Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 2005-03-01FILE �� tD13- MIZI s !� TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2005 The Town of Ithaca Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, March 1, 2005, in Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Fred Wilcox, Chairperson; Tracy Mitrano, Board Member; Larry Thayer, Board Member; Rod Howe, Board Member; Kevin Talty, Board Member (7:41 p.m.); John Barney, Attorney for the Town (7:15 p.m.); Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning; Daniel Walker, Director of Engineering (7:22 p.m.); Mike Smith, Environmental Planner; Christine Balestra, Planner, EXCUSED: Eva Hoffmann, Board Member; George Conneman, Board Member; Susan Ritter, Assistant Director of Planning. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Wilcox declared the meeting duly opened at 7:08 p.m., and accepted for the record Secretary 's Affidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearings in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on February 21, 2005 and February. 23, 2005, together with the properties under discussion, as appropriate, upon the Clerks of the City of Ithaca and the Town of Danby, upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning, upon the Tompkins County ' Commissioner of Public Works, and upon the applicants and /or agents, as appropriate, on February 23, 2005, Chairperson Wilcox read the Fire Exit Regulations to those assembled, as required by the New York State Department of State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control. Persons to be heard Mr. Wilcox asked if there were members of the audience who wished to address the Planning Board. There was. no one present wishing to address the Board. Agenda Item No. 2 — Public Hearing for Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval and Final Site Plan Approval for the Proposed Country Inn and Suites Hotel located at the southwest corner of West King Road and Danbv Road (NYS Route 96B) portion of Town of Ithaca tax parcel #37. -1 -17.1 business district c. Mr. Wilcox — Proposal involves sut plus or minus 4.76 -acre parcel intersection. The proposal also landscaping and lighting. David Bramhandkar applicant and Peter a presentation tonight? )dividing off a plus or minus 2.68 -acre parcel from the for the construction of a 58 -room hotel at the includes 61 parking spaces, sidewalks, signage, Auble, owner. Trowbridge and Wolfe, LLP for J. J. Trowbridge is the agent. Peter, you wish to make PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Trowbridge — I'm Peter Trowbridge, landscape architect here in the Town of Ithaca, 1345 Mecklenburg Road. A couple weeks ago we submitted a packet of materials that completed all of the requests that were made as a part of the resolution at preliminary review where we also went through determination of environmental significance and I thought I'd just very quickly go through the lists. There are 13 items, and let you know what the status of each of them are. I can tell you in advance that we have fulfilled, submitted, all the materials that were requested in those 13 items in the original resolution. The subdivision of the tax parcel has been resurveyed by T.G. Miller's and has been provided for the chairperson's signature and is also a part of the public record this evening. As of today, an easement and maintenance agreement has been delivered to John Barney's office from the potential builder's attorney. As you know that oftentimes takes several weeks or a couple of months to sort of move through the attorney's office, but it is in John's possession as of today. We have included all of our preliminary correspondence, reviews and permits with DOT and as you know there is a shared curb cut on Danby Road for this hotel and any future retail development that would occur to the south and everything that we've received from DOT today suggests that they should not have a problem ultimately issuing the work permit for this project. Also, T.G. Miller's has provided the storm water pollution prevention plan for the project and we've also referenced the notice of intent to NYS DEC that this is also shared with the Holly Creek subdivision project to the west. Other final permits for DEC and DOT will be issued prior to a building permit. Typically all of those permits for DOT / DEC can only be issued at such time when there's a complete set of construction documents. And so, that caveat would stand, but it's certainly our intention to receive those permits prior to going to the building department. We have revised the topographic and boundary survey, as I said, T.G. Miller's has updated that for us. They actually went out and resurveyed the site from scratch and have provided that for subdivision as required. Also, in terms of the signs; we have as a part of this document, the L103 plan, the landscape plan, all of the locations and the descriptions of sign and illumination occur on L103, however, there are some other additional graphic samples that are provided that represent the exit sign, which having talked to staff, is no longer illuminated, the ground based entrance sign which has been fully moved as well as all the associated landscape within the hotel parcel and I believe that is it. All the square footages that have been provided for the various signs were provided by one of the 5 vendors in the US that fabricate the signs for various Country Inn and Suites. There is an agreement in your packet, as well, regarding the storm drainage system because as you know one of the water quality basins or the water quality basins on the Holly Creek subdivision serve as the basins for this project so that construction would not be able to proceed unless those were in place. Dave Auble has agreed with that, there's a letter to that affect in your packet. Because of issues of sidewalk locations we don't really know where sidewalks should link up, either to the retail parcel to the south or to the Holly Creek subdivision to the west. It's the discretion of the Director of Planning to assist in the relocation of those at such time that we actually know where they're going. So while we show them on the plan as a part of the site plan approval they're. shown really as PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 intended locations and will be adjusted at such time when we know where the other adjoining development builds their sidewalks. We have provided building elevations and colors and Jagat Sharma, the architect whose here this evening also brought along some material samples because sometimes the actual colors that you see in a render plan that gets run through a color Xerox machine can be different from the real materials so we brought a color sample. However, I know staff likes to have a colored elevation that they can put in a file, they can't necessarily put material boards in a file. We have revised the L103 landscape plan as per the Board's recommendation providing both shrubs and perennials between the parking lot almost continuously between the parking lot and Danby Road along with canopy trees. So there is not only a topographic difference between Danby Road where the cars sit lower than the street, but additional planting would assist in buffering those: We did get a full set of engineering plans as developed to -date by T.G. Miller, they're in your packet. And the very last point `is that we did move the entrance onto West King Road as far as practicable on the current set of drawings. So I think that addresses all of the outstanding issues that were brought up as a part of the resolution that the Board provided at the preliminary meeting. Mr. Wilcox — Comments? Could I have a brief presentation on the colors? Mr. Sharma — The color scheme of the two - story ... inaudible... basically are presented in the color drawings that you have. Starting from the roof we have architectural (esport shingles ? ?) shingles in a green, oxford green color. Most of these colors are appointed by the Country Inn, they do have one or two packages, you can have a green metal roof or a green shingled roof, and I think for the location probably is a better thing to have a green shingled roof. And you can see it's a highly rich color and probably the most expensive shingled roof because of the green color. Coming down on the main wall surface we two color. The main color of the body of the building will remain a white, it is (ifers ? ?) color and the rectification on the corner will be prairie clay and again we have approved contrast and the resitication also has some...( ? ? ?) The other material that goes we'll be using white windows with clear glass and there will be a white grill under the window which is basically a decorative grill in the suites and it height a ptack unit ( ? ? ? ?) into the rooms which are, you know, still a few of them there. On both sides of the windows we'll color metal grilles, whatever, and they're in the classic burgundy color. Also the other trim will be white, the fascia and the downspouts. and painted woodwork around the entrance area. These are basically the main colors for the building. Mr. Wilcox — Mike, comments? Mr. Smith — Not really. You have the new landscaping and signage plan there that addresses the one item that I mentioned in the memo. Mr. Wilcox — In regard to the two sings? PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Smith — Yes. The one sign, directional signs aren't permitted to be lit in anyway and then the large sign by the entrance drive was originally proposed on the adjacent property and the sign law doesn't allow any off premise signs. They moved that over onto the property now. Mr. Kanter — Do we know what the dimensions of the freestanding sign are? I don't know if I saw it labeled. Mr. Smith — 24.8 square feet. Mr. Barney — Is that within the sign law? Mr. Smith — Yes. I believe it's 50 square feet. Mr. Wilcox — Jon Kanter, one of the proposed conditions grants the Director of Planning authority to permit minor modification of the sidewalk locations. Are you comfortable with that? Mr. Kanter — Yes. If it was anything more than minor I think I would bring it back to the board. Mr. Wilcox — Do we know what minor is? Mr. Kanter — I assume it's really more a matter of making sure that it connects from one property to the other rather than relocating them. Mr. Wilcox — It's 7:24. Ladies and gentlemen this is a public hearing if you wish to address the Planning Board this evening on this particular agenda item. Most of you know the routine. Please step up to the microphone, give us your name and address, and we would be very interested to hear what you have to say. Tony Ingrahm, 368 Stone Quarry Road, Ithaca, NY About 1,00 feet from the site. I have just have two concerns. I'd just like to make sure, hope the Planning Board addresses them. The first one has to do with lighting. There's a history of light pollution in that neighborhood. Right now I can still see the stars over my house, but I'm concerned that with all of the commercial development that will be happening in the area that that might be history at some point and that's a concern around the nation as people haven't been able to see the sky at night. With Big Al's new, now Manly's, gas station. He put up big flood lights that just really lit up the whole neighborhood and the sky quite a lot. I know that got a lot of neighbors upset. I think Town officials probably heard about that. Mr. Wilcox — And this Board as well Mr. Ingrahm — That's also a concern with the park too, because the park is nearby. It makes it extra important that light pollution is controlled there. I've looked just cursorily PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 ` APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 looked over some of the lamp designs, I'm not an engineer, I'm not qualified to sign off on those as a citizens, but I hope that you will really take a hard look at that and make sure we don't have buildings, something, that's going to project a lot of light into the neighborhood and into the sky. I have a friend who travels quite a lot and stays at a lot of hotels, including Country Inns and Suites, and he has seen a Country Inn and Suites, at least one, that used flood lighting for their entrance sign and for their building itself and just projected all this light up onto the sign, which created a tremendous amount of light pollution. So, I don't know what light number 1 is going to look like, I don't know whether that is projected on the sign or not, the property sign at the main entrance, but that one might be a concern. And I don't know if there is going to be any flood lighting of the building. It doesn't look like it from what I see in these diagrams, but I don't know. My second concern has been raised by other, is during the construction phase construction trucks on the neighborhood roads, particularly West King Road. I live pretty close to the uphill end of Stone Quarry Road and I live next to the park and I walk in the park a lot. When people run their trucks or other loud vehicles on West King Road it blasts into the park. It takes a whole several hundred yards into the park in either direction and puts sound pollution into the park. Not to mention in the neighborhood, too.. It gets pretty noisy when there are trucks and the like. So I would like to ask you to take special concern about that. And I would urge you to require that gravel trucks and whatever choose other roads. Those are not safe roads for trucks. Stone Quarry Road is a dangerous road and West King Road as it goes through the park is an exceedingly dangerous road and I've seen vehicles go down sideways coming down West King Road into the park. And they've taken out parks signs and things. If there is a way you can write into the contract that trucking contractors will use other safer roads not around the park that would be my preference. Christiann Dean, 330 West King Road, Ithaca, NY The eastern edge of my farm is .7 of a mile from the proposed hotel. site. You've heard my broader concerns. Mr. Wilcox you publicly have expressed your own, the trouble that you've. had inside yourself. approving this because of the impact on the neighborhood. And I know that Mr. Conneman has also publicly expressed that, apparently he's not here this evening, but he felt so strongly about that particular issue, the impact on the neighborhood, that he came as a private citizen to the Zoning Board of Appeals and spoke against this and urged them not to approve it. I know less about what the rest of you think about this. So let's talk about the neighborhood and the impact on the neighborhood. Clearly this is going to have a seriously detrimental effect on the neighborhood should you choose to approve it this evening. It would be a very small gesture to the neighborhood, if you were to approve this, for you to ask Mr. Barney to put into this resolution a requirement that the developer require not only construction trucks during the construction phase of this and his surrounding developments, but also maintenance trucks and delivery trucks to not use West King Road or Stone Quarry Road. This is within your hands, this is doable, this is something you could do this evening. I think it's unconscionable of you not to at least, in this very least, put that into this if you approve it. As I walked in here this evening I said to Mr. Auble, you look like you're gloating. He misheard what I said and said, glowing yes I'm PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 happy to have somebody help me pay my taxes. Well I can tell you that I came in here on January 31St and had to pay thousands of dollars of taxes to the clerks that were sitting right here where you're sitting right now. Knowing that money was going to go to partly enable the Town to pay Mr. Barney to draw up these resolutions, to pay Mr. Kanter for his work on this, basically I'm handing over money and it takes a long time at the price of red raspberries to earn thousands of dollars to turn over to the Town of Ithaca and that's what I had to do. So I am not glowing or gloating. I am very concerned. And this is the time of year when normally we would be sending off our orders to the seed companies. Normally we would be pruning our fruit trees. Normally we would be fixing our fences. We're not doing any of that pending the outcome of this evening's meeting. If you the wisdom to vote no on this then we would go home and do all of that. If you vote yes on this, there's not point in us farming any more. have one clarifying question to ask. It's a clarifying question regarding the curb cut on West King Road. I couldn't hear what was said there, that it's been moved and I'd like to know which direction it's been moved and for what reason. Mr. Wilcox — Okay, I'll ask them to restate that when they come back. Ms. Dean — Thank you. Mr. Wilcox — Let's try to deal with these in some order. Mike, any comments on the lighting over and above what you've already written? Mr. Smith — The site lighting has the cutoff, so it's the type that we usually look for. And the signs either have back lit or internal illumination. Mr. Wilcox — Do we want to talk about how, no we won't talk about Big Als. Ms. Mitrano — There is nothing that can be done about that at this stage? Mr. Barney — We fixed the loophole that they used, I think, in the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Wilcox — Do you know the story of Big AI's? Mr. Ingraham — I don't know all of it. Mr. Wilcox — Real briefly, the materials that we approved showed recessed lighting in the canopies over the pumps, which is really one of the most obnoxious things about that site when it was originally built. There was loophole, as Mr. Barney called it, in our Zoning Ordinance at that time which allowed the applicant to make changes if they cost less than a certain amount. It turns out Mickey got a hold of a used set of canopies which had the drop down lighting, clearly not what we approved, and as soon as that happened we actually changed our zoning ordinance very quickly so that no changes were allowed to the approved plan for a while until we got some final language. That was unfortunate and it's a little bit better now with the shrouds around it, but I agree that PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 it's not good, it's not what we intended, but Mickey was able to use a loop hold. I don't apologize for it, but I don't want it to happen again. Thank you. Do you want to do the curb cut right now, Peter, because that came from discussions with staff? Mr. Trowbridge — The curb cut moved as far west as possible on West King Road. It really came up as a staff suggestion for safety reasons so that there would be exiting from the site and there is a sign at the exit that requires that people make a right hand turn only going out to Danby Road so they can't make a left hand turn, not legally in any case, going left down West King. The intent was to have enough stacking between the traffic light and the exit lane so we could get two or three cars stacking. Initially it was close to the intersection in what was thought to be a not really safe location. We moved it as far west as we could practically. There are some grade issues. The fire chief requires that we have 1 -% or less gradient on any of these roadways and if you move down the hill the entry actually starts to get steeper so it was a combination of distance from the intersection and topography and also property boundaries that set the current curb cut in its location. Mr. Wilcox — Would you estimate how far west you're able to move it? Mr. Trowbridge — Well we moved it several times over the last year. This is probably the third time. This last time it really was very incremental. We had already done that. I think the staff was just saying make sure it's as far west as you can, and I think this time around it was quite incremental, just a few feet. Mr. Wilcox — Let's talk about construction traffic. Everybody's nodding their head that we should talk about it and then do something about it. And we've done. this before with regard to asking, requiring, that routing of larger trucks, heavier truck stay on certain roads, or stay off certain roads. Mr. Thayer — I think we can do that with construction vehicles, but it's going to be a little hard with delivery vehicles. That's going to be tougher. Mr. Wilcox — We generally agree that we want to try to keep the... Mr. Thayer — Yes, if we could add that to the resolution. Mr. Wilcox — Mr. Barney? Mr. Barney — Let me make sure it's all right with... Do you have a problem with it? Mr. Trowbridge — Well it seems that there already are limitations on certain roads relative to weights for various trucks. Mr. Barney — This would be above and beyond... PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Trowbridge — I understand that. So there's certain routing. The only concern that I haven't thought fully through is where certain materials are coming from and if, for instance, there was sand and gravel coming in from some location. That's the only concern I would have. I wouldn't to move the traffic out into somebody else's neighborhood to sort of keep it coming directly to the sight. And again I'm trying to imagine where certain materials like gravel might be coming from to this site. Ms. Mitrano — What are the weight- approved roads? Would it be certainly anything that's coming from 96B South and then anything that's coming from 96 North that takes Clinton Street up, rather than Sand Bank or Stone Quarry? Mr. Wilcox — Clearly it tends to keep the traffic on the State highways as much as we can. Ms. Mitrano — Is Clinton the one that is approved for the heavier vehicles? Mr. Walker — Isn't it Aurora Street? Ms. Mitrano — But how are people getting on Aurora Street if they're coming from the north? Mr. Walker — They might come down Clinton. Ms. Mitrano — I don't know any other way. Those are the three ways. Mr. Wilcox — Clinton is 96B coming through. Mr. Barney — I would like to hear the developer agree that this is acceptable for them. Mr. Trowbridge — I think for the heaviest vehicles, if someone was moving, which in this case would be either moving on or off site either spoils from the property or asphalt granular material. Most of the other deliveries I sure will be coming off 96B and I wouldn't want to exclude all truck traffic because there's going to be contractors pick up trucks. It would be very difficult to exclude that. I would expect that large bulk deliveries to the site that make sense. In fact it's a pretty steep road. I'm not sure people would automatically choose those routes coming up from Route 13 to the site. Mr. Barney — My concern, Peter, for us to police it is very difficult. We have.a situation here where obviously to be allowed to construct this is going to have an impact on the neighborhood and I would hope that the developer could perhaps see a way clear to say in order to alleviate at least this impact on the neighborhood that they will voluntarily basically agree to have a condition put in our approval that says that we will keep delivery trucks and any kind of construction truck traffic we will do everything that we can to keep it off of Stone Quarry Road and West King Road. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Trowbridge — I think the general contractor whoever is responsible during initial job meetings when we set up those initial meetings we would have to make that very clear. Again it is a policing issue, I think that in the end it is probably going to be the general contractor on a day -to -day basis. Mr. Barney — But you control the general contractor, we don't. The issue is whether you will consent to use putting in a provision in the approval if, in order to get the approval... Mr. Trowbridge — I think it's a very reasonable thing, John, to say that that would occur and all we can do is at weekly job meetings is to reinforce that as a condition. Mr. Barney — Well, you can build it in your contracts to. Mr. Trowbridge — No, it's exactly right. That's what we would say in our specifications in our construction documents. In fact often times we give as a part of the documents truck routing to a site and that would get provided. So, I'm sure we're more than happy to make that both graphically and a part of the specification which is a legal document between the owner and the... Mr. Barney — From our standpoint, we would like it in here as a condition. And I want to make sure that you're going to consent to that condition being put it. I . Mr. Trowbridge — As a resolution. Then we need to move it from that to the construction documents. Mr. Barney — We leave it to you to implement it. If you don't implement it then obviously we step in. Mr. Trowbridge — No, I think it's a reasonable condition. Mr. Barney — Okay. Then I would add "and subject to the further condition consented to by the applicant that during the course of any construction truck and other construction vehicles use roads other than West King Road and Stone Quarry Road in traveling to and from the site Kevin Talty arrives Mr. Wilcox — Would anybody else like to address the Board on this particular agenda item? There being no one I will close the public hearing at 7:43 and bring the matter back to the Board. Kevin, questions from you? Mr. Talty — No, Rod just brought me up to speed on what you guys were discussion don't have an issue, I read the correspondence that was provided. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Wilcox — Let me make one other comment to Christiann Dean just so that you're aware. The purpose of the Planning Board's review this evening is to make a determination as to whether the applicant has met the conditions that were included when the preliminary approval was given. That is the purpose of the Board this evening. This is not, if you will, a second review, or another review of the same application, but very narrowly it is has the applicant sufficiently met the conditions opposed as part of the preliminary approval. And that is what this board is being asked to consider this evening. Without new information, without somebody coming forward and pointing out mis- statements on the part of the applicant, it is difficult for this board to change the decision we made as part of preliminary approval unless we have something like that, that would cause us to rethink our original decision. So having said that, back to the Board. We're all set over here? Okay. Would someone like to move the draft resolution as proposed? Mr. Thayer — I will. Mr. Wilcox — So moved by Larry Thayer. Seconded? Mr. Talty — Seconded. Mr. Wilcox - Seconded by Kevin Talty. You heard the proposed addition? You're happy with that? Kevin, did you hear the language? You're okay with that? Mr. Talty — Yes. Mr. Wilcox — Okay. John, do me a favor would your read it one more time for my benefit. Mr. Barney — Just at the end adding after all of the conditions a further statement< "and subject to the further condition, consented to by the applicant, that during the course of any construction trucks and other construction vehicles use roads other than West King Road and Stone Quarry Road in traveling to and from the site". Mr. Wilcox — Condition e, Mike, can we strike that one? Mr. Smith — You probably can strike it if we include the reference to the new map someplace in there. Mr. Wilcox — You're right, we'd have to go b E has to do with the signage and we do revised position of the sign. Anything else? signal by saying aye. All those opposed? passed 5 to nothing. Thank you very much, ack through and, okay so let's leave it there. have a revised L103, which indicates the There being none all those in favor please There are no abstentions. The motion is ,. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 PB RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -016: Final Site Plan Approval and Final Subdivision Approval, Country Inn & Suites Hotel, Danby Road & West Kim Road Intersection, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 37 -1 -17.1 MOTION made by Larry Thayer, seconded by Kevin Talty. WHEREAS. 1. This project involves consideration of Final Subdivision and Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Country Inn & Suites Hotel located at the southwest corner of West King Road and Danby Road (NYS Route 96B), portion of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 37447.1, Business District "C ". The proposal involves subdividing off a +/- 2.68 -acre parcel from the +/- 4.76 -acre parcel for the construction of a 58 -room hotel at the intersection. The proposal also includes 61 parking spaces, sidewalks, signage, landscaping, and lighting. David Auble, Owner; Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP for Jay Bramhandkar, Applicant, Peter J. Trowbridge, Agent, and 2. This is a Type I action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review with respect to site plan approval, subdivision approval, and special approval, did on November 2, 2004 make a negative determination of environmental significance; and 3. The Planning Board, on November 2, 2004, did grant preliminary site. plan approval, preliminary subdivision approval, and issued an a positive recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the special approval for the proposed project, and 4. The Zoning Board of Appeals, on January 24, 2005, did grant the special approval for the proposed project; and 5. The Planning Board, at a Public Hearing held on March 1, 2005, has reviewed and accepted as adequate, a packet of drawings and details titled "Country Inn and Suites Hotel' (Final Site Plan Review), dated February 14, 2005, prepared by Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP, Jagat P. Sharma, Architect, T.G. Miller P.C., A.D Dixon and Company, and SRF Associates, and other material, and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED. 1. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby waives certain requirements for Final Subdivision Approval, as shown on the Final Subdivision Checklist, having determined from the materials presented that such waiver will result in neither a significant alteration of the purpose of site plan control nor the policies enunciated or implied by the Town Board, and PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 2. That the Planning Board hereby grants Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision of a portion of Tax Parcel No. 37 -1 =17.1, totaling +/- 4.76 acres along Danby Road, into two parcels of +/- 2.68 acres and +/- 2.08 acres, as shown on the plat entitled "Final Subdivision Plat Showing Lands of David C. Ruble," dated 218 12005, prepared by Allen T. Fulkerson, L. S., conditioned upon the following: a. submission of a receipt of filing the subdivision plat to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department; b. submission of an easement and maintenance agreement for the shared driveway from Danby Road (NYS Route 96B) for review and approval of the Attorney for the Town, prior to the issuance of a building permit; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 1. That the Planning Board hereby grants Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Country Inn & Suites Hotel as shown on the plans included in the packet titled "Country Inn. and Suites Hotel" _(Final Site Plan Review), dated February 14, 2005, prepared by Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP, Jagat P. Sharma, Architect, T. G. Miller P.C., A.D Dixon and Company, and SRF Associates, and other material, conditioned upon the following: a. submission of record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from county, state, and /or federal agencies, including but not limited to the driveway approval and other road work from NYSDOT; b. revision of plans to include the name and seal of the registered land surveyor or engineer who prepared the topographic survey, and the date of the survey, prior to the issuance of a building permit; C. completion of the approved stormwater drainage system. (swales, detention ponds, etc.) on the adjacent Holly Creek site to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering, prior to any site work or the issuance of any building permit for the Country Inn & Suites Hotel, d. construction of the two sidewalks which will connect to the Holly Creek pedestrian trail and to the neighborhood retail development site to the south shall be constructed when those developments occur, and that the Director of Planning is granted the authority to permit minor modifications of the location of these sidewalks to correspond with the adjacent developments; PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 e. submission of revised plans and details referencing changes to, the exit sign (no illumination) and the freestanding sign (located on hotel property), prior to issuance of a building permit; f. submission of one original set of the final site plan drawings on mylar, vellum, or paper, signed and sealed by the registered land surveyor, engineer, architect, or landscape architect who prepared the site plan material, prior to the issuance of a building permit; AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER CONDITION, CONSENTED TO BY THE APPLICANT, THAT during the course of any construction, trucks and other construction vehicles use roads other than West King Road and Stone Quarry Road in traveling to and from the site. The vote on the motion resulted as follows: AYES: Wilcox, Mitrano, Thayer, Howe, Talty. NAYS: None. The vote on the motion was carried unanimously. Mr. Thayer — I'm just asking if on Stone Quarry there could be a not truck sign put up. Mr. Walker — I don't think we have any weight limits on that road. Mr. Thayer — Basically 96B says no truck, on the hill, right? Mr. Walker — No, there's a truck and they're supposed to check they're supposed to check their bakes, that's where they're supposed to pull at Sam Peter's. But it is a State Road. Mr. Kanter — I think they try to divert trucks tc Spencer, but it's a State road and a truck route. Road are Town roads and I suppose if there decide to place truck weight limits on those road, the extent they can onto 96 through But Stone Quarry Road and West King were reasons the Town Board could Mr. Howe — We started the discussion, but didn't finish it. It would be beyond the purview of this Board to talk about where service vehicles go once it's built, right? Mr. Wilcox — It's a tougher one to control, I think. Mr. Barney — The main thing you're concerned about is construction traffic particularly where you're moving fill and that sort of stuff. The fact that some delivery truck comes through every two days is not going to be that much of an impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Howe — I was just curious if you could even go there or not. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Barney - With the consent of the applicant you can do a lot of things. Agenda Item No. 2 - Consideration of a sketch plan review of four proposed Cornell University projects collectively under one sketch plan submission including a contractor staging / parking area and three parking lots. Mr. Wilcox — The contractor staging / parking area is located on Palm Road, tax parcel number 64. -1 -1 planned development zone number 9 and will be regarded to become a centralized area for long -term contractor use. The existing gravel Rice Hall parking lot located on Tower Road, tax parcel number 67. -1 -13.2, low density residential zone, and the existing gravel large animal research testing unit parking lot located on the corner of Tower and Campus Roads, tax parcel number 61- 1 -2.2, low density residential zone will be paved with new lighting, landscaping and storm water facilities installed. The Freedman wrestling facility parking lot will be located off Campus Road, tax parcel number 67. -1 -13.2, low density residential zone, to the north of the wrestling facility and will be a paved lot for plus or minus 34 new parking spaces with new lighting, landscaping and storm water facilities. Cornell University. owner / applicant Lorraine Gilbert, agent. Welcome, Lorraine. Ms Gilbert — I come to you from Planning Design and Construction at Cornell University. I'm the project manager as well as the landscape designer and we're here tonight to present to you four transportation projects, transportation improvements, with the purpose of explaining the projects, their relationship to one another, and to show you their locations. And this is with the hope that we can return in April with more detailed information and that we will receive preliminary and final site plan approval at that point. There are four separate projects but they are very much related to one another and during the course of the presentation I hope to be able to explain that relationship. I'll start first with the contractor material storage and parking area. It's situated in the precinct 7 area on campus, which is designated as a special land use district, commonly known as a SLUD. It's also where the warehouse is located and the library annex and this particular project that we're proposing will be in common with those uses in that it will be a primary location for the contracting materials in storage and parking. That would replace several of the gravel lots on campus. Right now we have some small gravel lots on campus that are associated with the storage for the contractors of their materials and the parking. Instead of having that in separate locations around the campus, in small locations, this area would be the primary location. Just the way the warehouse takes in materials and then disperses them as need on campus, book deliveries are delivered the library annex and then dispersed on campus. This is very much along the same lines where contractors will bring their materials and then bring them to the specific sites that they are working on the campus. The project scope includes regarding the existing gravel area and the installation of new driveway culverts. We'll have some new entrances. into the site. This is a site map to orient you as to where the site is on the campus. This is Dryden Road or Route 366 and we have the veterinary medical center over here, Tower Road, and then Palm Road_ off of 366. The PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 library annex is here, the warehouse is here, and then we have some shops buildings, mason shop, carpenter shop, the paint, and the grounds facility, and environmental health and safety. This is a satellite infrared image that was taken in 2003. If you can imagine everything in red, which is infrared, if you can imagine that in green, that would be all vegetation, grass, trees. Everything else in gray is hard. surface. Just again, this is Palm Road which the entire site is circumference by, and this is the carpenter shop and paint shop that exists now that was built a few years ago. And their parking area back here which is gravel and has really no definition to it, which is something that we want to improve the definition of the whole area and I' show you how we're going to do that. Right now there is just by default more than anything else materials that have been placed there sort of one at a time. Pile of mulch here, pile of gravel there, some excess masonry materials and before you know it we've got a site that's becoming disorderly and we want to clean that up and make it a more organized, usable space. This is a view looking west to south along Palm Road and the reason I chose this side is not only to make you feel better about the weather, but here's Palm Road, here's the library annex and I just wanted to show you that there's a berm that is, well the whole area in the middle here is built up, it was a fill site, and the area that we're talking about creating this gravel storage area is up here so that you can't see it from anywhere on Palm Road or area. You won't be able to see the site that we're using. This is the view looking west to east along Palm Road. It's just the opposite view. This is the carpenter's shop and paint shop. And again this is the area that we're dealing with right now. This is a plan view of the proposed site as it will be. Again, the existing carpenter shop lot, Palm Road, the library annex, the warehouse, Cornell distribution center, the mail center and this area here which would be designated as the proposed contractor lot with some bermed island that would be landscaped, a new drive coming in on both sides and one from here. And then this area in here will be delineated by fence posts and each contractor that is given permission as part of their contract to set up in this area will section off their own piece of the pie with fencing. And they will store their materials, provided a certain amount of parking for their employees and subcontractors. Upon leaving they will be required to return that piece of the site back to its original condition. I'll move along to the resurfaced parking lots. The relationship between these parking. lots and the area out on Palm Road is that currently these gravel parking lots on the main campus are slated to be improved for employee parking. Two of the lots out of the three have always been employee parking as long as they've been gravel lots. It's just .recently that the contractors were using them. So we're returning that to employee parking. The one other lot, which I will show you, it will be an extension of an existing parking. Again, also employee parking. The improvements to these lots will include paving, lighting, landscaping, curbing, and drainage. This.is the location of the three lots on campus. Tower Road, along here, and then Campus and lot #1, let's say, would be on the east side of Rice Hall. There's currently a gravel lot there now. The other lot .next to the large animal research teaching unit on the east of that, on the corner of PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Campus Road and Tower Road. And then the third small lot is next to the existing visitor lot in back of the wrestling facility. Taking them one at a time. This is Rice Hall, Tower Road, and this is the existing lot and the configuration of it as it appears right now. This is looking at it from a photograph. I just wanted to show you that as part of this project there is an existing shared pedestrian / bicycle path that would be included in the project and will be improved and upgraded so that it will become part of the contiguous pedestrian bicycle trail that currently exists which is really beautifully landscaped on both side of this and this is sort of a missing tooth. We want to be able to keep that really nice experience that people have as they're walking along it. So with landscaping and modifications to the walkway, which we will show in April, we will be able to do that. Again, this is the new configuration for the Rice Hall lot. With this configuration we'll have 90 employee parking spaces, landscaped islands that will separate the parking lot from the buildings along the drive and then that shared pedestrian / bicycle route. The second parking lot is the large animal research teaching unit area. That building right there, LAR2, and this is what it looks like as it currently exists. Mr. Wilcox — Can you go back one? What are those elongated things in the parking lot. Ms. Gilbert — They're storage trailers for the contractors. They store their materials in them. Mr. Wilcox — Temporary trailers? Ms. Gilbert —Yes. This is the gravel lots as it's laid out now with some fencing around it. Tower Road runs . along here and Campus Road runs along there. And.then this is the new configuration with 142 employee spaces laid out on it. And again, the same thing with new paving, curbing, lighting, drainage and landscaping. The top of this got cut off, but this is the, well this was the infrared image that was taken in 2003. The Freedman wrestling facility hadn't been built quite yet. There's the footprint of it though. And this is the contractor area that is behind it. And the existing visitor lot that's right next to the Freedman athletics complex. This is a pay lot right here and we want to expand this parking lot. Here's the Freedman building after it was built and this is the existing parking lot and then this is the lay -down area behind that building. This is the new lay out with 34 new spaces that would be added to the back and again paved, and lit, and landscaped, curbed, and new drainage. One thing that I wanted to add was that the drainage for all of these parking lots will be onsite storm water detention drainage. We've been working with Dan and Jonathan on that: We're kind of proud of that because we were able to do that, that's a good. thing, we feel. Mr. Wilcox - Before you go on, Lorraine, isn't the City / Town line like right between the existing parking lot and the proposed new one? PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Ms. Gilbert — No. I believe the City / Town line is... Mr. Wilcox — Over there, okay. Mr. Walker — I thought the building was in the Town but the parking lot was in the City. Mr. Wilcox — You're real close in there, just make sure... Ms. Gilbert — I'm pretty sure it's right along the edge of the building. Mr. Walker — I think the parking is in the City. Mr. Wilcox — We'll have to determine. Obviously, if you're doing anything in the City, you'll have to be aware. Ms. Gilbert — I'm pretty sure we're safe, but I'll double check on that. Mr. Wilcox — The wrestling center is clearly in the Town, but I remember it being just barely in the Town and then I look at the new parking lot behind it which would connect to an existing parking lot, so there may be some sort of an asphalt connector that goes from the Town into the City. But if indeed the Town line is really to the west of the existing visitor lot then it's not an issue. Ms. Gilbert — I'll check it out. I was talking on that with the next go- round, but we've able to work together with the landscaping nicely. They're tight spots so it's hard to able to hold the water on site and accomplishment. about drainage. We'll have more information vvorked out some good systems and we were and the detention areas so that they work out really fit those detention areas in, just to be have it filter through the ground is an That's the rundown on the projects. Our next step hopefully is preliminary and final site plan approval in April. Mr. Wilcox — Is your being here right have anything to do with City's approval of whatever that new massive building, Life Science. Ms. Gilbert — There's a relationship there in that there are two projects that have been approved. The Life Sciences building and the one by the Vet School, the animal research facility. When those buildings are being built, there will be a need for contractor parking and then again, instead of using these sites which, you know, the ESRF project is right across from LAR2 gravel lot. Instead of having them move over there and take up that site again and not let us be able to use it for employee parking, the timing was right for us to put our heads together and create a centralized location. f PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Thayer - Moving the contractors way away, won't that create, we saw a lot a trailers there, in that particular parking lot. They're going to have to be moved over to the other one. In that particular case they would have been over there. So wouldn't that create a lot of truck traffic back and forth moving the materials? I'm not sure the contractors will be too happy with that, I don't know? Ms. Gilbert - They have to move their materials a lot anyway. It's not like they're not going to keeping, they'll be able to keep onsite what they're working on onsite without having to spread out farther. That's the way I see it. The employees for the contractors will be able to gather in one spot in the morning and get shuttled over to their project and then get shuttled back again. Mr. Thayer - There'll be a Cornell shuttle or their own shuttle? Ms. Gilbert - Their own shuttle. They'll use a few cars as opposed to each driving over to the site. It will be a secured site. It will be fenced in. They can lock it as they see fit. There will be traffic going back and forth to get their materials, but I don't see it as being a constant stream of traffic. Ms. Mitrano - I think they look like nice additions. Ms. Gilbert - They're definitely improvements. Mr. Wilcox - Can a parking lot be a nice addition? Ms. Mitrano - It's a heck of a lot better than gravel and undrained in the middle of March when it start to get warm. Mr. Wilcox - I agree. I don't like parking lots in general. We've had this discussion before. They're a necessity. I understand that. Mr. Howe - I am concerned about the fencing in of the construction. How is that, a chain link fence, how are they going to secure these areas? Ms. Gilbert - What we're planning to do is on the slide that I showed that showed you the delineations .of the three bays, we would be providing posts along there just to delineated the lines. To make it obvious where those three bays were. Right now contractors use their own fencing around their own sites, wherever they are. Sometimes they use orange fencing; sometimes they use chain link fencing. Whatever they would like to set up for their own particular use to secure their materials, they'd be welcome to, as long as it was done in a neat and orderly manner and that would be written into their contract. They would have to adhere to that. Upon leaving they would have to remove the same materials. And the configuration will change at times depending on how much space we determine they'll need for the particular project that they're working on. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Wilcox — When we say materials, obviously the bulk of their materials will be next to site at which they are working, I assume, right? Ms. Gilbert — Right. If they need topsoil it will be on the site. If they need gravel it will be on the site. But they can also store it out in the Palm Road area and then have it trucked over, as they need it. It might help them to be able to buy it in bulk, you know more; more at one time and then bring it to the site, as they need it. Ms. Mitrano — Lorraine, as your folks have worked these plans up I don't image that you have delved into the deeper details as to how some of these parking areas would be ranked according to the transportation service. I'm curious in particular about the one next to Rice Hall, Ms. Gilbert — All I know at this point is that it's employee parking. I don't know, I think they were talking about tier six. Mr. Wilcox — All right, what is tier six? Ms. Gilbert — It's a high- ranking parking... Mr. Wilcox — High ranking in terms of position within the university? Ms. Gilbert — No. Ms. Mitrano — No, how much money you pay. Ms. Gilbert — Any lot that we have on the main campus that's conveniently located next to a building on the main campus it's up there, because they really want to encourage the larger lots. Mr. Wilcox — Can you put a number on "it's up there "? Ms. Gilbert — No, I can't. Ms. Mitrano — I can't remember whether it's $500 a semester or a year. Mr. Kanter — I think when we met with Lorraine earlier we weren't sure what use classification this went under in the Special Land Use District, but I did check it further and I'm pretty certain it is one of those educational uses that's listed that's permitted by special approval. There's a section in the special land use district... Mr. Wilcox - Can we all agree that it's PDA now? Mr. Kanter — Well the PDZ, planned development zone. Although in the ordinance there's actually a listing of all the former special land use districts which are still called special land use districts. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Wilcox — In our new zoning we changed the name.. We got away from SLUD. Mr. Kanter — In section 271 -10 d 6 of the new code of the Town of Ithaca, it lists maintenance, repair, servicing, utility, supply, and storage facilities as permitted by a special approval provided they're owned and solely to service the educational institution. There's also a parking component that's permitted as a separate section there by special approval. So it seems like these probably in combination fall under those two things. And the special approval would be by this board, the Planning Board. Mr. Wilcox — There was some discussion about long form / short form on the these four projects. Ms. Balestra - Only for the Palm Road one. The entire site is 11 Y2 acres and anything over 10 acres requires, according to the Town environmental law, the completion of a full environmental assessment form, and they submitted that. But if the area to be disturbed is less than 10 acres, which it looks like it might be, then we'll probably be doing the short form. Mr. Wilcox — Well we already have the long form. Ms. Balestra — That's true. Mr. Kanter — Once you do the long form you don't go back to the short form. It's just the way it's processed. Mr. Wilcox — Anything else form this side? (There was nothing) Anything else you want to say Lorraine? Ms. Gilbert — I don't think so, not at this point. I'm looking forward to showing you the landscaping. Mr. Wilcox — We'll see you back here in April's what you're hoping for? Mr. Kanter — The timing still seems like you're going to try to bring all four projects in together at one meeting? Ms. Gilbert — Yes. The most critical one is the Palm Road site because in order to move the contractors off of the other sites we need the Palm Road site regarded and ready. Mr. Kanter — So there's a possibility that might come first if the others aren't ready? Ms. Gilbert — If for some reason we can't do all four at the same time, we would concentrate on the Palm Road site first. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Mr. Wilcox — This would be four separate public hearings, I assume? Mr. Kanter - Four separate applications, four separate SEQRs, four separate public hearings. I think in many ways doing this joint presentation as a sketch plan really helped a lot because if, by some chance, they do have to come in at separate times think the Board will have at least a better idea of how they do kind of fit together. Mr. Wilcox — It's like when someone comes in and wants to develop a _portion of their land. We always want to know what are they going to do with the rest of the land. This is asking Cornell, and Cornell coming and saying we are thinking about parking in general not just each lot individually and, you right, that's helpful to use and I appreciate it. Mr. Kanter — So if we do schedule them all at the same meeting it will probably be pretty much a Cornell meeting.. Ms. Mitrano — What's the date of that? Mr. Kanter — Subject to receiving the 'materials. Ms. Gilbert — It will be ready separate issues for each one, with each one. MINUTES in April if you. are. It's a lot of repetition. There will be I'm sure, but then again there's an awful lot in common There were no minutes before the Board for approval. SKETCH PLAN CHECKLIST Ms. Balestra — The sketch plan check list is all brand new according to the new zoning ordinance and there were a couple of things that were added by staff that were not in the zoning ordinance, but it is something that has been our practice for ever. One of those things was #3 where we asked for information to be filed in the Planning Department 15 calendar days prior to the Planning Board Meeting at which sketch plan review is requested. That's not specifically stated in the zoning ordinance, but it's something that we've practiced for °as long as I've been here. Also, the item "J ", 25 copies of everything so that it comes to the Board and all the appropriate agencies. We wanted to know if the Board okay with that or if you need to have any sort of approval. Mr. Kanter — What Christ is trying to say is, would you be willing to have a verbal resolution to that just says we've seen this new check lists and it's okay for the staff to use them. I would feel comfortable with a formal motion, although we didn't put one together, but just because there are a couple of things that are a little different from the zoning. PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 Ms. Mitrano - That's fine. Mr. Wilcox - The additions don't go against zoning, they allow you to operate efficiently. Mr. Barney - Doesn't the zoning permit such additional information may be required or requested by the Planning Board, or some language like that? Mr. Kanter - It probably does, but these are checklists that we actually give to the applicant and I'd like them to be on behalf of the Planning Board as opposed to the staff. Mr. Barney - If the zoning ordinance, permits it, why can't the Planning Board adopt a very simple resolution saying, in addition to the material required by the Zoning Ordinance these following additional items we would like to add. Mr. Wilcox - And those additional items are the 15 day.requirement on the sketch plan check list, and the 25 copies on the sketch plan check lists. Are those the only two? Ms. Balestra - The words, "determined by Planning Staff' in parenthesis on #3 of the preliminary site plan check list. Mr. Kanter - That's for the SEQR forms. Mr. Wilcox - Is that it? Ms. Balestra - I think that's it. Mr. Kanter - We also eliminated, actually in the zoning we took something out. It's the deposit of review fees, because we don't do that anymore with the new fee law. It's strictly application fees now. So we just eliminated that phase. PB RESOLUTION NO. 2005 =017: Approval of Sketch Plan, Preliminary Site Plan and Final Site Plan Checklists MOTION made by Fred Wilcox, seconded by Rod Howe. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board herby finds that the additional_ items listed below be included in the check lists 'used by Town staff in connection with applications for sketch plan review, preliminary site plan approval, and final site plan approval, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Planning Board finds that the additional items are reasonable, consistent with the site plan requirements listed in Section 270486 of the Town of Ithaca Code, and support the function of the Planning Board. These additional items, incorporated in the checklists (dated 21112005) include: PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 • Proposed Sketch Plan should be filed in the Planning Department at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the Planning Board meeting at which sketch plan review is requested. • 25 copies of all sheets of the proposed sketch plan in reduced format (no larger than 11 inches by 17 inches) and 25 copies of all other items required above, except Development Review Application. • In conjunction with the Preliminary Site Plan submission, one fully completed and signed Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part I (SERF), or Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 (LEAF), whichever is required (determined by Planning staff). • The required "deposit of review fees" can be eliminated from the Preliminary and Final Site Plan checklists since only application fees are now required in Section 153 -10 of the Town of Ithaca Code. The vote on the motion resulted as follows: AYES: Wilcox, Mitrano, Thayer, Howe, Talty. NAYS: None. The vote on the motion was carried unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Looking forward to the meeting on March 15, Mr. Smith told the Board the following may be before them at that meeting: Winston Court, adding front porches on to all 18 buildings; Ithaca College Garden Apartments, renovations to buildings 26 through 29; there are two other as yet unconfirmed reviews. Mr. Kanter reported that the Transportation Committee has prepared a draft Official Highway Map that will go in the Transportation Plan. It will come before the Town Board at their March 7th meeting. They would also like to send it to the Planning Board for their comments and it may come before them at the March 15th meeting. Ms. Mitrano will be missing the first April meeting. Mr. Howe will be missing the second April meeting. Mr. Howe asked if any staff would be attending the March Forest Home Traffic Calming meeting. Mr. Kanter stated he would be attending the evening meeting on March 8th Mr. Wilcox said he would try to make the afternoon meeting on that same day. Adjournment PLANNING BOARD MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 APPROVED MARCH 15, 2005 On motion by Mr. Thayer, the meeting,was adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Res ectfully Submi ed, Tee -Ann Hurifer `� Town Clerk TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Tuesday, March 1, 2005 AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Persons to be heard (no more than five minutes). 7 :05 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval and Final Site Plan Approval for proposed Country Inn & Suites Hotel located at the southwest corner of West King Road and Danby Road (NYS Route 96B), portion of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 37- 1- 17.1, Business District. "C ". The proposal involves subdividing off a +/- 2.68 -acre parcel from the +/- 4.76 -acre parcel for the construction of a 58 -room hotel at the intersection. The proposal also includes 61 parking spaces, sidewalks, signage, landscaping, and lighting. David Auble, Owner; Trowbridge &Wolf, LLP for Jay Bramhandkar, Applicant; Peter J. Trowbridge, Agent, 7:30 P.M. Consideration of a Sketch Plan review of four proposed Cornell University projects collectively under one Sketch Plan submission, including a contractor staging /parking area and three parking lots. The contractor staging /parking area is located on Palm Road (Tax Parcel No. 64 -1 -1, Planned Development Zone #9) and will be regraded to become a centralized area for long -term contractor use. The existing gravel Rice Hall parking lot located on Tower Road (Tax Parcel No. 67 -1 -13.2, Low Density Residential Zone) and the existing gravel Large Animal Research Testing Unit (LARTU) . parking lot located on the corner of Tower and Campus Roads (Tax Parcel No. 63- 1 -2.2, Low Density Residential Zone) will be paved with new lighting, landscaping, and stormwater facilities installed. The Friedman Wrestling Facility parking lot will be located off Campus Road (Tax Parcel No. 67 -1- 13.2, Low Density Residential Zone) to the north of the wrestling facility and will be a paved lot for +/- 34 new parking spaces with new, lighting, landscaping, and stormwater facilities. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant; Laurene Gilbert, Agent. 4. Persons to be heard (continued from beginning of meeting if necessary). 5. Approval of Minutes: (none available). 6. Other Business: Discussion of revised Site Plan Checklists. 7, Adjournment. Jonathan Kanter, AICP Director of Planning 273 -1747 NOTE: IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE NOTIFY SANDY POLCE AT 273 =17470 (A quorum of four (4) members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business.) TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Tuesday, March 1, 2005 By direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, March 1, 2005, at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, N.Y., at the following times and on the following matters: 7:05 P.M. Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval and Final Site Plan Approval for proposed Country Inn & Suites Hotel located at the southwest corner of West King Road and Danby Road (NYS Route 96B), portion of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 37 -1 -17.1, Business District "C ". The proposal involves subdividing off a +/- 2.68 -acre parcel from the +/- 4.76 -acre parcel _for the construction of a 58 -room hotel at the intersection. The proposal also includes 61 parking spaces, sidewalks, signage, landscaping, and lighting. David Auble, Owner; Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP for Jay Bramhandkar, Applicant; Peter J. Trowbridge, Agent. Said Planning Board will at said times and said place hear all persons in support of such matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual impairments, hearing impairments or other special needs, will be. provided with assistance as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearings. Jonathan Kanter, AICP Director of Planning 273 -1747 Dated: Monday, February 21, 2005 Publish: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARb SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: March 1, 2005 (PLEASE PRINT TO ENSURE ACCURACY IN OFFICIAL MINUTES) PLEASE PRINT NAME PLEASE PRINT ADDRESS /AFFILIATION TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I, Sandra Polce being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a Senior Typist for the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York; that the following Notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town of Ithaca and that said Notice has been duly published in the local newspaper, The Ithaca Journal. Notice of Public Hearings to be held by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in the Town of Ithaca Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on Tuesday, March 1, 2005 commencing at 7:00 P.M., as per attached. Location of Sign Board used for Posting: Town Clerk Sign Board — 215 North Tio ag Street. Date of Posting: Date of Publication: February 21, 2005 February 23, 2005 Sandra Polce, Senior Typist Town of Ithaca. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 23rd day of February 2005. Notary Public CONNIE F. CLARK Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 CL6052878. Qualified in Tompkins County Commission Expires December 26, 20 0 G