HomeMy WebLinkAboutPWC Minutes 1994-02-16 V
i' t .
•
TOWN OF ITHACA
ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Works Committee: •
David Klein, Chairman
John Whitcomb •
Edward Conley
Fred Noteboom
Rich Schoch
FROM: Dan Walker, Town Engineer
SUBJECT: Public Works Committee Agenda for Febuary 24, 1994 Meeting
DATE: February 16, 1994 •
•
The Public Works Committee will meet 7:30 A.M. February 24, 1994 at the
Town Hall Board Room.
•
•
AGENDA
1. Discussion of Highway Superintendents plan for expenditure of
Highway Funds for 1994
2. Temporary Summer Employee needs for Highway and Parks
3. Town/County shared'equipment purchases
4. Status-of Forest Home Bridge Project
5. Discussion of Water & Sewer Benefit'Formula
•
If you are unable to attend this meeting, please notify me as soon as
possible.
PWAG9402/ENGMEMO/02/16/94/DRW/mb
. xc: Joan Lent Noteboom, Town Clerk '
George Frantz, Assistant Town:Planner
Andrew Frost, Code. Enforcement Officer •
� h
t1
,r - r . TOWN OF ITHACA Br-ti T FORMULA • - Page 1
Adopted Septembe:_.8 , 1981
TOWN OF ITHACA WATER AND SEWER BENEFIT FORMULA •
•
The purpose of the Water and Sewer Benefit Formula -is to
r. • :establish the basis for computing the benefit derived from Town
. of.: =thaca water and sewer improvements and thereby assessing the
debt service cost for , such improvements ' to, •all; the- benefited •
properties in the Town-of Ithaca Townwide Water . and. Sewer
Improvement Districts.
. DEFINITIONS. •
• A developed lot is a- parcel of land with an improvement,
i.e. , structure.
• • An undeveloped lot is a vacant parcel of land delineated on .
• an approved subdivision plan or a parcel of land with an average
• , width of less than 250 feet as delineated on the Town of 'Ithaca
Tax Maps.
1. LOT FRONTAGE SERVED - WITH WATER AND/OR SEWER. --
a. DEVELOPED LOTS. One (1) unit for. every. lot on which an •
improvement has been ' constructed. - If the"',F.loti ;on which one
improvement is . located exceeds 100 feetn..average width lout is
. . less than 200 , feet ' in average width, ,the ' lot 'owner shall be
. . assessed one unit plus 1/20th of a unit :for . each . 10 feet of
average width in excess of 100 feet. 'If' the lot is 200 .feet or
more, and there is only one dwelling unit . on saidlot, the lot
owner shall be' assessed two units plus- 1/20th of aHunit for°each
10' feet of average width over '200 : feet up • to,•50, additional feet, .
i.e.., a- total lot width of 250 feet., A11' average widths. .of the
lot- in excess of 250 feet 'shall be treated asundeveloped "acreage•.
, , and assessed as set' forth ''below with, respects to undeveloped
` acreage. Notwithstanding the``foregoing,, „if - there, is more than
one dwelling unit on any lot;' 'the number of units shall be at
least equal to the number of ..dwelling„units.,,.
b. UNDEVELOPED: LOTS`. ` One (11,unit ;for .each legal building
. 'lot` of 100 feet or less . If 'the.`'lot h•as' more than,.100 -feet of
.average width but is less•'than.C7200; feet. in' averag_e.width, •-the lot ' . . •
• '.. owner shall be "assessed°one'tnit.,plus-1420th, of a:unit, for each
10 feet of average width'Vin'excess•..of •_10.0 feet. ..If the ,lot is •
. "200 'feet in _ average' width and.',is of.-s,ufficient,.depth, to .•make, two
legal building lots, the-'-lot'owner- shall be' assessed two units. .:
plus 1/20th ore unit for,eachr10, feet. in -excess of 200 feet up .
to.• a maximum of 50 additional:'.feet a"
i'.e.., ,total average. width
? of . 250 feet. All average' width'- in excess of 250 feet will be
treated as undeveloped acreage and assessed as 'set forth below.
In the event the lot - is, oft,insufficient. •size.;.-too be - a legal
'r, ' building lot and 'is -not ' Via•=--valid °.:non-conforming,- use, the
_ assessment shall be 1/20 ofatunit--for• each 10 . feet of average '
.width. If the lot is of 'sufficient" depth ,or width to .make at
least one building ' lot but, ''even `though it has 200 feet of
•
TOWN OF ITHACA PRNEFIT FORMULA ' Page -2
Adopted Septemb,_ 8, • 1981
average width,, is insufficient in . depth to make' two building (
lots, -the assessment shall be one unit plus 1/20th of a unit for
.each 10 feet of -average width in excess of the frontage required
to make at least one legal building lot. If. the lot is of
sufficient size to make at least two building lots, the• lotc•owner
shall be assessed two units plus 1/20th'. of a unit for 'each 10
feet ' of average width in excess of the - average ,width • needed to -
•
make two building lots up, to a maximum of 50 additional-'feet of
• average 'width. The- area of unimproved •. lots; in 'excess-;cof two
building, lots plus 50 additional feet of average width shall ' be.
assessed as undeveloped acreage as set forth below'. ' • -
•
- • c. - CORNER LOTS. In the case of a corner lot-where the side
-'', yard intersects .the front yard at an acute angle a line will be
house
drawn perpendicular to the road on which the fronts 100
. . feet long - so as to intersect the - right of way of the side yard
road. The amount of area included in the triangle thus formed
will be deleted from the calculation of units. The lot frontage
served will be taken as the remaining frontage on the primary
road.
2. ACREAGE SERVED WITH WATER AND/OR SEWER.
a.' UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE, WITH WATER AND SEWER• BENEFIT. The
area calculated in acres, 150 .feet deep • on • all• frontage (having
'benefit and assessed atone .(1) _ unit. ,per acre. All- 'remaining
acreage will be assessed, at 1/4 unit per: acre,,up to: and including
1,000 feet from -the mains, 1/6 -unit .per, acre for acreage more
than ' 1,000 feet -up to and including .21,000 feet>..:from ;.the_'mains,
1/8 - unit per acre ' for acreage ..more than 2, 000-; feet • uprto and
:including 3,000. feet from .the: mains, and :over.-3.,.0.00 feet- from the
• • • mains at $0. 02/M for water and $0.01/M for• sewer, -"of assessed
valuation. Where the topography, has a-, grade in:,excess: of 15% ,
the assessment will be the next lower-.unit, . e.g. ,-;1/4 -tool/6, per
acre. Minimum charge In category of- undeveloped: acreage with
water and sewer benefit, 0.1 unit.
b. UNDEVELOPED ' ACREAGE," SERVED WITH WATER OR SEWER ONLY.
Calculated in acres, 150_ feet deep and-_assessedvonet (1) •-:unit per
acre, the balanc•
e to be ' assessed at 1/6 ,unit,,perieJupi_ tot2;000
feet 'from the main, ',1/8 ,unit;;per acre from ,2_ 00lj(,ta+ 3, 0.00::feet •
• from -the main;' and , over- 3,000 feet .from;.,themain at :$0 . 02/M:and
• $0:01/M for sewer;, of` assessed valuation•. < ,Wheret the topography
has a - grade in ' excess 'of . 15% , the assessment. ,w,ill-s. bethe'next -
lower unit, - e.g., 1/6 to 1/8 , per acre. a t
I' i t- .
• 1e, rit'
c. FRONTAGE- FOR UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE. •i._Willi;beassessed no
. less than the units assessed, in 1.b. and-; no;.morelthan .four-,>(4)
units .
. ' d. UNDEVELOPED -ACREAGE,- WITH WATER :ONLY•f OR-iSEWER. ONLY,' 'BUT :`�
' WHERE' THE MAIN - Is ACROSS THE ROAD. •Calculated,;,at 1/61,_unit:r;.per _
- acre up to '2,000 feet from the main, - 1/8 , unit,rper-acre from• 2,001
• to' 3, 000 feet 'from 'the main,; and- over 3 ,,000-,feet;;fromv•the main at
E•s TOWN OF ITHACA BE"^FIT FORMULA • Page 3
Adopted Septembez_., 1981
$0.02/M for water and $0 .01/M for sewer, of assessed valuation.
( Where the topography has a grade in excess of 15%, ,the„assessment
will be the .next lower unit, e.g. , 1/6 to 1/8', per'acre. .
3 . REDUCTION IN ASSESSMENT, ACCESSESTACROSS ' ADJOINING PROPERTY .
OF OTHERS.
Where, as of August 1, 1981, - owner of land to be _assessed.
• .; ,.has , access to the. water • main or the sewer main. "only. by crossing •
•.:,adjoining private property of-others and the` lot owner has no
;,,easement or other rights to obtain 'access' Ito said water main
across the adjoining . private properties, ' the assessment will be
reduced by. one-half.
• 4. PARCELS WITH NO ROAD OR WITH UNDEVELOPED AGREAGE WITH WATER
• AND/OR SEWER SERVICE NOT READILY AVAILABLE .
Annual charge of $0 .02/M for water and' $0-. 01/M, for sewer, of
full assessed valuation.
•
5 . , .APARTMENTS .
One (1) unit per dwelling unit, ' or, as ,per frontage,
• whichever is greater.
6. •SCHOOLS, WITH:NO DORMITORY FACILITIES. :
Ten (10) students and/or faculty equal one (1)„ unit, .- based
• . on attendance for five full-days a week.. ._ • .. " -
;.; 7.. COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, EDUCATIONAL''OR INSTITUTIONAL.
; .May be assessed . benefit- charges based` on : metered .water
,,, consumption, frontage, assessed= valuation or . acreage, ., at, the
discretion. of the Town Board'.
8 . CORNELL UNIVERSITY. ::'
. : 4":' '
Where -,_Cornell University) supplies` rwater ''` from its•, own
treatment and filtration plant=through. .its; own ''system, to `its own
• : , property; -.there will be no 1 assessments=for water 'service.
•
9 . WATER AND SEWER CONSUMPTION.
When computing water. and sewer` units-based' on metered water
consumption, a landowner will be charged„'oneunit... for-each 16,000
cubic feet of water consumed. per-' yearfor•?thefirst:.•1,600,000
cubic feet of such consumption, i.e. , until he has' been assessed
100 units. If his consumption exceeds 1,600,,000 ,cubic. feet per
annum, he shall ' be 'assessed gone. aditiona'l .unit for, each
additional 32 ,000 cubic feet ' of water4;consumed� each` year,. up to
3,200 ,000 additional cubic -feetf;'`wa` oter: If `'he` consumes in
•- ; excess of 4 , 800 ,000' cubic feet =ofwater:tper ;year',,,he . shall be
assessed additional units ;at the' rate1 of"one unit``for'.each 64,000
i
• TOWN OF bTHACA "cNEFIT FORMULA Page \�
Adopted Septemk _: 8, 1981
additional cubic feet of water consumed per year. (Th
10 . UTILITY RIGHTS OF WAY.
Where a. right, .of -way for electrical and '' gas ' transmission
line exists (as opposed to rights of way for ' ordinary service
lines and normal easements across lots principally for providing
service to. the lot and neighboring lot) and the easement is 25
feet or more in width, and the easement restricts significantly '
the use to which ,the property -may• -be put, e.g. , precludes
construction within the. easement lines,. one—half 'of the acreage
subject to said right of ,way shall' be deducted for the purposes
of computing the acreage and/or frontage upon which water and
sewer benefit charges are based.
11. SEPARATE- SPRINKLER SERVICE.
Where separate sprinkler service connections are made to the
Town water system, the benefit charge .will 'be as"-follows: one
(1) unit for every ten (10) sprinkler heads, or .increment
thereof, installed, plus one (1) unit for each Siames'e .connection
and each standpipe outlet. In the event such requests are made -
for ,connection to the transmission system within the' Town of
' Ithaca, consideration will be given by the Town.' tosuch 'requests
only after formal approval by the Southern . Cayuga Lake
Intermunicipal Water Commission. , The foregoingcharge ' is waived
where domestic service is' provided to the same building.
' ' 12. WAIVER. '
In an approved subdivision where .a• developer his constructed
an ' approved' water distribution main and/or a sanitary sewer
collector serving part ;or;. all' of. the:.subdivision, the benefit on
'':; ; . that-portion of the,subdivision served ,shair be`'•deterznined by- the
standard provisions herein as if ,the. utility improvements did not
• exist for a period of five (5) years after 'construction of same
• • has been approved by the appropriate , Towauthorities', except
that the sale, land contract or lease of'any lot in any manner or
the issuance of , a permit -to build on ra3'lot/'.to c•anyone will make
such lot (s). subject. to the: standard provisionsherein `and all the
remaining land .will be • subjectto•,the standard-provisions herein
at the end of the five (5) years. '
• The developer must certify his ownership annually to the .
Town Clerk between September Land October 1. .y,:,
..,_ . . . , .. -t::d:2 .:•':r:.;t. :. . r
13 . POWER OF THE TOWN BOARD TO- VARY APPLICATION' OF 'BENEFIT
' FORMULA. . .. ii,• .. nrL .
The Town Board from time to. time, may;uary.iapplication',of the
benefit formula where physical -factors- 'such r"as . topography, lots fl
• split by municipal boundaries,.. etc. , preclude_'.utilization of' the
benefit otherwise available . to the ' : property. - owner.• Such
consideration will,, be given only .'upon 4written:.request from the
property owner.
MEMORANDUM
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 7
cf
FROM: PAT PUNGER (AS ADMINISTRATOR OF TOWN INSURANCE) `
DATE: APRIL 20, 1994
RE: POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR FUEL TANKS
I would like the committee to consider whether a reasonable
need exists to purchase pollution insurance in the event of a gas
spill or other incident involving the new above ground fuel tanks
at the highway garage.
Municipalities are not required by law to cover pollution
insurance; however, municipalities are constant targets of
lawsuits in all areas and we have previously paid extensive
damages in the past for fuel seepage claims. I understand these
new, above ground tanks are self-contained and offer many safety
features that may offset the need far this insurance and have
asked Dan and Fred to offer you their recommendations concerning
the risk factors involved.
Our insurance agent, Charlie Becker, has provided me with
the following information:
Cost: $1, 500. 00 annual for one million dollars of pollution
coverage - no matter how the pollution occurs, this
insurance will cover it. No negligence need be
proven by the Town.
$ 43.00 annual for $ 15,000 property damage coverage
on tanks and $ 4,000 loss of contents coverage' due
to vandalism or other incident.
Budget: 1994 Townwide liability and auto ,insurance
premium expense estimate - $80,000. Amount budgeted
for 1994 - $85,000.
If you feel this insurance is necessary, please make a
recommendation to the Town Board for the May 9, 1994 meeting.
Thank . you.