Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA History Combined (58) Zoning Board of Appeals History as of 26.-4-14 117 Hillcrest Dr Tax Parcels involved, with address if known 117 Hillcrest Dr 26.-4-14 with no subdivision and readdressing from 107 Hillcrest Dr. History: 2002 – Area Variance for deck - Granted 1980 – Area Variance for house - Granted APPROVED MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 16, 2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MONDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2002 FILE 7 : 0o P. M . DATE - ZSOC,D PRESENT : Kirk Sigel , Chairman ; Harry Ellsworth , Vice-Chairman ; Ronald Krantz , Board Member; James Niefer, Board Member; Andrew Dixon , Board Member; Andy Frost , Director of Building/Zoning ; David Dubow, Acting Attorney for the Town ; Mike Smith , Environmental Planner. ALSO PRESENT : Tee-Ann Hunter, 107 HillCrest Drive ; Rolf Pendall , 29 Renwick Heights Road ; Larry Snyder, Veteran Hill Road , Horseheads ; Robert & Evalyn MacLeod , 224 Eagle Estate Drive , Debary, Florida Chairperson Sigel called the December 18 , 2002 meeting of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals to order at 7 : 04 p . m . Chairperson Sigel — Tonight we have four appeals : that of Tee-Ann Hunter, that of Rolf Pendall , that of Larry Snyder, and that of Robert MacLeod . We' ll take them in that order. APPEAL : Tee-Ann Hunter, Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article XII , Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an outside wood deck on a non-conforming building/lot located at 107 Hillcrest Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 26-4-14, Residence District R-15 . Said parcel is non-conforming since it does not front on a Town , County, or State highway, with said building being located 19 feet from the front property line, whereas a 25 foot building setback is required . A variance from Article IV, Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance, may also be requested . Tee-Ann Hunter, 107 Hillcrest Drive- I had a deck attached to the back of my house when purchased it . It was rotting and needed to be replaced and in designing a possible replacement , k the deck was only six feet wide and I moved it out to eight feet wide and had it wrap around the house so that it could attach to a back door and the back stoop . It's a larger footprint now, it' s a non -conforming lot . Apparently, when I applied for this building permit , in researching the application , they discovered that in the past , somehow , permission had been given to build an addition closer to the property line than is allowed . Is that the deal Andy? Mr. Frost — Essentially, it's a non -conforming property . Hillcrest Dive is not a town , county or state highway so therefore it has no front yard . If it was a Town Road then it would appear that it is too close to the road . Ms . Hunter — So are you recommending that I get some sort of variance for that at this time ? Mr. Frost - No , I think my gut sense it that , under Article XII , Section 54 , this should be sufficient . Did you mention that there was an addition made to the house at some point ? 1 APPROVED MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 16, 2002 Ms . Hunter — I think there was a lot done to the house over the years since it's been there . It 's got an apartment . I don 't know if it used to be a garage or something other than what it is now. But that is apparently too close , right? Mr. Frost — It was clearly before my time with the Town , but it does appear that the apartment is in an area that was the garage . I think there was some record where there was an approval to convert the garage into an apartment. Chairperson Sigel — Are you aware , Andy, of an area variance granted ? It looks like the apartment is shown as 12 . 2 feet from the property line . Mr. Frost — I ' m not aware of one . Ms . Hunter — Oh , next to Doria . Doria was very aware of how many feet I was from her property line so maybe something was done at some point with regard to that . Chairperson Sigel — We could just grant a special approval , do the deck and not touch any of the other issues which may or may not already have variances granted . Mr. Frost — I would recommend that and that way you are not kind of committing yourself to keeping something that we may later find out is illegal . It's non -conforming , but it could be either legally non - conforming or not legally non -conforming . Ms . Hunter — As a property owner, how do I go about finding out if it is illegal . Mr. Frost — If information comes up somewhere in the process and it indicates whether there were approvals or there weren 't . Ms . Hunter — Well , say I want to sell it? Mr. Frost — Since you just bought it , obviously the former owners managed to sell it . What I ' m suggesting to the Zoning Board , Tee-Ann , is that if they were to give you the approval for the deck without committing to anything else based on information that we don 't have . Ms . Hunter — And if I wanted to clear it up so that there was a question of whether or not there was anything illegal , how would I proceed to do that? Mr. Frost — We would need to talk about that . I think that the bottom line is though , that you ' re not on a town , county or state highway so that your property is always going to be non -conforming . Ms . Hunter — I guess you ' re using non-conforming and legal as though they are opposites of one another? Chairperson Sigel — No , you can be legally non -conforming . I think what Andy is saying is that this Board may not want to grant variances for things that may already have been granted in the past and we are not sure about . For instance , the apartment appears to be too close to the lot line , that may 2 APPROVED MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 16, 2002 just have a variance already and it wouldn 't be appropriate for us to grant another one and also for the front yard setbacks . If you were to find that there was no variance granted , then you could come back to the Board and request a variance . Mr. Frost - Basically , Tee-Ann , the apartment has a setback of 12 foot to the property line . If and when that apartment was actually being used as a garage , only ten foot was required . When the apartment was converted then the setback would have had to be 15 foot , whether that was allowed or by mistake of some former building inspector I don 't know . There may be a variance for it . Mr. Ellsworth — (Comments not audible) Mr. Frost — Well , usually the buyer or the buyer' s attorney requests a Certificate of Occupancy from the Town upon sale and they would do research and perhaps uncover something . In this case , I don 't think you had a certificate of occupancy from the Town . Ms . Hunter - A Certificate of Occupancy for the house or the apartment? Mr. Frost — For the property when you bought it . Ms . Hunter — Well , I think I did , but maybe I didn 't . I don 't know. Mr. Frost — Your lawyer would have requested it . Ms . Hunter — One would hope so . Mr. Frost — I would say that it' s not uncommon for property transfers without a Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Dixon — They' re kind of happy with just the title search . Chairperson Sigel — Any questions? Ms . Hunter — Well , I have questions . Just one question . So say , I sell it and say upon the sale of this , Andy, someone requires the Certificate of Occupancy? What' s going to happen ? Mr. Frost — I can 't really answer that question . Presuming we don 't find any problems , we' d issue the Certificate of Occupancy. Ms . Hunter — Well , how can I engage the Town to perform that search for me . Mr. Frost — I ' m not sure that this is the forum for that discussion . Perhaps we could talk about it tomorrow. Ms . Hunter —Alright . Chairperson Sigel — Mike , any comments ? 3 APPROVED MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 16, 2002 Mr. Smith — Nothing to add . Just that the deck is extending out over existing lawn area and it's pretty well screened . Chairperson Sigel — So , none of the deck is encroaching on any setbacks ? Mr. Smith — No . Mr. Frost — It's really quite simple , the property doesn 't conform with some of the Town rules . She wants to enlarge the deck . It's a rather benign improvement , but the process is to go before the Zoning Board . Chairperson Sigel opened the Public Hearing at 7 : 14 pm . With no persons present to be heard , Chairperson Sigel closed the Public Hearing at 7 : 15 pm . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Chairperson Sigel — Would someone like to move on the Environmental Assessment? ZB RESOLUTION NO. 2002-080: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Hunter, 107 Hillcrest Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 264- 14, Residence District R- 15. MOTION made by Harry Ellsworth, seconded by James Niefer. RESOLVED, that this Board makes a negative determination of environmental significance in the appeal of Tee-Ann Hunter, Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article Xll, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an outside wood deck on a non- conforming building/lot located at 107 Hillcrest Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 26-4- 14, Residence District R- 15. Said parcel is non-conforming since it does not front on a Town, County, or State highway, with said building being located no less than 19 feet from the front property line, whereas a 25 foot building setback is required. This motion is based upon the Environmental Assessment Form signed by Tee-Ann Hunter on November 14, 2002 and by town staff on December 512002, The vote on the MOTION resulted as follows: AYES: Sigel, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Dixon NAYS: None The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously. Chairperson Sigel — Would someone like to make a motion on the appeal ? 4 APPROVED MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECEMBER 16, 2002 ZB RESOLUTION NO. 2002=081 : Tee-Ann Hunter, 107 Hillcrest Road, Tax Parcel No.26-4- 14, Residence District R-30. MOTION made by Harry Ellsworth, seconded by James Niefer. RESOLVED, that this Board grants the appeal of Tee-Ann Hunter, Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an outside wood deck on a non-conforming building/lot located at 107 Hillcrest Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 26-4- 14, Residence District R- 15. Said parcel is non-conforming since it does not front on a Town, County, or State highway, with said building being located no less than 19 feet from the front property line, whereas a 25 foot building setback is required. FINDINGS: a . The conditions of Article XIV, Section 77, Subsection 7, Subparagraphs a -h have been satisfied. CONDITIONS: a. The deck must be designed as shown on the submitted diagram. The vote on the MOTION resulted as follows: AYES: Sigel, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Dixon NAYS: None The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously. APPEAL : Rolf Pendall , Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article XII , Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to enlarge a single-family residence on a non- conforming lot, with the addition of a second dwelling unit, at 29 Renwick Heights Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 17-34, Residence District R-15 . Said parcel has an existing road frontage of 26 + feet, whereas 60 feet is required . Rolf Pendall , 29 Renwick Heights Road — We have an existing single family house at 29 Renwick Heights Road and we are proposing to separate that large single family house into a second unit as well as the principle dwelling unit . We ' re not proposing any enlargement of the existing unit , but rather to finish out the upper floors of the addition of that existing unit . There is no proposal to increase the building footprint . When we purchased the house , those upper stories were unfinished and the access into one of the rooms is not entirely conforming with code . Andy told us that when we moved in and he let us know that he wouldn 't give permission for us to occupy that room for anything except storage purposes until we addressed the landing that is just outside the door there . So we have , since then , not been using 5 v; IL Town Assigned Project ID Number Town of; Ithaca Environmental Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Located in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, NY ONLY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION o be com leted by A pplicant or Project Sponsor) 1 . Applicant/Sponsor: u ( 2. Project Name: 3. Precise location (street address, road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map): Tax Parcel Number: U 1 4. Is proposed action : NEW? EXPANSION? MODIFICATION/ALTERATION? 5. Describe project briefly: ( Include project purpose, present land use, current and future / construction plans, and other relevant items): 10 �� �aCe Cx � 5 g (Attach separate sheet(s) If necessary to adequately describe the proposed project.) 6. Amount of land affected : Initially (0-5 yrs) Acres (6-10 yrs) Acres (> 10 yrs) Acres 7. How is land zoned presently? 8. Will proposed action c ply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? YES NO If no, describe conflict briefly: ADS ,. rot4( -V r1k \C7� 9. Will proposed action lead to a re/"1 for now / Public Road? YES NO Public Water? YES NO V Public Sewer? YES NO 10. What Is the present land use In the vicinity of the proposed project? Residential Commercial Industrial Agriculture Park/Forest/Open Space Other Please Describe: 11 . Does proposed action Involve a permit, approval, or f nding, now ultimately from any other governmental agency (Federal, State, Local)? YES NO If yes, list agency name and permit approval/funding : DV \ \d ` n�3 12. Does any aspect of the proposed action have a currently valid permit or approval? YES NO If yes, list agency name and permittapproval. Also, state whether It will require modification. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TR ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appllcant/SSpponso�r Name ( Print or Type) : Signature : 1C._C" Rnr\ Date : Rev. 8/92 / 07 „ e. F . PART 11 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by the Town ; Use attachments as necessary) A. Does proposed action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617. 12 or Town Environmental Local Law? YES NO X If yes, coordinate the review process and use the full EAF. B. Will proposed action receive coordinated review as provided for unlisted actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.6 YES NO X If no, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency, if any. C. Could proposed action result in any adverse effects associated with the following: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1 . Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production and disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: None Anticipated. C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources? Community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: None Anticipated. C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish, or wildlife species, significant habitats, unique natural area, wetlands, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly : None Anticipated. The property is developed with the larger deck extending over existing lawn area. Natural vegetation along the rear and sides of the property help to buffer rear yard. C4. The Town ' s existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: None Anticipated. The Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan designates the site as "Suburban Residential” and it is zoned Residence District R- 15 . C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action ? Explain briefly : None Anticipated. C6. Long term, short term , cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1 -05? Explain briefly: None Anticipated. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy) Explain briefly: None Anticipated. D. Is there, or is there likely to be controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? YES NO X If yes, explain briefly : E. Comments of staff , CB., other attached. (Check as applicable.) PART 111 - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by the Town of Ithaca) Instructions: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial , large, important, or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i .e. urban or rural) ; (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration ; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope, and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting material . Ensure that the explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately address. Check here if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the full EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration . X Check here if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on Attachments as necessary the reasons supporting this determination . Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Z 0 2 Name of Lead Agency Preparer' s r ignature ( If different from Responsible Officer) Kirk Sigel, Chairman Name & title of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Signature of Contributing Preparer DATE : Si natu a of Responsible Offif er in Lead Agency WN ,ISM IW R <3T7 `\ mr t r � .f r 44 �«�•fi�°� ,�,�� �� 3 rat � • • r v.� TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, DECEMBER I6, 2002 7 : 00 P .M . By direction of the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ithaca on Monday, December 16, 2002 , in Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Tioga Street Entrance, Ithaca, NY, COMMENCING AT 7 : 00 P.M . , on the following matters : APPEAL of Tee-Ann Hunter, Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an outside wood deck on a non-conforming building/lot located at 107 Hillcrest Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 26-4- 14, Residence District R- 15 . Said parcel is non-conforming since it does not front on a Town, County, or State highway, with said building being located 19 feet from the front property line, whereas a 25 foot building setback is required. A variance from Article IV, Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance, may also be requested. APPEAL of Rolf Pendall, Appellant, requesting a special approval under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to enlarge a single-family residence on a non-conforming lot, with the addition of a second dwelling unit, at 29 Renwick Heights Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcels No. 17-34, Residence District R- 15 . Said parcel has an existing road frontage of 26 ± feet, whereas 60 feet is required. APPEAL of Larry Snyder, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article IV, Section 11 (6) to be permitted to construct a single-family residence with a building height of 39 ± feet (36 foot limitation) at 5 John Street, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 56-3 - 13 . 27, Residence District R- 15 . APPEAL of Robert MacLeod, Appellant/Owner, William Chaploney, Agent, requesting a special approval under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an existing non-conforming building/lot, with the extension of an outside wood deck, located at 981 Taughannock Boulevard, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 21 -2-30, Residence District R- 15 . A variance from Article IV, Section 11 (6) may also be requested to allow an overall building height to exceed 36 ± feet. Said building lot does not conform with the requirements for property dimensions, and the existing building has a north side yard setback of 2 to 5 feet ( 15 feet required). Said Zoning Board of Appeals will at said time, 7 :00 p.m. , and said place, hear all persons in support of such matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual or hearing impairments or other special needs, as appropriate, will be provided with assistance, as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing. Andrew S . Frost Director of Building and Zoning 273 - 1783 Dated : December 5 , 2002 Published : December 9, 2002 TOWN OF ITHACA FEE: $100.00 215 North Tioga Street RECEIVED: 4-q • Ithaca, New York 14850 (607) 273- 1783 CASH - ( ) SPECIAL APPROVAL CHECK - I r to the Building Inspector/Zoning Enforcement Officer ZONING: and the Zoning Board of Appeals For Office Use Only of the Town of Ithaca, New York Having been informed that authorization is required to: Vr o �ra c e. C c) k ko\ c, c ck--� o K) \ '\ n4 \ i \ a r,�( r cl at `� l- 'R7 11 �' `�C �D� -i VJC , , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 7Le � ' � - " � as shown on the accompanying application and/or plans or other supporting documents. The Special Approval authorization is requested pursuant to: Article(s) Section(s) of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, the UNDERSIGNED respectfully submits this request for Special Approval authorization. (Additional sheets may be attached as necessary.) By filing this application, I grant permission for members of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or staff to enter my property to inspect in connection `with my application, Signature of Owner/Appellan-t—�11 P0� Date : rl l � � r � ► 1 Signature of Appellant/Agent: / Date: Print Name Home Telephone Number: ��� i "� VQ" Work Telephone Number: (rlcl 4 NOTE: If construction of work in accordance with any approvals given does not commence within 18 months, the approval will ex ' . Your attendance at the meeting is advised. ?moo Z � O e ` er o '0 . ,. Q • o . � �. . to o9/P S0z \ � � � ONE R° /PE a � °006 � 0 . N 0 ' A'9GR:'�. CE,'r q.1A a�O S it U�i N % r -4 0A1 jVWeA1fda !5 IeA S / OA/S OF r/y/ MA X qo O J P w l, 1 o rQo� QIQ E A 1 Ae 7rQ0� R'\ n , 44 4N � 0 T Z n Ex ��r� v4 a„y p2PiPE, itS S'A/OC%✓ OvERMCAD � /NE � . . . . � D/�'►ENSiO.(/ vC ,C .DES (/OfE fEE 40Ki6i.✓44 JuR ✓Br Of r.✓/ S 4or M.00E 8Y GEgeaE Sli.q ✓Ey ReEEREA/GE C• SCr✓LEfNT, OE.� L• S.,• D/VfEO ,31918¢ AA/O SCHL EC//T �6 Svc✓Ey �7A7ZrO /// 9 / 8 ¢ ANO " gp YEREV/SCL OF 7/9/B ! • IFe-5r/A D $J� "N4�VZA.P/ ANO N /LLG ?EST 4vaD1v1S10'V IPEAG.4n/, L..9.v0 S7/,e% YUeS AS Saccd_SsoeS To J1Y ' L . A 6 RA v q H .SCf/LECNT L .J. (DATED B 1 (- / 47 DA-rCD : �VaV. / ifsS RE500UEY 13y (ZEAGAIJ LAUD 5UIZVEYW(, F / LED : �-P� �✓�R .erG� Aes vR veke MAP M ICI-IAEL IVY. YuwILLIGE.Z TOWu OF ITUACA ) TOMPVMIS COUwT \f , WEVJ YozV, TAX MAP tlo . 26 - y - 19 REFEZEME DEED / P 137 REAGAN, LAND SURVEYING NOTE: ANY REVISIONS TO THIS MAP MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2 OF THE NEW YORK STATE P0 BOX ' 124, DRYDEN NEW YORK 13053 EDUCATION LAW. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP (607) 844 -8837 OR COPIES BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON THIS MAP NOT VALID WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 'SURVEY AFFIDAVIT' OR "CERTIFICATE OF NO-CHANGE.” 11A� i DRAWN REAGALA S!!R'Ck ED G � ZOOI BY D ,k, SCALE I = SO JOBNO. . OI " 143 1 hereby certify to TOMP41115 TQ05T COMFAU. ITS SUC.CES50e.5 /o¢ ASSIGUS , sN �ND '�,�� 1AAIMI1 > 5EACIA , LLP TEE Aug IAUWTEV �`i,5�� kL�L that I am a licensed land surveyor, New York State License No . oygggZ and that this oml map correctly delineates an actual survey on the ground made by me or under my direct supervision , that it was prepared in accordance with the current code of practice for land title ' surveys adopted by the New York Association of Professional Land Surveyors : and that I found no visible encroachments either way across property lines except as shown hereon . . 04 SIGNED : N DATED : 0��17�0/ • • , , . . , , , , . 'Copyright ZOO ; All Rights Reserved, lAeacian Land Survevino" Printer Friendly Report Page 1 of 1 Property Description Report Ithaca (Town ) Status : Active Roll Section : Taxable Owner: Swis : 503089 Tax Map# 261 -4-14 HUNTER, TEE ANN D Location : 107 HILLCREST DR 107 HILLCREST DR ITHACA NY 14850 Zoning Code : Site : 1 TEE ANN D HUNTER Neighborhood : 30020 Last Sale : Property Class : 2 Family residence Sale Date : 07/16/2001 Land Type : Primary Sale Price : $ 1109000 . 00 Size : 0 x 0 Valid : 1 Arms Length : Y Land Assessment : $12 , 100 . 00 Deed Book : 910 Deed Page : 70 Total Assessment: $95 , 000 . 00 Prior Owner: Total Acreage : 0 TERWILLIGER, MICHAEL M School District : Ithaca Structure - Building Style : Ranch Utilities - Number of Baths : 3 Sewer Type Private Number of Bedrooms 3 Water Supply Comm/Public Number of Kitchens 2 Utilities Gas/Elec Number of Fireplaces 1 Heat Type Hot Air Overall Condition Normal Fuel Type Gas Overall Grade Average Central Air Porch Type Porch , Open Porch Area 120 . 00 sq/ft Improvements - Year Built 1954 Structure : PORCH , ENCLOSED Basement Type Partial Grade : Average Basement Garage Cap . 0 Attached Garage Cap . p Condition : Normal Size : 60 x 0 Area - Year: 1952 Living Area : 1 ,652. 00 sq/ft Tax Information - First Story Area : 1 ,652 . 00 sq/ft Second Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft Taxes may not reflect exemptions or changes in Half Story Area : 0. 00 sq/ft assessment ! Additional Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft Three-Quarter Story County Year Tax : $ 19157. 46 Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft County Year: 2001 Finished Basement 0 . 00 sq/ft School Year Tax : $0 . 00 Number of Stories 1 School Year: http ://asmsdg. tompkins-co . org/imate/printab] e . asp 11 / 15/02 Big Photo Page 1 of 1 r l r` http://asmsdg.tompkins-co.org/imate/bigphoto.asp?ref=http://asmsdg.tompkins-co.org/imag... 11/15/02 D x -a 0 c� N � O O 2 r n rn v m z N I( _ cn � x :u m 0 C) n > D o o E3 O CP D � a D Ca. (D '0 5 I m a a) jn o CL N 0 m z z z m o a K m N 0 O n N tompkins .�County DEPARIth aMcE�tiNe,q°T w "OF a A� l NING 121 East� u t Str i et a, YoYk 4850 . Edward C. Marx AICP Telephone (607) 274-5560 Commissioner of Planning \ * �/ Fax (607) 274-5578 November 19, 2002 Mr. Andy Frost, Building/Zoning Officer Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re : Review Pursuant to § 239 -1 , -m, and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law Action : Special Approval, Tee-Ann Hunter, 107 Hillcrest Drive, Tax Parcel No . 26 . 4- 14 Dear Mr. Frost: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by the Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to § 239 -1 , -m, and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. The Department has reviewed the proposal , as submitted, and has determined that it has no negative inter-community or county-wide impacts . Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record . Sincerely, Edward C . Marx, AICP Commissioner of Planning MW25MM TOWN OF ITHACA BUILDINGJONING l R