HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-08-23-PH TOWN OF ULYSSES
PUBLIC HEARING
AUGUST 23 , 2005
PRESENT: Supervisor Doug Austic, Town Councilpeople Lee Scott, Robert Weatherby;
Roxanne Marino and Don Ellis ; Town Clerk Marsha Georgia; Deputy Supervisor
Richard Coogan; Attorney Bruce Wilson.
Others Present: Sue Mills, Amy Meenen, Judith Cone, JB Swann, Cheryl Thompson,
Yuanne Pivien, and Lysle Gordon.
Supervisor Austic opened the Public Hearing at 7 : 05 PM and announced that the Town
Board will hear public comments on the creation of Development District #22 as follows :
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 22
1 . This District shall be known as Development District No. 22.
2 . The purposes for which the Development District may be used is as follows :
a. Agricultural Use as defined under Ag and Markets Law
b . Residential Use (Single Family)
c. Computer software research and development not to exceed 30
employees to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated
May 30, 2005 as drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect.
3 . Area of the District
The area of said District shall be approximately 22 .84 acres consisting of
parcels presently owned by Terrill Moore and Judith Cone, Tax Parcels 33 .-2- 1 . 2,
33.-2- 1 .3 ; and 33 .-2- 1 .4 in the Town of Ulysses, bordering Perry City Road on the
{ North and Krums Corners Road on the West, and more particularly described as
follows :
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND situated in the Town of
Ulysses, County of Tompkins, State of New York, more particularly
bounded and described as follows :
BEGINNING at a point marking the intersection of the centerline of
Perry City Road with the centerline of Krums Corners Road ;
Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East along the
centerline of Perry City Road 803 .21 feet to a point;
Thence South 7 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds West (passing through
a pin at 25.76 feet) 754.20 feet to a pin ;
Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East (passing through
a pipe at 150 feet) 395. 82 feet to a pin ;
Thence South 9 degrees 06 minutes 01 second West 360 feet to a pin ;
f
Thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West 998.57 feet to a
pin ;
Thence North 82 degrees 08 minutes West Passing a pipe at 174. 7 feet
a total distance of 200 feet to the center line of Krums Corners Road ;
Thence North 7 degrees 45 minutes East 446.9 feet along the center
line of Krums Corners Road ;
Public Hearing — Coon 2
08/23/2005
Thence North 07 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds East 671 .70 feet to the
point or place of beginning .
Mr. Austic started the hearing by having the Town Board review the SEQR Full
Environmental Assessment Form, Part I that Ms . Cone submitted and opening the
proceeding for comments or questions .
Mr. Austic read into record Part I as follows :
Name of Action : Zoning change to multi-use Planned Development District
Location of Action : 3520 Krums Corners Road, Ithaca, NY, Tompkins County
Name of Applicant : Judith Cone & Terrill M . Moore
Address : 3170 Perry City Road, Trumansburg, NY
Phone : 607-277- 1029
Description of Action : Change current residential zoning to a multi -use Planned
Development, District that contains : Business, (specifically Computer Research and
Development), Agriculture, and Residential uses . The PDD shall be adaptive re-use of an
existing farmhouse to be used for computer software development office space . This
involves the demolition of one addition to the existing structure that will be replaced with
a new addition that is slightly larger, has a full basement, and is two stories rather than
the present one story. The second story on the proposed addition is more, in keeping with
the rest of the structure . The applicants have asked that if the current business venture
ceases to operate at this location, then the building is to revert to residential use . The
parcel being considered is approximately 23 acres , of which approximately 20 acres is to
remain in existing use as agricultural cropland.
A. Site Description
1 . Commercial , Residential , Rural (non farming) , Agriculture
2 . Total acreage of project area: 22 . 84 acres
Approximate) Acreage Presently After Completion
Meadow or Brush land (non-Agricultural) Oacres 0 acres
Forested 0 acres 0 acres
Agricultural 21 acres 21 acres
Wetland 0 acres 0 acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres
Unvegetated 0 acres 0 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surface '/2 acres '/2 acres
Other — lawn & gardens 11 /2 acres 11 /2 acres
3 . What is predominant soil types on project site?
a. Soil drainage
Well Drained — 75 % of site Moderately well drained — 25 % of site
b . If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are
classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System?
21 acres
4 . Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site?
No
5 . Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes .
0- 10% - 100%
6 . Is project substantially contiguous to , or contain a building, site, or district,
listedlon the State or National Registers of Historic Places .
No
7 . Islproject substantially contiguous to , or contain a building, site, or district,
listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places?
No
t ��
Public Hearing — Coon 3
08/23/2005
8 . What is the depth of the water table?
20+(in feet)
9 . Is site located over a primary, principal , or sole source aquifer?
No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project
area?
No
11 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified
as threatened or endangered?
No
12 . Are there any unique or unusual landforms on the project site? (i . e . , cliffs,
dunes, other geological formations?
No
13 . Does the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area
presently use the project site?
No
14 . Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the
community?
No
Streams within or contiguous to project area:
None
15 . Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
None
16 . Is the site served by existing public utilities?
Yes
a. If YES , does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
Yes
b . If YES , will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
No
17 . Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture
and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304?
{ Yes
�. 18 . Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental
Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617?
No
19 . Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
No
B. Project Description
1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) .
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor:
22 . 84 acres
b . Project acreage to be developed :
'/4 acres initially; '/ acres ultimately
c . Project acreage to remain undeveloped :
20+ acres
d . Length of project, in miles :
N/A
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed.
60%
f. Number of off- street parking spaces existing
15 ; proposed 30
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour :
25 (upon completion of project) ?
h . If residential : Number and type of housing units :
N/A
i . Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure :
25 height; 40 width; 60 length
j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy
is?
40 ft .
Public Hearing — Coon 4
08/23/2005
2 . How much natural material (i . e . rock, earth, etc .) will be removed from the
site?
0 tons/cubic yards .
3 . Will disturbed areas be reclaimed
Yes
a. If yes , for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
grass, trees and flower gardens
b . Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
Yes
c . Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
Yes
4 . Hew many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed
from site?
'/ acres
5 . Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important
vegetation be removed by this project?
No
6 . If single phase project : Anticipated period of construction :
6 months, (including demolition)
7 . If multi-phased :
N/A
8 . Will blasting occur during construction?
No
9 . Number of jobs generated : during construction
10 after project is complete
10 . Number of jobs eliminated by this project
0
11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
Yes
I;f yes, explain: Elimination of an existing mobile office when project is
complete . r
12 . Is surface liquid waste disposal involved?
No
13 . Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved?
Yes
Type : Septic system
14 . Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
No
15 . Is project or any portion of project located in a 100-year flood plain?
No
16 . Will the project generating solid waste?
Yes landfill — Tompkins Co . Solid Waste
17 . Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
No
18 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides?
No
19 . Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day) ?
No
20 . Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
No
21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use?
Yes
I yes, indicate type(s) :
Electricity for approximately 10 workstations and air conditioning for additional
square footage.
Additional fuel oil for heating for additional square footage .
22 . If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity
20 gallons/minute
23 . Total anticipated water usage per day
200 gallons/day
24 . Does project involve Local , State or Federal funding?
No
Public Hearing — Coon 5
08/23/2005
Approvals Required :
Town Board
Yes - Zoning Change to PDD
Town Planning Board
Yes
Town Zoning Board
No
County Health Department
Yes -- Well, Water, Septic
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
Yes
If yes, indicate decision required :
Zoning Amendment
Site Plan Review
2 . What is the zoning classification(s) of the site?
Residential/Agriculture
3 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as
permitted by the present zoning?
Residential . Approximately 18 residential houses .
4 . What is the proposed zoning of the site?
Multi-use Planned Development District — Business , Agriculture
and Residential . Approximately 20 acres to be reserved for crop
farming.
5 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as
permitted by the proposed zoning?
Addition to 1 existing structure to be adapted for re-use and
additional parking.
Potential residential or agriculture structure .
6 . Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted
local land use plans?
Yes
Absolutely consistent with Ulysses Comprehensive Land Use Plan
which stresses maintaining rural character.
7 . What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4
mile radius of proposed action?
All surrounding land is in active agricultural use ; there are
approximately 10 residences within '/4 mile of the proposed action.
The proposed zoning classification is medium density residential .
8 . Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with
a '/4 mile?
Yes
9 . If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are
proposed?
No
10 . Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer
or water districts?
No
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided
services (recreation, education, police, and fire protection?
3 No
12 . Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly
above present levels?
No
D. Informational Details
Attach any addition information as may be needed to clarify your project. If
there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please
Public Hearing — Coon 6
08/23/2005
discuss such impacts and the measures, which you propose to mitigate or avoid
them .
Nothing attached
E. Verification
I; certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my
knowledge .
Applicant/Sponsor Name : Terrill M. Moore and Judith Cone
Date : June 1 , 2005
Signature : Signed by applicants .
Mr. Austic opened the floor for public comments .
No comments were heard. The Town Board shall complete Part II of SEQRA
after the Public Hearing is closed and opened for a Special Town Board Meeting.
Public Comments on the Proposed Development District Previously Entered
Into Record
Ms . Cone told the Board, — "If our business ceases at the present location, we
want the right to return building and barn back into residential use. "
Mr. Austic said to change the use of the dwelling back to residential would
require the action of the Town.
Ms . Thompson said that there is no intent to have the acreage proposed for
farmland to be developed for residential use .
Ms . Marino stated for the record that she wants to know that the acreage set aside fi
for apiculture will not be developed for residential use. a{
Ms . Pivien commented that she finds it hard to know what to ask until the Town
Board defines the uses for the PDD .
Mr. Austic explained that the entire 22 . 84-acre parcel is being considered for the
Development District but that only the 2 acres where the business is currently
housed will be rezoned for the business portion of the PDD . The 21 acres can be
used for residential or agricultural purposes .
Mr. Ellis said that he felt the PDD was more restricted in that only the buildings
can be used not the whole 2 acres . The business is limited to the inside of those
buildings . Any additional business use on the two acres would require the
approval of the Town Board .
Mr. Gordon of 2444 Perry City Road, whose property is directly across Perry City
Road from the proposed PDD commented that he sees the side of the barn and the
house everyday when he walks up the road to catch the bus to go to work and
that he supports the proposed PDD . He said that the business has never caused
him or any one else in the area any problems and the neighbors are glad that the
business is there. Mr. Gordon went on to say that he feels the proposed PDD will
protect the area from unwanted development rather than having any negative
effect. ' The restrictions proposed by the owners of the business certainly appear to
be tight enough to prevent anything unwanted from occurring without additional
action by the Town Board .
Hearing no further comments Mr. Weatherby moved, seconded by Mr. Scott to
close the Public Hearing. Public Hearing closed at 7 : 35 Pm
Respectfully submitted, Marsha L . Georgia, Ulysses Town Clerk
TOWN OF ULYSSES
SPECIAL TOWN BOARD MEETING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #22 - CONE
SEQR PART II
AUGUST 23 , 2005
PRESENT : Supervisor Doug Austic , Town Councilpeople Lee Scott, Robert Weatherby;
Roxanne Marino and Don Ellis ; Town Clerk Marsha Georgia; Deputy Supervisor
Richard Coogan; Attorney Bruce Wilson.
Others Present : Sue Mills, Amy Meenen, Judith Cone, JB Swann, Cheryl Thompson,
Yuanne Pivien, and Lysle Gordon.
Supervisor Austic opened the Special Town Board Meeting at 7 :36 PM and stated that
the first order of business for the Town Board was to review Part II of the Environmental
Assessment Form for the proposed PDD for the Cone property.
PART 2 — PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Impact on Land
1 . Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site?
No
2 . Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual landforms found on the site?
(i . e. , cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc . )
No
3 . Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under
Articles 15 , 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
No
4 . Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water?
No
5 . Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity?
No
6 . Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff?
No
7 . Will Proposed Action affect air quality?
No
8 . Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species?
No
9 . Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered
species?
No
10 . Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources ?
No
11 . Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual
EAF Addendum in Section 617 . 20, Appendix B .)
No
12 . Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or
paleontological importance?
No
13 . Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open
spaces or recreational opportunities?
No
14 . Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a
critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision
6NYCRR 617 . 14(g) ?
No
15 . Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
No
Special Town Board Meeting 2
08/23/2005
16 . Will Proposed Action affect the community' s sources of fuel or energy
supply?
No
17 . Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the
Proposed Action?
No
18 . Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
No
19 . Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community?
Yes
Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use . (Small to
Moderate Impact)
Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. (Small to Moderate
Impact)
Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. (Can Impact Be
Mitigated by Project Change)
No
20 . Is ; there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse
environment impacts?
No
After conducting Part II of the SEQR, Mr . Austic asked if there where any questions or
comments by the Town Board on the Environmental Assessment Form .
Mr. Ellis said that he to ask a question on Part I question #3 of the EAF .
Mr. Austic informed Mr. Ellis that Part I was submitted by Ms . Cone and as such will be
left as answered. The Board can discuss the impact raised by Part I Question 3 when the
Board makes their findings . The question being raised is that there is a potential for
residential structures on the site and there are no specifications to lot size and set backs so
the potential number of residential structures is unknown.
Mr. Ellis asked if there was the potential for any kind of structure on the property as
listed in the Al Agricultural District for permitted uses .
Mrs . Georgia Tasked permission to address Ms . Cone . Which was granted . Ms . Georgia
asked "Is it your intention, in regards to the additional acreage around the business, to
develop the land into residential properties or that the only use allowed for this land
would be for the raising of crops, and if the business should cease at this location only the
existing dwelling shall revert to residential use?
Ms . Cone said yes that is what she intends .
Mr. Austic said that in the agricultural district, residential is an allowable use . This is not
to say that Ms . Cone would ever build a house or sell land for a house, but that the action
would be allowable .
The Board decided to address this issue when they discuss Local Law #2 2005 .
Mr. Austic asked if anyone had any other comments or questions on SEQR?
Ms . Marino moved, seconded by Mr. Ellis the following :
Resolution and Determination
Whereas, Judith Cone and Terrill Moore, on or about June 1 , 2005 filed an
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with the Town Clerk and Town Board, a
copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and,
Whereas, said EAF is in connection with the application for the Zoning of Tax
Parcels No . 33 . -2 - 1 .2 , 33 . -2 - 1 . 3 , and 33 . -2 - 1 . 4 consisting of 22 . 84 acres into a
Development District under Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section 5 ; and,
Special Town Board Meeting 3
08/23/2005
Whereas, the EAF review date was posted on the Town Clerk ' s signboard and
published same in the official paper, a copy and proof of same are attached hereto
and made a part hereof; and
Whereas, it is hereby determined the action proposed does not constitute a Type I
action as defined in 6 NYCRR Section 617 . 12 of SEQR regulations since Section
617 .4 (b) (2) references adoption of Zoning changes of 25 acres or more in a
district and this application is for 22 . 84 acres, and
Whereas, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses hereby declares themselves as
lead agency and as such has made the following findings after accepting as
complete the submitted EAF :
1 . That the Re-Zoning is not deemed adverse to,
a. Water Resources
b . Air Quality
c . Plants and Animals
d. Aesthetic Resources
e . Historic and archeological Resources
f. Open space and recreation
g. Transportation
h. Energy
i . Noise and odor
j . Increase modem density
k. Public health
1 . Growth and characters of the community or neighborhood
2 . That the proposed action is consistent with social and economic
considerations .
3 . That all steps have been taken in the proposed action to the extent
practicable (i . e . per Site Plan Diagram) to mediate any negative
consequences identified, therefore it is hereby:
Resolved, that the EAF is adopted and approved as submitted and above referred
findings are hereby adopted ; and
Further Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses hereby makes the
determination based on the EAF and its findings that adoption of Development
District No . 22 as a Local Law No . 2 of 2005 as drafted is found to have no
significant impact on the environment and declares and issues hereby a negative
declaration under SEQR.
Mr. Austic aye
Mr. Scott aye
Mr. Weatherby aye
Ms . Marino aye
Mr. Ellis aye
Adopted.
Mr. Austic reminded the Board that the next step in forming the PDD was to document
the findings of support for the proposed rezoning that are based in the Ulysses
Comprehensive Plan. The need for findings was part of the comments made by
Tompkins County Planning in their response to the 239 1 &m review for this action.
In their review, Tompkins County Planning Department stated that they believe this
action will have no negative inter-community, or countywide impacts . Their other
comments are as follows :
• As a general rule, the Department does not support this type of small-area zoning
unless the proposed use is clearly consistent with the underlying zoning district or
Special Towns Board Meeting 4
08/23/2005
with the community's comprehensive plan. We do not believe this rezoning meets
that criterion.
• All future development in this Development District should be subject to site plan
review, since the proposed zoning language provides no guidelines for
development in this district (such as setback requirements, height limitations, and
the like) .
• The area proposed for rezoning is located within the Agricultural District. As
such, an Agricultural Data Statement is required to be completed and filed with
this application .
The general consensus of the Town Board on the County' s 239 1 &m review was :
1 . The application for re-zoning does meet with the Ulysses Comprehensive
Plan. (Board ' s findings stated below in the minutes . )
2 . The new Development District will be subject to site plan review.
3 . The Agricultural Data Statement will be completed and filed with the
Town Clerk tomorrow . (Each Town is responsible for drafting its own
Agricultural Data Statement .)
The Board had a lengthy discussion regarding the 20+ acres in the proposed development
district.
Ms . Cone, the applicant for the re-zoning requested, restated that she and her husband did
not have any plans for residential development and the only dwellings that they had any
interest in wars the existing structures should the business cease activities at this location.
Ms . Cone requested that under the purposed rezoning (Local Law #2 2005 ) where it
states the uses for the Development District that (item b . Residential Use (Single Family)
be deleted. If lin the future they want the option to sell or build a single- family home, then
they will return to the Town Board and request a zoning change for the PDD .
The Board debated the pros and cons of deleting the residential and came to the following
consensus to which Ms . Cone agreed :
1 . Delete b . Residential Use (Single Family)
2 . Change c . to b . which will now read :
Computer software research and development not to exceed 30 employees
to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated May 30, 2005 as
drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect inclusive of
Residential use in said structures .
After a discussion on findings, the Board agreed that the proposed rezoning does meet the
Ulysses Comprehensive Plan as follows :
• Maintains the natural and man-made aesthetic aspects of the community
• Promotes the viability of agriculture
• Promotes business activities that capitalize on the historic , cultural and natural
assets of the town and surrounding region
• Encourages commercial areas that provide necessary goods, services , and
employment for the residents of the town while maintaining the small-town
atmosphere valued by existing businesses, residents and visitors
• Encourages a strong, stable and diverse local economy to keep the Town of
Ulysses a desirable place to live, work, shop , and visit while preserving the small-
town atmosphere
• Promotes the expansion and development of industrial enterprises while
maintaining the small-town atmosphere and environmental integrity of the Town
• Maintains a clean, healthy, and viable natural environment
• Encourages and maintains a safe, efficient and environmentally sensitive
transportation system
• Consistent with Chapter 4, page 25 of the Town of Ulysses Comprehensive Plan
in terns of preserving agricultural buildings and character of structures in
neighborhoods while permitting business activities
Special Town Board Meeting 5
08/23 /2005
Mr. Ellis moved, seconded by Mr. Weatherby the following :
LOCAL LAW NO . 2 , 2005
CREATING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, Application has been made for re-zoning of lands , pursuant to the
existing Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section 5 , by Terrill Moore and Judith
Cone for a Development District ; and
WHEREAS, The Town Board of the Town of Ulysses referred the matter
pursuant to Article IV, Section 5 (b) to the Town of Ulysses Planning Board
which considered items 1 thru 4 therein and approved on June 22 , 2005 , with
modification, the District pursuant to Article IV Section 5 (c) ; and
WHEREAS, A Public Hearing was held on the proposed Draft Law on August
23 , 2005 by the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses after August 9,2005 review
of the Draft Law and scheduling by said Board, and lawful postings of notice and
publication as required by New York State Town Law ; and
WHEREAS, The Tompkins County Planning Department, having due notice, did
not object to said Local Law pursuant to it's General Municipal Law review under
Section 239 l&m ; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses has reviewed the short
form State Environmental Quality Review statement and made findings and
issued a negative declaration thereon; and
WHEREAS, based on all of the above the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses as
found the re-zoning application to be consistent with the Town's Comprehensive
Plan and in the best interests of the Town of Ulysses in that it still allows for
agricultural and single-family use and is limited in scope, purpose, and maintains
natural aesthesis in the area while adding to the Town workforce and property tax
base ; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses has fully considered all
comments of the public and applicant and procedures herein, Now Therefore it is
hereby,
RESOLVED, the Local Town Law No . 2 of 2005 creating Development District
22 is enacted as set forth for the purposes and premises set forth as follows :
BE IT ENACTED , by the Ulysses Town Board Local Law No . 2 of 2005 , as set
forth herein :
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO . 22
1 . This District shall be known as Development District No . 22 .
2 . The purposes for which the Development District may be used is as follows :
a. Agricultural Use as defined under Ag and Markets Law
b . Computer software research and development not to exceed 30
employees to be located in structures shown on Site Plan Map dated May
30, 2005 as drawn by Cheryl Lee Thompson, Licensed Architect inclusive
of Residential use in said structures .
3 . Area of the District
The area of said District shall be approximately 22 . 84 acres consisting of parcels
presently owned by Terrill Moore and Judith Cone, Tax Parcels 33 . -2- 1 . 2 , 33 . -2-
1 . 3 and 33 . -2 - 1 . 4 in the Town of Ulysses, bordering Perry City Road on the
Special Town Board Meeting 6
08/23/2005
North and Krums Corners Road on the West, and more particularly described as
follows :
ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND situated in the Town of Ulysses,
County of Tompkins, State of New York, more particularly bounded and
described as follows :
BEGINNING at a point marking the intersection of the centerline of Perry City
Road with the centerline of Krums Corners Road ;
Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East along the centerline of
Perry City Road 803 . 21 feet to a point;
Thence South 7 degrees 10 minutes 51 seconds West (passing through
a pin at 25 . 76 feet) 754 . 20 feet to a pin ;
Thence South 81 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds East (passing through a pipe at
150 feet) 395 . 82 feet to a pin;
Thence South 9 degrees 06 minutes 01 second West 360 feet to a pin;
Thence North 82 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West 998 . 57 feet to a pin ;
Thence North 82 degrees 08 minutes West Passing a pipe at 174 . 7 feet a total
distance of 200 feet to the center line of Krums Corners Road;
Thence North 7 degrees 45 minutes East 446 . 9 feet along the center line of Krums
Corners Road;
Thence North 07 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds East 671 . 70 feet to the point or
place of beginning .
Mr. Scott thanked Ms . Cone for her patience and he thinks this is a very good project .
The rest of the Board seconded Mr. Scott ' s statement.
Mr. Austic called for the vote .
Mr. Austic aye
Mr. Scott aye
Mr. Weatherby aye
Ms . Marino aye
Mr. Ellis aye
Adopted.
Ms . Cone will provide the Agricultural Data Statement to the Town Clerk tomorrow.
Hearing no further business Mr. Weatherby moved, seconded by Mr. Ellis to adjourn the
meeting. Unanimously approved . Meeting adjourned at 8 : 40 PM .
Respectfully submitted,
Marsha L. Georgia
Ulysses Town Clerk
MLG : mlg