Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA Area 7/15/2002 TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, JULY 154 2002 7 : 00 P.M. By direction of the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ithaca on Monday, July 15 , 2002 , in Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Tioga Street Entrance, Ithaca, NY, COMMENCING AT 7 : 00 P. M. , on the following matters : APPEAL of Arthur Bloom , Appellant, requesting an approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to construct a 500 + square foot building addition to an existing non-conforming building at 118 Judd Falls Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 66-5 -4, Residence District R- 15 . Said building is located within the required front yard building setback area. APPEAL of Donald Swart, Appellant, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article IV, Section 14 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to enlarge an existing garage, with a new side yard building setback of 6 feet ( 10 foot setback required) at 110 Winston Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 70- 11 -29, Residence District R- 15 . APPEAL of John Lango, Appellant, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article V, Sections 18 and 20 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to construct a 19 foot high accessory building ( 15 foot height limitation) on a vacant parcel of land, with the accessory building being the principal, use, at 203 Bostwick Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 31 -4-6. 6, Residence District R-30. Said Ordinance would require the proposed building to be accessory to a residence. APPEAL of Edward Gregoire, Appellant, Attorney Edward Mazza, Agent, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article V, Section 21 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to maintain an existing garage with a 9 + foot building setback ( 15 foot required) at 2 Schickel Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 36-2- 15 , Residence District R-30. APPEAL of Katherine Heine and Philip Syphrit, Appellants, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article V, Section 20 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to construct a 256 square foot building addition on the southeast side of an existing single-family residence located at 696 Coddington Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 49- 1 -23 , Residence District R-30 . Said addition will be 25 + feet from the property ' s side lot line (40 foot setback required) . APPEAL of Cornell University Real Estate Department, Owners, Ashley Management Corporation, Agent, requesting an approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals, under Article VII, Section 34 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to create a 1 ,200 square foot retail food service establishment within an existing building space located at 335 Pine Tree Road, the East Hill Plaza, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62-2- 1 . 121 , Business District C. APPEAL of Nancy Gould, Appellant, requesting variances from the requirements of Article V, Sections 203 21 , and 23 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to subdivide a parcel of land, containing two existing non-conforming buildings, resulting in two new parcels with area and building setback deficiencies, at 154 Indian Creek Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 22-2-6 . 1 . A variance from Section 280A of New York State Town Law is also requested. One new lot will not front on a public highway, while both new lots will be less than 30,000 square feet in area, with substandard building setbacks and lot area dimensions, including widths and depths . APPEAL of Peter Newell, Appellant, requesting authorization from the Zoning Board of Appeals under Article XII, Section 54 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to alter non-conforming buildings on a non-conforming building lot located at 891 Taughannock Boulevard, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 25-2- 15 , Residence District R- 15 . Said parcel contains four residential buildings with said alterations resulting in the creation of two residential buildings and one garage. A variance from the requirements of Article IV, Section 11 may also be requested to allow a building height to exceed 36 feet. Said Zoning Board of Appeals will at said time, 7 : 00 p . m. , and said place, hear all persons in support of such matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person . Individuals with visual or hearing impairments or other special needs, as appropriate, will be provided with assistance, as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing. Andrew S . Frost Director of Building and Zoning 273 - 1783 Dated : July 3 , 2002 Published : July 8 , 2002 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 15 , 2002 MINUTES APPROVED b. This approval is contingent on final site plan approval from the Planning Board. The vote on the motion resulted as follows: AYES: Sigel, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Dixon NAYS: None The motion was declared to be carried unanimously. APPEAL : of Nancy Gould , Appellant, requesting variances from the requirements of Article V, Sections 20, 21 , and 23 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to subdivide a parcel of land , containing two existing non-conforming buildings , resulting in two new parcels with area and building setback deficiencies , at 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 22-2-6 . 1 . A variance from Section 280A of New York State Town Law is also requested . One new lot will not front on a public highway, while both new lots will be less than 30 , 000 square feet in area , with substandard building setbacks and lot area dimensions , including widths and depths. Nancy Gould , 154 Indian Creek Rd - Before we begin , I 'd like to make a correction where it says " One new lot will not front on a public highway' both lots would run on public highways , one from Indian Creek Rd , the second one from Happy Lane and the culvert is already in on Happy to build a driveway for that house . Nothing would change as far as buildings are concerned . The two structures are currently there . What we ' re just asking to do is separate them to give us a little bit more flexibility. Currently, the front house is rented and the back house has my 90 year old mother- in - law living in it . We ' d like the flexibility to be able to sell the front house and turn it back into just a neighborhood house if we could , but we don 't want to give up the ownership of the back house as long as my mother- in - law is alive . It's become overwhelming for us to maintain both of them . We 've had the deaths of two fathers , so we' re maintaining four properties and my husband 's tired . Mr. Frost - I just wanted to clarify that in the appeal , I advertised this as needing a variance from Section 288 of the Town Law , which requires a road frontage . That should not be in there . That appeal is not necessary because this does have frontage on two roads . Chairperson Sigel - Well , the original proposed before the Planning Board , I think didn 't have . Mr. Frost - Well I have to speak for what I did when I wrote this up . You take the survey map like this and look at it . That section doesn 't show the word Happy Lane , when you open up the paper and see the words Happy Lane on the other side . I don 't think that was a Planning Board issue . Ms . Gould - It wasn 't concerning the Planning Board because they were aware , I think , that it had road frontage on two different roads . 23 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 15 , 2002 MINUTES APPROVED Chairperson Sigel — And I see , in fact that you did manage to get all of the Planning Board Member to vote for that . How long have these homes been here ? Ms . Gould — The first house was built in 1955 or so . At which time I believe 1600 square foot was the requirement then . The second house , this was the family house , was built for my grandfather when he had a stroke and I believe that was 1962 . Chairperson Sigel — So how is that in relation to when the Zoning Ordinance [the first ordinance] was enacted ? Andy , when was the first Zoning Ordinance enacted ? Mr. Frost — In ' 54 . Actually, prior to 1960 , we didn 't even label residence districts as residence districts . We didn 't break down things as we do today . That change happened in 1960 . Chairperson Sigel — Is it possibly the case that at that time , two residences were allowed on one lot ? Mr. Frost — Prior to ' 60 . If I understand the appellant , the second house was built later on . The change would have occurred in 1960 . The application of the laws that we had in the earlier years was not quite the same as we ' re had in the more recent years . Ms . Gould — I believe there was a valid permit granted for the second house . Chairperson Sigel — You think there was a permit ? Ms . Gould — Yes , I ' m fairly certain . Mr. Frost — The building permit at that time probably had name , address and phone number and that's about it . Chairperson Sigel — We do not have an Environmental Assessment form ? Mr. Frost — This is strictly an area variance . Chairperson Sigel opened the public hearing at 8 : 38 p . m . With no persons present to be hears , Chairperson Sigel closed the public hearing at 8 : 39 p . m . Mr. Ellsworth — Are we going to have to mention these yard setback dimensions ? I just wonder if , Nancy, these are accurate . Ms . Gould — It was recently surveyed by the surveyor. Chairperson Sigel — I think that this chart is somewhat inaccurate because it reflects parcel "A" being less that 15 , 000 square feet and that ' s been modified . 24 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 15 , 2002 MINUTES APPROVED Mr. Smith — That was for the Planning Board and they have since modified the plan . Ms . Gould — I think the plan you have before you shows the front the front parcel at a little over 15 , 000 feet . Chairperson Sigel — The survey doesn 't show the setbacks . Mr. Frost — Unless you scale it . The shed shown on the back there , there 's a note that says "shed to be removed " I assume that ' s going to be removed . Ms . Gould — Originally , we were going to keep the shed on the back lot , but because there was enough room to do that when we had made the front lot smaller. When they asked us to make the front lot larger, we had the option of either putting they shed on the front lot or moving it and my husband has decided he ' d like to keep it since he has a lot of carpentry equipment . We ' ll probably move that back over on the other property . Mr. Frost — The only thing I would offer is that the buildings aren 't moving and the proposed property line does not look like it would create any new deficiencies . Chairperson Sigel — We could just state setbacks as they exist currently . There is just the danger of something cropping up , a deck or something . And then it not being clear if that happened before or after tonight . Mr. Frost — The rear lot line of parcel "A" becomes the side lot line of parcel "B" . So you only need 15 feet from parcel " B" to the rear lot line of parcel "A" , which the rear of parcel "A" would require 30 feet and it would appear that you 've got that easy . I don 't think the subdivision is going to change anything . Ms . Gould — I have a scale on my copy , don 't you have a scale on yours . Mr . Frost — There is , but what happens when you copy a map with a scale , it changes the accuracy. Chairperson Sigel — You can just measure . Here , it ' s labeled a hundred feet , you know how long a hundred feet is . So what you ' re saying is only one lot line moved . Ms . Gould — The only thing we 've done is basically added a lot line between two houses . Chairperson Sigel — Right , but when this Planning Department chart was made up , the only thing since then is that the lot line has moved towards the back house . Parcel "A" is the front house . Ms . Gould — Parcel "A" is the front house on Indian Creek Rd . Chairperson Sigel — So the rear of parcel "A" would have gotten larger and it was insufficient . Do you know approximately how far the lot line was moved ? 25 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 15, 2002 MINUTES APPROVED Ms . Gould — Approximately 20 feet , I believe it was . It was 13 , 000 something before . Chairperson Sigel — So , it should have increased to approximately 54 feet , which would make it acceptable . So that deficiency should be removed . And "B" ' s side yard , I guess the 42 probably was reduced by 20 , is my guess . It looks like the 69 must have been the other side , so the 42 would become approximately 22 ? Does that seem right Andy? Mr. Frost — I guess I would say at being corrected at R-30 the side lot line of parcel "B" maybe less that an inch to the new property line , which would make it less than a 40 foot setback . Mr. Gould —So that would increase from 130 feet to 148 feet . 18 feet . Chairperson Sigel — I think we have some approximate measures that we can use . Mr. Frost — The depth of parcel "A" is definitely deficient . So you need a variance for the depth of the new lot "A" . Chairperson Sigel — Okay , but not the rear yard setback? Mr. Frost — No , the rear yard setback looks fine . The side yard setback of parcel "B" now looks like it's still 42 feet ? Chairperson Sigel — No , I think the 42 was reduced . I think the 42 was reduced by 18 . Mr. Frost — My guess is it's probably somewhat accurate I ' m getting about just over a half inch on the measurement of the map . So , I 'd say about 24 or 25 for side yard setbacks at 154 '/2 of lot " B" . 25 + feet as opposed to the required 40 . Mr. Ellsworth — I would move on your approving this appeal that it be made pending Ms . Gould and Andy Frost working out the precise measurements because we ' re guessing Mr. Frost — This is measuring close , but not exact . It looks like the 148 for the depth of parcel "A" is close to 148 , whereas 200 square foot' s required . Chairperson Sigel — I think we ' re pretty close and I think we ' re setting sort of boundaries on the house , if we ' re off too large , then actually they' ll need to come back . There ' s a chart on page 2 of the Planning Department Memorandum , dated May 29th , 2002 from Jonathan Kanter that lists all of the setbacks . There are two errors , one of them is the rear yard of parcel "A" is 52 feet instead of 34 feet and the side yard setbacks for parcel "B" are 24 feet and 69 instead of 42 feet and 69 feet . ZB RESOLUTION NO . 2002-047 — Nancy Gould , 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 22-2-6 . 1 . 26 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 15, 2002 MINUTES APPROVED MOTION made by Kirk Sigel, seconded Harry Ellsworth. RESOLVED, that this Board grants the appeal of Nancy Gould, Appellant, requesting variances from the requirements of Article V, Sections 20, 21 , and 23 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to subdivide a parcel of land, containing two existing non-conforming buildings, resulting in two new parcels with area and building setback deficiencies, at 154 Indian Creek Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 22-2-6. 1 . Both new lots will be less than 30, 000 square feet in area, with substandard building setbacks and lot area dimensions, including widths and depths. FINDINGS: a . The requirements for an area variance have been met. CONDITIONS: a . All conditions set by Planning Board be met, including the Planning Board final subdivision approval. b. All of the setbacks and lot sizes that are presently on the site are continued. c. The only permitted deficient measurements are as follows: Parcel A : Lot size not less than 15000 square feet. Width at setback not less than 99 feet. Depth not less than 149 feet. East and west side yard setbacks not less than 25 feet. Parcel B: Lot size not less than 23000 square feet. Width at setback not less than 100 feet. South side yard setback not less than 23 feet. Rear yard setback not less than 44 feet. The vote on the motion resulted as follows: AYES: Sigel, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Dixon NAYS: None The motion was declared to be carried unanimously. 27 FILE rw DATE `�--' ZB RESOLUTION NO . 2002-047 — Nancy Gould , 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No , 22-2-6111 MOTION made by Kirk Sigel , seconded Harry Ellsworth . RESOLVED , that this Board grants the appeal of Nancy Gould , Appellant , requesting variances from the requirements of Article V , Sections 20 , 21 , and 23 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance , to be permitted to subdivide a parcel of land , containing two existing non-conforming buildings , resulting in two new parcels with area and building setback deficiencies , at 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No , 22-2-6 . 1 . Both new lots will be less than 30 , 000 square feet in area , with substandard building setbacks and lot area dimensions , including widths and depths . FINDINGS : a . The requirements for an area variance have been met . CONDITIONS : a . All conditions set by Planning Board be met , including the Planning Board final subdivision approval . b . All of the setbacks and lot sizes that are presently on the site are continued . c . The only permitted deficient measurements are as follows : Parcel A : Lot size not less than 15000 square feet . Width at setback not less than 99 feet . Depth not less than 149 feet . East and west side yard setbacks not less than 25 feet . ZBA RESOLUTION NO . 2002-047 p . 2 Parcel B : Lot size not less than 23000 square feet . Width at setback not less than 100 feet . South side yard setback not less than 23 feet . Rear yard setback not less than 44 feet . The vote on the motion resulted as follows : AYES : Sigel , Ellsworth , Krantz , Niefer, Dixon NAYS : None The motion was declared to be carried unanimously . STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS : TOWN OF ITHACA . I , Lori Quigley , T-eWn-Sferk/Deputy Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca , New York, do hereby certify that the attached resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ithaca at a regular meeting on the 15th day of July 2002 . Lori Quigley , Deputy Town Clerk • \ j TOWN OF ITHACA FEE: $80.00 215 North Tioga Street RECEIVED: C): Ithaca, New York 14850 (607) 273- 1783 CASH - APPEAL CHECK - to the Building Inspector/Zoning Enforcement Officer ZONING: and the Zoning Board of Appeals For Office Use Only of the Town of Ithaca, New York r Having been denied permission to: Clllbidepl at IX-Y -��" ' '� d/ , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. �� b " , as shown on the accompanying application and/or plans or other supporting documents, for the stated reason that the issuance of such permit would be in violation of: Article(s) , Section(s) , of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, the UNDERSIGNED respectfully submits this Appeal from such denial and, in support of the Appeal, affirms that strict observance of the Zoning Ordinance would impose PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES and/or UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP as follows: (Additional sheets may attached as necessary .) aG �r4 /!/G�✓� C; v�/f�U �✓t'� s� yc 'r^� P c� /� r�l By filing this application, I grant permission for members of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or staff to enter my property to inspect in connection wit my application. /1 Signature of Owner/Appellant: crLc- Date:�dU — Signature of Appellant/Agent: l Date: Print Name Here: / Y A/(,P# Home Telephone Number: U ` y 0 7 p � � � ��-� Work Telephone Number: NOTE: If construction of work in accordance with any variances given does not commence within 18 months, the variance will . Your attendance at the meeting is advised. TOWN OF 1THACA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO : PLANNING BOARD FROM : . JONATHAN KANTER , DIRECTOR OF PLANNING JqLi� RE : PROPOSED GOULD TWO-LOT SUBDIVISION , 154 INDIAN CREEK ROAD DATE : MAY 299 2002 The above-referenced subdivision is scheduled for consideration at the June 4`h Planning Board meeting. The proposal includes subdividing the existing 38 , 362 +/- square foot parcel into two parcels of 13 , 191 +/- square feet and 25 , 171 +/- square feet , each containing an existing house . The subject site is located on the north side of Indian Creek Road, and is zoned R- 30 Residence District . Both houses are currently served by their own on - site septic systems . Both are served by public water. The current tax parcel contains two non-conforming houses , including one that is rented out and one that is occupied by a family member. The subdivision will enable the current owner to sell one or both houses , increasing the likelihood that both could become owner-occupied. The area surrounding the proposed subdivision site consists of single- family houses along Indian Creek Road and Happy Lane with woods ( owned by Cayuga Medical Center) across Indian Creek Road . The two houses are currently served by a single gravel driveway off of Indian Creek Road . The applicant plans to install a new driveway for Parcel B connecting with Happy Lane (a Town road) . This is a good solution , and staff has suggested including a condition in the resolution of approval committing the applicant to this . This will do away with the need for an access easement for continuing the shared driveway. The primary issue with this subdivision is that numerous variances will be required . Several variances result from existing non-conforming situations . However, most of the variances are necessitated by the proposed subdivision . In addition to variances from the minimum lot size requirements of the R- 30 District, additional variances will be needed for lot width, depth , and side and rear yard setbacks . The following table illustrates the R- 30 requirements and the lot and yard characteristics of proposed Parcels A and B : cc • r Required (R- 30) Parcel A Parcel B Min . Lot Size 30 , 000 sq . ft . 13 , 191 sq , ft . * 25 , 171 sq . ft . Min . Width at Street 100 ft . 100 .2 ft . 101 ft. Min . Width at Setback 150 ft . 100 .2 ft . * 101 ft . Min . Depth 200 ft . 132 .45 ft . * 203 .44 ft . Front Yard 30 ft . 46 ft . 135 ft . Side Yard 40 ft . 26 ft ./26 ft . * 42 ft./69 ft . Rear Yard 50 ft . 34 ft. * 45 ft . * Accessory Buildings 3 ft . from side or rear - - 2 ft . from side lot line ( must be in rear lot line (in yard) side yard) [ * Variance required] Although numerous variances will be required , the proposed subdivision will allow a non- conforming situation ( two houses on one lot) to be cleaned up . Since no additional development potential exists , the subdivision will not negatively inpact the character of the surrounding neighborhood . Attached are materials for the Board ' s consideration , including the Short Environmental Assessment Form Parts l and 11 , a proposed SEQR resolution , a draft resolution for preliminary and final subdivision approval with the relevant checklists , a survey map showing the proposed subdivision , a general location map showing the subject site and its location relative to the surrounding area , and a copy of the GML referral response from the County Planning Department indicating that there are no negative intercommunity impacts . Please let me know if there are any questions regarding the above . Att . 2 FILE 0 " DATE � C)Z� ADOPTED RESOLUTION : PB RESOLUTION NO . 2002-059 Preliminary Subdivision Approval , Gould Two- Lot Subdivision 154 Indian Creek Road Tax Parcel No . 22 . -2-6. 1 Planning Board , June 4 , 2002 MOTION made by Rod Howe , seconded by Kevin Talty . WHEREAS . 10 This action is consideration of Preliminary Subdivision Approval for the proposed two- lot subdivision located at 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 22 . -2-6 . 1 , Residence District R-30 . The proposal is to subdivide the 38 , 362 ± square foot parcel into two parcels of 13 , 191 ± square feet and 25 , 171 ± square feet , each containing an existing house . John G . & Nancy I . Gould , Owners/Applicants , and 2 . This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board , acting as lead agency in environmental review with respect to Subdivision Approval , has on June 4 , 2002 , made a negative determination of environmental significance , after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I , submitted by the applicant , and Part II prepared by the Town Planning staff , and 3 . The Planning Board , at a Public Hearing held on June 4 , 2002 , has reviewed and conditionally accepted a survey map entitled " Map of Survey Lot To Be Subdivided by John G . and Nancy I . Gould , Town of Ithaca , Tompkins County , State of New York , " prepared by Robert S . Russler, Jr. , Licensed Land Surveyor, dated May 1 , 2002 , and other application materials , NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED . 1 . That the Town of Ithaca Planning board hereby waives certain requirements for Preliminary Subdivision Approval , as shown on the Preliminary Subdivision Checklists , having determined from the materials presented that such waiver will result in neither a significant alteration of the purpose of subdivision control nor the policies enunciated or implied by the Town Board , and 2 . That the Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary Subdivision Approval for the proposed two- lot subdivision at 154 Indian Creek Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 22 . -2-6 . 1 , as shown on a survey map entitled " Map of Survey Lot To Be Subdivided by John G . and Nancy I . Gould , Town of Ithaca , Tompkins County , State of New York , " prepared by Robert S . Russler, Jr. , Licensed Land Surveyor, dated May 1 , 2002 , subject to the following conditions : a . Submission of a revised subdivision map showing the north line of Parcel A moved north approximately 20 feet to assure Parcel A is at least 15 , 000 square feet and showing the new location of the shed , and b . Obtaining the necessary variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals prior to final subdivision approval , and C , Revision of the subdivision plat to include the distance and bearing of the front lot line of Parcel B fronting on Happy Lane , and d . Access to Parcel B shall be provided via a new driveway connecting with Happy Lane , subject to review and approval by the Town Highway Superintendent , and e . Receipt of any approvals from Tompkins County Health Department of the septic system arrangement prior to final subdivision approvals . AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED : The Planning Board finds that there is no need for any park land reservation created by this proposed subdivision , and hereby waives the requirement for any park land reservation . The vote on the motion resulted as follows : AYES : Wilcox , Hoffmann , Conneman , Thayer, Howe , Talty . NAYS : None . The motion was declared to be carried unanimously. STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS : TOWN OF ITHACA . I , Carrie Whitmore , TeWR Clerk/Deputy Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca , New York , do hereby certify that the attached resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca at a regular meeting on the 4th day of June 2002 . TOWR Deputy Town Clerk Town of Ithaca Printer Friendly Report Page I of I FY 3 Property Description Report Ithaca (Town ) Status : Active Roll Section : Taxable Owner: Swis : 503089 Tax Map# 221 -2 -6. 1 GOULD , JOHN G & NANCY I Location : 154 INDIAN CREEK RD 102 HAPPY LANE ITHACA NY 14850 Zoning Code : Site : 1 JOHN G & NANCY I GOULD Neighborhood : 30020 Last Sale : Property Class : 1 Family Residence Sale Date : N/A Land Type : Primary Sale Price : N/A Size : 0 x 0 Valid : N/A Arms Length : N/A Land Assessment: $ 139900 .00 Deed Book : 628 Deed Page : 914 Total Assessment: $ 127 , 000 . 00 Prior Owner: Total Acreage : 0 . 87 N/A School District : Ithaca Structure - Building Style : Ranch Utilities - Sewer Type Private Number of Baths : 1 Water Supply Private Number of Bedrooms 3 Utilities Electric Number of Kitchens 1 Heat Type Hot Water/Steam Number of Fireplaces 0 Fuel Type Oil Overall Condition Normal Central Air Overall Grade Economy Porch Type Unknown Improvements - Porch Area 0 . 00 sq/ft Year Built 1951 Structure : GARAGE , 1 STY ATT. Basement Type Full Grade : Average Basement Garage Cap . 0 Condition : Normal Attached Garage Cap . 1 Size : 14 x 22 Year: 1941 Area - Tax Information - Living Area : 952 . 00 sq/ft First Story Area : 952 . 00 sq/ft Second Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft Taxes may not reflect exemptions or changes in Half Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft assessment ! Additional Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft Three-Quarter Story 000 s /ft County Year Tax : $19586. 28 Area : . q County Year: 2001 Finished Basement 0 . 00 sq/ft School Year Tax : $0 . 00 Number of Stories 1 School Year : http ://asmsdg.tompkins-co . org/imate/printable . asp 6/28/02 Printer Friendly Report Page 1 of 1 „W .= Property Description Report Ithaca (Town ) a .mac, E Status : Active Roll Section : Taxable Owner: Swis : 503089 Tax Map# 221 -2 -6. 1 GOULD , JOHN G & NANCY I Location : 154 INDIAN CREEK RD 102 HAPPY LANE ITHACA NY 14850 Zoning Code : Site : 2 JOHN G & NANCY I GOULD Neighborhood : 30020 Last Sale : Property Class : 1 Family Residence Sale Date : N/A Land Type : Secondary Sale Price : N/A Size : 0 x 0 Valid : N/A Arms Length : N/A Land Assessment : $ 13 , 900 .00 Deed Book : 628 Deed Page : 914 Total Assessment: $ 127, 000 . 00 Prior Owner: Total Acreage : 0 . 87 N/A , School District: Ithaca Structure - Building Style : Ranch Utilities - Sewer Type Private Number of Baths : 1 Number of Bedrooms 2 Water Supply Private Utilities Electric Number of Kitchens 1 Heat Type Hot Air Number of Fireplaces 0 Overall Condition Normal Fuel Type Oil Central Air Overall Grade Economy Porch Type Porch , Covered Improvements - Porch Area 66. 00 sq/ft Year Built 1964 Structure : PORCH , OPEN Basement Type Full Grade : Average Basement Garage Cap . 0 Condition : Normal Attached Garage Cap . 1 Size : 98 x 0 Year: 1941 Area - - Living Area : 704. 00 sglft Tax Information First Story Area : 704 . 00 sq/ft Second Story Area : 0 . 00 sglft Taxes may not reflect exemptions or changes in Half Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft assessment ! Additional Story Area : 0 . 00 sq/ft Three-Quarter Story 000 s /ft County Year Tax : $ 1 , 586. 28 Area : . q County Year: 2001 Finished Basement 0 . 00 sq/ft School Year Tax : $0 .00 Number of Stories 1 School Year: http ://asmsdg . tompkins-co . org/imate/printab] e . asp 6/28/02 TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION 1 , Dani L. Holford, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Town of Ithaca Building and Zoning Department Secretary, Tompkins County, New York; that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town of Ithaca and that said notice has been duly published in the local newspaper, The Ithaca Journal . Notice of public hearings to be held by the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals in Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York on Mondav, July 15, 2002 , commencing at 7 : 00 P. M ., as per attached. Location of sign board used for posting : Town Clerk Sign Board — 215 North Tioga Street. Date of posting: July 3, 2002 Date of publication: July 8, 2002 -�kiu k Dani L. Holford, Building and Zoning Dep Iment Secretary, Town of Ithaca STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS . : COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 8th day of July 2002 . Notary Public CARRIE WHITMORE Notary Public, State of New York No, 01 WH6052877 Commission Expires December 26, � . Y Board of Appeals of ` the APPEAL of Correll University Town 'of Ithaca on Mondayy Real Estate Depaefinent, July 1.5; `2002; in Town:Hall,` Owners;_ Ashley="Manage: 215 North' iTiogo ' Street; ment Corporation; Agent;.re: Tiogd' ' Street' Entrance ; ', �uesting: an; approval . from . Ithaca; ,_ NY,`MMMENC- t e- Zoning, Board _of,'Ap ING:.AT 7 00':P.M on :the Peals ' under Article ,V11, Sec- following matters:- . ,' ;; Lion 34"of the Town of.lthaca APPEAL of'• Arthur. Bloom, Zomn ' :'Ordinance, 'to ; be Appellant requesting an. ap erm eta lefood 500 royal . from; ._ the Zoni'nq vice establishment withm'on Board , Appeals under Art- existin buildin 's ace,;loo- cle"XII, Section ` 54 of '.the 9- 9 = P Town, -of. Ithaca Zoning Ordi, cote - t. East :Hill Pine, . nonce; to be' ipermitted :to Town .of Ithaca- ' Tax Parcel construct a, :500 + square No 52=21 121 ._' gusiness foot- building addition to. an f existing nonconformingg Disinct?C. ; buildingg at 118 Judd Fdhs APPEAL. of Nancy Gould; Rood Town �of athdca *Tax Appellant ,requesting - Poicel No ='6 6.5 4 °Resi• v ° r i a n c e s fro m the dente ' District -- requirements ; of - Article N :, building is located .within'the Sections 20 2I I,'and 23 . 01 re tirea setback areahyord; bmlding Ordnance totbec permitted APPEAL of. Donald Swart to subdivide a `='parcel of Appellant, re uestin a 'vari land -:containing awo exist- from the requirements ing non - conforming Of Article IV Section ' 14 of buildings, resulting in two the Town of Ithoca Zoningg new -parcels with area and - Ordinance, ,to'-66 permitted building : setback :; deficien- to , enlarge an' existing ga- ties at _154 Indian .Creek rage with a new-sicWyard Road, Town :of Ithaca Tax building setback ' of 6 feet Parcel No: 22 2.61 . A 4ari. . 10 foot setback .requiredl at once from Sectors 280A-'of 10'Win's n Drive; Town of New YorkState,Town Law is Ithaca , Tax Parcel :. Na . .alsorequested One new lot 70- 11 .29 Residence District wdl not front on`' a' public R 15 . highway, -,while' both _ ne- w APPEAL of A ' lots-Lan o lots will be less than 30,000 Appellant'requestinq a ,va-r square fe t ibuildiag., with, once from the tions_r 8 and :backs and lot _areo dimen- oEArti - t V Sections :18 qnd ': sions includm widths and 20 of the, Town=' of' Ithaca 9 Zoning Ordinance, to be" de the ^ ; pppermitted to , constnrct a 19 , APPEAI =of" Peter '_ Newell, 20 . too foothfiaccdsli daft building honzlation- homUhe�nZon ng a vocant parcel of land with Board of Appeals under Arti- . the accessory building eing' cle. - XII, --Section ..54; of the the principal use, :: at 203 Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordi- Bostwick Road; ° ' Town of nonce,- ' tci ? 66 permitted to Ithaca To . Pdreel 'Na, alter ''non conforming 31 -4.6:6, Residence :District buildings on 'a non - R 30 ' , ,Said ;, Ordinance conformingg buildingg -` lot 'lo- would .require the- 'proposed . cafe Boulevard; Taughan6ock building to be accessory to Tax Parcel ' No. °. 25-2. 1.5 a residence Residence District R-15 Said APPEAL o ' Edward arcel contains four 'residen- Giegoire, Appellant . At= P to'rney . Edward' Maiza, teal buildings with said olier- Agent,, requesting-`a vari. °tons resitting in-the cre- ance from >the requirements 'otion of . two ,,residential of - Article V - Sectionl21 :of buildings and 'one garage. the'Town of Ithaca Zoning A varionce from the Ordinance, to be `permitted requirements of Article IV, to maintain an existing 9a Section t . allow alsbuldin ragge with a 9'+'foot buildin " q 9 setback' ( 15 foot required a height to exceed 36 feet. 2 .'Schickkel Road; Town of Said Zoning`. Board of Ap- Ithaca Tax `Parcel No . Peals will at said time, 7:00 36-2-15, Residence, District P m ,- and said.,place, hear R-30. " y dll persons: in supppor'I APPEAL of Katherine Heine such matters or . objections Io .and-,`Pequestngharvanance by . ,thereto. g nttr- or. may.pe peonr from the . requirements -of Individuals-;with visual or . :.A"rticle ' V, -Section 20 of the hearing .'impairment's or 'Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordi- other spO}eciaW1l'eebds, as nonce, to be permitted to P P TOWN OF ITHACA construct a 256 square foot v ed with . :ossistcm&, as ZONING BOARD -- building addition . on -the necessary, upon request. OF APPEALS southeast side of an existing Persons jesirin assistance NOTICE OF single fomily ` residence lo- must :make such a hours.request cat MON.� U Y15I 2002 Road, Tow 9 of Ithaca gTax " tot then time of he prior . 7:00 PoMe Parcel No 49. 123 Rest- hearing By direction of the Chairman; dente , tin Disct R-30 'Said Andrew .S Frost ' of the Zoning Board of Ap- '. addiiion -.will : be' 25 + .feet Director of peals NOTICE IS HEREBY` from .the property"s side lot. Building' and Zoning GIVEN that Public Hearings line I40 ' foot setback re- .273.1783 will be h445ILtc&the ,Zonina amre l : . . 'July 8, 2002 Big • • Page I of Jet•� �- �_ �� rv� a �• 1 � r-' F http://asmsdg.tompkins-co.org/imateibigphoto.asp?ref=http://asmsdg.tompkins-co.org/image... • 1 1 i m cn D n x m 0 19 � N PO z v_ D z n X m O v z lA N O 7 (D cn ;7 X x T — m 0 C) C) D D o o ar o co cn ocw cn p G7 3 D CL v CD a -n Q a N m a) O C/) m D N z m N m O O N Big Photo OL Page I of T. i .� �� .$•.: a 4�� .}p y • 1 http://asmsdg.tompkins-co.org/imate/bigphoto.asp?ref=http://asmsdg.tompk'ms-co.org/image... • 1 y s 1 Indu.' 1 p k 44, • • r t