communityscience.org/outreach-and-education/public-event-presentations/. In 2024, Adrianna gave a poster presentation at the Finger Lakes Research Conference on clumps of benthic cyanobacteria that are popping up in the Cayuga Lake watershed: http://www.communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-FLRC-Poster_BenthicCyanos_FINALsmallerfile.pdf - Emails to local county health department officials confirming that a bloom received by CSI is a HAB. - Reports to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) when a HAB has been confirmed on Cayuga Lake. - Emails to NYSDEC whenever a biomonitoring location is found to be “moderately impacted” or “severely impacted”. Impact on the Town of Ithaca:Does the project enhance the Town's public image? Does it present potential for Town government to take additional steps to benefit the environment? Type of Benefit Produced:Preservation? Restoration? Removal/reduction of negative conditions? Creation of habitat or visual enhancement? Education? Negative Impacts: Could these have been foreseen and possibly avoided/reduced? Do they outweigh the benefits? Adrianna’s work enhances the Town of Ithaca’s public image by creating a community of scientifically engaged water stewards and naturalists who are committed to protecting the Town’s (and the entire Cayuga Lake watershed’s) shared water resources. Her work also presents potential for the Town government to take additional steps to benefit the environment through her important work collecting and analyzing water quality data. Thanks to Adrianna’s leadership of local volunteers, the Town of Ithaca has access to 12 years of BMI data (http://www.communityscience.org/bmi-results/) on local streams. The Town also has access to data on HAB cyanobacteria composition in the Town of Ithaca (and other lakeshore municipalities) thanks to the tireless hours that Adrianna has spent examining HABs under the microscope (http://www.database.communityscience.org/hab). The data from these monitoring programs can be used for water resource management decisions and outreach and education around important topics like HABs. Adrianna’s work is directly centered on education. However, the work that she does to educate community members of all ages aims to inspire others to preserve and care for our local environment. CSI volunteer, David Weinstein, shared “The countless hours she dedicates to helping us understand what is happening in our streams has helped us all appreciate our natural world that much more. Obviously, her interests about the natural world don’t stop at the streams, and she has been a resource for the rest of us for many aspects about the environment in which we live. She has advanced the goal of conserving precious resources of that environment an enormous amount.” I could not identify any negative impacts of Adrianna’s work in our community. Additional Items Attached:Alist naming each is fine. Ex: news articles, photos, web site etc. To submit this form in writing, address it to the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board, 215 N. Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850. It can be mailed or dropped off in person. To submit electronically, email to . - 2022 Water Bulletin Article on Journey of Water (Page 11): http://www.communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Final-2022-Water-Bullet in.pdf - CSI Volunteer Monitoring Sites in the Cayuga Lake Watershed: Yellow circles reflect all biomonitoring sites overseen by Adrianna - PDF of form responses for easy reading 2022 Edition Inside this Edition The Clean Water Act - 50 Year Anniversary • page 1 CSI Staff Highlights: The Faces Behind the Organization • page 4 The Not-So-Apparent Implications of Drought • page 8 Journey of Water: Cultivating a Place-Based Sense of the Water Cycle • page 11 How Does Weather Impact Harmful Algal Blooms? • page 12 Community Science Institute • www.communityscience.org • (607) 257-6606 • info@communityscience.org The Clean Water Act - 50 Year Anniversary Ithaca Falls Photo by Nathaniel Launer The year 2022 was the 50th anniversary of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, more commonly known as the Clean Water Act. After decades of limited and ineffective water quality legislation, the Clean Water Act improved standards, regulation, and enforcement of water protection. A History of US Water Legislation 1899—The Refuse Act This was the nation ’s ￿rst water-related regulation and was intended only to prevent dumping that would physically impede navigation.1 The Refuse Act banned direct dumping of solid waste or refuse into navigable waters or their tributaries but did not ban the dumping of liquid waste from streets and sewers directly into waterways. 1948—The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) This was the ￿rst legislation directly aiming to address water quality. It formed the basis of what would become the Clean Water Act. While the 1948 Act encouraged state action and interstate cooperation to tackle water quality problems, its enforceability was severely limited because it only governed interstate waters. Abatement actions could only be authorized when pollution affected the health or … continued on page 2 Page 2 welfare of people outside the state where the pollution originated. Even in cases where abatement actions were authorized, the state where the pollution originated could veto them. 1956-1961—Amendments to the FWPCA These aimed to improve the enforceability of the act, including allowing federal action on intrastate pollution. However, effective enforcement mechanisms were still lacking. 1965-1970—Laws Expanding the Federal Government’s Reach These broadened water quality standards to include chemical and biological indicators rather than just risks to public health, and these standards were expanded to address a broader range of pollutants. Enforcement was expanded by instituting reporting requirements for pollutant discharge and civil penalties for noncompliance. Despite this expansion of the federal government’s regulatory reach, the enforcement mechanisms were still unwieldy and largely ineffective. 1972— The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments, or the Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) expanded the scope of federal regulation of surface waters and empowered states to enforce water quality standards under the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It established a basic regulatory structure for controlling pollutant discharges, giving both the EPA and the states enforcement authority. Furthermore, it provided funding for the construction of wastewater treatment plants and encouraged programs for mitigating non-point source pollution. While previous legislation governed only interstate waters, the CWA expanded federal and state jurisdiction to cover all waters considered waters of the United States (WOTUS). The exact de￿nition of WOTUS has been the subject of legal battles in recent years. The currently accepted de￿nition includes all interstate waters and wetlands, any intrastate waters and wetlands the degradation of which could affect interstate commerce, such as by inhibiting interstate tourism or ￿shing, as well as any tributaries of these waters. Each water body included in WOTUS is de￿ned by its designated uses, which describe how the water body has been or is likely to be used (e.g. drinking water, ￿shing, recreation, etc.), which therefore determines what water quality standards are necessary to maintain those uses. A broad de￿nition of WOTUS signi￿cantly increases the scope of surface waters and wetlands that are subject to regulation by EPA and the states. One of the cornerstones of the CWA is the combined National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), which govern the issuance of permits for the discharge of pollutants. Implementation of the CWA and Citizen Involvement The CWA does not ban the discharge of pollutants into WOTUS entirely. Instead, it tracks point source discharge of pollutants through permits issued through the NPDES or SPDES programs. All point sources of pollution such as factories, boats, land￿ll leachate systems, concentrated … continued on page 3 The Clean Water Act - 50 Year Anniversary Page 3 animal feeding operations, or sewage treatment plants that discharge water into WOTUS have to obtain a permit in order to operate. These permits must be renewed every ￿ve years and usually require either a monthly or yearly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) demonstrating that discharge is within the limits set by the permit. In addition to reviewing DMRs, state and federal agencies can perform on-site inspections. The CWA speci￿cally promotes citizen involvement as an important part of ensuring point sources are in compliance with their permits, as state and federal agencies are stretched thin and inspections tend to be relatively infrequent. The permits and DMRs are publicly available, allowing citizens to check whether a point source is in compliance. If citizens or grassroots organizations suspect a permit is being violated, they are encouraged by the CWA to collect data by monitoring the impacted waters and lodge a complaint requesting that the state or federal agency enforce compliance. The CWA allows citizens to sue the government if it fails to remedy the SPDES or NPDES permit violation. Many enforcement actions begin with a complaint brought forward by the community, meaning public awareness and concern are an essential part of addressing pollution. Due in large part to community engagement, the permitting system established by the CWA has been extremely successful in bringing the rampant point source pollution of the 1960s under control. Concerned citizens can also take an active role in setting limits on pollution by taking part in the NPDES or SPDES permitting process or by participating in the establishment of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for a waterbody. When water quality becomes degraded to the point where it is insuf￿cient for one or more of a water body’s designated uses, the CWA requires a TMDL to be established for the out of control pollutants. The TMDL is set to achieve certain water quality goals and is accompanied by a management plan for achieving them. The plan accounts for all point and non-point sources of pollution and adjusts discharge permits and watershed management practices to reduce pollutant loads and restore water quality. The pollutant load from point sources is relatively easy to determine, but pollutant load from non-point sources, such as agricultural runoff delivered through streams, is much more dif￿cult to estimate. Estimates are dif￿cult in large part because stream 𿿿ow can vary dramatically throughout a year as well as between years. These estimates are likely to become more dif￿cult as climate change progresses and rainfall becomes more erratic (see 2022 Water Bulletin article: "The Not-So- Apparent Implications of Drought"). Developing a TMDL is complicated, which is why the CWA requires public involvement in the identi￿cation of impaired water bodies and the development of TMDLs to mitigate impairments. Data collected by volunteers from grassroots organizations like Community Science Institute can support the identi￿cation of a water body as impaired with respect to its designated use. These data can also be used to determine when a water body is no longer impaired. For example, in 2014, CSI data were used to help demonstrate that the southern shelf of Cayuga lake was no longer impaired by pathogenic bacteria, and the lake was therefore removed from the list of impaired waterbodies.10 Community collected data can also inform the design of the TMDL to restore the water body to its designated use. For example, CSI’s data on phosphorus loading from Fall Creek were used to validate the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for Cayuga Lake which is an integral component of the draft Cayuga Lake TMDL for total phosphorus.11 In sum, community stewardship is essential to the success of the CWA. … continued on page 4 A 9 Element (9E)6 watershed plan is similar to a TMDL. Taking into account a water body’s potential sources of pollution and its designated use, a 9E plan creates a strategy for improving water quality for water bodies that are not included on the impaired waterbodies list. 9E plans have a special emphasis on local community involvement. CSI is part of a group of stakeholders in and around Seneca and Keuka Lakes who joined together in 2018 to reduce nutrient loading7 by designing a 9E plan. With logistical and laboratory support8 from CSI, Seneca Lake Pure Waters Association (SLPWA), and Keuka Lake Association (KLA) ￿nalized9 the Seneca-Keuka Watershed 9E plan in October 2022. Monitored sites within the Seneca-Keuka Watershed (map by Nathaniel Launer). The Clean Water Act establishes a robust regulatory structure to determine what waters are polluted, what action needs to be taken to restore water quality, and how much pollution is permissible to allow economic activity while maintaining the health of the waters of the United States. Chronic underfunding of state agencies means that community involvement is more important than ever to meeting the goals of the CWA. While agencies like the DEC and the EPA play a role in monitoring, they are not able to monitor as many locations and as frequently as CSI volunteers. Check out our public online database to see just how many sites are monitored by CSI’s dedicated volunteers. CSI’s mission to empower community members to become stewards of their local water resources through water quality monitoring falls squarely within the framework of the Clean Water Act. We offer a range of programs to educate the public about water quality and foster stewardship, while partnering with volunteers to collect regulatory quality data to help improve water quality and inform water quality standards in and around our communities. If you now feel spurred to action (or maybe just want more detailed information) please check out the programs on our website to get involved with monitoring water quality in your neighborhood. You can also read The Clean Water Act Owner’s Manual5 by The River Network, which describes the CWA’s systems in more detail, shares some CWA success stories, and gets into the nitty gritty of the legal framework of the CWA. It’s a great resource for anyone passionate about protecting natural waters and was hugely helpful in writing this article. - Seth Bingham, Water Quality Scientist I recently moved from Minneapolis, MN to join the CSI team. With a B.A. from UCLA in the humanities but a lifelong interest in natural science, it’s been a bit of a journey to get here. Professionally-speaking, I found my way to the realm of science through community engagement and entomology. Over the years I've worked and researched in many different areas. I worked as an AmeriCorps member and crew leader at American Conservation Experience, a conservation corps in California, where we built trails, restored habitat for the threatened desert tortoise, and removed countless invasive species from habitats across the state of California. From there I explored the world of research, supporting scienti￿c studies ranging from element limitation in hardwood forests to the way monarch butter𿿿ies use roadsides as habitat. Ultimately, I pursued an MS in Natural Resources Science and Management from the University of Minnesota, where I studied the ecology of the introduced velvet longhorn beetle. Combining my background in Humanities and Science is highly ful ￿lling. I enjoy working towards integrating “soft” and “hard” skills and believe that the best science is done when we keep social implications in mind. An understanding of the way science works improves our communication with and understanding of each other. My role as Outreach and Programs Coordinator at CSI affords me the opportunity to make science more accessible and understood by a broader community. It also allows me to continue collecting and analyzing scienti￿c data while building community connections. CSI Staff Highlights: The Faces Behind the Organization Page 4 Grace Haynes - Outreach and Programs Coordinator, Grace enjoying the boundary waters in northern Minnesota. Cayuga Lake HABs Monitoring Program Coordinator Throughout my career, I’ve donned many hats in a wide range of scienti￿c disciplines, but the driving force behind my choice of projects has always remained the same; a deep desire to be involved in meaningful work that positively impacts the greater good both globally and in my little corner of the world. I hail from a small farming community in New York that borders Lake Ontario and spent my childhood on its shores as well as summers in the Adirondacks. The forests, lakes, and streams have always been intertwined in my everyday life. When I am able, I visit them daily to recharge. Here at CSI, I am honored to have the opportunity to protect our waters and the life that they sustain. Having previously worked 15 years in various Cornell University research laboratories, and with a deep appreciation for the natural world and all its beauty, I am excited to combine my love of science and nature to further CSI’s mission. With a B.S. degree in Plant Sciences from Cornell University along with a diverse research background in Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Entomology, and Horticulture, I enjoy my role as analyst in the laboratory testing the community’s drinking water and our streams, lakes, and tributaries for indicators of the presence of pathogenic bacteria. My role at CSI also includes that of administrative support which allows me to engage with a diverse clientele including the general public. Helping our community daily to ￿nd answers to their water quality concerns and determining if their water is safe to drink or to recreate in is a meaningful and rewarding endeavor. Contributing data to CSI’s long-term database by continuing the work of those who came before for its current use as well as by those who will follow is my privilege. In my spare time, I volunteer in animal rescue throughout the Finger Lakes, enjoy hiking, paddling, cross-country skiing, snow shoeing, fossil hunting, wood working, bird watching, studying geology, and spending time with my beloved dog and two cats. Charlene enjoying the sunset at Myers Point on Cayuga Lake Charlene Mottler - Administrative and Laboratory Assistant Page 5 Seth Bingham - Water Quality Scientist Seth hard at work at 95 Brown Road I only started work at CSI this past June, but I have been an upstate New York local my whole life. My family is from North Carolina, and I was born in Syracuse shortly after they moved there. I enjoyed every science class I took in high school, and went off to Colgate University with a broad interest in the sciences, but no speci￿c plan. After experimenting with different disciplines, I ended up getting a BA in chemistry with a minor in geology. I enjoy chemistry and am fascinated by all the things it can tell us, but an unfortunate downside is that much of the work occurs inside. My geology minor helped remind me that I want to feel connected to the world around me. The sense of immersion in the natural world you get examining bedding structures while squatting in the mud can be hard to come by in the lab. My work at CSI allows me to enjoy the nitty gritty of lab work, re￿ning processes to get work done quickly and minimize sources … continued on page 6 Page 6 From my upbringing to my education to my current role at Community Science Institute, water has always had an important presence in my life. I am originally from Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania, a small college town north of Pittsburgh, named after the stunning Slippery Rock Creek, which forms a gorge of its own in McConnells Mill State Park. As a student of biology, my studies regularly focused on how water quality impacts sensitive aquatic wildlife. I earned a B.S. in Biology from Slippery Rock University where I researched the effects of neonicotinoid insecticides (namely, imidacloprid) on amphibian development. I also had the opportunity to study weakly electric ￿sh behavior through a National Science Foundation internship at Indiana University. From there, I earned my PhD at Binghamton University working in Dr. Jessica Hua’s aquatic ecotoxicology lab. For my dissertation research, I studied the impacts of light pollution on native larval amphibians and their wetland communities. I also led and contributed to several research projects investigating the effects of road deicing salt runoff on amphibian physiology. As the executive director of Community Science Institute, I am passionate about using scienti￿c knowledge to empower and support the health of our community for the bene￿t of humans and wildlife. I believe that I have one of the most fun and meaningful jobs out there. Each day is different and engages my scienti￿c curiosity and creativity in new ways. Perhaps one of my favorite parts of my job is that I get to work closely with so many people, including research scientists, government of￿cials, and volunteers, who are dedicated to the protection of water quality in the Cayuga Lake watershed. I especially value the on-the-ground knowledge that our volunteers contribute to our monitoring programs including their personal observations and water quality concerns. Working alongside these diverse stakeholders as a community united in our effort to monitor and protect local water resources is truly inspiring. I am grateful that I can be a voice for the water quality data in our area. The Lorax may speak for the trees, but I get to speak for the streams. When I’m not at 283 Langmuir Lab, you can ￿nd me hiking local trails with my partner, Taylor, and our dog, Kita. I have hiked many famous locations including the historic Camino de Santiago in Spain and the Ecuadorian Amazon Rainforest, but my favorite trails by far are right here in the Finger Lakes. I also enjoy crocheting and practicing yoga. Along with my dog, Kita, I also have two cats, Minerva and Hippie, and many aquarium animals including an axolotl. Grascen Shidemantle - Executive Director Grascen at Buttermilk Falls. of error, while also being able to feel like the work I do is directly connected to the world I see when I look out the window. Working at a state certi￿ed laboratory comes with its fair share of challenges, and this type of work is still relatively new to me. My research work in college was computational, meaning I spent my time in the lab looking at 3d models of molecules not even wearing closed toed shoes. There’s been a lot to learn in my short time here, from developing pro￿ciency in the techniques of wet chemistry, to understanding the quality control system required of a certi￿ed laboratory. At ￿rst I felt a bit like a ￿sh out of water, but, especially now that I ’ve settled in, I'm glad that each day brings an opportunity to learn and stretch myself while doing work that bene￿ts my local community. As CSI’s biomonitoring coordinator, I organize yearly, volunteer-driven evaluations of benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) communities in Finger Lakes streams. CSI’s biomonitoring program has collected BMI biodiversity-based water quality data on over 30 streams at nearly 100 individual locations since it started in the early 2000’s. In recent years, the biomonitoring branch of CSI’s work has also extended into the realm of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs). As biomonitoring coordinator, I look at each of the volunteer-submitted HABs samples to verify and record the presence of cyanobacteria and other plankton and am always trying to pay attention to what’s happening in and around water from the perspective of tiny forms of life. I graduated from Cornell University with a B.S. in Natural Resources in 1999, but my love of water comes from the two gorge streams I grew up between near the Southeast end of Seneca Lake. I missed them terribly when I lived in the Western US and internationally for over a decade on international exchanges in Germany and Italy, earning an M.S. degree in Environmental Studies at the University of Oregon, working as a ranger-naturalist for the National Park Service, and studying relationships between “nature” and “culture” in Latvia. When I returned to the Finger Lakes seasonally in 2007 (still working summers in Yosemite National Park for another decade), I was excited to sign up as a volunteer with the Community Science Institute. My life experiences have convinced me that water, above all else, deserves our utmost reverence and attention. Getting involved with CSI’s developing biomonitoring program, then led by the lab chemist Michi Schulenberg, I found a niche that brought together my passions for water, for the Finger Lakes region and for cultivating cultural connections between humans and the other-than-human world. I was eventually hired by CSI to manage the program. I have always been fascinated by the idea that if you pay close attention to one aspect of life on Earth (e.g. communities of tiny stream or lake-dwelling creatures) you can learn important things about other aspects of life on Earth that are not typically treated as being related (e.g. water quality as a re𿿿ection of human activities on the land). I have worked as the part-time biomonitoring coordinator for CSI since 2011. The part-time nature of the job has allowed me to raise a water-loving child and to continue to work locally as an “interpreter” of nature and culture, leading walks and programs and developing interpretive materials. Noah Mark - Laboratory Director As laboratory director, it’s a given that the title carries a responsibility for the lab’s performance. In a sense, a certi￿ed lab should work like a well-oiled machine that records every action it takes: samples submitted to the lab move ef￿ciently from analysis to results reporting, passing through a series of checks along the way so that the lab feels con￿dent in the data being produced. You, the reader, might get a militant impression of the lab’s practices—in some respects, this is an apt description. Besides the strong emphasis on good performance and thorough documentation, chemistry’s risky reputation (perhaps justi￿able) supports the heightened need for vigilance in the lab. Despite these Page 7 Noah in CSI’s laboratory Adrianna sharing her love of benthic macroinvertebrates. Photo by Hilary Lambert. … continued on page 8 Adrianna Hirtler - Biomonitoring Coordinator Page 8 The Not-So-Apparent Implications of Drought concerns, the lab bench isn’t without its nerdy and artisanal satisfactions. There is nothing like coating metal granules with a copper-based solution, separating the components of a mixture in two immiscible liquids, or watching a magenta color change unfold in a reaction. Now, I should state that we are not reinventing the wheel to conduct water tests. My ￿rst brush with the “bible” of water quality, that is Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, was while obtaining my M.S. in Soil, Water, and Environmental Science. As a research assistant at Biosphere 2 in Arizona, I felt then as I do now the magic of chemistry, and although I am no longer investigating the behavior of emerging contaminants in my current role, lea￿ng through an established method, there’s still a standing-on -the-shoulders-of-giants feeling that pervades my work, as the toil of other scientists affords the convenience of adapting rather dependable test methods for CSI ’s lab. Fortunately, I still clock a fair amount of time at the bench, gleaning what microbes and chemistry can tell about the quality of various kinds of water, and keeping sharp the necessary muscle memory needed to conduct certain analyses and preparations with relative speed. I believe some types of knowledge reside in the body. Coming from a farm family in western New York, and in another chapter of my life, having co-owned and operated a diversi￿ed vegetable farm, I feel that the knowledge of wet chemistry as well as raising food lies in the hands as well as the head. Although automation has its advantages, CSI’s lab continues to see the bene￿ts of methods that rely on hand-eye coordination. As lab director, I am proud to play a part in CSI’s vision of how to practice science, which as our mission suggests, places people (and data) more squarely at the center of things, both in how we conduct our brand of science and in striving to democratize science. As a former grassroots organizer for environmental issues and sexual assault prevention, I still admire working more directly with the community. Over the years, I am thankful to have participated in some outreach and fundraising events/projects, for this also allows me to advocate for our brand of science outside the lab. - Curation by Charlene Mottler, Administrative and Laboratory Assistant In the Finger Lakes region, we are fortunate to be surrounded by abundant freshwater resources in our glittering lakes, winding streams, and rushing waterfalls. Indeed, the eleven Finger Lakes alone hold 8.1 trillion gallons of freshwater.12 However, if you visited any of our natural wonders this summer, you likely came across dry creek beds or trickling waterfalls. This August, under the direction of governor Kathy Hochul, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) expanded the state’s drought watch* to include most of western NY and other parts of the state.13 During this drought watch (which was lifted on October 8th), areas throughout Cayuga and Seneca counties and all of Tompkins County faced abnormally dry to moderate drought conditions14 (Fig. 1). Although the drought watch was expanded to our area of￿cially in August, many Community Science Institute volunteers throughout the Cayuga Lake watershed remarked on the dry conditions prior to this. Dry summer conditions signi￿cantly impacted CSI’s synoptic stream monitoring program in 2022 (Box 1). To collect samples that are most representative of a stream’s water quality, it is essential to have suf￿cient stream 𿿿ow and depth so that volunteers can fully submerge sample bottles below the surface of the water and allow water to 𿿿ow easily into the bottles. Unfortunately, ￿ve separate base 𿿿ow monitoring events in the Cayuga Lake watershed were canceled or rescheduled this year due to dry or low 𿿿owing streams. Similarly, volunteers on the Cayuga Inlet, Milliken Creek, Yawger and Great Gully Creeks, and Six Mile Creek monitoring teams … continued on page 9 and Grace Haynes, Outreach and Programs Coordinator *NYSDEC de￿nes a drought watch as “The ￿rst of four levels of state drought advisories ("watch," "warning," "emergency" and "disaster"). There are no statewide mandatory water use restrictions in place under a drought watch, but residents are strongly encouraged to voluntarily conserve water. Local public water suppliers may require conservation measures, depending upon local needs and conditions.” You can ￿nd more information on drought, including de￿nitions and classi￿cations, here. were forced to forgo sampling at several of their regularly monitored sites, citing insuf￿cient 𿿿ow or dry creek beds as the primary reason. USGS hydrographs, which depict stream 𿿿ow, showed 𿿿ows largely below the median daily statistic throughout much of the monitoring season (see Salmon Creek at Ludlowville, Fig. 2; note log scale on y-axis). In addition to challenges collecting representative base 𿿿ow stream samples, volunteers also faced hurdles in collecting stormwater samples. It is important to collect stream samples under stormwater conditions in order to understand the loading of pollutants into Cayuga Lake. Under stormwater conditions, levels of nutrients, total suspended solids, turbidity, and E. coli are elevated. High stream 𿿿ows during storms also carry these elevated pollutants into the lake more quickly than under base𿿿ow (i.e. non-stormwater) conditions. This year, it was not possible for CSI volunteers to collect stormwater samples from most of our regularly monitored streams and creeks in the Cayuga Lake watershed. Page 9 CSI’s Cayuga Inlet monitoring team volunteer, Barbara Chase, captured these photos which show the stark difference in stream conditions on En￿eld Creek Upper Treman in 2021 (A) and 2022 (B). Featured in photo B is Bill George, Cayuga Inlet volunteer and CSI’s own data entry specialist, taking detailed notes about the site. Barbara shared, “In the ￿ve or so years I have been collecting synoptic samples at this site, this is the ￿rst time I have seen that green algae on the surface of the right hand side of the stream (B). I think usually the water is 𿿿owing too fast for it to collect like that. One of the things I love about doing this is seeing the same sites on the streams in different seasons and 𿿿ow conditions.” Box 1. Volunteer Observations This year’s dry conditions posed challenges for the Sheldrake Creek monitoring team, leading to several canceled monitoring events. This photo (C) by volunteer, Jody Price, shows the low 𿿿ow and water level at the mouth of Sheldrake Creek on June 17, 2022. Jody remarked, “It was very early in the summer for the water level to be so low.” Fellow Sheldrake Creek volunteer, Chuck Tauck noted, “Sheldrake Creek completely dried up during this year's lengthy dry spell with no noticeable 𿿿ow at all.” … continued on page 10 Figure 1. U.S. Drought Monitor map and table of drought conditions on August 2, 2022 in the northeast United States. Colors on the map and table re𿿿ect intensity in drought conditions. The U.S. Drought Monitor is jointly produced by the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Map courtesy of NDMC. Similarly, our sister organizations on Seneca Lake (Seneca Lake Pure Waters Association) and Keuka Lake (Keuka Lake Association) faced challenges collecting stormwater samples within their watersheds. The only stormwater samples collected in the Cayuga Lake watershed this year were collected by the Canoga, Burroughs, and Williamson Creek monitoring team in Seneca County. The Fall and Virgil Creek team was able to collect water samples this November that fell somewhere between base𿿿ow and stormwater, representing moderate, rather than true stormwater conditions. The only other year in CSI’s history when there were so few stormwater events due to dry conditions was 2020, when only three out of the eleven volunteer monitoring teams were able to collect stormwater samples. Unfortunately, 2022 will likely not be the last year that CSI volunteers have to contend with collecting water samples in dry, drought- like conditions. Global climate change is expected to lead to an increase in both the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events like drought and 𿿿ooding.15 Increasing global temperatures interfere with once predictable precipitation patterns and alter the timing and amount of snow accumulation and snow melt.16 Although drought is a concern, our region is predicted to experience an overall increase in precipitation as a result of climate change.17 When extreme precipitation events follow dry conditions, there can be cascading consequences on harmful algal blooms (HABs).18 One of the many contributing factors to HABs formation are nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen. During dry years, excess nutrients can accumulate in soils, and, if followed by a wet year, those nutrients are 𿿿ushed out of the soil, leading to elevated nutrient loads which can impact HABs formation several weeks after the storm event.18-20 Similarly, drought conditions in 2016 were followed by the ￿rst year that community members started reporting signi￿cant HABs on Cayuga Lake. In 2021, a particularly wet year, CSI HABs Harriers reported a record number of HABs on Cayuga Lake.21 In contrast, during this year ’s dry monitoring season, HABs Harriers spotted less than two thirds the number of blooms that were reported in 2021 (See 2022 Water Bulletin article: “How Does Weather Impact Harmful Algal Blooms?”). This poses the question: After a dry 2022, will we see a spike in HABs in 2023? We will have to rely on our dedicated HABs Harriers volunteers to ￿nd out! When the Clean Water Act was established ￿fty years ago, not many scientists or legislators were thinking about climate change and how it would impact water quality, and in turn, the way water quality is monitored and regulated (see 2022 Water Bulletin Article: “The Clean Water Act - 50 Year Anniversary”). Many water quality standards in effect today are based on historical data which may no longer be meaningful under a changing climate.5 This highlights the need for long-term monitoring and data-gathering like we do here at CSI. We rely on our dedicated community scientist volunteers to collect the most current water quality data on our streams to identify pollution and to contribute to the development of water quality standards that may be more appropriate for the emerging era of climate change. Many thanks to the volunteers who committed their time and energy to partnering with CSI in collecting this valuable data and for providing excellent descriptions of the dry creek conditions this year! Page 10 - Grascen Shidemantle, Executive Director Figure 2. Screenshot of USGS hydrograph depicting stream𿿿ow measured in cubic feet per second on Salmon Creek at Ludlowville (42.5526111, -76.5338333) from March 2022 - November 2022. Solid lines refer to stream 𿿿ow data from 2022 and dotted lines refer to the median stream 𿿿ow from 2007-2022. Dark blue lines represent approved USGS stream- 𿿿ow data, while orange line represent provisional data, meaning the data have not yet been reviewed and approved by USGS. Apr 2022 Aug 2022Jun 2022 Oct 2022 Through the Community Science Institute, volunteers have spent two decades documenting water quality in streams and lakes in the Cayuga Lake Watershed and throughout the Finger Lakes region. It’s probably fair to say that many CSI volunteers are motivated by a sense that water is critical to our quality of life in this region. Through their monitoring work, CSI volunteers understand that our activities on land in𿿿uence the quality of water in surrounding water bodies. We wanted to highlight these connections of land and water for local youth through our 4-H20 2022 summer programming, so we adopted “the Journey of Water” as our theme. The Journey of Water series included nine free programs for youth and their families that were designed to give everyone a place-based sense of the water cycle, with opportunities to help monitor water quality along the way. Participants were given a Journey of Water “Passport” which they could get stamped at the end of each program they participated in. Kids who completed the whole passport received a CSI Journey of Water t-shirt. The program kicked off with a “Build Your Own Water Filter” event where kids and families worked together to make water ￿lters out of repurposed water bottles and natural materials. They then tested their ￿lters by running different kinds of “dirty” water (muddy, salty, and acidic) through them and doing some basic water quality tests on the water before and after running them through the ￿lters. It generated some interesting discussions about how living plants and wetlands in our watersheds do a lot of work toward maintaining good water quality in our streams and lakes. We also invited Journey of Water “travelers ” to join us for tours of the City of Ithaca Drinking Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities. At the Drinking Water Plant, our excellent tour guides, Roxy Johnston (Watershed Coordinator and Lab Director) and Alejandro Gonzalez (Assistant Chief Operator), showed us how water is taken from Six Mile Creek, piped to the plant and then journeys through a variety of processes that make it safe to drink when it ultimately comes out of faucets throughout the City of Ithaca. This left some kids thinking that it certainly takes a lot of work to get water “clean” enough to drink once there is any possibility of contamination. At the Wastewater Treatment Facility, we also had an amazing guide in Ed Gottlieb (Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator & Safety Manager) who led us through the processes that water goes through once we 𿿿ush it down our toilets or when it leeches off of land￿lls and needs to be treated before it can be released back into the lake. This led some of us to marvel at the remarkable ways that bacteria (just like the myriad bacteria in our own guts and out in the natural environment) do a lot of work to break down and consume some of the “dirtier” parts of “wastewater” so that the water that they release back into the lake won’t transmit disease or seriously increase nutrient loading in the lake. These tours should be required for all city residents! We are grateful to both facilities for accommodating our groups. As in previous years, we also offered our regular suite of three Water Quality Monitoring Cruises on Cayuga Lake in partnership with Discover Cayuga Lake’s Floating Classroom and three Biomonitoring Fun! events in partnership with New York State Parks. On the water monitoring cruises, kids get a chance to learn about the lake while helping to collect samples and analyze water quality at a number of different locations on Cayuga Lake, using scienti￿c equipment such as Van Dorn samplers, Secchi disks, plankton nets and microscopes. The results of this monitoring contribute to CSI’s long-term data sets and are publicly accessible through the CSI database. At Biomonitoring Fun! events, kids literally get their feet wet exploring four different State Park stream locations as they look for small organisms called benthic macroinvertebrates that tell us a lot about water Page 11 Biomonitoring coordinator Adrianna Hirtler demonstrating the correct use of a kick net to collect a biomonitoring sample. Journey of Water: Cultivating a Place-Based Sense of the Water Cycle … continued on page 12 Page 12 How Does Weather Impact Harmful Algal Blooms? One of the most common questions we are asked at Community Science Institute is “what causes HABs?” The scienti￿c literature on HABs implicates various, interacting factors in cyanobacteria bloom formation, including nutrient runoff, higher temperatures, and decreased mixing of lake layers due to low wind speeds or extended summers.22 Increased precipitation has also been linked to bloom formation.23 Given this context, it is interesting that the summer of 2022 was drier than recent years (see 2022 Water Bulletin article: "The Not -So-Apparent Implications of Drought") and also saw the ￿rst decrease in the number of blooms reported on Cayuga Lake since the onset of our program. However, any conclusions based on this correlation alone are merely speculation; collecting long-term, reliable data, like we do in our HABs monitoring program, is valuable because it allows us to observe and analyze trends over longer periods of time. While some patterns in HAB formation on Cayuga Lake are becoming clear (See Box 2), some trends, such as the impact of weather, are not as straightforward. Our case study demonstrates the complex relationship between weather and bloom formation on Cayuga Lake. … continued on page 13 Figure 1 Number of harmful algal blooms on Cayuga Lake reported through our Cayuga Lake Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring Program annually from 2018 -2022. Note the different colors within each bar which correspond to different concentrations of microcystin toxin. quality. By trying to answer ￿ve questions about who they ￿nd living under rocks, they decide whether the water quality at each site is good or if the site warrants further investigation. Interested kids and families also help participate in collecting full biomonitoring samples at the end of each event that are analyzed by volunteers at Open Lab Nights over the winter (which kids and their families are also invited to join). CSI’s 4-H20 program grew out of a parent -led 4-H club that wanted to focus on water quality monitoring, working within CSI’s existing volunteer monitoring structure. In recent years, with the speci ￿c families that had been involved aging out of the program, CSI has rejuvenated 4-H20 as more of a program-based offering in partnership with Tompkins County 4-H. For the past three years, the Park Foundation has helped fund this programming so that we can offer it free to all. The Journey of Water series this summer felt like a big success, coming out of the uncertainties and low program attendance of peak Covid times, with lots of interest expressed by folks who were new to our 4-H2O program. Even for CSI staff, the process of participating in all of these events that followed and highlighted water’s journeys throughout our lives felt like an important summer ritual that we hope to be able to offer again in the future. - Adrianna Hirtler, Biomonitoring Coordinator Community Science Institute and our dedicated HABs Harriers* have now completed ￿ve years of monitoring cyanobacteria blooms, also known as Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs), along the shoreline of Cayuga Lake (See Box 1 for details and background on the program). Since the start of the program, the number of blooms reported to CSI has consistently increased.21 This year, for the ￿rst time, we have instead seen this number decrease (Fig. 1). *Harrier: noun, from the verb harry, to harass or attack repeatedly. Example: A Harrier Hawk attacks small game. This term was applied to our HABs volunteers to describe their vigilance. Page 13 Case Study: King Ferry Blooms, 2019-2022 To begin looking at ways in which weather impacts HABs, we analyzed HAB trends over four years (2019 - 2022), concentrating on blooms reported just south of King Ferry, NY. This included HAB Harrier zones 3416, 3460, 3478, and 3492 and spanned Lake Ridge Point to Elmwood Point. This area was chosen for several reasons. First, there is a weather station near the shoreline of the Lake (KNYKINGF5, accessed via: www.wunderground.com) with data on wind speed, temperature, and precipitation going back to 2019 (no 2018 weather data were available). This area of shoreline also has broad volunteer coverage dating back through the beginning of our HAB monitoring program, giving us more certainty that the majority of blooms that occurred there were reported to us. Finally, this area had 18 blooms reported over the past four years, a large enough sample size to hopefully detect some patterns. In this case study, we compared the weather at the station on days when our volunteers reported blooms to days when they did not report blooms. On days when blooms were not reported, wind speeds tended to be higher than on days when blooms were reported (Fig. 2). No relationship was found between bloom observations (whether a bloom was observed or not) and temperature or precipitation on the same day as a bloom. Our consideration of the presence or absence of bloom reports and weather data on any particular day of the 2019-2022 bloom seasons suggest that wind can impact a bloom’s visibility. The windier a day is, the less likely a bloom is to be reported. This idea is consistent with anecdotal reports from our volunteers, who often observe that a bloom disappears quickly on a windy day. Scienti ￿c literature similarly demonstrates that higher wind speeds on a lake can be linked to smaller bloom extents on the surface of the water.25 Our exploration of the King Ferry HAB reports and weather data is one preliminary attempt to look at connections between weather and HABs on Cayuga Lake. This investigation did not take into account water temperature and only addressed air temperature and precipitation on the same day that the bloom occurred. Further, previously published work links precipitation and temperature with bloom formation over the course of days or weeks leading up to the bloom event, rather than the day of the bloom.18, 23 This may explain Figure 1 Maximum daily wind speed in King Ferry from 2019-2022 on days on which no blooms were observed vs. days on which blooms were observed. The boxes represent 50% of the data with the center line of each box demonstrating the median. Lines extending above and below the boxes represent the spread of the data, while dots depict outliers. … continued on page 14 Box 1: How exactly does CSI’s “HABs Harrier” program work? Community Science Institute currently has a team of 88 volunteers, or "HAB Harriers," who monitor Cayuga Lake for harmful algal blooms (HABs). This comprehensive program, a collaboration between CSI, Cayuga Lake Watershed Network, and Discover Cayuga Lake, integrates community engagement with rigorous science. Our Harriers, most of them concerned community members, survey sections of the shoreline weekly for blooms. Blooms can look like parallel streaks, green clumps, spilled paint, or even pea soup. These cues signal to our harriers that explosive growth of cyanobacteria is taking place. Cyanobacteria are always present in the water, but usually at concentrations too low to be visible. They can produce various chemical compounds, which may be bene￿cial or harmful to humans.24 In Cayuga Lake blooms, the cyanobacteria we see most commonly belong to the genera Microcystis and Dolichospermum. Once our volunteers observe a bloom, they collect a sample and bring it to CSI’s laboratory. There, we con￿rm blooms by checking to see if and what kind of cyanobacteria are present. Approximately 94% of samples collected by volunteers in 2022 contained cyanobacteria. We also test the samples for chlorophyll a concentration (to estimate bloom density) and microcystin toxin concentration (to estimate bloom toxicity). Microcystin is the only toxin for which we test, but microcystin toxin levels are not necessarily predictive of concentrations of other toxins. Page 14 - Grace Haynes, Outreach & Programs Coordinator, Cayuga Lake HABs Monitoring Program Coordinator why precipitation on the day of the reported bloom was not associated with whether or not a bloom was observed. Finally, matching weather data to the bloom events observed by our volunteers is dif￿cult because the weather conditions pulled from the weather station in King Ferry may not align precisely with the weather occurring in the exact location of a bloom. Recording weather conditions and water temperature at the time a bloom sample is collected would be preferable to pulling them from weather stations retroactively. Exploring the impacts of weather on HAB formation and composition is an exciting area of research. It is especially interesting to consider the variability in how weather may impact HAB formation at different locations on Cayuga Lake as there may be geographical features that impact susceptibility to changes in wind, precipitation, and air temperature. The decrease in the number of lakeside blooms reported across all of Cayuga Lake in 2022 may be connected to the lack of precipitation experienced this year. However, our case study on blooms in King Ferry also showed that wind was a relevant factor in that region. To more de￿nitively identify patterns in HABs formation, we need more years of data that re𿿿ect varying weather conditions. This is what makes broadly-collected, long-term data so important to scienti￿c inquiry. With more Cayuga Lake shoreline coverage and additional years of data with our volunteer partners, effects of weather on HABs formation, as well as other factors such as bloom composition and characteristics, may come into clearer view. Box 2: Consistent trends 2018 - 2022 Some trends noted in previous years persisted in 2022. For example, blooms in the northern ￿fth of the lake tended to be more numerous and have higher microcystin toxin concentrations compared to blooms at the south end of the lake. While nutrients generally favor HABs formation, and northern tributary streams are known to transport signi￿cantly higher concentrations of bioavailable phosphorus and nitrogen compared to tributaries at the south end of the lake,26 it is not clear that elevated nutrients are the cause of northern shoreline HABs. Consistently denser populations of cyanobacteria in the genus Microcystis (even when blooms are not occurring) have been documented in the northern end of Cayuga Lake,27 and the lake is shallower on the north end, making it generally warmer. Either of these factors could also contribute to this observed pattern of higher microcystin concentrations being found in the northern end of Cayuga Lake. As in previous monitoring seasons, in 2022 microcystin toxin concentration was correlated with total chlorophyll a concentration (Fig. 3) in blooms dominated by Microcystis sp. In contrast, we do not observe this same relationship between chlorophyll a and microcystin in blooms dominated by Dolichospermum, another cyanobacteria genus. Chlorophyll a concentration re𿿿ects the biomass of a bloom, while microcystin levels are one measure of a bloom’s toxicity. Therefore, in Microcystis-dominated blooms, as biomass (or bloom density) increases, so too does the bloom’s toxicity, whereas in blooms dominated by other cyanobacteria genera, there is no relationship between bloom biomass and toxicity. There are important caveats to this relationship, however. For example, chlorophyll a is present in all phytoplankton, not only cyanobacteria;28 thus, chlorophyll a concentration may overestimate a bloom's biomass if other phytoplankton are present. Further, microcystin is not the only toxin that can be produced by cyanobacteria so there may be other toxins contributing to a bloom's toxicity that we are not capturing in our laboratory analyses.29 CSI’s lab analyzes bloom samples for microcystin concentration because microcystin is a common cyanotoxin with a relatively slow rate of degradation and the only one for which there is currently an ELAP- certi￿ed test. Microcystin is also the most commonly found cyanotoxin in New York State.30 Figure 3. Relationship between chlorophyll a concentration and microcystin concentration in bloom samples collected from Cayuga Lake with data pooled from CSI HAB data 2018-2022. Color shows cyanobacteria composition: Microcystis-dominant blooms are shown in red, blooms with Microcystis sp. present but not dominant are in yellow, and blooms with no Microcystis sp. are in blue. Both axes use a logarithmic scale. The solid line denotes 4 µg/L of microcystin, or the contact recreation limit set by NYSDOH. The dotted black line denotes 0.3 µg/L, the CSI laboratory reporting limit and the drinking water limit set by NYSDOH for microcystin. In Microcystis-dominated blooms, chlorophyll a and microcystin are highly correlated Microcystin (µg/L) Chlorophyll a (µg/L) Microcystis dominant Microcystis present No Microcystis present Cyanobacteria Composition 4000 1000 100 10 0.3 10 100 1000 10000 microcystin reporting limit 4 µg/L microcystin Referenced Literature 1) 33 U.S. Code § 407 1899. Deposit of refuse in navigable waters generally. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from: hƩps:// www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/407 2) Harvey, Steve. June 13, 2010. California’s legendary oil spill. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: https:// www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jun-13-la-me-then-20100613-story.html 3) Boissoneault, Lorraine. June 19, 2019. The Cuyahoga River Caught Fire at Least a Dozen Times, but No One Cared UnƟl 1969. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/cuyahoga-river-caught-𿿿re- least-dozen-Ɵmes-no-one-cared-unƟl-1969-180972444/ 4) Kleiman, Jordan. (n.d.) Love Canal: A Brief History. N.d. Geneseo. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps://www.geneseo.edu/ history/love_canal_history 5) Killam, G. October, 2022. The Clean Water Act Owner’s Manual 3rd EdiƟon. The River Network. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from: hƩps://www.rivernetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CleanWaterActManual-3rdEdiƟon-𿿿nal-11.7.22.pdf 6) Stainbrook, K.; Ross, C.; Sheridan, E. March 17, 2016. Nine Element Watershed Plans. New York State Department of Environmental ConservaƟon. In: Water Quality Symposium/NYS CDEA Annual Training Session. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps:// www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/9eppt.pdf 7) ManƟus, Peter. October 22, 2022. Farmland Runo￿, Intense Storms Raise Phosphorus Loads That Drive HABs in Seneca-Keuka Watershed, 9E Study Finds. Water Front. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps://waterfrontonline.blog/2022/10/22/farmland- runo￿-intense-storms-raise-phosphorus-loads-that-drive-habs-in-seneca-keuka-watershed-study-𿿿nds/ 8) Mark, Noah. 2021. CSI’s Role in the Development of the Seneca-Keuka Nine Element Plan. The Water BulleƟn NewsleƩer, Fall 2021, 1-5. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩp://www.communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/CSI-Fall-2021-Water- BulleƟn-NewsleƩer-Final.pdf 9) Salka, John. October 20, 2022. New York State Releases Final Water Quality Plan for Seneca and Keuka Lakes. ‘Seneca-Keuka Watershed Nine Element Plan for Phosphorus’ Outlines Science- and Community-Based Program to Restore and Protect Two Treasured Finger Lakes. New York State Department of Environmental ConservaƟon. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps:// www.dec.ny.gov/press/126413.html 10)Cayuga Lake Watershed Network. 2017. Cayuga Lake Watershed RestoraƟon and ProtecƟon Plan 2017. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from: hƩps://www.cayugalake.org/wp-content/uploads/clwrpp_2017_𿿿nal_4_30_17.pdf 11)Upstate Freshwater InsƟtute. 2017. Phase 2 Final Report A Phosphorus/EutrophicaƟon Water Quality Model for Cayuga Lake, New York. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from: hƩps://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/cornelllscclmpphase2.pdf 12)Halfman, J.D. 2016. Water Quality of the eight eastern Finger Lakes, New York: 2005-2016. Finger Lake Water Quality Update. Finger Lakes InsƟtute, Hobart & William Smith Colleges. 13)New York State Department of Environmental ConservaƟon (NYSDEC). 2022. DEC issues update on statewide drought condiƟons. Retrieved January 9, 2023, from: hƩps://www.dec.ny.gov/press/126319.html 14)NaƟonal Drought MiƟgaƟon Center. 2022. U.S. Drought Monitor, Northeast. Map released: August 2, 2022. 15)IPCC. 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. ContribuƟon of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-DelmoƩe, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. MaƩhews, T.K. Maycock, T. Water𿿿eld, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, In press, doi:10.1017/9781009157896. 16)Satoh, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Pokhrel, Y.; Kim, H.; Shiogama, H.; Yokohata, T.; Hanasaki, N.; Wada, Y.; Burek, P.; Byers, E.; Schmied, H.M.; Gerten, D.; Ostberg, S.; Gosling, S.N.; Boulange, J.E.S.; Oki, T. 2022. The Ɵming of unprecedented hydrological drought under climate change. Nature CommunicaƟons. 13, 3287 (2022). hƩps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467 -022-30729-2 17)Wysocki, M. W. 2019. Floods, Droughts, and Temperature Swings: Not Your Grandfather’s Weather. Nutrients in the Seneca and Cayuga Lake Watersheds, Unusual Weather, and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Second Public ConversaƟon – September 28th, 2019. Ovid, NY. 18)Carpenter, S.R.; Gahler, M.R.; Kucharik, C.J.; Stanley, E.H. 2022. Long -range dependence and extreme values of precipitaƟon, phosphorus load, and cyanobacteria. PNAS. 119, 48. e221434119. 19)EPA 2022. Climate Change and Harmful Algal Blooms. Retrieved from: hƩps://www.epa.gov/nutrientpolluƟon/climate-change-and- harmful-algal-blooms 20)Loecke, T.D.; Burgin, A.J.; Riveros-Iregui, D.A.; Ward, A.S.; Thomas, S.A.; Davis, C.A.; St. Clair, M.A. 2017. Weather whiplash in agricultural regions drives deterioraƟon of water quality. Biogeochemistry 133:7-15 (2017). hƩps://doi.org/10.1007/s10533 -017- 0315-z 21)Launer, Nathaniel. 2021. Widespread Blooms Increase the Annual Count of HABs. The Water BulleƟn NewsleƩer, Fall 2021, 12 -14. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩp://www.communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/CSI-Fall-2021-Water-BulleƟn- NewsleƩer-Final.pdf 22)Paul, V.J. 2008. Global warming and cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms. In: Hudnell, H.K. (eds) Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms: State of the Science and Research Needs. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 619. Springer, New York, NY. hƩps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75865-7_11 23)Paerl, H.W. and Huisman, J. 2008. Blooms Like It Hot. Science, 320, 57-58. hƩp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155398 24)Namikoshi, M; Rinehart, KL. 1996. BioacƟve compounds produced by cyanobacteria. In: Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, Volume 17, Issue 5-6. Retrieved from: hƩps://academic.oup.com/jimb/arƟcle/17/5-6/373/5988970 25)Wu, T; Qin, B; Brookes, JD; Shi, K; Zhu, G; Zhu, M; Yan, W; Wang, Z. June 2015. The in񯿿uence of changes in wind paƩerns on the areal extension of surface cyanobacterial blooms in a large shallow lake in China. In: Science of the Total Environment, Volumes 518- 519. Retrieved from: hƩps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arƟcle/pii/S0048969715002430 26)O’Leary, N.; Johnston, R.; Gardner, E.L.; Penningroth, S.M.; Bouldin, D.R. 2019. Long -Term Study of Soluble ReacƟve Phosphorus ConcentraƟon in Fall Creek and Comparison to Northeastern Tributaries of Cayuga Lake, NY: ImplicaƟons for Watershed Monitoring and Management. In: Water 2019, 11, 2075. hƩps://doi.org/10.3390/w11102075 27)Launer, Nathaniel. 2020. Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in 2020. The Water Bulletin Newsletter, Fall 2020, 1-5. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: communityscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Fall2020WaterBulletin.pdf 28)Davis, T.W.; Berry, D.L.; Boyer, G.L.; Gobler, C.J.; June 2009. The e￿ects of temperature and nutrients on the growth and dynamics of toxic and non-toxic strains of MicrocysƟs during cyanobacteria blooms. In: Harmful Algae, Volume 8 Issue 5. Retrieved from: sciencedirect.com/science/arƟcle/pii/S1568988309000390 29)Bartram, J., & Chorus, I. 1999. Chapter 2. Cyanobacteria in the Environment. In Toxic cyanobacteria in water (1st ed.). chapter, F & FN Spon Press. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from: hƩps://www.who.int/publicaƟons. 30)Boyer, Gregory L. 2007. The occurrence of cyanobacterial toxins in New York lakes: Lessons from the MERHAB -Lower Great Lakes program, Lake and Reservoir Management, 23:2, 153-160, DOI: 10.1080/07438140709353918 Board of Directors Robert Barton President Stephen Penningroth Treasurer Angel Hinickle Vice-President Deborah Jones Darby Kiley Secretary Jerry Van Orden Sheila Dean Staff Grascen Shidemantle Executive Director Noah Mark Laboratory Director Adrianna Hirtler Biomonitoring Coordinator William George Data Entry Specialist Abner Figueroa Web Development Services Grace Haynes Outreach & Programs Coordinator, Cayuga Lake HABs Monitoring Program Coordinator Seth Bingham Water Quality Scientist Page 15 Newsletter Grascen Shidemantle Editor Grace Haynes Newsletter Design Charlene Mottler Administrative and Laboratory Assistant Robert Thomas Stephen Penningroth Founder Community Science Institute Water Bulletin - 2022 Edition 283 Langmuir Lab Send To: 95 Brown Road/ Box 1044 Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone/ Fax: (607) 257-6606 Certi￿ed Water Quality Testing Lab NYSDOH-ELAP #11790 EPA Lab Code NY01518 Partnering with Communities to Protect Water Since 2002 Membership Levels $25 (Creek) $50 (Stream) $100 (River) $250 (Lake) $500 (Estuary) $1000 (Watershed) Community Science Institute • www.communityscience.org • (607) 257-6606 • info@communityscience.org It is now more important than ever to work together to tackle the increasingly urgent and complex environmental issues of our time including climate change, harmful algal blooms (HABs), and changes in water quantity and quality. To do so, we must enrich our understanding of these issues through scientific monitoring and data collection, communicate data and their implication(s) effectively, and facilitate the collaborative development of equitable solutions. This 2022 issue of the Water Bulletin highlights the capability of Community Science Institute (CSI) to help tackle these issues by supporting community -based efforts to understand water quality issues of local concern including E.coli contamination of public swimming areas, communicating fast and accurate HABs data necessary for people to make safe decisions, and helping develop regional water quality protection plans such as the Seneca-Keuka Nine Element Plan through the collection of regulatory -quality data. It highlights CSI’s unique capabilities as a certified water testing laboratory that supports the work of over two hundred and fifty volunteers, to help connect community, science, and management so that we can protect our shared water resources. You can support our efforts by becoming a member of CSI or renewing your membership today! Your membership will allow us to advance our mission of empowering community members to become stewards of their local water resources through scientific water quality monitoring. Send contributions to Community Science Institute, 283 Langmuir lab, 95 Brown Rd/ Box 1044, Ithaca, NY 14850 To contribute by credit card, visit the “Donate” page on our website at www.communityscience.org/donate/ HELP PROTECT CLEAN WATER! DONATE TODAY With sincere thanks, The CSI Team Nominator Contact: Name: ________________ E-mail: __________________ Phone Number: _________________ Nominee Contact: Name/Group: __________________________________ E-mail: _________________________ Phone Number: _________________ Address: _______________________________________ Website: _________________________ Group Leader: ________________________________ Size, scope, and location: What size area and/or audience? What ultimate potential scope? Is the area affected fully or partially in the Town? Does it aim to provide Town-wide benefits, or focused more specifically? Summary of project/action prompting nomination: Lori Brewer ljb7@cornell.edu 6073423969 ICSD Child Nutrition Program beth.krause@icsd.k12.ny.us (607) 274-2302 Ithaca City School District 400 Lake StreetIthaca, NY 14850 https://www.ithacacityschools.org/page/child-nutrition Beth Krause - Director of School Lunch -Town of Ithaca resident The Ithaca City School District's (ICSD) cafeterias use approximately 268,740 single-use spoons and forks every year. These single-use plastic utensils which could amount to 5,000 pounds of waste are sent to the Ontario County Landfill. Under the guidance of Beth Krause, the Director of School Lunch, the ICSD Child Nutrition Program initiative to reduce this unnecessary waste has begun with the rollout of 3,200 reusable stainless steel sporks at the Lehman Alternative Community School and Boynton Middle School. Reusable sporks will eventually be introduced at all ICSD's campuses. This demonstrates the district's commitment to student well-being, environmental conservation, and financial responsibility. Families who reside in the Town of Ithaca register all their school-age children in Ithaca City School District. Reusable sporks will eventually be introduced at all ICSD's campuses starting with Lehman Alternative Community School and Boynton Middle School. This initiative to reduce waste in school cafeterias through a highly visible campaign around reusable utensils provides opportunity for students to be active participants in waste reduction which may inspire them to reduce waste by using reusable utensils as well as other products in their daily consumption of food and beverages outside their cafeterias. Fostering a culture of reuse in school-age children would provide immediate and future benefits to the Town of Ithaca's sustainability efforts. Cost-effectiveness: Does it achieve much for little expense? Applicability: Is this easily reproduced, or is it applicable for widespread use? Is this likely to encourage other beneficial actions for the Town? Awareness/Visibility: If a project is physical, how obvious/visible is it? If not, how has the public been made aware? In a yearly budget, it might possibly be cheaper to use and dispose of single use utensils than to buy and wash reusable stainless steel sporks. Though when we consider recent studies have revealed the presence of toxic chemicals, such as PFAS, in single-use foodware, including those made of so-called "compostable" or "biodegradable" bioplastics, posing risks to human health and the environment reusable utensils might very well achieve a whole lot for little expense. Evidence of compost contamination with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from compostable food serviceware (https://pubs.aip.org/avs/bip/article/18/3/030501/2894789/Evidence-of-compost-contamination-with-per-and) Schools that Ditched Disposables (https://ceh.foleon.com/ceh/ditching-disposables-toolkit/case-studies-schools-that-ditched-disposables) Reusable sporks will eventually be introduced at all ICSD's campuses. They might serve as a model and inspiration for a cultural shift across other institutions, organizations, and businesses including restaurants in our community. More than 5,000 students are enrolled in the Ithaca City School District. These students and their families produce an enviable word of mouth awareness campaign. Impact on the Town of Ithaca: Does the project enhance the Town's public image? Does it present potential for Town government to take additional steps to benefit the environment? Type of Benefit Produced: Preservation? Restoration? Removal/reduction of negative conditions? Creation of habitat or visual enhancement? Education? Negative Impacts: Could these have been foreseen and possibly avoided/reduced? Do they outweigh the benefits? Waste disposal disproportionately affects communities where landfills facilities are. Reducing solid waste that is shipped out of our community is important and necessary for a Town that treasures natural resources. Eliminating single-use plastic utensils in school cafeterias protects our environment. Reducing what is used can cut down on the volume or toxicity of the waste stream. Additionally, because we are not creating new material, we avoid all the environmental impacts and costs of producing a product in the first place. The primary concern about the effectiveness of this initiative is that students might dispose of these sporks, rather than returning them to the cafeteria so that they can be reused. A community effort to educate everyone about the reasons behind this transition and foster a sense of responsibility in students as they practice caring for the utensils so that future students can use them is critical to long term success. To submit this form in writing address it to the Conservation Board, 215 N. Tioga Street, Town of Ithaca, Ithaca, NY, 14850. It can be mailed in or dropped off in person. To submit electronically, fill out the form and save it as a pdf file, then email to Michael Smith (msmith@town.ithaca.ny.us) Additional Items Attached: A list naming each is fine. Ex: news articles, photos, web site etc. Article by IHS The Tattler https://ihstattler.com/blog/2023/10/the-rollout-of-reusable-sporks-in-icsd-a-step-toward- waste-reduction/ Nominator Contact: Name: ________________ E-mail: __________________ Phone Number: _________________ Nominee Contact: Name/Group: __________________________________ E-mail: _________________________ Phone Number: _________________ Address: _______________________________________ Website: _________________________ Group Leader: ________________________________ Size, scope, and location:What size area and/or audience? What ultimate potential scope? Is the area affected fully or partially in the Town? Does it aim to provide Town-wide benefits, or focused more specifically? Summary of project/action prompting nomination: James Hamilton jameswaldo@bluefrog.com 607 273-1335 Zero Waste Ithaca info@zerowasteithaca.org http://zerowasteithaca.org/ I don't really know if Zero Waste Ithaca (ZWI) has done or planned anything, but their publicity and website impressed me. I think I first heard of them as they protested replacement of IC sports field grass with plastic astroturf. And our Conservation Board's Waste Awareness Committee was, I believe, disbanded when they found ZWI to be already doing a good job at publicizing the importance of reducing waste in Ithaca. I like their focus on food industry single-use plastic waste. They're also concerned with student household waste left when college school years end. They meet once a month, according to their website. Cost-effectiveness:Does it achieve much for little expense? Applicability:Is this easily reproduced,or is it applicable for widespread use? Is this likely to encourage other beneficial actions for the Town? Awareness/Visibility:If a project is physical, how obvious/visible is it? If not, how has the public been made aware? Not sure if there are any big achievements, though probably every little bit helps. I think the "widespread use" is the larger Zero Waste movement, and Zero Waste Ithaca is trying to apply that notion to our locality. According to the ZWI website, this group has an annual highway trash cleanup. They held cleanups at Stewart Park, both on land and via kayaks along the shore. They held a "Buy Nothing Black Friday Hike" in Cornell's Fall Creek Natural area, picking up trash and not shopping on Nov 24, 2023's Black Friday. Though concrete physical impact may be minor, they're engaged at the webpage level via very handsome website and a facebook page that seems very actively administered. Impact on the Town of Ithaca:Does the project enhance the Town's public image? Does it present potential for Town government to take additional steps to benefit the environment? Type of Benefit Produced:Preservation? Restoration? Removal/reduction of negative conditions? Creation of habitat or visual enhancement? Education? Negative Impacts:Could these have been foreseen and possibly avoided/reduced? Do they outweigh the benefits? ZWI looks like it might help the Town discourage plastic sports turf, and property wasted by college students. ZWI may be more a set of webpages than anything solidly happening In Real Life, but I'd like to think they may help get some Ithacans involved in reducing waste and diverting resources from landfill. Their programs promoting restaurants that allow customers to take out food in the customers' own containers, and to encourange food service companies in Ithaca to "skip the stuff" like plastic utensils, napkins, condiments in foil pouches, may help make Ithaca greener. Maybe too much effort is just text, graphics, and virtual reality online. My "contact" with this group is through the internet, after all. But according to their website, they do actually meet in real life and promote public awareness, if not much real action. Additional Items Attached:A list naming each is fine.Ex: news articles, photos,web site etc. To submit this form in writing, address it to the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board, 215 N. Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850.It can be mailed or dropped off in person.To submit electronically, email to .