Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVZW Sunny View (Town of Ithaca) - 11-18-24 Supplemental Application-1NIXON Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. Lusk �- 1300 Clinton Square Partner PEABODYRochester, NY 14604-1792 Attorneys at Law nixonpeabody.com @NixonPeabodyLLP November 18, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestragtown.ithaca.n�us) T / 585.263.1140 F / 866.402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the "Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: By application dated May 29, 2024 and supplemental applications dated August 7, October 22, October 28 and November 14, 2024, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") submitted the above -referenced Application to the Town of Ithaca in connection with the above -referenced project (the "Project"). On November 15, 2024, Town Planner Balestra and Town Attorney Brock requested additional information regarding Verizon's compliance with applicable federal requirements as outlined in § 270-219(G)(2)(h) of the Town Code. In response, enclosed are the following that collectively demonstrate that the Project complies with applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA and NHPA requirements: Exhibit MM1: FAA Analysis (commonly known as the Towair Report). Note that it indicates that notice to the FAA is not required. Exhibit NN: Correspondence from GSS Inc. regarding the status of the NEPA process. ' Lettered to follow Exhibits A-LL previously submitted. 4870-6419-1226.1 Town of Ithaca November 18, 2024 Page 2 • Verizon's FCC licenses for Tompkins County were previously provided as Exhibit J to the Application. Note that a couple of the FCC licenses have expired since our initial submission, so we have enclosed copies of the updated licenses; • Proof of compliance with the federal emissions requirements (originally submitted as Exhibit P to the Application). We believe the information referenced herein and enclosed demonstrates that the Project complies with all applicable federal regulations. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. n truly Lusk JCL/mkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Developmen Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP 4570-6419-1226A EXHIBIT MM * ANALYSIS REPORT ******************* * Federal Airways & Airspace * Summary Report: New Construction * Antenna Tower BITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LOCATION : Ithaca College, NY RURAL TOWER ID: 10612 LATITUDE: 421 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. NOTICE CRITERIA FAR 77.9(a): NNR (DNE 200 ft. AGL) FAR 77.9(b): NNR (DNE Notice Slope) FAR 77.9(c): NNR (Not a Traverse Way) FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straight -In Notice Criteria FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Offset Notice Criteria FAR 77.9: NNR (DNE EMI Notice Screening Criteria) FAR 77.9(d): NNR (Off Airport Construction) NR = Notice Required NNR = Notice Not Required PNR = Possible Notice Required(depends upon actual IFR procedure) Review Air Navigation Facilities at bottom of this report. Notice to the £AA is not required The maximum height to avoid notice is 1025 ft. AMSL. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS Civil airport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Airport Surface FAR 77.19(a): DNE - Horizontal Surface FAR 77.19(b): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.19(c): DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.19(d): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.19(e): DNE - Transitional Surface Department of Defense (DOD) airport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.21(a)(1): DNE - Inner Horizontal Surface FAR 77.21(a)(2): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.21(a)(3): DNE - Outer Horizontal Surface FAR 77.21(b)(1): DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.21(b)(2): DNE - Clear Zone Surface FAR 77.21(b)(3): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.21(b)(4): DNE - Transitional Surface Heliport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.23(b): DNE - Approach Surface VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: ITH : ITHACA TOMPKINS INTL Type: A RD: 26361.41 RE: 1099.2 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Height not greater than 200 ft. AGL. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Primary Surface: DNE VFR Approach Surface: DNE VFR Transitional Surface: DNE VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: NO3 : CORTLAND COUNTY/CHASE FLD Type: A RD: 89637.36 RE: 1198.3 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Primary Surface: DNE VFR Approach Surface: DNE VFR Transitional Surface: DNE MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) FAR 77.17(a)(4) MOCA Altitude Enroute Criteria The Maximum Height Permitted is 17615 ft. AMSL TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260.3, Volume 4) FAR 77.17(a)(3) Departure Surface Criteria (40:1) DNE Departure Surface PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES FAC TYPE NAME IDNT BEARING To RANGE DELTA ARP FAA IFR FACIL IN NM ELEVATION NK72 AIR HENION PVT FLD 239.05 4.25 -341 No Impact to VFr Transitional Surface. Below surface height of 325 ft above ARP. NK05 AIR TOM N' JERRY 220.05 4.53 -531 No Impact to VFr Transitional Surface. Below surface height of 353 ft above ARP. AIR NAVIGATION ELECTRONIC FACILITIES FAC TYPE ST FREQ VECTOR DIST DELTA ST LOCATION GRD APCH IDNT AT (ft) ELEVA ANGLE BEAR ITH LOCALIZER I 108.7 350.38 31960 -118 NY RWY 32 ITHACA -.21 325 TOM ALP NDB I 24 233.13 105863 -328 NY ALPINE -.18 CFB VOR/DME R 112.2 137.68 125943 -624 NY BINGHAMTON -.28 BGM LOCALIZER I 110.3 119.43 143567 -672 NY RWY 34 GREATER -.27 340 BI BGM RADAR I 119.24 145857 -770 NY BINGHAMTON -.3 REGION UEK LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.38 146229 +5 NY RWY 06 ELMIRA/ 0.00 62 COR BGM ATCT I A/G 120.64 147189 -719 NY BINGHAMTON -.28 REGION KBGM RADAR WXL Y 162.47 121.77 147954 -772 NY BINGHAMTON -.3 AAJ LOCALIZER I 110.3 120.56 149636 -616 NY RWY 16 GREATER -.24 158 BI ITH ATCT I A/G 358.82 150079 -174 NY ITHACA TOMPKINS -.07 R ELM RADAR I 2750. 234.9 151520 -670 NY ELMIRA-CORNING -.25 RE ELM ATCT I A/G 232.72 151655 -79 NY ELMIRA/CORNING -.03 RE ELM LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.24 155681 +28 NY RWY 24 ELMIRA/ .01 242 COR ZNY CO Y A/G 193.95 178403 -592 PA SAYRE -.19 PYA NDB I 26 297.52 183772 +102 NY PENN YAN .03 ULW VOR/DME R 109.6 233.08 194031 -673 NY ELMIRA -.2 GGT TACAN I 117.8 50.55 216837 -1081 NY GEORGETOWN -.29 SECTION 2110 FAA EXTENSION, SAFETY AND SECURITY ACT - RURAL AREA ANALYSIS Warning! The object is within a rural area and not on agricultural land(View agricultural land -use image). Verification is required to determine if the studied location is adjacent to agricultural land.Please use the Rural Tower Analysis (RTA) certification tool to confirm the object is compliant with the Section 2110 FAA EXTENSION, SAFETY AND SECURITY ACT, is eligible for an exemption, or if additional actions are required. Agriculture Area Map Legend Non-agricultural land at this location CFR Title 47, §1.30000-§1.30004 AM STUDY NOT REQUIRED: Structure is not near a FCC licensed AM station. Movement Method Proof as specified in §73.151(c) is not required. Please review 'AM Station Report' for details. Nearest AM Station: WNYY @ 3064 meters. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 * OBSTRUCTION CRITERIA SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42' 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76' 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. 77.17(a)(1) A height more than 499 ft. Above Ground Level (AGL). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************* THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS: ....... 1324 ft. AMSL THE GROUND ELEVATION AT THE SITE IS: ... 825 ft. AMSL THE OVERALL CASE ELEVATION IS: ......... 959 ft. AMSL THE CASE IS BELOW THE ALLOWABLE BY: .... 365 ft. AMSL BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR ITH 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ ITH THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1099.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..4.7416 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 175.611 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS: ....... 1473 ft. AMSL 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> ITH <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 14/32 EXISTING RUNWAY 14/32 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 14/32 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 19614.33 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1099.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 17412.92 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 3111.938 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 11502.392 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................19614.33 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 17412.92 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 14 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 15/33 EXISTING RUNWAY 15/33 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 15/33 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 20740.93 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1100.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 18866.89 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 2011.689 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 13729.241 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................20740.93 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 18866.89 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 15 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR NO3 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ NO3 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1197.3 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..15.0341 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 223.952 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> NO3 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 06/24 EXISTING RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 3479.601 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1198.3 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 89360.34 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 13654.05 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 39360.34 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................3479.601 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 89360.34 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 2N4 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 2N4 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1380.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..19.5038 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 175.361 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 2N4 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 11/29 EXISTING RUNWAY 11/29 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 11/29 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 115801.1 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1377 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 23547.2 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 2479.72 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 108321.38 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................115801.1 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 23547.2 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 11 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR D82 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ D82 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1062.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..21.1302 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 133.54 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> D82 « . ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY O1L/19R EXISTING RUNWAY O1L/19R 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY O1L/19R THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 94338.38 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1088 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86385.72 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 8763.572 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36385.72 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................94338.38 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86385.72 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 01L IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 01R/19L EXISTING RUNWAY O1R/19L 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY O1R/19L THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 93851.87 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1095 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86164.84 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 8741.485 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36164.84 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................93851.87 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86164.84 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY O1R IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR BGM 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ BGM THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1635.6 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..24.2730 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 300.466 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> BGM <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 83321.72 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1591.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 120106.8 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 18266.02 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 70106.8 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................83321.72 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 120106.8 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 16/34 EXISTING RUNWAY 16/34 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 16/34 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 69374.81 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1636 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 125413.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 19312.01 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 75413.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................69374.81 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 125413.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 16 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 PROPOSED RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 83328.66 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1591.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 119549.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 18182.45 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 69549.6 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................83328.66 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 119549.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 16/34 PROPOSED RUNWAY 16/34 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 16/34 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 69413.26 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1636 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 125489.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 19073.41 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 75489.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................69413.26 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 125489.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 16 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR ELM 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ ELM THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 955.1 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..24.8114 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 52.224 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> ELM <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 05/23 EXISTING RUNWAY 05/23 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 05/23 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 4849.441 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................944.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 148077.9 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 14932.79 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 98077.9 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................4849.441 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 148077.9 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 05 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 06/24 EXISTING RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 5072.341 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................954.3 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 146779.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22516.92 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 96779.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................5072.341 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 146779.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************ DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 91590.84 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................944.5 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 118257.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 17988.66 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 68257.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................91590.84 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 118257.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as anon -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 06/24 PROPOSED RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 5065.283 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................955 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 146779.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22266.96 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 96779.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................5065.283 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 146779.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 PROPOSED RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 91590.74 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................945 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 118257.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 17988.66 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 68257.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................91590.74 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 118257.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 23/05 PROPOSED RUNWAY 23/05 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 23/05 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 4849.499 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................945 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 148077.9 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22461.69 ft. ************ *DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 98077.9 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................4849.499 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 148077.9 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 23 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR CZG ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ CZG THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 832.7 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..25.4974 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 321.89 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> CZG <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 03/21 EXISTING RUNWAY 03/21 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 03/21 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 136548.3 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................826.5 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 70532.57 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10829.89 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 20532.57 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................136548.3 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 70532.57 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY'03 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 03/21 PROPOSED RUNWAY 03/21 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 03/21 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 136550 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................826.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 70370.36 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10805.55 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 20370.36 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS .........................136550 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 70370.36 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 03 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR PEO ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ PEO THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 988.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..29.9292 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 116.961 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> PEO <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 01/19 EXISTING RUNWAY O1/19 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 01/19 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 157920 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................990 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86781.43 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 13267.21 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36781.43 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS .........................157920 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86781.43 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY O1 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet (34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsG Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 87464.44 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................903.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 158214 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 23982.09 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 108214 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................87464.44 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 158214 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 6B9 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 6B9 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1039.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..30.0728 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 180.807 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 6B9 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 04/22 EXISTING RUNWAY 04/22 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 04/22 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 75422.89 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1000 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 164795.1 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 16604.51 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 114795.1 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................75422.89 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 164795.1 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 04 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 182018.9 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................994 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 12159.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 1340.96 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 175677.94 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................182018.9 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 12159.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 4N7 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 4N7 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 935.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..30.2109 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 282.651 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 4N7 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 07/25 EXISTING RUNWAY 07/25 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 07/25 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 143095.6 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................904 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 115063.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 11631.37 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 65063.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................143095.6 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 115063.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 07 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE ********************************************* BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR OG7 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ OG7 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 491.8 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..31.8223 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 152.717 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> OG7 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 01/19 EXISTING RUNWAY 01/19 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 01/19 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 75535.83 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................490.7 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 175765.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 26614.85 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 125765.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................75535.83 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 175765.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 01 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 11/29 EXISTING RUNWAY 11/29 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 11/29 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 161199.4 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................465.7 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 105079.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10632.96 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 55079.6 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................161199.4 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 105079.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 11 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 7N1 ********************************************* 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 7N1 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 962.4 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..32.9835 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 64.757 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 7N1 <<. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA ************************* * BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS ************************* RUNWAY 13/31 EXISTING RUNWAY 13/31 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 13/31 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 159911.4 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................956.9 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 120212.5 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 12146.25 ft. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 70212.5 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................159911.4 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 120212.5 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 13 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. ************* DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE Airspace@) State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 6:12:11 * VFR - TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE ANALYSIS SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. Traffic Pattern Airspace, a structure that exceed any of the following maximum allowable heights is considered to constitute a hazard to air navigation : 1. The height of the transition surface (other than abeam the runway), the approach slope, the horizontal surface, and the conical surface(as applied to visual approach runways). 2. Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and in the climb/descent area - 350' above airport elevation or the height of part 77.17(a)(2), whichever is greater not to exceed 499' above ground level (AGL). The climb / descent area begins abeam the runway threshold being used and is the area where the pilot is either descending to land on the runway or climbing to pattern altitude after departure. 3. Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and NOT in the climb/descent area of any runway. —Above Airport Elevation not to exceed 499' AGL. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ ITH FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Maximum height is 1473.16 feet AMSL. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. The structure is within VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace. Structures that exceed horizontal, conical, and / or traffic pattern will receive a hazard determination from the FAA. Existing Runway 14/32 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 15/33 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ NO3 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ 2N4 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 11/29 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ D82 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR —Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01L/19R Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 01R/19L Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ BGM FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Proposed Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 16/34 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Runway 16/34 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ ELM FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 05/23 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 23/05 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ CZG FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 03/21 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 03/21 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ PEO FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01/19 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ 6B9 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 04/22 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ 4N7 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 07/25 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ OG7 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01/19 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 11/29 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. ************************Landing Facility Identifier************************ 7N1 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 13/31 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. *************************************************************************** * * The above analysis was conducted using default parameters - Category C * aircraft and a maximum of 4 like category aircraft in the VFR -Traffic * Pattern at one time. * * * To view a graphical image of VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace for these * airports use Terps@ Professional Software. Open the airport and Airspace@ * study. From the Map Menu select 'VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace'. The * proposed structure, airport, and the traffic pattern will now be shown * together. Use this information to locate an alternate site if necessary. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & AirspaceG Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 * AIRWAY ANALYSIS * FAR 77.17(a)(4) (EN ROUTE CRITERIA) * MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) * MINIMUM ENROUTE ALTITUDE (MEA) SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.56911 SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH (NM) 982 60 42-28-00.76N 076-46-23.61W 18000 21.03 Q82 70 42-30-59.71N 076-18-15.43W 18000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 18000 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway Q82.The Abeam distance from the course centerline is 5.20 NM. The proposedstructure is within the width of the secondary area of this airway. The width of the primary area is 8 NM and the width of the secondary is 2 NM. The maximum allowable height permitted by the secondary area MOCA of this airway at this location is 17615 feet AMSL. Airspace® State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE® and TERPSO are registered O trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace0 Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 * IFR RUNWAY DEPARTURE SURFACE ANALYSIS SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. An airport with at least one instrument approach procedure (IAP) will require all airport runways to be analyzed using 40: 1 criteria for Departure. FAA application of the 40: 1 screening criteria extendes 22.09 nautical miles and 1801 semi - circle area around the Runway centerline extended. Penetration of the 40: 1 surface will result initially in a determination of presumed hazard (NPH). An extended study is normally required to remove the NPH. A specified climb gradient (CG) greater than the standard (200 ft / nm) is sometimes necessary to allow acceptable obstacle clearance. Should the proposed location exceed the maximum height you may need to determine if there is a published climb gradient and conduct additional calculations to determine if the climb gradient will provide proper clearance for the proposed structure. Should you require additional assistance please contact Federal Airways & Airspace or another aeronautical consult to perform these calculations. Ident Dep Rwy Elev Distance 40:1 Max Hgt CG Rwy Status ITH 14 1099.2 26361 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy ITH 15 1100.1 28174 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy NO3 24 1198.3 89637 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy 2N4 11 1377 118219 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy D82 19R 1088 127788 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy D82 19L 1095 127282 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy BGM 28 1591.1 145972 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy BGM 34 1636 143828 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy BGM 28 1591.1 145520 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy BGM 34 1636 143913 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM O5 944.2 148382 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 06 954.3 147093 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 10 944.5 149369 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 06 955 147093 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM 10 945 149369 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM 05 945 148382 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy CZG 03 826.5 154044 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy CZG 03 826.2 153971 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy PEO 19 990 179749 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy PEO 10 903.2 181494 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 6B9 22 1000 181420 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 6B9 10 994 182435 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 4N7 25 904 183047 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy OG7 19 490.7 191221 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy OG7 11 465.7 192871 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 7N1 13 956.9 199424 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 * NAVAIDS IN PROXIMITY OF CASE ******************************** FAC IDNT TYPE ST AT SITE ID: 2126343 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . FREQ VECTOR DIST (ft) TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LONGITUDE: 76° . . 825 ft. . . 134 ft. . . 959 ft. DELTA ST ELEVA 27' 1.569" LOCATION GRD ANGLE APCH BEAR ITH GLIDE I 330.5 359.27 27270 -133 NY RWY 32 ITH -.28 325 SLOPE ITH UN I 122.95 355.55 28802 -140 NY ITHACA -.28 TOMPKINS I ITH DM R 111. 355.23 30146 -153 NY ITHACA -.29 ITH LOCALIZER I 108.7 350.38 31960 -118 NY RWY 32 -.21 325 ITHACA TOM NO3 UN I 122.80 43.99 91338 -238 NY CORTLAND -.15 CNTY/CHA NK09 UN I 122.70 268.42 99978 -521 NY EAGLE RIDGE -.3 ALP NDB I 24 233.13 105863 -328 NY ALPINE -.18 CFB VOR/DME R 112.2 137.68 125943 -624 NY BINGHAMTON -.28 D82 UN I 122.80 313.55 128392 -103 NY OVID -.05 NK49 UN I 123.05 151.29 128796 +52 NY OWEGO .02 9NY3 UN I 123.05 152.06 130149 +75 NY SUSQUEHANNA .03 42NY UN I 122.80 48.54 141510 -601 NY WALTERS FLD -.24 BGM LOCALIZER I 110.3 119.43 143567 -672 NY RWY 34 -.27 340 GREATER BI AAJ GLIDE I 335.0 119.71 145439 -663 NY RWY 16 BGM -.26 158 SLOPE BGM RADAR I 119.24 145857 -770 NY BINGHAMTON -.3 REGION UEK LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.38 146229 +5 NY RWY 06 0.00 62 ELMIRA/COR BGM ATCT I A/G 120.64 147189 -719 NY BINGHAMTON -.28 REGION BGM UN I 122.95 120.45 147491 -676 NY GREATER -.26 BINGHAMTO KBGM RADAR WXL Y 162.47 121.77 147954 -772 NY BINGHAMTON -.3 ELM GLIDE I 331.4 232.45 147991 +13 NY RWY 24 ELM .01 242 SLOPE AAJ LOCALIZER I 110.3 120.56 149636 -616 NY RWY 16 -.24 158 GREATER BI BGM GLIDE I 335.0 120.56 149751 -614 NY RWY 34 BGM -.23 340 SLOPE ITH ATCT I A/G 358.82 150079 -174 NY ITHACA -.07 TOMPKINS R ELM UN I 122..95 232.21 150806 +4 NY ELMIRA/ 0.00 CORNING RG ELM RADAR I 2750. 234.9 151520 -670 NY ELMIRA- -.25 CORNING RE ELM ATCT I A/G 232.72 151655 -79 NY ELMIRA/ -.03 CORNING RE UEK GLIDE I 331.4 232.38 153058 +23 NY RWY 06 ELM .01 62 SLOPE CZG UN I 122.80 141.89 154962 +126 NY TRI-CITIES .05 ELM LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.24 155681 +28 NY RWY 24 .01 242 ELMIRA/COR 06NY UN I 122.80 .51 156796 -141 NY MURPHY FLD -.05 PS81 UN I 123.05 186.84 158987 +179 PA ROBERT .06 PACKER HOS FAC TYPE ST FREQ VECTOR DIST DELTA ST LOCATION GRD APCH IDNT AT (ft) ELEVA ANGLE BEAR NK89 UN I 122.80 254.79 170040 -241 NY ULTRALIGHT -.08 FLIGHT ZNY CO Y A/G 193.95 178403 -592 PA SAYRE -.19 PEO UN I 123.00 296.94 181850 -29 NY PENN YAN -.01 6B9 UN I 122.80 .81 182746 -80 NY SKANEATELES -.03 AERO 4N7 UN I 122.80 102.64 183589 +24 NY GREENE .01 PYA NDB I 26 297.52 183772 +102 NY PENN YAN .03 OG7 VG I A/G 332.46 192315 +472 NY RWY19 TCH40 .14 GS300 OG7 UN I 122.80 332.71 193345 +467 NY FINGER LAKES .14 RGNL ULW VOR/DME R 109.6 233.08 194031 -673 NY ELMIRA -.2 OG7 VG I A/G 332.83 194776 +477 NY RWY01 TCH40 .14 GS300 7N1 UN I 122.80 244.77 200405 -3 NY CORNING- 0.00 PAINTED P GGT TACAN I 117.8 50.55 216837 -1081 NY GEORGETOWN -.29 NK71 UN I 122.80 6.83 219514 +109 NY MARCELLUS .03 THE NEAREST AIR NAVIGATION FACILITY TO CASE COORDINATES IS: ITH (GLIDE SLOPE) Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPSO are registered O trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 175 355 * AM RADIO STATIONS * Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Pattern * CFR Title 47, Part 1, Subpart BB SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83 CITY ST SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees LATITUDE LONGITUDE WNYY 1470 5,000 D T 3064 220.73 42-23-30 076-28-29 ITHACA NY This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 72'. The studied structure is not within 2039 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 2039 meters. WHCU 870 5,000 D T 8646 47.62 42-27-54 076-22-22 ITHACA NY This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 431. The studied structure is not within 3000 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 3446 meters. WHCU 870 1,000 D A 13928 246.69 42-21-47 076-36-21 ITHACA NY The authorized directional antenna pattern is augmented. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 431. The studied structure is not within 3000 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 3446 meters. DEFINITIONS: SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION: A significant modification of a tower in the immediate vicinity of an AM station is defined in CFR Title 47, Part 1.30002, as follows; (1) any change that would alter the tower's physical height by 5 electrical degrees or more at the AM frequency; or (2) in addition or replacement of one or more antennas or trnasmission lines on a tower that has been detuned or base -insulated. The addition or modification of an antenna or antenna -supporting structure on a building shall be considered a construction modification subject to the analysis and notice requirements of this subpart if and only if the height of the antenna supporting structure alone exceeds the thresholds in paragraphs(a) and(b) of this section. CALL SIGN: The Call Sign of the station or application. For applications and construction permits which do not have Call Signs a value of 'NEW' is used. FREQUENCY: in Kilohertz POWER: The nominal power of the station, as defined in Section CFR 73.14. This is not necessarily the effective radiated power, the transmitter power, the antenna input power, etc. ANT MOD: Antenna Mode, The mode of the complete antenna system. Indicates directional or non -directional. (D = Directional and N = Non -Directional) If a station is directional at one time during a day and non -directional at another time it is considered to be directional for the purpose of Movement Method Proof. If the same station has multiple locations these are listed as separate AM stations with the same Call Sign. PT: The type of antenna pattern which has been notified to (or by) foreign countries. DIST Meters: This is the calculated distance (in meters) between your proposed site and the latitude/longitude coordinates specified by the FCC data. Bearing Degrees: This is the true bearing from your proposed site to the station. LATITUDE: This is the latitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. LONGITUDE: This is the longitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. ST: This is the state where the AM Station is located. The material in this report on AM radio stations was obtained from the FCC who provided the data on an 'as -is' basis. Therefore, Federal Airways & Airspace@ disclaims all warranties with regard to the contents of these files, including their fitness for your use. In no event shall Federal Airways & Airspace@ be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever resulting from loss or use, data or profits, whether in connection with the use or performance of the contents of these files, action of contract, negligence, or other action arising out of, or in connection with the use of the contents of these files. Data conversion of the FCC data from NAD27 to NAD83 was accomplished using the USGS NADCON210 software program. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 *PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES IN PROXIMITY OF CASE* SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.23711 LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. FACIL TYP NAME BEARING RANGE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT To FACIL IN NM ELEVATION P77 NK72 AIR HENION PVT FLD 239.05 4.25 -341 NO NK05 AIR TOM N' JERRY 220.05 4.53 -531 NO NY55 AIR GRUND FLD 287.8 6.83 -494 NO NY18 AIR NENO 286.38 7.7 -324 NO 2NY9 AIR KAYUTAH LAKE/ 258 12.36 -426 NO JAMES &amp; HELENE D NY92 AIR COCHRAN 84.37 16.15 -321 NO NK09 AIR EAGLE RIDGE 268.42 16.45 -521 NO NK54 AIR MATEJKA FLD 210.9 16.49 -731 NO 6NY3 AIR AIRY -ACRES 318.26 18.51 +154 NO NK53 AIR DODGE/COPPOLA/ 228.83 18.89 -71 NO WHEELER NK24 AIR TILDEN 258.24 19.45 +59 NO NY29 AIR SCHUYLER 276.74 20.62 +89 NO NK35 AIR MARIWILL .82 20.65 -171 NO NK49 HEL OWEGO 151.28 21.2 +52 NO 9NY3 HEL SUSQUEHANNA 152.06 21.42 +75 NO NK74 AIR MATCH MATE 334.69 22.04 +119 NO 17NK AIR RE -DUN FLD 277.01 22.39 -392 NO 42NY AIR WALTERS FLD 48.55 23.29 -601 NO 38NY AIR GREENLAWN FARM 290.09 23.97 -51 NO 3NK9 HEL ARNOT OGDEN 221.7 25.11 +50 NO HOSPITAL 06NY AIR MURPHY FLD .52 25.81 -141 NO PS81 HEL ROBERT PACKER 186.83 26.16 +179 YES HOSPITAL 4NY8 AIR HARRIS HILL 228.78 26.63 -750 NO 94NY AIR ST BERNARD FLD 336.75 26.94 +419 NO PA33 AIR LARS/PRIVATE 182.98 27.78 -341 NO NK89 AIR ULTRALIGHT FLIGHT 254.79 27.98 -241 NO FARM 29NK HEL UHS WILSON TOWER 129.3 28.27 -26 NO 9NY1 HEL WILSON MEML RGNL 129.34 28.3 -20 NO MEDICAL CENTE 8NY4 HEL GUTHRIE CORNING 234.1 28.53 +58 NO HOSPITAL 1NK8 AIR CHENANGO BRIDGE 116.23 30.18 +19 NO 25NK AIR LOUCKS 272.91 30.33 -466 NO 4NK4 AIR WOODFORD AIRFIELD 36.96 31.19 -321 NO ONY6 HEL NEW YORK STATE 346.77 31.83 +359 NO POLICE 3NY5 AIR LUKE 136.85 32.06 -599 NO NY12 HEL AUBURN COMMUNITY 351.01 32.1 +229 NO HOSPITAL PN10 AIR CASH CREEK 184.6 32.94 -291 NO 6NY1 AIR OLD PORT ROYAL 237.51 33.67 -741 NO 9PN7 AIR VEIT 177.3 35.69 -401 NO NK71 AIR MARCELLUS 6.84 36.13 +109 NO FAA PROTECTED IFR PROCEDURE IFR Procedure FACIL TYP NAME BEARING RANGE DELTA ARP FAR FAA PROTECTED IDENT To FACIL IN NM ELEVATION P77 IFR PROCEDURE PN54 AIR AKM AIRFIELD 200.96 36.69 -434 NO 59PA AIR J P REILLY 146.19 36.86 -691 NO 5PN2 HEL ROBERT PACKER 179.91 37.65 +159 NO HOSPITAL - TOWAN NK12 AIR CANAAN FLD 229.33 37.72 -641 NO NY19 AIR WALLS 359.24 37.87 +349 NO 2NY7 AIR TOWNER FARM 242.49 38.13 -289 NO NY73 AIR MILLER FLD 98.79 38.29 -621 NO 7PA6 AIR CARRAR FARM 138.32 38.55 -588 NO NK76 AIR GRAMMAR 316.85 38.77 +204 NO 46NY AIR SAVANNAH 339.42 38.88 +494 NO THE NEAREST PRIVATE USE LANDING FACILITY IS: HENION PVT FLD HENION PVT FLD is an Airport type landing facility. landing facilities with IFR procedures are protected under FAR 77.17 (a) (3). Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 EXHIBIT NN ass INC. November 18, 2024 GSS Project #D24246-19-NY Ms. Katherine Jaeckel Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street Rochester, NY 14586 Submitted via email: katie.jaeckel@verizonwireless.com 1054 Texan Trail, Ste 300 Grapevine, TX 76051 Tel:682.651.0034 Fax:817.527.4081 ustxApassmidwest.com www.gssmidwest.com RE: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) STATUS — VERIZON SITE: SUNNY VIEW, FUZE PID# 2126343 111 WIEDERMAIER CT, ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY 14850 At the request of Verizon Wireless, GROUNDWATER SERVICE & SUPPLY INC (GSS) has prepared this NEPA Status Letter (Letter) for the below -referenced proposed wireless communications facility. This letter outlines the current stage of the environmental review process set forth in Title 47 CFD Part 1, Subpart I, rule sections 1.1301 to 1.1319. PROJECT INFORMATION Verizon Site Name: Sunny View Verizon Project ID: 2126343 Site Address: 111 Wiedmaier Court (0.17 miles SW of Slaterville Rd. and Wiedmaier Ct.), Ithaca, Tompkins County, NY 14850 Project Type: Raw Land Tower Type/Height: Monopole / 134' (Overall 138') Latitude/Longitude: 42°24'45.2376" N / 76°27'1.5696" W e-106 Number: 0011318208 TCNS Number: 285451 NEPA Process Summary Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) and Notification of Organization (NOO) The FCC TCNS process for tribal consultation was initiated on September 17, 2024. A Notification of Organization (NOO) was issued to tribal entities (Tribes) on September 20, 2024. Public Notice A public notice was issued on September 20, 2024, to inform the public of the proposed project and to invite comments regarding potential environmental and cultural impacts. The notice was published in Ithaca Journal, and the public comment period ended on October 20, 2024. No comments or concerns have been received. Notice of Initiation of the Section 106 Process Letter Notice of Initiation of the Section 106 Process Letters were sent to Landmarks Preservation Commission, City of Ithaca and History Center in Tompkins County on September 17, 2024, to inform the related parties the proposed project and to invite comments regarding potential environmental and cultural impacts. The comment period ended on October 17, 2024. No comments or concerns have been received. Section 106 Submission to New York State Historic Preservation Offices (NY SHPO) and Tribes Section 106 submission was made to the NY SHPO and Tribes on November 7, 2024. We are currently awaiting a response from NY SHPO and Tribes. NY SHPO has 30 days to review the submission, with the review period concluding on December 7, 2024. Any Tribes that have not responded by December 9, 2024, and December 17, 2024, will be referred to 1054 Texan Trail, Ste 300 Grapevine, TX 76051 Tel:682.651.0034 Fax:817.527.4081 5755 jzsstx(a passmidwest.com www.gssmidwest.com INC. the FCC to initiate the process to close out consultation. The anticipated tribal clearance date is January 4, 2025. However, this date is subject to change if significant events occur, such as requests for additional consultation, new findings, or unforeseen delays in the review process. GSS anticipates submitting the final NEPA report to Verizon Wireless on January 6, 2025. LIMITATIONS This Letter was completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you. There are no intended or unintended third -party beneficiaries, unless specifically named. GSS is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in this Letter or on the closing of any business transaction. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to Verizon Wireless. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stephen J. Blazenko, CEO GSS, Inc.