Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 1990-06-19a is 0 FILED TOWN OF ITHACA TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD JUNE 19, 1990 The Town of Ithaca Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, in Town Hall, 126 East Seneca Street, Ithaca, New York, at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT: Chairperson Carolyn Grigorov, Robert Kenerson, Virginia Langhans, William Lesser, Robert Miller, Stephen Smith, Eva Hoffmann, Dan Walker (Town Engineer), George Frantz (Assistant Town Planner), John Barney (Town Attorney). ALSO PRESENT: Eleanor Sturgeon, Samir Hanna, Alan Wood, Claudia Weisburd, Jerry Weisburd, Linda Loomis, Sandy Reuning, Lee Schafrik, Sue Hamilton, Scott Hamilton, Jagat Sharma, Ed Hallberg, Tom Niederkorn, Jean Papandrea, Tony Papandrea, Paul Jacobs, Sadatsugu Nishiura, Les Reizes, R.A. Moore, A. Aloysi, P.E., Jane Schafrik, W.F. Albern, Steve Mandl. Chairperson Grigorov declared the meeting duly opened at 7:30 p.m. and accepted for the record the Clerk's Affidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearings in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on June 11, 1990 and June 14, 1990, respectively, together with the Clerk's Affidavit of Service by Mail of said Notice upon the various neighbors of each of the properties under discussion, as appropriate, upon the Clerk of the Town of Ithaca, upon both the Clerk and the Building Commissioner of the City of Ithaca, upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning, upon the Manager of the Finger Lakes State Parks, and upon the applicants and /or agents, as appropriate, on June 13, 19904 Chairperson Grigorov read the Fire Exit Regulations to those assembled, as required by the New York State Department of State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 6, 1990 MOTION by Stephen Smith, seconded by Robert Miller. RESOLVED, that the Minutes of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board Meeting of March 6, 1990, be and hereby are approved as written. There being no further discussion, the Chair called for a vote. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith. Nay - None. Abstain - Eva Hoffmann. The MOTION was declared to be carried. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEED RESTRICTIONS FOR THE "WINNER'S CIRCLE" SUBDIVISION, TO ALLOW FOR GARAGE DOORS IN AREAS OF HOME FACADES OTHER THAN ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER, SAID DEED RESTRICTIONS WERE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD AS n U • Planning Board -2- June 19, 1990 PART OF FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL GRANTED FOR SAID SUBDIVISION ON FEBRUARY 7, 1989. Chairperson Grigorov declared the Public Hearing in the above -noted matter duly opened at 7:37 p.m. and read aloud from the 11 Notice of Public Hearings as posted and published and as noted above. Mrs Samir Hanna, ;owner of a.house located in Winner's Circle, addressed the Board and stated that the proposed action is the modification of deed restrictions applicable to the six lots within the subdivision to allow the location of garage doors in locations other than to one side or the other of homes. Mr. Hanna offered that subdivision where a duplex can and Lot No. 3. Lot No. 1 owned by Mr. Hanna, and' +there home on Lot No. 3. there are only three lots in the be constructed - Lot No. 1, Lot No. 4, already has a house on it. Lot No. 4 is are plans to construct a single family Chairperson Grigorov noted that this was a Public Hearing and asked if anyone present 'wished to speak. No one spoke. Chairperson Grigorov closed the Public Hearing and brought the matter back to the Board for discussion. There appearing to be no further discussion, Chairperson Grigorov asked if anyone were prepared to make a motion. (Adopted Resolutions for Winner's Circle Subdivision attached hereto as Exhibit No. 1)0 Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of modifications to the Deed Restrictions for the Winner's Circle Subdivision duly closed. PUBLIC" HEARING. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR FOUR ADDITIONAL LOTS ON LANDS OF THE INLET VALLEY LAND COOPERATIVE, INC., LOCATED AT 167 CALKINS ROAD, TOWN OF ITHACA TAX PARCEL NO. 6- 33- 1 -4.2, RESIDENCE DISTRICT R -30, AND FURTHER, MODIFICATION OF THE LOT LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF LOTS NO. 1,4, AND 8 WITHIN,SAID INLET VALLEY LAND COOPERATIVE, SAID LOTS BEING TOWN OF ITHACA TAX PARCELS NO. 6- 33- 1 -4.4, -4.7. AND -4.11. INLET VALLEY LAND COOPERATIVE, INC., OWNER; H. ALAN WOOD, AGENT. Chairperson Grigorov declared the Public Hearing in the above -noted matter- duly opened and read aloud from the Notice of Public Hearings as posted and published and as noted above. At this time, Chairperson Grigorov read aloud, into the record, the following memo. "MEMO telephone call 6/18/90 from LARRY PHILLIPS RE Inlet Valley Coop, request for preliminary subdivision approval, Planning Board meeting, 6/19/90 Mr. Larry Phillips is unable to attend meeting and is not sure he can arrange legal representaton at such short notice. 'Planning Board -3- June 19, 1990 • He asserts that action by the Town is inappropriate at this time because. 18 litigation not settled 2* request violates the organizations bylaws which require unanimous consent of participants - consent not yet achieved. 3. , agreement between NYS Attorney General's Office ( "no action'!) and developer not fulfilled. 4* basis of original approval by the Town was that further development would not occur. 5. purpose of subdivision is to provide funds for road. It is not clear that the proceeds would be sufficient to build road." The above Memo was taken via telephone by Shirley Raffensperger, Town Supervisor. At this point, Mr. Alan Wood, President of the Inlet Valley Land Cooperative, addressed the Board and stated that he was before the Board at the direction of the Inlet Valley Stockholders Cooperative. Mr 11 Wood said that the Inlet Valley Land Cooperative was formed in 1979 as approximately 100 acres of land with 9 leaseholds on the land to occupy approximately 40 acres. Eight of those leaseholds have single house dwellings. The remaining approximately 60 acres of land in the co -op is held as common land. The road was built and maintained by the corporation. At the present time.they are looking • to re -form the corporation in a much more conventional way. Mr. Wood said that they would like to take those 9 leaseholds and convert them to fee simple deeds,„ a much more conventional way of owning property. Mr. Wood stated that it is proposed that the road in the corporation also be converted to„ a Town road; that way this development will look like every other development in the Town. Continuing, Mr. Wood said that over the last 11 years the tax base on the properties has been based on the fact of full services in the Town of Ithaca, yet they pay the same type of taxes as everyone else. Attorney Barney stated that the owners are paying taxes based on the assessed evaluation just like everyone else in the Town. Mr. Wood said that they are proposing that the IVLC improve the road to bring it up to an acceptable level for the Town. The IVLC is proposing to use the original road, and, secondly, to move the road so it does not cross over the Phillips' property. Also, it is planned to put in turnarounds at the ends of the road. The IVLC plans to bear the cost of the road, i.e., they plan to add four new building lots. They will end up with building lots and 50 acres of open land. Mr. Wood said that in order to make them reasonable lots, it is being proposed that the lot line on No. 4 be slightly changed. Chairperson Grigorov noted that this was a Public Hearing and asked if there were anyone from the public who had any comments or • questions. Steve Mandl, of 167 Calkins Road, addressed the Board and stated that his father, Richard Mandl, had asked him to present a letter written by him. (Letter attached hereto as Exhibit 2). ' 4 1 ,Planning Board -4- June 19, 1990 • Eleanor Sturgeon, of 718 expressed a traffic concern. Ms. should" not seriously consider been settled. Elmira Road, spoke from the floor and Sturgeon commented that the Board this until after the litigation has Jerry Weisburd, of 167 -1 Calkins Road, approached the Board and stated that he was originally involved in the development of the project. Mr. Weisburd noted that, originally, the IVLC had attempted to set aside a large amount of land as open green space, and thinks that the Town has expressed more and more of a desire toward that same end, but the problem is that the IVLC has been caught in a squeeze, the cooperative itself is a difficult format to work with for some people, private ownership with a Town road is easier to sell, finance, and at the same time the IVLC still feels committed to the idea of preserving green open space. In this case 50 acres will remain permanently as green open space. The average lot size is about 3 -1/2 acres. Claudia Weisburd, of 167 -1 Calkins Road, approached the Board and stated that the litigation has been terminated; all the decisions 2 were made and the judgements were handed down. Ms. Weisburd Lot said that the Attorney General has signed off on it; it has been decided Mandle to go' for a conventional subdivision, which means erasing 4 the co -op completely. Lot No. 5 - In favor Ms Weisburd stated that it would take a 2/3 vote to make the • conversion to a Homeowners' Association. Board Member Miller asked about Lot #2. Ms. Weisburd responded that, if the Phillips really resisted the idea of this becoming a Town Road, and that really became a problem, then the IVLC would bypass their property. Ms. Langhans wondered how many homeowners joined Mr. Phillips. Ms. Weisburd said that as far as she knew, from the meetings held, it seems like 8 are in agreement to go ahead with the conversion. At this point, Attorney Barney wondered if names could be put on the lots, and the position the owners are taking relative to the conversion. Ms. Weisburd provided the following names. Weisburd Lot No. 1 - In favor Phillips Lot No. 2 - Not in Favor Reuning Lot No. 3 - In favor Mandle Lot No. 4 - In favor Euell Lot No. 5 - In favor Rondeau Lot No. 6 - In favor Wood Lot No. 7 - In favor Loomis Lot No. 8 - In favor Einfeldt Lot No. 9 - In favor Ms: Weisburd said that the above owners, with the exception of Mr. Phillips, are all in favor of a conventional subdivision. • Attorney Barney wondered how the open space land was held. Mr. Weisburd responded that the IVLC has land -trust format, and would like to follow that as far Ms. Weisburd stated that she had been informed that going to be looked into a as they can. the IVLC could Planning Board -5- • continue to own the common land, and private lots. June 19, 1990 the lots are deeded out as Atli this objection to point, Board Member Lesser stated that the 3 or 4,additional lot subdivision based he had no on what he can see matter; the Town on it is usually the sketch, but the road is somewhat of certainly '.much longer, being a single entry accepts. a different road, than .Town Engineer Dan Walker, referring to the existing road, said that it is in excess of 2000 feet which does not meet the Town standards for dead -end cul de sac roads. There is a major safety concern for that length 'consideration because of emergency vehicle access and, normally,' on a subdivision with this length of road and this number of units, the Town would want to have at least two access pointsil even if the secondary one were only an emergency access. The grades on the existing road and some of the curves are definitely not within Town standards.` Mr. Walker said that the reason for Town Highway standards is to,allow the Town to accept roads that will not overburden the Town from a maintenance and reconstruction standpoint shortly after dedication. Mr. Walker said that certain portions of the road are well in excess of the 10% maximum grade, i.e., the Town standard, and that is primarily a safety concern because there is a considerable amount of snow and ice in Ithaca. A 10% road is difficult for Town trucks to plow with a heavy snowfall and the icy conditions. Mr. Walker feels that from an engineering standpoint • there has to be a significant amount of work done to that road before he could make a recommendation to accept the road as a Town highway. Mr. Weisburd wondered if the IVLC could secure a preliminary approval on the lots tonight, and then work with the Town on the road. Attorney Barney stated that they are not totally independent considerations because the approval of the lots in a subdivision normally requires a road. At this point, Attorney Barney suggest the application as a Preliminary Plat until a presented to the Board. Attorney Barney discussion be held between staff and the IVLC alleviate the concerns about the road, and be held regarding the op'Ien space. ed that the IVLC withdraw more detailed plat is also suggested that some on what can be done to also a discussion should At this time, H. Allan Wood, Agent for the IVLC, stated that the IVLC would withdraw the application until a more detailed plat could be produced. Chairperson Grigorov asked if there were any other comments. There being none, Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of Consideration of Preliminary Subdivision Approval for Inlet Valley Land Cooperative duly withdrawn. • PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF "IDE'S BOWLING LANES ", LOCATED IN A BUSINESS "C" DISTRICT ON JUDD FALLS ROAD AT MITCHELL STREET (ELLIS HOLLOW :ROAD), TOWN OF ITHACA TAX PARCELS NO. 6- 62 -1 -1, -2.1, -2.2, AND -3.2, AND PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF CONVERTING EIGHT BOWLING LANES JL Planning Board -6- June 19, 1990 • TO 4,870 +/- SQ. FT, OF COMMERCIAL FLOORSPACE, A 5,440 +/- SQ. FT, ADDITION TO THE FRONT 'OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING PARKING AND CIRCULATION SYSTEM. SCOTT HAMILTON, OWNER; JAGAT SHARMA, ARCHITECT /AGENT. 0 r1 LJ Chairperson Grigorov declared the Public Hearing in the above -noted matter duly opened and read aloud from the Notice of Public. Hearings as posted and published and as noted above. Mr. Scott Hamilton addressed the Board and stated that he had appeared before the Board in August 1988 and was granted full approval for a redevelopment plan that was considerably larger in scope than what is being presented tonight. Mr. Hamilton is asking for preliminary approval of a considerably pared down version of the plan. Mr. Hamilton is asking for approval to renovate the interior portion of the northeast end of the building, which formally housed eight bowling lanes, ,creating a fire zone in that area, and converting it for retail space. Mr. Hamilton said that he would like to add an addition on the front of the current building, and turning the present parking to the rear of the building. Mr. Hamilton stated the motivation behind the plan is basically twofold. One is to change, cosmetically, a 1950 bowling alley to a modern complex, and, two, to make a much more reasonable and economic return on that particular parcel. Chairperson Grigorov noted that this was a asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one Grigorov closed the Public Hearing and brought the Board for discussion. Board Member Smith asked about the size - Hamilton responded that the configurations shown may change in size simply because of the time plan. Public Hearing and spoke. Chairperson matter back to the of the stores. Mr. on the prior plan delays regarding the Mr. Hamilton offered that the entrances from Judd Falls Road will remain: the same. The loop will be blocked off with landscaping, adding that the landscaping plans have yet to be submitted. Mr. Lesser asked about the traffic implications of the change. Assistant Town Planner George Frantz responded that he.assessed the traffic generation on a', Trip Generation Handbook which is put out by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Eva Hoffmann stated she felt: a little apprehensive about the proposal because of the Comprehensive Plan being prepared for the Town of Ithaca. There appearing to be.no further discussion or comments from the Board,'Chairperson Grigorov asked if anyone were prepared to offer a motion. (Adopted Resolutions for Ide's Bowling Lanes expansion attached hereto as Exhibit No. 3)0 1 . 1, 1 Planning Board -7- June 19, 1990 Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of Consideration of Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the proposed expansion of Ide's Bowling Lanes duly closed. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED PHASE III -B AND THE PROPOSED MARCY COURT PHASE OF THE "DEER RUN" CLUSTERED SUBDIVISION, LOCATED BACKLOT OF THE INTERSECTION OF TROY AND EAST KING ROADS, TOWN OF ITHACA TAX PARCEL NO. 6 -44 -1 -4.32, RESIDENCE DISTRICT R -15. PHASE III -B IS PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF 29 LOTS ON WHITETAIL DRIVE, AND THE MARCY COURT PHASE IS PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF 13 LOTS. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION OF PHASEI III, 54 UNITS, WAS GRANTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD ON JUNE 27, 1989, ,,AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR THE MARCY COURT PHASE WAS GRANTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD ON MARCH 17, 1987. DEER RUN INVESTORS, L.P., OWNERS; EDWIN A. HALLBERG, APPLICANT. Chairperson Grigorov declared the Public Hearing in the above -noted matter duly 'opened and read aloud from the Notice of Public''Hearings as posted and published and as noted above. Mr.' Niederkorn, Landscape Architect for the project, addressed the Board and stated that this is the last action in this particular development. Mr. Niederkorn said that Phase III -B consists of 29 lots on Whitetail Drive, and the Marcy Court Phase is proposed to consist of 13 lots. Mr. Niederkorn offered that the 29 lots are in a single - family clustered development. The 13 lots on Marcy Court would be a conventional type of development, adding, all of the lots are larger than the minimum required by the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Niederkorn stated that the Town Board has reviewed all of the roads and the open space, the park that the Town has taken over has just been completed and is ready for use. Mr. Niederkorn noted that there is nothing different about the Final Plan from the Preliminary Plat. Chairperson Grigorov; noted that this was a Public Hearing and asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one spoke. Chairperson Grigorov closed the Public Hearing and brought the matter back to the Board for discussion. Virginia Langhans wondered about the Deed Restrictions. Mr. Niederkorn responded that the Deed Restrictions on Marcy Court are the same as those along Teton Court. The Deed Restrictions on the other part are somewhat different and they are very closely related to the Deed Restrictions that pertain to "this" part down "here" which were approved prior to this proposal. Mr. Hallberg, owner, „offered that he and Town Engineer Dan Walker had a conversation about an alternate road spec. It takes the oil and stone surface with the open ditches and replaces it with a • hard -paved surface with concrete gutters on each side. Mr. Hallberg said that he was still trying to find out what the numbers are, but would like the Board', to empower Mr. Walker to accept either alternative. • Planning Board -8- June 19, 1990 Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval for Phase III -B and Marcy Court duly closed. PUBLIC HEARING. BOARD WITH RESPECT INCREASE FROM 52 (Deer Run Phase III -B and Marcy Court Phase Final Subdivision Approval Adopted Resolution attached AND hereto as Exhibit No. 4). Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval for Phase III -B and Marcy Court duly closed. PUBLIC HEARING. BOARD WITH RESPECT INCREASE FROM 52 CONSIDERATION OF TO MODIFICATION TO 65 THE NUMBER OF A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TOWN OF LOCAL LAW NO. 6 -1987 TO MOBILE HOMES ALLOWED IN COLLEGE rEW PARK, LOCATED ARCELS NO. 6- 33 -2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AT 136 -1.2 APPROVAL -146 SEVEN MILE AND 6- 33 -2 -2, FOR AN DRIVE, TOWN OF ITHACA TAX AND FURTHER, CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL 13 MOBILE HOMES IN THE PARK. PAUL ENGINEER /AGENT. AND LINDA JACOBS, OWNERS; WILLIAM ALBERN, P.E., Chairperson Grigorov declared the Public Hearing in the above -noted matter duly opened and read aloud from the Notice of Public Hearings as posted and published and as noted above. Mr. Albern addressed the Board and stated that the proposal is for an addition of 13 double -wide homes to the existing Mobile Home Park. All of the homes !will be on large lots of 9,000 SF, 10,000 SF, 11,000 SF. • At this point, Mr. Albern stated that the location of the Mobile Home Park as noted in the Public Hearing Notice is wrong; it should be 136 Seven Mile Drive, not 136 -146. Board Member Virginia Langhans wondered about the water situation. Mr. Albern stated that there is plenty of water, however, the whole project is predicated and subject to water and sewer coming through the area. It will be Town water and sewer; it will not be on the existing park water system nor on septic. Chairperson Grigorov wondered about open space. Mr. Albern said that there is an access area between Lots No. 60 and 61 to the recreation area. Chairperson Grigorov,noted that this was a Public Hearing and asked if there were anyone from the public who had any comments or questions. Tony Papandrea, of 146 Seven Mile Drive, appeared before the Board and voiced a concern about traffic on Route 13, which Seven Mile Drive feeds into. Eleanor Sturgeon, of 718 Elmira Road, spoke from the floor and stated that she was concerned this area was going to be made an urban area, the density of the housing is going to be as heavy as in the • City. Ms. Sturgeon also is concerned about traffic. Ms. Sturgeon stated that she felt trailers were throw -away housing because they only last maybe 20 -30 years then one throws them away. Planning Board -9- June 19, 1990 • Jane Schafrik, of 1491 Trumansburg Road, spoke from the floor and stated that College View Park is one of the finest examples of mobile home parks that the Town could hope to see. Ms. Schafrik commented that she did not see where 13 additional homes were going to influence the traffic.' Ms. Schafrik felt that the park was one small corner of affordable housing in the Town that should be encouraged. There appearing to be no one else from the public who wished to speak to this matter, °Chairperson Grigorov closed the Public Hearing and brought the matter back to the Board for discussion. William Lesser wondered if this proposal was the final development of the property. Mr. Albern answered, yes. Chairperson Grigorov noted that the Board is considering two things - one is changing the local law and the other is the site plan. Assistant Town Planner George Frantz said that no resolutions were prepared at this! Ipoint; the review has not been finished on the site plan. As far as the process is concerned, it has to go to the Town Board, and the Town Board has to amend Local Law No. 6 -1987 that was originally set up for the approval of the Mobile Home Park limiting it to 52 units. Mr. Frantz commented that the Town Board, not the Planning Board, is the Lead Agency for Environmental Review. The Planning Board will provide a recommendation regarding the SEQR, and possibly a recommendation regarding the amendment to the Local • Law that would allow the additional 13 units. Mr. Frantz, referring to a timeframe, stated that he expects on July 9, 1990 the Town Board will set the Public Hearing date. Mr Walker said that the concern staff has, as far as the site plan, would be a moot point if the local law was not revised to allow the additional sites.', Mr. Walker noted that there are a couple of lots pretty close to a stream going through the area, and staff wants to see a few additional details as far as construction and access is concerned. William Lesser wondered about the sufficiency of the recreation area on, or approximate to the site, adding that there are a number of potential additional children with 13 more doublewides. Mr. Frantz responded that' that is one of the things he wants to look at more closely; he has been to the site but has not been able to evaluate the proposed recreational areas as part of the Phase presented tonight to see if they are really suitable. Mr. Frantz offered that there are approximately 18 acres in.the whole site, and it does appear that they have at least in excess of the standard 10 %0 Chairperson Grigorov remarked that it is a very nice Mobile Home Park. Eva Hoffmann wondered about the sewer and water, and if the Town has plans to extend water and sewer to the park. Mr. Walker • responded that that is the Town 1989 Water and Sewer Inlet Valley Project. Mr. Albern '!:stated that until the Town completes their design on a water and sewer system he cannot go any farther; the project is definitely dependent upon water and sewer. • Planning Board -10- There appearing to be no further discussion, asked if anyone were prepared to make a motion. (Adopted Resolutions for College View Mobile hereto as Exhibit No. 5). Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter Recommendation to the Town Board with respect Local Law No. 6 -1987, and Consideration of Approval for an additional 13 mobile homes in the Home Park duly closed. June 19, 1990 Chairperson Grigorov Home Park attached of Consideration of a to modification of Preliminary Site Plan College View Mobile SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: PROPOSED CAYUGA CLIFFS SUBDIVISION, PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF 122 LOTS AND'', PARK ON APPROXIMATELY 105 ACRES, PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED BACKLOT OF TRUMANSBURG ROAD (NYS RT. 96) ON TOWN OF ITHACA, TAX PARCELS NO. 6- 24 -3 -3.2 AND 6- 25 -2 -41, FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING SITE DENSITY FOR CLUSTER SUBDIVISION, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. RESIDENCE DISTRICT R -15 AND R -30. CAYUGA CLIFFS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, APPLICANT; ANTHONY ALOYSI, ENGINEER /AGENT. Chairperson Grigorov opened the discussion on the above -noted matter and read aloud from the Agenda as noted above. Mr. Les Reizes addressed the Board and stated that the sketch tplan application originally was submitted in August 1988. Mr. Reizes said that he attempted to have it reviewed, and at that time the staff suggested that it,could not be reviewed because of the then expected Route 96 relocation. Mr. Reizes offered that the original plan did not take into Consideration' the expected relocation of Route 960 Mr. Reizes said that he met with the Town Planner in November 1989, and it was suggested that the developer realign certain roads in the subdivision, and also he was informed that, given the steep slope in part of the site, the site lent itself much more to a clustered subdivision 'than a traditional subdivision plan. Mr. Reizes stated that the traditional plan before the Board tonight was prepared, but Cayuga Cliffs is prepared to accept that the Board can say - go do a clustered subdivision. Mr. Reizes stated that he would like to set the density tonight. Mr. Reizes said that the plan before the Board is a Ido -able plan at this density; it may be expensive but from an engineering perspective this can be accomplished. Mr. Reizes said that he does not want to see it built, and does not think the Board wants to see it built, but the statute is written the way it is. Mr. Reizes remarked that this is the plan and the density the site can support. Mr. Reizes stated that if he gets the approval for the 122 lots he would redesign it for a clustered subdivision. Board Member Stephen Smith wondered if there were any contouring information available. Town Engineer Dan Walker answered that there • is a slope analysis. i,Board Member Robert Kenerson wondered if there were any 40 -foot gorges'in the middle. Mr. Walker responded that he did not think they were more than 10 feet deep, commenting that there is a significant amount 'of drainage going down the slope. Mr. Walker stated that there are some 20 % -30% slopes on the site. Mr. Walker Planning Board -11- June 19, 1990 noted that some of the drainage patterns go right through the middle of some of the proposed lots, so from that standpoint he did not think some of the lots were really developable, and also, given the type of environmental constraints whereby the Town views a subdivision. Mr. Walker stated that there is a 20% grade on some of the roadways. Mr. Walker commented that, as far as legal roads, all the roads do not work. Mr. Kenerson stated that he thought there should, be one entrance. Mr. Walker stated that an emergency entrance is nice - there is a potential to put another entrance {indicating on map} through "here" "although he did not think the owner of "this" property has any control, but there is space to put another entrance. Mr. Walker said that for an ideal subdivision layout, especially with the kind of slope being discussed, another roadway "here along with the proposed one would be fine, and connecting it to Route 96 would be much preferred. Mr. Walker said that with the circulation patterns that are in there now and the potential for Route 96 possibly coming through "here ", that would help alleviate some things as far as flow- through traffic and transportation. Mr. Kenerson stated that 122 potential units are still being discussed, with Mr. Walker agreeing, but he did not think that 122 was really do -able on the site. Mr. Kenerson offered that they are looking for a start. Mr. Walker stated that it is a place to start, but 200 -300 would probably be lost libecause of slope constraints and drainage constraints. Mr. Kenerson asked if the Town had any position in from Albany to the corridor for Route 96 as it was originally proposed. Assistant Town Planner George Frantz said that the State has essentially abandoned any plans for a new highway on West Hill, adding, that that has been discussed with Mr. Reizes and Mr. Aloysi. Mr. Frantz, pointing ,to a map from the DOT, said that the "yellow /brown" is Alternate B which is, essentially, the same alignment as the "C" alignment. Continuing, Mr. Frantz offered that the Town's proposal to'Cayuga Cliffs is to develop a plan that uses a road that follows the general alignment of the proposed Route 96, and create a series of cul de sacs off it, or loop roads. Mr. Frantz commented that the idea would be that this would be a roadway which would +not have curbcuts or houses fronting it, as on Triphammer Road, Warren "Road, and residential roads ithat are now arterials. Mr. Frantz stated that it is the same concept put forth through "Shalebrook" for Riley Drive. Mr. Frantz noted that this would be a controlled access road where the only access would be from streets off it, with no driveways or anything. Mr. Frantz offered that the Planning Department has been discussing this since last summer, but the idea would be to have a local connector down to Route 89, which would "serve the residential areas of West Hill. Mr. Frantz, indicating on the map, pointed out Cayuga Cliffs. Mr. Frantz said that the road would come down "here" and connect to the old railroad grade just north of Williams Glen - it would come through at the traffic light, where the present Dates Drive is located. Mr. Frantz said that this would avoid a very substantial bridge which was part of the Route 96 proposal, then connect with Route 89 in the vicinity of the Hangar Theatre. Mr. Frantz said that in the area of the Berggren property it would be more than 5 % -8% grade, but still within the 10o perameters. Mr. Frantz said that this would be a Town road built as the area is developed. Mr. Reizes said that the development would be much denser toward the top on the west of the road where it is less steep, and much less dense on the other side of the road, Planning Board -12- June 19, 1990 commenting that he had discussed that with the staff when the plan was re- designed. Chairperson Grigorov said that the Planning Board has to determine the density tonight. Board Member Stephen Smith responded that he was not sure the density should be determined tonight because it is not really taking into account the contouring. Mr. Reizes stated that the contours were shown on the plan he had submitted two years ago, the lots were indicated on the map, and the aerial photo was submitted. Board Member Virginia Langhans asked if the issue came before the Board. Mr. Reizes answered, no. Mr. Reizes stated that it did not come before the Board because the Town Planner decided to allow for the Route 96 relocation. Mr. Frantz offered that the plan shows 79 lots and it is all R -30 density. Mr. Reizes stated that that plan actually would have been built, although it couldn't be built. Mr. Smith wondered why no one would build it. Mr. Reizes responded that the lots are small; there is too much road for the size of the lots; it would be economically very expensive to do the drainage for the site, but engineering -wise it is completely feasible. Mr. Walker stated that the environmental concerns have to be taken into account, and, based on that, anything that disturbs those drainage patterns has to be looked at as not buildable lots. Mr. Reizes said that the question is - if cost is no object, can this be engineered and stay within the environmental constraints? Mr. Reizes stated that the development is within the Town's regulations. Attorney Barney stated that the highways do not meet the specs. Attorney Barney said that there is a regulation that involves the Town Highway specs which says there shall be no grades in excess of • 100, commenting that this development has highways that are in excess of 10%0 Mr. Reizes said that he does not want to engineer a plan that is never going to be built, but if the Board says - you can do 100 lots, then fine, a plan for 100 lots would be engineered in a clustered subdivision. Chairperson Grigorov noted that a cluster can only be as many units as would have been in a conventional. At this time, Attorney Barney referred to Article V, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CLUSTERED SUBDIVISIONS, Section 32, Paragraph 1, which states. "The number of dwelling units permitted in a clustered residential subdivision may in no case exceed the number otherwise permitted, in the Planning Board's judgment, by the applicable sections of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Law, The Planning Board may restrict the subdivider to a lesser number of dwelling units if, in the Planning Board's judgment, particular conditions of the site warrant such restriction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the density of dwelling units in a clustered development shall not exceed 3.5 units per gross acre in Residence Districts R -15 and R -30". Attorney Barney referred to Article V, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CLUSTERED SUBDIVISIONS, Section 32, Paragraph 3, which states: "The Planning Board may exclude from development areas on the sketch plat • which, in its opinion, are unsuitable for construction of the proposed housing because of excessive slopes, poor drainage, or other considerations which may be injurious to the health, safety, and welfare of the community." Attorney Barney said that the Board can take into account the slope, whereas if it is on a flat land one can Planning Board -13- June 19, 1990 • get a certain number of units. Mr. Reizes Barney. Mr. Reizes stated that the plan is have to have a number so they can design Chairperson Grigorov stated that the Board has of the lots are unbuildable and drop them buildable lots, agreed with Attorney not practical, but they something practical. to figure out how many from the number of Mr. Frantz commented that Cayuga Cliffs could replat the southern portion to R -15 density, and come back before the Board July 10, 1990, and the Board would look at that plan. Mr. Reizes stated that he thought it would come up with the same thing. Mr. Reizes stated that he would rather not redesign it for the fourth time. Mr. Reizes said that he would take 79 lots and do it in a cluster, which is well below the density of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Aloysi noted that it could be higher than 79.0 Mr. Reizes said that from a practical standpoint there could be much bigger lots where it is steep and also smaller lots. Mr. Frantz commented that, from an overall land use planning perspective, he would be more comfortable with 100 lots, because of the proximity to the City. Mr. Frantz said that the site is relatively close to the City, and with cluster it is accessible to bus routes, adding, from a anti - sprawl standpoint, having those 20 homes here rather than out another 1/2 to 3 miles is a better idea for overall land use planning for the Town. Chairperson Grigorov stated that the Board still has to consider whether there are that • many buildable lots. Mr. Reizes said that there is no problem with the sewer line as there are two sewer lines the development could be connected to, plus the water. Mr. Smith wondered if the lots would be sold off as building lots, with Mr. Reizes answering, yes, that is the current thought. Mr. Reizes said that the large lots are in the R -30 zone, and the smaller lots are in the R -15 zone. Mr. Frantz wondered if it would be possible to rework the 1988 plan and submit them at the same time. Mr. Reizes said that he would like a number. Mr. Frantz stated that he thought the developer could do a conventional subdivision by utilizing the higher density under R -15, and get, at least, close to 100 lots. Board Member Eva Hoffmann stated that she thought Mr. Frantz made a good point, in that this is a good parcel for denser development, but noted that she felt very uncomfortable trying to come up with a number based on the very sketchy information before the Board, and especially at this late hour. Ms. Hoffmann commented that it would be very nice if the Board could get copies of the older plan, and copies of the other plan, with some indication as to which lots are unbuildable, and which roads are too steep. Mr. Reizes stated that he felt a lot of effort was being spent on something that is never going to be built. Mr. Walker stated that the purpose was to set the density and then not degrade the density, but improve protection of natural areas and • by staying at the buildable density, a lot of those areas would not be disturbed because of natural features, steep slopes, and road restrictions. Mr. Reizes said that the proposal was submitted almost two years ago. Board Member Robert Miller stated that the Board has never seen it. Mr. Reizes said that he has had numerous sessions Planning Board -14- • with the Planning Department, and he is asking figure on the number of lots so Cayuga Cliffs sketch plan on cluster. June 19, 1990 for a reasonable can come back with a Attorney Barney commented that if Mr. Reizes is willing to do a sketch plan, and willing to take the risk of doing it simultaneously with a conventional plan with a number that he thought was buildable, after some discussion with Dan Walker and George Frantz, then that is fine. Attorney Barney said that the plan submitted has too many lots that are not suitable for building, which the Planning Board can exclude, adding that the Board needs to see a plan that is somewhat more realistic in terms of what is actually buildable in a meaningful way, and provides road grades that are appropriate to the subdivision requirements. Mr. Walker stated that the Board has to see a conventional subdivision that has legal roads. Mr. Frantz offered that, given the increased traffic problems the City is suffering from, more density has to be looked at closer to the City. Mr. Walker responded that the proper place to address that is the planning process and the zoning process. Mr. Walker stated that the design process is not the responsibility of the Town engineering or the technical staff; they are here on a reviewing and recommendation basis. Mr. Reizes said that he was going to rely on the original August 1988 submission, with the original number of lots indicated on the plan, commenting, this is the direct result of what the Town Planner asked Cayuga • Cliffs to come up with; this is not something Cayuga Cliffs dreamed up for fun. Mr. Reizes said that the 1988 proposal is all R -30 density; they did not take advantage of the additional density allowed under R -15. Mr. Reizes stated that he was under the impression the Town would require a cluster subdivision; that is why the density question was raised and the roads were realigned. At this point, Attorney Barney suggested that the Board take the old plan, have Town Engineer Dan Walker and Assistant Town Planner George Frantz look at it, and indicate whether it looks like the numbers would work. Mr. Frantz said that he checked the May 2, 1988 plan and it appeared to him that the roads meet the maximum grade requirements. Assistant Town Planner George Frantz stated that if Mr. Reizes could get a sketch plan to the next Planning Board Meeting scheduled for July 10, 1990, then the Board would review it. Mr. Reizes responded that he would get all the information in order and return on the 10th of July. Chairperson Grigorov asked if there were any other comments. There being none, Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of the Cayuga Cliffs Subdivision Sketch Plan Review duly closed. ADJOURNMENT • Upon Motion, Chairperson Grigorov declared the June 19, 1990, meeting of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board duly adjourned at 11:58 p.m. � 0 Planning r1 C, .7 Board -15- June 19, 1990 Respectfully submitted, Mary Bryant, Recording Secretary, Nancy M. Fuller, Secretary, Town of Ithaca Planning Board. • .7 • "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning Board, June 19, 1990 ADOPTED RESOLUTION: SEQR "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Robert Ken erson, seconded by Mrs. Virginia Langhans: WHEREAS: -1- 19 This action is the Consideration of Approval of Modifications to the Restrictive Covenants of the "Winner's Circle" Subdivision to allow for the placement of garage doors on the facades of homes other than on one side of the building. 2. This is an Unlisted action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board has been legislatively determined to act as Lead Agency for environmental review. 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the Short Environmental Assessment Form and other application materials. 4. The Assistant Town Planner has recommended a negative declaration of environmental significance. THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That the Planning Board make and hereby does make a negative determination of environmental significance for this action as proposed. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ADOPTED RESOLUTION: "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning.Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Stephen Smith, seconded by Mr. William Lesser: WHEREAS: EXHIBIT 1 ,• rr . • .7 • "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning Board, June 19, 1990 ADOPTED RESOLUTION: SEQR "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Robert Ken erson, seconded by Mrs. Virginia Langhans: WHEREAS: -1- 19 This action is the Consideration of Approval of Modifications to the Restrictive Covenants of the "Winner's Circle" Subdivision to allow for the placement of garage doors on the facades of homes other than on one side of the building. 2. This is an Unlisted action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board has been legislatively determined to act as Lead Agency for environmental review. 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the Short Environmental Assessment Form and other application materials. 4. The Assistant Town Planner has recommended a negative declaration of environmental significance. THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That the Planning Board make and hereby does make a negative determination of environmental significance for this action as proposed. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ADOPTED RESOLUTION: "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Covenants Planning.Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Stephen Smith, seconded by Mr. William Lesser: WHEREAS: EXHIBIT 1 C7 LJ • "Winner's Circle" Subdivision Slaterville Road Modifications to Restrictive Planning Board, June 19, 1990 Covenants -2- 1. This action is the Consideration of Approval of Modifications to the Restrictive Covenants of the "Winner's Circle" Subdivision to allow for the placement of garage doors on the facades of homes other than on one side of the building. 2. This is an Unlisted action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency for environmental review, has, on June 19, 1990, made a negative determination of environmental significance. 39 The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the application materials and other documents pertinent to the proposal. THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That the Planning Boa: the modifications to the Circle" Subdivision to add ding the foregoing, there dwelling with two garages separate front entrances. ", IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED: rd grant and hereby does grant approval of Restrictive Covenants of the "Winner's to Section 1 the following: "Notwithstan- may be constructed on Lot 4 a two- family in the middle of the building and two and That the modification approved at this meeting (June 19, 1990) is based upon and contemplates that the design submitted by Samir Hanna at this meeting is the design of the building to be constructed on said lot. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Town of Ithaca Planning Board. June 26, 19900 EXHIBIT 1 • Richard H. Mandl 167 Calkins Road Ithaca, IVY 14850 Phone 607 - 272 -2370 To the Town of Ithaca Planning Board June 19, 1990 I am writing this letter to support the proposal for expansion of the Inlet Valley Land Coop and improvement of the road. As an Environmental Biologist, I am deeply concerned with the quality of life, not only for myself, but for the community and world at large. Nine years ago when I heard about the concept of the Inlet Valley Land Coop, I was sure that this innovative mix of housing and conservation of the land was ideal. A large portion of the commonland bordering on the north, contains a stream and watershed area which feeds directly to the Inlet valley and hence to Cayuga lake. It is imperative that this watershed and ecologically sensitive area remain undeveloped to preserve the quantity and quality • of water. Our concept of limited development and permanent sheltering of the commonland will accomplish the necessary protection. My other concern is over the constant erosion of the coop road which deposits large amounts of soil onto Calkins road and the bordering culverts. Improvement of the road surface should prevent further erosion and enable proper services to reach the taxpaying home owners on the coop. Since I have cardiac problems, it is vital for me to be sure that emergency vehicles would have easy access to my house. I think we are doing our part for the community by developing an ecologically sound environment in which to live. I would now like to see the town reciprocate by doing something for the taxes which we have paid over the years. Thank you for patiently listening to my thoughts. Sincerely • Richard H. Mandl EXHIBIT 2 • • • "Ide's Bowling Lanes" Expansion Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street Preliminary Site Plan Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 (Ellis Hollow Road) ADOPTED RESOLUTION: SEOR "Ide's Bowling Lanes" Expansion Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street (Ellis Hollow Road) Preliminary Site Plan Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. William Lesser, seconded by Mr. Robert Miller: WHEREAS: -1- 1. This action is he k ons:iueta .LOEI of Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the proposed expansion of "Ide's Bowling Lanes ", located in a Business "C" District on Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street (Ellis Hollow Road), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 6- 62 -1 -1, -2.1, -2.2 and -3.2, and proposed to consist of converting eight bowling lanes to 4,870± sq. ft. of commercial floorspace, a 5,440± sq. ft. addition to the front of the existing building, and modifications to the existing parking and circulation system. 2. This is a Type I action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board has been legislatively determined to act as Lead Agency for environmental review. The Tompkins County Planning Department is an involved agency in coordinated review. 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, site plan, and other application materials submitted for this project. 4. The Town Planning ° Department has recommended that a negative determination of environmental significance be made for this action. THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That the Planning Board make and hereby does make a negative determination of environmental significance for this action as proposed. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. EXHIBIT 3 • "Ide's Bowling Lanes" Expansion Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street Preliminary Site Plan Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 (Ellis Hollow Road) ADOPTED RESOLUTION: "Ide's Bowling Lanes" Expansion Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street (Ellis Hollow Road) Preliminary Site Plan Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Stephen Smith, seconded by Mrs. Virginia Langhans: WHEREAS: -2- 1. This action .is the Consideration of Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the proposed expansion of "Ide's Bowling Lanes ", located in a Business "C" District on Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street (Ellis Hollow Road), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 6- 62 -1 -1, -2.1, -2.2 and -3.2, and proposed to consist of converting eight bowling lanes to 41870± sq. ft. of commercial floorspace, a 51440± sq. ft. addition to the front of the existing building, and modifications to the existing parking and circulation system. 29 This is a Type I action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency for environmental review, has, on • June 19, 1990, made a negative determination of environmental significance. 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the site plan and other application materials submitted for this project. C: THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That the Planning Board grant and hereby does grant Preliminary Site Plan Approval to the proposed expansion of "Ide's Bowling Lanes ", subject to the following conditions: 1. Receipt by the Planning Board, prior to final site plan approval, of the review of the proposed project by the Tompkins County Planning Department, pursuant to New York State General Municipal Law,.Section 239 -1 and -m. 20 Elimination from the site plan of the proposed 22 -foot by 70 -foot "unloading" area from within the 30 -foot front yard area required by Article VII, Section 38, of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, 3. Submission of landscape plan and plant schedule for the site to the Planning Board for approval before final site plan approval. MIBIT 3 i • • • " Ide's Bowling Lanes" Expansion Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street Preliminary Site Plan Approval Planning Board, June 19 1990 (Ellis Hollow Road) -3- 4. Execution of an agreement between the Town and the developer implementing the developer's offer to contribute a fair share, not to exceed $3,000.00, based on 'Che proportion of the gross floor area of the expanded " Ide's Bowling Lanes ", as proposed, to the total gross floor area of commercial and office space in the area of East Hill in the vicinity of the intersections of Pine Tree Road, Ellis Hollow Road, and Judd Falls Road, currently zoned Business "C ", toward the cost of construction of a sidewalk along Mitchell Street from the City /Town line to the western edge of the westernmost driveway into the Ide's development, under terms mutually acceptable to the developer and the Town, such agreement to be approved by the Attorney for :the Town and executed prior to the issuance of any building permit for any of the proposed construction. 5. Modification of the site plan to provide for a direct exit from the southwest corner of the parking lot to the Mitchell Street exit, or, such exit may be placed at such other location as the Town Engineer may approve. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith. Nay - Hoffmann. CARRIED, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 22?' 2 Nancy M. Fuller, Secretary, Town of Ithaca Planning Board, June 26, 1990. EXHIBIT 3 i ' "Deer Run" -- Phase III -B and f Intersection of Troy and East Final Subdivision Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 • Marcy Court King Roads, * * * * * * * * * * * * * Phase Backlot ADOPTED RESOLUTION: "Deer Run" -- Phase III -B and Marcy Intersection of Troy and East King Backlot Final Subdivision Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 -1- Court Phase Roads, MOTION by Mrs. Virginia Langhans, seconded by Mr. William Lesser: WHEREAS* 16 This action is the Consideration of Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed Phase III -B and the proposed Marcy Court Phase of the "Deer Run" clustered subdivision, located backlot of the intersection of Troy and East King Roads, on Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 6 -44 -1 -4.32, Residence District R -15, Phase III -B is proposed to consist of 29 lots on Whitetail Drive, and the Marcy Court Phase is proposed to consist of 13 lots. 29 This is a Type I action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as lead agency for environmental review, on March 17, 1987, made 'a negative determination of environmental significance for the proposed original preliminary plat for the site. On June 27, 1989, the Planning Board made a negative determination of environmental significance for the proposed revised plat for Phase III. 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the proposed final subdivision plans and other application submissions. THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: 1. That the Planning Board grant and hereby does grant Final Subdivision Approval to the proposed Phase III -B and the proposed Marcy Court Phase of the "Deer Run" subdivision, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval by the Town Board and Town Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits of the proposed deed restrictions for said Phases III -B and for Marcy Court. b. Submission of a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to assure the satisfactory completion of site improvements for said Phases III -B and for Marcy Court, prior to the issuance of any building permits for dwellings in each such subdivision, the amount of such letter to be approved by the Town Engineer and the form of the letter to be approved by the Town Attorney, unless said improvements are fully • completed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer prior to the issuance of any such permits. EXHIBIT 4 "Deer Run" -- Phase III -B and Marcy Court Phase -2- r Intersection of Troy and East King Roads, Backlot Final Subdivision Approval Planning Board, June 19, 1990 • c. Compliance with all requirements of approval of prior phases of the "Deer Run-" subdivision. d. Approval of the final design of the road and related specification by the Town Engineer ,before issuance of any building permits. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Nancy M. Fuller, Secretary, Town of Ithaca Planning Board. June 21, 19909 • • EXHIBIT 4 i. Iry .Y Y 136 Seven Mile Drive Modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to Permit an Increase from 52 to 65 the Number of Mobile Homes Allowed Recommendation to Town Board • Planning Board, June 19,, 1990 ADOPTED RESOLUTION: SEQR College View Park 136 Seven Mile Drive Modification of Local Law No. an Increase from 52 to 65 Mobile Homes Allowed Recommendation to Town Board Planning Board, June 19, 1990 6 -1987 to Permit the Number of MOTION by Mrs. Virginia Langhans, seconded by Mr. Robert Miller: WHEREAS: 1� 1. This action is the Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town Board with respect to modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 as the same relates to the proposed increase from 52 to 65 in the number of mobile homes allowed in College View Park, located at 136 Seven Mile Drive,, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 6- 33 -2 -1.2 and 6- 33 -2 -2, Residence District R -5; 2. This is a Type 1 action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is Lead Agency with respect to the proposed amendment of Local • Law No. 6- 1987. The Town of Ithaca Planning Board is legislatively determined to act as Lead Agency with respect to future related site plan approval, 39 it is necessary to amend said Local Law No. 6 -1987 in order to authorize any expansion of College Viers Park; 4. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted, as well as Part II thereof as completed by the Assistant Town Planner, and other application materials submitted with respect to the proposed expansion of College'View Park; 5. The Town Planning Department has recommended a negative determination of environmental significance with respect to the proposed C ?llege View Park expansion, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board recommend and hereby does recommend to the Town Board that a negative determination of environmental significance be made with respect to the amendment of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to permit an increase in the number of manufactured homes allowed in College View Park from 52 to 65, provided that any such amendment permits such increase only at such time as public water and sewer are available to the subject • site. EXHIBIT 5 ' � VVii.iyG Y�1C.M Y"QA, 136 Seven Mile Drive Modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 from 52 to 65 the Number of Mobile Recommendation to Town Board • Planning Board, June 19, 1990 to Permit an Increase Homes Allowed Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTED RESOLUTION: College View Park 136 Seven Mile Drive Modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to Permit an Increase from 52 to 65 the Number of Mobile Homes Allowed Recommendation to Town Board Planning Board, June 19, 1990 MOTION by Mr. Robert Kenerson, seconded by Mr. Stephen Smith: WHEREAS: 1. This action is the Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town • Board with respect to modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 as the same relates to the proposed increase from 52 to 65 in the number of mobile homes allowed in College View Park, located at 136 Seven Mile Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 6- 33 -2 -1.2 and 6- 33 -2 -2, Residence District R -5; 2. This is a Type 1 action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is Lead Agency with respect to the proposed amendment of Local Law No. 6 -1987. The Town of Ithaca Planning Board is legislatively determined to act as Lead Agency with respect to future related site plan approval, 3. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted, as well as Part II therefore as completed by the Assistant Town .Planner, and other application materials submitted with respect to the proposed expansion of College View Park; 4. It is necessary to amend said Local Law No. 6 -1987 in order to authorize any expansion of College View Park; 5. The Planning Board, at Public Hearing on June 19, 1990, Department has recommended to the Town Board that a negative determination of environmental significance be made with respect to the amendment of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to permit an increase in the number of manufactured homes allowed in College View Park • from 52 to 65, provided that any such amendment permits such 1WA1 ii:��l1t.'� %.u.Liege view Park -3- 136 Seven Mile Drive Modification of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to Permit an Increase from 52 to 65 the Number of Mobile Homes Allowed Recommendation to Town Board • Planning Board, June 19, 1990 increase only at such time as public water and sewer are available to the subject site; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board recommend and hereby does recommend to the Town Board that said Local Law No. 6 -1987 be amended to permit an increase in the number of manufactured homes allowed in College View Park from 52 to 65, upon the following conditions: a. that such amendment permit such increase only at such time as.public water and sewer are available to the subject site, and be that such expansion be subject to Planning Board approval of the site plan therefor. Aye - Grigorov, Kenerson, Langhans, Lesser, Miller, Smith, Hoffmann. Nay - None. • CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Nancy M. Fuller, Secretary, Town of Ithaca Planning Board. June 25, 1990. EXHIBIT 5 AFTIDA 1.17T OF PUBLICATION State of New Fork, Tompkins County, ss., Gail Sullins being dull• s" orn, deposes and says, that she /he resides in Ithaca, county and state aforesaid and that she /he is Clerk of The Ithaca Journal a public newspaper printed and published in Ithaca aforesaid, and that a notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, was published in said paper q9 6 0 d that the first publication of said notice was on the y of �� 19_ 1 Subs cr' and sworn to before me, this day Of 19 Notary Public. JEAN FORD Notary Public, State of New York No, 4654410 QLla. `fi%ad in Tompkins Couniy/� "f -0�"'' s.�� exoires May 31, 19. TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD, NOTICE OF PUBLIC, HEARINGS, 'TUESDAY, JUNE, 19, 1990 B direction of the Chairman of the Planning Board, NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN, that Public' Said 'Planning Botir1 will, at'j Hearings will be held by the l 'said times and said place hear Planning Board of the Town of all•peisons in'supporfiof such Ithaca on Tuesday, June 19,1 `matters` oC objections thereto.', 1990, in Town Hall, 126 East Persons' may appear.by- agent' Seneca Street, Ithoca,'N.Y., at or m`;' non 1, r'� r the following imes and on the ' following atters: s p r4`-" JeontH.Swartwood 9 Town Clerk' 7:30 P.M. Consideration . of _ r ;.y yK ,:, : N_y ,�zv273 -1721 proposed modifications to the„jurie.14;:1990'i.;: >" Deed Restrictions for the . me l "Winner's 'Circle" Subdivi- sion, to allow for garage, doors in areas of home fo -1 cades-other than one side orl the other. Said Deed Restric -• tions were approved by the! Planning Board as part of Final I Subdivision Approval grontedl for said Subdivision on Feb-1 ruary 7, 1989. 7:45 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary Subdivision Ap- proval for four additional lots on lands, of the Inlet Valley Land Cooperative, Inc.,., to -' cated at 167 Calkins Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.' 6- 33- 1 -4.2, Residence - District R -30, and further, modifica: Lion of the lot lines and di- mensions of Lots No. 1, 4, and 8 within said Inlet Valley Land Cooperative, said lots being Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No., 6- 33- 1 -4.4, -4.7, and - 4.11.. In- let Valley .Land Cooperative; Inc., Owner; H. Alan Wood; Agent. -' 8:30 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the proposed expansion of "Ide's Bowling Lanes ", lo- cated in a Business "C" District on Judd Falls Road at Mitchell Street (Ellis Hollow Road); Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No' 6- 62- 1- 1,' -2.1, -2.2, and -3.2; and proposed to -consist of converting eight bowling Ian; es to 4,870 plus /minus sq..ft. of commercial floorspace, a 5,440 plus /minus sq. ft. addi- tion to the front of the existing building, and modifications to the existing parking and circu t lotion system. Scott Hamilton; Owner; Jagat Sharma, Ar I chitect /Agent. t, t 9:00 P.M. Consideration of Fi J nal Subdivision Approval for! the proposed Phase III -B and' the proposed Marcy Court' Phase of the "Deer Run" clus =` tered subdivision, located 1, backlot of the intersection;of i Troy and East King Roads,. Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 1 6 -44 -1 -4.32, Residence District 1 R -15. Phase III -B is proposed to consist of 29 lots on Whitetail 1 Drive, and the Marcy Court Phase is proposed to consist of 13 lots. Preliminary Subdivi -.: sion Approval for modification of Phase 111, 54 units, was granted by the Planning Board on June 27, 1989, and Prelimi -:1 nary Subdivision Approval for the March Court Phase was granted by the Planning Board on March 17, 1987. Deer Run Investors, L.P., Owners; Edwin. A. Hallberg, Applicant. 9:30 P.M. Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town Board with respect to modifi- cation of Local Law No. 6 -1987 to increase from 52 to 65 the number of mobile homes al- lowed in College View Park, located at 136 -146 Seven Mile Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Par- cels No. 6- 33 -2 -1.2 and 6 -33 -2-