Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-11-17TOWN OF DRYDEN TOWNBOARD i EETING Nolvernbier 17, 2010 Present: Supervisor Macy. Ann Sumner, C1 Stephen telick, C1 Joseph olornon, C 1. Jason Leifer, Cl David Makar Elccted Officials= Bambi L. Avery, Town Clerk Jack Bush, Highway/DPW SuFx�rincondent Other TowD Staff; I•Ienry Slater, Zonin& 0Tcer Mahlon R. Perkins, Town Attornev Andrew Sciarabbal, TG Biller Engineers Jeff Kirby, Telecommunications Consultant upv Su mnr}r opened the meeting at 7:00 p- m. and board members and guests parr.icipated in the pledge of allegiance. PUBLIC.' HEARMG SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION OF PHILIP do KALENDRA SO>I.AT TO ]ESTABLISI-I AN AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS AT 301 S OFIELD ROAD upv Sumner ap(tned the public hearing at 7.02 p.m. and read the notice published in The Ithaca Journal_ 13oard inemlbers have [,Ca�aies of the application end supporting informatiom SLIPV Sumner nal'od that the Highway S'uperiritendent is not concerned about traffic on the road_ Barth Mapes, 11.4 Scofield Road, said he owns two properties on Scofield Road and. one of those borders the applicant's property. His feeling and that of others on the road is that the application should be denied. This used to he primarily an agricultural neighborhood, and now is very much residential. If the a pp] ica.tiorn is granted, the change in use of the property would degrade the value of his property. It would change the way neighbors could use their }property and change the value of their property. He noted most of the residen6a] properties are on the Lansing side of Scorield Road. Mr Mapes presented a petition asking that the, special use permit not be granted signed by several neighbors. Reasons cited are negative impact: or] property values of residential properties in that section of the road, setting a precedent for future commercial ventures in the neighborhood, concerns. far nois< L and traffic, and air quality. Pat Pryor, 150 Scofield Road, lives across road from applicant. °s property and shares the same conecrrns. She said the signatures on the petition represent all the property owners on the road between 34B and Asbury Road except one_ She also has concerns regarding water (runtamination and runoff to wcl1s and septic systems, Photos of neighboring properties were shared and she said they demon stra.te that this is clearly a well -kept neighborhood. An auto repair shop is not appropriatc there, Joanne Cippola Otmnis said she how the applicant would handle runoff, of business. Supv Sumner said Dryden have to comply with. Cippola Dennis sr Route 34 and the airport, lives nearby on West Dr cleaning fluids and item has o strict storrnwater Al there is already noise yden Road. Her concern is s that go a] ong with that type ordinance that they would in the area from Repute 33, Philip Solat, applicant, said he was unaware of the petition, but is not surprised. He knows the neighborhood and gruw up near there. There have been changes in the application. J "ace 1 0,2$ -1-13 1 1 -17-10 DRAfT 'Phis will be a part time business - he has a full time job_ ThrL neighbors' concerns are valid, but vehicles running are not different than using a remote start with respect to pollution. There is no wetland there_ Thcy have to raise the property up for the base of the garage. The type of repair they will be doing will not cause a lot of noise. There will be no increased traffic, ill will be part -time, evenings and weekends. Kalendra Solat said she grew up in the house where they plan to put the business. Advertisement will be word of rnoul.h_ They currently rent: office space in Ithaca and would like to consolidate the business to their home. They may move the garage they plan to build closer to their home. Applicant P Solat currently has a New Fork State retail auto dealers license acid buys and sells used cars one car at a time_ They don't currently have a repair business, hu €. do repairs and tires on vehicles they sell and are looking to expand that. This will not be a junk yard. There will be an oversized garage that looks like part of the residential property, and that w'II allow him In lcga.11y do auto repair in New York_ There will be no tires and parts visible and disposal of used parts and fluids will be dealt with appropriately_ P Solat said he understands the neighborhood_ It is residentia and well -kept, but it is his understanding that auto repair and gas stations are allowed in the Town by spcc;iat use permit, olat said building idnntifyinf, this the business will use business. They the exiting driveway and there may be do not expect a lot of traffic in a day, and a sign on the probably will not advertise. They will do oil changes, tireN, bna.ke jobs and other simple jabs. upv Sunuier said the neighbors would likely want some assurance that it would not become a full time bu'51nPl$S- P Solat said he li currently ves Hear the Lake Watch lrIn in the Town of Lansing on Route 4 f Cast Shore Drive and a residen Ili a_l neighborhood and has not had any noise complaints from neighbors when he is Working in his own garage_ There have also not been complaints about. messiness or cleanliness_ App] ic_ant states the building will be smaller than originally planned, and it will aIlw kys be a part -tune business_ They wi11 make the building look Iiko an oversi7 d garage instead of a cominerc;ial. style building so that it blends with the neighborhood_ Supv Sumner said that similar special use permits granted by th<_ town have required creerni.ng from the road, lirniting the number of cars on the property at any given dime and keeping rars behind the building. 1 Solomon asked about car and utility trailer sales. K Solat said they will not have a JQt of trailers in their lawn for stale. Trailers are ordered aind sold one ail ilirne from a local company_ They want to move away from cars Lund do mostly trailers. They currently only sell One rear at a time, Thrh Highway Su perinW irk dent estimates (based on a dsual count) ran average 527 vehicles per clay on Scofield Road, His statement: describes tht pavc:rnent and how the road is maintained, the ditch, c.;lc_ He states that heavily loaded vehicles would have a &CnOus impact on the road_ That would be a factor if tl,e appicant is selling equipment thhat is delivered by tractor trailers. Applicant presently has an office at 223 Dmira Road (office only) and ha% had this part time business since 2007. Cars for sale_ are displiayed at other locatiorke_ They sell one ca£ at a time, F olat reil'crted that auto repair will be parC -time nights and weekends. Moving the office to their residence will kec_p overhead douvn. Applicanl_s state they do not want to grow Paige 2 of ?5 TO 11 -17 -10 1)RArT the business; they want to keep it pert -time. They will do whatever they need to city to keep 11he neighbors happy and also allow them to do what they would like to do. Supv SUMner said one of the first clue Lions they consider Jai the review process is tiwhc:ther the location or use iL5 in conflict with the allowed uses of the zone or neighborhood. This is a bit in conflict) with the neighborhood cha.ractur_ Ferger asked if ilhe property will always be used for auto repair if the application is grani :cd. Supv said special use permits will have to be reapplied for if property is sold. Supv Sumner said an .jute 1:1USincss is not automatically noisy and dirty_ It it5 pot :Able to address t.hc concerns. The Board would like W called: mUre information and revisit this next month. They'd like more information on the size of the business and the ways they might be able to M!sf. C1, the activities. O Slater said this is } {gas good ides to see w hcl:h4r it can be balanced with the rneighborMc)nd_ A Sciarabba said the applicant should submit a new site p] an that how exactly what they plan to do. Applicant seems to be willing to address name and screening, and it would be good for the Town to have that, plan to look at and review_ RESOLUTION #158 120 10) — CONTINUE SOLAT PUBLIC HEARING Cl Stelick offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby continues the public hearing on I:he application of Philip and Kalendra Solat for a special use permit to relocate their established automotive business (commercial garage) PYs Auto to 301 Scofield Road, to December 15, 2010, to allow an opportunity to gather inom information. 2«11 Cl Leifer Roll OaH Vote 1 Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes C1 Makar Yes Cl I rifer Yes PUBLIC HEARING SPECIAL USE PERMIT "PL>l ATION OF VERI ON WIRELESS FOR CO- LOCATION INSTALLATION ANTENNAS ON TOWER AT 204 WALKER ROAD Supv Sumner opened the public h(;z�ring at 7.42 p. in. and Town Clerk B Avery read the notice published in The Ithaca ,iournal. Lisa Van gellow, of Verizon Wireless, explained that VeH24)n has made an application to make minor modifications to an existing tower site a1, 204 Walker Road. These mc�clifications are necessary because (if technology changes that require different equipment, They are proposing i10 exchange the antennas on the tower. The will remove 3 omniwhip antennas and replace them with 6 panel antennas and six runs of coax cable. This will make a total of 12 panel iurtennas on the tower_ There will be no changes to the equiprnenl, on ground or within the Ieased area on the ground. All necessary and required in jL orrn 4 tion has been provided to ,jefi` Kirby and 2;O Slater_ J Kirb y soid it was a straight forward Application and was css[.ntially envisioned the last time: the Togarn updated its local Iaw. The Town will Iikely see more of this type of application in the future_ There are some conditions that need to be addressed. There are no significant outstanding items. Pjj;e 3 of 2,5 61'13 1 1.17 -10 DItAI''I' ® ZO Slater said J Kirby's October 8 recommendation summarizes the conditions the Board should consider. The applicant in this case is offering to provide more recent technology, better coverage, and better equipment, which is one of the primary goals of the 2006 tower legislation amendment. Crown Castle owns the tower and is responsible for maintaining tower and inspections. They have submitted a letter indicating their willingness to address the condition of the access road. This tower was constructed in 1996, prior to the Town having any regulations for telecommunications towers. Sprint and Nextel are also on this tower and approved co- location tenants. There were no public comment or questions from board. The board reviewed the special use permit worksheet. a) Whether Section 1303.1 requirements have been met. - Yes b) Whether the location, use and nature, and intensity of operation will be in conflict antenna with the allowed uses of the zone or neighborhood. - No c) Whether the use will be more objectionable or depreciating to adjacent and nearby properties (by reason of traffic, noise, vibration, dust, fumes, smoke, odor, fire, hazard, glare, flashing lights or disposal of waste or sewage) than operation of the allowed uses of the zone. - No d) Whether the use will discourage or hinder the appropriate development and use of adjacent properties or neighborhood. - No e) Whether a non - residential use adjacent to an existing residential use shall be screened by a. landscaped buffer strip or suitable fencing. - N/A fJ Whether health, safety and general welfare of the community may be adversely affected. - No g) Whether or not a Stormwater Management; permit is necessary. If so, has one been submitted, and if so, is it acceptable? N/A The board reviewed the SEQR Part II. G I•Ianley of Verizon said this is a new technology that will be offered. They have four different licenses for four different frequencies in the area. Right now they are using only their 850 license and their PCS license on an adjacent. This site will use the PCS license on this site for added voice service and the 750 megahertz antenna will be for their future LTE high speed network. This will cover basically the whole village of Dryden with wireless high speed data, The board reviewed the visual addendum and found no concerns. RESOLUTION #159120101 - KEG SEQR DEC - VERIZON WIRELESS 204 WALKER ROAD Supv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: WHEREAS, A. The proposed action involves consideration of the application of Verizon Wireless to replace antenna on an existing telecommunications tower at 204 Walker Road. Be 0 The proposed action is an Unlisted Action for which the Town Board of the Town of Dryden is the lead agency for the purposes of uncoordinated environmental review in connection with approval by the Town. Page 4 042S 'I'll 11.17 -10 1.)ItATT C. 'r'1-he Town Board of the Town of Dryden, in performing the lead agency function for its independent and uncoordinated environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Laws - the State Environmental Quality Review Act "(SEQR), (i) thoroughly reviewed the short Environmental Assessment Form (the "Short EAF "), Part I, together with the Visual EAF Addendum, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted Twith respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, (ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR §617.7(c), and (iii) completed the Short EAF, Part I1; NOW, THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 11 'r he Town Board of the Town of Dryden, based upon (i) its thorough review of the Short EAF, Part I, the Visual EAF Addendum, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, (h) its thorough review of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may, have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR §61.7.7(c), and (iii) its completion of the Short EAF, Part 11, including the findings noted thereon (which findings are incorporated herein as if set: forth at length), hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance ( "Negative Declaration ") in accordance with SEQR for the above referenced proposed action, and determines that neither a frill Environmental Assessment Form, nor an Environmental Impact Statement will be required, and 2. The Responsible Officer of the Town Board of the Town of Dryden is hereby authorized and directed to complete and sign as required the determination of significance, confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and signed Short EAF and determination of significance shall be incorporated by reference in this Resolution. 2 "d Cl Solomon bond in the amount Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes equipment. Cl Solomon Yes Supv Surnner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes The public hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m. Crown Castle will provide a removal bond in the amount: of $40,000 to cover the tower, and Verizon Wireless will provide a bond in the amount of $1.0,000 for their equipment. J Kirby's letter of October 8, 2010, suggests conditions for the special use permit. An updated maintenance and condition assessment report for the tower has been received and is satisfactory. Crown Castle has indicated a willingness to repair the access drive, but the town needs to receive a detailed plan for that repair. RESOLUTION #160120 10) - APPROVE CO- LOCATION APPLICATION OF VERIZON WIRELESS - 204 WALKER ROAD Cl Makar offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: Page 5 of 25 416 I I -1740 DRAFT RESOLVED, that: this Town Board hereby approves the Special Use Permit application 19 of Verizon Wireless to replace equipment on an existing telecommunications tower at 204 Walker Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission by Crown Castle of a plan for repair of the access drive satisfactory to the town engineer, together with an acceptable time table. 2. A removal bond in the amount of $10,000 from Verizon Wireless to cover removal of their equipment, in a form approved by the Town Attorney. 3. Standard Conditions of Approval (7 -1.2 -2008) 2rkd Cl Solomon Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes CITIZENS PRIVILEGE Marie McRae, of Dryden Resources Awareness Coalition (DRAG) - read a statement and submitted it to the board. She offered a few observations on proposed protections with respect to hydrofracking. She said no regulations can prevent. heavy metals and other substances from coming to surface with the gas. No regulations can find the funding to construct waste treatment plants that might be able to filter the toxic chemicals and other materials from fracking waste. No regulations can prevent: chemicals from remaining underground or migrating. regulation will not prevent the squandering of fresh water that becomes contaminated permanently in the process. Foreign countries own a majority of leases and any profit and gas will go overseas. The Governor has reduced DEC staff to levels laughable in light of what is planned. No regulation can make the process safe. There is scant oversight_ Much of this activity happens in the middle of woods and in the middle of the night. She urged the board to follow the lead of the Pittsburgh City Council and ban hydrofracking process outright. (statement attached) Hilary Lambert, of DRAC, thanked the board for their work and responsiveness to date, including considering an industrial noise ordinance. They are now asking the board to consider an ordinance that would ban hydrofracking in the Town of Dryden. Pittsburg, PA has just done this. 3,000 signatures have been collected to ban hydrofracking in Norwich in Chenango County. A petition campaign has been launched in the Town of Ulysses. DRAC has started a petition drive to provide support. and encouragement to the board to take this action. They successfully collected 300mA.00 signatures on previous petitions on related matters. Wording of the petition was read to the board. Joanne Cipolla Dennis, of DRAG, expressed gratitude to the Town board for working on all issues concerning the Town, and to C1 Leifer and members of DRAG for their work_ She submitted a statement that: tells of her experience attending EPA hearings in Pittsburgh a few months ago. People have experienced death of cattle, stillborn and deformed calves, and having to carry fresh water. Some of their children are sick while at home and fine at school. ® She said research has revealed that horizontal fracking is uncontrollable and unpredictable. Page 6 or 15 014B 11 -17 -10 DRAFT There is catastrophic damage wherever methane development takes place. Many suffer health issues from feeling the threat and stress of losing it all. Methane gas is a fossil fuel at least 20 times more powerful than CO2. We don't. have to frack for methane gas. It can be made above ground without creating toxic substances through Anaerobic. Methane Digesters from dairy farms and from sewage treatment plants. J Cipolla- Dennis said we don't need to spend any more time, money or energy on the subject of gas development in Dryden to address this except for a permanent ban. She moved here four years ago and built a beautiful green home and now finds that neighbors on three sides have signed leases. They are surrounded by hundreds of acres of leased property. She was going to start a project to provide affordable housing for people with disabilities, but will not invest in that project unless she feels safe. She respectfully demands that the Town protect: her right to live without dangerous industrial development and protect her right to clean water and air. (statement attached) Dave Christie, said he has lived on krone Plain Road since 1984. We hear a lot of propaganda from the gas industry that fracking has been going on for 40 years and not a single groundwater source has been polluted. That is simply not true. They are talking about low volume vertical wells, not horizontal high volume slickwater (racking that has only been used in the last six or eight years. At a recent talk in Danby he learned (from the industry's own records) that 98% of the wells drilled in Pennsylvania don't leak or cause a problem with the groundwater. That means that 2% do. Wells with a higher rate of failure (around Dimock, PA) were removed. Each well pad is a minimum of five acres. The drill rigs are over 100' tall with a ilashing light on top and lights down the side. `!'here is a huge holding pond for wastewater that comes back up from a well. The drilling happens 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for about 6 months or more. There is a huge amount of noise. Great amounts of water are used for each fracking operation (over 5 million gallons) that must be trucked in. Roads are torn up by the trucks. The drill rigs are left permanently because when production drops, they come back and re- frack. D Christie said if the town is concerned about a small amount of pollution from an auto repair garage, these wells will make that seem laughable. The density in which they are proposed is one every couple hundred acres. Flight now the only difference between us and what is happening in Pennsylvania is the sort of de -facto moratorium that's been put in place. That is not permanent or sure. Tle asked Town to take local control to the extent that we can. Other local governments around the stage are trying to do the same thing. The more voices in that corner, the better the chances that this can be stopped before what is happening in Pennsylvania happens here. Joanne Cipolla- Dennis said that Ben Price, who is the lead attorney for these matters in Pittsburgh, has written her and offered his assistance here. Supv Sumner said she appreciates the amount of work the group has done and thanked them. Maybe we will begin to grasp the true cost of natural gas. Perhaps the sustainability projects that we are embarking on will help address howl much of what: we consume is produced by natural gas and how we are planning to avoid that. Joe Wilson said some of them have been doing research on economic development, because that is the more typical :argument for the fracking. That is simply not true. Monies generated will leave the community and local taxpayers will pay to renovate the infrastructure, driving up our tax rates. Supv Sumner said there is no process in place to address an outright ban, but they are working on road protection, noise, and protection of critical environmental areas. 11age 7 of L5 Cl Leifer said the only way to begun to address this is through zoning. Supv Sumner 40 said we could address industrial uses and this could be onto industridl'uS[_. She feels that would be mDre successful than simply banning fracking. if we zone industrial uses to where they might conceivably be passible, that and wtbacks would pretty much 1x_ successful- Cl Leifer said articles have been written that indicate you axe buying into a law suit by zoning agEd nst it. Martha Robertson said they are pursuing a ban in the Town of Ulysses. Supv Sumner slid the ` own' Environmental Ylanncr it5 prr:tl: }' [lurrgn� ors ik- f1+1 F�Ok7erkSC�n mid there is a court precedent that it can be zoned out of the municipality. You can't regulate it like the DEC can, butyou can have land use authority- Kevin Mayer, DRAG, said there is a nailional agency 11(i help municipalities that is ofcering fine Support and services, D Christie suggested the Town might restrict height of drilling rig. Joanne Cipolla- Dennis said tir�ie is of the essence- '] here will be drilling this summer, Marty Hatch said he supports the efforl, of an outright bzun and urged the board to take the step forward and don't be frightencd- M Ferger said there is a huge surplus of natural gas at the moment. A 8horkage would push us to find aIterna.tive clean energy sources. TOWN CLERK Town Clcrk B Avery asked the board i10 approve the meeting minutes of October 13 and October 20, 2010. Not all board members have read them. RESOLUTION #161120101 - APPROVE MINUTES upv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption. K"S0 LVED , that this Town [hoard hereby approves kht minutes of the OcOber 13, 2010 town board meeting - 21'11 C1 Solomon Roll Cull Vote C1 Cl Cl Cl telick Yc; Solomon Abstain ipv Sumner Yes Makar Yes Leifer Yep B Avery and Atty Perkins have worked together on a new dog control law For the town and board members hove received copies prior to the meeting, This must be in place by Joriva 1, 2011- CI telick said het feels this is exac,:ly right for the 7'O�vn of Dryden and thanked them for their efforCs- RESOLU'T`ION # 162 (2010) - INTRODUCE DOG CONTROL LAMP AND SET PUBLIC HEARING 0 Cl Makar offered the folloN -ving resolution and asked For its adoption: I'u $ Qi 25 T13 11 -17 -10 1)KAF1- 9 RESOLVED, OLVED, that this Town Board hereby introduces the following Town of Dryden Dag ontrol Law and sets the public hearing for De_crmber 18, 2010, at 7:00 p - rnI Short Title. This local law may be cited as the Town of Dryden Dog Control. L,�Lw- 1 Statutory authority. FrhiS local law is enacted pursuant to the provisions of Municipal Hpme Rule Law Section 10 and Article 7 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, ar> amended by Chapter 59, Part T, of the laws of 2010 (effer,6ve January 1, 2011 }. Purpose. The purpose of this local law shall be in the Town of Dryden (herein 'Town "l and to promote its people by enforcing regulations and restrictions on With the rights and privileges of dog owners and th(� ri; Town- 3 Definition$# to pre servo public peace and good order the public health, safety and welfare of the aeri sties of dogs that are consistent ;hts and privileges of other oit.iz _n$ of the A. As used in this local law, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: AT LARGE -An unleashed dog off' the premises of the owner. DOG CONTROL OFFICER -A person or persons appointed by the Town for the purpose of enforcing this local law, LEASHED - Restrained by a leash, attached to a collar or harness of sufficient g1;reTgffi to restrain the dug held by a person having the ability to control the dog- OWNER -The person entitled to claim lawful custody and possession of a dog and who is responsible for purchasing r -hu license for such dog unless the clog is or has been loci, t]nd such loss was promptly reported I.o Cbe Dog Control Officer, or to any peace officer. if a dog is not licensed, the term "owner" shall designate and cover any person or persons, firm, association or corporation who or which at any time owns or has custody or control of, harbors or is otherwise responsible for a dog which is kept in, brought into or comes into the Tourn. Any person owriLing or harboring a dog for a period of one week shall be meld and deemed to be the "owner" of such dog for the purpose of this 10(.Lal law. in the event that the "owner" of any dog found to be in V iolation of this local law shall b(: under 18 years of age, any head of the household in which said minor resides shall be deemed to have custody and control of said dog and shall be responsible for any acts of the said dog in violation of thi% local law- NOISE DISTURBANCE -The making of any sound which is audible across a real property line for 15 minutes in any one -hour interval, which sound disturbs a reasonable person of norrnal sensitivities, REAL PROPERTY LINE "The imaginary line, including its vertical extension, that separates one parcel of real property from another; or the: vertical and horizontal Pa[ c 9 „r �,� TK 11 -1740 1)itA1:11 boundaries of a dwelling unit that is in a multi - dwelling building. RECOGNIZED REGISTRY ASSOCIATION - Any registry association that operates on a nationwide basis, issues numbered registration certificates and keeps such records as may be required by the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets. RESIDENTIAL -any property used for human habitation. B. Terms not defined herein or in Agricultural and Markets Law 108 shall have their customary and usual meaning. 4. Prohibited acts. It shall be unlawful for any owner of a dog in the Town to permit or allow such dog to: A. Run at large, unless the dog is leashed or unless it is accompanied by its owner or a responsible person and under the full control of such owner or person. Por the purpose of this local law, a dog or dogs hunting in company of a hunter or hunters shall be considered as accompanied by its owner. B. Make sounds that create a noise disturbance across a. residential real property line. C. Cause damage or destruction to public or private property, defecate, urinate or otherwise commit: a nuisance upon the property of other than the owner or person is harboring the dog. D. Bite, chase, jump upon or otherwise harass any person in such a manner as to reasonably cause intimidation or put such a person in reasonable apprehension of bodily harm or injury. E. Chase, leap on or otherwise harass bicycles, motor vehicles, and any equine, including any rider thereon_ F. Kill or injure any dog, cat, other household pet or domestic animal. G. Be unlicensed when four months of age or older. H. Not have a valid Town identification tag on its collar while at large, whether or not leashed. 5. Female dogs. All female dogs shall be confined to the premises of their owner while such are in season (heat) and may not be left outside unattended. Any owner not adhering to this section will be subject to having the dog seized by the Dog Control Officer, or any peace officer, and removed to a safe place of confinement, at the expense of the owner. 6. Conditions for keeping dogs. All premises occupied or used by dogs shall be kept in a clean, sanitary condition. Failure to provide adequate food, water or space shall subject dogs to ® seizure and confinement. "Adequate" shall mean sufficient for age, size and number of dogs on the premises. Page 10 of 2g Tli 11 -17 -10 1) ItAFT is7. Licensing of dogs; fees. A. License required. All dogs in the Town over the age of four months shall be licensed by the Town Clerk. A person applying for a dog license shall present a current certificate of rabies vaccination at the time of making application for a license or for the renewal of an existing license. Unless the license application includes a certificate signed by a licensed veterinarian or an affidavit acceptable to the Town Clerk and signed by the owner showing that the dog has been spayed or neutered, the dog shall be deemed to be unspayed or unneutered, as the case may be. Such certificate or affidavit shall not be required if the same has previously been provided to the Town Clerk and noted in the dog's license record. B. Expiration of license. (a) Except: as otherwise provided herein, a license shall be issued or renewed for a period of at least: one year, provided, that no license shall be issued for a period expiring after the last day of the eleventh month following the expiration date of the current rabies certificate for the dog being licensed. All licenses shall expire on the last day of the last month of the period for which they are issued. (b) The owner may license a dog for two or three years, subject to the license expiration and rabies certificate expiration provisions in (a) above. 9 C. License fees. (a) The annual license fee for a spayed or neutered dog shall be $1.1, which fee includes a mandated state surcharge of $1 for the purpose of carrying out a state- mandated program of animal population control. (b) The annual license fee for an unspayed or unneutered dog shall be $23, which fee includes a mandated state surcharge of $3 for the purpose of carrying out a state- mandated program of animal population control. D. Purebred license. (a) The owner of five or more unaltered purebred dogs registered by a Recognized Registry Association may make application to the Town Clerk for a purebred license in lieu of the individual licenses required herein. Such license shall cover only purebred dogs, whether unaltered or spayed or neutered. (b) Application for a purebred license shall be on a form provided by the Town Clerk. All dogs over four months of age must be listed and included in the purebred license. Purebred licenses shall be issued for one year and renewed annually. (e) Copies of registry papers for every purebred dog on the application, or a comprehensive list of registry numbers and associations, shall be provided to the Town Clerk, along with the license application, and a current certificate of rabies vaccination for each dog on the application, ® (d) The application fee for a purebred license is: Page I1 0f25 '1013 1 1 -17 -10 DRAFT (i) For five to 20 dogs -$100 plus the mandated state surcharge of $1 per spayed or neutered dog on the application for the purpose of carrying out a stage- mandated program of animal population control, and $3 per unspayed or unneutered dog on the application for the purpose of carving out a state - mandated program of animal population control. (ii) For 21 or more dogs -$200 plus the mandated stage surcharge of $1 per spayed or neutered dog on the application for the purpose of carrying out a state - mandated program of animal population control, and $3 per unspayed or unneutered dog on the application for the purpose of carrying out a state- mandated program of animal population control. (e) No purebred license is transferable. Upon change of ownership of any dog licensed under a purebred license, the new owner shall make application for a license, except when the new owner holds a valid purebred license and adds the dog to such purebred license. (f) One identification tag per purebred license shall be provided by the Town. E. License Fee Waivers. The Town requires a license for any guide dog, hearing dog, service dog, wear dog, working search dog, detection dog, police dog and therapy dog, however, only the license fee is waived. The mandated stage surcharges cannot be waived by the town and shall be collected. The owner may purchase a special identification tag for a $4 fee. F. Purchase of Licenses and Renewals; Replacement Identification Tags; No Refund of Fees. (a) All dog licenses and renewals thereof shall be purchased from the Town Clerk. (b) The Town Clerk may issue a replacement identification tag for a fee of $3. (c) No license fee or portion thereof will be refunded in the event a dog is lost, stolen, sold, given away, surrendered or deceased before the expiration of the license term. G. Use of Fees. All fees called for in subsections (C) - (F) above shall be used for funding the administration of the Dog Control Law of the Town. H. Additional Fee for Enumerated Unlicensed Dog. In addition to the license and other fees provided for herein, the owner of a dog identified as unlicensed during a dog enumeration shall be charged an additional fee of $7 at the time of licensing. All such additional fees under this subsection shall be used to pay the expenses incurred by the town during such enumeration. S. seizure Officer, owner's owner's of dogs; redemptio or any peace officer, premises and /or any premises. n; disposition; impoundment fee. The Dog Control shall seize any unlicensed dog whether on or off the dog not wearing a tag, not identified and not on the A. if a dog seized is not wearing an identification tag (license tag), it shall be held for a period of no less than five (5) days. 0 Be If a dog seized is wearing an identification tag, the owner shall be promptly Page 12 of 25 El TB 11 -n -lo 1.)RAFT notified either in person or by certified mail. if the owner is notified in person, the dog shall be held for a period of no less than seven (7) days; if notified by mail, no less than nine (9) days. C. The fees for any seizure and impoundment of a dog in violation of Article, 7 of the Agriculture and Markets Law or of this local law are as follows: (a) For the first impoundment: $25 to the Town, plus the prevailing kennel charge. (b) For the second impoundment: $50 plus $10 per day or fraction thereof to the Town for each day of impoundment, plus the prevailing kennel charge. (c) For the third impoundment: $75 plus $10 per day or fraction thereof to the Town for each day of impoundment., plus the prevailing kennel charge. D. If not redeemed, the owner shall forfeit all title to the dog and it shall be released to an authorized humane society or kennel to be adopted or euthaniaed, E. The owner of any seized dog not wearing an identification tag at time of seizure shall pay an "unidentified dog fee" of $15 to the Town Clerk at the time of redemption in addition to any license, impoundment, kennel or other fees called for herein. Such fee shall apply whether or not such dog was licensed at the time of seizure. 90 Record of seizure. Upon seizure of any dog, the Dog Control Officer, or any peace officer, shall make a record of the matter. The record shall include date of seizure, breed, general description, sex, identification tag number, time of release to owner, location of release, and name and address of owner, if anv. 100 Complaints. Any person who observes a dog in violation of any section of this local law may file an accusatory instrument, under oath, with the Town Clerk or with the Dog Control Officer or any peace officer, specifying the violation, the date of violation, the damage caused and including place(s) violation occurred and the name and address of the dog owner, if known. Any such accusatory instruments filed with the Town Clerk or Dog Control Officer shall be promptly filed with the Town Justice Court.. 110 Enforcement. Any Dog Control Officer of the Town shall, and all peace officers may, administer and enforce the provisions of this local law and for that purpose shall have the authority to issue appearance tickets and to seize dogs, either on or off the owner's premises, if witnessed to be in violation of this local law. 12. Impeding Dog Control Officer unlawful. No person shall hinder, resist or oppose the Dog Control Officer or peace officer authorized to administer or enforce the provisions of this local law in the performance of such officer's duties. 13. Disclaimer of liability. The owner or person harboring any dog so destroyed under the provisions of this local law, whether destroyed by a Dog Control Officer or peace officer or released to an authorized humane society or veterinarian, shall not be entitled to any compensation, and no action shall be maintainable thereafter to recover the value of such dog or :any other type of damage. Pagc 13 of 25 '1613 11.17 -111 1) It A rr 140 Penalties for offenses. A violation of this local law shall constitute a violation as defined by the Penal Law and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $25, nor more than $75, except that (i) where the person was found to have violated this section or former Section 2 of the Town of Dryden Dog Ordinance within the preceding five (5) years, the fine shall be not less than $75, nor more than $150, and (ii) where the person was found to have committed two or more such violations within the preceding five (5) years the fine shall be not less than $150 nor more than $250. These penalties shall be in addition to any other penalty provided by law. 15. Severability. if any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, local law or part of this local law shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentience, paragraph, section, article or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. 160 When effective. This local law shall take effect January 1, 2011, after filing with the Secretary of State of the State of New York, 211d Cl Solomon Doll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes Atty Perkins said that there is an interesting dilemma here. The State wants you to enact a dog law pursuant: to a statute which dons not take effect until January 1, 2011. He doesn't know whether that is subject to challenge or not. He added that he believes there is authority pursuant to the Municipal Home Rule to do it anyway. That is why the wording in the statutory authority paragraph is the way it is. B Avery pointed out that there are 1,063 licensing municipalities across the state that are in the same position. The stage has also directed that we pay monies over to an entity that is yet to be chosen. Supv Sumner asked Atty Perkins to put together appropriate "whereases" for the resolution adopting the law. B Avery reported that there was a recent laurel in The Ithaca Journal regarding work done by the Town's dog control officer. She added that this month the Leonards received a letter addressed to them at the town thanking them for the dog they had adopted and contributing $100 to their shelter. HIGHWAY /DPW DEPARTMENT Highway Superintendent Jack Bush said the County, bridge crew checked the Johnson Road bridge and it has serious problems. The bridge is now posted at 20 ton. The County has done some repairs. J Bush recommends keeping it posted. It still has some deck issues. There is no plan to do the work this year. He asked that resident concerns directed to him. Salt storage building -The Town has received a proposal from Novelli for inspection to check the stricture in accordance with New York State snow loads. A Sciarabba said that Novelli would check the structure of the salt storage building in accordance with New York State minimum snow loads. The letter that J Bush received earlier 4D from CoverAll, who did the original design and installation indicated that they had a concern about their structure meeting those load requirements. They had plans to do their own analysis, but are now in some sort of Canadian form of bankruptcy and don't have funding to Nige 14 (W25 r TB 11 -17 -I0 DRAT7'1' do it. They are recommending to any owners of this series of roof system to have an engineer take a look at the structure. Novelli has proposed for $2,400 to take a look at their analysis and let us know whether it is safe or whether there need to be enhancements. The Memorandum Proposal not to exceed $2900 if there is a need to have technician on site to collect information or data. RESOLUTION #163 (2010) - APPROVE PROPOSAL FROM NOVELLI ENGINEERING Supv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby authorizes the expenditure of a su.m not to exceed $2,900 for an analysis of the salt storage building by Novelli Engineering, pursuant to their memorandum dated June 21, 20 1.0, to Andrew J. Sciarabba, PE, and the Town Supervisor is authorized to sign any necessary documents. 211d Cl Makar Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes Snow & Ice Agreement - Atty Perkins has revised the Snow and Ice Agreement between the Town and County to reflect the recent road swap. County Highway Manager is aware of the revision and is okay with it, Basically, this year the Town will do a section of Gulf Hill for the County and the County is doing German Cross Road for the Town. 19 RESOLUTION # 164 (20 10) - APPROVE SNOW AND ICE AGREEMENT Supv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby approves the 2011 Snow and Ice Agreement with Tompkins County and authorizes the Town Supervisor to sign the same. 2" d Cl Leifer Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes CI Makar Yes Cl Lcifer Yes Oakbrook Drive - J Bush explained that he has an opportunity to acquire a parcel of property on Oakbrook Drive for a snowplow turn- around and access to the Parke -Dabcs property the town now owns. This would also solve some problems for the property owner. This would be a swap for an exchange of work and the town would end up with ownership of this small piece of property. This is essentially an extension of Oak Brook Drive and would fix some erosion issues and problems with the ditch. The turnaround area would be increased. The cost is estimated at $6,500. J Bush asked the board for authorization to continue discussions and negotiations with the property owner, Susan Boutros. RESOLUTION #16512010) - AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATION WITH PROPERTY OWNER Supv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: 1':1ge 15 of L'i r III I 1 -17 -10 1) RAr'r RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby authorizes the Highway Superintendent to continue to discuss and negotiate with Susan Boutros for acquisition of a parcel of property on Oak Brook Drive. 2iii1 Cl Makar Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes J Bush displayed the plaque to be attached to the town hall sign planter. It says "Garden in honor of Justice Edwin R Sweetland for his years of service to the Town of Dryden ". It also says at the bottom "Built with pride by Larry Carpenter 2010 ". J Bush said I, Carpenter took that project on and did it pretty much by himself. J Bush has an agreement with SimplexGrinnell for alarm monitoring, This is a new contract. County Emergency Response will not: continue monitoring alarms because of regulations and budget constraints. The expense to the Town is $600 per year. RESOLUTION # 166 (20 10) - AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT WITH SIMPLEX GRINNELL FOR ALARM MONITORING Supv Sumner offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby approves the contract with Simplex Grinnell for alarm monitoring at a yearly expense of $600.00. 2iii1 Makar Roll Call Vote RECREATION DEPT CI Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes M Bianconi is unable to attend and sent a written report. The department served 210 youth in their fall programs. COUNTY BRIEFING Martha Robertson said the county budget was passed. it's not pretty, but it's done. She is on the NYSAC commission about Medicaid and they met in Albany last week. Medicaid has been instructed by the state legislature to prepare for the state taking over administration of Medicaid (about 2% of the cost of Medicaid). This could actually cost counties more money. They were told the plan they are writing now for the November 30 deadline is a plan to plan. One of the purposes is to get the stake ready for federal health care reform and insurance exchanges. She is hoping this is part of a comprehensive effort. It would not be effective or efficient to reorganize such a big health insurance program and Medicaid and then have to do it again to comply with federal requirements. Supv Sumner said she appreciates the efforts our County Legislators made to exert restraint and yet provide services. M Robertston said the county staff roster is down by 25.5 Puoe 16 01,25 r 'rB 11-17-10 DRAFT full time equivalents, and even though there were votes to add spending back to the budget, they were actually cuts compared to 2010. Municipal youth services ended up with a cut of almost half from the 2010 budget. M Robertson noted that if nine state mandates were removed, the tax bill on an average home would go from $1,026 to $258. Mike Lane said he did not support the county budget because he felt it was too high a tax levy tax increase, but he is proud of the open process. The Facilities Committee is applying for a green grant through DEC to build an experimental wetland on the Caswell Road dump to see if the wetland can process the leachate from the old dump. This has been successful in other areas. The benefit would be not having to truck the leachate to the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility, There will be a wildlife assessment done at the airport with most of the cost paid through an FAA grant program. This is because of a collision with a deer and a small plane on the runway. The state pays 12% of the cost. The Broadband Committee is under way and chaired by Pat Pryor. He is looking forward to their recommendations on how to bring access to rural areas. The County is proceeding with a law for protection of road rights -of -way from temporary high volume truck traffic from temporary projects (gas drilling and other projects). It provides for posting of those areas and bonding by the contractors to make sure that the roads are protected. There will be a permitting process and roads will be restored if damaged. This will be discussed tomorrow at the government operations committee. TCCOG is also looking at the issue, but the County wants to move forward with something. The County can replace their law in the future if they feel it is necessary. Aquifer protection laws are important. M Lane said that will help with protection of drinking water and at the least protect our aquifers. He urged the Town to move forward with its aquifer protection law. M Robertson said the County's cell tower initiative project will soon get going. There are seven municipalities that have signed up. ZOAiiING OFFICER ZO Slater said he is beginning to turn things over to others in the department in preparation for his retirement. The Wildflowers relocation application will be brought: to the board in December. Supv Sumner said the Wood Road complaint has been followed tip on. There is a clear violation. The Zoning Office will be working with the property owner to rectify the problem. Henry Slater's resignation letter has been received and Supv Sumner will be preparing a response. The board has received and reviewed a job description for Planning Director and Supv Sumner asked the board to take action to establish the position. The Personnel Committee will be bringing a proposal to fill the position. The board will probably also need to create a couple of other positions in connection with the restructuring of the department. Page 17 or25 'rB 11 -17 -10 1) RAF•T RESOLUTION #167 (2010) - ESTABLISH DIRECTOR OF PLANNING POSITION Cl Stelick offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Hoard does hereby establish the position of Director of Planning in accordance with applicable New York. State laws and the Civil Service Rules for Tompkins County. 2rid CI Leifer Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Y c s ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER No report. ENGINEERING Cortland Road Water issue - Supv Sumner reported that at a meeting with Jack Bush, Cl Solomon, Andy Sciarabba and Atty Perkins on Tuesday, they agreed to ask the board to authorize expenditure of funds for preparation of a map, plan and report for (a) a small water district along Route 13, and (b) Urger district encompassing the Cortland Road Sewer area_ In the meantime, the Village has sent letters to residents terminating service by February 28. There may be an opportunity to extend the deadline to accommodate some planning. It: is likely that the expense of replacing that water main alone is more than property owners can bear. The urgency is removed if these residents go ahead and drill wells. Supv Sumner would still like to ask for authorization for a map, plan and report for a larger district. There may not be much point in a smaller district unless there is a reasonable chance of getting the Village to extend the deadline. The Village's deadline was motivated by a notice received frorn the Tompkins County Health Department, Supv Sumner will attend the Village meeting tomorrow night to hear residents' comments and the board's comments. There may be an opportunity to delay the deadline. Atty Perkins has prepared two proposed resolutions, and suggested the board delete the part authorizing TG Miller to move ahead. The board can pass the resolution appropriating the funds. That will allow 30 days for the board to figure out whether to proceed with one or the other. TG Miller will not begin work unless and until directed by the board. Supv Sumner questioned whether to move ahead with a meeting of the residents of North Road. She said she has had conversations with several key players. Ed Bell suggests installation of a 1" copper line from Lee Road to be shared by some of the affected properties. But they don't want to put a lot of money into that solution if it turns out there is a municipal solution around the corner. The Village has asked for a task force. Supv Sumner asked Cl Solomon and Cl Stelick as the Town's infrastructure Committee to contact them. A Sciarabba said they did look at the numbers in the MR" report that estimated $400,000 for replacement of water main and felt that the per foot cost was very high. The urgency of fixing the main may qualify the project: for low or no cost. interest. on financing. Page 1 to d'25 Trs 11-17.10 DRAFT Is M Lane asked that the board keep the property owners advised that they are still looking at things. He doesn't want someone to spend several thousand dollars on a well and then have a water- line installed. Supv Sumner said TC3 has drilled a well to serve the HeadSt:art property at a cost of about $8,000.00. RESOLUTION NO. 168 (2010) RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR PREPARATION OF GENERAL MAP, PLAN AND REPORT FOR PROVIDING FACILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES IN A PROPOSED WATER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN. Cl Makar offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Dryden (the "Tow-n ") proposes to establish a. water district in the following described portion of the Town: that area which generally comprises parcels constituting the Cortland Road Sewer District, but is not necessarily limited by such parcel boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Town Board proposes to acquire, construct and install a water supply and distribution system in the proposed water district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11' RESOLVLD, subject. to permissive referendum, that: the surn of Eight Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($8,250.00) is hereby appropriated to pay the cost of preparing a general map, plan and report for providing water system facilities, improvements and services in the above described portion of the Town. This resolution is subject to permissive referendum as provided in Town Law Section 209 -b, in the manner provided in Article 7 of the Town Law. 2n,1 Cl Solomon Roll Call Vote C1 Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes C1 Leifer Yes RESOLUTION NO. 169 (2010) RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR PREPARATION OF GENERAL MAP, PLAN AND REPORT FOR PROVIDING FACILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES IN A PROPOSED WATER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN. Cl Stelick offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Dryden (the "Town ") proposes to establish a 41 water district in the following described portion of the Town: that area which comprises parcels currently served by the Village of Dryden "1892 water line" east of Route 13 and north of Lee Road, but is not: necessarily limited by such parcel boundaries; and Page 19 of, 25 T13 11 -17 -I0 DRAFT WHEREAS, the Town Board proposes to acquire, construct and install a wager supply and distribution system in the proposed water district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, subject: to permissive referendum, that the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500.00) is hereby appropriated to pay the cost of preparing a general map, plan and report for providing water system facilities, improvements and services in the above described portion of the Town. This resolution is subject to permissive referendum as provided in "Town Law Section 209 -b, in the manner provided in Article 7 of the Town Law. 2ni1 Supv Sumner Roll Call Vote Cl St:elick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes CI Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes ATTORNEY Atty Perkins said he has previously distributed an Order Calling a Public Hearing on the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment contract with Johnson Controls and it would be appropriate for the board to consider that. RESOLUTION #170 (2010) - ORDER FOR PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE 2010 ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO THE ITHACA AREA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, AND THE EXECUTION OF PERFORMANCE CONTRACT WITH JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. IMPLEMENTING SUCH PROJECT. Cl Makar offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: WHEREAS, a plan and report has been duly prepared in such manner and in such detail as this Board determines to be necessary, pursuant to General Municipal Law Article S- G and Town Law §202 -b, relating to proposed capital improvements to the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Plant ( IAWWTP) located in the city of Ithaca to produce certain energy savings for the IAWWTP which is owned in common by the Towns of Dryden and Ithaca and the City of Ithaca (collectively the "Municipalities" individually the "Municipality "), such project to be known and identified as the 2010 Energy Improvements Project, and hereafter also referred to as the "Improvements," such Improvements to be constructed and owned by the municipalities, and WHEREAS, the proposed 2010 )Energy Improvements Project involves the replacement of obsolete, inadequate, damaged, destroyed and worn out apparatus and equipment and the acquisition of additional apparatus and equipment: and consists of the improvements set forth below and as more particularly shown and described in said plan and report presently on file in the office of the Town Clerk: (i) Lighting systems modifications, and (ii) Installation or upgrades to energy management systems, and (iii) Energy efficiency improvements to the building envelope and HVAC systems, and Page 20 of 25 TB 11 -17 -10 0RAF'1I (iv) Replacement of the digester mixing equipment, cogeneration facility, heat exchanging equipment, toilers and generation blowers and dissolved oxygen control systems, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the Genera_i Municipal Law and Energy Law 9- 103(6) and (7) a Request for Proposals (RFP) was prepared and published, and WHEREAS, Johnson Controls, Inc. has submitted a proposal which has been determined to meet the requirements of the RFP, and WHEREAS, the Improvements will reduce energy consumption at the IAWWTP by an estimated 69% and will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an estimated 961 tons of carbon dioxide per year, and WHEREAS, Johnson Controls, Inc. has submitted a proposed Performance Contract that guarantees a specified level of energy savings over the period of the contract (15 years), and WHEREAS, approximately $6.9 million of the improvements are improvements that would need to be made over the next five years to replace aging digester gas facilities, cogeneration equipment, aeration blowers, dissolved oxygen controls and boiler equipment at the IAWWTP, and WHEREAS, the Improvements associated with the building envelope and HVAC systems and the purchase of a 5kW photovoltaic solar panel are being funded by a $406,179 NYSERDA grant, and WHEREAS, the maximum ainount proposed to be expended for the aforesaid Improvements is $8,030,000 (the Town of Dryden share being 1.98% thereof or $1.58,994); and WHEREAS, the proposed method of financing to be employed by the Town of Dryden for the aforesaid Improvements is payment of the Town's proportionate share from unreserved or unappropriated fund balances of the respective sewer districts of said Town served by the IAWWTP, and WHEREAS, the area of said Town determined to be benefited by said Improvements consists of the entire area of all the server districts in the Town served by the IAWWTP, including without limitation Dryden Sewer District # 1 (Varna area), Snyder Hill Sewer District, Monkey Run Sewer District, Turkey Hill Sewer District, and Royal Road Sewer District; and WHEREAS, it is now desired to call .a public hearing for the purpose of considering (i) the aforesaid plan and report, (ii) the providing of said Improvements, (iii) the authorization of payment of the costs of the improvements, and (iv) the authorization of the proposed Performance Contract between the Municipalities and Johnson Controls, Inc. in relation to such Improvements, and to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof, all in accordance with applicable provisions of the General Municipal Law and Town Law; NOW, THEREFORE, iT IS HEREBY ORDERED, by the Town Board of the "rover► of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York, as follows: Section 1. A public hearing will be held at the Town Hall, 93 Fast Main Street, Dryden, New York, on November 30, 2010, at 6:45 o'clock p.m. prevailing time to consider the aforesaid plan and report and the questions of the providing of said improvements, the authorization of payment of the costs of the Improvements, and the authorization of the Performance Contract: between the Municipalities and Johnson Controls, inc. to implement such Improvements, and PaSc 21 ot'25 'Ili I I -17 -10 0RAr•1• 0 to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof and concerning the same, and to take such action thereon as is required by law. Section 2, The Town Clerk of the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York, is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this order to be published once in The Ithaca Journal, official newspaper of the Town, and also to post a copy thereof on the Town signboard maintained by the Clerk, not less than ten nor more than twenty days before the day designated for the hearing as aforesaid. Section 3. This order shall Like effect immediately. 211 d Cl Solomon Roll Call Vote C1 Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes Atty Perkins said the board needs to pass a resolution scheduling a public hearing on the appropriation of funds to close on the Stuttle conservation easement. RESOLUTION # 171 (20 10) - SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING ON APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM UNAPPROPRIATED UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE FOR ACQUISITION OF A CONSERVATION EASEMENT FROM LEWIS AND LINDA STUTTLE Cl Slelick offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: WHEREAS, Lewis and Linda Stuttle are the owners of certain real property consisting of 432.30 acres, in 4 parcels located on Livermore Road, Livermore Cross Road, Cortland Road and Simms Hill Road in the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York; and WHEREAS, the Town of Dryden and the County of Tompkins are municipal corporations, and have the authority pursuant: to General Municipal Law §247 and Article 49 of the Emrironmental Conservation Law to acquire conservation easements; and WHEREAS, the Stuttle property consists primarily of productive agricultural land, containing approximately 245 acres of soils of statewide importance as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service; and WHEREAS, the Stuttle property contains a portion of Egypt Creek, a tributary to Virgil Creek, which is a major tributary to Tall Creek, which is the largest tributary to the southern basin of Cayuga Lake, a water body that is on the New York State Department: of Environmental Conservation's 303(d) list of impaired water bodies, and because of the steep topography of the banks of Egypt Creek, disturbance to soils in this area due to agricultural or other activity may significantly degrade water quality in the creek and adversely affect Cayuga Lake; and WHEREAS, Article 1.4, Section 4 of the New York State Constitution stales that "the policy of this state shall be to conserve and protect its natural resources and scenic beauty and encourage the development and improvement of its agricultural lands for the production of food and other agricultural products;" and WHEREAS, Environmental Conservation Law Section 49 -0301. provides that "the state policy of conserving, preserving and protecting its environmental assets and natural and man- Page 22 0'25 TD 11 -17 -10 nkA1 :T made resources, the preservation of open spaces, and the preservation, development and improvement of agricultural and forest lands..., is fundamental to the maintenance, enhancement and improvement of...balanced economic growth and the quality of life in all areas of the state;" and WHEREAS, Section 300 of the Agriculture and Markets Law provides that "It is hereby found and declared that many of the agricultural lands in New York State are in jeopardy of being lost for any agricultural purposes. When nonagricultural development extends into farm areas, competition for limited resources results ... It is therefore the declared policy of the state to conserve, protect and encourage the development and improvement of its agricultural land for production of food and other agricultural products ... It is the purpose of this article to provide a locally- initiated mechanism for the protection and enhancement of New York State's agricultural land as a viable segment of the local and state economics and as an economic and environmental resource of major importance;" and WHEREAS, Agriculture and Markets Law ( §321) provides that agricultural lands are irreplaceable state assets; and WHEREAS, the Stuttle property is located within Tompkins County's Agricultural District #1; and WHEREAS, the Stuttle property is located within Tompkins County, which adopted an Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan, which recommends strengthening the economic viability of farm businesses through programs of education, business retention and expansion; providing a supportive climate for continuation of farming through public: policies and actions on land use and taxation that minimize disincentives for farming; protecting the farmland base for farmers and the general public into the future; and protecting lands in Agricultural Districts in Tompkins County; and WHEREAS, the Stuttle property is located within the Town of Dryden, which adopted a Right To Farm Law in 1992, and a Comprehensive Plan in 2005, and the Town recognizes a long heritage and community built around agriculture, and annually celebrates this aspect of the community, and recognizes the economic and environmental importance of farmland in the Town, and the Comprehensive Plan proposes a Town -led agricultural land protection program, including purchase of development rights, and land use controls that recognize agriculture as `a legitimate, long term land use on par with residential, commercial, industrial, and other traditional land use, and not as merely a temporarT state pending development for a `higher' use;" and WHEREAS, the acquisition of rights in real property for the preservation of open spaces is a public purpose for which public funds may be expended for the purchase of development rights and a conservation casement following a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Town of Dryden and the County of Tompkins were awarded an Agricultural and Farmland Protection Implementation Grant by the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets to purchase a conservation easement from Lewis Stuttle and Linda Stuttle; and WHEREAS, the Stuttles and the Town of Dryden and County of Tompkins have negotiated a Purchase Agreement for a conservation easement which includes the development rights to the Stuttle property consistent with the requirements of the Department of Agriculture and Markets Agricultural and Farmland Protection implementation grant; and WHEREAS, the Town and County will be co- holders of the conservation easement 41 pursuant to its terms and the terms of an Agreement between the Town and County; and Page 23 c?f 25 TB I I -17 -10 1)KAFT WHEREAS, due to lack of current state funding, payment of the grant to the Town and County has been delayed; and WHEREAS, the Stutttles have indicated to the Town and County that due to changes in the tax laws they must close the sale of the conservation easement to the Town of Dryden and County of Tompkins before the end of 2010; and WHEREAS, Town Law 112((1) authorizes the town board by resolution to make additional appropriations from its unappropriated unreserved fund balance; and WHEREAS, General Municipal Law 247(2) requires a public hearing prior to the expenditure of public fiends for the acquisition of a conservation easement., now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: I. A public hearing before the town board of the 'Town of Dryden shall be held at the Town Wall, 93 East Main Street, Dryden, New York on November 30, 2010 at 6:30 p.m, prevailing time on the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: A. There is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated unreserved fund balance $753,000 to be used exclusively for the purchase of a conservation easement from Lewis and Linda Stuttle. B. Upon receipt of the grant. funds from the Department of Agriculture and Markets such grant: funds shall be deposited to the credit of the Town's unappropriated unreserved fund valance. C. The expenditure of $753,000 for the purchase of a conservation easement from Lewis and Linda Stuttle pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreements is hereby approved and the Towzl Supervisor is hereby authorized to pay such sum and execute all instruments necessary to affect such purchase. 2. The town clerk shall publish a notice of such public hearing at least ten (10) but not more than twenty (20) days prior to the public hearing. 2m] Supv Sumner Roll Call Vote Cl Stelick Yes C1 Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finger Lakes land Trust - Supv Sumner and /or C1 Makar is going to contact Andy Zepp to find out: what the town gets in return for contribution, whether there are gas leases on the property, whether there is a commitment that gas drilling will not be allowed on the property, if there is a property management plan, etc. Supv Sumner has the original request and will share it with board members. Paee 24 of 25 'I'li I I- Ii -I11 DRAFT NEW BUSINESS Clarity Connect Agreement - has been sent to Atty Perkins for review. This agreement: sets forth what towrn receives in exchange for waiving fees in connection with constriction of towers for the broadband project:. This document is intended to demonstrate that there is public benefit for waiving fees. Supv Sumner would like it by the December S meeting. The Teamsters have approved the new labor contract and the Town Board needs to approve it. The contract changes include a vacation package that encourages them to use their vacation time. Workers are now only allowed cash payment for up to 40 hours per year. There are changes in the work week. They will work four and half days in the summer instead of four ten hour days. Wage scale changes were settled on at 50 cents per year and 1 % longevity for more than 15 years. New employees pay will pay 1.0% of health insurance costs. RESOLUTION #172 (2010) - APPROVE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT Cl Stelick offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption: RESOLVED, that this Town Board hereby approves the collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Local 317, covering the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012, and the Town Supervisor is authorized to sign the same, 2nd Cl Leifer Roll Call Vote COMMITTEE REPORTS Cl Stelick Yes Cl Solomon Yes Supv Sumner Yes Cl Makar Yes Cl Leifer Yes Finance Committee - Will be meeting on Friday, November 19. Technology Committee - Will be meeting on Friday, November 19, Personnel Committee - Cl Leifer and Cl Stelick met on November 4 with Kevin Ezell. They will be meeting again December 3 (4:00 p.m.). They need a job description for the part time position for Henry Slater and for the new planner. Supv Sumner asked them to consider volunteerism policy for the employee handbook. Recently a staff member spent the night fighting a fire and still reported to work in the morning. She said there should be some accommodation for those types of circumstances. On motion made, seconded and unanimously carried, the board moved into executive session at 10:20 p.m. to discuss a matter of litigation. No action was taken, and on motion made, seconded and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bambi L. Avery Town Clerk Page 25 ot'25 TclWn cl Dryden Town Board Meeting November 17, 2010 Name - 1PleasePritl Address or Board I j I t�bG�2� �3 A ' S V W1, je�v P e�f l Sv �' \N VA pn J �} IA 07 L O ( ~ i` Town or nryden Town Board Meeting November 17, 2010 Name - ' __ lease, Print; ._ _. . ,i lvtAAf( 7n INsWlu�d—" Address or Board `1baAC z1 VIAe; r S y//WO G�� q u 11 -17 -10 SPEAKER SIGN IN SHEET If you wish to address the Board under citizens privilege of the floor please sign in below, Speakers will be limited to a maximum of three minutes. Please provide the Clerk with a Nwitten summary of your statement. Name Address C .t L W2 WI 1 WIMM �_, z � . / !i of `Ldp n ao 2 1 �3 ®y 1 a', . �-r� � Dryden Town Board Meeting Dryden Town Hall 93 East Main Street November 17, 2010 � 7:00 PM 1. Call Meeting to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Public Hearings -- Solat — 7:00 p.m. -- Verizon — 7:15 p.m. 5. Citizens Privilege 6. Town Clerk B Avery a. Approve Meeting Minutes for October, 13 and October 20, 2010 b. Introduce Town of Dryden Dog Control Law and set public hearing 7. Highway Superintendent/Dept Of Public Works .1 Bush a. Snow and Ice Agreement 8. Recreation Department M Bianconi 9, County Briefing County Rep 10. Zoning Officer H Slater 11. Environmental Planner D Kwasnowski 12. Engineering 13. Attorney 14. Unfinished Business a. Finger Fakes Land Trust b. Johnson Controls 1 IAWWTF Public Interest Order c. Stuttle Conservation Easement Acquisition Public Hearing Date d. Cortland Road Water District Update 15. New Business a. Establishment of Planning Director Position b. Clarity Connect Agreement 16. Committee Reports (3 minutes or less each, please) a. Finance Committee b. Tecluiology Committee c. Personnel Committee 17. Future Agenda Items 18. Executive Session (if necessary) A Sciarabba M Perkins M Sumner The Next Abstract and Agenda Meeting will be Wednesday, December 8 at 7:00 PM The Next Town Board Meeting will be Wednesday, December 15 at 7:00 PM The Organizational Meeting will be held January 5, 2011 at 7:00 PM Dryden Town Board Meeting Dryden Town Hall 93 East Main Street November 17, 2010 � 7:00 PM 1. Call Meeting to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Public Hearings -- Solat — 7:00 p.m. -- Verizon — 7:15 p.m. 5. Citizens Privilege 61 To�,«n Clerk B Avery a. Approve Meeting Minutes for October, 13 and October 20, 2010 b. Introduce ToxNgl of Dryden Dog Control Law and set public hearing 7. highway Superintendent/Dept O.f.'Public `Yorks J Bush a. Snow and Ice Agreement 8. Recreation Department 9. County Briefing 10. Zoning Officer 11. Environmental Planner 12. Engineering 13. Attorney 14. Unfinished Business a. finger Lakes Land '['rust b. Johnson Controls / iAWWTF Public Interest Order c. Stuttle Conservation Easement Acquisition Public I•Iearing Date d. Cortland Road Water District Update 15. New Business a. Establishment of Planning Director Position b. Clarity Comiect Agreement 16. Committee Reports (3 minutes or less each, please) a. Finance Conunittee b. Technology Committee c. Personnel Committee 17. Future Agenda Items 18. Executive Session (if necessary) IN1 Bianconi County Rep 1 -1 Slater D Kwasnowski A Sciarabba M Perkins M Sumner The Next Abstract and Agenda Meeting will be Wednesday, December 8 at 7 :00 PM The Next Town Board Meeting will be Wednesday, December 15 at 7:00 PM The Organizational Meeting will be held January 5, 2011 at 7:00 PM My comments tonight are a paraphrase of words penned by Carl Arnold, member, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter Gas Grilling ]"ask force isSome of us in this room have given considerable time and thought over the past year or two, working on ways to Protect our town residents and infrastructure, our land and water, from ills threatened by an industry using high volume slick water hydraulic fracturing to extract fossil gas from our earth. I would like to offer a few observations about proposed protections. No regulation can prevent the heavy metals and radioactive substances loosened by this process from coming to the earth's surface with the gas. No regulation, in this time of economic plummet, can find the billions needed to construct waste treatment plants that might, might be able to filter the toxic chemicals, heavy metals and radioactive materials from fracking waste. No regulation can prevent 30% to 70% of the toxic (racking chemicals from remaining underground. No regulation can predict or control the underground migration of toxic plumes. In this era of diminishing availability of fresh water in extraordinary squandering of fresh water - -5.5 million becomes contaminated permanently. At present, Japanese, Indian, European, Scandinavian, significant portion of US drilling leases. After despoil] their gas will go overseas. the US, No regulation can prevent the gallons average per well -- 100% of which and Canadian corporations own a ng our land, water and air, their profit and Even while New York State is planning to issue permits to drill and Crack in our state forests, the governor has reduced the Department of Environmental Conservation's budget and staff to minimal levels, laughably inadequate to deal with what the industry has planned. Oil & gas corporations have a long - established record of being rapacious, sloppy and inhumane, whether it's the Ecuadorian Amazon, the Niger Delta, Indonesia; Prince William Sound, the Gulf of Mexico or Pennsylvania. No regulation can make the process of high volume, slick water hydraulic fracturing safe. It is a human implemented, labor intensive process with scant oversight. Unlike other industrial processes, this one happens in the middle of the woods and in the middle of the night. Mishaps, accidents and bad decisions will occur. There is only one way to render this practice safe: Follow the lead of the Pittsburgh City Council and Ban it. Outright. Unequivocally. That is the only rational response to this proposed industrial destruction. Anything less dooms us. ® Submitted by Marie McRae November 17, 2010 0 Town Board of Dryden, First, I want to extend my gratitude to each member and to Bambi for dedicating your time, energy and care in working on all issues concerning Dryden as it continues to grow in a responsible, sustainable manner. I must also add special thanks to Jason Liefer and each member of the DRAC organization that I joined about 16 months ago. The in depth research to uncover what the true realities are when drilling for methane gas via the unconventional practice of horizontal hydro fracking is not a pleasant task. In the words of Mayor Tillman of Dish, Texas now suffering health consequences from drilling, "once you know, you can't not know" There are now faces and stories I cannot forget. While attending the Pittsburgh EPA hearings a few months ago I listened to 4' /z hours of speakers express disgust and anger toward their community and state leaders for allowing the industry into residential areas and farmlands. Grown people fighting tears, stated: "I had 5 goats, they all died, they were my kids ", "my father is dead from drinking the water", "my calves were stillborn and deformed because my cows drank the water" "my kids are sick at home and fine at school" , "I had to get rid of all my horses because I couldn't carry water anymore" The research has revealed that horizontal fracking is uncontrollable and unpredictable at best. Other events including flaring and explosions beneath the surface of our properties and aquifers are a reality in this practice. We have seen so much collateral and catastrophic damage to health, homes, land, air and clean water across this country wherever methane development takes place I can say without doubt it has affected each of us in profound ways and many of us suffer health issues brought on by the relentless feeling of threat and stress of loosing it all, moving, and fighting for our basic right to live without toxins found in drilling practices. Methane gas is a fossil fuel, at least 20 times more powerful than CO2. How can we come to the conclusion that spending our time, our money and risk our food sources, our clean air and water to drill for a harmful, limited, gas, that creates unprecedented amounts of CO2 emissions to refine and deliver? Why would we ® do that? Use Methane - OK but we don't have to frack for it. We can make it above the ground without creating toxic substances — through Anaerobic Methane Digesters from our dairy farms. If we cannot get any more gas by vertical wells. In short, it's gone, we don't need to spend any more time, money and energy on the subject of gas development in Dryden to address this issue any further except for a permanent ban. I am so tired of the word fracking. I cannot continue to spend time in an area that even thinks it will be permitted. I moved here 4 years ago, built a beautiful green home and 2 years into our build we find our neighbors on 3 sides signed leases. We are now literally surrounded by hundreds of acres of leased property. My significant financial investment will be a total loss if I cannot live in my home. I was about to start a project that would have provided affordable housing for people with disabilities. However, I cannot invest in that project until I feel safe here. Without the BAN I will never feel safe because I won't be. I am respectfully demanding that my Town protect my right to live without dangerous industrial development in my backyard and protect my right to clean water and air. The swipe of my neighbors' pen should not be able to destroy my home, health, clean air and water and the right to grow food and raise animals in a safe environment free of industrial toxins. It is either the swipe of their pen or yours that determines my fate. Should people be able to do what they want with their land -yes - but not at the expense of every one else's health and safety. Ironically; I use the infamous words of B.P.'s CEO Tony Hayward "I want MY life back" Respectfully I ask you to use your pen. Joanne Cipolla- Dennis Petition to ban slickwater horizontal hydrofracking in the Town of Dryden We, the undersigned residents of the Town of Dryden, believe that high volume, slickwater horizontal hydrofracking for gas extraction threatens our water and our air. *Allowing this practice in our community will significantly endanger our health and well- being. Hydrofracking is a heavily industrialized process that in surrounding states has snarled traffic and caused significant air, water and noise pollution, and severe damage to roads and other infrastructure. In many places it has had deleterious effects on tourism, hunting, fishing, agriculture and the local economy in general. We urge the Town Board to ban slickwater horizontal hydrofracking in the Town of Dryden Name Signature e-mail address (optional) Street address TownshIp Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Dryden Drvden Dryden Dryden 12/02/2010 13:40:23 MONTHLY REP0RT OF SUPERVIS0R TO THE TOWN B0ARD OF THE Town of Dryden: 0 suant to Section 125 of the Town Laren, I hereby render the following detailed statement all moneys received and. disbursed by me during the rno�h of. November, 2010: DATED: December 2, 2010 Balance Balance 10/31/2010 Increases Decreases 11/30/2010 A GENERAL FUND - TOWNWIDE CASH - CHECKING 7,994.77 0.00 0.00 249,557.70 112,735. 253,614.44 73 3,:38.03 CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS 1,276,783.30 1.11,008.4-1. 65,024.49 4 71,098.63 11, It 006. 2491547.53 0.00 1,074,334.40 CASH - SAVINGS 1,256,289.33 CASH IN TIME DEPOSITS - CD i,5040347.94 0.00 225,471.46 0.04 TOT "4,1, 0.00 1,504,347.94 502,647.29 30168'"5 PETTY CASH 212.37 600.00 0.00 0.00 502,859.66 0.00 TOr1L 600.00 PETTY CASH - POSTAGE 970.26 0.00 0.00 - 253,627.99 970.26 0.00 DPW Equipment Capital Reserve Recreation Capital Reserve 34,180.02 251,323.65 1,790,547.79 14.44 106.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,194.46 251,429.84 ®CASH CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL 31 0761 199, 94 2960776.96 503,161.97 2,8691814.93 DA HIGHWAY TOWNWIDE FUND CHECKING 0.00 0.00 33,174.77 112,735. 33,174.77 73 0.00 CASH - CHECKING 0100 399,263.43 1.11,008.4-1. 65,024.49 112,735. 11, It 006. 41 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 1,256,289.33 2,543.31 142,407.21 0.00 225,471.46 111,008.41 TOT "4,1, 112871688.13 HIGHWAY EQUIPMENT CAPITAL, RESE 0 502,647.29 30168'"5 69,226.00 212.37 01VI 0.00 502,859.66 SLl- VARNA LIGHTING DISTRICT TOr1L 1,758,936.62 - 253,627.99 0.00 222,016.82 609.09 1,790,547.79 B GENERAL - OUTSIDE FUND CASH - CHECKING 0.00 0.00 33,174.77 112,735. 33,174.77 73 0.00 CASH - SAVTFGS 399,263.43 CASH - 65,024.49 112,735. 33,174.77 ?3 431,113.15 PETTY CASH - POSTAGE 2,543.31 289,654.21 0.00 225,471.46 0.00 TOT "4,1, 2,543.31 Cash, Ci'.st•^.mers Deposit3 30168'"5 69,226.00 0. 01VI 0.00 3, 168.75 SLl- VARNA LIGHTING DISTRICT TOTAL 404,975.49 98,1.99.26 66,349.54 436,825.21 DB HIGHWAY OUTSIDE FUND CASH - C166ECKING 0.00 CHECKING 112,735.73 0.00 112,735. 73 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 11 622, 138. 0*1 97,748.70 CASH - SAVINGS 112,735. ?3 1,607,1°1.01 TOTP 1,622,138.04 21.0,484.43 289,654.21 225,471.46 TOT "4,1, 1.,607,151.01 SF1- DRYDEN FIRE DISTRICT CASH - CHECKING 0.00 34,613.00 34,613.00 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 3241144.8 122.33 34,613.00 289,654.21 TOT "4,1, 324,144.88 340735.33 69,226.00 289,654.21 SLl- VARNA LIGHTING DISTRICT - CHECKING 0.00 609.09 609.09 0.00 ®CASH CASH - SAVINGS 3,514.1" 1.23 609.09 2,906.31 TOT:'.L 3,514.17 610.32 1,218.18 2,906.31 Wage 1 MONTHLY REPORT OF SUPERVISOR SL2- ETNA LIGHTING DISTRICT CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL SL3- MEADOW/LEISURE LIGHTING CASH - CHECKING CAS" - SAVINGS TOTAL SM AMBULANCE DISTRICT CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL SS1- SAPSUCKER SEWER - UNITS CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL SS2- VARNA SEWER - UNITS ®CASH - CHECKING CASH -SAVINGS TOTAL SS3- CORTLAND RD SEWER CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS POSTAGE TOTAL, SS4- MONKEY RUN SEWER CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL SS5- TURKEY HILL SEWER CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TOTAL. SS6- PEREGRINE HOLLOW SEWER ®CASH - CHECKING CASH - SAVINGS TO z F.L Balance Balance 10/31/2010 Increases Decreases 11/30/2010 0.00 491.42 491.42 0.00 2,738.34 0.95 45 1.42 2,247.87 2,738.34 492.3"! 982.84 2,247.87 0.00 2,121.02 403.39 0.73 403.39 403.39 0.00 1,718.36 21121.02 404.12 806.78 0,71.8.36 0.00 231,547.95 52,600.00 75.61 52,600.00 52,600.00 0.00 179,023.56 231.,547.95 52,675.61 105,200.00 179,023.56 0.00 899.19 899.19 0.00 46,281.67 316.30 899.19 45,698.78 46,261.67 0.00 :1.75, 907.77 175,907.77 0.00 178,850.23 -20.88 178,829.35 0.00 171, 667..'3 17:1., 667.73 0.00 154,601.54 154, 601..54 1, 21.5.49 2,592.70 266.36 2,E59.06 49,309.60 36,225.22 0.00 80,534.82 1,281.54 230.20 1,511.74 4,730.84 145.38 4,876.22 1,798.38 2,592.70 2,592,30 5,185.40 44,309.60 44,309.60 0.00 88,619.20 1, 281..54 1,281.54 2,563.08 4,730.84 4,730.84 9,461.68 45,698.78 0.00 173,561.43 173,581.43 0.00 170,765.85 -20.88 170,744.97 0.00 170,616.39 170,616.39 0.00 150,016.08 150,016.08 0.00 95,607.16 257.59 40.29 257.59 257.59 0100 95,389.86 95,607.16 297.88 515.1E 95,389.86 Page 2 MONTHLY REPORT Or SUPERVISOR Balance Balance 10/31/2010 Increases Decreases 11/30/2010 SS7- ROYAL ROAD SEWER CASH - CHECKING 00.00 249.22 249.22 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 7,211.08 2.94 249.22 61964.80 TOTAL 7,211.08 252.16 498.44 6,964.80 SW1- VARNA WATER CASH - CHECKING 0.00 15,570.'5 15,570.75 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 353,479.IS 664.37 15,570475 3381572.80 TOTAL 3531479.18 16,235.12 31,141,.50 338,572.80 SW2- SNYDER HILL WATER CASH - CHECKING 0.00 1,231.74 1,23 1.74 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 66,051,.92 132.6 =, :I „231.79 64,952.29 TOTAL 66, 051.42 11364.35 2r463,48 64t952,29 SW3- MONKEY RUN WATER CASH - CHECKING 0.00 5,710.46 51710.46 0.00 CASH - SAV.T,NGS 188,342.30 413.04 5,710.46 183,044.86 TOTAL :1.88,342.30 6,123.50 11 ,420.92 183,044.88 SW4- HALL ROAD WATER CASH - CHECK.ING 0.00 3,121..10 3,121.10 0.00 0 CASH - SAVINGS 36,442.57 1.4108 3,121.10 33,335.55 TOTAL• 36,442.57 3,135.1.8 6,242.20 33,335.55 SW5- TURFY HILL WATER CASH - CHEC4TNG 0.00 4,662.33 9,662.33 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 1-79,990,23 253.21, 4,662,33 1.75, 581.. li TO:'.L 179,990.23 9,915.54 9,324.66 175,581.11 SW6- ROYAL ROAD WATER CASH - CHECKING 0100 11144.51 1,344.51 0.00 CASH - SAVINGS 2011.17.21 6.02 1.,144.51 18,980. ?2 TOTAL 20,117.21 1,1.52.53 2,2.89.02 18,960.72 CD REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS CASH - CHECKING 2i7,706.e8 2,946.84, 1,790.00 218,665.72 TOTAL 217,'706.88 21948.84 1,790.00 218,865.72 TA AGENCY FUND CASH - TRUST & AGENCY 7,311.80 121,861.66 121,861.66 71311.80 OHB TOTAL 7,311.80 121t661,66 121„ 861.66 7, 31.1 .80 CORTLAND ROAD SEWER BAN CASH. - SAVINGS 241798.65 0100 0.00 24,798.65 Page 3 MOiNTfILY REPORT OF SUPERVISOR Balance Balance 10/31/2010 Increases Decreases 11/30/2010 TOTAL 24,798.65 0.00 0.00 2,798.65 HE CAPITAL FUND - BARN CASH - SAVINGS 30,1.53.84 12.774 0,00 301171.58 TOTAL 30,158.84 12.74 0.00 30,171.59 HF CAPITAL FUND - FPIG CASH - SAVINGS 35, 185.30 14 .87 60.00 35, 200.1 7 TOTAL 351185.30 14,67 0.00 35,200.17 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 9, 416, 007.13 1, 19 ?, 31.8, C,9 1, 489, 608.39 9, 123, a 1,6.83 Page 4