HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-21 PC Packet TOWN OF ITHACA
„ _; NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
215 N. Tioga St 14850
607.273.1747
www.townithacany.gov
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2024 at 3:00 P.M.
Meeting Location: Ithaca Town Hall, 215 N. Tioga Street, Aurora Conference Room
(Enter from the rear entrance of Town Hall, adjacent employee parking lot.)
Members of the public may also join the meeting virtually via Zoom at
hllps://us06web.zoom.us/j/6750593272.
AGENDA
1. Persons to be heard.
2. Committee announcements and concerns.
3. Consider approval of September meeting minutes.
4. Amabel Cottage Court concept(revised)proposal presentation.
5. Green New Deal Action Plan 2025-26 review.
6. Review of Conservation Board Memorandum (10/29/2024)relative to Moratorium on the
installation of plastic carpet
7. Discussion of potential amendments to Short-term rental uses in Town Code Chapter 270-
219.7 (Zoning).
8. Staff updates and reports.
9. Discuss next meeting date and upcoming agenda items.
A quorum of the Ithaca Town Board may be present, however,
no official Board business will be conducted.
Town of Ithaca Planning Committee
Monday September 16,2024
(3:00 PM Aurora Conference Room and on Zoom)
Draft Minutes
Committee members present: Rich DePaolo, Chair; Rod Howe, Margaret Johnson
Board/Staff members: Director of Planning C.J. Randall; Director of Codes Marty Moseley; Town
Planner Nick Quilty-Koval; Senior Town Planner Chris Balestra; Director of Engineering Dave O'Shea.
Guests. Maplewood II project team on Zoom and in person including Jacob von Mechow, Scott
Whitham, Whitham Planning Design Landscape Architecture; Henry Weinberg & Dan Gellarmini, CBT
Architects, Drew Beckham; Cornell University, David Herrick, TG Miller.
Conifer-West Hill TND Team including Scott Whitham, Mary Martin & Mugdha Mallareddy, Whitham
Planning Design Landscape Architecture; Kevin Day, Conifer; Bear Smith, Holt Architects; David
Herrick, TG Miller.
1. Persons to be heard: None.
2. Committee announcements and con " , None
3.Approval of August meeting minutes Rod moved; Margaret seconded. The August 15, 2024,
minutes were approved as presented. 3 Ayes.
4. Continue review of Maplewood II development Planned Development Zone (PDZ) rezoning
proposal. A revised redlined rendition of the PDZ language showing the changes based on the last
meeting feedback was discussed. Scott Whittam introduced the design team and Jacob gave a brief
overview of the changes which were clarification in language, specifically related to building height and
other items. Rich noted additions such as community gardens and dog park to the allowed uses in the
Open Space areas after the site visit and discussions. The definition and purpose of Neighborhood local
street was further clarified per planning request and the previously presented travel area width from the
center line was 13ft to accommodate emergency access vehicles . Maintenance of the Multi use trail
was said to be available to be used year-round by the onsite property manager although was not written
in the section specifically. The parts in the Town ROW would remain the Towns responsibility.
In the Performance Standards section 271-18.5 A (2-a) , Marty suggested removing "as defined by
Building Code of NYS" for clarity, due to the average grade plane definition already being defined
previously. One additional change item noted by Marty that the dog park definition and intent must
match, adding "and play"into the into the intent bullet"A dog park intended for exercise of dogs"
would achieve the goal.
The height of the buildings was the last site component discussed. Additional renderings showing the
proposed buildings with the existing Maplewood development buildings shown were shared on screen
along with slides of each building and how the maximum height will be calculated with average grade
planes lines shown. Rich expressed his concern with the tallness of the tallest building on Maple Ave
being intrusive and cavernous and could open up the possibility for a similar building on the vacant land
1
across the street. The one-story difference, minimal setback with the slope and grade increased the
concern from Rich, however Rod and Margaret did not express height concerns with the proposed
buildings in the area proposed, her setback concern was reduced after the onsite visit and the sidewalk
width seemed appropriate with the fast street traffic that happens. CJ did not express concerns with the
height relative to the adjacent property and surrounding area and design of the proposed project. She
noted the Planning Department has had meaningful discussions on aesthetics, material and massing,
neighborhood pattern along with design elements and a building similar to proposed building A in the
future on the opposite side of the street would not be bad from the density and overall planning
standpoint of the project. Chris added that she has prepared draft language as part of the Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) that has some potential architectural amendments in hopes to give the
perception of a shorter building height as well as a few other amendments on visual impacts of the
buildings that the public will see on from the road. The visual impact of the interior of the project are not
considered in the EAF. The Planning board has members with architectural backgrounds that may help
add to the proposed design element changes.
It was proposed that further discussion and changes could be deferred until further review by the
Planning Board or input could be sought from the Board on the PDZ language specifically for additional
feedback. Staff noted they will begin the environmental review process on 9/17/24 assuming they
declare Lead Agency status at the beginning, which is anticipated. The committee agreed to await any
feedback or changes as the Planning Board moves through the Environmental Review process,
specifically referring the PDZ language as it is drafted currently, and pick back up with the PDZ again
on the committee level at the next meeting prior to final recommendation to the Town Board.
5.West Hill (Conifer) Traditional Neighborhood Development staff impressions and Public
Outreach Meeting Summary for the West Hill TND Design Charrette #1. Mary shared a summary
of the main concerns from their Design Team gathered from the charrette along with a detailed report.
Town Staff also shared a document containing comments on the strengths and weakness of the first
charrette approach and recommendations for future charrette(s). A list of the specific concerns heard
from charrette attendees was attached to the staff memo as well. C.J. went over this document in detail
after the summary from the design team.
Summary as presented by the design team: -
Main concerns were related to environmental preservation of the wooded area and existing natural
elements, existing stormwater issues and street access.
Updates are that the second Charrette is delayed. A meeting was held with the City's Project
Coordination Committee (PCC) on 9/10/24. More time is needed based on the staff and charrette
attendee feedback in between the two charrettes for additional research to be done on traffic and street
access options and within that time, transportation stakeholder meetings will take place along with
meetings on infrastructure and financing. An open house/office hours' idea has been proposed for
specific questions prior to the next Charrette as well. Two site design concepts will be shown at the
second Charrette.
A general timeframe to move forward was proposed for the additional team meetings over the months of
September and October with the second Charrette (format to be determined-two day, office hours, etc)
possibly in November and a late concept review to wrap up the year in December 2024.
2
Committee feedback was to show examples of existing mixed-use neighborhoods to help the potential
residents envision not leaving their neighborhood for services,reach out to Linderman Creek for
community feedback, explore the alternate street access options. Staff feedback was detailed in the
memo and discussed as well, housing market research, transportation and stakeholder meetings,
infrastructure ITCTC, Town/City Engineering, Town DPW,NYS DOT meetings prior to presenting
again to the public in the Charrette form.
Kevin noted future Attorney review of documents needed related to a Town owned 60ft. wide
easement/ROW (noted on maps as Riley Drive) as depicted on Official Town Map to be taken into
consideration.
6. Staff updates and reports.
C.J. updated on the following:
A question was raised whether the committee would like to explore adding exemptions to the existing
Town Code relative to Short-term rental uses?A brief discussion was possibly exemptions would be
appropriate in pre-existing homes, in Conservation Zones on large lots with adequate setbacks. The
committee was not opposed to this being explored further by staff researching issues that have come
before the Zoning Board, meet with Codes Staff and map parcel sizes for representations were some
recommendations. Not every circumstance was envisioned when this law was written, and it was also
noted that the language won't be reinvented for every unique circumstance that comes up.
A list/spreadsheet or queue with potential re-zoning requests listed will be developed for the Planning
Committee to update on potential projects,preference and also related to the town's overall goals. Pre
PEZ list for list to be kept current as these projects come in and out.
The large number of public comments related to the Conifer Charrette were shared with the committee
and noted. C.J. stated she is meeting the City Planning Director to determine whether a joint town/city
follow-up statement should be released. A link to the project website is shared on the town website for
further public information as well.
Safe Streets For All project upd es were on the CLEAR findings map was shared with the
committee. Complete Streets Policy, Vison Zero, Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and a possibly
needing a new Board resolution were items mentioned. Margaret asked for further information on the
upcoming multi jurisdictional meetings and C.J. will share the schedule.
No movement on T-GEN/PSC.
7.Next meeting date and upcoming agenda items: Thursday October 17, 2024, 3:00 p.m. Margaret
will confirm if she can attend.
The Town of Ithaca Planning Committee meeting concluded at 4:24 p.m.
3
Susan Ritter
From: Susan Ritter
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 4:48 PM
To: Susan Cosentini
Subject: 615 Five Mile Drive - appropriation of land by NYS
Attachments: 2015 Ithaca Dispatch.pdf; Liber 470 Book 524.pdf, Book 553 Book 519.pdf
Sue,
I am responding to your inquiry regarding the developability of 615 Five Mile Drive. As you know, I contacted the
Tompkins County Assessment Department to understand why there was a discrepancy between the survey you provided
showing a 2-acre lot and the 0.44 acre lot that the Assessment Department indicates in their database. After some
research,Assessment has indicated that while the survey you provided is correct(the lot is 2.0 acres in size), they are
only assessing the 0.44 acre of the lot due to the limitations on its development potential given the significant easement
on the property.
I've clipped the pertinent language from the easement and pasted it below, as well as attached the referenced
appropriation documents identified in the Ithaca Dispatch deed. The easement states that NYS has the rights to "clear
and grub trees, shrubs, brush, debris and structures." And to "Place, keep, and operate machines, tools and
equipment" at all times, within their easement area. This makes the easement area significantly problematic for
development purposes. In addition, this easement is with New York State. The Letter of No Objection that you provided
to me is not with NYS, but with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and it does not release any rights granted to NYS for the
easement.
I can't see the Town approving a residential development on 615 Five Mile Drive that would necessitate utilizing the
easement area for a building or even dedicated/required parking.
Regards,
Sue
A permanent easement for the rights to construct, reconstruct, m,aintaill and operas
Levees or dikes, (2) stork Area, (3) Landscaping, (4) Facilities of public and Private C
the relocation thereon and, (5) Appurtenances to all structures; and including the xigl:
therefrom any or all materials excavated, Gist, razed or torn, down from the area descril
any material, thereon, (2) Protect the Vank of improved creek and/or walls adjacent thex
deemed necessary by the owner of this easerr.ent, (3) Grade, (4) Clear and grub trees., 5k.
and structures, (5) Place, keep and operate machines, tools and equipment; with the xig
ingress, egress or regress by The People of the State of New YDrk, their successors an
agents irk the imm..provenent for Purposes connected with the Ithaca Fltod Protection Proje
the bounds of all that piece or parcel of property hereinafter designated as Parcel No.
Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins and State of hew York, as .shown on the accompanying
follows:
Susan Ritter, Director of Planning
215 N. Tioga Street
Ithaca, NY14850
(607)273-1747 x120
1
Town of Ithaca Planning Dept.
November 6, 2024
Amabel Cottage Court
615 Five Mile Dr.
Preliminary description/proposal for zoning change request
Background: This narrative assumes some basic knowledge of the site, i.e. that
the parcel has a large permanent DEC easement related to the flood control
system, stream set back constraints, and is not on the existing or proposed FEMA
flood zone maps.
Dear Planning Cmte,
Although the address is Five Mile Dr., this property is off of Inlet Rd. It is
immediately adjacent to the Amabel Pocket Neighborhood and the future Black
Diamond Trail as it conveys southward to Negundo woods and Buttermilk Falls
State Park.
Currently the site consists of an amalgamation of steel buildings that are used for a
taxi service office, fleet storage and maintenance, a shop and office for both a
remodeling company, and a plumbing company. The outdoor easement area is used
for storage of vehicles, boats, trailers, portapotty, large garbage bins, and sundry
other objects and detritus.
I am the developer, builder and also resident of Amabel Pocket Neighborhood. I
would love to be able to turn this unique Inlet Valley property into a small cottage
court residential community consisting of 12 one-bedroom cottages, and required
parking spaces. All twelve cottages are situated in a pocket neighborhood type
arrangement on the section of the parcel unencumbered by easements or stream
set back. The cottages all face a center courtyard, and each cottage has its own
small yard/garden area. This arrangement, like Amabel Pocket Neighborhood
employs many of the ideas of Architect Ross Chapin, and has benefitted greatly
from the help of John Anderson of Incremental Development. Seventeen parking
spaces, and one electrical pedestal are over the easement line tightly laminated to
the neighborhood.
The concept would convert the large eased area currently occupied by the items
mentioned above into an open park-like space. The large steel buildings would
become small attractive one-bedroom homes with their "backs" to the open space.
Residents would still be able to enjoy the beauty of the site, yet they would not look
out on the Black Diamond trail. Both the created open space and the cottage court
comport well with the Town's vision for this area.
Indeed, this use of the site is far more compatible with the Town's vision for Inlet
Valley than the current use.
As evidenced by the relative use of the road by the 12 occupied homes on Inlet
Rd, and the taxi service, vehicle use of Inlet Rd. and its connection to 13A will
diminish considerably.
TG Miller Engineers have established that the Amabel Sanitary system can easily
accommodate much more than 12 one-bedroom units.
In a previous iteration of Amabel Cottage Court, a large multi-unit structure with a
far greater parking requirement was contemplated. In the process of developing
that concept DEC and ARCOE were consulted, regarding a large parking area in the
easement. A preliminary letter of no objection was received from ARCOE regarding
this use of that space. The parking for this new and improved concept of just 12
diminutive cottages occupies a much smaller area, see attached. Dan Fuller at DEC
was consulted on this use of the space and the potential for the easement to be
used for staging inlet dredging spoils. Dan made it clear that a prepared site, not
this location would be used for that purpose. Mr. Fuller sent the attached email in
this regard and the possibility of using the small sliver for parking in this latest
concept plan.
A clause in the leases for the units at Amabel Cottage Court could indemnify the
Town in the event that DEC or ARCOE requires that cars be moved during some
operation. An agreement for parking in the overflow parking or along the road at
Amabel could be crafted to accommodate this unlikely event.
Amabel Cottage Court is the perfect use for this gorgeous site, and BDT trail head.
The quiet small cottages gathered around a common courtyard satisfies a need for
more housing within walking distance to most amenities, and is not a grossly
incompatible multi-unit structure. The currently detritus laden taxi parking area
turns into a lovely grassy open space that opens up into a view down the inlet,
fulfilling the Town's desires for this Inlet Valley location.
Please consider this request for review and submission to the Town Board for
zoning change consideration.
Thank you,
Susan Cosentini
a
�v
�d1h 2L�
LU
r
z ,-,Q
r z \ -Ab� --,
IN
uj
zG
xFes- '9 ,
10/29/24,7:21 PM Gmail-Amabel Cottage Court 615 Five Mile Dr. Ithaca, NY
Gm i I Susan Cosentini <coznewearth@gmail.com>
Amabel Cottage Court 615 Five Mile Dr. Ithaca, NY
Fuller, Daniel J (DEC) <daniel.fuller@dec.ny.gov> Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 3:36 PM
To: Susan Cosentini <coznewearth@gmail.com>
Cc: "Little, Nadine E (DEC)" <nadine.little@dec.ny.gov>, "Nicholson, Brian M (DEC)"
<Brian.Nicholson@dec.ny.gov>
Hello Sue,
Thanks for reaching out. As we discussed today, NYS DEC would be very unlikely to agree to sell
any flood control easement land. We would still be open to considering granting an Article 16 -
Flood Control Land Use Permit to you for the proposed parking area. Please review the concerns
and potential conditions for such a permit that were transmitted in previous correspondence
from DEC and USACE to you regarding this parcel.
Dredging or other flood control maintenance activities may take place in that general area in the
future. That may necessitate temporarily restricting parking or traffic within the flood control
easements, but we would attempt to minimize that.
Dan Fuller, P.E.
Professional Engineer 1 (Environmental)
Region 7 Division of Water - Flood Protection and Dam Safety
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
1679 US Route 11
Kirkwood, NY 13795
Office: (607) 775-2545, ext. 107
Cell: (607) 760-6465
From: Susan Cosentini <coznewearth@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2024 9:50 AM
To: Fuller, Daniel J (DEC) <daniel.fuller@dec.ny.gov>
Subject: Amabel Cottage Court 615 Five Mile Dr. Ithaca, NY
ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown
senders or unexpected emails.
[Quoted text hidden]
https://mail.go ogle.com/mail/u/0/?ik=16347153ea&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1814278277353490007&simpl=msg-f:1814278277353490007 1/1
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BUFFALO DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS
' 1776 Niagara Street
Buffalo,New York 14207-3199
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
CELRB-TDO-T 11/22/20
SUBJECT: Cayuga Inlet FRM Project,Ithaca,NY— Section 408 Request for Amabel
Lodge
Dear Ms. Cosentini,
This is in response to your request whether or not the Corps has any objections to the
general concept for the Amabel Lodge and parking lot Section 408 alteration project,located
adjacentto the Cayuga Inlet Flood Risk Management(FRM)project. The purpose of your
request is to advance project discussions with the Town of Itahca.
USACE Buffalo District does NOT have any objections to the GENERAL CONCEPT
for the subject Section 408 alteration project,however,this does not imply that Section 408
permission is or will be granted. Section 408 permission will require completion of a
coordinated review including a NEPA review,public comment period,and full coordination with
the federal project sponsor,NYSDEC. As you know,the Corps requires that NYSDEC provide
a Letter of No Objection (LONO)to the Corps as part of the Section 408 review. Please note
that Section 408 permission,if granted,does not negate the need to obtain any required local,
state, or federal permits required for the alteration project.
There are a number of technical issues which the Corps has regarding the alteration,
including(but not limited to):
1. NYSDEC will have to separately confirm their no objection to this alteration
proj ect.
2. NYSDEC requires that that an Article 16 permit be obtained for use of state flood
control lands(it is noted that you've applied already). Technical issues and
concerns that arise from processing this permit must be satisfactorily
addressed. USACE will work with NYSDEC and you in this regard, as both
agencies have some overlapping issues and concerns.
3. Need an accurate topographic map for the project. We understand that you plan to
do this.
4. Need a grading plan showing the contours and grades for the alteration project.
5. Need to identify proposed utilities (gas,water, electric, sewer, drainage,etc.), and
landscaping features(trees,bushes,fences, curbs,benches, etc.) and plotthem
accurately on the design drawing(s). We understand that you plan to do this.
6. Excavation for the new building cannot interfere with the adjacent levees, or their
foundations. Will the new building have abasement or will it be slab on
grade? We'll need a detail for the new building showing the foundation and
required excavations along the north and west sides (adjacent to the levees).
7. NYSDEC maintenance access routes must be available adjacent to the levees and
channels. It appears that your proposed preliminary plan allows for this. NYSDEC
to verify if adequate.
8. The plan view needs to be revised to include the western end of the federal levee
where it terminates along the road entrance to the complex (see attached As-Built
drawing,yellow highlight). Levee curves into the roadway at this location and is
not shown on your current plan. This portion of the levee must remain intact and
any road work in the vicinity must account for this.
9. Need to continue your coordination with the local floodplain manager. USACE
will also further review as part of the Section 408 process. See attached memo
from the Buffalo District Flo odplain Manager,Ms.Laura Ortiz. Please note that
higher-than-design floods can and do oocur. There's a risk,however small,that the
Cayuga Inlet and/or Coy Glen levees could overtop should a high enough
magnitude flood occur on either waterway.
There will likely be other technical issues as we move forward but at this point I believe
what has been identified so far can be worked out. Impacts to the levees and maintenance access
appear to be minimal and the proposed alteration mimics existing conditions(building and
parking lot in approximately same vicinity). NYSDEC will have to confirm as they are
responsible for the operations and maintenance of the federal project. Given that,there's always
risk that the NEPA review or public comment period could turn up issues. A Corps Section 408
technical review and decision cannot be completed until a full design drawing set is submitted
and NEPA and public reviews are accomplished.
I hope this memo is sufficientto advance your discussions with the Town. If youthink it
would help to setup a phone meeting between you,the Corps,NYSDEC, and the Town let us
know—we will try to arrange it. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Remmers,P.E., PMP
Chief,Operations and Technical Support Section
Levee Safety Program Manager/Section 408 Coordinator
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Buffalo District
1776 Niagara Street
Buffalo,New York 14207
Phone: (716)879-4277
Fax: (716)879-4357
e-mail: robert.w.remmers�7a usace.armv.mil
2
A'
615 Five Mile Dr
i I
i I
I I "EXCEPT AND RESERVE ALL EXISTING
PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND UTILITY R.O.W'S" NORTH 1963 I
� I I
MAGNETIC
I
z I x LEGEND
I o I 0- COMPUTED CORNER 1
b.- UTILITY POLE
NN
TERLOUW (R.O.)
1 i I 442/627 n m
Irn�l mm
II AZ I I An
II m m m I \
I I LPIN—` -_ -' -' -_ -N 0738'00' E_-. -_ -_ -273.86'—SET TOTAL
I c> (
(18. 7 (193.13' P TO MON.) CONCRETE MONU EN'
W O L.P. TANK G w
CM SWELL FOUND 0.8' WESTERL'
I m OF PROPERTY LINE
I 73.0't I
G
I m
` I I I o
I I 1 I GARAGE
I rn l 1 ` I PERMANENT EASEMENT
I I 1 THE PEOPLE OF TH
2 OFFICE BUILDING I STATE OF NEW YOR
NO. 615 SEE 553/579
I I I \J 0.00 GARAGE
co
CITY OF ITHACA (RIO.) I 1 •K3 SHED `
863/21 I OCC \
I
I I m
1 I N1 GRAVEL DRIVE & PARKING �26623J\ I I
�I.4 READING FOUND) Bl
} I \ m�O 1 I — CONCRETE MONOM1
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO L — — EDGE
I
1 22' WIDE RIGHT OF WAY TO FIVE MILE DRIVE PERMANENT EASEMENT TO
\ SEE 4431185 THE PEOPLE OF THE — — —
\ I oy STATE OF NEW YORK
SEE 4701524
I
IAL, INC.
DEED BOOK 759 PAGE 22
PIN TOTAL GROSS AREA 2.00 ACRES
SET 0.47 ACRES NET TO N.Y.S.
PERMANENT EASEMENTS
I �
I
I I
I I
I I s
OVER HEAD TRANSMISSION LINES
SUBJECT TO NYSEG
r31 RIGHT OF WAY
REFERENCE MAPS ENTITLED S�3
A
1.)"MAP OF HOMER BAILEY FARM—TOWN OF TO off
ITHACA NOW OWNED BY WILLIAM KNIGHT" �J
nercn sz/l l/lozn aV I-ADI rDAhInAl l �`"�.
's
•r s
�•' 1p('bw��' � +`. �. -yam rr ,� ��,� ,dam 1� �' 4 j�' t._�� 7
w, , "4 ;, •> ,'arm'
s
� z •
J -
i:
3 e*1 ye�r ,3.z
i
%1
a ga�
AT
MA
�s ; v i� rlStA i G�"! AV' i
r
!a � �y �G ��y� .��P�pia,gr� F�a _ 6 ,�'�','.,.N _i}� ��`•(� fie' d`r.♦' �
f pia}� yr , ice. Ow
C5 r3da }t-.
�,�+ - ♦ � "Y� � Y+y r''C{'r
x,. �,i 'fit �-..� w I =r � �; � .P 1 •"""w.l�'���' �-��,. s'� � `�!�"Y t �r"
TT
B0
Possible Units
� a
00
YRotpr�lP� Ib yw zuzj
Sr
T-AI-14
a
� F
t
KIT BATH
C:LO
GARAGE GARAGE
i
LIVINGf
DINING
=n�ra
I I
Established Cottage Court Community
1
J
•v �
i r
TOWN OF I T H A C A
I ie zi
NEW YORK
Green New Deal Action Plan
Overview
In March 2020,the Town of Ithaca adopted a resolution in support of a Green New Deal(GND)which included the
development of a GND Action Plan to provide details on how to achieve the Town of Ithaca goals for government
operations and the broader community. The Action Plan should be thought of as a road map that will be re-evaluated
annually.
The Action Plan:
• incorporates policy,cost and staffing implications
• values community input and collaborative approaches
• adheres to equity principles outlined in the Town's Green New Deal resolution(03/23/2020)
• supports exploration of grant opportunities,including federal and state,to help with implementation of GND
initiatives
• integrates across all components of the Town's organization and work
• taps into knowledge,research, and creativity
• coordinates to the fullest extent possible with City of Ithaca,Tompkins County, and other municipalities
• utilizes a decision-making process that factors in: Town's goals,meeting residents' needs,prosperity&vibrancy,
and the environmental health of the community
• considers the costs of environmental externalities
• tracks and reports on progress towards achieving goals
• incorporates the energy and climate protection goals and recommendations from the Town's Comprehensive Plan
Key Goals
1. Meet the electricity needs of Town government operations with 100%regionally sourced renewable electricity by
2025
2. Reduce emissions,or create offsets,from the Town fleet of vehicles by 50%from the 2010 levels by 2025
o Reduce emissions by at least 10%
o Offset remaining emissions
3. Achieve an equitable transition to carbon-neutrality town-wide by 2030
o Reduce net emissions by at least 85%through efficiency,conservation, and renewable energy
o Sequester carbon in the Town
o Offset remaining GHG emissions through regional initiatives
Goals for the next 2 years
In order for the Town to achieve the goals stated above it will address a wide range of topics including Buildings and
Facilities; Energy Sources;Fleet;Institutionalization and Implementation; Land Use;Transportation; Wastewater; Water;
and Purchasing. Specific goals will be identified for 2-year periods and will be re-evaluated annually. The goals in the
accompanying table are for 2025-2026.
Roles and Responsibilities
• Role of Town Board:to provide policy leadership for the Town's Green New Deal initiatives
• Role of Management: to provide management direction for policies and initiatives
• Town Board and Management Team: reevaluate priorities and initiatives annually
• Role of Departments: to implement policies and initiatives
• Role of Town Residents: to become aware and educated and work collaboratively with the Town toward a
sustainable and vibrant community
• Partnerships/Collaborations: through a number of arrangements with other municipalities and community
institutions and organizations we will fully explore synergies to achieve mutual sustainability goals
1
E w C4
Y Y Y E N O O
O O O @ a)
N ° 3 oa °' c -o E Z o
N m �46 c o o E o@
a E m c Q Q
L C L 0 c Q N U° in @ 0 @
CL ° o E o. c @ y o > o@ `m $ (n w e E
c £ L a° > c d o N N m ° U c c Y 3 ° H ai
c U UJ p 'Q N a) @
Z cc
'V N Q@ U C m E N F N@ O
~ ~ '0 W C -° c .� C 0 L N O fo A
O da o 0 .0 C '0 'O a) .0 Q ° D II O
@ N Uw a co Q
° y wr ca a CD
m ai o @ -v@o
CL p
a a-) -0 0 4 °N cc 0 � O cc m
r „ E m ? 3> cc° o a c
0 C NU 0
0 o@ ca U 'O .0 -
cQZ c a) Q � @@O L U c '0 - @ Co
C@ -0c N 'O co c @ @ C
° to o co
(oE . >� � te
@ o c a) cy
O - CL C E O
m N � .V a0
Zr 0 I
° c a a n ° °° mU @ d Q ° 'o @
w @ m o
( oQ
o O o a) a Q Q
Q c
o ° `o 0 L) o ° 3 3 0 N > C Z of ° o .0 a` U d
_ c C 0 w w °0- 2 E 8. @0 C, oo @ 0 0 `° d 3 U w
Q E 0 '6 y c 'o C co m C m m 2 c C@ C a 0 w N U j
0 0 o 0 a>i E m E a o d o o c @ o coo o c a�i m a ca
c
U U U ¢ Z Q. to H W Z) a O O@ U a U Q a@ aC ° C -1 -0 ii
00
C
on to on 'c
C c C c
Y 4 N
ti0
'� � Y O O O Q N N
O O O N N N
-a -a -a d m ai o boc
L L L "0 .0 'D c c
> > O O O C d
a a CL p U U U w r U. ii 0 a
Q.
.0 M :c Q M M .0 m w m 'n m fl .E E :n E :n
@ Cc @ @ @ @ @ @ on @ @ @ @ cc@ ca
c c cfn c c c c c c c c c a) c c c c c
co -co
n m n 9 0 y m 0 c m ° n 0 to y h 0 m 0
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 7 0 0
cn y y cn w cn cn a cn cn cn cn w cn (o cn cn cn
E E E E E E
> > > ° > >
m m m e m m c c m c c m c m m
o @
nm`o ac >_
a) NL aa)a) ) a) 3 E
a >- O U
Z°
o>
cn E °
IN a) o c a
do Nam c, c .0 N 'too 0 a T C t@
O � (n U pO O @ 0U aO2 O. _ Q
ID c f/) d O U ° @ 03: CL @ N m 7 ° L O a) a) @ .0 O
ca m U 0 N O -O @ L 0 0 @ @ a coo
O J
a) 3 U O fo U 0 U L 6
Y lL a) .N L p Q c0 :-E
@ ^ Y @ 0 N Y L U @ @
L U d W Q U .co (o N U •C w O � m 0 O@ —' -C U a
3 > o @ o y c@ E r c m ai Q = n o 3 � = w
w (� coo in 3 E 5 0 O c � E m a) Z E o
@ E o c Q y a L E C
_ ¢ d ° o Q m
w ° w 'o C a m ° o 'c U 0 3 o d
C O c a) N Q N Q ° a) .0 'c a L N 3 -p 0 sL+ U O �.
o w m o o 0 L@ �° � c°n c m £ a@ ° U 0
N c d c c Q } c o _ c c o0 o vUi o U@ V) c°� t c n y d
o ° @ 3 E Z `° w ¢ E w a c c > L o ° a° > ° °C
N E ° E o a) to U E @ Z c CL >. Y a) ' - L oTo
c N @ H (n c y 'a c C o 0a O C @ O
( 0 Q > "° U C C C O c C W N ° O O C C fA p, @ i' � " >i a)
LA E E m w no E a� c°) > o `oQ a) cxo a3i E t o c z w
N c ° @ C Q C E a) @ ' m U o E Q E c w ° oo U v a
C C a @ N C N @ C c C d
6 C,
T C v) N d to
U to .0 0 Q `p @ @ C 'U @ .N ~LD a) C C Cu 22
_ > > Q @ O @ > Ox. @ O NO a O O N � > � N N L O a O Q v)
a C C E C) a U N N N W 0 U N w Q Q w Q C1 U > U@ CL C CJ
a
p ao m m m o m o a o m a m a a o m
V V V N N N N N N 7 7 h 7 (n U?
V U U U V V V V U U U U U U U U
Q w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
® N N N f7 C? C) 7 CM 7 7 7 M (7 ('7 (? M
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Q 0 CD CD U 0 0 0 0 CD CD 0
Z
W y
V
Process
1.Annually review and update the GND Action Plan
2. Send to Town Supervisor and Director of Planning for initial edits.
3. Present changes to Planning Committee in late fall (October- December)
4. Present final GND Action Plan to Town Board at annual look back meeting(Jan/Feb)
Changes
1. In 2023, removed the#s column because it did not align with the comp plan or GND
2. In 2023, added the priority and department columns to provide clarity
3. In 2024, added the comp plan goal#s to connect this to the GND more firmly
4. In 2024, updated formatting to make Action Plan easier to digest
5. In 2024, updated metrics to make them more meaningful:this will be ongoing
6. In 2024, added linksto important Town Laws
Green New Deal Action Plan 2025-2026
GND Comp
Sector Goal Plan Action Priority
Goal
Analyze and monitor Town fleet with the annual
GND-2 EC-4-B High
Green Fleet Inventory
Investigate implementation of EV charging
GND-2 EC-4-B High
Transportation stations town-wide
Review and revise the Town's Green Fleet Policy
GND-2 EC-4-B High
in 2025
Implement and amend the Ithaca Energy Code
GND-3 EC-2-B High
Supplement(Chapter 135 of Town Law)
Manage the IECS Implementation Assistance
GND-3 EC-2-C Medium
Program
Participate in the NYSERDA Stretch to Zero(STZ)
GND-3 EC-2-B High
pilot program
Green Buildings
Continue planning and implementation towards
GND-1 EC-2-D goal of net-zero government facilities(Town Hall High
and Public Works).
Stay informed of CROWD and related policies
GND-3 EC-2-A (local and state level)for deconstruction/ Medium
construction waste recycling
Explore grant and funding opportunities to
GND-1 EC-2-D Medium
support Green New Deal initiatives
Complete government operations greenhouse
GND-1 EC-1-B High
gas inventory in 2025.
Explore incorporating internal(TOI)cost of
GND-1 EC-1-A carbon into project selection and planning(e.g., Medium
Institutionalizing through CIP and/or budget process.
Sustainability
Stay informed of NYS CLCPA implementation and
GND-3 EC-7-B Medium
related NYS policies.
Develop a plan on how to best incorporate equity
GND-3 EC-1-A High
principles into decision-making processes
Use Town newsletter and website to encourage/
enable Town residents,employees,and other
GND-3 EC-1-A Medium
stakeholders to help create a vibrant and healthy
community.
Growing Partnerships Continue partnership with City of Ithaca and
Local Power to advance the creation of a
GND-3 EC-5-D High
Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program
(Chapter 144 of Town Law)
In partnership with the City of Ithaca and Local
GND-3 EC-5-13 Power develop a Distributed Energy Resource High
(DER) Plan
Department How we measure progress
Sustainability, Complete inventory and
Public Works present analysis to Town Public
Works Committee
Collaborate with internal
Sustainability, departments to determine
Public Works feasability of EV charging
stations throughout the Town
Sustainability,
Public Works, Revised policies approved by
Town Town Board by December 2025
Supervisor
Sustainability, Amended code approved by
Codes&Zoning Town Board and NYS
Sustainability, Number of projects that utilize
Codes&Zoning the free assistance program
Sustainability, Participation in each quarterly
Codes&Zoning meeting and recieve$200k in
grant funds
Sustainability,
Town Halt weatherization study
Engineering,
completed in 2025 and
Planning,
successfully apply for grants
Finance
Update Town Supervisor and
other interested parties on
Sustainability deconstruction policies and
develop a potential scope of
work
Sustainability, Updated list of potential grant,
Finance rebate,and incentive programs
Government Operations
Sustainability Greenhouse Gas Inventory
completed and approved by
Town Board in 2025.
Sustainability,
Create an analysis of possible
Finance,
ways to incorporate cost of
Planning,
planning into project selection
Engineering,
and present to management
Public Works
Continually update Town
Supervisor and other interested
Sustainability parties on NYS climate and
energy policy. Use this to
inform Town policy.
Provide a draft analysis and
Sustainability, scope of work to Town
Planning Supervisor and Director of
Planning
Revise website to be more
accessible. Update website
Sustainability quarterly. Provide
sustainability updates to the
Town newsletter.
Launch CCA program when
Sustainability local administrators are
approved by NYS.
Sustainability Final DER Plan approved by
Town Board.
Green New Deal Action Items 2024-2025
Priority Goal Action
Explore incorporating internal(TO1)cost of
Incorporate sustainability carbon into project selection and planning,
High and climate protection into e.g.,through CIP and/or budget process.
long-term planning Continue to monitor and analyze progress
through the Green Fleet Inventory.
Reduce energy Continue implementation of Energy Code
consumption and GHG Supplement:Amend code through the IECS
High emissions in buildings and Workgroup; Manage the IECS Implementation
infrastructure. (New Assistance Program; Participate in NYSERDA
Construction) Stretch to Zero (STZ).
Reduce energy
Continue planning and implementation
consumption and GHG
towards goal of net-zero Town Hall and Public
High emissions in buildings and
Works facility. Research funding sources for
infrastructure (Town-
Town Hall and Public Workgs upgrades.
owned
Continue working with Cityof Ithaca and Local
Encourage and facilitate Power to develop Community Choice
High the production and use of Aggregation program for 2024 program
renewable energy. launch.Also explore additional options for
developing renewables for Town operations.
Enable successful Define equitygoals and metrics consistent
adherence to equity with GND resolution. Develop next steps for
High principles in GND ITown's equitywork.Stay informed of the City's
resolution Sustainability and Climate Justice
Commission.
Enable successful
Medium implementation of Explore grant opportunities to support Green
New Deal initiatives.
sustainability initiatives
Incorporate sustainability
Complete Community GHG inventory
Medium and climate protection into
estimate and fill in remaining gaps.
long-term planning
Reduce energy Stay informed of NYS CLCPA implementation
consumption and GHG and City of Ithaca work, especially relating to
Medium emissions in buildings and benchmarking and building performance
infrastructure. (Existing standards. Implement pilot program for
Buildings) electrification of 15 buildings.
Reduce energy
Stay informed of the Town's participation in
consumption and GHG
Medium Safe Streets 4 All.Assess how we can better
emissions in the
utilize the Town's current Transportation Plan.
transportation sector.
Reduce GHG emissions Stay informed of State legislation and the City
Medium related to waste generation of Ithaca's work around Deconstruction law
and purchasing. and/or Construction Waste Recycling law.
Use Town newsletter,website, and social
Enable successful media to encourage/enable Town employees,
Low implementation of residents,and other stakeholders to help
sustainability initiatives meet Town sustainability goals. Update
webiste quarterly.
KEY
Stalled In progress
Measures of Success or Town
Notes
Deliverables Departments
3rd annual GFI
Sustainability/
completed and
Initial proposals developed Planning/Publicpresented to PWC.
Works/
and considered Internal cost of carbon
Engineering/
has not been
Finance
incorporated yet.
IECS WG will be
making amendment
2023 version aims for 80% recommendations to
GHG reduction. Completion Sustainability/PlTB soon. STZ project
anning/Codes
of STZ project enables$2001< potentially being
grant funding. and Zoning expanded through
06/2025. Collected
$175I<thus far.
TH weatherization
Goal of net-zero facilities by Sustainability/ moving forwards.
Planning/Engine
2030 Streetlight rebates
Bring
being pursued.
CCA delayed at the
Increase renewable energy state level. City and
use, Economic development, Sustainability/ Town are moving
Equity, and affordability, Planning/Town forward with
Reduce GHG emissions Supervisor developingthe
Distributed Energy
Resource (DER) plan.
Attend, as needed,the
Enable tracking of progress Planning& City SCJC meetings.
toward GND goals Sustainability Have not developed
next steps for equity
work.
Ongoing, research
Number of grants awarded; Planning& done as needed/as
Amount of funding awarded. Sustainability new information
comes forwards.
The county is planning
Completed estimates allow Planning& on a community ghg
tracking of progress in all Sustainability inventory in 2025. Do
sectors not recommend doing
this at the Town level.
Ongoing. BlocPower
has moved towards
green job training, not
Inform Town policy sure how much
decisions. Buildings in Town Planning& building electrification
(community)take part in Sustainability has been occuring.
Electrification Program with With new federal
BlocPower. administration,
unclear how this will
progress(lack of
federal funding etc.)
Informed Town policy
Planning ?
decisions
Potential for an impact
Inform Town policy decisions Planning& analysis by CU to help
Sustainability determine feasability
of Deconstruction law
Have used Town
newsletter sparingly.
Size of newsletter list, Social Planning& Need to make the
media follows, Number of Sustainability Sustainability page
education sessions work for both staff and
residents:this has not
be accomplished yet.
Completed/Next steps
Status Update on Green New Deal Action Items 2023-2024
# Goal Action
Enable successful Hire a newSustainability Planner. Continue to
implementation of incorporate GND work into Planning
1 sustainability initiatives Department.
Enable successful
Explore grant opportunities to support GND
2 implementation of
initiatives
sustainability initiatives
Enable successful Use Town newsletter,website, and social
3 implementation of media to encourage/enable Town employees,
sustainability initiatives residents,and other stakeholders to help meet
Town sustainability goals.
Incorporate sustainability and
4 climate protection into Complete Community GHG inventory estimate.
long-term planning
Incorporate sustainability and Explore incorporating internal(TO1)cost of
5 climate protection into carbon into project selection and planning,
long-term planning e.g.,through CIP and/or budget process
Reduce energy consumption Continue implementation of Energy Code
6 and GHG emissions in Supplement:Amend code;Arrange technical
buildings and infrastructure. assistance; Participate in NYSERDA Stretch to
(New Construction) Zero (STZ); Update compliance documents.
Reduce energy consumption Stay informed of NYS CLCPA implementation
and GHG emissions in and City of Ithaca work,especially relating to
7 buildings and infrastructure. benchmarking and building performance
(Existing Buildings) standards. Continue encouraging participation
in City Electrification Program.
Reduce energy consumption
Continue planning and implementation
and GHG emissions in
8 towards goal of net-zero Town Hall and Public
buildings and infrastructure
Works facility.
(Town-owned)
Continue working with City of Ithaca and Local
Encourage and facilitate the Power to develop Community Choice
9 production and use of Aggregation program for 2024 program launch.
renewable energy. Also explore additional options for developing
renewables for Town operations.
Encourage and facilitate the
10 production and use of Complete Solar Law revisions
renewable energy.
Enable successful adherence Define equity goals and metrics consistent with
11 to equity principles in GND GND resolution. Develop next steps for Town's
resolution equitywork.
Reduce energy consumption
Update Transportation Plan. Other actions to
12 and GHG emissions in the
transportation sector. be taken by Planning and Engineering.
Reduce GHG emissions related Explore creation of Deconstruction law and/or
13 to waste generation and Construction Waste Recycling law in
purchasing. collaboration with City of Ithaca and CROWD.
Measures of Success or Town
Deliverables Departments Priority Status Update&2024-2025 Goals
New Sustainability Planner Planning N/A Completed: new Sustainability
hired Planner hired in April2023
2024-2025: No further action
needed.
In progress:We were awarded the
NYSERDA Stretch to Zero(STZ)
Number of grants grant in 2022.We applied for land
awarded;Amount of Planning Medium acquisition grants in 2023.
funding awarded. Awarded 1 of the land acquisition
grants. We researched funding
opportunities for reducing energy
consumption and GHG emissions
Size of newsletter list, In progress: quarterly website
Social media follows, Planning Low updates and newsletter
Number of education submissions are the most effective
sessions wayto utilize this platform.
Completed estimates Unknown: Tompl<ins County
allow tracl<ing of progress Planning Medium completed a Community GHG
in all sectors inventory in 2019.
In progress:The cost of carbon is
Initial proposals developed Planning/ incorporated into the yearly Green
and considered Public Worl<s/ High Fleet Inventory. Currently assessing
Engineering how we can incorporate
sustainability into the CIP process.
2023 version aims for 80% In progress:The IECSworkgroup
was reconvened to discuss
GHG reduction. Planning/
changes to certain amendments.
Completion of STZ project Codes and High
The STZfunding is being used to
enables$200k grant Zoning
support the IECS Implementation
funding.
Assistance Program.
In progress:Working with Bloc
Inform Town policy Power to design effective strategies
decisions. Buildings in to engage the Town in pilot
Town (community)take Planning Medium program.Also attending
part in Electrification information sessions on CLCPA and
Program. related legislation/policies at the
state and national levels.
In progress: Engineering
completed an initial TH
Goal of net-zero facilities Planning/Engin weatherization study. Completed
by 2030 Bering High assessment of different fudning
sources and potential costs. Next
step is architectural design
services.
In progress:The Town Board
Increase renewable energy approved the Distributed Energy
use, Economic Resource(DER) Plan. CCAwas
development, Equity,and
Planning/Town High renamed Tompkins Green Energy
affordability, Reduce GHG Supervisor Network(TGEN).The promotional
emissions video was completed.Waiting for
the PSC to approve local
administrators.
Planning/
Adopted law Codes and N/A Completed:The Town Board
passed the Solar Law in 2023.
Zoning
In progress:the Sustainability
Enable tracking of Planner is participating in the USDN
progress toward GND Planning Medium equity cohort and keeping abreast
goals of the City of Ithaca's Sustainability
and Climate Justice Commission.
Completed:T01 planners assessed
Adopted Transportation Planning Medium the current Transportation Plan and
Plan. found the existing plan still holds
merit.
In progress:the next step is to
Inform Town policy discuss with the City of Ithaca to
decisions Planning High assess what needs to be done to
push this forward. For example,can
it be included in the IECS?
Notes(not to be
2025 Goals included for Town
Board)
Prioritize the list and
base it on carbon
reduction +equity
principles etc.
There are things in the
budget that could
contribute to this through
the CIP process.
Balancing each piece
thoughtfully- Board
Members can help with
this effort
Margaret can hep with
Community GHG
inventory efforts
The 2024 (with 2023 data) Green Fleet
Inventory will be completed in the spring/
early summer. Public Works and the Cornell grad student
Sustainability Planner will continue to assess project- masters level
the feasability of fleet electrification and EV
Chargers.
IECS Implementation Assistance Program
will be completed in spring 2025. Assess it's
effectiveness (number of buildings) and
Anna I<elles has some
determine whether this should be continued
on a more permanent basis.An updated other legislation to fill
International Energy Conservation Code gaps in NYSERDA
(IECC)will be released in 2024.The Town programs where people
submitted potential addresses for a County just miss the threshold
RFP for EV Charging services.The RFP will be
released sometime in 2024.
Architectural design services for Town Hall
will be completed in 2024. Construction
would begin in 2025.
TGEN should be available to residents in
2024.The Town and City of Ithaca will
engage in 90 days of public outreach to
promote and answer questions around
TGEN. Design micro-grants for
Disadvantaged community(DAC) residents
for weatherization to payback in 5-7 years to
incentivize these changes. CCE could be a
potential partner.
More specific transportation goal to increase
multi-modal transportation. Metrics would
include a Sidewalk and bicylce infrastruction
plan assessment to help create more
connectivity in more dense areas of the
Town.Also examine where TCAT services
could be extended. For example,West Hill
has pockets of denisty in the apartment
areas that need connectivty to downtown.
On East Hill Plaza,the really good multi-use
path dies in the middle of the cooridor.
The Sustainability Planner will stay informed
of any state legislation related to this item.
For example,Anna Kelles will be introducing
legislatuion on deconstruction.The biggest
obstacle is where to put materials.This is a
multi-year project. CROWD would have Local
model ordinances.
EC-1
EC-1-A
EC-1-B
EC-I-C
EC-1-D
EC-1-E
EC-2
EC-2-A
EC-2-B
EC-2-C
EC-2-D
EC-2-E
EC-3
EC-3-A
EC-3-B
EC-3-C
EC-4
EC-4-A
EC-4-B
EC-5
EC-5-A
EC-5-B
EC-5-C
EC-5-D
EC-5-E
EC-5-F
EC-6
EC-6-A
EC-6-B
EC-6-C
EC-6-D
EC-7
EC-7-A
EC-7-B
EC-7-C
Incorporate Sustainability and climate protection into long-term planning
Institutionalize sustainability in Town operations
Conduct greenhouse gas inventories regularly
Implement Government Energy action Plan (EAP). Update on a regular basis
Develop and implement a Community EAP. Establish a sustainability committee
Maintain ICLEI membership
Reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings and infrastructure
Policy, regulations for energy use reduction in existing buildings
Require green building techniques and energy efficiency standards in new commercial buildings
Partner with organiations/ businesses to support incentives and options for energy efficiency
Various municippl building/facility recommendations
Various streetlight recommendations
Reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to treatment and distribution
Various water/wateewater system recommendations
Water pricing based on use
Water conservation education/outreach porgram, regulations
Reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions in transportation
Support programs to educate residents on efficient/clean vehicles
Municipal green fleet policy
Encourage and facilitate production and use of renewable energy
Adopt renewable energy goals
Revise regulations to facilitate renewable energy production
Work in partnership to provide incentives for renewable energy systems
Partner with organizations/businesses to support programs providing resources and information on
renewable energy
Various recommendations regarding renewable energy generation at Town facilities
Consider REC purchases to offset GHGs related to Town government operations. Encourage RECs for
Reduce GHG emissions related to waste generation and purchasing
Waste reduction policy compost program for municipal operations
Partner with local organizations/busineses to support recycling/compost programs
Work with other municipalities to eliminate redundant recycling/composting programs
Sustainable purchasing policyfor Town operations. Encourage businesses to consider similar policies
Build a resilient community by preparing for and adapting to impacts of climate change
Countywide climate adaption plan in cooperation with other municipalities and agencies
Updates policies to consider impacts of climate change on infrastructure
Plant shade trees
GND-1 Meet the electricity needs of Town operations with 100% regionally sourced renewable
GND-2 Reduce emissions,or create offsets,from the Town fleet of vehi Ices by 50%form the 2(
GND-2.1 Reuce emissions by at least 10%and offset remaining emissions
GND-3 Achieve an equitable transition to carbon neutrality town-wide by 2030
GND-3.1 Reduce net emissions byat least 85%through efficiency, conservation, and renewable
GND-3.2 Sequester carbon in the Town
GND-3.3 Offset remaining GHG emissions through regional initiatives
Sector(Draft
Comp Plan Goals*
Names)
EC-1-A Institutionalize sustainability in Town operations
EC-1-13 Conduct greenhouse gas inventories regularly
EC-5-F Complete community greenhouse gas inventory
Institutionalizing EC-6-D Sustainable purchasing policyfor Town operations. Encourage
Sustainability businesses to consider similar policies
fe-5-A Adopt renewable energy got+s�
EC-2-D Various municiapl building/facility recommendations
Ee-i-E Iniplenient Governnient Energy aetion Plan. Update on a regtilar basis
EC-4-13 Municipal green fleet policy
Ee-I-E
EC-5-13 Revise regulations to facilitate renewable energy production
EC-2-A Policy, regulations for energy use reduction in existing buildings
Building fora EC-2-13 Require green building techniques and energy efficiency standards in
Better Future
new commercial buildings
EC-5-E Various recommendations regarding rewnewable energy gneration at
Town facilities
Ee-2-E
EC-5-D Partner with organizations/businesses to support programs providing
resources and information on renewable energy
EC-2-C Partner with organizations/businesses to support incentives and options
for energy efficiency
EC-5-C Worl<in parthnership to provide incentives for renewable energy systems
Growing
Community EC-7-C Plant shade trees
EC-4-A Support programs to educate residents on efficient/clean vehicles
Partnerships
EC-3-C Water conservation education/outreach porgram, regulations
EC-7-A Countywide climate adaption plan in cooperation with other
municipalities and agencies
Safe Drinking EC-3-13 Water pricing based on use
WaterforAll EC-3-C Water conservation education/outreach porgram, regulations
EC-3-A Various water/wastewater system recommendations
Transportation
EC-4-A Support programs to educate residents on efficient/clean vehicles
EC-4-B Municipal green fleet policy
EC-6-A Waste reduction policy compost program for municipal operations
EC-6-B Partner with local organizations/busineses to support recycling/
compost programs
Reducingwaste EC-6-C Work with other municipalities to eliminate redundant recycling/
and pollution composting programs
EC-3-A Various water/wastewater system recommendations
EC-6-D Sustainable purchasing policyfor Town operations. Encourage
businesses to consider similar policies
*Some comp plan goals maybe duplicated if theyalign with more than one sector
Notes(if strikethrough= no longer relevan OR no further action
required)
Baseline gov't ops GHGI completed in 2009: not done regularly,butwill do one in
2025.
Baseline Community GHGI completed in 2010;the county indicated they may do
a community inventory in 2025-opportunityto jump on board their efforts
instead?
Completed 2021: may need revising 2025
Completed 2020(GND Resolution)
Completed 2011: I don't know if doing an updated one is the best use of staff time.
GND AP count as a "mini"EAP?
Completed 2021:analysis done annually,revision considered for 2025
USDN member instead
IECS;ongoing
IECS;ongoing
Completed
Various CCE collaborations (greeen job training,etc.)
Amplify CCE programs and initiatives
Amplify state and federal incentives; IECS Implementation Assistance Program
I don't know if this is the best use of staff time. Maybe there is an alternative
action the Town can take that would provide a similar benefit.
This should be lead by Tompkins County, if it hasn't already
Bolton Point
Completed 2021:analysis done annually,revision considered for 2025
The Town composts but does not have a waste reduction policy
Tompkins County has pretty robust programming,it would be easier to amplify
their existing work.
Was this ever done?Tompkins County has pretty robust programming,it would be
easier to amplify their existingwork.
Completed 2021: may need revising 2025
Departments
Planning
Finance
Engineering
Codes and Zoning
Sustainability
Town Supervisor
Public Works
Priority
High
Medium
Low
MEMORANDUM
To: Town of Ithaca Town Board
From: Town of Ithaca Conservation Board
Date: 10/29/2024
RE: Moratorium on the installation of plastic carpet
Greetings,
Plastic carpets installation could potentially contaminate Cayuga Lake as well as rivers,
streams, ponds, ground water, and soil in the Town of Ithaca by leaching chemicals. The
Conservation Board's mission is to preserve and protect the Town's natural and scenic
resources. We ask the Town Board to consider a moratorium on the installation of plastic carpet
(a.k.a. artificial turf ) on any land, of any size, within the Town of Ithaca, for a period of 3 years.
Plastic carpets have known environmental and health hazards. Town residents and Zero Waste
Ithaca have documented the extensive concerns related to plastic carpets
(https://zerowasteithaca.org/artificial-turf/ ). Plastic carpets contain toxic chemicals, including
flame retardants, plasticizers, and PFAS (a class of synthetic compounds that includes
approximately 4,700 chemicals). PFAS are a particular threat, as they are highly persistent
"forever chemicals" that never fully degrade. Plastic grass blades also break off artificial turf and
would be blown by the wind to surrounding areas where they would break down into
microplastic which also does not fully degrade, thereby threatening to contaminate areas with
PFAS, microplastics and other chemicals. Plastic carpets are produced from petroleum and
have a life expectancy of less than 10 years. Currently in the U.S., at most a couple facilities
collect plastic carpet fields for "recycling," but only the crumb rubber infill is recycled not the
plastic carpet blades.
We acknowledge plastic carpet manufacturers, installers, and users provided counter points and
data to support the use of plastic carpet. So let us halt the installation of plastic carpet
temporarily, while our community considers whether adopting changes to its comprehensive
plan and/or its land use regulations are needed. Let us give ourselves time to gain
understanding from the pending legislation list below as well as through discussions with local
organizations and community members who are also interested in the preservation and
protection of our Town's natural and scenic resources.
• January 2025 ban on PFAS substances in carpeting sold in New York state to take
effect. Title 33 Carpet Collection Program:
https://www.nysenate._.oq v/leqislation/laws/ENV/A27T33
• Pending Senate Bill S7239 establishes a moratorium on the installation of synthetic turf
pending a comprehensive environmental and public health study.
https://www.nysenate.aov/legislation/bills/2023/S7239
• Pending Senate Bill S4693 provides for a public health study by the department of
health on the installation of synthetic turf.
https://www.nvsenate.gov/leqislation/bills/2023/S4693
We look forward to hearing the Town Board's perspective on a moratorium on the installation of
plastic carpet. Let us know if you need additional information or wish to set a time to discuss the
topic further.
Respectfully submitted,
Conservation Board
Lori Brewer(chair)
Frank Cantone
James Hamilton
Eva Hoffmann
Michael Roberts
Ingrid Zabel
Lindsay Dombroskie