HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnvironmental Review Committee January 19, 1998 OF 17'
W. TOWN OF 1THACA
126 EAST SENECA STREET, ITHACA, N.Y. 14850
TOWN CLERK 273-1 72 a HIGHWAY 273-1656 PARKS 273-8C3_9
ENGINEE:RMG 273-i 7,47 PLANNWG 273-t as ZONflNG 2-2--,783
FAX �607) 273-1704
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kara Hagedom, Chair, Conservation Board
Members, Environmental Review Committee
FROM: George R. Frantz, AICP, Assistant Town Planne��`rc�
DATE: December 23, 1998
RE: Development proposal
Enclosed for your review are materials related to the following proposed development:
Project No.: 9812299. Wilson Laboratory G-Line Station Addition, Cornell University.
Description: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and a
recomr-nendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding Special Approval for the
proposed construction of a one-story +/- 4,000 s.f. addition to the Wilson
Laboratory/Synchrotron facility, located off NYS Rte 366/Dryden Road on Town of
Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 63-1-8.2, Residence District R-30. Cornell University, Owner;
Jeremy Moore, Agent,
Because of its location adjacent to or within the Cascadilla Creek UNA, this proposal is subject to
mandatory referral to the Conservation Board. The project is scheduled for consideration by the
Planning Board at its meeting on January 19, 1999, and by the Zoning Board of Appeals at its
February meeting.
Should you have any questions regarding this proposal,please contact me at 273-1747.
70
H"r� w .ii i n wG '- g p e"r //.ce
w J a a re „ xww _ / n /
�Y��
,�',1r N w, R f.� nS o a w,yw �, i r k +� a W" r "r i K
y, N a ,�', r J s '�" I/ " r " u m'w
J
n "i r r 9a 9 F. " i
%/ / i N ,� r 1 �a"v� )"III/,I". , ,, � r 7 �" ado � /
h/ w � ,+ '".7- 1
11
r J r w r 1 « v u a�,.y y e
E' U I U Y ..pa",,,,. 4 N 'w" "rm"gy y w ,A Y�fltl'
NO
k
,`�ud°hW .v 7r 11 J tlq
s �r d i ,a
,�, r "' 7rrw a u ^ " war N
v
y ri ^ u r "� .+--.,w, , ! m dlh �r'n �ww " y u
/ ,! r r
"� .q '"'- � ii r s c a ;" n r �"�" «a x y " Y u �."" I w7 X i �:"N
Iq n
r% ;
m ° 9 "�% r 11.
u "� ��'"a ,. 3 �,
II
1 L Y ✓ i" M RF N �"Mg r M'' ✓ / B w9 .A ll_ �, 4 f "t
r ✓y 'P u� ry „ Au a� �, Y :11 W ,
11,
A * V
w r W.
�" r %'" »M a,� ".= . '" " '"'xk � u,r ✓/a r» u k r w.
tl11
kr e wa�:M zdac it °,µ I; r !. ��r6 r"' I'll �'F*" � �i%,r �
w �i w� u U "�. w« �w
'11� ., "".��y"y,.y r„ p � "�+�«.✓k'�ic�' �'. r rh' �✓✓ �u pr,' rc uo�wY �, r r ,u. N
w 7. �111111i rell r 1+' r � r a x w�
11
h
w
m u
R"'" ti 1 /1 "","o F" ✓
11
a: u V .ra r; / ""rn r� 4 �" r r
r p''" "t " s '✓i ,n', w �.r f �i r O// �r r. ,u ti' q u t w- �J� it/� �'-'r`:�. " r rfi' "
",., ,; � + ,Z",, rw r p ;NW v°" `�w- /"r. Ili," .!° r/r �✓"ib " ",r ""� I^q ,, /rid " , r� r U
11
11 a ,u �'6' rvr? f Y"M r J� ' '� �o,""or ` ✓ w '„ �,rr t 1,��a ay
9 r di dM l / ! l 9 `9
, il I
��' / F� p
u/I 18 Pv // a l';
r,", W u r r✓, ✓ ,v rr r / /t , / / �ii�' i
r
xW� 0.+ / / r G/e ' r r i ', / n �E 1"",
.u�r, r " l F, N o rI I'llw, r p �"�tl �'N , r /r /
".� v y r;m�' w a h" i'llrr ..Y°r" ✓ r h� r11 r r r r11
frM �;
�,r,..�6 "" ✓ ,, r r r � 1 ' M, v p au r u i t //I i ✓'+�
A / .„., ° " ,, "'`ryy "x b "� w✓ k u� - +ice rk✓w, ry a
r / r b '. 1
r ✓ r „✓, * J` ,v, ✓ 1 k "ram r; / %, %r"r
''i ;r I '` / ;" �, " %, lr�"� ✓ r w�'a q�!r+uw�" „✓' al rr w'� r��'i r r" Nei `ril rear .r "
�i" Py / r rp� '� ^" l �, M1r a r r" G „u '� '".n'i rJF""5 r� d ✓fr%. to/r/r.,�r�ii� Y. r "r
,� /d rr� M lf'" a / Y YW"- a"r **g'w 1 h° iy�! rr lG ✓ , // rd/
if
o > o 1 2,r+ e,:✓ll, I✓�' 11�",„r a /, - r r / , 1r/14 n
�yy, I+�' 'Y C I C ! /F Hw IV A� / r / / /�
I�114 1,�n w'"L::yn�^u / °J" r% i `+w"✓W.", ' r � v ;./ Y r a "ri " ✓ �/. r " / ro r / r
W- M,w+ )�, '. ✓l 11 / yJ' I "'Ir,v"',r r;rc� �r,��l, .:'lb'S �l, Ia�P s rJ;i��,i"'%x,. 1 v //m,/<v,r ill �1 /iJ✓ '' "r6,,; 111,1 !m,i! "s
.�"u" "y �, r I" r i t + i"^, r a^.✓vl�/ n ", rr A'w�,r y �, r f //✓ ,a
r i_ w Vr rr • fir f ,r f J� ii"IY T 1 rk n I t
'" " " &, is„': '7, a�"." P w f S ✓ a r " �i rr ✓6, /w l tr 6 r
�w r ,✓ X i u r y u ur uu r f S / I/ l "C4 ,, " w,w n
1,ff r a r " "y,Kd. u,�, a a.. + I :4 c U✓ qr�+ ✓ r c nkJh k y p r / " 'tp i //i,, / ""/rrlll/�0 " ry
" ,' W ,.w N'�, �' 8 r P h /� r. ,,; I r✓ � �'� &ulDl a+x Agri �,// ✓ ( a J % w r I r
ii �, .� " °a pNp a It ti � E �d/ � id" ! � �. Y "ti! &uw„�, "�� ,/ 9 rrfl /6 y
w d ?� p Y r a°" � i iN io i w M r 'r �F w '1� �, r �"i4, r a✓i/"r l✓r /' ✓ '" a ,�! i,'
,, w r m IIW ', N, "m, r' a fi / r r r," +"✓ r r : r/ry
'�. �, Cdv"^ iw �' „ i „L ✓ l s rr f ✓"rr , rr / H I " r
" " tl p r;r y / _¢ " 1r / /vti k r
6' n �," ', 4 /i / e 9 / °/i/ // Y l fr ,"
�w ^� n V y ",T r .. ,° !SIR m '�'.,�:::, W" `" l" //i 1 r r/° i r
*" ,w.f r''k W' „r M ,`. n " "�W' w k d4. r / /ryi/ r rr gee j�s r r Y"°
✓✓ 7 ,- "' 9N '— k 4' �/ 'IM ��i, r / "9tiw r>' " / ✓Y///"��L�11111"/i ✓ft riu
r /
i,✓- / I u �il n/�� ✓/, rl rr �„
l�n s / a ry
q
.tlw / '� Y V.WwY w a iW«'� ;r 1�j!i , OS,u ✓" rrA n n
,,:„py 1M v„"4�1, M " ,� f / ,p r , �,�, //� / ✓ �r � fG „fib r
z y ' ."+r y Y �, �. rvw / /wn�, w f ,�,,7,',,�,; : r �"� J ' ✓ "/" 1 " w r ,�,, r^'wl. r,, i'✓�, u ,
e�ww d +� M1 "' ✓ ', du a 1 .lei /� „u r i
I� "? m v,$ ✓' �a, ,y , �7 ,' Jk r / I " ° a/ d/ X y 11 °,� y✓l/r y 8 /o
i'r"`r 11° /,✓ rl� r�T;✓ ", ^, "t� e M
Jiro `?U w "" w ✓ ✓ v e '� n ° F �✓ w `
u� Fr
'?,' n y
M/ 11
i,,,�,;,,i , U ,ri,,,
A >Iz, W I, r,
ilson
_.. w �,
LaboratoryStation
... .�
� i i "'
"P
'"
•
6 E. s Z IN E C A
.. 4.
��
DEC 1 �-.
Cornell University
Ithaca, New York
for
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN NARRATIVE
WILSON LABORATORY
G-LINE ADDITION
December 17, 199
rza No. 8320
re ar,d by
[—L61Js
Z.0�
MOORE
S ■ m
VM
ArchitectsEngineers+Scientists
Constructions Managers
11 Genesee Street
Utica, ew York 135
For Site Plan Review Submission tot the `Fawn of Ithaca
1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
A. Background
The Wilson Synchrotron Laboratory is located on Cornell University's central
campus. It is home to two academic departments: the Laboratory of Nuclear
Studies (LNS) and the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS). LNS
operates the synchrotron ring, an electron-positron collier with a circumference
of approximately a V-2 mile, located 50 feet below Alumni Field. LNS is the
original user of the Wilson Synchrotron Lab, constructed in 1965 for the study of
the subatomic nature oFmatter.
The circulating electron and positron beams of the synchrotron ring emit high
energy X-ray radiation as a byproduct. CHESS was formed in 1979 as a
collaborative, user-oriented research facility designed tomake use of this waste
energy as a useful research tool for examining the detailed atomic structures of
solids and liquids. CHESS currently operates six X-ray beam line stations. Each
year 600 to 700 users from around the nation and the world compete for the
opportunity to use nine experimental stations on the six existing X-ray beam lines.
They come to conduct groundbreaking research in areas such as the growth of thin
semiconductor films; determining the structure of polymers, liquid crystals, &
biomaterials; and protein crystallography.
B. Purpose and Scope
With existing beam lines being over-allocated, CHESS is seeking to expand their
research facilities and capabilities. The Wilson Lab G-Line Addition project will
create three additional beam stations (the existing six existing beam lines are
designated A-F, hence the name 'G-Line'). It will also use advanced optics to
create even higher quality X-ray beams for added research capability. G-Line will
be used strictly as a research facility.
The Wilson Lab G-Line Addition is planned to be a small 4000 square foot, single
story concrete structure located approximately 150 feet to tl°e west of Wilson Lab,
and recessed into Kite Hill. G-Line will be mostly underground as it will connect
to the existing synchrotron ring. G-1.ine will also be linked to Wilson Lab by an
underground link tunnel for personnel access.
Harza No. 8320 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
2.0 NARRATIVE TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
A. The following narrative is presented to accompany the site plan submission to the
Town of Ithaca under its site plan review provisions. The order of items
corresponds to the order provided in Town's Preliminary Site Plan Checklist. The
Schematic Design report, dated August 25, 1998, is used as an attachment to this
narrative to fully explain the G-)Line Addition.
1. Development Review Application
Please see attached completed application,
2. Payment of review fees and escrow deposit
Payments are attached.
3. Long Environmental Assessment Form
Completed LEAF is attached.
4. Proposed Preliminary Site Plan Contains the Following
a) Vicinity Map
Vicinity maps are located on both the survey map and the drawing
cover sheet,
b) Natural Features
Harza Northeast conducted a site topographic survey dated
November 27, 199& This map is enclosed in the submission and
shows natural and man-made features.
C) Boundary lines
The project is located entirely within lands owned by Cornell
University and is on the Cornell campus.
d) Existing structures and features
The survey enclosed in the submittal provides locations for
existing buildings, trees, utilities, and features considered in
developing the design.
Harza No. 8320 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
e) Proposed structures
Locations and sizes are found on the submittal site plans. A
discussion of construction materials, design, appearance, and
functionality is included in the Schematic Design report dated
August 25, 1998 (attachment A).
f) Location,design and construction materials of proposed drives
Pavements are shown on the submittal.
g) Signs and lighting
There will be no uniform traffic signs on the project as there is no
parking or provisions for regular vehicular traffic. Pedestrians will
access the building through the access tunnel. Lighting will be
accommodated off the building comers. No free standing lights
are anticipated.
h) Pedestrian and bicycle facilities
It is proposed a portion of the site adjacent to the Cascadilla,Creek
will be surfaced with mulched wood chips. This forms a walking
path for the length of the project, approximately 180 feet. This
area could link up to a greater Cascadilla Creek trail should one be
constructed along the north shore. This route would give hikers
and joggers an alternative to the somewhat narrow Route 366
corridor. Existing bicycle storage shed shown on survey is heavily
used and will remain.
i) Landscape Plan
The planting plan, ,)I anting schedule and site restoration strategy
was developed in consultation with Cornell Plantations, Dr. To
Witlow, of Cornell, was also consulted. The plan focuses on
preserving a 'green belt'buffer between the proposed building and
Cascadilla Creek, using native species to promote erosion control
and ringing the northern portion of the disturbed site with a new
'shelter belt'of native pioneer species. The latter will act to buffer
the view of Campus-Road from the Cascadilla gorge.
P Proposed water and sewer
Sewer and water utilities will be provided through connections to
existing public facilities in or around Wilson Labs. Specifically,
Harza No. 8320 3 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
sanitary sewer will be routed through the access tunnel from
Wilson, which will serve as main user entrances. Water will be via
an underground service.
k) Emergency zones
Emergency vehicles requiring access to the CHESS C-line facility
may access the site from a path shown on the submittal. As of this
writing, this access takes the form of a well drained, gravel path of
adequate dimension for fire/emergency vehicles. Nearest fire
hydrant is shown on the submittal along the south face of Wilson
Labs.
1) Proposed streets and easements
No new streets are required but access to the site for emergency
vehicles is shown on the submittal. Utility lines required to
support the project are shown in the submittal. Electric, gas,
telecommunications, sewer, and water services are provided.
m) Site topography (and other features)
The submittal addresses site grading. About 9,000 cubic yards of
material will be disturbed for construction of the building. About
4,000 cubic yards will be removed from the site. About 5,000
cubic yards will re-installed on the hillside and over the top of the
building structure as overburden to restore the area to grade. The
south elevation of the building will be exposed and provides
emergency exit to grade.
• Excavation: Soils borings from original construction and the
results of interviews with staff would indicate the soils are of
the 'glacial till'-ariety, A minor amount of site excavation
may be needed for general site fill under embankments. The
'green belt'will be unfilled and trees in this area left
undisturbed.
• Site lighting: will be off the south building corners.
• Signage and other features: Because the entrance to the
structure is via the enclosed pedestrian tunnel from Wilson
Labs, there will be little need for pedestrian vehicular signs.
'Frail markers, signs for hikers, will be provided for by others.
Harza No. 8320 4 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
n) Drainage Plan
The development will do little to add impermeable surface to the
site. The proposed building will be partially earth covered and
emergency vehicle access drives will be stabilized gravel. Fire
officials are currently reviewing the design of access drives for
adequacy.
• Drainage pipes and underdrains: from the uphill Campus Road
developed area discharge at the northern most portion of the
site. It is proposed, that this water be,intercepted by new storm
piping and conveyed in a westerly direction around the
proposed building and discharged to an existing low-lying area
at the western portion of the site.
• Underdrains will be provided to control ground water before it
reaches the building perimeter.
• Underdrains and underground storm drainage systems will
convey water via piping to a temporary siltation basin. After
construction of the building, a portion of the pipe will be
removed and replaced with stone riprap outfall. This riprap
will control erosion trap sediment, and provide a more
natural appearance.
• Storm water will be slowly released from the siltation basin to
an existing stabilized lowland area north of the green belt.
Storm water will be diffused into this area. Predominant
existing topography indicates waters will eventually seep into
the Cascadilla Creek via overland and underground flow.
Permanent on-site storm water detention /retention is not
envisioned as necessary at this time.
0) Sheet borders
Default Harza Northeast sheet borders were used as they seemed in
keeping with the general requirements of the code. Signatures and
seals were applied.
P) Map scale
Provided in bar form.
Harza No. 8320 5 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
q) Name of Proposed project
Provided in title block.
r) Name of Town, County and State
Provided on drawing cover sheet.
S) Date
Provided in title block.
0 Key map
Project does not require multiple base map sheets.
U) Names and seals
Surveyor, Engineer and Landscape Architectural seals have been
applied.
6, Names and Addresses of All Property Owners (Note: item 5 not
identified in Town Code)
Cornell University owns all property within 500 feet of the site.
7. Estimated costs
Construction costs estimated on July 19, 1998 were $1.7 million. Site
development costs represent about 1/4 of construction costs and will likely
increase from levels cited in the Schematic Design report, as site
restoration, extent of preserved green belts, landscape plantings have since
been better defined.
8. Dark line prints and other items
(3) copies of Site Plan prints in full size format are provided.
(25) copies of Site Plan prints in I I" x 17" format are provided.
(25) copies of the Site Plan Narrative are provided.
(25) copies of the LEAF are provided.
(1) original of the Development Review Application is provided.
Harza No. 8320 6 Preliminary Site Plan Narrative
'ON pur%w+utltg vomow
Nr NMVUO moazalumblummommomms
wru
96-,GZ-e 31VO
m c5ranp Y X 4 X 4t\4X44XtXXXr\..Xy r, It\ttXtt X
ter" t t 4 `« `t44Xr.rX 4XXXXrXrr ttXXX X t X4 X
��r`snN r 'a 4 4 4 4t 4444 X 4rtXf X\Y r l tt 4r 4 t tX X ,/p
���mo \. 4 ® 4 4 i4 XX X�X t tX�< X 9r m4 X t X.p °• X r X +� !
rn �ym \ Y 4 4 X t wt t l 4 aX Y X'�jX 4 t t�4 4 X Xp t t t X O
m��o�o- 4 � t t 11 1 } #4 1 X r 4 t`� Y t•14 X r i l XV Y� X t t 4
[ � �ro 4� � � .. .y Y t X f f r t YI X rf rr� rrttX 1 tXtr t 4 tt ��✓
.,, ✓ y 1 f Y I ! r i r + ' I r y t t t t t o t tt 4 4 \ r r
LO tAX l f ti rj I X 4 Xt XXX t iX X
z l I f XXr54 t r
X t t r r + r ► i,' a � �,� 4 t. Y I t
t a r ttlrl r r t iu: � �X a X t tt t t X
a
� . ,.. W t t t • y y l I f t �, Ir I� ,� It t 1� r X t t X t 4
� r r 1 a rr�� � •� i w � #,�� t X t t X 1 1 t t X tr
�pp8 ✓� f r + �`� � f', + ' �� � t X r4 1 t X 1 X r X r
r ✓ ! € ' .c, ,�;,.. X X t t rXX l r i X t
-''� ,« ✓ ✓ + r 1 � � � i \ X r X X Y r r t t r t r
� ✓ r / t t � � X � �� X XX4t i i1X X l t r
n
1 r
� ,' ! �� f r ! f w f ! ✓ Ir t # tX r t X t r
t r l l + t r t; Xrt, r XY , XX
r
t
t t tr t tX X®
r X t X r X X X k t t Y c X
tX r X f t 4 X h tX 4X t Xt tt t r "+ t X t t
Co1 r E
z
1 XI
I yk 1
r o XI + t4
I y
1
OZ29
AIJSU3AINn 113N)dOO 'ON
AinlOYd 3Nn E) SOd NMV80
13VI NOSIIM 136-5Z-13 3.LVCI
sm
-TI
Ewe
LR RZ,
j C
I r
I c
I
r G «
will CD
s
LA
_ A l
1 8 5i q
• tY
t
,�' •y •�� a �, r :� v',eRi i
•4 k Sj
a } '
» slit
(gyp. ".f:19 -c
U
` ` y v.tis h..�•
DATE WILSON LAB
DRAWN PCS
NO. 8320 +CORNELL UNIVERSITY
w...w.»w.w..rww.w.Yiw�•ww.�r.r�.•�ww
F
I N'A,.L
Appendix A
�.:�.
State Environmental Quality Review
FULt ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be
significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project
that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no fo al knowledge
of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. in addition, many who have knowledge in one particular
area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance_
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been
orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full FAF is comprised of three parts:
r
Part 1: provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists
a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as
to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form
also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced,
Part : If any impact in part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Fart 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is
actually important.
DETERMINATION Oi - Type 1 and UnlistedActions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: H part 1 0 Part 2 El Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts i and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and
considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by lead agency that:
A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s)and,therefore,is one which will not have a significant
impact on the environment„therefore„ a negative declaration will be prepared.
B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect for this
Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in Part 3 have been required,therefore a CONDITIONED
negative declaration will be prepared.*
C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the
environment,therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlis*ed Actions
Wilson Laboratory G-Line Addition
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type dame of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible fficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer)
December 18 13
Date
11
PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Prolect Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment.
Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval
and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete
Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research
or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
—Wilson Laborato!y,G-Line Addition
LOCATION OF ACTION (INCLUDE STREET ADDRESS,MUNICIPALITY AND COUNTY)
Cornell niverslt Ithaca
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Jeremy Moore, P.E. (607)255-9650
ADDRESS
Planning, Design and Construction......Humphreys Service Building
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Ithaca New York 114853
NAME OF OWNER(IF DIFFERENT) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
N.A. N.A.
ADDRESS
N.A
CITY/Po STATE ZIP CODE
N.A. STATE
ENI.PA�
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Construct an approximately 4000 GSF research facility addition on the west side of Wilson Laboratory. The now
facility,named G-Line,will be a mostly underground,single-story structure connected to Wilson Laboratory and to the
existing underground synchrotron ring. The new G-Line addition will Improve x-ray diffraction studies which will
facilitate Important research In the areas of bio, is an atial science.
Please Complete Each Ouestion-Indicate N.A.It not applicable.
A. Site lNescripflon
Physical setting of overall project,both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use:0 Urban M Industrial 13 Commercial 13 Residential (suburban) 0 Rural (non-farm)
0 Forest 0 Agriculture 0 Other Educational
2. Total acreage of project area: 2 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushiand(Non-agricultural) 1 acres 1 acres
Forested 1 acres 1 —acres
Agricultural(Includes orchards, cropland,pasture, etc.) —acres acres
Wetland(Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated(Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads,buildifigs,and other paved surfaces acres acres
Other(indicate type) acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site: Glacial Till
a. Soil drainage: 0 Well drained of site 0 Moderately welt drained 100 %of site
El Poorly drained_0/6 of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land
Classification System? N.A. acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? M Yes N No
a. What is depth of bedrock? . 804 ft.elev.* _(in feet) site surface elevation ranges from 820 ft.to 880 ft.
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 9 0-10% 50 % 0 10-15%_% 0 15%or greater So %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic
Places? 13 Yes 0 No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 0 Yes 0 No
& What is the depth of the water table? _A11L_(in feet) estimated elevation based on stream bed elevation
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 0 Yes 0 No
10. Do hunting,fishing,or shelf fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 0 Yes 0 No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
13 Yes 0 No Acoordingto April 13, 1995 letter from the US Dept.of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortiand,,NY
ecies In the vicinity of the proposed Cornell
UnivemItIt Lako roe Conlin LSC roe t. The ro osed site for the Wilson Lob G-Lute Addition
project Is within the vicinity of LSC and Is in a highly trafficked and viouty disturbed area.
Identify each specie
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.,cliffs, dunes,other geological formations)
0 Yes IN No Describe N.A.
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
M Yes 0 No 11 yes, explain Project located In a Cornell desionated managed green space
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
0 Yes 0 No
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Cascadilla Creek
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Cascadilla Creek is a direct tribute to the Ca a Lake Intet
16. Lakes,ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: There_are I]g NYSQEC wetlaLids, kjgMygE,there
small quantity of USACE wetlands In the vicinity nitv of the site as recently fttermined by Ichthvological Associates. Actual
Imoacted wetland area falls below the regulatory threshold and therefore does not require a permit
a. Name N.A. — b. Size (in acres) approximately 0.07 acre within project area
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 0 Yes 0 No
a. If Yes,does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 0 Yes 0 No The project will connect to existing
b. If Yes,will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 0 Yes 0 No Wilson Lab utilities.
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
0 Yes 0 No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and
6 NYCRR 617? 13 Yes 0 No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 0 Yes 0 No
B. Prolect Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate),
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: _AQQEgjiMA1g1XM acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 2 acres initially; <<1 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N.A. (if appropriate).
e. If the project is an expansion,indicate percent of expansion proposed: 3%. Expansion will be 3%of existing Wilson Lab
1. Number of off-street parking spaces existing: N.A. ; proposed N.A. and synchrotron ring
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially N.A. �.A. _ .A.________ N.A.
Ultimately N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
I. Dimensions(in feet) of largest proposed structure 14 height; 20 width;_.AO_Iength. totally underground except south face
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 feet,
3
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? approximately 4000 cubic yards.
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 9 Yes 0 No ❑ NIA
a. It yes,for what intended purpose is-the site being reclaimed? Site will be integrated with manaaed areen s ace.
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 9 Yes ❑ No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes ❑No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? I acres. at least SO*/*of this 1 acre
will be revegetated
S. Will any mature forest(over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes M No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 9_months (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated N.A. Inumber).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I N.A. _month M.A. year(including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase N.A. —month N.A. year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑ No N.A.
8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes 0 No
9. Number of jobs generated.- during construction 10 ; after project is complete 2
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 .
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 0 Yes 0 No
If yes,explain N.A.
M Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3 Yes 0 No
a. If yes,indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial,etc.)and amount Approved sanitary discharge only
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N.A.
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes 0 No Type Approved sanitary discharqgeSoDMy_
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 0 Yes 0 No
Explain N.A.
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 13 Yes 0 No a 1994 'Schematic Design Report for
Route 366 Crossing'by Gryphon International Engineering Services Inc.estimated the maximum flood level at 823 feet. This
supercedes a 1984 FEMA Flood Insurance Study estimate of 827.6 feet. Between 1984 and 1994 stop logs for the weir at
Dwyer Dam were removed.
16. Will the project generate solid waste? 0 Yes ❑ No
a. If yes,what is the amount per month 0.02 tons. Estimate for long-term operation of completed facility.
b. If yes,will an existing solid waste facility be used? 9 Yes " ❑ No
o. It yes,give name and location Superior Disposal Service cunently uses Highland Landfill In Angelica, NY and the Seneca
Meadows Landfill In Seneca Falls, NY to dispose of Cornell's solid waste.
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes C9 No,
e. If yes, explain N.A.
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? 0 Yes C3 No
a. If yes,what is the anticipated rate of disposal'? 0.02 tons/month. Estimate for long-term operation of completed facllfty.
b. It yes,what is the anticipated site life? —N.A. years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? to Yes 0 No Only to the extent that herbicides and pesticides are used on
campus grounds. Integrated pest management techniques will be utilized.
M Will project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day)? LI Yes M No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 0 Yes 0 No
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? 9 Yes 0 No
It yes, indicate type(s) Electricity and natural as
4
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N.A. gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 2_0 gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? 0 Yes E3 No
If Yes,explain Construction will use Cornell funds; equipment will be,fun ded by National Science Foundation
Approximate
25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date
City,Town, County Planning Board 0 Yes U No QML ggglign 239M January 129
City,Town, Village Planning Board M Yes 0 No Site Plan RevIew,FI1I Permit _1gnMgnLjA9
City,To Zoning Board IN Yes 0 No Special Approval Febag�99�
City,County Health Department El Yes 0 No
Other Local Agencies 13 Yes 0 No
Other Regional Agencies 0 Yes 0 No
State Agencies 0 Yes U No NYal&Q Protection of Waters Joint Permit_ Jan/Fab '99
Federal Agencies 0 Yes CJ No NSF USAC OE Prot of Waters Joint Permit Jan/Feb '99
C. Zoning and Planning Information
I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? 0 Yes 0 No
If'Yes, indicate decision required:
13 zoning amendment 0 zoning variance 0 special use permit 0 subdivision M site plan
13 now/revision of master plan IJ resource management plan 13 other
2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 8-aQ
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N.A.
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No Chance
5. What is them imum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoniing? -.,Np,-Qhange
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? E3 Yes 0 No
7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action-?
— Predominantiv educational:City zonina U-1.Town zoning R-30 and L-I(Light Industrial)
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a 114 mile? 0 Yes 0 No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N.A.
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N.A.
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes 0 No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services(recreation, education, police,fire2rotection)?
0 Yes 13 No
a. It yes,is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 0 Yes 13 No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? El Yes M No
a. It yes,is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? 13 Yes 0 No N.A.
D. informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated
with your proposal,please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them.
L Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Jeremy H. MA2ooQrMeEP&,&q2oMrn1eU11 Univer
sity Date Qgcgimloer 118 1998
Signature Title Pro eat Mana er
It the action Is in the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with
this assessment.
( FUTURE
� r 1
�fll SCREENINGSCREENING�!�" llllllll!!�
IIIlIIIf�I►Il=
! Ilfll! l�'m
lll!=i1I fill
MECHANICAL RM.
BEYOND
r
I ..
CHESS
I SEC
T T "� Il
SCALE :%° _ Y=0 r,IIII I IIl Illti►7�` --
=�IlI=111!=!!!lam#ui Ilf' IIIIII ! ��
=lll
IlDill
LINK
EL.
m
8 2 7 0'
c SECTION THRU LINK
SCALE a'/a' = 1°=0'
r f A f I �•p�ry� qy'g'� �'^g gwy,y-+�
I a �
I
I
I
AWD WALL
i .
'4 r ViAlt sSLOPE 'Pu-tun
Q° � ,
1f4r=1E S
N C p� 1 W e
b ` 4
\V
t t 4+f COIL
.N )
I
1
F►w. FLIP
827
� .6u vim,t, sc
� A