Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTB Minutes 2017-05-08 MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD May 8, 2017 Agenda 1. Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Board of Fire Commissioners' Quarterly Report Discuss the City of Ithaca's reorganization of their Committee structure and its effect 3. Persons to be heard and Board Comments 4. 5:30 p.m. Public hearing regarding a proposed local law: "Amending Restaurant Drive-Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270" a. SEQR b. Adoption 5. Continue discussion regarding short term rentals 6. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a local law regulating Signs and Murals 7. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270 Titled"Zoning" to allow limited retail sales in the Light Industrial Zone 8. Discuss and consider authorization for the Supervisor to sign a Stormwater Operation and Management Agreement and associated easement for the Ithaca Estates III Subdivision Project 9. Discuss water billing questions and action(s) 10. Consider Consent Agenda a. Approval of Town of Ithaca Abstract b. Approval of Bolton Point Abstract c. Approval of the revised Employee Wellness Program d. Approve Federal Work Study Agreements e. Approval of the Standard Work Day for Officials 11. Report of Town Officials 12. Review of Correspondence 13. Adjourn TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION 1, Paulette Rosa, being duly sworn, say that I am the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins Z:� COUnty, New York that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca and the notice has been duly published in the official newspaper,Iffiaca Journal: 1] ADVERTISEMENT/NOTICE ...f-NO,TICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 0 NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL 0 NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST ORDER Restaurant Drive-Through PUBLIC HEARING Location of Sign Board Used for Posting: TOWN OF ITHACA The own Board will hold a Town Clerk's Office T public h0ar,111,9 at the Town Hall, 215, N T16ga St, jjtjj�_ 215 North Tioga Street Ca, NY on, the 8�h day of May, 2017"apt 13'%joi p.rt,,, for Ithaca, NY 14850 the puroose of consicloile',q pro ,Xosecl local ' low, I Arnen, in Restayr ,,,pnrt Drive-Tht2qqh Provislr q e Cnnramunh ........... Co rmrcia�l Zonlog pr6Z�,- Town website at w\vwjownjthaca.l ly th M I sl.ns of, Ithaca Town (;ocj,6-` Chapter 27W%`at such Ohio' and Lace all'p6r//sorjsiihier- estO In the,pt'oobsed,jc�ai f6W tray be Ih,6ard q'Onco.Ira Date of Posting: 4/6/2017 Ing 010"same, lnforjyi;� flon aTrona ,6 available frothe �OWn Date of Publication: 4/10/2017 =t,and on, the t wVVW,town.1tha<a,uy.Nj Paulette Rosa 'rown'Clerk 5/112017 Paulette Rosa Town Clerk STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OFTOMPKINS) SS: TOWN OF ITHACA) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of 201T �ota- -Public Debra DeAugistine Notary Pubflc-State of New York No.0 1 DE6148035 Ouatified in Tompkins County My Commission Expires June 19,26 IL MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD May 8, 2017 Minutes Board Members Present: Bill Goodman, Supervisor; Rod Howe, Deputy Town Supervisor; Pat Leary, Tee-Ann Hunter, Rich DePaolo, and Pamela Bleiwas Absent—Eric Levine Staff Present: Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Mike Solvig, Director of Finance, Judy Drake, Director of Human Resources; Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk; Jim Weber, Highway Superintendent and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town 1. Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance Meeting called to order at 5:33 p.m. 2. Board of Fire Commissioners' Quarterly Report Mr. Gilligan reviewed his submitted report. Discuss the City of Ithaca's reorganization of their Committee structure and its effect (Attachment 1) Mr. Gilligan expanded on his attendance and input to the City Council regarding their restructuring of their committees. The meeting was on May 2nd and many of the members of the seven committees being absorbed went to state their concerns about what would happen to them including concerns about the focus of the smaller committees being lost and efforts diluted. One example is the Shade Tree Committee which is small and members are passionate about their mission but if it were folded into a large committee, their concerns and efforts wouldn't be heard. Mr. Gilligan added that he expressed other options such as improving the infrastructure with an enhanced application form that would more clearly define the applicants interests such as web design, human resources, public safety etc. and think about the staff support which seemed to not have been considered in this reorganization. He added that because this will change the number of appointments the Mayor can make, it may have to be on the November ballot. Mr. Gilligan stated that the City Attorney did not think there would be any impact on the distribution of the 2% monies that support the Fire Stations. Board questions Mr. DePaolo stated that it seems the Town's representation and vote regarding the fire service would be diluted and that is concerning and Ms. Hunter asked what authority the Commission had as far as voting. Mr. Gilligan responded that the Commission disperses the 2% funds and authorizes the bids for vehicles. Discussion followed and the issue was referred to the P&O Committee and Mr. Goodman will ask the City liaison to come to the study session to answer questions. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 1 3. Persons to be heard and Board Comments Diana Cole, 999 Coddington Road Ms. Cole stated that she just rented a place there and she was not aware that the police target practice and training center was so close to the house. She didn't know where to go with this, saying it is noise pollution when you are living in the country and there is target practice several times a day and even on the weekends. She would like to know what recourse she has. Patty Porter, 104 Juniper Drive Ms. Porter read a prepared statement (Attachment 2) Ms. Porter lives near Kendall Ave and had pictures and descriptions of the annual Kendal Day party which is the day after the last day of Ithaca College classes and is put out on social media. She described underage drinking, litter and public urination. She was appalled that the law enforcement was present but not doing anything about the party of approximately 4,000 students. There were numerous laws being broken, including the town's noise ordinance. The attachment has many details. Kenny Simpson, Renwick Heights Mr. Simpson stated that he is one of the residents that signed the petition against short term rentals in their neighborhood and they have attended committee and board meetings and they are concerned that there seems to be a move to actually expand the practice of short term rentals and repeal the existing code rather than enforcing the existing code. Mr. Simpson stated that because the code is not being enforced there are people actively exploiting that and listing their houses again for this summer since they weren't in trouble for last summer. He stated that the neighborhood has been changed so much and he is upset with that change with six or seven cars parked outside houses, and people not speaking to each other because they have rented their houses out. He said that people are justifying this by saying they need to make money to live where we live, but everyone bought the house knowing what the costs were, and we all pay probably the highest taxes in the country and we don't do that lightly. We want our neighborhoods to be protected and the rules enforced. He added that they would also like, when the board goes to remodel the law, they want full disclosure on those voting on whether they participate or consume these short term rentals. Mr. Simpson stated that AirBnB is a$3013 enterprise and there are a lot of different forces moving there and others could begin to move and they would like to see a balanced discussion because the Town of Ithaca is so diverse close knit neighbors, miles apart neighbors and transient neighbors and they chose to live where they do because they wanted the long-term residential neighborhood with very close neighbors and he thought they may be a special case demographically as is Forest Home and Cayuga Heights and when the board considers these issues you need to look at the micro-pockets in the Town as well because it does make a difference to them and it does make a difference on how we see our neighbors; saying the neighborhood used to have seasonal parties and holiday parties and those have disappeared because no one wants to see each other because there are parties as the short term rentals that TB 2017-05-08 pg. 2 have to be shut down etc. There is a long-term rental which is different and that family has integrated into the neighborhood. Mr. Simpson stated that the existing rules for B&B, if you want to make money and you don't have money to live in the area, why not get certified as a B&B? but for short—term, high turnover rentals just don't fit in our neighborhood, but if you do want to go through the process of having smoke detectors, fire alarms, background checks to make sure you're not a child molester or sexual predator and you are regulated in some way, then by all means, do it. But if you don't want to do that, the practice is potentially dangerous and there are many impacts to our community. Michael MacAnanny, Renwick Place Mr. MacAnanny stated that some of the other residents from the area were here with him and he didn't have a whole lot more than the previous speaker but he wanted to put a fine point on a couple of things that really are shocking and stunning to some of the group. It seemed to him that the Town is looking to find ways to regulate this situation they find themselves in and in doing so, maybe stepping into some dangerous areas in the sense that in the April 21st letter to residents, the Town has admitted that you are aware that there are residences being rented on a short-term basis that do not comply with ADA, with Town Code, Health and Safety and so forth and he thought that was a very, very slippery slope the Town was going down. Mr. MacAnanny thought it would seem that the Town would be better served to first enforce the existing codes and find ways to do so, and then if there are objections from the folks who want to rent their homes out then this can be discussed and meted out but first the enforcement should be there. Mr. MacAnanny stated that they live in an area where there are three schools; Cayuga Heights Elementary, Boyton Middle School and Ithaca High School that our children go to and we don't know who is coming into these houses. The people that rent these homes in some cases are absentee owners and he heard at the last meeting that there is a definition being considered that an owner can be considered to be a resident if they reside six months and one day of the year in the house. He thought that what this meant was that they could have people in their neighborhood that the owners have no way of vetting and probably no interest in vetting and they can be complete strangers from different parts of the country, one in each bedroom and are they safe? What protection is afforded to them? What protection is afforded to our children in our neighborhood? Mr. MacAnanny thought that the codes that are in effect now were well thought out and put there for a reason and clearly they are not being adhered to so they call once again on the Town to live up to what the Town says it will do, which is to enforce the code and create safe neighborhoods for our community. Thank you. Don Smith 1329 Taughannock Blvd Mr. Smith stated that he was the President of the West Shore Neighborhood Association and they have worked very hard over the years with successes such as the garbage truck traffic reduction and supporting Conservation and Lake Shore zoning and currently working on EMT access. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 3 Mr. Smith said that he is hearing concerns in relation to short term rentals, specifically, Air BnB and he was here to better understand the issues and act accordingly at the next meeting. One of the concerns, is the 50 foot frontage of a lot of the houses in the Town of Ithaca with in some cases two houses sharing 50 feet of frontage so you can start to understand that when you have a short term rental with other houses on the same property now that property has X number of people on the beach on the lake and you are not only disturbing your neighbors but the neighborhood. Thank you. Richard Boyd, Renwick Heights Rd Mr. Boyd said he wanted to put one idea out there, saying that in their neighborhood, what people are doing is essentially running unlicensed motels, and many of us have had the experience of staying in a hotel and seeing other people in the motel or hotel do things that they shouldn't, but in a hotel or motel, there is someone to go to and there is staff and or cameras so you have an immediate resource but the comparable person living next door to one of these houses being rented nightly, they have no resource. The kind of protection you have is absent. Mr. Boyd said he agreed with the statement before about the town being so diverse and there must be places where this isn't a problem at all so if you are going to have legislation, probably there should be legislation that is sensitive to very different demands in different places. Susan Vanna(?), Cayuga Heights - Ms. Vanna stated that Air BNB has spent millions and millions paying lobbyists and getting good PR in the newspapers to push this whole idea of a "sharing economy" but"sharing" is something you do in kindergarten when you share your toy with your friend or someone else, or in terms of a house, "sharing" would be you let some homeless refugee come stay in your house without paying; that is sharing. Renting out your property or renting out rooms in your property is not sharing, that is business. That is a commercial business, that is capitalism running the way it does, and she understands that people want to make money, but it is not"sharing" and people shouldn't be able to sort of hide under that euphemism saying oh, it's a"sharing economy" and we are just being nice here. If people want to rent out rooms in their house or rent out their whole house, there are rules about this that the Board's predecessors came up with Zoning and so on and the only thing that has changed from then until now is that people want to book on an app or online rather than by phone or mail which is how people used to book hotels and B&B's. Those are the things that have changed, but the fact that you are booking it on an app or online doesn't change any of the relevant variables such as making noise, changing the atmosphere of a neighborhood where you don't have neighbors anymore, you just have transient people, fire safety rules, disabled access rules... all of these things that regular proper B&B's are supposed to abide by; none of those things change just because someone is booking the room on an app rather than booking the room the old fashioned way. The rules should still apply because nothing has changed, unless your predecessors were wrong in the first place. It is the same issue, it is just that the Board and many people have been hoodwinked by this whole"sharing" thing to somehow make everyone think that now it is somehow sweet and lovely even though it is the same thing it has always been. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 4 Board comments Target practice Mr. DePaolo responded to the concern stating that he also lives on Coddington Road and hears the gunfire and he has informally approached the topic with the City Attorney over the years. The facility dates back about 50 years and located out in the boonies, but in the intervening years, South Hill has grown and residences are more or less encroaching on the facility. He learned that within the last 10 years or so it has been made available to law enforcement entities throughout the State of New York instead of just the City of Ithaca. There are even FBI agents that shoot fully automatic weapons there. He stated that he thinks the facility needs to be relocated to somewhere that it doesn't impact residences to the extent it does. At a minimum, it is disconcerting to hear gunfire at all hours of the day and night and it is an issue we need to discuss with the City because it wouldn't be prohibitively expensive to relocate the facility. Mr. Goodman added that he would speak to Donna Flemming who is our liaison with Common Council and we can also go to the Council meeting and report the concerns. This is not the first time we have heard this and we haven't been able to do much in the past but we can continue to bring it up. Kendall Day - Mr. Goodman thanked her for bringing in the information and stated that in the past we had complaints but hadn't heard any the past few years. He added that he thought Mr. Engman had contacted the Sheriff's office and they sent people out. Mr. Bates said there were a few litter complaints that he spoke to the owners about but it was cleaned up. The Town had to clean quite a bit on the trail. Ms. Hunter asked if we had any ticketing authority for the litter or the noise or the party permit and such. Mr. Bates responded that we do under property maintenance but that happens if they didn't clean it up after they were told to clean it up and the noise permit is enforced by the Sheriff s office. Ms. Hunter asked if the Town could ask the Sheriff s to issue tickets relative to not getting permits related to the event and Mr. Goodman responded that he could ask the Sheriff but he thought it would be better to work with the College because the Sheriff s are there but won't go in to something that size. Some discussion followed and if the Sheriff will not enforce the laws on the books, there isn't much we can do other than mandatory fines instead of a span. Mr. DePaolo stated that IC and Town/Community meetings for IC are to make sure their risk managers are happy and they say they have no control over the kids off campus and we can try to educate them but that's all we can do. Mr. DePaolo stated that he thinks there is this pervasive mentality that kids will be kids and they have to blow off steam once a year because they've earned it and we just hope nobody gets killed; the herd has gotten too big and we can't control it, we just don't want anybody to get hurt. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 5 We do have a noise ordinance that was crafted for this and we ought to revisit the idea of mandatory minimum fines rather than giving judges complete latitude to perpetuate this abuse and we should also discuss potentially tracking persistent abuses year after year to the property itself and tie it to those regulations as a way to brining the landlords into the loop at some level. Mr. DePaolo stated that he didn't know what to do about the Sheriff because they are there with upwards of 1,000 kids of all ages drinking and puking and peeing and it is an absolute affront to the senses and he doesn't live as close as the speaker, but he can hear it a quarter of a mile away. He didn't know how to address that concern, either through the County or some other way, because we do have certain expectations because if the College isn't involved, and the Sheriff isn't involved, then we are left with a situation where the kids are getting the tacit message that this behavior is acceptable, and it isn't. Mr. Goodman sent the issue to the P&O Committee for recommendations. Ms. Porter stated that Sheriff Meskill used to issue tickets and they were fined and the tickets were also sent to the College and Brian McCary brought the students into his office and letters were sent home to their parents. When Ken Lansing became Sheriff, he refuses to write the tickets saying it is a waste of his officers' time to go to court. 4. 5:30 p.m. Public hearing regarding a proposed local law: "Amending Restaurant Drive- Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270" Mr. Goodman opened the public hearing at 6:50p.m. There was no one wishing to address the board and the hearing was closed. TB Resolution 2017- 057 : SEAR: Proposed Local Law Amending Restaurant Drive- Throu2h Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270 Whereas, this action is the enactment of a local law amending restaurant drive-through provisions in the Community Commercial zoning provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270; and Whereas, this is a Type I Action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is acting as Lead Agency in an environmental review with respect to the enactment of this local law; and Whereas, the Town Board, at its regular meeting held on May 8, 2017, has reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), Parts 1, 2 and 3, for this action,prepared by the Town Planning staff, now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review, and Chapter 148 Environmental Quality Review of the Town of Ithaca Code for the above-referenced action as TB 2017-05-08 pg. 6 proposed, based on the information in the EAF Part 1 and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Parts 2 and 3, and, therefore, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Tee-Ann Hunter Vote: Ayes —Howe, Hunter, Leary, Goodman, Bleiwas and DePaolo TB Resolution 2017 - 058: Adoption of Local Law 9 of 2017 Amending Restaurant Drive- Throu2h Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270 Whereas, the Town's Community Commercial (CC)Zone, located on East Hill, allows restaurant drive-through facilities with special permit, but requires that restaurants with drive- through be a minimum of 1,500 feet apart, a distance that effectively restricts the zone to no more than one restaurant drive-through given that no other restaurant could meet the 1,500 distance requirement due to the relatively small size of the CC Zone, and Whereas, the Town Board, having been asked by a business owner to re-evaluate the distance criteria and consider instead enacting criterion that would minimize impacts caused by restaurant drive-throughs, referred the matter to the Planning Committee for a recommendation, and Whereas, the Planning Committee discussed and considered modifications to the restaurant drive-through provisions in the CC Zone at their meetings on 1/19/17, 2/16/17, and 3/16/17 and recommend to the Town Board that the current 1,500 foot distance requirement between restaurant drive-through facilities be eliminated and replaced with specific criteria intended to minimize the impacts of drive-through facilities, and Whereas, at its meeting on April 24, 2017, the Town Board reviewed and discussed the proposed local law and scheduled a public hearing for May 8, 2017 at 5:30 p.m. to hear all interested parties on the proposed local law entitled "A Local Law Amending Restaurant Drive-through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270", and Whereas, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal, and Whereas, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof, and Whereas,pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, adoption of said local law is a Type I Action for which the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, acting as lead agency in an environmental review with respect to adoption of this local law, has, on May 8, 2017, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form Parts 1, 2 and 3, and TB 2017-05-08 pg. 7 Whereas, the Town Board finds it is in the best interest of the Town and its citizens to adopt the local law, now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local law entitled "A Local Law Amending Restaurant Drive-through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zoning Provisions of Ithaca Town Code Chapter 270", and it is further Resolved, that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law with the Secretary of State as required by law. Moved: Rich DePaolo Seconded: Pat Leary Vote: Ayes —DePaolo, Leary, Hunter, Howe, Goodman and Bleiwas 5. Continue discussion regarding short term rentals (STRs) Mr. Goodman started the discussion by saying that he continues to look at other towns' handling of this and many are requiring a registry which we are also looking at and he distributed a list of a few with population and what they are doing. He thought a smaller group should look at this to draft legislation. Discussion followed and the Board felt the Planning Committee should keep this as it follows in some ways the regular rental registry they have been discussing. Looking at the examples, some municipalities prohibit"un-hosted" STRs and a special permit required for"hosted" which allowed for the revocation of that permit if problems were experiences. They also set"quiet time" parameters. Un-hosted would be similar to owner- occupied he thought. Other municipalities seemed more focused on sewer needs and parking needs. There is a wide variety of restrictions but almost all require some sort of registry or permit. Mr. Goodman asked the Board to discuss and figure out what they want to see in legislation and then get it to a committee to work on. He added that Jane Marie Law currently does hosted- STRs and she would like to talk to the board and would be happy with only hosted but there are other opinions out there. Ms. Leary stated that she likes the owner-present or hosted-STRs because it seems to her that many of the complaints are of the type that would be addressed by an owner on the premises. Ms. Leary said that she was in favor of having the Planning Committee continue on this since they have gotten this far already and suggested a moratorium while this is figured out because it sounds like it has gotten out of hand. Ms. Brock was asked if that was possible and she responded that she would have to look into it more, but it seems possible. A moratoria is on what is currently legally allowed while the board is studying and drafting proposed new zoning regulations which might make illegal that which is currently allowed. She added that there might be some nuances that need to be looked at but it is probably ok. Mr. DePaolo asked how we would attempt to delineate hosted from unhosted that would be problematic correct? and Ms. Brock responded that it might because there are different issues with each. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 8 Mr. DePaolo stated that based on some of the comments that have been made, it seems clear that the board is trying to address a problem, and one of the problems is that as far as our code right now is written and as far as our counsel has advised, we do not have a prohibition on STR in the Town of Ithaca and he heard several times that"we need to enforce the code as written" and he has not seen the code that prohibits this practice. We tried and started down this road under the assumption we could and tried to hang our hat on a couple of state codes that did not apply to the buildings in question in our town so we are left with a situation where we are scrambling to catch up with an economic paradigm that has outpaced our ability to legislate. He wanted the residents to understand that this is not an issue where we have something on the books that we are simply choosing to ignore; we do not have a legal construct to eliminate STR in the Town of Ithaca so we are not starting a legislative process that unfortunately is likely to take longer than the residents would like it to take, but that doesn't mean we are not endeavoring to address the problem. Mr. DePaolo went on to say that as far as some of the concepts that have been raised tonight, he thought that certainly we are going to entertain STR and integrate them into our Code and we don't need to do that on a town-wide basis, but we can do it in a zone-specific basis and the idea of owner-occupancy appeals to him but he has not read enough to know whether hosted vs un- hosted would meet the balancing test that he has between allowing responsible owners to derive some additional income versus removing a restriction that opens a Pandoras box of problems. Mr. DePaolo thought we should be cognizant of the fact that this area has a number of popular weekends but the 120 days is a non-starter for him; that is a business. He thought that as long as we can build in a sense of responsibility that is what we need to do and remove the idea that people can acquire properties for the purpose of running residential rental businesses without having to meet the requirements of the bed and breakfast regulations. Mr. Goodman asked Mr. DePaolo about the committee it should be with and he responded that he was willing to take it on but was concerned about the work load and suggested that the Planning Committee could start and flesh it out and then pass it along since they have a head start on it and staff support. Ms. Leary responded that she would like Planning Committee to see it through. Ms. Hunter thought it should stay with the Planning Committee and she has tried to look at other laws and bring herself up to date on the issue, but they are all over the place. She stated that she agreed with Mr. DePaolo about the 120 days being too generous but she would like to see the Board explore ways to hold the owners accountable and responsible with fines on them for things that happen when it is rented. Ms. Leary stated that the 120 day limit was actually associated to the number of days required to live at a residence to be considered owner-occupied related to an accessory apartment which was a discussion from the current 6-months plus a day timeframe. Mr. Howe thought the topic should stay with Planning Committee and Ms. Bleiwas said she agreed, but she would like to hear from others who are in this business and we need to hear from everybody and what the feeling is town-wide and then decide how to address it. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 9 Ms. Bleiwas addressed the speakers from earlier, saying that she has read a lot of letters and emails saying that the board has already made up their minds or there are conflicts of interest, but she does not think that anybody has made up their minds and we appreciate that you have brought this to our attention and we are looking at it with an open mind. She said that she would like to see more specifics instead of the general statements. Specific incidents that happen this weekend or throughout the summer, let us know. Mr. Goodman responded that Ms. Hunter and Ms. Bleiwas have both talked about hearing from others and generally at the Board meetings we don't have an opportunity to do that, and he asked if the full board would be interested in having a special meeting(s) to hear comments or to have back and forth discussions with more residents. Ms. Bleiwas would like to do that with some real outreach to all residents to hear all sides of the issue. Mr. Simpson addressed the Board again, saying that he doesn't understand about the moratorium when they were told the town does not allow rentals under 30 days and that has been enforced but now they are told it isn't enforceable. Why is it suddenly not enforceable when it has been enforced effectively? Mr. Bates showed us the section of the Code that stated that. He asked what they should do about the noise,parking and traffic and Mr. Goodman responded that he should call Mr. Bates tomorrow. Mr. Goodman went back to the Board and asked again about a special meeting and all members were in favor and Mr. DePaolo said that he was in contact with Mr. Knipe from the County and he offered to meet with the board. Ms. Hunter stated that this seems like an important enough issue that we need to think hard about how to facilitate the best possible community meeting to get input and we might want to think about holding meeting with those that currently rent out and those that don't want that separately. We might need a couple of meeting to find out what the problems are and what the impacts would be of our legislation and whether people have ideas on how to manage this. It should be well structured and maybe send out questions ahead of time. The Board asked for more parameters from other municipalities to have some point of compromise possible. Some discussion followed and will continue at subsequent meetings with Mr. Knipe invited to a study session. Ms. Leary asked for clarification on the less than 30-day being illegal and now not and Mr. DePaolo responded that that area of State Code applies to multiple-residence buildings which are defined as 3 or more units or 3 or more stories. Mr. Bates added that we were able to go after the renter under our occupancy regulations and since that time, there has been more discussion with the Board and counsel and found we cannot enforce that and we decided we will not until such it until we get this figured out. In addition, the State Code changed to the ICC Code as of 2017 and they have taken the inspection language basically out to essentially exempt single family homes from this issue. Ms. Brock stated that the occupancy restrictions can be enforced. TB 2017-05-08 pg. 10 Mr. Goodman brought the topic back to what the board would like to see prior to a special meeting and he will send out possible dates. This discussion will continue at the Planning Committee and the Study Session. 6. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a local law regulating Signs and Murals Mr. Goodman stated that he did meet with Ms. Hunter and Mr. Howe and discussed the first amendment right and our inability to regulate the content of signs and the one item remaining is the illumination provisions in the Mural law. The board discussed this briefly and agreed that illumination should be prohibited to protect night sky and conservation. Ms. Hunter asked about the wording"original" art and then allowing"digital form" and who would make that call. Some discussion followed and Code Enforcement would make that call. Mr. Goodman thought the requirement to affix it to a wall is going to control that. Ms. Leary asked about the laser displays and Mr. Goodman responded that it must be affixed so that is not a mural. TB Resolution 2017-059: Setting a public hearing re2ardin2 proposed local laws amending the Town of Ithaca Code, allowing for changes to sign and mural regulations throughout the Code Be it resolved, that the Town Board will hold a public hearing at its June 12, 2017 meeting which begins at 5:30 p.m. regarding proposed local laws relating to changes to sign and mural regulations throughout the Town of Ithaca Code as follows: A local law revising the Town of Ithaca's sign provisions by deleting Town Of Ithaca Code Chapter 221, "Signs," and by adding sign provisions to and revising Town Code Chapter 270, "Zoning" and Chapter 271, "Zoning: Special Land Use Districts" A local law deleting Chapter 192 of the Town of Ithaca Code, titled "Numbering of Buildings" A local law conforming sign requirements references in Town Of Ithaca Code Chapter 125, titled "Building Construction and Fire Prevention," and Chapter 173, titled"Lighting, Outdoor" A local law adding Art Mural Provisions to Town Code Chapter 270, "Zoning" ; and be it further Resolved, that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed local laws may be heard concerning the same; and it is further Resolved, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes — Goodman, DePaolo, Hunter, Leary, Bleiwas and Howe TB 2017-05-08 pg. 11 TB Resolution 2017 - 059: Setting a public hearing re2ardin2 proposed local laws amending the Town of Ithaca Code, allowing for changes to sign and mural regulations throughout the Code Be it resolved, that the Town Board will hold a public hearing at its June 12, 2017 meeting which begins at 5:30 p.m. regarding proposed local laws relating to changes to sign and mural regulations throughout the Town of Ithaca Code as follows: A local law revising the Town of Ithaca's sign provisions by deleting Town of Ithaca Code Chapter 221, "Signs," and by adding sign provisions to and revising Town Code Chapter 270, "Zoning" and Chapter 271, "Zoning: Special Land Use Districts" A local law deleting Chapter 192 of the Town of Ithaca Code, titled "Numbering of Buildings" A local law conforming sign requirements references in Town of Ithaca Code Chapter 125, titled"Building Construction and Fire Prevention," and Chapter 173, titled "Lighting, Outdoor" A local law adding Art Mural Provisions to Town Code Chapter 270, "Zoning"; and be it further Resolved, that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed local laws may be heard concerning the same; and it is further Resolved, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes — Goodman, DePaolo, Hunter, Leary, Bleiwas and Howe 7. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270 Titled "Zoning" to allow limited retail sales in the Light Industrial Zone TB Resolution 2017-060: Setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending the Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270 titled "Zoning", to allow limited retail sales in the Light Industrial Zone Be it resolved, that the Town Board will hold a public hearing at its June 12, 2017 meeting which begins at 5:30 p.m. regarding a proposed Setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending the Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270 titled"Zoning", to allow limited retail sales in the Light Industrial Zone, and be it further TB 2017-05-08 pg. 12 Resolved that at such time and place, all persons interested in the proposed local law may be heard concerning the same, and it is further Resolved that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca journal and to pose a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca. Moved: Rich DePaolo Seconded: Rod Howe Vote: Ayes —DePaolo, Howe, Hunter, Leary, Goodman and Bleiwas 8. Discuss and consider authorization for the Supervisor to sign a Stormwater Operation and Management Agreement and associated easement for the Ithaca Estates III Subdivision Project TB Resolution 2017 - 061: Authorization for Supervisor to sign the Stormwater Operation, Maintenance, and Reporting Agreement and stormwater related easements associated with the Ithaca Estates III Subdivision Proiect Whereas the Ithaca Estates III Subdivision Project includes stormwater management and treatment facilities which necessitates entering into a Stormwater Operation, Maintenance, and Reporting Agreement, along with stormwater easement agreements, between Ithaca Estates Subdivision Property Owners, including College Crossings II, LLC and the Town of Ithaca, for the property located on King Road East, Tax Parcel No.'s 43.-1-3.22 and 43.-1-3.11, now therefore be it Resolved that the Town Board does hereby authorize the Town Supervisor to sign the Stormwater Operation, Maintenance, and Reporting Agreement and stormwater easements associated with the Ithaca Estates III Subdivision Project. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes —Goodman, DePaolo, Leary, Hunter, Howe and Bleiwas 9. Pulled Discuss water billing questions and action(s) 10. Consider Consent Agenda Mr. DePaolo had a question about the history of the Wellness Program and its limits and Ms. Drake responded that the limits haven't been raised in 10+years and some proof of participation is required. TB Resolution 2017 - 062: Adopt Consent Agenda Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and/or adopts the following Consent Agenda items: TB 2017-05-08 pg. 13 a. Approval of Town of Ithaca Abstract b. Approval of Bolton Point Abstract c. Approval of the revised Employee Wellness Program Pulled Moved: Rich DePaolo Seconded: Pamela Bleiwas Unanimous d. Approve Federal Work Study Agreements e. Approval of the Standard Work Day for Officials Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Tee-Ann Hunter Vote: ayes —Howe, Hunter, Leary, Bleiwas, DePaolo and Goodman TB Resolution 2017 - 062a: Town of Ithaca Abstract Whereas the following numbered vouchers have been presented to the Ithaca Town Board for approval of payment; and Whereas the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now therefore be it Resolved that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers in total for the amounts indicated. VOUCHER NOS. 523 - 584 General Fund Townwide 56,848.83 General Fund Part-Town 3,305.19 Highway Fund Part-Town 21,054.36 Water Fund 12,530.70 Sewer Fund 6,252.52 Fire Protection Fund 299,296.40 Forest Home Lighting District 168.00 Glenside Lighting District 62.29 Renwick Heights Lighting District 70.71 Eastwood Commons Lighting District 158.64 Clover Lane Lighting District 18.41 Winner's Circle Lighting District 62.03 Burleigh Drive Lighting District 62.43 West Haven Road Lighting District 187.92 Coddington Road Lighting District 112.09 TOTAL 400,190.52 TB Resolution 2017-062b: Bolton Point Abstract Whereas, the following numbered vouchers for the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission have been presented to the Town Board for approval of payment; and Whereas, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now, therefore, be it TB 2017-05-08 pg. 14 Resolved, that the Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers. Voucher Numbers: 151-196 Check Numbers: 17079-17124 Capital Impr/Repl Project $ 39,172.00 Operating Fund $ 54,763.68 TOTAL $ 93,935.68 Less Prepaid $-____5.,836,40. TOTAL $ 88,099.28 TB Resolution 2017 - 062c: Approval of the Revised Employee Wellness Program Whereas, the Employee Relations Committee has reviewed the Employee Wellness Program at the request of the employee representatives; Whereas, the Employee Relations Committee recommends the revised Employee Wellness Program, which would increase the reimbursement levels; therefore, be it Resolved, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves of the revised Employee Wellness Program effective for September 2017 reimbursements. TB Resolution 2017- 062d: Approval of Federal Work Study Agreements. Whereas, the Town has budgeted the necessary funds to cover the cost of participating in the Cornell University and Ithaca College Federal Work Study Program to provide student interns with a valuable work experience while providing the Town of Ithaca with valuable technical support; and Whereas, Cornell University covers 75% of the hourly wages and 100% of the employment expenses of this program and the Town would be responsible for the other 25% of the hourly wages plus 10.25% for non-registered students employed for the summer; and Whereas, Ithaca College covers 100% of the hourly wages and 100% of the employment expenses of this program; now, therefore, be it Resolved, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the participation in the Cornell University and Ithaca College Federal Work Study Programs for the school year of July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018; and be it further Resolved, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby authorize and direct the Town Supervisor to sign any necessary Agreements or Participation forms; and be it further TB 2017-05-08 pg. 15 Resolved, the cost of participating in the said program for the year 2018 shall be reviewed and approved during the budget process. TB Resolution 2017-062e: Approval of NYS Standard Reporting for Officials Be it Resolved that the Town of Ithaca hereby establishes a 6.0 hour standard work day for Justice David Klein and submitted the required form to the State of New York Comptroller. 11. Report of Town Officials Mr. Goodman reminded the Board about the public outreach regarding the East Hill Village on Wednesday,May 17`h and the Housing Needs Study the same night. 12. Review of Correspondence Ms. Hunter asked about the notice of defect regarding the ditches and Mr. Goodman responded that they were discussed at the Public Works Committee and an estimate would need to be done, but it would be cost prohibitive. Mr. Weber added that in his opinion, he is stretching the definition of defect and is referring to Urban Collectors as opposed to Urban Residential which has completely different rules and regulations because of the average speed difference. Mr. Weber stated that there are no deficiencies to the roadway. Ms. Drake added that liability questions would be answered by our insurance company. 13.Adjourn Meeting was adjourned upon a motion and a second at 8:13 p.m. Submitte Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk TB 2017-05-08 pg. 16 Attachment 1 TB 05-08-2017 My name is Bill Gilligan, I'm a resident of the town of Ithaca and Chair of the Ithaca Board of Fire Commissioners. I thank you Mayor and members of the Common Council for the opportunity to speak briefly this evening regarding the proposed restructuring of 12 of the 28 volunteer Boards and Committees that serve the Ithaca community. At next week's Board of Fire Commissioners Meeting we will be discussing the BCRWG recommendation to create four umbrella commissions that would replace 12 current Boards and Committees including the Board of Fire Commissioners. We will then be able to provide a more formal response to the Common Council from the Board, but given the rapidity with which this massive restructuring proposal appears to be moving forward, I felt I needed to take advantage of this first opportunity for public input on the proposal to voice some of my initial comments and concerns. I would first like to commend the members of the working group for the tremendous amount of work, thought, and effort that has gone into organizing the data, the issues, and providing a graphic summary of the current Boards & Committees, and categorizing them into related groups. They have provided an historical perspective on previous and on-going efforts to more effectively utilize volunteers and their skills to benefit city operations and services. This information is very useful in understanding the problems that the working group is seeking to resolve. Further they have identified specific infrastructure changes that would better support all the City's Boards & Committees, It is clear that there are significant on-going resources required to support the City's 28 Boards & Committees and these require a significant amount of staff and common council time and that the proposed restructuring of 12 of these groups into 4 Commissions is one scenario that potentially addresses at least some of the issues identified by the Working Group,. However, I'm very concerned with this Big Bang Theory approach to creating a solution by blowing-up 12 of the current Boards, & Committees and then creating 4 new entities that are expected to rapidly replace the work and service of the dissolved groups. There may be unexpected and significantly detrimental consequences from this that could be avoided or mitigated by a more incremental approach to resolving the issues. For example, perhaps a number of the issues facing the current structure would be significantly improved by moving ahead with infrastructure support required for any new structure such as designing a new application and application process; creating a data base of experts; providling recommended/required agenda formats; provide training on running and participating in effective meetings to volunteers, and consider having a task force or working group from the existing committees to address issues of training and orienting members of the community who will be serving on Boards. In conclusion, I would hope there could be opportunities to discuss both the details of the transition to any new structure as well as considering alternatives to the current proposed restructuring scenario Thank you. Attachment 2 TB 05-08-2017 I' m Patty I. Porter and I live at 104 Juniper Drive, the street is south of Kendall and Pennsylvania Ave. I want to talk to you about what happens yearly on the Saturday after the last day of classes at Ithaca College and the unacceptable behavior by thousands of Ithaca College students. This day has become known locally and around the world from You Tube _h i : youtu,be/6BEubvatURo as Kendall Day. My revealation this year was that theYou Tube posts dating back to 2012 clearly show Sheriff's vehicles and deputies in the mist of the party crowd. Which raises the question: is this a police sanctioned event? I strongly suspect that some students chose to go to IC becasue of the media representation of IC as a party school and that this is being supported by our Sheriff's supervision of the event. This year the amplified noise and shouting began beforel0 am. and continued throughout the evening into the night with occasional fire works. It was it's worse between 10 and 4. But the parties shift on to Coddington Road later in the night so the disturbances continue. I walked on the South Hill Recreation Trail and Pennsylvania Ave. and witnessed the students (many underage), drunk with open containers of alchol, swearing, littering, and publicly unrinating. There was a huge police presence from the Sheriff's Department, complete with standing officers at the beginning of Kendal Ave and an elegant command center with tent, amenities, a van with more officers at the entrance to Therm. No attempt was being made to enforce the existing noise ordinances (Town of Ithaca 184-7) or the ordinances dealing with phroibition of parties (184-9), or open container laws or public urination laws. I checked with my Town of Ithaca Represenative, Rich DePalo and found that no party permits had been applied for or issued. When I spoke to the officers they did not want to be quoted but indicated that they are only to address the most agregious of offences and no tickets had been issued thus far. There is clearly some sort of sanction going on between Ithaca College and the Sheriff's Department that ignors local laws and allows this behavior without consequences to the students but with many negative consequences to the local residents who are forgoing peace and security in our neighborhood as well as paying for what looks like a Police Valet Service of the drunken debauchery of Ithaca College Students. I have no idea how many students visited the emergency room as a result of this day. I did see one ambluance leaving Kendal Ave during my walk and I wittnessed numurous falls. Nor do I know how much of my tax dollar goes for this service to the students. If any resident decided to invite 4000 friends (that's what the police quoted at Kendall this year) to thier house for debauchery I know their neighbors would have the party shut down immediatly. Yet tax paying residents are paying for suppervision of students who judging by the quantity of litter left behind care nothing for the neighborhood. For the past 10 years I've attended monthly meetings with Rory Rothman, other IC officials, representatives from the Town and City and the Sheriff's Department and the City of Ithaca Police to talk about these problems. They have resulted in many letters to the students and a late night bus route. But I now realize that these meetings have been a waste of my time since all reports are verbally sympathized with at the time but there is no accountablility on the part of IC and very few ticket issued by the sherif's department that might deter this behavior. Sheriff Lansing has told me that it is too dangerous for his men to try to shut down events of this size so they just hover around. He has also instructed his officers to not write tickets becasue the local judges dismiss them or won't enforce fines that might deter future parties, therefore wasting his officers time. So that makes the work that the Town of Ithaca has done on creating noise ordinances a waste of time also. We are told time and time again that IC has no authority over students living off campus. That is just scapgoating and actually encouraging the activity. It's not good enoguh. As it stands residents are paying high taxes for the ineffective police supervision. Perhaps it would be better to issue party permits to students that require documentation of private policing, liquior lisenses, insurance, and time limits. Perhaps the sheriff could enforce that? that might resule in more controlled parties or no parties at all. To add a final insult to the experience. The sports complex on campus blarred offensive music most of Sunday afternoon. There is no end to the colleges insults to the neighbors. Ten years ago this board thoughtfully addressed the IC dstudent noise problem with Noise Ordinances and with a cooporating sheriff we were able to deter these parties. Please help find a solution to this current problem. J I iii a. °r � n M a o ,m ti d F r r M I� , i i' a b; ,.,: � wm r<, k � r �. �, o � � a� i�� c, � � � a � u .t �: ��r- � �,A � � err„ ,�, � �.. � �� Y �. rd °�(�� i,��, iµ�., �� r �r n�� v , . ,,, �� F, , � d � �v,, �,; �" r�r �' /� �W �liy�/��j� ��' i/ �� ra �� ,,. t� or�% �,, /�d � � r �� 4, A i ry'�, �� „urr. 11 i_y ii i i � ��.�r i � i1� �r 1 0 �..,. ��WW p r ,., � r .� s � i r i�% �` � � � r -k�, „ �� ,;�� ,i �> ��' � ,�� a ta ''N �f�e d° � � /„� v i �. r �„ � '.I ��IIII� mmmm y� ii a ��', �� 1� °„c a�� ,o ... ,.. ,, �V p ,Y h %: � � � � �%:/ �.%�� ,,,,,,d ,,;i?idwm�r � ..� ,,. ea .gin,' �, ,i G j�r MY„ Shy" I 4' f f krl/ iM-ter„ 4� I ,M ri a ff � T � � i i � � ��I ��` � ��ii ilu��d w e"�� Pf�� ( a�,r� � rh- � ,ry�'�n �.�� .�. ��s.. cud., �'�°, �,r;, ��,�r. �.. ®■ s � � r., �y !� , � .. �` '�-. eei 1 W.., �. �� ,, .. .u. •° U� � (f� �� .� yd �' ., i Y .... � ,� y '" ��.. ��.. ��.�� r M �y�.a' .� e y�� Z„'K _f .. �, �; if I�r�% /^”�y�' ��4" d,. uxi ��_ h � 'y�,r `Stl� V l q�.. �n �.-il 4 +i,. ,SCI � fill��:4, ,,;,,, ,,,�r,. �, ,, �;��, ��.� �� ,r i �u��. � ;;, u, ,,-:�,�� '� �� ; �..0 ,��ro�.�. W p„ i T �'. „lam �;, � r ��r Ito � a ru�„� r ��:� ,a:,. .� d "a;,. rdw, �a�i��, � � 0. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Amending Restaurant Drive-Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zone of the Ithaca Town Code Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): Town of Ithaca Community Commercial Zone which encompasses the area in and around East Hill Plaza(see attached map) Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): The proposed local law will eliminate the current restriction that prohibits new restaurants with drive-through facilities from locating within 1,500 feet of the property boundary line of an existing restaurant with a drive-through facility. The proposal also adds criteria to address potential impacts associated with restaurant drive-through facilities,including:requiring a minimum length for a drive-through lane; requiring a minimum distance between the end of the drive-through lane and where the entrance drive intersects with the public right-of-way;requiring drive-through lanes to be clearly delineated and separate from traffic aisles; prohibiting drive-through lanes and service windows on building frontages; insuring that pedestrian access to the building entrances from the main parking areas do not pass through the drive-through lane;and requiring that any portion of the drive-through lane is a minimum of 60 feet from any residential zone. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:607-273-1747 Town of Ithaca E-Mail: Address:215 N.Tioga Street City/PO:Ithaca State:NY Zip Code:14850 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:607-273-1747 Susan Ritter E-Mail: SRitter@town.ithaca.ny.us Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a. City Council,Town Board, ❑Yes❑NO Ithaca Town Board Public hearing scheduled for 5/8/17 or Village Board of Trustees b. City,Town or Village ❑Yes❑No Planning Board or Commission c. City Council,Town or ❑Yes❑No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies ❑Yes❑No e.County agencies ❑Yes❑NO County Planning Dept.GML 239-i,-m,-n review requirement;does not involve an official approval f.Regional agencies ❑Yes❑No g. State agencies ❑Yes❑No h.Federal agencies ❑Yes❑No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑YesmNo ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑YesmNo iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑Yes[Z]No C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ®Yes❑No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally- adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ®Yes❑No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ❑YesmNo Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesmNo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. m Yes[-]No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? Community Commercial Zone b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? m Yes[-]No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? m Yes[--]No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? The proposed action changes the zoning use,not the zoning designation. CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Ithaca City School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Tompkins County Sheriff, Cornell University Campus Safety,and NYS Police. c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Ithaca Fire Department d.What parks serve the project site? There are no parks specifically serving the Community Commercial Zone. D.Project Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? b. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes[-]No i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes❑No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes[]No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes❑No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month _year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes❑No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: L Nature of historic/archaeological resource: El Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii.Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes❑No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local El Yes❑No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: L Identify resource: ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes❑No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: L Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Town of IthacalWilliam D.Goodman Date Signature 0'6� Title Town Supervisor PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 -Identification of Potential Project Impacts Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s)will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So,the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2,the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed,the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application,maps,supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer"Yes"to a numbered question,please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer"No"to a numbered question,move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box"Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact,it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity,that is,the"whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, ®NO ❑YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1.D.1) I "Yes'; answer questions a- I "No", move on to Section 2. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d ❑ ❑ less than 3 feet. b.The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15%or greater. E2f ❑ ❑ c.The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed,or E2a ❑ ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d.The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ❑ ❑ of natural material. e.The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Dle ❑ ❑ or in multiple phases. f.The proposed action may result in increased erosion,whether from physical D2e,D2q ❑ ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal(including from treatment by herbicides). g.The proposed action is,or may be,located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. Bli ❑ ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 RESET FORM 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ®NO ❑YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) I "Yes'; answer questions a-c. ff"No", move on to Section 3. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.Identify the specific land form(s)attached: E2g ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ®NO ❑YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers,ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.21) I "Yes'; answer questions a- 1. I "No", move on to Section 4. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b,Dlh ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10%or more than a D2b ❑ ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c.The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ❑ ❑ from a wetland or water body. d.The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ❑ ❑ tidal wetland,or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e.The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody,either from upland erosion, D2a,D2h ❑ ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f.The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s)for withdrawal D2c ❑ ❑ of water from surface water. g.The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s)for discharge D2d ❑ ❑ of wastewater to surface water(s). h.The proposed action may cause soil erosion,or otherwise create a source of D2e ❑ ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i.The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h ❑ ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j.The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q,E2h ❑ ❑ around any water body. k.The proposed action may require the construction of new,or expansion of existing, Dla,D2d ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 RESET FORM 1. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or V]NO ❑YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If"Yes'; answer questions a-h. If`No'; move on to Section S. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may require new water supply wells,or create additional demand D2c ❑ ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. b.Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c ❑ ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: c.The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and D1 a,D2c ❑ ❑ sewer services. d.The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d,E21 ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c,Elf, ❑ ❑ where groundwater is,or is suspected to be,contaminated. Elg,Elh f.The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p,E21 ❑ ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g.The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h,D2q, ❑ ❑ feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21,D2c h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. V]NO ❑YES (See Part 1. E.2) I "Yes'; answer questions a-g. I "No'; move on to Section 6. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j ❑ ❑ c.The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action may result in,or require,modification of existing drainage D2b,D2e ❑ ❑ patterns. e.The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b,E2i, ❑ ❑ E2',E2k f.If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action,is the dam in need of repair, El e ❑ ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 RESET FORM g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. [:]NO W]YES (See Part 1. D.2.£,D,2,h, D.2.g) If"Yes', answer questions a-f. If"No", move on to Section 7. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits,the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide(CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide(N20) D2g ❑ ❑ iii.More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbon(PFCs) D2g ❑ ❑ iv.More than.045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride(SF6) D2g ❑ ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g ❑ ❑ hydrochloroflourocarbons(HFCs)emissions vi.43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant,or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. c.The proposed action may require a state air registration,or may produce an emissions D2f,D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs.per hour,or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d.The proposed action may reach 50%of any of the thresholds in"a"through"c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e.The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts:Eliminating the 1,500 ft.foot requirement between restaurant drive-through ® ❑ facilities will allow additional drive-throughs on E. Hill resulting in more idling cars. 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2.m.-q.) W]NO ❑YES I "Yes'; answer questions a- I "No", move on to Section 8. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o ❑ ❑ threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ❑ ❑ any rare,threatened or endangered species,as listed by New York State or the federal government. c.The proposed action may cause reduction in population,or loss of individuals,of any E2p ❑ ❑ species of special concern or conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal government,that use the site,or are found on,over,or near the site. d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ❑ ❑ any species of special concern and conservation need,as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 RESET FORM e.The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural E3c ❑ ❑ Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. f.The proposed action may result in the removal of,or ground disturbance in,any E2n ❑ ❑ portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: g.The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding,foraging,or E2m ❑ ❑ over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. h.The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, Elb ❑ ❑ grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type&information source: i.Proposed action(commercial,industrial or recreational projects,only)involves use of D2q ❑ ❑ herbicides or pesticides. j.Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) W]NO ❑YES I "Yes'; answer questions a-h. ff`No'; move on to Section 9. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c,E3b ❑ ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b.The proposed action may sever,cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land El a,Elb ❑ ❑ (includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard,orchard,etc). c.The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ ❑ active agricultural land. d.The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb,E3a ❑ ❑ uses,either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District,or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e.The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a,Elb ❑ ❑ management system. f.The proposed action may result,directly or indirectly,in increased development C2c,C3, ❑ ❑ potential or pressure on farmland. 132c,D2d g.The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ ❑ Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 10 RESET FORM 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in W]NO ❑YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.La, E.Lb, E.31.) I "Yes'; answer questions a-g. I `No'; go to Section 10. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal,state,or local E3h ❑ ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. b.The proposed action may result in the obstruction,elimination or significant E3h,C2b ❑ ❑ screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c.The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h i. Seasonally(e.g.,screened by summer foliage,but visible during other seasons) ❑ ❑ ii.Year round ❑ ❑ d.The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h action is: E2q, i. Routine travel by residents,including travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ii.Recreational or tourism based activities Elc ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ❑ ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla,Ela, ❑ ❑ project: Dlf,Dlg 0-1/2 mile '/z-3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological QNO ❑YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If"Yes'; answer questions a-e. If"No", go to Section 11. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3e ❑ ❑ to,any buildings,archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ ❑ to,an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory. c.The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within,or substantially contiguous E3g ❑ ❑ to,an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6of10 RESET FORM d. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ e.If any of the above(a-d)are answered"Yes",continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e,E3g, ❑ ❑ of the site or property. E3f ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or E3e,E3f, ❑ ❑ integrity. E3g,Ela, Elb iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e,E3f, ❑ ❑ are out of character with the site or property,or may alter its setting. E3g,E3h, C2,C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a �NO ❑YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) I "Yes"; answer questions a-e. ff"No'; go to Section 12. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions,or"ecosystem D2e,Elb ❑ ❑ services",provided by an undeveloped area,including but not limited to stormwater E2h, storage,nutrient cycling,wildlife habitat. E2m,E2o, E2n,E2 b.The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a,Elc, ❑ ❑ C2c,E2 c.The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a,C2c ❑ ❑ with few such resources. Elc,E2q d.The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c,Elc ❑ ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ✓❑NO ❑YES environmental area(CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes"; answer questions a-c. ff"No'; go to Section 13. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or EM ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b.The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or EM ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 7of10 RESET FORM 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. QNO ❑YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) I "Yes'; answer questions a-g. ff"No'; go to Section 14. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ❑ ❑ more vehicles. c.The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ❑ ❑ f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO ❑YES (See Part 1. D.21) I "Yes'; answer questions a-e. I "No'; go to Section 15. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action will require a new,or an upgrade to an existing,substation. D2k ❑ ❑ b.The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1 f, ❑ ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a Dlq,D2k commercial or industrial use. c.The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dlg ❑ ❑ feet of building area when completed. EOther Impacts: 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. [:]NO AYES (See Part 1. D.2.m.,n., and o.) I "Yes'; answer questions a-,f I `No", go to Section 16. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ❑ ❑ regulation. b.The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m,Eld ❑ ❑ hospital,school,licensed day care center,or nursing home. c.The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ❑ ❑ Page 8 of 10 RESET FORM d.The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ❑ ❑ e.The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing 132n,Ela ❑ ❑ area conditions. f. Other impacts: Potential noise impacts resulting from the use of drive-through speakers for ® ❑ communicating with customers. 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ©NO ❑YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f.g. and h.) I "Yes'; answer questions a-m. I "No'; go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a.The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school,hospital,licensed day Eld ❑ ❑ care center,group home,nursing home or retirement community. b.The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg,Elh ❑ ❑ c.There is a completed emergency spill remediation,or a completed environmental site Elg,Elh ❑ ❑ remediation on,or adjacent to,the site of the proposed action. d.The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg,Elh ❑ ❑ property(e.g., easement or deed restriction). e.The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg,Elh ❑ ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f.The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future 132t ❑ ❑ generation,treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g.The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q,Elf ❑ ❑ management facility. h.The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q,Elf ❑ ❑ i.The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal,or processing,of 132r,D2s ❑ ❑ solid waste. j.The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf,Elg ❑ ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k.The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf,Elg ❑ ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1.The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the 132s,Elf, ❑ ❑ project site. D2r in. Other impacts: Page 9 of 10 RESET FORM 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. ZNO RYES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If"Yes'; answer questions a-h. If`No'; go to Section 18. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action's land use components may be different from,or in sharp C2,C3,Dla ❑ ❑ contrast to,current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela,Elb b.The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city,town or village C2 ❑ ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c.The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2,C2,C3 ❑ ❑ d.The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans,or other regional land use C2,C2 ❑ ❑ plans. e.The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3,Dlc, ❑ ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Dld,Dlf, Dld,Elb f.The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4,D2c,D2d ❑ ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j g.The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts(e.g.,residential or C2a ❑ ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) h. Other: ❑ ❑ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. QNO YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) I "Yes'; answer questions a-g. ff"No", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a.The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities,structures,or areas E3e,E3f,E3g ❑ ❑ of historic importance to the community. b.The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services(e.g. C4 ❑ ❑ schools,police and fire) c.The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2,C3,Dlf ❑ ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. Dlg,Ela d.The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2,E3 ❑ ❑ or designated public resources. e.The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2,C3 ❑ ❑ character. f.Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2,C3 ❑ ❑ Ela,Elb E2g,E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 RESET FULL FORM Agency Use Only [IfApplicable] Project Date: Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 -Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,or may,result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3,the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page,the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope,duration,probability of the impact occurring,number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not,or may,result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s)why the impact may,or will not,result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s)imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets,as needed. See Attached Sheet Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: ✓❑ Type 1 ❑Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: ❑Part 1 ❑Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF,as noted,plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact,it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that: ✓❑ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment,and,therefore,an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly,this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment,that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will,therefore,be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned,and,therefore,this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions(see 6 NYCRR 617A). ❑ C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment,and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s)and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly,this positive declaration is issued. Name Of Action: Amending Restaurant Drive-Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zone of the Ithaca Town Code Name of Lead Agency: Town of Ithaca Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: William D.Goodman Title of Responsible Officer: Town Supervisor Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Date: For Further Information: Contact Person: Susan Ritter Address: 215 N.Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Telephone Number: 607-273-1747 E-mail: sritter@town.ithaca.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations,a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located(e.g.,Town/City/Village of) Other involved agencies(if any) Applicant(if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.M.gov/enb/enb.htlnl PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3—Addendum Amending Restaurant Drive-Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zone of the Ithaca Town Code The proposal includes eliminating the provision in the Community Commercial Zone requiring that new restaurants with drive-through facilities not be located within 1,500 feet of the property boundary line of an existing restaurant with a drive-through facility. This provision would be replaced with new language incorporating drive-through design and placement criteria to help address potential impacts associated with restaurant drive-through facilities. The current 1,500 foot requirement essentially prohibits more than one restaurant drive-through facility from locating in the Town's only CC zone (in the East Hill Plaza area). This is due to the CC Zone being relatively small in size and less than 1,500 feet wide in any direction. Burger King is the current restaurant occupant of the CC Zone that has a drive-through facility. Drive-through facilities for banks and pharmacies do not have the same restriction and several are located throughout the CC Zone. The proposed action is likely to result in the Dunkin Donuts restaurant,located at the southwestern periphery of the CC Zone, to seek to augment their business with a drive-through facility. The proposed amendment will also make it possible for a new restaurant(s)with drive-through facilities to locate in the Community Commercial(CC) Zone, assuming it can comply with the new criteria. Currently Town Code has no provisions concerning the placement and design of drive-through facilities. The proposed criteria includes: requiring a minimum length for a drive-through lane (165 ft./ 8 cars);requiring a minimum distance between the end of the drive-through lane and where the entrance drive intersects with the public right-of-way(60 ft.); requiring drive-through lanes to be clearly delineated and separate from traffic aisles;prohibiting drive-through lanes and service windows on building frontages;insuring that pedestrian access to the building entrances, from the main parking areas, do not pass through the drive- through lane; and requiring that any portion of the drive-through lane be a minimum of 60 feet from any residential zone. Impacts generally associated with drive-through facilities include noise from drive-through call box speakers,traffic spillage onto public roads due to insufficient length of the drive-through lane, and air quality impacts from idling cars. The proposed criteria seeks to address impacts from noise on nearby residences by the establishing a minimum distance requirement between a residential zone and the drive- through lane. Impacts due to traffic spillage are addressed with new design requirements that mandate a drive through lane that can accommodate 8 cars (165 ft.)plus requiring an additional 60 feet from the end of the drive-through lane to the public right of way. In terms of air quality/greenhouse gas emissions impacts from idling vehicles, the enactment of the local law is not anticipated to result in multiple new restaurant drive-through facilities locating in the CC Zone. Much of the CC Zone is already built out and most of the remaining undeveloped land(and developed property)is owned by Cornell University(CU). In the near future, CU intends to redevelop the plaza and other lands in the CC Zone, converting it from an auto-oriented commercial/office center to one that is more pedestrian-friendly and village-like.New zoning, developed by the Town to enable this type of development,will further assess the drive-through provisions (for all business types)to insure that the goals of a pedestrian-oriented development can be realized. Given the relatively small size of the CC Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3—Addendum Amending Restaurant Drive-Through Provisions in the Community Commercial Zone of the Ithaca Town Code Zone and unlikelihood of it ever having a large number of drive-through restaurant facilities,potential air quality impacts would not be considered significant. Overall, the proposed amendments to the CC Zone regarding drive-through facilities are not anticipated to have significant impacts. P S i Y it III I 5 i 4 I � li oou III �� tl kul, o/'poi f f i i �� til t �✓�ID��+ni�i! M f I 1� fz iir of/l � e W " re' Map Prepared by Planning Dept. N Aerial Photo 2015 0 175 350 700 W— E Feet S Board of Fire Commissioners Report to Ithaca Town Board May 8,2017 The following is a summary of the Board of Fire Commissioners quarterly report to the Ithaca Town Board for the first quarter of 2017. Included with this report are: • The Fire Chief's Report given at the April 11, 2017 BFC meeting. This includes the Fire Marshal's Report & Fire Prevention Bureau activity. • The department call activity reports for January 1- March 31. 2017. Total calls for the first quarter were 1,184 (slightly lower than the 1st quarter of the prior 2 years — 1,228 & 1,197 respectively). • The financial operations summary through March 31, 2017. Fire Department Operational Staffing (March 31, 2017). • As of March 31, 2017 the active Uniformed staff totaled 63 (1 Chief, 6 Assistant Chiefs, 8 lieutenants, & 46 Fire Fighters plus 1 Deputy Chief on per diem). In addition there is 1 Administrative Coordinator for a total of 64 personnel. • In addition to these 63 uniformed staff, 4 additional fire fighters have been hired and are currently undergoing training. They are expected to be available and assigned to shift duty later this summer. These positions are fully funded by a federal SAFER grant (see grants below). Budget- The 2017 Ithaca City budget approved by Common Council in November 2016, increased by slightly less than 2%, to $10,060,747 including debt service and employee benefits. The 2017 budget includes funding for a full time deputy chief position beginning in December of 2017. As of March 31, 2017 of the $6,298,082 operating budget(excludes benefit costs and debt service) $1,435,475 or slightly less than 23% of the approved funds have been spent. Training Facility The Chief reported that the Department's Rope Rescue Tower and the burn building have been temporarily placed out of service as a result of some potential structural safety issues with them. Stopen Engineering was contracted with and the Chief will be reviewing their report on the facilities with them and the City Engineer to develop a plan for repairing the facility. He anticipates that the buildings will be available in a few weeks after mitigation work is performed. The longer term status of the training facility and its location will be a topic included in the development of the Department's Strategic plan. Strategic Plan for Fire Department - The Mayor has asked the Board of Fire Commissioners to take the lead in developing a strategic plan for the Fire Department. The Board began discussions of what the planning process would entail at its January meeting. Subsequent to the January discussion, a meeting was held with the Mayor to clarify the scope of this effort and the potential resources available to support the effort. A special BoFC meeting was held on April 25th to focus more closely on how to organize the planning effort. Previous Strategic plans developed by the department have been distributed to the Board for review including the 1986 effort that developed the plan for the current relationship between the City and the Town for Fire Services, including the relocation of two fire stations from the City to the Town and increasing Board of Fire Commissioners Report to Ithaca Town Board May 8,2017 the Board of Fire Commissioners from 3 to 5 individuals with the intent that this two positions would be filled by individuals recommended by the Town Board. The group is looking at other strategic plans from other departments and the NYS document on developing a strategic plan. The Board is discussing the scope of the planning effort both in terms of the time span to be considered 5-10 -20 years, the breadth of the study—current service area or including issues of concern to other fire districts in the County. We are also reviewing documents such as the ISSO report received last fall and the Station 9 relocation study. A member of the BFC has been named to the County EMS Task Force and the information from this group will be incorporated into our planning process development. The Board recognizes that to develop a comprehensive plan will in all likelihood require establishing a separate Ad Hoc group that will allow broad participation by a variety of stakeholders and subject area experts on issues that need to be considered in the plan. We also wish to make sure that this important effort will be structured such that the work involved can continue even if the City makes changes to the role of the Board of Fire Commissioners or consolidates its functions into one of four proposed commissions that are under discussion by the Common Council. Boards & Committees Reorganization Working Group —two members of the BoFC participated in the May 2, 2017 meeting held by the BCRWG with members of the 12 entities that the working group has proposed be merged into 4 Commissions that would become responsible for the tasks and functions previously covered by those 12 entities. Seven of the twelve groups were represented at this meeting and all indicated that they had significant concerns about the proposed change. Concerns were expressed about loss of focus on the areas that the existing groups have been tasked to cover and a loss of diversity of opinions and perspectives with the proposed restructuring. Concern was also expressed that the structural support issues that affect the current groups should be addressed before making any reorganizational changes —i.e. develop a new application that will better identify volunteer's area of interest and expertise, better web based information on need for and opportunities for volunteering with the city, identify and share best practices by existing committees, etc. The members of the BCRWG indicated that they anticipated that the 4 commissions would allow a more efficient and consistent use of city staff resources since some of the groups do not currently have staff support or a common Council liaison attending their meetings. It will provide a standard path for issues to be brought before Common Council and provide groups that the Common Council can refer issues to for consideration. The BCRWG members indicated that they will be meeting to consider the input provided by those attending the meeting. Apparatus - The two new pumper engines, ordered from Seagrave Fire Apparatus, LLC and received earlier in the year, are in service. Grants The Department received a grant for $45,455 towards the replacement of the 20 year old compressor that is used to refill the departments breathing air tanks. It is expected that the new compressor will be installed by the end of May. The department was awarded a$634,016 SAFER (Staffing for Adequate Fire and Board of Fire Commissioners Report to Ithaca Town Board May 8,2017 Emergency Response) grant to add 4 additional career staff to the department for a 2 year period. The positions are fully funded on the grant and require that no reduction from current staffing levels occur during the grant period. At the end of the period the City will have to determine if the positions will continue to be supported on the department's operating budget. Four individuals have been hired to fill these positions and are currently in training and will be assigned to a shift sometime this summer. Board of Fire Commissioners The BFC meeting agendas/minutes (dating back to October 1987) may be accessed from the Board of Fire Commissioner's section of the City Website at: htlp://www.cityofithaca.org/367/Board-of-Fire-Commissioners BFC Appointments - Currently all positions on the Board are filled. Mr. Larry Salinger, Town of Ithaca, took his oath of office prior to the Board's April meeting and is a valuable addition to the Board. Two Commissioners have terms ending June 30, 2017: Commissioner Sparks from the City and Commissioner Gilligan from the Town. Volunteer Program Development There are currently 14 active members of Volunteer Company No. 9 who serve the department. In addition, there are 3 provisional members of the Company, currently enrolled in the County's Basic Exterior Fireground Operations course (BEFO). They will complete this course in the next few weeks. A113 are interested in becoming certified as interior firefighters and it is expected that the County will offer the interior training course later this year. There is also 1 new provisional member who will be attending the Cortland County 3 week"bootcamp"interior firefighter training session this summer. An open house and volunteer recruitment event was held in conjunction with FASNY's (Firemen's Association of the State of New York) statewide recruiting weekend on April 291h at Station 1 —Central fire house. Unfortunately, this effort did not result in any response from the public or individuals interested in learning about volunteering with the department. Volunteer Company 9 and Department will be reviewing this effort and seeing what options are available for making the public more aware of the fact that Ithaca is a combination Fire Department. An ad hoc committee consisting of 2 members of the Board(Commissioners Gilligan & Guttridge), Chief Parsons, Assistant Chief/Training Officer Weinstein,plus a member from Company 9 will continue working to address various volunteer issues including training, recruitment, and retention. Other Items & Items in progress 1 There has been an improvement in the on-going issue with the CAD (computer aided dispatch) system used by the 911 Center. It appears that software and hardware updates made by the dispatch center as well as quality control training have improved the Center's protocol for dispatching a Fire Engine to certain lower risk EMS calls. This will potentially allow a reduction in the number of EMS calls requiring a response from the Department. The 911 Center is in the process of installing and testing an automatic voice Board of Fire Commissioners Report to Ithaca Town Board May 8,2017 dispatch system. The new dispatch system will cause an automated voice to be transmitted alerting responders of an emergency incident. 2 The Board is holding information sessions regarding departmental operations prior to the beginning of the formal BFC meetings. These sessions provide an opportunity to learn more about specific areas of department operations such as organization of department into shifts, protocols for dispatching apparatus based on criteria established with County 911 center, EMS call response protocols, Hazmat operations, Code division work, Rope rescue operations, water rescue, equipment and vehicles used by the department, etc. In conjunction with these sessions, the Board is also discussing with the Chief the possibility of scheduling an annual or semi-annual session at the training center that would provide an opportunity to provide a live demonstration of the responses required by the department to emergency incidents. 3 Charter Review- the Board is continuing its discussion of the role of BFC. We are working with the Board's Common Council Liaison Gearhart, the Common Council, and Town Board to clarify and update the role of the BFC. 4 Resource recovery/False Alarm Policy—Currently on hold pending review with the City Attorney. 5 County Fire-Disaster—EMS Advisory Board—no new action on this issue. 6 Training Center Facility Project no construction has been authorized due to the training site being located on land designated as City Park land. The Training facility will be included in the strategic planning process. Respectfully Submitted, Bill Gilligan, Chair, Board of Fire Commissioners CITY OF ITHACA 310 West Green Street Ithaca, New York 14550-5497 s OFFICE of THE FIRE CHIEF Telephone: 607/272-12'3 Fa)c: 607/272-2703 MEMORANDUM To: Board of Fire Commissioners From: Tom Parsons, Fire Chief Date: April 11th, 2017 Re: Fire Chief's Monthly Report to the Board of Fire Commissioners ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION Administration 1) Career Personnel Report PERSONNEL STAFFING LEVELS 1 Chief 1 Deputy Chief(Per Diem) 6 Assistant Chiefs 8 Lieutenants 47 Fire Fighters 63 Uniform Personnel 1 Administrative Coordinator Total employees as of March 31st, 2017 — 64 a) Vacancies • None b) Retirements: • None C) Hiring/Promotions • None Page 2 of 5 - Fire Chief's Monthly Report April 11th, 2017 2) Budget Report a) 2017 Budget: Budget Summary— see accompanying report 3) County Communications and 911 Programs: a) No Update: Tompkins County is in the process of installing and testing an automatic voice dispatch system. The new dispatch system will cause an automated voice to be transmitted alerting responders of an emergency incident. The system will reduce the time between when an incident is entered into the Computer Aided Dispatch System, and a voice alert goes out to the fire stations and voice pagers. 4) Grants and Donations a) No Update: A new breathing air compressor was ordered after the Board of Fire Commissioners awarded the bid to Jerome Fire Equipment in February. The compressor will be delivered in April. The funding for the compressor is coming from the 2015 Assistance to Firefighting Grant Program. We are approved to receive $45,455 towards the replacement of the compressor. 5) Collegetown Fire Station No Update 5) Apparatus No Update 5) Fire Training Center In March, Stopen Engineering was contracted to perform a structural inspection on our Rope Rescue Tower and the Burn Building at the training center. On April 6th, I received the engineer's report for the Burn Building. The engineer has recommended that the building not be used until some items identified in their report are repaired. I will be scheduling a meeting with the City Engineer and Stopen Engineering to go over the report, and to develop a plan for repairing the facility. Based on a phone conversation with the engineer, I anticipate the building will be available for training in a few weeks after some mitigation work is performed. I will provide the Board of Fire Commissioners an update at next month's meeting. Page 3 of 5 - Fire Chief's Monthly Report April 11th, 2017 LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Fire Prevention Bureau 1) Code Enforcement Division: The following is a list of Activities for March 2017: Complaints Received 22 Referred to the City Building Division 12 Referred to the Town of Ithaca 3 Investigated by the Fire Prevention Bureau 7 Inspections: 167 City Fire Safety &Property Maintenance 41 City - Permit Required City Fire Safety 64 Town Fire Safety &Property 21 City - Sprinkler Inspections 15 City - Alternative Fire Protection Systems 2 City - Fire Alarm Inspection 5 City— Standpipe Hydrostatic Test 0 City - Standpipe Flow Test 0 City—Fire Pump Flow Test 0 City—Elevator 19 Permits or Certificates: 128 Operating Permit—Assembly Occupancy 11 Operating Permit—Large Assembly Occupancy 7 Operating Permit—Hazardous Occupancy 1 Operating Permit—Lumber Yard 0 Operating Permit—Elevator 25 Operating Permit—Fireworks 0 Certificate of Compliance— Occupancy 9 Certificate of Compliance— School 0 Certificate of Compliance - Fire Alarm 0 Certificate of Compliance - Fire Sprinkler 1 Certificate of Compliance - Fire Pump 0 Certificate of Compliance—Fire Standpipe 0 Occupancy Posting Certificate 72 Certificate of Compliance - Alternative Suppression 2 2) Fire Investigation Unit: Page 4 of 5 - Fire Chief's Monthly Report April 11th, 2017 There was one fire investigation in March for a fire that occurred at 804 E State Street. The cause of the fire is undetermined at this time. 3) Public Education and Special Events Public Education Events: 2 Fire Drills Witnessed: 0 Child Safety Seat Inspections: 7 OPERATIONS DIVISION 1) Emergency Response: 2) Emergency Response: March 2017 Responses - 418 Incidents City of Ithaca: 287 Incidents (68.66%) Fires: 7 Overpressure/Rupture 1 EMS/Rescue: 107 Hazardous Conditions: 15 Service Calls: 14 Good Intent: 54 Alarms/No Fires: 87 Severe Weather: 0 Other: 2 Town of Ithaca: 126 Incidents (30.14%) Fires: 1 Overpressure/Rupture: 0 EMS/Rescue: 83 Hazardous Conditions: 5 Service Calls: 4 Good Intent: 17 Alarms/No Alarm: 15 Severe Weather: 0 Other: 0 Mutual Aid: 5 Incidents (1.20%) Fires: 2 Overpressure/Rupture: 0 Page 5 of 5 - Fire Chief's Monthly Report April 11th, 2017 EMS/Rescue: 1 Hazardous Conditions: 0 Service Calls: 0 Good Intent: 2 Alarms/No Fires: 0 Severe Weather: 0 Simultaneous Incidents: 66 Incidents (15.79%) 3) Emergency Management: No Report. 4) Mutual Aid Calls: Quarterly Report Support 1) Training Quarterly Report 2) Training Center Quarterly Report Volunteer Recruitment and Retention 1) Summaries of Service Hours: Quarterly Report 2) There are currently 13 Active Volunteer Firefighters and Fire Police; and 5 Probationary Volunteer Firefighters 3) There are no applications pending review by the interview committee and Company 9. Ithaca FD IFD - Incident Type Period Comparisons Alarm Date Between {01/01/2017} and {03/31/2017} Incident Type 01/01/2017 01/01/201 01/01/2015 01/01/2014 to 6 to to to 03/31/2017 03/31/201 03/31/2015 03/31/2014 6 100 Fire, Other 1 3 3 3 111 Building fire 7 10 8 19 112 Fires in structure other than in a building 0 0 0 1 113 Cooking fire, confined to container 4 6 6 8 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 1 0 3 1 116 Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 2 0 1 0 118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 2 0 3 130 Mobile property (vehicle) fire, Other 1 0 0 0 131 Passenger vehicle fire 0 3 2 4 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 0 0 1 150 Outside rubbish fire, Other 3 0 0 1 151 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 0 1 1 3 154 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 0 2 1 1 160 Special outside fire, Other 0 0 2 0 221 Overpressure rupture of air or gas pipe/pipeline 0 1 0 0 240 Explosion (no fire) , Other 0 0 0 1 251 Excessive heat, scorch burns with no ignition 2 1 2 1 300 Rescue, EMS incident, other 3 3 0 3 3002Gorge Rescue, EMS incident, Low Angle Rope Assist 0 0 0 1 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 11 5 1 3 320 Emergency medical service, other 3 12 6 10 321 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 487 493 520 442 322 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 13 17 18 24 323 Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 1 6 6 2 324 Motor Vehicle Accident with no injuries 7 4 13 8 331 Lock-in (if lock out , use 511 ) 0 1 2 0 33llLock-in / Knox Box Access Required 1 1 0 0 350 Extrication, rescue, Other 0 0 1 0 352 Extrication of victim(s) from vehicle 0 1 0 0 353 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 7 5 0 3 354 Trench/below-grade rescue 0 1 0 0 3561Gorge Rescue, High-angle Extrication 0 1 0 0 360 Water & ice-related rescue, other 0 1 0 0 381 Rescue or EMS standby 0 0 0 3 400 Hazardous condition, Other 3 17 10 17 410 Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 3 0 0 2 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 3 2 1 1 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 8 17 12 20 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 2 1 0 0 421 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 1 2 1 0 422 Chemical spill or leak 1 0 0 0 04/11/2017 12:08 Page 1 Ithaca FD IFD - Incident Type Period Comparisons Alarm Date Between {01/01/2017} and {03/31/2017} Incident Type 01/01/2017 01/01/201 01/01/2015 01/01/2014 to 6 to to to 03/31/2017 03/31/201 03/31/2015 03/31/2014 6 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, Other 2 3 3 2 441 Heat from short circuit (wiring) , defective/worn 2 1 0 1 442 Overheated motor 3 3 2 2 443 Breakdown of light ballast 0 2 0 0 444 Power line down 8 8 3 2 445 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 4 0 1 4 451 Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected 0 0 0 1 461 Building or structure weakened or collapsed 0 0 1 0 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 0 0 2 0 471 Explosive, bomb removal (for bomb scare, use 721) 0 1 0 0 480 Attempted burning, illegal action, Other 1 0 0 0 481 Attempt to burn 0 0 0 1 500 Service Call, other 21 17 32 51 510 Person in distress, Other 4 3 4 4 511 Lock-out 3 2 4 0 520 Water problem, Other 3 14 9 20 521 Water evacuation 1 8 0 12 522 Water or steam leak 4 10 11 21 531 Smoke or odor removal 1 1 2 0 540 Animal problem, Other 0 0 1 1 541 Animal problem 0 0 0 1 550 Public service assistance, Other 1 3 3 3 551 Assist police or other governmental agency 3 12 3 5 552 Police matter 1 2 3 1 553 Public service 2 1 2 0 554 Assist invalid 0 5 5 1 555 Defective elevator, no occupants 0 0 1 0 561 Unauthorized burning 0 2 0 1 600 Good intent call, Other 14 20 10 12 611 Dispatched & cancelled en route 2 3 4 0 6111Dispatched & cancelled en route - By Dispatcher 4 4 4 8 6112Dispatched & cancelled en route - By Bangs 70 66 45 37 6113Dispatched & cancelled en route - By CUEMS 4 8 21 21 6114Dispatched & cancelled en route - By CU EH&S 48 37 24 35 6115Dispatched & cancelled en route - By IC Safety 25 23 20 11 6117Dispatched & cancelled en route - By MA Dept 5 4 1 7 6118Dispatched & cancelled en route - By IPD 1 1 3 5 6119Dispatched & cancelled en route - By Other Police 0 0 0 1 622 No Incident found on arrival at dispatch address 13 8 8 6 641 Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 2 0 0 0 651 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 9 5 3 2 04/11/2017 12:08 Page 2 Ithaca FD IFD - Incident Type Period Comparisons Alarm Date Between {01/01/2017} and {03/31/2017} Incident Type 01/01/2017 01/01/201 01/01/2015 01/01/2014 to 6 to to to 03/31/2017 03/31/201 03/31/2015 03/31/2014 6 653 Smoke from barbecue, tar kettle 0 0 0 1 661 EMS call, party transported by non-fire agency 0 1 1 0 671 HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 8 19 12 7 700 False alarm or false call, Other 0 12 6 1 700lFalse alarm or false call, Other - Medical Alarm 7 25 22 7 710 Malicious, mischievous false call, Other 1 1 2 1 711 Municipal alarm system, malicious false alarm 0 1 0 0 714 Central station, malicious false alarm 8 8 9 10 715 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 1 0 3 0 730 System malfunction, Other 14 3 7 7 731 Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 2 4 6 8 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 10 16 16 12 734 Heat detector activation due to malfunction 2 3 1 3 735 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 32 21 20 32 736 CO detector activation due to malfunction 7 6 13 5 740 Unintentional transmission of alarm, Other 29 20 8 16 741 Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 8 5 14 4 742 Extinguishing system activation 2 0 0 0 743 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 137 136 119 118 744 Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 14 16 37 64 745 Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 55 25 31 31 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 2 2 6 800 Severe weather or natural disaster, Other 1 0 0 0 900 Special type of incident, Other 4 1 0 1 Totals 1184 1228 1197 1205 04/11/2017 12:08 Page 3 Ithaca Fire Department January through March 2017 Responses - Incident Type by District 700 - E Special Incident Type 600 m Severe Weather 500 MAlarms/No Fire MGood Intent Call SIEMENS= 400 mService Call E3 Hazardous Condition 300 NEIVIS/Rescue 200 m Overpressure/Rupture M Fire 100 ro' 0 0 0 i a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 01- i�,- 01- 0- 0- 01- 01 194- 1�1 1�9 0.- 0-1- Go' District January through March zoic Responses - inciaeni ryce by Municipality Ithaca Fire Department January through March 2017 Responses by Municipality 100% 90% 80% r 70% "' ®Outside Ithaca 60% ■Town of Ithaca 50% ®City of Ithaca 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Municipality Ithaca Fire Department Municipality, District, and Incident Type Responses January-March 2017 Special Overpressure/ Hazardous Good Intent Severe Incident Percentage of District Fire Rupture EMS/Rescue Condition Service Call Call Alarms/No Fire Weather Type Total Incidents City of Ithaca 14 0 262 30 33 101 244 0 4 688 58.11% City of Ithaca -Cornell Property 1 1 33 4 0 35 34 0 0 108 9.12% City of Ithaca - Ithaca College 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% City Cascadillla Creek Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% City Fall Creek Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% City Six Mile Creek Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Town of Ithaca 3 0 200 9 10 26 26 1 0 275 23.23% Town of Ithaca -Cornell Property 0 0 5 0 0 10 7 0 0 22 1.86% Town of Ithaca - Ithaca College 1 1 32 1 1 27 19 0 0 82 6.93% Town of Ithaca -Six Mile Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Town of Ithaca - Buttermilk Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Town of Ithaca -Treman Gorge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Outside Ithaca 2 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 0.76% Total 21 2 533 44 44 205 330 1 4 1184 100.00% Overpressure/ Hazardous Good Intent Severe Percentage of District Fire Rupture EMS/Rescue Condition Service Call Call Alarms/No Fire Weather Other Total Incidents Total City 15 1 295 34 33 136 278 0 4 796 67.23% Total Town 4 1 237 10 11 63 52 1 0 379 32.01% Outside Ithaca 2 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 0.76% Total 21 2 533 44 44 205 330 1 4 1184 100.00% Ithaca FD IFD Mutual Aid Responses by Department (Summary) Alarm Date Between {01/01/2017} And {03/31/2017} Type of Aid Count 55001 Brooktondale Fire Department Mutual aid given 1 1 55002 Cayuga Heights Fire Department Automatic aid given 1 1 55011 Lansing Fire Department Mutual aid given 1 1 55013 Newfield Fire Department Mutual aid given 1 Automatic aid given 1 2 55018 Trumansburg Fire Department Mutual aid given 1 Automatic aid given 1 2 04/11/2017 12:07 Page 1 Cou nt of Iricidents by Alarm Huu r, Al arm D ate B etwe e n 10 1/0 1/2 0171 An d 10 3/31/2 0171 SIG TO 601- 4.0- 30- 20. 10- ............ ................. DIG 'O'l 'G.2. 014 D5 06 07' 'O"s 10 11 '12 13 14 5, le 17 lis, 1 9 20, 21 22 23 Alm Hour • � : - : - I I I � I I UI A p d I l I I I V sm ' ' u � u it it it it it it it it it it it it it � I I i i i I i i U C la u - III p u u II II II II II II II II II II II II II � I i I i I i A P� U U � I la u .. . III o u u � I II II II II II II II II II II II II II � 0 i A P� U U � I u u I la u III � A A o I I � u � A I Ao � � I u. u u � 1 II II � Ilo Ilo II �, P � I I I I I r AD 1' i V I � d II I ' V U u A I � I I i I i I I � U u � VAu � I Ilo Ilo II � a � I i I i I Y I U I� " u II I A c I' I n n. i P U A I I I I I I I � U u � VAu � I Ilo Ilo II � a � I i I i I Y I V A i p U � I Ao � u la p - III w I i i u u A � �,��IIIIIIIII I II II II II II II II II II II II II II � I i I i I i U �i „Imp I Ao � u - III la 0 L � A I IIS u u I � I II II II II II II II II II II II II II � �,��IIIIIIIII I I i I i I i P� U �i A U � I Ao � la u - III 0 I u u I � I n'� I � 6 P a U U A � � 1 � 1 1 II II � i Ilo Ilo II �, P � I Y I �II�I i I� I II c I' I U i n r. u P I. I I I I I I � I U u � VAu I II I a � U I� i I i i Y a u u u u u u u u u u u u u I I I I I I I I I I I I III III III III III III III III III III III III III II n I II II II � II II II II II II II I u I III. I III. I III. I III. . III. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I li A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 li A li 1 1 i � i 0117 REVENUE SUMMARY IB"hl'' ACCOUNT MARCH ' 117 Pisa ('-'o,de 1 nspedion 1565 S64,000 $23,337 36% $40,663 $'?, Flan' &Conija°n Seivices 2f89 $fit 0 0 pl' i lic Sofety Selrvjc,.es 2260 500 % $500 0 0 File w 1 oleic ive;?eMces 2262 _ 3,033,+300 $456,,070 $Z57030 $1 52,,02 3 $1, 24,281x), i Renlatl of Eq,tipment 2414 0 0 $ 0 "dun*lr w'ol �, 2655 a 100, 0 $100 "'bn"";;a Sde of Egjiipn"weo.,al 266S $20.0100 huyance Recoveries 2680 $15,000 $0 0% $15,000 $0, $0 .ffier .raMnl.ernation fir Loss 2690 50 $0 I°t.l ire:t 4'an pe td:a;;_�r Expense 2701' $50 -0'% $0 $ offt i°'aaaa citN4.ns 2705 $78-,,904 0, % $10 $ G% . Don alions (s 2250) 270,55 1 $19,335 lnnntckms t ed 1,!evenule 2770 $,-s4)O % ,y $0 t &°°tu e's'q It waairaooA°'ri iiVxlE m rn° 91' °9i 0 0 0 X11 Pub��c Safely 43,89 VY12.0160.111111111--.] 0% $0 $0 $0 $4,230,964 $501,714 11 19% $2,453,32 1 $160,7"9 . 2,017 m Atit''ri'oW tll6 NtlV.'ro 3351!'l 2Q24 444 11d,00 7?dl7 2*W? 1779 4rn� � S ��a ��xd2 Sgof 4,9:1 MOW 92,098 II 't !I49,adZ «I2063 45 287 ea&2J4 QM110"It §:✓pl,",&"V^Alk 125 4,1994 q's 0 52. (16 I 14,3l 0 Z+.A') 0 B 51 Florin&FlOueo offic*F,,qwlp, 11 As x) 710 YAH9 0 9 A8 rtd'% V9 Mtw Tsl4phorde I `.i s 405 W,102: 11 132 3,434 I rY P k f 4 M.tI9I'lltamm tl,VX11;u 00 9 11^q P9 d'I 6 11% 6 :my cWhes pY5 9,o TN 5 3.25 24,236 Grvm&ON 00rcelpxpen 96.1d ) 43,5 tl,51R1T ¢U' B YiR.t ¢:"T coRtitwach 3 ,180 A,�,S 4.232 S'ko'IT Dowig 25,19u.,1i 4,40 _ l;q_ _.... �v le "l"'l.x�l Rj5 Tr 'e1 11 X1,1„5dd 4�4$ q 2TW'2 2,592 I nmunmence RUB) T"t.,r 4 R J4 prgm Surol 24,1300 457 4q N 8^499 ol 0 0 8.542 dST ',,1"ne'- Nq �l�all 9,3 4"n, °1 11»x _ Drop M alydA 2,:rvY030 05, 3,6 1! ;I,nrw6Cy I 85ig, n";O"D Equip Muhl 844 D&M, 476 ftp (3 3,44d 10 Q 4^,q,9 r Equo Prim 9A,>~yl) 4;1 t' dp'14, R,Fxd 6 77% Mqd I Mwnrt4lnM 8.800 OAD ..__...._............�..^.... 9n x "d Y5 a ^.. ^ ...;,, 6°.290082 1159°19 ' 9 ,1, 7 15,307 642,278 423,424 2$,,9,9,2 74,119 11,435,475 1 77 4° 4 ,6 7 ,..� ...w.._� Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0131 4/3/2017 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 24.-3-2.1 101 Harris B Dates Dr DMAGNUSO APPROVED 4423.50 Description: 18' X 21' metal building storage structure to be constructed on existing asphalt. No electric, sewage, or water systems. 2017-0132 4/3/2017 SIGN 62.-2-1.121 323A Pine Tree Rd BBATES PENDING Description: Install new sign 2017-0133 4/4/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: Platform/Tent 16 Electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1, 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 square feet 2017-0134 4/4/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: Platform/Tent 17 Install electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1, 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 sq ft. 2017-0135 4/4/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: Platform/Tent 18- Electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 sq ft 2017-0136 4/4/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: Main High voltage Electrical Service for tents 16, 17, 18 & 19 from vault from NYSEG pole L314, Install 400 Amp secondary service per drawing attached 2017-0137 4/5/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 58.1-1-53.1 53A Lois Ln DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: Change out 100 amp meter can. NYSEG Job# 10300339584 2017-0138 4/5/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AD 70.-1-48 515 Warren Rd MSTONIER APPROVED 15000.00 Description: Build a 22' x 24'garage attached to house with electrical. Electrical: Install 6 outlets, 2 switches, outdoor lights, and garage door opener. 2017-0139 4/6/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/AL 63.-1-8.1 651 Dryden Rd MKELLY APPROVED 200000.00 Description: Replacement of some deteriorated process water piping, with some additional demolition of piping. 2017-0140 4/6/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 33.-3-2.10 122 Ithaca Beer Dr BBATES APPROVED Description: TENT 30' x 40'with sidewalls and propane heater. 2017-0141 4/6/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 72.-1-37 114 Concord PI MMOSELEY APPROVED Description: Temporary service to for fire restoration NYSEG Job 10300339249 Page 1 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0142 4/7/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AD 61.-1-8.42 20 Dove Dr DMAGNUSO PENDING 90000.00 Description: Remove existing screened porch, add 4'x12' to existing floor plan, new kitchen, floors, new screened in porch, access ramp, deck work. 2017-0143 4/7/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 62.-2-5 126 Game Farm Rd MSTONIER APPROVED 12500.00 Description: Install LG 12,000 BTU Mini-split Heat Pump System. Condensing unit power supply will be fed from electrical sub panel (P-1 B)which comes from the main electrical panel in Rm 10061. 2017-0144 4/7/2017 DEMOLITION 63.-1-8.1 161 Synchrotron Dr MSTONIER APPROVED 16000.00 Description: Demolish 2 story interior modular control room structure within the high bay rm. 151. Disconnect/remove electric back to panels; disconnect/cap HVAC and plumbing from building. 2017-0145 4/7/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A31.-1-1 300 Culver Rd DMAGNUSO PENDING 5000.00 Description: Create a second dwelling unit in the basement. Install a wall, kitchen, stove and sink. 2017-0146 4/10/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A70.-10-1.33 106 Pinewood PI MSTONIER APPROVED 19000.00 Description: Kitchen cabinet removal and new ones installed Electrical: move outlets, lights and add outlet in island in new kitchen. 2017-0147 4/10/2017 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 24.-1-25.23 200 Hayts Rd SWILLIAMS APPROVED 5060.00 Description: Replace siding and repair or replace sheathing damaged by wind. 2017-0148 4/10/2017 ROOFING 70.-1-18 16 Muriel St MSTONIER APPROVED 29576.00 Description: New roof to lower roof/part of house. 2017-0151 4/12/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 58.-2-4 149 Honness Ln MSTONIER APPROVED 17800.00 Description: Installation of furnace heating system 400,000 BTU 2017-0152 4/12/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A72.-1-1.114 310 Winthrop Dr MSTONIER APPROVED 8000 Description: new bathroom in the basement using up flash system. External and plumbing will be done by Orion Mechanical. Owner will be doing the framing and the walls. 2017-0153 4/12/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 44.-2-6 153 King Rd E MSTONIER APPROVED Description: Going from overhead to underground NYSEG job# 10300342415 Page 2 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0154 4/13/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/AL 63.-1-3.4 395 Pine Tree Rd PENDING 6000.00 Description: East Hill Office building renovation/alterations to demo existing wall to make kitchenette larger. Includes new VCT and larger countertop. CU ID 2921 2017-0155 4/13/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A45.-2-20 145 Ridgecrest Rd SWILLIAMS APPROVED 141740.00 Description: Level 2 Alteration - Demolish front of exist structure and reconfigure floor plan. Add two bathrooms and create a master suite. Electrical: Rough-in and trim-out electric in areas of new construction. 2017-0156 4/13/2017 ROOFING 71.-5-4 201 Roat St MMOSELEY APPROVED 14000.00 Description: Tear off whole house roof. New underlayment. Ice and water and shingles. sheathing is ok. there is an active permit for the addition. 2017-0157 4/13/2017 GENERATORS 41.-1-30.2 113 Campus Center Way MSTONIER APPROVED 750000.00 Description: Installation of new service equipment and generator. Provide generator pad. Duet banks at exterior of the building. Electrical: Provide new 2500A service to Campus Center. Provide 500KVA generator and ATS switch to backup the facility. NYSEG Job#: N/A-Campus utilities. 2017-0158 4/14/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave MSTONIER APPROVED Description: Temp electrical service 2017-0159 4/14/2017 DECK 37.-1-20.102 101 Alison Dr MMOSELEY PENDING 15,000 Description: Demolish concrete patio and build a wooden deck 2017-0160 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-20.2 311-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 3630.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0161 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-20.3 311 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 8690.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0162 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-21.2 321-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 1320.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. Page 3 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0163 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-21.3 321 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 9350.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0164 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-22.2 341-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 3520.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0165 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-22.3 341-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 10890.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0166 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-12.1 240-2 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 4290.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0167 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-12.2 240-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 7480.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0168 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-12.3 240-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 7590.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0169 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-11.2 250-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 3300.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0170 4/14/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A60.1-1-11.3 250-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY APPROVED 4840.00 Description: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0171 4/17/2017 DECK 18.-5-5 940 East Shore Dr BBATES DENIED 3500.00 Description: Replace existing entry deck and build new shed roof over entry deck 2017-0172 4/17/2017 ROOFING 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St BBATES APPROVED 8000.00 Description: Roof on the house Page 4 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0173 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A28.-1-34.22 108 Woodgate Ln MSTONIER APPROVED 4345.00 Description: Replace sliding door 2017-0174 4/20/2017 SOLAR 35.-1-11 823 Elmira Rd DMAGNUSO PENDING 30600.00 Description: 7.8 Kw Photovoltaic system Pole Mounted 2017-0175 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 1 Canvas Safari TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0176 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 2 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0177 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 3 Canvas TENT 14 X 16 on platform 2017-0178 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 4 TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0179 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 5 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0180 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 6 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0181 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 7 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0182 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 8 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0183 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 9 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0184 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 10 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform Page 5 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/1/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0185 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 11 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0186 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 12 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0187 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 13 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0188 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 14 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0189 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 15 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0190 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 16 Canvas TENT 16 x 20 on platform 2017-0191 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 17 Canvas TENT 14 x 16 on platform 2017-0192 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 18 Canvas TENT 14 X 16 on platform 2017-0193 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: SITE 19 Canvas Safari TENT 16 X 20 on platform 2017-0194 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: LOBBY POLE TENT 30 x 40 2017-0195 4/20/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO APPROVED Description: BANQUET Pole TENT 20 x 40 2017-0196 4/21/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 56.-2-1.1 1551 Slaterville Rd BBATES APPROVED Description: 20 x 20 Annual Deck Tent from 5.1.17 thru 10.30.17. Page 6 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0197 4/21/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/AL 31.-2-25.2 651 Five Mile Dr MKELLY PENDING 18000.00 Description: Cell Tower-swapping out antennas with new antennas at existing cell tower 2017-0198 4/21/2017 FENCE/RETAINING WALLS 41.-1-30.2 127 Conservatory Dr DMAGNUSO PENDING 1497500.00 Description: Install new upper and lower retaining walls at Butterfield Stadium 2017-0199 4/24/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 70.-10-3.7 1448 Hanshaw Rd MSTONIER APPROVED Description: Replace service riser cable, meter and ground property NYSEG 10300345009 2017-0201 4/24/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/A28.-1-26.85 331/333 Rachel Carson Tra DMAGNUSO PENDING 30731.00 Description: Covered porch construction. 2017-0212 4/25/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 70.-10-1.2 107 Salem Dr MKELLY PENDING Description: Replace service with 200 amp on 1 meter in new location 2017-0213 4/26/2017 PYROTECHNICS 41.-1-30.2 953 Danby Rd MMOSELEY APPROVED Description: Fireworks display Saturday May 20, 2017 9:45 pm- 10:00pm 2017-0214 4/26/2017 GENERATORS 62.-2-1.123 381 Pine Tree Rd BBATES PENDING Description: GENERATOR use of Honda EU70001S -5500 watt Electric Start Portable Inverter Generator 20 feet from Temp Structure for Cornell Graduation events 2017-0215 4/26/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 62.-2-1.123 381 Pine Tree Rd BBATES PENDING Description: TENT 30 x 75=2250 sq ft. Event: Cornell Graduation May 26, 27 &28, 2017 4:30pm - 1 am with generator Installation May 24th Removal May 30 2017-0216 4/26/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRU 62.-2-1.123 381 Pine Tree Rd BBATES PENDING Description: TENT 30 x 45 = 1350 sq ft Single frame tent that is barrel weighted. Event Cornell Graduation May 26, 27 &28, 2017. Installation May 24, removal May 30th. 2017-0217 4/26/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/AL 41.-1-30.2 143 Tower Skyline Dr DMAGNUSO PENDING 1823000.00 Description: Demoliton of existing bathrooms on floors 8-13 and creation of new. MEP upgrades in these bathrooms as well as finishes. Electrical: Page 7 of 9 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Construction Application # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inspector Status Cost 2017-0218 4/26/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 56.-3-13.25 9 John St MSTONIER APPROVED Description: Electrical work on a kitchen remodel. Kitchen doesn't need a building permit. 2017-0220 4/27/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 21.-2-26 997 Taughannock Blvd MKELLY PENDING 3642.00 Description: Installing a Rheem RA1336AJINA 34on a/c system. Electrical: Install Rheem RA1336AJINA 34on a/c and 34on coil to include new electrical of 20'. 2017-0221 4/28/2017 FENCE/RETAINING WALLS 66.-2-2 206 Forest Home Dr MSTONIER PENDING 30000.00 Description: Build retaining wall to protect existing barn 2017-0223 4/28/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 28.-1-26.85 313 Rachel Carson Trail MKELLY PENDING 4470.00 Description: Installation of a single-head minisplit AC. Run conductors from the MSP through the exterior wall and along the west side of the building, to a location at the front of the building to be determined by Snug Planet. Install circuit breaker for the MSP, and NEMA 3R disconnect for the outdoor unit of the mini split system. 2017-0224 4/28/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 28.-1-26.85 306 Rachel Carson Trail MKELLY PENDING 16320.00 Description: Installation of four air conditioners in apartments. Units 3B, 3C, 3D, 4C. Run conductors in Wiremold or equivalent surface mounted raceway from the MSP to a disconnect on the exterior wall, adjacent to the outdoor unit of the mini split system. The raceway will pass through the bathroom, closet and front bedroom. Install circuit breaker for the MSP, and NEMA 3R disconnect for mini split system. 2017-0225 4/28/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/AL 41.-1-30.2 151 Tower Skyline Dr DMAGNUSO APPROVED 698000.00 Description: West Tower window replacement per QPK Design bid documents 1.27.17 Page 8 of 9 5/4/2017 Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permit Application Report - Totals From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Permit Type Count ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 2 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/ALTERATION 5 DECK 2 DEMOLITION 1 ELECTRICAL ONLY 11 FENCE/RETAINING WALLS 2 GENERATORS 2 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 5 PYROTECHNICS 1 ROOFING 3 SIGN 1 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 17 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADDITION 2 SOLAR 1 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURE 25 Total: 80 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 2017-0117 4/3/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 72.-1-3.3 404 WINTHROP DRIVE MKELLY OPEN 4500.00 Desc: Install wood burning fireplace insert w/ a full flue stainless steel liner. 2017-0127 4/3/2017 FENCE/RETAINING WALLS 63.-1-11 709 Dryden Rd MSTONIER CLOSED 3500.00 Desc: Cornell Orchards: install a 900' long extension to current 8' high perimeter deer exclusion fence at Cornell Orchards. Same fencing had existed in this same location about 10 years ago. 2017-0128 4/4/2017 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/ALTERATION 67.-1-10.2 240 Farrier Rd MSTONIER CLOSED 12000.00 Desc: Install ADA door operators and push pads on the two doors of the main entrance into the NYS Veterinary Diagnostic Lab (AHDC) Building. 2017-0137 4/6/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 58.1-1-53.1 53A Lois Ln DMAGNUSO CLOSED Desc: Change out 100 amp meter can. NYSEG Job# 10300339584 2017-0131 4/6/2017 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 24.-3-2.1 101 Harris B Dates Dr DMAGNUSO OPEN 4423.50 Desc: 18' X 21' metal building storage structure to be constructed on existing asphalt. No electric, sewage, or water systems. 2017-0140 4/7/2017 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURE 33.-3-2.10 122 Ithaca Beer Dr BBATES OPEN Desc: TENT 30' x 40'with sidewalls and propane heater. 2017-0126 4/7/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 49.-1-21.12 688 Coddington Rd MSTONIER OPEN 10000.00 Desc: Kitchen renovations and electrical work to change fuse panel to breaker. NYSEG Job# 10300339326 2017-0112 4/7/2017 COMMERCIAL NEW 33.-3-6 654 Elmira Rd SWILLIAMS OPEN 875000.00 Desc: Provide 2 new motel wing additions to existing center building, totalling 31 units. Also add one owner occupied apartment to existing center building. Total Bldg Square footage is 14,795. 2017-0141 4/7/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 72.-1-37 114 Concord PI MMOSELEY OPEN Desc: Temporary service to for fire restoration NYSEG Job 10300339249 2017-0149 4/11/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 72.-1-6 544 Warren Rd LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0150 4/11/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 70.-11-4.2 218 Tareyton Dr LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units Page 1 of 7 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 2017-0143 4/11/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 62.-2-5 126 Game Farm Rd MSTONIER OPEN 12500.00 Desc: Install LG 12,000 BTU Mini-split Heat Pump System. Condensing unit power supply will be fed from electrical sub panel (P-1 B)which comes from the main electrical panel in Rm 10061. 2017-01384/11/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADDITION 70.-1-48 515 Warren Rd MSTONIER OPEN 15000.00 Desc: Build a 22' x 24'garage attached to house with electrical. Electrical: Install 6 outlets, 2 switches, outdoor lights, and garage door opener. 2017-0144 4/11/2017 DEMOLITION 63.-1-8.1 161 Synchrotron Dr MSTONIER OPEN 16000.00 Desc: Demolish 2 story interior modular control room structure within the high bay rm. 151. Disconnect/remove electric back to panels; disconnect/cap HVAC and plumbing from building. 2017-0146 4/11/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 70.-10-1.33 106 Pinewood PI MSTONIER OPEN 19000.00 Desc: Kitchen cabinet removal and new ones installed Electrical: move outlets, lights and add outlet in island in new kitchen. 2017-0148 4/11/2017 ROOFING 70.-1-18 16 Muriel St MSTONIER OPEN 29576.00 Desc: New roof to lower roof/part of house. 2017-0060 4/11/2017 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE NEW 63.-2-10.2 105 Lena St SWILLIAMS OPEN 7974855.00 Desc: Construct 4 Story Wood Frame Apartment Building -59,073 Gross Square Footage 2017-0129 4/11/2017 ROOFING 71.-1-11.66 309 Blackstone Ave DMAGNUSO OPEN 12500.00 Desc: Strip roof to deck, repair deck sheathing as needed, add ice &water shield in valleys & eve's, &shingle roof of house and attached garage. 2017-0147 4/11/2017 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 24.-1-25.23 200 Hayts Rd SWILLIAMS OPEN 5060.00 Desc: Replace siding and repair or replace sheathing damaged by wind. 2017-0061 4/11/2017 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE NEW 63.-2-10.2 111 Lena St SWILLIAMS OPEN 7054830.00 Desc: Construct 46,668-sqft apartment building containing 58 dwelling units for Cornell University graduate housing. Building Height 47-feet, 8-inches. 201 7-01 52 4/13/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 72.-1-1.114 310 Winthrop Dr MSTONIER OPEN 8000 Desc: new bathroom in the basement using up flush system. External and plumbing will be done by Orion Mechanical. Owner will be doing the framing and the walls. 201 7-01 56 4/13/2017 ROOFING 71.-5-4 201 Roat St MMOSELEY CLOSED 14000.00 Desc: Tear off whole house roof. New underlayment. Ice and water and shingles. sheathing is ok. there is an active permit for the addition. Page 2 of 7 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 2017-0153 4/14/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 44.-2-6 153 King Rd E MSTONIER OPEN Desc: Going from overhead to underground NYSEG job# 10300342415 2017-0151 4/14/2017 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 58.-2-4 149 Honness Ln MSTONIER OPEN 17800.00 Desc: Installation of furnace heating system 400,000 BTU 2017-0158 4/14/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave MSTONIER OPEN Desc: Temp electrical service 201 7-01 57 4/17/2017 GENERATORS 41.-1-30.2 113 Campus Center Way MSTONIER OPEN 750000.00 Desc: Installation of new service equipment and generator. Provide generator pad. Duct banks at exterior of the building. Electrical: Provide new 2500A service to Campus Center. Provide 500KVA generator and ATS switch to back up the facility. NYSEG Job#: N/A-Campus utilities. 201 7-01 72 4/18/2017 ROOFING 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St MSTONIER CLOSED 8000.00 Desc: Roof on the house 201 7-01 55 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 45.-2-20 145 Ridgecrest Rd SWILLIAMS OPEN 141740.00 Desc: Level 2 Alteration - Demolish front of exist structure and reconfigure floor plan. Add two bathrooms and create a master suite. Electrical: Rough-in and trim-out electric in areas of new construction. 2017-0160 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-20.2 311-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 3630.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0161 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-20.3 311 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 8690.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 62 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-21.2 321-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 1320.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 63 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-21.3 321 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 9350.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. Page 3 of 7 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 201 7-01 64 4/18/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-22.2 341-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 3520.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 65 4/19/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-22.3 341-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 10890.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-01424/19/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADDITION 61.-1-8.42 20 Dove Dr DMAGNUSO OPEN 90000.00 Desc: Remove existing screened porch, add 4'x12' to existing floor plan, new kitchen, floors, new screened in porch, access ramp, deck work. 201 7-01 66 4/19/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-12.1 240-2 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 4290.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 67 4/19/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-12.2 240-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 7480.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 68 4/19/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-12.3 240-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 7590.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0170 4/20/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-11.3 250-4 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 4840.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 201 7-01 69 4/20/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 60.1-1-11.2 250-3 Strawberry Hill Cir MMOSELEY OPEN 3300.00 Desc: Remove existing cedar siding and vapor barrier; inspect plywood substrate &flashing. Replace as needed. Install new tyvek house wrap, tape all seams and install new cedar shake siding. 2017-0090 4/20/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE NEW 70.-11-2 222 Tareyton Dr DMAGNUSO OPEN 201000.00 Desc: Build a new single story 1300 sq ft home on a slab with a 500 sq ft garage; Electric included - NYSEG Job# 10300325623 201 7-01 73 4/20/2017 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 28.-1-34.22 108 Woodgate Ln MSTONIER OPEN 4345.00 Desc: Replace sliding door Page 4 of 7 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 201 7-01 36 4/24/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO OPEN Desc: Main High voltage Electrical Service for tents 16, 17, 18 & 19 from vault from NYSEG pole L314, Install 400 Amp secondary service per drawing attached. NYSEG#10300331915 2017-0200 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301A Maple Ave Maple Avd_KOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0201 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 B Maple ave Maple AveLKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0202 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301C Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0203 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 D Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0204 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 E Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0205 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 F Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0206 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 G Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0207 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 H Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0208 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 1 Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0209 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 J Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units 2017-0210 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 K Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units Page 5 of 7 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued Perm # Date Type SBL Legal Address Inpector Status Cnst. Cost 2017-0211 4/24/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 63.-2-7.1 301 Maple Ave LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Maintenance Shed 201 7-01 99 4/25/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 70.-10-3.7 1448 Hanshaw Rd MSTONIER CLOSED Desc: Replace service riser cable, meter and ground property NYSEG 10300345009 2017-0219 4/26/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 54.-2-1 1000 Hudson St Ext OPEN Desc: 2017-0218 4/26/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 56.-3-13.25 9 John St MSTONIER OPEN Desc: Electrical work on a kitchen remodel. Kitchen doesn't need a building permit. 201 7-01 33 4/26/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO OPEN Desc: Platform/Tent 16 Electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1, 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 square feet 201 7-01 34 4/26/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO OPEN Desc: Platform/Tent 17 Install electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1, 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 sq ft. 201 7-01 35 4/26/2017 ELECTRICAL ONLY 36.-1-4.5 1150 Danby Rd DMAGNUSO OPEN Desc: Platform/Tent 18- Electrical service from distribution panel, install 2 quad receptacles and 1 240 volt receptacle for portable heater 500 sq ft 2017-0222 4/28/2017 OPERATING PERMIT 72.-1-8.1 542 Warren Rd LKOFOID OPEN Desc: Multiple Residence 3 or more units Total 62 Page 6 of 7 5/4/2017 Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Permits Issued - Totals From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Permit Type Count ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 2 COMMERCIAL NEW 1 COMMERCIAL RENOVATION/ALTERATION 1 DEMOLITION 1 ELECTRICAL ONLY 10 FENCE/RETAINING WALLS 1 GENERATORS 1 HEATING AND COOLING UNIT 3 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE NEW 2 OPERATING PERMIT 16 ROOFING 4 SINGLE FAMILY RENOVATION/ALTERATION 16 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADDITION 2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE NEW 1 TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURE 1 Total: 62 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Certificates Issued From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Cert. # Date Type Temp SBL Legal Address Inspector Status 2015-0594 4/3/2017 ELECTRI 28.-1-10.2 1401 Mecklenburg Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2017-0067 4/4/2017 CO 39.-1-1.22 950 Danby Rd SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2016-0513 4/4/2017 CC 72.-1-9.1 528 Warren Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2016-0426 4/5/2017 CO 24.-3-2.1 101 Harris B Dates Dr SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2016-0434 4/5/2017 CC 24.-3-2.1 101 Harris B Dates Dr MKELLY ISSUED 2016-0183 4/5/2017 CC 56.-2-4 1557 Slaterville Rd MKELLY ISSUED 2015-0667 4/6/2017 TCO X 27.-1-11.3 103B Bundy Rd SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2017-0070 4/7/2017 CC 33.-3-6 654 Elmira Rd SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2017-0102 4/7/2017 CC 63.-1-8.1 651 DRYDEN ROAD MKELLY ISSUED 2017-0137 4/7/2017 CC 58.1-1-53.1 53A Lois Ln DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2017-0049 4/11/2017 CO 71.-1-11.48 301 St Catherine Cir DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2016-0593 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave BBATES ISSUED 2016-0594 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0595 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2017-0001 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-14 201 Maple Ave BBATES ISSUED 2016-0587 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0588 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0589 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0590 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0579 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0580 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0581 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0582 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0583 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0596 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave BBATES ISSUED 2016-0597 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0571 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0572 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED Page 1 of 3 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Certificates Issued From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Cert. # Date Type Temp SBL Legal Address Inspector Status 2016-0573 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0574 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0575 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0564 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0565 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0566 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0567 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0568 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0569 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0570 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0576 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0577 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0578 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0584 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0585 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2016-0586 4/11/2017 CC 63.-2-10.2 201 MAPLE AVE BBATES ISSUED 2017-0006 4/13/2017 ELECTRI 66.-5-1 134-36 Judd Falls Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2017-0059 4/13/2017 CO 39.-1-1.22 950 Danby Rd SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2016-0533 4/17/2017 CO 73.-1-9.11 4 Sanctuary Dr BBATES ISSUED 2017-0127 4/17/2017 CC 63.-1-11 709 Dryden RD MSTONIER ISSUED 2017-0106 4/21/2017 CO 39.-1-1.22 950 Danby Rd SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2017-0096 4/25/2017 CC 17.-3-21 15 Renwick Heights Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2017-0097 4/25/2017 CC 17.-3-21 15 Renwick Heights Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2017-0120 4/26/2017 CC 30.-1-13 204 Glenside Rd DMAGNUSO ISSUED 2016-0452 4/26/2017 TCO X 54.-2-1 1000 Hudson St Ext SWILLIAMS ISSUED 2015-0688 4/27/2017 CO 70.-11-34.4 204 SALEM DRIVE MKELLY ISSUED 2017-0105 4/27/2017 CC 28.-1-34.26 301 WOODGATE LANE MKELLY ISSUED 2017-0156 4/28/2017 CC 71.-5-4 201 Roat St MMOSELEY ISSUED Page 2 of 3 5/4/2017 Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Certificate Report Totals by Type and Status From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Certificate Type Certificate Status Count CC 45 CO 7 ELECTRICAL ONLY CC 2 TCO 2 Total: 56 ISSUED 56 Page 3 of 3 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Received Report From' 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Date Type Tax Parcel # Legal Address Disposition 4/3/2017 UNSANITARY LIVING CON 39.-1-11.1 103 Birdseye View Dr CLOSED Desc: While doing an inspection before pouring the slab at 105 Birdseye the contractor Jeff Romig, alerted me to the fact that raw sewage was coming out a drain pipe on the adjoining property. He stated that he and Travis Cleveland had an argument about the problem and that Travis told him that he was responsibile to reinstall the sewage line that apparently ran across this lot before they started excavation for the new house under construction. 4/3/2017 NYS BUILDING CODE 46.-1-15.12 201 Eldridge Cir OPEN Desc: Bill Sitzabee called regarding 201 Eldridge Cir driveway, now that the snow has melted, he has stone (from plowing) roughly 8' on his property. Driveway cuts into his property. Please call Bill, he does have pictures to send if needed. 4/3/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 1251 Trumansburg Rd OPEN Desc: IFD responded to an activated smoke detector in basement due to dust. Interior crews found several doors in basement area that could not be open with know keys. IFD responded back to same location for same detector in basement zone as earlier call. Detector removed, system reset and trouble silenced. EC Leon Apgar will call PVE to have them repair system. 4/5/2017 OCCUPANCY WITHOUT a 23.-1-11.130 121 Woolf Ln OPEN Desc: Section 125-7 A(1) Town of Ithaca Code 4/7/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 151 West Hill Circle OPEN Desc: A leak in the roof which allowed rain water to go through two local smoke detectors. IFD took down the two smoke detectors and shut off the circuit breakers to this apartment. Resident went to stay with friends. We notified building maintenance via telephone answering service. 4/7/2017 NYS Residental Code 16.-2-3 117 Renwick Dr OPEN Desc: Running an AirBNB 4/7/2017 NYS Residental Code 17.-3-20 11 Renwick Heights Rd OPEN Desc: running an AirBNB 4/7/2017 NYS Residental Code 17.-3-30 20 Renwick Heights Rd OPEN Desc: Running and AirBNB 4/13/2017 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 57.-1-3.2 121 Snyder Hill Rd OPEN Desc: Unlicensed motor vehicle on property 4/17/2017 BUILDING WITHOUT A PER 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: New roof being installed without a permit Page 1 of 4 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Received Report From' 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Date Type Tax Parcel # Legal Address Disposition 4/17/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave CLOSED Desc: Temporary fuel tank was installed and is not compliant with section 5704.2.9 of the Fire Code 4/18/2017 ZONING VIOLATION 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: Small storage shed in back yard too close to property line 4/18/2017 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: Lack of 911 number 4/19/2017 GARBAGE 34 950 Danby Rd OPEN Desc: Encampment behind and to the right of the lower parking lot of South Hill Business Campus, in conjunction with fugatives from Florida wanted on firearms warrant. Called in by Dan Donahue, Sheriffs Department. Police removed evidence and tore it down and covered it with a tarp. 4/19/2017 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 141 West Hill Circle OPEN Desc: 4/19/2017 ZONING VIOLATION 70.-10-1.14 104 Pinewood PI OPEN Desc: The existing use that, is allowed, is a single family use as permitted in the medium density residential district. We have not received any building permit applications for alterations to this property. The additional units need to be removed, in accordance with resolution number 53 of 1997, as they were illegally constructed. The amount of occupants in the structure do not comply with the definition of a family, in accordane with section 270-3 of the Town Zoning Code. 4/20/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 125 Textor Cir OPEN Desc: Minor roof leak at the top of a stairwell and in an area that sees little or no usage. Failed FSI by OFPC with abatement plan in place, deadline of August 1, 2017 for completion. Operating Permit 2017-0042 4/20/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 113 Campus Center Way OPEN Desc: OFPC Inspection violations, Conference and Events Center and the snack bar. Both have abatement plans with OFPC deadline of August 1, 2017. See operating permit for details. 4/20/2017 BUILDING WITHOUT A PER 26.-2-4 138 Bundy Rd OPEN Desc: Received a third party inspection report for an electrical upgrade to service done without a permit. 3rd party not accepted. 4/24/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 1083 Danby Rd OPEN Desc: Fire Alarm and/or security system had been powered down at the breaker by staff during thunderstorm two nights ago because it was activating (reported as a common occurance during storms). When attempting to repower the unit it sets off the alarm. IFD Contacted on fire chief line and 903 responded. Attempted to figure out issue but it appears to be a problem with the alarm itself. Manager Keith Collins 272-8811 will call alarm company to repair. Unit was left off line, building is unoccupied at night. Page 2 of 4 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Received Report From' 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Date Type Tax Parcel # Legal Address Disposition 4/25/2017 SIGN LAW 59.-2-12 113 Clover Ln CLOSED Desc: There is an off premises "For Sale" sign from Warren Real Estate, Jill Bulrington agent. Corner of Mitchell St. and Clover Ln. 4/25/2017 BUILDING WITHOUT A PER 71.-1-33 508 Warren Rd OPEN Desc: Home has an accessory apartment in the basement that was done without a building permit. Anonymous referral. 4/26/2017 OTHER 37.-1-20.2 1132 DANBY RD OPEN Desc: road right of way. 4/27/2017 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 39.-3-1 3A Vista Ln OPEN Desc: Joan Heffernan who lives at 3A Vista Lane has a unlicensed vehicle in driveway, has been there for approx 10 yrs and is filled with garbage and all tires are flat. The Association wants to start paving the driveway and paint the porches in early May, but vehicle is in the way and her porch is full of garbage. The Association has spoke to Joan Heffernan about helping her out, but no change (Rodney said she wrote a nasty letter to the Association). Rodney said this is the last duplex to have painting and driveway done. 4/27/2017 NYS BUILDING CODE 46.-1-15.12 201 Eldridge Cir CLOSED Desc: Shailja lives at 103 Southwoods Dr and is complaining about the gravel used for the driveway at 201 Eldridge Cir - it has been plowed on to her property and has been trying to get it removed. Shailja has called TRJ owners to have it removed, they said they will remove it but it's been 10 days; no one has come. Would like to know who to contact to come and have it removed or what can she do from here besides the complaint. Page 3 of 4 5/4/2017 Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Totals by Complaint Type & Status ComplaintType Complaint Status Count BUILDING WITHOUT A PERMIT 3 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 6 GARBAGE 1 NYS BUILDING CODE 2 NYS Residental Code 3 OCCUPANCY WITHOUT a C of O or C of 1 OTHER 1 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 4 SIGN LAW 1 UNSANITARY LIVING CONDITIONS 1 ZONING VIOLATION 2 Total: 25 CLOSED 7 OPEN 18 Page 4 of 4 Town of Ithaca 5/4/2017 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Closed Report From' 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Date Type Tax Parcel # Legal Address Disposition 4/3/2017 UNSANITARY LIVING CON 39.-1-11.1 103 Birdseye View Dr CLOSED Desc: While doing an inspection before pouring the slab at 105 Birdseye the contractor Jeff Romig, alerted me to the fact that raw sewage was coming out a drain pipe on the adjoining property. He stated that he and Travis Cleveland had an argument about the problem and that Travis told him that he was responsibile to reinstall the sewage line that apparently ran across this lot before they started excavation for the new house under construction. 4/17/2017 BUILDING WITHOUT A PER 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: New roof being installed without a permit 4/17/2017 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 63.-2-10.2 201 Maple Ave CLOSED Desc: Temporary fuel tank was installed and is not compliant with section 5704.2.9 of the Fire Code 4/18/2017 ZONING VIOLATION 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: Small storage shed in back yard too close to property line 4/18/2017 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 70.-11-52 127 Muriel St CLOSED Desc: Lack of 911 number 4/25/2017 SIGN LAW 59.-2-12 113 Clover Ln CLOSED Desc: There is an off premises "For Sale" sign from Warren Real Estate, Jill Bulrington agent. Corner of Mitchell St. and Clover Ln. 4/27/2017 NYS BUILDING CODE 46.-1-15.12 201 Eldridge Cir CLOSED Desc: Shailja lives at 103 Southwoods Dr and is complaining about the gravel used for the driveway at 201 Eldridge Cir - it has been plowed on to her property and has been trying to get it removed. Shailja has called TRJ owners to have it removed, they said they will remove it but it's been 10 days; no one has come. Would like to know who to contact to come and have it removed or what can she do from here besides the complaint. Page 1 of 2 5/4/2017 Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Complaints Report From- 4/11/2017 To: 4/30/2017 Totals by Complaint Type & Status ComplaintType Complaint Status Count BUILDING WITHOUT A PERMIT 1 FIRE SAFETY VIOLATIONS 1 NYS BUILDING CODE 1 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 1 SIGN LAW 1 UNSANITARY LIVING CONDITIONS 1 ZONING VIOLATION 1 Total: 7 CLOSED 7 Page 2 of 2