HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA History Combined (45)
Zoning Board of Appeals History as of 44.-2-7.2
165 King Road E
Tax Parcels involved, with address if known 165 King Road E 44.-2-7.2 with
subdivision from 44.-2-7.
History:
2002 – Area Variance for subdivision - Approved
2000 – Height Variance for shed - Approved
TOWN OF Y ACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 2000
7:00 P.M.
By direction of the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings
will be held by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ithaca on Wednesday, March 8, 2000, in Town Hall, 126
East Seneca Street, (FIRST Floor, REAR Entrance, WEST Side), Ithaca, N . Y., COMMENCING AT 7 :00 P.M. on the
following matters :
APPEAL of South Hill Cemetery Association, Appellant, Raymond Mayo, Agent, requesting a Special Approval from
the Zoning Board of Appeals under Article V, Section 18 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to
expand the cemetery land area at 822 Coddington Road, Town of Ithaca Tax . Parcel No. 46- 1 -9 and a portion of parcel
No. 46- 1 - 15 . 2, Residence District R-30.
APPEAL of George Blanchard, Appellant, requesting a variance from the;requirements :ofArticle V, Section 20 of the
Town of Ithaca Zomhg`Ordinance, to be permitted to construct! an: :accessory• building with= a height of 20 ± feet ( 1,5 •foot
height limitation) to house• farm equipment, located at 165 East• . ing Road; ,Towwof Ithaca Tax Parcel No.
Residence District District R-30.
Said Zoning Board of Appeals will at said time, 7 :00 p.m. , and said place, hear all persons in support of such
matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual or hearing impairments
or other special needs, as appropriate, will be provided with assistance, as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring
assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing.
Andrew S . Frost
Director of Building and Zoning
273 - 1783
Dated: February 29, 2000
Published: March 3 , 2000
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 3 MARCH 8, 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
The second appeal to be heard was as follows :
APPEAL of George Blanchard , Appellant , requesting a variance form the requirements of Article V ,
Section 20 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance , to be permitted to construct an accessory
building with a height of 20 ± feet ( 15 foot height limitation ) to house farm equipment , located at 165
East King Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 44=2-7 , Residence District R-30 .
George Blanchard , 165 East King Road , stated that he would like to build a pole barn for a
tractor .
Mr. Niefer asked if Mr. Blanchard is actively engaged in farming the land .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he has a John Deer A . The reason for the height of the door is
because the John Deer A is fairly tall in height . He would like to be able to drive the tractor into the
barn .
Chairperson Stotz asked where Mr. Blanchard presently stores the farm equipment .
Mr. Blanchard stated that it is at his father's house .
Mr. Frost stated that Mr. Blanchard mentioned that access drive was going to come in at a
different location from the current driveway.
Mr. Blanchard stated that it would be on the northwest corner where the pond is located .
Once you enter the lot , it would be parallel to the road for about 300 feet then there is an access cut
down the middle of the property that will access the barn .
Mr. Frost stated that 433 feet is shown on the portion of the property near Bruno and then
another 1400 feet. There is a total of 1800 feet .
Mr. Blanchard stated that is correct . It is the latest survey.
Chairperson Stotz stated that there are a lot of trees on the property. Would the trees screen
the pole barn from Chase Lane?
Mr. Blanchard stated that he couldn 't see a house from where the barn will be located . He
stated that he is not sure why a variance is needed for a single-story building. He is unable to build a
building with less height .
Mr. Niefer asked if Mr. Blanchard was planning to do anything else in the building other than
the storage of farm equipment .
Mr. Blanchard stated that it is going to be a traditional dirt floor pole barn that is unheated .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 4 MARCH 8 , 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
Attorney Barney asked if there would be plumbing .
Mr . Blanchard responded no .
Chairperson Stotz asked if it would be open on the sides .
Mr . Blanchard responded no . It is going to be enclosed .
Chairperson Stotz asked what is the siding .
Mr. Blanchard replied it would have the same siding as the house .
Mr. Sigel asked if the barn would have electricity.
Mr. Blanchard stated that he does not plan on having electricity in the barn . It is a cold
storage building .
Chairperson Stotz asked if it would have eaves troughs .
Mr . Blanchard replied that it would not . He is going to have one-foot over hangs .
Mr. Niefer asked if he was planning to use the barn to store equipment that he would use for
any kind of business operation .
Mr . Blanchard stated no .
Mr. Niefer stated that it is a nice residential area .
Chairperson Stotz opened the public hearing at 7 : 25 p . m . , and asked if any members of the
public wished to be heard . With no persons present to be heard , Chairperson Stotz closed the public
hearing at 7 :26 p . m .
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
Attorney Barney stated that this is a large building for one John Deer tractor.
Mr. Blanchard stated that to double the size of the building is not much more expensive than
to build the smaller building .
Mr. Frost stated that there is a large house on the property. He might want to store something
else in the barn down the road .
Attorney Barney stated that the reason for the barn does not require the size that is being built .
The concern is that in an R- 30 zone the uses be limited to those that are permitted in the zone . A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 5 MARCH 8, 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
large building such as this often invites a need to move into some type of business that would
support it .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he did not want to by a canvas tent over the tractor. He wanted
something of more quality. He also has a boat that he would like to store in the barn .
Chairperson Stotz asked if he had horses .
Mr . Blanchard stated that he has horses at his parents' house . It is not being built for horses .
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
MOTION made by Ronald Krantz, seconded by James Niefer.
RESOLVED, that this board makes a negative determination of environmental significance in the
matter of George Blanchard, requesting a variance from the requirements of Article V, Section 20 of
the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to construct an accessory building with a
height of 20 ± feet (15 feet height limitation) to house farm equipment, located at 165 East King
Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No, 44-2- 7, Residence District R-30.
A vote on the MOTION resulted as follows:
AYES: Stotz, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Sigel.
NAYS: None.
The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously.
Chairperson Stotz stated that the reason for the height increase is because of the height of the
traffic .
Mr. Blanchard stated that in order to structurally build the building , the joices with an 8/ 12 pitch
makes it a 20-foot building . He cannot build a shorter building with the 10-foot sidewall . The joices
run the shortest distance .
Chairperson Stotz asked how much would the width of the building need to be reduced in
order to comply with the ordinance .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he would not be able to pull a tractor with a brushhog or his boat into
the building . The code is 15 feet height .
Attorney Barney stated that the code is designed for garages . It was also adopted at a time
when the style was lower roofs .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 6 MARCH 8, 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
Chairperson Stotz stated that he would be inclined not to approve this , but it is on a large
piece of property and trees screen it . It is clearly a large building .
Mr. Blanchard responded that it is not as tall as his house .
Chairperson Stotz stated that it is still a large building as opposed to a garage or utility
building .
Mr. Krantz stated that 1700 square feet is the size of a house .
Mr. Frost stated that the width of the boardroom is about 25 feet . The length is 34 feet .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he does not know of the average size of a pole barn .
Mr . Frost stated that he could not see Mr. Blanchard 's house from Chase Lane . It can be
seen from King Road . The area of the proposed building cannot be seen from Chase Farm . It is
hard to see Chase Farm coming from Mr . Blanchard 's driveway.
Mr. Smith stated that he did drive into Chase Farm . He could not see Mr. Blanchard 's house .
Mr . Frost stated that it is very secluded .
Mr. Krantz stated that the building would be approximately double the size of the boardroom .
Mr. Frost stated that it will be another five feet wider and another 15 feet longer than the
boardroom .
Mr . Niefer asked if notices were sent to the neighbors .
Mr. Frost responded yes . It is noted that the 10 400t sidewall would accommodate a 9-foot
door for farm equipment .
Mr . Blanchard responded that it was done in the center. It was done more for aesthetics .
Chairperson Stotz asked if the roof would be the same style roof as the house .
Mr . Blanchard stated that he might have a steel roof , but he is being told that they sweat a lot .
He does not want moisture . It will probably be the same that is on the house .
Chairperson Stotz asked if it would be insulated .
Mr . Blanchard responded that it would not be insulated .
Chairperson Stotz asked if he would like to have the barn insulated at a later date .
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 7 MARCH 8, 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
Mr. Blanchard stated that he is not building it to insulate it . It is possible at a later date . It
would be nice to have his riding lawn mower on a pad , but it would be done at a later date .
Chairperson Stotz asked if Mr. Blanchard discussed this with Mr. Newhart .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he has had discussions with Mr. Newhart and he does not have any
problem .
Mr. Frost asked if Mr. Blanchard would be able to have a home occupation out of the building
with the proposed condition in the resolution . He would not be able to do something that is permitted .
Attorney Barney stated that it is a condition of getting a variance for a very large accessory
building in an R- 30 zone . If he wanted to do something later on , he could come back to the board .
Mr. Blanchard stated that the board passed a pole barn building structure , with concrete floor
and heated of the same footprint without restrictions . Why is this different ?
Mr. Frost stated that it is difficult for the board to know the circumstances without being able to
see the file . They do not have the file before them . The person did have some home occupation
components to it .
Mr. Blanchard stated that he was not prohibited from commercial use .
Mr. Frost stated that he was prohibited from having a bathroom .
Attorney Barney stated that each application is taken on its face . This board and the prior
boards are not going to be unreasonable if there is a need shown . He came in with a particular
application for a particular building with for a particular use . There might have been conditions
imposed on that application as well . This board has a concern about the size of the building . It is
being represented to the board that the purpose of the building is cold storage . They are willing to
allow that . They do want to retain an element of control that if the use changes that it be brought
before the board .
Mr. Blanchard asked if he would be required to share the use change .
Attorney Barney stated that absent the restriction , he would not be obliged to come forward as
long as the use was permitted it the zone . There are some types of commercial uses as home
occupations . This is introducing what could be a very large home occupation in a residential zone .
MOTION made by Harry Ellsworth, seconded by Ronald Krantz
RESOLVED, that this board grants the appeal of George Blanchard, requesting a variance from the
requirements of Article V, Section 20 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to
construct an accessory building with a height of no more than 21 feet ( 15 foot height limitation) to
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAGE 8 MARCH 8, 2000
APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - MAY 10, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED
house farm equipment and a boat, located at 165 East King Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No, 44-
2- 7, Residence District R-30, with the condition that the building shall not be used for any commercial
purposes based on the following findings:
a. the need for the height is a result of the fact that the building has a very large footprint and in
order to obtain a reasonable pitch to the roof, it is needed to exceed the normal height limits;
and
be this is a very large building in an area that is on a large piece of property, but nevertheless is a
residential R-30 zone; and
C. as a result there is a concern that the building not be used for something that would cause a
change in the neighborhood character and alter the area as a residential zone; and
d, therefore the board finds is appropriate to impose a condition that no commercial activities be
conducted out of the building.
A vote on the MOTION resulted as follows:
AYES: Stotz, Ellsworth, Krantz, Niefer, Sigel,
NAYS: None.
The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously.
Wit ther business , Chairperson Stotz adjourned the meeting at 7 : 44 p . m .
David D . t z, C airperson
Carrie L. Coates , Deputy Town Clerk
RESOLUTION NO . 2000- 12 - George Blanchard Variance.
MOTION made by Harry Ellsworth , seconded by Ronald Krantz.
RESOLVED, that this board grants the appeal of George Blanchard , requesting a variance from the
requirements of Article V , Section 20 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance, to be permitted to
construct an accessory building with a height of no more than 21 feet ( 15 foot height limitation ) to
house farm equipment and a boat, located at 165 East King Road , Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 44-
2-7 , Residence District R-30 , with the condition that the building shall not be used for any commercial
purposes based on the following findings :
a . the need for the height is a result of the fact that the building has a very large footprint and in
order to obtain a reasonable pitch to the roof , it is needed to exceed the normal height limits ;
and
b , this is a very large building in an area that is on a large piece of property , but nevertheless is a
residential R- 30 zone ; and
C, as a result there is a concern that the building not be used for something that would cause a
change in the neighborhood character and alter the area as a residential zone ; and
d . therefore the board finds is appropriate to impose a condition that no commercial activities be
conducted out of the building .
A vote on the MOTION resulted as follows :
AYES : Stotz, Ellsworth , Krantz , Niefer, Sigel .
NAYS : None .
The OTION was declared to be arried unanimously .
Carrie . Coates , Deputy Town ler .
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS :
TOWN OF ITHACA:
I , J)e lOOfck ke, ` T.-Gle VDeputy Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca , New
York , do hereby certify that the attached resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the
Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca at a regular meeting on the 8th day of March 2000 .
k4Deputy Town Clerk
Town of Ithaca
RESOLUTION NOO 2000- 11 — George Blanchard Negative Determination of Environmental
Assessment.
MOTION made by Ronald Krantz, seconded by James Niefer.
RESOLVED , that this board makes a negative determination of environmental significance in the
matter of George Blanchard , requesting a variance from the requirements of Article V , Section 20 of
the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance , to be permitted to construct an accessory building with a height
of 20 ± feet ( 15 feet height limitation ) to house farm equipment , located at 165 East King Road , Town
of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 44-2-7 , Residence District R-30 .
A vote on the MOTION resulted as follows :
AYES : Stotz, Ellsworth , Krantz , Niefer, Sigel .
NAYS : None .
The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously.
W- t (L&� -jj - --
Carrie L. Coates , Deputy To n Clerk .
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS .
TOWN OF ITHACA.
1 , 1 �'a A � '� U herk/Deputy Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca , New
York, do hereby certify that the a ached resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the
Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca at a regular meeting on the 8th day of March 2000 .
l7G�
T-ot� Town Clerk
Town of Ithaca
Town Ass . 10 / ; C
gned Project ID Number
Town of Ithaca Environmental Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Located in the Town of Ithaca , Tompkins County ONLY
PART I — Project Information ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor )
1 . A hcant / Sponsor : 2 . Project Nam
o e L t7 le iq
3 . Precise Lo ation ( Street Address and Road Intersections , prominent landmarks , etc . or provide map ) :
Tax Parcel Number : tj
4 . Is Proposed Action : E` E:tPANSiON D MODIFICATION / ALTERAT i0N
5 . Describe Project Briefly ( Include project purpose , present land use , current and future construction plans , and oth ? r j
relevant items)
i
I
( Attach separate sheet(s ) if necessary to adequately describe the proposed project .) i
6 . Amount of Land Affected : Initially (0-5 yrs) 00Z Acres ( 6- 10 yrs) Acres ( > 10 yrs ) Acres ':
7 . How is the Land Zoned Presently ?
8 . Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions ?
YES NO If no , describe conflict briefly
I
9 . Will proposed action lead to a request for new : i
i
Public Road ? YES NO Public Water ? YES NO Public Sewer ? YES Q NO
10 . What is the present land use in the vicinity of the proposed project ? aResidential Commercial
❑ Industrial C+griculture Park /Forest /Open Space Other
Please describe :
1 1 . Does proposed action involve g rmit , awl, or .luoding , now or ultimately from any other governmental agency
(Federal , State , Local) ? YES NO If yes , list agency name and permit / approval /funding :
12 . Does anu aspect of the proposed action have a currentlu valid permit or aDDroval ? YES NO El
If yes , list agency name and permit /approval . Also , state whether, that permit /approval will require modification .
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOYE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant / Sponsor Name (Print or Type) :
I
Signature :
Date :
PART lI - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by the Town ; Use attachments as necessary)
A. Does proposed action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617. 12 or Town Environmental Local Law?
YES NO X if yes, coordinate the review process and use the full EAF.
B. Will proposed action receive coordinated review as provided for unlisted actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.6
YES NO X if no, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency, if any.
C. Could proposed action result in any adverse effects associated with the following :
( Answers may be handwritten, if legible)
Cl . Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production
and disposal, potential for erosion , drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
See Attached.
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources? Community or
neighborhood character? Explain briefly :
See Attached.
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish, or wildlife species, significant habitats, unique natural area, wetlands, or
threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly :
See Attached,
C4. The Town 's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other
natural resources? Explain briefly:
See Attached.
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action ? Explain briefly:
See Attached.
C6. Long term , short term , cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl -05? Explain briefly:
See Attached.
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy) Explain briefly:
See Attached.
D. Is there, or is there likely to be controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts?
YES NO X If yes, explain briefly :
E. Comments of staff , CB other attached. (Check as applicable.)
PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by the Town of Ithaca)
Instructions: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important, or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i . e . urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration ; (d)
irreversibility; (e) geographic scope, and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting material . Ensure that
the explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately address.
Check here if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then
proceed directly to the full EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration .
X Check here if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that
the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on Attachments as
necessary the reasons supporting this determination .
Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals
Name of Lead Agency Preparer' s Signature(If different from Responsible Officer)
aD. Stotz, Ch an
s ible Off In Lead Agency Signature' of Contributing Preparer DO
DATE :
�%—F�d
' O is in e Agency
PART II — Environmental Assessment:
George Blanchard
165 East King Road
Height Variance — Accessory Building
Zoning Board of Appeals
A . Action is Unlisted.
B . Action will not receive coordinated review.
C . Could action result in any adverse effects on, to or arising from the following :
Cl . Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels,
existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,
drainage or flooding problems?
No significant adverse effects are anticipated related to air quality, water quality or
quantity, noise levels, traffic, solid waste, or potential for erosion, drainage or flooding as
a result of the proposed project.
The proposal is to construct a pole barn on Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 44-2-7, located
at 165 East King Road, R-30 Residence District. The 30-foot by 58-foot pole barn would
be constructed behind the existing house and would not be visible from East King Road
or any neighboring houses . The pole barn will be used for storage of farm equipment.
A pond and potential wetland areas have been identified on the applicant' s property near
East King Road . The proposed pole barn is located well to the south of the pond and wet
areas, and should have no significant impact on those areas .
C2 . Aesthetic, agriculture, archeological, historic, or other natural or cultural
resources, or community or neighborhood character?
None Anticipated . No aesthetic, archeological, historic , or other natural or cultural
resources are known to exist on the site, or are expected to otherwise be affected by the
proposed action.
C3 . Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or
threatened or endangered species ?
None Anticipated. No significant vegetation or wildlife habitats are known to exist on
this site . The area where the pole barn is proposed to be located is presently covered by
low grass with thinned out trees, and thicker vegetation around the area.
C4 . The Town ' s existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use
or intensity of land or other natural resources ?
None Anticipated . This site is zoned R-30 Residential District, and the Town of Ithaca
Comprehensive Plan designates this site as " Suburban Residential . " The proposed pole
_ I
barn would be built to a height of 20 feet where as the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance
allows a height of 15 feet for accessory buildings .
C5 . Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by
the proposed action?
None Anticipated .
C6 . Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl -05 ?
None Anticipated .
C7 . Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of
energy)?
None Anticipated .
D . Is there, or is there likely to be, controversy related to potential adverse
environmental impacts?
No controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts is anticipated.
PART III. — Staff Recommendation, Determination of Significance
Based on review of the materials submitted for the proposed action, the proposed scale of
it, and the information above, a negative determination of environmental significance is
recommended for the action as proposed .
Lead Agency : Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals
Reviewer : Michael Smith, Planne
Review Date : March 1 , 2000
TOWN OF ITHACA FEE : $ 80000
126 East Seneca Street RECEIVED :
Ithaca , New York 14850
CASH
( 607 ) 273 - 1783
CHECK
A P P E A L
ZONING :
to the
Building Inspector / Zoning Enforcement Officer For Office Use Only
and the
Zoning Board of Appeals
of the
Town of Ithaca , New York
Having been denied permission to :
C7 I V 40
at Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . / d �- ,
as shown on the accompanying application and / or plans or other supporting documents , for the
stated reason that the issuance of such permit would be in violation of :
Article ( s ) , Section ( s ) of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance , the
UNDERSIGNED respectfully submits this Appeal from such denial and , in support of the Appeal ,
affirms that strict observance of the Zoning Ordinance would impose PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES
and / or UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP as follows :
( Additional sheets may be attached as necessary . ) /
12 12t /I
S cy _ � / o /d ' � r m.e Uv �/ Z�7 e r lvvzz
goo
Jo
By filing this application , I grant permission for members of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board
of Appeals or staff to enter my prope ty to inspect in connection with my application .
Signature of Owner / Appellant : Date : 5� _
Signature of Appellant/ Agent : \ Date :
Print Name Here :
Home Telephone Number : c 7 Work Telephone Number :
NOTE : If construction of work in accordance with any variances given does not coieence within 1S sonths , the
variance will ez ire .
6 � F , k ) AI �d N
l �
kk
¢
�6 y y'
r) DBEs'
f�/ rAlC�f�i��
I � I
I I
I
I
1 I
/-� I I I I I I I
6 00000
XotrIT
pp
elL
I
d�'-�s_C
I I
AL 64 a/ IIIII b
1- 4
G 16scus 1
II
I I
I
I - i
I
I
M 61
� I
� � 7
I
2
-
� i I
� I I
I
ow -
t
- --� _ �
I � I I t I
I � � � � � � I I ! ! I I I ► I l i i
I I I I =
i
I t �
i
I
I
I I I I
I -
' I
I I !
i
I _
pi
I
' I I I ► 1 f l i l l l I l
I II � I II I II
i I
llfil � ii hill "" ! I
Al
it
1
-
I
1
i I
to i ! I I - j
IttIIII
1
t t
t I
I I I ! I
o I I I I
1 I
I
I �
1
is
i I It
INS ro
� A a
gmpkins County
DEPART .. EN 1 F PLANNING
1*21 as teL J
v }. `�j f
.Mica,`si�ie�, w YaA 14850
James W. Hanson, Jr. ,4 Telephone (607) 274-5560
Commissioner of Planning Fax (607) 274-5578
February 29, 2000
Andy Frost.
- 2 2000 P
Zoning Officer
Town of Ithaca TOWN OF 1THACA
126 East Seneca Street BUILDING /ZONING
Ithaca, NY 14850
Re : Review Pursuant to § 239 - 1 and -m of the New York State General Municipal Law
Action : Height Variance, Blanchard, 165 East King Road, Tax Parcel No . 44-2 - 7
Dear Mr. Frost :
This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment
by the Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to § 239 - 1 and -m of the New York State
General Municipal Law.
The proposal, as submitted, will have no significant deleterious impact on intercommunity,
County, or State interests . Therefore, no recommendation is indicated by the Tompkins County
Planning Department, and you are free to act without prejudice.
Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record.
Sincerely,
James W. Hanson, Jr. �'(--
Commissioner of Planning
t% Recvcled paper
C-Q 1��- c CT z6o 3
2-0&y Qfi
rIQ()► a/ ..4. 0-two
rr PIP; 11
r _ ;
i�
I
r6v1�ld;��
w
,Orr ve
i