The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTB Minutes 2008-10-02 Budget Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board Thursday, October 2 , 2008 at 5 : 30 p . m . 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY AGENDA 1 . Call to Order 2 . Pledge of Allegiance 3 . Presentation of the Tentative 2009 Town of Ithaca budget by the Town Clerk 4 , Consider Setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the 2009 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas 5 . Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment re amending the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing the Water Rate Charges and Application Fees 6 . Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment re a Local Law to amend the Town of Ithaca Code to adopt a New Water Rate Schedule effective January 1 , 2009 for water rates , charges , and other fees chargeable to consumers of water in the Town of Ithaca 7 . Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment re a proposed Local Law amending Local Law No . 2004-3 to increase sewer rents in the Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Area Effective January 1 , 2009 8 . Discuss and consider the Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment ( IAWW ) Plant budget 9 . Consider 2009 wages for Bolton Point Employees 10 . Presentation and Discussion of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2009 Tentative Budget 11 . Discuss and Consider Adoption of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2009 Tentative Budget as 2009 Preliminary Budget 12 . Consider setting a Public Hearing for October 20 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the adoption of the 2009 Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Budget 13 . Consider a resolution amending the basis upon which annual wage increases are determined for non- bargaining unit employees 14 . Consider wage scale for non-bargaining unit staff Final — September 24 , 2008 Page 1 of 2 15 . Consider 2009 Elected Officials ' Salaries 16 . Consider adoption of the Town of Ithaca 2009 Preliminary Budget 17 , Consider Setting a Public Hearing for Monday, November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the proposed Adoption of the 2009 Town of Ithaca Final Budget 18 . Consent Agenda : a . Consider Town of Ithaca Abstracts 19 . Consider Adjournment Final — September 24 , 2008 Page 2 of 2 Regular Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board Pr Thursday, October 2 , 2008 at 5 : 30 p . m . g 4O 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Present Herb Engman , Supervisor; Pat Leary, Councilwoman ; Peter Stein , Councilman ; Eric Levine , Councilman ; Bill Goodman , Councilman ; Tee-Ann Hunter, Councilwoman ; Rich DePaolo , Councilman , Staff Karen Billings , Town Clerk ; Fred Noteboom , Highway Superintendent ; Dan Walker, Town Engineer; Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning ; Bruce Bates , Director of- Code Enforcement ; Judy Drake , Human Resources Specialist ; Al Carvill , Budget Officer, Others Krisy Gashler Call to Order Additional Agenda Supervisor Engman added discussion and consideration of a resolution regarding Local Government Records Management Fund . Board agreed to add it to the agenda ; placing it just prior to the consent agenda . Agenda Item No . 3 - Presentation of the Tentative 2009 Town of Ithaca budget by the Town Clerk Supervisor Engman explained that the budget was given to the Town Clerk and distributed to the board . Supervisor Engman briefly outlined the Town ' s budget process . Agenda Item No . 4 - Consider Setting a Public Hearing for November 6 . 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the 2009 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas Councilman DePaolo moved and Councilman Stein seconded the proposed resolution . Supervisor Engman suggested the public hearing be held at 5 : 35 p . m . Board agreed . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Final TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008494: Set Public Hearing Date for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at 5:35 pm, on November 6, 2008 at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY for the consideration of the following 2009 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas: Forest Home Lighting District Glenside Lighting District Renwick Heights Lighting District Eastwood Commons Lighting District Clover Lane Lighting District Winners Circle Lighting District Burleigh Drive Lighting District Westhaven Road Lighting District Coddington Road Lighting District Water Improvement Benefited Area Sewer Improvement Benefited Area MOVED: Councilman DePaolo SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved - Unanimous Agenda Item No. 5 - Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6, 2008 at p. m. to hear public comment re amending the Southern Cayu_ga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing the Water Rate Charges and Application Fees Supervisor Engman explained the water rate charged by the Commission would increase from $2. 32 per 1 , 000 gallons to $2. 58 per 1 , 000 gallons. He suggested the public hearing be set for 5:40 p. m. Councilman Stein moved and Councilwoman Leary seconded. Councilwoman Hunter asked how the increase would affect the minimum amount due on the water bill. Mr. Walker explained that the minimum charge is based on 10, 000 gallons of consumption . The minimum for Bolton Point would be 10 times that rate; the minimum sewer is based upon 8, 000 gallons. Supervisor Engman called for a vote. Page 2 Final TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 195: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Amending the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing the Water Rate Charges and Application Fees RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on the 6t" day of November 2008, at 5:40 p. m. for the purpose of considering the approval and execution of an amendment to the agreement of intermunicipal cooperation between the Town and several other municipalities pursuant to which the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission was formed, which amendment would ,increase the water rate charged by the Commission from $2. 32 per 1000 gallons to $2. 58 per 1000 gallons, said changes to be effective January 1 , 2009; and it is further RESOLVED, that at such time and place all persons interested in such memorandum may be heard concerning the same; and it is further RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal published in the City of Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, said publication to occur not less than ten days before the day designated above for the public hearing. MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion approved - Unanimous Agenda Item No . 6 - Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment re a Local Law to amend the Town of Ithaca Code to adopt a New Water Rate Schedule effective January 1 , 2009 for water rates , charges , and other fees chargeable to consumers of water in the Town of Ithaca Supervisor Engman stated that the proposed increase would take the water rate from $ 3 . 55 per 1 , 000 gallons to $3 . 81 per 1 ; 000 gallons . He confirmed that both water rates were increasing by $0 . 26 (this is a pass along ) . Councilman Stein suggested that the public hearings be held one minute apart. The public hearing was set for 5 : 41 p . m . Councilman Goodman moved and Councilman Stein seconded the resolution . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Page 3 Final TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 196: Setting a Public Hearing to Consider a Local Law To Amend the Town of Ithaca Code to Adopt a New Water Rate Schedule Effective January 1, 2009 for Water Rates, Charges, and Other Fees Chargeable to Consumers of Water in the Town of Ithaca RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold 'a public hearing at the . Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on the 6th day of November 2008, at 5:41 p. m. for the purpose of considering a proposed local law amending Schedule A of Chapter 261 of the Town of Ithaca Code, which amendment would increase the water rate charged for water consumption in the Town from $3. 55 per 1000 gallons to $3. 81 per 1 , 000 gallons effective January 1 , 2009, and it is further RESOLVED, that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed amendment and fees may be heard concerning the same; and it is further RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal published in the City of Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca, said publication and posting to occur not less than ten days before the day designated above for the public hearing. MOVED: Councilman Goodman SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved — Unanimous Agenda Item No . 7 - Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment re a proposed Local Law amending Local Law No . 2004-3 to increase sewer rents in the Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Area Effective January 1 , 2009 Supervisor Engman suggested the public hearing be set for 5 : 42 p . m . Councilman Stein moved and Councilwoman Hunter seconded . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Councilman Goodman noted that the proposed law was not attached and that the proposed increase was not listed . Supervisor Engman explained that they do not have the actual proposed increase . Councilwoman Hunter confirmed that the sewer budget given to the board does not include the proposed increase ; she asked why the rate is being increased if the sewer fund ' s budget is balanced . Mr. Carvill explained the rate may need to increase due to operating costs of the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Page 4 Final TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 197: Set a Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed "Local Law Amending Local Law No. 2004-3 to Increase Sewer Rents in the Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Area Effective January 1, 2009 " BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for a Public Hearing to be held on Thursday, November 6, 2008 at 5:42 p. m, in the Town Hall located at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY in order that the Town Board may hear public comment regarding a proposed, "LOCAL LAW AMENDING LOCAL LAW NO, 2004-3 TO INCREASE SEWER RENTS IN THE TOWN OF ITHACA SEWER IMPROVEMENT AREA EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1 , 2009 ". MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilwoman Hunter VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion approved — Unanimous Agenda Item No . 8 - Discuss and consider the Ithaca Area Waste Water Treatment ( IAWW) Plant budget Mr. Carvill clarified the IAWWTP tentative budget total operational charge to the Town is $ 1 , 165 , 000 , saying that this is approximately a $ 118 , 000 increase over 2008 . Councilman DePaolo asked if the proposed increase was based upon usage . Mr. Carvill thought it was based upon the flow capacity through the line . Mr. Walker explained that the charges for sewer plant funding are based upon the previous year' s consumption as measured by the sewer flow meters . But he cautioned that the sewer flow meter system is not functioning properly at this time so numbers have been estimated by using water meter readings in the service areas . Mr. Walker explained that the Town has added approximately 400 units to the system , which contributes to the 26 % usage increase . Mr. Walker noted that a fair amount of flow is generated by Cornell , but it does not appear in the summary ( such as the Mouse House ) . He said that he is trying to get that number from Steve Thayer at the City. Councilman Stein stated that Cornell has its own water supply, asking how does the City know how much water is used ? Mr. Walker explained that Cornell provides their water meter readings to the City. Supervisor Engman added that the sewer flow meters are being worked on , which will provide a more accurate reading . He thought that they would have solid information at the next meeting . Page 5 Final Agenda Item No . 9 - Consider 2009 wages for Bolton Point Employees Supervisor Engman explained that as the employer and treasurer of record , the Town is obligated to approve wages . Ms . Drake stated that the collective bargaining employees are receiving a 3 . 5 % increase and the non -collective bargaining employees are receiving a 4 . 0 % increase . Supervisor Engman moved and Councilman Stein seconded the proposed resolution . Councilman DePaolo asked if the concept is to keep up with the cost-of- living over time . Supervisor Engman replied that this is the first year he ' s been on the Commission ; he was not sure how the Commission determined the percentage increase . Ms . Drake explained the Commission looks at the CPI and compares the increases of the 5 membership municipalities . Councilman Stein verified that it is a " pass-through " resolution . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 198: Approval of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Employee Wages for 2009 WHEREAS, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca has reviewed the proposed wages for Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 's (Commission) employees for the year 2009 (see attached); and WHEREAS, the said wages have been approved by the Commission at their September 4, 2008; Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the said wages for the Commission 's employees for the year 2009 as presented, and to be filed in the Human Resources Office . MOVED: Supervisor Engman , SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved — Unanimous Page 6 Final Agenda Item No . 10 - Presentation and Discussion of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2009 Tentative Budget Budget provided to Board in their packets . Agenda Item No . 11 - Discuss and Consider Adoption of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2009 Tentative Budget as 2009 Preliminary Budget Councilman Goodman moved and Supervisor Engman seconded the resolution . Supervisor Engman pointed out that it is an approximate increase of 11 . 5 % over 2008 , but the rates date back to 1996 . In reality, Bolton Point has been conservative in its budgeting , which kept the rates low. Councilwoman Hunter confirmed the excess money from the Office Space Addition project would be returned to fund balance . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 198: Approval of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Employee Wages for 2009 WHEREAS, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca has reviewed the proposed wages for Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 's (Commission) employees for the year 2009 (see attached); and WHEREAS, the said wages have been approved by the Commission at their September 412008, Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the said wages for the Commission 's employees for the year 2009 as presented, and to be filed in the Human Resources Office . MOVED: Supervisor Engman SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye, Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved — Unanimous Page 7 Final Agenda Item No . 12 - Consider setting a Public Hearing for November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the adoption of the 2009 Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Budget Supervisor Engman set the public hearing for 5 : 43 p . m . on November 6 , 2008 , Councilman Levine moved and Councilwoman Hunter seconded the resolution . Supervisor Engman called for a vote . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-200: Set public hearing for consideration and adoption of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission preliminary budget as Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission final 2009 budget BE / T RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York on the 6th day of November 2008 at 5:43 p. m. for the purpose of considering the 2009 Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Preliminary Budget as the 2009 Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Final Budget, and it is further RESOLVED that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed budget may be heard concerning the same; and it is further RESOLVED that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the City of Ithaca, New York and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town, said publication and posting to occur not less than 5 days before the day designated above for the public hearing. MOVED: Councilman Levine SECONDED: Councilwoman Hunter VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved — Unanimous Agenda Item No . 13 - Consider a resolution amending the basis upon which annual wage increases are determined for non- bargaining unit employees Supervisor Engman explained that the Personnel Committee discussed the resolution provided in the Board ' s packet.. . The committee members thought that it was confusing and too restrictive ; the proposed change recommends that the Consumer Price Index be used as one of the basis upon which the annual cost of living adjustment for non- collective bargaining staff is determined . Page 8 Final Supervisor Engman moved adoption of the proposed resolution . Councilwoman Leary seconded . Councilman DePaolo asked Supervisor Engman to enumerate some of the criteria for which salaries would be considered . Supervisor Engman explained that one item would be union negotiations . He thought that there was some desire on the part of the Town to not allow Town Hall employees to fall behind other employees . He explained that the Board also takes into consideration current situations . Last year the proposed cost of living adjustment was increased by 0 . 5 % because the Board felt that the situation had changed . Councilman Stein added that the point of the resolution , when it was adopted two years ago was for the Board to commit to following the cost of living . He did not want to pass a resolution that did not mean anything . Councilman Stein preferred to rescind the resolution and offered that as an amendment . Councilman DePaolo seconded . Supervisor Engman called for discussion . Councilwoman Leary thought that the original proposal before the Board was important because it' s important to state the CPI as a criterion . She felt strongly that it was fairer to peg the increase to the CPI . Supervisor Engman added that an advantage of the resolution was that it indicates which CPI to use , the Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers CPI -W , Councilman Goodman stated that the resolution changes the index being used because the 2006 resolution described the average for the Northeast US Urban and US Cities population less than 50 , 000 . He wondered what the theory was behind the change . Councilwoman Leary explained it makes it more appropriate for the non-bargaining unit employees . Ms . Drake added that the Town was using that CPI , but then narrowing it down to NE Urban and Cities less than 50 , 000 . Councilwoman Hunter recalled that the Personnel Committee did not want to recommend rescinding the resolution . The Committee did not want employees to think the CPI would not be a factor in their wage increases . Councilman Stein remembered that the Board had a fair amount of discussion with regard to what CPI was the right CPI . He thought a reasonable way to make an index was to average the Northeast and the National Small Cities . Councilman DePaolo added that the Town was not bound to use a CPI ; it was a statement of preference not policy. Councilwoman Leary stated that it Would send a bad message to staff to rescind the 2006 resolution , especially since the CPI is currently around 6 % . She would not support rescinding the resolution for that reason . Supervisor Engman recapped that the resolution on the floor was to rescind the cost of living resolution . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Ayes : Councilman Stein ; Nays : Supervisor Engman , Councilwoman Leary, Councilman Page 9 Final Levine , . Councilman Goodman , Councilman DePaolo , Councilwoman Hunter. Motion Failed . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-201 : Rescind TB Resolution No. 2006-211, Adopt Consumer Price Indexes for use in Calculating Town Cost of Living Adjustment RESOLVED, that this board rescinds TB Resolution No. 2006-211 , Adopt Consumer Price Indexes for use in Calculating Town Cost of Living Adjustment. MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman DePaolo VOTE: Supervisor Engman, nay, Councilwoman Leary, nay; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, nay; Councilman Levine, nay, Councilman DePaolo, nay; Councilwoman Hunter, nay. Motion Failed. Councilman Stein proposed an amendment to the original motion , which was to go back to the 2006 resolution . Supervisor Engman was swayed by the argument to change the CPI because the group of employees has changed . The Public Works Department employees are now covered under the collective bargaining unit . Councilman Stein agreed that it was one factor, but the Northeast is a different region and small cities was also different. Councilwoman Leary asked if it would be difficult to consider all three CPIs . Ms . Drake explained that the three CPIs could be averaged . After further discussion , Councilman Stein added the National CPI -W to his proposed amendment . Councilman DePaolo seconded . Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried unanimously . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-201a : Re-establish TB Resolution No. 2006-211 and add the Consumer Price Index - Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers RESOLVED, that this board re-establishes the use of TB Resolution No. 2006-211 as the bases upon which Annual Cost of Living Increases are determined, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Consumer Price Index - Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers be added as one of the basis upon which the annual cost of living adjustment for non-collective bargaining staff is determined. MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman DePaolo VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye. Carried Unanimously. Page 10 Final Supervisor Engman called for a vote on the original resolution with amendment . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-202: Adopt Basis upon which Annual Cost of Living Increases are Determined WHEREAS, the Personnel Committee has reviewed resolution 2006-211 from October 16, 2006, in which the calculation for Cost of Living adjustments was established, and WHEREAS, the Personnel Committee recommends restating the calculation to reflect the actual practice; and therefore, be it RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby declares the intention to use the average of the "Consumer Price Index – Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers" (CPI- W), the Northeast U. S. Urban, and U. S. Cities Less than 50, 000, as one of the basis upon which the annual cost of living adjustment for non-collective bargaining staff is determined. MOVED: Supervisor Engman SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion approved – Unanimous Agenda Item No . 14 - Consider wage scale for non- bargaining unit staff Supervisor Engman moved and Councilman Levine seconded the proposed resolution . Councilman Stein stated that the Town already pays its workers considerably more than workers in similar jobs in the local market. He remembered , depending upon the classifications , that the Town paid 10 % to 40 % more . Councilman Stein did not think it was fair to the taxpayer to increase the gap . He called the County, City, and Cornell to get their proposed increases , which were 3% and 4% . He noted that most taxpayers were not going to get a 4 . 5 % increase . Councilman Stein moved an amendment to the proposed resolution of a 3 . 5 % increase . No second—motion died . Councilwoman Hunter stated she was not a fan of the wage scale increases because it did not include performance based increases , which she felt was problematic . She also noticed an increase between the lower paid employees and the higher paid employees . Councilwoman Hunter explained that part of the rationale for the 4 . 5% increase was the relatively low percentage increase staff received in 2008 . She requested that the wage scale and performance based increases be looked at in the future . Page 11 Final Councilman DePaolo asked what precedent the proposed increase was setting for collective bargaining . Supervisor Engman explained that the Personnel Committee discussed the issue . He thought the Board should remember that in a union agreement it is over a period of years . At the end of the union contract , if they feel they' ve been underpaid for those years , compared with the non- union employees , the union will try to recoup it as part of the next union agreement . Councilman DePaolo asked if giving staff a 4 . 5 % increase would set a precedent . Ms . Drake responded that the increases have varied from year to year. The Board looks at the CPI and the tax rate as part of the consideration . Ms . Drake explained that the Employee Relations Committee discussed the issue and the employee representatives expressed that the employees would like a safety zone range of 3 % to 5 % . They realize the Town cannot pay 10 % if the CPI goes that high . Councilwoman Leary added that is why the Committee wanted to keep the CPI up front to bring a rationale to wage increases . She explained that the Town has been a leader; they don 't necessarily look at what other municipalities are doing—they do what they believe is right . Councilman DePaolo asked what happens if the CPI is 1 %? He wanted to know if employees would still expect 3 % to 5 % . Councilwoman Leary responded that the wage increase was low last year because inflation was much lower. Councilman Stein explained that he spent a lot of time two years ago analyzing wage increases ; at that time his conclusion was that in the 5 years previous to that the Town had always exceeded the cost of living increase . He thought that was good because the workers are the Board ' s friends , but the Board also has to balance who is paying the bill with the benefits . Councilwoman Hunter asked Ms . Drake if the wage increase also increases the hiring minimum and job rate wages . Ms . Drake responded yes , the job rate increases at the same percentages . She added that there have been years when the hiring minimum rate has not been increased . Councilwoman Hunter thought that it was problematic to have the hiring rate "jacked - up" each year with the raises . She asked that the hiring rate and job rate be looked at in relation to what is given as raises on an annual basis . Ms . Drake explained that it is a $4 range between the hiring minimum and the job rate . A new employee is hired at the wage of hiring minimum or between hiring minimum and job rate . It takes the employee 3 years to get to job rate ; after 3 years employees are at job rate . Councilwoman Leary pointed out that the money paid to employees does not disappear from the community. Town employees spend money locally; they are not generally taking trips to Europe . The Town is supporting the local economy when they are paid a living wage . Page 12 Final Councilman Goodman , referring to his question about what influenced Bolton Point' s wages , asked , what were some of the factors that influenced the Personnel Committee' s decision to recommend a 4 . 5 % increase . Supervisor Engman responded that some of the other Commissioners are from smaller communities and they are going to have smaller increases in their communities . Generally the smaller municipalities give much smaller raises--there is a different expectation . Supervisor Engman stated that one of the factors that drove the committee to recommend 4 . 5 % was the fact that they, already know that many of the Town ' s employees cannot live in the Town of Ithaca . It is a very expensive Town in which to live . They are trying to keep up as best they can , but it is a very difficult community to find a house in and to be able to afford it . Another influence was the CPI , which was pushing 6 % from July 2007 to July 2008 . Councilwoman Leary added that the largest inflation has been in gas , heating fuel , and food—very basic necessities . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman called for a vote . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-203: Approval of 2009 Wage Scale for Non-Collective Bargaining Positions WHEREAS, on May 7, 2001 , the Town Board established a Wage Scale, which set the Hiring Minimum and Job Rate for each job classification, which are to increase each year based on a Cost of Living Adjustment; and WHEREAS, after evaluating the Consumer Price Index (CPI- W) as well as other factors, the Town Supervisor and Human Resources Manager in preparation for the 2009 Tentative budget recommended to the Personnel Committee a 4. 5% Cost of Living Adjustment for all classifications of the Wage Scale for Non-Collective Bargaining positions; and WHEREAS, the Personnel Committee reviewed and discussed the recommendation and recommends a 4. 5% Cost of Living Adjustment for all classifications of the 2009 Wage. Scale for Non-Collective Bargaining positions (see attached); and Now, therefore be it RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve a 4. 5% Cost of Living Adjustment for all classifications of the 2009 Wage Scale for Non-Collective Bargaining positions. MOVED: Supervisor Engman SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, nay; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Page 13 Final Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion carried. Agenda Item No . 15 = Consider 2009 Elected Officials ' Salaries Supervisor Engman proposed a 4 . 5 % increase for elected officials' salaries . Councilwoman Leary moved and Supervisor Engman seconded the resolution. Councilwoman Leary explained the Town Board adopted a policy some time ago that the elected officials' salaries would follow along with the staff salaries , which is why they adopt staff salaries first . As the person who made the resolution two years ago , Councilman Stein explained that it was awkward to vote yourself a raise . The idea was to tie the public officials ' raise to the raise of the staff so that they are not making an independent decision . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Councilman Stein voted against the resolution and explained that he was voting against the resolution because he thought it was awkward for him to vote no for raising staff wages and then vote yes for raising his own salary. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008=204: 2009 Proposed Elected Officials Salaries WHEREAS, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca has reviewed the proposed salaries, indicated below, for the elected officials for the year 2009; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the said proposed salaries for the elected officials for the year 2009; and be it further RESOLVED, the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish the said proposed salaries as required by Section 108 of the Town Law. SUPERVISOR $ 48, 036. 06 (Paid Biweekly) (includes Supervisor's Administrative Function) TOWN BOARD MEMBERS (6) $ 8, 710. 28 Each (Paid Quarterly) TOWN JUSTICES ' (2) $ 16, 651 . 93 Each (Paid Biweekly) MOVED: Councilwoman Leary SECONDED: Supervisor Engman VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, nay, Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion carried. Page 14 Final Agenda Item No . 16 - Consider adoption of the Town of Ithaca 2009 Preliminary Budget – See attachments Supervisor Engman suggested the Board discuss the budget before adopting it . He added that the Board has a lot of material in front of them and negotiating through it is quite a task . Supervisor Engman turned to Mr. Carvill , stating that Mr. Carvill had some ways to look at the information that may make it less onerous . Mr. Carvill provided the Board with a synopsis of the budget ; See attachment #1 . Next he walked the Board through the budget synopsis . During the discussion of the Water Fund summary, Mr. Walker brought it to the Board 's attention that the benefit assessments number was incorrect . Mr. Walker and Mr. Carvill were going to review the benefit assessment rolls to confirm the number on the summary sheet. Referring to the Fire Protection Fund summary, Councilwoman Hunter asked if the Town maintains its own fund balance for the fund and if so , what is done with the fund balance . Mr. Carvill responded that the Town does have its own Fire Protection Fund balance . He explained that historically the fire department comes to the Town and asks for another fire fighter or asks for an equipment purchase . The fund balance would help the Town pay for those expenses without affecting the ensuing year' s tax rate . It also gives the Town the ability to look at other options to consider. Councilman Stein asked if Mr. Carvill had a number for the increase in expenditures . Mr. Carvill did not have the number. Councilman Stein stated that he would like to see what the percentage increase is for all expenditures . Mr. Carvill said he could provide Councilman Stein with that information . Mr. Carvill then turned the Board ' s attention to the hand -out titled "Tax Table— Illustrating the Tax Increase Due to Increased Property Valuation from 85 % Valuation to 100 %" and walked them through the table . See Attachment. The Board and Mr. Carvill then reviewed the hand -out entitled "Summary of all Principal Debt Outstanding as of December 31 , 2008" and "Constitutional Debt Limit" . See Attachment #2 . Supervisor Engman emphasized that the Town tries to " pay as you go" and have very little debt, which was why he did not try to reduce the tax levy this year. He explained that keeping the money coming in without raising the tax rate puts the Town in a better position so that they do not have to borrow funds for other things . He added that the 2009 budget puts the Town in a good position for the 2010 and 2011 budgets . Mr. Carvill stated that as the Board moves forward into 2009 in its operating year, the Capital Projects Committee , Finance Committee , Supervisor Engman and himself have looked critically at each of the capital projects and how much they would cost . He explained that due to the financial fall-out on Wall Street , long-term bonding is going to Page 15 Final be very .expensive . There is also confusion as to who would underwrite and insure the bond issues . Councilman Stein asked if the Town was increasing its debt by 50 % in 2009 . Mr. Carvill confirmed that he was correct. Councilman Stein thought that seemed like a lot . Mr. Carvill explained that $3 , 000 , 000 of the proposed debt was for the East Shore Drive water line . Supervisor Engman added that the Town is not sure how much the East Shore Drive project is going to cost if the City should decide to go to Bolton Point for its water supply. The Town also has the opportunity to spend several hundred thousand dollars on sidewalks and trails because there are other partners putting up most of the money. Councilwoman Leary explained that sidewalks and trails have been identified as a high priority among Town residents . It is also part of the Town ' s efforts to be more environmentally sensitive and reduce dependence upon cars . In response to Councilman Stein ' s comment regarding the debt increase , Councilwoman Leary commented that , when dealing with a low base , 50 % sounds like a lot . Councilwoman Hunter asked if the Hanshaw Road , Honness Lane , and Warren Road capital projects were contingent upon the Coddington Road project . Staff confirmed that none of the projects were contingent upon the Coddington Road project. Supervisor Engman added that the Hanshaw Road Reconstruction project was contingent upon the Coddington Road project . The Town would not be expending the money if the project did not occur. The Board discussed the Warren Road Walkway project . Mr. Walker clarified that the $498 , 010 included in the budget was reimbursed by the State except for $ 102 , 000 . He added that the Town also planned to use the Public Works Department staff for the project and that time was already budgeted for. Councilman DePaolo asked if the reimbursed money was guaranteed . Supervisor Engman responded that the Town would not be expending their share unless the Town was guaranteed reimbursement through the contract. Mr. Kanter added that grant funds only dry up if the Town does not follow through time-wise when they are supposed to . Ms . Drake provided the board with the hand -out titled "Summary of Increases over Preceding Year' s Budget" . See attachment #3 Ms . Drake stated that the health insurance for 2009 was budgeted at a 15 % increase and the quote came in at a 15 . 5 % increase . She also received the State Retirement System estimates . She proposed reducing the A- Fund budget by $ 17 , 000 , the B - Fund budget by $9 , 000 , and increasing the DB - Fund for a $ 6 , 500 budget increase based upon the . Retirement System estimates . Page 16 Final Supervisor Engman asked if the Department Heads had any items that they would like to point out in their budgets . There being none , Supervisor Engman turned the discussion over to the Town Board . He asked if the Board would like further information or if they would like to talk about specific issues . Councilman Stein would like a total for increases in the expenditures and a running plot starting in 2002 of personnel expenses ( including fringe benefits ) year by year. Mr. Carvill , responding to Councilman Stein ' s request , stated that the increase in expenses was $ 316 , 683 between the 2008 and 2009 budget . Councilman Stein asked that the information be provided to him as a percentage and in written form . Councilwoman Hunter thought that the Board needed to get a grip on personnel costs . She agreed with Councilman Stein , but did not think that there was anything that they could do this year. Councilwoman Hunter stated that she has trouble with the library and the SPCA. She did not think that it was a good year for the Town to be paying $20 , 000 for the library to be open on Sunday; she did not know how the library spent their money and the Town did not have any auditing capabilities . Councilwoman Hunter talked with a County Legislator about why the library did not have enough money and she was informed it was because the library has a hard time collecting fines . She wondered if fines can be levied to a tax bill and wanted a representative from the library at the next budget meeting to answer that question . Councilman Stein commented that the presentation given by Mr. Carvill is pretty clear—there are only 4 discretionary items that the Town has . He thought the Board should be able to devote a significant amount of time to listen to presentations and ask questions . Councilman DePaolo added that there are many other discretionary items in the budget , but they didn 't rise to the level of $20 , 000 . Supervisor Engman agreed . The items outlined by Mr. Carvill were new items or greatly increased items . Councilman DePaolo followed up on the library discussion and stated that there was probably no single resource that was more valuable to the community than the library, in his opinion . He said that it gives people an opportunity to acquire resources that a lot of people do not normally have . He said that he talked with Janet Steiner about how usage was determined for various communities and it is traced back to library cards and circulation . Councilman DePaolo agreed with Councilwoman Hunter; the Town of Ithaca pays a share through County taxes and is being asked to pay an equal share again . He was more comfortable with proposal 2 , which proportions the expense based upon the municipalities involved . Councilwoman Leary thought of the main library downtown as the Town ' s local library. She kind of agreed with Councilman DePaolo that the funding should be tied more closely with usage . It was not a huge difference in the funding amount, but she thought it made more sense . Councilman DePaolo added that a downside to that was the County already allocated $20 , 000 in their budget and he wasn 't sure if that would cause Page 17 Final any shortfalls in the library' s budget . Councilwoman Leary did not think the City was allocating funding for the library. Councilman Stein asked to defer the discussion until. Ms . Steiner was present to answer questions because he thought the Board would have the same discussion again at that point . i Supervisor Engman explained the reason he put $20 , 000 in the budget was because it was a clean way of funding a certain number of months . The Town could fund four (4 ) months regardless of what other municipalities choose to do . He added that the County already puts a substantial amount into the library. The City contributes approximately $ 17 , 000 to the library budget . The Town has not contributed in the past and Supervisor Engman thought it was a clean proposal to fund 4 months of the year. The Town could also get good credit for it . Councilman Levine , responding to Councilwoman Hunter' s concern about it being a lean year to contribute , stated that he thought of it in the opposite way. He thought that people need the library when they can 't afford to spend a lot of money at the bookstore . Some people only have Sunday as a free day. Councilwoman Hunter wondered why closing the library on another day in order to be open on Sunday was never discussed as an option . She thought exploring more efficient options was important . The Town did not seem to be working with the library to explore options for them to serve the community in the most cost effective manner. Councilwoman Hunter added that the community voted down a special library district because they did not want to be taxed additionally for the library. Supervisor Engman responded that in his studying of the issue , the library has looked at which days they could close . Councilwoman Leary added that the budget request narrative listed Sunday as the second highest use day . Councilwoman Hunter wondered what the worst- use day was . Councilwoman Leary thought that all days were pretty in demand for after school . She added that the library was well prepared this year in their budget request to the Town . They came to the Town early with a concrete plan . She was concerned , though , that other municipalities would forego contributing because the Town started to contribute . Councilman Stein moved that the Board ask T-CAT , the SPCA , and the library to come to the November meeting . Councilman DePaolo thought that the SPCA was a contractual arrangement. Supervisor Engman stated that he needed to explain dog control . The Board should not be calling it SPCA ; it was not a proper way to describe it . It is officially, " Dog Control . " Councilman Goodman asked if the Board was adopting the budget on November 6 th Supervisor Engman responded that the Board can adopt the budget on November 6th or at the regular meeting on November 10th . Councilman Goodman preferred not to have to vote on the final budget the day the Board is hearing presentations . The Board Page 18 Final discussed when to have presentations and decided to have the presentations on November 6th and then the budget could be adopted on November 10th if needed . Supervisor Engman explained that members of TCCOG met with the SPCA about dog control that morning . It was not clear how everything was going to fall out, but there seemed to be a consensus among the dog control providers and the municipalities about how it should work. He explained that what would probably happen is the Town would sign an agreement with the SPCA through June of 2009 . The SPCA would then transfer its dog control responsibilities to Pet Playhouse and including , perhaps , one or two dog control officers , vehicles , and animal catching equipment. The SPCA said that they were going to get out of the dog control business within 3 years anyway. TCCOG thought rather than wait 3 years , why not transfer it as soon as possible . Pet Playhouse is willing to do all this . Supervisor Engman added that he visited Pet Playhouse early in the morning and he parked on the hill overlooking the facility. The dogs were having a blast ; they have a huge fenced in field and the dogs were having a great time running around . He added that Pet Playhouse also has a daycare facility for dogs . Supervisor Engman explained that there is plenty of room for expansion and they have a barn that can be converted to another kennel . The kennel they have is a beautiful kennel and is very well designed . The SPCA has said they will train Pet Playhouse personnel to handle dog control . The bad news—Supervisor Engman explained that other municipalities have agreed to base the formula on human population , which means $3 per person . The SPCA has been subsidizing the municipalities for 6 or 7 years , eating up all its reserves on dog control . The Town has been getting a bargain for dog control for the past several years . Supervisor Engman and Ric Dietrich , Danby Town Supervisor, reviewed the SPCA books and thought $300 , 000 was not enough , but $300 , 000 was agreed upon . The new formula would cost the town $ 54 , 000 in 2009 for dog control . Councilman Stein understood that dog control was not a discretionary item and the Board did not have an alternative . Supervisor Engman agreed . He felt that the SPCA had done a very good job with dog control . Councilman Stein added that Supervisor Engman forgot the good part , being that the Board does not need to think about this because it is essentially an obligation . Supervisor Engman stated that he has spent an enormous amount of time and energy on dog control and he is eager to get it settled so the Town does not have to deal with it for the next several years . Councilman Stein was convinced and did not want to have the SPCA come before the Board for a presentation . The Board agreed with Councilman Stein . Councilwoman Hunter asked Ms . Billings if the dog license fees in the Town were at the statutory limit for what could be charged . Ms . Billings responded that the Town is at the statutory limit for dog fees . Supervisor Engman added that TCCOG has talked about going to the state and asking for an increase in the statutory limit . Page 19 Final TCAT—Supervisor Engman asked if the Board wanted to discuss TCAT . Councilman DePaolo stated that the Town has identified reducing single occupancy vehicle uses and increasing mass transit as priorities , but he wondered why TCAT was not a self- sustaining entity and why they needed municipal subsidies to exist . Supervisor Engman responded that it would be good to have more explanation about how TCAT works . He explained that TCAT has 3 partners--Cornell , City of Ithaca and Tompkins County and they are actually only small contributors to the TCAT budget . The 2009 proposal is for each partner to pay around $ 8007000 each . The rest of the budget is funded by State and Federal subsidies based on ridership and distance traveled . The rural towns earn good chunks of money for TCAT where the Town of Ithaca may have a fair number of riders , but don 't have the distance factor. Supervisor Engman did not feel that there was good data for the Town to figure out what they should or could be paying . He was reluctant to add $ 175 , 000 to the budget as TCAT had requested . Supervisor Engman thought that TCAT was getting all the Federal and State subsidies they could , but it was starting to get very painful for the 3 partners to put up any more money ; yet the Town of Ithaca continues to grow and want more stops . He added that the Town ' s contribution could lead to the Town having a voice with TCAT . Councilman Stein stated that he was a great supporter of the library, but if given a choice between the library and TCAT he thought TCAT was more important to the future than the library. He does not like the nickel and diming of trying to figure out the Town ' s usage . He is a big user of TCAT , but is never counted because he walks to work and takes the bus home and therefore is counted as Cornell . Councilman Stein agreed that the Town should have a voice , but thought that the Town should step up to the plate and contribute . Councilman Levine stated that what he liked about the library contribution was that the Board has a tangible thing that they are telling their taxpayers what they are getting . He wanted to know how the Board would present to its taxpayers what they were getting for $ 50 , 000 . Supervisor Engman thought the Town would have to have a contract with TCAT and the contract would list items the Town would like to have money spent on . Councilman Stein did not think the Town would be helping TCAT if it were to give money for additional services . He thought it was more important to have a seat at the table rather than dictate how the money was spent. Councilwoman Leary answered that for a seat at the table the Town would have to spend a lot more money. She was looking at it as a transitionary time because at some point TCAT would need to address a restructuring of its governance so that it is not just made up of 3 large partners—all or nothing . She saw it as a bridge , a good -faith down payment. Councilwoman Leary added that the Town is serious about decreasing its carbon footprint and there is a lot of demand for bus service on the hills . Ithaca College was talking about installing a swiping mechanism similar to Cornell so that students are charged the fare . Councilwoman Leary expressed concern over the full partners taking Page 20 Final the money out of the pot if the Town puts money in . She would like to see what happens with the budget talks to see how much the Town can or should put in . Councilwoman Hunter asked what the Town could do legally . Supervisor Engman explained that the Town would need to have a contract saying the Town would give money and TCAT would do "x" for the Town . He thought the "x" could be pretty nebulous . Councilman Stein added that the money could be passed through the City without a contract. Supervisor Engman agreed with Councilwoman Leary. If TCAT wanted to involve other entities , then they would need to figure out how to get others involved in the decision making . Councilman Stein thought that the Town ' s interest should be laid out to TCAT . Then TCAT and the Town could figure out how to involve the Town . Mr. Kanter suggested that TCAT and the Town go to Ithaca College and get more participation from Ithaca College in TCAT . It would help with the issue of students walking on the streets. At one point a few years ago Ithaca College did make some effort to subsidize some enhanced service on the campus , but it only lasted a few months . Supervisor Engman added that Mr. Kanter and he had been participating in the transportation and housing initiatives of Cornell . He stated that he was a big critic of Cornell , but he has been very impressed with Cornell on both initiatives . He wanted to get Ithaca College engaged in some way and did meet with President Rochon . He made it clear to Ithaca College that they should be contributing towards fire protection like Cornell does , as well as TCAT . Supervisor Engman asked if the Board would like a presentation from TCAT and they said they would . The Board discussed whether or not they wanted Janet Steiner from the library to come to the November 6th meeting . ( No real conclusion stated . ) Councilwoman Leary was interested in getting more information about TCAD ( Tompkins County Area Development) . Supervisor Engman apologized for not getting the Board the information that was given to him . It was mostly brochures that were hard to copy , but he had the information on his desk if anyone wanted to review it. He was impressed with TCAD because they had done a fair amount of work in the Town , which has resulted in increased revenues for the Town . He also looked at their Board of Directors and there are some superb people on the Board that he has great respect for, which impressed him . It is a group the Town has not engaged before . One of the things the Town has not done is talk about economic development and jobs . He thought it would be a way for the Town to engage with that community in order to start talking more with them . Page 21 Final Councilman DePaolo added that the IDA has provided funding for some projects that he felt was not in-keeping with their mission , which is ostensibly job creation . He would want to make sure that if the Town is going to have some representation with TCAD that the Town make sure that they are held true to their mission . They have circumvented the job creation component in order to make back interest money on bonds and things of that nature . Supervisor Engman stated that 2 or 3 years ago TCAD took affordable housing as one of their top priorities . He was impressed by their recognizing the need of affordable housing as a key issue with businesses and jobs . Councilwoman Hunter thought that the possible $ 1 , 000 contribution from the Town would not make or break TCAD . She stated it was a bigger question the Board needed to ask themselves ; is this an entity the Board wants to continue funding to on an annual basis? Is this something the Board wants to open the door to ? She thought if the Board funded TCAD this year then they would be back following years . Councilman Stein added that even though it is only $ 1 , 000 , he would be interested in learning what TCAD does . Supervisor Engman interjected that there are 4 other towns with membership in TCAD . Councilwoman Hunter asked what benefit the Town would receive by being a member. Supervisor Engman was not sure , but thought that the Board could ask TCAD to make a presentation at the November 6 Councilman DePaolo made the observation that the Sliding Tax Rate given to the Board only starts with the current tax rate and goes up . He thought that the current tax rate should be in the middle , with the Sliding Tax Rate scale showing lower and higher tax rates . Referring to the Large Equipment Line in the Highway Fund , Councilman DePaolo asked if he could have a break down of " large equipment" . Mr. Noteboom explained that the Public Works Department has an equipment replacement program and the equipment is split across many line items . Equipment scheduled for replacement include : a truck , flatbed truck, grasshopper mower, sidewalk plow tractor. Mr. Noteboom offered to give the Board the narrative explanation of the funds , which breaks down all line items the Public Works Department works with . Moving on to Fire Protection , Councilman DePaolo stated that he would like to see more transparency regarding what the Fire Department budget is all about . He wanted to know what the Fire Contract entails and how the money is spent . Supervisor Engman explained that the Town receives a monthly print-out of what has been spent . He offered to provide a copy to Councilman DePaolo . The Board returned to discussion of the Sliding Tax Scale and the impacts of decreasing a tax rate instead of maintaining a tax rate . Page 22 Final Councilwoman Hunter asked about the decrease in fines . Are there less criminals coming before the Town or are the judges being more lenient with fines? Mr. Carvill responded it is a difference in fines given between the previous judge and the new judge . Agenda Item No . 16 - Consider adoption of the Town of Ithaca 2009 Preliminary Budget Councilman Stein moved and Councilwoman Leary seconded the adoption of the 2009 Preliminary Budget . Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried unanimously . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008=205: Adoption of the 2009 Town of Ithaca Tentative Budget as the Town of Ithaca 2009 Preliminary Budget Whereas, the 2009 Town of Ithaca Tentative Budget was filed with the Town Clerk on September 23, 2008 and distributed to the Town Board members for their review, and Whereas, the Town Board reviewed the Tentative Budget at its meeting on October 2, 2008, and Now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts the 2009 Town of Ithaca Tentative Budget as the 2009 Town of Ithaca Preliminary Budget. MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion approved - Unanimous Agenda Item No . 17 - Consider Setting a Public Hearing for Monday, November 6 , 2008 at p . m . to hear public comment regarding the proposed Adoption of the 2009 Town of Ithaca Final Budget Supervisor Engman set the public hearing to 5 : 45 p . m . on November 6 , 2008 . Councilman Levine moved and Councilman Stein seconded the resolution . Supervisor Engman called for a vote - carried unanimously . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-206: Set Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of 2009 Town of Ithaca Final Budget BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York on the 6th day of November 2008 at 5:45 p . m. Page 23 Final for the purpose of considering the 2009 Town of Ithaca Preliminary Budget as the 2009 Town of Ithaca Final Budget, and it is further RESOLVED that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed budget may be heard concerning the same; and it is further RESOLVED that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the City of Ithaca, New York and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town, said publication and posting to occur not less than 5 days before the day designated above for the public hearing. MOVED: Councilman Levine SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion approved - Unanimous Additional Agenda Item - Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund Supervisor Engman directed the Board ' s attention to the resolution before them . He explained that the resolution provides Town of Ithaca Town Board support to the New York State Town Clerks Association in requesting that no other it sweeping or other transferring of money from the dedicated fund be permitted and that a resolution be sent to Governor Paterson and other elected officials . Councilwoman Hunter stated that she wrote a grant for the Town of Caroline that was is She wasn 't sure if that would be a conflict of interest . The Board did not think it was . Councilman Levine moved and Councilman Stein seconded the resolution . Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried unanimously. TS RESOLUTION ' NO. 2008-207: CONSIDER SUPPORTING THE NEW YORK STATE TOWN CLERKS ASSOCIATION'S OBJECTION TO THE LOSS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT FUND WHEREAS, the Local Government Records Management Improvement Fund was established through Chapter 78 of the Laws of 1989 to improve records management and archival administration in New York 's local governments, and WHEREAS, this law provided for a $5 surcharge on every document recorded in the County Clerks Office throughout New York State; and Page 24 Final WHEREAS, the revenues collected were dedicated to fund competitive records management grants administered by the State Archives; and WHEREAS, this grant program has had tremendous positive impacts in counties, towns, cities, school districts and special districts throughout NYS awarding $ 168 million to 8500 local governments since its inception; and WHEREAS, in March, 2008, a little known provision of the State Budget allowed $500, 000 of these dedicated funds to be "swept" into the State 's general fund; and WHEREAS, an additional 6% of "unexpended" funds has now been reduced from grants awarded from this dedicated fund; WHEREAS, the NYS Town Clerks Association is asking the State Legislature to recognize that these funds are local funds raised by local clerks for local government and dedicated by the Senate and Assembly for a specific valuable purpose; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca recognizes the valuable contributions of this fund to our own records management program where we have received over $30, 000 in grant funding over the years and most recently we were able to successfully apply for and receive $ 7, 180 in the 2006- 2007 cycle to fund -a project entitled, Educational Uses of Local Government Records, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca joins with the NYS Town Clerks Association in requesting that no further "sweeping " or other transferring of money from this valuable dedicated fund be permitted, and be it further RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to Governor Paterson, the Speaker of the NYS Assembly and Majority Leader of the NYS Senate, and our local representatives in the Senate and Assembly, Senator George Winner and Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton along with the Education Committee Chair for the Senate and Assembly. MOVED: Councilman Levine SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE. Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye Councilman DePao/o, aye. Motion approved — Unanimous Page 25 Final Agenda Item No . 17 - Consent Agenda : Town Abstract Councilman Stein moved and Councilwoman Hunter seconded consent agenda . Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-208: ConsentAgenda Items BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and/or adopts the resolutions for Consent Agenda Items: a . Town of Ithaca Abstract MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilwoman Hunter VOTE., Supervisor. Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, abstain . Motion approved TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-208a : Town of Ithaca Abstract WHEREAS, the following numbered vouchers have been presented to the Ithaca Town Board for approval of payment; and WHEREAS, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now therefore be it RESOLVED; that the Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers in total for the amounts indicated. VOUCHER NOS. 5830- 5945 General Fund Town wide $88, 911 , 50 General Fund Part Town $ 7, 898. 29 Highway Fund Part Town $ 140, 627. 24 Water Fund I $303, 452. 16 Sewer Fund $ 7, 332. 62 Trumansburg Rd. Water Main Impr $5, 972. 39 Fire Protection Fund $ 186, 121 . 74 Forest Home Lighting District $ 163. 24 Glenside Lighting District $63. 61 Renwick Heights Lighting District $88. 63 Eastwood Commons Lighting District $ 181 . 48 Clover Lane Lighting District $21 . 85 Page 26 Final Winner's Circle Lighting District $63. 21 Burleigh Drive Lighting District $ 74. 40 Westhaven Road Lighting District $241 . 53 Coddington Road Lighting District $ 143. 05 TOTAL $ 741 , 356. 94 MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilwoman Hunter VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, abstain . Motion approved Adiournment Upon motion of Councilman Goodman and Councilwoman Leary, Supervisor Engman adjourned the meeting at 8 : 44 p . m . Respectfully Submitted , Karen M . Billings Town Clerk Page 27 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL TOWNWIDE FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 59054,031 .00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (3 ,601 ,695.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 194527336.00 LESS : CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES ( 1 ,255,426.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ 1969910.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 5 .47% SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : TOMPKINS CONSOLIDATED AREA TRANSIT $ 509000.00 TOMPKINS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 209000.00 TOMPKINS COUNTY SPCA 309000.00 TOMPKINS COUNTY AREA DEVELOPMENT 19000500 EMPLOYEE WAGES & SALARIES 829056.00 EMPLOYEE FRINGES 24,070.00 NET INCREASES AND DECREASES = OTHER ( 109216.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ 196 ,910.00 Page 1 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL TOWNWIDE FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 590549031 .00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (396109189.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 1 ,443,842.00 LESS : NET BOND BORROWING ( 19080, 110.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 3639732 .00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 10908% SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : TAX LEVY $ 3129134.00 TAXES IN LIEU OF 195350.00 SALES TAX 1405498.00 CLERK FEES & OTHER FEE INCOME 165800.00 RENTAL INCOME 19500.00 DOG LICENSE APPORTIONMENT 39500.00 TOWN COURT FINES and FEES (509000.00) MORTGAGE TAX (709000.00) PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE GRANT (109020.00) INTERFUND TRANSFERS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED 109350.00 USE OF FUNDS BALANCE (10,380.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 363973100 Page 2 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL PART TOWN FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 15058,611 .00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (952,006.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 1069605.00 NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ 106,605.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 11 .20% SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : ZONING & CODE ENFORCEMENT $ 413230.00 AGRICULTURAL & FARMLAND PROTECTION PLAN 259000.00 EMPLOYEE WAGES & SALARIES 569350.00 EMPLOYEE FRINGES 237600.00 NET INCREASES AND DECREASES - OTHER (39,575.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ 106 ,605.00 Page 3 of 12 r r TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL PART TOWN FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 190589611 .00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (9527006.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 1069605.00 NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 106 ,605.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 11 .20% SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : SALES TAX $ 84998300 ZONING FEES 25500.00 BUILDING PERMITS 269000.00 PLANNING FEES 59000.00 AGRICULTURAL & FARMLAND PROTECTION PLAN 25,000.00 USE OF FUNDS BALANCE (369878.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 106,605 .00 Page 4 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL PART TOWN HIGHWAY FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 292187149.00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (19978,359.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 2399790.00 LESS : CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (200,000.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ 399790.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 2.01 % SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : GENERAL ROAD REPAIRS $ 149500.00 PERMANENT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 119100800 HIGHWAY EQUIPMENT 22,200.00 HIGHWAY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 69150.00 BRUSH & WEED SERVICES 620.00 SNOW REMOVAL 209500.00 EMPLOYEE WAGES & SALARIES 769032 .00 EMPLOYEE FRINGES 319400.00 CAPITAL PROJECTS (143,000.00) INTERFUND CHARGES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 288.00 TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ 39,790.00 Page 5 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 GENERAL PART TOWN HIGHWAY FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 212189149 .00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (159789359.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 239,790.00 NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 2399790.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 12 . 12% SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : SALES TAX $ (94,531 .00) INTEREST INCOME (59000900) SALE OF EQUIPMENT 99000600 CULVERT FEES 1 ,000.00 STATE AID - CHIPS 13 ,000.00 BOND BORROWING 2009000.00 USE OF FUNDS BALANCE 1169321 .00 TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 2399790900 Page 6 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 WATER FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 497259060.00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (3 ,9749063.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 7509997 .00 LESS : CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES (7509000.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ 997 .00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 0.03% SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 79476.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE 29000.00 EQUIPMENT 39700.00 LINE MAINTENANCE & OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 88,955 .00 CHARGE FOR WATER SUPPLY FROM BOLTON PT PLANT (115057 .00) EMPLOYEE WAGES & SALARIES (149960.00) EMPLOYEE FRINGES (59000000) INTERFUND CHARGES FOR BONDS & ADMINISTRATIVE SRVCS (709117.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ 997.00 Page 7 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 WATER FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 457255060.00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (399749063.00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 7509997.00 LESS : NET BOND BORROWING (750,000.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 997.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2 O 008 0,03% SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS $ (69924.00) INTEREST INCOME ;3DD. UNUSED APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE 59621 .00 TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 997.00 i �C, Page 8 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 SEWER FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 251839759.00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (251979215 .00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ (139456 .00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ (139456.00) PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 =0.61 % SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $ 71476.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE (29000,00) EQUIPMENT 39700.00 LINE MAINTENANCE & OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (940.00) CHARGE FOR SEWER DISPOSAL = CITY OF ITHACA 1949220.00 EMPLOYEE WAGES & SALARIES (79420.00) EMPLOYEE FRINGES (49250.00) INTERFUND CHARGES FOR BONDS & ADMINISTRATIVE SRVCS 90 242.00 CAPITAL PROJECTS (1145000.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ ( 13 ,456.00) v Page 9 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 SEWER FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 29183,759.00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (291979215 .00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ ( 139456 .00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ ( 139456.00) PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 -0.61 % SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS $ (19244.00) INTERGOVERNMENT CHARGES 284.00 UNUSED APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE (129496 .00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ (13,456.00) Y - Page 10 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED EXPENSES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 FIRE PROTECTION FUND BUDGETED EXPENSES 2009 $ 39254,718.00 BUDGETED EXPENSES 2008 (39268,881 .00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ ( 147163.00) NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSES $ ( 149163.00) PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 -0.43% SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : AUDITORS $ 400.00 LEGAL SERVICES - CONTRACT REVIEW 19000.00 DISTRIBUTION OF 2% MONIES (762.00) FIRE CONTRACT - CITY OF ITHACA (205081 .00) FIRE CONTRACT - VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS 55280.00 TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED EXPENSES $ (14, 16300) Page 11 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF NET INCREASES and DECREASES IN BUDGETED RESOURCES BETWEEN 2008 and 2009 FIRE PROTECTION FUND BUDGETED RESOURCES 2009 $ 3 ,6575034.00 BUDGETED RESOURCES 2008 (390875006 .00) NET INCREASE IN EXPENSES FOR 2009 $ 570,028.00 NET INCREASE IN BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 5709028.00 PECENT OF NET INCREASE OVER 2008 18.47% SUMMARY OF NET RESOURCES IMPACTING 2009 BUDGET : TAX LEVY $ 5859770.00 2% FOREIGN FIRE INSURANCE DISTRIBUTION (74200) INTEREST INCOME (159000.00) TOTAL NET INCREASE IN 2009 BUDGETED RESOURCES $ 5709028.00 Page 12 of 12 TOWN OF ITHACA SUMMARY OF ALL PRINCIPAL DEBT OUTSTANDING AS OF DECEMBER 31 , 2008 BONDS ISSUED PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING 12/31 /2008 ISSUES 1991 Public Imp SERIAL - Water & Sewer Infrastructure $ 750 ,000. 00 2003 Public Imp SERIAL - Public Worls Facility 711 ,000 .00 2004 Bostwick Rd Wtr Tank & Transmission Main SERIAL - Water Infrastructure 736, 000 . 00 2004 Public Improvement SERIAL - Water Infrastructure 19600, 000 . 00 2004 Phase II Sth Hill Wtr Main Transmission SERIAL - Water Infrastructure 4009000 . 00 2006 - Public Imp SERIAL - Public Works Facility 6407000. 00 2008 Trumansburg Road Water Main Imp BAN - 100% - $524 , 000 510, 900 .00 2008 Hanshaw Road Water Main Imp BAN - 100% - $693 , 000 675 , 675 . 00 .-b TOTAL $ 65023,575.00 GENERAL TOWNWIDE FUND OBLIGATIONS 2003 Public Imp SERIAL - Public Worls Facility - 100% $ 7117000 .00 2006 - Public Imp SERIAL - Public Works Facility - 100% 6409000 .00 1 , 351 ,000 .00 WATER FUND OBLIGATIONS 1991 Public Imp SERIAL - 52% $ 3909000. 00 2004 Bostwick Rd Water Tank & Transmission Main SERIAL - 100% 7367000. 00 2004 Public Improvement SERIAL - 100% 19600 , 000. 00 2004 Phase II South Hill Water Transmission Imp SERIAL - 100% 4007000 . 00 2007 Trumansburg Road Water Main Imp BAN - 100% - I YR RENEWAL 5109900 . 00 2007 Hanshaw Road Water Main Imp BAN - 100% - 1 YR RENEWAL 675 ,675 .00 ; TOTAL - - — $ 4 , 312 , 575 . 00 SEWER FUND OBLIGATIONS 1991 Public Imp SERIAL - 48% $ 360 ,000. 00 TOTAL $ 3605000. 00 TOTAL DEBT OUTSTANDING @ 12131 /08 $ . 690239575.00 INCREASED DEBT BY 2009 CAPITAL PROJECT BORROWING 6 ,023 ,575.00 r BOND BORROWING IN 2009 : GENEAL TOWNWIDE FUND HANSHAW ROAD WALKWAY 163 , 316 . 00 HONNESS LANE WALKWAY EXTENSIO 120 ,000 . 00 WARREN ROAD WALKWAY .5ak ,}-" 1, <,� w 498 ,010. 00 E KING RD/HALLBERG PARK & CHASE PD TRAIL 100 ,000. 00 PART TOWN HIGHWAY FUND FOREST HOME DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION 200 ,000 . 00 FOREST HOME DRIVE UPSTREAM BRIDGE 1029500. 00 FOREST HOME DRIVE TRAFFIC CALMING 2367600 . 00 WATER FUND EAST SHORE DRIVE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT 21000 ,000. 00 HUNGERFORD HILL PUMP STATION 2507000. 00 TOTAL NEW DEBT IN 2009 $ 396709426.00 TOTAL DEBT OUTSTANDING AT 12/31 /09 $ 996949001 .00 TOWN OF ITHACA CONSTITUTIONAL DEBT LIMIT the following was prepared , pursuant to Tile 8, Article II of the Local Finance Law DEBT LIMIT Taxable Real Property: 12/31 /2004 $ 835 , 297 , 966 12/31 /2005 937, 0225814 12/31 /2006 110199584 , 844 12/31 /2007 1 , 040 ,091 , 254 12/31 /2008 11054 , 7302990 Total for 2004 - 2008 $ 478869727 , 868 Average Five (5) Year Full Valuation $ 9777345 , 574 Permitted Percentage of the "Average Full Valuation " 7% Town of Ithaca Constitutional Debt Limit $ 6894149190 $68 , 414 , 190 represents the maximum amount of gross or net debt that the Town of Ithaca can issue and have outstanding allowable under the NYS Constitution , Article VIII , Section 2 . TOTAL NET INDEBTEDNESS OF THE TOWN Principal Borrowings Outstanding @ 12/31 /09 $ 916949001 Total Inclusion $ 91694 ,001 Less total exclusion : Water & Sewer Indebtedness (69922 , 575) Total Net Indebtedness of the Town of Ithaca $ 297719426 NET-CONTRACTING MARGIN Constitutional Debt Limit $ 68 , 4142190 Less : Total Net Indebtedness (21771 , 426) Net Debt=Contracting Margin $ 65,642 ,764 PERCENTAGE OF DEBT=CONTRACTING POWER EXHAUSTED " Total Net Indebtednes " divided by " Debt Limit: 4.05% Page 1 TOWN OF ITHACA TAX TABLE ILLUSTRATING THE TAX INCREASE DUE TO INCREASED PROPERTY VALUATION FROM 85% VALUATION TO 100% REAL PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUATIONS 2009 $ 1 ,240,258,761 REAL PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUATIONS 2008 (190549464,951 ) INCREASE ASSESSED VALUATION $ 185,793,810 TAX RATE FOR 2009 / $1000 ASSESSED VALUATION (NO CHANGE IN THE TAX RATE FROM 2008) $1 .68 TOTAL INCREASE IN THE 2009 TAX LEVY $ 312,134 LEVY INCREASE / $1000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION $ 0.001680 HOW DOES THE INCREASE IN ASSESSED VALUATION INCREASE THE TAXPAYERS 2009 TAX BILL? ASSESSED TAX RATE TAX PERCENT ASSESSED TAX RATE TAX NET VALUATION /EACH $1000 REVENUE ASSESSED VALUATION /EACH $1000 REVENUE TAX INCREASE TO AT 85% MKT OF ASSESSED RAISED VALUATION AT 100% MKT OF ASSESSED RAISED THE TAXPAYER -W= - VALUATION INCREASE VALUATION 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 $ 10,000.00 $1 .68 $ 16.80 17.6% $ 11 ,760.00 $1 .68 $ 19.76 $ 2.96 $ 15,000.00 $1 .68 $ 25.20 17.6% $ 17,640.00 $1 .68 $ 29.64 $ 4.44 $ 209000.00 $1 .68 $ 33.60 17.6% $ 239520.00 $1 .68 $ 39.51 $ 5.91 $ 25,000.00 $1 .68 $ 42.00 17.6% $ 299400.00 $1 .68 $ 49.39 $ 7.39 $ 30,000.00 $1 .68 $ 50.40 17.6% $ 359280.00 $1 .68 $ 59.27 $ 8.87 $ 359000.00 $1 .68 $ 58.80 17.6% $ 419160.00 $1 .68 $ 69.15 $ 10.35 $ 409000.00 $1 .68 $ 67.20 17.6% $ 479040.00 $1 .68 $ 79.03 $ 11 .83 $ 459000.00 $1 .68 $ 75.60 17.6% $ 529920.00 $1 .68 $ 88.91 $ 13.31 $ 509000.00 $1 .68 $ 84.00 17.6% $ 589800.00 $1 .68 $ 98.78 $ 14.78 $ 559000.00 $1 .68 $ 92.40 17.6% $ 649680.00 $1 .68 $ 108.66 $ 16.26 $ 65,000.00 $1 .68 $ 109.20 17.6% $ 76,440.00 $1 .68 $ 128.42 $ 19.22 $ 705000.00 $1 .68 $ 117.60 17.6% $ 822320.00 $1 .68 $ 138.30 $ 20.70 $ 75,000.00 $1 .68 $ 126.00 17.6% $ 88,200.00 $1 .68 $ 148.18 $ 22.18 $ 80,000.00 $1 .68 $ 134.40 17.6% $ 94,080.00 $1 .68 $ 158.05 $ 23.65 $ 859000.00 $1 .68 $ 142.80 17.6% $ 99,960.00 $1 .68 $ 167.93 $ 25. 13 $ 909000.00 $1 .68 $ 151 .20 17.6% $ 105,840.00 $1 .68 $ 177.81 $ 26.61 $ 95,000.00 $1 .68 $ 159.60 17.6% $ 1119720.00 $1 .68 $ 187.69 $ 28.09 $ 100,000.00 $1 .68 $ 168.00 17.6% $ 1179600.00 $1 .68 $ 197.57 $ 29.57 $ 200,000.00 $1 .68 $ 336.00 17.6% $ 2359200.00 $1 .68 $ 395. 14 $ 59.14 AsSUMMARY OF INCREASES OVER PING YEAR 'S BUDGET. at 4. 5% 2009 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2009 Budget #'s 9/24/2008 of Fund I 1 1 LONG I I I I I I I for Salary I I SOCIAL I STATE I TERM I 1 HEALTH I WORKERS I I I I Funds T tal & FUND 1 SALARIES I SECURITY 1 DBL 1 DBL 1 LIFE INS I INS. 1 COMP. I UNEMPLOY I NYS&LR I Flex Plan I TOTAL Appropr tions Benefits I 1 I I I I I I I A 20091 11475,0201 113,5001 110001 8 ,5001 3, 1001 320,0001 25,0001 415001 125 ,0001 1 ,0001 290769620 5,054, 031 41 .1 % 20081 1 ,392 ,9641 107,000 1 1 ,000 1 81500 1 3, 1001 290,0001 27,000 , 511001 135 ,0001 8301 19970,494 DIFF. ' 82 ,0561 6 ,5001 1 1 - ' 3090001 (2,000) 1 (600) 1 ( 10,000) 1 1701 1069126 % Incr. 1 5.9% 3). 1 %1 0.0%1 0.0%1 0.0% 1 10.3% -7.4% - 11 .8% -7.4%1 20.5% 1 5.4% I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 B 20091 629, 100 1 485400 1 3501 3,600 1 11300 1183000 1 61000 5001 46 ,000 1 3501 853, 600 110585611 80.6% 20081 572 ,750 1 44,000 1 350 1 3,500 1 1 ,300 1 98 ,500 1 6,400 1 500 1 46 ,000 1 350 1 773,650 DIFF. 1 56,3501 4,4001 - 1 1001 - 1 19 ,5001 (400) 1 1 - I - 1 799950 % Incr. 1 9.8% 1 10.0%1 0.0%1 2 .9% 1 0.0% 1 19.8% 1 -6.3% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%I 0.0% 1 10.3% DB 20091 812,7801 62 ,5001 5001 411001 117001 215 ,0001 6030001 15,5001 52 ,5001 3001 11224,880 21218, 149 55.2% 20081 736,748 1 56 ,500 1 5001 318001 116001 180,000 1 641000 1 15,0001 5%000 1 3001 1 , 117,448 DIFF. 1 76,0321 610001 1 3001 1001 35,0001 (4,000) 1 5001 (6,500) 1 - 1 107,432 % Incr. 1 10.3% 1 10.6% 1 0.0% 1 7.9% 1 6.3% 1 19.4% 1 -6.3%1 3.3%1 - 11 .0%1 0.0% 1 9.6% F 20091 171 ,2801 13,3001 1501 1 ,0001 3501 45,0001 13,0001 2 ,0001 14,5001 1001 260,680 4,725,060 5.5% 20081 186,2401 14,5001 150 I 1 , 1001 3501 45,0001 13,0001 2 ,200 1 18,0001 100 I 280, 640 DIFF. ' ( 141960) ( 1 )200) 1 ' ( 100) 1 - I - 1 1 (200) 1 (39500) 1 - ' (19,960) % Incr. -8.0% -8. 3% 0.0% -9. 1 %1 0.0%1 0 .0% 1 0.0% -9. 1 % 1 19.4% 0.0% -7.1 % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 G 20091 785240 61100 701 600 1501 17,000 9 ,000 11000 81500 100 1205760 2 , 1835759 5.5% 20081 85 ,660 1 6,600 1 70 1 650 1 150 1 19,000 I 9,000 1 1 ,200 1 10,000 1 100 1 132 ,430 DIFF. 1 (7,420) 1 (500) 1 - 1 (50) 1 - 1 (21000) 1 1 (200) 1 ( 19500) 1 1 (119670) % Incr. ) -8.7% 1 -7 .6% 1 0.0% 1 -7.7%1 0.0% 1 - 10 .5% 1 0.0% 1 - 16.7% 1 - 15.0%1 0.0% 1 -8.8% TOTAL 20091 311665420 ) 2432800 21070 17,800 6,6001 715,000 1 1132000 23,500 246,500 11850 1 41536,540 15,239,610 29.8% 20081 21974,362 1 228,600 1 2 ,070 1 173550 1 615001 6323500 1 119,4001 24,000 1 268,0001 116801 41274 ,662 DIFF. 1 192 ,0581 15,2001 1 2501 1001 82 ,5001 (67400) 1 (500) 1 (211500) 1 1701 2619878 % Incr. 1 6.5%1 6 .6% 1 0.0% 1 1 .4% I 1 .5%1 13.0%1 -5.4%1 -2. 1 %1 -8 .0% 1 10. 1 % 1 6.1 % % of salaries & I I I 1 1 I I I I I benefits 1 69 . 80% 1 5. 37% 1 0 .05% 1 0.39% 1 0 . 15% 1 15. 76% 1 2 .49% 1 0 .52% 1 5.43% 1 0 .04% 100. 00% % of Total Town of budget expenses is for Approp: 20.78% 1 . 60% 0.01 % 1 0. 12% 0.04% 4.690/6 0.74% 0. 15% 1 .62% 0. 01 % 1 29 . 77% salary & benefits Fringe rate = 43.27% Salary total X % = fringe costs TOWN OF ITHACA 2009 BUDGET DRAFT 818/2008 104.5% 75 hours x 26 "80 hours x 01 /01 /09 pays => 1950 26 pays => 2008 Hourly 2009 hourly tN.CLASSED PLOYEE TITLE Date of Hire Yrs Svc wage 2008 SALARY wage N OF ITHACA 2009 BUDGET 8/8/2008 TB Res: 2008- EMPLOYEES DRAFT Approved %: 104.5% EMPLOYEE 2008 BUDGET 2009 Budget % increase Town Justices (Paid bi weekly) Salk, James $ 15, 934. 86 S 16. 651 . 93 4. 50% Klein , David $ 15 ,934. 86 S 16 ,651 . 93 4.50% Town Board Per member for year $ 81335.20 $ 8 . 710. 28 4. 50% Elected Officials (6 members Paid 4x year) $ 509011 . 20 $ 52,261 .70 Town Supervisor/Fiscal Officer (bgt= 40%) $ 189387.01 S 197214 . 43 4.50% $ 48,036. 06 Administrator function for Town (bgt = 60%) $ 279580. 51 S 28 .821 . 63 4.50% combined Deputy Town Supervisor $ - S 0.00% Receiver of Taxes 0 $ 6, 015 .78 S 6, 286. 49 4.50% Planning Board Members Per Meet'n $ 75 .51 S 78 . 91 4.50% Per meeting x 24 meetin sx 7 members+ 1 alt $ 14,497. 92 $ 15 , 150 . 33 Per Meeting: $ 81 .82 S 85. 50 4. 50% P ing Chairman (24meetings) $ 12963.68 $ 23052 .05 Board Members Per Meeting: $ 75.51 S 78. 91 4.50% Per meeting x 12 meetings x 5 members & 2 Alt. $ 61342 . 84 $ 67628. 27 Total Non-Classified: $ 156, 668. 66 $ 163,718.75 4.50% $ 1569667.39 Actual 2008 Budget per 2009 Budget/ by person not account person Difference % CHANGE Non-Classified (electe $ 156,667.39 $ 163,718 .75 $ 71051 .36 4.50% Personnel w/long . $ 29698 , 194.73 $ 29876, 901 .85 $ 178,707. 12 6.62% includes longevity TOTAL $ 2,8541862. 12 $ 31040,620. 60 $ 185,758.48 6.51 $ 21 , 099.40 people vs. budget Adopted Budget 5 . 59% = 5 YR AVG (2004 -2008) Salary Budgets for for . 100 & . 101 & . 103 & . 110 % bdgt increase $ Increase 2009 $ 31061 ,720. 00 6.45% $ 185,558.00 Dir CO, Mgmt salary at 40 hrs/wk 2008 $ 21876, 162.00 6. 97% $ 187,372.00 +pinr + code enf+ 2 seas labor+2 2007 $ 21688 ,790.00 3. 16% $ 82,320.00 -Dir B/Z+ pinr (p/t to f/t) + temp pinr 3 mths 2006 $ 2,6061470. 00 3. 16% $ 79, 925 .00 +Plnr(temp-f/t)-Dir B/Z 11mths 2005 $ 21526,545.00 6.42% $ 152,345.00 +Code Enfc+Labr+2 seasl labr+eng intn 2004 $ 21374,200.00 8.23% $ 180,580. 00 27 paychecks+Rec Cord -Sr Typ 2003 $ 21193,620. 00 7. 12% $ 145,770.00 =Admin asst 40 hrs/ prin acct 37.5 2002 $ 2 ,047,850.00 16.37% $ 288,040.63 +pd RecTax + 4 seasonal labors+ Plan int, 7/1 /2001 $ 68 ,556.23 °7/01 reciass +Sr Eng tech & N 2001 $ 1 ,691 ,253. 14 6. 75% $ 1069947.56 +pd Dept TS + 1 HEO 2000 $ 11584,305 . 58 3.96% $ 60,318.62 1999 $ 11523,986. 96 7. 50% $ 106,345.56 3/99 Restructed Hwy work crews/ night sh 1998 $ 11417,641 .40 6.78% $ 90,053.40 +Ntwk/RecSpec 1997 $ 11327,588.00 7,57% $ 93,461 .00 1996 $ 112343127.00 5.81 % $ 67,728.00 9/24/2008 2009 4.5% Tent Bdgt2009 Budget wages Prepared by Judy Drake TOWN 0 2009 BUDGET DRAFT 8/8/ 104.5% TB Res: 2008- 75 hours x 26 *80 hours x 01/01 /09 pays => 1950 26 pays => 2080 $.Raise increase:in 2008°Hourly 2009-hourly 2009 Gross for 26 actual Gross 11 /09 EMPLOYEE TITLE Date of-Hire Yr6 Svc: ,. wage. 2008,SALARY wage biwkly pays. Wages % increase Longevity S Walker, Daniel* Director of Engineering 04/09/90 18.75 $ 41.61 $ 86,548.80 $ 43.48 $ 90.438.40 $ 31889.60 4.49% $ 750.00 Kanter, Jonathan* Director of Planning 05/31 /94 14.60 S 41.61 $ 86.548.80 S 43.48 $ 90,438.40 $ 31889.60 4.49% $ 550.00 Noteboom, Fred* Highway Superintendent 06/27/88 20.53 $ 41.61 $ 86,548.80 S 43.48 $ 90,438.40 $ 3,889.60 4.49% $ 850.00 Bates, Bruce* Director of Code Enforcement 09/02/08 03 $ 35.00 $ 72,800.00 T°KT�37�4uZF $ 772937.60 $ 51137.60 hired at bdgt at 22. 74 $ 473299.20 $ 25.500.80 53.91 % R $ 74,295.00 $ 41446.00 6.37% Carvill, Alfred* Budget Officer 12/05/96 12.08 $ 35.82 $ 69,849.00 $ 38. 10 $ 79,248.00 $ 4,953.00 6.67% $ 450.00 Q $ 68, 140.80 $ 33057.60 4.49% Drake, Judith * Human Resources Manager 12/04/96 12.08 $ 32. 76 $ 63,882.00 $ 34.23 $ 71 , 198.40 $ 4 .258.80 6.67% $ 450.00 Billings, Karen* Town Clerk 09/17/07 1 .29 $$ 03 54- $ 61 ,444.50 $� 3348J $ 692638.40 $ 4,352.40 6.67% $ 65,286.00 $ 33841 .50 O P Carrier-Titti, Lisa Network/Records Specialist 09/14/98 10.31 $ 27.83 $ 54,268.50 $ 29.08 $ 56,706.00 $ 21437.50 4.49% $ 350.00 Ritter, Susan Assistant Director of Planning 01 /12/98 10.98 $ 27.83 $ 54,268.50 $ 29.08 $ 563706.00 $ 2,437. 50 4.49% $ 350.00 Rice, Kristie Sr. Code Enforcement Officer 06/15/98 10.56 $ 27.83 $ 542268.50 $ 29.08 $ 56,706.00 $ 22437.50 4.49% $ 350.00 Hebdon, Creig* Assistant Director of Engineering 09/14/98 10.31 $ 27.83 $ 57,886.40 $ 29.08 $ 609486.40 $ 27600.00 4.49% $ 350.00 Redman, Eugene * Deputy Highway Superintendent 05/30/84 24.61 $ 27.83 $ 57,886.40 $ 29.08 $ 60,486.40 $ 23600.00 4.49% $ 1 ,050.00 Schoch, Richard* Parks Maintenance Manager 06/08/82 26.59 $ 27.83 $ 57,886.40 $ 29.08 $ 60,486.40 $ 2,600.00 4.49% $ 11150.00 Sincebaugh, Wayne* Water/Sewer Mntc Supervisor 11 /26/90 18. 11 $ 27.83 $ 57,886.40 $ 29.08 $ 60,486.40 $ 2,600.00 4.49% $ 750.00 O Smith , Michael Environmental Planner 06/07/99 9.58 $ 25.25 $ 492237.50 $ 26.39 $ 51 ,460.50 $ 23223.00 4.51 % $ 300.00 N Balestra, Christine Planner 01 /29/01 7.93 $ 23.99 $ 46,780.50 $ 25.07 $ 48,886.50 $ 22106.00 4.50% Kiley, Darby Planner '07 1 /2 yr '08= f/t for 2 yr 3/3/2008 0.83 w$ 227" '4 $ 44,343.0024'32 $ 47,424.00 $ 3,081 .006 95% Williams, Steve* Code Enforcement Officer 07/26/04 4.44 $ 23.99 $ 49,899.20 $ 25.07 $ 522145.60 $ 22246.40 4.50% Taylor, Kristin* Civil Engineer 03/20/06 2.79 � z$ :7! -2 7 $ 49,379.20 4 507 ' $ 52145.60 $ 2,766.40 %' Ballard, Craig* Senior Engineering Technician 02/19/98 10.87 $ 23.99 $ 492899.20 $ 25.07 $ 52, 145.60 $ 22246.40 4.50% $ 350.00 Williams, John Heavy Equipment Mechanic 07/11 /94 14.49 $ 23.99 $ 49,899.20 $ 25.07 $ 52, 145.60 $ 2,246.40 4.50% $ 550.00 Hulbert, Jeffrey* Working Supervisor 04/18/95 13.72 $ 23.99 $ 493899.20 $ 25.07 $ 523145.60 $ 21246.40 4.50% $ 500.00 Tenkate, Donald * Working Supervisor 07/07/86 22.50 $ 23.99 $ 49,899.20 $ 25.07 $ 522145.60 $ 2,246.40 4.50% $ 950.00 Tenkate, Richard * Working Supervisor 07/06/93 15.50 $ 23.99 $ 493899.20 $ 25.07 $ 52, 145.60 $ 21246.40 4.50% $ 600.00 M Clark, Connie Principal Account Clerk 09/24/01 7.28 $ 23. 14 $ 452123.00 $ 24. 18 $ 47, 151 .00 $ 21028.00 4.49% Kelley, Deborah Bookkeeper to the Supervisor 03/18/96 12.80 $ 23. 14 $ 45, 123.00 $ 24. 18 $ 473151 .00 $ 23028.00 4.49% $ 450.00 Whitmore, Carrie First Deputy Town Clerk 05/04/98 10.67 $ 23. 14 $ 45, 123.00 $ 24. 18 $ 471151 .00 $ 21028.00 4.49% $ 350.00 Poole, Betty Court Clerk (salary @ 37.5 hrs) 07/24/89 19.45 $ 23. 14 $ 45, 123.00 $ 24. 18 $ 47, 151 .00 $ 22028.00 4.49% $ 800.00 Fetherbay, Linda Court Clerk (salary @ 37.5 hrs) 10/03/05 3.25 $ 23. 14 $ 45, 123.00 $ 24. 18 $ 473151 .00 $ 25028.00 4.49% Kroll, Gail* Administrative Assistant 01 /25/93 15.95 $ 23. 14 $ 489131 .20 $ 24. 18 $ 502294.40 $ 2, 163.20 4.49% $ 600.00 L Slater, Joseph* Engineering Technician 1 08/20/01 7.37 $ 22.27 $ 46,321 .60 $ 23.27 $ 48,401 .60 $ 2,080.00 4.49% Manning, Raymond* Heavy Equipment Operator 07/07/86 22.50 $ 22.27 $ 46,321 .60 $ 23.27 $ 48,401 .60 $ 23080.00 4.49% $ 950.00 Salmi, Larry* Heavy Equipment Operator 06/24/85 23.54 $ 22.27 $ $ 23.27 $ 48,401 .60 $ 27080.00 4.49% $ 1100 Dean , Jeffrey* �quipment Operator 12/20/93 15.04 $ 22.27 $ $ 23.27 $ 483401 .60 $ 21080.00 4.49% $ 6 20094.5% udgetwages areuareaWJuwDrake 0124/2008 TOWN- OFft2009 BUDGET DRAFT 8/a/ 104.5% TB Res: 2008- 75 hours x 26 *80 hours x 01/01 /09 pays => 1950 26 pays => 2080 $ Raise increaswin 2008 Hourly 2009 hourly 2009 Gross for 26 actual Gross 11 /09 EMPLOYEE TITLE Date of Hire Yrs Svc - wage 2008 SALARY wage biwkly pays Wages % increase Longevity Shepardson, John* Heavy Equipment Operator 04/08/96 12.74 $ 22.27 $ 46,321 .60 $ 23.27 $ 48,401 .60 $ 2,080.00 4.49% $ 450.00 Hulbert, Joseph* Maintenance Worker 06/25/01 7.53 $ 22.27 $ 46,321 .60 $ 23.27 $ 48,401 .60 $ 25080.00 4.49% K _ $ 39,019.50 $ 7,803.90 25.00% Neilsen, Paulette Deputy Town Clerk 08/14/06 2.39 $ �w��01:i $ 31 ,215.60 �[$y«, 21 .1 j_. $ 41 ,281 .50 $ 2,262.00 :5:48% Holford, Dani SeniorTypist -Code/Zoning 10/09/89 19.24 $ 20.26 $ 39,507.00 $ 21 . 17 $ 413281 .50 $ 12774.50 4.49% $ 800.00 Polce, Sandra SeniorTypist - Planning 04/12/99 9.73 $ 20.26 $ 39,507.00 $ 2117 $ 41 ,281 .50 $ 11774.50 4.49% $ 300.00 Kirchgessner, Marnie Recreation and Youth Coord. 05/03/04 4.67 $ 20.26 $ 39,507.00 $ 21 . 17 $ 41 ,281 .50 $ 11774.50 4.49% Boyes, David* Motor Equipment Operator 07/01 /96 12.51 $ 20.26 $ 42, 140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 1 ,892.80 4.49% $ 450.00 Griffin, Eric* Motor Equipment Operator 07/29/96 12.44 $ 20.26 $ 42, 140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 1 ,892.80 4.49% $ 450.00 Mouillesseaux, Monty' Motor Equipment Operator 07/07/97 11 .50 $ 20.26 $ 42, 140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 12892.80 4.49% $ 400.00 Beach, Michael* Motor Equipment Operator 04/12/99 9.73 $ 20.26 $ 429140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 1 ,892.80 4.49% $ 300.00 Lincoln, Matthew* Motor Equipment Operator 06/07/99 9.58 $ 20.26 $ 42, 140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 17892.80 4.49% $ 300.00 Brown, Toby* Motor Equipment Operator 03/24/03 5.78 $ 20.26 $ 420140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 $ 11892.80 4.49% Morse, Bernie" Automotive Mechanic Assistant 04/15/02 6.72 $ 20.26 $ 42, 140.80 $ 21 . 17 $ 442033.60 $ 1 ,892.80 4.49% J I Vacant position Laborer (TH-p/t PWD p/t summer) $ 7. 15 $ 6,000.00 $ 7.25 $ 61000.00 $ - 0.00% Schrier, Stanley* Laborer 09/28/84 24.28 $ 16.85 $ 35,048.00 $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 $ 1 ,580.80 4.51 % $ 11050.00 Eighmey, Henry* Laborer 05/01 /00 8.68 $ 16.85 $ 35,048.00 $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 $ 11580.80 4.51 % Munson, Jon* Laborer 08/21 /04 4.37 $ 16.85 $ 353048.00 $ 17.61 $ 36,628080 $ 1 ,580.80 4.51 % Stevens, Jamie* Laborer 04/03/06 2.75 $ "' Y16 60'; $ 34,528 00 ;$ k 17, 61;- $ 36,628.80 $ 2, 100.80 64108%0• Yolman, Hank* Laborer 06/19/06 2.54 $ i = 16 60 $ 34,528 00 $ , �17.61r $ 36,628.80 $ 22100.80 e.p$°'o Vacant position Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) 2nd yr returning $ 11 .00 $ 11 ,000.00 $ 11 .25 $ 11 ,250.00 $ 250.00 2.27% Vacant position Laborer(temp) (25wks @40hrs) 2nd yr returning $ 11 .00 $ 111000.00 $ 11 .25 $ 11 ,250.00 $ 250.00 2.27% Vacant position Laborer(temp) (25wks @40hrs) 1st yr working $ 10.75 $ 10,750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 110100.00 $ 350.00 3.26% Vacant position Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) lstyrworking $ 10475 $ 10,750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 $ 350000 3426% Vacant position Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) lstyrworking $ 10.75 $ 102750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 113100.00 $ 350.00 3.26% Vacant position Laborer(temp)(25wks @ 40hrs) lstyrworking $ 10.75 $ 10,750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 112100.00 $ 350.00 3.26% Vacant position Laborer(temp) (25wks @ 40hrs) lstyrworking $ 10475 $ 10,750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 $ 350.00 3.26% Vacantposition Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) lstyrworking $ 10.75 $ 103750.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 $ 350.00 3.26% Not Classified: Vacant position Planning Intern (25 wks @37.5hrs =937.5 hrs) $ 10.75 $ 10,078. 13 $ 11 . 10 $ 10,406.25 $ 328. 13 3.26% Vacant position Project Assistant-Eng. ('08= 10wks @40hrs) $ 10.75 $ 4,300.00 $ 11 . 10 $ 42440.00 $ 140.00 3.26% Crossing Guard $/crossing x 9/day for 5 days/wk for 42 weeks $ 9.90 $ 18,711 .00 $ 10.00 $ 187900.00 $ 189.00 1 .01 % Laura Johnson-Kelley Town Historian (Stipend paid out Quarterly) $ 1 ,000.00 $ 11000.00 $ - 0.00% Totals: et Salary NOT including longevity = $ 2,682,794.73 Total: $ 2,857,001 .85 $ 174,207. 13 $ 19,900.00 2008 Actual Budget Salary including longevity = $ 2,698, 194.73 Total+ Lg: $ 2,8761901 .85 $ 178,707.12 2008 vs 2009 M Total % incr. '08 gross vs. '09 gross = 6.5% ' below Jop`Rate '' g g now @job=.l Total % incr '08 gross vs '09 gross (long) = 6.6% above Job Rate Represents what 4.5% x 2008 bdg $ 121 ,418.76 $ 2,857,o01 .85 % of 2009 Total Net increase $ 178,707. 12 Why not 4% increase: above Job Rate $ 271 ,315.20 9% Longevity $ 41500.00 3% 7 positions in progression from hiring to job rate rbelow Job'Rate $ 195,000.00 7% below ob ° ._-. � : 1 $ 12,060. 10 7 /0 2 mgmt positions salaried at 40 hrs versus 37.5 now,lobiRate $ 166,684.70 6% now @ job $ 9,230.00 5% 1 position in 2008 bdgt changed to higher level Seas/xgrd/intern $ 129,846.25 5% P changes pay Y $ 463868.90 26% Normal $ 2.094,155.70 73% % cola $ 106,048. 13 59% New/elian . edPositjons 0.00% $ 178,707. 13 100% 100.00% $ (0.00) 412006 2009 4.5°/ dget wages Prepared by Judy Drake so T�ITHACA 2009 BUDGET 8/8:08 4. 50% Resl: 2008 TENTATIVE TENTATIVE PRELIMIN OPTED FINAL Adopted Pay Biweekly APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT AND POSITION TITLE Base Rate BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Base Rate or Ortly GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND 2009 bdgt 2008 bgt dill A1010. 100 TOWN BOARD Line Total : S 52.300.00 $ 52,300.00 500100.00 $ 2,200.00 Town Board Members (6) $ 81710.28 $ 52,261 .70 At 110. 100 JUSTICES Line Total: S 128.500.00 $ 1283500.00 1223900.00 $ 5,600.00 David, Jim Justices (2) $ 162651 .93 $ 33,303.86 Betty Court Clerk (37 .5 hours week/ Salary) $ 47, 151 .00 $ 47,951 .00 Linda Court Clerk (37.5 hours week/ Salary) $ 47, 151 .00 $ 47, 151 .00 $ 128,405.86 A1220, 100 TOWN SUPERVISOR Line Total ! S 19.300.00 $ 19,300.00 185390.00 $ 910.00 Town Supervisor/Fiscal Officer (bgt= 40%) $ 192214.43 $ 19,214.43 A1220. 101 DEPUTY SUPERVISOR Lune Tolak S - $ - - $ - Deputy Town Supervisor $ - $ - A1220. 103 ADMIN FUNCTION SUPERVISOR Line Total: S 28,900.00 $ 28,900.00 27,590.00 $ 1 ,310.00 Administrator function for Town (bgt = 60%) $ 28,821 .63 $ 28,821 .63 A1316. 100 ACCOUNTING/BOOKKEEPING Line Total : S 47.700.00 $ 47,700.00 45,600.00 $ 21100.00 Deb Bookkeeper to the Supervisor $ 24. 18 $ 475601 .00 A1330. 100 TAX COLLECTION Lune Total; S 8.600.00 $ 81600.00 81200.00 $ 400.00 Deb Receiver of Taxes (Salary) $ 61286.49 $ 6,286.49 Carrie First Deputy Town Clerk ( 2 hrs/pay =52 hrs) $ 24. 18 $ 1 ,257.36 Connie Principal Account Clerk ( =40 hrs) $ 24.18 $ 967.20 $ 8,511.05 A1340. 100 BUDGET Line Total S 79,700.00 $ 79,700.00 70,300.00 $ 9,400.00 Al Budget Officer $ 79,248.00 $ 79,698.00 A1410. 100 TOWN CLERK Line Total: S 135,700.00 $ 135,700.00 1189400.00 $ 172300.00 Karen Town Clerk $ 692638.40 $ 69,638.40 Carrie First Deputy Town Clerk (50 hrs/pay =1300) $ 24. 18 $ 31 ,784.00 Paulette Deputy Town Clerk (55 hrs/pay =1430) $ 21 . 17 $ 30,273. 10 ? Project Asst P/T ( -551 hrs) $ 7.25 $ 41000.00 $ 135,695.50 A1430. 100 HUMAN RESOURCES Line Total: S 127.500.00 $ 127,500.00 1182500.00 $ 91000.00 Judy Human Resources Manager $ 71 , 198.40 $ 713648.40 Connie Principal Account Clerk (=1910 hrs) $ 24. 18 $ 46, 183.80 Vacation Buyback for Afund $ 9,000.00 $ 126,832.20 A1440. 100 ENGINEER Lune Total: S 204 .200.00 $ 204,200.00 1942600.00 $ 9,600.00 Dan Director of Engineering (Town Engineer) $ 90,438.40 $ 912188.40 Creig Assistant Director of Engineering $ 29.08 $ 60,836.40 Kristin T. Civil Engineer $ 25.07 $ 52, 145.60 $ 204, 170.40 A1440. 110 ENGINEERING -Intern Line Total: $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 4,300.00 $ 200.00 VACANT Project Assistant-Eng. ('08=10wks @40hrs) $ 11 .10 $ 4,440.00 A1460. 100 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Line Total: S 57, 100.00 $ 57, 100.00 54,300.00 $ 2,800.00 Lisa Network / Records Specialist $ 29.08 $ 57,056.00 A1620. 100 BUILDINGS/TOWN HALL Line Total : S 13.900.00 $ 13,900.00 27,200.00 $ (13,300.00) Joe Maintenance Worker (15% or 312 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 71260.24 Stan (house) Laborer (15% or 312 hrs) $ 17.61 $ 61544.32 $ 13,804.56 A1620. 101 BLDG/TOWN HALL. -PWD EMPLOYEES Line Total: S '1- .260.00 $ 2,260.00 41312.00 $ (2,052.00) ntage of PWD Employees 0.25% $ 2,260.00 4/2008 2009 4.5% Te gel wages PrePa,eu by Judy Drake > ITHACA 2009 BUDGET /2008 4.50% Rest 2008 as TENTATIVE TENTATIVE PRELIMI OPTED FINAL Adopted Pay Biweekly APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT AND POSITION TITLE Base Rate BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Base Rate or Ortly A1620. 102 BLDG/TOWN HALL -On Line Total: S 3.500.00 $ 3,500.00 3,000.00 $ 500.00 Sue K A3120. 100 POLICE/ CROSSING GUARDS Line Total: S 18.900.00 $ 18,900.00 18,800.00 $ 100.00 Dan, Jeanette 9 crossing per day for 5 days/wk for 42 weeks $ 10.00 $ 18,900.00 A5010. 100 SUPERINTENDENT HIGHWAYS Lune Total: S 144 ,200.00 $ 144,200.00 136, 100.00 $ 8, 100.00 Fred Highway Superintendent $ 902438.40 $ 91 ,288.40 Gail Administrative Assistant $ 24. 18 $ 509894.40 Youth Project Assistant (6 wks @ 40 hrs =275 hr) $ 7.25 $ 2,000.00 $ 144, 182.80 A5010. 102 SUPERINTENDENT HIGHWAYS Or`T S 200.00 $ 200.00 200.00 $ - A5132. 100 HIGHWAY GARAGE Line Total: S 46.200.00 $ 46,200.00 30,300.00 $ 15,900.00 Joe H (house) Maintenance Worker (50% or 1040hrs) $ 23.27 $ 243200.80 Stan Laborer (60% or 1248 hrs) $ 17,61 $ 21 ,977.28 $ 46, 178.08 A5132. 101 HIGHWAY GARAGE-PWD EMPLOYEES Line Total: S 6. 780.00 $ 63780.00 82624.00 $ ( 1 ,844.00) Percentage of PWD Employees 0.75% $ 6,780.00 A5132. 102 HIGHWAY GARAGE -on Line Total: $ 1 .000.00 $ 11000.00 15000.00 $ - A7020. 100 RECREATION ADMWISTRATION Line Total: S 41 ,300.00 $ 41 ,300.00 39,600.00 $ 1 ,700.00 Marnie Recreation and Youth Coordinator $ 21 . 17 $ 41 ,281 .50 A7110. 100 TOWN PARKS Line Total : S 75,700.00 $ 75,700.00 72,400.00 $ 31300.00 Rich S(house) Parks Maintenance Manager $ 29.08 $ 61 ,636.40 Joe H Maintenance Worker (10% or 208 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 41840. 16 Stan Laborer (25% or 520 hrs) $ 17.61 $ 92157.20 $ 75,633. 76 A7110. 101 PARKS ( PWD EMPLOYEES) Line dotal: S 199.000.00 $ 199,000.00 191 ,000.00 $ 89000.00 Percentage of PWD Employees 19.50% $ 176,280.00 Vacant positior Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) $ 11 .10 $ 113100.00 Vacant positior Laborer(temp)(25wks @40hrs) $ 11 .10 $ 11 ,100.00 $ 198,480.00 A7110, 102 PARKS O/T Line Total : S 9.000.00 $ 92000.00 92000.00 $ A7510. 100 TOWN HISTORIAN Line Total : $ 1 .000.00 $ 1 ,000.00 1 ,000.00 $ - Laura Town Historian (pd quarterly stipend) $ 1 ,000.00 A8540. 101 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT -PWD Line Total: S 18,080.00 $ 18,080.00 17,248.00 $ 832.00 Percentage of PWD Employees 2.0% $ 18,080.00 A8540. 110 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT -Intern Line Total: S - S S $ $ VACANT POSITIONS NOT BUDGETED TO FILL: Senior Account Clerk Typist, Secretary to the Supervisor, Typist, Sr. Typist, Admin Asst. GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (A) TOTAL .100 Personal $ 1 1201 Y800.00 $ - $ 0. 100 $ 1 ,201 ,800.00 $ 1 , 126,690.00 $ 75,110.00 EE GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (A) TOTAL . 101 Personal $ 226, 120.00 $ - $ 0. 101 $ 226, 120.00 $ 221 , 184.00 $ 4,936.00 GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (A) TOTAL . 102 Personal inc $500 $ 13,700.00 $ - $ 0. 102 $ 13,700.00 $ 13,200.00 $ 500.00 GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (A) TOTAL . 103 Personal $ 28,900.00 $ - $ 0. 103 $ 28,900.00 $ 27,590.00 $ 1 ,310.00 GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (A) TOTAL . 110 Personal $ 42500.00 $ - $ 0. 110 $ 41500.00 $ 4,300.00 $ 200.00 A FUND TOTAL $ 7 ,475,020.00 $ - $ $ 1 ,475,020.00 $ 1 ,392,964.00 S 82 .056.00 people vs. dept $ 1 ,472,988.47 $ - $ - rounding $ 2,031.53 $ - $ 20094.5% qet wages 4/2008 Prepared by Judy Drake T THACA 2009 BUDGET 8/8/2008 4. 50% Resl: 2008 TENTATIVE TENTATIVE PRELIMINAR D FINAL Adopted Pay Biweekly APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT AND POSITION TITLE Base Rate BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Base Rate or Qrtly GENERAL FUND PART TOWN 2009 bdgt 2008 bgt dill B8010. 100 ZONING Line Total: 5 239.800.00 $ 2392800.00 2029300.00 $ 37,500.00 Bruce Director of Code Enforcement $ 77,937.60 $ 77,937.60 Kristie Senior Code Enforcement Officer $ 29.08 $ 57,056.00 Steve Code Enforcement Officer $ 25.07 $ 523145.60 Dani Senior Typist $ 21 . 17 $ 425081 .50 Carrie First Deputy Town Clerk ( 8 hrs/pay =208 hrs) $ 24. 18 $ 52029.44 Paulette Deputy Town Clerk (10 hrs/pay =260 hrs) $ 21 . 17 $ 5,504.20 $ 239, 754.34 $ - $ - 88010. 101 ZONING BOARD Line Total: S 6.600.00 $ 61600.00 6,350.00 $ 250.00 Zoning Board Members (5+2 members for 12 mtgs/yr) $ 78.91 $ 61628.27 88020. 100 PLANNING LneTotal: S 355,000.00 $ 355,000.00 337,500.00 $ 17,500.00 Jon Director of Planning (Town Planner) $ 90,438.40 $ 90,988.40 Susan Assistant Director of Planning $ 29.08 $ 57,056.00 Mike Environmental Planner $ 26.39 $ 51 ,760.50 Chris Planner $ 25.07 $ 48,886.50 Sandy Senior Typist $ 21 . 17 $ 41 ,581 .50 Carrie First Deputy Town Clerk ( 15 hrs/pay =390 hrs) $ 24. 18 $ 91430.20 Paulette Deputy Town Clerk ( 10 hrs/pay =260 hrs) $ 21 . 17 $ 5,504.20 Darby Planner '07 112 yr '08= f/t for 2 yr $ 24.32 $ 47,424.00 $ 352,631.30 B8020. 101 PLANNING BOARD Line Total: S 17.200.00 $ 17,200.00 161500.00 $ 700.00 Planning Board Chairman (24 meetings per year) $ 85.50 $ 21052.05 Planning Board Members (7+1 members for 24 mtgs yr.) $ 78.91 $ 152150.33 $ 17,202.37 68020. 110 PLANNING INTERN Line Total: S 10. 500.00 $ 102500.00 10, 100.00 $ 400.00 STUDENT Planning Intern (25 wks@37.5hrs =937.5 hrs) $ 11 . 10 $ 101406.25 j 8 Budget = PART TOWN WIDE FUND (B) TOTAL . 100 Personal $ 594,800.00 $ $ 0. 100 $ 594,800.00 $ 539,800.00 $ 55,000.00 2,750.00 PART TOWN WIDE FUND (B) TOTAL . 101 Personal $ 23,800.00 $ $ 0. 101 $ 23,800.00 $ 22,850.00 $ 950.00 6,350.00 PART TOWN WIDE FUND (B) TOTAL . 110 Personal $ 10,500.00 $ $ 0. 110 $ 10,500.00 $ 103100.00 $ 400.00 9.8% BFundTotal: $ 629, 100.00 $ $ $ 629, 100.00 $ 572,750.00 S 56. 350.00 10% people vs. dept $ 626,622.53 $ - $ - Vac buyback $ 2,477.47 $ - $ - 20094.5% Te el wages wepvea ey .xey o,oxe /2008 T THACA 2009 BUDGET 8/8/2008 4. 50% Resl: 2008 TENTATIVE TENTATIVE PRELIMINAR ED FINAL Adopted Pay Biweekly APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT AND POSITION TITLE Base Rate BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Base Rate or Ortly HIGHWAY FUND PART TOWN Gene (house) Deputy Highway Superintendent $ 29.08 $ 61 ,536.40 Jeff H. Working Supervisor $ 25.07 $ 52,645.60 Don T. Working Supervisor $ 25.07 $ 533095.60 Rich T. Working Supervisor $ 25.07 $ 522745.60 John W. Heavy Equipment Mechanic $ 25.07 $ 522695.60 Ray Heavy Equipment Operator $ 23.27 $ 49,351 .60 Larry Heavy Equipment Operator $ 23.27 $ 49,401 .60 Scott D Heavy Equipment Operator $ 23.27 $ 49,001 .60 John S. Heavy Equipment Operator $ 23.27 $ 48,851 .60 David Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 442483.60 Eric Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 44,483.60 Monty Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 44,433.60 Mike B Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 44,333.60 Matt Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 44,333.60 Toby Motor Equipment Operator $ 21 . 17 $ 44,033.60 Bernie Automotive Mechanic Assistant $ 21 . 17 $ 443033.60 Henry Laborer $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 Jon Laborer $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 Jamie Laborer $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 Hank Laborer $ 17.61 $ 36,628.80 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 .25 $ 11 ,250.00 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 .25 $ 11 ,250.00 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 . 10 $ 112100.00 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 Seasonal Laborer (40 hrs X 25 wks) $ 11 . 10 $ 11 , 100.00 Craig Sr. Engineering Technician (420 hrs) $ 25.07 $ 10,529.40 $ 15, 183.40 Joe S. Engineering Technician 1 (200 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 4,654.00 Shift Differential 26 wks @ 40 hrs $ 1 .00 $ 22080.00 Total of all Employees: $ 1 ,010,139.00 $ 15,183.40 $ %, of $895,000 RECHECK 2009 bdgt 2008 bgt dill HIGHWAY PERSONNEL BREAKOUT: $ 904,000.00 Line Total: Al 620.101 0.25% $ 22260 D85110, 100 GENERAL REPAIRS 26.00% S 235.040.00 A5132.101 0.75% $ 65780 D65110. 100 $ 235,040.00 219,912.00 $ 152128.00 DB5110102 GENERAL REPAIRS OrT S 4.500.00 A7110.101 19.5% $ 176,280 D135110. 102 $ 41500.00 51500.00 $ (11000.00) DB5112. 100 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS 9.00% S 96.560.00 A8540.101 2% $ 18,080 DB5112. 100 $ 96,560.00 74,868.00 $ 21 ,692.00 DB5112, 102 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS Off +% ofCB & JS S 5.000.00 F8340.101 7% $ 631280 DB5112. 102 $ 5,000.00 51000.00 $ - DB5130, 100 MACHINERY JW& BM S 96.300.00 G8120.101 1 % $ 9,040 DB5130. 100 $ 96,300.00 932000.00 $ 3,300.00 D135130. 102 MACHINERY Orf $ 96,729.20 S L500.00 065110.100 26% $ 235,040 D65130. 102 $ 1 ,500.00 1500.00 $ - DB5140. 100 BRUSH / WEEDS 7.50% S 67.800.00 DB5112.100 9% $ 96,560 DB5140. 100 $ 67,800.00 60,368.00 $ 7,432.00 D135140. 110 BRUSH / WEEDS (non-work tune) 17.00% S 153.680.00 DB5140.100 7.5% $ 675800 DB5140. 110 $ 153,680.00 1293360.00 $ 24,320.00 DB5140. 102 BRUSH / WEEDS Off S 2.000.00 DB5140.110 17% $ 153,680 DB5140. 102 $ 22000.00 21000.00 $ - DB5142. 100 SNOW REMOVAL 10.00% S 90.400.00 DB5142.100 10% $ 90,400 0135142100 $ 90,400.00 862240.00 $ 4, 160.00 2008 Budget = DB5 142. 102 SNOW REMOVAL Off S 60.000.00 subtotal: $ 919,200 D65142. 102 $ 60,000.00 59,000.00 $ 1 ,000.00 736,748.00 HIGHWAY FUND (DB) TOTAL . 100 Personal $ 586, 100.00 $ - $ DB5130.100 $ 965300 0. 100 $ 5863100.00 $ 534,388.00 $ 51 ,712.00 76,032.00 HIGHWAY FUND (DB) TOTAL . 110 Personal $ 153,680.00 $ - $ - Total $ 1 ,0157500 1 0. 110 $ 153,680.00 $ 129,360.00 $ 24,320.00 10.3% HIGHWAY FUND (DB) TOTAL . 102 Personal $ 73,000.00 $ $ $ 898,226.40 $ 5,361.00 0. 102 $ 73,000.00 $ 732000.00 $ DB Fund Total: $. 8127780.00 $ - $ - vac buyback $ 812,780.00 $ 7369748.00 $ 76,032.00 10% ncluded $ 15183 for Ballard/Slater 20094.5% T twa es 4/2008 9 9 v,e�rea oy Hwy orexe T THACA 2009 BUDGET 8/8/2008 4 . 50% Res1: 2008 TENTATIVE TENTATIVE PRELIMINAR ED FINAL Adopted Pay Biweekly APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT AND POSITION TITLE Base Rate BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Base Rate or Ortly WATER FUND 1 2009 bdgt 2008 bgt dill F8310. 4. 00 WATER: ADMINISTRATION Lme Total: S 37. 100.00 F8310. 100 $ 37, 100.00 35,500.00 $ 12600.00 Wayne Water/Sewer Maintenance Supervisor (24 hrs/wk 1248) $ 29.08 $ 37,041 .84 (longevity house F8340. 100 WATER: DISTRIBUTION Line Total: S 55.900.00 F8340. 100 $ 55,900.00 55,500.00 $ 400.00 Joe H. Maintenance Worker (10% or 208 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 41840. 16 Craig (house) Sr. Engineering Technician (1240 hrs) $ 25.07 $ 312436.80 Joe S. Engineering Technician 1 (840 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 193546.80 $ 55,823. 76 78340, 101 WATER: PWD EMPLOYEES Line Total: 5 63.280.00 F8340. 101 $ 63,280.00 86,240.00 $ (229960.00) Percentage of PWD Employees 7.00% $ 635280.00 F8340. 102 WATER: OVERTIME Line Total: S 15.000.00 F8340. 102 $ 15,000.00 9,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2008 Budget = WATER FUND ( F ) TOTAL . 100 Personal $ 93,000.00 $ $ 0. 100 $ 93,000.00 $ 91 ,000.00 $ 21000.00 186,240.00 WATER FUND ( F ) TOTAL . 101 Personal $ 633280.00 $ $ 0. 101 $ 63,280.00 $ 86,240.00 $ (222960.00) (14,960.00) WATER FUND ( F ) TOTAL . 102 Personal inc $4000 $ 15,000.00 $ $ 0. 102 $ 15,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 62000.00 8.0% IF Fund Total: $ 171 ,280.00 $ $ $ 171 ,280.00 $ 186,240.00 $ (14,960.00) -8% people vs, dept $ 171 ,145.60 $ - $ - rounding 134.40 - - SEWER FUND 68110. 100 SEWER: ADMINISTRATION Line Total: S 24.200.00 G8110. 100 $ 243200.00 23,200.00 $ 1 ,000.00 Wayne Water/Sewer Maintenance Supervisor (16 hrs/wk 832) $ 29.08 $ 24, 194.56 66120. 100 SEWER! SANITARY SEWERS S 23.87 S 42.000.00 G8120. 100 $ 42,000.00 37,900.00 $ 4, 100.00 Joe H Maintenance Worker (15% or 312 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 7,260.24 Craig Sr. Engineering Technician (420 hrs) $ 25.07 $ 10,529.40 Joe S. (house) Engineering Technician 1 ( 1040 hrs) $ 23.27 $ 249200.80 $ 41,990.44 G6120. tot SEWER: PWD EMPLOYEES Lute Total S 9.040.00 G8120. 101 $ 9,040.00 21 ,560.00 $ ( 125520.00) Percentage of PWD Employees 1 .00% $ 92040.00 G8120: 102 SEWER: OVERTIME Line Total: $ 3.000.00 G8120. 102 $ 31000.00 3,000.00 $ 2008 Budget = SEWER FUND ( G ) TOTAL . 100 Personal $ 66,200.00 $ $ 0. 100 $ 66,200.00 $ 61 , 100.00 $ 5, 100.00 85,660.00 SEWER FUND ( G ) TOTAL . 101 Personal $ 9,040.00 $ $ 0. 101 $ 92040.00 $ 21 ,560.00 $ (12,520.00) (7,420.00) SEWER FUND ( G ) TOTAL . 102 Personal $ 3,000.00 $ $ 0. 102 $ 31000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ -8.7% G Fund Total: $ 789240.00 $ $ $ 789240.00 $ 859660.00 $ (7,420.00) -9% people vs. dept $ 78,225.00 $ - $ rounding $ 15.00 $ - $ - GRAND TOTALS AS BUDGETED:'• - 1 GRAND TOTAL FOR . 100 Personal Service (DB . 110) $ 2,6952580.00 $ $ - 0. 100 $ 2,695,580.00 $ 2,4822338.00 $ 2132242.00 9% GRAND TOTAL FOR . 101 Personal Service $ 322,240.00 $ $ - 0. 101 $ 322,240.00 $ 351 ,834.00 $ (291594.00) -8% 12008 Budget = GRAND TOTAL FOR . 102 Personal Service $ 104,700.00 $ $ - 0. 102 $ 104,700.00 $ 98,200.00 $ 6,500.00 7% 2,974,362.00 GRAND TOTAL FOR . 103 Personal Service $ 282900.00 $ $ - 0. 103 $ 28,900.00 $ 27,590.00 $ 11310.00 5% 192,058.00 GRAND TOTAL FOR 110 Personal Service $ 15,000.00 $ $ - 0. 110 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 600.00 4% 6.5% y ,, , , GRAND'TOTAL $ 3t166,420.00' '$ $ : . TOTAL ) $ "'3;166,420.00 - 2,974;362':00 $ _ '°192;058.00 { 6% ( - .102) $ 3,061 ,720.00 $ - $ - bdgtvs. actual $ 10,019.40 $ - $ 5,361.00 20094.5% Mengget wages P�w oy� 008