The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-04-281 TOWN OF DRYDEN PLANNING BOARD MEETING April 28, 2022 Hybrid / Zoom Approved 5-26-22 Present: John Kiefer (Chair), Tony Salerno, Joe Wilson, Diane Tessaglia-Hymes, Simon St Laurent (alternate), Craig Anderson Zoom – Dan Bussmann, Alice Green (alternate) Absent: Linda Wagenet Staff: Ray Burger, Planning Director, (Zoom - Joy Foster, Recording Secretary) Liaisons: D. Lamb (TB) Others: Paul Simonet, Gary Sloan, Steven Hugo, Sam Gordon Chair J. Kiefer called the meeting to order at 6:02 pm J. Kiefer activated the Alternate S. St. Laurent in place of L. Wagenet to be able to vote tonight. Approve the minutes: of 3-24-22 Planning Board Meeting Motion J. Wilson, 2nd S. St. Laurent all in favor, yes. of 4-13-22 Steering Committee Meeting Motion J. Wilson, 2nd T. Salerno all in favor, D. Tessaglia-Hymes abstains, she was not present. Sam Gordon from EDR gives update on the Comp. Plan I am attaching the latest version of the Public Review Draft for your review. I am waiting on Dan Lamb for updates to the Broadband section. We also need to update the Census data. I will have that completed before the meeting on the 28th. I will also send out the updated Appendices with table of contents with these other items. As you know we had received multiple comments regarding the accuracy of the maps in the document. While I was reviewing the Future Land Use Map (#15), I realized that there was a significant and glaring error in the Wetlands and Floodplains Map (#3). The map scale for Map 3 was incorrect. We have fixed Map 3, and that has influenced changes to Map 15. Map 15 has been updated to reflect the significant ecological corridors within the town that relate to streams and significant wetland areas. This further led to some tweaks to the Conservation Character Area. 2 Below is a list of the changes that have been incorporated into this draft (changes within the draft are marked by a pink box): Page i. updated the formatting of the dedication Page v. page numbering updated Page vii. page numbering updated Page 13. Updated project milestones Page 24. Added sentence about Appendix A Page 32. Corrected budget figures per correspondence with Dan Lamb Page 33. Added note re: town revenue sources and sales tax offset per discussion with Dan Lamb Page 36. Updated formatting of vision statement per discussion with Dan Lamb Page 40. Updated formatting of asterisk explanation to make it more prominent Page 42. Updated affordability and housing diversity language Page 46. Added language re: shared equity programs at INHS per Charles Geisler Page 48. Swapped out image for habitat for humanity photo from Ray Burger Page 53. This entire section has been reorganized, Map 3 updated due to mapping error Page 54. Narrative on this page is new, adapted narrative from the 2005 Plan and added new context Page 58. Added language re: farmers proactive restoration of riparian areas Page 59. New photo Page 62. New photo Page 65. Added new actions related to protection of riparian areas Page 92-93. Waiting for broadband info Page 101. Added municipal reduction target language and Figure 23 Page 103. Added community reduction target language and Figure 28 Page 109. New photo Page 110. Added clarifying language related to zoning updates and challenges 3 Page 111. Added challenges narrative section related to SUPs and the development process Page 112. Updated action LU 1.2.1 added clarifying language Page 113. Update Future Land Use Map, influenced by changes to Map 3 as outlined in my message above. Page 123. Updated narrative to accommodate changes to Future Land Use Map also as outlined in my message above I am sending an updated version of the public review draft dated 4/25 which incorporates the municipal broadband input from Dan Lamb as well as updated Census data, and a few other items (including sheep farms) as outlined below (changes within the draft are marked by a pink box): Page vii. added Figure 22 (to correspond with updates to page 92) to the list, updated figure numbers accordingly Page 6. Updated likely recommendations to the town board section Page 28. Updated figures and narrative to correspond with 2020 Census data Page 58. Update figure 11 w/sheep farm data and updated narrative accordingly Page 78. Updated narrative and graphics to incorporate 2020 Census data Page 92. Updates to broadband narrative and added figure 22. Updated Appendices (with tables of contents) to follow Discussion with Planning Board Members asking for their comments. The Resolution was edited during the discussion. RESOLUTION 2022-#1 RECOMMENDING THAT THE TOWN BOARD ADOPT DRYDEN2045 AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 TOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, in 2019 the Town Board asked the Planning Board to make a recommendation on whether the town should update its 2005 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that 2005 Comprehensive Plan will continue to provide useful and relevant guidance on topics such as recreational resources, agricultural protection, and residential development, based on principles of natural resource conservation and smart growth and, 4 WHEREAS, during a review of the 2005 Plan, The Planning Board concluded the 2005 Plan lacks guidance on critical topics such as climate change, transportation, and diverse/affordable housing choices, and WHEREAS, in 2019 the Planning Board recommended to the Town Board that the 2005 Plan be updated and offered to manage the work; and WHEREAS, in Resolution #84 of 2019 the Town Board charged the Planning Board to “manage and execute a general update to the Town Comprehensive Plan”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to serve as Steering Committee for the work. The Committee also included Dan Lamb, representing the Town Board, and Ray Burger, representing the Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Committee chose Environmental Design and Research, using a competitive selection process, to prepare the update; and WHEREAS, the update was named Dryden2045 in recognition that it is a 25 year plan for the town; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board conducted a public hearing on Dryden2045 on March 24, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee has completed its work on Dydren2045; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends that the Town Board adopt Dryden2045 as an amendment to the Town 2005 Comprehensive Plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the Town Board considers implementation of the many recommendations in Dryden2045, that it place emphasis on critical needs associated with climate change, transportation, and affordable housing choices in the town; and 5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends that the town’s Recreation Master Plan be updated and formally adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board wishes to formally thank members of the public for their participation in development of Dryden2045; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board wishes to formally thank members of Dryden’s volunteer committees and boards for their reviews and comments on Dryden2045. 4/21/22 jak draft#1 4/27/22 jak/ca draft #2 Motion to approve, C. Anderson Second: T. Salerno All in favor 6-Yes, Simon No Ray reports, 1. 1061 Dryden Road -Evergreen Townhomes was a PUD approved in 2017 for 36 dwellings comprising 108 bedrooms. The six buildings were about 149x62 ft. each. The PUD was amended in 2018 to be 36 units and 84 bedrooms with buildings 149x52 ft. Now M&R Entities is proposing to build 42 units with 90 bedrooms with buildings 144x47 ft. The PB is to review this pursuant to Town of Dryden Code Section 270- 10 See https://ecode360.com/34362776 As I see it the Concept Plan is still valid and this application is for a modification to the Development Plan. Therefore the PB can make a “…recommendation to the Town Board that the development plan be approved as submitted, approved with modifications, changes or conditions, or rejected. Any modifications, changes or conditions, and reasons for rejection shall be detailed in the recommendation.” Code Section 270-10.4 D. 4. The TB will hold a public hearing at their May meeting. Gary Sloan and Steven Hugo talk about the 1061 Dryden Rd. – Evergreen Townhomes and shows Board sketches. *Sketch Plans as Attachment *2016 Traffic Study as Attachment 6 Board thoughts • Biggest concern is the traffic study. Bad corner, poor driveway views, crosswalk and bus stop needed. • Suggested that Town Board members go and spend some time looking at these concerns. • Suggested that the units be Affordable housing, with affordable utilities, making units be all electric no fossil fuels. Electric car charger be in place for all units. • G. Slone confirmed no fossil fuel, air source heat pumps will be used for heating and hot water. RESOLUTION 2022-#2 The Planning Board recommends to the Town Board to adopt this plan and to take a careful look at the traffic issue and also to confirm that the Stretch Code is applied. Motion to approve: C. Anderson Second: D. Bussmann All in favor – Yes - 6 Opposed – J. Wilson Recommendation Passed Next up is 366 Virgil Rd. SUP Application for a Home occupation Level II Ray reports, 2. 366 Virgil Road is an SUP application for a Home Occupation Level 2 business. Second Knob Gifts and Antiques, LLC (which includes Shots by Shana Photography) is closing down their storefront at 129 North Street. The owner proposes to relocate the business to a 1500 sq ft building behind their residence at 366 Virgil Road. The TB would welcome recommendations relative to the site plan (application and SEAF attached). The TB will hold a public hearing at their May meeting. Applicant Shana Karn answers Boards questions. • No public in store, occasional person picking up their order at the door. • Parking, 3-spaces off McClintock Rd. • Deliveries, mostly USPS, rarely UPS maybe once every 2 weeks. • No items on lawn for sale, has a few of larger Antiques from father to get rid of will be on side of garage in the back. • Employees, has one will be full time. 7 RESOLUTION 2022-#3 recommends that the Town Board approve the Site Plan for this project. Motion to approve: S. St Laurent Second: J. Wilson All in favor - Yes Next, we have The Outdoor sign discussion, Ray reports, Paul Simonet from Park Outdoor (owner of most of the billboards along Route 13) would like to make a presentation to the PB about the new electronic signs used in this industry. Our sign law Code Section 270-9.4 (https://ecode360.com/34362721 ) does not presently allow electronic signs, but maybe there are some benefits that make amendments to our sign law worth exploring. Having one LED billboard along Route 13 may allow us to consolidate/eliminate a few of the existing larger billboards. It would also allow for Town of Dryden messaging (such as when we have comp plan meetings to advertise) and other PSAs. I've attached a draft PowerPoint that Paul may use *Park Outdoor Sign Presentation as attachment Board thoughts, lots of discussion on if Dryden needs these types of signs, lots of questions on size, lighting, placement, quantity. Most feel if done correctly and maybe only 1 or 2 in Dryden would look nice. Board wants to take 30 days to poll residents to see what thoughts are. Asked for more details and specifications from Owner. Will meet again on this. Planning Dept. reports they are getting more projects in to review. Town Board reports we are making progress on the Rail Trail underground, laying conduit for the Broadband. Next regular Planning Board Meeting will be June 23, 2022 Meeting adjourned 8:45 pm Respectfully submitted, Joy Foster May 17, 2016 Mr. Gary Sloan 117 Horton Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 RE: Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes, Town of Dryden, NY Traffic Impact Assessment Dear Mr. Sloan: The purpose of this technical letter is to provide an assessment of potential traffic impacts and mitigation needs, if any, related to development of the proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes along NYS Route 366 (Dryden Road) in the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York. The following outlines the results of the study. Existing Conditions The study area consists of the intersection of Dryden Road and the Pineridge Residences driveway in the Town of Dryden, New York, as referenced above. The site location is depicted in Figure 1 – Site Location and Study Area (all figures are included at the end of this letter). Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) is owned and maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT). The highway is functionally classified as an urban minor arterial type highway with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (MPH) with the immediate study area. Dryden Road is generally an east-west highway with one travel lane in each direction. According to the most recent traffic volume data collected by the NYSDOT in 2013, the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) along Dryden Road in the vicinity of the site is 7,126 vehicles per day (vpd). Existing AADT information was obtained from the NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer. The lane geometry at the study intersection and the AADT are depicted in Figure 2. Peak hour traffic volumes were collected by SRF & Associates on Monday, May 9, 2016 for the weekday commuter PM peak hour between 3:45-4:45 PM at the study intersection of Dryden Road/Pineridge Residences. Peak hour volumes for the weekday commuter AM period were obtained from NYSDOT hourly traffic volume data along Dryden Road. Historical AADT traffic volumes were reviewed to determine if adjustments to the volumes were needed to establish 2016 existing base conditions. Based on a slight increase in AADT between 2010 and 2013 according to the Historical Traffic Count Trends in Tompkins County, NY report (Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council, 2015) a 0.5% growth rate per year over the last three years was applied to the 2013 traffic volumes to establish 2016 existing base conditions. The peak hour traffic periods generally occurred between 8:00-9:00 AM and 3:45-4:45 PM. The 2016 existing base peak hour volumes are depicted in Figure 3. 3495 Winton Place Building E, Suite 110 Rochester, NY 14623 phone 585.272.4660 fax 585.272.4662 Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY 2 May 17, 2016 Background Conditions Construction of the proposed development is expected to be completed in approximately one year. The Town of Dryden was contacted to discuss current projects within the project study area that are currently under construction and/or approved. There are no identified projects. To account for normal increases in background traffic growth, including any unforeseen developments in the project study area, a growth rate of 0.5% per year based on historical traffic volumes on Dryden Road has been applied to the existing traffic volumes in the study area for the one-year build-out period. The background traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 4. Proposed Development The proposed development consists of constructing 36 residential townhomes with access onto Dryden Road via a single driveway. The proposed concept site plan is shown on Figure 5. The next step in the evaluation is to determine the additional traffic attributable to the development as defined, vehicle trips entering and exiting the site. The Trip Generation, 9th Edition as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used as a reference for obtaining this information. The trip rate for the peak hour of the generator may or may not coincide in time or volume with the trip rate for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Volumes generated during the peak hour of adjacent street traffic, in this case, the weekday AM and PM peaks, represent a more critical volume when analyzing the capacity of the system; those intervals will provide the basis of this analysis. The volume of site-generated traffic has been estimated based on ITE Land Use Code 230, as shown in Table 1. All trip generation calculations are included in the attachment to this letter. TABLE I - SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Description Units AM Peak PM Peak Enter Exit Enter Exit Townhomes 36 4 19 17 9 The proposed development is anticipated to generate 4 entering/19 exiting vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 17 entering/9 exiting vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. The cumulative effect of site-generated traffic on the transportation network is dependent on the origins and destinations of that traffic and the location of the access drive serving the site. The proposed arrival/departure distribution of traffic generated at this site is considered a function of several parameters, including:  Employment centers in the area;  Proximity to Cornell University and the City of Ithaca;  Existing traffic patterns; and  Existing traffic conditions and controls Based on these parameters, Figure 6 shows the anticipated trip distribution patterns for the proposed development. Figure 7 illustrates the peak hour site-generated traffic based on those percentages. Figure 8 combines the background conditions (Figure 4) and the site-generated trips (Figure 7) to establish the anticipated future traffic volume under full development conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY 3 May 17, 2016 Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis is a technique used for determining a measure of effectiveness for a section of roadway and/or intersection based on the number of vehicles during a specific time period. The measure of effectiveness used for the capacity analysis is referred to as a Level of Service (LOS). Levels of Service are calculated to provide an indication of the amount of delay that a motorist experiences while traveling along a roadway or through an intersection. Since the most amount of delay to motorists usually occurs at intersections, the capacity analysis specifically focuses on intersections. Six Levels of Service are defined for analysis purposes. They are assigned letter designations, from "A" to "F", with LOS "A" representing the best conditions and LOS "F" the worst. Suggested ranges of service capacity and an explanation of Levels of Service are included in the attachments. The standard procedure for capacity analysis of signalized and un-signalized intersections is outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) published by the Transportation Research Board. Traffic analysis software, Synchro 8, which is based on procedures and methodologies contained in the HCM, was used to analyze operating conditions at the study area intersections. The procedure yields a Level of Service (LOS) based on the HCM as an indicator of how well intersections operate. Existing and background operating conditions during the peak study periods are evaluated to determine a basis for comparison with the projected future conditions. The future traffic conditions generated by the proposed development were analyzed to assess the operations of the study area intersections. Capacity results for existing, background, and full build-out conditions are listed in Table II. The discussion following the table summarizes capacity conditions. All capacity analysis calculations are included in the attachments. TABLE II – CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS Intersection Existing Conditions Background Conditions Full Development Conditions AM PM AM PM AM PM Dryden Road/Pineridge Residences Eastbound – Dryden Road A(8.7) A(7.7) A(8.7) A(7.7) A(8.7) A(7.7) Westbound – Dryden Road A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) Northbound – Driveway C(17.9) A(0.0) C(18.0) A(0.0) C(18.2) A(0.0) Southbound – Pineridge Residences B(13.7) B(12.1) B(13.7) B(12.1) B(13.8) B(12.2) Dryden Road/Proposed Driveway Eastbound – Dryden Road A(0.0) A(7.7) A(0.0) A(7.7) A(0.0) A(7.7) Westbound – Dryden Road NA NA A(7.7) A(8.6) Northbound – Proposed Driveway C(15.9) C(15.2) Southbound – Apartments Driveway B(12.3) A(9.4) B(12.4) A(9.4) B(12.4) A(9.4) Notes: A(8.7) = LOS(Delay in seconds per vehicle) NA = Approach does not exist and/or was not analyzed during this condition The capacity analysis results show that all approaches operate at LOS “C” or better during both peak hours under all conditions. An LOS of “C” is projected for the northbound approach at the proposed driveway location during both peak hours; however, this condition is acceptable. No significant adverse impacts are Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY 4 May 17, 2016 projected as a result of the proposed development. A detailed discussion regarding the Sight Distance Evaluation at the proposed driveway is described in the following section. Based on the capacity analysis results, no mitigation is warranted or recommended. Sight Distance Evaluation Sight distance was investigated at the proposed driveway location along Dryden Road. Sight distance is provided at intersections to allow drivers to perceive the presence of potentially conflicting vehicles. This should occur in sufficient time for a motorist to stop or adjust their speed, as appropriate, to avoid a collision at the intersection. Sight distance is also provided at intersections to allow the drivers of stopped vehicles a sufficient view of the intersecting highway to anticipate and avoid potential incidents. If the available sight distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major road, then drivers have sufficient sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. To enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are desirable along the major road. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2011, was used as a reference to establish the required stopping sight distance and desirable intersection sight distance for the proposed site access driveway location. Required stopping distances and desirable intersection sight distances are based on the design speed for a given section of roadway; generally, the design speed is the posted speed limit plus 5 MPH. In this case, the posted speed limit along Dryden Road in the vicinity of the site is 45 MPH. Hence a design speed of 50 MPH was used. The required stopping sight distance and desirable intersection sight distance based on the design speed is shown in Table III. TABLE III – SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT AND MEASUREMENTS Intersection Posted Speed Limit (MPH) Design Speed (MPH) Desirable Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) for Left Turn from Stop (ft) Required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) (ft) Available Sight Distance (ft) to the: Left Right Dryden Road/ Proposed Driveway 45 50 555’ 425’ 780’ 523’ The available sight distance along Dryden Road exceeds the required SSD and desirable ISD at the proposed driveway location to the left (westerly direction). To the right (easterly direction), the required SSD is met, but the desirable ISD is not met. Given that the required SSD is met and the proposed driveway is located immediately adjacent a posted bus stop (advanced warning signage posted for westbound traffic prior to the stop, at Pineridge Residences) with the likely understanding this is a known “slow down” area, and the condition is borderline for the desirable ISD, no mitigation is recommended. Any brush and foliage along the sight lines should be maintained to ensure maximum visibility. Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY 5 May 17, 2016 Conclusions and Recommendations This study evaluates the potential traffic impacts resulting from full build-out of the proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhome Development. Based upon this analysis, the results indicate that the proposed development will not have significant adverse traffic impacts to the existing roadway network. The following sets forth conclusions and recommendations based upon the results of the analyses: 1. The proposed development is anticipated to generate 4 entering/19 exiting vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 17 entering/9 exiting vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. 2. The capacity analysis results show that all approaches operate at LOS “C” or better during both peak hours under all conditions. An LOS of “C” is projected for the northbound approach at the proposed driveway location during both peak hours; however, this condition is acceptable. 3. The available sight distance along Dryden Road exceeds the required SSD and desirable ISD at the proposed driveway location to the left (westerly direction). To the right (easterly direction), the required SSD is met, but the desirable ISD is not met. Given that the required SSD is met and the proposed driveway is located immediately adjacent a posted bus stop (advanced warning signage posted for westbound traffic prior to the stop, at Pineridge Residences) with the likely understanding this is a known “slow down” area, and the condition is borderline for the desirable ISD, no mitigation is recommended. Any brush and foliage along the sight lines should be maintained to ensure maximum visibility. 4. No significant adverse impacts are projected as a result of the proposed development with the potential left-turn lane mitigation in place. If you have any questions or are in need of additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, SRF & Associates Stephen R. Ferranti, P.E., PTOE Principal S:\Projects\2016\36030 1061 Dryden Rd\Report\1061 Dryden Road Townhomes TIA 051716.docx ! !!2 !1 Dryde n R d Fores t L n PROPOSED 1061 DRYDEN ROAD TOWNHOMES ·TOWN OF DRYDEN, NY 0200400100 Feet Legend !Study Intersection !Proposed Intersection Site Location Study Area FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA PROPOSEDPROPOSED 1061 DRYDEN ROAD1061 DRYDEN ROAD TOWNHOMESTOWNHOMES FIGURE 5 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN ATTACHMENT May 17, 2016 Letter to Mr. Gary Sloan Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden Tompkins County, New York 3495 Winton Place Building E, Suite 110 Rochester, NY 14623 COLLECTED TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Fi l e N a m e : R T 3 6 6 . A p t s . P M Si t e C o d e : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St a r t D a t e : 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 6 Pa g e N o : 1 Gr o u p s P r i n t e d - U n s h i f t e d - B a n k 1 - B a n k 2 AP T S A N D 1 0 6 1 So u t h b o u n d RT 3 6 6 We s t b o u n d AP T S A N D 1 0 6 1 No r t h b o u n d RT 3 6 6 Ea s t b o u n d St a r t T i m e Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s In t . T o t a l 03 : 4 5 P M 20 0 0 05 2 0 0 00 0 0 199 0 0 15 4 To t a l 2 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 99 0 0 15 4 04 : 0 0 P M 00 1 0 02 9 0 0 00 0 0 1103 3 0 13 7 04 : 1 5 P M 00 0 0 04 5 0 0 00 0 0 0131 3 0 17 9 04 : 3 0 P M 11 0 0 03 8 0 0 00 0 0 1124 1 0 16 6 Gr a n d T o t a l 31 1 0 0 1 6 4 0 0 00 0 0 3457 7 0 63 6 Ap p r c h % 60 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0. 6 9 7 . 9 1 . 5 0 To t a l % 0. 5 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 0 2 5 . 8 0 0 00 0 0 0. 5 7 1 . 9 1 . 1 0 Un s h i f t e d 3 1 1 0 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 45 7 7 0 63 6 % U n s h i f t e d 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 Ba n k 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % B a n k 1 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 Ba n k 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % B a n k 2 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 SR F & A s s o c i a t e s 34 9 5 W i n t o n P l a c e , B u i l d i n g E , S u i t e 1 1 0 Ro c h e s t e r , N Y 1 4 6 2 3 Fi l e N a m e : R T 3 6 6 . A p t s . P M Si t e C o d e : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St a r t D a t e : 5 / 9 / 2 0 1 6 Pa g e N o : 2 AP T S A N D 1 0 6 1 So u t h b o u n d RT 3 6 6 We s t b o u n d AP T S A N D 1 0 6 1 No r t h b o u n d RT 3 6 6 Ea s t b o u n d St a r t T i m e Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ap p . T o t a l Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ap p . T o t a l Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ap p . T o t a l Ri g h t Th r u Le f t Pe d s Ap p . T o t a l In t . T o t a l Pe a k H o u r A n a l y s i s F r o m 0 3 : 4 5 P M t o 0 4 : 3 0 P M - P e a k 1 o f 1 Pe a k H o u r f o r E n t i r e I n t e r s ec t i o n B e g i n s a t 0 3 : 4 5 P M 03 : 4 5 P M 22 0 52 5 2 00 0 0 0 1 04 : 0 0 P M 00 1 01 02 9 0 0 2 9 00 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 1 0 7 13 7 04 : 1 5 P M 00 0 0 0 04 5 0 0 4 5 00 0 0 0 0 13 1 30 13 4 17 9 04 : 3 0 P M 1 1 00 2 03 8 0 0 3 8 00 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 1 0 1 2 6 16 6 To t a l V o l u m e 3 1 1 0 5 0 16 4 0 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 45 7 7 0 46 7 63 6 % A p p . T o t a l 60 20 20 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 6 97 . 9 1. 5 0 PH F .3 7 5 .2 5 0 .2 5 0 .0 0 0 .6 2 5 .0 0 0 .7 8 8 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .7 8 8 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .7 5 0 .8 7 2 .5 8 3 .0 0 0 .8 7 1 .8 8 8 Un s h i f t e d 31 1 0 5 0 1 6 4 0 0 1 6 4 00 0 0 0 3 4 5 7 7 0 4 6 7 63 6 % U n s h i f t e d 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 Ba n k 1 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 % B a n k 1 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 Ba n k 2 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 % B a n k 2 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 A P T S A N D 1 0 6 1 RT 366 RT 366 A P T S A N D 1 0 6 1 Ri g h t 3 0 0 3 Th r u 1 0 0 1 Le f t 1 0 0 1 Pe d s 0 0 0 0 In Ou t To t a l 7 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 5 Right 0 0 0 0 Thru 164 0 0 164 Left 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 0 Out TotalIn 458 164 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 458 622 164 Le f t 0 0 0 0 Th r u 0 0 0 0 Ri g h t 0 0 0 0 Pe d s 0 0 0 0 Ou t To t a l In 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 Left 7 0 0 7 Thru 457 0 0 457 Right 3 0 0 3 Peds 0 0 0 0 Total OutIn 167 467 634 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 634 467 Pe a k H o u r B e g i n s a t 0 3 : 4 5 P M Un s h i f t e d Ba n k 1 Ba n k 2 Pe a k H o u r D a t a No r t h SR F & A s s o c i a t e s 34 9 5 W i n t o n P l a c e , B u i l d i n g E , S u i t e 1 1 0 Ro c h e s t e r , N Y 1 4 6 2 3 MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS Ro a d w a y T r a f f i c C o u n t H o u r l y R e p o r t STA T I O N : 36 0 0 1 4 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 30 FA C T O R G R O U P : 45 SP E E D L I M I T: 10 0 3 3 4 DO T I D : FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 RE F. M A R K E R : EN D M I L E P O S T: LA N E S B Y D I R : TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 16 - U M i n o r A r t e r i a l FU N C . C L A S S : 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: Dr y d e n - To w n - 0 2 4 0 MU N I : CC S T N : BI N : RR C R O S S I N G : HP M S S A M P L E : DAT E DA I LY TO T A L HI G H CO U N T HI G H HO U R 00 - 0 1 01 - 0 2 02 - 0 3 03 - 0 4 04 - 0 5 05 - 0 6 06 - 0 7 07 - 0 8 08 - 0 9 09 - 1 0 10 - 11 11 - 1 2 12 - 1 3 13 - 1 4 14 - 1 5 15 - 1 6 16 - 1 7 17 - 1 8 18 - 1 9 19 - 2 0 20 - 2 1 21 - 2 2 22 - 2 3 23 - 2 4 BE G I N D AT E : 10 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 AD D L D A T A : Ve h i c l e CO U N T T Y P E : EB L a n e NO T E S 1 : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1, 2 ST D I R C O D E : 1 W A Y C O D E : WB L a n e NO T E S 2 : FE D D I R C O D E : TS T- d n m TA K E N B Y : R0 3 - J A B PR O C E S S E D B Y: DO T- R 0 3 R 3 W W 4 2 BAT C H I D : 01 - N Y S D O T JU R I S D I C T I O N : 4. 6 5 3, 7 42 WE E K O F Y E A R : Ne w Y o r k S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 E a s t 1 W e s t 10 / 1 5 , T u e 31 8 36 4 42 2 47 2 57 1 72 5 58 3 38 1 25 3 21 5 17 8 11 8 80 46 8 0 10 / 1 6 , W e d 47 37 19 31 49 11 1 32 3 72 9 65 9 42 3 33 3 33 0 36 8 36 9 48 3 56 8 73 4 64 7 35 8 25 9 19 3 15 0 10 8 66 73 9 4 73 4 16 - 1 7 10 / 1 7 , T h u 39 27 20 37 49 11 9 33 8 74 4 68 5 46 0 311 34 4 37 7 35 5 45 2 55 9 71 5 62 3 37 7 23 0 18 1 15 7 10 7 50 73 5 6 74 4 07 - 0 8 10 / 1 8 , F r i 29 22 15 38 52 94 31 7 70 4 62 7 41 3 23 11 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y H O U R S (Ax l e F a c t o re d , M o n 6 A M t o F r i N o o n ) 38 29 18 35 50 10 8 32 6 72 6 65 7 43 2 32 2 33 1 37 0 38 2 46 9 56 6 72 5 61 8 37 2 24 7 19 6 16 2 11 1 65 73 5 4 AW D T DAY S Co u n t e d WE E K D AY Ho u r s WE E K D AY S Co u n t e d HO U R S Co u n t e d Cr e a t e d o n : Pa g e 1 o f 3 DV 2 0 12 / 0 5 / 2 0 1 3 1 3 : 4 6 ES T I M AT E D AA D T 3 71 72 6 9. 9 51 2 14 . 4 54 8 14 . 5 3 71 71 2 6 34 5 3 36 7 3 FA C T O R Mo n t h Se a s o n a l Su n Mo n Tu e We d Th u Fr i Sa t Ax l 10 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: 36 0 0 1 4 STA T I O N : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1. 0 3 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y Hi g h H o u r Ro a d w a y % o f d a y % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r Ea s t % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r We s t We s t Ea s t Ro a d w a y EB T r a f f i c C o u n t H o u r l y R e p o r t STA T I O N : 36 0 0 1 4 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 30 FA C T O R G R O U P : 45 SP E E D L I M I T: 10 0 3 3 4 DO T I D : FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 RE F. M A R K E R : EN D M I L E P O S T: LA N E S B Y D I R : TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 16 - U M i n o r A r t e r i a l FU N C . C L A S S : 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: Dr y d e n - To w n - 0 2 4 0 MU N I : CC S T N : BI N : RR C R O S S I N G : HP M S S A M P L E : DAT E DA I LY TO T A L HI G H CO U N T HI G H HO U R 00 - 0 1 01 - 0 2 02 - 0 3 03 - 0 4 04 - 0 5 05 - 0 6 06 - 0 7 07 - 0 8 08 - 0 9 09 - 1 0 10 - 11 11 - 1 2 12 - 1 3 13 - 1 4 14 - 1 5 15 - 1 6 16 - 1 7 17 - 1 8 18 - 1 9 19 - 2 0 20 - 2 1 21 - 2 2 22 - 2 3 23 - 2 4 BE G I N D AT E : 10 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 AD D L D A T A : Ve h i c l e CO U N T T Y P E : EB L a n e NO T E S 1 : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1, 2 ST D I R C O D E : 1 W A Y C O D E : WB L a n e NO T E S 2 : FE D D I R C O D E : TS T- d n m TA K E N B Y : R0 3 - J A B PR O C E S S E D B Y: DO T- R 0 3 R 3 W W 4 2 BAT C H I D : 01 - N Y S D O T JU R I S D I C T I O N : 4. 6 5 3 42 WE E K O F Y E A R : Ne w Y o r k S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 E a s t 10 / 1 5 , T u e 14 7 16 4 24 7 27 3 35 1 51 6 35 7 20 4 13 4 11 7 10 2 53 36 27 0 1 10 / 1 6 , W e d 18 16 12 7 7 18 79 16 7 18 0 15 0 14 0 14 6 20 8 18 1 31 6 38 0 51 4 42 5 20 5 15 0 11 7 85 51 40 36 1 2 51 4 16 - 1 7 10 / 1 7 , T h u 21 16 12 9 5 25 89 19 0 19 8 18 4 13 6 16 1 20 9 18 4 26 6 36 9 50 6 38 3 20 3 13 8 10 1 97 51 23 35 7 6 50 6 16 - 1 7 10 / 1 8 , F r i 20 11 9 12 11 17 73 17 7 18 5 14 9 66 4 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y H O U R S (Ax l e F a c t o re d , M o n 6 A M t o F r i N o o n ) 20 14 11 9 8 20 80 17 8 18 8 16 1 13 8 15 1 19 4 20 4 28 5 36 7 51 2 38 8 20 4 14 1 11 2 95 52 33 35 6 4 AW D T DAY S Co u n t e d WE E K D AY Ho u r s WE E K D AY S Co u n t e d HO U R S Co u n t e d Cr e a t e d o n : Pa g e 2 o f 3 DV 2 0 12 / 0 5 / 2 0 1 3 1 3 : 4 6 ES T I M AT E D AA D T 3 71 72 6 9. 9 51 2 14 . 4 54 8 14 . 5 3 71 71 2 6 34 5 3 36 7 3 FA C T O R Mo n t h Se a s o n a l Su n Mo n Tu e We d Th u Fr i Sa t Ax l 10 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: 36 0 0 1 4 STA T I O N : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1. 0 3 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y Hi g h H o u r Ro a d w a y % o f d a y % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r Ea s t % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r We s t We s t Ea s t Ro a d w a y WB T r a f f i c C o u n t H o u r l y R e p o r t STA T I O N : 36 0 0 1 4 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 30 FA C T O R G R O U P : 45 SP E E D L I M I T: 10 0 3 3 4 DO T I D : FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 RE F. M A R K E R : EN D M I L E P O S T: LA N E S B Y D I R : TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 16 - U M i n o r A r t e r i a l FU N C . C L A S S : 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: Dr y d e n - To w n - 0 2 4 0 MU N I : CC S T N : BI N : RR C R O S S I N G : HP M S S A M P L E : DAT E DA I LY TO T A L HI G H CO U N T HI G H HO U R 00 - 0 1 01 - 0 2 02 - 0 3 03 - 0 4 04 - 0 5 05 - 0 6 06 - 0 7 07 - 0 8 08 - 0 9 09 - 1 0 10 - 11 11 - 1 2 12 - 1 3 13 - 1 4 14 - 1 5 15 - 1 6 16 - 1 7 17 - 1 8 18 - 1 9 19 - 2 0 20 - 2 1 21 - 2 2 22 - 2 3 23 - 2 4 BE G I N D AT E : 10 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 AD D L D A T A : Ve h i c l e CO U N T T Y P E : EB L a n e NO T E S 1 : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1, 2 ST D I R C O D E : 1 W A Y C O D E : WB L a n e NO T E S 2 : FE D D I R C O D E : TS T- d n m TA K E N B Y : R0 3 - J A B PR O C E S S E D B Y: DO T- R 0 3 R 3 W W 4 2 BAT C H I D : 01 - N Y S D O T JU R I S D I C T I O N : 4. 6 5 7 42 WE E K O F Y E A R : Ne w Y o r k S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n 1 W e s t 10 / 1 5 , T u e 17 1 20 0 17 5 19 9 22 0 20 9 22 6 17 7 11 9 98 76 65 44 19 7 9 10 / 1 6 , W e d 29 21 7 24 42 93 24 4 56 2 47 9 27 3 19 3 18 4 16 0 18 8 16 7 18 8 22 0 22 2 15 3 10 9 76 65 57 26 37 8 2 56 2 07 - 0 8 10 / 1 7 , T h u 18 11 8 28 44 94 24 9 55 4 48 7 27 6 17 5 18 3 16 8 17 1 18 6 19 0 20 9 24 0 17 4 92 80 60 56 27 37 8 0 55 4 07 - 0 8 10 / 1 8 , F r i 9 11 6 26 41 77 24 4 52 7 44 2 26 4 16 4 7 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y H O U R S (Ax l e F a c t o re d , M o n 6 A M t o F r i N o o n ) 19 14 7 26 42 88 24 6 54 8 46 9 27 1 18 4 17 9 17 6 17 8 18 4 19 9 21 3 22 9 16 8 10 7 85 67 59 32 37 9 1 AW D T DAY S Co u n t e d WE E K D AY Ho u r s WE E K D AY S Co u n t e d HO U R S Co u n t e d Cr e a t e d o n : Pa g e 3 o f 3 DV 2 0 12 / 0 5 / 2 0 1 3 1 3 : 4 6 ES T I M AT E D AA D T 3 71 72 6 9. 9 51 2 14 . 4 54 8 14 . 5 3 71 71 2 6 34 5 3 36 7 3 FA C T O R Mo n t h Se a s o n a l Su n Mo n Tu e We d Th u Fr i Sa t Ax l 10 RO U T E / R O A D : NY 3 6 6 FR O M : OL D RT 3 9 2 TO : STA R T 1 3 / 3 6 6 O L A P 3- TO M P K I N S RE G I O N - C O U N T Y: 36 0 0 1 4 STA T I O N : .6 8 4 M i l e W o f H l R d PL A C E M E N T: 1. 0 3 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 1. 0 0 AV E R A G E W E E K D A Y Hi g h H o u r Ro a d w a y % o f d a y % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r Ea s t % o f d a y Hi g h H o u r We s t We s t Ea s t Ro a d w a y Project Name:1061 Dryden Road TownhomesNo:36030Date:5/13/2016City:DrydenState/Province:New YorkZip/Postal Code:Country:United StatesClient Name:SloanAnalyst's Name:DLKEdition:ITE-TGM 9th Edition Land Use Size Entry Exit Entry Exit230 - Residential Condominium/Townhouse 36 Dwelling Units 4 19 17 9 Project Information AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PR O P O S E D 1 0 6 1 D R Y D E N R O A D T O W N H O M E S TO W N O F D R Y D E N , N Y AM P E A K Nu m o f y r s 1 20 1 6 To t a l F U L L En t e r E x i t Tr i p s I N T r i p s O U T Si t e B u i l d 0. 5 % D i s t . % D i s t . % 4 1 9 Tr i p s Vol u m e s 1 Dr y d e n R o a d / Pi n e r i d g e R e s i d e n c e s / D r i v e w a y SR 1 0 1 0 1 0 ST SL 3 3 3 WR 1 1 1 WT 5 5 6 5 5 9 3 0 % 1 1 5 6 0 WL NR NT NL 3 3 3 ER ET 1 9 1 1 9 2 3 0 % 6 6 1 9 8 EL 2 2 2 2 Dr y d e n R o a d / A p a r t m e n t s D r i v e w a y Pr o p o s e d D r i v e w a y SR 2 2 2 ST SL WR WT 5 6 9 5 7 2 5 7 2 WL 3 0 % 1 1 1 NR 3 0 % 6 6 6 NT NL 7 0 % 1 3 1 3 1 3 ER 7 0 % 3 3 3 ET 1 9 3 1 9 4 1 9 4 EL Pr o p o s e d T o w n h o m e s Ba s e Vo l u m e LO C A T I O N NU M B E R IN T E R S E C T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N Bk g d Vo l u m e PR O P O S E D 1 0 6 1 D R Y D E N R O A D T O W N H O M E S TO W N O F D R Y D E N , N Y PM P E A K Nu m o f y r s 1 20 1 6 To t a l F U L L En t e r E x i t T r i p s I N T r i p s O U T Si t e B u i l d 0. 5 % D i s t . % D i s t . % 1 7 9 Tr i p s Vol u m e s 1 Dr y d e n R o a d / Pi n e r i d g e R e s i d e n c e s / D r i v e w a y SR 3 3 3 ST 1 1 1 SL 1 1 1 WR W T 1 6 4 1 6 5 3 0 % 5 5 1 7 0 WL NR NT NL ER 3 3 3 ET 4 5 7 4 5 9 3 0 % 3 3 4 6 2 EL 7 7 7 2 Dr y d e n R o a d / A p a r t m e n t s D r i v e w a y Pr o p o s e d D r i v e w a y SR 1 1 1 ST SL WR W T 1 6 7 1 6 8 1 6 8 W L 3 0 % 5 5 5 NR 3 0 % 3 3 3 NT NL 7 0 % 6 6 6 ER 7 0 % 1 2 1 2 1 2 ET 4 6 7 4 6 9 4 6 9 EL 1 1 1 Pr o p o s e d T o w n h o m e s Ex i s t i n g Vo l u m e LO C A T I O N NU M B E R IN T E R S E C T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N Bk g d Vo l u m e LEVEL OF SERVICE: CRITERIA/DEFINITIONS Level of Service Criteria Highway Capacity Manual 2010 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, based on service measures such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, and convenience. Level of Service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay specifically, average total delay per vehicle for a 15 minute analysis period. The ranges are as follows: Level Control Delay of per vehicle Service (seconds) A < 10 B 10 – 20 C 20 – 35 D 35 – 55 E 55 – 80 F >80 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service for unsignalized intersections is also defined in terms of delay. However, the delay criteria are different from a signalized intersection. The primary reason for this is driver expectation that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher volumes than an unsignalized intersection. The total delay threshold for any given Level of Service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. The ranges are as follows: Level Control Delay of per vehicle Service (seconds) A < 10 B 10 – 15 C 15 – 25 D 25 – 35 E 35 - 50 F >50 LEVEL OF SERVICE: CALCULATIONS Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Base Conditions - AM Peak Hour1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 1 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 2 191 0 0 556 1 3 0 0 3 0 10Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 2 220 0 0 598 1 4 0 0 4 0 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 599 0 0 220 0 0 829 823 220 822 822 598 Stage 1 - - - - - - 224 224 - 598 598 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 605 599 - 224 224 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - - 1349 - - 290 309 820 293 309 502 Stage 1 - - - - - - 779 718 - 489 491 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 485 490 - 779 718 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - - 1349 - - 282 308 820 293 308 502Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 282 308 - 293 308 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 777 717 - 488 491 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 473 490 - 777 717 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 17.9 13.7HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 282 978 - - 1349 - - 431HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.002 - - - - - 0.038HCM Control Delay (s) 17.9 8.7 0 - 0 - - 13.7HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Base Conditions - AM Peak Hour2: Dryen Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 2 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRVol, veh/h 0 193 569 0 0 2Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 93 93 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 222 612 0 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 612 0 - 0 834 612 Stage 1 - - - - 612 - Stage 2 - - - - 222 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 967 - - - 338 493 Stage 1 - - - - 541 - Stage 2 - - - - 815 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 967 - - - 338 493Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 338 - Stage 1 - - - - 541 - Stage 2 - - - - 815 - Approach EB WB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.3HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 967 - - - 493HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.005HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 12.3HCM Lane LOS A - - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 1 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 7 457 3 0 164 0 0 0 0 1 1 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 92 92 92 62 62 62Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 525 3 0 208 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 208 0 0 529 0 0 754 751 527 751 753 208 Stage 1 - - - - - - 543 543 - 208 208 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 211 208 - 543 545 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 - - 1038 - - 326 340 551 327 339 832 Stage 1 - - - - - - 524 520 - 794 730 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 791 730 - 524 519 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 - - 1038 - - 321 337 551 325 336 832Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 321 337 - 325 336 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 516 - 788 730 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 785 730 - 520 515 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0 12.1HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) - 1363 - - 1038 - - 518HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.016HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.7 0 - 0 - - 12.1HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 2 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRVol, veh/h 1 469 168 0 0 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 79 79 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 1 539 213 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 213 0 - 0 754 213 Stage 1 - - - - 213 - Stage 2 - - - - 541 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - - 377 827 Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 583 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - - 377 827Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 377 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 582 - Approach EB WB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.4HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 1357 - - - 827HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.002HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 9.4HCM Lane LOS A A - - AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - AM Peak Hour1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 1 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 2 192 0 0 559 1 3 0 0 3 0 10Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 2 221 0 0 601 1 4 0 0 4 0 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 602 0 0 221 0 0 833 827 221 827 827 602 Stage 1 - - - - - - 225 225 - 602 602 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 608 602 - 225 225 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1348 - - 288 307 819 291 307 500 Stage 1 - - - - - - 778 718 - 486 489 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 483 489 - 778 718 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1348 - - 280 306 819 291 306 500Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 280 306 - 291 306 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 776 717 - 485 489 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 471 489 - 776 717 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 18 13.7HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 280 975 - - 1348 - - 429HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.002 - - - - - 0.038HCM Control Delay (s) 18 8.7 0 - 0 - - 13.7HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - AM Peak Hour2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 2 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRVol, veh/h 0 194 572 0 0 2Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 93 93 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 0 223 615 0 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 615 0 - 0 838 615 Stage 1 - - - - 615 - Stage 2 - - - - 223 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - - 336 491 Stage 1 - - - - 539 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - - 336 491Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 336 - Stage 1 - - - - 539 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 - Approach EB WB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 12.4HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 965 - - - 491HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.005HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 12.4HCM Lane LOS A - - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - PM Peak Hour1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 1 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 7 459 3 0 165 0 0 0 0 1 1 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 92 92 92 62 62 62Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 528 3 0 209 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 209 0 0 531 0 0 757 754 529 754 756 209 Stage 1 - - - - - - 545 545 - 209 209 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 212 209 - 545 547 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1362 - - 1036 - - 324 338 550 326 337 831 Stage 1 - - - - - - 523 519 - 793 729 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 790 729 - 523 517 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1362 - - 1036 - - 319 335 550 324 334 831Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 319 335 - 324 334 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 519 515 - 787 729 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 784 729 - 519 513 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0 12.1HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) - 1362 - - 1036 - - 516HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.016HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.7 0 - 0 - - 12.1HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - PM Peak Hour2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 2 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRVol, veh/h 1 469 168 0 0 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop StopRT Channelized - None - None - NoneStorage Length - - - - 0 -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 79 79 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 1 539 213 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 213 0 - 0 754 213 Stage 1 - - - - 213 - Stage 2 - - - - 541 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - - 377 827 Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 583 -Platoon blocked, % - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - - 377 827Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 377 - Stage 1 - - - - 823 - Stage 2 - - - - 582 - Approach EB WB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.4HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 1357 - - - 827HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.002HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 9.4HCM Lane LOS A A - - AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - AM Peak Hour 1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report SRF & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 198 0 0 560 1 3 0 0 3 0 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 228 0 0 602 1 4 0 0 4 0 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 603 0 0 228 0 0 841 835 228 835 835 603 Stage 1 - - - - - - 232 232 - 603 603 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 609 603 - 232 232 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1340 - - 284 304 811 287 304 499 Stage 1 - - - - - - 771 713 - 486 488 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 482 488 - 771 713 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1340 - - 276 303 811 287 303 499 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 276 303 - 287 303 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 769 712 - 485 488 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 470 488 - 769 712 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 18.2 13.8 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 276 975 - - 1340 - - 426 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.002 -----0.038 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.2 8.7 0 - 0 - - 13.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - AM Peak Hour 2: Proposed Driveway/Apartments Driveway & Dryen Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report SRF & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 194 3 1 572 0 13 0 6 0 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 223 3 1 615 0 16 0 8 0 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 615 0 0 226 0 0 843 842 225 845 843 615 Stage 1 - - - - - - 225 225 - 617 617 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 618 617 - 228 226 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - 1342 - - 284 301 814 283 300 491 Stage 1 - - - - - - 778 718 - 477 481 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 477 481 - 775 717 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - 1342 - - 282 301 814 280 300 491 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 282 301 - 280 300 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 778 718 - 477 481 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 474 481 - 768 717 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 15.9 12.4 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 355 965 - - 1342 - - 491 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - - 0.001 - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.9 0 - - 7.7 0 - 12.4 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - PM Peak Hour1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 1 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 7 462 3 0 170 0 0 0 0 1 1 3Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 80 80 80 62 62 62Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 8 531 3 0 215 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 215 0 0 534 0 0 767 764 533 764 766 215 Stage 1 - - - - - - 549 549 - 215 215 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 218 215 - 549 551 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 - - 1034 - - 319 334 547 321 333 825 Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 516 - 787 725 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 784 725 - 520 515 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 - - 1034 - - 314 331 547 319 330 825Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 314 331 - 319 330 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 516 512 - 781 725 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 778 725 - 516 511 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0 12.2HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) - 1355 - - 1034 - - 510HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - - 0.016HCM Control Delay (s) 0 7.7 0 - 0 - - 12.2HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - BHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - PM Peak Hour2: Proposed Driveway & Dryen Road 5/16/2016 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 ReportSRF & Associates Page 2 IntersectionInt Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRVol, veh/h 1 469 12 5 168 0 6 0 3 0 0 1Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop StopRT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - NoneStorage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 80 80 80 80 80 80Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Mvmt Flow 1 539 14 6 213 0 8 0 4 0 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2Conflicting Flow All 213 0 0 553 0 0 774 773 546 775 780 213 Stage 1 - - - - - - 548 548 - 225 225 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 226 225 - 550 555 -Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - 1017 - - 316 330 538 315 327 827 Stage 1 - - - - - - 521 517 - 778 718 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 777 718 - 519 513 -Platoon blocked, % - - - -Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 - - 1017 - - 314 327 538 311 324 827Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 314 327 - 311 324 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 516 - 777 713 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 770 713 - 515 512 - Approach EB WB NB SBHCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 15.2 9.4HCM LOS C A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1Capacity (veh/h) 365 1357 - - 1017 - - 827HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.001 - - 0.006 - - 0.002HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 7.7 0 - 8.6 0 - 9.4HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - AHCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - - 0 Town of Dryden March, 2022 About Park Outdoor CNY based Company Family based ownership, VERY involved with the Community Headquarters is in Ithaca Four Divisions (Syracuse/Utica/Binghamton/Finger Lakes) 60+ employees 95% of our sign inventory is in CNY We value our locations in Dryden Locations along Route 13 Mostly local businesses advertise on this inventory We are sympathetic to issues regarding signs near trail Current Trends in the Industry Industry is requiring more digital offerings: This direction is being forced on the Outdoor Sign Industry and POA Advertising Agencies are integrating outdoor signs with other digital strategies Government entities are migrating to digital technology Public Service announcements Amber alerts Weather or hazards can be communicated immediately More advanced companies require more dynamic messaging More advertising per location More than 7 times that of a static board Client can change messages daily to highlight different offerings Breakfast, lunch and dinner specials on a daily basis Digital can be integrated to other forms of media Fascinating realities associated with the change in direction in advertising FHWA/NYSDOT Sign Safety Requirements FHWA has vetted technologies and safeguards: $ Millions spent by FHWA on studies and field trials to identify best practices NYSDOT permit required: In the unlikely event the sign does cause statistical increase in accidents, the DOT can require the sign’s immediate removal Technology rivals redundancy found on USN ships! Our signs are monitored by NYSDOT. Requirements include: Brightness and self dimming; ongoing monitoring by POA A minimum of 8 seconds per turn, no motion whatsoever, instant display changes Distance from each other along highway is 2500 feet NOT what you see at “the local drug store” or “on-premise signs” Recent Digital Sign Locations Nearby Cortland area Tompkins Street Route 281 Cortlandville Route 13 Gutchess Sports Complex Elmira Area City of Elmira Town of Horseheads Town of Big Flats Town of Barton Town of Watkins Glen Anticipated Future Activities: Corning Hornell Painted Post Binghamton Area City of Binghamton Town of Union Town of Vestal Village of Endicott Town of Norwich Anticipated future activities: Village of Johnson City Owego Fenton Intrinsic Values of Signs Advertising Integrates digital technologies…much more flexible, dynamic Public Service Announcements Charities Municipal notices/emergency messages Amber alert Property owner revenue Solid income for minimal space Local Business brand development A presence “just works” Possible Sign Locations Example Location along Route 13 behind Finger Lakes Library Example location Example location Our Final Proposal will address: Sign structure specifics Type of structure Size of face Aesthetics associated with immediate property Protocol for emergencies and occasional Town PSAs Requires creating realistic protocols We are all for safety! Cap and Replace candidates Any concerns raised by the Town