The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTB Correspondence 2017Frc�rn: Janell� Alvstad-Mattsan [mailta:'�� rn�il.c�rrr� ��ata Thursday, January i9, 2017 10:52 AM To; Laura Pastore; Paulette %rwilliger �aabj��t: Better signage an 5nyder Hill Road? Hello, I live �t 214 Snycler� Fiill Road. I've talked to the Tow1i af Ithaca a bit abc�ut ihis it� the }aast, blrt I feel like it needs to �et addressed again. Would it be at all possible to get some better sign��e c�i7 �nyd�;r ��i11 Road near Dove Drive and SkyVue? This is the only stretcl� of SHR that� still has barely a shoulder. T11ere ar� pe;destrians whc� neeci to �Falk on this stretch in order ta �et tc� parks and trails z�earby. (7n top of that, it's a stee�� p��rt� oi the hill ��ncl cars are coming izito town �re comin� fi•c►m a less detzsely popt�lated area of SHR, so tlespite th�: �fcw si�;ns �th�t sl�ow the 40rnph speed limit, many of the cars arc going 55 ar faster. Next year t1�e ��ark c�n I7ove L7rive is �etting a new playground. This will only increasc pedestrian traffic oyi and across Snyder �-Iil1 Ro1d in tlzis �rea. I feel a crosswalk at Dove and Skyvue �l�d/ar pe�estrian sigr7s could greatly reduce risk for th�se �aedestri�yls. It would be a visual indicator f�r cars to rc�d�.ice speed and/or increase awareness. Please cansider this, faz� aur childreti's safety and our own. I'm includirig ��low tl�e ]a171ent I p�zt� on Facebook t1�is rtlorning regardizlg tl�is z��tter. 'I�his is a daily struggle %r our family. I've redliced myself to making my ov��n "SLOW DOWN" signs to post araund aur driveway so people ��on't drive so fast as my cliildret� wait for the bus (the bus th�it stc�ps in frotit of our h�use� only because of n-�y constant battle with the ICSD bus �ara�e that corltinues to make our oftici�l btis stop at the coriier of SHR aild Dove). Janelle Alvs�tad-Mattso�n 214 S�iyder Hill Ttoad Ithaca ��;� �' G'� ��°�r� 1 �� r � �� ", /n r= ""'; � �� »��tt��6�� A��d� ��ro Every day I take my dog far a walk. in order to da this, I need to walk a block an a section afi 40 mph suburban road with no sidewalk and very little shaulder. �learly every day cars drive by me on this stretch going between 40 and 55 miles an hour. C7f these cars approximately 70% of them da not mave aver even siightly despite the fact that nothing is coming in the apposite direction. WHY?????? Is it that di�cult for you ta puil your car slightly toward the middie of the road in order to ensure the safety and cornfort of pedestrians? Does veering left far 5 seconds inconvenience you that much? I just don't get it. r^ �r+� rr�� ,��a� l�q��¢�•��tk�� Here's a pic af my shoulder: • ,, �,,,n r,. ,F r�., ,:, .. . ,,. a, : , , . � , -�r ,nM,,,��, ,,,,��, a, ,,., � , �„ � �,� , , ,, ;,,;1, , , ,.,� , .�,.�,�<, , n �,,. ,m . �„G,:>..,,,,,, <, � � „r ,.,,�:�, ,, ,,, ,o�.. ,,. �,,:,.�,,,�, Frorv�: Janelle Alvstad-Mattson <janelleam@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:39 PM To: Paulette Terwilliger Subject: Re: Better signage on 5nyder Hill Road? Ms. Tei•williger, I have oile n�ore thing to submit in regard to tlze mattez•. My friend who lives at 171 Snyder IIill Road just commented in response ta my Facebook post. Thank you. �,r��a��i� �9��s��c�a� J�ar�i�� i live very close to Janelle -- less than 1/4 mile on the same road. This is a picture of my driveway on January 10. Do you think the car on the left was going 40 mph? Granted, it was an icy night, but I am haunted by the thaught that we could have been outside with our dag. Ui�lik� � ��ply � �� o��if��:>a , U�u �� ° � , ��a.uw �. �r��r�� l��rs��;�� J�r��a P.S. I puli away from the side, and I slaw down a lot. But I also avoid walking an our road and an Ellis Hollow Road. tJr�like � ��pBy 1 r" ��i�-�s:, '�, � a�� . . . �.M� .v .. ��0��6� �E��s�► Ja�rc�� P.P.S. in the past 20 years, two pedestrians have been hit by cars in frant of aur hause. Both were hit and runs. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Janelle Alvstad-Mattson <��Y��1��r��Cr`)� 7�rt�xii �;�»��> ��rote: Thank you On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Pa�tlette Terwilliger ��"1 cr•�r��11i ��:r ir)t«wn;�itl�,�z��z�iy.��> wrote: °�'har�k ycr�a Ms. Alvst�d-IVlattsc�n, I have cc'c� the �`�wrr Ba�rd �r�d tt7is will g� in ihe ccrrr�spand�nce folder for their r�vaeuv ar�d comr�l�r�t. �a�al��te �'�r�rvilli�er � Tompkins �ounty Industrlal Development Agency Administration pravicled by �Tl..� january 19, 2Q17 Bill Goodman 215 North Tiaga Sfreet Ithaca NY 14850 Re: Off-Sife Commercial Solar Photovoltaic Policy Dear Mr. Goodman, The Tompkins Counfy IDA is contemplating the adoption of an Off-Site Commercial �olar Photovoltaic Policy. The policy is enclosed for your review. The TCIDA Board respectfully requests camments by February $, 2017 for discussion at the next regularly scheduled TDA Board meeting on February 9, 2017. Comments may be mailed to the II7A Board at the address below or emailed to me at: heatherm@tcad.org I will also be presenting the proposed policy at the Tampkins �ounty Council of Governments meeting on February 23, 2017 at 4:OOpm if anyone is interested in participating in fhe discussion. .� � � ;;�.�.:.�._.'�► � 11►�►�: '+ �� Heather I7. McDaniel Administrative Director Encl: Off-Site Commercial Solar Phatovoltaic Policy 401 E MLK Straet, Suite 4Q2B, Ithaca, New Yark 14850 • phone: (607} 273-0005 • fax: {60'7) 2�3-8964 To�r�pkins County Industrial Develapment Agen Off-Site Commerciat Solar Photavoltaic Palicy Draft - December 28, 2Q16 Purpose The Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency {IDA) wishes ta adopt an off-site cornmercial solar photovoltaic palicy to encourage solar development for the foilawing purposes; 1. Support New York State's "Reforrning the Energy Vision" Initiative, which is intended ta encaurage renewable energy development that will spur econamic growth and develap new energy business models. The initiative sets statewide gaais of.cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80°lo by 2050 and generating SO°!a af New York's electricity from renewables by 203Q. 2. Support Tompkins County's energy and greenhouse gas emissions palicy to "meet community needs without contributing additional greenhouse gases to the atmosphere." The policy includes gaals ta: - Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach a minimum 80 percent reduction from 20081evels by 2050 and reduce reliance on fossil fuels across all sectors. - Increase the use of local and regional renewable energy sources and technologies. 3. Support consumer chaice for renewable energy generation. 4. Administer a single countywide unifarm ta7c exemption policy allowing municipalities ta collect long-term predictabie payments in lieu of taxes withaut the burden of developing and administering PILOT agreements at the municipal level. 5. Assist project develapers by offering a single countywide tax exemptian policy, eliminating the need to negotiate PILOTS with multiple taxing jurisdictions. 6. To enhance deveiopers' prospects for financing community distributed generation projects by offering a uniform PILOT structure that is simpie, predictable, and mare appealing to lenders. Policv This policy pravides incentives for off-site solar projects that provide renewable energy benefits ta residential and commercial customers. Eligibie projects commerciai scale prajects, generally twa megawatts or less, as autlined in state law. Types of eligible projects inciude: • Community distributed solar Jshared salar • Off-site generatian projects that have a wholesale power purchase agreement with ane or i��"TT�T�.��F� To respect variations in local municipal policy, each project application must include a letter from the host municipality endarsing the praposed payment in lieu of tax agreement with the IDA. It is strangiy encouraged that applicants provide a preference or pre-offering to Tampkins County residents. The following standard incentives will be offered: Property Tax: Real estate taxes an the increased value resulting frarn improvements are partially abated over a twenty (20) year period. The annual payment in lieu of t�es {PILO.T) is $8,400 per megawatt (MW} af the facility's nameplate capacity, with a 2°lo increase each year. Tompl�ins County Industrlal Development Agency Sales Tax: Exernption from State and local sales t� on project casts outlined in the IDA Policies and Pracedures. Mortgage Recording Tax: Exemption from the State share of the mortgage recording tax as autiined in the IDA policies and Procedures. Fees The applicant is responsible for paying the IDA Adrninistrative Fee at the time of closing. The fee will be equal ta .SO°!o of the total value of expenses that are positively impacted by IL}A incentives. The applicant is alsa responsible for paying the IDA far a11 legat casts it incurs including IDA Caunsel. C}ther Unless specifically outlined in this policy, the appiicant wi11 be respansible for complying with alI ofiher rules and regulations as set forth in the IDA's Policies and Procedures. Palicy appraved: Paulette Terwilliger From: Mary Beth O'Cannor <maconnor@ithaca.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2Q1711:40 AM Ta: supervisor@townofcaroline.org; cal snaw@townofcaroline.org; Irene_Weiser@townafcaraline.org; gary_reinbolt@townofcaroline.arg; jahn_fracchia@tawnafcaraline.org Cc: clerk@tawnofcaroline.arg; supervisor@dryden.ny.us; townclerk@dryden.ny.us; supervisar@townofdanbyny.org; townclerk@townafdanbyny.org; Bill Goodman; Paulette Terwilliger Subject: Proposed Trail Hello Everyane, I originally wrote this to send to a list serve I'm on, where the cammentary has been utterly dismissive of anyane not suppartive of the propased trail. Mare after the italicized part. J jusf want to say that / think it's irrrportant to reeognize that rrrany people have legi�irnate concerns about the proposed extension of the recreation way. For severa/ property owners, the proposed trail wvu/d run right fhrough their /and—through fheir orchards, their farms, their yards. 1 ask you to consider haw you wou/d feel if a graup of peop/e wanfed �o establish a frail fhrough your backyard. /f's not a matter of b/owing ouf of propartion ihe possible dangers of "mofher rapers" or a kind of bJindness % the proposed benefits of such a trail to the public. But from what 1've read on this list serve and others, propanenfs of the trail seem �o have established an "us versus them" rnentality.• property owners who do not want a paved public trail running through their land must tre somehow selfish or evil—c�r simp/y bad terrrpered. J'm a cross country skier, and a hiker, and a cycfist. Would if be nice to have a way to iravel befween 8rooktondale and lihaca that's no� on route 79 or Coddingfon Road? Sure—if fhat doesn't inierfere with anyone's property rights or desire to have their surroundings remain private and rural. But in fhis case, fhe proposed trail does interfere with those rights and desires. l moved �o Brookfanda/e, purchased acreage and an o/d farmhouse precisely because l wanfed to live in the country in the relafive peace and quiet. Shou/d fhis trail be built, it would errrpty ouf direct/y across fram our hame. Suddenly there would be trail heads, parking lots, and /ots of people. Shou/d the trail be extended further than Middaugh Road (which, I'm pretfy cer�ain is fhe larger plan), it wou/d go right �hrough our side yard, very near fo our house. The last time this trail was proposed, someane tried to convince me that a wall could be buili to shield us from the traffic! Right through our garden! (and then on through the fie/d in which our sa/ar pane/s are set up). !n a reoent posf, skiers' respect for properfy owners was c/ear when a contributor to the list encountered a man over in the Yellaw Bam area, ! believe it was, who told the skier �ha� he was trespassing, or abouf to. The skier had been unaware of this and proceeded to find another way to ski wifhout trespassing. l think this kind of neigh6arly respecf is important. 1 hope fhaf you all who support fhe trail can understand why l—and many oihers— don't want this praject to go forward. Thanks for listening. I would just add that I find it somewhat arnazing that peaple who don't live along the proposed trail would ridicule the concerns of thase who do, not to mention going ahead and trespassing in the mean time (E.g., an the Hilker property}. What does private property rrrean if something property owners don't want is forced upan us? Praponents of the trail—especially the more self-righteaus af them— seem to think that the praposed route runs through—samehaw—public land. It is not public land. It is owned by those of us wha purchased it. I think this needs to be clarified immediately. A final note: my spouse and I have not received any correspondence regarding the proposed trail from our town supervisar, who said in the last Brooktondale newsletter that he has been in tauch with concerned praperky awners. Thank you for yaur consideration. Sincerely, :- ! • • • �a. • '�.• : •� � •. - �: January 25, 2017 My name is Clarene Stephens. I am writing ta you regarding the Caddingtan Traii. I am opposed to this traii as I was in 2008. I baught my hame in 1993. We chase ta live here because we wanted a speciai, naturai, private space to enjoy together. It has aiways been my belief that being a homeowner gave me the right ta my personal space. Over the years my husband and I have dane improvements to create a sanctuary for our now re�irement years. I have experienced people wandering in my yard because they wanted to see my gardens; dags unleashed pooping in my yard and peapie parking in my yard right after I mawed it so they could walk the trail as it is naw. We aisa have had a burgiary and attempts. I strangly believe by making this trail bigger it will compromise aur personai space as weil as our safety. I can understand people being in favor of this trail, but I wauld imagine it would not interfere with their privacy ar safety as it daes ours. Thank yau for your consideration, Clarene Stephens Paulette Terwilliger From: Mark Witmer <supervisor@townofcaroline.org> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 9:50 AM To: Mary Beth O'Connor; Ca) Snow; Irene Weiser; Gary Reinbolt; John Fracchia Cc: Marilau Harrington; supervisor@dryden.ny.us; townclerk@dryden.ny.us; supervisor@townofdanbyny.org; townclerk@townofdanbyny.org; Bill Goodman; Paulette Terwilliger Subject: Re: Proposed Trail Hello Mary Beth, Tha�l�lks �or sl7aring yoiir perspective oi1 the proposed trail extension �nd our process. My process - and what I wrote in the Olcl Mill - is that I h�ve re�ched out to neighbars adjoinin�; the rail bed �roperty along the proposed Caroline ext�nsian to provide informatiorz and notice of ineetings, and to discuss the proposal. As youc property is not adj�ce�lt to the proposed trail extension, you were not on my list. But I am happy to add you in aild w�ill do t1�at. I also want to emphasize that I 111ve contacted neighbors to t11e trail property in advarlce of town meetings and public events about the proposed project, whether by mail, phone, or on foot. We have heard your (and others') concerns ai7d the Caroline Town Sc�ar•d is evaltiating infor�mation in order to inforin their thi��king abo��t tl�is proposal. Our challenge as a town board is to weigh the costs and be�nefits that would come with the trail extension, and to woi�lc to gain an objective understianding of the potential �impacts and how they inight be Znitigated shou�d the project move forward. I thinic the example you mention of the respectful skier avoiding trespass is wonderful, and is the kind af cLllttiire we want to cultivate. To be clear: we are no�t proposing taking anyolle's ��roperty. The rail bed is owned by NYSEG and clearly designated on property maps for this segment. The pl�n is for the County to obtain a License Agreement for public use 1s a trail. A neighbor to the proposed irail extension did write us a 1et�ter challenging ow�nership of the trail; we toak that seriotiisly and enga�;ed oui° tow�n attorney to investi�ate. His cozzclusion was that NYSEG owns the trail, and that is also NYSEG's understanding. T want to call your attention to the public event that was held on November 2)th to provide information to the public about the South Hill Recreation Way Extension proposal. I atte�zded the meeting ancl advertised it on Tow�n flnnouncements and the Town Website, in addition to contacting the Caroline neighbors to the railbed pl•ope�rty. The gaal oithis meetin�; was to provide a canstructive public forum at which information abo�tt the trail �1an could be presented az�cl feedback from the public coLild be gathered. Informatioli presented at that meetin�; can be viewed at: �kiit�s://sc��:i�th�ilill�•ccwa .�pr�ss.con�. I wili be in touch soon with more i1i%rnlatian. Please do not hesitate to cantact ine to diseuss the plan or just to get an update on the process. I am at the Tow�n Hall most days and yoLl are welcome anytime. Or give me a ca11. 5iilcerely, Mark Witmer Cat•oline Town Supervisor G07-539-3395 Paulette Terwilliger From: Sent: Ta: �� Hi, jpv3@cornell.edu on behalf of Jesse Veverka <jesse@veverkabros.com> Friday, January 27, 2017 12:56 PM supervisor@townofcaroline.org; john_fracchia@townofcaraline.org; gary_reinbolt@townofcaroline.org; cal_snow@townofcaroline.arg; irene_weiser@townofcaroline.org; clerk@tawnofcaroline.org; supervisor@dryden.ny.us; townclerk@dryden.ny.us; supervisor@townofdanbyny.arg; townclerk@townofdanbyny.org; Bill Goodman; Paulette Terwilliger Interview Request: South Hill Recreation Way I am a local documentary filmmaker who has recently become aware of tlze growing cantroversy surrounding the extension of the Sout1~� I��ill Iz.ecreation Way into the Town oi Caroline. Specific�lly, I have learned that many Town of Caroline residents oppase the ex:tension of the trail, sighting various concerns including private property rights, safety, eizvironmental impact and cost. IIowever, Tompkins cotiinty is continuin� to p�ish Caroline's Town Board to adopt the proposecl extension despite this opposition. Furthermore I understand �that� �there is a pending� lawsuit against certain lacal �;c�vernincnt entities as well as �ccusations o� lack-�f transparency, impropriety and possible carruption ii� l�cal �;overnment with regard to this tnatter. I believe this story would be of interest to the greater Tompkins conlmunity aild woLild like to prodl�ce a documentary expose on t�11e subject exploring these concel-ns. As yotii are a lnember of local government relevarlt to this issue, I am therej'or writing to request a short on-caniera iliterview for inclusion in this film. This would be a cllance to explain your views. Please let nze knaw if you would be willing to participate, and when yoli might b� available for a short on- camera interview. i�"lc�lll{ y0ll, J�SSe Jesse Veverka Producer Veverka Bros. Productioils LLC +1 607-216-4304 (USA) Skype: kina7$7 j esse(�z7veverkat�rc��;. cc�tz� www.vev��•1c��-rrc�s.cc�r��. This eznail �nd atly attachzY�ents ta it lnay be confidential and are intended solely for tlie use of the individual(s) ta whom it is adclressed. 1 Februaly, 2017 To: Represei�tatives f��c�rn the Towiss of Ithaca, L7ryden, Dariby, Carol.ir�e From: Coddington Land 5tewards Re: Prapased South I-lill Recreltian Way Extension �� .�� T��,�� ,��,,, _ ��;.„,� �: 'The Coddi�7gton Lal�d Stewa��ds is a group of over 301andawners wha op�ase the idea of extending the South Hill l�ecl•eatio�� Way past its current terminu� at �urns Ficra�. f�l�i� r7�c�1�n1�E�rs y�esic�e iz1 the towns of Ithaca, Dryden, Danby; and Caroline. Landow�zei�s i�� atu• graup have retained Nels Ackerson, of Elckersan, Kauffinan Fex, in Washington i)C in this rz��tter. NIi�. Ackerso��'s f.irm has workecl in the area of rail-trail law since 1991.. N[r�. Ackerson is aclssiowledged as oz�1e raf ttie n��tio��l's pre�iY7iz7�irt Experts in th� field. We thr7ugtrt 1VIi��. .E1�kerso��s testimony before Congress on October, �30, 1997, reg�rding landowners' perspectives wo�:ilcl be v�luable reading for you. W�'re ho�in� that Mr. Ackerson's testiinony may help you better uncf�rstabid wllere meznbers of the Coddingtan Land Stewards are comi:ng from in our opposition to the trail. Please review the following testimany of Nels Ackersan. If you I�ave any questin�ls, comments, or concerns, please ernail: Coddington Land Stewards c:odc�in�t,��rxla.azt�st�w��ci�a7��n,�il.c:o� Thank you, Coddingtc�n Land Stewards Source: https:/lwww.gpo. ovlfdsyslpkglCHRG-105hhrg46626lpdflCHRG-1Q5hhr 4�, 6626 pdf pages 37-38 TESTIMONY OF NELS ACKERSOlV BEFORE THE SUBCtJMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS, FORESTS, AND LANDS i • ' ! ' # � � � i � i ! : • 1 •• STATEMENT OF NELS ACKERSON, ATTORNE�, THE ACKERSON GROUP Mr. ACKERSON. Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, I have the priviZege of representing, individually and in ciass actions, now tens of thousands of landowners, homeowners, families, retirees, sma11 businesses, farm organizatians, and athers, in about 15 states across the nation. Like the author of H.R. 2438, Mr. Ryun, many af my clients enjoy the outdoors and knaw the benefits of recreational trails. They also in many cases are canservatianists. What distinguishes my clients from others is fihat they awn the land on which raiiroads once Qperated their trains, and upon which trails are now aperating or proposed. They are nat adjacent landowners; they are the landowners. They own the strips of land running through their farms or their yards, where trains once ran, every bit as much as any homeowner owns a backyard, a driveway, ar a deck. And so, members of the Committee, I want to ask this Committee to look at two different perspectives on the railroad corridors where trails have been gropased or are operating; not just the perspective down the corridor, but the perspective acrass the corridor. The owner's perspective is different, because it is their land. They not only laok dawn the abandoned railraad, but also across it. Looking cross the right-of-way they see the rest of their farm, reunited for a mare efficient farming operation, now that the railraad has braught to an end the agreement that allowed railroad use on their land. They see a backyard in which their children can play in safety and privacy. Sometimes they see a strip of land that has become a sanctuary for wildflowers, berry bushes, and wildlife which they would like preserved, free from asphalt surfaces and free from traffic. In short, what my clients, Che landowners, see, is their home, their farm, their land. Unfartunately, the perspective that has dominated much af the debate, and nat a bad perspective, but a different perspective—and it's only bad if it's the anly perspective— and that is the perspective down the corridor. Railroad companies and trails advacates often fail ta look at the other perspective, acrass the corridor. Railraads want to be paid for land they once used, regardless of whether they own it. Traiis propanents see opgortunities for recreational uses, and often view my clients as greedy or disgrunded neighbars, who are troublesome in their bothering to stop part af a trail; rather than as the owners of the traii that is to be taken without their consent and without their consultation for the purpose that they did not have in mind. Now those who look down the corridor, and only down the corridar, nat only miss a beautiful view of life; they also miss the fundamental point that we learned in kindergarten: you shouldn't take something that is nvt yours without first asking. That's the first principle. The ather is, you should pay for what you take. The perspective down the corridor—when it is the exclusive perspective— turns a blind eye to those who own the land. A trail proponent in zeal to establish a recreational traii may presume that the railraad, rather than the real landowner, should be approached and paid far the land. The railroad of caurse likely will be happy to oblige. It's a rule of human nature I think—even in this city—that if you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can often count on Paul for support. Thus the real landowners are taken out of any involvement whatsoever in what happens to their land. That is the perspective that has been fostered and maintained by the present law. Owners of the land to be taken far a trail don't even know Paulette Terwilliger From: scott vangaasbeck �svangaasbeck@gmail.com> Sen#: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 1:13 PM Ta: Mark Witmer; John Fracchia; Gary Reinbolt; Cal Snow; irene_weiser@tawnofcaroline.org; Marilou Harrington; rdietric@twcny.rr,com; supervisar@dryden.ny.us; Bambi Avery; supervisor@townofdanbyny.org; townclerk@tawnofdanbyny.org; Bill Gaadman; Paulette Rosa; rbrenner@townofdanbyny.org; Iconnors@townofdanbyny.org; jholahan@townafdanbyny.org; jmiller@tawnafdanbyny.org; Ilavine@dryden.ny.us; DCipolla-Dennis@dryden.ny.us; dlamb@dryden.ny.us; kservoss@dryden.ny.us; PBleiwas; Rich DePaolo; Rod Howe; T Hunter; P Leary Subject: An Open Letter to the Towns of Ithaca, Dryden, Danby, and Caroline February 7, 2017 An Open Letter to the Towns of Ithaca, Dryden, Danby, and Caraline February 7, 2017 I would like to address the issue af "The Greater Goad" so often raised by Town and Caunty officials ta justify a trail for public recreatian on aur farms and near our homes. The phrase has come up often, used by many officials. I will use as a typical example this email exchange between Sandra Kenne, whose family (the Middaughs) has owned a farm on Middaugh Road since befare the Civil War and which is diaganally bisected by the proposed trail, and Mr. Ric Dietrich, Town of Danby Supervisor. Sandra vaiced concerns, like the rest of us, and received this respanse: On Jan 30, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Ric Dietrich �rdi�tric�twcr��.rr.�c�rn> wrate: I believe most of the questions yau asked Have already been answered ta my satisfactian On Jan 30, 2017, at 7:03 PM, Sandra Kenne <�csk�r�n�C�hc��il.�c�r�> wrate: Would you please respond ta my questions that you feel have been met ta your satisfaction. Sandra Kenne On Jan 30, 2017, at 7:30 PM, Ric Dietrich �rdie�ric�ia, t�vcr�v.rr.com> wrote: All of them 1 am pre disposed ta endorse this project Because I started it, and want it to go all the way through to Newark valley. I have heard all the objections before And non af thern has come true . . . . - . . .... And since the trail follows the railroad right of way Which all landowners knew to be a pre existing condition adjacent to their land At some point their were trains running by yaur house A trail seems much less intrusive Setting aside the arragance, and the factual points (all the way to Newark Valley, "adjacent" to their land (in Sandra's and other cases it is through, not adjacent), and the ridiculous assertion that people wandering through at all times would be less invasive than a scheduled train where people stay on the train and do not set foot on our land), we see Mr. Dietrich's core argument is that "the public goad" is an acceptable justification for causing harrn to individuals or a class of people. When we are young we are all taught that "the ends don't justify the means" as a basic moral principle, and yet this moral principle is nat always considered to apply to gavernment. In fact, it is always the argument used to justify what would otherwise be considered the warst crimes or heinous acts by gavernment — common examples are: drapping the atamic bombs an Hiroshima and Nagasaki ostensibly to prevent even more death and destruction in an invasian, torturing terror suspects ostensibly to prevent same future attack, or banning Muslims from our country to ostensibly protect the non-Muslim majority. Killing innocent people or depriving them of liberty is certainly a greater harm than destroying their privacy and sense of security, but the argument is exactly the same, and it is flawed. The greater good argument is always flawed because it always reduces the freedom and morality of all people when a large graup uses a small group as a means to their ends, no matter how noble the ends (The moral taint on our nation is clear in each af the examples above, no matter what your opinian an whether aur country should have done them). The true greater good in any nation is inextricably linked to the degree of freedom and rights given to each and every citizen in equal measure. The resart to the greater goad argument is in fact evidence af a failure of government to plan appropriately and work things out among the parties. I think in hindsight, any thinking, moral persan could think of alternate paths of gavernment policy that would have avaided the need to propose a "greater good" solution to the war with Japan or to terrorism. The challenge before yau, as our lacal government, is to find solutians ta the conflicting desires of some citizens ta recreate on our property and landawners' right to live in peace and privacy. The only rational measure of whether a plan meets these needs is if the parties affected feel it meets these needs. The "greater gaod" argument, to throw us under the bus because more people would enjoy what we have, is unnacceptable. This is nothing new, and in fact organizations like Rails to Trails stress the importance of working with, nat against, landowners. The Fingerlakes Trail is an example of a trail created while respecting landowner rights. The reason this particular trail is failing is because of the 9 year histary of planners with an attitude like Mr Dietrich's that have convinced landowners we are dealing with a tyrannical and undemacratic government determined to take away our rights far the benefit of their friends who want to recreate on our nice land. At this point, sa much bad faith and damage has been created, the negatives for the community far autweighing any "greater goad" to recreate. Unfortunately, just as we see nationally, "greater good" arguments do a tremenaus amount af damage ta the civic health of aur community. People who once valued local government now resent it. People who were promised use of their neighbars' land harbor resentment, and landowners are dismayed ta see haw quickly neighbors will discount their rights when egged-on by the government. The wounds to our tawnships will take years to heal. I realize, after being forced ta file FOIL requests to find out what is planned for my farm, that much of the push to take from the 70 of us who signed the petition in 20q8 and give to the (supposedly) many has come from the Tompkins County Planning Depatment, not the towns, but the negative consequences will be felt most srongly in the tawns far years to come. This is the time for aur Town Baards to step up to the plate and do better. No war or terrorism is imminent, there is all the tirne in the warld to go back to the plans and find a better salution than "greater good" Scott Van Gaasbeck •: •�. • '• Brooktondale, NY ._ .- , . . . about these abandonments in many many cases. Some af my clients who own farms or little homes aiong abandaned railroad corridors don't read the Federal Register every day. They don't get a second notice. Same of them have no idea what's happened until it's done. That is why the issues that are addressed in this bill must be addressed seriously, H.R. 2438 provides a way to restore balance among the various pubic and private interests that are affected by the National Trail System Act. Pubiic policy should recognize and protect the legitimate interests of persons whose land is taken for a new public purpose, and whase lives and the Zives af their families wili be changed forever as a result. Those persons wha are the most affected should at the very least, have a significant role in the process, be given pratection against the loss af security and privacy, and have access ta traditional land law to enforce their property rights. The conservation, recreatian, and even natianal security objectives af the National Trail System Act and incidentally, I wouid like to address those national security issues if the time will permit—those objectives can be accomplished without sacrificing what has been the very fabric of society embedded in the Canstitution. We dan't need fio sacrifice canstitutional safeguards. We don't need to eliminate the roles of state and local government. And we don't need to violate the simple principle, that we should never take what is ours without first asking, and we shouid pay for what we take. I beiieve my time is up, uniortunately. I hav� adcir�ssed in my written statement a number of misconceptions about the law and abaut the facts, which I would be hapgy to address if anyone has questions. [The prepared statement of Mr. Ackerson may be found at end of hearing Paulette Terwilliger Fram: Bridget Foster <bf12@corne�l.edu> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 3:52 PM To: rdietric@twcny.rr.com; supervisor@townofcaroline.org; john_fracchia@townofcaroline.org; gary_reinbolt@townofcaroline.org; cal_snow@townofcaroline.org; irene_weiser@townofcaroline.org; supervisor@dryden.ny.us; supervisor@townofdanbyny.org; Bill Goodman; Paulette Rosa Cc: scott vangaasbeck; Coddington Landsteward Subject: RE: An Open Letter to the Towns of Ithaca, Dryden, Danby, and Caroline February 7, 2017 C7ear R. Dieiric, My first question is "whai's in this for you"? Besides the sel�-proclaimed, �lary vain reason of "I started it and want ta s�e it go through aIB the way to Newark Valley" — why is ihis so important ta yau? C ^ • ;,. ' - • -. - . - . . , , , . , . , , , � . � , . , y _ .. ,, r • •• - r • •Ms • . r • • �� • • • •�• . , � . . • , � • - . _; * . � _ „ r • s • , � •• • - • � • -• • r , r r*. ^ •' • • • r�• • • r- r • • r � r • M „ • , _ • . � . , a � • � - _ • • s • •� , . � • • ^ *��t r• s « • • , r- • ' • - . •t ., • • - • • - • � � - . ' • . . .- • • • s �^ a • • �- • ! . �:• . '• �. f •�.'. •� • '. �.f� . '� ��.! �• �.^f .� 4• � •� '1� • . f•� �. �•� •.� r�M ��. �^ .�.�;�•• �^�' '��i� M � � M�.� �.• •. •� � i," �.i k�•��1�� wf�� 'M �i�' �� : • . � M • • A^. , •� f�� •� 4�' .#��. ..• M��. ' •'� �'. • t,�: ��. �. ., ... ♦ ... .. � • � i .� t i � � t ,.. � . � � - � . • .' � � � �' . .-. �' .- 4 . M '. ." �� . . � .. : «. . . . . w. �. i : � 4 �� • . �. . E . � . • •� • f �. , [ �... .. �. • li '�. �;, � � '1. . • • ` ! N� . � •� �.� � � • . . ��. • . � r .�. � � � * �.. � # .. : . . . „ . .,, . . �. . �. • � .. �, . . • �. • . • .� . �. ., � .. �� . . . . . �. . : • ' ' � 4. ,.. . .. . .' �: . �. • . ��. . . . • � • � r • • • ��• • •�• .�- a • • • • .N 'r • r •r- -• •. • �. 1� ;,w" �.i� � •♦�' •' .�.! �:•^ •.. M�•��. . 1.� f �� . �� !�� , •. , . .�. �� . i ��. . . . � ��. . • �.�'� � .. t �: � � •� ! �� `� � ! � i� �� . � » . � . ,: .! f � � . .,, . # .�. . . : � . . ' . r • ' •• „ • s r- •� t � . • • i �� . . t �. �. • • . �. ': M� , , ��. • �. .� ' • � � . � • •� � � •. ; � +1 '. . i • • • 1 ►�. .��, � �:��.: -��,.. � ..�•� f .�•�:. -:.:N- • . ...M ;�IF'� ..�. • " �" �•. 1�. .. .�,.: • •1�• '• ��.'�. �. :! �: i� � � N . �. '. � . We purchased our land ar have remain�d living in aur locations, purposefully because it offered a specific setting and/ar agri-business and/ar proximity ta hunting, fishing, phatagraphy, nature study, etc. VI/e landawners came to live where we are far different reasons, but I guarantee we all have a specific and personal purpose for living where we do — in a quiet rura6 set�ir�g away from ih� naise, lights, and popul�tion af villages and neighbor��oods. I dc�n't need ar want additional strang�rs traveling into rny isodated lacatian. I pickecl this lacatian specificaily to avoic� p�ople artd tr�ffic. And i paid far it — th�refare, yau have na right to stamp all aver my rights! Ar�d yau villagers and neighborhoad/city dwellers, choose to live where you are far specific, p�rsc�nal reasans. Which rnakes it even less appropriate for you to �ow want to destroy what we have, for your person�l benefit! IF you wanted to enjoy our valley sc� much — why� didn't you buy land out there? My prap�rty was for sale fcrr over a y�ar — no one lool<ed at it or bid on it except for me. And I choose it sp�cifically b�cause a� the rural setting, with the abundarrce crf nature, the quiet, the I�c6< of traffic (ears �nd pe�ple) and the beauty of my surresundings, I warl�ed fon� hard hc�urs and sav�d my money for 2S years in ord�r to find and buy my first haus� in th� perfect locatior�. Which you naw propose to destray for personal gain and clearly little consideration, ernpathy crr understanding o�th� impact on me or any of the crther landowners, And, let me emphasize I�rrdc��a��r. Tax payer, C�re talcer. Your persc�na9 interes� shcruld nc�t trump rr�y right ta contir�ue to live in the specific lacatic�c� I wr�rked so long and hard to purchase. Why is it �.I<. fcrr you tal<e that auvay from me? /�gain —your benefit at the e�pense of rny detriment is nc�t for the greater good. I can't hel� k�ut ask—�vvhy are ycru more important than rr�e? Why is the desire of the non-land a�ners, more valuable than that of the tax-payir�g I�nclawners whcr will be r�egatively impacted? You've heard the c,bjeciions and "rrc�n has come true". Nonestly, I dc�n't �hink yc�u°ve lisiened very closely or carefully, Certainly not with any consideratian. Aside frorn all th�t's been said — I'll leave you with tf�is, which I guara�tee you won't car� abaut but it needs to be stated. That in additioi� t� the negative impact on the landowners, th� prop�sec! trail with its unavoidable carbon footprint arrd tax increases for maintenance, will alsa d�str�a�y the habitat for countl�ss migrating and nesting ducks, raptors, bic�ds, and marrrrnals. It wili directly impact the nesting site of countiess snappAng turtles, painted turt{es, and otk�er �mphik�iarrs, nr�t to rr�entian the deer, bobc�t, fishers, coyotes, raccaons, minl<, w�asels, �turkeys, otters, possums, fox, �nd bear—which afl live, nest, and ro�m throughout the area. ��r s, . �� . . . ; „� ,,,�,: 1� i • t 1M � • • «��, M �. . .rw ... 2 Paulette Terwilliger From Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ric Dietrich <rdietrich@townofdanbyny.org> Tuesday, February 07, 2017 5:03 PM Bridget Faster; C.J. Randall Ric Dietrich; Don Barber; john_fracchia(�a�townofcaroline.org; gary_reinbolt@townofcaroline.org; cal_snaw@townofcaroline.org; Irene Weiser; Supervisor Sumner); Ric Dietrich; Bill Goodman; Paulette Rosa; scott vangaasbeck; Coddington Landsteward Re: An Open Letter to the Towns of Ithaca, dryden, Danby, and Caroline February 7, 2017 Thank you for sharing your views on the situation. I apalogies somewhat for my" arrogance" and you may be right,that I cary same hubris on the subject. Many years ago, it was part of my responsibilities, to drum up summer work prajects for rural youth. This braught me in contact with people who were loaking towards our future trail systerns . The old R.R. beads, were a natural candidate for restoring into pathways mare suited ta people than cars. It taak some years working with The Town Of Ithaca's Park service, to develop a plain, convene the approbate public meetings, and take the propasal the town board. We then applied for a number of grants to hire the participants. we worked this road bead starting at South Hill school, and over the next three years inched it farward. It was real work, that the participants could take pride in, knowing they were building something they could come back to and say, I helped build that. But it was not all fun and a sense of accomplishment, their were concerns, from landowners, legitimate claims that needed ta be answered. their was concerns much like you have described ta me , their was strong feelings expressed. Most of the concerns, in my apinion were worked out through mitigations put forward, and then incorporated into plain. same were not and needed ta go ta court. All of the issues you have braught forward in your email, as they did then"in my opinion" I believe were answered in court, at that time It was a noble project that has brought joy to many,and I do hear your frustrations on the matter. Fast forward from twenty five years or so ago When the trail again got same traction and its desire ta move further south, came up, I believe many of the same legal questions came up, and have been answered "I believe" I know I am not saying anything you want to hear, But I thought you should know where I am coming from f��i �:�r��$�:ra�.. 14 February 2017 ��e��a General Obligatian (or GO Retated)y Aa1 Na Outlaak Cc.�r�l:�ac:ts Gregory Max Sabel 212-553-95H7 Ass�xic�Y,e �n<alysC gre�ory.scrbe(Ca'imoociys.r.c7rr7 Geordie 7hc�rT7psorr �r1 212 55a 032'1 VP-SrGedit C)fficer/ Manager geord ie. th<3rripson(u�rnoadys.cam Town af Ithaca, NY Annual Comment on Ithaca Town "- � The Town of Ithaca is located in Tompkins County in western New York's Southern Tier, approximately 45 miles southwest of Syracuse. Tompkins County has a population of 104,691 and a population density af 221 people per square mile. The county's per capita persona� income is $37,686 (2nd quartile) and the August 2016 unemployment rate was 4.0% (1st quartile).�' The largest industry sectors that drive the loca� economy are local government, retail trade, and professionaUscientific/technical services. Q��"�G�6� ��"R"\✓d�V�! Ithaca Town has an excel�ent credit position, and its Aa1 rating is stronger than the median rating of Aa3 for US cities. The credit drivers include a robust financial position, and a srnall debt burden with an affordable pensian liability. It a�so reflects a strang sociaeconamic profile with a moderately sized tax base. Finances: The financial position of the town is very healthy and is s�ightly favorable when compared with the assigned rating of Aa1. The net cash balance as a percent af revenues (62.1°/o) is far superior to the US median and rose significantly between 2012 and 2015. Additianally, the available fund balance as a percent of operating revenues (50.4%) is materially higher than other Moady's-rated cities nationwide. Debt and Pensions: The debt and pension burdens of Ithaca Town are srnal�. That said, they are a slight weakness in relation to its Aa1 rating. The net direct debt to full value (1.2%) is slightly above the US median. Furthermore, while the Moody's-adjusted net pension liability to operating revenues (0.78x) is favorably below the US median, this indicator unfavor�bly increased modestly between 201Z and 2015. Economy and Tax Base: The economy and tax base of Ithaca Town are quite healthy in comparison to the Aa1 rating assigned. The median fami�y income equates to a strong 132.2% of the US level. Moreover, the total full value ($1.3 billion) is consistent with other Moody's-rated cities nationwide and grew modestly from 2012 to 2015. Unfavorably, however, the full value per capita ($64,482) is s�ightly weaker than the US median. Management and Governance: Positive operating margins demonstrate strong financial management. Advantageously, on average, Ithaca Town's operations were positive as the tax base expanded modestly. New York cities have an institutional framework score ' of "A," or moderate. Revenues are highly predictable, as property taxes are usually the largest revenue source, fa�lowed by, sales and mortgage taxes, as well as building permit revenue. Cities have a moderate revenue raising ability, as they can increase property tax revenues above the tax cap with a 60°/o vote of the �ocal legislative body. Expenditures vary across the state but primarily consist of personnel costs, which are moderately predictable. Expenditure reduction ability is low given the presence of strong co�lective bargaining groups and the Triborough Amendment which enhances collective bargaining powers. ��r�� `��u�� ww Y��r "��rk C�i�� New York municipalities will benefit from the state's improving economy, although economic growth varies across the different regions. Municipal governments will have difficulty tapping into under�ying economic growth due to the property tax cap, which is .68°/4 in 2017 before exemptions and ro�lovers are added, though they rnay override the cap with a three fifths vote af the governing body. Although sales tax growth may remain s�uggish, it is typically a small percentage of municipal revenues. Overall, economically sensitive revenues remain below pre-recession peak levels. Exhibit 1 Key Indicators�' Ithaca Town, NY conomy / Tax Base Totat Full Value Full Value Per Capita Median Family Income (°!o of US Median) Finances �i�12 �fY"f3 Z��31� 26�15 USC°��dit�r� �e�a�i�"i¢�nc& $1,274M $1,281M Si,Z95M $1,324M $1,722M Stable $64,150 564,183 564,297 564,482 $85,195 Stable 151.9% 149.$% 132.2% 132.2% 1152% Weakerted Available Fund Balance as % of Operating Revenues 39.1°fo 43.5% 45.2°/o 50.4% 32.1% Improved Net Cash Balance as % of Operating Revenues 463% 53.8% 56.4% 6Z.1% 34.4% Improved _...__ --- – ._...-- 6ebt! Pensians —^_--�--- Net Direct Debt ! Futl Velue 0.44% 0.21°/a OZ6% 1.2% 1.2% Weakened Net Direct Debt / Qperating Revenues 0.52x 0.23x 0.29x 1.32x 0.94x Weakened Moody's-adjusted Net Pension Liability 031% 0.54% 0.63% 0.71% 1.7% Stdble (3-yr average) ta Full Vatue Moody's-adjusted Net Pension l.iabitity (3-yr average) ta dperating Revenues 036x 0.60x 0.69x p.78x 1.35x Stable Saurce: Moody's Exhibit 2 Avaitabte fund balance as a percent of operating revenues increased between 2012 and 2015 Available Fund Batance as a Percent of Operating Revenues `Avai�ab&e F�uK�d B�eiE�tince �as f� ui U�reratin�; RevkrrEaes � dJ5 Cft,ies Medaarr 50°f 40"/u 3J% m,warr � r'�ii ��aiy�i ✓,,rnrrN` mu�,� d�: rrsH reaa 2012 21713 20'14 Z015 Source: tssuerfinancial statements; Moody's This� piabtic�t.icorx �isFvs not c�nriauR�ce a crerJit rati�� action. por any crediz� ratings ref'ere>nce,d in this �r�ih�lictatiorr, piease sr,e LE�t rati��gs tab on t}ze isse}erfentity Pa�'e on www.maacl,ys.coR7� frrthn rr�cr�s7 i,�pdateci c�redit rating actiari irifarmation an�l rat.inf, histc7ry �� , ��,t � r��rr� �� r . ..,, � ,�� i ��roai � 2 14 February 2077 Tow� of Rhaca, NY: Annual Comment on ithaca Town Exhibit 3 Tatat full vatue grew from 2012 to 2015 Total Full Vatue (miktions) �� Tcrt2�f Fs�tf 'Vzr(ue ^� YUY % C'ht�r7�e oF�r Full V�rtue $1,320 � �` 2.0% i�y��' $1,3470 �� 1.5% �� $1,280 ,a� ir�✓' 1.�°f �a,�rr�a, 0.5% 2�i12 Zt�'f3 201�1 2015 Source: Issuer�nancial statements Government data sourcer, Offering statementr, Moody's Exhibit 4 Moody's-adjusted net pension liabitity to operating revenues increased from 2012 to 2015 Net Direct Debt and Adjusted Net Pension Liability / Operating Revenues fi C7eE�t" - f�ensicans" 2.Ox 1 Ox jrl�/� f��ji%f/G�fi �a r�� %j/l;/,�� ul /iii/r �j�,�� 1 � j�l��e/r!%///'//�� /ri��/��I� r� y��liy�'�� /,C�Oi�' l,,rr�l��si i �!%�f%i;r��i� �l%%fliri��r O.Ox . .. .. "�y ir %i/��'/'� /� ... �!�i .... �' iio .1 r�. 2€J1c� �013 2014 2015 �`Debt is represented as Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues. Net Direct Debt is defined as gross debt minus self supporting debt. Pensions are represented as ANPL / Operating Revenues. ANPI is defined as the average of Moody's-adjusted Net Pension Liability in each of the past three years. Source: Issuer financia( statements; Government data sources; Of(ering statements Moody's 3 14 february 2017 Town of khaca, NY: Annual Commenk on Ithaca Town 1. The rating reFerencecf in this r�port is th� govemment's GQneral Obtigatian (G4} rating or its high�st pubtic r4+king that is Gt�-retated. A GO bond is gen�rally a security baciced by th� fult faitl7 and credit pledge and totat taxing power of th� lacal gavernrnent. See Lr�cat C�«ver nrrrerrt �G f�f�d�c_s_V�ry Acr�ss St�t� s, for mare details. GO-retated ratings inctude issuer ratings, which ere GO-�quivalent ratings for governments that do not issue GO debt. GO-related ratings a(so include ratirigs on other securities that are natched ar atherwise related to what the gavcmr�r7ent's GO rating woutd be, such as annual appropriatian, tease revNnue, non-ad v�lorem, and moral abtigation d�bt. Th� referenced ratin�s reflect tl7e gavernment's underlying credit quatity withput re�ard to state guarai�tae or enhancement prograrns or bond insurance. 2 TP7e per capita personal incon7e data and unemptoyment data for all counties in the US census are altocate�d to quartiles. Th� quartites are ordered fram strongest-to-weakest fram a uedit perspective: the highest per capita personal income yuartile is first quartiln, and the lowest unernplaymer7t rate is first quartite. The first quartite consists af the top ZS% of observations in the dataset, tl7e second quartile consists af khe next ?_S°/ , and sa an. The medien per capita personat incozne for U5 counties is $46,049 for 2614. The median unerriployment rate for U5 caunties is h.9°fo far August 2016. 3 The institutior7at frarr7ework score measures a munfcipality's legat ab4lity to match revenues with expenditures based or7 its canstitutionatly and legislaYively conferred �owers and responsibilities. See US I_r�c�rl Governrr�er��_Ger�eral,: flbti��sCion Li°!t�t (J�sr�o��ry �Ui4�) for more det�its. �+, For definitions of th� metrics in the Key Indicators 7abte, U5 Lprat Gavero7rnascrofi G�r7e�i�al (7bti�a�iaai� I✓f�tYr<a�c�lcr�y G�rr�rJ �car��;�ard 11��r Cauod�; (J��Z01�. Th� papu(ation figure used in the t=utl Vatue Per Capita ratin is 2he most recently availabte, most often sourced from eikher the li5 Census or the American Community Survey. 5irnil2irty, tFie Median Famity income data reported as of 2012 and later is atways the most recentty available data and is saurced Fram the Am�rican Comrnunity Survey. 7he Median Fami(y Income data prior ta ZOl2 is saurced tram the 2010 US Census. The Futt Value figure used in the hJet Direct qebt a��cl Mvody's-adjust�d Net Pensian liabiiity (3-year average ARIPL) ratios is m;�tched ta the sarne year as audited financiat data, or if nat avaitable, tags by on� or two years. Certairr state-specific rutes also apply to Futt Va�ue. For exampl�, in Catifornia and Washington, assessed value is the best avaitabte proxy for Futl Vatu�. Certain state specific rutes also appty ta individuat data points and ratios. Moody's makes adjustrnents to iVew Jersey tocal gavernments' report�d f'rnancial statements to make it more comparabte to GRAP. Additionally, MoocJy's ANPI.s reftect arratyst adjustments, if any, fnr pension caM:ribution support fram non-o�rerating funds and se(f-supporting enterprises. Many tocal goverrnnent pensi�rr tiabilities are associaked with iCs participation in the statewide multiple-emptoyer cost-sharing plans. Metrics represented as N/A indicale th� data w�+re not available at the time of publication. 5 The medi �ns c�me frorrr our rr�os�e recer7Cty pu6lished locat governmant medians repor�C, h�1ed's�c?s.._ Grcawira� 1 a,a Eia.a,w,c4 Gtnd S;t�i�l� Furra�...6�lanc�a Su� orC S�ctor's__S1:�at�fility.,(i�1�rch �CJ.'16�. The medians cc�nform to our L!S Loca( Governmer�t Gerrer�l Obli�atian C7Fbt ratin� mPthodology published in January 2U14. As such, the medians presented here are based on the key metrics outtined in the mF=thodolagy and the associated scarecard. 7he appendir. of this repart provides addikional metrics broken out by sector, rating categary, and papulatian. 4Ve use data frorer a variety of sources to calculate the medians, m�ny of which havr cJiFfering reporting schedules. Whenever possible, we calculated these medi�ns using availabte data for fiscat year 2014. Nowever, there are some exceptians. Poputation data is based on the 2010 Census and Median Pamity Incarne is derived from tf7e 2012 Amcrican Community Survey. Medians for some rating tevels are based on relatively sn�atl sampte sizes. These medians, tl�erefare, rnay be subject to patentiatly substantiat year-aver-ye�r v�+riation. dur ratin�s reflect our forward looking opinian derived from forecasts of financial perfarmance and qualitaYiv� factars, as opposed tc� strictly historicat quar7titative data used far the medians. Our expectation of future performance combined with the relative irnportance of certain metric, on individual local government ratings account for the range of vatues that can be found within each raYing categary. Median data for prior years pubtisl7ed ii7 this repart may not match tast year's pubtication due to data refinemei7t and cA�anges in the sainple sets used, as we(t as rating changes, initial ratings, and r�eting witV7drawals. 14 February 2017 7own of Ithaca, NY: Annual Comment on ithaca Town ��'� � Q�� 406 Coddilzgton Road Itli�ca, NY 14850 February 22, 2017 Mr. Bill Goadman, Supervisor Town of Itllaca 215 North Tioga Street Tthaca, NY 14850 RE: PETITION TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF' ITHACA FOR A WAIVER UNDER THE LOCAL LAW 5 OF 2016 TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT AT 403 CODDINGTON ROAD Dear Mr. Goodman; REQUEST Owners of 403 Coddington Road, Bill and Susan Lesser, are seeking a waiver from the tempor�ry moratorium on the construction of accessory apartments so that an accessory apartment may be cre�ted from two existiilg structures on the site. BASIS OF THE REQUEST `The waver is requested uiider Section 4 oF Local Law 5 of 2016, and particularly A(2) which in part allows for "opportunities the projc;ct p�•ovides to protect historic resources". The petitianers also identi�'y A(1) which references "u�znecessary hardship to the petitioner". We �urcllased 403 Coddingtol� 12oad, which lies directly across tlle road fi�om our long-term residence at 406 Coddin�ton Rd. in 2014: In large part this pu�rchase was to preve�ni the constrllction of student rental housing on the praperty, an intent expressed by one of the bidders. The 403 �roperty is nearLy an acre iii s�ize (.9llacre) and cunentiy contains a small dwelling unit, a sin�le stoi-y of approxiiziately 650 squal°e feet including a single c�u• garage. (225 sq. ft.). Subsequently we have been consideri�lg how to enhance the property so as better to recover our investnlent while retaining the nei�hborhood cha�•acter. In the Call 2016 a notice appeared af�ering the siructLire at 341 Coddington Road free for any�ne who would relocate it. We appi�eciaie that the Town Board was inst��ur�lei�tal in arranging with tllis option rather than detnolition. The structure is in the Greek. Revival style, abaut 1840-45, which matches our hause at 406 Caddington Road. Indeed it is ane of three ariginal farm houses on the stretch of Caddingtan. The idea af moving it ta our under-utilized praperty at 403 accurred ta us imrnediately. Our carnmitment was strengthened when we learned that hause maves in today's enviranment rarely exceed severai biacks due to the campiexity and costs. If we did not move it, demolition of this histaric f�rmhouse was virtually assured. It took three months to make the necessary arrangements. Required were a hause mover, legal advice, architectural and structural engineering services, arrangements with three utilities (NYSEG, Time-Warner and Verizon} ta relocate their wires during the move, alang with securing permits fram the Town and the Caunty Highway Department. A parch was remaved to allow the building ta pass between the telephone pales lining both sides of the road. Due to Mr. Iocavelli's interest in ciearing his lot quickly, we focused entirely on the move arrangements, and succeeded in the moving af the structure to 4Q3 in Navember 2016 where it remains on cribs until the foundation is cornpleted. We are in the process af planning the alterations and so are initiating this request to the Town Board for autharizatian ta connect the relocated building to the existing structure to create two dweliing units. JUSTIFICATION We are excited about preserving this historic structure and attaching it to the small existing dwelling unit an the site. However, the costs invalved in the move (appraximately $ �Q,000), and the anticipated casts for alteratians and faundatian (hause is currentiy gutted with roaf in poar conditian and needs everything) are in the $ 125,40Q-$175,OOQ range. Those casts, and cansidering the ariginal purchase price of 403 Coddington, has made the aption of a creating an accessory apartment extremely attractive. It is agreed by reai estate and design professianals that an accessory apartment is the best optian for the praperty making the praperty mast desirable while maintaining the character of Caddington Rd. The praposed structure wauld rneet the square faatage criteria and code related criteria were the moratorium nat in piace. Therefare we request waiver relief from the current moratorium recognizing the histaric structure. A waiver will permit us to move in a straight line taward a hui�ding permit as soan as passible, and necessazily na longer than 6 months fram our November 2Q 16 move date. We believe aur circumstances fit salidly within Section 4 of Local Law 5 af 2016, and particulariy A(2) which in part ailaws far "appartunities the project pravides to protect histaric resources under just these circumstances. PLANS Current pians are to renovate the historic hause of 2,200 sq. ft. (2 story} to create three bedraams, 2 baths connected to the existing one car garage. The existing dwelling unit 65Q sq. ft. ane story) with one bedraom and bath, wi11 be updated and be suitable for a ane ar two occupants. A preliminary pian is attached for yaur informatian. The plans exceed all minimum set back requirernents. indeed the front yard will be '75+ feet deep and the rear, as at present, 150 feet. Lat caverage wili be aniy seven percent, well belaw the allowed 20 percent ma�cimwm in the Mediurn Density zone. As such the plans conform easily with the existing neighborhood character. With the granting of aur requested variance we will be able to put a11 the pieces af the project tagether pragrnatically yet authentical�y. Thank you for your consideratian. We laok forward to the apportunity ta restare the `yeilaw hause' to its rightful piace in the cammunity. Sinc ly yo s, �`a� ------e�.. �� ..� �- S <S� �~ Bili & Susan Lesser, Owners and Petitianers CC: Paulette Rosa, Ithaca Town C1erk Claudia Brenner, Architect �;�`z�jri Subject: Fw: Follaw up regarding petition From: To: Date: Mia Slotnick (miajs123@yahoo.com) DDeAugustine@town.ithaca.ny.us; Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:18 AM �� "`� w� � Hello Bill, Rich, and Paulette, Prinf �...._-. � � � p ��°'�`"r��, .. �' "��_ ; ��k .--.r �'� ��` �`k '�,�. _� � �::._.. �..._.. �";� �� w.�'�'' �:::'„� G 1� � � .,. I was wondering if any progress has been made with the short term rental issue since the meeting with Renwick Heights neighbars in December? With the warm weather, we have noticed the return of unfamiliar cars and people in the neighborhood, Maybe a note in the Town newsletter, the Ithaca Journal, and the Ithaca Times stating the current regulations would help to clarify what is and is not allowed before things take off again with the spring short term rentals. Thanks for considering, Mia From: Kenneth William Simpson �kws5@cornell.edu> To: Fiich DePaolo <RDePaolo@town.ithaca.ny.us>; Paulette Terwilliger <PTerwilliger@town.ithaca.ny.us>; Bill Goodman �bgoodman@town.ithaca.ny.us> Cc: Michael MacAnanny �macananny@gmail.com>; Luisa McAnanny <beauvisage@hatmail.com>; Barbara Marie Koslowski �bmk2@cornell.edu>; Richard Newell Boyd <rnbl @carnell.edu>; Maralyn Edid �mse421 @gmail.com>; Lawrence Edward Blume �Iblume@cornell.edu> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 1:38 PM 5ubject: Re: Follow up regarding petition Dear Rich, Paulette and Bill, At the meeting we raised the issue of educating people about the Code and legal stance of the town and NYS on short term rentals as a means of prevention. As Spring is headed our way people will soon start ta list their properties. Are yau able to pre-emptively address this issue in the Town newsletter and the Ithaca Journal, I�haca Times? Kenny Simpson Renwick Neighbors • ' �-'.• � �*�,.. s �r � To: Mia Slotnick <miajs123�yahoo.cor-n> Gc: Paulette Terwilliger ��'Terwilliger@towr�.ith�ca.ny.us>; Bill Goodman �bgoerdman@�own. ithaca. ny. us> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:55 AM Subject: Re: Follow up regarding petition � about: blank ] /3 From: Ciii! n drr To: PL r7t�r,,,C; E Lrvine; H�a t�'r('J�;7t��; Ricl� DeP�fr�; �7 I-icJ�n'Ss� PFSleiw�s Cc: ,.�ulc t�s� Subject: FW: Water bill issues 1114 East Shore Drive Date .^m""�� Friday, May 19, 2017 1:31:32 PM Hi folks, In anticipation of our discussion abaut water refunds at Monday's Study Sessian, here is one af the requests that i've received (and which we've briefly discussed at a priar Budget Cmte and Tawn Board meeting} ta inform our discussian. Have a good weekend. Bill From: Noward Silcoff [maiita:siico94@gmail.cam] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 3:07 PM ��mm� Ta: Bill Gaodman Subject: Water bill issues 1114 East Share Drive Hi again Bill. Thank you for getting bac;k to us. We really do appreciate you taking the time to try and help us deal with problem of �etiii�g billed and then being forced to pay for water that we did not use, but the outcolne ta date is llnacceptable. T17ere is reaily no way ta look at �the problei7� and conclude �t1�at it is fair to be charged a�lrnc�st $900 for water we did not tiise, and then to be threatened with 1lavin� our water supply turnecl off iinless we paid the fee, which we of eoL�rse clid. I ean not see this as anything l�cGt a form of blaekr11ai1. Tlzere wer� a few comme��ts in your last el7zail which make it seem as if you don't really understand how we got t� tl�e place we are at. You noted "The main p�roble�7� is that yon 11ad. stzbmitted meter readin�s showing there was no usage for a number of qtiarters before the new meter was installed, or at least that is what Bolton Point explained to me." I would hope that you couid go back and look over my earlier correspondatice to you explaining all of this and not just believing what the folks at Bolion Point are telling you. Remembet• that our readings came fi�om looking at the tneter they pointed us to. We read off the meter in q�.�estion every quarter. VJllile it is ti•ue this number was not changing from quarter to quarter, we did not have any idea what this n7eailt. We were barely using the home and cotiild have easily assumed the number on the meter in question would anly change if we went over our allotted 10,000 gallo��s. We just reported what we were asked to report. Al�ct what about the fact that wheil Bolton Point was given t�iese readings, th�y never reached out to us to questioll the numbers eve�1 thotii�li we kept pi•oviding the same readin� quarter after quarter for abaut 1.5 years. I wouid thillk that would be a simple thin� for them to have done. So Bolto�n Point is incorrect wit11 the explanation they are giving you, You then mention "W�hen Bolton Point switched to the new meters, tlzere were a lot of custozners wha saw an increase in their bills because of mistakes in iheir prior readings. If T11e TowY1 Board was goin� t� give you a break, tlzen we would have to give everyone a bi°eak, a11d I just don't see that happening when the reason for the discrepancy was cus�tc�mel error." Th�re are multiple areas of coi-�cern with this statement. First and foremost, blaming �the 'customer'. As written to yoLi previously, we purchased this property in the spring of 2015 at which time we commti�nicated with Bolton Point and were asked to loak for the water meter and give them the reading. We were told tlle n�eter mi�ht be �indoors or outdc�ors. We found the meter (and I previausly sent you a picture of the meter), called in the # on the meter, and were told this seemed in line with the prior owners last reading and therefore were reassured we had the correct meter reading. So, is this aur fault? I think not, and neither should you. VVe would never have learned that there was a secand water meter somewhere onlin the property if not for Bolton Point coming to change the meter last fa11. Ta blame us for this error you could be saying only ane thing- that we knowingly tried to deceive Bolton Point which is surely not the case. We were not knowingly cheating anyone or trying to get away without paying for our fair share af water use. My second caneern is you putting our case inta the same basket as others complaining about their water biils. Whether ar nat tv grant us a refund should be based solely an the merits of our specific circumstances. You then stated "'If there was some error that Baiton Point had made, then perhaps the Town Board would look at it differently, but I don't see that in your case." Yes, Boltan Point made the error that set this whole prablem in motian, by telling us to give them the reading from what we later (1.5 yrs later!} learned was an old water meter that was no longer being used. I am hopeful you can understand this. Please understand that alang the way, during the 1.5 years that we were providing readings from what turned out to be the wrong meter, Cindy had telephone conversations with folk from Bolton Point. At one paint they discussed the question of use and whether it was being reflected by our meter that seemed not to change over time, and she was told nat ta worry about it given that we were being charged for minimum use, which seemed to fit our situation as were using the home only occasionally. Bolton Point couid have come to the hause at any time in the 18+ manth biiling period to check out the situation if our subrnissions did nat make sense to them. But they never called us about it, never came to look a the meter themselves, never did anything to prevent the problem from cantinuing. And they were the only anes that could have known the prabiem. It does not give them the right to falsify our finai bill. The reason the bi11 is wrong is because it is based on our initial reading which was taken fram the wrong/different meter. The final bill then is based on fictitious use, because who really knows what the correct initial reading was. How exactly is that legal? The following is a surnmary af the finances and water'use` involved for the time in questian, and comes directly fram my prior email to you. Perhaps a reread of it wi�l help yau understand our pasition a little better. Everything seemed frne until our metep was replaced on 9l14l16. We were told at the titne that our meter reading then was 95 530 and that the last reading provided by us was 54 QQQ. So the assum�tion here was that we used >41 000 gallons of water in the month between our reading on $115l16 and the reading by the technician from Bolton Point on 9114/16. The problem here, as we later learned, was that the meter we were reading the whole time was apparently not the correct meter, and the meter with the 95 530 reading was a completely different meter that we knew nnthing about (an whzch we never saw!). So we have been billed for this >41 000 gallons of water, but this is based on a completely erroneous starting point! And, f'ar a house that was vacant for at least half the time zn the month in question. Frorra the time our meter was replaced on 9I14I16 until tFie end of the billing cycle on 11l1 Sl16 another 37 800 gallons of water was used, based solely an the readings from the new meter, per Bolton Point. (We question the uccuracy of this as well, but that's a different issue.) Sotne other important facts relating to water use on this property: -Per �oltr�n Point, the meter reading fratn the prior owner was 28 9QQ on S�I S115. -Per Boltan �'oint, this same meter� read 95 530 on 9114116. -Therefore... 6b 630 gallons were used from 5l1511 S-9I14116 -We paid: $2b7. 32 in Sept `15, $97.96 an 12/1 SI1 S, $99.98 x3 (March, June, Sept 2Q16}, for a total of �$6b5. Putting the above together, we paid' �-$665 for 66 630 gallons of water~ between S!1 Sll S- 9114l16, which is almost exactly $1 QQ per 10 Q00 gallons which is as expected based on current pricing of water and sewer ($99.9&ll Q 000 gallons for 2016). So even though the 54 OQQ mete� reading was wrong all along, this seemed to have worked itself out. The problem is that we are currently being asked to pay another $Sb1.52 for water use,for the quarter, from 8I16116-1 �/1 Sl16, and as nQted above, much af this is based an an obviously erroneaus initial meter reading. We are asking to be reimbursed the �861.52 that we were forced ta pay to continue to get aur water service from the local water monopoly while trying to get this prablem salved. We would also like to present aur case directly to the town board. We feel we are in a better position to explain the prabiern than yau are. If someane from Boitan Paint wants to show up too for the discussion, then sa be it. We are asking for a little common sense and fairness. We are not asking for any special treatment. We want to pay for our water use, and not be knowingly charged more than double our true water use over the course of one and a half years. Thank you, Howard Silcoff �denfamilymedicine.com Paulette Rosa To: 2017 Town Board Cc: Mike Solvig Subject: Quarterly billing 3Xs over Attachments: Water Billing dispute letter 1103 Hanshaw Rd.pdf Gaod afternoon, Mr. Denson came in and submitted the letter ta the Town Baard. I talked to him for a bit and in essence, they would like a refund or credit because the new meters, which were advertised ta be able ta warn peaple af unusual usage sa it could be stapped or investigated right away, did not happen and they are therefare being penalized. He also said the new meter was not warking correctly and not able to be read remately sa estimates were used again denying them infarmatian about a possible leak or extra water usage leading to a large bill. In the past, they would have sent in the reading and the larger usage would have been naticed sooner. He thinks it may have been a leaky toilet but that's a lot for that also so I did suggest he ga back and read the meter naw far a 1 manth usage and see if that was high for a third of the time the bill is for usually. (if 10K is usually used, it should be at about 3K right now; if higher, there is still a problem} He did submit a copy of a bill of his neighbor with 2 ar 4 children ta compare ta his which is just 2 adults. 1 explained the pracess wauld be our asking Balton Point for a repart and then Bill and Mike discussing it and bringing any recammendatian to the full baard. Thank you Paulette � ti 1103 Hanshaw Rd., Tthaca, NY March 29, 2017 Town af Ithaca Baard 215 N. Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Supervisor Goodman and Board Members: �e�rt � � �z � � We are writing to request a reduction in our water and sewer bill for the period of 1 U16l16 ta 2(15/17. As the attached letter from Bolton Point indicates, we are faced with a current bill of $585.3b—a total more than three times the usual amaunt we pay every quarter. That figure took us by surprise, to put it mildly, as we had had no prior indicatian that our use would be recarded at such a high level. When the new meter was installed at our house last summer, we were assured that the convenience of future readings of the meter wauld be enhanced. We subsequently found, in the last several months, that other Baiton Point personnel had reservations about the installatian of that meter—"it was "faulty," accarding to twa af them— and turned out to be incapabie of being read by radio transmission {one of its main purposes}. Hence we continued to receive bills in the neighbarhaad af $18d the last two quarters, leading us ta assume that nothing was awry. The letter arriving earlier this month alerted us to another error made in the reading of the meter, and a correction was applied ta the tune of $113.16 for the billing periQd 5/15/16 to 8l15l16. And then the figure of $585.36, for which we were given no prior preparation, supplied the biggest shock. In light of the malfunctioning of the new meter over a several-manth period, of the inability af Bolton to read our meter remotely until it was repaired very recently, and of the lack of natice informing us of the gigantic increase in our usage which did not allow us to address the passible reason for such an increase, we are requesting that same adjustment be made and our current bill be reduced. Thank you for your consideratian. Sincerely, �� k� Marlene Kobre j�� ..1.�.�-�-=t._ Ron Denson � � ea�:To� �at �`�. ��INATE�� ` ,�. SYSTEM ' � r1}1A A,C�"�'"""�t1`t � Phone: 6Q7-277-0660 Fax: 607-277-3p56 www.baltonpoint.arg scliwc@boltonpoint.org COMMISSIONERS: H. MICHAEL NEWMAN Chairperson ROY E. STALEY Vice Chairperson BILL GOODMAN Treasurer DONA�D HARTILL TEE-ANN HUNTER TNQMAS 1.10NES EDWARD LAVIGNE 1ASON �EIFER JACK RUECKHEIM �i��a waaaa�Q CONSULTANTS: KATHY MILLER MARY RUSSEI.L MARYANN SUMNER MANAGEMENT: 10AN F�OTE General Manager STEVE RIDDLE Distributian PAMEIA VAfVGELDER Finance 6�ENN RaTAJCZAK Production SaUTHERN CAYUGA LAKE INTERMUNICIPAL WATER CUMMISSIUN TOWNS OF DRYDEN � ITHACA • LANSING - VI�LAGES OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS • �ANSING � 1402 EAST SHORE C?RIVE — ITHACA, NY 14850 February 28, 2017 Marlene Kobre 11Q3 Hanshaw Rd ithaca NY 1485d Re: Account # T1347,1103 Hanshaw Rd Dear Marlene Kobre: Enclosed yau will find your March 1, 2017 Water Bill. You wi11 notice it has $173.76 tiue in arrears. This amount is for a carrected bill back on the 9J1J16 quarter. The 9j1�16 bill is for billing period: 5-15-16 to 8-15-16. In between theses dates, yaur meter was replaced with a new meter. The ald meter reading should have been used at that time and it was not. The bill was estimated using 15,80Q gallons instead. The bill should have been readings 2254400 to 22862Qd-last reading on old meter. The usage should have been 31,800 gallons..The correct bill would be $345.35, yau paid $171.59 and it left a balance due of $173.76. I apolagize far the confusian. If you have any questions about this, please contact myself. Thank you, (, ... ,, tJ ��'.�i�a� `� udy rasi Account Clerk cc T1347 �♦♦Excellence in water quality and customer service ♦♦♦ � 03/30/17 �- TOWN OF ITHACA 15:34:59 Accaunt Ledgers WATER SEWER COLLECTION Date Reference Charge Penalty Other Charge Penaity Other Charge Penalty Balance Account # T1347 MARLENE KOBRE stai�o4 3/01l04 3l30/04 �01104 J20l04 3l01 f05 3t3Q105 6t0i/05 6/16l05 9l01 /05 9/19105 2/01l05 2t19/05 3/01106 si2�ros 6l01 {06 61Q7106 9�d1l06 sr2s�os 2/Oi /06 �2aas 3td1�07 s�2sla7 6l01 /07 6(12l07 9l011Q7 9l18/07 2l01 !07 2/17/Q7 3f01 /Q8 313QJ08 6l01 !08 6/11 !08 9l01 !08 9t30/08 2/01108 �1101l09 �1 /Q8l09 �3/Q1l09 �3l31 /09 �4/07109 i6101 /09 M6130l09 �sio� ros 0/01 /09 19l29/09 0/13l09 Forward Billing CR716049 Billing CR744054 Billing CR796045 Billing GR823033 Billing CR861067 Biiling CR896063 Biiling CR936047 Billing CR959095 Biiling cRoasal4 Billing CRQ43080 Billing cRosgass Billing GR107092 Billing CR151064 Billing CR187073 Billing CR242106 Billing CR267065 Billing GR322086 Billing Penalty CR362027 Billing Penafty CR402004 Billing CR440030 aining Penalty CR4890Q1 ADJ05962 Page: 1 32.Od -32.00 32.00 -32.OQ 34.40 -34.40 34.4d -34.40 56.42 -56.42 41.62 -41.62 34.40 -34.40 34.4d -34.4d 34.4Q -�4.4a 34.40 -34.40 34.40 -34.40 34.40 -34.40 72.24 -72.24 34.40 -34.4Q 35.50 -35.50 36.57 -36.57 49.35 -49.35 35.50 6.06 -35.50 -6.05 42.5Q 4.25 -432$ -4.25 42.50 -41.72 42.50 4.25 -42.5Q -4.25 25.00 -17.19 -7.81 17.60 -17.60 18.04 -18.04 17.60 -17.60 17.60 -17.6Q 36.08 -36.08 26.62 -26.62 20.24 -�a.24 17.6d -17.6d 2Q.46 -20.46 17.sa -17.60 17.60 -17.60 18.70 -1$.70 46.20 -46.20 19.80 -19.80 17.60 -17.60 22.66 -22.66 30.58 -30.58 17.60 1.76 -17.60 -1.76 17.60 1.76 -17.64 -1.76 17.60 -17.60 � 7.sa 1.76 -17.6Q -1.76 ., Account # T1347 12l01(09 12l21 tQ9 03l01l10 03l30(10 06l01l1 Q 06l30l10 09l01 /1 Q 09l23l10 12l01 /10 12l17/10 03/Qi 111 03(30(11 06/d 1 /11 46/30t11 09101l11 Q9t28l11 12(01l11 12(31111 a��1a��2 03/01 f 12 03/30/12 06l01 h 2 06127l12 Q9/Qi /12 09/21l12 12/01l12 12118t12 03101 t13 03129113 asra1�13 06l30/13 09lQ 1(13 09l30l13 12101/13 12l2�113 03/01 /14 03t24114 06l01f14 06124114 Q9/01 /14 09125l14 12(41l14 12/22l14 Q3/Q1l15 03/30l15 06/01115 06130l15 09l01l15 09ld8l15 12lb1l15 12/22l15 03/01116 03130l16 06141116 06(27(16 Billing GR515110 Billing CR569045 Billing CR612069 Billing CR641 d42 Billing GR672077 Billing GR717052 Billing CR763002 Billing CR796Q64 Billing Penalty CR842001 Biiling CR876019 Billing CR914056 Billing CR947044 Bil(ing CR978069 Billing CRQ31046 Billing GR080073 Billing CR1201 Q9 Billing CR149031 Billing CR189Q53 Billing CR24QQ49 Billing CR3Q2059 Billing GR347121 Billing GR409025 Billing CR471053 Billing GR492001 Billing CR561075 Billing CR622035 Billing CR66810$ Page: 2 42.5Q -42.50 �.2a -43.20 43.2Q -43.20 102.82 -102.82 116.21 -116.21 47.00 -47.Od 47.OQ -47.00 86.01 -86.01 8225 -82.25 72.$5 -72.85 81.84 -81.84 166.17 -166.17 104.79 -104.79 92.27 -92.27 ss.a�a -58.40 93.44 -93.44 67.74 -67.74 78.47 -78.47 59.90 -59.90 131.7$ -131.78 65.29 -65.29 96.34 -96.34 81.03 -81.Q3 $1.03 -81.03 103.36 -103.36 92.36 -82.36 134.2$ -134.28 8.23 -8.23 17.60 -17.60 17.60 -17.64 17.60 -17.60 52.36 -52.36 59.18 -59.18 30.48 -30.48 34.67 -34.67 69.72 -69.72 66.68 -ss.ss 61.17 -61.17 68.72 -68.72 139.53 -139.53 87.89 -87.99 66.36 -66.36 �s.sa -33.60 67.2Q -67.24 48.72 -48.72 55.88 -55.68 34.00 -34A0 93.50 •93.50 46.33 -46.33 64.48 -64.48 5423 -54.23 54.23 -54.23 69.17 -69.17 60.�7 -60.77 88.36 -88.36 -6.67 80.10 0.00 60.80 0.40 60.80 0.00 155.18 0.00 175.39 0.00 77.48 0.00 81.87 OAO 155.73 0.00 148.93 163.$3 14.90 148.92 0.00 150.56 0.00 305.70 0.00 192.78 O.OQ 158.63 0.00 92.00 o.00 160.64 0.00 116.46 OAO 134.15 4.00 93.90 0.00 225.28 0.00 111.62 0.00 160.82 0.00 135.26 OAO 135.26 0.00 172.53 0.00 153.13 0.00 222.64 0.00 Aecou�t # T1347 09l01 !16 d9120f 16 12l01116 12l19l16 a1t11l17 Q3101 /17 Billing CR704084 Billing CR750084 ADJ01031 Billing TOt��S: Page: 3 103.49 -103.49 108.i3 -i 0$.73 104.8Q 353.05 457.85 68.10 -68.10 71.55 -71.55 68.96 232.31 3d1.2� ,,,,,.a�_.z,,, C 1�.../ �� c c,� � t71.59 0.00 180.28 0.00 173.76 759.12 j �� ` � � �� . � i ` Subject: FW: Airbnb -------- Origi��al r7zessage -------- Fram: Maralyn Edid ��s��2_l Cr�x;��:�il.�:c>i��> Date: 2Q17/04/23 3:12 PM (GMT-05:00) Ta: I:�C:��cscl�i��4��a C��>t�.>ws�.it��c�°�t.17y.t�� Subject: Aii•bnb Mr. Goodxnan, We ai•e long-terizl residents of Renwick Heights who value its tucl�ecl-away location and strc�ng neighboi•hood identity. We perceive tl�at the incursion of s�zort-term Airbnl� rentals is negatively af�ecting t1�1e character and security of our community. When people ]ct out their homcs to str•angers there is risk not only t� their property �nd s��fety buC to that of their neighbors, as we11. Moreover, the coming and going of strangers is disrupCive and potentially pioblematic. It invites an incre�se in traf�tic and noise, frays community norms, and injects an elernent of �.lrban anonymity into small-town quality aF life. We believe thc Town af I�thaca can and sholtld ban shoz-t-term rentals of' a11 Cy��es. W�e vigorously oppose the Town's detei•rz�inatiol� to �llow stixch rentals �involving single visitors, and are concerned about ullequal notification and e�lforcenzent within the jurisdiction. Are certai�n neighbc�rhoods mare prc�tec�ed agaii�st Airbnb incursions than athers? We ai�e tr-Llly disappainted Ch��t the Town would tolerate and even e�lcour�ibe rentals under 30 days, essentially taking a st��nce th��t so cleai-ly harnls residents. Sincerely, Maralyn Edid ar�ld Lawi�ence BlLlme 22 Renwick Heights Rd. r�� , �,( - � '� «,$'�; �,,� 2 �l5 Ie1. '�'io�a �tree�, I�h�c��,1�1.Y. 14�50 ' ��, , r,,% ��°�. � ��-'�' w�vw.tc�wn.ithaca,ny.us I'Y1oT1e: (E�7) 273-1721 Bi11 Gc�odman, Tawn Su�crvisor F'�iuleCtc R<�sa, Tr>wn Clerk I3ru�e 13��tes, t�irecCor of Cocic Enfqrcement �r�oc�dm�nC�?Ccawn.itl�aca.ny.us N7rqs�+C?>Ct�wr�.ithac<t.ny.us hbatc�C�?towr�.ithac�l.ny.us Apri121, 2017 I�ear Tow�1 oF Itllaca Resicle�7t, Over thc past seve,xal year�, thc T�wia c�f IChaca has experienced a clr�rnatic rise in the iilciclence of sho�r-t-tcri7�� resic�ential ��er7t�tls (STRR). U�n1ikE tr��lclitianal renC�l ar�ra�zgements, whei•e ten�nts and landlords agree Cc� tcrzn5 for-lnnnt}1s c��• years at � time, STRR ofte7a last for• less than a week, frequently for a nigilt o�� twa. Landlords ancl tenant� finci �ac}7 athe�� oilline, utilizing sites like aii-bnb.cam, flipkey.cc�r7� and h�ar�neaw�,y.cc7m. W11ile ensuri�ng �the availabilify of accorru7l�dations f�c>r pers��s visiting �thc Ithac� ��re�� is ii�nportant, STRI�', are 1ar�ely unregulated, are nat subject tc� healt�r and sa�fery inspe�cCic��i�5, ancl have beccrme a source of frequent nuisanee complaints involviiig r�oi�e, ��rk.ing and litter. The Town af Ithaca �is ende��voring to devise policies that balazlce the re�lities af "the s17�Xr�i�ig econc�n�y" with the neecls and expectations of periz�anent residenty and the Town's rangc�ing desirc. �c� pr�serve and enhance the availability of stable, affarc�able housing. ThE:, ��r�ces5 is corzzplicated, anci ec�uitable solutic�ns wi11 require considei•able time, and i�escai-ch. In the i��7eantinle, �Ch� Towr7's elec�tecl oificials and code enforeement stafl� feel t}�at it �is iz��perrt�nC Ca cletail the re,g��l�ztory lanclscape, as it c�irrently exists, related to shcrrt-ternz residenti��l rentals. Sh�t°t-�e�-rr� Y�esicl�tat��1 T�ental� I+'re��a��flnt�y Vi��l�te Tc�vvn ��' yth�c� Code Shoi•t-terrn reyiclential rentals freqL�Ent1y violat�e Town Code provisions related to �ccupancy, parki�lg, ancl naise. Th� Town of Iihaca regulates �-esiclential accupancy based on its definition of "t'�zmily," wl�icl� is sitnilar c�r identical to clefinitions used �th.i•oughout New York State. For ex�r��plc, based �an curre,nt reglzl�ltions, a�n owner-�ccuparlt of a sin�le-iamily house can only rent to c�ne ira�ividual at a ti�71e. OcGr.l�ancy exceecl4��Lices ��•e s�ibject to fines and penalties. . t " � [• .i ... Cc�ia�pliance The const��uction azid subwequent ecccGpancy of si�lgle-fatnily and two-family buildings, which �ccount foc virtually ��ll af the STRR in the Town o�f Ith��ca, ar�e regulated izi accor-dance with paranleters seL fo�•th in thc Internatic�nal ResidenCial Cacl� (IRC). Whi1e it is possible that Page 1 of 2 some of the existing STRR meet IRC requirements far minimum habitabie square faotage, egress, smoke detectors, etc., without comprehensive inspections af STRR it is not passible for the Tawn to ascertain whether structures are safe for renters. Moreover, it is possible that modification af the property to enable STRR cauld trigger the obligation to comply with cunent code requirements that did not exist at the time the structure was built. Creating a Regulatary Pian Far Short-Term Residential Rentals The Tawn of Ithaca is sensitive ta the evolution of the short-term rental economy and is exploring avenues that cauld patentially ailow for owner-occupants to utilize their primary dwellings an a limited basis to supplement their income and, by extension, make their homes more affardable. Hawever, properties that are acquired and/or converted for the sole purpose of STRR remove much-needed hausing stock frarn the market, raise rental pr�perty rates across the board, and have proven ta be cansistently problematic for neighbars. These "business" properties wili be under increased regulatary scrutiny as legal parameters are developed. In the meantime, residents are encauraged to comrnunicate with their neighbors to attempt to resolve issues, and report suspected vialations to the Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Department, at (607) 273-1721, for investigatian and potential enforcement action. Page 2 af 2 Town of Ithaca Manica I.ang Se Bradford K Krakow 215 N Tioga St 228 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Qarothy D Park Katherine Howe & �ouis Hyman 205 Devon Rd 13d Sunset Dr ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Ayaka S& Michael B Timmons 126 Sunset Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Elizabeth Caldwell & Anthony Brighton 11 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Neville & Vera Dyson-Hudson 123 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Kathleen Ann & David Putnam 17 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Renee Alexander 2 Renwick PI Ithaca, NY 14850 lohn Eckenrode 21 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Karen & David Smith 221 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Lisabeth Chabot & Nichalas Whitmer 1 Renwick P� Ithaca, NY 14850 ludith & Frank Wayno 11Q Renwick Or Ithaca, NY 14850 Michael and Katherine Kingra 14 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Barbara Kolowski & Richard Bayd 18 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Mallika Thomas 20 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Monica Lang & Bradfard Krakow 228 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Ayaka S& Michae) B Timmons 126 Sunset Or Ithaca, NY 14850 Romas & Kristina Spokas 102 Renwick Or Ithaca, NY 14850 Fayerty Creagan 117 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Thomas D Fox 15 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Maureen Viele 19 Renwick PI Ithaca, NY 14850 Mallika Thomas 20 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Nancy D Hart I.awrence Blume and Maralyn Edid 215 Renwick Dr 22 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Katherine Stettler & David Deitcher Robert & Bonnie Mac Daugall 227 Renwick Or 120 Sunset Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Manica �ang & Bradford Krakow Sarah Schneider Gunther & Amy Rose Marga & Oskar �iivak 228 Renwick Dr Krosch 230 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 23 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Edward B Swartz Anthony J Pane,lr Marian Moynes & lahn Hickey 232 Renwick Dr 235 Renwick Dr 236 Renwick Dr ithaca, NY 1485Q ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Elke Siegel & Paul Fleming 237 Renwick Dr ithaca, NY 14850 Christopher Kerber & Genevive Meredith 240 Renwick Or Ithaca, NY 1485Q �ena & �awrence Siany 250 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Elliott & Elizabeth Ryan 27 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Phyllis & William Highland 3 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 1485d Lara & Lee Kaltrnan 24 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Debra & Jeffrey Lillie 37 Victor Mendon Rd Mendon, NY 14506 Catherine A& Paul R Dawson 256 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Mia Slotnick & Kenneth Simpson 28 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 lennifer Germann & Peter McCracken 3Q Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Christapher Kerber & Genevive Meredith 240 Renwick Or Ithaca, NY 14850 Lynda W D Bogel 25 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 William C Brothers 260 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 1�$50 Selina & Michaei Lenetsky 29 Renwick Heights Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 Britta E& Brian T Lee 5 Renwick Dr Ithaca, NY 1485Q Luisa & Michael MacAnanny Mary Schwartz Xiaoyun Wang 6 Renwick P) 7 Renwick Qr 8 Renwick Or Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 Ithaca, NY 14850 .. � Apt-il 24, 2017 TO: 'i'hc "Towr� �f Ithaca (Attn: "I'ow1� Cler•k) In accordr�nce �vith New York State Town I.,aw Sectic�n 65-a, notice is hereby �;ive7� t�� the 'I'c�wn af Itllaca t(�a�t�. clan�erous rc��d conditions exist on Westview l..ane, 'i'ere�aceview Lane and Towe,rvie;w Rc�ad in thc Gr��nclview suL�d�ivisio77 of the Town of Ithaca. These dangerous conditions consist of; l. C,xces�ivelv stee�-slo[�ed roadside sa�rface w�ater callectic��t ditches that cawair�ver�c yafety siar�c�4�rds of thc Fecleral I-I,i�hwav Administration and the rer,�m►��encl�tiora� of the Cox•raell Local i2oad� �'rot?i•an�, I�o�ciside surface water collectian ditct��s ��rc within the r�o�d right-of-way, necessary f'or r<��dway preserva�tion, and are serviced by the tc�wn as an inte�ral ��art of roadway ��airrt�iiai�lce. "Cher��fo��c, they ca» reaso�Yably be constnied as part and parcc�'I �1't�l�e roadway. �"]�e abc�ve-mentianed organizations assea•t tl�at: "`Ditch slopes steeper than 1 V:3I-I �re not cc�r�sid��re;cl traversable and should ri�t be f�und in t1�7� clear zone." "Ditch sides are usually constructe,cl ir� t11e ranges of' 1 V:3H to IV:6FI_ Steeper slap�s pos� breaY�e�r• safety risk to mator vehicles traveling acrass c�r dc>wn ther�n. Side slopes of '1 V:4H or �11�fter ar�e ca7�rnonly aceepted as safe side slopes." "Ir� slopes of less than '1 V:3H t}re fi•ont slo��; can be steep enc��zgh t� cause a rc�llovec �zcciclent. Iithe vehicle stays upri�ht, the c�allisian with tl�le back slc�pe coulcl l�e severe un�augh t'�7 cause injur�ies. ]f the �front bumper digs into t}ie back s'Inp�, a car can be spun ar��mcl in a very violcnt� man�ier." [7itch�;s s��citically in violation are loeatecl in fr�ant o�f�the fc�l1awirl�; addresses and locatic�ns in tl�� C�rar�clview subdivision: Westview Lane: 12G 128 ]29 (31 13S 137 138 139 141 142 143 l45 147 152 153 155 201 202 2(73 20fi 204 210 2l1 Or� b��th �ides oFtl�e road from the inters�cti��r� ��C Westview Lane and Towerview Rc�ac3 t<� the irrtersectior7 wit�h NYS Rt. '79. On the north and east sides af the northeast bend of Westview Lane. Towerview Road: 101 103 105 112 113 121 On the narth side af Terraceview beginning at 102 cantinuing to the intersection of Honness Lane. 2. Large, exqosed concrete sanitarv sewer access basins within the roadside surface water callection ditches. These basins are in breach af a Federal Hi�hwav Administration safetv warning: "Concrete drainage features adjacent to the roadway are potentially hazardous when they extend above the surrounding ground. These features are r'rgid abjects that can snag the undercarriage af a vehicre leaving the roadway or initiate vehicie roliover." Expased sanitary sewer access basins within the roadside surface water callectian ditches exist in front af the fallowing addresses and tocations in the Grandview subdivisian: Westview Lane 137 151 In two locations on the east side af Tawerview Raad near the intersectian with Rt. '79. 3. Extremelv narrow road shoutders that endan$er qedestrians and fail to comptv with the standards of a number of reca�nized road safetv a�encies and the stipulations af the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA}. Absent sidewalks, pedestrians have no choice but ta use the road shoulders. Mast of the road shaulders in the Grandview subdivision are cansiderabty narrower than 5 ft., often are sloped mare than 2 degrees and have the added hazard of immediateiy bordering on excessively steep and deep raadside surface water callectian ditches. Mobility impaired residents using mobility devices, as well those wha are visualty impaired, find it particularIy difficult and dangerous to negatiate Grandview's raadways. Shoulder width leaves little or no roam to operate certain mobility devices farcing rnability irnpaired persons using such devices to travei in the roadway. Sight impaired persons aften are faced with the dangers of being struck by a ear ar falling into a deep ditch. An a egr �iaus example af a cambination of narraw shoutder and steep ditch is located on the west side of the sautheast curve af Westview Lane. The Federal Highway Administratian (FHWA}, the New York State Department of Transportatian (NYSDOT) and the American Assaciation of State Highway and Transpartation Officials (AASHTO) have a standard requiring that raad shoulders be canstructed of "�rm and stahle material" with a minimurn 4 ft. width, and a siope from the roadway of no greater than 2 degees in cases where road shoulders are used as pedestrian paths and the pedestrian traffic Level of Service (LOS} rating is "A"(<=16 pedestrian per m1m as anecdotaliy estimated far the Grandview development). This road shaulder specification represents a coilective interpretatian by these pertinent transpartation agencies and professional arganizations as ta what is required to pravide for pedestrian safety while concurrently camplying with ADA stipulations. As such, it is evident that the road shoulders currently in use af necessity as pedestrian paths in the Grandview develapment might be construed to be unsafe and in violatian of ADA requirements. Summary: Grandview is a comparatively densely papulated subdivision af duplex homes. Cansequently, vehicular traffic is higher than in subdivisions af similar acreage containing only singie family houses. There is considerabie bicycle and foat traffic caused, in part, by the proximity of the East Ithaca Recreatian Way. Pedestrians with disabilities frequentiy use these roads as wetl. The steep and deep roadside ditches and the narrow, steep road shouiders cantravene established safety standards and recarnmendations, vialate ADA requirements, and present a reai and present danger ta motarists and pedestrians using Grandview's roadways. There are no apparent topagraphical, hydralogical ar structurai constraints that prevent the remediatian of these ditch and road shoulder issues. It is therefore highly recammended that the Town of Ithaca correct these deficiencies in a timelv way befare questians af liabiiity are at issue. References: Federal Highway Administration "Maintenance of Drainage Features far Safety" (http:l/safety.fhwa.dot.�avllocal ruralltrainin�/thwasad9424/#c2.2} Cornell Lacal Roads Pragram, "Road Safety Fundamentals" NYSDQT Hi�hway Desi�n Manual. Chapter 18 "Pedestrian Facility L7esign ", Revision 83, June 24, 2Q1 S American Association af State Highway & Transpartation Officials (AASHTO} "Guide for the Ptanning, Design and Operation of Pedestrian Facifities. " Arnerican Disabilities Act (ADA} "Guidelines for Burldings and Facilities" as supplemented by "Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Pubtic Right-of-Way." spectfuliy submitted, David D. Stotz 153 '!Z VVestview Lane Ithaca, NY 1485Q 607-319-4$ r 0 djs2�cornetl.edu cc: $itl Goodman, Town Supervisar Jim Weber, Town Highway Superintendent Certified Mail � r � Fram: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Attachments: Andrew Kalloch <andrew.kalloch@airbnb.com> Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:31 PM pgoodman@town.ithaca.ny.us Paulette Rosa; Bruce Bates; Eric Levine; P Leary; T Hunter; Rod Howe; Rich DePaolo; PBleiwas Airbnb in Ithaca, N.Y. Airbnb Neighbors Taol Briefing.pdf; Airbnb Trust and Safety Briefing.pdf; Summary of Portland ME STR Regulations Mar 2017.pdf; Airbnb Cover Letter, Ithaca NY.pdf G�c�cl aftErnc>c>n, S�ipe;rviyor Go�dman, membez•s of tl�� Z'c�w» Bca�u�d, and st�3fP. My name is A��drew Kallqch and I �zm a lawycr working in Public Policy t'or Airbnb. IC l�as c�mc. Cc� pur att� nii�an that the B<�ard is working or� sl�c�r-t-tern�� rrr7Ca1 (STR) rules and, to that Enc�, w�i�l�cl to �a�iss a1c�a1� some additional inPar-mali��>n r�baut Airbi�b that may be of use in yoiir clelilaer�ticins. Attacl��d l�> this �mail are C(�e following: l. A covcc lctttr, wl�ieh deseribes many ��f Airb��b's tnist ancl saf�ty/qu�lity of life too]s and pz•ovicl�s k�y statisties for New Yoik ancl ICh�ca (city ancl tc�wr� combined). 2. A P�7w�r-Poii7t �reser�tation (via a Gc�ogle Di•ive link, bcic�w) autlining Airt�nb's ��l�abal foot�rinl ancl its �.conomic impact in New York Statc. 3. Twcr ori�-p��ige brie;fings on our Trust and Safery �f�l'�.�r�t;� �1nd ��ur �Zew Neigl7bors tool, whicl� ar� particular•ly im��ortant for the kind af lisung co��c�rns c�utlined in the articl� ah��ve. 4. A summa�y c�f t�he new ordinance from PorCl�znd, Main�, wl�icli acidresses key public s�lfety ai7d c�uality ��1" li1�e conce�-��s in a mark�t;t like ICliaca that is largely resideratial, t�ut w'hich �Isc> benefits fr�m Che tourist ecc�nomy. � � ,�� '��a �"�� a��g��aa� '��tr� �a��a� ��a�� As y�u can see, horne sharir�g is an imp�rtant and growin� p�rt crf ll�e regic�n's c;conomy and we ar� pr�7uc] t�7 be raart' of thc e;ec�nc�mic potential it provides i'c>r N�w Yc�rk's famili�s, ��eighbonc��ods, ancl cc�rnr�runities. Th�nk yc�u a��tir1 f�7r yo�ir Cimt and please don't hesitatE Co r�ach c>ut i1` you h�vc c�uestions. Sincer�;ly, Andrew L. K�zil�>cl�� =_ :. Andrew L. Kalloch Ptiiblic Policy �ar� clr� �, �; �� I l ca� l� C�,� �� r�l-�. �;�»r�. �. �� , ��,. s� ,, � u�� a � � � �,�� u � ��f�� r�, Aµ t�rwm � G6/,�' � � � "�1 y ��am;!^arm� "��km r.�� 7a5i/'P sDiY�S��?� Tuesday, Apri125, 201� Hon. Bi11 Goodman Supervisor Town of Ithaca, New York 2i5 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, N.Y. i485a pgoodman@town.ithaca.ny.us Re: Home Sharing Laws in Ithaca, New York Siipervisor Goadman, On behalf af Airbnb, I urge the Town of Ithaca to adopt regulations that support responsible hame sharing and the ecanomic value it provides to househalds and businesses in your community. Airbnb was launched in 2008 with a single listing in a single apartment in San Francisco. Our founders-- recent (and unemployed) graduates of the Rhode Island School of Design-- were struggling to afford an increasingly expensive housing market and decided to open up their own home to host ather artists who were in town for a design canference. Nine years later, that single home share has turned into a platform that has brought 15o million guests to over 3 million listings in 6,�,00a cities in nearly every country across the glabe. Of course, while Airbnb has used the power of the internet to bring together millions of hosts and guests, New Yorkers are well aware that home sharing didn't start with Airbnb. Rather, it is a historic tradition—in this state and otllers. Airbnb is proud to be part of this tradition. In the last year alone, over 49,00o hosts welcomed 2.i million guests to the Empire State, with aver z.5 million New York residents using Airbnb to travel elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad. The vast majority of these New York hosts—�6 percent of whom are women—are individuals and families who share their homes occasionally to pay for their martgage, medicine, and student loans, or save inoney for retirement ar a rainy day. In fact, the typical hast in New York earns $5,,0o in supplemental income by sharing their home for about three nights a month. Furthermore, unlike ather types of lodging, such as multinational hotel chains, g� percent of revenue generated tlxrough Airbnb goes directly to aur hosts, who plow it back into the Empire State economy. Hame sharing is particularly valuable in college towns like Ithaca, which welcome large aznounts of visitors during graduation weekends, making it di�cult for graduating students' guests to book traditional accommodations like hatels. Airbilb is a flexible way for college towns ta dynainically add nzuch-needed accommodations supply during majar events like commencement, providing visiting families with an �ffardable accominodation aption that benefits residents and 1oca1 businesses alilce. It thus comes as na surprise that Ithaca has a substantial community of Airbnb hasts and guests. In the last year (ending April l, 2oi7}, there were approximately: • boo Active Hosts • �i percent af Ithaca hosts are women and the average host age is 46. 37 percent of local hosts are over the age of �o, highlighting haw many hosts use supplementai income from extra bedrooms to "age in place" in the neighborhoods they cali hame. • The typical host rented their hame for just 28 nights in the last year. Indeed, far the vast majority of hosts, home sharing represents a part-time, supplemental source of incame, not a full-time, commercial operation. • gl,000 Inbaund Guests • Average guest is 39 years ald and the average guest group size is 2,� people, signaling that Ithaca is a prime destinatian for couples and families. Moreover, the average length of stay is g nights, highlighting how Airbnb is e�anding travel options and spurring economic growth in Ithaca. • Over 2�,aao Ithaca residents used Airbnb to travel elsewhere in New York State and around the warld. Airbnb has grown significantly in recent years and one of the reasons far our success has been aur investments in innovative toals ta protect hasts, guests, and neighbors: • Airbnb uses sophisticated technologies and behavioral analysis techniques ta help prevent potentially troublesome hosts or guests from utilizing the platfarm in the first place. Far U.S. residents, Airbnb also runs host and guest information through several public databases to check if there are matches with certain felany convictions, sex offender registrations, or significant misdemeanors. • Airbnb maximizes transparency by allowing hosts ta require that guests provide a government ID, and we created a program called Verified ID, which connects a person's offline identification (a driver's license or passgort) with another online profile to their Airbnb account, such as Facebook, Google, ar LinkedIn accounts. • Airbnb encourages hasts and guests to communicate and get to laiow one another before a trip occurs. Like other online platforms like Ebay, our community builds trust and a track record for users to be able to learn more about each other through publicly available reviews and feedback. • There have been over 16o million guest arrivals in Airbnb listings to date. Incidents do happen, but they are rare. That's why we offer $1 million Hast Pratection Insurance and a$i millian Host Guarantee to help protect hosts and guests, In 2016, there were more than 3o millian trips at Airbnb listings worldwide. Significant property damage (claims that were reimbursed under our Host Guarantee program for over $i,000) was reported to us o.009% af the time. Far what it's worth, at that rate, you could host a new reservation every single day for aver 27 years withaut expecting to file a significant property damage claim under our Hast Guarantee. • If a guest or a hast ever have an issue, our global Trust and Safety team is an call 24J� to heip. • Last year, we launched the Neighbors platform-- a taol that allows people who may not even use Airbnb ta report potential concerns directly ta aur staff for review. Between the time the system launched and the end of 2oi6, there were a,229 neighbor concerns that came into the system. Based on boaldngs in that same time frame, that represents a rate of less than i in every 2b,00a guest arrivals during that time, or .004%. In additian to these taols, Airbnb believes that reasonable regulation can foster responsible home sharing. To that end, we've worked with hundreds of municipalities across the country and around the world to craft rules that work for their communities. At the heart of most of these ordinances is the recognition that occasionally renting a home daes not transform the property into a commercial hotel any more than a garage sale transforms a home inta the local ma11 ar providing music lessons to local kids turns one's home into Carnegie Hall. To that end, we believe Ithaca should recagnize short-term rentals as an accessory use in residential zones, not a full-time commerciai practice like a traditional B&B. Lastly, we believe short term rentals on Airbnb should be taxed like any other transient lodging. Since 2oi4, the company has signed voluntary collection agreements with over a7� jurisdictions around the world, including right here in Tamgkins County. These voluntary callectian agreements have enabled us to collect over $24o million ta fund critical public serv%ces. New Yark has a well-earned reputation as a place that is open to new ideas and embraces innovatian. Home sharing is the latest industry to honor that tradition and we urge Ithaca to follaw the lead of other cammunities in welcoming the econamic appartunity it creates for residents and businesses alike, Sincerely, Andrew L. Kalloch Airbnb CC: Hon. Rod Howe, Deputy Town Supervisor Hon. Pamela Bleiwas, Town Board Mernber Hon. Rich DePaolo, Town Board Member Hon. Tee-Ann Hunter, Town Board Member Hon. Pat Leary, Tawn Board Member Han. Eric Levine, Town Board Member Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk 3 $%� YFw � �g �� ' h �Y NtlNO�' °��14qIhYi/�� . A�►afe, Welcoming Community: Airbnb Nei�hbors Every time a host welcomes a guest into their hoine, they are alsa welcoming them into their neighborhood. We're proud that since Airbnb gat started, there have been over loo million guest arrivals in Airbnb listings and those guests have Ueen welcomed by hosts and their neighbars in over 34,00o cities and towns across 190+ countries warldwide. The overwhelining majority of Airbnb guests are respectful travelers, so complaints and issues are incredibly rare, but we always want to do everything we can ta help our community members be gaod neighbars in the places our hosts call hame. To help achieve tllat gaal, Airbnb l�:X��7.c�l�c�ci a new resource for neighbars af Airbnb hosts on May 31, 201E7: AirUnb Neighbors.l Anyone can log on to ��,�.i�_l:r�?k:�.c�Wc��r��.�:l��c�tw� to share s�eci�c cancerns they might have about a listing in their community. These cancerns could include things like noise complaints. From there, our team reviews their concern and, if necessary, follows up with the host regarding the issue. Neighbors can submit informatian anonymously or allow our team to pass along their contact infarmation so the host can follow up with them directly. Once a neighbor subinits feeclback, we send a con�rmatian email, along with a case numUer. We treat e�ch case seriously and ensure that we give hosts and their neighbars the apportunity to resolve concerns themselves, whenever passible. Hasting is a big responsibility and those who repeatedly fail to meet aur standards and expectatians are subject to suspensiozz or removal from the Airbnb cammunity. Uur community of hosts, guests, and neighbors is defined by a set of valiles that support our shared mission to create a world where people can belang anywhere. We're excited to offer this tool as we continue to work to suppart everyone — including neighbors — in the Airbnb cammttnity. ' hii ; l:�fe�i;.�xic�k��h.cecrt�a tt<:�ti��—a•c��c�>�t'c�1--��i.;�l��iur�s . ��d � �mw4� ., �V . pAu!� � , � „� � � � � �)WM l�raiosu�m�M1�Z,ri�nna� : « • . r � � • � � � ' . � There have been over i6o million guest arrivals in Airbnb listings and negative incidents are extremely rare. Our community is growing quicl�ly because it is built on trust - it is the faundatian of our business. We've developed a number of lcey features that help to build this trust, including: • Airbnb uses sophisticated technologies and behavioral analysis techniques to help prevent potentially traublesolne hosts or guests from utilizing the platform in the first place. For U.S. residents, Airbnb alsa runs host and guest inforination through several public databases to check if there are matches with certain felony car�victions, sex offender registrations, or significant misdemeanors. • Airbnb maximizes transparency by allowing hosts to require that guests provide a goverr�ment ID, and we created a prograin called Verified ID, which connects a person's affline identificatian (a clriver's license or passport) with another online profile to their Airbnb account, such as Facebook, Gaogle, or Linkedln accounts. • Airbnb encourages hosts and guests to communicate and get to icnow one another before a trip occurs. Lilce other anline platforms like Ebay, aur coinmunity builds trust and a track record for users to be able to learn more �bout each other through publicly available reviews and feedbacle. • There have been over i6o millian guest arrivals in Airbnb listin�s ta date. Incidents do ha��pen, but they are rare. That's why we offer $i million Host Protection Insurance aizd a$i million Host Guarantee to help protect hosts and guests. In 2oi6, there were mare thar� ,o million trips at Airbnb listiiigs worlc�wiae. Significant propei•ty damage (claims that w�re reiinbursed under our Host Gtiarantee program for over $l,00a) was repoz�ted to us o.aa9% af the time. For what it's woz-t11, at that rate, you could host a new reservation evety single day for over 2� years without expecting to file a significant property damage claim tlncler our Host Guarantee, • If a guest or a host ever have an issue, our global Trust and Safety team is on ca1124/� to help. • Last year, we launched the Neighbors platform-- a tool that allows people who may not even use Airbnb to report patential concerns directly to our staff for review. Between thc time the system launched and the end of 2a16, there were 2,2�g nei�hbar concerns that came into the system. Based on baakings ilz that same time frame, that represents a rate of less than 1 in evezy 26,00o guest arrivals during that time, ar .004%>. At the end of the day, while we ean't eliminate all the rislc in traveling, we worlc very hard to help hosts and guests have the ability ta malce the most informed decisions they can. We have zero tolerance for inappropriate behavior and the safety af the Airbnb camrnunity is the single most impoz~tant thing we work an every day. Short Term Rental �STR} Framework 1�Page Dra$ STR Regulatory Framework: Updated Febr��ary l, 201'7 l. A Short Term Rental {STR} is a dwelling wzit or rooming unit for transient guests far less than 30 days; 2. Praperty owners and their agents (Hosts) rr�y not aperate an STR withaut anrivally registering with the Housing Safety Off�e each tulit or roommg wut; 3. The City will reevaluate the STR policy six months af�er registratian begins and annually thereafter ta understand the STR �xket impact on Partland's housing stock; 4. A cap af 300 w�its will be made ava�able for all STR wuts that are not located on the islands and are not a host's primary residence. No cap for nan-awner accupied units will initially be set for the islands. a. Once caps have been reached a wait list will be forrr�ed to help gauge market demand; b. 11te City w�l reevah�ate the STR cap for bath the islands and maimland s� rnonths a$er registration begins and annually thereaf�er to understand the STR �rket impact on Portland's housing stock and whether adjustments should be made to either cap; 5. Regardless of ownership shucture, mdividuals sha11 nat be allowed to register more than five {5} STR units across any bu�dings in Portland 'm which they have a financial interest; 6. Due to accountability and e$'ective enforcement concerns only property owners w�l be able to register STRs, with the exceptian that a renter may register one apartme�rt provided that: a. The apartment is their primary dwelling and the tenatrt submits a primary res�ience affidavit and assac�ted dacuments; b. A�Ong with their registration applicatian and fee tenants must provide a notarized copy of the city draf�ed ]andlord-tenant STR permission �tter signed by their ]andlord. 'I'he letter wiil inclutie: i. Landlord and tenant's carnact infotmatian; ii. A notarized statemerrt of permission by Iandlord allowing tenarrt to rent apartrr�rrt as STR inchzding an acknawledgment by the owner of their liability under the Disorderty House Ordinance, inspections, and ariy fees or code vialations; '7. A violation of the Disorderly House Ordinance wil1, at the discretion of the City Manager or their desigrtee, result in an immedaate revocation af the registration and 12 rr�nth suspension from registering again; 8. AIl Island rentals will corrtinue to register with the Housing Safety 4ffice. Because these rentals are typically rented seasanally the registration fee structure wi� folLow the registratian fees for awner-occupied muhi-family bu�dings. Also, given the type of housing stocic on the is]ands nan-owner accupied sing(e f�mily homes shall be allowed to operate as STRs so long as they �et all other requ�ements; 9. Under the STR regulations condominiums w�l be cansidered single £amily horr�s subject to the same fees and STR limitatians as outlined in the chart below; _ _ _ __ 2�Page a. For clarity, the City's STR regul�tions will nat supersede candominium by�.ws pertaining to subletting or o�ering STR and each condominium association may enforce its own STR restr�tions as the association deems appropriate; 10. STR u� be addressed similarly to all other applicable bw�ling and land use violations as descrbed under 5ection 6.1 of the City Code and the Disorderly House Ordinance; 11. All registration fees and penalties associated with ST'Rs will be allacated to administrative costs for regulating S'TRs. C}nce the administrative needs have been rr�et any rerrraining revenue w�l be allocated ta the Housing Trust Fund. 12. Property management firrns faund operating STR.'s without proper registration rr�ay be fined. These fines rnay be in addit'ron to fines levied against the property awner; 13. Where appiicable, hosts must sign an affidavit that the registered unit is their primary residence and provide copies of documents approved by the City demanstrating compliance wwithh this residency require�nt, including governnn�errt ID's, Homestead Exernption, voter registratian, current busi�ness license, andlor any ather docur�nts deemed appropriate by City sta� 14. Hosts must camplete the Clwner's Pre-Inspect�n Checklist ar suni� r docurr�rrt provided by the Housing Safety Qffice as part of the registrat�n process; 15. As a candition of registration, STR's must allow ot�site inspections, as well as upon request preserrt their registrat�n information, retltal history and upcoming reservatians; 16. A registration number v�ri]1 be given to each hast per dwelling imit; this registration number shall be displayed 'm the dweiling unit and be featured 'm ads; 17. Failure of hosts or their represerrtatives to adequately respond to inquiries by the City within a 48 hour period shall be cansidered a violation af these regulations and be subject to penalt�s under Section 6.1; 1 S. Over�ught STR guest occupancy w�l be limnted ta twa guests per bedraom plus na more tY� two additianal guests who may ut�7ize other s�eeping space in another area of the dwelling unit such as a pullout couch. For example, a one bedroom dwelling unit cau�d be rented for a tatal af four guests, whereas a two bedraom dwelling unit could be rented to a total of sizc guests; and 19. T1ie number of STR units that may be operated in a bu�ding and the'rr associated registration fees wili depend on whether ar not the building is owner occupied as fi:irther detailed in the chart on the ne�ct page. a. Fees w�l be cumulative and will increase based on the nwnber af tatal wzzits and each unit fee will relate to whether or not it is in an owner occupied or non-owner occupied building. b. Fees will be calcu]ated by fi�st using any STRs operating in single family homes or oumer occupied multi-family bu�dings and then fees will be attrbuted at a higher rate for any uniks in non-owner occupied bu�dings. It w�l not matter what order the wiits are registered in as maney owed w�l be adjusted accord'mgly ta accurately re�ect the 3�Page total reg�sstratian fee due based on the number of total units and building typalogy represented. i. If a property owner registers STRs in rrr�re than one building the registration fees will esca]ate based on the tatal number of STR's that they register rather than resetting the escalating fees for each building. For e�mple, if a person owns two non-owner occupied three unit buildings and can register two units in each building the registration fee charged would be a total of $3,704 as fees rise even if registered S'TR units are not in the same huilding. If an owner alsa operates STRs in an owner occupied multi family or single family buikiing the registration fees w� accumulate the awner occupied wut first, no cnatter the tirn�ing of registration and the fee for the number of STR uruts m non-owner occ�pied bwldings w�l start m a step above the number of STR units operated in a single family home or owner accupied multifamily bui�ding. ii. If we look at the e�mple above where an oumer has two three unit properties -- one of which is owner occupied -- and chooses to register two STRs in each bu�din�, the STRs in the owner accupied bu�ding woukl be cakulated first for a total of $35Q. The two rnmits irm the non owner occupied building would tr�igger higher fees of $1,000 and $2,000 because they are the third and fourth STR. units registered under that owner and these units are in a nan-awner occupied biulding. In this scenaria the tatal registration fee for both buildings wouid be $3,350. iii. The order of units registered w�l not affect the totai fee that is required as part of registrat�n. The fees owed w�l be adjusted as units are registered to reflect the correct total arnount. Owner occupied single family homes and wuts in oumer occupied multifamily ho�s w�l always be tallied as the first wuts even if registered at a lat�er date from units in rron-owner occupied buiidings. Far e�samp�, �' an awrter registers two wlits in a non-owner occupred building for $700 and then a rr�nth later returns to register two units � a owner-accupied building the fee calculated will consider the units in the awner occupied bw�dings ta be at the first and second imit rates and the units in the non-owner occupied bu�ding w�]] be considered the third and fourth uruts for higher fees resu�ing in a total registratian cost of $3,35Q. The previously paid amoumt af $700 w�l act as a credit towards the $3,350 owed and at the fine of the second registration the owner would owe the remaming balance of $2,650. 4�Page _ _ Type of Limitatians/Max # of STR Registratian Fee Building Singie Fam�y May o�er rooms in home as STR When 100 Home: owner is away, may offer entire horr� as Uwner- STR. aG�u�� Singte Family Nat allawed except on the islands N/A Home: Nat Owner- Occupied* 2 unit building — 2 STRs ls� Unit: $140 Multi Unit 3 unit building — 3 STRs 2"� Unit: $250 Bur�ding: 4 unit 6uilding — 4 STRs 3ra Unit: $504 Uwner- 5+ unit building — S STRs 4th Unit: $1400 4ccupied Sth Unit: $2000 1 � Unit: $200 2°� Unit. $504 3rd Unit: $1,aoo Multi-Unit 4th Unit: $2,000 Bui�dings: 2 unit building —1 STR �tn Unit: $4,aoa Not Owner �"5 unit bu�ding — 2 STRs 6-9 unit bwlding — 4 STRs Occupied NOTE: Fees are cumu�ative 1 Q+ wvt buikling — 5 STRs and escalate with additional units whether thev are in the sarr� buildin� or spread across multiple properties. * STRs in condominiums w�l be viewed as singie family homes utxler these re�tians �:w�'��M�� ..1��%�,��6��.� Martha E. I'c>11ac1< Presid�rit iVlay 15, 2017 Mr. Bill Goodi�lan Supervisar Town of Ith�c�t 21 S N. Tio�;a St:rce.t Ithaca, NY 14850 ��b�� Dea�r Supex��c�r"" &roodman, Thank you for t7kin� tirnc to meet with n�e last W�dxlesci��y a»d for yaur renlarks at t(�e Maplewoacl ccremany an Friday. T17e collaborativ�; relationsl�li�� betweer� the Towt� 01' Ithaca a��d Cornell is essential and very much ap}7r�ciated. We are cognizanti that r�lajc�r projects will provide �i��;w tax revenues arld otl�er bel��eiits, but tlzat t1�ey can �lsc� r�t��;an extr-a worlc and stress for �towr7 �b��rds anc� �professional siaif. Please keep us abreast ofi hc�w thi��,s are goin�;—fix�m tl�e �tawn's pei-spective—durin� �tl�e clevelopmant of'E�is�t I��ill Vill�ge. T was als� l��ppy to learn of�tl7e Town-Cornell Working Group and hope that it cc�ntinues to sei�ve as an impociat�t re,source. I hope you will be: ��l�le tc� att�,nd my inaugur�tiorl oi1 �u�ust 25 and wo�zld be hoi�ored to have you join us as wc,11 a�t a con7inunity-focuscd inau�uration event to be lzeld at t17e Lab of Or»itliolo�ry c�n August 26. We will be reacl�in� c�ut io y�aLlr staff regard�ing both invitations. I 1c�o�k forwarcl to w�rkit�� witl7 you over the cc�ming r�7c�r�ths and yea.rs. I�1 t}7e,177e�ntiin�, �le�e ci�r�r't l�csii�l� tc> r�c,�c17 c��tt if the�°� is �a��yt�ri�r1�; wc: cai°� �ic7 for y�u. - Sincerely, � " ��_ � _ �...n._ Mart11a E. F'ollack 300 Day 1-Iall Itllaca, NY 14853-280"t Tele�phone: (6(�7) 255-5201 Fax: (6O7) 255-9�324 E-rnail: �piesiderl�tC�ccar•neC�l.eclu � : n� � ;�. � . ;: �� '# , .� ,�w '� s „ N A4 , � ?"' ^; �,•" iM : ', ' .'. ' , ;iM, ? � � �"�,C'�,��:kZ�' i'�9. s:aR„la��PU�� a�� #�,��"��:"Y �w�:atec=,rn��t f;ca€r�r�-tw°c;>ic:7r7�.r M:�. Bill Gc�odrnar7 Supervisor, �I'own of Ithaca 215 North T.ioqa St=reet t khaca, NY :14�� C7 Re: Biggs Mernorial Hospital Cottage 402 H��rx�.i_s F Dates Driv�; Itr�aca, NY 14E350 Tnm1 k i.l�;; r'nu?11=. j C7�a.r Mr. Goodman: M��y 1:1, "1..017 Fol1<7wing a detailed review, the State Review Boarc� h�:�s re,comrnen�ie:d tc> t�t-�e �e�mmissi�ner c�� f��arks, Rc�cr�at�:ic�n and Hi_��t�c>r,:i.�; F'r�servatir�n, wY1�> is tri��; Nc;�a 7'e�r,l� ;>t_ate Histc�r:ic; F'reservatian Officer (SHPO) , t.hat the �arope:rty :i_dentific�d �k�ov<; br,� listed on the New York State Register of Hi.st.oric Places �:�ncl naminated to thF= National Register_ of Histo.r:i_c Places. After reviewing the nomination, the SHPC7 has aqree,c� w:i. th the rec;omrrie:ndat�i.an o.f the State Review Board and has listed the property on t.he State Regist_.e;r af Histori.c Plac.es. We sha11 nc,w forward the narri:ination to the Keepe.r of tvhe� National R2g=ister in Washingtan, D. C. If th� Keeper of the National Register approves rhe nami.nation, th�� pro��erty wi11 be listed on t_he National. FZegister. Yau wi_11 be nc>t:ifie.r.1 wYlen th:_s dec:.ision i_s made. Inforrn�t.i«n about the results of St.at� arl� Natian�ll Reqister list i_r�q werE� i.nc.luded in our earlier notifirat_ion letter. If you have <zny further qu<:>:;t�_c>ns, pl.ease cc�nta<;t: yr>ur field .representative �Ii_:rgini.a Bar�as, ��t trie Division .for Historic Preservation, (518} 268-2161. Sirrc�rc;ly, k� �� ' '+�� r �,� Vt ; � w �...� r� � � g �N�� ,�e • N � - � �: Michael_ F. 1ync�, �'�F�., AIA Dir_ec;tar, Divisi.��n�'�for Histo.r.ic Preservation ��,r '��a�6� �� ff�� r�� '�rk�, &�� F�� `�� I�)iwi�<,i4�7r? fc�r Ni=,4�rrir I��>re�,�;rv��kir.7rt. i'€��hles� l�sfs,ar�c� i'C:a &3r.>r 9`rr�i '�1JetFr�fcirri. P�J¢:�w `P��r(< i�?�1(��-("1�34) � r�1�3-:?3�-c��>�;� � www,ny�arks.corn � � � , D�VICI D. S�OtZ 153 1/2 Westview Lane Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Mr. Statz: � 215 �t. Tiaga �tr�et, Ithaca, �I.Y. 14850 www.tawr�.ithaca.ny.us TOWN SUPEF�VIS(�R 273-1721 x 125 FAX (607) 273-1704 Re: Petition abaut Westview neighbarhoad ditches At its meeting an May 8, 2017, the Tawn Board reviewed the infarmatian you recentiy submitted about the ditches in your neighbarhood, which were also the subject of the Petition filed by you and yaur neighbors on November 15, 2016. The B�oard has asked the Public Works Department to investigate the potential casts ta replace the ditches with piping, since any such change cauld be very costly, as you may recall when you attended the Public Works Committee meeting in December 2016. Unfortunately, the engineering staff has been overloaded with other projects far a while naw, so it will take some time before they can come up with an estimate for the committee to review. We wiil let you know when it is put on a future cammittee agenda for further discussian. Sincerely, � c" �,��'��--��.,�- William D. Gaodman, Town Supervisor � �� :"�� .�� d�,��'` �� m � �� b .�wm�°�� °��.��,;�� .�� • . • • il� • ! ,w . � .r � �r • * r- .- . � - "• • .» . � : 1 +r 1 $ i► � +r w • ! � '"' ` w �r • � � • " � � �� ar * "` .r r " w � ' ' . .,r .. • "" • "` "" ' • I� "' * rt • • • • • �• "'t • .r •. •'"" • !^ �r •�i• •"` !1 •• �� ' r � ""r � • w � " � � � � w• � • � � � w . � * � � � 11� 1r 'M � +11 � �� r A� � M 11I .�` '�" � � � � � � ! � � � � � � i M � � �. # � � � w � � � �! � r � i111 i . ~ � i ! AR I � 1! � � � : ! �1M`� � � �� .� "�` �` w * '� � � � �I # 1� � # �1 # * a .w Mw � M '� yrt AI� � 1I �IIII 7 �.. � � � � � � � � � � � � M� # � r � rM ll� � A1� � � M � � � ! . � ~ 7 I � �{ � w wt wM i 1/ � � � � � . • • �I � � � �� M/ iIM . � � M1 � � 111! � M � �' . .. �! � IR �I M �. � . . � iR ..�w.. � � . � .�Y w IL �.i � �. wt 11I 1R Ali' � � AI � .♦ �� . ♦. . AR � � .y/ � i S . ` W .'y :'W' � . �Y � � .Mb � AI� �Y � • 111i� Ae � . �� . # M � 01k M ��II �� n! i � i .M �IR � �I • � � � � � � .� r, � � � r r � r � .. �. �: �� ` ar " � � � � � ` ' � �� `� • N1 � 5. The ground salar system permit sho.uld require the hcilder ta ptant #oliage �or install a waEl), as necessary, to (imit the v�sual impact of the solar system on adjoining pro.pe�ies. This need rtc�t reduce e�ectrica� output if thought aut. If sufficientiy dense, fc�liage could act as a fence. 6. �ystems should be kept as close to the ground as possible;: a 40" height above the ground Ievel is more effectively hidden. Reques#s for more height should be consiclered on a case by case basis. ' • ' • ! ' � r • o f � • 0 � i .. ! ♦ i f� � ! .i't I offer these recommendatians to ba�ance the admittedly desirable prospec� of renewable power with the equally desirable. praspect of preserving a r�atural, beautiful world. Given paradise, we should try to maintain it. Existing permit appi�cations shou�d.:be imrnediately suspended until this is recansidered and acted upan �by the Planning Commissi�n. I appreciate your attention in this. �� ; 6��vw'MaarVc ��ate 97epar��av��c� es� Ecwwoo�+anrru�r��l ¢�¢�r��rv��Brsra 625 Bro�dway, 14th Floor, Albany, New York 12233-1010 P: (518) 402-8545 I F: (518) 4d2-8541 W�,�/W.CI E'C.V`E}/.CJOW Hanorabie Bill Gaodm�n Supervisor, Town of Ithaca 215 f�arth Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 1485q i-. .— . ... On behalf of the iVew York State agencies sponsoring the Climate Smark Cpmr�unifies Progr�rn, I cangratulate you �nd the Tovvn of Ithac� for �chieving stataas �s a Cer�ifisd Clir��te Smark Community. Climate change is the defining issue of �ur genera�ion; the acti�r�s I�hac� has taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ad�pt ta clima�� ch�nge embody �he kind af cammitment needed io fac� this great challenge. In particuiar, I applaud the town's ac�ians to reducing greenhouse g�s emission� thro�cgh improved energy efficiency, ba�h in municipal oper�tions and in the 9arger commuroity. Reducing energy consumption saves taxpayer dollars and is the fiound�fiion of climafe-smart managemenfi. Ir�itiatives like municipal lighting upgr�des, the Residen�ial �nergy Scare F'roject, and the �reen �uilding Policy Proj�c� illustrate the tawn's carr7rv�itment to maxirrrizir�g efficiency. It is also clear thafi efficiency is just one component af 9�hac�'s well-rounded, camprehensive loc�l clima�e actian pragram, which embraces both mitig�tion and adapta�ion. B coraimend �he Town of Ifh�ca for working closely with your county governmenfi �o cond�ct adapta�ion planning th�� addresses th� risks posed by climate ch�nge. Your efforts will m�ke your community �nd local ir�frastructure mare resilient under a changing climafie. The C{irnate Smarfi Comrrrunities program is an imporkan� partnership between local and S��te gavernments that gives camrnunities the tools tc� respond e�fectively to climafie ch�nge. Your autstanding example demonstrafies the economic �nd environmen��l bene�its of {oc�l climate action to your pe�rs — you demonstrate what is possible with ec�rnmitied lead�rship. W�th yo�r help, we can build a viable p�th forvvard for ail cc�mmunities in IVev� York Sf�� to prafiec� our citizens, our economies, �nd o�ar �nvironment from the worst of clima�� charoge. Th�nk you for yaur le�dership ar�d for coll�bar�ting uvifih us a� this eriticai momenfi in history. Pie�se confiact Dazzle Ekblad at (51$) 4Q2-8448 or clim�techange(c�dec.ny.gc�v if yoaa h�v� any questions. Sincerely, ��.._ . �,�ro��°� � � �asil Seggos Carnmissianer -7 �a��r�a�� tl��*�a��ra�ffn�e�� {rnrr.ov ovroarur�rrv �,�q��p'�pg'�g'y^g�ggQ�g� ��* �,GD9��N"Vda"��C�4��4 ..,.....� n��. h f �r �`�'"� 4 ` ` °'F' � Dylan Watras �� P o� °r � � , � ��,� � � �y �' '� i��w, ,:, � 185 Kendall Avenue �� '� � ` �� Ithaca, NY 14850 � �;t . .,....__ � � 607.342.2358 dylanwat9l@gmail.com . •�. Ithaca Town Supervisor 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Mr. Goodman, In December, Bruce Bates informed me that I could not obiain a building permit for my residence because my property did not have sufficient frontage on an official Town of Ithaca road. Since its construction in 1986, my residence has been issued three building permits; one for the constructian af the residence and two for woad stoves that were installed. Thus, this decision was despite my residence being an existing property, already having been issued permits in the past, and paying taxes to the Town. I attended the Ithaca Tawn Board meeting in January in order to z•eceive building permits for my property. At the board meeting I was told the issue would be moved to the Planning Board and that developers had also inquired about this same area. I am writing this letter because I feel that I shouid not be cansidered in conjunction with the developers on this issue. My residence already exists and I am not seeking to expand its footprint. With the numbez• of lots thai these developers own, they wili be able to build several buildings at the current zoning designation of the area - and even more if the zoning level is increased. The development of the South Hill 12ecreation Trail and construction on these lots will surely become controversial due to the removal of green space lining the recreation trail and construction of "coakie cutter" houses that are favored by the developers. This pracess will surely result in a significant delay in the issuance of a permit for my existing residence. In order to resolve this situation, I hope you can address my request separately from these new develapments and issue permits for my property by designating it as an "open development area," in accordance with state cade. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions you may have regarding this request. Sincerely, Dylan Watros �, ��.�. � ��"" � �� '`�` '� 215 N Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 1485Q �'" �. � � e� �" ` �" Phone: 607-273-1721 � Fax: 607-273-5854 �b �, �� .�,�,,,,��11i�',,;'�' www.town.ithaca.ny.us °' ��,�,� Tawn Clerk: Paulette Rosa (PRosa@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Deputy T`awra Clerks: Debra DeAugistine (DDeaugistine@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Jasmin J Cubero (JCubero@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) J��r1� 2y, 2017 P��tr�ick Doty 8�1 Five M�ile Drive Itlzaca, NY 14850 Dear Mi�. .Dc>ty, Thc Tc�wrz �Bocu-cl r�ceivecl yc�ur letter/petition r�garding the Towir ��cce�ting� Lut-tt Rd., � private road/acccss that is in significant disrepair. The lnatter was referred to thc Public Works Committee. Th� Co�niTuttee discussed the request, including the histc�ry af the �xb��rldarlrl�ent in 1952, and reeo�7lnzenclecl/reportecl ta t�1e Town Board that the use of the ro��d i� st�i11 consist�nt with tlzat hititc�i-y, thc��e�f'c7re C��, cammittee did not reeomsnenc� accepting the r�c>�td. The Bo�rd agreed. The nc�tcs �fr�utn ihe Public Works Canlnlittee and the Town Bc�a�•cl nicetin� ac� av��il�ble on our websi�Ce under �SoardlCc�mr�nittee minutes. If you t7av� any c�uestiorls c�r rle.ed assistance, plea�;e feel fi�•�e to cc�rlt�ct me. Sir�ccre ; / � :.� ' � � f .w_ �.�� f�� Paulcttc Rasa Town Clerk cc. J Web�r ��z�� p '�� 215 N Tioga St, Ith�ca, NY 14850 �� -"w.:'�:� r°�°�� „„0w,'��/ Phane: 607-273-1721 ■ Fax: 607-273-5854 �� ,� �� ; ,a'; z, �� ,��/ ,�,.��u��,��,�. www.town.rthaca.ny.us ��..�� m�� , � Y� 'Tawrs Clerk: Paulette Ros� (PRosa@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) �epaaty Towr� Clerks: Debra DeAugistine (DDeaugistine@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Jasmin J Cubero (JCubero@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) June 2y, 2017 Dennis Foer�ster 165 Westhave,rl Rcl Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Mr. Foerster, The Tawn �Bo��rcl rcceiveci your letter forwarded by the Pl�nzling $oard coi�ccr-ning the solar array legislatian recently eriacted. The legisl�tion w�nt thro��h a r•i�oroL�w c;c>rz�tt�Zitt�e ��rc�ce,ss with ext�,nsive research of similar 1e�isla�ic��n in c�ther muziicip��lities, �s well as reviews of scientific ai�ticles and existi�ng solar arrays. After fin�l re�vi�ions anci �ut�lic input ��p��ort�unities, the Town Board cieterz��.incd the legislation was in the best intcre�ts c�f the town as a whole anci adopte.cl ttle local law. Many of the concerns raised i�� yc�lir 1�Cter were c�iseusseci in detail at both levels and notes/minutes of those discl�ssic�ns c��t1 �ie fot�nci on ou�1- website Linder- Board/Committee Minutes so yau ean fully unclerstanc� the re�soning th�t went in to ��ch c�ceision. If you have any q�xe�;tions ar need assistallce, please f�ecl fr�;e to contact me. Sincerel /(,�� paLilette lZ.oSa Town C.lerk J�Line 30, 2017 �"c�yc�,�-�e� I,c�k� c��c�°��z�c� r C: � � (� C�A �.r l�zs`c�r�r��zu��ricij�rcxl C'rxr7�r��r�crti��ra ��.�rrrvtir��;r ��t�c�tz�rP. ��'td�� ti��ut��•.sh��c� Dear Municipal Official, The Caytilga Lake Watershed In�termL�nicipal C7i•ganizatio�l (IO) completed two majoi- tindertakinbs in 2016. We have finalized work on tl�e Lipcl�te of ti�e Cayuga Lake Watershed Restoz�ation and Protection Plan (RPP), and we have received state fundi��g for a three yea1� pz�oject to help watershec� municipalities implementi the plan's recom.mendations. Attached to this letter is an electronic copy o�f the RPP upcl��te f�or yollr informatiorl and review, along with a copy of the recent press release anz7ouncing �the plan's car�lp(etion. Many thanks are due to the Cayuga Lake Watershed Netwark and their watershecl stewarc�, Hilary LarYlbert. For threc years, the IO and Hilary have been hard at work gathering public and professic�nal izzput. T1�e RPP L��clate i-epresents many hours of time volunteered by water quality expei•ts ancl mu�lici�aal IO r•epl-eserltatives who alsa cleserve thanks. The update has been submitted to NYS Depa�•tment of State and we ai•e ready to �move on to the work of implementing its recommended actions. Continuing municipal support is i�eeded to �in��ltch the state fL�nds recently awarded ancl we ask that you remember to inclucle an IO contribution in your upcoming �bLidget. If support for the IO has not been in your recent budgets, please seriocisly consider adding yoLcr support. ThY•oughout the update process, we were told how difficult it is for municipalities to tackle water quality projects. We heard yoLi, and for this reason we applied for funding to hire Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board to help IO member municipalities. That f�unding has been awarded, bLit it� i•eqt�ii-es a inatch of $] 2,000 per year from the IO. That match must come frc�m your municipal coz�trib�:ltions. P'lease honor your commitznent to the watershed by including an IO contribution in your buc�get. You will be sent contriblition vouchers from the Town of Ithaca under separate cover. We will have the new brant contract in hand shortly and will contact each of you to see how we can help your municipality. There is an increasing level of st�ite commitment and local energy being d.ireeted to the health of �he Finger Lakes. We look forward to working with watershecl Y77unicipal.ities in taking advantage of the opportunities this new and inc�reasing attention oEEer. Please feel free to contact me at (�(�"_l__�`7��_ %��c1 ar R��l�tc�i�t�clftx)�=��6�zl.�c�.c��, for more information. Regards, Tee-Ann Hunter Chair, Cayuga Lake WaCershecl Interr7lunicipal Oi•ganizaCion Fram: Bill Gaadman Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 3:50 PM To; Paulette Rosa Cc: Debra DeAugistine Subject: FW: Deer Management praposal in the Town of Ithaca FYI, for Correspondence Folder -----Original Message----- From: Kyllikki Inman [rr_i�iV1c� r�: I�iikdciir7rra�rr��r1:l�1er�k.nc�� Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 3:40 AM �� To: P Leary; E Levine; Rod Howe; T Hunter; Bill Goadman; Ricn DePaolo; PBleiwas Subject: Deer Management praposal in the Town of Ithaca Dear Town Baard Members, I am highly apposed ta the "Deer Management" plan being propased for the Town of Ithaca. Like Cornell's current plan, this advocates the use of severe and cruel methods to kill an excessive number of deer. Some of the data used ta defend the program is faulty and one sided. They are touting the killing of deer to reduce Lyme Disease, but the deer have nothing to do with the bacteria that causes the disease. it is infected White-footed Mice that give the disease to to the ticks, if the numbers of deer are reduced, the ticks will host on ather animals - people, dags, etc. I live in Forest Home, and my house is effectively surrounded by Corneil land - the golf course and the land formally known as "The Plantatians", both where they have been killing deer for years . I used to enjoy seeing deer in my yard, almost every day, seeing them interact and calmly going about their lives. Now, thanks to Cornell's extermination of the White Tail Deer, I hardly ever see a deer in my yard. When I do it's a scrawny, smali scared deer. Never more than one, and never the majestic large deer with 10 point antlers that I used to see frequently! I haven't see a doe with a fawn in years! Carnell has killed them all. (They like to say "harvested" or "taken" , because that sounds "clean" instead of violent and cruel.) Cornell uses the highly illegal carn baiting and shooting the deer at night with search lights to frighten and paralyze the paor creatures. (Illegai if regular hunters do this, why is Cornell special?) They spoke in their plan about how when shot with arrows deer run into people's yards, and then Carnell wants permission to go in people's yards "to finish them off". I have experienced this twice in my yard, with deer bleeding from the neck and another one from the shoulder. Bleeding copious amounts of blaad onto the snaw, I toak a photo to document this under my bird feeder 5 feet from my hause. Does everyone want ta experience this in their yards? I ask you don't just take Carnell's word on "Deer Management" as gospel, they have an agenda. Do your own research before you vote on having a deer massacre in the Town of Ithaca. There are many sides to this subject and many possible future ramifications not mentioned in their proposal. Thank you very much for your time, Sincerely, Kyllikki Inman i � i �� II, '1 II � � � � :' � 215 Nc�rth Tfoga Str�et Itl7aca, iVY 1�850 Re: Freedom of Inform�ttian Law Request D��ar Tawr� L�c�ard Memb�rs: . ,, �. � � � � l�caz�s�t�nt tc� 11�� F��eec�csr�x c��' I�f�1�r��tisa�a La�nr, P�s��ic C�fficc�irys L��nr �irticic� C, C l�erek�y �eq�.z�st a cc��y ��'t�e recr�rcis listeci b�lca�v, Fcrr r�urp�se� c�1�t��i� r�equ��;ts „��tn�nuni��tic��is" s}7�Ii i��clud� ca��a��crndet�c�, �lectr°r�rai€; �r��il (ir�c��.�dir�� a11 ��:ttachmer��s�, text mess��,es, and re��at din�s or c�e��s re��irv�ir��; co�v��tic�ns i�� c�s�s�� ot� bY ��c�r�� r vic�ec� cl��t. I r�q�est the i'c�llc��eri��e 1. A1� cc�rrzzriunic�tz�a��s �nci �tl��r reccrds irr �he ��ssessir�ri c�f tla� "I`r��r�� r�f It1�� I�c��rd per9tair�in� tc� ttYr� creatian csl� �x deer r�iar��r�merr� cc�zramit��e, crtrz�� i�rise�l�y cotr�r�zitt�c�e �r othei~ f�r�ci�r n7eant tca <�c�dr�ss tl�� r�ser�ce af c�c��r in th� ts�v�rt� (�:l�is req��st includ�s any cr�rr7rr��rLic:�ti�ai��s �r c�th�r re�ot�cls �ert�irzin� t� t�ae �:c�tn��c�sitic�� oi such a b�d�r, i,e,, wl��t ��rticip�t�ts rr�i�ht �k.ApV6. 416A LAlI. 0..0..YAdA1AdALL4.�p ASAV�LG4C.A61%1� 1.C1.Jt,..1�VLp 4.L'1...�. Z. �.11 ccs;rn�:►un�c��tic�t�s ��tvvc�� ny Tc�wn �� Itl��c:� �c��rd I��mbe�� r c�thPr ic�w�t c�t Ithac:�� caifici�l a��d any ��zrre��t �r �'c�rrvrne�a ��c�lty➢ staf�, a�° st�c�er��s �t tl�e ��txt�al �.��;c�utwc�s De��r°tznLnt �t �c�a��119Jni�r�rsity (inciti�clitx� l.�ut r��t �irrait�ci ta �er��c� F�lc�s�ey, P�ul C�rtis �t�cl J�a� Bc�ul�r��r� ��r��il�tir,� tts c�e�r, d��r� rr7�n��;err��t, c�eer h�ar��in�, c�t� thc px�c��r�ara�� irr tl�� rilla��s t�f Lar�sin�, �'��urn�r�sburg, c�� C�yu�� ei�l�is �rc�m J��t�y 1, Zi715 tca the d�te t�ais r�c{u�st is fa:zlfil�ed. 3. �.11 cc�tnrnun�catic�r7s �ra�] �th��° r�cc�rds itr the poss�s�ic-ax� c�f th� "I'c��nrr�t of Itl�ac� l�c�ai�d ��t��irtin� �a the 1��1:u�°al ��:��az��s 17�p��trrrerat ��; Ccrr�►�11 Ur�iversity c�z- at�y of its c�ar��c�ni: c�a- fot•rr�°�aer (��c�alty, s�af'f, c�r s�ud�r�ts (ir�cludir�� r�xt nca� lir��i�ec� �c� I�er�d �Ic�ss��, P��l G;car°tis a�d Ja�! F�c��al�nget�j frs�rr� �c�rguary 1, 201� tc� the d�t� tk7�s �°ec�uest is f�.glfilled. 4. All communicatians between any Town of Ithaca Board Member ar other Town of Ithaca official and any of�cial in the villages of Lansing, Trumansburg, or Cayuga Heights pertaining to deer, deer management, deer hunting, or the Cornell University Department af Natural Resaurces or any of its current or farrner faculty, staff, or students (including but not limited ta Bernd Blassey, Paul Curtis and Jay Boulanger) from January 1, 2015 ta the date this request is ful�lled. Please provide as many respansive recards as possible in electranic form via email. If all the records cannot be emailed ta me, please inform me of the partians that cannot be emailed along with the cast of �Mnting paper capies, before you begin printing. If you determine that partions of the requested records are exempt from disclasure, please pravide me with access ta the non-exempt portions. If a portion of my request is denied for any reason, please inform me of the reasan for deniai �citing the specific FOIL exemption yau reiy on to withhold each partian af the recard request) and pravide me with the name and address of the person or body ta whom an appeal shauld be sent. If, in your response to any of the requests made abave, you claim that no responsive records are in your possessian, please provide a sworn statement certifying that fact, pursuant ta NY Pubiic Officers Law Articie 6§ 89{3�(a). The Freedom of Infarmation Law requires that an agency respond to a request within five business days. I look farward to receiving your response as soon as passible. Your efforts and fuli cansideratiQn af this request are greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Lawe11 Garner lgarner@twcny.rr.com cc Bill Goodman, Supervisar (BGaodman@town.ithaca.ny.us� Pamela Bleiwas, Board Mernber {PBleiwasC�town.ithaca.nv.us� Rich DePaola, Board Member CRDePaoloC«�tawn.ithaca.nv,,_us� Rod Hawe, Board Member [RHawe@town.ithaca.ny.us� Tee-Ann Hunter, Board Member (THunterC�a town.ithaca.ny.us� Pat Leary, Board Member (PLearX@town.ithaca.ny.us) Eric Levine, Board Member �ELevine@town.ithaca.nv.us� Paulette Rosa, Town Cierk �TownClerkC�town.ithaca.nv.us) SC;PRE;MF. C'O[,'�2"I' ()� THE S"�'A'T�; C)F' NEW' �'(7Iil{. C`Cli;;ti"TY OF'TE)i'VIF'�t.I �S EL)FZ M.APL[�WO(;)17 LLC P lai nti ff%Petitioner, l� ,'" � ; � r i ' ' ' , `,'r r �; i r.l' � �� -21��irlst- Ind�x No. GI"`� �� (."'.a�� .I�HL� �SSESSOPt, �l�l-1[ [�C)AR.D (J[� ASSESSOI�tS AND'I }fF E�3f),�RD O� ASSESSMI�:NT / � �J � �. RGVIEW OF "I�HE=.7��(7V�""�' OF [TI�IAC�;A ANI) T�-�E TOWN OF ("C}[�CA 17etenci��ntl�espondent, -------------------___...-- ---- -----------------------------------------------------------------x 1�tC}'TI�E (7�I1� C;IJ►MIV[ENCE1ViE�dT (�F �,C;'TICDN Si:JSJE�'I' 'TC3 1i��NLiE1.TORY ELE('Ti"�.t�NiC' F'ILING PL� ASf� �I�AI<l tiOTICE: trrat the zriatter ca��Ci<>>�e�i �zbc�ve, whicb has l�c�er� comrnenced by ��ilin� of the accoznpanying documcnes �,�itt� thc C`c>ur�ty Cltrk, i� �subject tc> m�ndatory electronrc t��iling pursuant tc7 Scctiar7 2C12.5-bh e>f'thc I.1��iform Rtiley fc�r the "Trial Courts. This rac��Cic� is bein� �;e��v�cl �� r�c�uir�c3 l�y Sub�livision (b) (3) <,7fttlaC Section. The New Y��rk State Courts Electronic Filing Syst.e.m ("t�tYSCEF") is ctesi�neci %r thc electronic filing o�f docum�nts with Y}1e C��u�nty (� leiic and the eo�ar-t ��nd f�or the eleckronic serviee of t}�os� cl�>cum�nts, ec�urt dc>cumcn�s, and cc>urt nokices upon cou71se1 ancl self-represenf�eci parties. Cou�zsel u�ni3 ur pa��ti�s w�}�� d�� rzc>t nc�tify the court c>f"a claimed ex�m�tiur,l (s�e helc�w) as required by Secti��r12O2.5-bb(e) mList irrrrrre diately recerrr� t�ieir repr�ser�itaCion withir� the e-fil� tnaCter c>ri the Consent p��zge in hlY`�C;F;F. Failtzre tc� do so r.rz��y r�sult in aninability to r�cei�, c electrunic c�c7hc� c>f ducument tilings. Fxen��pti�7ns f�rorr� n7andatory e-tiling are limiCed tc�: l) attc�rneys who certify in ��od i�aith tl�at Lhey laek thc eornpti�Ce;r ��uipme;nt arzci (al�i�lg w�ith all ern�7l�ryc��es) the rLq�iisite knowledge Cta c�>z�rrply �inc12) self-rcpr-�seneecl parties who c't7aose not to participrlt�; in e-filing. I'�r ��c�c(itic�nal infc>rn�ratior� about ele�;trc>n.ic �ling, ineludin� <�ceess tc> Seetion 202.S-bb, consult tl�ie N�YSCLF website at www.nye�>urts.gov/e�fil� t>r contact tht NY`�C'E.t fZesaurce C'cnter at 646-386-3C)33 crr efile(a;caurts.�;tate.n}�.us. I7�zted: � �, �---. � �:..5�-�� ''"_"..,,---- __ �;ean �1 C`rc7nin ('IZ(>NIti ��: C.'iZc7'�lti 1:1�'�' f 1f�M, }'[.I.C. � (Signature) (i�Iame) (Firrr� Name) 2�0 OI..:D CC)t.JN TFZY KC)[1I:), SLTITE 470 (Acic.lress) MINFOT.A, NY 1 1_5t) i 516-?47-2220 scronin(a),cro�lintaxlaw.cc�nz (Ph�>ric�) (E-Mai1) (]��r P�ile # 20Q-08h0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE QF NEW YORK COU23TY OF TdMPKINS --------------------- -----------------------X In �he Matter of the Application of: EDR MAE'LEWOOD LLC NdTICE OF PETITION AND PETITION Peti�ioner, -against- THE AS SE S S�R , THE E30P.F:D OF A5 SE S SORS P.ND THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA AND THE TOWN dF ITHAGA Respandents. Far Review o� a Tax Assessment Under Asticle 7 of the Real Property Ta.x Law. -------------------------------------X 200-0840 S I R S : Index # �'°;'�. �'.`:�"��..� '� �,�. �� ..�� Tax Year 2017/18 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed Petition, application will be made at Special Term of the Supreme Court of the State a� New Yor]�. ta be held at the Courthouse located in the State of New Yark, on the 5th Day of September 2017 at the opening of Court on that day or as soon thereafter as caunsel can be heard, for review under Psticle 7 a� the Real Property Tax Law of the assessment upon Petitioner's real property described in the Pe�.ition, and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. DATED: 7/11/2017 Yours, etc. CRONIN & CRONIN LAW FIRM, PLLC. Attorn�ys for Petitioner 200 Old Country Road, Suite 470 Mineola, New York 11501 " The aforementioned Fetitioner, by' its a�torney, GRONIN & CRflNIN LAW FIRM, � PLLC, respectfully alleges as fallows: l. The afarementianed Petitianer, whase pos� oifice address is a/o CRONIN & CRONIN Law Firm, PLLC, 200 Old Country Raad, Mineola, New Yark 11501, a.t a.11 times herein mentioned, was and still is an aggrieved party under section 704 and 706 a£ the RPTL with respect ta the assessment roll set farth in the schedule in this petitian. 2. The Respondents prepared and completed, according to law, a tentative assessment roll for the assessing jurisdiction for �.he year set forth on �he cover page of this petition and notice of petition, which assessment rol.l included an assessment for Petitioner's real property, described in the following schedule. 3. If there be more than one Petitianer herein, the ward "Fetitianer" shall mean "Petitioners" or "each of' the Petitioners", whenever the sense and context so requires, 4. Sf there be more than one assessment herein, the ward �l�SS�.SSIC�GiSt..j� shall mean "assessments" or "each of the asssssrnents", whenever �he sense and context so requires. 5. If there be more than one property herein, the word "proper�.y" shall mean "properties" or "each of the properties", whenever the sense and context so _ •�� 6. Raspondents are authorized to assess real property in said jurisdiction. ?. Respondents are authorized to hear and determi.ne complaints in relation to assessment and has all af the pawers and duties impased by the Real Praperty Tax Law 8. The Respondents prepared and completed a ten�.ative assessment roll a� all real property in said jurisdictian for the tax year as set forth on the attached schedule. 9. On or before Grievance Day, Petitioner pratested said assessment by fiZing with Respondents a writ�en application far correctian ai the assessed valuatian(sy, " in which applicatian was included a stateznent, under oath, speeifying � the respects in which said assessment was incarrect and a request that said assessment be corrected and reduced as set forth in t.he aforementioned schedule. Said application and statements are hereby referred to and made a pa.rt of this Petition as if fully set forth herein. 10. The said applicatian and statements were received by Respondents, withaut abjection, withirY the time fixed by I.aw for the making and hearing of complaints in respeat �o assessments. 11. A final decisian and determina�.ion of the assessments of said real properties were duly rendered by Respondents, who failed to aorrect and reduce said assessment as requested and iinallg campleted and £iled the assessment rall as required by law to the amount set forth in the afaremantioned schedule. , 12. Thirty (30) days has not elapsed since the latter of the f�nal compl.etion and filing af the assessment roll and the giving of natice thereof as required by law, or, the final day set by law for the filing af the assessment roll. 13. The Petitianer herein alleges �hat a cammon quesfi.ian of law ar fact exists pursuant to RPTL Section 706(2}, 14. The said assessment of your Petitioner's praperty on the assessment roll as finally completed is incorrect and erroneous upon �.he fallowing graunds: {a). Excessive to the extent set forth in the aforementioned scheduled. {b) Unequal to the exten� set fort.h in 'the aiorementioned seheduled in that there is an inequalit�r of assessments, the Petitioner's assessment having been made at a higher proportionate valuation than the assessments of other real property an the same roll and/or other real praperty in the same class on the same roll by the same officers and Respondents; the specified instances of said inequality are the assessments of a1.1 of the real praperty and/or other real property in the same class other than the praperty of Petitioner in the assessing jurisdiction and in each and every parcel thereof. In order that the assessment af Petitioner's real property be made proportionate ta assessment,s of all of the real proper�y � thraughout , the assessing juxisdictian anclf ar other rea3. proper�y in the same class " throughout the assessing jurisdiction, it is necessary tha�. it be reduced to the amount set forth in the aforementioned schedule. (c} Illegality to the extent set forth in the afarementioned schedule in that subject property is being assessed i.n an erroneous, arbitrary, and capriaious manner. (d} Unconstitutianal to the extent the methodolagy used by the Respondents is in violation of the Egual Protection Clause of the New Yark Btate Constitution and the United States Ganstitu�.ion. (e) Tllegal and unconstitutional ta �.he extent tha� the Petitioner's groperty has been reevaluated by the Respondents, and on information and belief, no improvements had been made by Petitioner and no canstruction of any structure had occurred which could justify the increase in assessment. 15. While canfirming the increased assessment placed upon Peti�ioner's real praperty, on information and belief, the Responden� Assessor{s) did not engage in any market reevaluation as to lats that are similar to thase owned by the Petitioner. 16. If �.he assessment at issue is a transitional assessment, such assessment is excessive, erroneous and illegal. ir� that it exceeds the permissible transitional increase as set farth in the Real Property Tax Law. 17. Your Petitioner is aggrieved and injured by said unjust, unequal, excessive, illegal, incarreet and erroneous assessment in that, by reason thereof, Petitioner wil7. he compelled to pay a greater amount and propor�ion of taxes basecl upan the assessment ro].l than Petitioner would be required to pay if said assessment had been just, fair, equal and correct. 18. Na pravision is made by laFr for an appeal or other relief from the final determinatian of Responden�s, except by a xeview by petition to �.he Supreme Court and no previaus applicatian iar t2ze relief herein asked has been made to any court or Judge. 19. The assessmen� is excassive and illegal in that Petitioner is denied tha ' benefit of a RPTL �485-b New Canstruation Exemption even thaugh the Petitianer complied with all the requirements set forth therein and that the oonstruation is comple�ed in accordance with RPTL ;4$5-b. 20�. The Petitianer's real praperty has been misclassified. The class designation of Petitioner's real property results in an incorrect allocation af the real prapert�r's assessed valuation between tc,ro ar more classes. The criteria used by the Respandents for the determination by ta� class is arbitrary, capriciaus and unlawful. 21. The Agricultural Exemption is improperly implemented in that it omitted acreage as not qualified for the exemption even though this acreage is used solely for agricultural use. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner grays that �he Supreme Court review and correct on the merits the aforementioned final determination of the Respondents on the grounds set forth in this Petition, and that the.said Caurt take evidence ta enable your Petitioner to show the unjust, unequal, excessive, illegal, masclassified and erraneous assessment af the said real property ta the end that the assessment may be reduced ta the iull, true and market value thereof far land and improvernents and to a valuation propartionate to the assessments of other real graperty, and�ar all ather praperty in the same elass, assessed on the same ralls for the same year, so that equality of assessments will result, and may be properly classified, and for such other and further rel.ief as �.he Court may� deem praper, toget.her wa.th the cost and disbursements of this proceeding. CRONIN & CRONIN LAW FIRM, PLLC Attorneys for Petitioner 200 Old Country Raad, Suite 474 Mineola, New York cs�.�� 747-2220 STATE OF NEW YORK } ss.. COUNTY OE' NASSAU } RAYMOND J. FUREY, being duly staorn, deposes and sags: That deponent is the agent for the Petitioners herein, that depanent has read the faregaing Natice af Petition and Petition and knaws the contents thereaf; that the same is true to depanent's awn knowledge, except as ta matters therein stated to be alleged upan infarmation and belief, and that as to thase matters, degonent believes it to be true; and that the reason this verification is made by deponent and nat by the Petitioners is that all the material. allegations (except those as to matters of public record} of said Petition are within the persanal knowledge of depanent. Sworn to before me this � � � day af S�t.�� , 2017 �� ._ �� Notary Fublic Antania Moy Natary Public, State of New York No. 01M06345921 Qualified in Nassau Cauntg Commission E�ires August 1, 202d 5 ��s 63 . -z-�.o . a Ten�.ative AV Claimed AV Final AV $9,000,000 $9QQ,000 $9,0OO,OflO I 1�111111�11 IIIII llill IIIII 1111111111 III I IIII Ineq/QvVal $$,100,000 *iosoi�s* CRUNIN & CRONIN LAW FIitM, PLLC. IS �EREBY AUTH4RIZED to file and verify as agent complaints and. pefiitians for the reduction of real estate tax assessments for the following praperty and to represent the pefitioner in ail apgea]s therefram. 1 1� SWIS CODE: sa3aoo COUNTY OF TOMPKINS TOWN OF ITHACA P�t+t)PE�t'i'I' AIDDRESS 201 MAPLE AVE ITHACA DATEI}: May 19, 2017 PET'ITIONER: ELiR MAPLEWQQD LLC � i..as, , e � �• i�► FILE # 200-0840 I��f�l�all��l�l�l��l��l� *sa7sa=2ao-os�o* �: SD TAX DES�RI�''�`�ON soa�oo 63: 2-] 0.2 Number af Lots Covered: I Title: '�S��S�t��C�.U�u.'c�C 0 � To�N aF rr�cA AGREED UPON PROCEDURES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 � � YNU�P �� p . i��1 . . . � .� . . . w e . . � '� . . "M� . , ..,�. ., . �. �.�a� IwL:h..71F1Ed PWE3L�C AC�C;CDUIVTAhJTS F3IJSIf�0EFJ5 G'I�fWd°�I.JL."f'ANYS ' �. � �- t :,�. . �. ��. ..�' :, I :�, ��... r �; r# i� � � � The Town of Ithaca and Office of State Colnptroller Bureau of Justice Court Fund We have performed tl�e proeedures enulnerated in the attached schedule, which were agreed ta °""�"""r by t11e Town of Ithaca and Office of State Comptroller Bureau of Justice Court Fund, solely to assist you with respect to the accounting records of the Tow1z Justices of tl�e Town of Itl�aca for the year ended December 3l, 2016. The Town Juslices of tl�e Town of Ithaca's management is "�'"' responsible far the Town Justices' accounting records. The sufficiezlcy of the procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of the report. Cansequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described eitller for the purpase for °""�"°' which this report has been requested or %r any other pur�ase. Our procedures and findings are summarized on the attached pages. Also attached is a Summary of Town Coizrt A�tivity for tl�e Town Justices. � This agreed-upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation ""�"" standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accauntants. We were not engaged to and did not conduct an examination or review, the objective af which would be tl�e expression of an opinion or conclusion, respectively, on the accounting records of the Town "°�' Justices of the Town of lthaca. Accordingly, u�e do i�at express sucll aiz opinion or conclusion. Had we performed additiona] procedures, other matters might have came to our attention tllat would have been reported to you. qimuiiWr, This report is intended salely for the use of tlle Town of Ithaca and Office of State Comptroller and is not intended to be and should liot be used by anyone other than those specified parties. � o� � Sciarabba Walker & Ca., LLP Ithaca, New York June 6, 20l 7 �� Il() I;a�t [7�71ar7�3 lios:ul �?,�3 `�t�atc l�crtite "1:i It17:tC�r,l�e�n�li�rls 7.�`�,.�Q �.'�rrdan�`i,l`�e�Nl�<rrlc ;1 7(J�45 '�'" t�07-272-5550 / 601-2I:�-F7357 (1�',lx) wv��w.,s��cll�.c:c��rra � � PROCEDURES: Tawlv oF �T�c� AGitEED UPON PROCEDITRES � 1. Perform process narrative and walkthroughs for cash receipts and cash disbursements to trace and agree amounts, dates, payer, and violation {if applicable) relating to the Bail account and the Regular Fine accaunts: �"" a. Cash Receipts — Follow the ticket {receipt) or bail through the entire process from the docket and credit card receipt {if applicable) being created to the monthly report and the bank statement with the cancelled checks (if applicable) and deposits attached to the monthly suanmary report, b. Cash Disbursements — Follow the monthly payment to the Town of Ithaca Chief Fiscal Officer far the disbursement to the NYS Comptroller (or the returned bail back to the defendant} to the bank statement with cancelled. checks. � 2. From random scanning, nate the manthly receipt summaries to be in nutneric and date order with no missing receipts (check beginning and ending is sequential, 4 monthly summaries reviewed). 3. Review any deleted or vaided transactions in the monthly receipt slunmaries for reasonableness {reviewed 4 months}. 4. Review summary sheets with attached deposits to assure timely filing is within 3 business day parameter {reviewed 6 suxnmaries). 5. For every month, agree checkboak balances to bail account and regular fine account bank statements and trace any year-end outstanding checksldeposits ta checkbook, receipt �, journals, and January 2017 bank statement, 6. Verify copies of cancelled checks and deposits are kept with bank statements and that cancelled checks are signed (reviewed 3 months). 7. Verify pre-numbered checks are used for the monthly check remitted ta the Town of Ithaca {reviewed 3 months}. 8. Review the Current Bail Defendant's report for 5 months that included bail ta assure a � list of bail is maintained and trace arnounts over $l,aoa t� case files nating proper documentation and receipts are in place. 9. Trace and agree manthly report issued to NYS Compiroller, invaice received from NYS Camptroller, and check issued to �he Town of Ithaca Chief Fiscal Officer (reviewed 6 months). 10. Review submissian date of monthly report to the NYS Comptroller. Report is due by the l Oth of the following manth (reviewed 6 manths). � -2- JUSTICE KLEIN F�`INDINGS: A11 agreed upon procedures listed on page 2 were perFormed for Justice Klein. The following finding is assaciated with those procedures: �"' 1. There is a difFerence of $1,054.50 between the computer generated bail report and the bail check register balance. .TUSTICE SALK FINDINGS: � A11 agreed upon pracedures listed an page 2 were perfarmed for Justice Sa1k. The fallowing finding is associated with those proceciures: � l. Receipt #JAS8385 was duplicated in the system. SEI has averride authority, but the clerks do nat. V�Then Judge Salk's clerk caiied SEI to carrect a mistake in the system, they �"'' created a new receipt that had the same number as anather already included in the system. � -3- � TOWN OF ITHACA SUMN[ARY OF TOV4�N COURT ACTIVITY � Justice Justice Klein Sa1k � CASE3: Number of cases clased 7$6 1,174 � Number of cases apen 1,146 1,647 Arraignment for ather courts 7 12 Charges transferred to caunty court 10 11 � TOTAL CASES �,g�� ,844 '� FINES AND FEES: Criminal, matar vehicle $ 56,739 $ 7Q,033 Surcharges 61,250 64,939 � Civil 9,733 11,653 Bail poundage 24p 225 � ITHACA TOWN COURT COLLECTIONS $ IZ'],9{)� � j4�i,$$� " r�, BAIL RECEIVED $ 34,1 �5 $ 10,700 CASH BALANCES: �"" Regular $ 8,456 $ 12,154 Bail 3,540 3,75Q � TOTAL CASH $ 11,9�b $ 15,9d4 AGGREGATE NEW YORK STATE JUSTICE GUURT REMITTANCE $ 27A,$ ] 2 � -4- .� �� .�� TOWN OF ITHACA � � 215 N Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 � '��f � �'�� % � �' Phone: 6Q7-273-1721 ■ Fax: 607-273-5854 � 18 21 �,�� ,f„ r�- � www.town.ithaca.ny.us �� Tawn Clerk: Paulette Rosa (PRosa@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Deputy Town Clerks: Debra DeAugistine (DDeaugistine@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Jasmin 1 Cubero (JCubero@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) August 29, 2017 Irene Stein, Chair Tompkins Caunty Demacratic Cc�tnmittee PO Box 6798 Ithaca, NY 14851 Dear Ms. Stein, I'm writing as a fallow-up t� an event the Democratic Committee held in the T�wn Hall hoarc�rcx7in on August 22 to introduce the candidates running far open seats in congressional races. Since your organization has nsed the raom many times over the years and as such should be w�ll aware of rhe re�rms unde�r which arganizatic�ns are allowed re� use the facility, I was surprised to learn of the many unauthorized activities that taak place that evening. All outside arganizations entrusted to use town facilities are held to the same rules, guidelines, and standards, and if they dan't comply may be denied use of our facilities in the future. Applicants agree to the follawing: • The sound systein can be used only if a Town of Ithaca staff rnember is present. • If the sound system is used, the micraphones must stay in their holders; taking them out puts the finely calibrated system in danger of failin�. • There is absolutely NO access to Town Hal1 offices for any purpose other than an emergency, such as a fire. The alarrn on the emergency exit door has been reactivated. • Heat and air conc�itioning is programed off-site and cannot be averridden for single events. • NO ONE is allowed behind the judges' table; emergency alarm buttons located there could be inadvertently set off. I was told people entered the Tawn Hall offices via the emergency exit, taking chairs and trying to open windaws. This simply cannot happen. I saw from pictures in the media that rnicrophones were used aff their stands and that the door behind the board table was apened into the offices. That you would allow the public to access our private office space is frankly alarmin�. I ur�dersrand that more pec�ple attendec� than hacl beerz anticipated, kaut there is standin� roc�m. To reiterate, if these guidelines are not fallowed, use af the boardroo�n by the Demacratic Committee will be discontinued. If yau feel the size of your event will exceed the number of ehairs prc�vided c>r the abiliry of rhe HVAC systein tc� maintain a eomfc�rtable ternperattlre, I sug�est you find another locatian that better suits yaur needs. inc ely � �� aulette osa cc. Marcy Rc�sencrantz Paulette Rosa From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Janelle Alvstad-Mattson <janelleam@gmail.com> Saturday, 5eptember 02, 201711:16 AM Paulette Rosa Injury from laose gravel on Skyvue image2.JPG; ATT00001.tyct; image3.JPG; ATT00002.txt Hello, 1 am on sure who ta address this to exactly, so I am sending it to you, the Town Clerk, hoping that you can pass it alang to the right people. I am writing today, because the town's salution for "repaving" our side streets is not anly inconvenience, but dangerous. V1le were unhappy with the gravel solution, as it is not as nice far riding bike, and it is now impossible for my children to ride their scooters to the park as they used to love to da. Hawever, taday, on our walk to the park around 10:30 am, in clear conditions and broad daylight, my 9 year old daughter slipped on the loose gravel, fell dawn the side af it and scratched up her leg and hand. This happened on Skyvue at the corner of Snyder Hill Road. I've heard of several others who have slipped, fallen ar otherwise injured themselves with this raad coverage. I had heard "it will be better ance the roads are scraped" but I believe that has already happened. I hape that the town will cansider bikers and pedestrians more when considering road treatments in the future. lanelle Alvstad-Mattson 214 Snyder Hill Road 6d7-379-2215 r�yf ��%,f , ��' � P � �2, / `; ,ir4 ri / � i; � vk� /i� , �rr; .. � �h !v/� �t iyu , r69i�`%� t�' ; , ;,l ,;;r�f(�;. .. , � ,� �, �iv ? m�d' �` � � � � �`� , ; � ,,,i �z i� r�ar, „i ` ;? , e-, ,, .. �,',,, „ �( �w; r ' ��ii, ;r,- �. r n� , �� y � `�„ �� iaw r, �� - , � � �,�,,, y� Fy y� Y% � �� A, i' j °� "� ' j '�IYara Np ��, �i�^ �` o�n wr� � �rar�u"�,v�,v��yt„�� , �'„;��5 �^� � , � +3rn� ��bY+�' r", . a 'mrwo,t��, 'd;l�� ` �� wl�' "� . �I1JF� ", ��,"�'. IliJ,o�r�rr �j'"" �"'J �'h �J % tira� �r�na �' u� ��."" ,p no.,eav,. as 1 uN�Wv � � ik � � � � ,� �� , l�r � d � �� , , � � � `) � 1 ��j; � �Y° , i, iat/o„r � , , �J4✓I �r,/�"�� v � �i ,� �� 2 � �r 'frf � ,� � i �� 4 „ p�j; � �,� 'Ak' ` , � � �� a� � , �� frl '� y.� a �Y✓JW! e'i7h�p � l�rS��i�;y . f Y I; �' � � � '� � � �' ' s � 1 `t ` ,�i "% `�r %� °" �,� '�� i a�i � � �� . � �' � n �r �w i f��i 05w .{� �; �aNr^ j y ��, � �� IUIIw,�.u,,Pl/ ��f„�f f ' � '?�q °� �wirq�., Rly, ('i �""1�j �� i� �sri��iD��titaw �'�'7d��" i��i,: �til'�i i . � �� il � r �14 r � � � ir� �� , � ��/j ;�( '��4', '�N Id ��'��'��` �t (�jk �!;� Wi� u � r� '�` � � � � �m�� ,�� r� ��% � i �� l'�bi � ��' �s� � �� r�� , �, ��,�w,�f� m� �,��J �r � , �'�' ��r'i ar �y� sW � s �,. �. ��'s , , �, �11,,, �„ �' uu.�� "�4lt�`'�nunrv��wti�it �. � � ;� � � y r �. `� � <� �r ,�; r w i �� 9��' y� t �, `�� , � �, " ' �, , � �� .,r,. � , ,�° ,� .� �� „, � � � �� . � , Gd A M* . xf .° s• 'r� �.+' n "�� ;na �° r�,�� W� � � � � � �� , � � ✓ ��. � � � � „� �; .��"u��, r �' � ° "� � � � � �; � „�,, , P �� o �"�' Tw m � �, �n -�� w ;;-t �, � ��', , �." � G �'��" .�' � 4,y: ,� ✓ ^"+" 5 t�''� �� `�� r �7��t� mr� " � �`�"�+�'"�"" ��r� �� ,�� '� � ��`�" �'M'� ��"�2�';�"M'J�� w ,. ' . � . w, � �n�i �;:; .� � „� � �;� ` �,�„ � �� ., � "� �� ' � .�'. � ,+ y� � ?`° °� , a N`r �,: w � y. p� '" ,� � �" �� ' � v ! ro.-^'� �", � �r�,y, �y��,.. ;,, q✓F� PJ , J "" �, �v mu r^.�„. 9 f� �. NW ^�Y, A„, 4m f�� y, �, . vx� �ar, �G,a� � � b��✓, � w,�� $�� , I r, „idl��y „el,,S�'!��'�I�11U¢IW!�g�i�rmVyr�rr+�y�y¢w�aw��,m^i°m�„y„ „�„� _ � . � ,, m, ,,,�,,� ,w,,,i o , ,o„ , �„ , ,r ,,, ,�„ � � _ 7� `°��,�,. � �.,.,,,�,,,. � . .. .. . . . . � ._. f � �n � ,4r i� � !�m;��a �� e� �� q; � � � �� rta �'��'��"�� «,, . ,._f ' I , .. . . ... ��.�,�/ 1 ar`��v�' �. � s' ��y��;s N � "�oo August 2Q17 — Petition to �ower the Speed Limit on Culver Road in the Town of Ith�ca r � I'( � J, f i',(;��1�� a,.� �� i � ��' f' I f ......... ......i Whereas Culver Road is not posted and therefore the speed limit is 55 mph., the residents of Culver Road rf=quest that the Town Board start the process to establish a speed limit on Culver Road of 35 mph as befil:ting its numerous curves, steep gullies on one side and no shoulder. 175 Culver Rd 204 Culver Rd 214 Culver Rd 235 Culver Rd 250 Culver Rd 251 Culver Rd 289 Culver Rd �— � � � �- (�'Rd 291 Culver Rd ,�" ' � � f� 295 Culver Rd � G � � �" � �� .-. � ��„w�---P`""-" �, �„�„c� ,M.� �,��s �.. , � ,k; � �., 310 Culver �td � „�" 300 Culver Rd 7 P � � � � � Si�vTE f7F �,.. ar��oe�rur��rv.. 1 �° � � �� Three Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12223-1350 www✓.dps.ny.gov The Hon. Svante Myrick Mayar, City of Ithaca 10$ �ast Green Street Ithac�, NY 14850 The Han. F3i11 Goadman Supervisor, Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 September 19, 2017 ��s��Bi� ��rvie� �c��7i��is�r, Jc�3�� . �hc�d�� Chair and Chief Executive Officer �9°L�t,� �. ��P�' �O�B1� �. �U9°6�1�f1 J�6Y9�� . �0��9 Comrnissioners �Thd��71�� (�61�dt�ii Deputy Chair and Executive Deputy ��aal Ac�r��i� General Counsel ��th6��r� H. �3urg�� Secretary Re: Case 16-G-0432 - Petition o1�New York State Electric & Gas Corporation for Authorizatian to Construct a Natural Gas Cotnpressor Pilat Project in Tompkins County, NY Dear Mayor Myrick and Supervisor Gaodman: Thank you very much for your May 25, 20171etter to Commissioner Greg� Sayre in which you express the support of both the City and Town of Ithaca for the transition to fossil fuel-free heating. To that -end, yau note your belief that this can be accomplished without the expansion of natural gas infrastructLire, and reference plans of the City and the Town to encourage, and ultimately require, green buildings construction in your cammunities as a means of achieving a clean energy future. Thank you ior your interest in this important matter. I note that documents regarding this praceedin�; can be found on the Department of Public Service's website (www.c�ps.ny.gov) by searching Case 16-G-0432. Your comments have been included ainong those subinitted in this matter, and thus will become part of the Public Service Commission's record in tl�is praceeding. Sincerely, �.�� J n �� athleen F�I. Burgess �� Secretary Paulette Rosa From: Melanie <ms.translate@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:43 PM Ta: grandview-nbad; smearhoff@ithacajournal.com; Joe McMahon; Todd Bittner; Bill Goodman - TB; Eric Levine; Julie Holcomb; Paulette Rosa; svantem@gmail.com; mrobertson@tompkins-co.org; mlane@tompkins-co.org Subject: Re: Gorge Ranger program cut from City budget Open letter ta Sarah of the Ithaca Journal, Bill, Eric and Paulette of the Town of Ithaca, Svante and Julie of the City of Ithaca, Todd of Cornell, and neighbors of the Grandview neighborhood, re the Gorge Ranger Program (Sarah's article is appended to this email): I know that all of you share my concern about gorge jumping. I have a couple of questions about current status. - What is the status of the Gorge Ranger funds that were coming from other sources (Town, County)? - What is the status af Six Nlile Creek dams? Several years ago I understood that one or more dams were going to undergo a safety evaluation of, I forget if it was First or Second Dam, or both. I heard mentioned the possible dynamiting of one of the dams. What's been happening with the safety evaluation? - Several years ago, I shared with m��ny oi you a tip: the State Troopers office told me ihat if the City would send them a memo about ownership of the relevant part of Six Mile Creek, they would provide the needed enforcement. Has a memo been sent? Has enfarcement been requested of the State Troopers? If so, haw did that go? - Are there any statistics available that track illegal Six Mile Creek gorge use over time? Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Melanie On 10/19/2017 9:29 AM,1VIelanie wrote: Frorn today's Ithaca Journad: (:'ttv"� _(:�r�o_��;_ca ��xrr�e5r� ��r•��,�r�•c�na_r� c�ti r�rric�it � c�r,€� 1 will comment in a separaZe email. In his 26�1��'� �.,r�,y €��d�� i�� E�a��.;�fi ��s�� c-�C, Ithaca Mayor Svante Myrick elinzinated itinding for the city's decades-old C;c}z-�� .��,�� program, which employs rangers to monitor safety at Ithaca's gorges. But it was actu�illy this ye�1r that the program first got the chopping block. Despite a$15,000 allocation in 2017's budget, gorge rangers were never hired for the 2017 season, said Ithaca City C1erk Julie Holcomb, who acts as the city's liaison for gorge safety programs. "So I guess you could say that the program ended in September of 2016," Holcomb said. C�it� �x�c��»�cl� indicate the gorge ranger position was cre��ted in 1984 to hinder ��1��c��i1i�,��l ,�wilnr��ix�;� in ihe gorges. Armed with body cameras since 2016, the rangers helped to ensure swimmers did not get injured from swimming in rough water or diving from cliffs up to $0 feet high. Rangers had no power tcr ticket or anest Ithaca thrill-seekez�s for illegal activities, though. That was up to the police, if and when the rangers called for backup. "The largest problem is that the Rangers weren't getting good compliance unless they had consistent back-up and oversight from (Ithaca Police Department)," Myrick said via email. "IPD was clear that they weren't able to provide that consistent back-up and oversight." uy Photo Ithaca Garge Ranger Brittany Lagaly warns people on the cliff at Second Dam. (Phato: ANDREW CASLER / 5taff Photo) Holcomb said this sums up the program's primary strugble; What city institution is suited to be the backbone of the program? The gorge ranger program has historically been overseen by city's Parks and Forestry Division and budgeted oc�t of the Department of Public Works, Holcomb said, but over months of discussion, the city has determined it needs more of an enforcement component. "With the cliff jumping and the drinking and some af the dangerous activities that have occurred in and araund the gorges, the enforcement camponent of job has been more pronounced," Holcomb said. uy Photo Ithaca Garge Ranger Angela Sims, right, paints her body camera toward people illegally swimming at Second Dam. She and Ranger Brittany Lagaly confronted about 20 people at Second Dam during this incident. (Photo: ANDREW CASLER / Staff Phato) Such enforcement doesn't fa11 under the city forester's jurisdiction. Holcomb said the program would benefit from more support fram IPD, but the city police are "criticaily short-staffed right now." "We started the conversations with IPD, Tompkins �ounty, the fire depariment, police departments, trying to find a hame for this program," Holcomb said. "But every department was saying, `This is not something we can take on right now."' So the program was quietly eliminated until further notice. Myrick said his office informed the city's Cammon Council, but, "I don't know if we senC a media release." Discussion of the program's cut does not appear in the city's online records of public meeting agendas and minutes. Media reports of the program's ter•mination refer to the 20 �18 budget — nothing earlier. And now it's gone Cw��c, �.��y t��,1�, �c��:.._l�i�as:��_.�c��°...zv�r�� 'T�� ':� c.��th �� Q,�t�9 ��. r�zir��tc � _c�� _t_��:�; vvl7�;:�� r�t�r��iz7�i�� r��. Holcomb said the funds that previously contributed to the gorge ranger pr�ogram will in 2018 be allocated to increase the city's existing Forestry Technician position from part-time Co fu11-time. BLit what became of 201� budget's $15,000 gorge ranger allocation, Holcomb said she is unsure. "I know that I just ordered gorge regulation signs for Fall Creek and Six Mile Creek and the cost wi11 be coming from that account," Holcamb said. Although the program's future is unsure, Holcomb said it is important that the city continues to work to find a solution for what she considers a"public safety priority." "I think that the natLiral areas are beautifLil and I want everyone to enjoy them, but there are inherent dangers in them," I�olcomb said. With proper enforcement, Holcomb said visitors and Ithacans "can responsibly enjoy the beautiful areas that Ithaca is known for without risking the horrible deaths and drawninbs that can happen." They are heartbreaking for everyone involved and for the community as a whole." Follow («��sc�rc��c �aac Lr��lze,�� c�n Twztter. Melanie Stein i��7 . �t;:L�a.r�i��lat�C�c�i�n� i.1. . cc>,�n _ _-- _ __ phone: (607) 677 0635 November 21, 2017 Tawn Clerk 215 N Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 1485U RE: �asella Recycling , �� , �� ,�� The purpose of this I�tter is ta file a complaint �gainst Caseila Recycling. Despite rr7ultiple atten�pts to speak with Glaria at Casella, my calls are raever returned. So, I am hoping you might be able to help or at least direct this letter ta sameone who can. The main probfem is th� inconsistency with orvhich Casella picks up recycling materials on the Byway, Forest Hame. �or example, pick up was due 6ast Tuesday (November 14}. Our materiafs cantinu� to sit or� the Byw�y, ignared by Casella. The previous pick �p was mare �han three days lat�. In many cases, �ick up is a�: least c�ne io two d�ys late. In several instances, they will pick up material at #4 The Byway and ignore the rest of the stre�t. We pay town taxes and c�ne of the services is waste management, of which rec:yeling is part of. Therefare, as you ean image, the folks on the Ciyway are not very happy with the state of affairs. I dc� hope that this matter wili be tak�n care of soon. Thank you. 5ineerely, , ,A� A, �,'' ,� ��° � :��°�'� „ � � � ��<��James E. Naldeman �"� 6 Th� Byw�y Ithaca, NY 14850 cc: Caselfa, 1180 Elmira Rd, Newfield, NY 14867 Casella Headquarters, PO �3s�x 1.37�, �1ii1li�>ic�r�, �� 7"��5- ��.. ,�, o�' x�,� TOWN OF ITHACA p '�`h 215 N Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 �" �"' Phone:607-273-1721 ■ Fax:607-273-5854 'g�21 www.town.ithaca.ny.us �� Y�� Tawn Clerk: Paulette Rosa (PRosa@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Deputy Town Clerks: Debra DeAugistine (DDeaugistine@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Jasmin J Cubero (JCubero@Town.Ithaca.NY.US) Noveml�er 30, 201? James Halcleman 6 The Byway Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Mr. Halcleman, I receiveci yonr letter upon my return to the office on Nove:mber 30`'' Tom��kins Caunty Solid Waste handles recycling for tlie entire Cotinry so the Town has na authority or input into the selection of Casella for seivices. That beitig said, I did google tlzc divisian and the persan I would suggest sending this to would be 8arb Eckstrom, Director, Tomkins Counry Recycling, 122 C;ommercial Ave, Ithaca, NY 14850. I will put your letter and my response in the Tawn Baard's correspondence so they are aware of your concerns/issues with the vendor. Sincer�l �� Ci��. lulette Rosa Tawn Clerk C:GO Notification Letter f'or LIHC Prajects — Outside of NYC Certified Mail — Retr.irn Receipt Requested CEO Name: Willliam D. Goodman. CEO Title: Town Su��ervisor Mailing Add:ress: 215 N. Tioga St., Ithaca, NY 14850 Date: ! �.°'1l�rj`1 RE: Transmittal of LTIIC Pi��ogram Applicatiali fc�r: .T_,ow-Incor�le I�Iousi�z�� Credit Pz-o�;ram F'undlli� Proj�et N�ame: Ithaca Townhomes Project Loca�tion: 1205 Trumazlsb�ur Ttd., I�thac�ti, NY �14$50 Project Sponsor: NRP IIoldrn�s LLC Dear Supervisor Goociman: 'This is to inform yc�n of our� intEntio:n to sub.mit the above re:Perenced anci enclosed applicatian uzicler i}le Low-Incoi7le Housing Creclit Prograxn (LIHC) to the New York State Uivision oiHo�.tsing and Coznmunity Renewal. This Program was established by the Tax Refornl Act of 1986 (witl� a new Sectiar142 i:a the Internal Revenue Coc1e) whicl� autlzorized fecieral assislatice in the far-m of tax credits fc�r ownet-s of rcnt�l llousing that is z-eserved for households elrning 60°/<, or less of the area median ir1co17ie. Under ilze Intei•n�l Revcnue Code Section 42(��rn)(1)(A)(ii), an allocatic7n of Creclit to a project caruloi be made uizless the chieF executive officer (or the eq��ivalent) of thc local jurisdiciion with�in which the proposed project is located, is zioti�ed and is provided a reason�ible opportunity to corn�nent on the ��roject. If yc��z h��ve aziy cozrunents regarding the enclosed lpplication, piease subnait ther�l within 20 c��ys of receipt oithe ericlosed a}�plication �o: New Y�rlc State Division �f Ho�ising anci Com�mui�ity Renewal (DHCI�) 38-40 State Sh-eet; 6�' T?loo1- Albany, New York 12207 Atte»tion: Az�ion Adler; Program Maz�agez- (518) 486-5044 The returned certified mail postal receipt for this package, accepted 3nd signed for by your oftice, will be retL�rned ta the applicant fc�r forwarding ta DIiCR to serve as proof tl�at the requirernents o� Sectic�n 42(m)(1)(A)(ii) have l�eeii �2et by t:his Low-Income .�Iousing Credit Prograln applican,t. If you wrsh to discuss the enclosed �pplicatio�rz or az�y other aspect of t�he propc7sed project, please feel fxee to cantaci me at the address above or call me at (716) 445-0940. S in ly, ��, �� Project Rcpresentative/Sponsor/Develaper; And Project Representative/S�aoi7sor Developer Org�inization. Cc: Arnon 1ldler; New York State Division of Housing and Community t2enewal 38-40 State Street Alb�ny, New York 12207