Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBAA-25-2 Packet 210 Pine Tree RdTown of Ithaca January 22, 2025 ZBAA-25-2 Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 1/13/2025 Primary Location 210Pine Tree RdUnit Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner Cornell University Thurston Ave 223 Ithaca, NY 14850 Applicant JohnPillar 443-831-1246 jp2495@cornell.edu 223 Thurston Avenue Ithaca, New York 14850 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 60.-1-9.2 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes GML-239 Reason for Review* The right of way of any existing or proposed county or state road Type of Variance Area Variance Appearance Date for Variance 2/25/25 Variance Code Language Variance Code Section ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 1 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance) – Materials For GML-239 Were Sent – Deadline for Hearing Notice to Journal Public Hearing Notice Was Sent – Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent – Date Sign Was Picked-up – Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members – Historical Only Address affiliated with request Status Applicant's Information Applicant is* Property Owner Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No Description ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 2 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM § 270-254 Brief Description of Variance Request* Variance from section S270-254 Section C. The proposed sign would be 18' in height from ground. Variance from section S270-254 Section E6. The proposed sign would be 96 square feet. <label for="32571259_input" style="flex: 1 1 0%; scroll-margin-top: calc(var(-- code-content-top) + 16px);"> Residential and Conservation Zones. </label> Area Variance Criteria Form <label for="32571259_input" style="flex: 1 1 0%; scroll-margin- top: calc(var(--code-content-top) + 16px);"> </ label> C. Freestanding signs shall not exceed six feet in height. E. Notwithstanding Subsection D above: (6) If the square footage of all principal buildings on a parcel exceeds 8,000 square feet: (a) Signs up to 32 square feet in the aggregate are permitted, and no one sign shall be larger than 24 square feet in area. (b) In addition, signs up to 100 square feet in the aggregate on any one parcel are permitted for signs that are located at least 500 feet from a public right-of-way; no one such sign shall be larger than 50 square feet in area. § 270-254 Residential and Conservation Zones. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 3 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties?* No Reasons: The proposed sign is set back significantly from the road, more than 1,000 feet, and it will not be a detriment to nearby properties as there is significant tree cover on 3 sides of the proposed sign. Also, rugby matches cannot be played at night because the field has no lights, so the sign will not be illuminated at night. It will not produce any sounds. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance?* No Reasons: Spectators for the club rugby team cannot identify time and score from the grandstands by alternative means. Other sign locations have been explored around the field and the southwest corner is the only feasible location. 3. Is the requested variance substantial?* No Reasons: The proposed sign would be well below the top of the existing goal posts at the field. And, due to its setback from the road, would not be intrusive. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 4 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood?* No Reasons: Caution will be taken during construciton to not allow excavation spoils or disturbed earth to remain on site. The area of earth disturbance is minimal. Power will not need to be run to the sign, as it is anticipated to be provided locally by either a small generator or battery only during matches. 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created?* Yes Reasons: This proposed scoreboard sign is a self created zoning variance due to the restrictions of the town sign law, but in my opinion, is not a significant variance, nor would it have a detrimental impact on the surrounding neighborhoods or properties. Affidavit The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 5 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM Digital Signature* John Pillar Jan 10, 2025 Meeting Date 01/10/2025 PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E-check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: *Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 *Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 *Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Attachments Message received about 210 Pine Tree Rd_ Cornell University.msg Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 13, 2025 at 1:03 PM SCL ZBA Application.docx Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 13, 2025 at 3:57 PM SCL Sign Permit Application for Rugby Scoreboard.pdf Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 10, 2025 at 12:58 PM Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1.pdf Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 10, 2025 at 12:56 PM Determination/Denial Letter Narrative Survey and/or Plans Environmental Assessment Form ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 6 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 1 Lori Kofoid From:Town of Ithaca <noreply@opengov.com> Sent:Monday, January 13, 2025 12:13 PM To:John Pillar Subject:Message received about 210 Pine Tree Rd, Cornell University Town of Ithaca Marty Moseley commented on Code Department Review : Message: "Based on my review of the sign proposed. The sign would need the following area variances: 1. A variance from section 270-254 C of Town Code, as the height is proposed to exceed 6' 2. A variance from section 270-254E6 of town code, as the sign area being proposed exceeds the maximum of sign area allowed of 50sq.ft. Additionally, the Planning Department will be reviewing this application in the near future and may have additional comments or concerns. Please feel free to use this message to apply for an area variance if you desire to do so. " Where: 210 Pine Tree Rd, Cornell University Type: TOI - Sign Permit Application Number: SGN-25-1 View Details TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION Contact Information: John Pillar, jp2495@cornell.edu, 443-831-1246 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Location Address: 210 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca NY 14850 Property Data: MBL 60.-1-9.2 Lot Area 31.22 Acres Public water Public sewage Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR) Site Information: Zoning District Residential/Conservation Zone Physical Location on the Property – see Image 1 Sign Information: Freestanding Sign 8’ high x 12’ wide – see Image 2 Sign area 96 ft2 Setbacks: 75’ from West property line 585’ from South property line 1,120’ from East property line Overall Height 18’ (10’ offset from ground) Internally Illuminated center portion Property Owner: Cornell University 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Jp2495@cornell.edu 443-831-1246 Sign Company: Daktronics Clayton Huisken, 605-692-0200 clayton.huisken@daktronics.com Installation: CU grounds will excavate foundations and place concrete piers CU carpenters will install pier formwork and reinforcement CU sheet metal shop will install columns Daktronics to attach scoreboard to columns Powered by small generator only during daylight matches (no field lights) Appendices: 1 Daktronics Scoreboard cut sheet 2 Supporting structure 95% Construction Documents 3 Photos from Pine Tree Road Narrative Reorganized in 1938, Cornell Rugby has a storied history which the current Big Red players honor with their on-field performance that traces all the way back to 1879. Cornell University Rugby Football Club is an elite group of scholar-athletes and represents Cornell in the Ivies, nationwide and abroad. Both men’s and women’s teams compete on the club rugby field behind the Oxley Equestrian Center in 80 minute matches. Combined, the two teams host approximately 12 games at the field per year during daylight hours, as the field does not have lights for evening play. Therefore, there would be no impact to the night sky. The grandstands are located on the east edge of the field looking west. Therefore, the two locations that would best suit the proposed scoreboard are the northwest corner and the southwest corner of the field, as both the players and fans could view the game information. However, game day logistics rule out using the northwest corner location, since that is the primary vehicle access to and from the field. The southwest corner was therefore chosen to develop the structural design of the scoreboard frame and create photo renderings of the view from Pine Tree Road. The proposed scoreboard would point to the northeast. Strict adherence to the Town sign law would mean that both of the text banners would need to be removed to limit the sign area to 48 square feet (leaving only the portion within the white rectangle on Image 2), and the 4’ tall scoreboard could be at most 2’ above grade. This would be problematic when viewing the scoreboard, since perspectives from both the players and fans would be interrupted by the players. It would also be a safety hazard to have the scoreboard located at such a low elevation in an area that routinely sees players careening towards it while trying to stay in bounds or corral the ball. The practicality of such a scoreboard would not suit the needs of Cornell Rugby, and the Town sign law creates an undue hardship for a team that has coexisted peacefully with its current home for many years and has become part of the local fabric of the community. Image 1 – sign location on property Image 2 – sign elevation Illuminated center portion outlined in white: 4’x12’ Non-illuminated upper and lower text banners: 2’x12’ each TOWN OF ITHACA SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION Contact Information: John Pillar, jp2495@cornell.edu, 443-831-1246 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Location Address: 210 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca NY 14850 Property Data: MBL 60.-1-9.2 Lot Area 31.22 Acres Public water Public sewage Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR) Site Information: Zoning District Residential/Conservation Zone Physical Location on the Property – see Image 1 Sign Information: Freestanding Sign 8’ high x 12’ wide – see Image 2 Sign area 96 ft2 Setbacks: 75’ from West property line 585’ from South property line 1,120’ from East property line Overall Height 18’ (10’ offset from ground) Internally Illuminated center portion Property Owner: Cornell University 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Jp2495@cornell.edu 443-831-1246 Sign Company: Daktronics Clayton Huisken, 605-692-0200 clayton.huisken@daktronics.com Installation: CU grounds will excavate foundations and place concrete piers CU carpenters will install pier formwork and reinforcement CU sheet metal shop will install columns Daktronics to attach scoreboard to columns Powered by small generator only during daylight matches (no field lights) Appendices: 1 Daktronics Scoreboard cut sheet 2 Supporting structure 95% Construction Documents 3 Photos from Pine Tree Road Image 1 – sign location on property Image 2 – sign elevation Illuminated center portion outlined in white: 4’x12’ Non-illuminated upper and lower text banners: 2’x12’ each WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2167442 091620 Page 1 of 8 This outdoor LED soccer scoreboard displays period time to 99:59, HOME and GUEST scores to 99 and HALF (or PERIOD or QTR) to nine. When period time is less than one minute, the scoreboard displays time to 1/10 of a second. Scoreboard shown with optional striping and amber PanaView® digits. DIMENSIONS UNCRATED WEIGHT POWER (120 VAC)* 4'-0" H x 12'-0" W x 8" D (1.22 m, 3.66 m, 203 mm)180 lb (82 kg) Red/Amber Digits 120 Watts, 1.0 Amp White Digits 260 Watts, 2.2 Amps *Scoreboard requires a dedicated circuit. Models with 240 VAC power at half the indicated amperage are also offered (International Use Only). CONSTRUCTION Alcoa aluminum alloy 5052 for excellent corrosion resistance PRODUCT SAFETY APPROVAL ETL-listed to UL 48, tested to CSA standards, and CE-labeled OPERATING TEMPERATURES • Display: -22° to 122° Fahrenheit (-30° to 50° Celsius) • Console: 32° to 130° Fahrenheit (0° to 54° Celsius) DIGITS • All digits are 18" (457 mm) high. • Select red, amber, or white LED digits. • Scoreboard features robust weather-sealed digits (see DD2495646). • Digits may be dimmed for night viewing. CAPTIONS • HOME and GUEST captions are 10" (254 mm) high. All other captions are 8" (203 mm) high. • Standard captions are vinyl, applied to the display face. DISPLAY COLOR Choose from 150+ colors (from Martin Senour® paint book) at no additional cost. DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST HALF Choose one of three vinyl captions (Optional changeable caption panels also offered) + 2'H x 12' W BANNERS TOP AND BOTTOM APPENDIX 1 WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2167442 091620 Page 2 of 8 DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS SEGMENT TIMER MODE The segment timer mode is ideal for keeping practices on schedule. The horn at the end of a segment allows coaches and athletes to focus on the practice and to listen for the horn when it is time to change drills (see SL-04004). TIME OF DAY MODE This scoreboard features a Time of Day (TOD) mode that allows it to act as a clock when the control console is unplugged or off. Refer to the scoreboard installation manual for instructions on how to enable the Time of Day mode. MOUNTING Scoreboard is typically mounted on two vertical beams or poles. Hardware to mount scoreboard on two beams is included; hardware for more beams is at additional cost. Standard mounting uses I-beam clamps. Optional mounting method using angle brackets is also offered; maximum beam width is 12" (305 mm) and maximum beam depth is 22" (559 mm). Refer to attached drawings for more information on mounting methods. SERVICE ACCESS Digit panels and electronics are serviced from the front of the scoreboard. GENERAL INFORMATION Scoreboard provides scoring capabilities for two teams. 100% solid state electronics are housed in an all aluminum cabinet. Scoreboard is shipped in one section. Scoreboard power is to be provided on a dedicated circuit to prevent loss of game information due to failure of another component on the circuit. Specifications and pricing are subject to change without notice. ADVERTISING/IDENTIFICATION PANELS Backlit & Non-Backlit: 1'-6" H x 12'-0" W (457 mm, 3.66 m) 2'-0" H x 12'-0" W (610 mm, 3.66 m) 2'-6" H x 12'-0" W (762 mm, 3.66 m) For additional non-backlit panel sizes, see SL-03761. OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES • Scoreboard border striping • Multiple caption and striping colors (see DD2101644) • Team name caption in place of HOME • Team names on changeable panels • Baseball, football, and lacrosse/field hockey captions on changeable panels • Horn • Individual digit protective screens (see SL-04939) • Protective netting (see DD2690927) • Optional angle bracket mounting method • Advertising/identification panels • Decorative accents • Electronic message centers and video displays in multiple sizes FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Installation Specifications: DWG-1157186 (attached) • Standard I-beam Mounting: DWG-1052565 (attached) • LVX I-Beam Mounting: DWG-3918361 (attached) • Optional Pole Mounting: DWG-1048184 (attached) • Component Locations: DWG-1073981 (attached) • Architectural Specifications: See SL-05182 The Bluetooth® word mark and logos are registered trademarks owned by the Bluetooth SIG, Inc. and any use of such marks by Daktronics, Inc. is under license. CONTROL CONSOLES CONTROL OPTIONS All Sport® 1600* (see SL-04352) *May be upgraded to All Sport 5000 (see SL-03991) Wired (standard): One-pair shielded cable of 22 AWG minimum is required. A cover plate with mounted connector and standard 2" x 4" x 2" (51 mm x 102 mm x 51 mm) outlet box is provided. Connector mates with signal cable from control console. Wireless (optional): 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio features 64 non-interfering channels and 8 broadcast groups (see SL-04370). RC-200 (see DD3715714) Optional wireless handheld controller features 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio with 64 non-interfering channels and 8-10 hours of operation via internal rechargeable battery. DAK Score & MX-1 (see DD3888368) CUSTOMER-SUPPLIED mobile device or tablet with DAK Score app installed communicates via Bluetooth® wireless technology to an MX-1 Interface Box that controls the scoreboard through 2.4 GHz radio or wired connection. WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM All Sport® and PanaView® are trademarks of Daktronics, Inc. Martin Senour® is a registered trademark of its owner. DD2167442 091620 Page 3 of 8 Copyright © 2011-2020 Daktronics, Inc. Baseball Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown Football Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown Lacrosse/Field Hockey Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST INNING PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST QTR PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST PERIOD ALTERNATE CAPTIONS & SCORING MODES DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. COPYRIGHT 2013 DAKTRONICS, INC. DAKTRONICS, INC. AV DRAWN:DATE: SHEET JOB NO:REV OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD INSTALLATION 12' WIDTH SCOREBOARD INSTALLATION SPECS RSCHWAR 27 NOV 13 P 1647 E 10 A 1/16"=1' RSCHWAR 115718602 DATE:REV BY: 02 27 OCT 15 AMP UPDATED WIDE FLANGE AND FOUNDATION VALUES DATE:REV BY: 01 23 JUL 14 TJT UPDATED CLAMPS IN REAR AND SIDE VIEW ANDADDED 170 WIND SPEC COLUMN REV DATE:BY: 01 21 FEB 12 CHANGED ROCKER TO I-BEAM KDD 02 07 MAR 12 ADDED STANDARD MOUNTING METHODS NOTES KDD 03 23 OCT 13 PER EC-12382; CHANGED BOLT TORQUE FROM 30 FT-LB TO 40 FT-LB NJM 04 06 JAN 14 ADDED ALLOWABLE TENSION AND SHEAR CAPACITY DETAILS JAVA 05 22 DEC 15 PER EC-22871; ADDED LUBRICANT NOTE PJS18704 THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWINGARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BYANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2016 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD TITLE:P1647; I-BEAM CLAMP MOUNTING DATE:22-DEC-15 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/8 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 05 DESIGN:MCARSRU JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE 1052565DRAWN:MCARSRU P 1647 E -07 -A MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. PLACE SPRING NUTS INTO SCOREBOARD CHANNEL IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF VERTICAL BEAMS 2. LIFT SCOREBOARD INTO POSITION 3. MAKE SURE THE 1/2-13 BOLTS ARE AS CLOSE TO THE I-BEAM FLANGES AS POSSIBLE 4. WHEN SCOREBOARD IS ADJUSTED TO FINAL DESIRED POSITION, TIGHTEN BOLTS FIRMLY 5. IF FLANGE THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 3/4" THICK LONGER BOLTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CUSTOMER'S EXPENSE. STANDARD MOUNTING METHOD ALLOWABLE CAPACITY PER EACH CLAMP: SHEAR = 160 LBS TENSION = 2300 LBS SHEAR AND TENSION LOAD DIRECTION ARE AS INDICATED ON REAR ISOMETRIC VIEWTENSIONSHEAR - X SHEAR-Y ***CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES TOP VIEW VERTICAL BEAM - FLANGE THICKNESS MUST BE 1/4" - 3/4" OF SPRING NUT. BOLT MUST BE TIGHTENED TO 40FT-LB TORQUE 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT - BOLT THREAD MUST ENGAGE ENTIRE DEPTH 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER TO I-BEAM AND NUT I-BEAM CLAMP - ASSURE CLAMP IS TIGHTLY ENGAGED SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD FRONT OF SCOREBOARD EXPLODED REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW SPRING NUT ***CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT PPaarrtt ## -- DDWWGG--0011005522556655 VVeerrssiioonn -- 0055..11 DDeessccrriippttiioonn -- NN AA PP11664477;; II--BBEEAAMM CCLLAAMMPP MMOOUUNNTTIINNGG LLiiffeeccyyccllee SSttaattee -- FFuullll PPrroodduuccttiioonn LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd BByy -- ppsscchhrrooee LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd -- 22001155--1122--2222 6.000[152,4]TYP. SPACING REV DATE:BY: THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWINGARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BYANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OFDAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES.COPYRIGHT 2018 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD TITLE:P1647; LVX I-BEAM CLAMP MOUNTING DATE:18-MAY-18 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/5 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 00 DESIGN:KDRAGT JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE 3918361DRAWN:KDRAGT P1647 E -07 -B MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS:1. PLACE SPRING NUTS INTO SCOREBOARD CHANNEL IN LOCATIONS SHOWN IN TOP VIEW2. PLACE SPRING NUTS IN UNISTRUT IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF VERTICAL BEAMS2. LIFT SCOREBOARD INTO POSITION3. MAKE SURE THE 1/2-13 BOLTS ARE AS CLOSE TO THE I-BEAM FLANGES AS POSSIBLE4. WHEN SCOREBOARD IS ADJUSTED TO FINAL DESIRED POSITION, TIGHTEN BOLTS FIRMLY5. IF FLANGE THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 3/4" THICK LONGER BOLTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CUSTOMER'S EXPENSE. STANDARD MOUNTING METHOD ALLOWABLE CAPACITY PERCOLUMN CONNECTION:SHEAR = 185 LBSTENSION = 2400 LBS SHEAR AND TENSION LOADDIRECTION ARE AS INDICATED ONREAR ISOMETRIC VIEW ***CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES RECOMMENDED METHOD OF INSTALLATION:- INSTALL 1 1/2" BOLT, 1/2" LOCK WASHER, 1/2" FLAT WASHER USING SHALLOW SOCKET WITH EXTENSION.- ENTER FRO MSIDE OF UNISTRUT SECURING INSIDE BOLTS FIRST AND MOVING OUTWARD. VERTICAL BEAM - FLANGE THICKNESS MUST BE 1/4" - 3/4" 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT - BOLT THREAD MUST ENGAGE ENTIRE DEPTHOF SPRING NUT. BOLT MUST BE TIGHTENED TO 40FT-LB TORQUE 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER I-BEAM CLAMP - ASSURE CLAMP IS TIGHTLY ENGAGEDTO I-BEAM AND NUT LONG SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD FRONT OF SCOREBOARD TOP VIEW EXPLODED REAR ROTATED VIEW SPRING NUT***CRITICAL***MAKE SURE SPRING NUTIS TURNED TO VERTICALPOSITION INSIDEUNISTRUT CHANNEL I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHERTENSIONSHEAR - X SHEAR-Y SCALE 1/8 3-1/4" UNISTRUT VERTICAL BEAM UNISTRUT SCOREBOARD I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER LONG SPRING NUT SIDE VIEWSCOREBOARD ATTACHEMENT EXPLODED SIDE VIEWUNISTRUT ATTACHMENTSCALE 1/15 SEE DETAIL A DETAIL ASCALE 1/4 SHORT SPRING NUT 3-1/4" UNISTRUT SCOREBOARD 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2-13 X 1.500 BOLT PPaarrtt ## -- 00AA--11664477--11007744 VVeerrssiioonn -- 0000..22 DDeessccrriippttiioonn -- LLVVXX II--BBEEAAMM MMTTGG;; PP11664477 FFBB EEXXTT,, 44 CCOONNNNEECCTTIIOONNSS LLiiffeeccyyccllee SSttaattee -- FFuullll PPrroodduuccttiioonn LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd BByy -- kkddrraaggtt LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd -- 22001188--0055--2244 REV DATE:BY: 01 06 OCT 11 REPLACED VERTICAL I-BEAM WITH 6" X 6" SQUARE TUBE JAVA 02 20 SEP 12 PER EC-7114; REMOVED CHAMFER FROM 0M-133259 LMG 03 03 JULY 13 ADDED STRUCTURAL NOTE TTF 04 22 DEC 15 PER EC-22871; ADDED LUBRICANT WARNING PJS 18704 THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWINGARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BYANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2016 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARDS TITLE:P1647; POLE MOUNTING OPTIONS DATE:22-DEC-15 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/5 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 04 DESIGN:DOPPELT JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE 1048184DRAWN:DOPPELT P 1647 E -10 -A NOTES: - THREADED RODS RUN ALONG BOTH SIDES OF BEAM - RODS DO NOT PASS THROUGH THE FLANGES OF THE BEAM - NO DRILLING NECESSARY - MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL OPENING ON SCOREBOARD ***CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES: - BOLT TORQUE: 30 FT-LB SIDE VIEW 1/2" FLAT WASHER, LOCK WASHER, AND NUT VERTICAL BEAM 1/2" THREADED ROD SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD REAR MOUNTING ANGLE TOP VIEW SCALE 1/10 1/2" FLAT WASHER LOCK WASHER, AND NUT 1/2" THREADED ROD VERTICAL BEAM FRONT OF DISPLAY SPRING NUT DISPLAY REAR MOUNTING ANGLE ***CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW EXTRA THREADED ROD CAN BE CUT OFF THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWINGARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BYANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OFDAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES.COPYRIGHT 2018 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION AH REV TITLE: PROJECT: INCHES [MILLIMETERS] DESIGN: SCALE: DIM UNITS:DATE:SHEET DO NOT SCALE DRAWING FUNC - TYPE - SIZE DRAWN:- JOB NO. - OUTDOOR LED SCOREBOARDSCOMPONENT LOCATION; SO-918-R/A/W LGROOTW 31 OCT 11 P1647 E 10 A 1=25 KDRAGT 107398105 REV DATE:BY: 01 17 DEC 13 KDD PER EC-12908, ADDED TEXT FOR OPTIONALPERIOD OR QTR CAPTIONS REV DATE:BY: 02 14 APR 14 KDD PER EC-14117REMOVE OPTIONAL COLON NOTE REV DATE:BY: 03 27 FEB 15 KDB PER EC-17119, REMOVED DETAIL AADDED SIGNAL OPTION NOTECHANGED MASTER TO PRIMARY REV DATE:BY: 04 08 JAN 19 KDM PER CN-70689, UPDATED LOCATION OF DAKTRONICS LOGO REV DATE:BY: 05 10 AUG 20 TAN PER CN-107858REMOVED LABELS TO MOVE TO NEW STANDARAD FP FP S/P S/P PARKING C B A HAY BARN 2665 REIS TENNIS CENTER BELKIN INTERNATIONAL SQUASH COURTS 2667 JOHN T. OXLEY EQUESTRIAN CENTER 2664 NEW SWINE BARN 1059 NIEMAND ROBISON SOFTBALL FIELD 5032 SWINE BARN COMPLEX 1056 Multi-Pupose Fields Precinct 9 5032A VISTING DOUGOUT 5032F HOME DOUGOUT 5032G PRESS BOX 5032H SHED 5032E 5032A RUGBY SHED 2640 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 X-100 X-100 1 1 INTERIOR ELEVATION 1 X-100 SECTION MARKER 1 X-100 ENLARGED DETAIL CONSTRUCTION KEYED NOTE DEMOLITION KEYED NOTE DRAWING REVISION NOTE LINETYPE: TO BE PROVIDED / NEW LINETYPE: DEMOLITION / TO BE RELOCATED LINETYPE: EXISTING TO REMAIN # # # 1 11 11 PHOTO/ VIEW REFERENCE1/ A-101 FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN: DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 Cornell University F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION T-001 16315661 TITLE SHEET FE DESIGN EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 GENERAL T-001 TITLE SHEET CIVIL C-001 NOTES, LEGENDS, AND ABBREVIATIONS C-101 SITE UTILITY PLAN STRUCTURAL S-101 STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATIONS S-501 DETAILS BUILDING CODE SUMMARYGENERAL SYMBOLS LEGEND SHEET INDEX PROJECT SCOPE SITE LOCATION -CORNELL UNIVERSITY RUGBY FIELD APPLICABLE CODES 2020 NYS BUILDING CODE PROJECT SUMMARY THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF 20 SF NEW STRUCTURE. BUILDING LIMITATIONS CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION:N/A CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDS:N/A HIGH-RISE BUILDING:N/A EXTINGUISHING REQUIREMENT:N/A OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:NOT APPLICABLE THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE THE CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND STEEL SUPPORT POSTS FOR THE NEW SCOREBOARD (BY OTHERS) AT THE RUGBY FIELD OFF PINE TREE ROAD. CORNELL UNIVERSITY RUGBY FIELD 5032A PINE TREE ROAD1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW MITCHELL STREET ELLIS HOLLOW ROAD HONNESS LANE APPENDIX 2 6"X 6"X 10"XX 10"XX E E E E E(DB)E(DB) T T T T E&T E&T T T T T TC TC TC(FO)TC(FO) 6"W 6"W HW HW HWD HWD 24"CW 24"CW CP CP 6"S&2"R 6"S&2"R 6"PCR 6"PCR 6"G 6"G x x ////////////////////// SANITARY SEWER UTILITY SYMBOLS STORM SEWER OPEN DRAINAGE DITCH ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DIRECT BURIED TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELEC. & TEL. UNDERGROUND T.V. CABLE OVERHEAD T.V. CABLE UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOM. FIBER OPTICS WATER (POTABLE) HOT WATER (HEATING) HOT WATER (DOMESTIC) CHILLED WATER (SUPPLY & RETURN) CATHODIC PROTECTION (ANODE) CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION◬CP TS STEAM & CONDENSATE RETURN PUMPED CONDENSATE RETURN GAS VALVE UTILITY POLE OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE HYDRANT POST INDICATOR VALVEP.I.V. STREET LIGHTOR TUNNELS VAULTS FENCE 815.6 GRADE ELEVATION 818 GRADE CONTOUR TREE REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY MATERIALS DESIGNATIONS EARTH BACKFILL GRAVEL BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CRUSHER-RUN LEDGEROCK CONCRETE SAND PAVEMENT REMOVAL/ REPLACEMENT EXISTING GRADE (TURF) CIVIL SYMBOLS TRAFFIC SIGN A.D.A. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SCOPE AREAS GROUND SNOW LOAD, Pg 40 PSF FLAT-ROOF SNOW LOAD, Pf N/A SNOW LOAD IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Is 0.80 THERMAL FACTOR, Ct 1.2 DRIFT SURCHARGE LOAD, Pd SNOW DRIFT WIDTH, w BASIC WIND DESIGN SPEED, V 103 MPH WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY C RISK CATEGORY I FORCE COEFFICIENT, Cf MWRFS DESIGN PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, qz 19.7 PSF SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Ie 1.00 Ss 0.15g S1 0.05g ASSUMED SOIL SITE CLASS D SDS 0.160g SD1 0.08g SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY B SEISMIC FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM(S)STRUCTURAL STEEL NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE BASE SHEAR, V 40 LBS SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, CS 0.053 RESPONSE MODIFICATION COEFFICIENT, R 3 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE DESIGN PARAMETERS EXPOSURE FACTOR, Ce 1.0 SLOPED ROOF FACTOR, Cs N/A ALLOWABLE WIND DESIGN SPEED, Vasd 80 MPHSNOW LOADSWIND LOADSSOIL DESIGN PRESSURE, ASSUMED 1500 PSF RAIN INTENSITY, i 2.35 INCHES/HR SEISMIC LOADSN/A N/A 1.75 W_X__STEEL BEAM OF SIZE W_X__ STEEL COLUMN NEW CONCRETE A ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM AVG AVERAGE B BLDG BUILDING C CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLR CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONT CONTINUOUS CRS COURSE(S) D DEMO DEMOLITION DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DN DOWN DWG DRAWING E EA EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION EPDM RUBBER ROOF MEMBRANE EOR ENGINEER OF RECORD EQ EQUAL (E),EXISTING EXIST EXT EXTERIOR F FDN FOUNDATION FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FRP FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER FT FOOT/FEET FTG FOOTING G GA GAGE GALV GALVANIZED H HT HEIGHT L LB(S)POUND(S) M MFR MANUFACTURER MAT MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM N N/A NOT APPLICABLE NTS NOT TO SCALE O O.C.ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER P +/-PLUS OR MINUS PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PT PRESSURE TREATED Q QTY QUANTITY R REQ REQUIRED REV REVISION S SIM SIMILAR SF SQUARE FOOT/ FEET SS STAINLESS STEEL STL STEEL STD STANDARD T TOS TOP OF STEEL TYP TYPICAL U UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE V VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W W/O WITHOUT WD WOOD SYMBOLS &AND @ AT #POUND(S) WIDE FLANGE MEMBERS A992, Fy = 50 KSI STRUCTURAL STEEL GRADES HSS RECTANGULAR MEMBERS CHANNELS AND ANGLES A500 GRADE B, Fy = 46 KSI A36, Fy = 36 KSI HSS ROUND MEMBERS A500 GRADE B, Fy = 42 KSI PLATES A572, Fy = 50 KSI PIPES A53, Fy = 35 KSI THREADED RODS F1554 GRADE 36, Fy = 36 KSI FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN: DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION C-001 16315661 NOTES, LEGENDS, AND ABBREVIATIONS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 GENERAL ABBREVIATIONS ADJ ADJACENT AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ALT ALTERNATE CC CENTER TO CENTER CLG CEILING CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS DIM DIMENSION DTL DETAIL DWG DRAWING EXT EXTERIOR FF FINISHED FIN FINISHED GA GAUGE H HEIGHT INCL INCLUDED INT INTERIOR L LENGTH MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER RO ROUGH OPENING SHT SHEET STD STANDARD STL STEEL TYP TYPICAL VERT VERTICAL VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W WIDTH UTILITY ABBREVIATIONS ABND ABANDONED BITUM BITUMINOUS CB CATCH BASIN CO CLEANOUT CONC CONCRETE COND CONDENSATE CW CITY WATER (CITY OF ITHACA DOMESTIC AND FIRE WATER) CWS/ CWR CHILLED WATER SUPPLY/ RETURN DIA DIAMETER DW DOMESTIC WATER E ELECTRIC(AL) EL ELEVATION EXST EXISTING FT FEET FW FIRE WATER (CORNELL UNIVERSITY FIRE AND DOMESTIC WATER) HP HIGH POINT HYD HYDRANT ID INSIDE DIAMETER INV INVERT LP LOW POINT MH MANHOLE NG NATURAL GAS OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER PCR PUMPED CONDENSATE RETURN PIV POST INDICATOR AND VALVE PVMT PAVEMENT R RADIUS RD ROAD REF REFERENCE REQD REQUIRED STA STATION STM STEAM T TELEPHONE UD UNDERDRAIN W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT X SANITARY XX STORM WATER DIG SAFELY NOTES (UDig NY) 1.0 CLICK OR CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. STATE LAW REQUIRES YOU TO PLACE A LOCATION REQUEST WITH UDig NY PRIOR TO DIGGING OR EXCAVATING. CALL 811 OR 1-800-962-7962, OR SUMBIT A REQUEST ONLINE AT UDIGNY.ORG. YOU WILL RECEIVE A LOCATION REQUEST NUMBER AND A LIST OF MEMBER UTILITY COMPANIES THAT WILL BE NOTIFIED OF YOUR PLANNED DIGGING PROJECT. 2.0 WAIT + LOCATE. ALLOW THE UTILITIES TIME TO LOCATE YOUR PROPOSED DIG SITE BY CONTACTING UDig NY AT LEAST 2 AND NOT MORE THAN 10 FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING YOUR WORK, NOT COUNTING THE DAY OF YOUR CALL, WEEKENDS, OR HOLIDAYS. 3.0 CONFIRM UTILITY RESPONSE. AFTER UDig NY HAS NOTIFIED MEMBER UTILITIES OF THE PENDING EXCAVATION, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE EACH OPERATOR HAS RESPONDED PRIOR TO DIGGING ON YOUR STATED COMMENCEMENT DATE. 4.0 RESPECT THE MARKS. FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE MARKINGS AND THE LOCATIONS OF BURIED FACILITIES AT THE SITE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 5.0 DIG WITH CARE. DIG TEST HOLES TO VERIFY LOCATION, TYPE, SIZE, DIRECTION-OF-RUN, AND DEPTH OF THE MARKED FACILITY. C-001 GENERAL NOTES 1.0 COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHER ACTIVE CONTRACTORS IN PROXIMITY, SPECIFICALLY AWARDED CONTRACTOR FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE WHICH INCLUDES WORK AT BOTH HUMPHREYS AND TRANSPORTATION. 2.0 CONSTRUCTION OF APRONS, WALKS, CURBS, AND GUTTERS SHALL BE COMPLETED SUCH THAT ONE DRIVEWAY REMAINS ACTIVE AT ALL TIMES. 3.0 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN, SAFE, AND ORDERLY WORKSITE AT ALL TIMES. 1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW CODES & GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. PERFORM ALL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2020 NEW YORK STATE BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING CODES AND STANDARDS ARE REFERENCED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS: A. ACI 318-14 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE B. AISC 360-16 SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS C. AISC 341-16 SEISMIC PROVISIONS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS D. ASCE7-16 MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES WITH SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TEMPORARY SHORING INCLUDING PROVIDING TEMPORARY SHORING DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISIN OF A NEW YORK STATE-REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WHERE NEEDED. TESTING & INSPECTIONS 1. OWNER SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN INSPECTION AGENCY TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING SERVICES. ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONCRETE CYLINDERS SHALL BE TAKEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. IN ABSENCE OF LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS, ONE SET OF 5 CYLINDERS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACH DAY'S POUR: (2) 7-DAY, (2) 28-DAY, AND (1) HOLD. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE 1. CLEAR COVER FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE 3". 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD: A. SHOP DRAWINGS WITH REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT B. CEMENT PRODUCT DATA a. PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE I, TYPE II, OR TYPE I-II AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-150. C. AGGREGATE PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING GRADING D. MIX DESIGN PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING STRENGTH TESTS E. ADMIXTURE PRODUCT DATA a. WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494. HIGH RANGE WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES, OR SUPERPLASTICIZERS, SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494 TYPE F OR TYPE G. b. AIR-ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-260. AIR-ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE PER ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.3.1 WHERE AIR-ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES ARE USED. c. RETARDING AND ACCELERATING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494. F. REINFORCEMENT MILL CERTIFICATES a. STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-615 AND SHALL BE GRADE 60. EPOXY COATED STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-775 AND SHALL BE GREADE 60. STAINLESS STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-955. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-1064. STAINLESS STEEL WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-1022. G. HOT WEATHER PROCEDURES AND/OR COLD WEATHER PROCEDURES AS APPLICABLE 3. FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO MOISTURE, 15% TO 20% OF THE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH CLASS F FLY ASH CONFORMING TO ASTM C-618. 4. NORMAL WEIGHT AGGREGATES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-33 AND THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: a. COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATES MUST BE FROM A NYSDOT APPROVED SOURCE AND NOT BE FLAGGED FOR ASR. b. THE MINIMUM BULK SSD SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THE COARSE AGGREGATE ON THE NEW YORK STATE DOT POSTED TEST RESULTS SHALL BE 2.67. c. THE MAXIMUM ABSORPTION OF THE COARSE AGGREGATE ON THE NEW YORK STATE DOT POSTED TEST RESULTS SHALL BE 1.2% 5. THE DENSITY OF THE CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE 145 PCF +/-5 PCF FOR NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE. 6. CONCRETE DURABILITY DESIGN CLASSIFICATIONS PER ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.1.1 SHALL BE F3, C1, S0, AND W1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ACI FOR THOSE CATEGORIES. 7. CONCRETE PRODUCER SHALL VERIFY THAT SUBMITTED CONCRETE MIXES DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM WATER-SOLUBLE CHLORIDE ION LIMITS PER THIS EXPOSURE CLASS AS STATED IN ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.2.1. 8. THE WATER CEMENT RATIO SHALL BE 0.42 +/-0.03. THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO ADD MORE WATER THAN IS SPECIFIED ON THE SUBMITTED MIX DESIGNS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DELIVERY TICKET THE QUANTITY OF WATER WITHHELD AT THE BATCHING PLANT THAT CAN BE ADDED ONSITE. 9. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4500 PSI UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. POST-INSTALLED ANCHORS 1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS ARE TO BE USED: HILTI HIT HY200R, DEWALT AC200+, DEWALT AC100+ GOLD, OR EQUAL EARTHWORK 1. THE VERTICAL BEARING PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 1500 PSF AND THE LATERAL BEARING PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 100 PSF PER THE 2020 BCNYS TABLE 1806.2 PRESUMPTIVE LOAD-BEARING VALUES. NO GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AT THIS LOCATION. 2. IF UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL IS FOUND AT THIS LOCATION, FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE OVEREXCAVATED AND BEARING MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LEAN CONCRETE WITH A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2000 PSI. STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES STRUCTURAL STEEL 1. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE ASTM FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC "STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL" AND ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH AISC "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES." 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD: A. STEEL PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING STRENGTH OF MATERIAL B. STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS INCLUDING ERECTION PLANS AND PIECE DETAILS a. DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE DETAILS FOR APPLICATIONS AND ASSEMBLY OF ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS; INCLUDE DETAILS OF CUTS, CONNECTIONS, HOLES, AND OTHER PERTINENT DATA; AND INDICATE WELDS BY STANDARD AWS 2.1 SYMBOLS SHOWING SIZE, LENGTH, AND TYPE OF EACH WELD. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. b. NO FABRICATION SHALL PROCEED PRIOR TO SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL. SHOP DRAWINGS MARKED "REJECTED" OR "REVISE AND RESUBMIT" MAY NOT BE FABRICATED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL CHANGES BEING MADE. C. WELDERS' CERTIFICATIONS D. WELDING MATERIALS PRODUCT DATA 3. GRADES OF STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE PER TABLE THIS SHEET U.O.N. 4. ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS TO BE MADE WITH GALVANIZED BOLTS CONFORMING TO ASTM A153, CLASS C AND SHALL BE HOT-DIP GALVANIZED. 5. ALL NUTS SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-563 DH OR ASTM A-194 2H. 6. ALL WASHERS SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F-436. 7. ALL BOLT HOLES IN STEEL MEMBERS SHALL BE 1/16" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE NOMINAL SIZE OF THE BOLT USED, U.N.O. ON DRAWINGS. 8. WELDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE" AWS D1.1-2006. ELECTRODES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 70 KSI AND BE LOW -HYDROGEN TYPE. THE LENGTH OF WELD SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS IS THE MINIMUM EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF THE WELD. ALL WELDS TO BE A MINIMUM 1/4" FILLET WELD U.N.O. ON DRAWINGS. 9. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL SHALL BE PRIMED AND THEN PAINTED WITH TWO-PART SOLVENT-BASED EPOXY BY TNEMEC, PPG (E.G. PPG AMERLOCK 2 / SIGMACOVER 2, TNEMEC SERIES 27) OR EQUAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. STEEL WILL THEN RECEIVE A TOPCOAT OF CORNELL RED COLORED PAINT. COLOR OPTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR OWNER'S APPROVAL. ALL PAINT SELECTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL. 10. ALL STEEL SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CAMBER UP EXCEPT WHERE NOTED OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS AND AT CANTILEVERS WHERE STEEL SHALL BE INSTALLED W ITH CAMBER DOWN. 11. SPLICING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS WHERE NOT DETAILED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AS TO LOCATION, TYPE OF SPLICE, AND CONNECTION TO BE MADE. STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES CONT'D STRUCTURAL SYMBOLS STRUCTURAL ABBREVIATIONS 6"XX X X X X X XXX XX D IS IN TE G R ATO R HAY BARN 2665 JOHN T. OXLEY EQUESTRIAN CENTER 2664 RUGBY SHED 2640 8 7 0 875880X 878.8 X 879.5 X 876.3 X 876.5 X 876.5 X 876.4 8 7 5 8808808808 8 0 890890890X 881.3 X 880.1 X 895.8 X 886.6 X 878.9 X 879.7875880885885885 885 8858908908 90 8908908 9 08958 9 5 895895895 900X 900.4 X 890.5 X X 884.0 X 891.2 X 891.4 X 890.2 87 5880880885X 879.5 X 883.4 89089089589 5 9 1 0 915920925930935X 911.7 X 917.7 X 925.3 X 933.7 X 929.2X 918.6 X 909.0 X 902.5 X 910.6 X 917.4 X 924.1 X 936.2 X 935.8 X 889.3 X 889.5 X 889.9 X 889.6 X 890.7 X 889.6 X 889.7 X 890.5 X 890.6 X 890.6 X 891.1 X 891.6 X 897.5 8 9 5 895 895 9 0 0 9 0 0 9009009 009 0 5 9 0 5 9 1 0 9 2 0 925 9 2 5925 9 3 0930930 9 3 5 935X 932.9 X 931.9 X 932.1 X 932.6 X 928.6 X 929.2 X 931.6 X 934.2 X 901.1 X 912.8 X 906.4 X 907.9 X 915.7 X 909.8 X 902.1 X 933.7 X 934.6 X 934.6 X 933.4 X 934.4 X 900.2 X 901.4 X 901.1 X 900.5 X 899.2 X 900.0 X 905.6 X 902.9 X 904.6 X 933.2 X 933.5 X 933.6 X 931.6 X 935.9 X 936.5 9 3 5 X 935.6 X 935.7 X 935.6 X 935.3 885890890 8958 9 5 895 895 9009 0 5 905 9109 1 0 915920925930935X 896.6 X 904.2 X 910.3 X 919.5 X 927.4 X 933.1X 927.8 X 918.8 X 910.1 X 898.2 X 882.1 9 4 0940940 X 942.2 X 940.9 X 938.4 X 935.7 X 935.3 X 943.9 X 942.8 X 939.7 X 939.7 X 935.6 X 935.8 X 936.3 X 936.4 9 4 0 940 X 943.7909.80910.15POND 2POND 3POND 1A P P R O X . L O CA T I O N 1 6 "W PT-5 8 "W 3 15"XX 1 2 "X X ? 1 2 "X X 1 2 "X X X X 1 76 27 27 ESA NI TAR Y DI SIN TEG RATO R APPROX. FIELD PERIMETER SEE 1/S-101 FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN: DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION C-101 16315661 SITE UTILITY PLAN Q. OLSEN-BIEBER EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" 1 SITE UTILITY PLAN 0'30'60'120' SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" 1. COORDINATE FOUNDATION LOCATIONS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES. 2. FOUNDATION LOCATIONS ARE MARKED BY STAKES IN THE FIELD. 7' - 6" NOTES: 1. COORDINATE SPACING OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WITH SCOREBOARD MANUFACTURER. 2. LOCATION OF SCOREBOARD HAS BEEN MARKED IN THE FIELD. 3. SEE DETAILS SHEET FOR BASE PLATE AND KICKER CONNECTIONS. FIELD WELDED KICKER CONNECTIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF BOLTED CONNECTIONS. W12X26 W12X26 CONCRETE FTG, TYP. 2 LOCS S-101 2 S-101 3 L4X4X5/16 SL O P E D U P ø 4 ' - 0 "ø 4' - 0"SCOREBOARD BY OTHERS NOTES: 1. COORDINATE CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS WITH SCOREBOARD MANUFACTURER 2. SLOPE TOPS OF PIERS OUTWARD SLIGHTLY SO THAT WATER CANNOT COLLECT ON THE TOP. 3. STEEL POSTS AND KICKERS SHALL HAVE BASE PLATES PER DETAIL ON S-501. 4. ELEVATIONS WERE MEASURED AT STAKE LOCATIONS. CONFIRM IN FIELD. T/PIER EL. 0'-3" B/PIER EL. -8'-6" T/COLUMN EL. 18'-0" GRADE EL. 0'-0" CONCRETE PIER T/KICKER EL. 7'-0" GRADE EL. -1'-7" T/PIER EL. -1'-4" B/PIER EL. -10'-1" GRADE VARIES SCOREBOARD, BY OTHERS POST, SEE PLAN FOR SIZE FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN: DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION S-101 16315661 STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER QCO 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 0' 2' 4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 STRUCTURAL PLAN 1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 ELEVATION FINISHED COLUMN END SURFACE CL COLUMN ANCHOR RODCOL 2" NON-SHRINK GROUT T/CONCRETE EL SEE PLANS, DETAILS, OR SCHEDULES CL COLUMN CL COLUMN PROVIDE FOUR (4) 3/4" DIA. ANCHOR RODS EMBEDDED 1'-4" 5/16 NOTES: 1. POST BASE PLATE IS 1'-6" X 1'-0" X 1". 2. COLUMN STABILITY DURING ERECTION IS RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR 3. SEE TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4. PROVIDE 1-5/16" DIA. ANCHOR HOLES IN BASE PLATE WITH MIN. 2" X 1/4" THICK WASHER (SQUARE OR ROUND)1' - 0"1' - 6" 2"7"7"2" T/CONCRETE SETTING NUT AND PLATE WASHER (1/2" MINIMUM WASHER THICKNESS) OR SHIM AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION/ COORDINATION SQUARE OR ROUND PLATE WASHER WITH STANDARD HOLE SIZE HEAVY HEX NUT FULLY TIGHTENED DOUBLE NUTS OR HEX HEAD BOLT 3/4" DIA. ANCHOR ROD 1'-4" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT BOTTOM OF BASE PLATE ANCHOR ROD DETAIL 2" NONSHRINK GROUT 2"4"4"2"POST BASE PLATE 2"6" 1/2" NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 8"X6"X1/2" PLATE FOR CONNECTION BETWEEN KICKER AND POST. 2. TYPICAL CONNECTION BOTH ENDS OF KICKER 1/4 1/4 2 1/4"2 7/8"ELEVATION SECTION #3@16" O.C.2"(23) #8 LONGITUDINAL BARS NOT TO SCALE1BASE PLATE DETAIL FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN: DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION S-501 16315661 DETAILS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER QCO 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 STEEL CONNECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE3CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT APPENDIX 3 PHOTOGRAPHS FROM PINE TREE ROAD PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 PHOTO 1 GOAL POSTS PHOTO 2 GOAL POSTS Chris Balestra (she/her) Feb 12, 2025 at 8:48 am All - here is the Planning Department recommendation - I will also place this same comment in the "Detail" section of the sign permit: Planning sta has reviewed the proposed Rugby Scoreboard sign at 210 Pine Tree Road and compared it to Town Code Section 270-260B (sign review criteria), outlined below: (2) The Director of Planning or their designee shall consider the following criteria to make their recommendation on the acceptability of the proposed signs as to design, materials, illumination, placement, and size: (a) Signs should be legible in the circumstances in which they are seen and layout should be orderly. The proposed sign is legible and the layout is orderly. (b) Freestanding signs should be designed to be compatible with their surroundings and appropriate to the architectural character of the buildings near which they are placed. Sign panels and graphics on buildings should relate with and not cover architectural features or details and should be sized in proportion to them. The proposed freestanding sign is not located near a building – it will be installed on an existing Cornell Rugby athletic field that is more than 1,000 feet west of Pine Tree Road and placed more than 850 feet behind the nearest building, which is a Cornell-owned agricultural building that is not associated with the athletic use of the field. The sign is typical of an athletic scoreboard in terms of size and design, and, at 96 square feet in area, is much smaller than other existing scoreboards in the Town of Ithaca (e.g., 400s.f. Ithaca College Butterfield stadium sign, 350s.f. Ithaca College Freeman baseball field sign, 175s.f. Ithaca College Carp Wood Field sign, 115s.f. Valentino baseball field sign at Tutelo Park, etc.) (c) Illumination should be appropriate to the character of the surroundings and shall be in accordance with the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Law. There is no exterior illumination associated with the sign. The proposed sign has elements of internal illumination (display of numbers/scores) that is not in accordance with the Sign Law. However, most of the sign is not illuminated, and the portions that contain illumination are designed to strictly show the scores during rugby games. Additionally, the sign is oriented away from residences and there will be no light spillage onto other properties. The nearest residences are more than 450 feet west, with thick woods between them and the proposed sign that will block any views and impacts of the sign on the residences. Finally, the application materials indicate that the field will not be used at night, so the sign will not need to be lit after dark. (d) Monument signs are preferable to pole signs. Pole signs should be as low to the ground as practical. The proposed sign is a type of pole sign. A monument sign would not be practical in this case. (e) Multi-use or multi-tenant signs located on the same premises should meet the requirements of §270-256C and F. The proposed sign is not a multi-tenant sign. This criterion does not apply. (f) Landscaping should be installed and maintained at the base of a freestanding sign if such landscaping would improve the overall appearance of the sign. Landscaping would not improve the overall appearance of the sign and is not recommended. The Town Sign Law does not contain provisions that would accommodate a typical athletic scoreboard, so variances will be necessary to allow it. The height of the proposed sign exceeds the maximum height permitted in the Sign Law. The sign is also larger than permitted and contains elements of internal illumination. As noted in (b) above, there are other athletic scoreboards in the Town of Ithaca that are significantly larger (and have received similar approvals by the town). The proposed sign is oriented away from residences, so any potential visual impacts will be mitigated. The primary issue associated with the location of the proposed sign is its potential impact on a scenic view of known importance, per the Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory. The Inventory lists the view from Pine Tree Road as #9 of the top ten most scenic views in the town. However, given “Photo 1” in the application packet, and Planning sta’s site visit of the property (photos listed in the attachments), it does not appear that the proposed sign will impact the scenic view in a way that will damage or impede the view. Given the design criteria above, we recommend approval of the proposed design, illumination, materials, and placement of the proposed sign. COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. February 21, 2025 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Sign Variance for proposed Cornell Rugby Sign located at 210 Pine Tree Road, Tax Parcel # 61.-1-9.2, Cornell University, Owner; John Pillar, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. Urban Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify):□ Forest Agriculture □ Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: □Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland □ Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ _ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, January 10, 2025 11:02 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]No Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Lori Kofoid From:heidi decoo <lastcedoo@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 7:50 PM To:Codes Subject:Request for variance ZBAA-25-2 I am writing in response to the request for variance ZBAA-25-2, Cornell's request re: the site known as the Cornell Rugby Field. My husband I request that you please deny granting Cornell's variance request. The area involved is close to the East Hill Recreation Way which is parallel to our community of Eastwood Commons. The Rec Way is a popular park for our immediate neighborhood and the many homes along the periphery, and the rest of the extended neighborhood. It is a source of great comfort to a lot of people, being as it is, a chance to walk, jog and contemplate nature's bounty. The proposed variance would produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and we believe would be a detriment to nearby properties. We hope that you will take our concerns under consideration as you reach your decision. The East Hill Recreation Way is a special place for anyone lucky enough to be able to use it. Thank you, Heidi DeCoo Carl Norton 1 Lori Kofoid From:chet gates-lupton <chetlupton@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 4:42 PM To:Codes Subject:Variance requst ZBAA-25-2 **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department I am writing in response to the request for variance ZBAA-25-2, Cornell’s request re: the site known as the Cornell Rugby Field. I strongly urge the Board to decline to grant that variance request. I am a rugby fan, and have attended a number of rugby matches at the site in question. And I agree that some type of “scoreboard” displaying scores and possibly a game clock might be of benefit. However, I am also a resident in Eastwood Commons, a neighborhood very close to the site. In addition, I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD 1 Lori Kofoid From:Julie Tryon Brumsted <jtbrumsted@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 6:06 PM To:Codes Subject:Zoning Board Appeal for sign at 210 Pine Tree Road **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals: I have received a notice of this variance request because I live within 500 feet of the property seeking relief from the Town of Ithaca Code. Note that the letter I received regarding this matter was addressed to a previous owner, I have lived at 231#3 Strawberry Hill Circle for the past 6 months. My unit is in the back of the building, my patio, front porch and living room face the East Hill Rec Way and the open field beyond it. There is an entrance to the Rec Way just above my patio with little vegetation blocking my view. I can see all the way to barns on the far side of Pine Tree Rd. from my living room. It is unclear to me from Image 1 of the ZBA packet for this appeal where, exactly, this proposed sign would be and whether I would be able to see an 18-foot-high sign from my property. I am also not clear on where the location of the "significant tree cover on three sides" of the proposed scoreboard is. A very tall scoreboard in an open expanse is not something I want to see from my living room window. In my opinion, an 18' tall illuminated sign with banners is not compatible with the open fields and horse paddock surrounding the rugby field. If the Rugby Team has "coexisted peacefully with its current home for many years," why is there now a hardship that requires such a mismatched structure for the adjoining expanse of land? Please preserve the status quo as much as possible, it is a pleasant viewshed for me, my neighborhood and for the many users of nearby section the East Hill Recreation Way. Julie Brumsted 231#3 Strawberry Hill Circle Ithaca 1 Lori Kofoid From:Cora Ellen Luke <coraellen@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 9:43 AM To:Codes Subject:Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department I am a resident at Eastwood Commons and have lived here for 27 years. Through all that time I have also walked nearly every day on the recreation path very near the Rugby field. On that path I have walked to and from work, to and from shopping at East Hill Plaza, and for pleasure and exercise. Thus the path has enabled me to use my car less. The quiet and the natural beauty of the path has been a steady balm to the spirit, much needed now in these increasingly troubled times. I know this is true for me, and I have heard numerous others say the same. Children and adults alike enjoy the use of this path on a regular basis. The natural area through which the path travels is home to many animals, including birds, some of them rare species. Thus the path is used by many bird-watchers, including myself. Extra light, noise, and smells (some of which would likely occur due to the generator) would most certainly have a strongly negative impact on all of the above. I am most distressed to hear of the request for a variance. My neighbor, Chet Gates-Lupton, wrote the following letter to you. I strongly agree with everything he said. He said it so well, I am quoting, in italics, a part of his letter below (with his permission). "I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD" Thank you for your consideration of these points. Sincerely, Cora Ellen Luke 1 Lori Kofoid From:Carolyn Young <carolynmaryyoung@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:19 AM To:Codes Subject:Comment on variance request **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Ithaca Town Planning Commission, I am writing in response to the proposed variance that Cornell University is requesting regarding a variance for signage at the rugby field on Pine Tree Rd. My husband and I are residents of Eastwood Commons and live close to the East Hill Recreation Way. We walk almost daily on this path (which is extremely well maintained by the Town of Ithaca). We have made many friends during these walks and it allows us to get to the grocery store, gym, bank, drug store, etc - meaning we use our car much less than we would otherwise. One of the best features of the trail is its wild nature. Despite being close to residential neighborhoods, it is filled with animals, plants and birds, making it an enjoyable, relaxing place to walk. It is used by a great many people for various forms of exercise, and those we talk with often speak of its beauty and serenity. The rugby field located behind the trail is currently unobtrusive. We have gone to watch rugby matches, and it does seem that it would be helpful to have some sort of sign to indicate scoring and timing. However, there does not seem to be any need for a large, lighted sign. The presence of such a sign would clearly affect those of us who use the trail regularly, as well as residents of Eastwood Commons. It doesn't seem to us that this variance is necessary or appropriate, and we strongly request that it be denied. Sincerely yours, Carolyn Young/ Richard Gerber 311 Strawberry Hill Circle, Unit 4 Ithaca, NY 14850 1 Lori Kofoid From:Cathy Mulvey <cathyathome48@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:24 AM To:Codes Subject:Cornell's Rugby Field area variance **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Greetings, I wanted to share that I moved to my neighborhood along the recreation trails near the location of the rugby field a few years ago. Yes, this home was the right fit for me, YET more importantly within my world is the "fit" I enjoy with the biking and walking trails nearby. They provide a way for me to transport myself to so many locations without using my car. Of course, since I am 76 years old, I appreciate the fact that they also provide a place for exercising. How much I enjoy the wildlife, peace, and quiet along the various trails is more delightful than I can express.The nearby rugby scoreboard, etc, would affect my neighborhood and our Ithaca community walking trails. I am not alone with these feelings regarding the recreational trail delights! An acquaintance sent the following letter to the town, and he has given me permission to include it within my letter. I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 2 Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD" Thank you for "listening," Regards, Cathy Mulvey 1 Lori Kofoid From:Mary Jacobus <mlj25@cam.ac.uk> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:42 AM To:Codes Subject::Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area **WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department As a resident of Eastwood Commons who backs onto the Eat Hill Rec Way which I use every day, I would like to second and third the comments copied below. Although a small wood across the EHRec Way blocks the sightline of any large board from my immediate condo, and I assume I recievedno notice because of this, the overall impact a few hundred yards along the ECRec way is not sheltered. The current spaort use is not a nuisance but a large illuminated board represents a potentiaion incursiion into an otherwise rural and undeveloped space. Mary Jacobus, 251 #2 Strawberry Hill Circle, Ithaca, NY 14850. Forwarded messages from other members of the EastHill Commons Residents' Assocation. From: Cora Ellen Luke <coraellen@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:43 AM Subject: Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area To: <codes@townithacany.gov> I am a resident at Eastwood Commons and have lived here for 27 years. Through all that time I have also walked nearly every day on the recreation path very near the Rugby field. On that path I have walked to and from work, to and from shopping at East Hill Plaza, and for pleasure and exercise. Thus the path has enabled me to use my car less. The quiet and the natural beauty of the path has been a steady balm to the spirit, much needed now in these increasingly troubled times. I know this is true for me, and I have heard numerous others say the same. Children and adults alike enjoy the use of this path on a regular basis. The natural area through which the path travels is home to many animals, including birds, some of them rare species. Thus the path is used by many bird-watchers, including myself. Extra light, noise, and smells (some of which would likely occur due to the generator) would most certainly have a strongly negative impact on all of the above. I am most distressed to hear of the request for a variance. My neighbor, Chet Gates-Lupton, wrote the following letter to you. I strongly agree with everything he said. He said it so well, I am quoting, 2 in italics, a part of his letter below (with his permission). *"I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons.* *The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print):* *1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties.* *2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. * *3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located.* *4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood.* * Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD"* Thank you for your consideration of these points. Sincerely, Cora Ellen Luke -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Eastwood Commons, Ithaca" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to eastwood-commons-ithaca+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/eastwood-commons- ithaca/CAJTRN_YsZziBN8Nm510hp1szBJ3GouEBRJjt-ys6JQ7PtnwKpA%40mail.gmail.com.