The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZBA Minutes 2016-12-19TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Monday December 19,2016 215 North Tioga Street,Ithaca 6:00 P.M. Appeal 0022-2016,Cayuga Medical Center,Owner,Holt Architects,Agent requesting a variance from Chapter 270-116 Height Limitations,of the Town of Ithaca Code,to build an addition that is 47 4" high where 38'feet is allowed located at 101 Harris B.Dates Dr.,Tax Parcel 24.-3-2.1 Office Park Commercial Zone. Appeal 0024-2016 Ira Kamp and Marne O'Shae,Owners,requesting a variance from Chapter 270-223 8(3)Fences,and walls;retaining walls, to place a retaining wall across a property line located at 4 &6 Sanctuary Dr.,Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 and 9.1, Medium Density Residential. Bruce W.Bates Director of Code Enforcement 607-273-1783 Dated:December 12,2016 Published:December 13,2016 TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I, Lori Kofoid,being duly sworn,say that I am the Deputy Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County,New York that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca and the notice has been duly published in the official newspaper,Ithaca Journal: n ADVERTISEMENT •NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ZBA Public Hearings-Appeals Cayuga Medical Center,Behavioral Sciences - Height Variance - 101 Harris B. Dates Dr. Ira Kamp and Mame O'Shae - Retaining Wall Variance - 4 & 6 Sanctuary Drive Location of Sign Board Used for Posting: Town Clerk's Office 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca,NY 14850 Date of Posting:December 12,2016 Date of Publication:December 14,2016 Paulette Terwilliger Town Clerk STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS)SS: TOWN OF ITHACA) Sworn to and subscribed before me this / /CO ,2016. otarv Public Debra DeAugistine Notary Public -State of NewYork NO.01DE6148035 Oualified in Tompkins County p My Commission Expires June19.20 /O ay of TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Monday December 19,2016 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca 6:00 P.M. Appeal 0022-2016,Cayuga Medical Center,Owner, Holt Architects,Agent re questing a variance from Chapter 270-116 Height Limitations,of the Town of Ithaca Code,to build an ad dition that is 47'4"feet high where 38'feet is al lowed located at 101 Harris B.Dates Dr.,Tax Parcel 24.- 3-2.1 Office Park Commercial Zone. Appeal 0O24-2016 Ira Kamp and Marne O'Shae,Own ers,requesting a variance from Chapter 270-223 B(3) Fences,and walls;retaining walls,to place a retaining wall across a property line located at 4 & 6 Sanctuary Dr.,Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 and 9.1,Medium Density Residential. Bruce W.Bates Director of Code Enforcement 607-273-1783 Dated:December 12,2016 12/14/2016 000179395741 Streeter Associates,Inc.i_s N3 OI PR fil. (SJ fic Co SSI of AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS.: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) I,Paulctte Terwilliger, being duly sworn,deposes and says, that deponent is not a party to the actions, is over 21 years of age with a professional address of 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York. That on the 12'''day of December 2016,deponent served the within Notice upon the property owners listed on the attached document,of the following Tax Parcel Numbers: Cayuga Medical Center,Behavioral Sciences - Height Variance - 101 Harris B. Dates Dr. Ira Kamp and Mame O'Shae -Retaining Wall Variance - 4 & 6 Sanctuary Drive By depositina««ame enclosed in a postpaid addressed wrapper.In a post office under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Post Office DepartmenfAvimiii/^eState of New York. Paulette 1erwiTlTgcrTown Clerk Town of Ithaca Sworn to before me this 3^Day ofMq/,2016. i Debra DeAugistine Notarv Public -Stateof New YorkNO.01DE6148035 Ouallfied in Tompklns County , My Commission Expires June 19,20 ( Best,Ronald W Best,Sharon A 55 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Cornell University PO Box DH Ithaca NY 14853 Fire Rocket,LLC 110 Willow Creek Pi Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Gamer,Matthew R 95 Brown Rd Suite 177 Ithaca NY 14850 Kim,Chris Lee,Soyong 24 RosinaDr Ithaca NY 14850 Mack,Joshua Michael Trees Bost,Alyssa 254 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Park,Jiwoong Kim,Eojean 12 Sanctuary Dr #1 Ithaca NY 14850 Sapsucker Woods Prop Inc 1993 Route 38A Moravia NY 13118 Solomon,Harry Solomon,Marsha PO Box 322 Dryden NY 13053 Yasmin,Rubina 5 Meadow Lark Rd Ithaca NY 14850 09 L8/09 L9@^-i9AV 08ab aiqiiediuoo uilu xluuj S2 IBlujo^9p 09l8/09l9®'^9AVL|i!M aiqpBdLUOO „8/9 2 x „l azjs |8qe| Boland,David 4 Players Club Dr Charleston WV 25311 Cornell,Daniel Cornell,Deidre 10 Meadowlark Dr Ithaca NY 14850 Frostclapp,David R Frostclapp,Kara L 26 Woodcresl Ave Ithaca NY 14850 Jang,Hoyoun Kim,Eunah 7 Sanctuary Dr #2 Ithaca NY 14850 Linville,Cynthia J 129 Muriel St Ithaca NY 14850 Mundell,Helen M 59 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Ramelot,Denise 65 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Schichor,Jeremy 6 Meadow Lark Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Stoneman,Neil P Stoneman,Cindy 238 Sapsucker Woods Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Yuan,Zhongshuang Ye, Hong 150 Lexington Dr Ithaca NY 14850 Chen, Ngai Tan,Ying 11 Sanctuary Dr Ithaca NY 14850 Diamond,Christiana PO Box 4644 Ithaca NY 14852 Garner,Matthew R 704 SW9th Armadillo TX 79101 Kamp, Ira 6 Sanctuary Dr Apt 1 Ithaca NY 14850 Lucente Homes LLC 120 Briarwood Drive Ithaca NY 14850 G'Dell,Sabine 1 Meadow Lark Rd Ithaca NY 14850 Rusmevichientong,Paal Chiang,Yuanhui 1772 Rose Villa St Pasadena CA 91106 Skalwold,Eric H 363 E King Rd Ithaca NY 14850 West,Robert D West,Diane L 274 AsburyRd Lansing NY 14882 label size 1"x2 5/8"compatible withAvery®5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery'®5160/8160 1290 Professional Building LLC 10 Graham Road West Ithaca,NY 14850 Cornell University Real Estate Department Box DH,15 Thomwood Drive Ithaca,NY 14853 John &Katherine Finn 132 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Sophia Gluck 152 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Gerald &Patricia Hall 1307 Trumansburg Road Ithaca,NY 14850 John &Anne Krupa 126 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Donald &Marianne Montague 126 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Paleontological Research Inst. 1259 Trumansburg Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Eric Skalwold 363 King Road East Ithaca,NY 14850 Paul A.Levesque H,AIA Holt Architects 619 W.State Street Ithaca,NY 14850 Joaquin Canay &Alexa Schmitz 1296-98 Trumansburg Road Ithaca,NY 14850 County of Tompkins 170 Bostwick Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Future PRI,LLC 250 S.Clinton Street,Suite 502 Syracuse,NY 13202 Jacqueline Gould Richard Boyer 104 Happy Lane Ithaca,NY 14850 Dorothy Hillyard Allen Eleanor Gill 138 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Roy Luft &Nancy Emerson 1317 Trumansburg Road Ithaca,NY 14850 NYS Electric & Gas Corp. 70 Farm View Drive Freeport New Gloucester,ME 04260 Jane Schantz 142 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 The People of New York State Commissioner of Parks Albany,NY 12238 Cayuga Professional Center LLC 323 N.Tioga Street Ithaca,NY 14850 John Ecker 1250 Trumansburg Road Ithaca,NY 14850 Theresa Gangl 140 Indian Creek Road Ithaca,NY 14850 John &Nancy Gould 102 Happy Lane Ithaca,NY 14850 Holochuck Homes LLC 7 Brightside Avenue EastNorthport,NY 11731 Carl Mann Nancy Gould 102 Happy Lane Ithaca,NY 14850 Overlook at West Hill Housing Dev Fund Cor 11 Park Place,Suite 1705 New York,NY 10007 Joerg Schuhmann 402 Harris Dates Drive Ithaca,NY 14850 John Rudd,President Cayuga Medical Center 101 Harris B.Dates Drive Ithaca,NY 14850 TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Monday,December 19,2016 Minutes Board Members present:Rob Rosen (Chair), Bill King, Chris Jung, and George Vignaux; Alternates:Carin Rubin and William Highland Staff present: Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Debra DeAugistine, Deputy Town Clerk;Lorraine Moynihan-Schmitt,Attomey for the Town Mr.Rosen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Appeal 0022-2016 of Cayuga Medical Center, Owner, Holt Architects, Agent requesting a variance from Chapter 270-116,Height Limitation,of the Town of Ithaca code to be permitted to construct an addition to the building that is 47 feet 4 inches high, where 38 feet is allowed, located at 101 Harris B.Dates Dr.,Tax Parcel No.24.-3-2.1,Office Park Commercial. Mr. Rosen disclosed that his girlfriend works for HOLT Architects,but that he will not benefit financially in any way from the outcome of the appeal. Paul Levesque,HOLT Architects, said that the intent of the addition is to expand the space occupiedby the behavioralhealthunit.They're not increasingthe number of patients,but adding squarefootagefor program space.The goalis to havefewer readmissionsandto releasepatients sooner. Kelly Maher, HOLT Architects, said they propose adding 6000 square feet over the existing first floor. The project will add 13 feetto the existing height at the addition area, but will still be two stories (25 feet) below the rest of the wing and the adjacent wing.They're matching the floor level with the existing behavioral unit and adding on immediately adjacent to it. Without completely relocatingthe behavioralhealth unit, there isn't another way to increaseprogram space while staying below the height exception. Mr. Vignauxsaid it's straightforward.They're not takingup anymore spaceon the groundand the vertical rise won't be higher than the existing building. Ms. Jung said the addition is so seamless,it's hard to differentiatethe before and after. She doesn't think there's much,if any,impact. Mr. King said he's in complete agreement since it's not expanding the footprint and not exceeding the height of the existing building. Mr. Rosen stated that he agreed with Ms. Jung in that it's hard to detect a difference in the mass of the building in the before-and-after renderings. It blends in seamlessly and doesn't appear to have a negative impact. Mr. Rosen opened public hearing at 6:10 p.m. ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 1 Nancy Emerson,1317 Trumansburg Road,stated that she's one of three neighbors who will be directly impacted by the project and that she supports the approval.Everything they've done at the hospital has beentastefully done, and this is a tremendously needed service.She's gladthat this beautiful environment will be added for people who really need the service. Roy Lufl,1317 Trumansburg Road, spoke in favor of the project. His property abuts hospital property, and he considers CMC to be wonderful neighbors. He thinks this is a great improvement, and that it will benefit the entire community. Mr.Rosen closed the public hearing at 6:12 p.m. ZBA Resolution 0022-2016:SEQR Height Variance Cayuga Medical Center,Behavioral Health Addition 101 Harris B.Dates Dr. Tax Parcel No.24.-3-2.1 December 19,2016 Motion made by Rob Rosen,seconded by Chris Jung Resolved that this board makes a negative determination of environmental significance based on the information given in Parts 1and 2 and for the reasons stated in Part 3 of the environmental assessment form, with approved changes. Vote Ayes: Rosen, King, Jung, Vignaux,Rubin Unanimous ZBA Resolution 0022-2016:Height Variance Cayuga Medical Center,Behavioral Health Addition 101 Harris B.Dates Dr. Tax Parcel No.24.-3-2.1 December 19,2016 Motion made by Rob Rosen,seconded by George Vignaux Resolved,the board grants the appeal of Cayuga Medical Center requesting a variance from the requirements of Chapter 270-116,Height Limitation,of the Town of Ithacacodeto bepermitted to construct an addition to the building that is 47 feet 4 inches high, where 38 feet is allowed, located at 101 Harris B. Dates Dr., Tax Parcel No. 24.-3-2.1, Office Park Commercial, with the following: Condition 1.That the height not exceed 48 feet, as measured from the lowest interior level; and with the following ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 2 Findings That the benefit to the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community,specifically that 1.The benefit the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be met by any other means,given the need for this specific design to accommodate the needs of the clients served and because the design will allow the unit to remain on the second floor of the medical center; and 2. There will not be an undesirable change in the neighborhood character or to nearby properties given that this is a relatively small addition to what is already a large hospital building, it will fit seamlessly within the existing footprint of the building, and it appears to be nicely designed and well-proportioned;and 3. The request is not substantial, given that the building actually appears to be approximately 50 feet high already from the front, and it is only when measuring from the lowest interior space from the rear of the building, which is downslope, that the requested height variance becomes necessary; and 4. The request will not have adverse physical or environmental effects for the reasons stated in the SEQR;and 5. While the alleged difficulty is self-created, the benefit to the applicant nevertheless does outweigh any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare ofthe community. Vote Ayes: Rosen, King, Jung, Vignaux, Rubin Unanimous Appeal 0024-2016ofIra Kampand Mame O'Shae,Owners,requestinga variancefromChapter 270-223 B(3) Fences, and walls; retaining walls, to place a retaining wall across a property line located at 4 & 6 Sanctuary Dr., Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 and 9.1, Medium Density Residential. Mr. Rosen disclosed that he's a patient of Dr.Kamp's practice, but that it will not affect his abilityto makea fairand impartialdecisionon this particularissue. Dirk Galbraith,attorney for the applicants, stated that the reason this has become an issue is that the wall was constructed without a variance,because Dr. Kamp didn't realize a variance would berequiredsincetheyown both properties:6 Sanctuaryand4 SanctuaryDrive.Dr.O'Shea maintains her medical practice at 4 Sanctuary Drive as a home office occupation. Mr. Bates thoughtthatthe appropriate course of actionwasto makean applicationforan areavarianceto permit the continued distances and use of the retaining wall and turnaround area. Ms.O'Shae said they purchasedNo. 6 (which is a duplex) in April and it wastheir residence until her mother and her mother's full-time aid came to live with them. The house got crowded, sothey purchasedNo. 4 next doorand movedtheir residenceto that duplex.The buildingher practice wasin downtown wentupfor sale,sotheymovedher practice to that location atthe end of July. After a rain, they noticed that the handicapped vans were having difficultyturning around, sothey were backing out of the driveway instead, which is not safe. At that time, they ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 3 hired a contractor to build the retaining wall. They didn't know a retaining wall would be needed or that it would cross the property line; they just wanted to improve the driveway.The handicapped lift is inside the garage. Mr. Highland asked if there would be a title problem if they try to sell one of the parcels in the future. Mr.Galbraith said that if one or the other property is sold, there will probably be a survey, which would disclose the fact that the parking area is over the line.If that's an objection to the buyer of 6 Sanctuary Drive,that could be the end of the deal, or,more likely,a license agreement would be entered into between the buyer and seller. The parking area would probably be permitted to remain there or possibly moved over the line. Mr.Highland asked how much it would cost to move the wall. Mr. Galbraith said certainly more than leaving it in its present location. Also,it's necessary as a turnaround for handicapped-access vehicles, which is how many of the doctor's patients arrive at her office. To a question from Mr. Rosen, Ms.O'Shae said the wall varies between 1 and 2 feet in height. Mr.Vignaux shared a photo of the wall he had taken with his phone. He emailed it to Mr.Bates to include in the record. Ms.Moynihan-Schmitt said that she talked to Ms.Brock on the matter of the encroachment.Her concern was that since the two parcels are held by the same owners, an easement addressing the encroachmentnow would be subsumed by merger. This could become a problem in the fiiture if one of the lots is conveyed. She recommended, as a condition of approval, that if one of the lots is conveyed in the future, at the time of filing of the deed, an easement, approved by the town attorney,would also be required to be filed. Mr. Batessaid this way,they don't haveto come backbeforethe board if they wantto keepthe wall;otherwise,they could just remove the wall. Ms. Moynihan-Schmittsaid an easement would be required if the retaining wall wereto remain. Ms.Jungsaidyou can't see it fromthe road,so it's notchangingthe characterbyanymeans. You have to go on the property to see it. Mr. Rosen agreed that a one-foot-highretaining wall located at the side of the garagetoward the back of thelotwill nothavea noticeable visualimpactto peopleon the public right-of-way. Mr. Highlandsaid he was troubled by the language that a retaining wall may not encroach on the adjoiningproperty,nor interferewithadequatesite distance.Mr.Rosen's point is that it doesn't interfere with adequate site distance. ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 4 Mr.Rosen said if you had a 6-foot-high wall at the end of your driveway,then people coming out of the driveway wouldn't be able to see, but that's not the case here.Regarding encroaching on the neighboring property,that's why they're applying for a variance. The choice being suggested would be to get a variance and require either an easement or removal of the wall when the property is resold. Ms. Rubin thought it was a reasonable way to deal with it. Mr. Highland said that if the cost of removing the wall were not prohibitive,that would make life easier for purchases in the future because they wouldn't have a title problem, but that an easement could cure the title problem.It's not a problem now because the applicants own both parcels. Mr. Vignaux said if they sell the property, it won't be a problem to remove the retaining wall if the new owners don't want it.It's just landscape timber. Mr. Rosen said that if they're separate owners,the one owner probably won't want the neighbor's driveway in their yard, but the tumeiround could be moved. What we have to decide now is whether the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve outweighs any detriment to the community. He thinks there's no detriment to the community by letting the wall stay. We see this all the time,where someone wants to do something or has done something:theoretically,there are lots of ways to do things, like with behavioral health unit, they could have built the addition to the hospital somewhere else that wasn't two stories high. But the question is whether what they want to do has a negative impact on the health, safety, or welfare of the neighborhood. Mr.Vignaux added that it might not have an impact on the neighborhood, but it might on the sale of the property, but that comes into the price of the sale. Mr. Highland asked whether we should inflict that burden on buyers in the future. Mr. Bates said you can grant a variance with conditions. Those conditions can be:if the property is sold to separate owners, at that point the wall either has to be removed or an easement granted. The possible future sale of the property is up to the new potential owner's desire. The board is just saying these are the conditions that we're granting you to keep this wall, and the decision in a possible future sale is up to the buyer and the seller. The choice of this board is 1)to not grant the variance, in which case the applicants have to remove the wall; 2) to grant the variance with conditions; or 3) to grant the variance without conditions. Mr. Rosen said the last option would be irresponsible and contrary to the advice of the town attorney. He proposed to move ahead and allow the wall to stay, but to follow the advice of the attorney and put a condition on the variance that if eitherproperty is sold, then either the wall has to be removed or an easement has to be granted. You can't buy a house with someone else's driveway on your lot;he's bought and sold enough houses to know that you're not going to get title insurance.The town attorney is right that we need to anticipate the need for an easement. ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 5 Ms. Moynihan-Schmitt said the variance with conditions runs vrith the land, not with the current owners. Mr. Rosen agreed, saying the town attorney has found a good way to solve this by putting a condition on the variance.She did a lot of work on this.The county GML review stated that there is no significant intermunicipal impact of this and the SEQR found no environmental impacts. Ms.Rubin thought the condition for an easement or removing the wall is reasonable. Mr.Rosen opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. Mr.Luft said he's a patient of Mamie O'Shae and that he wants to see the variance approved because he does not want to see her practice inconvenienced in any way since that could be an inconvenience to him. Mr.Rosen closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. ZBA Resolution 2016-0022 SEQR Area Variance 4 & 6 Sanctuary Dr. Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 &73.-1-9.1 December 19,2016 Motion made by Rob Rosen,seconded by Bill King Resolved that this board makes a negative determination of environmental significance based on the information given in Parts 1 and 2 and for the reasons stated in Part 3 of the environmental assessment form. Vote Ayes:Rosen,King,Jung,Vignaux,Highland Unanimous ZBA Resolution 0024-2016 Area Variance 4 & 6 Sanctuary Dr. Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 &73.-1-9.1 December 19,2016 Motion made by Rob Rosen,seconded by George Vignaux Resolved that the board grants the appeal of Ira Kamp and Mamie O'Shae,requesting a variance from Chapter 270-223 B(3) Fences, and walls;retaining walls, to place a retaining wall across a property line located at 4 & 6 Sanctuary Dr., Tax Parcels 73.-1-9.10 and 9.1, Medium Density Residential,with the following: ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 6 Conditions 1.The retaining wall must be maintained as a retaining wall, as is, and in substantially the same form,size,and location;and 2. If one of the lots is conveyed, either the retaining wall must be removed OR a required filing shall be made in the Tompkins County Clerk's office, at the time of the recording of the deed for the conveyed lot,of an easement that has been approved by the Attorney for the Town and that allows the retaining wall to remain in its current location, and submission to the Code Enforcement Office of proof of such filing, within 5 days of the filing, and such approval shall be conditioned upon the filing of this Zoning Board of Appeals resolution in the Tompkins County Clerk's office, indexed to the two lots, and submission to the Code Enforcement Office of proof of such filing; and with the following: Findings That the benefit to the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community,specifically that: 1.The benefit the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be achieved by any other means feasible given that a turnaround area is needed for vans that bring patients to the practice; and 2. The location of the driveway and the location of the lift are already predetermined;and 3. There will not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood cheiracter or to nearby properties given that the location is in the side yard at the rear of the building, not visible from the street;and 4. The request is substantial given that retaining walls over the lot line are not permitted and this one goes over by 10 feet; however, the benefit to the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health,safety, and welfare to the community;and 5. The request will not have adverse physical or environmental impacts for the reasons stated in the SEQR form;and 6.While the alleged difficulty is self-created in that the owner wishes to have a turnaround area for vans, the benefit to the applicant does outweigh any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community for the reasons stated above. Vote Ayes: Rosen, King, Jung, Vignaux Nays:Highland Motion passed 4 to 1. ZBA Resolution:Recommendation to Town Board and setting of meeting schedule Moved by George Vignaux; seconded by Caren Rubin Whereas,the Zoning Board of Appeals has unanimously recommended that Rob Rosen be reappointed as a regular member of the Zoning Board of Appeals from January 2017 through December 2021 and as Chair for the year ending December 31,2017;and ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 7 Whereas,Chairman Rosen, the Zoning Board of Appeals members,and the Director of Code Enforcement have recommended that William Highland and Caren Rubin be reappointed as alternate members of the Zoning Board of Appeals;now therefore be it Resolved,the Zoning Board of Appeals sets their meeting schedule as the third Monday of the month beginning at 6:00 p.m., with the following exceptions due to holiday observances: January 23rd rather than January 16th due to the Martin Luther King Holiday February 27th rather than February 20th due to Presidents Day October 23rd rather than October 16th due to the Columbus Day Holiday Be It Further Resolved,the Director of Code Enforcement will convey the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendations stated above to the Town Board for their consideration. Vote Ayes: Rosen, King, Jung,Vignaux,Rubin Unanimous Approval of Minutes On a motion by Rob Rosen the board voted to approve the minutes of November 21, 2016. Ayes:Rosen,King,Jung,Vignaux,Highland Unanimous The meeting was adjourned upon a motion and a second at 7:02 p.m. Submitted by DeAugistinerDeputy Town^erk ZBA Meeting 12-19-2016 pg. 8