Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PB Packet 2023-03-21
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD Shirley A. Raffensperger Board Room, Town Hall 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Tuesday, March 21, 2023 7:00 P.M. Members of the public are welcome to attend in-person at Town Hall or virtually via Zoom. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments in-person or through Zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83643764382. If the public would like to attend the meeting for viewing purposes only, it is recommended to watch the livestream video on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC9vycXkJ6klVIibjhCy7NQ/live). AGENDA 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Special Permit for a proposed temporary daycare use at the College Circle Community Center at Ithaca College, located at 30 College Circle. The proposal involves utilizing existing meeting rooms in the community center for the Coddington Road Community Center (CRCC) daycare program while the CRCC property undergoes renovations. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. David Prunty, Ithaca College, Owner; Heather Mount, Coddington Road Community Center, Applicant/Agent. 2. SEQR Determination: Osborne Subdivision / Consolidation, 232 Haller Boulevard. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located at 232 Haller Boulevard. The proposal involves subdividing the 6.082-acre parcel into three parcels. Parcel A, at 5.347 acres, will be consolidated along with a small strip of land (0 Haller Boulevard) with the property to the north (244 Haller Boulevard). Parcel B, at 0.368 acres, will become a separate buildable lot fronting Haller Boulevard. Parcel C, at 0.367 acres, contains an existing residence and garage. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Paul D. Osborne, Attorney-in-fact for Marcia Joyce Osborne, Owner; Christopher Anagnost, Applicant/Agent. 4. SEQR Determination: The Learning Farm, 272 Enfield Falls Road. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Learning Farm educational project located at 272 Enfield Falls Road. The proposal involves the development of a learning kitchen building and educational spaces, up to ten guest structures, associated gravel and grassed parking areas, trails, and walkways, lighting, and stormwater management facilities. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Christa Nunez, Khuba International, Owner/Applicant; Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, Agent. 6. Persons to be heard. 7. Approval of Minutes: January 17, 2023 8. Other Business. 9. Adjournment. C.J. Randall Director of Planning 607-273-1747 NOTE: IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE NOTIFY CHRIS BALESTRA AT 607-273-1747 or CBALESTRA@TOWN.ITHACA.NY.US. (A quorum of four (4) members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business.) Accessing Meeting Materials Online Site Plan and Subdivision applications and associated project materials are accessible electronically on the Town’s website at https://www.town.ithaca.ny.us/meeting-calendar-agendas/ under the calendar meeting date. TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Planning Board will hold public hearings on Tuesday, March 21, 2023, at 7:00 P.M. on the following matters: Consideration of Special Permit for a proposed temporary daycare use at the College Circle Community Center at Ithaca College, located at 30 College Circle. The proposal involves utilizing existing meeting rooms in the community center for the Coddington Road Community Center (CRCC) daycare program while the CRCC property undergoes renovations. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. David Prunty, Ithaca College, Owner; Heather Mount, Coddington Road Community Center, Applicant/Agent. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located at 232 Haller Boulevard. The proposal involves subdividing the 6.082-acre parcel into three parcels. Parcel A, at 5.347 acres, will be consolidated along with a small strip of land (0 Haller Boulevard) with the property to the north (244 Haller Boulevard). Parcel B, at 0.368 acres, will become a separate buildable lot fronting Haller Boulevard. Parcel C, at 0.367 acres, contains an existing residence and garage. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Paul D. Osborne, Attorney-in-fact for Marcia Joyce Osborne, Owner; Christopher Anagnost, Applicant/Agent. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Learning Farm educational project located at 272 Enfield Falls Road. The proposal involves the development of a learning kitchen building and educational spaces, up to ten guest structures, associated gravel and grassed parking areas, trails, and walkways, lighting, and stormwater management facilities. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Christa Nunez, Khuba International, Owner/Applicant; Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, Agent. Members of the public are welcome to attend in-person at Town Hall or virtually via Zoom. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments in-person or through Zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83643764382. If the public would like to attend the meeting for viewing purposes only, it is recommended to watch the livestream video on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC9vycXkJ6klVIibjhCy7NQ/live). Any person wishing to address the board will be heard. In addition, comments can be sent via email to townclerk@town.ithaca.ny.us up to the end of business the day of the meeting and all comments will be forwarded to the board. Additional information is available at www.town.ithaca.ny.us. C.J. Randall, Director of Planning TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD January 17, 2023 Draft MINUTES Present: Greg Lindquist, Chair; Members Fred Wilcox, Ariel Casper, Liz Bageant, Yvonne Fogarty, Cindy Kaufman, and Bill Arms Sue Ritter, CJ Randall, Dan Tasman and Chris Balestra, Planning; Marty Moseley, Codes; Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town; John Little, IT; David O'Shea, Engineering and Becky Jordan, Deputy Town Clerk Mr. Greg Lindquist called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. with an introduction and welcome to CJ Randall,new Planning Director. Agenda Item 1 Consideration of a recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board regarding a proposed local law amending Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270 establishing an Inlet Valley Overlay District Overview Ms. Ritter provided an Inlet Valley introduction. [Audio failed to capture the beginning of Ms. Ritter's statement]. We want to keep the city urban feel from entering the area. We have two premier state parks, Treman and Buttermilk as bookends, agriculture in the area including Eddy Dale Farms and other farmland, and tourism with Motels. We want to encourage tourism, agriculture,recreation, possibly some art. This is the vision that helped produce some of the uses in the law. Mr. Tasman gave a presentation on the Inlet Valley District Overlay zoning code. Permitted uses, sighting of structures,physical design requirements that go beyond setback and building height and include architectural design and general sight planning. Pedestrian and vehicle circulation. Landscaping screening, sight lighting, and sign requirements. <Attachment I> The two district overlays are Light Industrial which will all be in the Inlet Valley Center(IV-C) and Inlet Valley Transition Overlay (IV-T). Special Use Permit required. Discussion Ms. Bageant asked what the difference is between the two references to solar use. Mr. Tasman replied that as a principal use solar energy is not allowed such as a solar farm but, as an accessory use you can have solar panels on your building. Ms. Bageant recalled conversation about the Town identifying appropriate solar farm locations. Ms. Ritter replied that the Town has a draft solar law that would allow larger facilities but that locations have not yet been identified. Ms. Kaufman expressed her support. We need to consider how the desired businesses will be attracted and thrive on this busy, loud stretch of route 13. Businesses such as a Bed and Breakfast situated right on route 13 may not get the desired business. The idea of a laneway behind the building(s) and the front of the building(s) facing opposite route 13 may make for a safer, more successful project. Shared parking could be a design idea. Ms. Bageant, acknowledging route 13 is a state road, inquired of safety concerns for future development. Ms. Ritter responded that the Town,years ago, asked DOT if a traffic light could be installed at Elmira Road and Seven Mile Drive and they said no at that time. If development starts happening in the corridor there may be more opportunities for traffic calming measures. There has been talk of route 13 upgrades. Pedestrians and cyclists will have the Black Diamond Trail on the eastern side and possibly a laneway on the western side. Ms. Fogarty commented that she loves the fact that the electrical lines will be underground. When the Planning Board was reviewing the plans for the hotel in that area, I went to the property and when I tried to exit left I had to wait for over 200 vehicles. I have serious questions about putting a lot of businesses or anything there unless we can find a way to calm the traffic because it will be very dangerous. I voted no on the hotel because I don't think it's safe right there. Mr. Lindquist replied that he thinks once this is adopted it could be the impetus for putting it forward to the state DOT. The state DOT is becoming more progressive with an acceptance of different ideas. I see this as a multi-year project,it is not going to happen overnight and not without a number of tweaks. I think this is 1000%better than what we have now. There has been a lot of work that has gone into this. PB RESOLUTION 2023-01: Recommendation to the Town Board Regarding a Proposed Local Law Amending Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270, Establishing an Inlet Valley Overlay District Town of Ithaca Planning Board January 17, 2023 WHEREAS: In 2017, after adoption of the Town Comprehensive Plan,the Town of Ithaca commissioned an economic development feasibility study and strategic plan for the Inlet Valley area (the "Inlet Valley Ithaca Plan")to explore ideas for shaping the corridor's development future, and for fostering its distinctive semi-rural/agricultural character and the setting for two premier NYS Parks, WHEREAS: A key recommendation of the Plan was to revise the zoning regulations to encourage desired types of uses and a character of development that would make the corridor an appealing and distinctive destination, WHEREAS: The proposed Inlet Valley Zoning Overlay District was initiated under the direction of the Economic Development Ad Hoc Committee subsequent to their completion of the Inlet Valley Ithaca Plan (2018) and later transferred to the Planning Committee for more in-depth work and refinement, WHEREAS: The Planning Committee recommended the Inlet Valley Zoning Overlay District to the Town Board at their meeting in October 2022, WHEREAS: The Town Board, at their meeting on December 28, 2022, discussed the proposed local law and referred it to the Planning Board for review and recommendations, and WHEREAS: The Town of Ithaca Planning Board has reviewed and discussed the proposed local law at its meeting on January 17, 2023; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby recommends that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca adopt the proposed local law amending the Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 270, Establishing an Inlet Valley Overlay District. Moved: Fred Wilcox Seconded: Ariel Casper Vote: ayes—Casper, Kaufman, Wilcox, Fogarty, Lindquist, Bageant and Arms PB Resolution No. 2023-00: Nomination and Election Planning Board Vice Chairperson 2023 Town of Ithaca Planning Board January 17, 2023 Moved: Yvonne Fogarty Seconded: Cindy Kaufman RESOLVED,that the Town of Ithaca Planning Board does hereby nominate and elect Fred Wilcox as Vice Chairperson of the Planning Board for the year 2023. FURTHER RESOLVED,that said election shall be reported to the Town Board. A vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casper, Bageant, Kaufman, Arms, Fogarty, and Lindquist Abstained: Wilcox Item 2 Persons to be heard—None Item 3 Other Business Mr. Lindquist gave a reminder of Sue Ritter's retirement celebration on Friday, January 27th. Also, the New York Planning Federation seeks solicitations for nominations for their awards. I'm thinking about submitting an application for the Heissenbuttel award for planning excellence for the New Neighborhood Code(NNC).Nomination applications are due by February 15, 2023. Mr. Wilcox advised, as past Planning Federation board member and President, there is a paperwork requirement to support the nomination so there is some work involved and he is happy to help. Ms. Ritter provided a project update on North Campus Residential that the Planning Board approved in 2019. As part of that project, there was included a proposal to realign Pleasant Grove Road as a main thoroughfare to Cradit Farm Road which is not going forward. This is as a result of recent traffic counts for this and those traffic counts made it clear there was no big difference to traffic due to the North campus residential project and it was clear that a much smaller percentage of vehicles are going down Cradit Farm Road than what is going to Forest Home Drive. Instead, Cornell has proposed an improved signage plan with "wayfinding" signage on Pleasant Grove Road and elsewhere as well as a monument"You have arrived on campus" sign. The hope is to have less travel into Forest Home not meaning to be there. Ms. Ritter thanked the board and stated that it has been great working with all of them, they're a terrific planning board. Meeting adjourned at 8:36 pm upon motion by Fred Wilcox, seconded by Ariel Casper. Submitted by Becky Jordan, Deputy Town Clerk DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tioga St 14850 607.273.1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Planner DATE: March 14, 2023 RE: Proposed Coddington Road Community Center Temporary Child Day-Care Center Use at 30 College Circle Drive – Ithaca College/College Circle Community Center – Special Permit Enclosed please find materials related to the consideration of Special Permit for the proposed temporary use at the College Circle Community Center at Ithaca College, located at 30 College Circle Drive, located in the Multiple Residence Zone. The proposal involves utilizing existing meeting rooms in the community center for the Coddington Road Community Center (CRCC) daycare program while the CRCC property undergoes renovations. The proposed daycare use is permitted with a Special Permit from the Planning Board. The property being utilized for the use contains the Ithaca College - College Circle Apartment complex, which includes several apartment buildings surrounding a community building. The community building houses meeting spaces, an exercise room, laundry facilities, several shared lounges, a snack center, and mail room. According to the application materials, CRCC will be renting the meeting spaces in the building, which can be connected or separated by movable panels. The Planning Board granted final site plan approval in 2022 for a building addition to the CRCC property at 920 Coddington Road. The CRCC has contracted with Ithaca College to utilize space in the College Circle Community Center during the construction of the CRCC building addition. The applicant anticipates that construction will take at least two years, beginning this summer (July 2023). This project has been classified as a Type II Action, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Law (SEQR), as it is considered a “minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent impact on the environment.” There are no proposed changes to the building or to the site. The applicant has provided a parking, circulation, and building access plan that appears to adequately accommodate the temporary daycare use. The proposed use is not expected to conflict with the existing uses within the building. The enclosures include a draft resolution for the project among the other materials. The resolution contains draft Special Permit findings for the Planning Board to consider. Please feel free to call me at 273-1747, extension 121, or email me at cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us if you have any questions prior to the meeting. Cc: David Prunty, Ithaca College Heather Mount, Coddington Road Community Center Special Permit Narrative Ithaca College and Coddington Road Community Center Date = 02 /22/2023 The purpose of this special permit application is to allow the Coddington Road Community Center to utilize space on the Ithaca College campus for childcare while work is taking place at the current Coddington Road Community Center property. The anticipated length of time that this special permit will be needed is at least two years, starting approximately in July, 2023. The Coddington Road Community Center is undertaking a major site renovation that will involve taking down one of their buildings and the erection of a new building on site. During the demolition and construction time period , Ithaca College will partner with Coddington Road and rent a large meeting space in the College Circle Community Building to Coddington Road for childcare. This partnership will allow Coddington Road to continue to offer childcare for the same number of people and families levels as they currently provide to the greater Ithaca community . The spaces to be rented to Coddington Road are the contiguous rooms 110, 112, 112A and 115 . Rooms 110, 112 , 112A and 115 are one large space that can be subdivided by manual, movable, folding walls. Some, limited outdoor green space will also be made available to Coddington Road during the time(s) they are providing child care at Ithaca College . Coddington Road will offer child care during their regular operating hours (approximately 7:30 am to 5 :30 pm, Mondays through Fridays). Access to the College Circle Community Center will be through the main doors (using card access) for staff, and through the north facing exterior doors for the parents and children. Considerations for approval (§ 270-200. Considerations for approval. [Amended 4-9- 2018 by L.L. No. 2-2018]): 1. This project is suitable for the property and the existing College Circle Community Building , the accompanying parking lots and grounds. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Special Permit Coddington Road Community Center Temporary Child Day-Care Center at Ithaca College – College Circle Community Building Tax Parcel No. 43.-1-2.2 Town of Ithaca Planning Board, March 21, 2023 WHEREAS: 1. This action is Consideration of Special Permit for a proposed temporary Child Day-Care Center use at the College Circle Community Center at Ithaca College, located at 30 College Circle Drive. The proposal involves utilizing existing meeting rooms in the community center for the Coddington Road Community Center (CRCC) daycare program while the CRCC property undergoes renovations. David Prunty, Ithaca College, Owner; Heather Mount, Coddington Road Community Center, Applicant/Agent; 2. This is a Type II Action, as stated in 6 NYCRR Section 617.5(c)(21) of the regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, because the Action constitutes a “minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent impact on the environment,” and thus approval of the special permit is not subject to review under SEQR; and 3. The Planning Board, at a Public Hearing held on March 21, 2023, has reviewed, and accepted as adequate a narrative, aerial maps, a drawing titled “Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal- Building Floor Plan” date-stamped February 22, 2023, prepared by the Ithaca College Office of Facilities, along with other application materials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Planning Board hereby grants Special Permit for the proposed temporary use at the College Circle Community Center building, finding that the Special Permit standards of Article XXIV Section 270-200, Subsections A – H, of the Town of Ithaca Code, have been met, specifically that: A. The project will be suitable for the property on which it is proposed, considering the property’s size, location, and physical site characteristics. The College Circle Community Center building is large enough and suitable to accommodate the added temporary day care use along with its existing use as a college community facility. There will be no change to any physical site characteristics to house the temporary daycare use. B. The proposed structure design and site layout are compatible with the surrounding area. There are no proposed new structures and no changes to the building or site layout. C. Operations in connection with the proposed use do not create any more noise, fumes, vibration, illumination, or other potential nuisances than the operation of any permitted use in the particular zone. The community facility use will not change. The temporary use will not create fumes, vibrations, illumination, or other nuisances. Noise impacts related to the daycare use will be temporary and limited to typical daytime business hours of 7:30am to 5:30pm, Mondays through Fridays. D. Community infrastructure and services, such as police, fire and other protective services, roadways, schools, and water and sewer facilities are currently, or will be, of adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use. There are no changes to existing infrastructure and services. All infrastructure to accommodate the use is in place and is of adequate capacity. E. The proposed use, structure design, and site layout will comply with all the provisions of the Town Code and with the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan. F. The site layout, with proposed vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access, traffic circulation, and parking and loading facilities, is sufficient for the proposed use and is safely designed for emergency vehicles. There are no proposed changes to the existing site layout. All existing vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian areas will remain unchanged and can accommodate all uses of the property. G. The project includes sufficient landscaping and/or other forms of buffering to protect surrounding land uses. Existing vegetation is preserved to the extent possible. There are no changes to existing vegetation or other features on the property. H. To the extent deemed relevant by the Planning Board, the proposed use or structure complies with all the criteria applicable to site plan review set forth in Chapter 270, Zoning. Site Plan approval is not required with this Special Permit. This criterion is not applicable to the project. Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal -Site traffic map, including 96B entrance and exit Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal -Parking and traffic map Coddington Road Employee Parking and Family Drop Off Areas in This Lot Family Drop Off Route Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal -Drop off and pick up plans and access Drop off and pick up will be through the exterior doors in order to keep Ithaca College student foot traffic separate from Coddington Road foot traffic College student entrance and exit via the front doors Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal-Building Floor Plan Shared Spaces Ithaca College and Coddington Road Proposal-Building Floor Plan Shared Spaces DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tioga St 14850 607.273.1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Planner DATE: March 13, 2023 RE: Preliminary and Final Approval – 232 Haller Boulevard Subdivision/Consolidation Enclosed please find materials related to the consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located at 232 Haller Boulevard. The proposal involves subdividing a 6.08+/- acre parcel into three parcels (see attached subdivision plat). Parcel A will then be consolidated with an adjacent property to the north, along with another strip of land labeled as 0 Haller Boulevard; Parcel B will become a building lot fronting Haller Boulevard; and Parcel C will contain an existing residence and garage. The property at 232 Haller Boulevard consists of a residence, garage, and attached outbuildings on 6.08+/- acres of land maintained as lawn, first succession vegetation, and forested areas (the attached memo from the applicant erroneously notes that this property is only four acres in size). The property is bordered on the north, south, and west by private residences and wooded areas, and on the east by Haller Boulevard and the City of Ithaca municipal boundary. The applicant proposes to split the parcel at 232 Haller Boulevard so that Parcel A (at 5.347 acres), along with a small strip of land immediately north of Parcel A (0 Haller Boulevard), are consolidated with Tax Parcel No. 29.-6-1.2, owned by Carpenter (244 Haller Boulevard). Parcel C will retain the existing residence and garage associated with 232 Haller Boulevard; and Parcel B will become a new building lot that could potentially contain a single-family home with accessory dwelling unit in the future. There is no development proposed and all resultant lots will comply with the dimensional requirements in the Town Code for properties located in the Medium Density Residential Zone. The applicant has been working with TG Miller Surveyors and Engineers to revise the subdivision plat to show an existing sewer line that runs north from the existing home at 232 Haller Boulevard. The revision has no impact on the lot layouts or the subdivision action itself, so it has been added as a condition of approval in the attached draft resolution. Please also find attached an aerial location map, completed environmental review, and draft SEQR resolution to consider. Please contact me by email at cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us or by phone at (607) 273-1747 or (607) 227-0956 if you have any questions. Att. cc: Christopher Anagnost, Christopher George Real Estate jFEB052023iiiFCH?ISkOPHERGEORGEREALESTATEhUdNOFflf,3APLDNH3418NTiogaStIthaca,NY14850ChristopherI.AnagnostOffice:607-272-8213Cell/Text(607)279-5520LicensedRealEstateBroker/PrincipalEmail:christophergeorgerealestate@gmail.comTownofIthacaPlanningBoard215N.TiogaSt.Ithaca,NY14850Re:SubdivisionofandpartialConsolidationwiththefollowing:Taxparcels29-6-2.2and29.-6-1.1232HaIlerBlvd.and0HaIlerBlvd.Taxparcel29.-6-1.2244HaIlerBlvd.Tothemembersoftheboard:Thepropertyat232and0HaIlerBlvd.consistsoftwoparcels.Thefirst,#29.-6-2.2consistsof4acres[approximately]ofland,ahouse,detachedgaragesandalongstringofattachedoutbuildingsthatwereformerlychickencoops.0HaIlerBlvd.isa1.01narrowstripoflandthatadloinsthispropertyonthenorthandalsoadjoinsthepropertynextnorthwhichis244HaIlerBlvd.[taxparcel#29.-6-1.2J.Thesethreeparcels[thetwothatarepartofthisapplication]andtheoneonthenorthareownedbymembersofthesamefamily.Theownerof232HaIlerBlvd.andthesmallstripoflandisthenieceoftheownerof244HaIler.ShehasnotlivedinIthacaformanyyearsandhasdecidedtoselltheproperty.Theuncleofthecurrentowner,isthepersonwhoowns244HailerBlvd.Hewantstoretaintheoutbuildingsandrearportionoftheland.Thatisthereasonforthisappeal.Themappresentedforthisapplicationshowsthreeparcels:ParcelAconsistsof5.347acresoflandandthestringofattachedoutbuildingsthatwerethechickencoopsmentionedabove.Thisparcelisgoingtobeconsolidatedwith244HaIlerBlvd.,parcel#29-6-1.2.ParcelBwillbeavacantlotanParcelCwillbethehouseandgarages.Therewillbenophysicalchangestothetopographyoranychangestothecharacteroftheneighborhood.Respectfullysubmitted,Christopheri.Anagnost,BrokerndAgentfortheOwner. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: SEQR Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval Osborne Subdivision/Consolidation 232 Haller Boulevard Tax Parcel No. 29.-6-2.2 Town of Ithaca Planning Board, March 21, 2023 WHEREAS: 1. This is consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located at 232 Haller Boulevard. The proposal involves subdividing the 6.082- acre parcel into three parcels. Parcel A, at 5.347 acres, will be consolidated along with a small strip of land (0 Haller Boulevard) with the property to the north (244 Haller Boulevard). Parcel B, at 0.368 acres, will become a separate buildable lot fronting Haller Boulevard. Parcel C, at 0.367 acres, contains an existing residence and garage. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Paul D. Osborne, Attorney-in-fact for Marcia Joyce Osborne, Owner; Christopher Anagnost, Applicant/Agent; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is the lead agency in the environmental review with respect to the project; 3. The Planning Board on March 21, 2023, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a subdivision map entitled “Subdivision Plat, Showing Lands of Marcia Joyce Osborne, Located at No. 232 Haller Boulevard, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” prepared by T.G. Miller, P.C. dated 9/28/2022, and other application materials; and 4. Town planning staff has recommended a negative determination of environmental significance with respect to the proposed Subdivision Approval; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review for the above referenced action as proposed, based on the information in the EAF Part 1 and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Parts 2 and 3, and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. 25.50* 6.08 acres - total of Parcels A,B,C +19.42 acres - Carpenter property =25.50 total acres* 6.08* The area is served by TCAT Routes 14 & 14S N/A No development proposed - N/A No development proposed - N/A Please See Part 3 Please See Part 3 Page 1 of 2 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept “Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?” No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2.Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4.Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6.Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7.Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? 10.Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11.Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Page 2 of 2 For every question in Part 2 that was answered “moderate to large impact may occur”, or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Name of Lead Agency Date _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, March 1, 2023 4:20 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report MEMORANDUM To: Town of Ithaca Planning Board From: The Town of Ithaca Conservation Board - Environmental Review Committee Date: 03/2/2023 RE: Osborne 3-Lot Subdivision and IC/CRCC Child Care Center Osborne 3-Lot Subdivision In reviewing the proposed application for the 3-lot subdivision located at 232 Haller Blvd the NYS Environmental Resource Mapper identified that the west side of what is proposed to become Parcel A is within the buffer area of an element occurrence of a rare plant (map included below). If in the future the new owner of Parcel A is considering a project or activity on their parcel, before taking actions they will want to contact our regional DEC office for more information about how to proceed. For the proposed 3-lot subdivision the Environmental Review Committee finds there will be no significant environmental impact resulting and recommends approval by the Planning Board. https://gisservices.dec.ny.gov/gis/erm/ IC/CRCC Child Care Center Special Permit For the proposed activity the Environmental Review Committee finds there will be no significant environmental impact resulting and recommends approval by the Planning Board. Respectfully submitted Lori Brewer Lindsay Dombroskie Elise Edwards Eva Hoffmann Michael Roberts Pg. 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval Osborne Subdivision/Consolidation 232 Haller Boulevard Tax Parcel No. 29.-6-2.2 Town of Ithaca Planning Board, March 21, 2023 WHEREAS: 1. This is consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision located at 232 Haller Boulevard. The proposal involves subdividing the 6.082- acre parcel into three parcels. Parcel A, at 5.347 acres, will be consolidated along with a small strip of land (0 Haller Boulevard) with the property to the north (244 Haller Boulevard). Parcel B, at 0.368 acres, will become a separate buildable lot fronting Haller Boulevard. Parcel C, at 0.367 acres, contains an existing residence and garage. This is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to environmental review. Paul D. Osborne, Attorney-in-fact for Marcia Joyce Osborne, Owner; Christopher Anagnost, Applicant/Agent; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, as lead agency in the environmental review with respect to the project, has on March 21, 2023, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the Town Planning staff; and 3. The Planning Board on March 21, 2023, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a subdivision map entitled “Subdivision Plat, Showing Lands of Marcia Joyce Osborne, Located at No. 232 Haller Boulevard, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” prepared by T.G. Miller, P.C. dated 9/28/2022, and other application materials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed subdivision and consolidation at 232 Haller Boulevard, as shown on the subdivision map noted in Whereas #3 above, subject to the following conditions: a. Submission for signing by the Planning Board Chair of an original and three dark lined prints of the approved final subdivision plat, revised to show the existing sewer line that runs north of the property from 232 Haller Boulevard, prior to filing with the Tompkins County Clerk’s Office; and submission of a copy of the receipt of filing to the Planning Department; b. If Parcel B is conveyed to the owner of 232 Haller Boulevard, then submission of a sewer easement for Parcel B that has been approved by the Attorney for the Town. Once approved, recording of said easement in the Tompkins County Clerk’s office at the time of the recording of the deed for the conveyed lot; and submission to the Planning Department of proof of such filing within 5 days of the recording; and Pg. 2 c. Within six months of this approval, consolidation of Tax Parcel No. 29.-6-1.1 and Parcel A with Tax Parcel No. 29.-6-1.2 (244 Haller Boulevard), and submission to the Planning Department of a copy of the completed Tompkins County Consolidation Request Form. ´ TP #29.-6-2.2 to be subdivided:Parcel "A"- consol with adj parcelsParcel "B"- new buildable lotParcel "C"- existing residence TP #29.-6-1.2 Carpenter HALLER BLVD(city/town line)WESTHAVEN ROADELM ST EXT. TP #29.-6-1.1 to be consolidatedwith 29.-6-1.2 (Carpenter)A C B LOCATION MAPOsborne Sub/Consolidation232 Haller BoulevardPlanning Board, March 21, 2023 ± 0 350 700175 Fe et LEGENDA—COMPUTEDPOINT•—PINSETWITHCAP—IRONPINFVUND—IRONPIPEFOUND0—UTILITYPOLE*—PROPOSEDNEWDIVISIONLINEo—CATCHBASINIoI//MARIAJOYCEOSBORNELEVENE,GOULDIN&THOMPSON,LLPELIZABETHCARPENTERCARLT.CARPENTERALLEN&MAINESIherebycertifyto______________________________________thatIamalicensedlandsurveyor,NewYorkStateLicenseNo.050096,andthatthismapcorrectlydelineatesanactualsurveyonthegroundmadebymeorundermydirectsupervisionandthatIfoundnovisibleencroachmentseitherwayacrosspropertylinesexceptasshownhereon.SIGNED:_________________________DATED:9/28/2022CARPENTER(RD.)736/78TMN29—6—1.2TAXMAPPARCEL29—6_ilTAXMAPPARCEL29.—6—2.2PARCELATOBECONSOLIDATEDWITHLANDSOFCARPENTERTAXMAPPARCEL29.—6—1.2AREA=5.347ACRESTT.G.MILLER,P.C.ENGINEERSANDSURVEYORS605WESTSTATESTREET,SUITEAITHACA,NEWYORK14850WWW.TGMILLERPC.COM607—272—6477200!P1401QINT.ASPHALTS0231’32”W32.08’-PARCELCAREA=0.367ACRESN0231’32”E100.00’IEirGENUNG(RD.)745/83TMN29—6—24.4/64.76(PTO—-JN’FLINETfTfEINFORVAJ’JONPARCELSA,B,&CMARCIAJOYCEOSBORNEINSTRUMENTNo.506471—001TAXMAPNo.29.—6—1.1&29—6—2.2TOTALAREA=6.082ACRESTOSTREETLINE/———_81——____________0—EMILIAN(R.O.)917/246TMN29—6—24.27/*N8III/IHALLER(R.O.)595/3D3TMN29.—6—1D.2r------------N855297——___________706.64’jz‘i1WARMNGALTERATIONOFTHISMAPNOT1%:’CONFORMINGIDSECTION7209.SUBOMSION2.NEWYORKSTATEEDUCATIONLAW.AREPROHIISIEDBYLAW.AU.CERTIFICATIONSHEREONAREVALJDFORTHISMAPANDCOPIESTHEREOFONLYIFSAIDMAPORCOPIESBEARDIEIMPRESSIONSEALOFINCLICENSEDLANDSURWIVRWHOSESIGNATUREAPPEARSHEREON.PARCELBAREA=0.368ACRESL0MAPREFERENCESS8730’Qo”E15’0231’32E100.00’CERTIFICATION•S023406wW.100.00’S021O’35”W.91.00’1.)“SURVEYMAPNo.220HALLERBOULEVARDDATED4/12/2D17,BYT.G.MILLERP.C.2.)“MAPFORTHEPROPOSEDWATERDISTRICTTOSERVEELMSTREETEXTENSIONANDHALLERAVENUEDATED10/6/1948,BYE.D.CRUMB.3.)“SURVEYMAPCHRISTIANHALLERESTATEDATED9/15/1982,AMENDED5/19/1983,BYT.G.MILLERP.C.4.)“SURVEYMAPSHOWINGPREMISESOFDONALD&RUTHSWEARINGENDATED8/7/2001,BYT.G.MILLERP.C.5.)“PARTOFLANDSOFISABELLBURNEJTDATED1/26/1980,BYK.A.BAKER&HOWARDR.SCHLEIDER6.)“SURVEYMAPSHOWINGLANDSOFCARPENTERDATED9/25/1974,LASTAMENDED10/6/1983,BYT.G.MILLERP.C.02TITLE:SUBDIVISIONPLATSHOWINGLANDSOFMARCIAJOYCEOSBORNELOCATEDATNo.232HALLERBOULEVARDTOWNOFITHACA,TOMPKINSCOUNTY,NEWYORKREVISEDDATE:,,ISCALE:1w=801S22822 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tioga St 14850 607.273.1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us TO: Planning Board Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Planner DATE: March 14, 2023 RE: The Learning Farm Proposal, 272 Enfield Falls Road – Site Plan, Special Permit Enclosed please find materials related to the consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Learning Farm project located at 272 Enfield Falls Road. The proposal involves the development of a learning kitchen building and educational spaces, up to ten guest structures, associated gravel and grassed parking areas, trails, walkways, lighting, and stormwater management facilities. The Town Board adopted modifications to the Town Code in 2022 to allow Agritourism uses by right in the Agricultural Zone, along with seasonal farm lodging facilities by Special Permit issued by the Planning Board. This was in response to a request by the applicant (letter attached). The Town Planning Committee discussed and supported the proposed changes. The revised Town Code §270-29.N and §270-30, along with revised definitions, are included in the enclosures. The proposed Agritourism programming and Seasonal farm facilities offered by The Learning Farm are permitted with approval by the Planning Board (other proposed structures and uses at The Learning Farm property are permitted as of right). Thus, portions of the project require Site Plan/Special Permit approval and portions do not. To simplify, the application materials show the project elements as Phase I and Phase II. The Planning Board approval process only applies to Learning Farm’s Phase I project elements, except for item “C” under the “Proposed Plan” (see attached memo written by Aleksandr Mergold). Item C is considered part of the Farm/Agritourism use permitted by right, so it is exempt from Planning Board review. Similarly, all of Phase II is considered part of the farm/agritourism use and is also exempt from Planning Board review. To summarize the Planning Board may consider approval of the following: A. Learning kitchen building (earth-bermed) – technically part of the Farm use by right, but contains bathroom facilities for the guest yurts, per §270-30, so Planning Board will review/consider. B. Guest structures/yurts on platforms – Planning Board will review/consider per §270-30. C. Barn conversion - exempt from review/Planning Board approval per §270-29. D. Gravel and grassed parking, trails, etc. - Planning Board will review/consider per §270-30. E. Septic systems/stormwater swales - Planning Board will review/consider. Regarding “E”, the Town Engineering Department has approved a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the whole project (including Phase II) and has reported that the project has received a sewer exemption. Should the board approve the project, the department has suggested a condition of approval related to stormwater facilities that is included in the attached draft resolution. 2 The enclosures include a completed environmental review and draft resolutions for the project. Please feel free to call me at (607) 273-1721, extension 121, or email me at cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us if you have any questions prior to the meeting. Cc: Christa Nunez Aleksandr Mergold PROJECT NARRATIVE 1 of 4 THE LEARNING FARM DRAFT – August 1, 2022 REVISION – August 11, 2022 REVISION -- August 29, 2022 Project Description The Learning Farm’s mission The proposed site development plan consists of a variety of small-scale educational infrastructure, building and landscape interventions into the existing 16-acre farmstead to support children and their families in gaining needed understanding and growth in food production abilities and healing nature connection to support healthy lifestyles as part of the Learning Farm’s mission of equitable food production and consumption education. The Learning Farm is black-owned, woman-owned, and its founders have African American and Indigenous farming histories. Nurturing relationships with self, nature, family, and community are important as are deeply-rooted access to learning moments that balance these elements at a young age. To at-risk youth, learning experiences in nature are especially dignity-affirming as they impart unique agency over, and understanding of, external factors that impact health such as food segregation and systemic urbanization. Throughout the site-specific programming, a community of land stewards, academics, and practitioners will support the development of place and program in an effort to reverse systems that perpetuate health injustice across several sectors of society. This key tenet of our methodology will be implemented through the teaching of historical record around food and land, hunger and poverty, and historically practical solutions such as farm cooperatives and CSAs as a means to teach life skills such as cooperation, historical analysis as well as the importance of soil health, water retention, plant diversification and the value of companion planting. Proposed Plan The plan provides for an educational learning center which will include: In Phase I A. A single, approx. 2500 SF, learning kitchen building, with rest room, bathing and laundering facilities for the students and visitors of the Learning Farm B. Ten (10) guest structures of approx. 675 SF each with approx. 100 SF porch on raised platforms C. Conversion of existing barn and silo structures (approx. 1500 SF) into an educational space (classrooms – The Learning Barn) D. Associated gravel and grassed, parking, trails, and walkways for Phase I E. Required septic systems and stormwater retention swales In Phase II F. An approx. 5000 SF Welcome Center G. An approx. 5000 SF juicing/bottling building H. Associated gravel and grassed, parking, trails, and walkways for Phase II PROJECT NARRATIVE 2 of 4 www.mergold.work The Learning Kitchen (A) will be used as a means to support nutritious cooking classes for small groups of K-12 students in two cohorts of twenty students each (max. of 40 total students on-site) as well as small-scale product development. This building will act as the educational, research and development hub of the site. The guest structure (B) dwellings will house families for farm immersion stays to learn key aspects of sustainable agriculture, healthy food service and community food systems creation. The Learning Barn (C) will provide additional space and case-study for learning about agriculture. The Welcome Center (F) is planned to create a space to welcome visitors as well as teach hospitality skills and the cultivation of a spirit of welcome to family program participants. A small-scale juice production facility (G) is planned to accommodate juice making as well as business development workshops for program participants and small K-12 student groups in learning about how organic retail juice is made and put on the market. Additionally, a green focus permeates the plan so that buildings will be constructed in an ecologically-sound manner and all trails will be kept natural to limit the impact of hardscape surfaces in the environment. Phase I A – Learning Kitchen The proposed building will be a single-story earth-sheltered and naturally lighted space, that besides the kitchen, also houses food processing, production and refrigeration spaces, office, staff lounge, staff and visitor bathrooms. Under the same roof, but separated by an enclosed breezeway, is a fully accessible bathing block, serving the proposed guest dwellings (B) and converted Learning Barn (C) at the Farm. The building is accessed from the existing parking area that will be upgraded. In front of the new kitchen building, facing south-east, will be an open (shaded) brick patio with an exterior fireplace. The planted green roof over the kitchen will be gently sloped to allow visitor access from the west; on the roof, the visitors will be able to observe the kitchen operation below through large, glazed monitors/skylights. The minimal excavation will be used to shelter the western walls of kitchen and become a planning bed in front of the sloping green roof. This new building will become part of the existing collection of farm buildings (barn, silo, house, etc.) already dedicated to the Learning Farm operation. Inspired by farm construction techniques (i.e. bank barn) this will be a contemporary interpretation of the historical agrarian building, where ingenuity of adaptive reuse and re-imaging of existing materials will combine with the cutting edge building technology and energy efficiency. As a multifunctional space – a place of learning, gathering, food celebration – the Learning Kitchen will be a dynamic and energized destination for both local community of Ithaca and visitors alike. B – Guest Structure Dwellings Proposed cluster of seasonal dwellings are prefabricated yurts that will be places of wood- framed platforms that will allow no or minimal excavation of the site. The yurts, perched on the hilly area on the north end of the site will have expansive views of the Farm. Laundry and bathing facilities will be provided at the Learning Kitchen Building (A). PROJECT NARRATIVE 3 of 4 www.mergold.work C – The Learning Barn Preservation and adaptive reuse of these antebellum structures will be exemplifying the Learning Farm’s appreciation of historical farming practices and providing additional spaces for education and instruction. Bathroom and bathing facilities will be provided at the Learning Kitchen Building (A). Phase II The Welcome Center (F) and the Juicing Building (G) are planned for a later development, pending completion of Phase I and funding. These structures will be located in the lower, south-east corner of the farm. While proximate to the principal Farm buildings, they will also form a separate agricultural processing cluster with it own directed access to Enfield Falls Rd via existing dedicated driveway. Zoning Compliance (see attached table) The AG (Agricultural) zoning district has varying lot size minimums and allows buildings to cover 10% of their lot. The height allowance is 38’ above grade plane. There is a 30’ front yard requirement, 40’ side yard requirement, and 50’ rear yard requirement, as well as 50’ adjacent stream setback. The lot is 16.22 acres or 706,543 SF, and the existing building footprint currently occupy 3685 SF allowing for additional 66,969 SF of coverage. The proposed buildings are located well within the setbacks, within height limits above proposed grade and designed to appear to be a part of the existing landscape. Parking be located in the areas that are in for the most part already used as such but will be better defined; the proposal is to consider using maximally- permeable parking surfaces like grass-crete and/or gravel. Allowed Uses AG zone allows non-retail use related to agriculture without a special permit and seasonal farm lodging by special permit. Our proposed educational, dwelling and food production facilities educational that support the Learning Farm’s mission fall under AG primary farm use, as well as accessory uses of Agritourism, and Seasonal farm lodging. Stormwater & Landscape In principal, we proposed best practice strategy that uses minimal excavation and retention of existing naturally-formed site hydrology, green roofs that slow and directs runoff to the vegetated side yard to filter stormwater prior to its entry into the creek below. The treatment of horizontal surfaces – roofs, patios, parking spaces decks – has the storm-water and restorative agriculture practices in mind. In we are proposing the use of vegetated roof and planted slow-release swale, in addition to maximally-permeable materials for all horizontal surfaces. Utilities and Energy The water will be supplied by the existing well on site, and the proposal is considering offsetting/supplementing electricity usage by solar array directly on the site or via subscription into an existing array off-site. New septic systems are proposed on site. Heating and cooling PROJECT NARRATIVE 4 of 4 www.mergold.work systems will be provided through passive heating/cooling, electric fans and in-floor radiant heat and a back-up electric heat pump system yet to be designed. Traffic The impact on automobile traffic of the new buildings is expected to be negligible relative to the traffic levels already present on Enfield Falls Rd. Community Benefits - The new buildings and landscapes will help the Learning Farm’s mission by providing dedicated educational spaces, creating several local jobs, and providing restroom and bathing facilities to the proposed camping spots – this making this already desired and popular summer learning destination a much more comfortable and exciting experience - The new buildings and outdoor spaces will be able to support local community events and functions throughout the year - Proximity to Robert H. Treman State Park adds another recreational destination for locals and visitors alike in the area Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Dear Town of Ithaca Board, We are a small, local 501(c)(3) non-profit charitable organization focused on the growing of environmental and human rights literacy, self-sufficiency and healthy lifestyles in young people and their families. To support this work, we are eager to develop this sustainably-run farm space, in an ecologically-sound style, as an agricultural center to preserve the healthy pursuit of life on land for socially disadvantaged youth and families. Our five year needs are as follows: ●Youth and family agriculture training programming - youth after school and summer program, weekend visits for families ●10 small temporary family dwellings for summer stays ●Commercial / teaching kitchen for garden produce use and nutrition education Our five-ten year plans include the following: ●A welcome and learning center / farm stand The plan is for up to forty kids plus 1 teacher per 10 children (4) / 1 administrator / 1 farm manager and 1 farm assistant to be on-site and involved with the various educational programs each season. The After School program will operate according to the ICSD school calendar - Late August - Late June M-F 2-5:30pm except during school holidays and off days. The Summer Program will operate during Summer for the last 5 weeks the ICSD school calendar designates as summer break. Late July - Late August Mon-Fri 8am-5:30pm Family farming programming will occur the first 5 weeks of Summer Late June - Late July for 5 consecutive week-long stays. The existing property is comprised of 15.5 acres of mixed-use land. Approx. 6 acres of arable agriculture land planted currently in perennial fruit trees, grapevines, berry bushes and annual and perennial vegetables, culinary herbs and fruit beds. Plans are to further develop these plots along the same lines in future. There is approx. 7 acres of forest and creek-scape land that will remain untouched and will be used for forest and riparian / watershed study, art, meditation, self-reflection and a small site for mushroom logs. There is approx. 2 acres of rocky / gravel open field on which we’d like to site a welcome and learning center / farm stand. All of the land at present and in future will be used for educational and small group / family natural world recreation purposes. Existing structures include a farm house where the administrator ’s family lives year round, a barn with storage areas and two finished rooms for gathering in inclement weather, a 400 sq. ft. cottage for the farm manager and a shed. Current animals on the farm include 2 Nigerian Dwarf Goats and 27 chickens. Future plans for animals include a pony and two female sheep. All animals and plants are used for environmental stewardship and sustainable agricultural teaching purposes. A diverse array of young people come to the farm for after school and summer programming. Some families pay for registration and others are free, depending on financial need and any family histories of marginalization or social disadvantage. The ten families per year participating in Summer 5 week stays are families from diverse backgrounds - mainly food insecure black, white, Indigenous,people of color who are seeking to make lifestyle changes with regard to their work and food systems interactions. They are mainly Tompkins County residents who have experienced systemic racism or other forms of economic marginalization and its impacts on their housing and food sources. They are looking to live and behave more sustainably with regard to their impacts on the natural environment and feel it is important to have power and agency in the protection of our environment and in the development of healthier food and housing interactions.They would be staying on the farm for a five-week intensive practicum in order to gain valuable knowledge and practice in sustainable agriculture and environmentally protective methods of living. They are eager to make changes and eager to engage with energy efficiency and renewables as well as community development work. Ten (10) small temporary dwellings for Summer stays will be yurt-style structures to house a single families between approximately 2-6 people.A camp/composting toilet, sink and shower would be provided in each dwelling, along with a kitchenette with a mini fridge and counter space for minimal food prep. No stove. People will learn about sustainable agriculture, ag and green business development and ecological living and develop a positive personal connection with nature and farmland. A 1,000 sq. ft. commercial kitchen will be used as a means to support nutritious cooking classes for small groups of K-12 students in two cohorts of twenty students each (40 total students on-site) as well as small-scale product development.Two families at a time will utilize the kitchen for group meal preparation. One of our family programs includes field trips to neighboring farms for children and their parents and caregivers to learn about where their food comes from and how they can be a more integral part of our local food production system.We partner with these local farms and farming and youth development organizations in order to provide this aspect of our program: The Youth Farm Project Groundswell Center for Local Food and Farming Pressbay Alley Food Hub Wellspring Forest Farm Van Noble Farm Here We Are Farm The existing barn has two classrooms which are used for shelter purposes for programming for 50 people split over the two rooms during inclement weather. I have been told by Town of Ithaca staff that the described uses are currently not allowed in our applied zoning. Because we believe this is a beneficial use as well as a neighbor and community supported use for this property, we are requesting a special zoning provision to make space for this unique work that we seek to do. Though the type of land use that we are requesting does not fit any zoning models the Town of Ithaca currently has, our goals align very closely with those of the Town’s regarding the promotion of agricultural uses of land in Ithaca’s surrounding farmland. We look forward to hearing from you on this matter.Please reach out with any questions or with any further information needed to inform your decision to consider ways to make a change in zoning. Sincerely, Christa Núñez Executive Director Khuba International / The Learning Farm 272 Enfield Falls Rd. Ithaca, NY 14850 (707) 570-5178 ChristaNunez@gmail.com c\Ccc\crXvt(:yINc2c\JQ)AGRITOURISMActivitiesconductedaspartoffarmoperationsandofferedtothepublicortoinvitedgroupsforthepurposeofrecreation,educationoractiveinvolvementinthefarmoperation,andwhicharerelatedtoagriculturalornaturalresourcesandincidentaltotheprimaryfarmoperationonthesite.Agritourismactivitiesincludefarmtours,hayrides,cornmazes,u-pickoperations,farmfestivals,youthand/oradulteducationactivitiesrelatedtoagriculturalproductsorskills,andsimilaruses.[Added2-14-2022byL.L.No.3-2022]FARMAnyparceloflandcontainingatleastthreeacreswhichisusedintheraisingofagriculturalproducts,suchascrops,livestock)poultry,anddairygoods.Itincludesstructuresnecessarytotheproductionandstorageofagriculturalproductsandequipmentandon-farmbuildingsusedforpreparationormarketingofproductsproduced,orderivedfromproductsproduced,predominantlyonthefarmpropertyonwhichthebuildingislocatedsubjecttothelimitationsregardingroadsidestandssetforthinthischapter.[Amended8-1-2005byL.L.No.7-2005]SEASONALFARMLODGINGFACILITIESTemporarytentoryurtlodgingfacilitiesusedinconjunctionwithandaspartoffarmoperationsinwhichguestslivewhileparticipatinginthefarmingactivitiesforthepurposesoflearningaboutfarmlifeorwhilesupportingandprovidingtemporarylabortothefarmoperations.(Added2-14-2022byL.L.No.3-2022] Tqvnofthaca,NYEcodc36Ohttps://ccode36O,com/print/ITI944?guid8661616,8661634,866166...TownofIthaca,NYThursdaySeptember15,2022Chapter270.ZoningArticleVI.AgriculturalZones§270-26.Permittedprincipaluses.OnlythefollowingbuildingsorusesarepermittedofrightinanAgriculturalZone:A.Anylawfulfarmpurpose,includingusualfarmbuildingsandstructures,butexcludingrenderingplants.B.Plantnursery.C.Equestrianfacility.D.Kennel,coop,orotherfacilityforthehousingorcaringforanimals,birds,orfish,whetherforhireorotherwise,includingananimalshelter,wildliferefugeandfishfarms.E.Aroadsidestandorotherstructure,notexceeding3,000squarefeetofenclosedspace,forthedisplayandsaleoffarmornurseryproductsrelatedtofarmingandasaseasonalconveniencetotheownerorownersoftheand.Themajorityoftheproductssoldatsuchstandshallbe,orbederivedfrom,productsproducedonthefarmonwhichtheroadsidestandislocated.Anysuchstandshallbelocatedaminimumof30feetfromthestreetline,insuchamannerastopermitsaleaccessandegressforautomobiles,andparkingoffthehighwayright-of-way.[Amended8-1-2005byL.L.No.7-2005]FAone-familydwellingtobeoccupiedbynomorethan:(1)Onefamily,or(2)Onefamilyplusnomorethanoneboarder,roomer,lodger,orotheroccupant.G.Atwo-familydwellingconsistingofaprincipaldwellingunitandaninternalorattachedaccessorydwellingunit,providedthat:[Amended12-11-2017byL.L.No.20-2017](1)Theprincipaldwellingunitisoccupiedbynomorethanonefamilyplusnomorethanoneboarder,roomer,lodgerorotheroccupant;(2)Theaccessorydwellingunitisoccupiedbynomorethanonefamily;and(3)Theapplicablerequirementsof§270-219.6(Accessorydwellingunits)aremet.H.Publiclyownedparkorplaygroundincludingaccessorybuildingsandimprovements.I.Anymunicipalorpublicutilitypurposenecessarytothemaintenanceofutilityservicesexceptthatsubstationsandsimilarstructuresshallbesubjecttothesamesetbackrequirementsasapplytoresidencesinthedistrictinwhichthesubstationsorsimilarstructuresareconstructed.J.Day-carehomes,familyday-carehomesandgroupfamilyday-carehomes.Iof69/15/2022,12:39PM fawnof!tfl6i,NVEeode3tOkttp//.6sde3O.e6m/pI:inULTI944!guidd6l6Ie,8&1I&flñltlL.K.Communityresidence.L.Forestmanagementandotherforestresourceuses,includingtheharvestingoftimberinconformancewithenvironmentallysoundforestrypractices.M.Amateurradiofacilities,subjecttothelimitationsonamateurradiofacilitiessetforthin§270-219.3.[Added8-13-2007byLL.No.7-2007]N.Smallwindenergyfacilities,subjecttothelimitationsonsmallwindenergyfacilitiessetforthin§270-219.4.[Added8-11-2008byL.L.No.13-2008]0.Landscapingserviceproviderandtree-careserviceprovider,providedthatadequateprovisionismadetopreventnuisancetoadjoiningresidencesandprovided:[Added10-21-2019byL.L.No.8-2019](1)Theminimumlotsizeis10acres;(2)Thereisanonoccupiedbufferofatleast50feetaroundtheperimeterofthelotthatcannotbeusedforthepermitteduse;(3)Outdoormaterialstoragedoesnotoccupymorethan15%oftheentirelot;(4)Alloutdoorstoragemustbescreenedorsituatedinsuchawaythatitisnotvisiblefromthepublicright-of-wayoradjacentresidentialproperties;(5)Noon-sitesaleofproductsisallowed;(6)Vehiclesandequipmentusedintheconductofthebusinessmustbestoredinenclosedbuildingsorbescreenedorsituatedsuchthatwhennotactivelybeingusedtheyarenotvisiblefromthepublicright-of-wayandadjacentresidentialproperties;(7)Employeeparkingmustbescreenedorsituatedinsuchamannerthatitisnotvisiblefromthepublicright-of-wayandadjacentresidentialproperties;(8)Noisestandards:(a)Theexteriornoiselevelmustnotexceedthefollowinglimitsbeyondtheboundaryofthelot:[1]From7:00a.m.to7:00p.m.:65dBa.[2]From7:00p.m.to7:00a.m.:55dBa.(b)Thetemporaryuseofequipmenttomaintainanon-siteresidence,includingbutnotlimitedtopowermowers,isexemptfromthenoisestandardsinthisSubsection0(8);(9)Allnewbuildingsassociatedwiththeuseshallbefullyscreenedorsituatedsuchthattheyarenotvisiblefromanypublicright-of-wayunlessotherwiseallowedbythePlanningBoard.CriteriaforthePlanningBoardtoconsiderindeterminingtheneedforvisibilitycontrolsincludewhetherthebuildinghasthefollowingdesirablecharacteristics:(a)Thegeneralsize,shape,andscalewillbearchitecturallycompatiblewithotherbuildingsvisiblealongtheright-of-waycorridor;(b)Thebuildingwillhaveaslopedroof,notlessthanfourin12;(c)Thebuildingfacadefacinganypublicright-of-waywillhavewindowsorentrancewaysratherthananuninterruptedblankwall;(d)Thefrontyardareaimmediatelyadjacenttothebuildingwillbelandscapedwithlawn,2ofô9/15/2022,12:39PM TownofIthaca,NYEcode36Ohttps://ccode36O.corn!print/1T1944?guid=8661616,8661634,866166...shrubsorflowers;(e)Theexteriorcladdingonthebuildingfaçadefacinganypublicright-of-waywillbeprimarilycomposedofbrick,siding(wood,fibercement!polymer!vinyl,steel),stone,orstucco.P.InadditiontotheusesofbarnsasprincipalbuildingsonfarmlotsorforfarmpurposespursuanttoSubsectionA,abarnbuildingmaybeaprincipalbuildingonalotthatisnotusedasafarm.AnysuchbarnbuildingmaybeusedforanyofthepermittedprincipalusesintheAgriculturalZone,subjecttotherequirementsinthisarticleandchapter.Abuildingpermitmaybeissuedforconstructionofanotherprincipalbuildingonthelot!providedthatthebarnbuildingbecomesanaccessorybuildingtotheotherbuildinguponissuanceofacertificateofcompliancefortheotherbuilding.Ifabarnbuildingbecomesanaccessorybuildingpursuanttothisprovision,itsusesasanaccessorybuildingaresubjecttotherequirementsofthisarticleandchapterAbarnbuildingthatbecomesanaccessorybuildingpursuanttothisprovisionmayexceedorcontributetotheexceedanceofthecumulativesquarefootagelimitforaccessorybuildingsin§270-29D.providedthatnoexpansionofthebarnbuildingorotheraccessorybuildingsisallowedoncethecumulativesquarefootagelimitismet.[Added2-14-2022byL.L.No.3-2022]§270-27.Principalusesauthorizedbyspecialpermitonly.ThefollowingusesarepermittedinanAgriculturalZone,butonlyuponreceiptofaspecialpermitforsamefromthePlanningBoardinaccordancewiththeproceduressetforthinthischapter:A.Retailsalesrelatedtoagriculturaloperations.(1)Exceptaspermittedasofrightintheprecedingsectionretailsalesofmachinery,products,supplies,orproduceprimarilyrelatedto,orderivedfrom!agriculturaloperationssubjecttothefollowinglimitations:(a)Anybuildingdevotedtosuchactivitymaybenolargerthan4,000squarefeet;(b)Nomorethansixpersonsmaybeengagedinoremployedbytheactivity;(c)Nomorethanthreeacres,inclusiveofbuilding!parking,driveways,well,septicsystemandotherancillaryfacilities,bededicatedtotheuse;(d)Nooutsidestorageotherthantemporaryday-timeonlydisplayofproducts,unlessotherwiseauthorizedbythePlanningBoard.(2)Indeterminingwhethertograntsuchauthorization,thePlanningBoardshallconsider,inadditiontoothercriteriasetforthinthischapter,that:(a)Thenatureofthebusinessgenerallyrequiresoutsidestorage;(b)Thereisadequatespaceonthelotfortheproposedstorage;(c)Thepremisesarescreenedorotherwisebufferedsothattheoutsidestoragedoesnotadverselyimpacttheneighboringpropertiesandpropertyowners;and(d)Theproposedoutsidestoragewillnotadverselyaffectthecharacterofthesurroundingneighborhood.B.Veterinaryofficesorhospitals.C.Churchorotherplacesofworship,conventandparishhouse.D.Cemeteryandthebuildingsandstructuresincidentthereto.3of69/15/2022,12:39PM TSWRofItha6a,NVeadi]Ohttp//a6ade3O,e6ffl/pFinUITI944?guid.SéIIñj6Ifl34JlE...E.Public,parochialandprivateschools,publiclibrary,publicmuseum,nurseryschool,andanyinstitutionofhigherlearningrelatingtoagriculturalpursuits.FFirestationorotherpublicbuildingnecessarytotheprotectionofortheservicingofaneighborhood.S.Golfcourseordrivingrangewithrelatedfacilitiessuchasclubhouse,restaurant,andproshop.H.Cross-countryskicenterwithrelatedfacilitiessuchaslodge,skishopandrestaurant.I.Commercialcompostingfacilitywherecompostingoccursforsale,utilizingmorethan400squarefeetoflandinwhicheventthefollowingadditionalrequirementsshallapply:(1)Thelotonwhichthefacilityislocatedshallbeatleasttwoacresinsize;(2)Thecompostingfacilityshallbelocatedatleast100feetfromanyroadwayandanylotline,exceptforlotlinesadlacenttoResidentialZones,inwhicheventthesetbackfromtheResidentialZonelineshallbeincreasedto250feetandshallhaveabufferofvegetationorfencingtoscreenthefacilityfromtheResidentialZone;(3)Thefacilityshallbeoperatedinacleanandorderlymannersothatitdoesnotcreateanuisancetoanyneighboringproperty.J.Huntingpreserves,lodges,orclubhouses.K.Bed-and-breakfast.L.Television,commercialradio,telecommunication,microwave,satelliteorotherelectronictransmissionfacilityoperatedpursuanttoalicensefromtheFederalCommunicationsCommissionoranysuccessorfederalorstateagency.[Amended8-13-2007byL.L.No.7-2007]M.Researchfacilitiesprincipallydedicatedtoresearchinagricultureoranimalhusbandry.[Amended8-1-2005byL.L.No.7-2005]N.Farmretreat.0.Adultday-carefacilitiesservingnomorethanfourclientsatanyonetime.§270-28.Principalusesauthorizedbyspecialapprovalonly.ThefollowingusesarepermittedinanAgriculturalZone,butonlyuponreceiptofaspecialapprovalforsamefromtheBoardofAppealsinaccordancewiththeproceduressetforthinthischapter:A.Mining,subjecttothefollowingrequirementsinadditiontothenormalrequirementsforaspecialapproval:(1)Nospecialapprovalshallbegranteduntil:(a)ThePlanningBoardapprovesasiteplanfortheproposedminingoperations;and(b)TheappropriateNewYorkStateauthorities(DECorotherregulatorybody)hasapprovedareclamationplanandtheplanandanyrequiredsecurityfortheperformanceoftheplanhasbeenprovidedtotheStateofNewYork.(2)Thereshallbeabufferareaofatleast100feetaroundtheperimeteroftheminedareabetweentheminedareaandanysurroundingproperty,suchbuffertoconsistofnaturalvegetation,plantings,berms.fences,orotherscreeningasdeemedreasonablebytheBoardofAppealstominimizetheauditoryandvisualimpactsoftheminingoperationsonsurroundingproperties.4of69/15/2022,12:39PM TqwnofTJhaca.NYEcode36Ohttps://ccodo36O.comiprirn/ITI944?guid=8661616.8661634.866166...(3)Afillpermitshallbeobtainedinaccordancewiththetillpermitrequirementsotthischapterbeforecommencementofanyminingoperations.(4)Hoursofoperationshallbelimitedtobusinessdays(daysotherthanweekendsandholidays)from8:00a.m.to5:00p.m.localtimeunlesstheapplicant,forgoodcauseshown,demonstratestotheZoningBoardofAppealsthatspecialcircumstancesexistwhichcompelthatthetimesbeextended.(5)Notwithstandingtheforegoing,ifthematerialtobeminedissoil,gravel,orothersimilartypesoftill,upto50cubicyardsofsuchproductmaybeminedinanyonecalendaryearwithoutspecialapproval.Ifmorethan50cubicyardsbutnotmorethan250cubicyardsinanyoneyeararebeingmined,thespecialapprovalmaybeissuedbytheDirectorofEngineeringoftheTown.Inallothercases,thespecialapprovalshallbeobtainedassetforthabove.§270-29.Permittedaccessorybuildingsanduses.ThefollowingaccessorybuildingsorusesarepermittedasofrightinanAgriculturalZone:A.Anyfarm-relatedstructurenototherwiseexpresslyreferredtoorlimitedbyanyprovisioninthischapter.B.Iftheprincipaluseisasafarm,oneormoreone-ortwo-familydwellings,subjecttotheoccupancylimitationssetforthabovetorone-andtwo4amilydwellingsandsubjecttotheoveralldensitylimitationssetforthbelowin§270-35.C.Iftheprincipaluseisasone-ortwo-familydwellingorasafarmwithdwellings;aprivateswimmingpool,tenniscourt,orothersimilarrecreationalfacilityfortheprincipalprivateuseoftheoccupantsofthedwelling.D.Iftheprincipaluseisasaone-ortwo-familydwelling,uptothreeaccessorybuildings,allsuchaccessorybuildingsintheaggregatenottoexceedatotalot1,500squarefeetinsize.Anybuildingoccupiedbyadetachedaccessorydwellingunitshallcounttowardstheone-thousandfive-hundred-square-footlimit.[Amended12-11-2017byL.L.No.20-2017]E.Off-streetgarageorparkingspacefortheoccupants,usersandemployeesinconnectionwithusespermittedinthisarticle,butsubjecttoprovisionsot§270-227.FAtemporarybuildingforcommerceorindustry,wheresuchbuildingisnecessaryorincidentaltothedevelopmentofaresidentialarea.SuchbuildingsmaynotbecontinuedformorethanoneyearexceptuponreceiptofaspecialapprovaltrqmtheBoardofAppeals.G.(Reserved)111[1]Editor’sNote:FormerSubsectionG,whichsetforthsignsasapermittedaccessoryuse,wasrepealed8-7-2017byL.L.No.12-2017.H.Thekeepingothouseholdpetsinadwellingunitorotherlocationadjacenttooraccessorytoadwellingunit(e.g.,outsidedoghouse,etc.)providedthatnomorethanthreehouseholdpetsshallbekeptoutsideofdwellingunitsunlessagreaternumberisauthorizedbyspecialapprovaloftheZoningBoardofAppeals.I.Homeoccupations,subjecttothelimitationsonhomeoccupationssetforthin§270-219.2.[Added2-12-2007byL.L.No.1-2007]J.Amateurradiofacilities,subjecttothelimitationsonamateurradiotacilitiessetforthin§270-219.3.[Added8-13-2007byL.L.No.7-2007]5of69/15/2022,12:39PM Pow,1orffliaai,MYeoa3&OkitpgllaeoaoO.eoiit)pMnUETIQ4(9guid4IK.Smallwindenergyfacilities,subjecttothelimitationsonsmallwindenergyfacilitiessetforthin§270-219.4.[Added8-11-2008byL.L.No.13-2008]L.Iftheprincipaluseisasaone-familydwelling,adetachedaccessorydwellingunit,providedthat:[Added12-11-2017byLL.No.20-2017](1)Theaccessorydwellingunitisoccupiedbynomorethanonefamily;(2)ForbuildingsconstructedaftertheeffectivedateofthisSubsectionL,thebuildingwhichtheaccessorydwellingunitoccupiesislocatedwithin150feetoftheprincipaldwelling;and(3)Theapplicablerequirementsof§270-219.6(Accessorydwellingunits)aremet.M.Short-termrentaluses,subjecttothelimitationsonshort-termrentalusessetforthin§270-219.7.[Added12-29-2021byL.L.No.16-2021]N.Agritourism.12[Added2-14-2022byL.L.No.3-2022J[2]EditorsNote:ThissubsectionwasoriginallyaddedasSubsectionM,butwasredesignatedasSubsectionNastheCodealreadycontainedaSubsectionM.§270-30.Accessorybuildingsandusesauthorizedbyspecialpermitonly.[Added2-14-2022byL.L.No.3-2022]A.Seasonalfarmlodgingfacilities.(1)Yurtsand/ortentsplacedonaplatformandusedsolelyasseasonalfarmlodgingfacilities.(a)Nomorethan10tentsoryurts,oranycombinationthereof,arepermitted.(b)Noyurtortentmaybelargerthan735squarefeet.andallsuchyurtsandtentsintheaggregatemaynotexceedatotalof5,500squarefeet.(c)Inadditiontosleepingfacilities,seasonalfarmlodgingfacilitiesmayincluderelatedbathroom/shower,laundry!and/orkitchenfacilitiesinthesametents/yurtsthatcontainsleepingfacilities,orintents/yurtsthatdonotcontainsleepingfacilities.(2)Yurtsandtentsmaybeerectedfornomorethan180daysinanycalendaryear.[1]Editor’sNote:Former§270-30,Accessorybuildingsandusesauthorizedbyspecialapprovalonly,wasrepealed12-11-2017byL.L.No.20-2017.6oIô9/15/2022,12:39Ply PROPOSED RESOLUTION: SEQR Preliminary Site Plan Approval & Special Permit The Learning Farm Tax Parcel No. 33.-1-24.1 272 Enfield Falls Road Town of Ithaca Planning Board, March 21, 2023 WHEREAS: 1. This action involves consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Learning Farm Agritourism and Seasonal farm lodging facility project located at 272 Enfield Falls Road. The proposal involves the development of a learning kitchen building and educational spaces, up to ten guest structures, associated gravel and grassed parking areas, trails, and walkways, lighting, and stormwater management facilities. Christa Nunez, Khuba International, Owner/Applicant; Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, Agent; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is the lead agency in the environmental review with respect to the project; 3. The Planning Board, on March 21, 2023, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Town Planning staff, a narrative, a set of drawings titled “The Learning Farm,” including sheets A1-A5, dated 05-03-2022; sheets A500-A503, dated 22 July 2022; sheet A001, dated 1 August 2022; sheets A100, A110, A300, A301, A400, A401, dated 19 September 2022; sheets SW1-SW7, dated Jan.19, 2023; sheets A000, A010, E000, and FP001, dated February 27, 2023; and other application materials; and 4. The Town Planning staff has recommended a negative determination of environmental significance with respect to the proposal; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review for the above referenced proposal, based on the information in the EAF Part 1 and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Parts 2 and 3, and, therefore, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. Urban Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify):□ Forest Agriculture □ Parkland SEAF 2019 Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 12.a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Please see Part 3 applicant mistakenly checked "yes"-staff corrected Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: □Shoreline □ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland □ Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ _ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________ applicant mistakenly checked "yes"-staff corrected EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, March 10, 2023 3:45 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]No Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Page 1 of 2 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept “Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?” No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2.Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4.Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6.Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7.Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8.Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9.Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? 10.Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11.Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Page 2 of 2 For every question in Part 2 that was answered “moderate to large impact may occur”, or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Name of Lead Agency Date _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 – Determina on of Significance- Learning Farm The Learning Farm project involves the development of an a er-school and summer K-12 agricultural educa onal program on Enfield Falls Road. The physical project elements include the construc on of 10 seasonal guest structures (yurts on pla orms), along with a par ally earth-bermed building that will contain bathrooms and a learning kitchen. The site layout will also contain associated trails, walkways, parking areas, and stormwater management facili es. The farm and some of the educa onal uses currently operate in several exis ng buildings and barns on the property. The construc on of another building and guest facili es to accommodate an expanded program will slightly increase the intensity of the use of the land by having more structures and people on the property than currently exists. However, the guest structures will be seasonal and only used by families of the students in the summer; the program itself is only for a few hours a er-school and in the summer; and the program is limited to a specific number of people on site (40 students maximum, plus 4 teachers, a farm manager, an administrator, and a farm assistant). There are no expected significant adverse environmental impacts with the increase in the use of land or the intensity of the use of land. The proposed earth-bermed building will be constructed behind the exis ng barn, north of the exis ng gravel turnaround area, where the ground is sloped. The proposed guest structures will be located west of the new building, tucked behind exis ng vegeta on. The exis ng gravel turnaround will be expanded to include a small parking lot, located behind the exis ng home. The property is rela vely flat and clear of large trees and vegeta on in the areas proposed for construc on. There is one large deciduous tree adjacent to the proposed building that will remain and will be protected during construc on. There are no expected significant adverse environmental impacts to exis ng vegeta on. The proposed building is a very low-profile structure with natural-colored and textured materials, par ally earth-bermed with a vegetated roof. The guest structures are seasonal yurts, made of natural materials, and designed for removal once the season has ended. The proposed ligh ng consists of short bollard pathway lights, wall-mounted lights, and angled reflector lights. All proposed ligh ng will comply with the Town Outdoor Ligh ng Law, and any LED's will be a maximum 3000k color temperature. Visual impacts are expected to be minimal, considering the designs and that most of the project will be constructed behind exis ng structures and vegeta on, and will not be easily seen from the road. The proposal will involve a slight increase in traffic, based on the development of the educa onal program and of on-site guest structures. However, as noted, the program is only an a er-school and summer program, with a limited number of students, and families only visi ng during the summer months. The parking and circula on layout is well defined with the proposed plan, with delineated parking spaces that are expected to accommodate all users of the property. There are no expected significant adverse impacts related to traffic, parking, or circula on. Regarding Part 1, Ques on 13a: There is a stream located along the north/east property boundary that is regulated by the Town's Stream Setback Law. This stream is also within a Tompkins County Unique Natural Area (UNA-145 Steep Hollow). The UNA comprises the rear 200 feet of the property along the north/east boundary. The project will be located outside of the UNA and the required stream setback. The project includes rain gardens, diversion swales, and other protec ons that will mi gate any impacts to the UNA and stream during and post construc on. PROPOSED RESOLUTION Preliminary Site Plan Approval & Special Permit The Learning Farm Tax Parcel No. 33.-1-24.1 272 Enfield Falls Road Town of Ithaca Planning Board, March 21, 2023 WHEREAS: 1. This action involves consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Learning Farm Agritourism and Seasonal farm lodging facility project located at 272 Enfield Falls Road. The proposal involves the development of a learning kitchen building and educational spaces, up to ten guest structures, associated gravel and grassed parking areas, trails, and walkways, lighting, and stormwater management facilities. Christa Nunez, Khuba International, Owner/Applicant; Aleksandr Mergold, AIA, Agent; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, as lead agency in the environmental review with respect to the project, has on March 21, 2023, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the Town Planning staff; and 3. The Planning Board, at a public hearing held on March 21, 2023, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a narrative, a set of drawings titled “The Learning Farm,” including sheets A1-A5, dated 05-03-2022; sheets A500-A503, dated 22 July 2022; sheet A001, dated 1 August 2022; sheets A100, A110, A300, A301, A400, A401, dated 19 September 2022; sheets SW1-SW7, dated Jan.19, 2023; sheets A000, A010, E000, and FP001, dated February 27, 2023; and other application materials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Planning Board hereby finds that the Special Permit standards of Article XXIV Section 270-200, Subsections A – H, of the Town of Ithaca Code, have been met, specifically that: A. The project will be suitable for the property on which it is proposed, considering the property’s size, location, and physical site characteristics. The property is large enough to accommodate the project. It is currently utilized as a farm and is an adequate location, with site characteristics suitable for the proposed structures and farm-related uses. B. The proposed structure design and site layout are compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed structures are designed to blend in and be compatible with the surrounding rural area, with natural materials and colors, and earth-berming for the main building. The project is largely located off the road and behind existing structures, so it will be somewhat hidden from the surrounding area. C. Operations in connection with the proposed use do not create any more noise, fumes, vibration, illumination, or other potential nuisances than the operation of any permitted use in the zone. The proposed project will create similar potential nuisances that any farm use would create. Noise, illumination, fumes, etc. are mitigated by the seasonal (after-school and summer) aspect of the use. D. Community infrastructure and services, such as police, fire and other protective services, roadways, schools, and water and sewer facilities are currently, or will be, of adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use. The proposal has received a sewer exemption from the Town of Ithaca. All other community infrastructure and services are of adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use. E. The proposed use, structure design, and site layout will comply with all the provisions of the Town Code and with the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan. F. The site layout, with proposed vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access, traffic circulation, and parking and loading facilities, is sufficient for the proposed use and is safely designed for emergency vehicles. The project includes expanding an existing driveway to create a looped access with parking. All accessways have been safely designed for emergency vehicles. G. The project includes sufficient landscaping and/or other forms of buffering to protect surrounding land uses. Existing vegetation is preserved to the extent possible. There will be minimal tree and vegetation loss associated with the project; and the project will be largely hidden behind existing vegetation and other structures. There is no need for additional landscaping or buffering. H. To the extent deemed relevant by the Planning Board, the proposed use or structure complies with all the criteria applicable to site plan review set forth in Chapter 270, Zoning. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Learning Farm project at 272 Enfield Falls Road, as described in the materials listed in Whereas #3 above, subject to the following condition: a. Before the issuance of any building permits, submission, review, and execution of an Operation, Maintenance and Reporting agreement for the proposed stormwater management facilities, specifying the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the stormwater system, including: (i) Submission of an access easement to assure Town of Ithaca access to the stormwater facilities, and (ii) Town Board authorization to allow the Town Supervisor to sign any necessary easements and the stormwater Operation, Maintenance, and Reporting Agreement associated with the project. MEMORANDUM To: Town of Ithaca Planning Board From: The Town of Ithaca Conservation Board - Environmental Review Committee Date: 11/28/2022 RE: The Learning Farm In reviewing the application for The Learning Farm at 272 Enfield Falls Road, the Environmental Review Committee noted that the answer to #8a on Short EAF says there will be a substantial increase in traffic while in the narrative document on page 4 under “Traffic” it says it is expected to be relatively negligible. Additional details a re needed to clarify the current inconsistency. We applaud The Learning Farms’ mission to support equitable food production and consumption education as well as the plans to include features like a green roof and bioswale in the site development. The answer to #17 on Short EAF states that stormwater will flow into adjacent properties. We encourage The Learning Farm to implement an approach to evaluating the effectiveness of the features after implementation and consider if additional strategies should be added to maximize stormwater retention on site. We also appreciate The Learning Farms’ plans to use best practices that minimize impacts on the landscape during the construction phases. We hope it will be possible to find and use clean fill or at least a local fill to minimize adding new weedy and invasive species to the area. If it has not been done already, we would recommend surveying the project area to identify the existence of invasive plants (DEC Prohibited and Regulated Invasive Plants). Taking steps to reduce their presence in work areas will help minimize their further spread as will having vehicles cleaned, especially those running among several job sites. Seeds or other plant parts stuck in soil in tire treads and other vehicle parts will easily spread invasive plants. Respectfully submitted Lori Brewer Lindsay Dombroskie Eva Hoffmann Elise Edwards Michael Roberts LETTER 1 of 1 November 29, 2022 RE: 11/28/22 memorandum from Town of Ithaca Planning Board “In reviewing the application for The Learning Farm at 272 Enfield Falls Road, the Environmental Review Committee noted that the answer to #8a on Short EAF says there will be a substantial increase in traffic while in the narrative document on page 4 under “Traffic” it says it is expected to be relatively negligible. Additional details are needed to clarify the current inconsistency.” The Narrative from 8/1/22 specifically states: “Traffic The impact on automobile traffic of the new buildings is expected to be negligible relative to the traffic levels already present on Enfield Falls Rd.” Traffic levels around the Learning Farm in the summers are elevated owing to the very successful summer camp programs offered there. Compared to these summer levels, the traffic impact of the new buildings will be relatively negligible. If compared to the level of traffic experienced in the fall or winter, the traffic will likely result in an increase above present levels, as stated on the Short EAF. The occupancy numbers in the proposed buildings were included with the proposed project documents. ´ red = property boundaryblue = streamsstriped areas = UNA-145 LOCATION MAPLearning Farm Educational Center272 Enfield Falls RoadPlanning Board, March 21, 2023 ± 0 350 700175 Feet Enfield Falls Rd SPECIFICATION SHEET WESTINGHOUSE LIGHTING Item Number Specifications .................................................................. .................................................................. .................................................................. Installation Refer to instruction manual for installation and additional warnings. Consult a qualified electrician if unsure how to proceed. Warranty Information - 5 Year Limited Warranty This Westinghouse Lighting Fixture is warranted against defects in material and workmanship for a period of Five Years from purchase date. Specifications are subject to change without notice, please visit www.westinghouselighting.com for latest information. , WESTINGHOUSE, and INNOVATION YOU CAN BE SURE OF are trademarks of Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Used under license by Westinghouse Lighting. All Rights Reserved. 6579000 Dimmable LED Wall Fixture Textured Black Finish Frosted Glass Winslett • Height: 6.25" • Width: 6.25" • Extends: 3.50" • Height from Center of Outlet Box: 3" • Back Plate: D: 6.25" • Includes 12 Watt Integrated LED • Hours: 25000 • Life (years)*: 22.8 • Fixture Lumens: 300 • Light Source Lumens: 700 • Kelvin: 3000 • Equivalent Incandescent Wattage: 40W *Based on 3hrs./day 2020 9226-12: One Light Outdoor Path Collection: Landscape Lighting 120V incandescent die cast landscape light. Pipe not included UPC #:785652922626 Finish: Black (12) Dimensions: Diameter:5 7/8'' Height:7'' Weight:2 lbs. Wire:18'' Connection:Mounted To Box Bulbs: 1 - Medium A19 75w Max. 120v - Not included Features: Powder coat added to the finish to protect against aging. Meets Title 24 energy efficiency standards Title 24 compliant if used with Joint Appendix (JA8) approved light bulbs listed in the California Energy Commission Appliance database. Material List: 1 Body - Die Cast Aluminum - Black Safety Listing: Safety Listed for Wet Locations Safety Listed for Wet Locations Instruction Sheets: English (HC-447) Shade / Glass / Diffuser Details: Part Material Finish Quantity Item Number Length Width Height Diameter Fitter Diameter Shade Top Length Shade Top Width Shade Top Diameter Diffuser Glass Clear 1 Shipping Information: Package Type Product #Quantity UPC Length Width Height Cube Weight Frt. Class UPS Ship Individual 9226-12 1 785652922626 10 6.18 6.18 0.221 2.5 93 Yes Master Pack 4 10785652922623 13 13 10.78 1.054 11 93 Yes NJ Pallet 216 48 40 65 72.222 594 No NV Pallet 240 48 40 65 72.222 654 No Sea Gull Lighting reserves the right to revise the design of components of any product due to parts availability or change in safety listing standards without assuming any obligation or liability to modify any products previously manufactured and without notice. This literature depicts a product design that is the sole and exclusive property of Sea Gull Lighting . In compliance with U.S copyright and patent requirements, notification is hereby presented in this form that this literature, or the product it depicts, is not to be copied, altered or used in any manner without the express written consent of, or contrary to the best interests of Sea Gull Lighting � A Generation Brands Company. Vist our web site at www.SeaGullLighting.com 9226-12 - page 1 of 1 LSI Industries Inc. 10000 Alliance Rd. Cincinnati, OH 45242 • www.lsi-corp.com (513) 372-3200 • ©2020 LSI Industries Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. Page 1/3 Rev. 05/04/21 SPEC.1060.A.0720 Catalog #:Project: Date:Type:Prepared By: Angled Reflector (AD150) LSI Abolite® LED Angled Reflector FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Construction • Heavy gauge aluminum with a thermally cured high quality polyester powder coat finish. • Integrated power supply built into the fixture allowing the RLM to be connected directly to line voltage. • Manufactured in the USA Optical System • Available in 5000K, 4000K, 3500K, 3000K, and 2700K color temperatures • Glass Globe required for outdoor applications • Minimum CRI of 80 Electrical • Standard Universal Voltage (120-277 Vac) Input 50/60Hz • 0-10V dimming, 5% standard • Operating Temperature -30° to +50°C (-22°F to +122°F) Installation • Fixed hub tapped for 3/4” NPT conduit. • Pre-wired with 96” leads standard. • Suitable for gooseneck mounting applications. • Not designed for uplight applications. Warranty • LSI luminaires carry a 5-year limited warranty. Refer to https://www.lsicorp.com/ resources/terms-conditions-warranty/ for more information. Listings • UL Listed • Suitable for wet locations OVERVIEW Lumen Range 1,250 - 1,700 CCT 27/30/35/40/50K Wattage Range 9.3 - 12.8 QUICK LINKS Ordering Guide Performance Dimensions wet location LSI Industries Inc. 10000 Alliance Rd. Cincinnati, OH 45242 • www.lsi-industries.com (513) 372-3200 • ©2020 LSI Industries Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. Page 2/3 Rev. 05/04/21 SPEC.1060.A.0720 Type: LSI Abolite® LED Angled Reflector ORDERING GUIDE Back to Quick Links Prefix Lumen Package Voltage Color Temp Lens2 Finish Mounting Options AD 150 12L - 1250 lms 15L - 1500 lms 17L - 1700 lms INC1 - Incandescent UNV - Universal Voltage (120/227V) 120 - INC 50 - 5,000K 40 - 4,000K 35 - 3,500K 30 - 3,000K 27 - 2,700K (blank) - INC Blank - Flat lens (indoor only) CGG6 - Clear Glass Globe 6-3/4” FGG6 - Frosted Glass Globe 6-3/4” PGG6 - Prismatic Glass Globe 6-3/4” GWT - Gloss White GBK - Gloss Black GRD - Gloss Red BBL - Bright Blue DKG - Dark Green SLV - Silver MBK - Matte Black RST - Rust HCP - Hammered Copper LDS96WL- Prewired leads. For use with stem or bracket mounting in wet or indoor locations. TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE:AD 150 17L UNV 35 CGG6 GRD LDS96WL Accessory Ordering Information CANOPY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number 3/4” (19mm) Tap Decorative Box Cover Aligner - Gloss White BA 3 GWT GLOBE GUARD ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number 6-3/4" Cast Aluminum Globe Guard GGDC6 6-3/4" Wire Globe Guard GGW6 WIRE GUARD ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number 10” (254mm) Convex Wire Guard - Metallic Silver COG 10 MSV GOOSE NECK BRACKETS ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN A 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN B 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN C 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN D 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN E 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN F 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN G 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN H 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN J 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN K 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN P 3 GWT 3/4" (19mm) Aluminum Gooseneck Bracket - Gloss White GN U 3 GWT STEM ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number 3/4" x 3" (19mm x 76mm) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 3 3 GWT 3/4" x 6" (19mm x 152mm) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 6 3 GWT 3/4" x 12" (19mm x .4m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 12 3 GWT 3/4" x 18" (19mm x .5m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 18 3 GWT 3/4" x 24" (19mm x .6m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 24 3 GWT 3/4" x 36" (19mm x .9m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 36 3 GWT 3/4" x 48" (19mm x 1.2m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 48 3 GWT 3/4" x 60" (19mm x 1.5m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 60 3 GWT 3/4" x 72" (19mm x 1.8m) Aluminum Stem - Gloss White STM 72 3 GWT 1. Lamp supplied by other. E26 MED Base socket. 2. Flat lens for indoor LED applications only. Globe required for outdoor applications. Standard finish is Gloss White Powder; other RLM colors available. Standard finish is Natural Aluminum; other RLM colors available Standard finish is Gloss White Powder; other RLM colors available. Standard finish is Gloss White Powder; other RLM colors available. Standard finish is Metallic Silver Powder; other RLM colors available PERFORMANCE Back to Quick Links ELECTRICAL DATA* Lumen Package Wattage 120V 208V 240V 277V 12L 9.3 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.03 15L 10.9 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.04 17L 12.8 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.05 *Electrical data at 25C (77F). Actual wattage may differ by +/-10%. *Photometric performance values shown are representative with flat lens option. Alternate glass globe option outputs will vary. Consult factory. DELIVERED LUMENS Lumen Package CRI 2700K 3000K 3500K 4000K 5000K WattageDelivered Lumens Efficacy BUG Rating Delivered Lumens Efficacy BUG Rating Delivered Lumens Efficacy BUG Rating Delivered Lumens Efficacy BUG Rating Delivered Lumens Efficacy BUG Rating 12L 80 1162 126 B1-U2-G1 1294 141 B1-U1-G1 1152 125 B1-U1-G1 1150 125 B1-U1-G1 1150 125 B1-U1-G1 9.3 15L 1403 128 B1-U2-G1 1563 143 B1-U2-G1 1391 127 B1-U1-G1 1389 127 B1-U1-G1 1389 127 B1-U1-G1 10.9 17L 1587 124 B1-U2-G1 1768 138 B1-U2-G1 1574 123 B1-U2-G1 1571 123 B1-U2-G1 1571 123 B1-U2-G1 12.8 LSI Industries Inc. 10000 Alliance Rd. Cincinnati, OH 45242 • www.lsi-industries.com (513) 372-3200 • ©2020 LSI Industries Inc. All Rights Reserved. Specifications subject to change without notice. Page 3/3 Rev. 05/04/21 SPEC.1060.A.0720 Type: LSI Abolite® LED Angled Reflector PRODUCT DIMENSIONS Back to Quick Links Prefix Height (A)Diameter (B)Neck (C) AD150 12" (305mm)10" (254mm)5-1/4" (133mm) Aleksandr Mergold, AIA Architect A Learning Kitchen A001 PROJECT NOTES A010 SITE PLAN & EGRESS A100 GROUND LEVEL PLAN A110 ROOF PLAN A300 ELEVATIONS A301 ELEVATIONS A400 SECTION A401 SECTION A500-503 VIEWS AClaudia Brenner Architect B Guest Structure Dwellings A1 PERSPECTIVE A2 FIRST PLOOR PLAN A3 ELEVATION A4 BUILDING SECTION A5 DETAILS A6 FRAMING PLAN DATE.REV # REVISION DATE.CLAUDIA BRENNER421 N Aurora St. #7Ithaca, NY 14850607-275-0715architectA105.03.20221.02Yurt272 Enfield Falls Road,Town of Ithaca, NYThe Learning FarmPerspectiveFOR SITE PLANREVIEW A311A448' - 0"36' - 0"4' - 0"30' - 0"14' - 0"676 SFYURT1017 SFDECK3' - 0"30' - 0"3' - 0"DATE.REV # REVISION DATE.CLAUDIA BRENNER421 N Aurora St. #7Ithaca, NY 14850607-275-0715architectA205.03.20221.02Yurt272 Enfield Falls Road,Town of Ithaca, NYThe Learning FarmFirst FloorPlanFOR SITE PLANREVIEW FLOOR0' - 0"TOP OF WALL8' - 0"48' - 0"330' - 0"DATE.REV # REVISION DATE.CLAUDIA BRENNER421 N Aurora St. #7Ithaca, NY 14850607-275-0715architectA305.03.20221.02Yurt272 Enfield Falls Road,Town of Ithaca, NYThe Learning FarmElevationFOR SITE PLANREVIEW FLOOR0' - 0"TOP OF WALL8' - 0"128' - 0"WOOD COMPRESSION RINGYURT DOMEFABRIC OVER RAFTERSWOOD RAFTERSFLOOR DECKING/ SUBSTRATE T.B.D.STUDS @ EA. RAFTER2x BLOCKING BTWN. RAFTERS @ MID-SPAN30' - 0"DATE.REV # REVISION DATE.CLAUDIA BRENNER421 N Aurora St. #7Ithaca, NY 14850607-275-0715architectA405.03.20221.02Yurt272 Enfield Falls Road,Town of Ithaca, NYThe Learning FarmBuildingSectionFOR SITE PLANREVIEW 1/4" = 1'-0"1Section FLOOR DECKING/ SUBSTRATE T.B.D.3"x 14 GA. L BRACKET @ EA. STUD.FASTENING T.B.D.- MAX. UPLIFT PER STUD = 270 lb- MAX. HORIZ. SHEAR PER STUD = 305 lb2x STUDSLATTICE WALLFABRIC OVER LATTICE WALLFLOOR DECKING/ SUBSTRATE T.B.D.14 GA. L BRACKET @ EVERYOTHER JOINT (ABOUT 24"o.c.), CONNECTION TOSUBSTRATE T.B.D.LATTICE WALLEXTERIOR WALL AND FLOOR CONNECTIONLATTICE DECK ATTACHMENT2x RAFTERS2x STUDSLATTICE WALLFABRIC OVER LATTICE WALLEXTERIOR WALL AND RAFTER CONNECTIONTYP120.00°14 GA. TRUSS PL. (1) EACH SIDE OF STUD, FASTEN TO STUD w/ #8 HEX HEAD SHEET METAL SCREWS @ EA. CONN. POINT.CABLE AND SCREW CONNECTION, BY MANUFACTURERFABRIC OVER RAFTERSWOOD COMPRESSION RINGRAFTER/DOME WOOD CONNECTION14 GA. U-CLIP x 3" @ EACH RAFTER w/ (1) 3/8" Ø, GRADE 5, THRU-BOLT, TYP.2x RAFTERS w/ BLOCKING (WHERE REQ'D)YURT DOMERUBBER GASKETFABRIC OVER RAFTERSDATE.REV # REVISION DATE.CLAUDIA BRENNER421 N Aurora St. #7Ithaca, NY 14850607-275-0715architectA505.03.20221.02Yurt272 Enfield Falls Road,Town of Ithaca, NYThe Learning FarmDetailsFOR SITE PLANREVIEW CStephen J.A. Maybee, P.E. Public Health Engineer D-E Parking, Trails and WalkwaysSeptic SystemsStormwater Management SW-1 SITE PLAN SW-2 GRADING AND STORMWATER EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SW-3 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS SW-4 RAIN GARDEN DETAILS SW-5 BIORETENTION AREA DETAILS SW-6 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DRAINAGE WORKSHEET - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW-7 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DRAINAGE WORKSHEET - PROPOSED CONDITIONS WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWW WWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW850 860870766 SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSC.O.SSSSSC.O.7 9 6 83 0 7 9 5 766 764 761762 762 763 C.O.C.O.C.O.S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSexisting wellfuture wellfuture wellSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSC.O.C.O.SSSSSSSS15" CpEp CulvertInv. El. 837.80'25-LF @ S = 1.0% +/-SSSSSSSSSSSSSS.G.1" = 50'SW-120-012SITE PLAN TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmSCALE: 1" = 50'-0"50'0'50'75'JAN 19, 2023 WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW850 870766 Area of Disturbance278,997 SF (6.40-AC)Stabilized ConstructionEntranceStabilized ConstructionEntranceStockpile Mngt AreaConcrete Washout AreaConcreteWashout AreaConcreteWashout AreaSilt FencingSilt FencingSilt FencingSilt Fencing764 761 762 84 3 Fine Rip-Rap ArmoringFine Rip-Rap ArmoringCheck DamsCheck DamsS SSS7 9 6Fine Rip-Rap Armoring83 0 7 9 5 Fine Rip-Rap Armoring12" CpEp CulvertSilt FencingSPECIFICATIONS FOR WINTER STABILIZATIONDesign for Construction between Nov 15 and Apr 1A. Prepare a snow management plan with adequate storage for snow and control of melt water,required to clear snow to be stored in a manner not affecting ongoing constructionactivities.B. Enlarge and stabilize access point to provide for snow management and stockpiling. Snowmanagement activities must not destroy or degrade installed erosion and sediment controlpractices.C. A minimum 25-ft buffer shall be maintained from all perimeter controls such as silt fence.Mark silt fence with tall stakes that are visible above the snow pack.D. Edges of disturbed areas that drain to a waterbody within 100-ft will have 2 rows of siltfence, 5-ft apart, installed on the contour.E. Drainage structures must be kept open and free of snow and ice dams. All debris, icedams, or debris from plowing operations, that restrict the flow of runoff and meltwater, shallbe removed.F. Sediment barriers must be installed at all appropriate perimeter and sensitive locations. Siltfence and other practices requiring earth disturbance must be installed before the groundfreezes.G. Soil stockpiles must be protected by the use of established vegetation, anchored strawmulch, rolled matting or other durable covering. A barrier must be installed at least 15-ftfrom the toe of the stockpile to prevent soil migration and to capture loose soil.H. In areas where soil disturbance activity has temporarily or permanently ceased, theapplication of soil stabilization measures should be initiated by the end of the next businessday and completed within three (3) days. Rolled erosion control blankets must be used onall slopes 3:1 or steeper.I. If straw mulch alone is used for temporary stabilization, it shall be applied at double thestandard rate of 2 tons per acre, making the application rate 4 tons per acre. Othermanufactured mulches should applied at double the recommended rate.J. To ensure adequate stabilization of disturbed soil in advance of a melt event, areas ofdisturbed soil should be stabilized at the end of each work day unless.1. Work will resume within 24 hrs in the same are and no precipitation is forecast or,2. the work is in disturbed areas that collect and retain runoff, such as open trenches, foundation excavations or water management areas.K. Use stone paths to stabilize access perimeters of buildings under construction and areaswhere construction vehicle traffic is anticipated. Stone paths should be a minimum 10-ft inwidth but wider as necessary to accommodate equipment.MaintenanceThe site shall be inspected frequently to ensure that the E&SC plan is [performing to winterstabilization function. If the site will not have earth disturbing activities ongoing during thewinter season, all bare exposed soil must be stabilize by established vegetation, straw or otheracceptable mulch, matting, rock or other approved material. Seeding of areas with mulch coveris preferred but seeding alone is not acceptable for proper stabilization.Compliance inspections must be performed and reports filed properly in accordance with theSWPPP for all site under winter shutdown.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCECONSTRUCTION PHASE 1A. Conduct a pre-construction meeting with the Town of Ithaca prior to initial constructionactivity.B. Construction of stabilized construction entrance(s);C. Placement of silt fence;D. Construction of development roadway to gain access to each individual construction area(s).E. Construction of the diversion swales, and culverts, necessary to bring runoff to areas asdesigned on plans.F. Construction activities for the development of each focus area:a. Construct stormwater management practice and grade site to promote runoff into basin.Note: The footprint of each stormwater practice may be used as a temporary sedimenttrap during construction. Once the area draining to the basins has been stabilized and construction complete, the basins may be backfilled with media andcompleted.b. Construct general utility services (ie. water and sewer piping, storm piping, etc.)c. Construct other utility service connections (gas, electric, phone);Note: For all Underground Utilities - Sediment barriers such as silt fencing, proper seeding andmulching will be utilized as required to bind the down slope side of utility construction and soilstockpiles;G. Remove any accumulated sedimentation from associated swales. Return property topermanent lines and grades;H. Final Grading Mulching & Seeding - Sediment barriers will be maintained down slope fromdisturbed soil during these operations;I. Completion of site stabilization, ie. Vegetative cover, driveway surface. Sediment & ErosionControls to remain in place until vegetative cover reaches 80% density.J. Notes on soil restoration -a. Areas with no soil disturbance or minimal disturbance activities do not need to followspecial restoration procedures.b. Areas where topsoil is stripped away only (with no changes in grade), shall apply 6” ofnew top soil (HSG A & B soils). If HSG C&D soils, aerate with use of tractor-drawnimplements with coulters by making a narrow slit in the soil, or a roller with spikes makingindentations in the soil, the apply 6” of topsoil.c. HSG A&B soils that have been cut or filled shall be restored with aeration followed by 6”of top soil. C&D soils shall apply full soil restoration as per “Deep Ripping andDe-compaction, DEC 2008.”J.4" DownspoutsForebay Sized to 25% WQv411 CF WQv = 1,612 CFForebay 8' L X 2' WBroadcrested Rip Rap WeirInv. El. 797.50'Forebay Sized to 25% WQv806 CF WQv = 2,131 CFForebay 8' L X 2' WBroadcrested Rip Rap WeirInv. El. 763.50'Check Dams to Promote Pretreatment PondingWQv of Basin = 414 CF25% of WQv at Swale = 100 CF6" Perf Weep Drain4" Downspou ts SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSfuture wellfuture wellSSexisting wellSSSSSSSSSSSSC.O.Area UndisturbedStockpile Mngt AreaSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSC.O.SSSSSS15" CpEp CulvertInv. El. 837.80'25-LF @ S = 1.0% +/-SSSSSS762 763 SSSSSC.O.SSSSSC.O.SSSSSSSBR-3 TestInfiltration TestAreaBR-2 TestInfiltration TestAreaBR-1 TestInfiltration TestAreaBR-4 TestInfiltration TestArea4" Perf Pipe Weep Drainw/CleanoutsInv. El. 790.5'75Lf @ S = 1.3%S.G.1" = 50'SW-220-012GRADING AND STORMWATER EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmSCALE: 1" = 50'-0"50'0'50'75'JAN 19, 2023 S.G.N.T.S.SW-320-012EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK DETAILS The Learning Farm5. STOCKPILES, BORROW AREAS AND SPOIL AREAS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND3. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF FROZEN PARTICLES, BRUSH, ROOTS, SOD, OR OTHER FOREIGN OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS STANDARD AND SPECIFICATION. ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD AND SPECIFICATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRAIN4. SEEPS OR SPRINGS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED IN THAT WOULD INTERFERE WITH OR PREVENT CONSTRUCTION OF2. ALL FILL TO BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 9 INCHES SUPPORT BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES AND CONDUITS, ETC. SHALL BE COMPACTED1. ALL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED AS REQUIRED TO REDUCE EROSION, SLIPPAGE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR CODES. SETTLEMENT, SUBSIDENCE OR OTHER RELATED PROBLEMS. FILL INTENDED TO OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD. SATISFACTORY FILLS. IN THICKNESS.1. PHYSICALLY MARK LIMITS OF LAND DISTURBANCE ON THE SITE WITHTAPE, SIGNS, OR ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE, SO THAT WORKERS CANSEE THE AREAS TO BE PROTECTED.2. DIVERT OFF-SITE RUNOFF FROM HIGHLY ERODIBLE SOILS AND STEEPSLOPES TO STABLE AREAS.3. CLEAR ONLY WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY. LARGE PROJECTS SHOULD BE CLEARED AND GRADED ASCONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES. AREAS EXCEEDING TWO ACRES IN SIZESHOULD NOT BE DISTURBED WITHOUT A SEQUENCING PLAN THAT REQUIRESPRACTICES TO BE INSTALLED AND THE SOIL STABILIZED, AS DISTURBANCEBEYOND THE TWO ACRES CONTINUES. MASS CLEARINGS AND GRADING OFENTIRE SITE SHOULD BE AVOIDED.4. RESTABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTERCONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. ON SITES GREATER THAN TWO ACRES INSIZE, WAITING UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE READY FOR SEEDING ISUNACCEPTABLE. FOURTEEN DAYS SHALL BE THE MAXIMUM EXPOSUREPERIOD. MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURECONTINUED STABILIZATION. EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW, ALL SITES SHALL BESEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS, SUCH ASSTRAW MULCH, JUTE MESH, OR EXCELSIOR, INCLUDING AREAS WHERECONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED OR SECTIONS COMPLETED:A. FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUCH AS BORROW ORSTOCKPILE AREAS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS WITHIN 50 FT.OF A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION, A PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLSYSTEM CONSISTING, FOR EXAMPLE, SILT FENCING, SHALL BE INSTALLEDAND MAINTAINED TO CONTAIN SOIL. EXPOSED DISTURBED AREASADJACENT TO A CONVEYANCE THAT PROVIDES RAPID OFF-SITE DISCHARGEOF SEDIMENT, SUCH AS A CUT SLOPE AT AN ENTRANCE, SHALL BECOVERED WITH PLASTIC OR, GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO PREVENT SOIL LOSSUNTIL IT CAN BE STABILIZED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILLBE MAINTAINED TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING MATERIAL OFF-SITE.B. ON THE CUT SIDE OF ROADS, DITCHES SHALL BE STABILIZEDIMMEDIATELY WITH ROCK RIP-RAP OR OTHER NON-ERODIBLE LINERS (EG.ROLLED EROSION PRODUCTS), OR WHERE APPROPRIATE, VEGETATIVEMEASURES SUCH AS SOD.C. PERMANENT SEEDING SHOULD OPTIMALLY BE UNDERTAKEN IN THESPRING FROM MARCH THROUGH MAY, AND IN LATE SUMMER AND EARLYFALL FROM SEPTEMBER TO OCTOBER 15. DURING THE PEAK SUMMERMONTHS AND IN THE FALL AFTER OCTOBER 15, WHEN SEEDING IS FOUNDTO BE IMPRACTICABLE, AN APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BEAPPLIED. PERMANENT SEEDING MAY BE UNDERTAKEN DURING THE SUMMERIF PLANS PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE WATERING. TEMPORARY SEEDING WITHRYE CAN BE UTILIZED THROUGH NOVEMBER.D. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 (H:V), OR 33.3%, AS WELL ASPERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, AND EMBANKMENTSSHALL, UPON COMPLETION, BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH SOD, SEEDAND ANCHORED STRAW MULCH, OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATIONMEASURES. AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLSYSTEM SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMEDAS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONTINUED STABILIZATION.E. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL NOT BEREMOVED UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED IN ALLCONTIRBUTORY DRAINAGE AREAS. SIMILARLY, STABILIZATION SHALL BEESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CONVERTING SEDIMENT TRAPS/BASINS INTOPERMANENT (POST-CONSTRUCTION) STORMWATER MANAGEMENTPRACTICES.5. IF TEMPORARY WORK ROADS OR HAUL ROADS CROSS STREAMCHANNELS, ADEQUATE WATERWAY OPENINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTEDUSING SPANS, CULVERTS, WASHED ROCK BACKFILL, OR OTHERACCEPTABLE, CLEAN METHODS THAT WILL ENSURE THAT ROADCONSTRUCTION AND THEIR USE DO NOT RESULT IN TURBIDITY ANDSEDIMENT DOWNSTREAM. ALL CROSSING ACTIVITIES AND APPURTENANCESON STREAMS REGULATED BY ARTICLE 15 OF THE ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATION LAW SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH A PERMIT ISSUEDPURSUANT TO ARTICLE 15 OF THE ECL.6. MAKE SURE THAT ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORSUNDERSTAND THE ESC PLAN AND SIGN THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENTREQUIRED BY NYSDEC GP.7. DESIGNATE RESPONSIBLITY FOR THE ESC PLAN TO ONE INDIVIDUAL.THIS PERSON SHALL BE NAMED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT.8. AN ESC PLAN INSPECTION PROGRAM MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OFTHE NYSDEC GP, IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE WHEN ESC MEASURES NEEDMAINTENANCE OR REPAIR. PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO INSPECTIONSREQUIRED AFTER RAINFALL. THE INSPECTION PROGRAM SHALL ALSO STATETHE COMPLETION OF IDENTIFIED REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ITEMS.9. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CONTINUE DURING WINTER, ACCESSPOINTS SHOULD BE ENLARGED AND STABILIZED TO PROVIDE FOR SNOWSTOCKPILING. IN ADDITION SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOULD BEPREPARED WITH ADEQUATE STORAGE AND CONTROL OF MELTWATER. AMINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM PERIMETERCONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCING. KEEP DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OPENAND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ARENECESSARY TO ENSURE THE FUNCTION OF THESE PRACTICES DURINGRUNOFF EVENTS.EXCERPTS FROM NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLNOVEMBER 2016GENERAL NOTESNYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSIONAND SEDMIMENT CONTROL, NOVEMBER 2016LAND GRADINGSPECIFICATIONSTOP SOILINGSPECIFICATIONS1. PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL IN PLACE WHERE POSSIBLE, THEREBYREDUCING THE NEED FOR ADDED TOPSOIL.2. AS NEEDED, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SUCH ASDIVERSIONS, CHANNELS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, AND STABILIZING MEASURES,OR MAINTAIN IF ALREADY INSTALLED.3. COMPLETE ROUGH GRADING AND FINAL GRADE, ALLOWING FOR DEPTHOF TOPSOIL TO BE ADDED.4. SCARIFY ALL COMPACT, SLOWLY PERMEABLE, MEDIUM AND FINETEXTURED SUBSOIL AREAS. SCARIFY AT APPROXIMATELY RIGHT ANGLES TOTHE SLOPE DIRECTION IN SOIL AREAS THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 5%. AREASTHAT HAVE BEEN OVERLY COMPACTED SHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 12-INCHES WITH A DEEP RIPPER OR CHISEL PLOWPRIOR TO TOPSOILING.5. REMOVE REFUSE, WOODY PLANT PARTS, STONES OVER 3-INCHES INDIAMETER, AND OTHER LITTER.6. TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 6% BY WEIGHT OF FINE TEXTUREDSTABLE ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND NO GREATER THAN 20%. MUCK SOILSHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TOPSOIL.7. TOPSOIL SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN 20% FINE TEXTURED MATERIAL(PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE) AND NOT MORE THAN 15% CLAY.8. TOPSOIL TREATED WITH SOIL STERILANTS OR HERBICIDES SHALL BE SOIDENTIFIED TO THE PURCHASER.9. TOPSOIL SHALL BE RELATIVELY FREE OF STONES OVER 1 1/2-INCHES INDIAMETER, TRASH, NOXIOUS WEEDS SUCH AS NUT SEDGE ANDQUACKGRASS, AND WILL HAVE LESS THAN 10% GRAVEL.10. TOPSOIL CONTAINING SOLUBLE SALTS GREATER THAN 500 PARTS PERMILLION SHALL NOT BE USED.11. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TO A UNIFORM DEPTH OVER THEAREA. IT SHALL NOT BE PLACED WHEN IT IS PARTIALLY FROZEN, MUDDY, ORON FROZEN SLOPES OR OVER ICE, SNOW, OR STANDING WATER PUDDLES.12. TOPSOIL PLACED AND GRADED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 5% SHALLBE PROMPTLY FERTILIZED, SEEDED, MULCHED, AND STABILIZED BY"TRACKING" WITH SUITABLE EQUIPMENT.SECTION VIEW MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD. LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X,3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER-2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 12 1/2 GAUGE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION.4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN10' MAX. C. TO C.WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN. 14 1/2 GAUGEW/ MAX. 6" MESHSPACING)CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE.WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 1/2GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING)WITH FILTER CLOTHFL O W PERSPECTIVE VIEWCOMPACTED SOIL36" MIN. FENCE POSTEMBED FILTER CLOTHA MIN. OF 6" IN GROUND.FL O W FLOWSILT FENCEUNDISTURBED GROUNDHEIGHT OF FILTER= 16" MIN.36" MIN. LENGTH FENCEPOSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16"INTO GROUND.20"MIN.16"MIN.8" MIN.4"SYMBOLPROFILENOT TO SCALESAME ELEVATION1. STONE WILL BE PLACED ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION TO THE LINES,2. SET SPACING OF CHECK DAMS TO ASSUME THAT THE ELEVATIONS OF THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE SAME ELEVATION OF THE TOE OF THE 3. EXTEND THE STONE A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANKS TO4. PROTECT THE CHANNEL DOWNSTREAM OF THE LOWEST CHECK DAM FROM SCOUR AND EROSION WITH STONE OR LINER AS APPROPRIATE.5. ENSURE THAT CHANNEL APPURTENANCES SUCH AS CULVERT ENTRANCES BELOW CHECK DAMS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO DAMAGE OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONE.CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS9"MIN.SECTION A-ANOT TO SCALE GRADES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN IN THE PLAN. PREVENT CUTTING AROUND THE DAM.MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 2 ACRES.CUTOFF TRENCH18" WIDE6" DEEP UPSTREAM DAM.FILTERFABRICMIN.1.5'FILTER FABRICCUTOFF TRENCHDESIGN BOTTOMSPACING VARIESDEPENDING ONCHANNEL SLOPEBTOEBSLOPEX24" MAX@ CENTERCHECK DAMSYMBOLSLOPE (FT/FT)H (Ft)1SECTION B-BNOT TO SCALEX =H212111118"AA24" MAX@ CENTER6"CRESTSYMBOLCONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONSGRASSED/VEGETATEDSWALEGPLAN VIEWNOT TO SCALENEED NOT BE COMPACTEDPOSITIVE DRAINAGE18"MIN.EXISTINGGROUND18"MIN.2'MIN.SUFFICIENT GRADE TO DRAINCROSS SECTIONNOT TO SCALE2'MIN.FLOWSLOPESEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL MEASURESTYPICALN.T.S.DIVE R S I O N DIV E R S I O N SILT F E N C E SILT F E N C E D D D D STO C K P I L E OR U T I L I T Y EXC A V A T I O N STABILI Z E D CONST R U C T I O N ENTRA N C E GRASSED/VEGETATED SWALE1. DRAINAGE AREA SHALL BE LESS THAN 5 ACRES.2. HEIGHT SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 18-INCHES FROM BOTTOM OF SWALETO TOP OF DIKE EVENLY DIVIDED BETWEEN DIKE HEIGHT AND SWALEDEPTH.3. BOTTOM WIDTH OF DIKE SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 2-FEET.4. WIDTH OF SWALE SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 2-FEET.5. SWALE SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO AN ADEQUATELY STABILIZEDOUTLET TO AN UNDISTURBED AREA. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE NOTTO EXCEED 8%.6. THE DISTURBED AREA OF THE DIKE AND SWALE SHALL BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 7 DAYS OF INSTALLATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR TEMPORARY SWALES.7. DIVERTED RUNOFF FROM A DISTURBED OR EXPOSED UPLAND AREASHALL BE CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE SUCH AS ATRAP, BASIN, OR TO AN AREA PROTECTED BY ANY OF THESE PRACTICES.8. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND REQUIRED MAINTENANCE MUST BE PROVIDEDAFTER EACH RAIN EVENT.MATERIALSTOCKPILINGTEMPORARY CHECK DAMS REMOVE AFTER 80% GERMINATIONSEE SITE PLANSYMBOLCONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONSDIVERSION SWALE SECTION AS REQUIRED TO MEET THE CRITERIA SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND BE FREE OF SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE2. THE DIVERSION SHALL BE EXCAVATED OR SHAPED TO LINE, GRADE, AND CROSS1. ALL TREES, BRUSH, STUMPS, OBSTRUCTIONS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL A. FOR DESIGN VELOCITIES OF LESS THAN 3.5 FT. PER. SEC., SEEDING AND5. STABILIZATION SHALL BE DONE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE4. ALL EARTH REMOVED AND NOT NEEDED IN CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SPREAD OR3. FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED AS NEEDED TO PREVENT UNEQUAL SETTLEMENT THAT BANK PROJECTIONS OR OTHER IRREGULARITIES WHICH WILL IMPEDE NORMAL FLOW. DIVERSION OF THE WATER UNTIL THE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. EXCELSIOR MATTING OR WITH SEEDING AND MULCHING INCLUDING TEMPORARY SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SOD, WITH SEEDING PROTECTED BY JUTE OR ENTERING THE DIVERSION DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE VEGETATION. DIVERSIONS OR OTHER MEANS SHOULD BE USED TO PREVENT WATER FROM IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, WHEN CONDITIONS PERMIT, TEMPORARY MULCHING MAY BE USED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE VEGETATION. PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE DIVERSION. DIVERSION. B. FOR DESIGN VELOCITIES OF MORE THAN 3.5 FT. PER. SEC., THE DIVERSION AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR VEGETATIVE PRACTICES. WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE IN THE COMPLETE DIVERSION.DPARABOLIC CROSS-SECTIONTRAPEZOIDAL CROSS-SECTIONZ1WIDTHZ1Db4'MIN.FREEBOARDTT/2DD/4FREEBOARD4'MIN.WIDTH1. FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, ONE SPECIFIC AREA ON EACH LOTSHALL BE DESIGNATED FOR TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OF TOPSOIL ANDALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONTAINING FINES THAT CAN BEMOVED BY RUNOFF. THIS AREA SHALL BE AS SMALL AS PRACTICABLE.2. STOCK PILES WILL HAVE DOWN HILL SIDE PERIMETER SILT FENCINGPROTECTION. REFERENCE SILT FENCE DETAILS THESE PLANS.3. STOCK PILES WILL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IF ANTICPATED TO BE LEFTIN PLACE 14-DAYS OR MORE. REFERENCE DETAIL SHEET NOTES ANDSPECIFICATIONS THIS PLANT SET AND STORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) ACCOMPANYING THIS PLAN SET.4. SILT FENCE AND OTHER TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INPLACE BEFORE STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS.CONSTRUCTIONSCESYMBOLEXISTING PAVEMENTSTABILIZEDENTRANCE(OPTIONABLE)MOUNTABLE BERM12' MIN.GROUNDEXISTING6" MIN.FILTER CLOTH3'12' MIN.50' MIN.50' MIN.PAVEMENTEXISTING10' MIN.5:110' MIN.CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES.10. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EXITS AND TEMPORARY ACCESS SHALL9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPINGS8. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. RIGHTS-OF-WAY. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACTED WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. TWENTY-FOUR (24) FOOT4. WIDTH - TWELVE (12) FOOT MIN. BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES. LOT WHERE A 30 FOOT MIN. LENGTH WOULD APPLY).2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET (EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE IF SINGLE ENTRANCE TO SITE. EQUIVALENT. EACH RAIN. DEVICE. PERMITTED. OF STONE.1. THE WASHOUT FACILITY SHOULD BE SIZED TO CONTAIN SOLIDS, WASHWATER AND RAINFALL2. WASHWATER SHALL BE ESTIMATED AT 7 GALLONS PER CHUTE AND 50 GALLONS PER HOPPER OF CONCRETE PUMP TRUCK AND/OR DISCHARGING DRUM. 3. THE MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE 8' X 8' AT THE BOTTOM AND 2' DEEP. IF EXCAVATED, THE SIDE4. LOCATE THE FACILITY A MINIMUM OF 100' FROM DRAINAGE SWALES, STORM DRAIN INLETS, WETALANDS, STREAMS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS. PREVENT SURFACE WATER FROM ENTERING THECONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND SIZED TO ALLOW FOR THE EVAPORATION OF THE WASHWATER AND RAINFALL. SLOPES SHALL BNE 2 HORIZONTAL : 1 VERTICAL.CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE EXCEPT FOR THE ACCESS ROAD. 5. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE ACCESS WITH A GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD SLOPED DOWN TO STRUCTURE. 6. SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED TO DIRECT DRIVERS TO THE FACILITY AFTER THEIR LOAD IS DISCHARGED. 1. INSPECT ALL FACILITIES DAILY. REPAIR ALL DAMAGED OR LEAKING WASHOUT STATIONS IMMEDIATELY.THE LINER SHALL BE PLASTIC SHEETING WITH A MIN. THICKNESS OF 10 MILS WITH NO HOLES OR TEARS.ANCHOR THE LINER TO THE TOP OF THE PIT WITH AN EARTHEN BERM, SAND BAGS, STONE, ETC.MAINTENANCE2. PUMP OUT ANY ACCUMULATED RAINWATER OVER HARDENED CONCRETE.3. ACCUMULATED HARDENED MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN 75% OF THE STORAGE CAPACITY OFTHE STRUCTURE IS FILLED. 4. DISPOSE OF HARDENED MATERIAL OFF-SITE IN A C/D LANDFILL. ON-SITE DISPOSAL IS ACCEPTABLEIF IT HAS BEEN APPORVED AND ACCEPTED AS PART OF THE SWPPP. 5. REPLACE THE PLASTIC LINER WITH EACH CLEANING OF WASHOUT FACILITY.6. INSPECT THE PROJECT SITE FREQUENTLY TO ENSURE THAT NO CONCRETE DISCHARGES ARE TAKING PLACE IN NON-DESIGNATED AREAS.DESIGN CRITERIAJAN 19, 2023 S.G.AS SHOWNSW-420-012RAIN GARDEN DETAILS TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmCOPY OF NYS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN MANUAL, CHAPTER 9,SECTION 9.5.1, "Alternative Stormwater management Practices, Raingardens"DETAIL - CROSS SECTIONRAIN GARDENDETAIL - PLANRAIN GARDENW/ UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM (Typ.)JAN 19, 2023 REFERENCE THE BASIN PLAN & SECTION SHEETS FORELEVATIONS, DIMENSIONS, LINES & GRADESBioretention Area and Infiltration Basin DetailsLocationBottomLength (ft)BottomWidth (ft)Bottom SurfaceArea (Sqft)Floor of PracticeEl. (ft)Bottom ofPractice El. (ft)Berm El (ft)EmergencyOverflow Inv.El. (ft)Forebay Sizing(CF)*Forebay BaseFloor El (ft)ForebayOverflow WeirEl. Inv. (ft)Weep Drain Inv.El.Weep DrainDaylight Inv. El.Bioretention Area 169 6600855.0851.5 856.5855.50 468.00 854.00 854.50Bioretention Area 275231700 795.0 790.5796.5795.501000.00796.00 798.50 790.50 789.50Bioretention Area 380201600761.0 756.0762.5761.502500.00762.00 764.50Bioretention Area 4 2516400837.0833.5 838.5837.50 478.00839.00841.50Rain Garden 1228180841.0838.5 842.5841.50NANANARain Garden 2 307200843.0 840.5 844.5 843.50NANANASPECIFICATIONS FOR BIORETENTION SYSTEMSPlanting SoilThe soil shall be a uniform mix, free of stones, stumps, roots or othersimilar objects larger than two inches. No other materials or substancesshall be mixed or dumped within the bioretention area that may beharmful to plant growth, or prove a hindrance to the planting ormaintenance operations. The planting soil shall be free of noxiousweeds.Planting soil shall be of a sandy loam consistency containingapproximately 75% concrete sand, 25% top soil and organics.CompactionMinimize compaction of both the base of the bioretention area and therequired backfill. Place soil in lifts 12" or great. Do not use heavyequipment within the bioretention area basin.MIRAFI 140NGEOTEXTILE#1 WASHED STONESOIL MEDIUMPLANTING & TEMP. PONDING AREADRAINAGE LAYER POROSITY = 0.40 DRAINAGE LAYER POROSITY = 0.20 2" - 4" MULCH LAYERBioretention Underdrain Layers, BR-1 & BR-4 Rip Rap WeirRip Rap Weir, 2-4" Stone2' Long x 2' Wide (BR-1& BR-4)Cross-Section Bioretention Area1'-0"2'-6" EL. 4.00' EL. 1.00' EL. 0.00'Top of Berm EL. 5.00'EL. 4.50'Bioretention Suggested Plantings -USDA Zone 5ASHRUBSHERBACEOUSPLANTSWitch HazelHamemelis viginianaCinnamon FernOsmunda cinnamomeaWinterberryIlex verticillataCutleaf ConeflowerRudbeckia laciniataArrowwoodViburnum dentatumWoolgrassScirpus cyperinusBrook-side AlderAlnus serrulataNew England AsterAster novae-angliaeRed-Osier DogwoodCornus stoloniferaFox SedgeCarex vulpinoideaSweet PepperbushClethra alrifoliaSpotted Joe-Pye WeedEupatorium maculatumSwitch GrassPanicum virgatumGreat Blue LobeliaLobelia siphaticaWild BergamotMondarda fistulosaRed MilkweedAscelpias incarnataTop of BermINFILTRATION BIORETENTION FOR PARKING LOT & DRIVES (BR 2, BR 3, BR-4)INFILTRATION BIORETENTION FOR BUILDINGS AND LAWNSPACE (BR 1)3" MULCH LAYER(DECORATIVE STONES, ROOTMULCH, ETC.)RIP-RAP BROADCRESTED WEIRPRIMARY OVERFLOWINV. EL. See TableRIP RAP BROADCRESTEDWEIRPRIMARY OVERFLOWINV. EL. See TableSuggested PlantingsSuggested PlantingsFloor of PracticeTop of Berm2'W x 3'D Pea Stone LensGrassed Filter StripMIRAFI 140NGEOTEXTILE#1 WASHED STONESOIL MEDIUMPLANTING & TEMP. PONDING AREADRAINAGE LAYERPOROSITY = 0.40 DRAINAGE LAYERPOROSITY = 0.20 2" - 4" MULCH LAYERBioretention Underdrain Layers, BR-2 & BR-3 0'-6"PONDING DEPTH Rip Rap WeirRip Rap Weir, 2-4" Stone1'-0"3'-0" EL. 5.50' EL. 5.00' EL. 1.00' EL. 0.00'Top of Berm EL. 6.50'EL. 6.00'766 0'-6" PONDING DEPTH EL. 3.50'761762 Check Dams to PromotePonding for Pretreatment4' Long x 2' Wide (BR-2& BR-3)Forebay Overflow Weir Inv. El.(See Table)762 763 NOTES ON INFITLRATION TESTINGBioretention Areas 1-4Infiltration testing shall be performed in accordancewith The New York State Design Manual, Appendix D.Forebays for BR-1, 3 and 4 have been sized to atleast 100% of the drainage area WQv with ananticipated Field Infiltration Rate (Fc) of >5"/hrmaximum. The forebay for BR-2 has been sized to50%.SSSSSSSSSC.O.SSSSSSSC.O.8 5 4 8 5 4 Forebay Overflow Weir Inv. El.(See Table)4" Perf Weep Drain w/CleanoutsBR-2 OnlyS.G.AS SHOWNSW-520-012BIORETENTION AREA DETAILS TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmJAN 19, 2023 DPE-1HdAESC-110.26- ACREFERENCE HYDROCAD (HYDRAULIC & HYDROLOGIC) MODELING RESULTS PRESENTED WITH THESE PLANSEXISTING SUBCATCHMENTHdAHdAHdAHdAHpEHdDHdDHdCHdCHdCHdCHdCHdDHdCHdDExisting-Site Subcatchment-1 (ESC-1)Existing-Site Conditions - Area = 447,049-SF (10.26-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 67, Straight Row Crop, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 30, Woods, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 32, Woods/Grass Comb, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 39, Pasture, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 96, Gravel, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 63, Small Grain Crop, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 1,081lf +/-Sheet Flow, Range - 100 LF @ S = 12.8% avg +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Short Grass Pasture - 213 LF @ S = 13.4% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Woodland - 514 LF @ S = 13.7% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Short Grass Pasture - 69 LF @ S = 9.3% avg +/-Trap/Vee Channel Flow - 185 LF @ S = 13.1% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPE-1)CroplandBrushWoodsPastureWoods / Grass Comb.GravelLongest Flowpath TcS.G.N.T.S.SW-620-012HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DRAINAGE WORKSHEET - EXISTING CONDITIONS TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmJAN 19, 2023 Off-Site Subcatchment-1 (OSC-1)Off-Site Conditions - Area = 92,285-SF (2.12-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 67, Straight Row Crop, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 30, Woods, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 39, Pasture, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 32, Woods/Grass Comb, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 1,291lf +/-Sheet Flow, Cultivated >20% Residue - 100 LF @ S = 5.0% avg +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Cultivated Straight Rows - 200 LF @ S = 5.0% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Short Grass Pasture - 189 LF @ S = 3.7% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Woodland - 435 LF @ S = 11.9% avg +/-Trap/Vee Channel Flow - 367 LF @ S = 6.0% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)CroplandBrushWoodsPastureWoods / Grass Comb.GravelLongest Flowpath TcLongest F l o w p a t h T cProposed-Site Subcatchment-1 (PSC-1)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 13,077-SF (0.30-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 67lf +/-Sheet Flow, Long Grass - 67 LF @ S = 14.9% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)OSC-12.12- ACPSC-10.30- ACPSC-20.08- ACProposed-Site Subcatchment-2 (PSC-2)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 3,544-SF (0.08-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 53lfSheet Flow, Brush, 53 LF @ S = 15.0% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)Proposed-Site Subcatchment-3 (PSC-3)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 8,837-SF (0.20-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 97LFSheet Flow, Brush 97 LF @ S = 10.0% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)Longest Flowpath Tc PSC-50.12-ACProposed-Site Subcatchment-5 (PSC-5)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 5,053-SF (0.12-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 35LFSheet Flow, Smooth Surfaces, 25 LF @ S = 33.0% avg +/-Shallow Conc. Flow, Grassed waterway, 15LF @ S = 10.0% avg. +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)Proposed-Site Subcatchment-4 (PSC-4)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 2,622-SF (0.06-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 25LFSheet Flow, Smooth Surfaces, 25 LF @ S = 33.0% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1) PSC-40.06-ACPSC-61.43- ACL o n g e s t F l o w p a t h T c Off-Site Subcatchment-2 (OSC-2)Off-Site Conditions - Area = 194,844-SF (4.47-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 67, Straight Row Crop, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 39, Pasture, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 32, Woods/Grass Comb, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 1,122lf +/-Sheet Flow, Dense Grass - 126 LF @ S = 12.7% avg +/-Trap/Vee Channel Flow - 100LF @ S = 6.0% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Short Grass Pasture - 152 LF @ S = 10.5% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow - Woodland - 448 LF @ S = 12.5% avg +/-Trap/Vee Channel Flow - 296 LF @ S = 2.7% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)Proposed-Site Subcatchment-6 (PSC-6)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 62,450-SF (1.43-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 76, Gravel Surfaces, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 413LFSheet Flow, Smooth Surfaces, 100 LF @ S = 2.3% avg +/-Shallow Conc. Flow., Paved, 133 LF @ S = 3.0% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow, Grassed Waterway, 65LF @ S = 15% avg. +/-Trap/Vee Channel Flow, 115 LF @ S = 15.4% avg. +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)PSC-71.35- ACProposed-Site Subcatchment-7 (PSC-7)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 58,930-SF (1.35-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 98, Rooftops, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 322LFSheet Flow, Dense Grass, 86 LF @ S = 40% avg +/-Sheet Flow,Dense Grass, 14 LF @ S = 9.3% avg. +/-Shallow Conc. Flow, Grassed Waterway, 28 LF @ S = 9.3% avg. +/-Sheet Flow, Unpaved, 194 LF @ S = 2.1% avg. +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)Longest Flowpath TcREFERENCE HYDROCAD (HYDRAULIC & HYDROLOGIC) MODELING RESULTS PRESENTED WITH THESE PLANSPSC-30.20- AC7 9 6 7 9 5 830 Longest Flowpath TcOSC-24.47- ACOff-Site Subcatchment-3 (OSC-3)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 9,937-SF (0.02-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 98, Parking, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 100lfSheet Flow, Brush, 100 LF @ S = 3.0% avg +/-To Design Point - (DPP-1)766 764 761762 L o n g e s t F l o w p a t h T c L o n g e s t F l o w p a t h T c PSC-80.30- ACProposed-Site Subcatchment-8 (PSC-8)Proposed-Site Conditions - Area = 13,055-SF (0.30-AC)Surface Conditions & Soils:100.0% HpE, HdA, HdC, HdD - Howard gravelly loams, Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) ARunoff Curve Number = 30, Brush/Grass, HSG A SoilsRunoff Curve Number = 76, Gravel Drive, HSG A SoilsOverland Stormwater Runoff - Longest Flowpath = 6 minTo Design Point - (DPP-1)762 763 SSSC.O.SSSC.O.S.G.N.T.S.SW-720-012HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DRAINAGE WORKSHEET - PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOWN OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK The Learning FarmJAN 19, 2023