Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CU Meinig Fieldhouse Sketch Plan- Lead Agency PB Packet 2024-01-16
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tioga St 14850 607.273.1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner DATE: January 9, 2024 RE: Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center Project – Sketch Plan Review, Consider concurrence with City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board Lead Agency declaration Enclosed please find application materials pertaining to the proposed Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project, located on the Cornell Campus, on Tower Road in the Town of Ithaca and City of Ithaca. The project involves replacing the Robison Alumni Fields with a 90,000+/- square foot, 56-foot-tall indoor fieldhouse building and a new synthetic turf outdoor field hockey field, along with new sidewalks and pedestrian connections, stormwater facilities, landscaping, lighting, and other site improvements. The proposed facility will enable year- round practice space and play for many field sports, and limited competition for NCAA lacrosse in early spring months. The Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project will require special permit and site plan approval from the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, area variances from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, and approvals by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board. The proposed project is a Type I Action, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR Part 617). As such, the project requires the completion of a Full Environmental Assessment Form and a coordinated review amongst the agencies that have discretionary decision authority to approve certain aspects of the project. The City Planning and Development Board has declared their intent to be the Lead Agency in the environmental review of the project. The attachments include a letter from the city officially notifying the town of this intent and requesting concurrence from the Town of Ithaca Planning Board. Also enclosed is a draft resolution for the Planning Board to consider concurring with the City Planning and Development Board’s (PDB) intent to serve as Lead Agency. Assuming concurrence by all involved agencies, the City’s PDB is anticipated to make a formal declaration of Lead Agency on January 23, 2024. This will give involved agencies like the Town Planning and Zoning Boards 30 days to provide comments, concerns, and recommendations related to the SEQR Full EAF and its contents. The purpose of the January 16th meeting is for the Planning Board to discuss concurrence with the City of Ithaca being the Lead Agency in the environmental review of the project. Representatives from the applicant team be present to introduce the project and explain the attachments. 2 The Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals will discuss the SEQR Full EAF at a future meeting (within 30 days of the City PDB declaration of Lead Agency); and staff will follow up with a letter to the City PDB that contains any town concerns, comments, and recommendations. Please feel free to contact me by phone at (607) 273-1721 or by email at cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us if you have questions before the meeting. Att. Cc: Elisabete Godden, Project Manager, Cornell University Facilities and Campus Services Kimberly Michaels, Director of Landscape Architects, TWM, a Fisher Associates Landscape Architecture Studio Lisa Nicholas, Director of Planning and Economic Development, City of Ithaca Leslie Schill, Director of Campus Planning, Cornell University, Office of the University Architect PROPOSED RESOLUTION: SEQR Lead Agency Concurrence Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse City of Ithaca (TP No. 31.-1-1.2) Town of Ithaca (TP No. 67.-1-13.2) Town of Ithaca Planning Board, January 16, 2024 WHEREAS: 1. Cornell University is proposing the Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center facility along Tower Road on the Cornell University Campus. The project involves replacing the Robison Alumni Fields with a 90,000+/- square foot, 56-foot-tall indoor fieldhouse building and new synthetic turf outdoor field hockey field, along with new sidewalks and pedestrian connections, stormwater facilities, landscaping, lighting, and other site improvements, 2. Approximately 80% of the Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project is located within the City of Ithaca. The overall project area totals 7+/- acres, with 5.8+/- acres in the City of Ithaca (including the proposed outdoor synthetic turf field hockey field, approximately 74,000+/- square feet of the proposed fieldhouse building, most of the proposed paving, landscaping, lighting and stormwater management facilities) and 2.1+/- acres in the Town of Ithaca (including approximately 16,000+/- square feet of the proposed fieldhouse building, some paving, landscaping, lighting, and stormwater facilities), 3. Development of the project will require special permit and site plan approval from the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, area variances from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, approvals from the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, and potentially other approvals from State and County agencies, 4. The Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project is a Type I action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR Part 617) and will be conducted as a coordinated review amongst the various agencies that have discretionary decision authority to approve certain aspects of the project, and 5. In a letter dated December 21, 2023, the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board indicated its intent to serve as the lead agency for the environmental review of the Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby concurs with the designation of the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board as lead agency under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR Part 617) for the purpose of overseeing the environmental review of the Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Center project. To: C.J. Randall, Town of Ithaca Jonathan Stercho, NYS DEC Scott Freyburger, Tompkins County Department of Health Katherine Borgella, AIC, Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability From: Nikki Cerra, Environmental & Landscape Planner Date: December 21, 2023 RE: Lead Agency Concurrence Request – 239 Tower Rd – Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse REQUEST FOR LEAD AGENCY STATUS The City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has a pending application for an indoor sports and recreation center at 239 Tower Road on the Cornell University campus. The applicant proposes to construct the Meinig Fieldhouse, an indoor sports and recreation center of approximately 90,000 SF on the existing Robison Alumni Fields which is composed of natural grass and artificial turf fields, sidewalks, spectator viewing areas, and parking lots. The Meinig Fieldhouse will accommodate a field that will be programmed to support NCAA requirements for women and men lacrosse competitions; a varsity soccer pitch and/or varsity football field for practices; and the facility will host campus recreation, club, and intramural sport teams. The proposed building will also include a mechanical room, restrooms, a training room, and storage on the ground floor; two team rooms, restrooms, an area for elevated filming and mechanical spaces on the second level mezzanine accessible by both stairs and elevator; and on each level an area for a limited number of spectators. The project is located in central campus and the limit of disturbance is proposed to be approximately 7 acres in total, with 5.8 acres in the City and 1.2 acres in the Town of Ithaca. The project site is located in the U-1 Zoning District in the City of Ithaca and will require no variances and is located in the Low-Density Residential Zoning District in the Town of Ithaca and will require variances in the town. This has been determined to be a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance §176-4 B.1(b), (n), and 8(a), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) §617.4 b. (11) and is subject to environmental review. In an effort to coordinate review under SEQRA and CEQRO, your Board or Agency has been identified as potentially having approval authority over some aspects of this project. It is the Planning and Development Board’s intention to act as Lead Agency. The CEQRO Full Environmental Assessment Form (“FEAF”) Part 1 and supplemental information provided by t he applicant are available here Meinig Fieldhouse. These are the minimum materials required under SEQRA and CEQRO for lead agency coordination. It is respectfully requested that you advise the undersigned within 30 days of your consent to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board serving as Lead Agency for this project. In the event that you do not respond within thirty (30) days, the Planning Board will undertake Lead Agency status at that time. You may indicate your consent by countersigning this letter in the space indicated below and returning it to this office. Please contact me at (607) 274-6516 if you have questions. Thank you for your cooperation. It is agreed the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board shall be designated Lead Agency for the environmental review of the above referenced project in the City of Ithaca. The undersigned represents that she/he has the requisite authority to consent to lead agency status. Signature: Agency: Title: Date: CITY OF ITHACA 108 E. Green St. — Third Floor Ithaca, NY 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Lisa Nicholas, Director Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6565 E-Mail: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Meinig Fieldhouse Indoor Sports and Recreation Facility Site Plan Review Application Report Cornell University Ithaca, NY December 15, 2023 This page has been intentionally left blank. TWM - A Fisher Associates Landscape Architecture Studio Fisher Associates, P.E., L.S., L.A., D.P.C. 1001 West Seneca Street, Suite 201 Ithaca, New York 14850 ph: 607.277.1400 www.twm.la | www.fisherassoc.com December 15, 2023 C.J. Randall, Director of Planning Department of Planning, Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Site Plan Review for Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Dear Director Randall: Attached please find SEQR and site plan review materials for the new Meinig Fieldhouse on Cornell University campus. The proposed Meinig Fieldhouse project will support students and campus with much-needed indoor practice and competition space for athletics, club sports, and recreation needs. The project site is on the central campus, in the area currently occupied by Robison Alumni Fields, with Tower Road to the north, Robert J. Kane Sports Complex Field to the east, Bartels Hall to the south, and Weill Hall to the west. The proposed facility will enable year-round practice space and play for many field sports, and limited competition for NCAA lacrosse in early spring months. The facility will be a 90,000 square foot building that is 56 feet tall. Cornell’s Marsha Dodson Field Hockey pitch will be relocated to the west, providing the field hockey athletes with an updated synthetic turf field. Included in this booklet is the following: Detailed Project Narrative Lighting Cut Sheets SEAF + FEAF Geotechnical Report C100 Legend Notes C101 Existing Conditions Plan C102 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan C103 Utility Demolition Plan C104 Water and Sanitary Service Plan C105 Drainage Plan C201 Utility Details C202 Utility Details C203 ESC Details A1-01 Floor Plans A2-11 Exterior Elevations L1-01 Site Protection & Removals Plan L1-02 Fire Access Routes L2-01 Layout Plan L3-01 Materials Plan L4-01 Grading Plan L5-01 Planting Plan L8-01 Site Details - Paving Assemblies L8-02 Site Details - Edge Conditions L8-03 Site Details - Paving Joint L8-04 Site Details - Planting Vehicle Tracking Studies Separately, a technical drawing set, in 11x17 and full-size, is provided and includes: Since the project crosses the municipal boundary, a copy of these same materials is also submitted to the City of Ithaca. We hope to introduce the project at the Town of Ithaca’s January 16, 2024 Planning Board Meeting, where each municipality can discuss the potential for the City to be lead agency. Sincerely, Kimberly Michaels Director of Landscape Architecture Sasaki Associates Project Architect and Landscape Architect TWM – A Fisher Associates Landscape Architecture Studio Fisher Associates, P.E., L.S., L.A., D.P.C. Project Municipal Approvals T.G. Miller, P.C. Project Civil Engineer R.F.S. Engineering Project Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineers Project Consultants Table of Contents Town of Ithaca Owner Authorization Form ..............................................................................7 Project Narrative ..................................................................................................................9 Short Environmental Assessment Form ...............................................................................27 Full Environmental Assessment Form .................................................................................31 Supplemental Information ..................................................................................................45 Impact on Land ...............................................................................................................47 Impact on Water ..............................................................................................................47 Impact on Air ..................................................................................................................47 Impact on Plants, Animals & Agriculture ..........................................................................47 Impact on Aesthetic Resources ........................................................................................48 Impact on Cultural Resources ..........................................................................................48 Impact on Open Space & Recreation ...............................................................................48 Impact on Critical Environmental and Unique Natural Areas ..............................................48 Impact on Transportation .................................................................................................48 Impact on Energy ............................................................................................................49 Impacts from Sound, Odor & Light ..................................................................................49 Impact on Human Health .................................................................................................49 Impact on Growth & Character of Community ..................................................................49 Impacts from Construction ..............................................................................................49 Appendices ........................................................................................................................51 Technical Drawing Set (11x17) .........................................................................................111(separate packet) This page has been intentionally left blank. 7 Town of Ithaca Owner Authorization Form 9 Project Narrative 10 Project Narrative Project Summary Cornell University is proposing to construct the Meinig Fieldhouse, an indoor sports and recreation center that will support students and campus with much-needed indoor practice and competition space for athletics, club sports, and recreation needs. The project site is on Central Campus, in the area currently occupied by Robison Alumni Fields, with Tower Road to the north, the Robert J. Kane Sports Complex Field to the east, Bartels Hall/Newman Arena to the south, and Weill Hall to the west. The proposed facility will enable year-round practice and play space for athletes as well as limited competition venue for NCAA lacrosse players, with a 90,000 square foot building at 56 feet tall. A new field hockey pitch will provide Cornell’s field hockey athletes a much-needed updated synthetic turf field located to the west of the Meinig Fieldhouse. Project Purpose, Need, and Benefit The new Meinig Fieldhouse on central campus will support student physical and mental health by providing access to recreation, physical education, club team, and intercollegiate activities throughout the year. There is currently not enough field space across campus to accommodate the demand. Student access to recreation is further limited by inclement weather and the northeast winter conditions in effect for much of the academic year. Many other Ivy League institutions have indoor venues, and this project will allow for better recruitment and training opportunities for student athletes. Location The new Meinig Fieldhouse will be located on Cornell University’s Ithaca campus, predominantly in the City of Ithaca (about 83%) and partially in the Town of Ithaca (about 17%) on a site that is currently an outdoor field complex composed of natural grass and artificial turf fields, sidewalks, spectator viewing areas, and parking lots. It is accessed from the north via Tower Road and the south via Campus Road. The site of the proposed building is primarily located within the City of Ithaca on a portion of tax parcel 31.-1-1.2, which is approximately 154 acres in size per the County Assessment tax map. It is also partially located within the Town of Ithaca on a portion of tax parcel No 67.-1-13.2, which is approximately 31 acres in size, per the County Assessment tax map. The limit of disturbance for the project will be approximately 7 acres in total, with 5.8 acres in the City and 1.2 acres in the Town. Setting The project site is situated in an area that includes Kane Sports Complex (track) to the east, Friedman Wrestling Center to the southeast, Bartels Hall to the south, and Lynah Rink to the southwest, and Weill Hall to the west. Across Tower Road to the north, there is Bradfield Hall, Fernow Hall, Rice Hall, Minns Garden, Bailey Conservatory, and greenhouses. Project Narrative 11 Location Map Project Narrative 12 Location Map in context with Cornell Project Narrative 13 Zoning Diagram 14 This page has been intentionally left blank. 15 Zoning The Meinig Fieldhouse will be located mostly within the City of Ithaca U-1 (University) Zoning District and partially within the Town of Ithaca LDR (Low Density Residential) Zoning District. City of Ithaca: U1-Zone The project is an allowed use within the City’s University Zone and meets all the regulations of the U-1 Zone. Within the City’s U-1 zone, there are no requirements related to off-street loading, minimum lot size or lot width at the street line. Cornell manages all parking as a campus-wide district and will continue to be in compliance with requirements for the U-1 zoning including the development of this project. There are also no yard dimension requirements in the code that are applicable to the project. Relative to building height, there are no limits to the number of stories, and building height is generally limited to 175 feet. The proposed building will be shorter than this limit, with the peak of the sports complex roof at approximately 56 feet from average grade. The portion of the project site in the City is located on tax parcel 31.-1-1.2, which captures most of central campus, approximately 80 buildings, and is 154 acres in total size. In this zone, 35% lot coverage is permitted, allowing for 53.9 acres of development. Existing structures on this parcel cover 31.63 acres. This project will add approximately 1.6 acres of building footprint on the City of Ithaca parcel (out of a total building footprint of approximately 2.1 acres), making the total lot coverage on the City of Ithaca parcel approximately 33.23 acres— well within the total lot coverage allowance. The project will also include an additional 72,000 SF reconstruction of the outdoor synthetic turf athletic field. Town of Ithaca: Low Density Residential (LDR) The project is an allowed use with a special use permit in the LDR zone as part of an institution of higher learning. Within the LDR zone, there are no requirements related to off-street loading. Cornell manages all parking as a campus-wide district and will continue to be in compliance with its Traffic Demand Management Plan including the development of this project. Pursuant to Town Code §270- 63, the yard requirements for this lot apply only towards the exterior public street frontages, and the distance from the Fieldhouse and Tower Road and Campus Road comply with the Code’s requirements. Front yard requirements state that the yard shall not be less than 30 feet and no greater than 60 feet, and not less than the average depth of the front yards of adjacent buildings. The rear yard must not be less than 50 feet in depth, and side yards must not be less than 40 feet in width. Building height is generally limited to 38 feet below interior grade or 36 feet below exterior grade (whichever is lower). The proposed building will be taller than this limit, with the peak of the sports complex roof at approximately 56 feet from average grade. Therefore, the project will require an area variance from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals. The portion of the project site in the Town is located on tax parcel 67.-1-13.2, which includes athletic facilities and land south of the Cornell Botanic Gardens, including approximately eight buildings and is 31 acres in total size. Minimum lot size in this zone is 30,000 square feet, and minimum lot width is 100 feet at the street line, which are met by the dimensions of the tax parcel. In this zone, 10% lot coverage is permitted, allowing for 3.1 acres of development. Existing structures on this parcel already exceed this limit, totaling 3.12 acres. This project will add approximately 0.5 acres of building footprint on the Town of Ithaca parcel (total building footprint of approximately 2.1 acres) and will require an area variance for lot coverage from the Town’s Zoning Board of Appeals. Gorge Protection Zone & Unique Natural Area The project is well outside of designated natural areas, including the City’s Gorge Protection Area (GP-A) near Cascadilla Creek; the GP-A limit is along the south edge of Hoy Road, southwest of the project. The project is fully outside the Cascadilla Unique Natural Area. The limit for this UNA is south of Campus Road, across the street from the project. The project is also fully outside the Beebe Lake Woods and Gorge Unique Natural Area, which is located to the north. Project Narrative 16 Tompkins County GML 239 Review The proposed project will require 239 Review based on geographic location triggers for being within 500 feet of the boundary of any city, village or town. Building Program The new building will be a campus hub for varsity, club and intramural practices and a limited number of lacrosse competitions. The overall dimensions and height of the field house are sized to accommodate a field that will be programmed to support NCAA requirements for both women’s and men’s varsity lacrosse competition; a varsity soccer pitch and/or varsity football field for practices; and the facility will host campus recreation, club and intramural sport teams. A synthetic turf field with rubber/sand infill occupies most of the ground floor usable space of the proposed building. Also, on the ground floor is a mechanical room, restrooms, a training room, and storage. There is a second- level mezzanine on the south side of the field, along with two team rooms, restrooms, an area for elevated filming and mechanical spaces. This area will be accessible by both stairs and elevator. Space along the south wall of the proposed building will provide an area for a limited number of spectators on both the field-level and the mezzanine level. Architectural Design The Meinig Fieldhouse will be an inviting athletic venue designed to embrace the spirit of outdoor play indoors. The flexible open fieldhouse space will be able to accommodate all types of team sports and individual fitness routines. The Meinig Fieldhouse is designed with a clean architectural aesthetic. A few folded façade moments provide clarity to the building entries, while glazing on the corners open an opaque façade, allowing inviting glimpses into the activity space from all approach directions. The architectural composition is expressed through a clean palette of materials including metal panel and strategically placed storefront glazing. The majority of the building envelope is composed of insulated metal panel installed horizontally and decreasing in width from the bottom of the facade to the top. The metal panel finish is paired in contrast with angled glazed storefront at each of the four corners. The large triangle shaped glazed openings provide views in and out of the facility and incorporate natural light into the activity space. The entire facility sits on a 16” brick curb that visually lifts the volume and provides a durable yet attractive base for protection from day-to-day maintenance operations and a clean edge for adjacent plantings and landscape. The interior field house walls consist of metal panels and exposed super structure with metal decking above. The building support bar is primarily painted gypsum wall board while the flooring materials consist of a mix of functional and performance-based materials including polished concrete at the entries, rubberized flooring at the team rooms and artificial infill turf at the field house activity space. Project Narrative 17 Conceptual rendering showing massing of the building. Some site features not included. Refer to technical drawing set for proposed site layout and landscaping. 18 This page has been intentionally left blank. 19 Illustrative Site Plan 20 This page has been intentionally left blank. 21 Site Development Fire/Emergency Access The project site will be accessible to fire and emergency vehicles from four points. Two 20-feet wide angled curbs are proposed to the north of the Meinig Fieldhouse structure from the Alumni Field parking lot, and two 20-feet wide flush curbs are proposed to the south of the structure, from the parking area adjacent to the Friedman Wrestling Center. A continuous pathway of minimum 20 feet width is proposed around the entire perimeter of the Meinig Fieldhouse structure, allowing access for fire apparatus. The pathway along the north side of the Meinig Fieldhouse structure is proposed to be 26 feet wide, offset from the building facade between 15 feet and 30 feet to accommodate fire apparatus aerial access. The northernmost lane of the existing parking area adjacent to the Friedman Wrestling Center (20 feet minimum width) will serve fire apparatus access along a portion of the southern access route. A paved point of access at the northeast corner of the exterior turf field will provide access onto the playing surface for emergency vehicles. The Fire Apparatus Access Routes sheet and Vehicle Tracking diagrams are provided in the technical drawing set under separate cover. Service Access and Snow Storage Service will be provided to the proposed Meinig Fieldhouse via a 10-feet wide roll-up door located on the east elevation of the structure. Service vehicles may utilize the path network established for fire apparatus and emergency vehicles. Deliveries will be made via the lanes of the existing parking area adjacent to the Friedman Wrestling Center. Areas within the site, adjacent to fire apparatus and emergency vehicle routes, have been identified for piling snow, as part of snow clearing operations. The site design includes two dumpsters on a heavy-duty concrete pad. They will be accessible via flush curb from the parking area adjacent to the Friedman Wrestling Center. These areas are diagrammed below. Snow removal and storage, dumpster locations Project Narrative 22 Landscape Natural landscape spaces around the building will include sod lawn, meadow grasses and perennials, a rain garden, shrubs, and a mix of deciduous shade trees, evergreens, and flowering trees. A strong emphasis will be placed on using native, non-invasive plant material. To the west of the Meinig Fieldhouse, a synthetic turf field of 72,000 square feet is proposed in accordance with International Hockey Federation (FIH) guidelines. Appropriate drainage will be included. Site Materials All pedestrian walkways are proposed with a minimum six-foot width. Site paving will include asphalt and concrete walkways. Other site hardscape items include precast concrete seat walls, and cast-in-place concrete stairs. Site furnishings include bicycle racks, and recycling/trash receptacles. Railings and guardrails are proposed to be stainless steel. Other site materials include a river stone drip edge along the outer perimeter of the building, stone dust pathways, concrete retaining walls, and a black vinyl chain link fence with pedestrian and vehicular swing gates along the hockey field perimeter. Circulation Sidewalks will connect the building and fields to the existing pedestrian network along Tower and Campus Road. Parking The Meinig Fieldhouse is well served by adjacent parking, both in the Alumni Lot (225 spaces) to the north and the Bartels Lot to the south (80 parking spaces). As the new facility is expected to be primarily used for students for practice, recreation, and club play very little parking is expected to be needed on a daily basis. For a limited number of NCAA lacrosse games that may be held in the facility annually, games are scheduled on weekends or evenings when adjacent parking lots are not utilized by campus faculty and staff and would be available to support parking for the Meinig Fieldhouse. Currently, three permanent ADA parking spaces are located in the Alumni Lot to the north and two are located to the south in Bartels lot. Bartels Lot currently serves as a primary location for auxiliary ADA parking in the evenings (six more spaces) to support athletics events: basketball in Newman Arena and hockey in Lynah Rink. Transportation and Delivery Services is prepared to dedicate additional, full-time ADA spaces in the Bartels Lot to support the new Meinig Fieldhouse, as required by code. Cornell manages its entire campus parking system - located in both the City of Ithaca and Town of Ithaca- as a district (approx. 11,000 parking spaces), in accordance with the City of Ithaca’s U1 zoning. Tower Road, to the north of the new facility, is a complete street that includes full bike lanes and a number of bus stops for routes that offer both rural and urban service. Campus Road, to the south, supports auxiliary parking for athletic events in the Crescent Lot and Hoy Garage, which are walking distance from the new facility. Bicycle parking is provided on site according to City of Ithaca standard regulations outlined in Chapter 276, “Site Plan Review - Supplementary Bicycle Parking Standards”. 36 bicycle parking spaces will be provided on-site, separated into three bicycle parking facilities, located adjacent to the main north and south entrances to the Meinig Fieldhouse. Bicycle parking facilities will be easily accessible from pedestrian or fire access pathways and not intrude into these walkways. Project Narrative 23 Site Lighting Site lighting within the project limit of work will be a combination of building-mounted and pedestrian pole-mounted fixtures, which will be dark sky compliant. Site lighting levels will be designed for safety and security as well as comfort for individuals using the exterior areas. The site design will utilize Cornell University standard poles and fixtures. Lighting cut sheets are provided in the appendix. Athletic field hockey light fixtures will be sharp cut off and have a color temperature of LED 5700 K – 75 CRI, per NCAA requirements for play and recording. The 5700k color provides maximum white bright color similar to daylight and is the industry standard for athletic field lighting. Signage Exterior signage will be in compliance with Cornell standards and will be compatible with nearby signage elements. MEP Design Mechanical Systems Base load heating will be derived from a new 4,250 PPH steam-to-hot water heat exchanger located within neighboring building Bartels Hall. A pair of new pumps located within Bartels Hall will distribute hot water. A 1,500 CFM air handling unit located above the support bar will provide ventilation air to the support spaces. A ductless split heat pump system will be provided for heating and cooling of the training room and support spaces. Occupiable zones will be provided with ventilation air via a small energy recovery ventilator. Hot water propeller unit heaters will be provided in the mechanical room and cabinet unit heaters will be provided in entry vestibule and lobby. Project Narrative 24 The total area that is being heated is +/- 90,289 sf. This includes the first-floor field, north and south entries, and mezzanine floor spaces. The area that is being cooled (air conditioned) is +/- 446 sf. This includes the taping room, electrical, AV, and IDF closets. Lighting and Lighting Control Systems The design lighting power density is anticipated to be 20% less than the prescriptive code requirement for the building type and will utilize all LED systems at both the interior and exterior of the building. In addition, daylight and occupancy-based control systems will be utilized where required. Domestic Water Systems Domestic hot water will be provided to the building via a new domestic water service connection from the high-pressure Cornell-owned water main located in Tower Road. Domestic hot water will be generated by a 50-gallon hybrid heat- pump electric, tank-type water heater. Energy Renewable Energy The electrical infrastructure design is being planned to accommodate a photovoltaic array on the southfacing slope of the pitched roof. With an available area of 26,000 sq.ft., approximately 450 - 500 kW of array capacity could be harnessed, with the potential to generate approximately 534,000 kWh annually, offsetting an additional 537,000 lb of CO2 emissions per year. Ithaca Energy Code Supplement The Ithaca Energy Code Supplement establishes local energy code amendments with requirements above and beyond the state energy code. The prescriptive requirements give priority to electrification, renewable energy, and affordability and is the intended path for energy code compliance at this point in the design process. The Meinig Fieldhouse will comply with the IECS. Site Utilities Existing Conditions The existing electric service is fed from a transformer located on the south edge of the site. Field irrigation lines run throughout the site and are fed from a pump system located on the southern end of the existing turf field. A major utility corridor containing active steam and chilled water distribution piping runs north-south through the center of the existing grass fields. These utilities are not expected to be impacted by the project. Proposed Improvements Sanitary sewage from the proposed building will be directed to a duplex grinder pump station and lifted to the University owned gravity system along the south side of Bartels Hall. Domestic and fire water service will be provided by a proposed 10-inch HDPE water main which will be connected to the University Zone 2 High Pressure system along Tower Road. The main will extend along the east side of the site and a sports field watering system will be connected. Backflow prevention devices will be used for the building and sports field watering system connections. Telecommunication and electrical services to the building will be connected to the University’s existing networks along the southern edge of the site. Site Stormwater Management Existing Conditions The existing site is comprised of both grass and artificial turf athletic fields with accompanying impervious features such as sidewalks and spectator viewing areas. Slopes across the athletic fields are minimal and on average do not Project Narrative 25 exceed 2%. Beginning at the western center edge of the turf field, a small uniform depression occurs and slopes towards the site’s low point in the southwest corner. Underlying soil information is not available for the site but given the level of prior development a hydrologic soil classification of C or D will be assumed until soil testing can be performed. The site is located above the 100-year flood level according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapping. Stormwater runoff from the site is collected via a system of underdrains which are connected to the larger University owned stormwater collection system at the southern edge of the field. Located just upstream of the connection point is an outlet control structure (OCS) which reduces discharge rates and effectively allows the field’s drainage system to be used as stormwater detention practice. Drainage for the grass athletic fields is provided by a system of underdrains and drainage inlets which are connected to the University system in the southwest corner of the site. The stormwater management practice which services adjacent Weill Hall is located underneath the grass athletic field in the southwest corner of the site. Runoff from the entire site is conveyed through the University system and eventually outfalls into Cascadilla Creek west of the Wilson Synchrotron Laboratory. Proposed Improvements Stormwater drainage improvements in support of the proposed building and artificial turf field will include a system of drainage inlets, manholes, underdrains, roof leader connections, and swales. Drainage patterns will remain consistent with the existing conditions to the maximum extent possible. The two existing points of stormwater discharge along the southern edge of the site will be maintained. Discharge rates will be controlled in order to reduce or at a minimum match existing rates. Permanent stormwater management practices will be used to meet stormwater regulations. Total soil disturbance will be greater than one acre and therefore the project will be required to prepare a Full Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in compliance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (NYSDEC) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity as well as the City and Town of Ithaca’s stormwater regulations. The SWPPP will include requirements for temporary erosion control practices to be installed and maintained during construction, and contain additional requirements for the construction, operation, and maintenance of permanent practices to remain after construction is complete. Obtaining permit coverage for stormwater discharges under the general permit will require submission to the NYSDEC of a Notice-of-Intent along with an MS4 SWPPP Acceptance Form approved by the City of Ithaca Stormwater Management Officer as well as the Town of Ithaca Stormwater Management Officer. Runoff from the proposed building and artificial turf field will be conveyed to a single below grade detention system with the required volume to detain the 1% chance storm event. This system will use manufactured chamber units encased in an envelope of stone and be located underneath the turf field. Diversion structures will be placed upstream of the detention system to direct runoff from low flow events to the system’s pretreatment “isolator rows”. Higher flow events will bypass the isolator rows and enter the system directly. An outlet control structure will be installed downstream of the system to ensure discharge rates do not exceed the existing conditions. Water quality treatment, including both the required water quality volume (WQv) and runoff reduction volume (RRv), will be provided by means of infiltration. Permeability testing will be performed in accordance with the NYSDEC Stormwater Design Manual. A bioretention filter located in the open space north of the building will provide additional WQv treatment as well as contribute to (RRv). Additional WQv will be provided by a Hydrodynamic Separator which will treat runoff collected from adjacent impervious areas. All of the proposed permanent stormwater management practices will be located within the City of Ithaca. Project Narrative This page has been intentionally left blank. 27 Short Environmental Assessment Form Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 –Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor:Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State:Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify):Agriculture □Urban □Forest SEAF 2019 Parkland Meinig Fieldhouse Robison Alumni Fields,Ithaca,NY 14850 Cornell University is proposing to construct the Meinig Fieldhouse,an indoor sports and recreation center that will support students and campus with much-needed indoor practice and competition space for athletics,club sports,and recreation needs.The project site is on the central campus,in the area currently occupied by Robison Alumni Fields,with Tower Road to the north,Robert J.Kane Sports Complex Field to the east,and Weill Hall to the west. The proposed facility will enable year-round practice space and play for many field sports,and limited competition for NCAA lacrosse in early spring months.The facility will be a 90,000 square foot building that is 56’feet tall.Cornell’s existing Marsha Dodson Field Hockey pitch will be relocated to the west,providing the field hockey athletes with a new synthetic turf field. Kimberly Michaels 607.227.1400 kam@twm.la 1001 W.Seneca Street,Suite 201 Ithaca NY 14850 See FEAF 7.3 7.3 7.3 Educational/Institutional Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13.a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 12.a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: □Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland □ Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond,waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ _ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date:_____________________Applicant/sponsor/name:____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________ See FEAF and project narrative Kimberly Michaels December 15,2023 Director of Landscape Architecture PRINT FORM 31 Full Environmental Assessment Form Page 1 of 13 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes”or “No”.If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”,proceed to the next question.Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State:Zip Code: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: FEAF 2019 Cornell University Meinig Fieldhouse Robison Alumni Fields -239 Tower Road,Ithaca,NY 14850;Tompkins County;City Parcel 500700-31.-1-1.2;Town Parcel 503089-67.-1-13.2 Cornell University is proposing to construct the Meinig Fieldhouse,an indoor sports and recreation center that will support students and campus with much-needed indoor practice and competition space for athletics,club sports,and recreation needs.The project site is on the central campus,in the area currently occupied by Robison Alumni Fields,with Tower Road to the north,Robert J.Kane Sports Complex Field to the east,and Weill Hall to the west. The proposed facility will enable year-round practice space and play for many field sports,and limited competition for NCAA lacrosse in early spring months.The facility will be a 90,000 square foot building that is 56’feet tall.Cornell’s existing Marsha Dodson Field Hockey pitch will be relocated to the west,providing the field hockey athletes with a new synthetic turf field. Kimberly Michaels 607.227.1400 kam@twm.la 1001 W.Seneca Street,Suite 201 Ithaca NY 14850 Elisabete Godden,Project Manager 607.255.2478 egodden@cornell.edu 102 Humphreys Service Building Ithaca NY 14853 Cornell University Page 2 of 13 B. Government Approvals B.Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship.(“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required Application Date (Actual or projected) a.City Counsel, Town Board,9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission c.City, Town or 9 Yes 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No f. Regional agencies 9 Yes 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i.Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?9 Yes 9 No ii.Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?9 Yes 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?9 Yes 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? •If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. •If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example:Greenway;9 Yes 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Ithaca Planning Board (SEQR and SPR), Town of Ithaca PB (SEQR,Special Permit,SPR) Winter 2024 Town of Ithaca Zoning Board (Height Variance and Lot Coverage) Winter 2024 City of Ithaca MS4:SWPPP Acceptance,Town of Ithaca MS4:SWPPP Acceptance Winter -Spring 2024 Tompkins County Planning (GML 239 Review),Tompkins County Health Department (backflow prevention device approval)Winter -Spring 2024 NYSDEC for SWPPP Winter -Spring 2024 Page 3 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?9 Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?_____________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?_____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?_____________ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?9 Yes 9 No iii.Number of lots proposed? ________ iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ 9 Yes 9 No _____ months _____ _____ month _____ year e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? i.If No, anticipated period of construction: ii.If Yes: •Total number of phases anticipated •Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) •Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year •Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town -LDR,Low Density Residential City -U1,University Ithaca City School District Cornell University Police,Ithaca Police Cornell University Fire and Life Safety,Ithaca Fire Department Station 2,Cornell University Emergency Medical Service There are multiple green space areas nearby, including Cornell Botanic Gardens, Minns Garden, Rockwell Azalea Garden, Libe Slope, and other green spaces on campus. 7.3 7.3 7.3 16 Institutional,recreational Page 4 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii.Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i.Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii.If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi.Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: ii.How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? •Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ •Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii.Will the excavation require blasting?9 Yes 9 No ix.Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?______________________________________________________ 1 56 ft 382 ft 224 ft h:+/-90,289;c:+/-446 Building foundations 0 Excavated materials will remain on site. Page 5 of 13 ii. iii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g. excavation,fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines.Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 No If Yes,describe:__________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ •expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ •purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ •if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal?9 Yes 9 No •Is the project site in the existing district?9 Yes 9 No •Is expansion of the district needed?9 Yes 9 No •Do existing lines serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No iii.Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: v.If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.If water supply will be from wells (public or private),what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ •Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district?9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed?9 Yes 9 No •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated:__________________________________________________________________ •Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ 3,600 Cornell University Water System (NYSDEC Permit #:7-5030-00008/00007) A new 10"HDPE water main will be connected to the existing high pressure system located along Tower Rd.and extended to the building. Fall Creek via the Cornell University Water Filtration Plant A public water supply will used for the proposed project. 3,600 Domestic wastewater only. Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment Facility (IAWWTF) Ithaca Area Waste Water Service Area Page 6 of 13 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? •Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: • •Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ •What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v.If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ •If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? iv. f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i.Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: •___________Tons/year (short tons)of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) •___________Tons/year (short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Applicant/sponsor for new district: ___________________________________________________________________ 9 Yes 9 No Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? 9 Yes 9 No Sanitary sewage from the proposed building will be lifted to the University gravity sanitary sewer system along Campus Rd by means of a duplex grinder pump station through a new polyethylene force main. 3.3 7.3 Building roof drainage system,swales,athletic field underdrains. Runoff will be collected via a system of on-site drainage inlets,swales,and underdrains;then directed to a series of below grade detention facilities and green infrastructure practices with discharge connections to existing sewer systems.Existing drainage patterns and rates will be maintained. N/A None during operations.During construction:earth-moving equipment,trucks,material handlers,cranes,and boom lifts. None anticipated. None. Page 7 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,9 Yes 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i.Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i.When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. iii. iv. v. 9 Yes 9 No vi.Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: iii.Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade, to an existing substation?9 Yes 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction:ii.During Operations: •Monday - Friday: _________________________•Monday - Friday: ____________________________ •Saturday: ________________________________•Saturday: ___________________________________ •Sunday: _________________________________•Sunday: ____________________________________ •Holidays: ________________________________•Holidays: ___________________________________ For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Parking spaces:Existing __________ Proposed ___________Net increase/decrease _____________________ Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i.Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable,via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Not applicable 7AM -7PM 7AM -7PM 7AM -7PM 7AM -7PM 24/7 (hours vary by programming) 24/7 (hours vary by programming) 24/7 (hours vary by programming) 24/7 (hours vary by programming) Page 8 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i.Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n.W thill propeos actioed havne outd lighoorting?9 Yes 9 No If yes: i.Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p.9 Yes 9 No Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i.Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Volume(s)______per unit time ___________(e.g., month, year) iii.Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i.Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: •Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) •Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Not applicable During construction only.Rock removal using hydraulic hammers mounted on excavators will occur if needed. See attached Narrative Page 9 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: •________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or •________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii.If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t.Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i.Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i.Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii.If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) •Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces •Forested •Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) •Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) •Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) •Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) •Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) •Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ University Campus 2.3 5.6 +3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lawn and Natural Turf Sports Fields 5 1.7 -3.3 Page 10 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i.Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: •Dam height: _________________________________ feet •Dam length: _________________________________ feet •Surface area: _________________________________ acres •Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii.Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i.Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i.Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv.If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________The EAF Mapper may identify several sites but they are all located more than 2000 feet from the project site and are hydraulically downgradient. Page 11 of 13 v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ •Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ •Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ •Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ •Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?9 Yes 9 No •Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ __________% ___________________________ __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained:_____%of site 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____%of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%:_____% of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii.Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: •Streams: Name ____________________________________________Classification _______________________ •Lakes or Ponds:Name ____________________________________________Classification _______________________•Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________Approximate Size ___________________ •Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v.Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway?9 Yes 9 No j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ >24 Brown silt and clay (0-20 ft depth)100 >24 100 100 Page 12 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii.Extent of community/habitat: •Currently: ______________________ acres •Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres •Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?9 Yes 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i.Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Wildlife common to developed urban and Mating pair of red-tailed hawks nest on a suburban areas.light pole on site. Lake sturgeon and Rusty-patched Bumble bee are listed in EAF Mapper report,however,the existing site is a sports field and therefore inhospitable to either of these species. Page 13 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii.Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h.9 Yes 9 No Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state,or local scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i.Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ Kimberly Michaels December 15,2023 PRINT FORM Director of Landscape Architecture 45 Supplemental Information This page has been intentionally left blank. 47 Impact on Land Existing Conditions Approximately one third of the project site is a level/flat artificial turf field, with a border varying from twenty to forty feet in width. This border slopes down to the field. The remainder of the project site is managed as very flat natural turf. There is a black chain link fence along the perimeter of the entire project site and just south of the fence on the southern end of the project site is a row of deciduous trees. Excavation All excavated soil materials will be reused on site. Impact on Water No streams, bodies of water, federal or state jurisdictional wetlands present on or near the site. The project site has been previously disturbed, developed, and maintained as natural and artificial turf, with associated improvements. The indoor turf system is a long fiber turf with infill and a shock pad. The outdoor field hockey field is a non-infilled surface, (with no crumb rubber or sand infill), that is installed over a shock pad. The specified turf surface will be manufactured without PFAS, including all raw materials and finished products. No significant adverse impacts to water are expected to result from the proposed project. Impact on Air The proposed project will include no new emissions sources and therefore is not expected to have negative adverse impacts on air quality. Impact on Plants, Animals, & Agriculture According to the NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper which provides generalized locations of Rare Plants and Animals, Lake sturgeon and Rusty-patched bumble bee are listed in the project vicinity. However, the project site consists of natural and artificial turf, which is inhospitable to either of these species. According to xerces.org the greatest threats to Rusty-patched bumble bee populations is commercial bumble bee rearing and insecticide applications on farms. The plans for this project include the incorporation of meadow grasses, a rain garden, native shrubs and trees, which will potentially provide food sources and habitat for invertebrates as well as other wildlife. The site plan for the Meinig Fieldhouse and relocated field hockey venue will maintain the two existing sports lighting poles that currently serve as the preferred nesting location for a pair of beloved Cornell red-tailed hawks (Big Red and Arthur). The sports lighting poles that will remain will not be lit or powered and are not programmatically operational. They remain solely as a host to nest, hunting lookout and yearly fledging activities. Preserving these key light poles is to encourage the nesting pair to continue to inhabit their current nest at Alumni Fields through construction and beyond. Numerous constructions projects have occurred during their occupation in this area of campus, and they continue to make the location home. New plantings of native species and a natural grass lawn north of the field house aim to further supplement an inviting and sustainable environment for Big Red and Arthur in hopes that they will remain on campus during construction and after completion. Additional details will be provided during the site plan review process, but it is expected that the project will result in a net addition of trees to the project site. No significant adverse impacts to plants, animals and agriculture are expected as a result of the proposed project. Supplemental Information 48 Impact on Aesthetic Resources The proposed project is not located within a Tompkins County identified viewshed. The Meinig Fieldhouse is proposed for construction in a location where there are currently sports fields comprised of both natural and artificial turf and is surrounded by campus buildings of various sizes and materials. No significant adverse aesthetic impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project. Impact on Cultural Resources Per the Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS), there are three National Register-listed buildings in the general area - Rice Hall, Fernow Hall, and Wing Hall. Fernow Hall is also a designated Local Landmark. Rice Hall is located approximately 650 feet northeast from the center of the project site. Fernow Hall is located approximately 650 feet north from the center of the project site, on the north side of an open quad along Tower Road. Wing Hall is located approximately 1,200 feet east of the center of the project, along Wing Drive, with the Charles Berman Field/Robert Kane Sports Complex in between. The project will not modify or encroach upon any of these buildings. No significant adverse impacts to historic resources are expected as a result of the proposed project. The existing site and proposed location for the Meinig Fieldhouse has been developed and highly disturbed over the years. Given the highly disturbed nature of the site, and lack of evidence supporting archaeological significance on the site, no impacts to archaeological resources are anticipated. Impact on Open Space & Recreation The project site is currently used for Cornell athletics and will continue be used for that purpose. No negative impacts to open space or recreation are anticipated as a result of this project. Impact on Critical Environmental and Unique Natural Areas The proposed site is not located in a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). The nearest CEA, Coy Glen, is located approximately four miles from the project site. The project is well outside of designated natural areas, including the Gorge Protection Area (GP-A) near Cascadilla Creek; the limit of GP-A limit is along the south edge of Hoy Road, southwest of the project. The project is fully outside the Cascadilla Unique Natural Area. The limit for this UNA is south of Campus Road, across the street from the project. The project is also fully outside the Beebe Lake Woods and Gorge Unique Natural Area, which is located to the north. Impact on Transportation Parking Impacts The project will result in the removal of several parking spaces. Traffic Impacts The proposed project is expected to result in an increase of one staff. The resulting anticipated traffic increase to campus will be insignificant. Cornell’s Parking Management Cornell University manages parking in compliance with the City’s U-1 zoning. Cornell manages its large parking inventory of approximately 11,000 parking spaces through a coordinated parking permit system. All of these programs are managed together as a parking and transit ecosystem or district. Employee permits are issued through a work- in zone system based on groupings of buildings by designated parking areas. For a given zone, a limited number of permits are sold, so that purchasers have a reasonable chance to park. Individual facility projects that impact parking or transit in the short or long term are reviewed for impact on the entire system, and they benefit from the flexibility the Supplemental Information 49 system provides for shifting demand and supply to meet campus community needs. Impact on Energy The proposed project is designed to be energy efficient, will utilize Cornell’s highly efficient district energy system, and will comply with both the NYS Energy Code and the City of Ithaca’s new Ithaca Energy Code Supplement. There will be no natural gas connections in the proposed building. Impacts from Sound, Odor & Light Sound generation will be restricted to the sounds of air handling fans and a ductless split heat pump system within the building. Any noise perceived will be well below municipal sound limits. There will be no significant odor-producing sources from either the building or operations. No significant adverse impacts to sound, odor or light are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.. Impact on Human Health Artificial turf has been shown to pose no health risk in more than 110 technical studies conducted by a variety of trusted scientific authorities, including the US EPA, Washington State Department of Health, US Department of Energy and Environment, and more. Studies in California and Washington State have not found support for cancer associations with artificial turf use; various exposure and risk assessments do not support a cancer risk. The outdoor field hockey field is a non-infilled surface, (with no crumb rubber or sand infill), that is installed over a shock pad. The specified turf surface will be manufactured without PFAS including all raw materials and finished products. No significant adverse impacts on human health are expected. Impact on Growth & Character of Community The new building is being developed within Cornell’s Central Campus. The area is already well developed with academic buildings and open space quads. Given that the project is in alignment with the campus character and in an area of similar campus development, no significant adverse impact on the character of the community is anticipated. The project will not influence overall University enrollment. It will result in the creation of one additional job. Given this, the project is not anticipated to have a significant impact on the growth of the community. Impacts from Construction Construction of the new building is anticipated to take approximately 16 months, beginning in fourth quarter 2024 with completion in the first quarter of 2026. Third quarter 2025 is anticipated to be the busiest time in terms of construction activity. This is when the greatest number of construction vehicles and the greatest number of workers will be present on site. At peak activity, a maximum of 80 workers could be expected on site in a single day. Construction vehicles will be directed to access the site via a prescribed route from Tower Road for new field work and from Campus Road for the building work. The new building water line crosses Tower Road. Due to this a temporary rerouting and road closure is anticipated for Tower Road of about two weeks. This closure would be planned for summer months when the campus population is lower. There is also new utility work in the parking lot south of Tower Road/North of the project site as well as the parking lot North of Campus Road adjacent to Friedman Wrestling Center. Portions of each of these lots will require closers of about two weeks for utility work. Supplemental Information 50 Three existing pedestrian sidewalks within the project site are planned for demolition and reconstruction. The first runs north/south between Robison Alumni Field and the Robert J. Kane Sports Complex. The second runs east/west and is located just north of Bartels Hall. The third runs north/south and is located just east of Weill Hall. East/west pedestrian traffic will be rerouted to the south of Bartels Hall to the existing to remain sidewalk along Campus Road. North/south pedestrian traffic will be rerouted to the existing to remain sidewalk between Weill Hall and the Biotechnology Building. Excavation work will not include blasting and will reuse existing soils on site. The resident hawks appear to be accustomed to construction activities since there is currently active construction on either side of the project site and they have not left.. Supplemental Information 51 Appendices This page has been intentionally left blank. 53 Appendix A: Site Lighting Cut Sheets ©2015, 2017 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · M-1909-en04-3 Solutions for Lighting Solutions for Lighting Solutions for Lighting What Matters in Lighting Technology Light Control 1977 SportsCluster® 1989 SportsCluster®•2 1989 SportsCluster®•2 Level 8™ 1989 SportsCluster®•2 Total Light Control™ 2005 Light·Structure System™ Green Generation™ Today Light·Structure System™ TLC for LED™ Today Other Luminaire Manufacturer LED Used equal parameters for: • On-field light level per pole • Wattage per luminaire • Mounting height • Luminaire aiming angles • Pole distance from aiming point Photographed at 100 ft (30 m) from field edge Datasheet: Light-Structure System™ 1 www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com TLC for LED is a trademark of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC and is registered in the United States. ©2015, 2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC · U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending. · M-3301-en04-1 2 1 3 4 5 Precast Concrete Base Galvanized Steel Pole Electrical Components Enclosure Poletop Luminaire Assembly Wire Harness 5 Easy Pieces™ Complete System from Foundation to Poletop Factory wired, aimed, and tested Fast, trouble-free installation Comprehensive corrosion package Integrated lightning ground TLC for LED® Luminaire and Driver – TLC-LED-1500 MKT-4488 1500 LED Cover Illustration RWS 7 November 2018 All components from foundation to poletop are designed to work together in Light-Structure System™ to ensure reliable, trouble-free operation. Luminaire Data Weight (luminaire) 67 lb (30 kg) UL listing number E338094 (pending) UL listed for USA / Canada UL1598 CSA-C22.2 No.250.0 (pending) CE Declaration LVD, EMC, RoHS Ingress protection, luminaire IP65 Material and finish Aluminum, powder-coat painted Wind speed rating (aiming only)150 mi/h (67 m/s) UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, luminaire 50°C (122°F) Photometric Characteristics Projected lumen maintenance per IES TM-21-11 L90 (13.5k)>81,000 h L80 (13.5k)>81,000 h L70 (13.5k)>81,000 h CIE correlated color temperature 5700 K Color rendering index (CRI)75 typ, 70 min Lumens1 160,000 Footnotes: 1) Incorporates appropriate dirt depreciation factor for life of luminaire. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1500 5700K 75 CRI • M-2979-en04-3 Datasheet: Light-Structure System™ www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 1 TLC-LED-1500 5700K 75 CRI Standard System View Datasheet Global M-2979- en04-3 MKT-4431-1 900 LED Luminaire wiring Schiederwerk Driver RWS 20 March 2018 + - Fuse FuseL1 L2* Surge† protection Disconnect Driver Controller(if present) * If L2 (com) is neutral then not switched or fused. † Not present if indoor installation. Luminaire Luminaire and Driver – TLC-LED-1500 Typical WiringDriver Data Electrical Data Rated wattage1 Per driver 1430 W Per luminaire 1430 W Number of luminaires per driver 1 Starting (inrush) current <40 A, 256 µs Fuse rating 15 A UL, IEC ambient temperature rating, electrical components enclosure 50°C (122°F) Ingress protection, electrical components enclosure IP54 Efficiency 95% Dimming mode optional Range, energy consumption 12 – 100% Range, light output 17 – 100% 200 Vac 208 Vac 220 Vac 230 Vac 240 Vac 277 Vac 347 Vac 380 Vac 400 Vac 415 Vac 480 Vac 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50/60 Hz 60 Hz 60 Hz 50/60 Hz 50 Hz 50 Hz 60 Hz Max operating current per luminaire2 8.86 A 8.52 A 8.06 A 7.71 A 7.39 A 6.40 A 5.11 A 4.67 A 4.43 A 4.27 A 3.70 A 22.00 in (559 mm)27.00 in (686 mm) 23.00 in (584 mm) 26.00 in (660 mm) Footnotes: 1) Rated wattage is the power consumption, including driver efficiency losses, at stabilized operation in 25°C ambient temperature environment. 2) Operating current includes allowance for 0.90 minimum power factor, operating temperature, and LED light source manufacturing tolerances. Notes 1. Use thermal magnetic HID-rated or D-curve circuit breakers. 2. See Musco Control System Summary for circuit information. U.S. and foreign patent(s) issued and pending • ©2019 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC • TLC-LED-1500 5700K 75 CRI • M-2979-en04-3 Datasheet: Light-Structure System™ www.musco.com · lighting@musco.com 2 54 Appendix B: Geotechnical Report Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 2 of 8 hockey field (B-1 thru B-3), two at the throwing field (B-4 and B-6), and two at the teaching research barns (B-7 and B-8); note that borehole B-5 was deleted due to access considerations and the lack of a suitable alternate location. The test boring locations were selected by Stantec and were staked in the field using taped measurements from existing site features (and by visual reference). Their approximate locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. The test borings were completed between October 2, 2018 and February 4, 2019 by Empire’s affiliated drilling and materials testing company, SJB Services, Inc., using standard rotary drill rigs equipped with hollow stem augers. Completion of the boreholes on the existing athletic fields required waiting until the fields were sufficiently frozen and snow covered such that the fields were not damaged by the drill rig. As the augers were advanced, overburden soils were sampled in accordance with ASTM D1586, the Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. Split spoon samples and standard penetration tests (SPTs) were taken on a continuous basis from the ground surface to a depth of 8 to 12 feet, and at standard five foot intervals thereafter to the borehole termination depths. The test borings were thus advanced to total depths of 3.9 to 50.0 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). Representative portions of the recovered soil samples were transported to SJB’s office, whereupon a geotechnical engineer or geologist prepared individual subsurface logs based on visual/manual classification of the recovered soil samples and review of the driller’s field notes. The samples were described based on estimation of the grain size distribution, and characteristics such as color, relative density or consistency, moisture condition, etc. The subsurface logs are presented in Attachment A, together with a summary sheet and key which explains the terms and symbols used in their preparation. In addition to the test borings completed for this investigation, the findings of other geotechnical investigations previous completed by Empire across the Cornell campus have been considered and incorporated herein as applicable. 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil conditions at each of the three sites under consideration are essentially similar, as summarized by stratum below. The individual subsurface logs should be referenced for specific conditions encountered at each test boring location. Surface and Fill Materials Surface veneers of either topsoil or asphalt pavement were present at most test boring locations, at thicknesses of approximately 0.5 to 0.8 feet. Below this, fill soils were encountered at boreholes B-4, B-7 and B-8. In general, the fill was found to consist of sand and gravel with lesser amounts of silt, and extended to depths of about two to six feet bgs. Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 3 of 8 Note that at location B-8, a total of four attempts were made to advance the borehole. The attempts were made within several feet of one another, and each met refusal between the depths of 3.2 and 3.9 feet, apparently on old building rubble. A representative of the college indicated that an old barn was formerly located in that area, and a circa 1968 aerial photo seems to bear this out. Test boring B-8 did not fully penetrate the fill/rubble. Indigenous Soils Directly beneath the surface materials (and whatever fill was present), native silt and clay soils were found. The silt and clay deposit was typically of medium consistency as indicated by measured SPT N-values. At depths of about 15 to 20 feet and below, glacial till soils were encountered. The glacial till was comprised of silts and sands with lesser amounts of gravel and clay, and was typically of a firm to very compact relative density. The glacial till soils prevailed for the reminder of the depths explored. Bedrock Bedrock was not encountered at any of the test borings advanced for this study. We note that a test boring performed by SJB in 2006 for another project, and located near the intersection of Wing Road and Campus Road, was advanced to a depth of 112 feet with no bedrock encountered. Overburden soils in that borehole were similar to that encountered in the test borings advanced for this project. For information purposes, the Geologic Map of New York – Finger Lakes Sheet (New York State Education Department, 1970) indicates bedrock beneath the project area consists of Genesee group shales and siltstones of the Ithaca formation. Groundwater Conditions Measurable groundwater inside the augers was found at only one location (test boring B-6, at a depth of 10.7 feet bgs as the borehole was advanced). Similarly, wet soil samples were recovered from just two locations (boreholes B-6 and B-7, at discrete intervals below the depth of 20 feet). In general, it appears that groundwater, where present across the site, is perched or trapped in more permeable sandy/gravelly layers within clayey or glacial till soils which are otherwise non-water bearing. While not identified through this investigation, perched groundwater may also be present in localized areas nearer the ground surface, particularly where any fill is present. Perched groundwater may be more prevalent during seasonally wet periods and following heavy or extended periods of precipitation. It should be expected that groundwater conditions, and the extent of any perched water, will vary with location and with seasonal Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 4 of 8 fluctuations in precipitation and runoff. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Each of the three sites investigated through this study is considered suitable for support of the proposed structure using conventional shallow spread foundations. Based on the conditions disclosed, we offer the following general conclusions, followed by provisional design recommendations in the subsequent report sections. We recommend that final design be developed with the benefit of a more thorough investigation once the site location is settled on and the design concept is more firmly established, so as to confirm the findings and assumptions outlined herein. 1)New foundations may be seated on undisturbed native soils, or on imported structural fill which is placed over the native soils after all existing fill is removed, along with any disturbed or otherwise unsuitable material that may be found. 2)Assuming that all fill materials on the site are similar to those found in the test borings, consideration may be given to leaving the fill in place beneath the new field surface (after all existing topsoil and/or pavements are removed). However, the subgrade should be thoroughly proof-rolled to identify any localized soft areas which should be investigated and stabilized as necessary prior to any necessary grade increases or subbase placement. 3)A suitable imported granular fill should be used for the purposes of raising site grades, should such be necessary. 4)As soils excavated for foundation construction are expected to be excessively silty/clayey or possibly variable in composition, we recommend against their reuse as foundation backfill. An imported granular fill should be used for all fill and backfill work around new foundations. Excavated onsite soils be separated and wasted or reused in landscaped areas only. 5)At the time of investigation, groundwater was found below the depths likely to directly impact on design and construction of building foundations. If groundwater is encountered, it is expected to occur as relatively slow seepage and be of limited volume; standard sump and pump methods should be adequate to dewater shallow foundation excavations during construction. 4.1 Foundation Design A maximum net allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be assumed for conventional spread foundations at each of the three sites under consideration. Continuous strip footings should be at least two feet in width, and isolated footings should be at least three feet in width. All exterior foundations should be seated at least four feet below final adjacent grades for frost protection. Interior foundations (beneath heated spaces, if any) should bear at a nominal depth of two feet or more below finished floor to develop adequate bearing capacity. Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 5 of 8 The foundations may be seated directly on undisturbed native soils, or on imported structural fill placed over the native soils after removal of all existing fill, remains of former structures or otherwise unsuitable materials that may be found. As subsurface conditions may vary, careful inspection of the subgrades is recommended as excavations are made to verify that foundations are constructed on the materials intended. If over-excavation is required beneath the foundations to remove unsuitable material, the excavation should extend horizontally beyond each side of the foundation a distance equal to at least one-half the depth of the undercut below the final bearing grade elevation. Replacement material should meet the specification and compaction guidelines for structural fill as outlined in Attachment B. Any water which enters foundation excavations should be promptly removed, together with any softened bearing grade materials. All final bearing grades should be firm, stable, and free of any loose soil, mud, water or frost. Assuming that foundations are designed and constructed as recommended, total settlement is not expected to exceed one inch, and differential settlement is not expected to exceed ¾- inch. Any such settlement should occur as construction proceeds and proportionally as loads are applied. 4.2 Athletic Field Construction The athletic field surface (or any floor slabs that may be planned) should be constructed over a minimum six inch thick base course of subbase stone (or as recommended by the field surface vendor); consideration should be given to increasing this thickness in areas subject to heavier loads and/or use, or in areas which are unheated. The athletic field subgrades should be prepared as outlined in section 4.4 herein. Material specification and placement guidelines for the subbase stone are provided in Attachment B (see structural fill). 4.3 Seismic Design Considerations In our estimation, each of the three sites under consideration meet the criteria for seismic Site Class “D” (stiff soil profile) as set forth in table 20.3-1 of ASCE 7 referenced in the 2015 International Building Code adopted by New York State. Spectral response accelerations in the project area were obtained from the ATC Hazards by Location web application. The accelerations are based on USGS seismic hazard data as promulgated in the building code. Using geographic coordinates 42.4455°N, 76.4706°W for the project site, the indicated maximum spectral response accelerations normalized for sreference Site Class B conditions are 0.126g for the short period response (0.2 second, S ) 1and 0.056g for the 1 second period response (S ). For design purposes, these spectral Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 6 of 8 response accelerations must be modified for the soil profile determined at the project site, as follows: Maximum spectral response accelerations, adjusted for Site Class: MS•Short Period Response (S ) - 0.201g M1•1 Second Period Response (S ) - 0.135g Maximum five percent damped design spectral response accelerations: DS •S - 0.134g D1•S - 0.090g Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, the potential for liquefaction to occur during a seismic event is considered minimal. 4.4 Site Preparation and Construction Construction Dewatering Appreciable groundwater or water table conditions are not anticipated within the excavation depths anticipated for this work. If perched groundwater is encountered, it is expected that it will occur as relatively slow seepage which may be controlled through sump and pump methods of dewatering. Any seepage of groundwater should be intercepted and maintained below the proposed excavation bottom, such that work proceeds in the dry. Excavation for Foundation Construction Excavation to the proposed bearing grades for foundation construction should be performed using a method which limits disturbance to the bearing grade soils, such as a backhoe equipped with a smooth blade bucket. All topsoil and existing fill should be removed from beneath proposed foundation bearing grades, along with the remains of any former structures, disturbed, soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable materials which may be found. Subgrades should be carefully inspected during construction to verify that foundations are constructed on suitable materials. The native soil bearing grades should be observed and evaluated by the geotechnical engineer prior to foundation construction, or where over- excavation is required, before placement of structural fill. Placement and compaction of any structural fill beneath foundations should be as outlined in Attachment B. All bearing grades for foundation construction should be protected from precipitation and surface water. Water should not be allowed to accumulate on the bearing grades and the bearing grades should not be allowed to freeze, either prior to or after construction of foundations. Any water which enters foundation excavations should be promptly removed, together with any softened bearing grade materials. All final bearing grades should be firm, stable, and free of any loose soil, mud, water or frost. Empire Project No.: WA-18-016 Proposed Covered Athletic Facility - Cornell U niversity Page 7 of 8 Foundation excavations should be backfilled as soon as possible and prior to construction of the superstructure. We recommend that foundation backfill consist of structural fill or suitable granular fill. Subgrade Preparation for Athletic Field Surface Beneath the new athletic field (or any slabs-on-grade or pavement areas that may be planned), all existing topsoil and pavements should be removed, along with any stumps, roots, excessively coarse or otherwise unsuitable material that may be found. Following removal of surface materials and excavation to proposed subgrades, the exposed subgrades should be proof-rolled to evaluate their condition. The proof-rolling should be performed prior to any required fill placement, using a smooth drum roller with a static weight of at least seven tons. The roller should be operated in the static (non-vibratory) mode and complete at least two passes over the exposed subgrades in opposite directions. All subgrades and/or proof-rolling should be observed by the geotechnical engineer. Any areas which appear wet, loose, soft, unstable or otherwise unsuitable should be undercut. Over-excavation, which may be required as a result of the evaluation, should be performed based on guidance provided by the engineer. Where undercut to remove unsuitable soils and improve stability, subgrades should be backfilled with a controlled structural fill. Suitable granular fill may be used for general grade increases and to raise site grades beneath the subbase course for the athletic field, slabs-on-grade or pavements. Placement of material to raise site grades should be monitored by a representative of the engineer to ensure the recommendations contained herein are adhered to. Material specification and placement guidelines for imported granular fill materials are provided in Attachment B. During construction, the contractor should take precautions to limit construction traffic over slab and pavement subgrades. Any subgrades which become damaged, rutted, unstable or are otherwise degraded should be undercut and repaired as necessary prior to placement of the subbase course. Excavation Safety All excavations must be performed in accordance with Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, along with state and local codes as applicable. The co n t ractor is s o l e l y res p o n sible for all as p ect s o f ex cavation safet y. Figures Site Location Map Subsurface Investigation Plan(s) ATTACHMENT A Subsurface Logs and Key DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 3 3 4 5 7 1.0 Topsoil 0.8' thick S-2 2 2 4 4 6 1.0 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-3 3 3 5 6 8 1.5 throughout S-1 through S-5. S-4 6 9 8 7 17 2.0 S-5 4 6 6 11 12 2.0 S-6 4 10 19 10 29 1.5 S-7 12 22 50/.3 -Ref.1.0 Ref.= Spoon Refusal S-8 8 48 50/.4 -Ref.0.8 Ground water was not encountered during drilling or after completion. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist 5 10 15 20 Test boring complete at 24.4 feet.25 30 35 (Very Compact) Brown SILT and SAND, little Gravel, SM (Moist, Firm) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) (Stiff) 1/30/19 B-1 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 1/30/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 3 3 3 3 6 0.8 Topsoil 0.6' thick S-2 3 3 5 4 8 0.5 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-3 3 4 6 6 10 1.0 throughout S-1 through S-6. S-4 4 6 9 10 15 2.0 S-5 3 3 4 4 7 1.2 S-6 5 6 8 8 14 1.0 S-7 2 2 2 3 4 1.5 S-8 12 12 12 12 24 1.0 S-9 12 25 35 50 60 2.0 S-10 30 50/.2 --Ref.0.5 Ref.= Spoon Refusal Ground water was not encountered during drilling or after completion. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist 5 10 15 20 Gray SILT, little fc Sand, trace fm gravel, ML25 30 35 Contains "little" fm Gravel Test boring complete at 30.7 feet. (Moist, Very Compact) Gray SILT, little Clay, little f Gravel, trace sand, ML (Moist, Firm) (Soft) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Brown SILT, little Clay, trace f. sand, trace f. gravel, ML (Moist, Loose) Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) 2/1/19 B-2 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 2/1/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 1 3 3 4 6 0.5 Topsoil 0.6' thick S-1: trace roots/organics. S-2 2 3 5 6 8 0.0 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-3 3 3 4 5 7 1.5 throughout S-1 through S-7. S-4 3 3 4 5 7 1.5 S-5 2 2 3 2 5 1.2 S-6 6 10 8 8 18 1.5 S-7 2 4 5 5 9 1.5 Ref.= Spoon Refusal S-8 4 7 8 50/.4 15 1.0 Ground water was not encountered during drilling or after completion. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist 5 10 15 20 (Firm to Very Compact) Test boring complete at 25.0 feet.25 30 35 Gray SILT and SAND, little f. Gravel, SM (Moist, Loose) (Stiff) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) (Soft) 2/1/19 B-3 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 2/1/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 -12 50/.1 -Ref.0.6 Asphalt 0.5' thick Ref.=Spoon Refusal S-2 12 25 25 13 50 1.0 S-3 20 20 32 20 52 0.0 S-4 17 15 16 11 31 0.3 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-5 4 6 7 6 13 2.0 S-4 to completion. S-6 6 6 8 8 14 2.0 S-7 50/.3 ---Ref.0.1 S-7: poor recovery. Ground water was not encountered during drilling or after completion. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) No Recovery Brown SILT and CLAY, little f. Gravel, little Sand, ML (Moist, Compact) Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Fill: Brown SAND, some f. Gravel, some Silt, trace clay (Moist) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec Test boring complete at 15.5 feet with auger refusal. 25 30 35 5 10 15 20 2/4/19 B-4 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 2/4/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 5 3 5 4 8 1.0 Topsoil 0.5' thick S-2 3 3 5 4 8 1.0 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-3 2 2 4 4 6 1.2 throughout S-1 through S-5. S-4 3 3 3 3 6 1.5 S-5 4 4 6 6 10 1.8 S-6 8 8 8 8 16 2.0 S-7 6 15 16 25 31 0.8 S-8 25 50/.3 --Ref.0.7 Ref.= Spoon Refusal S-9 50/.3 ---Ref.0.3 Ground water was first encountered during drilling at 10.7 feet. Ground water was measured at 4 feet after sitting over weekend period. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec (Stiff) Grayish brown SILT and GRAVEL, some Sand, trace clay, GM (Moist, Compact) Test boring complete at 25.0 feet. Grayish brown SAND and SILT, some Gravel, trace clay, SM (Wet, Very Compact) 30 35 5 10 15 20 Grayish brown SAND and GRAVEL, little Silt, SM (Moist, Very Compact)25 2/1/19 B-6 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 2/4/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 44 21 13 8 34 1.6 Topsoil 0.8' thick S-2 7 9 8 11 17 1.5 Partings, seams, and layers of silty clay and clayey silt S-3 6 6 7 9 13 1.7 throughout. S-4 9 8 9 9 17 1.8 S-5 26 50/.5 --Ref.1.0 Ref.= Spoon Refusal S-6 37 42 50/.5 -Ref.1.1 S-7 21 27 34 30 61 1.8 Ground water not encountered during drilling. S-8 30 27 35 39 62 1.4 S-9 21 37 45 41 82 2.0 S-10 33 40 47 51 87 2.0 40 DRILLER:G. Spizzirri DRILL RIG:CME-850 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist WA-18-016 4" casing, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) Brown SILT and CLAY, CL-ML (Moist, Medium) Contains "trace" sand, "trace" f. gravel (embedded) (Stiff) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Fill: Brown fc SAND and GRAVEL, little Silt, SM (Moist, Compact) Brown SILT, some Clay, ML (Moist, Stiff) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec Brown SILT and SAND, some f. Gravel, SM (Moist, Very Compact) Grades to "some" Clay Grayish brown SILT, some Clay, little Sand, ML (Moist, V. Compact) 25 30 35 5 10 15 20 Contains "and" CLAY, "trace" f. sand, ML 10/2/18 B-7 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 10/2/18 1 2 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-11 20 23 27 30 50 1.0 Wet lenses S-12 13 28 50/.5 -Ref.1.4 80 DRILLER: G. Spizzirri DRILL RIG:CME-850 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist 4" Casing, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) WA-18-016 75 70 65 60 55 50 Test boring complete at 50.0 feet. Grayish brown SILT, some Clay, little Sand, ML 45 (Moist to Wet, Compact) Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION 10/2/18 B-7 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 10/2/18 2 2 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 DATE HOLE NO. STARTED:____________SURF. ELEV. FINISHED: ____________G.W. DEPTH SHEET ___ of ___ PROJECT:LOCATION: CLIENT:DEPTH-FT.SAMPLESSAMPLE NO.N Rec (ft)NOTES S-1 10 7 10 10 17 0.8 S-2 4 6 50/0 -Ref.0.6 Ref.= Spoon Refusal A total of 4 attempts were made to complete this bore- hole with auger refusal at each location on possible buried building remains as follows: B-8: at 3.2 feet. B-8A: at 3.5 feet. B-8B: at 3.9 feet. B-8C: at 3.8 feet. Moved several feet east from original location between each attempt. 40 DRILLER:S. Wolkiewicz DRILL RIG:CME-550 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION: JOB NUMBER: TEMPERATURE:CLASSIFIED BY:Geologist WA-18-016 4 1/4" Auger, 2" Split Spoon Sampler (ASTM D1586) SOIL OR ROCK CLASSIFICATION Fill: Brown SILT, some Clay, little SAND, little fine Gravel, trace organics/roots (Moist, Firm) Fill: Brown GRAVEL and SAND, little Silt, (Moist) Test boring complete at 3.2 feet with auger refusal. Proposed Covered Athletic Facility Stantec 25 30 35 5 10 15 20 1/30/19 B-8 G.S. Cornell University Ithaca, New York 1/30/19 1 1 SUBSURFACE LOG See notes 0 6 12 12 18 18 24 6 GENERAL INFORMATION & KEY TO SUBSURFACE LOGS The Subsurface Logs attached to this report present the observations and mechanical data collected by the driller at the site, supplemented by classification of the material removed from the borings as determined through visual identification by technicians in the laboratory. It is cautioned that the materials removed from the borings represent only a fraction of the total volume of the deposits at the site and may not necessarily be representative of the subsurface conditions between adjacent borings or between the sampled intervals. The data presented on the Subsurface Logs together with the recovered samples provide a basis for evaluating the character of the subsurface conditions relative to the project. The evaluation must consider all the recorded details and their significance relative to each other. Often analyses of standard boring data indicate the need for additional testing or sampling procedures to more accurately evaluate the subsurface conditions. Any evaluation of the contents of this report and recovered samples must be performed by qualified professionals. The following information defines some of the procedures and terms used on the Subsurface Logs to describe the conditions encountered, consistent with the numbered identifiers shown on the Key opposite this page. 1. The figures in the Depth column define the scale of the Subsurface Log. 2. The Samples column shows, graphically, the depth range from which a sample was recovered. See Table I for descriptions of the symbols used to represent the various types of samples. 3. The Sample No. is used for identification on sample containers and/or Laboratory Test Reports. 4. Blows on Sampler - shows the results of the “Penetration Test”, recording the number of blows required to drive a split spoon sampler into the soil. The number of blows required for each six inches is recorded. The first 6 inches of penetration is considered a seating drive. The number of blows required for the second and third 6 inches of penetration is termed the penetration resistance, N. The outside diameter of the sampler, hammer weight and length of drop are noted at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. 5. Blows on Casing - Shows the number of blows required to advance the casing a distance of 12 inches. The casing size, hammer weight, and length of drop are noted at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. If the casing is advanced by means other than driving, the method of advancement will be indicated in the Notes column or under the Method of Investigation at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. Alternatively, sample recovery may be shown in this column, or other data consistent with the column heading. 6. All recovered soil samples are reviewed in the laboratory by an engineering technician, geologist or geotechnical engineer, unless noted otherwise. Visual descriptions are made on the basis of a combination of the driller’s field descriptions and noted observations together with the sample as received in the laboratory. The method of visual classification is based primarily on the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487) with regard to the particle size and plasticity (See Table No. II), and the Unified Soil Classification System group symbols for the soil types are sometimes included with the soil classification. Additionally, the relative portion, by weight, of two or more soil types is described for granular soils in accordance with “Suggested Methods of Test for Identification of Soils” by D.M. Burmister, ASTM Special Technical Publication 479, June 1970. (See Table No. III). Description of the relative soil density or consistency is based upon the penetration records as defined in Table No. IV. The description of the soil moisture is based upon the relative wetness of the soil as recovered and is described as dry, moist, wet and saturated. Water introduced into the boring either naturally or during drilling may have affected the moisture condition of the recovered sample. Special terms are used as required to describe soil deposition in greater detail; several such terms are listed in Table V. When sampling gravelly soils with a standard two inch diameter split spoon, the true percentage of gravel is often not recovered due to the relatively small sampler diameter. The presence of boulders and large gravel is sometimes, but not necessarily, detected by an evaluation of the casing and sampler blows or through the “action” of the drill rig as reported by the driller. 7. Rock description is based on review of the recovered rock core and the driller’s notes. Frequently used rock classification terms are included in Table VI. 8. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. Solid stratification lines delineate apparent changes in soil type, based upon review of recovered soil samples and the driller’s notes. Dashed lines convey a lesser degree of certainty with respect to either a change in soil type or where such change may occur. 9. Miscellaneous observations and procedures noted by the driller are shown in this column, including water level observations. It is important to realize the reliability of the water level observations depends upon the soil type (water does not readily stabilize in a hole through fine grained soils), and that any drill water used to advance the boring may have influenced the observations. The ground water level will fluctuate seasonally, typically. One or more perched or trapped water levels may exist in the ground seasonally. All the available readings should be evaluated. If definite conclusions cannot be made, it is often prudent to examine the conditions more thoroughly through test pit excavations or groundwater observation wells. 10. The length of core run is defined as the length of penetration of the core barrel. Core recovery is the length of core recovered divided by the core run. The RQD (Rock Quality Designation) is the total length of pieces of NX core exceeding 4 inches divided by the core run. The size core barrel used is also noted in the Method of Investigation at the bottom of the Subsurface Log. ATTACHMENT B General Fill Material and Earthwork Recommendations B-1 ATTACHMENT B GENERAL FILL MATERIAL AND EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS I. Material Recommendations A. Structural Fill Structural Fill should consist of processed sand and gravel or crusher run stone, free of clay, organics and friable or deleterious particles. As a minimum, the material should meet the requirements of NYS Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, Item 733.0402 or 733.0404 B Type 2 or 4 Subbase, with the following general gradation limits. Sieve Size Percent Finer Distribution by Weight 2 inch 100 3 inch 25-65 No. 40 5-40 No. 200 0-10 B. Suitable Granular Fill Suitable soil material, classified as GW, GP, GM, SW, SP and SM soils using the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) and having no more than 85- percent material by weight passing the No. 40 sieve, no more than 20- percent material by weight passing the No. 200 sieve and which is generally free of particles greater than 6 inches, will be acceptable as Suitable Granular Fill. It should also be free of topsoil, asphalt, concrete rubble, wood, debris, clay and other deleterious materials. Suitable Granular Fill should be used as foundation backfill. II. Placement and Compaction Requirements All controlled fill placed beneath foundations, and all foundation backfill should be compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor test (ASTM D1557). During placement, individual fill layers should not exceed a loose lift thickness of 6 to 9 inches, and lift thickness should be limited as necessary to ensure that adequate compaction is achieved with the compaction equipment in use. Fill should have a moisture content within two percent of the optimum moisture content prior to compaction. Subgrades should be properly drained and protected from moisture and frost. Placement of fill on frozen subgrades is not acceptable. It is recommended that all fill placement and compaction be monitored and tested by B-2 a representative of the engineer. III. Quality Assurance Testing The following minimum laboratory and field quality assurance testing frequencies are recommended to verify fill material quality, and to ensure satisfactory placement and compaction of the fill. These minimum frequencies are based on generally uniform material properties and placement conditions. Should material properties vary or conditions at the time of placement vary (e.g., moisture content, placement and compaction, procedures or equipment, etc.) Then more frequent testing would be recommended. Any additional testing which may be necessary should be determined by qualified geotechnical personnel, based on evaluation of the actual fill material and construction conditions. A. Laboratory Testing of Material Properties $ Moisture content (ASTM D-2216) - 1 test per 4000 cubic yards or no less than 2 tests per each material type. $ Grain size analysis (ASTM D-422) - 1 test per 4000 cubic yards or no less than 2 tests per each material type. $ Liquid and plastic limits (ASTM D-4318) - 1 test per 4000 cubic yards or no less than 2 tests per each material type. Liquid and plastic limit testing would generally be necessary only if deemed appropriate based on material composition (e.g., clayey or silty soils). $ Modified Proctor moisture-density relationship (ASTM D-1557) - 1 test per 4000 cubic yards or no less than 1 test per each material type. A maximum/minimum density relationship (ASTM D-4253 and ASTM D-4254) may be an appropriate substitute for ASTM D-1557 depending on material gradation. B. Field In-Place Moisture/Density Testing (ASTM D-3017 and ASTM D-2922) $ Backfilling along trenches and foundation walls - 1 test per 50 lineal feet per lift. $ Backfilling isolated excavations (e.g., column foundations, manholes, etc.) - 1 test per lift. ATTACHMENT C Information Regarding Geotechnical Report GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LIMITATIONS WMA Engineering DPC / DBA Empire Geotechnical Engineering Services (Empire) has endeavored to meet the generally accepted standard of care for the services completed, and in doing so is obliged to advise the geotechnical report user of our report limitations. Empire believes that providing information about the report preparation and limitations is essential to help the user reduce geotechnical-related delays, cost over-runs, and other problems that can develop during the design and construction process. Empire would be pleased to answer any questions regarding the following limitations and use of our report to assist the user in assessing risks and planning for site development and construction. PROJECT SPECIFIC FACTORS: The conclusions and recommendations provided in our geotechnical report were prepared based on project specific factors described in the report, such as size, loading, and intended use of structures; general configuration of structures, roadways, and parking lots; existing and proposed site grading; and any other pertinent project information. Changes to the project details may alter the factors considered in development of the report conclusions and recommendations. Accordingly, Empire cannot accept responsibility for problems which may develop if we are not consulted regarding any changes to the project specific factors that were assumed during the report preparation. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS: The site exploration investigated subsurface conditions only at discrete test locations. Empire has used judgement to infer subsurface conditions between the discrete test locations, and on this basis the conclusions and recommendations in our geotechnical report were developed. It should be understood that the overall subsurface conditions inferred by Empire may vary from those revealed during construction, and these variations may impact on the assumptions made in developing the report conclusions and recommendations. For this reason, Empire should be retained during construction to confirm that conditions are as expected, and to refine our conclusions and recommendations in the event that conditions are encountered that were not disclosed during the site exploration program. USE OF GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Unless indicated otherwise, our geotechnical report has been prepared for the use of our client for specific application to the site and project conditions described in the report. Without consulting with Empire, our geotechnical report should not be applie d by any party to other sites or for any uses other than those originally intended. CHANGES IN SITE CONDITIONS: Surface and subsurface conditions are subject to change at a project site subsequent to preparation of the geotechnical report. Changes may include, but are not limited to, floods, earthquakes, groundwater fluctuations, and construction activities at the site and/or adjoining properties. Empire should be informed of any such changes to determine if additional investigative and/or evaluation work is warranted. MISINTERPRETATION OF REPORT: The conclusions and recommendations contained in our geotechnical report are subject to misinterpretation. To limit this possibility, Empire should review project plans and specifications relative to geotechnical issues to confirm that the recommendations contained in our report have been properly interpreted and applied. Subsurface exploration logs and other report data are also subject to misinterpretation by others if they are separated from the geotechnical report. This often occurs when copies of logs are given to contractors during the bid preparation process. To minimize the potential for misinterpretation, the subsurface logs should not be separated from our geotechnical report and the use of excerpted or incomplete portions of the report should be avoided. OTHER LIMITATIONS: Geotechnical engineering is less exact than other design disciplines, as it is based partly on judgement and opinion. For this reason, our geotechnical report may include clauses that identify the limits of Empire’s responsibility, or that may describe other limitations specific to a project. These clauses are intended to help all parties recognize their responsibilities and to assist them in assessing risks and decision making. Empire would be pleased to discuss these clauses and to answer any questions that may arise. StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University/(*(1'127(6C100 StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityEXISTINGCONDITIONSPLANC101 StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityEROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLANC102 Indoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityUTILITYDEMOLITIONPLANC103StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityWATER ANDSANITARYSERVICE PLANC104 StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityDRAINAGEPLANC105 StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityUTILITYDETAILSC201 StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityUTILITYDETAILSC202^dKZDtd ZDE'D EdWZd/ ͗/KZ d Ed/KE&/>d ZWZK: d/͗^W ^EzZͲyyyyyyDh^d D/Ed/E /EKZE t/d,KΘDW>E͘KEKdZ DKs KZ>d Z͘ StampDrawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONAS SHOWN12/12/2023DAHOBB28020.00UDAHDWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/12/2023SITE PLAN REVIEWIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell UniversityESCDETAILSC203xxx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tampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorth5/4/2023 9:55:01 AMIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/15/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGSITE PROTECTION &REMOVALS PLAN1" = 20'CLEAR AND GRUB. REMOVETOPSOIL AND STORE FORREUSEREMOVE EXISTING TREEREMOVE AND DISPOSEGRAVELPROTECT EXISTING UTILITYSTRUCTUREREMOVE & DISPOSESAWCUT PAVEMENTREMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLEAND FOUNDATIONREMOVE AND DISPOSECONCRETE PAVEMENT &UNDERLYING SLABLEGENDCENTDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLSABBREVIATION DESCRIPTIONGENERALTYP TYPICALR&D REMOVE AND DISPOSER&S REMOVE AND SALVAGEP&S PROTECT AND SUPPORTLIMIT OF WORK (LOW)REMOVE & SALVAGE SITEFEATUREREMOVE AND DISPOSEARTIFICIAL TURF SYSTEMREMOVE AND DISPOSE ASPHALTPAVEMENT & UNDERLYING SLABPROTECT & SUPPORT SITEFEATUREPLANTED AREA TO REMAINSITE PREPARATION & REMOVALS NOTES:1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TOTHEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTINGBUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, ANDABOVE/UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES THAT ARENOT BEING DEMOLISHED.3. DAMAGE TO AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE LIMIT OFWORK CAUSED BY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACTSHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NOADDITIONAL COST.4. STAGING AND INSTALLATION SHOULD TAKEPLACE ONLY WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK ASDEFINED ON THE DRAWINGS AND ADJACENTASPHALT OR CONCRETE AREAS AS NEEDED. NOSTAGING SHALL TAKE PLACE IN ADJACENTPLANTING AREAS. COORDINATE STAGING AREASWITH OWNER.5. REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTIONSNECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE WORKAS DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.6. IN ALL AREAS DESIGNATED FOR TYPICAL(NON-HAND EXCAVATED) PAVING REMOVAL,REMOVE EXISTING MATERIAL TO A MIN. DEPTHOF 10 INCHES/250MM BELOW EXISTING GRADEOR TO BOTTOM OF EXISTING BASE AGGREGATE,WHICHEVER IS DEEPER.7. PROTECT ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL FROMDAMAGE AND ALL PLANTING SOIL FROMCONTAMINATION DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. IF EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPING IS FOUND,REMOVE IRRIGATION HEADS,VALVES, LATERALSAND MAINLINES AS NECESSARY. CAP END OFUNDISTURBED MAINLINES AND LATERALS.ENSURE SYSTEM REMAINS OPERATIONAL TOEXISTING PLANTING AREAS NOT WITH INDISTURBED AREA. RESTORE CONNECTIONS AFTERCONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.9. PRESERVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING SITEFURNISHINGS OR HARDSCAPE TO REMAIN.REMOVE ALL FURNISHINGS AS IDENTIFIED ONDEMOLITION PLAN, INCLUDING ANY FOUNDATIONOR OTHER FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THEFURNISHING.10. NECESSARY DISCONNECTS AND ALTERATIONS TOEXISTING MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMSSHALL BE INCLUDED AS NEEDED. PATCH ASREQUIRED ALL CONSTRUCTIONS TO REMAIN INACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS.11. ALL REMOVALS AND SALVAGE, UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED OR REQUESTED BY THEOWNER, SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THECONTRACTOR.12. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOREMOVAL, ANY ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE ITEMSNOT ANNOTATED ON THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGSTHAT NEED TO BE REMOVED TO COMPLETESCOPE OF WORK.13. ALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND HARDSCAPEELEMENTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FIELDUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REINSTALL ALL TEMPORARILY REMOVEDFURNISHINGS TO THEIR ORIGINAL LOCATION ANDPLACEMENT IN FIELD EXISTING CONDITION,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.14. ALL ROOTS FOUND BELOW PAVING TO BEREMOVED SHALL BE CUT AND REMOVED AMINIMUM OF FOUR INCHES/100 MILLIMETERBELOW THE DEPTH OF EXCAVATION OR AT THEEDGE OF THE LIMIT OF WORK. ALL ROOTPRUNING TO BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIEDARBORIST.15. ALL SURFACES CALLED FOR SANDBLASTING TO BEREVIEWED IN MOCKUP FIRST WITH LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.16. ALL SURFACES CALLED FOR REPAINTING TO BESTRIPPED, CONCRETE SANDBLASTED, METALSTRIPPED, BEFORE PRIMING AND REPAINTING.17. ALL TREES TO BE REMOVED TO BE CUT AT BASE,STUMP TO BE GRINDED, AND ANY ROOTS LARGERTHAN 2 INCHES/50 MILLIMETER IN DIA. WITHIN A5 FOOT/1.5 METER RADIUS OF THE CENTER OFTHE TRUNK TO BE REMOVED.18. THE LIMIT OF WORK LINE FOR THE AREA TO BECLEARED AND GRUBBED SHALL BE THE SAME ASTHE LIMIT OF WORK LINE NECESSARY FORGRADING PURPOSES, I.E., THE GRADING LIMITSAROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROJECT AREA.19. THE DISPOSAL OF ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS ISTHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR ANDMUST BE OFF-SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALLFEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL MUNICIPALREQUIREMENTS.20. REMOVE AND RESET ALL REGULATORY SIGNAGEPER CITY REQUIREMENTS.21. ANY DAMAGED UTILITIES MUST BE RETURNED TOPRE-DAMAGED CONDITION, OR BETTER.22. ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES SHALL BE SHUTOFF AND CAPPED AT THE WATER MAIN. EXISTINGSERVICE LINES, VALVES, AND VALVE BOXESSHALL BE REMOVED.23. SEE CIVIL SERIES DRAWINGS FOR EXISTINGWATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMDRAINAGE SERVICES TO BE REMOVED. ANYADDITIONAL SERVICES LOCATED DURINGCONSTRUCTION NOT INDICATED TO REMAINSHALL ALSO BE BROUGHT TO IMMEDIATEATTENTION OF THE SITE ARCHITECT.24. ALL STREET LIGHTING AND TRAFFIC SIGNALCONDUITS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BEPROTECTED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ANYDAMAGE TO THESE CONDUITS SHALL BEREPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR.DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/15/2023ISSUE FOR PERMIT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874+/- 382'26.00'20.00'29.50'26.00'20.00'+/- 225'11.33'20.00'ACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADACCESS FROMTOWER ROADVEHICULAR ACCESS TO FIELDACCESS FROMTOWER ROADVEHICULAR ACCESSVIA ROLL UP DOORACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADMOUNTABLECURBMOUNTABLECURB20.80'50.68'HYDRANTHYDRANTLIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKTOWN OF ITHACACITY OF ITHACAMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY StampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/15/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGLIMIT OF WORKSYMBOLS DESCRIPTIONLEGENDFIRE APPARATUS ACCESSFIRE ACCESS ROUTES1" = 20'DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/15/2023ISSUE FOR PERMIT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874180.00, TYP.20.00, TYP.120.00, TYP.16.0016.00300.00, TYP.115.00, TYP.71.00, TYP.71.00, TYP.130.00, TYP.50.00, TYP.11.25,TYP.212.00, TYP.N:891674.86E:849161.22LOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFN:891660.37E:849210.63LOCATION TO BE VIFN:891672.61E:849579.98LOCATION TO BE VIFN:891671.62E:849614.16ALIGNR3.00'R3.00'R3.00'R8.00'R3.00'R20.00'R5.00'R5.00'N:891654.31E:848909.95N:891684.42E:848909.99N:891684.49E:848898.12N:891584.92E:848897.37N:891584.81E:848909.378.00R3.00'N:891646.31E:848909.90S89° 40' 45.49"E261.79R12.00'R12.00'R8.00'R5.00'R5.00'R5.00'R5.00'R35.00'R3.00'R3.00'R2.00'R10.00'R2.00'R10.00'R28.00'R3.00'R3.00'R3.50'R3.00'R5.00'R3.00'R2.00'N:891619.86E:849144.43N:891618.86E:849143.42N:891606.23E:849143.85N:891621.79E:848920.69N:891527.86E:848911.88N:891288.43E:848919.18N:891383.79E:848918.64N:891199.35E:849329.35N:891200.23E:849337.10N:891200.34E:849353.81N:891229.98E:849380.33N:891232.63E:849524.95N:891243.86E:849599.09N:891238.46E:849614.38N:891298.11E:849594.51LOCATIONTO BE VIFALIGN12.0012.00S0° 28' 38.22"W74.77N0° 17' 47.28"E32.60N:891671.12E:849207.18N62° 08' 55.79"W187.3626.0026.00N:891519.31E:849368.14N:891563.91E:849202.37N:891587.43E:849268.44N:891268.11E:849289.17N:891253.47E:849267.95N:891279.86E:849213.661.50, TYP.N:891514.60E:849426.78N:891508.81E:849426.73N:891522.92E:849416.21N:891523.62E:849330.3720.00 R10.00'N:891250.98E:849135.37N:891256.03E:849167.639.765.00N:891586.71E:849264.911.50, TYP.N:891560.74E:849328.84N:891564.25E:849330.26N:891595.15E:849268.349.83R3.50'20.006.00 20.00S89° 40' 46.71"W107.33S89° 30' 46.49"E400.84N0° 00' 00.00"E25.846.00N:891229.93E:848957.06N:891240.09E:848957.16N:891230.47E:848894.14N:891585.00E:848884.95N:891574.64E:848885.00N:891574.58E:848891.32N:891556.58E:848884.84N:891536.13E:848884.67N:891536.08E:848890.80N:891531.81E:848890.76N:891531.82E:848896.91N:891584.87E:848913.08N:891526.78E:848920.87N:891556.53E:848891.16N:891241.16E:849164.93N:891231.14E:849172.33N:891218.07E:849315.14N:891218.02E:849305.09N:891199.31E:849305.18N:891235.83E:849329.93N:891243.05E:849347.38N:891236.25E:849362.52N:891243.48E:849379.97N:891236.64E:849395.11R28.00'N:891282.74E:849289.59N:891282.85E:849290.30N:891268.84E:849278.40N:891251.41E:849220.10N:891273.24E:849228.903.00N:891259.12E:849241.36N:891251.49E:849235.223.79N:891276.22E:849247.95N:891283.64E:849198.166.663.00, TYP.7.00, TYP.27.4517.4917.4911.8942.28R10.00'6.00 LOCATIONTO BE VIFALIGNLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFLOCATION TO BE VIFALIGN17.9645.98N:891621.09E:849244.901.50, TYP.N:891595.43E:849295.06N:891559.24E:849359.778.00N:891508.88E:849418.34N:891382.60E:849172.88N:891504.95E:849193.948.006.0011.33N:891661.44E:849170.29N:891661.29E:849200.3020.008.0020.00R10.00'182.68214.348.00N:891555.41E:849593.17N:891349.52E:849594.428.00N:891509.58E:849593.51N:891565.24E:849194.42N:891550.30E:849253.33N:891553.26E:849253.82S89° 42' 12.72"E13.55N0° 29' 38.63"E304.19N0° 29' 38.63"E95.28N89° 41' 13.27"E185.56N85° 24' 33.61"E31.20S51° 10' 08.08"E20.47N89° 08' 48.03"E121.79N35° 47' 56.13"E20.94S89° 36' 24.43"W64.3826.00 N:891244.11E:849422.5189.2010.2714.5013.00S0° 28' 38.22"W28.9720.00N0° 28' 37.09"E251.12N:891287.87E:849141.57N:891289.70E:848929.58N:891384.89E:848907.65N:891383.76E:849154.89N:891382.87E:849141.39N:891524.74E:849157.11N:891524.86E:849143.611.00, TYP.N:891626.92E:849197.94N:891558.74E:849202.39N:891512.81E:849194.00N:891509.19E:849384.53N:891512.51E:849384.56N:891523.76E:849317.46N:891510.75E:849200.10N:891286.69E:849192.0768.033.00N:891257.62E:849277.923.00, TYP.N:891270.38E:849288.18N:891255.52E:849214.98N81° 05' 49.46"E62.93L=12.41, R=8.00'=88.90L=4.70, R=5.00'=53.88N90° 00' 00.00"E10.12L=4.65, R=5.00'=53.34N:891231.61E:849256.98N:891526.69E:848931.62N:891522.74E:848925.86N:891388.77E:848924.68N:891384.69E:848930.39N:891388.79E:848919.684.00, TYP.8.00,TYP.4.00, TYP.1.25, TYP.94.00, TYP.14.50N:891431.84E:849145.31N:891473.83E:849146.67N:891523.85E:849146.1117.0010.00,TYP.40.0010.00N:891621.66E:848973.440.33, TYP.N:891289.01E:848970.57105.00, TYP.62.9210.1620.001.50, TYP.N:891507.48E:849584.87R8.00'N:891259.06E:849616.97LOCATIONTO BE VIFN:891531.64E:849613.44N:891602.95E:849613.07N:891460.66E:849613.74N:891390.02E:849614.15N:891318.85E:849614.43LOCATIONTO BE VIFLOCATIONTO BE VIFLOCATIONTO BE VIFLOCATIONTO BE VIFLOCATIONTO BE VIFN0° 01' 15.60"W56.66N0° 38' 07.75"W20.69N0° 16' 40.68"W133.66N0° 21' 09.68"W129.53N0° 28' 58.95"E12.45N0° 13' 37.43"W55.31ALIGN5.678.00R3.00'N89° 30' 20.70"W40.54N:891455.87E:848909.76N:891455.84E:848913.76N:891531.01E:848910.41N:891607.57E:848911.07N:891657.19E:848930.32N:891624.02E:848927.11N:891622.60E:849038.45N:891381.05E:848908.92N:891305.70E:848908.62N:891253.61E:848930.21N:891254.11E:849005.22N:891254.51E:849080.22N:891257.37E:849160.75N:891369.57E:849169.78N:891444.57E:849170.42N:891519.15E:849170.93N:891522.43E:849230.12N:891594.22E:849171.84N:891656.28E:849080.32N:891655.83E:849155.32N:891632.42E:849233.91N:891553.03E:849272.65N:891522.43E:849312.53N:891599.07E:849294.70N:891562.22E:849360.04N:891551.41E:849438.39N:891519.94E:849513.42N:891553.02E:849587.21N:891601.57E:849616.70N:891660.49E:849616.70N:891490.04E:849615.60N:891415.05E:849615.16N:891340.02E:849616.17N:891264.69E:849616.17N:891271.42E:849565.18N:891261.14E:849518.06N:891239.79E:849462.78N:891240.12E:849387.75N:891240.80E:849326.81N:891229.68E:849262.41N:891267.18E:849293.73N:891257.69E:849217.51N:891526.88E:848908.8720.0040.00, TYP.N:891294.57E:849169.15N:891656.74E:849005.32LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKTOWN OF ITHACACITY OF ITHACAMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY StampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorth5/4/2023 9:55:01 AMIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/15/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGBEARING DISTANCE CENTERLINE (CL)LEGENDLIMIT OF WORK (LOW)DESCRIPTIONSYMBOLS694.56'N01°16'44"ER1'-0"5.00'RADIAL DIMENSIONLINEAR DIMENSIONARC LENGTH DIMENSIONABBREVIATION DESCRIPTIONGENERALTYP TYPICALVIF VERIFY IN FIELDNNORTHEEASTSSOUTHWWESTO/C ON CENTER1'-312"N:10541359.19E:3297858.87NORTHING/EASTING COORDINATESLAYOUT PLAN1" = 20'LAYOUT NOTES:1. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, WALLS,ROADS AND CURBS AFFECTING LANDSCAPE SCOPEOF WORK WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVILENGINEER'S DRAWINGS.2. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL VAULTS, ELECTRICALDUCT BANKS, MANHOLES, CONDUIT AND PIPING,DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER UTILITIESWITH THE APPROPRIATE ENGINEERINGDRAWINGS.3. TAKE ALL DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB,WALL OR BUILDING OR TO CENTERLINE OFCOLUMNS OR TREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.ALL MEASUREMENTS TO DESIGNATEDCENTERLINE(S).4. TAKE ALL DIMENSIONS PERPENDICULAR TO ANYREFERENCE LINE, WORK LINE, FACE OF BUILDING,FACE OF WALL, OR CENTERLINE.5. ALL DIMENSIONS TAKEN TO CENTERLINE OFBUILDING COLUMN SHALL MEAN THE FIRST ROWOF COLUMNS CLOSEST TO THE FACE OF THEBUILDING. SEE ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS FORCORRESPONDING COLUMN LINES.6. ALL ANGLES TO BE 90 DEGREES AND ALL LINESOF PAVING AND FENCING TO BE PARALLELUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MAINTAINHORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF ADJACENTELEMENTS AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.7. REFERENCE TO NORTH REFERS TO TRUE NORTH,REFERENCE TO SCALE IS FOR FULL-SIZEDDRAWINGS ONLY. DO NOT SCALE FROM REDUCEDDRAWINGS.8. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALESSHOWN ON DRAWINGS.9. NOTES AND DETAILS ON SPECIFIC DRAWINGSTAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES ANDTYPICAL DETAILS.10. DO NOT INSTALL ANY WORK ON STRUCTUREPRIOR TO REVIEW OF WATERPROOFING BYARCHITECT.11. ALL CONCRETE SLABS AND RAMP OR STEPFOOTINGS SHALL BE DOWELED INTO ABUTTINGWALLS, FOUNDATIONS AND FOOTINGS USINGBARS OF THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE. SEE JOINTING DETAILS.12. WHERE NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS,SEE CIVIL ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS FOR ROADWAYCENTERLINES, BUILDING SETBACKS ANDBENCHMARKS.13. ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMEDGRID SYSTEM. COORDINATES REFER TO THECENTER OF STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED OR DETAILED.DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/15/2023ISSUE FOR PERMIT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKTOWN OF ITHACACITY OF ITHACAMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY NATIVE MEADOW ANDPERENNIAL PLANTINGS, TYP.FIRE LANE,BITUMINOUS CONCRETEPAVING, TYPRIVERSTONE DRIPEDGE, TYP.STEEL EDGING, TYP.NATIVE MEADOW AND PERENNIALPLANTINGS, TYP.STONE DUSTPATHWAY, TYP.PRECAST CONCRETESEATING, TYP.FIELD HOCKEYSEATINGHEAVY-DUTY CONCRETEPAVING, TYPCONCRETE PAVING, TYP.HEAVY-DUTYCONCRETEPAVING, TYPPRECAST CONCRETESEATING, TYPCAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETEPRESS BOXPERIMETER CONCRETETURF CURBTREE PLANTING, TYP.FLUSH CONCRETECURBFLUSH CONCRETECURBSYNTHETIC TURF FIELD6'H PERIMETER FENCINGCAST IN PLACE CONCRETETEAM SHELTERSFIELD HOCKEY STRIPING25' HIGH END OF FIELD NETTINGSCOREBOARDSPORTS LIGHT POLE, TYP.42" CHAIN LINK FENCENATIVE MEADOW ANDPERENNIAL PLANTINGS, TYP.LAWNLANDSCAPE SYNTHETIC TURF40' FLAG POLELANDSCAPE SYNTHETIC TURF42"H CHAIN LINK FENCEHYDRANTHYDRANTRELOCATED EXISTING DUMPSTERSON HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PADBICYCLE PARKINGFACILITY, TYP.TRASH AND RECYCLINGRECEPTACLES, TYP.TRASH AND RECYCLINGRECEPTACLES, TYP.SITE LIGHT POLE, TYP.SITE LIGHTPOLE, TYP.BICYCLE PARKINGFACILITY, TYP.TREE PITSHRUB PLANTING, TYP.SHRUB PLANTING, TYP.SNOWMELT SYSTEM, TYP.ROLL-UP DOOREXISTING SPORTSLIGHTING TO REMAINSTONE DUST, TYP.PRECAST CONCRETEPAVERS, TYP.MOUNTABLE CONCRETECURBFLUSH CONCRETECURBMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURBVT-05L8-04PA-02L8-01VT-07L8-04EG-06L8-02VT-03L8-04VT-01L8-04PA-06L8-01PA-01L8-01VT-08L8-04VT-09L8-04VT-03L8-04VT-01L8-04VT-03L8-04PA-02L8-01PA-08L8-01StampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorth5/4/2023 9:55:01 AMIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/15/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGMATERIALS NOTES:1. TYPES OF MATERIALS AND FINISHES ARE NOTED INTHE LEGEND.2. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LAYOUT SHALL BECOORDINATED WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS ANDARCHITECTURE CONSTRUCTION PACKAGESSYMBOLS DESCRIPTIONBITUMINOUS CONCRETEPAVINGHEAVY-DUTY CONCRETEPAVINGCONCRETE PAVINGDECIDUOUS TREEPLANTINGSSHRUB PLANTINGSSNOWMELT SYSTEMNATIVE MEADOW ANDPRECAST CONCRETE PAVERSSYNTHETIC TURFLAWNPERENNIAL PLANTINGSSTONE DUSTLEGENDLIMIT OF WORK (LOW)MATERIALS PLAN1" = 20'DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/15/2023ISSUE FOR PERMIT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874FG 0.30%SG 0.50%FG 0.30%SG 0.50%FG: 874.00, TEL: 873.96 TOS: 873.87, TSG: 872.99FG 874.31FG 874.31TOS: 874.18TSG: 873.51FG: 874.06, TEL: 874.02 TOS: 873.93, TSG: 873.09FG: 874.12, TEL: 874.08 TOS: 873.99, TSG: 873.19FG: 874.18, TEL: 874.14 TOS: 874.05, TSG: 873.29FG: 874.24, TEL: 874.20 TOS: 874.11, TSG: 873.39FG: 874.30, TEL: 874.26 TOS: 874.17, TSG: 873.49FG: 874.30, TEL: 874.26 TOS: 874.17, TSG: 873.49FG: 874.24, TEL: 874.20 TOS: 874.11, TSG: 873.39FG: 874.18, TEL: 874.14 TOS: 874.05, TSG: 873.29FG: 874.06, TEL: 874.02 TOS: 873.93, TSG: 873.15FG: 874.00, TEL: 873.96 TOS: 873.87, TSG: 873.25FG: 874.08, TEL: 874.04 TOS: 873.95, TSG: 873.12SG 0.50%FG 0.30%FG 0.30%FG 874.31TOS: 874.18TSG: 874.51FG 874.31TOS: 874.18TSG: 873.51+ 875.50+ (875.70)(875.87)+(876.17)874.00 x+ 875.50+ 876.15+ 874.04.99%4.75%+ 877.304.5%+ 878.10+ 878.25+ 878.02+ 877.65+ 877.2512.4%2%+ 877.9013% 3.33%1.5%1%+ 877.50+ 877.201.5%1.5%5 STAIRS+ 877.75877.70 ++ 877.60+ 877.322%+ 878.90+ 878.80+ 878.302.3%1%1%+ 875.50+ 875.60+ 875.001.5%2%1%+ 877.70+ 876.27+ 875.80+ 877.65+ 878.252%878.10+878.10+878.20++ 878.75+ 878.60878.10++877.601%+877.60+ 874.0+ 875.50+ 875.15+ 876.15+ 875.901.75%+ 877.45+ 876.05+ 877.452%+ 876.85877.95++ 878.60+ 878.702%1.5% 1.5%878.10++880.202%+ 878.25878.25 ++ (879.69)+877.60+(TC 878.36)++ (877.57)+ (877.51)(878.26)TC 878.10BC 877.60+877.75+878.00+877.95+877.95+878.10+877.70+877.85+878.25+(878.20)++ 878.251.5%877.55+877.70++ (877.70)877.75+(TC 878.70)++878.60(TC 880.10)+(TC 880.30)++879.55(879.70)++879.182%878.10 +878.10 ++ (879.00)++(879.28)+(BC 879.33)+1%(BC 877.00)+875.30+877.90+878.15+(878.09)++ 875.25+ 877.71+ 877.47+ LP(878.15)+(878.16)++ 877.96+ 877.97+ 878.47+ 878.60+ 878.25880878(879.20)(879.25) +875875879875876877878876877878878HPS 875.950.67%LPS 874.350.67%FG 874.00FG 874.15FG 874.15FG 874.50FG 874.30FG: 874.00, TEL: 873.96 TOS: 873.87, TSG: 872.99FG: 874.06, TEL: 874.02 TOS: 873.93, TSG: 873.09FG: 874.12, TEL: 874.08 TOS: 873.99, TSG: 873.19FG: 874.18, TEL: 874.14 TOS: 874.05, TSG: 873.29FG: 874.24, TEL: 874.20 TOS: 874.11, TSG: 873.39FG: 874.30, TEL: 874.26 TOS: 874.17, TSG: 873.49FG: 874.30, TEL: 874.26 TOS: 874.17, TSG: 873.49FG: 874.24, TEL: 874.20 TOS: 874.11, TSG: 873.39FG: 874.18, TEL: 874.14 TOS: 874.05, TSG: 873.29FG: 874.06, TEL: 874.02 TOS: 873.93, TSG: 873.15FG: 874.08, TEL: 874.04 TOS: 873.95, TSG: 873.12FG: 874.12, TEL: 874.08 TOS: 873.99, TSG: 873.19FG: 874.00, TEL: 873.96 TOS: 873.87, TSG: 873.255 STAIRSFG 874.15FG 874.15FG 874.00FG 874.00FG 874.00LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKTOWN OF ITHACACITY OF ITHACAMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY StampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorth5/4/2023 9:55:01 AMIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/15/2023TSJSP28020.00UAG5110.00TSBSVERIFY IN FIELDSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONLEGENDSPOT ELEVATIONFINISHED FLOORELEVATIONTOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRCONTOUR MAJORCONTOUR MINORGRADINGVIFFFELIMIT OF WORKEXISTING TREE TO REMAINAND BE PROTECTEDTCBCTOP AND BOTTOM OF CURBTWBWTOP AND BOTTOM OF WALLHPLPSLOW POINT OF SWALEHIGH POINTCONTOUR/ELEVATIONEXISTINGGRADE BREAKRIM ELEVATIONRIM(5)DRAINNOTE: "+" IDENTIFIES LOCATION REQUIRING SPOTELEVATION, TYP.LPLOW POINTHPSHIGH POINT OF SWALETREE PROTECTIONFENCE,TYPTRENCH DRAIN, SEE CIVILSPECIFICATIONS, TYP.GRADING NOTES:1. FOR EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY INCLUDING GRADES,UTILITIES, PROPERTY LINES, LIMITS OFROADWAYS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, EXISTINGTREES, ETC., REFER TO THE SURVEY.2. SAWCUT AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING PAVEMENTIN AREAS WHERE THE PROPOSED GRADES ARELESS THAN 1 INCH/25 MILLIMETER GREATERTHAN THE EXISTING GRADES.3. PATHWAY LONGITUDINAL SLOPES SHALL NOTEXCEED 5%. PATHWAY CROSS-SLOPES AND PLAZASLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% IN ANYDIRECTION. ADA RAMP LONGITUDINAL SLOPESHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3%. ALL PAVED AREASSHALL BE SLOPED TO DRAIN WITH A MINIMUMSLOPE OF 0.5%. PLANTED AREAS SHALL HAVE AMINIMUM SLOPE OF 2% AND A MAXIMUM SLOPEOF 33%. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFYENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/OWNERIMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEENTHESE RULES AND GIVEN SPOT GRADES.4. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL PROVIDE FORNATURAL RUNOFF OF WATER WITHOUT LOWSPOTS OR POCKETS. SET FLOW LINESACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM 1% AND AMAXIMUM 3:1 (33%) GRADIENT UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.5. HOLD FINISHED GRADES INCLUDING THE MULCHLAYER FOR SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS1/4 INCH/7 MILLIMETER BELOW TOP OFADJACENT PAVEMENT, CURBS, OR HEADERSUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.6. GRADUALLY ROUND OFF TOPS AND TOES OF ALLPLANTED SLOPES TO PRODUCE A SMOOTH ANDNATURAL APPEARING TRANSITION BETWEENRELATIVELY LEVEL AREAS AND SLOPES.7. RETAIN A 1 FOOT/300 MILLIMETER MINSHOULDER (5% SLOPE OR LESS) ADJACENT TOALL WALKWAYS AND UTILITY TABS, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.8. VERIFY ACCURACY OF ALL EXISTING GRADES ATAREAS TO REMAIN, PRIOR TO STARTINGCONSTRUCTION OF ADJUSTMENTIMPROVEMENTS. NOTIFY CLIENT AND DESIGNTEAM OF DISCREPANCIES.9. HOLD TOPS OF WALLS LEVEL UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.10. COORDINATE ALL EXISTING MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, UTILITY BOXES, CLEANOUTS, VAULTS,FIRE HYDRANTS, ETC., TO MATCH NEW FINISHEDGRADES.11. IN FILL AREAS WHERE PROPOSED GRADES ARE 1TO 3 INCHES/25-75 MILLIMETER HIGHER THANTHE EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE PROPOSEDGRADES SHALL BE MET BY ADDING PAVEMENTOVERLAYS (1.5 INCH/40 MILLIMETER MAXIMUMTHICKNESS EACH LIFT) TO EXISTING PAVEMENT.GRADING PLAN1" = 20'DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/15/2023ISSUE FOR PERMIT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKTOWN OF ITHACACITY OF ITHACAMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY StampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorth5/4/2023 9:55:01 AMIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/22/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGPLANTING NOTES:1. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOREACH SPECIES OF TREE INSTALLED ON GRID ORSPACED EQUALLY IN ROWS AS SHOWN ONDRAWINGS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.2. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR ALLHEDGE PLANTINGS. SPACE EQUALLY(TRIANGULARLY) AS SHOWN.3. INSTALL ALL TREES A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET/1METER FROM BACK OF CURB, EDGE OF WALLOR PAVING.4. FORM MINIMUM 3 INCH/75 MILLIMETERWATERING BASIN AROUND ALL TREES NOTINSTALLED PAVED AREAS. FILL TREE RING WITHA 3 INCH/75 MILLIMETER LAYER OF MULCH.5. NO MULCH OR SOIL TO BE LEFT DIRECTLY ONROOT CROWN.6. REMOVE ALL GIRDLING ROOTS FROM NEW TREEMATERIAL.7. REMOVE TOP AND SIDES OF B&B TREES BURLAPAND WIRE FRAMES, REMOVE ANY EXCESS SOILFROM AROUND ROOT CROWNS.8. FOR BOXED TREES, REMOVE FOUR VERTICALSIDES OF BOX, LEAVING BOTTOM OF BOXINTACT IN TREE PIT.9. FOR BARE-ROOT OR MISSOURI GRAVEL TREES,FOLLOW CLIMATE CONTROLRECOMMENDATIONS OF SUPPLIER, SOAKHYDROGEL SPRAYED ROOTS FOR ONE HOURBEFORE PLANTING. SEE ROOT CROWN 1/2 INCH/13 MILLIMETERS ABOVE ADJACENT SOIL, ANDEVENLY SPREAD OUT ROOTS AND BACKFILL OFSOIL TO AVOID GROUPING OF ROOTS OR FINEROOTS, BUT RATHER RADIALLY ARRANGINGROOTS WITHIN TREE PIT.10. GENTLY LOOSEN OR CUTAWAY PLASTICCONTAINERS FROM CONTAINER STOCKPLANTINGS. FOR HIGHLY ROOT-BOUNDCONTAINERS, SHAVING ROOTS CUTTING FINEROOTS FOR THE OUTER 1/4 INCH/7MILLIMETER OF CONTAINER, FOR MILDLYROOT-BOUND CONTAINERS, HAND LOOSENBEFORE PLANTING.11. EACH LOCATION OF TREE SHALL BE STAKED ATAPPROXIMATE FINISH ELEVATION BYCONTRACTOR FOR REVIEW BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO FINALINSTALLATION. ALL TREES IN AREA SHALL BESTAKED FOR REFERENCE AND LIMITS OF PLANTBEDS AND PAVING CLEARLY MARKED AT AMINIMUM.12. PLANT NAMES ARE ABBREVIATED ON THEDRAWINGS. SEE PLANT LEGEND FOR KEY ANDCLASSIFICATION.13. ALL TREES TO HAVE A 3 INCH/75 MILLIMETERTHICK LAYER OF MULCH, AND SHRUB ORHERBACEOUS PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE 2INCH/50 MILLIMETER THICK LAYER OF MULCH,SEE SPECIFICATIONS.14. DO NOT PLANT GROUND COVERS, HEDGES, ORFLOWERING PLANTS WITHIN 3 FEET/1 METEROF ANY EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSEDHYDRANTS, PIV, FDC, DCDA, ETC.15. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANCHOR, TREECOLLARS, AND ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS ANDREQUIREMENTS NEEDED FOR PLANTING.TREE PRUNING NOTES:1. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WITHIN THELANDSCAPE LIMIT OF WORK TO BE REVIEWEDBY A REGISTERED ARBORIST FOR HEALTH ANDSAFETY. THE ARBORIST WILL MAKERECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRUNING ANDREMOVING AS NECESSARY TO SUPPORT LONGTERM HEALTH AND SAFETY.2. A TREE PRUNING WORK PLAN WILL BESUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTFOR REVIEW. THIS WORK PLAN WILL BEDEVELOPED BY A REGISTERED ARBORIST, ANDWILL DESCRIBE THE SCOPE OF WORK TO BEUNDERTAKEN.3. ALL DEADWOOD, CROSSING BRANCHES, ANDSTRUCTURALLY COMPROMISED BRANCHES ANDTRUNKS SHALL BE REMOVED. ALL SUCKERS TOBE REMOVED. ALL DENSE CANOPIES INEXISTING TREES TO BE LIFTED ABOVE 8FEET/2.5 METER HIGH FOR TREES 6 INCH/150MILLIMETER DBH OR LARGER.4. ALL PRUNING TO BE DONE BY REGISTEREDARBORIST, FOLLOWING ISA BEST PRACTICESFOR BOTH SAFETY AND METHODS, ANSI 300.5. REMOVE OR CUT AT THE BASE ANY POSTS,FENCING OR OTHER MATERIALS THAT THETREE HAS GROWN AROUND. NOTIFYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF ANY FOREIGNOBJECT REMOVAL REQUIRES ADDITIONALDEMOLITION OF EXISTING TO REMAIN SITESTRUCTURES.TREE TRANSPLANT NOTES:1. A WORK PLAN FOR TREE TRANSPLANTING TOBE SUPPLIED BY A REGISTERED ARBORIST TOTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW.2. ALL TREE IDENTIFIED ON DEMOLITION PLANSFOR TRANSPLANTING ARE TO BE DUG, BALLEDAND BURLAPPED, AND LOCATED TEMPORARILYON THE PROPERTY DURING HARDSCAPECONSTRUCTION. THE ROOT BALL SHOULDEQUAL 1 FOOT/300 MILLIMETER PER 1INCH'/25 MILLIMETER OF CALIPER RADIUSFROM THE CENTER POINT OF THE TRUNK,UNLESS THE TREE IS CONTAINERIZED OR ARECENT PLANTING, IN WHICH CASE THE ROOTBALL CAN MATCH THE EXTENTS OF THELIMITED ROOT SYSTEM.3. IF A MULTI-SEASON TRANSPLANT IS REQUIRED,DIG HALF THE ROOT BALL DURING DORMANCYYEAR 1, THEN THE SECOND HALF DURINGDORMANCY YEAR 2. SEE SPECIFICATIONS.4. IF THE TREES CAN BE HELD IN THEIR EXISTINGLOCATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DUGCLOSE TO REPLANTING, TRANSPLANT TREESMUST HAVE THE SAME TREE PROTECTION ASTHE EXISTING TO REMAIN TREES.5. ALL TRANSPLANTING TO BE OVERSAW BYREGISTERED ARBORIST, FOLLOWING ISA BESTPRACTICES FOR BOTH SAFETY AND METHODS,ANSI 300.6. DURING STORAGE ON SITE, TRANSPLANTEDMATERIAL TO BE WATERED REGULARLY. IFSTORED MORE THAN 1 WEEK, TRANSPLANTEDMATERIAL TO BE EITHER TEMPORARILYPLANTED, OR MOUNDED IN MULCH ORSTOCKPILED SOIL. ADEQUATE SUPPORT WITHSTAKES AND RUBBER TREE TIES SHOULD BEUSED IF ROOTBALL IS UNSTABLE IN HOLDINGTHE TREE PLUMB, EVEN IN WINDYCONDITIONS.7. TRANSPLANT PLANTING TO FOLLOW SAMEDETAILS AS TREE PLANTING INCLUDED IN THEPLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.PLANTING PLAN1" =20'DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/22/2023DESIGN DEVELOPMENTDECIDUOUS TREESHRUBSOD - TYPE 1 - CORNELLTURFGRASS SEED BLENDLOW MOW NATIVE UPLANDSEEDLEGENDCENDESCRIPTIONSYMBOLSLIMIT OF WORK (LOW)LOW MOW NATIVE UPLANDPLUGSTURF - LOW-GROW MIXGROUND COVERS BCAUNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SUBGRADECOMPACTED DENSEGRADED CRUSHED STONEBITUMINOUS CONCRETEBINDER COURSEBITUMINOUS CONCRETEWEARING (SURFACE)COURSE12" MIN.ABVEHICULAR1 1/2" 2 1/2"C12"6"COMPACTED DENSE GRADEDCRUSHED 3/8" STONE1'COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBEDSUBGRADEREINFORCING BAR @ 12''O.C., BOTH DIRECTIONS. SEESPECIFICATIONS.3"3"SEE SPECIFICATIONS FORCONCRETE FINISH, TYP.SAWCUT JOINT. JOINT DEPTH =14 CONCRETE SLAB DEPTH, TYP.SEE SPECIFICATIONS & LAYOUTPLANS L2-01 THROUGH L2-03.6"6"1' - 3', SEE PLANCOMPACTED ORUNDISTURBEDSUBGRADECOMPACTED AGGREGATEBASEFILTER FABRIC1 12 " to 2" RIVER STONEPLANTING, TYP.14" THICK X 5" DEEPSTEEL EDGING, STAKED.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.BUILDING FACE, TYP.,SEE ARCH. DWGSDRAINAGE BOARD,SEE ARCH. DWGS6"6"REINFORCED CAST IN PLACECONCRETE PAVING WITHEXPOSED AGGREGATE FINISH.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.COMPACTED DENSE GRADEDCRUSHED 3/8" STONE1'COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBEDSUBGRADESAWCUT JOINT. JOINT DEPTH =14 CONCRETE SLAB DEPTH, TYP.SEE SPECIFICATIONS & LAYOUTPLANS L2-01 THROUGH L2-03.WELDED WIRE MESH REINFORCING.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.VARIES 12"FLEXIBLE SEALANTBACKER RODCOMPRESSIBLEFILLER12" S.S. SLIP DOWEL, 30" O.C.CORE DRILL INTO EXISTINGCONCRETE, SET DOWEL WITHNON-SHRINK EPOXY.BELOW GRADECONDITION VARIESFINISH VARIES. SEESPECIFICATIONS.10"6"CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCEDCONCRETE HAUNCH12"3"34"1'PROCESSED AGGREGATE BASE, PLACEIN TWO COURSESPRECAST CONCRETE UNITPAVERS, MATCH CAMPUSSTANDARD3/4" BEDDING SANDAPPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE18" POLYMERIC SAND JOINT, TYP14" THICK X 5" DEEPSTEEL EDGING, STAKED.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.PLANTING AREA OR RIVER ROCKIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/22/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthSITE DETAILS - PAVINGASSEMBLIESAS NOTEDASPHALT PAVINGPA-012" = 1'-0"RIVER ROCK DRIP EDGEPA-062" = 1'-0"HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVINGPA-022" = 1'-0"CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATEPA-042" = 1'-0"C.I.P. CONCRETE AT EXISTING CONCRETE PAVINGPA-072" = 1'-0"PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERPA-082" = 1'-0"DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/22/2023DESIGN DEVELOPMENT HIGH USE LAWN SOILPREPARED SUBGRADEMEADOW/POVERTY SOILORSTRIPPED EXISTINGTOPSOIL/MEADOW SOIL,SEE SPECIFICATIONS2" DEPTH MULCH.4" FIBER REINFORCED UPPER,SEE SPECIFICATIONS14" THICK X 5" DEEP STEELEDGING, STAKED. SEESPECIFICATIONS.LAWN AREAPLANTING AREA2'-0" TYP.NOTE:DETECTABLE WARNING PAVER TO BE INSTALLED PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS.6"12:1 MAX6"AT CURB CUTSCAST IRON DETECTABLEWARNING PLATECAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PAVINGCOMPACTED AGGREGATE BASECOURSEMATERIAL VARIES, SEE PLANSOIL SUBGRADE SHALL BE PREPAREDIN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE EARTHWORKSPECIFICATION AND THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY.10" MIN1'-6" MINA'ASEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FORCONCRETE CURBING DETAIL, TYP.6' MIN2% MAX.MATERIAL VARIES,SEE MATERIALS PLANFINISHED GRADE OFSIDEWALK; SEE PLANSSECTION A-A'NOTES:1. SEE CIVIL DWGS FOR ROADWAY GRADING AND CURB DETAILS2. REFER TO LAYOUT PLANS FOR WIDTH OF WALKWAY AND EXTENTS OF FLUSH CURBS3. ORIENTATION OF RAMP SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN PLANFLUSH CURBTC ± 0BC ± 0TR +6"1:12 MAX.1:12 MAX.6' MIN.TC + 6"BC ± 0EG-01KNIFE EDGEA'ASEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FORCONCRETE CURBING DETAIL, TYP.6' MIN2% MAX.MATERIAL VARIES,SEE MATERIALS PLANFINISHED GRADE OFSIDEWALK; SEE PLANSSECTION A-A'NOTES:1. SEE CIVIL DWGS FOR ROADWAY GRADING AND CURB DETAILS2. REFER TO LAYOUT PLANS FOR WIDTH OF WALKWAY AND EXTENTS OF FLUSH CURBS3. ORIENTATION OF RAMP SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN PLANFLUSH CURBTC ± 0BC ± 0TR +6"1:12 MAX.1:12 MAX.6' MIN.TC + 6"BC ± 0EG-03KNIFE EDGEPRECAST CONCRETE PAVERSON CONCRETE BASE WITHCONCRETE HAUNCH2"R112"NOTES:1. TOP OF CONCRETE MOUNTABLE CURB ELEVATION TO MATCH LINE AND GRADE OF EXISTINGADJACENT CONCRETE ROAD CURBS. SEE MATERIAL AND LAYOUT PLANS FOR ALIGNMENT ANDEXTENTS.FLUSH9"1'-6"R1"CONCRETE CURB, BEYOND. SEECIVIL DETAILS. ALIGN FACES OFCURBS.ADJACENT PAVEMENT. SEECIVIL DRAWINGS.REINFORCED CAST-IN-PLACECONCRETE MOUNTABLE CURB(2) #4 GALVANIZED REBAREXPANSION JOINT1'-2"1'Indoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/22/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthSTEEL EDGINGEG-062:1_XREFSITE DETAILS - EDGECONDITIONSAS NOTEDCAST IRON DETECTABLE WARNING PLATEEG-052' = 1'-0"CURB RAMP TYPE AEG-033" = 1'-0"CURB RAMP TYPE BEG-043" = 1'-0"CONCRETE MOUNTABLE CURBEG-021 1/2" = 1'-0"DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/22/2023DESIGN DEVELOPMENT VARIES1 2"FLEXIBLE SEALANTBACKER RODCOMPRESSIBLE FILLER12" S.S. SLIP DOWEL FIXED ATONE END 30" O.C.CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASEWITH FIBERMESH REINFORCINGBELOW GRADE CONDITION VARIESFINISH VARIES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS.NOTE:1. REFER TO LAYOUT PLANS FOR JOINTING TYPE, LAYOUT, ANDSPACING, TYP.VARIES1 2"FLEXIBLE SEALANTBACKER RODCOMPRESSIBLE FILLERADJACENT RIGID ELEMENTVARIES: WALL, CURB, FOOTING,OR OTHER, TYP.FINISH VARIES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS.NOTE:1. REFER TO LAYOUT PLANS FOR JOINTING TYPE, LAYOUT, ANDSPACING, TYP.2. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN RIGIDSURFACES SUCH AS WALLS, CURBS, PAVINGS, AND FOOTINGS.SEE SPECIFICATIONS.Indoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/22/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthSITE DETAILS -PAVING JOINTAS NOTEDEXPANSION JOINTJT-012" = 1'EXPANSION JOINT AT VERTICAL ELEMENTJT-022" = 1'DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/22/2023DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 2" DEPTH COMPOSTED BARK MULCH,KEEP FREE OF TRUNKS / STEMSSET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1"ABOVE FINISHED SOIL GRADEREMOVE ROPES, WIRES, &NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALSFROM ROOTBALL, LOOSEN ROOTBOUND ROOTBALLS OF CONTAINERGROWN SHRUBSNOTE:1. PRUNE BROKEN BRANCHES.HAND WATER IN ALLSHRUBS AFTER PLANTING.DRAINAGE SAND, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSFOR DRAINAGE DETAILS AND TYPESPREPARED SUBGRADE1'PLANTING BED SOILHORTICULTURAL SUBSOIL2'VARIESVARIES2" DEPTH LEAF MULCH.DO NOT COVER STEMSOR FOLIAGEREMOVE CONTAINERAND LOOSEN ROOTBALLSPREPARED SUBGRADEDRAINAGE SAND, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS FOR DRAINAGE DETAILSAND TYPES1'1'PLANTING BED SOILHORTICULTURAL SUBSOILFINISHED GRADESODDED LAWNDRAINAGE SAND, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS FOR DRAINAGEDETAILS AND TYPESPREPARED SUBGRADEPLANTING BED SOILHORTICULTURAL SUBSOIL1'1'EXTENT OF PLANTING PIT2"-3" DEEP LOAM WATERING BERM @EDGE OF ROOTBALL, REMOVE AFTERONE YEAR3'MULCH RINGPLAN2" DEPTH MULCH, DO NOT APPLYMULCH TO ROOT FLARE OF TREE(3) 2"X4"X10' STAKES DRIVEN MIN24" INTO UNDISTURBED GRADEOUTSIDE ROOTBALL3'MULCH RINGSECTION120°WOOD STAKES SPACED EQUALLYAROUND TREE (3 PER TREE)TREEROOTBALLEXTENT OF MULCH RING.DO NOT APPLY MULCH TOROOT FLARE OF TREE18'-0"GUY WIRE (3 PER TREE)PREPARED SUBGRADE OR STRUCTURE6"ALLSIDESCUT AND REMOVE BURLAP ANDCOMPLETELY REMOVE WIREBASKET ANDNON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALSFROM ROOTBALLNOTE:1. SET TREE TRUNK PLUMB VERTICAL.2. MULCH SHALL NOT COVER BASE OF TREE TRUNK.3. PRUNE BROKEN, CROSSING OR RUBBING BRANCHES.4. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR STAKING INFORMATION.COMPACTEDHORTICULTURAL SUBSOILSET TREE FLARE AT FINISHEDGRADE OF SOILTREE WATERING STAKES, SEEIRRIGATION DRAWINGS1'2'PLANTING BED SOILHOSEARBORTIE, FIXED TO WOOD POSTHORTICULTURAL SUBSOIL, DEPTHDEPENDS ON ROOTBALL SIZE, TYP.CUT AND REMOVE BURLAPAND COMPLETELY REMOVEWIRE BASKET3' DIA. MULCH (NO MULCHAROUND TRUNK BASE)CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVEEXCESS FILL FROM TOP OFTRUNK. SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 2" HIGHER THANFINISHED GRADE.TREES ARE TO BE PRUNED TOMAINTAIN UNDERSTORY.COMPACTED SOIL PEDESTALTO PREVENT SETTLING WITHTREES > 2.5" CALIPER TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOMOF HOLEROOTBALL3' DIA. MULCH (NO MULCHAROUND TRUNK BASE)VARIES, SEE PLANSNO GROUNDCOVEROVER ROOT BALLNOTE:1. TREE TRUNK TO BE PLUMB VERTICAL.2. MULCH SHALL NOT COVER BASE OF TREE TRUNK OR GROUND COVER.3. ALL TREES TO BE STAKED PER TREE STAKING DETAIL.PLANSECTIONPREPARED SUBGRADE ORSTRUCTUREPLANTING BED SOILARBORTIE, FIXED TO WOOD POSTWOOD STAKES (3 PER TREE)SP-04PLANTING SOIL, SEE PLANSPREPARED SUBGRADE ORSTRUCTUREARBORTIE, FIXED TO WOOD POSTROOTBALLSOIL SAUCER120°2" DEPTH MULCH, DO NOT APPLYMULCH TO ROOT FLARE OF TREETREEARBORTIE GUY (3 PER TREE)PLANEXTENT OF PLANTING PIT5'-1114"ALLSIDESPLANT PIT=3X ROOT BALL DIAMETERSECTIONCUT AND REMOVE BURLAPAND COMPLETELY REMOVEWIRE BASKET ANDNON-BIODEGRADABLEMATERIALS FROM ROOTBALLWOOD STAKES (3 PER TREE)WOOD STAKES(3 PER TREE)NOTE:1. SET TREE TRUNK PLUMB VERTICAL.2. MULCH SHALL NOT COVER BASE OF TREE TRUNK.3. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS FOR ARBORTIE INSTALLATION.4. PRUNE BROKEN, CROSSING OR RUBBING BRANCHES.5. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR STAKING INFORMATION.PLANTING BED SOIL1'HORTICULTURAL SUBSOIL, DEPTHDEPENDS ON ROOTBALL SIZE, TYP.MEADOW SOILNO-MOW FESCUE ANDPERENNIALS; SEEPLANTING PLAN1'-0"SCARIFY SUBGRADEPREPARED SUBGRADE;SEE SPECIFICATIONSPERFORATED PIPE WITHFILTER FABRIC SOCK (ASREQUIRED)SAND DRAINAGELAYER (ASREQUIRED)4"-6"NOTES:1. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE FINAL TREE AND SHRUB PROTECTION FENCING IN FIELD PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.2. REFER TO TREE PROTECTION PLAN FOR FENCING LOCATIONS.VARIESPLANSECTIONEXISTING TREE TO REMAINAND BE PROTECTED, TYP.TREE ARMOR, TYP. SHALLBE 2x4's WITH WIREWRAPPED AROUND TREETRUNK.TREE PROTECTION FENCE INSTALLEDAT LOCATION SHOWN IN DRAWING.FENCING SHALL BE GALVANIZEDCHAIN LINK FENCING, 6'-0" HIGH.FENCE POST ANCHOR SYSTEM SHALLNOT DAMAGE TREE ROOT SYSTEM.TREE DRIP LINE, TYP.TREE PROTECTION FENCE, SEESPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS.EXISTING TREE TO REMAINAND BE PROTECTED, TYP.PLACE MIN 2" MULCH OVERSLOPE, TAKING CARE NOT TOBURY PLANTSPLANT SHRUBS AND LARGERPLANTS AT SLOPE ANGLE,ROUGHEN ROOTBALLS TOIMPROVE CONTACT W/ SOIL.REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FORSLOPE REINFORCEMENT FORSLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1PLANTING SOILPLACE & COMPACT FILL IN 6"LIFTS, CREATING BENCHES TOSTABILIZE PLANTING BED SOILIndoor Sports and RecreationCenter & Field HockeyTower RoadIthaca, NY 14853Cornell University12/22/2023TSJSP28020.00UAGStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthSITE DETAILS - PLANTINGAS NOTEDSHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGVT-011" = 1'-0"SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING - ON SLOPEVT-021" = 1'-0"PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGVT-031" = 1'-0"SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER TRIANGULATION LAYOUTVT-041" = 1'-0"SODDED LAWNVT-051" = 1'-0"MEADOWVT-061' = 1'-0"DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGVT-071/2" = 1'-0"MULTI STEM TREE PLANTINGVT-081/2" = 1'-0"CONIFER TREE PLANTINGVT-091/2" = 1'-0"TREE PROTECTION FENCINGVT-106" = 1'-0"DWG ISSUE & REVISION HISTORYNo. Description Date12/22/2023DESIGN DEVELOPMENT ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADACCESS FROMTOWER ROADVEHICULAR ACCESS TO FIELDACCESS FROMTOWER ROADACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthVEHICLE TRACKINGSTUDY28020.00AR1" = 20'12/08/2023Cornell UniversityTRUCK BODYTRUCK CHASSISJPAG ALUMNI FIELD PARKING LOTINDOOR SPORTS &RECREATION CENTERFFE 878.33FIELD HOCKEYFIELDFIELD EL. 874ACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADACCESS FROMTOWER ROADVEHICULAR ACCESS TO FIELDACCESS FROMTOWER ROADACCESS FROMCAMPUS ROADStampProject Directory:Drawing No.Drawing Title:Key PlanProject Title:Scale:Project No:Drawn By:Checked By:Approved By:Date:ARCHITECT + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSASAKI110 Chauncy StreetBoston, MA 02111TEL. 617.926.3300www.sasaki.comCIVILTG MILLER605 West State Street, Suite AIthaca, NY 14850TEL. 607.272.6477www.tgmillerpc.comSTRUCTURALLEMESSURIER1380 Soldiers Field RoadBoston, MA 02135TEL. 617.868.1200www.lemessurier.comMEP/FPRFS ENGINEERING71 Water StreetLaconia, NH 03246TEL. 603.524.4647www.rfsengineering.comBUILDING AND FIRE CODEHOWE ENGINEERS141 Longwater Drive, Suite 110Norwell, MA 02061TEL. 781.878.3500www.howeengineers.comNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNorthVEHICLE TRACKINGSTUDY28020.00AR1" = 20'12/15/2023Cornell UniversityTRUCK BODYTRUCK CHASSISJPAG