Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-08-23-PH TOWN OF ULYSSES PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 23 , 2005 PRESENT: Supervisor Doug Austic, Town Councilpeople Lee Scott, Robert Weatherby; Roxanne Marino and Don Ellis ; Town Clerk Marsha Georgia; Deputy Supervisor Richard Coogan; Attorney Bruce Wilson. Others Present: Sue Mills, Amy Meenen, Judith Cone, JB Swann, Cheryl Thompson, Yuanne Pivien, and Lysle Gordon. Supervisor Austic opened the Public Hearing at 7 : 05 PM and announced that the Town Board will hear public comments on the creation of Development District #22 as follows : DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 22 1 . This District shall be known as Development District No. 22. 2 . The purposes for which the Development District may be used is as follows : a. Agricultural Use as defined under Ag and Markets Law b . Residential Use (Single Family) c. Computer software research and development not to exceed 30 employees to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated May 30, 2005 as drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect. 3 . Area of the District The area of said District shall be approximately 22 .84 acres consisting of parcels presently owned by Terrill Moore and Judith Cone, Tax Parcels 33 .-2- 1 . 2, 33.-2- 1 .3 ; and 33 .-2- 1 .4 in the Town of Ulysses, bordering Perry City Road on the { North and Krums Corners Road on the West, and more particularly described as follows : ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND situated in the Town of Ulysses, County of Tompkins, State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows : BEGINNING at a point marking the intersection of the centerline of Perry City Road with the centerline of Krums Corners Road ; Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East along the centerline of Perry City Road 803 .21 feet to a point; Thence South 7 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds West (passing through a pin at 25.76 feet) 754.20 feet to a pin ; Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East (passing through a pipe at 150 feet) 395. 82 feet to a pin ; Thence South 9 degrees 06 minutes 01 second West 360 feet to a pin ; f Thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West 998.57 feet to a pin ; Thence North 82 degrees 08 minutes West Passing a pipe at 174. 7 feet a total distance of 200 feet to the center line of Krums Corners Road ; Thence North 7 degrees 45 minutes East 446.9 feet along the center line of Krums Corners Road ; Public Hearing — Coon 2 08/23/2005 Thence North 07 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds East 671 .70 feet to the point or place of beginning . Mr. Austic started the hearing by having the Town Board review the SEQR Full Environmental Assessment Form, Part I that Ms . Cone submitted and opening the proceeding for comments or questions . Mr. Austic read into record Part I as follows : Name of Action : Zoning change to multi-use Planned Development District Location of Action : 3520 Krums Corners Road, Ithaca, NY, Tompkins County Name of Applicant : Judith Cone & Terrill M . Moore Address : 3170 Perry City Road, Trumansburg, NY Phone : 607-277- 1029 Description of Action : Change current residential zoning to a multi -use Planned Development, District that contains : Business, (specifically Computer Research and Development), Agriculture, and Residential uses . The PDD shall be adaptive re-use of an existing farmhouse to be used for computer software development office space . This involves the demolition of one addition to the existing structure that will be replaced with a new addition that is slightly larger, has a full basement, and is two stories rather than the present one story. The second story on the proposed addition is more, in keeping with the rest of the structure . The applicants have asked that if the current business venture ceases to operate at this location, then the building is to revert to residential use . The parcel being considered is approximately 23 acres , of which approximately 20 acres is to remain in existing use as agricultural cropland. A. Site Description 1 . Commercial , Residential , Rural (non farming) , Agriculture 2 . Total acreage of project area: 22 . 84 acres Approximate) Acreage Presently After Completion Meadow or Brush land (non-Agricultural) Oacres 0 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural 21 acres 21 acres Wetland 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surface '/2 acres '/2 acres Other — lawn & gardens 11 /2 acres 11 /2 acres 3 . What is predominant soil types on project site? a. Soil drainage Well Drained — 75 % of site Moderately well drained — 25 % of site b . If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 21 acres 4 . Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? No 5 . Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes . 0- 10% - 100% 6 . Is project substantially contiguous to , or contain a building, site, or district, listedlon the State or National Registers of Historic Places . No 7 . Islproject substantially contiguous to , or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? No t �� Public Hearing — Coon 3 08/23/2005 8 . What is the depth of the water table? 20+(in feet) 9 . Is site located over a primary, principal , or sole source aquifer? No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? No 11 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? No 12 . Are there any unique or unusual landforms on the project site? (i . e . , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? No 13 . Does the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area presently use the project site? No 14 . Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? No Streams within or contiguous to project area: None 15 . Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None 16 . Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes a. If YES , does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes b . If YES , will improvements be necessary to allow connection? No 17 . Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? { Yes �. 18 . Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? No 19 . Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? No B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) . a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 22 . 84 acres b . Project acreage to be developed : '/4 acres initially; '/ acres ultimately c . Project acreage to remain undeveloped : 20+ acres d . Length of project, in miles : N/A e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 60% f. Number of off- street parking spaces existing 15 ; proposed 30 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour : 25 (upon completion of project) ? h . If residential : Number and type of housing units : N/A i . Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure : 25 height; 40 width; 60 length j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 40 ft . Public Hearing — Coon 4 08/23/2005 2 . How much natural material (i . e . rock, earth, etc .) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards . 3 . Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes a. If yes , for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? grass, trees and flower gardens b . Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes c . Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes 4 . Hew many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? '/ acres 5 . Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? No 6 . If single phase project : Anticipated period of construction : 6 months, (including demolition) 7 . If multi-phased : N/A 8 . Will blasting occur during construction? No 9 . Number of jobs generated : during construction 10 after project is complete 10 . Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes I;f yes, explain: Elimination of an existing mobile office when project is complete . r 12 . Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? No 13 . Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes Type : Septic system 14 . Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? No 15 . Is project or any portion of project located in a 100-year flood plain? No 16 . Will the project generating solid waste? Yes landfill — Tompkins Co . Solid Waste 17 . Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? No 18 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides? No 19 . Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day) ? No 20 . Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? No 21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes I yes, indicate type(s) : Electricity for approximately 10 workstations and air conditioning for additional square footage. Additional fuel oil for heating for additional square footage . 22 . If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute 23 . Total anticipated water usage per day 200 gallons/day 24 . Does project involve Local , State or Federal funding? No Public Hearing — Coon 5 08/23/2005 Approvals Required : Town Board Yes - Zoning Change to PDD Town Planning Board Yes Town Zoning Board No County Health Department Yes -- Well, Water, Septic C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes If yes, indicate decision required : Zoning Amendment Site Plan Review 2 . What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Residential/Agriculture 3 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Residential . Approximately 18 residential houses . 4 . What is the proposed zoning of the site? Multi-use Planned Development District — Business , Agriculture and Residential . Approximately 20 acres to be reserved for crop farming. 5 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Addition to 1 existing structure to be adapted for re-use and additional parking. Potential residential or agriculture structure . 6 . Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes Absolutely consistent with Ulysses Comprehensive Land Use Plan which stresses maintaining rural character. 7 . What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? All surrounding land is in active agricultural use ; there are approximately 10 residences within '/4 mile of the proposed action. The proposed zoning classification is medium density residential . 8 . Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? Yes 9 . If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? No 10 . Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, and fire protection? 3 No 12 . Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? No D. Informational Details Attach any addition information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please Public Hearing — Coon 6 08/23/2005 discuss such impacts and the measures, which you propose to mitigate or avoid them . Nothing attached E. Verification I; certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge . Applicant/Sponsor Name : Terrill M. Moore and Judith Cone Date : June 1 , 2005 Signature : Signed by applicants . Mr. Austic opened the floor for public comments . No comments were heard. The Town Board shall complete Part II of SEQRA after the Public Hearing is closed and opened for a Special Town Board Meeting. Public Comments on the Proposed Development District Previously Entered Into Record Ms . Cone told the Board, — "If our business ceases at the present location, we want the right to return building and barn back into residential use. " Mr. Austic said to change the use of the dwelling back to residential would require the action of the Town. Ms . Thompson said that there is no intent to have the acreage proposed for farmland to be developed for residential use . Ms . Marino stated for the record that she wants to know that the acreage set aside fi for apiculture will not be developed for residential use. a{ Ms . Pivien commented that she finds it hard to know what to ask until the Town Board defines the uses for the PDD . Mr. Austic explained that the entire 22 . 84-acre parcel is being considered for the Development District but that only the 2 acres where the business is currently housed will be rezoned for the business portion of the PDD . The 21 acres can be used for residential or agricultural purposes . Mr. Ellis said that he felt the PDD was more restricted in that only the buildings can be used not the whole 2 acres . The business is limited to the inside of those buildings . Any additional business use on the two acres would require the approval of the Town Board . Mr. Gordon of 2444 Perry City Road, whose property is directly across Perry City Road from the proposed PDD commented that he sees the side of the barn and the house everyday when he walks up the road to catch the bus to go to work and that he supports the proposed PDD . He said that the business has never caused him or any one else in the area any problems and the neighbors are glad that the business is there. Mr. Gordon went on to say that he feels the proposed PDD will protect the area from unwanted development rather than having any negative effect. ' The restrictions proposed by the owners of the business certainly appear to be tight enough to prevent anything unwanted from occurring without additional action by the Town Board . Hearing no further comments Mr. Weatherby moved, seconded by Mr. Scott to close the Public Hearing. Public Hearing closed at 7 : 35 Pm Respectfully submitted, Marsha L . Georgia, Ulysses Town Clerk TOWN OF ULYSSES SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #22 - CONE SEQR PART II AUGUST 23 , 2005 PRESENT : Supervisor Doug Austic , Town Councilpeople Lee Scott, Robert Weatherby; Roxanne Marino and Don Ellis ; Town Clerk Marsha Georgia; Deputy Supervisor Richard Coogan; Attorney Bruce Wilson. Others Present : Sue Mills, Amy Meenen, Judith Cone, JB Swann, Cheryl Thompson, Yuanne Pivien, and Lysle Gordon. Supervisor Austic opened the Special Town Board Meeting at 7 :36 PM and stated that the first order of business for the Town Board was to review Part II of the Environmental Assessment Form for the proposed PDD for the Cone property. PART 2 — PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency Impact on Land 1 . Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? No 2 . Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual landforms found on the site? (i . e. , cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc . ) No 3 . Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15 , 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) No 4 . Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? No 5 . Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? No 6 . Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? No 7 . Will Proposed Action affect air quality? No 8 . Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? No 9 . Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? No 10 . Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources ? No 11 . Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617 . 20, Appendix B .) No 12 . Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? No 13 . Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? No 14 . Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617 . 14(g) ? No 15 . Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? No Special Town Board Meeting 2 08/23/2005 16 . Will Proposed Action affect the community' s sources of fuel or energy supply? No 17 . Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? No 18 . Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? No 19 . Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Yes Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use . (Small to Moderate Impact) Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. (Small to Moderate Impact) Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. (Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change) No 20 . Is ; there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? No After conducting Part II of the SEQR, Mr . Austic asked if there where any questions or comments by the Town Board on the Environmental Assessment Form . Mr. Ellis said that he to ask a question on Part I question #3 of the EAF . Mr. Austic informed Mr. Ellis that Part I was submitted by Ms . Cone and as such will be left as answered. The Board can discuss the impact raised by Part I Question 3 when the Board makes their findings . The question being raised is that there is a potential for residential structures on the site and there are no specifications to lot size and set backs so the potential number of residential structures is unknown. Mr. Ellis asked if there was the potential for any kind of structure on the property as listed in the Al Agricultural District for permitted uses . Mrs . Georgia Tasked permission to address Ms . Cone . Which was granted . Ms . Georgia asked "Is it your intention, in regards to the additional acreage around the business, to develop the land into residential properties or that the only use allowed for this land would be for the raising of crops, and if the business should cease at this location only the existing dwelling shall revert to residential use? Ms . Cone said yes that is what she intends . Mr. Austic said that in the agricultural district, residential is an allowable use . This is not to say that Ms . Cone would ever build a house or sell land for a house, but that the action would be allowable . The Board decided to address this issue when they discuss Local Law #2 2005 . Mr. Austic asked if anyone had any other comments or questions on SEQR? Ms . Marino moved, seconded by Mr. Ellis the following : Resolution and Determination Whereas, Judith Cone and Terrill Moore, on or about June 1 , 2005 filed an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with the Town Clerk and Town Board, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and, Whereas, said EAF is in connection with the application for the Zoning of Tax Parcels No . 33 . -2 - 1 .2 , 33 . -2 - 1 . 3 , and 33 . -2 - 1 . 4 consisting of 22 . 84 acres into a Development District under Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section 5 ; and, Special Town Board Meeting 3 08/23/2005 Whereas, the EAF review date was posted on the Town Clerk ' s signboard and published same in the official paper, a copy and proof of same are attached hereto and made a part hereof; and Whereas, it is hereby determined the action proposed does not constitute a Type I action as defined in 6 NYCRR Section 617 . 12 of SEQR regulations since Section 617 .4 (b) (2) references adoption of Zoning changes of 25 acres or more in a district and this application is for 22 . 84 acres, and Whereas, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses hereby declares themselves as lead agency and as such has made the following findings after accepting as complete the submitted EAF : 1 . That the Re-Zoning is not deemed adverse to, a. Water Resources b . Air Quality c . Plants and Animals d. Aesthetic Resources e . Historic and archeological Resources f. Open space and recreation g. Transportation h. Energy i . Noise and odor j . Increase modem density k. Public health 1 . Growth and characters of the community or neighborhood 2 . That the proposed action is consistent with social and economic considerations . 3 . That all steps have been taken in the proposed action to the extent practicable (i . e . per Site Plan Diagram) to mediate any negative consequences identified, therefore it is hereby: Resolved, that the EAF is adopted and approved as submitted and above referred findings are hereby adopted ; and Further Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses hereby makes the determination based on the EAF and its findings that adoption of Development District No . 22 as a Local Law No . 2 of 2005 as drafted is found to have no significant impact on the environment and declares and issues hereby a negative declaration under SEQR. Mr. Austic aye Mr. Scott aye Mr. Weatherby aye Ms . Marino aye Mr. Ellis aye Adopted. Mr. Austic reminded the Board that the next step in forming the PDD was to document the findings of support for the proposed rezoning that are based in the Ulysses Comprehensive Plan. The need for findings was part of the comments made by Tompkins County Planning in their response to the 239 1 &m review for this action. In their review, Tompkins County Planning Department stated that they believe this action will have no negative inter-community, or countywide impacts . Their other comments are as follows : • As a general rule, the Department does not support this type of small-area zoning unless the proposed use is clearly consistent with the underlying zoning district or Special Towns Board Meeting 4 08/23/2005 with the community's comprehensive plan. We do not believe this rezoning meets that criterion. • All future development in this Development District should be subject to site plan review, since the proposed zoning language provides no guidelines for development in this district (such as setback requirements, height limitations, and the like) . • The area proposed for rezoning is located within the Agricultural District. As such, an Agricultural Data Statement is required to be completed and filed with this application . The general consensus of the Town Board on the County' s 239 1 &m review was : 1 . The application for re-zoning does meet with the Ulysses Comprehensive Plan. (Board ' s findings stated below in the minutes . ) 2 . The new Development District will be subject to site plan review. 3 . The Agricultural Data Statement will be completed and filed with the Town Clerk tomorrow . (Each Town is responsible for drafting its own Agricultural Data Statement .) The Board had a lengthy discussion regarding the 20+ acres in the proposed development district. Ms . Cone, the applicant for the re-zoning requested, restated that she and her husband did not have any plans for residential development and the only dwellings that they had any interest in wars the existing structures should the business cease activities at this location. Ms . Cone requested that under the purposed rezoning (Local Law #2 2005 ) where it states the uses for the Development District that (item b . Residential Use (Single Family) be deleted. If lin the future they want the option to sell or build a single- family home, then they will return to the Town Board and request a zoning change for the PDD . The Board debated the pros and cons of deleting the residential and came to the following consensus to which Ms . Cone agreed : 1 . Delete b . Residential Use (Single Family) 2 . Change c . to b . which will now read : Computer software research and development not to exceed 30 employees to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated May 30, 2005 as drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect inclusive of Residential use in said structures . After a discussion on findings, the Board agreed that the proposed rezoning does meet the Ulysses Comprehensive Plan as follows : • Maintains the natural and man-made aesthetic aspects of the community • Promotes the viability of agriculture • Promotes business activities that capitalize on the historic , cultural and natural assets of the town and surrounding region • Encourages commercial areas that provide necessary goods, services , and employment for the residents of the town while maintaining the small-town atmosphere valued by existing businesses, residents and visitors • Encourages a strong, stable and diverse local economy to keep the Town of Ulysses a desirable place to live, work, shop , and visit while preserving the small- town atmosphere • Promotes the expansion and development of industrial enterprises while maintaining the small-town atmosphere and environmental integrity of the Town • Maintains a clean, healthy, and viable natural environment • Encourages and maintains a safe, efficient and environmentally sensitive transportation system • Consistent with Chapter 4, page 25 of the Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan in terns of preserving agricultural buildings and character of structures in neighborhoods while permitting business activities Special Town Board Meeting 5 08/23 /2005 Mr. Ellis moved, seconded by Mr. Weatherby the following : LOCAL LAW NO . 2 , 2005 CREATING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 22 WHEREAS, Application has been made for re-zoning of lands , pursuant to the existing Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section 5 , by Terrill Moore and Judith Cone for a Development District ; and WHEREAS, The Town Board of the Town of Ulysses referred the matter pursuant to Article IV, Section 5 (b) to the Town of Ulysses Planning Board which considered items 1 thru 4 therein and approved on June 22 , 2005 , with modification, the District pursuant to Article IV Section 5 (c) ; and WHEREAS, A Public Hearing was held on the proposed Draft Law on August 23 , 2005 by the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses after August 9,2005 review of the Draft Law and scheduling by said Board, and lawful postings of notice and publication as required by New York State Town Law ; and WHEREAS, The Tompkins County Planning Department, having due notice, did not object to said Local Law pursuant to it's General Municipal Law review under Section 239 l&m ; and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses has reviewed the short form State Environmental Quality Review statement and made findings and issued a negative declaration thereon; and WHEREAS, based on all of the above the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses as found the re-zoning application to be consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan and in the best interests of the Town of Ulysses in that it still allows for agricultural and single-family use and is limited in scope, purpose, and maintains natural aesthesis in the area while adding to the Town workforce and property tax base ; and WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses has fully considered all comments of the public and applicant and procedures herein, Now Therefore it is hereby, RESOLVED, the Local Town Law No . 2 of 2005 creating Development District 22 is enacted as set forth for the purposes and premises set forth as follows : BE IT ENACTED , by the Ulysses Town Board Local Law No . 2 of 2005 , as set forth herein : DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO . 22 1 . This District shall be known as Development District No . 22 . 2 . The purposes for which the Development District may be used is as follows : a. Agricultural Use as defined under Ag and Markets Law b . Computer software research and development not to exceed 30 employees to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated May 30, 2005 as drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect inclusive of Residential use in said structures . 3 . Area of the District The area of said District shall be approximately 22 . 84 acres consisting of parcels presently owned by Terrill Moore and Judith Cone, Tax Parcels 33 . -2- 1 . 2 , 33 . -2- 1 . 3 and 33 . -2 - 1 . 4 in the Town of Ulysses, bordering Perry City Road on the Special Town Board Meeting 6 08/23/2005 North and Krums Corners Road on the West, and more particularly described as follows : ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND situated in the Town of Ulysses, County of Tompkins, State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows : BEGINNING at a point marking the intersection of the centerline of Perry City Road with the centerline of Krums Corners Road ; Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East along the centerline of Perry City Road 803 . 21 feet to a point; Thence South 7 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds West (passing through a pin at 25 . 76 feet) 754 . 20 feet to a pin ; Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East (passing through a pipe at 150 feet) 395 . 82 feet to a pin; Thence South 9 degrees 06 minutes 01 second West 360 feet to a pin; Thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West 998 . 57 feet to a pin ; Thence North 82 degrees 08 minutes West Passing a pipe at 174 . 7 feet a total distance of 200 feet to the center line of Krums Corners Road; Thence North 7 degrees 45 minutes East 446 . 9 feet along the center line of Krums Corners Road; Thence North 07 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds East 671 . 70 feet to the point or place of beginning . Mr. Scott thanked Ms . Cone for her patience and he thinks this is a very good project . The rest of the Board seconded Mr. Scott ' s statement. Mr. Austic called for the vote . Mr. Austic aye Mr. Scott aye Mr. Weatherby aye Ms . Marino aye Mr. Ellis aye Adopted. Ms . Cone will provide the Agricultural Data Statement to the Town Clerk tomorrow. Hearing no further business Mr. Weatherby moved, seconded by Mr. Ellis to adjourn the meeting. Unanimously approved . Meeting adjourned at 8 : 40 PM . Respectfully submitted, Marsha L. Georgia Ulysses Town Clerk MLG : mlg