Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBAA-24-18 Materials 1Town of Ithaca November 19, 2024 ZBAA-24-18 Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 5/29/2024 Primary Location 111 Wiedmaier Ct Unit S Roberts WC Land LLC Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner S Roberts WC Land LLC 1129 Avenida Sevilla 5C Walnut Creek, CA 9459 5 Applicant Jared Lusk 585-263-1140 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes GML-239 Reason for Review* The right of way of any existing or proposed county or state road Type of Variance Area Variance Appearance Date for Variance 11/26/24 Variance Code Language ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct., Ithaca, NY, 14850; Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code secon 270-16 (Height limitaons). Town ofIthaca Code 270-16 requires a maximum height of 30’ for all nonagricultural structures, where the proposed personal wireless service facility tower/structure would exceed the 30’ maximum height requirements. The current property is located in the Conservaon Zone Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Variance Code Section 270-16 Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance) – Materials For GML-239 Were Sent 09/26/2024 Deadline for Hearing Notice to Journal 11/14/24 Public Hearing Notice Was Sent 11/15/2024 Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent 11/18/2024 Date Sign Was Picked-up – Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members – Historical Only Address affiliated with request Status Applicant's Information Applicant is* Owner's Agent Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No If the applicant is NOT the owner, a letter/email from owner designating the applicant as agent or a copy of the contract with owner's signature will need to be provided. Description Brief Description of Variance Request* Height variance. Area Variance Criteria Form 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 3. Is the requested variance substantial?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. Affidavit The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. Digital Signature* Jared C. Lusk May 29, 2024 Meeting Date 11/26/2024 PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E-check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: *Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 *Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 *Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Attachments Ithaca Letter.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM Determination/Denial Letter SunnyView_ZDFinal_20240220.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:04 PM EAF.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:06 PM Lease.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:07 PM Exibit A-J.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Exibit Y.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Exibit K-X.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Second Letter 111 Wiedmaier Court-missing materials final.pdf Uploaded by Abby Homer on Jun 7, 2024 at 11:45 AM General Municipal Law (GML) 239 Planning and Zonin-14.pdf Uploaded by Lori Kofoid on Sep 26, 2024 at 1:33 PM ZBA - Wiedmaier cell tower Full EAF All parts and memo.pdf Uploaded by Chris Balestra (she/her) on Nov 6, 2024 at 2:09 PM History Date Activity 11/19/2024, 8:44:38 AM Lori Kofoid changed form field entry Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent from "" to "11/18/2024" on Record ZBAA-24-18 11/19/2024, 8:44:38 AM Lori Kofoid changed form field entry Public Hearing Notice Was Sent from "" to "11/15/2024" on Record ZBAA-24-18 Survey and/or Plans Environmental Assessment Form Letter or Email of Authorization Exibit A-J.pdf Exibit Y.pdf Exibit K-X.pdf Second Letter 111 Wiedmaier Court-missing materials final.pdf General Municipal Law (GML) 239 Planning and Zonin-14.pdf ZBA - Wiedmaier cell tower Full EAF All parts and memo.pdf 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Uploaded to Town of Ithaca OpenGov online submission system, sent via E-mail to jlusk@nixonpeabody.com, and via U.S. Mail on Friday, June 7, 2024 June 7, 2024 Mr. Jared C. Lusk, Esq. Nixon Peabody, LLP – Attorneys for Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 Dear Mr. Lusk, On Thursday, May 30, 2024, the Town of Ithaca (“Town”) received additional application materials related to the construction of a proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22, via the Town of Ithaca OpenGov online submission system and via Federal Express. Pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) regulation at 47 CFR § 1.6003 defining the presumptive “reasonable period of time” provision in 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(ii) for municipalities to act on siting applications, and Town Code §270-219. E (7), the Town is hereby notifying you in writing within 10 days of the Town’s receipt of the additional application materials that the application is still incomplete. The relevant shot clock is therefore tolled until the following materials are provided and the Town determines that the application is complete: 1. Evidence that a significant gap in coverage exists (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (s) [2]) – Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The Town Code requires in-kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include each frequency, in table format: a. The date and time for the test, b. The location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded, c. Each signal strength recorded, measured in decibel milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. 2. Dropped call records (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (s) [4]) – Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, 2 percentage, and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. 3. Economic analysis study (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (v)) – Exhibit Y acknowledges the following application requirement, but the economic analysis was not conducted on properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. The Town Code requires the submission of an economic analysis of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF may have on all adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. 4. Insurance requirements (Town Code §270-219. V (1) – Insurance requirements as follows will need to be supplied for the building permit process: (1) Minimum Coverages. Each PWSF Permittee shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a PWSF Permit, an insurance policy, or policies. Such policy or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the Permittee's operations, as follows: (a) Commercial Umbrella insurance with limits of not less than $5,000,000, (b) Pollution Liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate, with any deductible not to exceed $25,000 each occurrence. 5. Electrical Permit Application - An electrical permit application needs to be submitted, in addition to the building permit application, at the following link: Code Enforcement & Zoning Department - TOI - Electrical Permit Application - ViewPoint Cloud (opengov.com) 6. Town Code Chapter 125-5C requires the following items to be provided in addition to what has already been provided: a. One hard copy set of plans needs to be submitted as part of the process for the building permit, b. A statement that the work shall be performed in compliance with Chapter 270, Zoning, the Uniform Code, the ECCCNYS, the ECS, this chapter, and other applicable state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, c. It appears that the documents were submitted by an engineering firm and not a sole practitioner professional engineer, which requires the firm's certificate of authorization number to be placed on the title block, d. Please provide a statement of special inspections for this project, e. Please provide the building permit fee, when prompted by the permitting system, f. Please provide proof of workers compensation and disability or the proper exemption documentation from the NYS Worked Compensation Board. 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Engineering Comments – The Engineering Department still requires the following information: a. Please fill out a SWPPP application on the Town of Ithaca online permitting system Engineering page, and upload all SWPPP information: https://ithacany.viewpointcloud.com/categories/1080, 3 b. Please include the Construction Sequence/Erosion and Sediment Control Sequence in the construction drawings, c. Please include a contractor certification form certifying compliance with the terms and conditions of the submitted SWPPP. A sample of the form can be found attached (as requested in the SWPPP), d. According to the provided SWPPP, all excess materials from the work will be sent to a state approved solid waste facility. If any of the excess material is spread outside of the limits of disturbance or sent to another site within the Town limits, a revision of the drawings shall be required to be submitted for review. 8. Consultant Escrow Fee (§270-219.Q, §153-2D) – The following minimum consultant escrow fee applies to this Project: $3,000.00, pursuant to Town Code §270-219.Q, which states: (1) The Town, at the expense of the applicant, may employ its own consultants to examine the application and related documentation. The consultants that the Town may retain include, but are not limited to, professional structural and/or electrical engineers, attorneys, and other experts reasonably required by the Town to competently and fully evaluate any application and the resulting construction. Such consultants may be requested, among other matters, to make recommendations as to whether the criteria for granting approvals and permits have been met, including whether the applicant's conclusions regarding a significant gap in coverage, co- location, safety analysis, visual analysis, and structural inspection are valid and supported by generally accepted and reliable engineering and technical data and standards and whether the personal wireless service facility as constructed will be in compliance with the approved plans and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards. (2) To assure sufficient funds are available to the Town to pay for the consultants referred to in the preceding subsection, an applicant shall be required to deposit review fees in escrow, in accordance with the terms of, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Town Board shall set from time to time by resolution the minimum initial escrow deposit for any personal wireless service facility application which anticipates construction of any type of tower exceeding 50 feet. The Town Board set the minimum initial escrow deposit at $3,000 in Town Board Resolution No. 2023-110. The shot clock remains tolled while the application remains incomplete. Please advise whether the Town to place this application on Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals agendas for their considerations and actions while the application remains incomplete. Nothing in this letter shall be construed to waive any application requirements or any consequences of an incomplete application. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require clarification. I can be reached by phone at (607) 273-1721, extension 121 or by email at cbalestra@townithacany.gov. Sincerely, Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Cc: Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Rod Howe, Town of Ithaca Town Supervisor Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Inc. Marty Moseley, Town of Ithaca Director of Code Enforcement C.J. Randall, Town of Ithaca Director of Planning David Squires, Chair, Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Jeffrey Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP Fred T. Wilcox, III, Chair, Town of Ithaca Planning Board PROJECT TITLE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Contractor’s Certification All contractors and subcontractors identified as implementing any erosion control measures shall sign a copy of the following certification statement: “I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also understand that the owner or operator must comply with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) regulations for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings.” To be completed by president, secretary, treasurer, vice president or any person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the above-listed contracting firm: Name: (Please Print) Title: Firm: Address: Telephone Number: SWPPP Elements Responsible For: Signature: Date: To be completed by the on-site “trained contractor” that will be on site on a daily basis when soil disturbances are being performed: Trained Contractor’s Name: (Please Print) Title: Telephone Number: Site Address: Signature: Date: NY industrial code rule 753 requires no less than twoworking days notice, but not more than ten days notice.Before You Dig, Drill Or Blast!CALL US TOLL FREE 811 OR 1-800-962-7962UNDERGROUND FACILITIESPROTECTIVE ORGANIZATIONUDIG NY LEGEND LEGEND LEGEND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTESSAFETY NOTESPROJECT SPECIFIC NOTESTESTING SCHEDULE COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. September 30, 2024 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Area Variance for proposed cell tower located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel #56.-4-1.22, S Roberts WC Land LLC, Owner; Jared Lusk, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Appeals Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner DATE: October 30, 2024 RE: Verizon Wireless “Sunny View Site” Personal Wireless Service Facility (Telecommunications Tower), 111 Wiedmaier Court This memo explains the various requirements and approvals related to the personal wireless service facility located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, off Slaterville Road/NYS Route 79. The proposal involves the construction of a 138' +/- monopole tower (134’ plus 4’ lightning rod at the top) consisting of nine antennas, two equipment cabinets, a generator, and other equipment within a 50' x 50' +/- chain link fenced area. The Planning Board is responsible for considering site plan and special permit approval for the project. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) is responsible for considering a height variance. Other than the height, the proposed tower meets all of the dimensional standards of the town Personal Wireless Service Facility law in the Town Code (§270-219). The project will include minimal lighting for the equipment cabinets, which will be compliant with the town’s Outdoor Lighting Law. Federal Requirements The applicant initiated a building permit application for this project on November 13, 2023, which started a 150-day Federal Shot Clock, per the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii). The Shot Clock, by definition, is the sum of the number of days specified by federal regulation as the presumptively reasonable time for the Town to act on the relevant personal wireless service facility application type, plus the number of days of any applicable tolling period, per 47 CFR 1.6003. The Town Code, §270-219, explains the Shot Clock period, along with the requirements to comply with the regulations. The Town of Ithaca has 150 calendar days (excluding holidays and other days per federal definition) from the date of initial submission to complete the review process associated with the proposed tower. The town issued two letters of “incompleteness” to the applicant dated December 11, 2023, and June 7, 2024. The letters described and requested missing materials from the application. The applicant responded with materials on May 29, 2024 (including a narrative and Exhibits A-Y), and August 7, 2024 (including another narrative and Exhibits Z-EE). The application was deemed complete on August 14, 2024, and was then scheduled for the next available Planning Board meeting. The Planning Board began their review of this project at the October 1, 2024, Planning Board meeting. The Board continued their review on October 29, 2024, where they issued a negative determination of environmental significance and opened and closed the public hearing for the proposed site plan and special permit. The Planning Board will continue their site plan and special permit review on November 19, 2024. Project Location As indicated in the application materials and required by Town Code, the proposed facility will be constructed to support up to four total telecommunications carriers. However, Verizon is the only applicant for this facility and the only carrier that is currently planning to locate antennas on the tower. The area where the proposed cell tower will be located is a 12.3+/- acre vacant property that has been previously disturbed. The parcel was created as a result of the Wiedmaier Court 5-lot residential subdivision that was approved by the Planning Board in December 2003 (please see the FEAF Part 3 attachment for a description of the prior disturbance). The parcel is bordered on the north by woods and Burns Road, on the east by private residences on Wiedmaier Court, on the south by a stream and woods, and on the west by woods. There are no trees or other vegetation to remove to accommodate the tower and associated facilities and access drive. The Planning Bord required a landscape plan to mitigate potential aesthetic impacts of the equipment cabinets and associated facilities. As noted in the enclosed FEAF Part 3 attachment, this area is not listed among the most significant scenic views in the Town of Ithaca or Tompkins County Scenic Resources Inventory lists. Camouflaging the tower to look like an evergreen tree is not recommended, as it will be surrounded by open meadow and will stand out even more, which could potentially increase its visual impact. Finally, there is minor earth removal associated with the development of the concrete pad and gravel access drive, so an erosion and sedimentation control plan for this project (Simple SWPPP) has been submitted and will be approved by the Town Engineering Department. Please call me at (607) 273-1721 or email me at cbalestra@townithacany.gov with any questions regarding this project. Cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Inc. Jared Lusk, Esq., Nixon Peabody, LLP S. Roberts WC Land, LLC Proposed action is site plan, special permit approval by the Planning Board, and a height variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals 111 Wiedmaier s , including a generator on a 4' x 8' concrete pad. TC Planning Dept GML 239 referral mtgs 10/1 & 10/29/24 mtg 11/2024 response rec'd 9/13/2024 .46 +/-(per SWPPP) Closest facilities are Coddington Road Community Center (4800+/- feet away), East Ithaca Preschool (T. Dryden, 4500+/- feet away), and Ithaca Media Arts (4800+/- feet awaty). There are no hospitals or group homes anywhere near the site. Unnamed stream along eastern property boundary Unregulated by state/federal agencies 18-24 inches Page 1 of 10 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, † NO † YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur E2d 9 9 b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9 9 c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. E2a 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons of natural material. D2a 9 9 e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year or in multiple phases. D1e 9 9 f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). D2e, D2q 9 9 g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9 9 h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 9 9 a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. Notes: Please see Part 3 for items checked "yes." Unchecked boxes are "no impact." 4 4 4 Page 2 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, † NO † YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ E2g 9 9 b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: _____________________________________________________ E3c 9 9 c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 9 9 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water † NO † YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. D2b 9 9 c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from a wetland or water body. D2a 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. E2h 9 9 e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. D2a, D2h 9 9 f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal of water from surface water. D2c 9 9 g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge of wastewater to surface water(s). D2d 9 9 h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. D2e 9 9 i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. E2h 9 9 j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or around any water body. D2q, E2h 9 9 k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, wastewater treatment facilities. D1a, D2d 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 3 of 10 l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 9 9 4.Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or † NO † YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. D2c 9 9 b.Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ________________________________________________________ D2c 9 9 c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. D1a, D2c 9 9 d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater.D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. D2c, E1f, E1g, E1h 9 9 f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products over ground water or an aquifer. D2p, E2l 9 9 g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E2l, D2c 9 9 h.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 5.Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding.† NO † YES (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway.E2i 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain.E2j 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain.E2k 9 9 d.The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. D2b, D2e 9 9 e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding.D2b, E2i, E2j, E2k 9 9 f.If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, or upgrade? E1e 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 4 of 10 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 9 9 6.Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. † NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) ii.More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) iv.More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2g D2g D2g D2g D2g D2h 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. D2g 9 9 c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. D2f, D2g 9 9 d.The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, above. D2g 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. D2s 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 7.Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.)† NO † YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a.The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2o 9 9 b.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. E2o 9 9 c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2p 9 9 d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. E2p 9 9 4 4 4 Page 5 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c 9 9 f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E2n 9 9 g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m 9 9 h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ E1b 9 9 i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q 9 9 j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) † NO † YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. E2c, E3b 9 9 b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). E1a, Elb 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. E3b 9 9 d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. E1b, E3a 9 9 e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land management system. El a, E1b 9 9 f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d 9 9 g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. C2c 9 9 h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________ 9 9 4 4 Page 6 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in † NO † YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. E3h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. E3h, C2b 9 9 c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ii. Year round E3h 9 9 9 9 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E3h E2q, E1c 9 9 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. E3h 9 9 f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed project: 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile D1a, E1a, D1f, D1g 9 9 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological † NO † YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. E3e 9 9 b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. E3f 9 9 c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E3g 9 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 Page 7 of 10 d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 e. If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Yes”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i.The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property. ii.The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or integrity. iii.The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3e, E3g, E3f E3e, E3f, E3g, E1a, E1b E3e, E3f, E3g, E3h, C2, C3 9 9 9 9 9 9 11.Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a † NO † YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. D2e, E1b E2h, E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource.C2a, E1c, C2c, E2q 9 9 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area with few such resources. C2a, C2c E1c, E2q 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the community as an open space resource. C2c, E1c 9 9 e.Other impacts: _____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 9 9 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical † NO † YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d 9 9 c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 4 4 Page 8 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems.† NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network.D2j 9 9 b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or more vehicles. D2j 9 9 c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access.D2j 9 9 d.The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations.D2j 9 9 e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods.D2j 9 9 f.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy.† NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation.D2k 9 9 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a commercial or industrial use. D1f, D1q, D2k 9 9 c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity.D2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square feet of building area when completed. D1g 9 9 e.Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. † NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local regulation. D2m 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. D2m, E1d 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day.D2o 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 9 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties.D2n 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, E1a 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure † NO † YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. Relevant Part I Question(s) No,or small impact may cccur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. E1d 9 9 b.The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation.E1g, E1h 9 9 c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. E1g, E1h 9 9 d.The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). E1g, E1h 9 9 e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. E1g, E1h 9 9 f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. D2t 9 9 g.The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste management facility. D2q, E1f 9 9 h.The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste.D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of solid waste. D2r, D2s 9 9 j.The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1f, E1g E1h 9 9 k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill site to adjacent off site structures. E1f, E1g 9 9 l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the project site. D2s, E1f, D2r 9 9 m.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Please See Part 3 4 4 Page 10 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. † NO † YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). C2, C3, D1a E1a, E1b 9 9 b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. C2 9 9 c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use plans. C2, C2 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. C3, D1c, D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb 9 9 f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. C4, D2c, D2d D2j 9 9 g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or commercial development not included in the proposed action) C2a 9 9 h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. † NO † YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9 b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire) C4 9 9 c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where there is a shortage of such housing. C2, C3, D1f D1g, E1a 9 9 d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized or designated public resources. C2, E3 9 9 e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. C2, C3 9 9 f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h 9 9 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 9 9 4 4 4 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: •Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. •Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. •The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. •Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. •Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact •For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. •Attach additional sheets, as needed. Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: † Type 1 † Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: † Part 1 † Part 2 † Part 3 Agency Use Only [IfApplicable] Project : Date : FEAF 2019 4 4 4 4 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Wiedmaier Court Cell Tower November 26, 2024 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that: † A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. † B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)). † C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Name of Lead Agency: Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Title of Responsible Officer: Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: E-mail: For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html Page 2 of 2 4 Application materials dated 11-23-23, 5-29-24, 8-7-24, 10-22-24, and 10-28-24, containing narratives, reports, drawings, and studies (including Tabs A-GG), site layout drawings, SWPPP, engineering reports and drawings, consultant report dated 9-20-24, revised 10-21-24,and other materials. Verizon Wireless Wiedmaier Court Telecommunications Tower (Personal Wireless Service Facility) None - Uncoordinated review - Planning Board & Zoning Board Caitlin Cameron and David Squires Planning Board Vice Chair and Zoning Board of Appeals Chair Christine Balestra, Senior Planner 10/22/2024 Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Town of Ithaca Planning Department, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 607-273-1721 extension 121 cbalestra@townithacany.gov Town of Ithaca Planning Board & Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals (uncoordinated review) PRINT FULL FORM 1 Part 3 – Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts Verizon Telecommunications Tower State Environmental Quality Review Full Environmental Assessment Form Actions: Site Plan Approval, Special Permit, Height Variance Location: 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Decision-Making Bodies: Town of Ithaca Planning Board & Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Description: The proposal involves the construction of a 138 +/- foot tall personal wireless service facility (monopole tower) with nine antennas, two equipment cabinets, a generator, and other equipment within a 50' x 50' +/- chain link fenced area, located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22. The Planning Board is considering granting Preliminary and Final Site Plan approval and Special Permit for the project. The Zoning Board of Appeals is considering granting a height variance for the project. The proposed actions are Unlisted Actions pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617 State Environmental Quality Review and Chapter 148 of the Town of Ithaca Code (Environmental Quality Review). 1. Impact on Land a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). Briefly describe the impact on land: The project site involves a 12.3+/- acre, previously disturbed, vacant property that was created as a result of the Wiedmaier Court 5-lot residential subdivision that was approved by the Planning Board in December 2003. The parcel is bordered on the north by woods and Burns Road, on the east by private residences on Wiedmaier Court, on the south by a stream and woods, and on the west by woods. Per the FEAF, Part 1, 100% of the property contains slopes of 0-10% and moderately well-drained soils. The applicant has stated that the project will be constructed over a period of approximately two months. The proposal will result in a physical change to the project site with the construction of a 138+/- foot tall monopole telecommunications tower, equipment shelters, generator, and other associated equipment within a 50-foot by 50-foot fenced area. The proposal also involves widening an existing 8- foot wide gravel/grass access drive into a 12-foot wide, 500 +/- foot long gravel driveway that will allow access to the site from the end of Wiedmaier Court. The proposed drive will dead-end in a 15- foot wide gravel parking and turnaround area located immediately adjacent to the tower. The project will result in the physical disturbance of approximately .46+/- acres to accommodate the concrete pad containing the tower, all equipment, and expanded gravel access drive. According to the FEAF Part 1, the project site contains an average depth to water table between 18 and 24 inches. This is a previously disturbed site, with very minimal excavation and earth-moving activity associated with the project. The project is not expected to negatively impact the water table; and any impacts will be mitigated with the erosion and sedimentation control plans described in sections 3-5 below. 2 The area that surrounds the project site is characterized by rural residential development. The proposal will not change the overall character of the area. Impacts to water, air, plants, aesthetics, and other resources will be evaluated in the sections below. 3. Impact on Surface Water h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. 4. Impact on Groundwater h. Other impacts: The EAF Mapper database indicates that there is a principal aquifer near the site. 5. Impact on Flooding d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. Briefly describe the impact on surface water, groundwater, and flooding: The project site is relatively flat and involves minimal grading. There will be some earth-moving activities related to the construction of the concrete pad, tower, and gravel access drive. The application materials state that the proposal will physically disturb .46+/- acres of the 12.3+/- acre project area. The Town of Ithaca Engineering Department has indicated that the project will require a simple Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (Simple SWPPP).The submitted application drawings indicate the construction of silt fencing surrounding the areas of construction (limited to a small portion of the existing cleared area and existing driveway), to help filter stormwater runoff and control site drainage. Related to water quality, the applicant proposes temporary erosion and sedimentation control practices that will control dust and minimize soil tracking and erosion off site. There is a stream that runs along the eastern property boundary that is located approximately 125- 175 feet from the existing cleared areas of the property. There is no anticipated adverse impact on the stream, provided that the proposed erosion controls are installed and properly maintained, and that no additional disturbance occurs past any of the areas marked “approximate location of no disturbance” on the plans. According to the NYS DEC EAF Mapper Program, there is a principal aquifer located near the project site. NYS DEC classifies principal aquifers as "aquifers known to be highly productive or whose geology suggests abundant potential water supply, but which are not intensively used as sources of water supply by major municipal systems at the present time". A review of the USGS Unconsolidated Aquifers in Tompkins County Water-Resources Report (published 2000) indicates that the project site is located within the “Six Mile Creek Valley” aquifer, which encompasses most of the area between Slaterville Road and Coddington Road. The project will not involve significant development that would negatively impact the aquifer. As noted above, the proposal includes very minimal grading, with any impacts to surface water, groundwater, and flooding being mitigated via the installation of sediment and erosion controls. These controls are outlined in the Simple SWPPP that has been submitted and that will be approved by the Town Engineering Department before a building permit is issued for the project. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 3 6. Impacts on Air f. Other impacts: The proposed action will include on-site air emissions, including fuel combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations. The FEAF Part 1, page 6 indicates that the project will utilize construction equipment during construction and a backup generator during operations, both of which are sources of on-site air emissions. However, the use of construction equipment is temporary and will cease once the project is completed (approximately two months). The backup generator is proposed for emergencies and will only operate in the event of an emergency. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 7. Impacts on Plants and Animals: j. Other impacts: The project is located within a Unique Natural Area. The project site is located within the designated Six Mile Creek Valley Unique Natura Area and is zoned Conservation by the town. There are no known endangered or threatened plant or animal species located on or near the site that would be impacted by the proposed tower, concrete pad, or access road. Additionally, there will be no tree cutting associated with the proposal. The proposed tower will be constructed entirely within an existing cleared area; and the existing driveway access will only be widened by four feet to accommodate the proposed use. History of impacts on plants and animals: The project site is “Lot 5” from the Wiedmaier Subdivision, approved by the Planning Board in December 2003. In 2007, the property owner at the time performed extensive earthwork and illegal tree clearing in preparation for a housing site. The clearing was in violation of the subdivision approval and other Town Code provisions. Prior to the earthwork, the site was a mix of thick meadow/brush and evergreen and deciduous trees. Topographically, the site was a hilltop, with steep sloping sides leading to streams on both sides. To create the large level site that currently exists, the property owner removed the hilltop, and spread out the excavated material, creating a large plateau with steep unstabilized sides. The property owner was required by NYS DEC to undertake additional earthwork to soften slopes and install permanent stormwater practices to remediate the site. To correct the subdivision approval violations, the property owner was required to hire a professional landscaper to re-landscape the hillside with a native seed mix and plant approximately 250 trees. The remediation plans also identified a “no disturbance zone” on the filed subdivision plat, to inform all future owners and to insure that this portion of the land would be left in a natural state in perpetuity. There has been no further clearing since the remediation plans were established. Trees and other landscaping were monitored for a period of five years, which was a condition of Planning Board approval. Nearly all of the plantings survived or were replaced. None will be disturbed as part of the proposed project. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 4 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally ii. Year round d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Briefly describe the impact on aesthetic resources: The project site is not listed in the Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory or in the Tompkins County Scenic Resources Inventory. It is not in an area that is officially designated as a federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. The project site is located adjacent to residences and is approximately 500-feet from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road. In order to properly assess potential aesthetic and visual impacts, the applicant submitted included a visual analysis “balloon-fly” at the proposed tower height (134ft), along with before and after photo renderings and photo simulations of the tower within the landscape at various viewpoints. The simulations show the balloon inset on each page, followed by a photo showing the tower and another photo showing a camouflaged tower that is made to look like an evergreen tree. The list below includes the specific views in the visual analysis where the tower will be visible: a) P-1/S-1 – Intersection of Wiedmaier Court and NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, looking southwest [tower most visible here] b) P-3/S-3 – Looking west from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, near 1667 Slaterville Road (approx. 1550-feet from project site) c) P-4/S-4 – Intersection of Burns Road and NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, looking south d) P-5/S-5 – Looking south from Burns Way e) P-6/S-6 – Looking northeast along Burns Road The visual analysis illustrates that the project will only be visible from adjacent residents, and those traveling along NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road or Burns Road, either recreationally or as part of a daily commute. Other than the South Hill Recreation Way, which will not be impacted by the tower, there are no public parks or recreation trails nearby, so only the adjacent property owners and residents on Wiedmaier Court, Burns Road, and Slaterville Road will see the tower on a consistent basis. At 134-feet tall (plus 4’ lightning rod), the tower will be taller than surrounding trees at full leaf- out. However, in most cases, one will need to deliberately look for the tower in order to see it while commuting in a vehicle. The project will be visible in the winter when the deciduous trees that surround the site have lost their leaves. However, there should be enough coniferous trees to adequately screen the tower from most views. The applicant has proposed additional landscaping around the base of the fenced-in area, to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the ground equipment on adjacent residences. Camouflaging the tower itself to look like an evergreen tree is not recommended, as it will make the tower stand out more than necessary, which could create negative aesthetic impacts. There are no similar projects visible near the proposed project. The two nearest personal wireless service towers are located at least three miles away from the project (Cornell monopole on Dryden 5 Road in the Town of Ithaca, and a tower in the Town of Danby). These facilities can be seen from a number of public and private properties. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 14. Impact on Energy e. Other Impacts: The project will utilize electric power provided by the local utility company. The applicant indicated in the FEAF Part 1 that the project will utilize electric energy that is sourced from the local utility company (NYSEG). According to the application materials, the new tower will result in a minimal increase in electrical power usage. It is unknown if the facility will need to comply with the Town of Ithaca Energy Code. Regardless, impacts associated with energy usage would be considered small in magnitude. 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light f. Other Impacts: The project will create construction noise and will require safety lighting. The applicant indicated in the FEAF Part 1 that the project will create noise during construction. The emergency generator will also create noise impacts when in use. The closest residence will be located approximately 450-feet from the tower once constructed. Noise impacts are expected to be temporary, with the majority ceasing after construction and the generator only operating during emergencies. In terms of lighting impacts, the tower itself does not require or include lighting, pursuant to FAA standards. The project does include a 25W “flood light” that will be mounted around 8-feet high and angled down towards the equipment cabinets in a manner that will comply with the Town Outdoor Lighting Law. The light is a required safety feature and is not expected to create significant adverse impacts on neighboring residences. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 16. Impact on Human Health While there is competing science upon different frequency emissions upon human health, especially for transmitters and receivers located over 150’ in the air, the FCC has wholly occupied this field and preempted federal, state, or local review of this issue (human health effects) when the project meets the minimum guidelines promulgated by the FCC. This application has met those minimum requirements, and further inquiry into alleged or potential health impacts is thus precluded under federal law. Pursuant to Town Code §270-219.Q, the Town of Ithaca hired a consultant team to examine and evaluate the application and related documentation. The consultant team specifically reviewed the electrical RF (radio-frequency) aspects of the project, and, per Town Code, evaluated the RF information provided by the applicant for completeness, consistency, and adequacy. The consultant’s written report dated September 20, 2024, revised October 21, 2024, made the finding that the Applicant provided a Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report (Exhibit P) dated March 14, 2023, 6 and signed by David C. Cotton, P.E., that shows the proposed site will not exceed the FCC General Population limits. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 18. Consistency with Community Character f. The proposed tower will be inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. As noted above, the proposed tower will be located on a previously disturbed vacant parcel that is surrounded by rural residential development. The proposal will not change the overall character of the area but will be inconsistent with the character of the existing landscape. The tower will be set back from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, with tall trees on all sides, which will mitigate impacts of the facility on the natural landscape. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. Staff Recommendation, Determination of Significance A negative determination of environmental significance is recommended for the action as proposed, based on review of the materials submitted for the proposed action, the information above, and analysis of the magnitude and importance of the project impacts. Decision-Making Body: Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Reviewer: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Review Dates: September 24, 2024 & October 22, 2024