Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout906 Triphammer Road ResolutionZBA Appeal No. 2012-5 Res. March 5, 2012 VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON MARCH 5, 2012 FOR APPEAL NO. 2012-5 Motion made by: A. Watkins Motion seconded by: M. Eisner WHEREAS: A. This matter involves consideration of the following proposed action: granting of an area variance at 906 Triphammer Road, Tax ID# 10.-6-5.1, to allow an existing structure to remain in its current location and be treated as a Portable Shed as defined in Local Law No. 1 of 2011: Portable Sheds. The structure’s dimensions are 10’x14’x13.5’, of which two of the dimensions exceed the 12’x12’x10’ allowed by the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Ordinance; and B. On March 5, 2012 the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing regarding such action, and thereafter thoroughly reviewed and analyzed (i) the materials and information presented by and on behalf of the applicant(s) in support of this appeal, (ii) all other information and materials rightfully before the Board, and (iii) all issues raised during the public hearing and/or otherwise raised in the course of the Board=s deliberations; and C. On March 5, 2012, in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law - the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ASEQR), and 6 NYCRR Section 617.5, the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals determined that the proposed action is a Type II action, and thus may be processed without further regard to SEQR; and D. On March 5, 2012, in accordance with Section 712-b of the Village Law of the State of New York and Village of Cayuga Heights Article IX'21, the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals, in the course of its deliberations, took into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the area variance is granted as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals hereby makes the following findings with respect to the specific criteria for such area variance as set forth in Section 712-b of the Village Law of the State of New York and Village of Cayuga Heights Article IX'21: ZBA Appeal No. 2012-5 Res. March 5, 2012 Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties will be created by granting the area variance. Finding: YES_____ NO X, because: The shed has already been constructed and there have been no objections from neighbors. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue other than an area variance. Finding: YES_____ NO X, because: It is not feasible for the applicant to reduce the size of the structure. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. Finding: YES X NO______, because: The change in the volume of the shed is substantial. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Finding: YES_____ NO X, because: There have been no objections from neighbors and the shed is already constructed. The structure poses no environmental impact. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. Finding: YES_____ NO X, because: The Zoning regulations have changed through the processes and the applicant has made every attempt to comply. 1. It is hereby determined by the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals that the following variance is GRANTED AND APPROVED (with ZBA Appeal No. 2012-5 Res. March 5, 2012 conditions, if any, as indicated), it being further determined that such variance is the minimum necessary and adequate to grant relief and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community: Description of Variance: The granting of an area variance at 906 Triphammer Road, Tax ID# 10.-6-5.1, to allow an existing structure to remain in its current location and be treated as a Portable Shed as defined in Local Law No. 1 of 2011: Portable Sheds. The structure’s dimensions are 10’x14’x13.5’, of which two of the dimensions exceed the 12’x12’x10’ allowed by the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Ordinance. Conditions of Variance: The shed must remain as currently constructed. The existing structure also has 3 foot eaves which are allowed to remain. The vote on the foregoing motion was as follows: AYES: A. Shull A. Watkins M. Eisner R. Parker J. Young NAYS: None The motion was declared to be carried. STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS: VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS) I, Angela Podufalski, Deputy Village Clerk of the Village of Cayuga Heights, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the Village of Cayuga Heights Zoning Board of Appeals at a regular meeting on March 5, 2012. _____________________ Deputy Village Clerk Village of Cayuga Heights ZBA Appeal No. 2012-5 Res. March 5, 2012 A copy of said resolution being sent to the applicant and filed with the Village Clerk on March __________, 2012