HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA Minutes 1988-05-11 FILED
TOWN OF ITHAC/A
TOWN OF ITHACA Date
-%1�� Fp [�9
• ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C1ark . �99
May 11 , 1988
A regular meeting of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of
Appeals was held on May 11 , 1988 at the Ithaca Town Hall , 126
East Seneca Street , Ithaca , New York .
PRESENT : Chairman Henry Aron , Edward King , Joan Reuning ,
Eva Hoffmann , Building Inspector Andrew Frost , and Town Attorney
John C . Barney .
ALSO PRESENT . Janet Jonson , Jon Albanese , Shirley Valenza ,
John Izzo , Kathy Izzo .
The public meeting opened at 7 : 00 p . m .
Chairman Aron stated that all posting and publication of the
public hearings had been completed and that proper affidavits of
same were in order .
Photographs of the subject properties were passed around for
the Board to review .
• The first item on the agenda for consideration was as
follows :
APPEAL of Jonathan 0 . Albanese , Appellant , requesting the
authorization of the Zoning Board of Appeals for the
construction of an 8 - foot by 14 - foot by 22 - foot triangular
outside wood deck as an addition to the west side of an
existing legal non - conforming single - family dwelling at 1040
East Shore Drive , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 6 - 19 - 2 - 10 ,
Residence District R- 15 . The request is made under Article
XII , Section 54 , of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance
whereby no non - conforming building may be extended except as
authorized by the Board of Appeals .
Chairman Aron instructed the recording secretary to correct
the appeal notice from " 8 - foot by 14 - foot by 22 - foot " to " 8 - foot
by 14 - foot by 11 - foot " as the correct dimensions of the proposed
deck .
Chairman Aron inquired of Mr . Albanese what the need of the
deck was and Jon Albanese answered that it would be a place for
sunning and barbequeing . ' Chairman Aron inquired if then it would
be for strictly recreational purposes and Mr . Albanese responded
that was correct .
Chairman Aron asked in which direction he would be
encroaching if he placed this deck where he desired and Mr .
2
• Albanese responded that!' it would encroach towards the lake .
Mr . Frost stated that after he had pursued this particular
appeal in the manner in which he did , that is , to require Mr .
Albanese to come before the Board , he researched Section 65 of
the Zoning Ordinance which stated " that the provisions of this
Ordinance shall not apply to fences or walls not over six foot
high above the natural grade nor to terraces , steps , unroofed
porches or other similar features not over three foot high above
the level of the floor',', of the ground story . " In applying this
section of the Ordinance , he was not sure ( 1 ) whether it was
appropriate for the Albanese case which is a non - conforming use ,
and ( 2 ) whether the Board intended the Zoning Ordinance to not
restrict a wood deck that is perhaps three foot off the ground ,
although not in the ca'�se of Mr . Albanese , but for someone else
who could actually take a deck and put it right to someone ' s
property line at the level of not over three foot above the floor
of the ground story of the building . Mr . Frost said that then
the Ordinance would not apply , nor would there be a requirement
to come before the Board of Zoning Appeals for approval . He
offered Section 65 as al, point of discussion .
Chairman Aron responded that Section 65 , according to the
Zoning Ordinance , would allow Mr . Albanese to build a deck
without coming to the Zoning Board of Appeals . Mr . King
• interjected that was so if the Board interpreted that section
that way .
Attorney Barney stated that if the deck were three feet or
less off the ground then it would be permitted without the need
of a variance .
Chairman Aron inquired how high Mr . Albanese ' s deck would be
and Mr . Albanese responded that the surface of the deck above the
11
ground would be less than two feet .
Attorney Barney inquired if there would be a railing and Mr .
Albanese responded that there would be no railing . Attorney
Barney asked if the deck would be simply a flat surface and would
not drop off at any point to a distance any greater than three
feet and Mr . Albanese responded that was correct .
Mr . Frost asked if the deck itself would at any point be
over 18 inches from the ground and Mr . Albanese said that it
would be right about at that level . Mr . Frost offered that the
Building Code required any deck or platform that was 18 inches or
more from the ground to have a railing that was at least three
feet high . He continued that if you had a deck that was eighteen
inches off the ground and then added the required three foot
railing then the actual ', height from the ground would take it up
• to about four and a half foot .
3
• By looking at the 'drawings Mr . Albanese had submitted it was
determined that this deck was roughly seventeen and one half
inches from the ground .,"
The public hearingj, was opened . No one appeared . The public
hearing was closed .
Mrs . Hoffmann noted that by looking at the property it
appeared that Mr . Albanese had a railing on the edge of the roof
on the upper level of his home . She asked if there was actually
a balcony up there and Mr . Albanese responded that that was
actually the roof of the living room which was made in such a way
so as to use it as an exposed deck as well . Mrs . Hoffmann asked
ifthat could not be :' used for sunning purposes also and Mr .
Albanese said that was ;, correct except that to get to that deck
one had to walk throughlhis bedroom and they would prefer to have
an area where sunning could be done without having one walk
through his bedroom .
Mr . King said that as far as Section 65 was concerned no
decision should be made',', on this point . He felt that where a non-
conforming use is to be extended in any direction Section 65 is
of lesser import than the provisions regarding the extension of a
non - conforming use . ! Mr . King noted that in this case the
• applicant ' s proposal did not tend to encroach on any neighbor
other than the lake and 'dtherefore it was rather innocuous .
Chairman Aron reada letter from a neighbor of Mr . Albanese ,
David Gersh , a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 .
Mr . Gersh was in favor of Mr . Albanese ' s appeal .
Mrs . Hoffmann saidi that she did not see where the practical
difficulty or unnecessary hardship would be if the deck was not
built . Mr . King said , this was not essential in the case of a
non - conforming use .
Mrs . Reuning said she felt it would be an improvement to the
property and she could not see where it was going to encroach on
anyone .
Mr . King said it would not be out of character with the
other buildings in thisl, area .
Chairman Aron wondered , as to Section 65 , if Mr . Albanese
did have to come before the Board since his deck would be less
than eighteen inches from the ground . Chairman Aron said that
other applicants would Abe coming to the Building Inspector for
the same type of construction and an interpretation should be
made of this section as to whether or not it was necessary for
them to come before the11
, Zoning Board of Appeals .
• Attorney Barney said that based upon his interpretation of
4
• Section 65 he viewed it as being very explicit and what he
thought Section 65 was really getting at was the kind of
innocuous improvements to a property that did not really alter
signifiit
cantly the landscape or the shape of the property . For
example , he continued , ,, if someone wanted to put a terrace in and
they had a non - conforming use and they were going to lay some
flagstones , he did not think it would require a variance or
approval to extend a terrace in back of a house or up to a side
yard . Mr . Barney felt that the deck in this matter , to the
extent it did not extend more than three feet above the ground
level , would come within Section ' 65 and therefore would not
require approval .
Edward King said that in the Albanese case the structure was
being extended because girders would be put in for the deck . He
felt that extending a building itself such as this proposal gave
a different situation and it was up to this Board to hear some
facts and decide whether it was innocuous when the extension was
of a non - conforming use . Mr . King said that the Board was not
being called on to decide in this case because they were
presented with an innocuous westerly extension toward the lake
which , he gathered from , the comments of the Board , that they were
all in favor of . Mr . King felt that Mr . Albanese did not need an
interpretation of Section 65 to gain his ends tonight and the
• Board ought not to interpret Section 65 at this point .
A motion was made by Edward King as follows :
WHEREAS , this Board finds that the proposed open deck
extension to the west of the existing building , which is a
legal non- conforming structure at this point , does not
unduly encroach upon any neighboring property ; and
WHEREAS , the immediate neighbor to the north has gone on
record as favoringl, this project ; and
WHEREAS , the proposal would not change the essential
character of the neighborhood but in fact would be in
keeping with the !cottage type homes in this area ; it is
therefore
RESOLVED , that this Board approves the proposal for the
addition of the deck .
Joan Reuning seconded the motion .
The voting was as follows :
Aye - King , Aron , Reuning , Hoffmann
Nay - None
• The motion was unanimously carried .
5
The second item onl'uthe agenda was as follows :
APPEAL of Ivar and Janet Jonson , Appellants , requesting the
authorization of '; the Zoning Board of Appeals for the
construction of a '' second dwelling unit to be attached to an
existing legal non - conforming single - family dwelling at 934
East Shore Drive , ITown of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 6 - 18 - 5 - 10 ,
Residence District R- 15 . The proposed addition is to be
located on an abutting legal non - conforming vacant lot , Town
of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 6 - 18 - 5 - 9 , which is to be
consolidated with said Parcel No . 6 - 18 = 5 - 10 . The request is
made under Article XII , Section 54 , of the Town of Ithaca
Zoning Ordinance whereby no non - conforming building may be
extended except as authorized by the Board of Appeals .
Mrs . Janet Jonson addressed the Board . She explained that a
couple of years ago she and her husband bought the property next
door to them when it was in the City of Ithaca . Due to the
annexation of the City ?', to the Town , the property was now in the
Town of Ithaca . She continued that the City of Ithaca decided
that the structure on the lot should be leveled . Chairman Aron
inquired when that was and she responded it was in 1985 .
Chairman Aron inquired ! when the building was demolished and she
responded that she thought it was in 1987 . Chairman Aron asked
• if she had any documentation as to when the building was
demolished and Mrs . Jonson said that she was almost sure it was
in February of 1987 . She said that there was a tenant in the
structure and a small fire had erupted and when the fire
department came to the scene they suggested that the City come in
and inspect the premjses which they did and subsequently
condemned the building . ", Chairman Aron asked when this took place
and Mrs . Jonson responded it was in November of 1986 . Mrs .
Jonson said that they got a demolition crew to level the building
and then talked to the " City about rebuilding it . She continued
that then some changes °came about with the Town annexing to the
City . Mrs . Jonson stated that instead of building back up on
the lot the way it had 'ilbeen before which would add just another
row house they wished to consolidate the new structure with their
present home to make it " aesthetically more pleasing .
Mr . Frost showed on a map presented to the Board members
exactly where the property in question was . He explained where
Mr . and .Mrs . Jonson were proposing to add an 18 x 30 foot
addition attached to their house .
Chairman Aron inquired if the parcel had been transferred to
their present property ',;and Mrs . Jonson responded that they had
not had it surveyed yet . She said that they owned both lots but
had not had them consolidated as one lot as yet .
• Chairman Aron asked if there had been no house standing on
• 6
the lot since February of 1987 and Mrs . Jonson said that was
correct . Chairman Aron inquired of Mr . Frost if the lot was non -
conforming and Mr . Frost responded that was correct .
Mrs . Jonson said that they now wished to build a structure
attached to their present house extending into the vacant lot .
The public hearing was opened .
Mrs . Shirley Valenza of 938 East Shore Drive , Ithaca , New
York addressed the Board . She stated that there was one small
cottage between her house and the vacant lot in question . Mrs .
Valenza said that in her neighborhood there were nine houses only
and most of the people were families who had been there a very
long time . She said that in five of those families the lady of
the house was over 60 years old . Mrs . Valenza said this had been
a quiet family neighborhood with people paying their taxes and
minding their own business . She continued that it took a little
while sometimes for older people to adjust to new ideas and she
felt that she had much to learn about the zoning laws , for
example , setback requirements . Mrs . Valenza stated that the area
in question was very congested in every way which was hard on the
lake , was hard in terms of space and quiet , and very dangerous as
far as fire because in many cases one could stand between two
• houses and touch both sides . She said that she did not know what
the plans of the Jonsons were but she had talked with her
neighbors and many of them were not able to come to the meeting
because of ill health . However , she said , she had not talked
with one neighbor , young or old , who was in favor of the Jonson
proposal . Mrs . Valenz ,a was interested in learning exactly what
the proposal of the Jonsons was in more detail than was presently
available . Thereforel, she said , she thought more time was
needed .
Mr . John Izzo of 936 East Shore Drive , Ithaca , New York next
addressed the Board . He explained that he was renting his home
from Esther O ' Neil and was representing Ms . O ' Neil , his aunt .
Mr . Izzo stated that Ms . O ' Neil owned two pieces of property in
the area , both of which were adjacent to the Jonson property .
Mr . Izzo felt that the neighbors had not actually had time to
digest exactly what the Jonsons would like to do . From his own
experience in living in this area he felt it was a very congested
area ; there was limited parking directly on the road , and the
houses were extremely close together . He questioned what type of
dwelling the Jonsons would have , whether it would be a rental
unit or not because if it was to be rental , this would add to the
congestion of the parking . Mr . Izzo was not in favor of the
Jonson proposal personally and spoke for Ms . O ' Neil , whom he was
representing , who also did not approve .
Mr . King asked who owned " Solid Comfort " a cottage north up
• the lake and Mrs . Valenza said she owned it . Mr . King asked
1
where Mr . Izzo lived in relation to the Jonson property and by
looking at the map it was determined that it was to the east of
the subject property , east of the railroad tracks and that Ms .
O ' Neil owned two parcels in that area .
Mr . King said that the Jonson proposal was to extend the
large building , which was their home , northerly 18 feet into the
vacant lot which would apparently leave five or six feet side
yard to the north . He asked if Mr . Izzo would see any difference
in that proposal from their building a separate structure on this
lot . Mr . Izzo replied that in the place he was staying in now it
would depend on whether it was a single level unit or whether it
would have a second or ° third story on it . If it had additional
stories , he said , that would tend to block some of the view he
enjoyed right now . Mr . Izzo said he was not fully aware of all
of the aspects of this project and both he and his aunt had some
concerns .
Mr . King said one 'of the problems was that the Board had not
much detail either .
Mrs . Valenza said that the parking was all on the state
highway which was very„ narrow . She said there were six parking
places in one section , sometimes to be used by six families .
• Mrs . Valenza said that the Jonsons have three vehicles
themselves . In addition to that , she said , it was a very
hazardous road and in the not too distant past there were two
automobile accident deaths on this road .
Mr . King asked if it was possible to drive down to this
property and Mrs . Valenza said no it was not possible and in
order to get down to the lake they have to go through a mutual
right of way .
The public hearing was closed .
Chairman Aron stated that all the Board had was a rough so -
called survey map and a sketch which did not tell them anything
and before the Board could even consider the proposal of Mr . and
Mrs . Jonson , they needed an elevation plan , a floor plan of the
proposed structure , and how it would be attached to the existing
structure , and a proper survey showing the location of the house
and how many feet it would be from the next property . Chairman
Aron made clear that bringing in these materials did not assure
Mrs . Jonson of obtaining approval but merely would give the Board
more detailed information with which to decide , and also would
inform the public more specifically of what the proposal would
entail .
Mrs . Jonson said the materials she had were from her
application for a building permit and she was not aware of what
the Board would ask for and decided to wait until she had been
• 8
before the Board to find out exactly what else was needed .
Mrs . Jonson said that they bought the property because it
had a house on it and ' were told that it had to be taken down
because of not being in compliance . There were a lot of houses ,
she continued , in that kind of shape in that area . She stated
that they did not want an empty lot but wanted to use it for
expanding her existing house . Mr . King asked if she was planning
a one - story and Mrs . Jonson responded it would be a two - story
with the bedrooms being on the second floor .
Mr . Frost said that the sketch as submitted was a floor plan
which did show a first floor and a second floor . Chairman Aron
said he did not accept this as a floor plan .
Mrs . Jonson pointed out that the neighbors were concerned
about whether the proposed structure would be a rental property
but that it had always been a rental property until last year
when it was torn down . She continued that one of the elderly
owners has never lived , on the lake , had maintained it very well ,
but had never lived there and indeed had rented her property out ,
and with the exception of herself and two other homeowners who
live there year round , all of the other owners rent their
properties .
• Joan Reuning asked if this structure were added on to the
existing home would it not all have to become one parcel and
would that make a difference if they consolidated the two parcels
into one . Mr . King said that consolidation was not important in
this case because if they extended the house into the other lot
that would consolidate the two lots as they would not be able to
sell the land without ' sawing the house in half . Mr . Frost said
it was conceivable that they could sell the land if it was not
consolidated if there was a party wall construction which Mr .
Jonson indicated he might do . Mr . Frost continued that if a
party wall was put up °between the first unit and the second unit
that would be code if ' Mr . Jonson wanted to divide that property
in half again . Mr . King asked Mrs . Jonson if this was part of
the proposal and Mrs . Jonson responded she had not talked to her
husband about that but had lived on the lake for about eight
years and loved it and had no intention of selling any of her
property .
Mr . King inquired what the nature of the occupancy of the
house was before and Mrs . Jonson responded it was a one family
occupancy . Mr . King asked if it was occupied all the time and
Mrs . Jonson responded it was occupied on and off . She stated
there had been two owners since she had lived in the house next
door because the woman who owned it , Mrs . Beasley , had died
leaving it to her nephew . She stated that they both had rented
• it out . Mrs . Jonson stated that the City never knew how bad some
of the properties were in that area and if inspections had been
• 9
done code violations would have been discovered and the property
would have been condemned sooner .
Mr . King asked how Mrs . Jonson would address the parking
problem . Mrs . Jonson responded that they always had the same
amount of parking for the same amount of buildings shown on the
sketch . She stated there had never been any change . Mrs . Jonson
further stated they did not have three cars , that her daughter ,
the owner of one car , was home from college but would be leaving
soon for a trip abroad; . Mrs . Jonson stated that although there
might have been some hurt feelings over parking places they had
always managed .
Chairman Aron asked what the square footage of the present
dwelling was now and Mrs . Jonson responded she did not know . Mr .
Frost interjected that it was approximately 36 - 1/ 2 by 30 feet .
Chairman Aron inquired about many people were living in the house
now and Mrs . Jonson responded there were three people , she , her
husband and their daughter who would be leaving soon for the
summer and then returning to college in the fall .
Mrs . Hoffmann asked if Mrs . Jonson would be renting out the
addition and she responded that she would rent it out just as she
had the previous building . Chairman Aron inquired if there would
be a separate entrance and Mrs . Jonson responded that there would
• be . Mrs . Jonson thought that it would not be so worrisome to the
neighbors if they joined the addition on to their own home as
well as making it look nicer than a row house .
Mr . King inquired how many floors were in the existing
building and Mrs . Jonson responded they had two floors and a
loft . Mr . King asked if the loft were occupied and Mrs . Jonson
responded it was not , that they used it as a TV room .
Mr . King said perhaps there was also a problem with Section
53 of the Ordinance which governs the abandonment of a use . He
read from the Ordinance as follows :
"When a non - conforming use has been abandoned for a period
of at least one year , it shall not thereafter be re -
established and the future use shall be in conformity with
the provisions of this Ordinance , except that a non -
conforming use that ceases to operate because of a national
emergency . . . might be resumed . "
Mrs . Jonson said that she had been working with the City and
was not aware that she had to come back in that year . Mr . King
asked if she had made application to the City within one year
after the building was demolished . Mrs . Jonson responded that
she knew the property was being turned over from the City to the
• Town so she kept calling Noel Desch and she asked him several
times if their property was with the Town or the City . Mr . Desch
• 10
told her it would be in the Town in two months so she waited for
that two months instead of working with the City .
Attorney Barney said that the vote on the annexation took
place in March or April of 1987 .
Mr . Frost directed to Mr . Barney the fact that Section 63 of
the Ordinance talks about abandonment of use but then the
beginning of that paragraph talks about a non - conforming use .
The use , he said , because it was . residential , was legal and
conformed with the Ordinance . He continued that Section 64 talks
about no non - conforming building or use . Mr . Frost stated it
would be his perception that the lot and the building that was on
there including the Jonson building was a non - conforming building
and not a non - conforming use . Mr . Frost said that he would
question whether Section 53 was intended to apply for a non -
conforming building as well as a non - conforming use .
Chairman Aron said that in his opinion a non - conforming use
could not be an accessory building but would have to be a
building of living quarters or any other type of erection rather
than an accessory building .
• Attorney Barney called the Board ' s attention to Section 57
which basically said that a lot , if it is a non - conforming lot ,
may be used as a single family residence regardless of the fact
that it is undersized so long as you comply with the other
requirements of the Ordinance . He continued that if Mr . and Mrs .
Jonson were to come before the Board with an application to
construct a single family house on this lot instead of attaching
it to the existing house and sought a variance because they could
not meet the side yard requirements he felt that the Board would
grant that variance because of the nature of the lot and the
hardship that would result because it would be economically
impossible to build anything on there that would not require a
variance for the side yards . Attorney Barney continued that if
you approached it from that view then the question was whether it
made much difference if it was a single family house erected
solely on one lot or an addition to an existing lot in that
configuration where there was no possible way of adding much more
to it because there was not much space .
Chairman Aron said that this all had to be weighed in many
ways . One way , he said , would be that the hardship would be that
the lot was small and was a legal non - conforming lot . Of course ,
he said , they would need to know the dimensions in question .
Chairman Aron reiterated to Mrs . Jonson that that was why they
needed more information from her as to the size of the addition .
He said that once the Board had a clear picture of what it looked
• like then it could discuss the matter .
Chairman Aron suggested that the Board adjourn the meeting
ATFIDAV17 Ol PUALWATIDN
THE ITHACA , JOURNAL
TOWN OF ITHACA .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
c NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS,
If 2Ktir ltmk, RL2L� WED. , MAY 11 , 1988, 7 P.M. . .'.
J � H— By direction of the Chairman'
of the Zoning Board of Ap-
peals NOTICE IS HEREBY:
-�..Kif(I. I _„ being duly twom, deposes GIVEN that Public Hearin s% '
will -be held by the Zoning ',.
Board of Appeals of the Town-';I,
and "Y's. that he resides in Ithaca, County and state aforesaid and 11 Ithaca 88,0 nvTownn SHof(, "126
thatEast Seneca Street, (FIRST
he is Clerk h
Floor, REAR Enhance, WEST
_ . _... ._..»»...._..».._._..»_.._ ..--- .._.._. .... ...._.........._..._ Side), Ithaca, N. Y. , COM
MENCING AT 7:00 P.M. ; ton' ';;
of T= ITEACA JOMNAL a public newspaper printed and publid3ed the following matters.
APPEAL of Jonathan O. -Alba=',; �'� .
nese, Appellant, . requesting. 't-
the authorization of the Zon-;='
In Ithaca aforesaid, and that a aotiee, , ,Qf which the annexed is a true ing Board of Appeals for the : ,
construction of an 8-foot by.Y�`
14-foot by 22-foot triangular :;>:
copy, vas published in said paper 1 G _ ( , , outside wood deck as an addi- t"
• f•t--• tion to the west side of on fJ'
- existing legal non-conforming11
?'
single-family dwelling at 1040
..._.»..».... ..»._
...... •- -.. .�_... . — -_ ... . ... ... .._. .......- ,0. .....�...... East Shore Drive Town of Itha-
ca Tax Parcel No. ' 6- 19-2-10;,
Residence District R- 15. The
•• • ---»---•---•---•----• • -•-_....., ..- „ _ request is made under Article ':.
••—•^•-••--• XII, Section 54, of the Town of
Ithaca Zoning Ordinance• '°
wherebno
and that the first publication of said notice Was on the ..�- -._„__• , build ng may bee tended e non-conforminx
ceps as authorized by the
yBoard of Appeals.
Of »._.... ......__... .... .... .. ... . .. 19 . ' •• APPEAL of Ivor and Janet Jon-.
son, Appellants, requesting
the authorization of the Zon4 ' '
»._............ .... . ».._. . .. — - � ing Board of Appeals for the:'. i
"""•"•'— construction of a second0 Ova
k•
dwelling unit to be attached to
Subscribed and sworn to before me, this . an existing legal non-con-
- -- -• -•»---••_--..... day' forming single-family dwell
ing at 934 East Shore Drive, .-'r
Of . Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'la
”—"--------- -----•_.••• 18••»IV 6- 18-5-10, Residence District .
The proposed addition g ,
to be located on an abutting
to b .'
let,al non-conformingvacant
-• -» '� ••.... .._.. lot, Town of Ithaca Tx Parcel
JEAN FC3RTS' """ Notary Dubuc No. 6-18-5-9, which is to be
Notary Public Sista of New York consolidated with said Parcel
No. 6- 18-5- 10. The request is :'
made under Article XII, Sec-
NO. 46 „ 4 410 tion 54, of the Town of Ithaca _.
Qualified in Tcr,, kins County Zoning Ordinance whereby'
r no non-conforming building
Commission expires May 31, 19 : may be extended except as
authorized by the Board of
Appeals.
Said Zoning Board of Appeals
will at said time, 7:00 P. m. ,
and said place, hear all per-
sons in support of such matters -
or objections thereto. Persons
may appear by agent or in -
person.
Andrew S. Frost
Building Inspector/
Zoning Enforcement Officer
Town of Ithacb
273-1747
May 6, 1988
. 11
until such time as Mrs . Jonson had all the required information
satisfactory to the Building Inspector . Mr . Frost and Mr . Barney
both wanted clarification as to what Chairman Aron wanted .
Chairman Aron repeated that he wanted three documents . ( 1 )
elevation drawings , ( 2 ) ' a scaled floor plan , ( 3 ) a surveyor ' s map
showing the footage from the addition to the lot line , and the
distance to the next building .
Mrs . Jonson wanted to know if the survey should be of both
lots with the existing structure and the proposed structure and
Chairman Aron responded that was correct . Mr . King said they
wanted to know the proposed separation between the new addition
and the building next door to the left .
It was moved by Henry Aron as follows .
RESOLVED , that this Board adjourn this matter until the 29th
day of June , 1988 , to allow Mrs . Jonson to get all the
necessary documentation ready .
Joan Reuning seconded the motion .
The voting was as . follows :
• Aye - Reuning , King , Aron , Hoffmann
Nay - None
The motion was unanimously carried .
There being no further business to come before the - Board ,
the meeting was adjourned at 8 : 00 p . m .
Respectfully submitted ,
v
Beatrice Lincoln
Recording Secretary
Exhibits atta hid : 1
APPROVED
Henry Aron , Chairman
•
old , Ad
a
DAVIT) GERSH
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
• - r;,' POST OFFICE BOX 202
- - 404 NORTH CAYUGA STREET
ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850
(] JI TELEPHONE
May 5 , 1785 (607) 277-3300
Mr . Andrew S . Frost
Town of Ithaca
126 East Seneca St .
Ithaca , NY 14850
+1
RE : Zoning Appeal of Jonathan 0 . Albanese: (May 11 . ZBA hearing )
Job I,
Dear Mr . Frost :.
I own property at 1046 East Shore Drive , immediately north of the property which.
' is - the subject of the captioned zoning appeal . Mr . and Mrs . Albanese are fine
P .
neighbors , and I want to ' go on record as indicating that I have no . objection
to .
whatever to . the proposed wood deck .
Sincerel
It
• David B . Gersh
It
DBG : j em •
)lit"d. .
,. .
� 4r
If I
a
T ._r '{/,^'(�'9 ..d'a. K- f: r J 'Fii•,i_ «T ::V'....n+�K•v.,N^'i. T^�,5:!J:7`y� � s r•� �Y �rvrn,-rr, (+r ^ •LT ,:r T[ >l_,,.. r.7 r,, m, X34^:: I:: "ill. ::a•.i:2 . r .,1 r
r t�i�1,41`y'J„7•S �lt'1 +'ti LL7 p b j l 1 ) ♦f 1 r. 11 ,.-�L11 ':. t (,1 :.1 : 9�,µ i' v' l r R•t 4r 1 �l1 N' rjl l•: ,'1'� :b•... t t , ':tt 1 \ 'S' ' '1
.x)-a� rj (r
It
:i.^ ) i fJ F.1 L }�Tf wiyil� ) . x �'} ( S 1ry7• Y. �rv �1 l� �<il dltl:lf 1 ! .rF111M r rrrj ir> � J • II . r J4 f :l jt +'. fado I tt ' Sr . f rt`X t� : 1 .
yh.1: r.,k ria �� . Jr{r 1 t ).. rj /' ,,t. 2.: r t ' ) J2aT. 1 s, J ,..j a { ' f -'r 1 t' t e /
✓' 1«�p}(..r'(.t1Nlfrl �'[ ,.( l,L''. . ( '1 �•t . . '• �L 1 .t:llil �{M 1i1 i } ,l,l � IY r',p •a Yp r\ r� AI ' . il ?1r y, � ) ,1 � 11JY 4 . � 1 •! •? �y " i .a ♦11It
taf ', r Fa ��t ` 11r , . ntFIr( } 1rFrlr r � -..L: .! i ti . r .1. :•j •A'n J ' : d �,,: ! 2 f . Yr add.•,� ':
w p' . -:?i: S F';Ar iu ',a. /n )'l i:.tY{'., )) .t ('. radr . lr. ftl }:�,i.J�":Yr . ° ! T%ypl :'.'Jr.,! • II'-• . r • r 't.. ...; .. t;, yp 'li. l i.. , i.• { i'. . SIJ .Ik , de. ' { a, jrt } tr � '.
Q.'. tf,'S7y T.S kjntt,� 4R 9 (rt"Y5t 1e ,1:.x '!1 ltTiC ,N f Vr ' 1 ). 41 w vl>cl• a ! M1 .'r.i. ! J\ - fil,r rf H.i;. •1 , r ) t`• 1 . ♦ . tt• .4 1 ( : _
rt ! ,mfJ : < tfr .S;l, aIfr. ij s•11 '1J a.iYS I vl} .r ! . - Irf . J' . rS 1 [ �' r r , f r - . Y •' ira
y{ '. tfY)^ �rf ,r,.r }RFl� M1 \ 11 :rY..S"-fir t'S' v.r. ar 't !: r. lJ� }•. itr V .: kfQS � j" . I "��){!• 1 �"t.1 �. r T . I .,= t11 � f tr '�.I )'k +.* 1 ,: -0f ?v ': r .t
-8'14 Pl.rn .fs . IL 7t i' Tri' nlFY4. 4,J.;i.. r +� ¢ ..) t i,1, tt d r f jr r M„sr T ul \ { 't i r, Id"
- I• 1 ar ! '!r t .ry i. .
C ,ItrE ; e .`'" G Y C F -.!'. t 1 4t •s..\ f .4S.t t lr . tS t' \ It'r F :t -7 1 1. Ii T rt - r i.a r . ! - I' i. y !r )t J -
' > ''+"». ar t7xrax : d ff ;.>1. ISR 1 > r Yr r r t . rl. : r { - _t r ' % I tJ r .� . rt r t'
!t •. .14L { 6 ;-f:b rrt4 ul , } Itl_ .. . nisi l r : {. ril ttt w'L . it Ib + e1 �; \ � tl r .. rr ' sti .i' ' Kltr iji, =,.t I ? r • ' J i - ` ' ) F IN
Y a -
w 211:,.•, o .t>. '' ,�k .4` } s Yr 1S 1 i t + , A }" - .t Lr J ) to / . r tf. it i er t 9 J f tt t _ r
!{{ R. .PP.yy.''Y . r'Lat� - yt�lr,;ik J�} j S0.11i't.. +.. jY �' � r . • .nr. !! e. t ; .r . .rr.. �1N.� -{C'r4�5r�J SS °."i. . ,:} (yns .it < 1 ' Ii� . . rs/J3\ . .. \ � t 't ' . t '. j. )..1. ` 'il tl j 1� �� It t !
Y .,1.'III` •r{ 4faiJ 9„y it "l1 g l �(' ) J . -?ir' 1?y! ( } r Ar `�' . t9s .;IV, . ITtt 4 ):5 Y - frrri 1 it n 4 '4'iJ i r( . ' eviN ( : rr , ./�. t. I(? . , f
g�pti]h'.^3 ( fir", s FtF . .r.! y+Crj.lA . a '(\ i + I . Y' ii"}. ta•f•' rr •l,,.y;Wyki 'f� r rA. ;NdJ \ 11 rt !'{ . J ' R1l'Ili
l.i'. I J' .i�' r.. ' ' I ! ' te1'} 1.i: 11 : si+ § r rl,, T Ett
F+' .p`$i:{}p'�(¢ iL YrN �4yn 7z•"rr M ':Yt7." rl ( ¢t t r: f" \ rMr• ., ) µ Y,t,`rr! { .'� a •f r p .1. 'r . t r 1 iC r .•r •
iTf- a.�Vf. wY ``9,ii¢! r�'11Y.x .ft .,q.M :hcC ; t.M 1. 1i ri.'1"nr� .Vr .Y � r �S. .r' tr 4 .'? .�:y�' J v'�jldo old! ,. ! (i 4 fi q r \u r) r L'f A ) l�'!, ' 3. Y1 1 r�Cl S !r, t S r4 t ;._ rI Ift w V ' -) . . � " t %. ro
ft ,si, SyY rS>,•„ ,�( 51s i. r • F ,t _ f 1 } yl t � t, li;, . \ n:• 7.7 r T 1 � rvClt i� li ; 1 • .1 r i 'V }
N r'-f• f tai "d' [ia"jtl )! J '•,t1. 6 3S Jr.rr` 1.r4 Tri.ril'•,1<f¢}(},( fl Y } .. lt AL s_f ff'u+e, t t1�1 rr-. f '. r .ti1C y� �' l:'I I • ,{� Sj Nr .P sfdr _ C - I. old it ' . ry . TM11.. > ! i ly :..
J� 1 ^�. �a 1 t, To Nb did ._} ..aF trY t iii as• t . . r :1:.N y ".,.(L\rt ( •: l. e ,)1)r..' + t1 .it It y{rJ at ntlf(\ 19..i.r.�`t If i�;Y . Jr r ' r , . ¢5 }t r 1 1 r iir r \ t . . .tti., r '
:y 7.T piy yf:f+Sf•ShlI. .r( r w Ir . t�, .v } „4!1 , .: ••y r�u, r .• t'. v'1,• :Ja, t _ . . rIllt{. J.. Jii' vli:.n vrp.t•.r`.ti ' ...:.� "I,r . • (. y".. ai . of of A.. J (f . S!. " I . l .
frk rt .Ir.itf f:th v.. tNttyFi rvr Knf� .it +;iYa � -i ,l .f ,Il... { St r.Cl ; ! .S.' t' 4 r .. .!\rd, ¢"9' 1. � Pr "+ ' rJ J: I , T I'
III vl t4r rNdidn }i ( : •: +� : , . t ( . . .
fi%y f ..tlr k F..fJ t . Ni ti� r !Xr - -}� l tY , }` K a : . �' S ca . t 113 a ,+ r-
: r?'.. c TAi . i lS a.f v'''• tt i�.. fh I f;l`' �, s }. \ . L'•. V.! r,C ! f . . Y. •. '{�{ii .q � , 1^: »t:. '' t 0 a { , } , tf v r
I2,,}}yy .i•1 ' r°sf �.jyya': r(J;, t ' If J:PJ.'iJ'.f r J 'ft't.f'S f :P 1 ¢T li . f ' r r 7 t ; 1. + r •.
•SS.ru.(`ty. l}�7,. a • ' . . ls . Yr�';S IY I..fi�h�:{•t t7C. .'i.n. i (. i *h!d la Nry �'Yr it� Birt . r. t -t rJ l ,"�i}J4 rJJ-1 r r a . ^j . t^} F y�t .'I11 { i t ' tr SL ^•,.. lZt ' ;r arr
tt y"+G`tr.{. / .'.f.����. l fir,:: Y�'irr' ) TF � e r:i..ta 'Jir Cr "t, .tk ri. .,: ) rl 3!"'i'ir. �S' \B'rt : t ;\`r' 4 .: 7' iSl �.(�''a • .{�ly j, tl' rfi ! C1 ' r + N y: ) :. I : v) ry - . ,r • r 1
vur;'t�pL^:'•?rI`r ^o'�•"�•. ""Ll,fr rMdr� n )... 4'U .fi \YJ ,f• ; 'jtJ ' larjr. r., {1L . .r )`.t Y{ Jat. i,`11 / Ilr itl> y1ir r,„ rvT.,r '' '' , ter 'd5 '' S ' ,- ! If1 R : L
tSt t?R'1.. r �, ... i1 t:;�' ..2'rJJ.. ,J S '• A. Al. t�.4 v j pt . • J t t• t tI Y
{ ¢'If/ frtJ{: ,4 ) S J a r t % •� ' - .tit { }(.•y ! r+r^r. i t Il ii 'v ? tJ.y ,i r rr r r°L,` tf. \ ) +.ifii ":�tt " . { i.:: a r 1 J
! . Si� .'T?yaft,•i .J: } y.r• ey.�hi if A7 �� v!r :t±t• t r 7. « a t ' 'a•T '[j�TyD .(►t r .;.'r,. , . r . 1
1 . Itore..--r;,} AYd�e3 ( t, 4. n.YsN l3 -1. ¢r . \.jar rJ . i, + 7� f at. i � If 1..r, ;i,�-1f' J111 �t2` , yt trj , 'l.t • i.F .t>I -i - :..•r.... .a^..r1 . .:i f',. ' r- ' t
. . T. .t fir. .NFfV `•,I^ rb- mil,• J� S � J1 •'1,. . p ).� r• . C .rr. . Y1J it i = J L+ t }W 41 t, A. t rf .. 1 F I . f .
Old4" 'if t - u;, .: y .. I a hill t r )a. F l r'r ` r'.t > J t',tl .r i ''" t.,SS,' U 1jS'1 ild t t !; \
(, t Y•'y,. ' � ,r �.:-7 r'; tl r y .� fP t r T f 1.,1lb, j J .:`., ` M.y t;�'t:`�'a Err ::r ' .4' r r 5 a5,;) (.(� 'LL 1. . t . '\:- i. II S . r .. r r r..� + v' i. .. +' ' i ! 1 dr ! r .
-dn 'X�:i IJ^J1 5tS ,. t }; JS n/. < a .l fi F:i lJe t. t .!iP, . r` r'r}t•/:. 4. jy, , ri t i. ,rltL.tt i:. R rS\' r (' L{ >•. �. - tl. r . stat ..t, , r _ r �' .tet itl
. lyyTt: .Jr�r .; . E•#. J f t I } ,. . t6V f r i :J:r,+ . F r ><r ..v+YiYl L� -_.r11. t ) ' J : ItIF rJ r. „ir( {S 9-
,ri . . Qt�z)). .f rffy L {{" t,"'{` JN } 1 - t $� ' ii ", `` ri ,•. 1 . .!, . .i r 7: t e5 r , 1 Y st) :} M1 9 JIf
3 '"4J U. '? 1 ')r •'•'p3,�ti`;- '>ii .•�j''t'\rF :a;t5C4 ' 1 + T%tr�, } T y` vr1). - } JF, .Jr. " t Jrs Cl �lJb . A - f i -' J l„f t11. � �I . - r.If ...•:. )a i IIJJr rl. A. s m. ! ♦ . - t. S -I. 1. r. J Iffififf f. f t . . 1
�f I!
) { s^.Sp,.S. e• ,: •ter .1 'Sh:Si. .af IJ 73Y...rF' .x,•.,v><.'�^ . l Jar . ,. If• . I+ vs •pF +< tt iYM r1 1Ct
n i�Crr'i ), � rY,}r Y.,.fir ,!`-; vy< )}G: ' 'A� • )- a ' , f ' f+, t�:Y } 'At, •. .ttrr.r�n .F%c¢ t r' tl; . -,'C n vd'Iif711ia�� - i*1 '>�r :it ii r . I) 1j3 ,. r 1 11 t 1 Biu. a r �� t >t. t . rf. L . r .
f l. 3a 35: ,{ 1,. . T;altS� .J-'{ A 7•'-.�4 .did I; I :( ;C S J t yy4w )i . 'S I't �. 1 -,. u •t n- r• . a - t . t .t 1' 3 \ •,t
a �Jit1a. 11 4'1L }x+,.:11 t7 !r•• t:et i of hr t \1r t. ly F t "' d f t ) .. (tif .l`t t t ' r ! s i
rapya7a 1''+e.? -5a ! fei f+ `y�'s.. '('Sr ,y+ .^I,! `t . i} a F' j'r s it {.. r 6 �:. ei'J 1 f f,l )61. r ` jL ;, r } t ..
ff 10,$'1 a t r 1Y t �1 tr . .` r .yyii). /.' 'f• ': 1 e' J V tt rf \ .� f . \ . i; h { %}• xI '1) � �';"`ir Jl,z Jl/t .Al r .11 !,I it. .. t..� • .r1 k f"':ri ' r } : r :I Irl..' r , t , ' i t
dL
,p kri lf�:)y7i.G•7{ .0 PJP' �'" tr.y1'S. ,:t qrr , 'GQ4k, ) l :P ' ;JIJ,.(p•,L � ,r T.C.rwd r -1r.},:v ' i '1• Y JI II. t ;<. �• \r� 1 ! }tt {h.. is f . .r, .a !. . :1 1.l bo, .. . . 1 .J. t ,. rp.. . 51
I P pp trrL. �]{I,?rtf ,S` R21 .}, T. Y!/' "r'N i l:�a'x'4t�.CAJ i; S ( 't Ar r bad rI3 1 I-rt Jr ir .\F 71t J t SS tkirQ w "at JF tl .i6¢ . hJt iSa !. f ,J Iffi'k ( I ti)r x..tJ s ��Iv' t. t ..
'_yy >e,1 1Y'!�ra^yJ.T .F" ..I y qk r .i. e¢ .lr{.. ,f . r 6t�. 1 -d Ja. sJrr-S tl tt •p ;' : :. . .t .. l t `n au.. •41i O'k:` rt i.Jt ; f ,. tI ♦ tif it .,}:• . t
�� ,.}:t` r :3", tt i. 3[Sl,,,y �K1t ei J t+i 11. '=• l rn 1- r :•T e fi f ' j r +•r,,, Ir t . t } ,+ 1f In. ) •' i
a . .T rd riss •rty, r4 " { �tparl r„ 1J.. f . k fLI A r 1 ( r Ill-J. , Atr., a Y ) f 't .� i .. t '. flrlry ,'rt ra; ! r 4 a F r.f'rC t,{ + , t. If
w 1 .N--„" 1f( \ Fr �{'a:- r . t 'Jy r t ta'' r . i iJw C! 5i r t - " AIN, Nof ( r rr 5 1 er '1. r > >t -. .)all .. rr �> X tN :J .,: t t
µ.tl4",4d'YTCr Yfl'-;drtt . ,; t lr,.K`pa ;{ )1 ray s r: \ std 1 .; 5 '. } r. . .e; l 1 . r • ' +. ( r
{ a,,} l- '(1 I r1 t Y jY • t r J { J l 't , CJ •
fr Ra, . .§' ,"f l'•: . 1Dt . • " tgc•t F vl ;�t :7;rr!r ° •i 11t :. r "t�}^ l" 1 q ,•}, . \ 4 >1,�1,V.- , ;:,; - x • .+ (. . r Tjr t'i tag ti. ,ri .. Y r .
,a' �vT';Je1r;.S. )) ar . 4 .. , t ' f � ' a . 1 ' .L, 1 . ,c
'ry`r j, Jn r 4) J 1L\ a ( t(•r ix r t t , ! t I . ... . v it;r< J1 f 4 J
«i .( tL'lty '< • '`C1°i •j E - vtr t J, �' . r t r • 4 r
cc { a� q t `> ' I J 1 r - t - r rr f JIt I
} S�b tf 1 s kit; i (r t -: `w•. % ,t fl lJ tr + - 1 ' . rtr > + - 11J r .t7 . Yy rr to yJ, ar
I. ifl.ti :.fit L. 1. .f ) It -LrJS ) .fir Ir !r � 1 ..Jtir - t )' f . . r�
IN]I .tt;,a`�' t2t J / ' L . i S`4if fl. , . tr Fc ,t'u f - °. 1 a7 . v la } , . ir4 : r J
. . xaY.''j.Y�r ' 3",+�W, lji� f.'S.yY=^ :.U. a � 4�Vi(t� 1 + l: ':� t/ /. r 11 1. ^I ^rr � �\ ft � '%4 r:.� t!>tr 1: { � �':i1 r.+ V �tl.�ry -I.N." .1. 1,,{ jtrl:• i iia - ) y l ♦, r _ r
, fa ^ .3+(,)cu.IY ..t � .7 F lA l rl!y' Ilrf tJt t5 ;.A .M.a e . . V v rt 17 . tt J " IV
i ,r tk• ! 15 41t�.:T b'''ra '' A. , t t'f�:,j�-r.'W: . kL L..J'1 Y•..•, 7 to .: t1 I Ct ( \ ' i ' rr y t:a r t t : t 1 rtl ' 1 L! r. :.
Stt't' +J v')3•. 4" L.. ;: r - Ar: ,, ..^ 7 . i:t t .Kr; • y) raj y 1� a.at S . ,,r raF t f ( ra .t . t: I if e rY t RaC '" J.: •. ,q tsl t {jr a J IIIId
} Y�/itrir Jrrt i� ,tjt }�' .Fi.•',r':�'�'!;lit S •'4 r i I . } rcyj k��1it '4 r'^ : SS Jr j�Dt sofr . - rlV, l.a'a {r aYrq . . 'i f`y A" I . r 1 J. . t - Y. .�tJ7 GCJ. q. : r r
id, h' 4F t,j,rY /w j�.'jt 'dt;R; j .i ,.. It Ji ' .'{.'qi Il ma'i'l i. - r 'orf jny" 1Ni' J {r i . . r •r. t. IN
;1 i�,.Y „ lt. dirt 'Jt': V r rN , , t Li JI : , .y . ? .'7 tl it f .i 1 i .r
`f "t�''ry.f�' 31f . , , Jl ;Sb n(1�1 .W c;. +rL tt rJa it .�f),t rt 1} , r..;. wi:, . a.-1n i, tt. . "r i rt• ' 1 � la t • .
1 A.„ cvri it {;Ti}1£.} .ItdC +. Ic•.S ririof 13 fr 1'} - � fi.a r . of ) J- ... j I .j 11_.1. . 1 ( d ,Il.2. :fjr1','l�rPlJrr 1\.r):'� r% 1. . i '.j 'r 'it r' i �r tr . ! 1. J
ar{Ja,../. Ay A+yy�t .n. / lK <. t t9� : `.a J.:. r1 m 'J i J }rli { Z ,.�',r '1., •1l Yr � t - Vo I •r ae/`F :5. :1 - t i{l, l I.:..' ro l r ;'yIf
77 r a !\a� ff ira0 1• ,X, J t� L y t t a t Mgita ktir n "i10 11 R'hY M1fl ai'j i it :y 1 r :' i [[, 1t i ,.• f 1 Yr ;^ CI .i't ' :,Ir.fy: 1 l ' {'
rr-1a } t.�it t'. r,ly ,it`.?L'' r1{1 - r ' \t il.- of Mf{ .} 1 f/' 1 t : :L - / ) f !J x9 to 1; wi• r ,
y l Y t qq� f/(r(�' Ir-J.z . r . - t , t. . >t µ '{ ✓ t f S tt v { p, r j a
r 7.,�I .+yolt.'d Yt ��fof ir:!. bxi1 .�. • 1}Y¢7 Y t it Nry /!E. s;. � ' 4- It
"Y( 'itt.rw..y ILr[L,N" t I l .tiriT 'y,) {9itT 1`„•ys ta. _:r} i }S:sr r t3 r: 0. f t t >t .f.r^ � Jl eJ , l�' '
r -,f,frr•iJ�t �i• t�+�•�. L}rtd .,� fjE„ Y .IN I . .Nfil:J- 9 ;ty . . 11 '7 tr^1.d,; i (r. 1 .1r1{' lrftIle.,•;Y + 1v1.Rt7 }}.,bfl{J ' ' JS : nJn �r�F; J}.GrY"lr, �iy : 4 )y{.0. iY. a ':'it } i , t } .t. itra
' ;r4„IIIy..rf,. ( C 1' 't't7Cift (iilCtr �' ffa5 ' Y;\Ja! •$ ti.. 1� t0LYt{.F:.i, V 'r;ddr 5. t .
> t+ /r0 a• r11;'fi 1,. 0.ra It4.Mfrt ;� t' j( { N 11 .1¢ ; { . L.,a . l l3 t kf...1 ' ) :4If
-
. L'ni rY'e 1'YT'r1f Jt>,' jp.iJ"'' •.,,af } •y+ ijt - r ,l) . Fi yf .1 Ct f.
to t1 M 'i rt i J 'rv'. f is 5 � 4T• - N J y y }.1j jtJ }.l . r.yW.y % f ' t. ° Y Vx - \ yt ' t ♦ rtV t t �rY 1.[ r 1 t
a ¢�{': 'h j.},• 9 :,}�lV. lg11 ..1� CiN'{Cfi[LA�{ ) 11,i, f) .r ty) ...•' J4 1 ( No.fl' . !(l1..(. iffj AIS j tAJi t) J'' f •. i (j '1 .tte: .j14 t � k] ! r I a ' r ( .
yyY,l't J' yy Ir4 \ L H ! !t( i a;h;..ul ry4 . J ^ iI ✓ . "){>,l { l ' l : li�' ti \ Y �tA 1•t.� 1 V t:•J t.(. tr It 11 1'� � If )�i. l tl r�. I .r ) '/ayl T ar 1 . Y \1 % t '1 •ir, for r 1• ' t
{yr . rSSia III lot rl Ca \ 5 Tt,. {JC t t 1 •. ra,r , J r, . k{„' . a-} •. Ua .. " AJfitt. . lof f .1,, i:. , t. ,
tFt ? 3• N .y x t f 5fJ p .Yr } rr iJ 1 ti -f in I . (J IJ . t tJ{ r ' t 0. a. } J t c . ' f rfJ \ •
r '. 4y '( t :.N� l t1. ` .t T. j. 4 1 r o 1'I r \, J ry } (. ! irr 1 f r t j 1 t ")I } 'I .. s rls r%4'1 t '� + i. t vi. Cr r L J - i, \ old
{•,y1 Sys. rj ., >➢l �G rtvf>•,jJ}r J ..;r... rl � 4 � .} A, jat. Ji ya:. Sn �•sl ,* }7 .0i rr ti-! .r r •�•t� Sff lrG _�tifi 1 i 12 .•1 y /f .+y !a - r
rt{,•4 7b f.t4ri t. . rt r. t f ( f r ) j .. t �' ,h off a t •'f
0. X <� 1+ r 1 at i' It { 1 ♦' 4 rf fw } r s a4f L v 1 P rl r > r . it r it t • f
r 1. iM1 ei4lv�411) . • r �r 1 - 5J • . � t +JJ T J- uy t G. 0. I . r S. J 1 as 1.a, ! r 1 Jr
.ji 3 tT' M1 f •j r :✓yt ) ) tr .. j 'i•_ti"`,-, ( .J , t r a ,v r 1: r l t r r l ) t 'J . 1 + � : 9 _ ' r
1, Y4 i vJ.",d t , 1 Pt . � Attl rJ rN.e to t7 . StJtt t tr rY ♦♦ ( t. IL f bb 1 a t 1. , . 't I ! C t f i t• b.
1. ia�ti4• As.r_.Y.Jt. e4•:., ..)nt. ..� r. t... . f,. . :.t... .J 4a.: : l••.i _...:i .f . rJ i" < .+.l•..itf . .. .. r.,.1 nr ...l. . : .. 0 r4 n1•r:5: '+1.r'^is.'itIfhoI�(J.t,VIN ,.J , It . :. . .°.. f. . d �'. 1 ...� ..^, 4J�J ( . j.r. . . 3 '