No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB Packet 2022-10-17Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board October 17, 2022 This meeting will be held both in person at Town Hall, and available via .Z.O. .M. and Ygu L u7 Livc and for your convenience. AGENDA 1. Call to order and pledge of allegiance 2. Persons to be heard 3. Public Hearings and consideration of adoption of: a. Proposed increase to Town of Ithaca Water Rates b. Proposed increase to Sewer Rents c. 2022 Assessment Rolls for the Town of Ithaca's Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas 4. Public Hearing regarding the 2023 Preliminary Budget for the Town of Ithaca a. Consider any changes to the Preliminary Budget b. Consider adoption of the 2023 Town of Ithaca Budget 5. Presentation of Public Works Fueling Station Project options and consider the award of Part B, Final Design and Bid Phase a. SEQR b. Award part B contract 6. Acknowledge Receipt of Annual Conservation Easement Inspections 7. Consider authorization for the Town Engineer to issue a Sewer Exemption for 272 Enfield Falls Rd, The Learning Farm 8. Consent Agenda a. Approval of Town of Ithaca Abstract 9. Reports by Town Officials Item 03a MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - : Adoption of revised Water Rate Schedule Chargeable to Consumers of Water in the Town of Ithaca Effective January 1, 2023 Whereas, the Town Board wishes to revise the water rate schedules for all Town of Ithaca Water Improvement Areas; and Whereas, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been determined by the Town Board that adoption of the proposed resolution is a Type 11 action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment," and thus this action is not subject to review under SEQRA; now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the Town Board establishes the following: WATER RATE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2023 The rate charged for water consumption shall be $8.89 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed, (was $89.51). The rate will be the rate charged for all regular quarterly bills sent on or after January 1, 2023, regardless of whether the actual or base consumption occurred prior to January 1, 2023. Notwithstanding the foregoing rates, the following minimum base charges shall be applicable to the meter size indicated for quarterly bills issued on or after January 1, 2023. The table below also shows the amount of water consumption that is permitted before the minimum base charge would be exceeded: METER SIZE BASE CONSUMPTION (INCHES) (Gallons) 3/4 5,000 1 15,000 1-1/2 22,500 2 45,000 3 70,000 4 100,000 6 175,000 MINIMUM CHARGE $ 44.45 $ 133.35 $ 200.03 $ 400.05 $ 622.30 $ 889.00 $ 1,555.75 1 Item 03a Multiple Housing and mobile home parks of over 2 dwelling units, using a master meter, will be computed as follows: The quarterly master meter reading will be divided by the number of dwelling units and the water charge will be figured on this number as if the unit was individually metered. The water charge will then be multiplied by the number of units on the master meter, and this will be the billing rendered. If the calculation of the water consumed per dwelling unit is less than the allowable consumption for a three-quarter inch meter, then the billing will be calculated by multiplying the number of units on the master meter times the minimum charge for a three-quarter inch meter. The water application fee for each new application for water service shall be the charges for new water connections charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission including application fees, meter charges, service tap fees, inspection fees, accessory materials, installation costs, and any other fee or cost charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission for connecting new water services. An annual charge for each fire protection main serving a fire suppression system will be billed along with the first quarterly water bill of the calendar year. The annual charge for this service shall be $20.00 per diameter inch of the pipe supplying the fire suppression system or such other amount as is charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission for such systems. The pipe supplying the fire suppression system is the pipe needed to supply the fire suppression system, installed downstream of the system control valve. Moved: Seconded: Vote: ayes — 2 ITEM 03B MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - xxx: Increasing Sewer Rents for all Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Areas Effective January 1, 2023 Whereas, the Town Board wishes to revise the sewer rent schedules for all Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Areas; and Whereas, a public hearing was duly advertised and held on the 17t' day of October 2022, and Whereas, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been determined by the Town Board that adoption of the proposed resolution is a Type II action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment," and thus this action is not subject to review under SEQRA; now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the Town Board establishes and imposes the following Sewer Rents effective January 1, 2023: (1) a sewer rent payable by all users connected to the Town -wide sewer system will be $5.75 (was $5.50) per 1,000 gallons of water consumed, and (2) notwithstanding the foregoing rate structure, there shall be a minimum quarterly base charge in the amount of $28.75, which minimum charge is based on 5,000 gallons of usage, regardless of whether that amount is used, and (3) Multiple housing and mobile home parks of over two dwelling units, using a master water meter, will be computed as follows: The quarterly master water meter reading will be divided by the number of dwelling units and the sewer rent charge will be figured on this number as if the unit was individually metered. The sewer rent will then be multiplied by the number of units on the master water meter, and this will be the billing rendered and the amount payable. If the calculation of the water consumed per dwelling unit is less than the amount that would be permitted before exceeding the minimum sewer rent set forth above, then the billing will be calculated by multiplying the number of units served by the master water meter times the minimum sewer rent set forth above, and (4) The charges set forth above shall be effective with respect to bills rendered on or after the effective dates set forth above, even if the measurement is for consumption prior to the above effective dates (i.e., any bill rendered on or after January 1, 2023, shall be calculated at the 2023 rate even if the sewer use occurred prior to January 1, 2023), and (5) In the event a property is connected to public sewer, but is not connected to a water meter, ITEM 03B the sewer rent shall be based upon estimated water consumption as reasonably determined by the Director of Public Works based upon recognized methods of estimating typical consumption for the type of facility involved (e.g., gallons per day per bedroom). Moved: Seconded: Vote: ayes — Item 03c MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - : Adoption of the 2022 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas for Tax Year 2023 Whereas, the Town Board held a duly advertised public hearing on the 17th day of October 2022, regarding the proposed adoption of the 2022 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas for the Town of Ithaca for Tax Year 2023; now, therefore, be it Resolved, the Town Board hereby approves and adopts the 2022 Assessment Rolls for the Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas of the Town of Ithaca for Tax Year 2023 as follows: Fire Protection District: Assessed Value - $1,422,710,362.00 Forest Home Light District: Assessed Value - $45,814,600.00 Glenside Light District: Assessed Value - $6,248,100.00 Renwick Heights Light District: Assessed Value - $16,269,600.00 Eastwood Commons Light District: Assessed Value - $20,679,900.00 Clover Lane Light District: Assessed Value - $3,280,000.00 Winners Circle Light District: Assessed Value - $3,123,000.00 Burleigh Drive Light District: Based upon 3,851.1 lineal feet. Westhaven Road Light District: Based upon Road Frontage of 9,038.12 lineal feet. Coddington Road Light District: Based upon Road Frontage of 8,930.11 lineal feet. Water Improvement Benefit Area: Units Available & Connected - 7,832.40 Ad Valorem Water Improvement Benefit Area: Assessed Value - $713,122,234.00 Sewer Improvement Benefit Area: Units Available & Connected - 7,464.70 Ad Valorem Sewer Improvement Benefit Area: Assessed Value - $785,863,058.00 Moved: Seconded: Vote: Item 04b MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2021 - : Adoption of the Town of Ithaca 2023 Budget Whereas the Town Board held a public hearing on Monday, October 17, 2022, to hear comments regarding the 2023 Preliminary Budget, and Whereas the Town Board discussed, reviewed, and made any changes properly put forth and voted upon to the 2023 Preliminary Budget, now therefore be it Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and adopts the 2023 Preliminary Budget as the Final 2023 Town of Ithaca Budget. Moved: Vote: Seconded: Engineering Report 1 lbl it c Works Facillilty Fudliing S t Mi Ol llljl i I) o s n w n 1)roject Town of Ithaca Public Works, Ithaca, NY Prepared For Town of Uthac:a Public Works 114 Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 October 2022 Engineering Report Forthe Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project Town ofIthaca Public Works Ithaca, New York October 2022 Prepared For: Town ofIthaca Public Works 114Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 Prepared By Barton & Lo0uidice D.P.C. 443Electronics Parkway Liverpool, New York 13OOO T�% ����m��w������� IL 4 Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 2.0 Fleet Fuel Usage....................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Aboveground vs. Underground Petroleum Bulk Storage Fueling Systems .................................. 7 4.0 Local Zoning Requirements..................................................................................................... 11 Article Vill: Low Density Residential: .......................................................................................................... 11 §270-54 Permitted uses..........................................................................................................................11 §270-59 Height limitations.....................................................................................................................12 §270-60 Yard regulations........................................................................................................................12 §270-61 Building area.............................................................................................................................12 Article XXVI Special Regulations: ................................................................................................................ 12 §270-217 Deposit or removal of fill and related products.....................................................................12 §270-219.5 Stream setback....................................................................................................................13 Article XXVIII Administration: ..................................................................................................................... 14 §270-233 Permit to build........................................................................................................................14 §270-234 Certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance............................................................14 Chapter173: Outdoor Lighting...................................................................................................................14 §173-6 Control of glare; shielding requirements....................................................................................14 §173-10 Lighting under roof overhangs and canopies...........................................................................14 §173-11 Spotlights and floodlights.........................................................................................................15 §173-14 New construction......................................................................................................................15 Chapter 228: Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control............................................15 §228-6 Applicability................................................................................................................................15 §228-9 Performance and design criteria................................................................................................15 §228-10 Stormwater pollution prevention plans and erosion and sedimentation control plans .......... 16 §228-11 Maintenance, inspection, and repair of stormwater management practices ..........................16 5.0 Site Evaluation........................................................................................................................18 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................................ 22 2071.004.001110.22 - i - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Tables Table1. Fuel Usage by Year.......................................................................................................................... 2 Table2. Fuel Usage by Month...................................................................................................................... 2 Table3. Fuel Deliveries................................................................................................................................. 3 Table4. Emergency Fuel Duration................................................................................................................4 Table 5. AST & UST Regulatory and Inspection Requirements..................................................................... 8 Table 6. Site Characteristics Evaluation......................................................................................................18 Table 7. UST Evaluation by Location...........................................................................................................21 Attachments Attachment 1— AST Systems Regulated By DEC Attachment 2 — UST Systems Regulated By DEC/EPA Attachment 3 — AST/UST Conceptual Fuel Station Layouts by Location Attachment 4 — Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Attachment 5 — Wetland Impact Assessment Attachment 6 — Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 2071.004.001110.22 - ii - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 1.0 Introduction The following Engineering Report has been prepared by Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. (B&L), on behalf of the Town of Ithaca Engineering Department for the Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility property located at 114 Seven Mile Drive in Ithaca, New York. As an Emergency Operations Center, the Public Works Facility is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the town's potable water, sanitary sewer, storm sewers, and road infrastructure systems. The existing Public Works Facility Fleet Fueling Station was installed in 1994. The fueling station consists of one dual compartmented aboveground tank comprised of a 3,000-gallon unleaded gasoline compartment and a 3,000-gallon diesel fuel compartment. The tank is located within a steel containment system that exhibits signs of corrosion. This report provides a review of the facility's existing and projected fleet fuel usage needs, the relative benefits and risks associated with aboveground and underground petroleum bulk storage tank systems, and an analysis of four locations onsite proposed for a new fueling station installation. Local zoning requirements have also been reviewed for this assessment, and factors such as: location accessibility, security and tamper resistance, site lighting and canopy impacts, topography, constructability, permitting requirements and environmental impacts. 2071.004.001110.22 -1 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 2.0 Fleet Fuel Usage The Engineering Department provided B&L with historic fuel usage data in order to evaluate tank storage capacities as part of the desired replacement of the Public Works Facility Fleet Fueling Station. The fleet is composed of approximately 17 heavy duty/equipment trucks, 30 light duty truck and passenger vehicles, and 25 mixed use equipment. The historic fuel use data from the Fuelmaster® fuel management system is summarized in the following tables. The summary tables include the dates, gallons used, averages, minimum, and maximum values of both diesel fuel and gasoline. The annual fuel usage can be found in Table 1 below. Table 1. Fuel Usage by Year Year Total Gasoline (gal) Total Diesel (gal) Total 2016 24,490 26,801 51,291 2017 23,337 28,184 51,521 2018 26,554 25,511 52,066 2019 24,123 27,008 51,131 2020 2021 22,099 22,249 44,348 Average: Maximum: Minimum: 24,121 26,554 22,099 25,951 28,184 22,249 50,071 52,066 44,348 Note: Due to COVID-19 during 2020, the data was disregarded due to irregularity. *All values rounded to whole numbers. Although there was not a significant difference between the gasoline and diesel averages, the average gasoline throughput was slightly less. Moreover, the maximum and minimum throughput of gasoline and diesel fuel are similar. Table 2, shown below, contains the fuel usage by month over the last year. Table 2. Fuel Usage by Month Year Month Gasoline Total (gal) Diesel Total (gal) 2021 June 1,915 1,990 2021 July 1,694 1,411 2021 August 1,819 2,111 2021 September 1,726 1,571 2021 October 1,484 1,693 2021 November 1,485 1,466 2021 December 2,048 1,254 2022 January 2,485 2,935 2022 February 2,054 2,630 2022 March 2,277 1,826 2071.004.001110.22 -2- Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Year Month Gasoline Total (gal) Diesel Total (gal) 2022 April 1,744 1,357 2022 May 1,905 1,730 2022 June 1,507 1,216 Average: Maximum: Minimum: 1,857 2,485 1,484 1,784 2,935 1,216 *All values rounded to whole numbers. January is the peak month in both gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel used, with an average of 37% more than the other months in gasoline and 76% greater in diesel fuel. The overall average, maximum, and minimum between gasoline and diesel fuel used do not differ greatly. Fuel Deliveries B&L also reviewed fuel delivery data provided. Table 3 summarizes the fuel deliveries by fuel type for the previous 12-month period. Table 3. Fuel Deliveries Gasoline Diesel Date Time Gasoline (gal) Date Time Diesel Fuel (gal) 6/ 30/ 21 2:42:01 PM 1,903 7/ 27/ 21 6:21:54 AM 1,850 8/ 04/ 21 7:29:39 AM 1,640 8/ 17/ 21 7:17:01 AM 1,326 9/ 23/ 21 9:08:01 AM **2,300 9/ 07/ 21 10:13:02 AM 1,400 9/ 23/ 21 9:08:17 AM **626 9/ 30/ 21 8:39:07 AM 1,200 10/ 19/ 21 1:04:54 PM 589 10/ 27/ 21 1:02:33 PM 1,053 10/ 25/ 21 9:30:09 AM 1,115 10/ 29/ 21 6:32:23 AM 750 11/ 22/ 21 10:09:55 AM 1,004 11/ 24/ 21 7:12:18 AM 1,234 12/ 14/ 21 1:47:20 PM 1,528 12/ 27/ 21 10:40:44 AM 1,063 12/ 20/ 21 1:17:48 PM 1,000 1/ 13/ 22 2:43:10 PM 1,792 1/ 14/ 22 10:00:45 AM 1,738 2/ 01/ 22 12:00:31 PM 1,819 2/ 01/ 22 12:01:04 PM 1,595 2/ 23/ 22 12:33:48 PM 2,010 2/ 24/ 22 1:49:42 PM 1,780 3/ 21/ 22 6:58:26 AM 1,907 3/ 18/ 22 10:03:31 AM 1,002 4/ 15/ 22 8:14:59 AM 1,206 3/ 25/ 22 2:12:44 PM 1,100 5/ 25/ 22 6:17:32 AM 846 4/ 15/ 22 2:43:39 PM 1,303 6/ 02/ 22 6:52:38 AM 1,650 5/ 10/ 22 8:11:23 AM 1,204 6/ 03/ 22 6:24:44 AM 1,768 Average: Maximum: Minimum: Total Deliveries: 1,364 2,300 589 17 1,407 2,010 750 15 *All values rounded to whole numbers. **Values provided included in gasoline average, although delivery times are nearly identical. 2071.004.001110.22 -3- Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report The average duration between gasoline deliveries is 21 days, which ranged from 6 to 50 days. The average duration between diesel fuel deliveries is 22 days; however, this ranged from 2 days to 40 days. Although the ranges between deliveries can be longer than a month, the average span between gasoline and diesel fuel deliveries were quite similar. Considering both the total gallons averages and days between deliveries average, the average fuel consumption per day was found to be 65 gal/day for gasoline and 64 gal/day for diesel. Catastrophic Event/Emergency Fuel Storage As part of this assessment, the Engineering Department requested a review of fuel capacity required to continue to operate emergency equipment if a catastrophic event/emergency were to occur and fuel could not be delivered for a 2 day, 4 day and 6 day period of time. A peak daily fuel usage was provided for emergency equipment of 905 gallons of diesel fuel, and 145 gallons of gasoline. Table 4 provides of summary of the amount of fuel needed for this daily use scenario for emergency equipment to continue to operate: Table 4. Emergency Fuel Duration Emergency Duration (days) Gasoline Needed (gallons) Diesel Fuel Needed (gallons) 2 290 1,810 4 580 3,620 6 870 5,430 *Based on peak daily fuel usage provided by the Engineering Department; all values rounded to whole numbers. The existing capacity of the gasoline tank (3,000 gallons design capacity/2,700 gallons working capacity — 90% design capacity) is sufficient to supply fuel at 145 gallons per day for up to 6 days without fuel delivery. Delivery records show that the tank has an average of 1,336 gallons of gasoline just prior to deliveries, assuming tanks are filled to working capacity. At the time of a catastrophic event/emergency, only 870 gallons of fuel are needed in the tank to span the 6 day emergency duration. The existing capacity of the diesel fuel tank (3,000 gallons design capacity/2,700 gallons working capacity — 90% design capacity) is sufficient to supply 905 gallons per day for 2 days without fuel delivery. This assumes that the tank has a minimum of 1,810 gallons of fuel in the tank at the time of the catastrophic event/emergency. To ensure that sufficient capacity is available in an unpredictable emergency event, 1,810 gallons of fuel would need to be maintained in the tank at any one time, which would require a 5,000 gallon capacity tank. Beyond 2 days, a 4-day emergency would require 3,620 gallons of diesel fuel, and a 6-day emergency would require 5,430 of diesel fuel. This would require a minimum of a 4,000 gallon design capacity tank to cover a 4-day emergency without fuel delivery, and a 6,000 gallon design capacity tank to cover a 6- day emergency without fuel delivery. This also assumes that the tanks are filled to capacity prior to this emergency event, which may or may not be predictable. To ensure that sufficient capacity is available in 2071.004.001110.22 -4- Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report an unpredictable emergency event, that amount of fuel would need to be maintained in the tank at any one time, which would increase the size of the tanks required to 7,000 gallons for a 4-day event, and 9,000 gallons for a 6-day event. Fleet Fuel Use Summary and Tank Capacity Recommendations The following provides a summary of the fuel usage reviewed as part of this assessment: • Historic annual gasoline throughput is consistent, ranging from 22,099 gallons/year to 26,554 gallons per year, with an average of 24,121 gallons per year. • Historic Annual diesel fuel throughput is consistent, ranging from 22,249 to 28,184, with an average of 25,951 gallons per year. • Per the Engineering Department, predicted future gasoline and diesel fuel use is anticipated to be similar to these historic throughput quantities. • The previous 12-month data indicates that monthly gasoline and diesel fuel use peaks during the winter months (January 2022) at 2,485 gallons of gasoline and 2,935 gallons of diesel fuel. The average monthly use for gasoline is 1,857 gallons/month. The average monthly use for diesel fuel is 1,784 gallons/month. • The previous 12-month data indicates that the average duration between deliveries for gasoline and diesel fuel is 22 days and 21 days, respectively. Based on the fuel throughput data and delivery frequencies provided, the existing tank sizes provide adequate capacity for the facility's fuel needs. As part of this assessment, the Town requested a review of fuel capacity required to continue to operate if a catastrophic event/emergency were to occur and fuel could not be delivered for a 2 day, 4 day and 6 day period of time. The Town provided peak daily fuel usage for emergency equipment of 905 gallons of diesel fuel, and 145 gallons of gasoline. These values were used to evaluate additional storage capacity requirements. The results of the emergency fuel assessment indicate the existing 3,000 gallon gasoline storage tank size is of adequate size to provide the daily fuel needed in an emergency situation of up to 6 days without fuel deliveries, based on average volume in the tank before deliveries. The peak daily use of diesel fuel for emergency equipment is significantly more, and therefore would require increasing the size of the tank from 3,000 gallons to 5,000 — 9,000 gallons, depending on the emergency situation, to continue with normal fuel use and still maintain adequate reserve capacity. Increasing the size of the tank increases the space required, as well as the initial construction costs of the project. 2071.004.001110.22 - 5 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report |nconsideration ofthe above, itisrecommended that the facility install a3,0O0gallon design capacity tank for gasoline storage. Due tothe amount ofdiesel fuel use for emergency equipment during peak operations, it is recommended to increase the tank size from 3,000 gallons to 5,000 gallon design capacity tank for diesel fuel. This will a||ovv maintaining sufficient reserve to withstand a 2-day period of peak diesel fuel usage without fuel deliveries, as well as up to 4-5 days of peak diesel fuel usage if the tank can befilled tocapacity prior tothe emergency event. 2072.00400111822 6 Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 3.0 Aboveground vs. Underground Petroleum Bulk Storage Fueling Systems The DPW facility has the option to replace the existing AST system with a new AST system, or an underground storage tank (UST)system. NYSDECrequires notification tobeprovided tothe department 30'days prior to closure of registered petroleum bulk storage tank. Ademo|ition permit from the Town may also berequired. Due to the unknown containment dike integrity, confirmation soil samples may be required to be collected during the tank closure to confirm no impacts to the underlying soils are present. The following provides an overview of additional regulatory inspection requirements,construction costs, and long-term maintenance, associated with each new aboveground or underground storage tank option. Regulatory and Inspection Requirements Both ASTs and U5Ts are subject to New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) Regulation 6NYCRRPart 613. This regulation requires both A5Tsand U5Ts toberegistered with NYSDEC. In addition, the regulations require certified operators designated on the facility PBS registration for certain UST systems, including gasoline and diesel fuel fleet fueling UST systems. Operators must be trained and pass DEC -administered exam that demonstrates their competence to operate these UST systems, but not needed for AST systems. In addition to NYSDEC PBS regulations, USTs are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) UST regulation 40CFRPart ZO0. This regulation includes requirements currently not contained with NYSDECPBS regulations, and does not apply toAST systems. ASTs are subject to federal USEPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation, 40 CFR Part 112, which requires the development of a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan to mitigate and control any potential environmental hazards associated with the storage or use of oil. An 5PCC Plan is not required for U5Ts. SPCC regulations require that the SPCC Plan incorporate all aboveground oil storage at the facility in containers with a capacity of 55 gallons and larger, and any oil filled operational equipment (transformers, hydraulic reservoirs, etc] that contain 55 gallons or more of oil. As part of SPCC Plan compliance, secondary containment must be provided for fuel transfers from the delivery vehicle tothe ASTs. This typically consists of a constructed area, such as a curbed, depressed concrete pad where the fuel delivery truck parks so that any spills during transfer could be contained, or an underground oil/water separator to contain fuel from leaving the site in the event of a spill from the transfer offuels. The following table provides a summary of regulatory and inspection requirements for the NYSDEC and EPA regulatory programs applicable to petroleum bulk storage ASTs and USTs. Note that this list is not exhaustive, but provides the important differences between requirements for the two types of tank systems for comparison purposes. Asummary ofPBS recordkeepin0requirements for AST and UST systems provided by the DEC is attached as additional information for review against a category 3 tank system installed after October 11, 2015 (see Attachments 1 and 2, respectively). 2072.00400111822 7Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Table 5. AST & UST Regulatory and Inspection Requirements Regulatory and Inspection ASTs USTs Requirements NYSDEC PBS Regulations Monthly Inspections Monthly Inspections Formal Exterior Inspection Weekly Monitoring of Leak for Certified Inspector Detection Systems (Tanks >5,000 gallons) 1 Annual Line Leak Detection Testing Requires Certified Class A/B UST Operator EPA Part 280 Regulation N/A Spill Bucket and Containment Sump Testing — Every 3 Years Overfill Prevention Equipment Inspections — Every 3 Years Monthly and Annual Walkthrough Inspections —Can be combined with NYSDEC Inspections EPA SPCC Regulation Prepare and Implement N/A an SPCC Plan. 1 This requirement is in accordance with Consensus Code steel Tank Institute (STI) SP001 "Standard for the Inspection of Aboveground Storage Tanks" as referenced in 6 NYCRR Part 613- 1.10. In addition to the above regulatory requirements, New York State (NYS) and NFPA 30A Fire Code (2020) requires installation of UL 2085-listed ASTs which are fire -rated and impact protected. Fencing is also required by NFPA 30A around aboveground storage tanks located at motor fuel dispensing and repair garages. Fencing is required to be offset 10 feet from the tank on all sides. This, combined with the need for delivery transfer containment for ASTs in accordance with EPA SPCC requirements, increases the footprint needed for an aboveground tank system when compared to an underground tank system, which does not require fencing or transfer containment. Conceptual layouts showing the footprints of the UST and AST fueling system options are provided in Attachment 3 for Town review. Vehicle tracking paths for a lowboy trailer are shown for each AST and UST option; whereas the path shown for each AST option shows accessibility to the transfer containment structure, and the path shown for each UST option shows accessibility to the fuel dispensing location (located in the same area for the respective AST and UST option). Fire suppression is no longer required and has been removed from New York State Fire Code. Emergency fuel shutoff switches (EFSOS) are required by NYS and NFPA 30A; however, these switches that eliminate all power to the fueling system if pressed are not interconnected to the facility fire alarm panel. 2071.004.001110.22 - 8 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Cost Comparison B&L prepared a preliminary opinion of probable construction costs for the demolition of existing fuel station and construction of an AST fueling system option and UST fueling system option (see Attachment 4). Both options considered installation of a dual compartmented tank with a total design capacity of 8,000 gallons (5,000 gallons diesel fuel compartment / 3,000 gallons gasoline compartment) as a basis for cost comparison. Each option includes a concrete fuel island with fuel dispenser, two concrete fueling lanes for dual -sided fueling (with the exception of location 1 due to wetland restrictions); re -use of existing fuel management system (FMS) or installation of a new FMS; tank monitoring system including inventory monitoring, leak monitoring, and overfill protection; underground double -walled piping; and optional canopy with LED fuel station lighting. Location number 4, the existing fleet fueling station location, has been evaluated specifically with respect to a UST option as agreed with the DPW staff. The AST option at this location is not practical due to the narrow and sloped topography prohibiting installation of the additional aboveground items listed below for ASTs, and as such, the AST option at this location has not been further evaluated. Items that are different between the two options include the following: Items required for ASTs and not USTs: • Additional bollard impact protection. • Remote fill station. • Aboveground fill and supply piping and associated pipe supports. • Transfer containment. • Tank perimeter fencing and access gates. • Tank -top access via stairs/ladder and catwalk/platform (integral to the tank costs). Items required for USTs but not ASTs: • Tank top sumps and spill buckets. • Tank ballasting. • Additional subsurface excavation during construction, including specialty backfill material around tank. Detailed cost breakouts for components required for each option are provided for Town review. The following summarizes the total preliminary opinion of construction costs for the average of each tank option for all locations. • UST System Construction Costs (Locations 1 through 4): $759,275 • AST System Construction Costs (Locations 1 through 3): $1,169,767 2071.004.001110.22 - 9 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report These costs are to be considered as estimates only for the purpose of comparing the relative cost difference between the two tank -type options, and do not consider differences between site locations, although it can be assumed that the overall percent difference between AST and UST systems carry from site to site. A more detailed opinion of probable costs can be prepared during the design phase of the replacement project, but preliminary opinion of probable costs are shown for each option at each location. Overall long-term maintenance costs are expected to be similar between AST and UST systems. Repairs to UST tank top components such as vents, spill buckets, and overfill prevention valves and associated tank connections may be more costly if the tank top needs to be exposed to make the repairs. These costly repairs can typically be avoided with proper installation and maintenance. ASTs and associated aboveground piping require periodic painting in order to ensure they are sufficiently protected from corrosion. Both ASTs and USTs typically come with a 30-year limited warranty. In addition, there are regulatory requirements such as preparing, updating and maintaining an SPCC Plan that is not required for a UST system, which add operating costs to an AST system. Similarly, there are additional testing requirements for USTs such as the 3-year sump and spill bucket testing, and overfill prevention system testing, that will need to be contracted out to a third -party tank service company, which are not currently required for AST systems. Further, USTs require Class A/B certified operators. These roles are typically filled by facility personnel. There is no cost to be a certified operator, other than staff time directed to reviewing the requirements, taking the examinations, and staying up to date on regulatory requirements. It is estimated that costs associated with an AST fueling station will be $6,000 for a 5-year SPCC Plan. This Plan is required to be updated every 5 years for an estimated cost of $3,000. For a UST fueling station, additional testing costs noted above are estimated to be $1,500 per year, for a total of $4,500 every 3 years including sump testing. Petroleum Bulk Storage Tank System Recommendation It is recommended that the DPW facility chooses to proceed with a UST fueling station option due to lower construction costs and minimal site disturbances. 2071.004.001110.22 -10 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 4.0 Local Zoning Requirements The DPW facility is located on a property zoned for Low Density Residential (LDR). The Town of Ithaca Code review presented herein focuses on several Code Article and Sections that are anticipated to influence the design and implementation of the selected fuel station location, including: 1. Chapter 270: Zoning a. Article Vill: Low Density Residential i. §270-54 Permitted uses. ii. §270-59 Height limitations. iii. §270-60 Yard regulations. iv. §270-61 Building area. b. Article XXVI: Special Regulations i. §270-217 Deposit or removal of fill and related products. ii. §270-219.5 Stream setback. c. Article XXVIII: Administration i. §270-233 Permit to build. ii. §270-234 Certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance. 2. Chapter 173: Outdoor Lighting a. §173-6 Control of glare; shielding requirements. b. §173-10 Lighting under roof overhangs and canopies. c. §173-11 Spotlights and floodlights. d. §173-14 New construction. 3. Chapter 228: Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control a. §228-6 Applicability. b. §228-9 Performance and design criteria. c. §228-10 Stormwater pollution prevention plans and erosion and sedimentation control plans. d. §228-11 Maintenance, inspection, and repair of stormwater management practices. Redactions of the Town Code Chapters providing further detail for the applicable Articles and Sections outline are presented below, followed by a Key Findings summary. Chapter 270: Zoning Article Vill: Low Density Residential: §270-54 Permitted uses The LDR district permits "any municipal or public utility purpose necessary to the maintenance of utility services," among other uses. 2071.004.001110.22 -11 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report §270-59Height limitations |nthe LDRDistrict, buildings must not exceed 38 ft in height from the lowest interior grade or 36 ft in height from the lowest exterior grade, whichever islower. For buildings occupied byadetached accessory dwelling unit, the maximum allowed height is 20ft. Any other structures onthe property have aheight limit of30ft. §270-60 Yard regulations On a property within the LDR district, the building must have a front setback that is no less than the average building setback ofthe adjacent lots oneither side. The front setback must also bebetween 30 ftand 60ft. The building's rear setback must beatleast 50ftand the side setback must beatleast 4Oft. Additionally, any accessory buildings may not occupy any open space other than the rear yard, and may only occupy upto1GY6ofthe rear yard setback. The accessory building must beatleast three feet from any side orrear lot line. Finally, for publicly owned properties inthe LDRdistrict ofatleast six acres and traversed byinterior roads or driveways, the front, side, and rear yard requirements only apply to the exterior public street frontages and along the boundaries of adjacent properties owned by separate entities. §270-61 Building area |nthe LDRdistrict, the maximum allowable building area for any lot is1O%. Publicly owned properties are allowed tohave more than one principal building onalot. Article XXVUSpecial Regulations: §270-217 Deposit orremoval mffill and related products If 50 to 250 cubic yards of fill are being removed or deposited on a parcel in one year, the action must be permitted through receipt of approval by the Director of Public Works. If 250 cubic yards or more of fill is being removed or deposited on a parcel in one year, the action must be permitted by receipt of a Special Permit from the Planning Board. Additionally, ifmore than five cubic yards offill isbeing removed or deposited on a parcel in one year in or within 100 ft of a wetland, the action must be permitted byreceipt ofaSpecial Permit from the Planning Board. 2072.00400111822-12-Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report §270-219.5 Stream setback 10Qftsetback (15OOacre and greater drainage area) � . 5Oftsetback (175acre mless than 15QOacre drainage area) 35ft setback (35acre mless than 175acre drainage area) Stream sections known tobeou|venedorenter aroadside ditch Snippetsfrom the Town of Ithaca Stream Setback Map dated 03108117. For streams with adrainage area of35'175acres, such asthe stream that touches the eastern property line, atotal setback of35ftisrequired. This setback isdivided into two zones: 1. Steam Setback Zone 1. Beginning atthe stream centerline, asetback of2Oftisrequired. 2. Stream Setback Zone 2. Beginning at the outer edge of Stream Setback Zone 1, a setback of 15 ft is required. For streams with adrainage area of175'1,50Oacres, such asthe stream that follows the southernmost property line, a total setback of 50 ft is required. This setback is divided into two zones: 1. Stream Setback Zone 1: Beginning atthe stream centerline, asetback of30ftisrequired. l Stream Setback Zone 2: Beginning atthe outer edge ofStream Setback Zone 1,asetback of20 ftisrequired. Where strearnside wetlands and/or steep slopes of 25% or greater are identified, these areas shall not count towards the stream setback requirement (i.e. the setback must be extended accordingly). An area variance with a proposed mitigation plan may be submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals to request permission toencroach upon the stream setback. In Stream Setback Zone 2, several activities and uses are prohibited, including the installation of structures, the installation of impervious surfaces and/or parking areas, land -disturbing activities, the installation ofutility lines, outdoor storage ofhazardous/noxious materials, and others. In Stream Setback Zone 1, all activities/uses prohibited in Stream Setback Zone 2 are also prohibited with several additions. 2072.00400111822-13-Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Article XXVIII Administration: §270-233 Permit to build A building permit from the Code Enforcement Officer is required prior to commencing the "erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, improvement, repair, removal, or demolition" of any structure. §270-234 Certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance A certificate of compliance is required for all work where a building permit is required. The structure for which the building permit is required may not be used until the certificate of compliance has been issued by the Code Enforcement Officer. Chapter 173: Outdoor Lighting §173-6 Control of glare; shielding requirements Lamps of 1,000 lumens or less do not require shielding. §173-10 Lighting under roof overhangs and canopies Canopy lighting must be mounted underneath the canopy such that the sides are not illuminated. The light fixture must be recessed so that the lens cover is either flush or recessed with the bottom of the canopy, ensuring that the light is dispersed no more than 85 degrees from vertical (see graphic below). Source: f nter-nabona[ Dark -Sky Assoc 2071.004.001110.22 -14 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report §173-11 Spotlights and floodlights Spotlights and floodlights must be aimed 45 degrees or more below the horizontal (see graphic below). uIM . §173-14 New construction Hbrizontal Applicants for any Town permit or approval must provide the following: 1. Plans with the location and type of lighting devices. 2. A description of the lighting devices and their lumen output. 3. Photometric data of the angle of cut off/light emissions and the lumen output. Chapter 228: Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control §228-6 Applicability The proposed Project will require a simple erosion and sediment control plan for an area of disturbance of 10,000 square feet or more, and less than one acre. §228-9 Performance and design criteria The simple erosion and sediment control plan must: 1. Be in conformance with the Design Manual and Erosion Control Manual. 2. Be in conformance with NYS water quality standards. 3. Minimize the disturbance of wetlands, waterways, and waterbodies through buffers and treatment before discharge. 4. Maintain groundwater recharge capacity. 5. Not infiltrate hotspots (stormwater discharges from activities with higher pollutant loadings potential) into groundwater. 2071.004.001110.22 -15 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report §228-10 Stormwater pollution prevention plans and erosion and sedimentation control plans The simple erosion and sediment control plan must include all components outlined in §228-10(B). A simple erosion and sediment control plan does not require professional certification; however, the plan must follow the standards and specifications in the Erosion Control Manual as described in §228-9. §228-11 Maintenance, inspection, and repair of stormwater management practices In regards to maintenance during construction, the developer/owner must maintain and operate stormwater management practices and treatment/control systems so that they comply with §228 and must clear out sediment traps/ponds when design capacity is reduced by 50%. Key Findings The following summary identifies the key findings of the Code Review which are to be considered during the development and implementation of the Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project. CDR Bulk & Dimensional Requirements Max height Front setback Rear setback Side setback Max building area 30 ft No less than the average building setback of adjacent lots on either side; and, Between 30 ft and 60 ft. 50 ft 40 ft 10% Stream Setback Requirements For the stream that touches the eastern Setback Zone 1= 20 ft property line Setback Zone 2 = 15 ft Total Setback = 35 ft For the stream that follows the southern Setback Zone 1= 30 ft property line Setback Zone 2 = 20 ft Total Setback = 50 ft Note: Wetlands and slopes of 25% or greater do not count towards setback requirements. n Lamps of 1,000lumens or less No shielding required. Canopy lighting Must be mounted under the canopy; and, Dispersed light cannot exceed 85' from vertical. Spotlights/Floodlights Dispersed light must equal to or exceed 45' from horizontal grade. 2071.004.001110.22 -16 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Plans, and Permitting General Deposit and removal of fill Lighting Stormwater and erosion Max building area Building permit. Certificate of compliance. 50-250 cubic yards of fill/yr = approval by Director of Public Works 250+ cubic yards of fill/yr = Special permit >5 cubic yards/yr within 100ft of wetland = Special permit Any required Town permit or approval must be supplemented with information on the type, location, and lumen output of lighting devices as well as photometric data on the angle of cut off/light emissions. Simple erosion and sediment control plan. Area variance. In summary for the proposed locations: • Building set -back for canopy option appears achievable for all locations. • Stream setbacks do not appear to interfere with the proposed locations. • Lighting requirements can be met with our without the canopy option. • A building permit and certification of compliance are needed for the canopy option. • Approval by the Director of Public Works or a Special Permit is not required for this project as it is exempt under article §270-217 1 (1) for any normal building operation in connection with a legal building permit (for the canopy). • A simple erosion and sediment control plan will be needed for construction. • A variance to pursue this project that expands on the maximum building area is required. 2071.004.001110.22 -17 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 5.0 Site Evaluation To complete a comprehensive analysis of the new fueling station options, a site evaluation of each of the four proposed locations, independent of UST and AST options, include: 1. Location 1: Located in the front of the property closest to Seven Mile Drive to the east, within the proximity of a wetland. There is no activity related to facility operations at this location. 2. Location 2: Located on the northern portion of the property where wood chips and mulch is currently staged, next to residential staging bins for landscaping materials. 3. Location 3: Located on the back side of the property towards the west, behind the salt storage building. Gravel materials are staged immediately beyond the extents of this location. 4. Location 4: Existing fuel station location. The following tables provide a comparison of the characteristics of each location proposed for the new fueling station. Table 6. Site Characteristics Evaluation Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 (UST only) Accessibility Accessible for UST Accessible for AST Accessible for AST Accessible. option. AST option and UST options. and UST options. undesirable due to delivery vehicle transfer containment placement. Security/Tamper Most visible from Relatively visible Least visible from Readily visible by Resistance road. from surroundings. surroundings/most DPW facility staff. Underground option Underground option secluded. provides more provides more Underground option tamper resistance. tamper resistance. provides more tamper resistance. Site Lighting All locations can be provided with lighting that is achievable by code (aboveground and underground options, canopy or no canopy). Canopy Impacts A canopy can be provided at each location, but is subject to local zoning requirements; however, set -back requirements appear achievable for all locations. Applicable to aboveground and underground options. 2071.004.001110.22 -18 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacilitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Location Characteristics Topography and Constructability Permitting Requirements/En vironmental Impacts Local Zoning Requirements Price - Reference Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs for Aboveground and Underground Options Location 1 Location is not utilized for current facility operations. Weltand impact present for AST option. Single lane fueling limitation for AST/UST. Most prohibitive (both aboveground and underground). Wetland impact present for AST option.' Location 2 Location is used to stage mulch and wood chip materials and is planned for potential future expansion. Least prohibitive (both aboveground and underground). Existing topography is optimal for construction. N/A Location 3 Location is relatively vacant but can be used to store small miscellaneous equipment. Smallest available footprint of the proposed locations. Most prohibitive for aboveground. Re- grading required and stone wall removal. Relatively prohibitive for underground option. N/A Location 4 (UST only) Location is currently utilized for fleet fueling. New design will maintain traffic flow and not cause a disturbance to other facility operations. Least prohibitive. Existing topography is optimal for construction. N/A Canopy height is less than restricted height for low density residential zone. All locations also appear to comply with building and stream set -back limitations. See code review memo for additional information. Lowest for UST due to single lane fueling and proximity. Highest for AST due to wetland impacts. Average for both UST and AST options. Highest for UST due to electrical. Lowest for AST due to all features within closest proximity of each other (least amount of site work following re- grading). Approximate average. 'Permitting will add time to project schedule, incur additional costs due to increased consultant effort and possible mitigation fees, and will open up the entirety of the site to regulatory "eyes" (possible questions related to unpermitted wetland and stream encroachment occurring in other areas of the property could arise). See the wetland impact assessment in Attachment 5 for further details. 2071.004.001110.22 -19 - Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Table G.AST Evaluation bVLocation Accessibility Security/Tamper Resistance Site Lighting Canopy Impacts Location Characteristics Topography and Construotabi|ity Permitting Requirements/ Environmental Impacts Local Zoning Requirements Price Total 4 � � V V V VA V V V Z072.O04OO111822-20-Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report Table 7.UST Evaluation bVLocation Accessibility V V V V Security/Tamper V V � Resistance Site Lighting V V V V Canopy Impacts V V V Location V Characteristics Topography and V � Construotabi|ity Pennkhn0 V V V V Requirements/ Environmental Impacts Local Zoning Requirements Price V Total 7 7 6 8 2072.00400111822-21-Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Public Works FacifitV Fueling Station Design Project Engineering Report 8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The Town should pursue location number 4 onsite for replacement of the existing fleet fueling station with a UST fueling system option. This location achieves Town Code, provides zero disturbance to existing site operations, avoids the potential need for any outside agency permitting associated with wetlands, and provides an ideal location for construction of a UST system. The UST option provides the most affordable option compared to an aboveground option, and the factors identified above prove to bethe most favorable for location number 4. The UST option atlocation 4also falls within the range of costs identified for UST systems atall locations. |tisunderstood that ofthe equipment onsitethat utilizes the existing fleet fueling station, a lowboy trailer is the largest with respect to amount of turning radius needed to access this location; however, it is able to traverse the sloped pavement entrance and exit curves without scraping the bottom. To support the Town of Ithaca Town Board in advancement of their consideration of location number 4 under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF)isprovided asAttachment 6. The project meets classification asanUnlisted Action under the SECiRAregulations in6NYCRRPart 61l The Town Board will beconducting an uncoordinated review ofthe project. Parts Zand 3ofthe SEAFwill need tobedrafted inthe future for Town Board review and approval, and to support issuance of the Town's Determination of Significance (determination as to whether or not the proposed action has the potential to result in a significant adverse environmental impact). 2072.00400111822-22-Barton& Loguidice,I\/![ Attachment 1— AST Systems Regulated By DEC dukl M , AN ON NEA MIMI EMWN N DOLV4,i The following is a list of recordkeeping requirements for aboveground storage tank systems (ASTs) regulated by DEC. It is unlikely that any one facility will need to maintain every type of record listed — maintain only those records required for your tank system(s). It is recommended that you, as the facility owner/operator, print this file and highlight the documents/records required for what you have at your facility. Note that this document does not replace the regulations themselves. This is meant to be a tool to help you prepare for compliance inspections and be an aid for general recordkeeping compliance. For TANK SYSTEMS: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records TANK YSTEM RE ORD Initial Registration; Every 5 Years Must Be 613-1.9(a, c) Facility Registration Certificate Thereafter; Current/ You MUST have this When Ownership is Accurate at Transferred All Times 3 Years After Only WHEN you permanently close your AST 613-4.5(c) Closure Records z At AST System Closure AST System Closure system 'A copy of the closure records must be sent to DEC within 30 days after AST system closure. 6/6/2016 Page 1 of 2 For TANKS: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records Lining Manufacturer's Guarantee When a Steel AST is Life of AST 613-4.2(d)(5) Only IF you have a lined AST w/ Tightness Test for Lined ASTs I Lined I System Cathodic Protection Test Only IF you have a cathodically protected Sacrificial Anodes Every Year Category 2 or 3 steel AST WITH a sacrificial 613-4.2(b)(2) anode CP system 3 Years Cathodic Protection Test Every Year Only IF you have a cathodically protected Impressed Current Category 2 or 3 steel AST WITH an impressed current CP system 613-4.2(b)(3) Impressed Current Inspection Every 60 Days LEAK DETECTION RECORDS: CATEGORY 1 TANKS, 613-4.3(b)(1) Monthly Inspection Monthly 3 Years You MUST have this You MUST have this IF your tank has a design capacity of 10,000 or more OR your tank has a 613-4.3(b)(2) 10-Year Inspection z Every 10 Years 10 Years design capacity of less than 10,000 gallons and is near a sensitive receptor, UNLESS your tank is entirely aboveground (i.e., on a rack, cradle, or stilts) OR stores No. 5/6 fuel oil LEAK DETECTION RECORDS: CATEGOR 2 & 3 TANKS 613-4.3(b)(1) Monthly Inspection Monthly 3 Years You MUST have this 2 If a tightness test is used to meet this requirement, a copy of the tightness test results must be sent to DEC within 30 days after pei formance of the test. For UNDERGROUND PIPING: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records CATHODIC PROTECTION RECORDS Cathodic Protection Test Only IF you have cathodically protected Sacrificial Anodes Every Year Category 2 or 3 steel piping WITH a sacrificial 613-4.2(b)(2) anode CP system 3 Years Cathodic Protection Test Every Year Only IF you have cathodically protected Impressed Current Category 2 or 3 steel piping WITH an impressed current CP system 613-4.2(b)(3) Impressed Current Inspection Every 60 Days LEAK DETECTION RECORCIS. CATEGORY 1 PIPING 613-4.3(d)(2) Pressurized Line Tightness Test Every 10 Years 10 Years You MUST have this only IF you have pressurized piping 613 4.3(d)(2) Suction/Gravity-Fed Line Every 10 Years 10 Years You MUST have this only IF you have suction Tightness Test or gravity -fed piping 6/6/2016 Page 2 of 2 Attachment 2 — UST Systems Regulated By DEC/EPA The following is a list of recordkeeping requirements for underground storage tank systems (USTs) regulated by both DEC and EPA. It is unlikely that any one facility will need to maintain every type of record listed — maintain only those records required for your tank system(s). It is recommended that you, as the facility owner/operator, print this file and highlight the documents/records required for what you have at your facility. Note that this document does not replace the regulations themselves. This is meant to be a tool to help you prepare for compliance inspections and be an aid for general recordkeeping compliance. For TANK SYSTEMS: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records TANK YSTEWRE ORD Initial Registration; Every 5 Years Must Be 613-1.9(a, c) Facility Registration Certificate Thereafter; Current/ You MUST have this When Ownership is Accurate at Transferred All Times 613-2.1 As -Built Plan When a UST System Life of UST Only IF you have a Category 2 UST system (b)(4)(iii)(a) Component 1 is Installed/Replaced System As -Built Plan w/ Attributes List Only IF you have a Category 3 UST system Calibration/Maintenance/Repair Records of Leak Detection After Completion of Servicing Work Equipment (Required) 613-2.3(e)(4) 3 Years You MUST have this Calibration/Maintenance After Installation of Schedules for Leak Detection Leak Detection Equipment Equipment Length of 613 2.5(f) Operator Records When Operator is Operator You MUST have this Designated Designation PLUS 3 Years 613-2.6(c) Site Assessment Report z Prior to UST System 3 Years After Closure UST System Closure Only WHEN you permanently close your UST system 613-2.6(e) Closure Records s At UST System Closure 'A UST system component refers to either the tank or any length of piping. 'A copy of the site assessment report must be sent to DEC within 90 days after UST system closure. 3 A copy of the closure records must be sent to DEC within 30 days after UST system closure. 6/6/2016 Page 1 of 3 For TANKS: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records EQUIPMENT RECORDS, 613-2.1 (b613- ii 1 Installer Certification When a New UST System Component is Life of UST System Only IF you have a Category 3 UST system 613-2.1 Manufacturer's Installation Installed (b)(4)(iii)(c) Checklist Within First 10 Years; Only IF you have an internally lined, steel 613-2.1(c)(2)(i) Interior Lining Inspection Every 5 Years 5 Years Category 1 UST WITHOUT cathodic protection Thereafter REPAIR RECORDS You MUST have this IF your UST is repaired, UNLESS the UST is inspected (API RP 1631) OR 613-2.2(d)(3) Tightness Test for Repaired USTs Within 30 Days After is monitored using automatic tank gauging, Repair Life of UST vapor monitoring, groundwater monitoring, System interstitial monitoring, or statistical inventory reconciliation 613-2.2(d)(4) Cathodic Protection Test for Within 6 Months Only IF you have a cathodically protected Repaired USTs After Repair steel UST AND the UST is repaired CATHODIC :.PROTECTION RECORDS Cathodic Protection Test Within First 6 Months; Only IF you have a cathodically protected Sacrificial Anodes Every Year Thereafter steel UST WITH a sacrificial anode CP system 613-2.2(b)(2) Cathodic Protection Test Within First 6 Months; Only IF you have a cathodically protected 3 Years Impressed Current Every Year Thereafter steel UST WITH an impressed current CP system 613-2.2(b)(3) Impressed Current Inspection L Every 60 Days LEAK DETECTION RECORM'CATEGORY 1 TANKS 613-2.3(c)(1) Inventory Monitoring Daily with 10-Day Only IF your UST system stores motor Reconciliations fuel/kerosene that will be sold Manual Tank Gauging Automatic Tank Gauging You MUST perform AND document any ONE 613 2.3 (c)(2, 4 6, 8) Vapor Monitoring 4 Weekly 3 Years of these leak detection methods 5 UNLESS Groundwater Monitoring 4 your UST is double -walled Statistical Inventory Reconciliation 613-2.3(c)(7) Interstitial Monitoring 5,6 Weekly Only IF your tank is double -walled 613-2.3 Operability Check of Electronic Monthly Only IF you have an electronic leak (b)(1)(iii) Leak Monitoring Systems monitoring system LEAK DETECTION RECORDS: CATEGORY 2 & 3 TANKS 613-2.3(c)(1) Inventory Monitoring Daily with 10-Day Only IF your UST system stores motor Reconciliations 3 Years fuel/kerosene that will be sold 613-2.3(c)(7) Interstitial Monitoring 5,6 Weekly You MUST have this 613-2.3 Operability Check of Electronic Monthly Only IF you have an electronic leak (b)(1)(iii) Leak Monitoring Systems monitoring system 'Vapor monitoring and groundwater monitoring each require a baseline report INADDITION to the weekly monitoring records. 5 Electronic interstitial monitoring must be performed continuously (and needs monthly operability checks); manual interstitial monitoring must be performed weekly. 6 Continuous electronic monitoring satisfies the weekly monitoring requirement. 6/6/2016 Page 2 of 3 For UNDERGROUND PIPING: 6 NYCRR Type of Documentation When Required How Long to What Conditions Require This? Keep Records EQUIPMENT RECORDS 613-2.1 Installer Certification (b)(4)(iii)(b) When Piping is Installed Life of UST System Only IF you have piping installed after 10/11/15 613-2.1 Manufacturer's Installation (b)(4)(iii)(c) Checklist REPAIR RECORD You MUST have this IF your piping is repaired, UNLESS the piping is monitored using 613-2.2(d)(3) Tightness Test for Repaired Piping Within 30 Days After automatic tank gauging, vapor monitoring, Repair Life of UST groundwater monitoring, interstitial System monitoring, or statistical inventory reconciliation 613-2.2(d)(4) Cathodic Protection Test for Within 6 Months Only IF you have cathodically protected steel Repaired Piping After Repair piping AND the piping is repaired CATHODIC PROTECTION RECORDS Cathodic Protection Test Within First 6 Months; Only IF you have cathodically protected steel Sacrificial Anodes Every Year Thereafter piping WITH a sacrificial anode CP system 613-2.2(b)(2) Cathodic Protection Test Within First 6 Months; 3 Years Impressed Current Every Year Thereafter Only IF you have cathodically protected steel piping WITH an impressed current CP system 613-2.2(b)(3) Impressed Current Inspection 60 Days LEAK DETECTION RECORDS: CATEGORY 1 +& 2,PIPING Automatic (Mechanical or 613-2.3(d)(1) Electronic) Line Leak Detector Every Year 3 Years Only IF you have pressurized piping Functionality Test 613-2.3(d)(2) Pressurized Line Tightness Test 7 Every Year Until the Next Test You MUST perform AND document one of Vapor Monitoring' these methods 6 only IF you have pressurized 613-2.3(c)(5-8) Groundwater Monitoring a Weekly 3 Years piping Interstitial Monitorings,6 Statistical Inventory Reconciliation 613-2.3(d)(2) Non -Exempt Suction Line Every 3 Years Until the Tightness Test 7 Next Test You MUST perform AND document one of Vapor Monitoring' these methods 6 only IF you have suction 613-2.3(c)(5-8) Groundwater Monitoring a Weekly 3 Years piping that is NOT safe suction Interstitial Monitorings,6 Statistical Inventory Reconciliation 613-2.3 Operability Check of Electronic Only IF you have an ELECTRONIC line leak (b)(2)(iii) Leak Monitoring Systems Monthly 3 Years detector OR an electronic sensor (i.e., sump sensor) LEAK ©ETECTIC N RfCQRbsS CATEGORY !PIPING Automatic (Mechanical or 613-2.3(d)(1) Electronic) Line Leak Detector Every Year Only IF you have pressurized piping Functionality Test You MUST have this IF you have either 613-2.3(c)(7) Interstitial Monitoring 5,6 Weekly 3 Years pressurized piping OR non-exempt suction piping 613-2.3 Operability Check of Electronic Only IF you have an ELECTRONIC line leak (b)(2)(iii) Leak Monitoring Systems Monthly detector OR an electronic sensor (i.e., sump sensor) 7 A copy of the tightness test results must be sent to DEC within 30 days after performance of the test. 6/6/2016 Page 3 of 3 Attachment 3 — AST/UST Conceptual Fuel Station Layouts by Location M� z � o �o ' Y Y _ W ui � ' rrrxz r J r J ( J _ rJr,,rrrrJ � �? ti •,, S M Jr rJr rJr'rYrJ�� �Q 7 T rz rz rr rJ rJ rJ r1 IJ z' ��� XC f, T 7rrJ E J X T r I r I r "r r r r T r T w -i � r7r7r1rJrTrJrJrJ(J'J{II' r r T J r J ,r r r r w� rJrJ�J�,J.JJrJ,�JrI ��, �J J�J.�.J�Jr.JJJr,Jrfr� 1 r r T J r J r J 7 T, 1,T'I VAC„1 r J r J r J , I T r 7 1 1 ,1,J-� � > zIr r;J rJ rJ rJr'J r r'I z:J J r'J;rr r'xrz,.r.� N. rrrJrrTJt,'j, I,rrJTr�J"fr,'ItYJ Jr r, r 1_�r r r — — g� t r r f,, I �m-�rmrzra o s �d ✓� _ r X r r ,r T r T r J ,r. J r ,J.-- r r r r r r r, rrJ oaIJJJ, �JJ.� ,r,;rJJrrX J —� - JJ rJ rz rJ rJ J:r �� _._ JAJrX' XrXrr � - rrz�rJzrrJzrr z�r���%� , i - r r r r T z r, T --- r T r i vI oe • a • • • • r 7 r J: J, ---- ! J J � r -- �s z XrT TY� zr ` o "snbg I IoT a i i F h � b J N � I F N Y i h , o zrrrrJ CJ tzzw­ r. rrCJt J, rrl irJ J r Q C r v rr � �rJ��rrrXr ,trt,r, r rJrrrrr 1 -M r'r �t t trz rt rr rt rJ rJ r� t� t 1 t r I 1 Ii � ?�''—� .�, � r�7rr r �Ir(rrrfrI'I"I' rJI[T""J" � 7J' t r 1 TCT E J rr,rrr rrr,rrr,v �Ir,rrrrr rr,rrr,r„rrtr� w� Cr:jrry tt�J�J�.r�r�Jrlr, 1 tJ r1 rJ rJ 7�7rr,` 1 C'l rJ rJ rJ rr7rrr l l,l.-� =�� a t r r r. ,r r r J, rtr,Xrxrxrr zrrry rtrtrr_rrr�'_ �� r,rrt rT (rrJ CIJ,rJ I1 a -- ,x r ,x. ;r. . Yrr. . t.�7 , r,r,X. r;r r 'r ,f, r. ,f, 1 C. r / m \.m r I.rr J'I lJ)'I J)71) 1rS t � t r r rat r, C 5 l, I T, r m ---.- rttrJtrr tt[ z [ 7 , WW_I _ - r r r r r r r r r r, Jf' l - �avrio� noe J > 1 ,J rJ rJ uj AIL ------------- e / - kY, st it i6vNFvda d i z i u I 3�NJ01 i i 1 v m \ f _ I D 1 O ' V O I D v � > x Di D \ U Attachment 4 — Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs volition Piping, Steel Dike, Wooden Supports and Metal Roofing k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k Gasoline AST Cleaning, Removal and Disposal um Contaminated Fluids Disposal um Contaminated Soils Excavation, Disposal, and Backfill ;storation leet Fueling System nk and Accessories plit 5k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL Gasoline Fireguard AST w/ 20% OP ,er, Ship Ladder, Catwalk & Freight plit 5k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL DW Brine -Filled FRP UST W/ Concrete ian Anchors, Hold -Down Straps, Manway, Cover, Single Wall FRP Sump 3, Freight emote Fill Station " Fill Piping Valves and Flanges ill Pipe Supports ank Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, etc.) ank Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, DW spill bucket, etc.) nderground Piping Transition Sump -1/2" Gasoline Supply Piping Valve Set at AST -1/2" Gasoline Double Contained UG Fuel Piping s for 1-1/2" Fuel Supply Piping .boveground Piping and Fittings (welded steel) " Diesel Supply Piping Valve Set at AST " Diesel Double Contained UG Fuel Piping s for 2" Fuel Supply Piping ingle Product Dual Hose Nozzle Dispenser Dispenser Sump ixed Speed Submersible Pump ubmersible Pump Controller lock Gauge :its el Management System ted Fuel Management System w/ New Fuel Island Terminal nkMonitoring S sy teals �MNTEC Tank Monitoring System w/ Software utomatic Tank Gauge Probe nerstitial Sensor �P Chamber Sensor Dispenser Sump Sensor ransition/Tank Top Sump Sensor nopV 8' x 16' Pre -Fab Canopy, Foundations, w/ LED Lighting ,neral Construction and Site Work ar Fill and Compaction Restoration/Re-grading 'ad Concrete tainless Steel Island Forms -ane and Island Concrete ate Transfer Containment Pad :ive Bollards - 6" diameter :ive Bollards - 8" diameter HD hain Link Security Fencing - 8' 'Slide Gate it Construction & Labor zctrical cal Construction AST cal Construction UST Hand Mitigation z Free (ILF) Program - 0.5 acre disturbance using 2:1 mitigation ratio $5,000.00 LS 1 $5,000 $9,500.00 LS 1 $9,500 $2.50 Gal 600 $1,500 $150.00 Ton 15 $2,250 $7,500.00 LS 1 $7,500 $122,000.00 LS 1 $122,0001 $99,250.00 LS N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $4,500.00 EA N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 1 $2,500 $1,950.00 LS 1 $1,950 $40.00 LF 90 $3,600 $950.00 LS 1 $950 $60.00 LF 100 $6,000 $2,950.00 LS 1 $2,950 $50.00 LF 90 $4,500 $1,450.00 LS 1 $1,450 $11,000.00 EA 2 $22,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,750.00 EA 2 $3,500 $750.00 EA 2 $1,500 $1,000.00 EA 2 $2,000 $1,500.00 LS 1 $1,500 $15,000.00 LS $15,000 1 $8,500.00 EA 1 $8,500 $1,400.00 EA 2 $2,800 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $50,000.00 LS 1 $50,000 $35.00 CY 827 $28,933 $5.50 SF 8,000 $44,000 $400.00 CY 67 $26,667 $3,500.00 EA 1 $3,500 $400.00 CY 17 $6,914 $400.00 CY 25 $9,877 $750.00 EA 15 $11,250 $850.00 EA 4 $3,400 $125.00 LF 180 $22,500 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $7,500.00 WK 10 $75,000 $150,000.00 LS $100,000.00 LS $98,000.00 AC 1 $150,000 N/A N/A 1 1 600 15 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 50 N/A N/A N/A 50 N/A 2 2 2 2 N/A 1 1 1 2 1 N/A 2 2 361 4,000 10 1 17 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 8 N/A 1 $100, 0.5*2 $98,0001 N/A Mob/Demob/Submittals/Project Closeout $10,000 Demolition $25,750 New Fleet Fueling System $665,840 Wetland Mitigation $98,000 Subtotal Administration, Bonds, Insurance (10%) *Contingency Factor (40%) Construction Estimate PROJECT ESTIMATE $799,590 $80,000 $319,800 $1,199,390 $1,199.400 $71 b/ Nu bmittal s/ Uoseout on ig, Steel Dike, Wooden Supports and Metal Roofing �L Diesel Fuel/3k Gasoline AST Cleaning, Removal and Disposal contaminated Fluids Disposal contaminated Soils Excavation, Disposal, and Backfill ition mu'u mu LN 1 mu'um $5,000.00 LS 1 $5,000 $9,500.00 LS 1 $9,500 $2.50 Gal 600 $1,500 $150.00 Ton 15 $2,250 $7,500.00 LS 1 $7,500 Fueling System fad Accessories ik GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL Gasoline Fireguard AST w/ 20% OP ;hip Ladder, Catwalk & Freight $122,000.00 LS ik GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL DW Brine -Filled FRP UST W/ Concrete anchors, Hold -Down Straps, Manway, Cover, Single Wall FRP Sump and to Fill Station l Piping Valves and Flanges 'ape Supports Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, etc.) Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, DW spill bucket, etc.) -ground Piping Transition Sump ' Gasoline Supply Piping Valve Set at AST ' Gasoline Double Contained UG Fuel Piping 1-1/2" Fuel Supply Piping ,ground Piping and Fittings (welded steel) ;sel Supply Piping Valve Set at AST ,sel Double Contained UG Fuel Piping 2" Fuel Supply Piping Product Dual Hose Nozzle Dispenser user Sump Speed Submersible Pump ersible Pump Controller Gauge lanagement System Fuel Management System w/ New Fuel Island Terminal lonitoring Systems TEC Tank Monitoring System w/ Software natic Tank Gauge Probe titial Sensor hamber Sensor user Sump Sensor ition/Tank Top Sump Sensor 32' Pre -Fab Canopy, Foundations, w/ LED Lighting d Construction and Site Work ill and Compaction toration/Re-grading ;oncrete ess Steel Island Forms and Island Concrete ransfer Containment Pad Bollards - 6" diameter Bollards - 8" diameter HD Link Security Fencing - 8' le Gate instruction & Labor cal :onstruction AST :onstruction UST 1 $122,000 1 $99,250.00 LS N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $4,500.00 EA N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 1 $2,500 $1,950.00 LS 1 $1,950 $40.00 LF 85 $3,400 $950.00 LS 1 $950 $60.00 LF 100 $6,000 $2,950.00 LS 1 $2,950 $50.00 LF 85 $4,250 $1,450.00 LS 1 $1,450 $11,000.00 EA 2 $22,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,750.00 EA 2 $3,500 $750.00 EA 2 $1,500 $1,000.00 EA 2 $2,000 $1,500.00 LS 1 $1,500 $15,000.00 LS 1 $15,0001 $8,500.00 EA 1 $8,500 $1,400.00 EA 2 $2,800 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $75,000.00 LS 1 $75,000 $35.00 CY 685 $23,976 $5.50 SF 15,000 $82,500 $400.00 CY 67 $26,667 $3,500.00 EA 1 $3,500 $400.00 CY 28 $11,062 $400.00 CY 25 $9,877 $750.00 EA 15 $11,250 $850.00 EA 4 $3,400 $125.00 LF 180 $22,500 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $7,500.00 WK 10 $75,000 $160,000.00 LS 1 $160,000 $105,000.00 LS N/A N/A Mob/Demob/Submittals/Project Closeout Demolition New Fleet Fueling System Subtotal Administration, Bonds, Insurance (10%) *Contingency Factor (40%) Construction Estimate $10,000 $25,750 $738,081 $773,831 $77,400 $309,500 $1,160,731 1 1 1 600 15 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 20 N/A N/A N/A 20 N/A 2 2 2 2 N/A 1 1 0 1 2 1 N/A 2 2 0 230 5,000 10 1 28 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 8 N/A 1 PROJECT ESTIMATE $1.1 I contingency to account for increase in costs due to unknown market conditions. b/ Nu bmittal s/ Uoseout on ig, Steel Dike, Wooden Supports and Metal Roofing �L Diesel Fuel/3k Gasoline AST Cleaning, Removal and Disposal contaminated Fluids Disposal contaminated Soils Excavation, Disposal, and Backfill ition mu'u mu LN 1 mu'um $5,000.00 LS 1 $5,000 $9,500.00 LS 1 $9,500 $2.50 Gal 600 $1,500 $150.00 Ton 15 $2,250 $7,500.00 LS 1 $7,500 Fueling System fad Accessories ik GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL Gasoline Fireguard AST w/ 20% OP ;hip Ladder, Catwalk & Freight $122,000.00 LS ik GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL DW Brine -Filled FRP UST W/ Concrete anchors, Hold -Down Straps, Manway, Cover, Single Wall FRP Sump and to Fill Station l Piping Valves and Flanges 'ape Supports Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, etc.) Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, DW spill bucket, etc.) -ground Piping Transition Sump ' Gasoline Supply Piping Valve Set at AST ' Gasoline Double Contained UG Fuel Piping 1-1/2" Fuel Supply Piping ,ground Piping and Fittings (welded steel) ;sel Supply Piping Valve Set at AST ,sel Double Contained UG Fuel Piping 2" Fuel Supply Piping Product Dual Hose Nozzle Dispenser user Sump Speed Submersible Pump ersible Pump Controller Gauge lanagement System Fuel Management System w/ New Fuel Island Terminal lonitoring Systems TEC Tank Monitoring System w/ Software natic Tank Gauge Probe titial Sensor hamber Sensor user Sump Sensor ition/Tank Top Sump Sensor 32' Pre -Fab Canopy, Foundations, w/ LED Lighting d Construction and Site Work ill and Compaction toration/Re-grading ;oncrete ess Steel Island Forms and Island Concrete ransfer Containment Pad Bollards - 6" diameter Bollards - 8" diameter HD Link Security Fencing - 8' le Gate instruction & Labor cal :onstruction AST :onstruction UST 1 $122,000 1 $99,250.00 LS N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $4,500.00 EA N/A N/A $2,500.00 EA 1 $2,500 $1,950.00 LS 1 $1,950 $40.00 LF 60 $2,400 $950.00 LS 1 $950 $60.00 LF 100 $6,000 $2,950.00 LS 1 $2,950 $50.00 LF 60 $3,000 $1,450.00 LS 1 $1,450 $11,000.00 EA 2 $22,000 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 $1,750.00 EA 2 $3,500 $750.00 EA 2 $1,500 $1,000.00 EA 2 $2,000 $1,500.00 LS 1 $1,500 $15,000.00 LS 1 $15,0001 $8,500.00 EA 1 $8,500 $1,400.00 EA 2 $2,800 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 2 $700 $350.00 EA 1 $350 $75,000.00 LS 1 $75,000 $35.00 CY 546 $19,115 $5.50 SF 11,250 $61,875 $400.00 CY 67 $26,667 $3,500.00 EA 1 $3,500 $400.00 CY 28 $11,062 $400.00 CY 25 $9,877 $750.00 EA 15 $11,250 $850.00 EA 4 $3,400 $125.00 LF 180 $22,500 $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 $7,500.00 WK 10 $75,000 $180,000.00 LS 1 $180,000 $125,000.00 LS N/A N/A Mob/Demob/Submittals/Project Closeout Demolition New Fleet Fueling System Subtotal Administration, Bonds, Insurance (10%) *Contingency Factor (40%) Construction Estimate $10,000 $25,750 $730,345 $766,095 $76,600 $306,400 $1,149,095 1 1 1 600 15 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 20 N/A N/A N/A 20 N/A 2 2 2 2 N/A 1 1 0 1 2 1 N/A 2 2 0 230 5,000 10 1 28 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 8 N/A 1 PROJECT ESTIMATE $1,149,1001 I contingency to account for increase in costs due to unknown market conditions. Mob/Demob/Submittals/Closeout $10,000.00 LS 1 $10,000 Demolition Demo Piping, Steel Dike, Wooden Supports and Metal Roofing $5,000.00 LS 1 $5,000 Split 3k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k Gasoline AST Cleaning, Removal and Disposal $9,500.00 LS 1 $9,500 Petroleum Contaminated Fluids Disposal $2.50 Gal 600 $1,500 Petroleum Contaminated Soils Excavation, Disposal, and Backfill $150.00 Ton 15 $2,250 Site Restoration $7,500.00 LS 1 $7,500 New Fleet Fueling System Tank and Accessories New Split 5k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL Gasoline Fireguard AST w/ 20% OP Chamber, Ship Ladder, Catwalk & Freight $122,000.00 LS N/A N/A New Split 5k GAL Diesel Fuel/3k GAL DW Brine -Filled FRP UST W/ Concrete Deadman Anchors, Hold -Down Straps, Manway, Cover, Single Wall FRP Sump and Lid, Freight $99,250.00 LS 1 $99,250 New Remote Fill Station $2,500.00 EA N/A N/A New 3" Fill Piping Valves and Flanges $2,500.00 EA N/A N/A New Fill Pipe Supports $1,500.00 EA N/A N/A New Tank Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, etc.) $2,500.00 EA N/A N/A New Tank Compartment Accessories (vent, overfill valve, DW spill bucket, etc.) $4,500.00 EA 2 $9,000 New Underground Piping Transition Sump $2,500.00 EA N/A N/A New 1-1/2" Gasoline Supply Piping Valve Set at AST $1,950.00 LS N/A N/A New 1-1/2" Gasoline Double Contained UG Fuel Piping $40.00 LF 50 $2,000 Fittings for 1-1/2" Fuel Supply Piping $950.00 LS N/A N/A New Aboveground Piping and Fittings (welded steel) $60.00 LF N/A N/A New 2" Diesel Supply Piping Valve Set at AST $2,950.00 LS N/A N/A New 2" Diesel Double Contained UG Fuel Piping $50.00 LF 50 $2,500 Fittings for 2" Fuel Supply Piping $1,450.00 LS N/A N/A New Single Product Dual Hose Nozzle Dispenser $11,000.00 EA 2 $22,000 New Dispenser Sump $1,500.00 EA 2 $3,000 New Fixed Speed Submersible Pump $2,500.00 EA 2 $5,000 New Submersible Pump Controller $1,750.00 EA 2 $3,500 New Clock Gauge $750.00 EA N/A N/A Spill Kits $1,000.00 EA 1 $1,000 Signage $1,500.00 LS 1 $1,500 Fuel Management System Integrated Fuel Management System w/ New Fuel Island Terminal $15,000.00 LS 1 $15,000 Tank Monitoring S sy terns New OMNTEC Tank Monitoring System w/ Software $8,500.00 EA 1 $8,500 New Automatic Tank Gauge Probe $1,400.00 EA 2 $2,800 New Interstitial Sensor $350.00 EA 1 $350 New OP Chamber Sensor $350.00 EA N/A N/A New Dispenser Sump Sensor $350.00 EA 2 $700 New Transition/Tank Top Sump Sensor $350.00 EA 2 $700 Canopy New 28' x 32' Pre -Fab Canopy, Foundations, w/ LED Lighting $75,000.00 LS 1 $75,000 General Construction and Site Work Granular Fill and Compaction $35.00 CY 230 $8,058 Paving Restoration/Re-grading $5.50 SF 5,000 $27,500 Tank Pad Concrete $400.00 CY 10 $3,951 New Stainless Steel Island Forms $3,500.00 EA 1 $3,500 Drive Lane and Island Concrete $400.00 CY 28 $11,062 Concrete Transfer Containment Pad $400.00 CY N/A N/A Protective Bollards - 6" diameter $750.00 EA N/A N/A Protective Bollards - 8" diameter HD $850.00 EA 4 $3,400 New Chain Link Security Fencing - 8' $125.00 LF N/A N/A New 5' Slide Gate $1,500.00 EA N/A N/A General Construction & Labor $7,500.00 WK 8 $60,000 Electrical Electrical Construction UST $110,000.00 LS 1 $110,000.00 Mob/Demob/Submittals/Project Closeout $10,000 Demolition $25,750 New Fleet Fueling System $479,270 Subtotal $515,020 Administration, Bonds, Insurance (10%) $51,500 *Contingency Factor (40%) $206,000 Construction Estimate $772,520 PROJECT ESTIMATE $772,600 Notes: *Additional contingency to account for increase in costs due to unknown market conditions Attachment 5 — Wetland Impact Assessment • Site Location #1 Wetland Impact: o Delineated wetland exists in this location — per site survey provided by Town in RFP. o Aerial images and site photos confirm wetland presence. o Wetland isn't identified as a NYSDEC mapped freshwater wetland; wetland is assumed to be under federal jurisdiction. ■ Hydrologic connection into and out of wetland area is confirmed by aerials. o Disturbance to wetland would be permitted by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under Section 404 of Clean Water Act and by NYSDEC under Section 401 of Clean Water Act. o A Joint Application for Permit (JAP) process would be completed to obtain the necessary state and federal permits (required due to the assumed wetland impact). o Wetland impacts below 0.5-acre could be permitted by the USACE under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit. ■ An alternatives analysis would need to be provided as part of the JAP — showing why other locations that would incur no or less wetland impact were not selected . o Wetland impacts over 0.10-acre would require federal wetland mitigation (replacement of lost wetland functions and values within the watershed). o The replacement ratio would be determined through coordination with the USACE, but is typically a 2:1 (new wetland to impacted wetland). 0 2 options for wetland mitigation: ■ In -Lieu Free (ILF) Program payment: lump sum payment to an approved ILF program; no other Applicant responsibilities. Typically costs—$98,000 per credit (1 credit typically = 1 acre); for example, a wetland impact of 0.5-acre would require purchase of 1 credit using a 2:1 mitigation ratio. ■ Permittee-responsible Mitigation: wetland creation somewhere within the watershed. • Sometimes new property acquisition is required if the Applicant does not already own a suitable site for creation of new wetland. • Requires additional site investigations and design to layout the new wetland site. • Wetland creation also comes with a 5 to 10-year post -creation monitoring requirement that is the responsibility of the Applicant. • If the new wetland does not meet the performance criteria established in the federal permit, additional corrective action may be needed at the Applicant's expense. Attachment 6 — Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1- Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1— Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1— Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility Fueling Station Project Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 114 Seven Mile Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 33.-2-6.1 Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action involves the removal and disposal of an existing above -ground, 6,000 gallon dual compartment fuel tank, wood canopy, and appurtenances; and the construction/installation of an underground, 8,000 gallon dual compartment tank, along with a metal roof canopy and associated appurtenances. The new equipment will be located in the same general location as the existing facility ("Location 4"- as identified in the report titled "Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project," prepared by Barton & Loguidice, dated October 2022). The proposed action will require area variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, pursuant to sections 270-56.0 (accessory structure aggregate) and 270-61 (building lot coverage). Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 607-273-1721 E-Mail: rhowe@town.ithaca.ny.us Town of Ithaca - Rod Howe, Town Supervisor Address: 215 North Tioga Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Ithaca NY 14850 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: ZBA variance(s), Town of Ithaca building permits, NYS DEC permit ❑ 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 11.73 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.34+/- acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 11.73 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑ Urban ❑✓ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑✓ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑✓ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑ Parkland Page, 11 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A F-1 Fv-1 El E1_ El Fv-1 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES F-1 Fv-1 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES Fv-1 F-1 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES Fv-1 F-1 0- Z 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: N/A NO YES F-1 F-1 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: N/A NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES Fv-1 El 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES 1:1 Rl- RI Page, 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑ Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional 0 Wetland ✓❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? USFWS website reports potential for northern long-eared bat NO YES ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Rod Howe Date: Signature: Title: Town Supervisor PRINT FORM 1 Page' „3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, October 11, 2022 3:14 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. ( PSI e,.aIt eaf r y� 1y T Iorwit X ./yq qx bIYItl4II Ii�� NI G P EaiW�l ".�i�u�+f'I9�rlm 61 Ali I�IJ;,l;;it,i �/' �, - FIE'utf�mu��m�uan�lry p�f�lr ,awnin I FIR,Cau it _I q �,i� l'dlEll,. Esn China (Hong Ve,,;r��fij E,n !E=r�,�IEPIT�F�1���� �,I i E )), J�p��z,I � I,IEII�,Eal7 �. ��a ,, r�t�i�n �,.I�°I'FEIIE��1TF Ins,.11 �, B ri iTrai 1, nd), hJ ���_ , N!-.) c w7_,� w h�l'' wL. ar I7 L���tr�ar� I �fial tl°7 c S,l � l_I air :,,gal �r rrr �u � I C Y.� 7a t�Ydh, �� C'ol rtn Lf" '+r Ywaf'k allph [a in (K.'wirl I(drlll:�N, E d cil S U ser f �0l'nIII Lllll Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Bartol`:i. WW IOa't011all I CHOgUdce.com Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1- Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1— Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1— Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility Fueling Station Project Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 114 Seven Mile Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 33.-2-6.1 Brief Description of Proposed Action: The proposed action involves the removal and disposal of an existing above -ground, 6,000 gallon dual compartment fuel tank, wood canopy, and appurtenances; and the construction/installation of an underground, 8,000 gallon dual compartment tank, along with a metal roof canopy and associated appurtenances. The new equipment will be located in the same general location as the existing facility ("Location 4"- as identified in the report titled "Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project," prepared by Barton & Loguidice, dated October 2022). The proposed action will require area variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, pursuant to sections 270-56.0 (accessory structure aggregate) and 270-61 (building lot coverage). The action will also require a height variance, pursuant to section 270-59. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 607-273-1721 E-Mail: rhowe@town.ithaca.ny.us Town of Ithaca - Rod Howe, Town Supervisor Address: 215 North Tioga Street City/PO: State: Zip Code: Ithaca NY 14850 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: ZBA variance(s), Town of Ithaca building permits, NYS DEC permit ❑ 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 11.73 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.34+/- acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 11.73 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑ Urban ❑✓ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑✓ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑✓ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑ Parkland Page, 11 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A F-1 Fv-1 El E1_ El Fv-1 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES F-1 Fv-1 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES Fv-1 F-1 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES Fv-1 F-1 0- Z 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: N/A NO YES F-1 F-1 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: N/A NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES Fv-1 El 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES 1:1 Rl- RI Page, 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑ Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional 0 Wetland ✓❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? USFWS website reports potential for northern long-eared bat NO YES ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Rod Howe Date: Signature: Title: Town Supervisor PRINT FORM 1 Page' „3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, October 11, 2022 3:14 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. ( PSI e,.aIt eaf r y� 1y T Iorwit X ./yq qx bIYItl4II Ii�� NI G P EaiW�l ".�i�u�+f'I9�rlm 61 Ali I�IJ;,l;;it,i �/' �, - FIE'utf�mu��m�uan�lry p�f�lr ,awnin I FIR,Cau it _I q �,i� l'dlEll,. Esn China (Hong Ve,,;r��fij E,n !E=r�,�IEPIT�F�1���� �,I i E )), J�p��z,I � I,IEII�,Eal7 �. ��a ,, r�t�i�n �,.I�°I'FEIIE��1TF Ins,.11 �, B ri iTrai 1, nd), hJ ���_ , N!-.) c w7_,� w h�l'' wL. ar I7 L���tr�ar� I �fial tl°7 c S,l � l_I air :,,gal �r rrr �u � I C Y.� 7a t�Ydh, �� C'ol rtn Lf" '+r Ywaf'k allph [a in (K.'wirl I(drlll:�N, E d cil S U ser f �0l'nIII Lllll Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: PWF Fueling Station Project Date: October 17, 2022 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? ❑✓ ❑ 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑� ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑� El 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the RI F-1 establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? ❑✓ ❑ b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? PRINT FORM Paget of2 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: rPWF Fueling Station Project Date: October 17, 2022 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Ithaca Town Board Name of Lead Agency Rod Howe Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Town Supervisor Title of Responsible Officer Christine Balestra Signat parer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 — Determination of Significance Proposed Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility Fuel Station Project — October 2022 The project involves replacing an existing fuel station, including an above -ground fuel tank, canopy, and related appurtenances, with a new fuel station that includes a larger, underground tank, canopy, and related appurtenances. The project is located at the Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility, which contains multiple buildings, accessory structures, trucks, equipment, and stockpiles of mulch, gravel, and other materials. The proposed fuel station will be in the same general area as the existing station but will have an underground tank and larger canopy than the existing station. Replacing the existing fuel station with a larger station will not change the use or increase the intensity of the existing use of the property. The use of the property will remain a municipal facility. The larger fuel station will increase the capacity of the municipality to serve its constituents with an appropriately sized facility to fuel municipal trucks and other diesel/gas-powered equipment. The proposed canopy, at 900+/- square feet in area and 19+/- feet in height, will be located approximately 500+/- feet from Seven Mile Drive, behind the main Public Works building, and adjacent to the existing salt barn. The canopy will not be visible from public view, given the juxtaposition between it and the existing salt barn (it will blend in with the barn roofline). Any proposed outdoor lighting will comply with the town's Outdoor Lighting Law. Therefore, the project is not expected to create significant adverse aesthetic impacts. The decision to replace the above -ground fuel tank with an underground tank will result in lower site disturbance than if it were replaced with another above -ground tank. The project will require the installation of sediment and erosion controls during the construction phase that will mitigate any potential environmental impacts. The proposal will require three variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals: one to exceed the aggregate area permitted for accessory structures in the Low Density Residential Zone (2,000s.f. permitted, 21,691s.f. with the new canopy — existing variance granted for 21,356s.f.), one to exceed the amount of lot area that is covered by buildings and structures (10% permitted, 10.4% proposed — existing variance granted for the current lot coverage of 10.3%), and one to exceed the height limit of 15' ( top of canopy proposed height of 19' above grade). The proposal otherwise complies with all Town Code provisions. The property has received variances in the past, due to its unique nature as a public works facility and not a residential use. The proposed variances are not expected to create significant adverse environmental impacts, as the proposed increases are minor, and the project will involve minimal site disturbance. Regarding Part 1, question 12b - According to the NYS Historic Preservation Office Cultural Resources Information System, the entire area surrounding Cayuga Lake in the City and Town of Ithaca, could potentially contain archaeological sites deemed sensitive. However, the area proposed for the new fuel station contains an existing fuel station, pavement, structures, and utilities. Given that the land has been highly disturbed, any archaeologically sensitive materials would have been discovered with prior disturbances. Regarding Part 1, question 13a - There is an existing stream located along the southern property line, approximately 150+/- feet south of the project. There is also a wetland listed on the National Wetland Inventory located in the same area of the stream, approximately 215+/- feet from project. The project will include proper stormwater and drainage controls to mitigate any impacts to the stream and wetland. Regarding Part 1, question 15 - The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) website indicates that the entire area surrounding Cayuga Lake in the City and Town of Ithaca might contain suitable habitat for the northern long- eared bat, a threatened species that has been suffering from fatal white -nose syndrome disease since 2015. The bats live in caves and mines, underneath tree bark, and in the cavities of live and dead trees. According to the USFWS, northern long-eared bats rarely roost in human structures like barns and sheds. The Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility, and specifically the area proposed for the new fuel tank, has been highly disturbed and does not contain habitat suitable for the northern long-eared bat. Therefore, the proposal is not expected to have any impact on the species. Given the analysis above, the proposed action will not result in significant environmental impacts. Item 05a MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - : SEOR Determination — Public Works Facility Fueling Station Project Whereas, this Action is the removal and disposal of an existing above ground 6,000-gallon dual compartment tank, wood canopy, and appurtenances; and construction/installation of an underground, 8,000-gallon dual compartment tank, metal roof canopy, and associated appurtenances at Location 4 as identified in the "Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project" Engineering Report, dated October 2022; and Whereas this is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board, acting in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to the project, now therefore be it Resolved that the Town Board makes a negative determination of environmental significance, in accordance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act for the above -referenced Action as proposed, based on the information in the SEAF Part 1, and for the reasons set forth in Parts 2 and 3. Moved: Seconded: Vote: Item 05b MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD Monday, October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - : Award and authorization to sign a contract with Barton & Loguidice for the Final Design and Bid Phase Services associated with the Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project Whereas, the Town Board authorized the award of Part A of the Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project (Project) to Barton and Loguidice, D.P.0 (B&L) in May 2022, and an amended fee and scope of work in September 2022; and Whereas, as part of Part A of the Project, the Town Board was presented with four conceptual designs/locations, including above ground and buried tank options and recommendations and cost estimates for each, and Whereas the Town Board has chosen the option of an 8,000 gallon, buried tank at Location 4; and Whereas, the Town Board has determined it is appropriate to proceed with Part B of the Project, Final Design and Bid Phase, and Whereas, Barton & Loguidice has submitted a revised proposal for Part B services, dated October 11, 2022, for a fixed fee of $46,500 for design services and geotechnical borings and reports; and Whereas, the Town Engineer has reviewed the proposal and recommends it to the Town Board, and Whereas this is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board, acting in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to the project, has on October 17, 2022, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by the Town Planning Department staff, now therefore be it Resolved, that the Town Board authorizes the Supervisor to sign all necessary documents associated with the award of Part B of the Project to Barton and Loguidice, D.P.C, as submitted, and be it further Resolved that the Director of Engineering is authorized to approve contract amendments not to exceed $5,000 in aggregate, with no further action needed by the Town Board. Moved: Seconded: Vote: ayes — Town of Ithaca and Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. Services Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 2022 between the TOWN OF ITHACA, with offices at 215 N. Tioga St., Ithaca, NY 14850 (hereinafter referred to as the "Town"), and BARTON & LOGUIDICE, D.P.C., whose address is 443 Electronics Parkway, Liverpool, New York 13088 (hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer"). The Town and Engineer agree as follows: Services to be Performed. Engineer agrees to perform the Part B Detailed Construction Drawings and Specifications Preparation services for the Town as set forth in the Town's Request for Proposal entitled " Design Option Analysis And Detailed Construction Drawing(s) Preparation For The Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project" dated March 22nd, 2022 (the "RFP"), and in Engineer's April 20, 2022 Proposal (the "Proposal") submitted in response to the RFP. Services to be performed by the Engineer and tasks schedule are further detailed in the October 11, 2022 "Proposal for Professional Engineering Services, Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project, Part B Design: Detailed Construction Drawings and Specifications" (the "Part B Proposal") addressed to Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. The RFP and Proposal are attached as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The Part B Proposal is attached as Exhibit C. The Part B services include, but are not limited to, the following: 0=3 • Perform and provide soils investigations and report • Prepare preliminary, advanced detail (approx. 95% detail phase), and final construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates for Location 4. • Prepare preliminary and final demolition plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the removal of the existing fuel station. • Prepare and obtain all necessary permits and associated documents. • Prepare "Bid Ready" final construction plans and bid documents for the project, sealed by a Professional Engineer who is licensed and registered to practice in the State of New York. • Provide all associated erosion control plans and stormwater protection details. • Provide the Town with an electronic CAD file of the detailed plans and specifications. 2. Fees. Engineer shall be paid a fixed fee of $36,500.00 for services provided to complete the Petroleum Bulk Storage Assessment and Design Phase, which shall be inclusive of all travel, time and expenses associated with providing these services to the Town. Engineer shall be paid a fee not to exceed of $10,000.00 for services provided for the Geotechnical Borings and Report. Payments will be made in accordance with the procedures in Section 5 below. 3. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be from 2022 to January 01, 2023 unless earlier terminated by either party. Notwithstanding the term set forth above, this Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time without cause upon seven (7) days prior written notice to the other party, in which case the Engineer shall be paid pro rata for the satisfactory work performed to the date of termination. This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either party upon the breach of any of its terms by the other party. Termination shall be effected by the breaching party's receipt of a written notice of termination setting forth the manner in which the party is in default. In the event of the Town's termination for Engineer's default, the Engineer will be paid only for services performed in accordance with this Agreement. If it is later determined by the Town that the Engineer had an excusable reason for not performing, such as a strike, fire, flood, or other events which are not the fault of or are beyond the control of Engineer, the Town may allow the Engineer to continue work, or treat the termination as a termination without cause. 4. Quality of Work. The work to be performed hereunder shall be of good workmanship and quality. If this Agreement is for the performance of services, the Engineer shall perform its services using that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by experienced, qualified, competent and reputable professionals practicing in the same field in the same or similar locality at the time of performance. 5. Payment for Services. Requests for payments for services shall be submitted on the standard Town voucher, which will list the activities or products, expenses, the dates on which performed, supplied or incurred, and, if applicable, the time spent on each indicated date for which the Town is being billed. Payments will be made on a monthly basis, based on a schedule set by Engineer and Town. All requests for payment will be submitted 5 days prior to the Town Board Voucher Deadline (typically the 1st and 3rd. Wednesday of every month) for review by Town. Payments for fixed fee tasks will be made based on the percentage of work completed for each task. Payments for the Geotechnical Borings and Report shall be based on the subcontractor cost to perform the services with an additional 15% administrative fee. 2 The Town Board will review the vouchers and, if acceptable, pay for the services and/or products after approval of the vouchers by the Town Board in compliance with the Town Board's statutory duties to audit claims for payment. In no event will the total payments to Engineer exceed the fee amounts stated in Section 2 above. 6. Relationship. The Engineer is, for all purposes (including, without limitation, withholding of income tax, payment of workman's compensation, and payment of FICA taxes) an independent Engineer and no employer -employee relationship is intended, implied or created by this Agreement. Engineer shall determine the times and manner of performance of any services for the Town hereunder consistent with the overall obligations to complete the work contemplated by this Agreement. Engineer shall be free to devote such portions of its time not required for the performance of services to the Town in such manner as Engineer sees fit and for such other persons, firms, or entities as Engineer deems advisable, provided that such other services do not constitute a conflict of interest with the interests of the Town. 7. Ownership of Products of Service. All work products of any services to be performed hereunder shall be the property of the Town, and the Town is vested with all rights therein, including the right to use, duplicate, distribute, share or sell such materials, without any further compensation of any nature to Engineer. If patents or copyrights may be obtained with respect to such work, the Town shall own same and have all rights to same without further compensation to the Engineer. The Engineer also retains the right to use the work products. Any reuse of the work product not for their intended purpose shall be at the sole risk to the Town. 8. Insurance Requirements. A. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Engineer shall procure and maintain the insurance described in this Section 8. B. Notwithstanding any terms, conditions or provisions in any other writing between the parties, Engineer hereby agrees to effectuate the naming of the Town as an additional insured on Engineer's insurance policies, with the exception of workers' compensation and professional liability. C. The policies naming the Town as an additional insured shall: ■ Be an insurance policy from an A.M. Best rated "secured" or better, New York State admitted insurer. ■ State that the Engineer's coverage shall be primary coverage for the Town, its Boards, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. ■ The Town shall be listed as an additional insured by using endorsement CG 2010 or broader. The certificate must state that this endorsement is being used. If another endorsement is used, a copy shall be included with the certificate of insurance. ■ Be written on an occurrence basis. D. The Engineer agrees to indemnify the Town for any applicable deductibles. E. Required Insurance: ■ Commercial General Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. The general aggregate shall apply on a per -project basis. ■ Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit for owned, hired and borrowed and non -owned motor vehicles. ■ Workers' Compensation and N.Y.S. Disability Statutory Workers' Compensation, Employers' Liability and N.Y.S. Disability Benefits Insurance for all employees. ■ Excess Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate, with the Town named as the additional insured. ■ Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the professional acts of the Engineer performed under this Agreement. F. The insurance producer must indicate whether or not it is an agent for the companies providing the coverage. G. Engineer acknowledges that failure to obtain such insurance on behalf of the Town constitutes a material breach of contract and subjects it to liability for damages, indemnification and all other legal remedies available to the Town. The Engineer is to provide the Town with a certificate of insurance, evidencing the above requirements have been met, prior to the commencement of work or use of facilities. The failure of the Town to object to the contents of the certificate or the absence of same shall not be deemed a waiver of any and all rights held by the Town. H. The Town is a member/owner of the NY Municipal Insurance Reciprocal (NYMIR). The Engineer further acknowledges that the procurement of such insurance as required herein is intended to benefit not only the Town but also the NYMIR, as the Town's insurer. 9. Workers Compensation and Disability Insurance. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Engineer shall present to the Town proof either that the Engineer provides the levels of workers' compensation and disability coverage required by the State of New York or that the Engineer is not required to provide such coverage. 10. Indemnity. The Engineer agrees to fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Town, its elected officials, public officers, employees, and agents from and against all claims, actions, suits, demands, complaints, damages, liabilities, obligations, losses, settlements, judgments, governmental investigations, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs), whether or not involving a third party claim, which any or all of 91 them may incur, resulting from bodily injuries (or death) to any person, damage (including loss of use) to any property, other damages, or contamination of or adverse effects on the environment, to the extent caused by or arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Engineer or Engineer's employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with this Agreement. To the extent the Town is negligent, Engineer's duty to indemnify the Town shall not extend to the proportion of loss attributable to the Town's negligence. 11. Engineer May Not Assign. This Agreement may not be assigned by the Engineer without the previous written consent to such assignment from the Town, which consent may be withheld entirely at the discretion of the Town, it being understood that the Town is making this Agreement personally with the Engineer and is not intending that it be performed by any other person or entity. 12. Binding Nature of Agreement. This Agreement is binding upon the parties, their respective representatives and successors and, when assignment is permitted, assigns. 13. Governina Law. Jurisdiction. and Enforcement. This Agreement is made in New York, and shall be construed under the laws of the State of New York without regard to, or the application of, New York State's choice of law provisions. Both parties consent that if any action is brought to enforce this Agreement, it shall be brought only in an appropriate Court in Tompkins County, New York, and both parties consent to the jurisdiction of such court. 14. Notices. Any notices or other communications given under or in relation to this Agreement shall be deemed duly given if served personally or by commercial courier service upon the other party at the address set forth above, or, if the mails are operating, mailed by certified mail to the other party at the address set forth above, return receipt requested. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. Either party may change the address to which notices are sent by giving notice of such change in the manner set forth above to the other party. 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements, negotiations or understandings, existing between the parties. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by each party. 16. Survival. The rights and obligations of the respective parties under Section 10 (Indemnity), Section 12 (Binding Nature of Agreement), Section 13 (Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Enforcement), and Section 17 (Claims and Disputes Arbitration) shall survive the expiration or termination (for any reason) of this Agreement and remain in full force and effect. 17. Claims and Disputes Arbitration. The Town may elect to subject disputes arising out of this Agreement to resolution by mediation or arbitration or litigation. This election can be made at any time up until sixty (60) days after the claim or dispute arises in writing. If the Town does not make an election, the dispute shall be subject only to litigation. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties at the time of such election, the rules governing mediation or arbitration invoked by the Town shall be the Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association. Engineer hereby waives the right to elect the method of dispute resolution and agrees that this waiver is supported by sufficient and appropriate consideration. 18. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is deemed to be invalid or inoperative for any reason, that part may be modified by the parties to the extent necessary to make it valid and operative, or if it cannot be so modified, then it shall be deemed severed, and the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if this Agreement had been signed with the invalid portion so modified or eliminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written below. TOWN OF ITHACA in Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. ENGINEER 0 Rod Howe, Name: Scott D. Nostrand, P.E. Town Supervisor Senior Vice President Date: Date: 2 Exhibit A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES DESIGN OPTION ANALYSIS AND DETAILED CONSTRUCTION DRAWING(S) PREPARATION FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY FUELING STATION DESIGN PROJECT LOCATED AT TOWN OF ITHACA 114 SEVEN MILE DR, ITHACA, NY 14850 TOMPKINS COUNTY 1 plllll1i1u111 M�l REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TOWN OF ITHACA PUBLIC WORKS FACILIITY FUELING STATION DESIGN PROJECT Table of Contents: A. Purpose B. Background —3 3 C. Issuing Office 3 D. Scope of Services 3-5 E. Agreement 5 F. Insurance 5 G. Rejection of Proposals —5 H. Incurred Cost 5 I. Addenda to the RFP 5 J. Completeness of the Submitted Proposal 5-6 K. Consultant Responsibilities 6 L. Acceptance of RFP Content 6 M. Compensation 6 N. Schedule Dates 6 O. Responses P. Pre -Proposal Meeting -7 —7 Q. Non -Collusion 7 R. Consultant Evaluation 7-8 S. Additional Information 8 T. Conflict of Interest 8 Appendices: Exhibit A -Sample Engineering Services Agreement Exhibit B-Non-Collusive Certification Exhibit C- Site Map, dated 3/9/2022 Exhibit D-Photos of Existing Fuel Station Exhibit E-Sample CAD Data 2 General Information and Proposal Requirements A. Purpose The purpose of this "Request for Proposal' (RFP) is to solicit professional engineering firms (hereinafter called "Consultants") for detailed Proposals to perform the design option analysis, engineering, permitting, and detailed construction drawing preparation for the Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project. The fueling station provides unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel to the towns over road and off road equipment and vehicle fleet. The Engineer Selection Committee will review the Proposals and make a recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board, based upon an evaluation of the following criteria: recent related project experience, personnel assigned to the project (Project Team), understanding of the project, schedule for completion, estimate of hours and fixed fee associated with Part A, and estimate of hours and fees associated with Part B. An interview between the Consultants and the Engineer Selection Committee (April 26' thru April 28') may be required prior to a final recommendation. Final selection of a Design Consultant will be made by the Town of Ithaca Town Board. B. Background The Public Works Facility is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the town's potable water, sanitary sewer, storm sewers, and road infrastructure systems. The facility is an Emergency Operations Center. The facility is connected to an onsite generator. The existing fueling station was installed around 1994. The station has one above ground tank that has a 3,000 gallon unleaded fuel compartment and a 3,000 gallon on road diesel compartment. The tank is located within a steel containment system. The containment system is rapidly deteriorating. A wood structure roof system is installed over the tank and containment system. Fuel Master Fuel Management system is being utilized and has been recently upgraded to keep the station operational till a new station can be built. The station has one dispenser. The location of the existing station can be reviewed on the site map located in Exhibit C. Photographs of the existing station can be reviewed in Exhibit D. There are no known violations occurring. There are no known issues with the system except for the deterioration of the containment system that has been visually observed. C. Issuing Office This RFP was prepared for the Town of Ithaca Town Board by the Town of Ithaca Engineering Department. The project representative for the Public Works Facility Fueling Design Project is Daniel Thaete, P.E., Director of Engineering. D. Scope of Services The primary objective of the project will be to design and prepare three (3) preliminary design options and prepare detailed construction plans, specifications, and obtain permits for the construction and installation of the chosen option. Each option shall have a canopy with a minimum clearance height of 14' and the ability to fuel two items simultaneously from opposing sides of a pump. The Consultant shall provide an overall Fixed Fee cost to perform the scope of services identified for Part A. The Consultant shall provide an estimate of hours, along with corresponding hourly billing rates, to determine a price not to exceed for scope of services identified in Part B. Part A: Design Option Analysis: • The town will provide a DWG file that contains topographic information, wetland and stream locations, existing utility locations, and property boundaries. Exhibit E contains a map created from this file. • Review fleet fuel usage and provide recommendations on 2 day, 4 day, and 6 day fuel storage tank sizes. The fleet is composed of approximately 17 heavy duty/equipment trucks, 30 light duty truck and passenger vehicles, and 25 mixed use equipment. If a catastrophic event/ emergency were to occur and fuel could not be delivered, the tanks needs to be of adequate size to allow the facility to operate. • Review fire suppression and alarm requirements. If an alarm is required, review the existing Public Works alarm system to determine expandability/upgrade requirements to incorporate the fueling station. • Provide information regarding the use of above ground vs. below ground storage tanks. The information shall include: ■ Initial construction costs and long term maintenance cost comparisons ■ Regulatory/inspection requirement differences • Evaluate the 3 Proposed Fuel Station Locations outlined on the site map located in Exhibit C and provide a summary of the findings. The evaluation shall review/provide the following items at each location, at a minimum: ■ Accessibility for town equipment and vehicles. Analyze and provide turning moving templates for each location utilizing vehicles that are representative and similar to the make and model 10-wheel plow trucks and tractor and low bed trailer the town utilizes. ■ Security/tamper resistance ■ Site lighting and canopy impacts ■ Review location characteristics, topography, and constructability. ■ Review permitting requirements and environmental impacts. ■ Review local zoning requirements. ■ Preliminary design and cost estimate for the construction of the fuel island, tanks, canopy, utilities, and all other associated components. The fuel management system shall be compatible with our existing Fuel Master Fuel Management System. • Provide a cost analysis for the demolition of the existing fueling station and identify all necessary permits, approvals, and/or monitoring requirements. • Consultant will meet with the Public Works/Engineering staff to review progress. The Consultant should plan on a minimum of four (4) progress meetings; (3) three with staff and one (1) meeting with the Public Works Committee to present all three (3) options. • A professional engineer registered in New York shall prepare an engineering report after the Public Works Committee meeting. The report shall outline the items listed above and associated findings and recommendations. The report shall be stamped by the engineer. The fee shall include two revisions to the report. • Consult shall prepare documents and drawings necessary for submission to a Sketch Plan review by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board (assume one (1) evening meeting). • Consultant shall prepare appropriate State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) documents • Consult shall revise the previously mentioned report with recommendations from town staff and comments from the Planning Board Meeting. This report will be utilized as the Map, Plan, and Report for the Town Board • Present final (chosen) option to the Town of Ithaca Town Board (assume one (1) evening meeting). Part B: Detailed Construction Drawings and Specifications Preparation: (Part B cannot be authorized to move forward until the Town has completed the appropriate Permissive Referendum Requirements as outlined in Article 12 and 12C of New York Town Law.) • (If elected from the findings of Part A) Perform and provide soils investigations and report • Prepare preliminary, advanced detail (approx. 95% detail phase), and final construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the chosen option. • Prepare preliminary and final demolition plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the removal of the existing fuel station. • Prepare and obtain all necessary permits and associated documents. • Prepare "Bid Ready" final construction plans and bid documents for the project, sealed by a Professional Engineer who is licensed and registered to practice in the State of New York. • Provide all associated erosion control plans and stormwater protection details. • Provide the Town with an electronic CAD file of the detailed plans and specifications. Town of Ithaca Staff will provide: • Conduct public information meetings to update stakeholders on the status of the project (if required). • Project construction administration/inspection. • Provide construction phase services as the Engineer of Record for the project. Notice is hereby given that any on -site construction inspection and materials testing services necessary during the time of construction of the project will be work that is separate from and shall not be included in the work performed under this RFP. The On -site construction inspection and materials testing services during the time of construction of the project may be contracted under a separate RFP, or may be performed using the town's existing Engineering staff. E. Agreement The Consultant selected to provide the above -referenced services will be expected to enter into a contract Engineering Services Agreement with the Town of Ithaca (refer to Sample Engineering Services Agreement -Exhibit A) attached hereto. F. Insurance The Consultant shall maintain minimum insurance coverage as outlined in the Agreement. ( Refer to Sample Engineering Services Agreement -Exhibit A, attached hereto). G. Rejection of Proposals The Town of Ithaca reserves the right to reject any and all of the responses received as a result of this RFP. The Town of Ithaca does not intend to award a contract solely on the basis of responses to this RFP or otherwise pay for the information solicited or obtained in response to this RFP. H. Incurred Cost The Town of Ithaca will not be liable for any cost incurred by the Consultant for any work performed through, and including the execution of, a contract for professional services prior to the execution of a contract. L Addenda to the RFP In the event that it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, a copy of all addenda will be sent via email to all Consultants of record. It is the responsibility of the Consultant to check their email for addenda. The final date for posting addenda to the Website will be five (5) working days prior to the due date of the Proposal. J. Completeness of the Submitted Proposal 1. The Proposal shall address all items completely and thoroughly, in an 8'/z" x I F format, and shall be signed by an officer of the firm authorized to bind the Consultant to its provisions. 2. The contents and commitments in the Proposal shall remain firm for ninety (90) calendar days from the submittal due date. 3. Debarment - By submitting a RFP, the Consultant certifies that it is not currently debarred from submitting bids for contracts issued by any political subdivision or agency of the State of New York and that it is not an agent of a person or entity that is currently debarred from submitting bids or contracts issued by any political subdivision or agency of the State of New York. K. Consultant Responsibilities The Consultant shall be capable of providing all professional services as described under the Scope of Services and to maintain those capabilities until notification that their Proposal was unsuccessful. Exclusion of any service for the project may serve as cause for rejection. L. Acceptance of RFP Content The Proposals presented will be evaluated by the Engineer's Selection Committee. The Proposals will be scored on the basis of the following: 1. Recent related project experience with this type of Engineering work 2. Listing personnel to be assigned to this work 3. Consultant's understanding of the project 4. The proposed timeframe for completion of the design project and man-hours by tasks 5. Fixed fee 6. Estimate of hours and fees associated with Part B Final recommendations of the highest-ranking firm(s) will be made by the Selection Committee and subsequent Town of Ithaca Town Board. Final approval to contract with a design consultant will be made by Resolution of the Town of Ithaca Town Board. M. Compensation The fixed fee for the analysis and preliminary design phase (Part A) shall be based upon hourly labor and overhead cost to perform all aspects of the contract, including Consultants. (if required) N. Schedule Dates The following is an anticipated schedule for the RFP process. The Town of Ithaca reserves the right to modify any part of this schedule: Part A: Advertise Request for Proposal (RFP) March 22 d, 2022 Pre -Proposal Meeting (Optional) Aril 081h, 2022 Proposal Due April 201h, 2022 (4:00 p.m. EST) Interview/Presentation if requested) Aril 261h thru 28rh 2022 Consultant Selected May 9rh, 2022 Contract Negotiations & Notice to May 20rh, 2022 Proceed Public Works Committee Review and Site July 19rh, 2022 Selection Planning Board Sketch Plan Review (Evening Meeting; Requires Submission August 16', 2022 21 Days Prior) Town of Ithaca Town Board Presentation August 22" d, 2022 Part B: Timeline to be established once the agreement is revised and executed. O. Responses To be considered, five (5) hard copies of the Proposal and one (1) digital must be submitted to the Town of Ithaca Town Clerk no later than 4:00 p.m. April 20th, 2022, and should be addressed as follows: Office of the Town Clerk Town of Ithaca, Town Hall 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 RE: Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project Consultants mailing their Proposals shall allow normal mail delivery time to assure timely receipt. P. Pre -Proposal Meeting An optional pre -proposal conference will be held at the Ithaca Public Works Facilities, 114 Seven Mile Drive, Ithaca NY at 10:00 am, local time, on April 81h , 2022. A Town representative will be present to discuss the RFP. Consultants are encouraged to attend and participate in the conference. Town representative will transmit to all prospective consultants of record, such Addenda, as considered necessary in response to questions arising at the conference. Oral statements may not be relied upon and will not be binding or legally effective. Q. Non -Collusion The Consultant shall be required to submit, with its Proposal, a fully executed Non -Collusion Statement: Exhibit-B attached hereto. R. Consultant Evaluation Proposals should be complete, but concise. Consultants shall be available for Consultants will be evaluated on the following information: 1. Related Project Experience: Provide a list of related project experience with pertinent project information. Provide the name of the Project Manager for each similar project completed. Present the proposed budget and schedule for each project in comparison to the final cost and completion time. References should be provided for each project. 2. Personnel Assigned to Project (Project Team): Provide the name of the Project Manager to be assigned this work along with a description of their experience and expertise. This person will direct and coordinate all phases of the project. Also, list the names of other key members of the project team, including Environmental Specialists or Sub - Consultants, along with their experience and expertise. Personnel with experience in the design and construction of fuel station project are preferred. If selected, the naming of personnel as listed above will be considered by this office to be the design project team and will be expected to be assigned to the project for its duration. These personnel are also expected to be readily available by email, telephone, and in person. 3. Understanding of the Project: Provide a brief statement as to the Consultant's understanding of the project. Discuss the proposed planning, organization and management tools to be used to control schedule and costs. 4. Schedule for Completion: A progress schedule shall be provided demonstrating the time elements in relationship to each work task. This project schedule must consider all elements and their relationships, as described in the Project Background and Scope of Services. 5. Fixed Fee: The Cost Proposal for the work described in the Proposal shall be provided as a fixed amount. The Proposal shall provide a breakdown by task, staff hours, and hourly and material cost to produce a cost matrix for Part A of Section D of the Proposal. The purpose of the matrix is to produce an estimated project cost. The matrix will be used to review billings during the study as well as to compare the level of effort estimated for each task. Consultant will propose a total fixed amount, not to exceed figure that will be the maximum amount billed to the town. It need not match the matrix's estimated cost but will be a binding maximum, which includes reimbursables. 6. Estimate of Hours An estimate of hours and corresponding billing rates to complete the tasks outlined in the Scope of Services presented in Part B of Section D is required. The estimate is to be presented in a format that details the effort assigned to employees based on their classification. S. Additional Information The submission of additional pertinent information beyond the requirements of this RFP is acceptable. This would include the identification of any work not covered in the Scope of Services presented in Section D, together with an estimate of hours for the additional work that you believe is important or necessary to meet the project's objectives. T. Conflict of Interest The Consultant shall prepare and submit a statement that no conflict of interest issues exist at the submission of this Proposal. In addition, non -conflict of interest statements must also be provided for any sub consultant. Exhibit A Town of Ithaca and Services Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 2022 between the TOWN OF ITHACA, with offices at 215 N. Tioga St., Ithaca, NY 14850 (hereinafter referred to as the "Town"), and , whose address (hereinafter referred to as the "Engineer"). The Town and Engineer agree as follows: 1. Services to be Performed. Engineer agrees to perform the following services for the Town and/or to provide the following products to the Town: Part A: XXX Part B: Work under Part B is not yet authorized as work at this phase of the project depends upon what is defined as needed and what is approved by the Town after completion of Part A, including to discern whether and when the Town may opt to proceed with capital improvements, maintenance and repair work, or both or neither, depending on costs and the reported findings in the Part A report. If Part B is to be pursued, the scope of anticipated work to be authorized reads as follows: XXXX 2. Fees. Engineer shall be paid a fixed fee amount of XX for services provided in Part A, and a fee not to exceed XX for Part B including all travel, time and expenses associated with providing these services to the Town or as otherwise agreed upon. This payment will be made in accordance with the procedures in Section 5 below. Payment for Part B services are only due if the Town elects to proceed after delivery of Part A data, and Part B will be undertaken, in relation to the above services at the cost terms set forth below, with Part B information also informing any map -plan for capital improvements, if so required and elected by the Town. 3. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be from XXXX, 2022 to XXXX,2022 unless earlier terminated by either party. Notwithstanding the term set forth above, this Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time without cause upon seven (7) days prior written notice to the other party, in which case the Engineer shall be paid pro rata for the satisfactory work performed to the date of termination. This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either party upon the breach of any of its terms by the other party. Termination shall be effected by the breaching party's receipt of a written notice of termination setting forth the manner in which the party is in default. In the event of the Town's termination for Engineer's default, the Engineer will be paid only for services performed in accordance with this Agreement. If it is later determined by the Town that the Engineer had an excusable reason for not performing, such as a strike, fire, flood, or other events which are not the fault of or are beyond the control of Engineer, the Town may allow the Engineer to continue work, or treat the termination as a termination without cause. 4. Quality of Work. The work to be performed hereunder shall be of good workmanship and quality. If this Agreement is for the performance of services, the Engineer shall perform its services using that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by experienced, qualified, competent and reputable professionals practicing in the same field in the same or similar locality at the time of performance. 5. Payment for Services. Requests for payments for services shall be submitted on the standard Town voucher, which will list the activities or products, expenses, the dates on which performed, supplied or incurred, and, if applicable, the time spent on each indicated date for which the Town is being billed. Payments will be made on a monthly basis, based on a schedule set by Engineer and Town. All requests for payment will be submitted 5 days prior to the Town Board Voucher Deadline (typically the 1st and 3rd. Wednesday of every month) for review by Town. Part A: Payment will be made based on the proportion of the fixed amount earned for work satisfactorily completed as described in Section 1, Part A of this Agreement. �1:19 For the services listed in Section 1, Part B of this Agreement, Engineer shall be paid an amount not to exceed XX, which is based on the XX Team Hourly Estimate schedule set forth in Engineer's Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project Proposal dated XX,XXX (Copy attached hereto -Exhibit A). The amount due to Engineer shall be calculated according to the time actually expended by Engineer in the satisfactory performance of services of each task or for the satisfactory completion of each task, all at the rates set forth in Exhibit A. This not -to - exceed amount of XX includes complete compensation for all labor, materials, equipment, reasonable expenses, overhead, general administrative costs, and profit in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. The Engineer shall be paid only for so much of Part B as is elected by the Town based upon the scope of the report noted in Part A and the Town's approval of maintenance, repair, or capital improvements works. The Town Board will review the vouchers and, if acceptable, pay for the services and/or products after approval of the vouchers by the Town Board in compliance with the Town Board's statutory duties to audit claims for payment. 2 In no event will the total payments to Engineer exceed the fee amounts stated in Section 2 above. However, if as a result of the Part A report and the approvals or work ordered and approved by the Town for Part B is increased, such as for capital improvement projects, then the Town and the Engineer shall meet and update this agreement in accordance with any new scope of work. 6. Relationship. The Engineer is, for all purposes (including, without limitation, withholding of income tax, payment of workman's compensation, and payment of FICA taxes) an independent Engineer and no employer -employee relationship is intended, implied or created by this Agreement. Engineer shall determine the times and manner of performance of any services for the Town hereunder consistent with the overall obligations to complete the work contemplated by this Agreement. Engineer shall be free to devote such portions of its time not required for the performance of services to the Town in such manner as Engineer sees fit and for such other persons, firms, or entities as Engineer deems advisable, provided that such other services do not constitute a conflict of interest with the interests of the Town. 7. Ownership of Products of Service. All work products of any services to be performed hereunder shall be the property of the Town, and the Town is vested with all rights therein, including the right to use, duplicate, distribute, share or sell such materials, without any further compensation of any nature to Engineer. If patents or copyrights may be obtained with respect to such work, the Town shall own same and have all rights to same without further compensation to the Engineer. The Engineer also retains the right to use the work products. 8. Insurance Requirements. A. Throughout the term of this Agreement, Engineer shall procure and maintain the insurance described in this Section 8. B. Notwithstanding any terms, conditions or provisions in any other writing between the parties, Engineer hereby agrees to effectuate the naming of the Town as an unrestricted additional insured on Engineer's insurance policies, with the exception of workers' compensation and professional liability. C. The policies naming the Town as an additional insured shall: ■ Be an insurance policy from an A.M. Best rated "secured" or better, New York State admitted insurer. ■ State that the Engineer's coverage shall be primary coverage for the Town, its Boards, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. ■ The Town shall be listed as an additional insured by using endorsement CG 2010 or broader. The certificate must state that this endorsement is being used. If another endorsement is used, a copy shall be included with the certificate of insurance. ■ Be written on an occurrence basis. D. The Engineer agrees to indemnify the Town for any applicable deductibles. E. Required Insurance: ■ Commercial General Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. The general aggregate shall apply on a per -project basis. ■ Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit for owned, hired and borrowed and non -owned motor vehicles. ■ Workers' Compensation and N.Y.S. Disability Statutory Workers' Compensation, Employers' Liability and N.Y.S. Disability Benefits Insurance for all employees. ■ Excess Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate, with the Town named as the additional insured. ■ Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the professional acts of the Engineer performed under this Agreement. F. The insurance producer must indicate whether or not it is an agent for the companies providing the coverage. G. Engineer acknowledges that failure to obtain such insurance on behalf of the Town constitutes a material breach of contract and subjects it to liability for damages, indemnification and all other legal remedies available to the Town. The Engineer is to provide the Town with a certificate of insurance, evidencing the above requirements have been met, prior to the commencement of work or use of facilities. The failure of the Town to object to the contents of the certificate or the absence of same shall not be deemed a waiver of any and all rights held by the Town. H. The Town is a member/owner of the NY Municipal Insurance Reciprocal (NYMIR). The Engineer further acknowledges that the procurement of such insurance as required herein is intended to benefit not only the Town but also the NYMIR, as the Town's insurer. 9. Workers Compensation and Disability Insurance. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Engineer shall present to the Town proof either that the Engineer provides the levels of workers' compensation and disability coverage required by the State of New York or that the Engineer is not required to provide such coverage. 91 10. Indemnity. The Contractor agrees to fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Town, its elected officials, public officers, employees, and agents from and against all claims, actions, suits, demands, complaints, damages, liabilities, obligations, losses, settlements, judgments, governmental investigations costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs), whether or not involving a third party claim, which any or all of them may incur, resulting from bodily injuries (or death) to any person, damage (including loss of use) to any property, other damages, or contamination of or adverse effects on the environment, caused by or arising out of the negligent acts of Contractor or Contractor's employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with this Agreement. To the extent the Town is negligent, Contractor's duty to indemnify the Town shall not extend to the proportion of loss attributable to the Town's negligence. 11. Engineer May Not Assign. This Agreement may not be assigned by the Engineer without the previous written consent to such assignment from the Town, which consent may be withheld entirely at the discretion of the Town, it being understood that the Town is making this Agreement personally with the Engineer and is not intending that it be performed by any other person or entity. 12. Binding Nature of Agreement. This Agreement is binding upon the parties, their respective representatives and successors and, when assignment is permitted, assigns. 13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Enforcement. This Agreement is made in New York, and shall be construed under the laws of the State of New York without regard to, or the application of, New York State's choice of law provisions. Both parties consent that if any action is brought to enforce this Agreement, it shall be brought only in an appropriate Court in Tompkins County, New York, and both parties consent to the jurisdiction of such court. 14. Notices. Any notices or other communications given under or in relation to this Agreement shall be deemed duly given if served personally or by commercial courier service upon the other party at the address set forth above, or, if the mails are operating, mailed by certified mail to the other party at the address set forth above, return receipt requested. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. Either party may change the address to which notices are sent by giving notice of such change in the manner set forth above to the other party. 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior written or oral agreements, negotiations or understandings, existing between the parties. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by each party. 16. Survival. The rights and obligations of the respective parties under Section 9 (Indemnity), Section 11 (Binding Nature of Agreement), Section 12 (Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Enforcement), and Section 16 (Claims and Disputes Arbitration) shall survive the expiration or termination (for any reason) of this Agreement and remain in full force and effect. 17. Claims and Disputes Arbitration. The Town may elect to subject disputes arising out of this Agreement to resolution by mediation or arbitration or litigation. This election can be made at any time up until sixty (60) days after the claim or dispute arises in writing. If the Town does not make an election, the dispute shall be subject only to litigation. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties at the time of such election, the rules governing mediation or arbitration invoked by the Town shall be the Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association. Engineer hereby waives the right to elect the method of dispute resolution and agrees that this waiver is supported by sufficient and appropriate consideration. 18. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is deemed to be invalid or inoperative for any reason, that part may be modified by the parties to the extent necessary to make it valid and operative, or if it cannot be so modified, then it shall be deemed severed, and the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if this Agreement had been signed with the invalid portion so modified or eliminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written below. TOWN OF ITHACA xxxx ENGINEER By: By: Rod Howe, Name: Town Supervisor Principal Date: Date: 2 Exhibit B NON -COLLUSIVE CERTIFICATION By submission of this proposal, each Consultant and each person signing on behalf of any Consultant certifies, and in the case of a joint proposal each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, under penalty of perjury, that to the best of knowledge and belief- (1) The prices in this proposal have been arrived at independently without collusion, consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other Consultant or with any competitor; (2) Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this proposal have not been knowingly disclosed by the Consultant and will not knowingly be disclosed by the Consultant prior to opening, directly or indirectly, to any other Consultant or to any competitor, and, (3) No attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Consultant to induce any other person, partnership or corporation to submit or not to submit a proposal for the purpose of restricting competition. (Name of Corporation) by Title Exhibit C BY: TOWN OF ITHACA ENGINEERING DEPT ALL LOCATIONS AND SOURCE: BOLTON POINT BOUNDARIES ARE APPROXIMATE. of TOI ENGINEERING 0 100 200 400 600 NYS GIS CLEARING HOUSE Feet IDRM-Ilm Exhibit E >180A M3N 'ALNnoo SNINdMi 'VOVH1i AO NMOl yaoA3nans �`ye`� o bll d;W 0.'A'J,I✓0O17 dOVHlI J0 NM Ol ¢N b 8 J3A?JfiS 31111 aNVl SdSN/d1-1V au .e� a �dI2IQ r�7IW NSA S "- g 1� 11 "' �� i �j =c✓ I " -'�g2-S� � ��oMM,, •ou�ve }I Hv�S,-s q� I p I` \ ` `` d� 9 F � ; wry' 5„c mow. are / I r a 0 0 pig I I E o _ g FIn Z 2 2 F F E W Oil Exhibit B I ,Ba,rton,, )l )gu �tdtce I Power to Solve, m Barton, , °�ice E II'14 V i IR ON M E II14TAL April 20, 2022 Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Director of Engineering Town of Ithaca Public Works 114 Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 RE: Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project File: 708.6020 Dear Mr. Thaete: An experienced environmental and engineering design team is essential when creating a new, state of the art fueling station. Barton & Loguidice (B&L) has specialized in municipal fleet fueling system designs, and will provide the Town of Ithaca with a seasoned design team for this project. Our team has been working together on fueling system projects for over 20 years, and we have addressed all elements that are expected with the evaluation and design of a new fueling station at the Town's public works facility located at 114 Seven Mile Drive. As Engineer of Record for the project, and residing member of the community, I will lead a veteran design team that has fine tuned the types of equipment that should be specified and those to be avoided for this project. The City of Ithaca and Tompkins County Highway's Fleet Fueling Station Replacement projects included detailed herein can attribute to our experience with both aboveground and underground fuel systems locally. Our experience will assist in providing the Town with a cost effective design analysis approach and long lasting facility. Key highlights for our team include: • Our team offers the Town of Ithaca extensive experience with all facets of site planning and fueling system design from tank selection and registration to the latest electric controls, leak detection, fuel management, and fire suppression technologies. • Over the past two decades, our design team has replaced and upgraded a wide variety of fleet fueling systems incorporating both underground and aboveground tanks, and we will use our lessons learned to provide the best possible design for your facility. • Our design will be functional, practical, and fully integrated with the existing facility and fuel management system to meet the Town's needs now and into the future. • We are familiar with Town staff and Town planning board processes and protocols. We will commence this project without a learning curve. We have reviewed, in detail, the requirements, efforts, and approach necessary to effectively and efficiently deliver the design option analysis and detailed construction drawings and specifications preparation scope of services. We look forward to continuing our relationship with the Town of Ithaca, and propose to use Jeffrey J. Reed, P.E., as your project manager, and Joshua R. Thomas, I.E., as your assistant project manager. Jeff manages our environmental systems design team, of which Josh provides integral design and construction management support, and has been the primary designer for our fleet fueling and bulk storage system project for the past two decades. Jeff and Josh will work directly under my authority. I look forward to discussing our qualifications and scope for the Town's Public Works Facility's Fueling Station Design project with your selection team. Please do not hesitate to contact Jeff, Josh, or me if you have any questions. Sincerely, BARTON & LOf1UIIDC ICE„ ID.P.C. Scott D. Nostrand, P.E. Senior Vice President 443 Electronics Parkway, Liverpool, New York 13308 I Office:315-457-5200 1 bartonandloguidice.com TOWN UF MHACA,IINEW `HU•III TA1131IIIIIIIIIIF IIN ull 111E11N'T' Related Project Experience....................................................................................................................Section 1 ProjectTeam................................................................................................................................................Section 2 Understanding of the Project.................................................................................................................Section 3 Schedule for Completion.........................................................................................................................Section 4 Fixed Fee and Estimate of Hours.........................................................................................................Section 5 RequiredDocuments................................................................................................................................Appendix TOW CAI: 7HACA,III NEW `HOII1 2 E W VW III F W WA I Il i nii Illnnni 1 EIR IIII Il i B&L's Environmental Practice Area has been operating as an individual practice unit since 2000, and currently maintains a professional staff of 57 engineers, environmental scientists, hydrogeologists, and industrial hygienists. We have specialized in petroleum and chemical bulk storage compliance and design engineering, and have a wealth of experience upgrading municipal fueling stations across New York. In fact, in Tompkins County, B&L has designed and replaced fueling stations for the City of Ithaca DPW, Tompkins County Department of Highways, Borg Warner, and Cornell University. In addition, we have also upgraded the fueling station for the SUNY Cortland Facilities operations. These are just a few of the fueling stations we have been involved with across the state. IPetirolleuiril and Cheriiicall IBUllk Storage B&L has extensive experience in managing petroleum and chemical bulk storage tank systems. Whether the project involves the design of a new system or the closure of an existing one, we meet the regulatory mandates to ensure successful project completion. Our new systems designs meet all National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes and incorporate fuel management systems and fuel leak detection. Other designs include bulk storage containment, chemical bulk storage tanks, and loading area containment systems. To complement the spill program and bulk storage tank areas, we prepare Chemical Bulk Storage Spill Prevention Reports, Hazardous Waste Reduction Plans, and Environmental Compliance Audits. SI ullll IPrevention, Contird, anal f"ounterinneasure (SIC) IPlans B&L has developed hundreds of Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans in accordance with Federal EPA Oil Pollution Prevention Regulation 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 112., which are required for above ground tank systems. These plans are developed to mitigate and control potential environmental hazards associated with the storage and use of oil. The plans incorporate all aboveground oil storage (bulk storage tanks, transformers, hydraulic reservoirs, etc.) for products including petroleum fuels, fuel oil, cutting oils, waste oil, lubricants, hydraulic oils, oils in transformers, and any other oils stored or used at a facility. These plans focus on product inventory, emergency spill response, and hazardous material cleanup and disposal. A key component to our response plans is training. We do not simply hand a client a management plan; instead, we conduct training to ensure that the concepts in the plan are understood and implemented by facility staff. l nvuroninrientall 16 eir e uatiion It is not uncommon during upgrades to fueling stations to encounter petroleum spills. Many times these can be addressed as a source removal (excavation) project during the station construction project, but occasionally need further site characterization and investigation to identify the extent of a release, and the most practical remediation solution. B&L routinely conducts remedial site investigations associated with spill releases and hazardous waste and brownfield sites. We maintain a full staff of hydrogeologists and remedial engineers that work to identify the limits of a release and design the remedial solution. l nvhroniniientall lPerviliittun B&L diligently maintains relationships with regulatory staff in11' local, county, state, and federal�rti,�1������\������� review agencies. Combined with our`0�° vast technical experience, these relationships allow us to quickly and\\ efficiently obtain permits for our clients for projects including brownfield site assessment and development, wildlife habitats, wetlands, ecosystem concerns, and hazardous materials management. Our staff has conducted many environmental assessments necessary for permitting projects such as these. Our permitting and assessment experience includes: State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); National Environmental Policy Act (NFPA); Section 1 . mmr ��1 "... iI� ' N w l . Page 1 Du' [3II Ih µ II�<s IL IIIIL..II1'Y II II:III IlllNG ST TIII II' Il)E&k 111 • Environmental assessment form; • Environmental impact statement; • Exempt activity determinations for projects requiring environmental assessments and findings of no significant impact; • Clean Water Act, Sections 401 and 404; • Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands Act; • New York State Environmental Conservation Law (NYSECL) Article 15, Stream Protection Act; • United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) collaboration; • Adirondack Park Agency Act, Executive Law, Article 27; • Freshwater Wetlands Act; • Wild Scenic and Recreational Rivers System Act, Article 15, Title 27 of NYSECL; • New York State Department of Environmental Protection (NYSDEP) permitting and reviews; • State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES); • Water Withdrawal Permit Program; • New York State Endangered Species Permitting (NYSECL Article 11); and • Threatened and endangered species habitat assessments. �#0 11IIDU GNP GOP, , t " ffinU Coi ninuniity Outreach and PubHe IPaifiiciil at on B&L has experience with all aspects of community outreach and public participation including public meetings, engineering reports, community surveys, design presentations, promotional materials, and project websites. Our knowledgeable technical staff are supported by a talented pool of in-house graphic designers and writers who prepare presentation materials ranging from reports to websites and presentation boards. With detailed graphic visualizations and clear explanations, the Town Planning Board can see our ideas at work. This facilitates consensus building and community buy in while also allowing us to carefully and clearly address any public concerns and diffuse the potential for volatile situations created by a lack of understanding. Our staff will listen to the needs and wants expressed by local residents, businesses, and the Public Works Committee and will respond with appropriate follow-up activities. In doing so, we are able to help the Town move forward with their project. TOWN UllF MHACA,III NEW `HU•tlll OSWEGO COUNTY �I°;�I �I III IIII llll IIIII .Ilf ::l' IIL......° �I Irinva,I Dorn-a-mR T IIWmel*i1wall A_[ mMil,1yfeel 1 B&L provided design, bidding, construction, tank closure, and spill remediation assistance for the replacement of fleet fueling stations at the County's highway garages in Parish and Pulaski, New York. The Pulaski station consisted of a complete replacement and relocation of the existing underground fueling system with a new aboveground fueling system for dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel. The Parish fueling station was also a complete replacement of an underground system with an aboveground system, but also added E85 ethanol and biodiesel to the fueling options. B&L provided design and bidding of the environmental, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering for the fueling stations at each site. Both systems include new protected aboveground tanks, underground piping, new dispensers including satellite dispensers for diesel fuel, new fire suppression, fuel management and tank monitoring systems, and remote filling stations. The Parish site also involved delivery tanker transfer containment, bulk lube oil storage, and pumping systems, and heated storage tanks for biodiesel and lube oils. Both sites involved the remedial excavation of petroleum contaminated soils and groundwater treatment. Excavation, removal, and closure of USTs; 1,250 tons of petroleum contaminated soils removal and disposal; • 51,737 gallons of impacted groundwater treatment; Demolition and removal of existing fueling stations; New protected aboveground tanks for diesel fuel, gasoline, E85, biodiesel, motor oil, and hydraulic oil; New UL971 compliant underground piping and secondary containment systems, fuel islands, dispensers and fueling lanes; New tank monitoring and fire suppression systems; New remote fill stations, AST accessories and transfer containment; and • Provision for temporary fueling systems during construction. B&L provided construction administration for the project including: review of submittals required by the specifications, UST closure assessment, periodic construction oversight during construction, maintaining construction schedules, contractor coordination, periodic construction progress meetings, and review of contractor invoicing during the course of the project. Section 1 w i . " ,, DUII3II Ih µ WOIR<s IL IIIIL..III° 1( II II: III IIIING STA704 IlYE&k 111 Ih III°ZOSI C'T" SUNY CORTLAND �' �IfIIIII llf IIII �IfIIIIIGFROUP II°° EIII IIIING s"" ' "° 'IIII AIM UPGRADE ANIII) SIR IEPIIL...... III II III' "" ' ,6141:4 1 W—'IgI 7Ag,I AYWI•7c�:� SUNY Cortland desired to upgrade and replace an aging underground storage tank (UST) based fleet fueling system used to store gasoline and diesel fuel. B&L reviewed multiple design options based on site specific criteria to assist SUNY Cortland in the decision making process. Ultimately, the final decision was to divide the project into two Phases: Phase I included removal of the existing gasoline UST and replacement with a new aboveground storage tank (AST) at a new location and upgrade the existing fuel island and dispensers; Phase 11 included removal of the diesel fuel UST and replacement with an new AST adjacent to the new gasoline AST. Phase I was completed in 2012, and Phase 11 was completed in 2017. For this project, B&L provided design options for the replacement of the existing 2,000-gallon gasoline and 2,000 gallon diesel fuel underground storage tanks (USTs) with similarly sized aboveground storage tank (ASTs). The selected AST option was for new 2,000 gallon protected aboveground storage tanks at a new location, new underground piping, new gasoline and diesel fuel dispensers on a new fueling island, new concrete fueling lanes, and new fire suppression system. An existing loading dock adjacent to the new tank location was also improved to serve as the delivery transfer containment area for the new gasoline and diesel fuel tanks, and additional security fencing was added. • UST removal, soils assessment and tank closure reporting; • Demolition and removal of existing fueling station; • New protected ASTs for gasoline and diesel fuel; • New UL971 complaint underground piping and secondary containment system; • New fuel island, dispensers, and fueling lanes; • New fire suppression system; • New remote fill station and AST accessories; • Delivery tanker transfer containment; and • Provision for temporary fueling systems during construction. B&L provided design, bidding services, and construction oversight for this project. Section 1 w . e Page TOWN CAI: MHACA,III NEW `HOII•I CORNELL UNIVERSITY F1,BE I � ° �I III IIII ' E11 ITHACA, NEW YORK B&L assisted Cornell University Facilities Services with the design and installation of a new fleet fueling station at the Teaching and Research Center Agricultural complex in Harford, New York. The project design consists of a dual compartment above -ground storage tank that stores 6,000 gallons of diesel fuel and 2,000 gallons of gasoline. Fueling station equipment included: • An electronic dispenser for gasoline and diesel fuel; • Fire suppression; • A tank gauging and monitoring system; and • A security camera system. A 20-foot by 42.5-foot concrete fueling lane was also provided directly adjacent to the tank area for access to the facilities. B&L also assisted Cornell with the permitting and compliance requirements for the fleet fueling system project. B&L prepared a tank closure report detailing the closure of the existing underground storage tanks and updating the petroleum bulk storage registrations for the new modified system. The layout of the new system minimizes disruption of site activities while vehicles are fueling. 0:1 rd:20,14111:411I i &1:Z#1►k14ki11 • Removal and closure of existing gasoline and diesel fuel fleet fueling station; • New UL2085-listed dual compartment tank; • New concrete island and fueling lanes; • New fuel pumps and dispensers; • New fire suppression system and light; • Delivery tanker transfer containment; • Security fence; • Automated tank monitoring system; • Remote fill port containment; and • Security camera installation. Section 1 w . e Page DUII3II Ih µ WUIIR<s IL IIIIL..III° 1( II UII: III IlllNG ST TIIIUII' Il )Elk 111 Ih �l°'ZOSU CT CITY OF ITHACA �I°;�I �I III IIII llll IIIII .Ilf ::l' IIL......° �I I k 1 I_ sngIAmi7 7 B&L assisted the City of Ithaca with the design, bidding, and construction of a replacement fleet fueling station at the City's Streets and Facilities Complex located in Ithaca, New York. The project consisted of closure and replacement of the aging underground fleet fueling system station with a new state-of-the-art fleet fueling station with new aboveground tanks. The new fueling station includes new protected UL 2085 listed aboveground storage tanks including overfill protection chambers, underground double wall piping and secondary containment sumps, new dispensers for diesel fuel and gasoline, new canopy and LED lighting, fuel management and tank monitoring leak detection systems, remote filling stations, and delivery tanker transfer containment. The project also include geotechnical considerations and foundation designs due to poor soil quality. B&L provided construction administration for the project including: review of submittals required by the specifications, UST closure assessment, periodic construction observation and inspections, maintaining construction schedules, contractor coordination, periodic construction progress meetings, and review of contractor invoicing during the course of the project. B&L also assisted the City with assessing and closing out a spill associated with the former USTs and fueling system which included soils borings, monitoring wells and laboratory analysis. 1:1 1' :Z�r111 C+1ri i7 i19#1►k14k1k • Canopy foundation design and pile design coordination; • UST fuel system closure design; • New UL2085 protected ASTs for diesel fuel and gasoline; • New UL971 compliant underground piping and secondary containment systems; • New fuel islands, dispensers, and fueling lanes; • New tank monitoring and fuel management systems; • New remote fill stations, AST accessories, and transfer containment; • NYSDEC tank closure and installation notifications; • Construction administration; • SPCC plan incorporating the new fueling station; • UST closure: assessment and reporting; • Approximately 375 tons petroleum impacted soils removal and disposal; • Approximately 8,100 gallons of petroleum impacted groundwater removal and disposal; and • Spill investigation, monitoring, and closure reporting. Section 1 . m, mr ��1 "... iI� , N �I l M. TOWN GllF MHACA, IIWE. `HU•tlll TOMPKINS COUNTY �I°;�I �I III IIII llll IIIII .Ilf ::l' IIL......° �I IIII 10 I_Tif_wgIAmi gm B&L assisted Tompkins County with the design and installation of a replacement fleet fueling station at the County's highway garage located on 170 Bostwick Road in Ithaca, New York. The project consisted of replacing the aging fleet fueling system station with a new state-of- the-art system to include both E85 ethanol and biodiesel fueling options. B&L met with the County and presented design options for the replacement fueling system, as well as engineering opinions of probable construction costs. The selected design included removing and replacing the existing fleet fueling system with new underground storage tanks, piping, tank monitoring system, fueling island and dispensers, fire suppression system and overhead canopy. B&L provided design of the environmental, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering for the fueling station. During the construction phase of the project, B&L reviewed shop drawings, coordinated work with the contractor and County, provided assistance to County construction inspectors, and performed periodic construction oversight and final inspections of the work. B&L was also present during the removal of the underground fueling system to assess the underground conditions, collect soil samples, and coordinate any necessary remediation work. • Evaluation of site soils to assist in canopy replacement foundation design; • Survey of the area of work to provide a base site plan for the project; • Excavation, removal, and disposal of USTs and petroleum contaminated groundwater; • Staging of contaminated soil for on -site remediation; • Demolition and removal of existing fueling station and overhead canopy; • New 12,000-gallon and 10,000-gallon underground storage tanks; • New UL971 compliant underground piping and secondary containment systems; • New fuel islands, dispensers, fueling lanes, and overhead canopy; • New tank monitoring and fire suppression systems; • New site security cameras; and • Provision for temporary fueling systems during construction. Section 1 w . e Page DU[3II Ih µ CII�<s IL IIIIL..II1'Y II II:III IlllNG ST7IICII' Il)E&k 11 JDC PROPERTY GROUP, LLC DID EII U IIP4 IIf) sIII°° E D ESIIIGN SERVICES e TOWN OF DEWITT, NEW YORK B&L provided engineering services for the redevelopment of a portion of the Magna -New Venture Gear site in the Town of Dewitt, New York, into a new 150,000 square foot Federal Ground distribution and warehouse facility. B&L's services included gaining local planning approvals and then design for associated parking, driveway improvements, stormwater management measures, landscaping, lighting and signage. In advance of this site being selected, B&L provided preliminary engineering and environmental investigations for three potential sites. • Traffic impact study • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment • Environmental investigations • Preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) for SEQRA • Site plan approval documents • Subdivision application • Review with County plan • Traffic mitigation plans • Stormwater Management Design and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) • Sanitary sewer and potable water design • Preparation of opinion of probable costs • Construction phase services Section 1 w . e Page TOWN OIIF III IHA µA, IIWE. `HOII•tlll w Design closure and removal of existing ASTs and fuel station; design Fleet Fueling new fleet fueling station; Canton CSD/ System y School District UL 2085 ASTs with OP chambers, dispensers, tank 2 ASTs 3 ASTs 2022-ongoing Replacement; Heating Oil Tank Bus Garage; monitoringand fuel 4,000/4,000 1,000; 8,000; 10,000 Removal High School management systems, canopy option, LED lighting, transfer area secondary containment. SPCC Plan Madison County Highway Garage Fleet Fueling Municipal Design closure and 2 USTs Demolition/ Station Removal Highway Garage removal of existing USTs and fuel station. NA 10,000 ea. 2022-ongoing Design closure and removal of existing UST fuel station; design new Adirondack CSD/ Fleet Fueling School fleet fueling station; UL 085 ASTs with OP 2 2 ASTs 1 UST 2021-ongoing Station Replacement District Bus Garage chambers, dispensers, tank 10,000/2,000 2,000/10,000 monitoring and fuel Compartmented management systems, transfer area secondary containment. SPCC Plan. Design closure and removal of existing AST and fuel station; design new fleet fueling station; Alexander CSD/ Fleet Fueling School UL 2085 ASTs with OP 2 ASTs 1 AST System District chambers, dispensers, tank 2021-ongoing Replacement Bus Garage monitoring and fuel 3,000/1,000 3,000 management systems, canopy, LED lighting, transfer area secondary containment. SPCC Plan Design closure and removal of existing USTs, School AST, and UST fleet fueling District station; site work for UST 3 USTs Fleet Fueling removal area restoration, (2) 15,000; DCMO BOCES/ System Fleet Fueling; design site work, structural slabs, transfer area 1 AST 8,000; 2021-ongoing Replacement; Heating Oil Tank secondary containment for 5,000 Removal Harrold new fleet fueling station. 1 AST Campus; New UL 2085 ASTs with Pole OP chambers, dispensers, 2,000 Campus tank monitoring and fuel management system by others. SPCC plan. Section 1 . mmr ��1 "... iI� ' N w l . Page 9 Il[Illl.. 1 KS II Illh...11TING S T `I'll ill II III &l&N ['II°ZOJIECT Design closure and removal of existing USTs and fuel station; design new fleet fueling station; UL 2085 ASTs with OP chambers, dispensers, tank monitoring and fuel East Greenbush CSD/ Fleet Fueling School District management systems, 2 ASTs 2 USTs System canopy, LED lighting, 2021-ongoing Replacement Bus Garage transfer area secondary 5,000 ea. 4,000; 4,000 containment, modify existing UST to add to new fuel management and tank monitoring systems. Large spill remedial excavation and removal completed. SPCC Plan Salmon River CSD/ Fleet Fueling System Removal; School District; Design closure and removal of existing USTs 3 USTs 2021-ongoing Heating Oil Tank Bus Garage and fuel station; heating oil UST removal; site NA 2 4,000; (1)0,000 Removal and High restoration. Remove UST and replace with new UST; including Tioga CSD/ Fuel Oil Storage School underground piping, 1 UST 1 UST 2021-Ongoing UST Replacement District secondary containment 10,000 10,000 sumps, and new tank monitoring. Remove UST and replace Central Square CSD - q with new UST; including AA Cole Elementary Fuel Oil Storage School underground piping, 1 UST 1 UST School/ UST Replacement District secondary containment 10,000 10,000 2020-2022 sumps, and new tank monitoring. Design closure and removal of existing station; design new fleet fueling 1 AST 1 UST Holland Patent CSD/ Fleet Fueling School District station; UL 2085 ASTs with 5,000/5,000, 10,000 2020-ongoing Station Replacement Bus Garage OP chambers, dispensers, tank monitoring and fuel Compartmented Cop 1 AST management systems, 1,000 canopy, LED lighting, transfer area secondary Remove UST and replace Remsen CSD/ Fuel Oil Storage School with new UST; including underground piping, 1 UST 1 UST 2020-2022 Tank Replacement District secondary containment 10,000 10,000 sumps, and new tank monitoring. Section 1 . mmr ��1 "... iI� ' w l . Page 10 TOWN OIIF 7HACA, NEW `HOII1 � a m Illlu a , m IIV 'hillii m 1�111 IIV w' m w Design closure, removal and replacement of underground fuel piping, fuel island and dispensing systems; replace and School upgrade tank monitoring 1 AST Sodus CSD/ Fleet Fueling District and fuel management systems, new fuel island 2,000/4,000 N/A 2020-ongoing System Upgrades Bus Garage g with canopy and LED Compartmented lighting, existing tank and piping re -painting, transfer area secondary containment; SPCC Plan. Spill discovered and remediated during Remove UST and replace Adirondack CSD — with AST; including West Leyden Fuel Oil Storage School underground and 1 AST 1 UST ElementaryTank Replacement District aboveground piping, containment sumps, tank 5,000 10,000 School/2019-2022 monitoring, and transfer containment, SPCC Plan Design of new fleet fueling station; UL 2085 ASTs with 1 AST OP chambers, dispensers, Beaver River New Fleet Fueling School tank monitoring and fuel 2,000/6,000, N/A CSD/2019-2022 Station Design District management systems, Compartmented canopy, LED lighting, transfer area secondary containment, SPCC Plan Design removal of in - ground hydraulic bus lift In -Ground Mount Markham In -Ground Lift School system and associated N/A Hydraulic Lift CSD/2019-2020 Removal District appurtenances; subsurface System spill investigation; lift removal oversight. Design and construction oversight of fuel Oswego County Highway Department Fuel Management Highway management system and dispenser upgrades for & Dispenser Maintenanc several County facilities. NA NA 2019-on oin g g Upgrades e Facilities Project also included preparation of 4 SPCC Plans. Design closure and removal of existing station; design new fleet fueling 1 AST Otselic Valley CSD/ Fleet Fueling School District station; UL 2085 ASTs with 5,000/2,000, 2 USTs 2019-ongoing Station Replacement High school OP chambers, dispensers, tank monitoring and fuel Compartmented 2,000; 10,000 management systems, transfer area secondary containment; SPCC Plan Section 1 . m, mr ��1 "... iI� ' N w�� l , Page 11 PUl[Illl.. 14°' III III Illh...11Ty III I[°] ING S T °PO II III &l will'4 ['II°ZOJIECT m m; Design closure and w III III 1111111 IM IMI removal of existing station; design new fleet fueling 1 AST Otselic Valley CSD/ Fleet Fueling School District station; UL 2085 ASTs with 5,000/2,000, 1 UST 2019-ongoing Station Replacement Bus Garage OP chambers, dispensers, tank monitoring and fuel Compartmented 10,000 management systems, transfer area secondary containment, SPCC Plan Design of new fleet fueling station; UL 2085 ASTs with OP chambers, dispensers, 1 AST New Fleet Fueling tank monitoring and fuel Sandy Creek Station Design, School management systems, 6,000/4,000, 2 USTs CSD/2019-2022 Underground Tank District canopy, LED lighting, Compartmented 2,000 ea. Removal transfer area secondary containment. Removal of USTs and associated appurtenances, SPCC Plan Design removal of in - ground hydraulic bus lift In -Ground Hannibal CSD/2018- In -Ground Lift School system and associated N/A Hydraulic Lift 2020 Removal District appurtenances; subsurface System spill investigation; lift removal oversight. 1 UST 8,000 Penn Yan CSD/2018- Aboveground and Underground Tank School Removal of AST, UST and N/A 3 ASTs 19 Removal District associated appurtenances 1,000 275 240 Design removal of in - ground hydraulic bus lift In -Ground Seneca Falls In -Ground Lift School system and associated N/A Hydraulic Lift CSD/2018-2020 Removal District appurtenances; subsurface System spill investigation; lift removal oversight. Design of new fleet fueling station; UL 2085 ASTs with New Fleet Fueling OP chambers, dispensers, 1 AST Station Design, tank monitoring and fuel 1 AST 2,000 Solvay Union Free Aboveground School , management systems 2,000/2,000, School District/2018- 2020 Tank Removal and District canopy, LED lighting, transfer area secondary Compartmented In -ground Lift Removal containment. Removal of In -Ground Hydraulic Lift AST, bus lifts and System associated appurtenances, SPCC Plan Section 1 Page 12 OWN CAI: MHACA, INEW ` U•tlll 011�1111 11�11�1�11�111 IIIII�I�III� loll II III When you choose B&L, you will receive the advantages of an integrated team of professionals who uphold our firm's commitment to engineering excellence. The team proposed to assist the Town of Ithaca with the fleet fueling system upgrade routinely works together on projects. As Project Manager, Jeffrey J. Reed, P.E., will lead the team that has provided environmental and engineering services for more than 250 projects involving fleet fueling stations, petroleum and chemical bulk storage, and associated mechanical design across New York State. The chosen professionals outlined in the organizational chart below will work on this project for the Town of Ithaca. Resumes detailing staff qualifications and responsibilities are attached on the following pages. During Part A: Design Option Analysis: Josh Thomas will work directly under Mr. Reed and interface with the Town Engineering staff for the review and analysis of the existing equipment, fuel usage, proposed site locations, design alternatives, and associated costs. Kyle Williams will provide review of Josh's analysis, recommendations, and summary of his findings. Johanna Duffy will lead our environmental permitting team, with the initial preliminary screenings of each site location in relation to SEQR. Mr. Thomas will work with Rebecca Minas and Chuck White, in preparation of our planning board sketch plans and renderings, as they bring multiple years of project work assisting planning boards with review of development projects. Rebecca and Scott Nostrand, will be available for presentation of our summary work at the planning and Town board meetings. We have also identified the team leaders for our mechanical, electrical and structural groups, who will be more directly involved during Part B portion of the project. ORGAN IIZATIONAL.. CHART' o/ Kyle C. Williams, P.E. Lead Engineer Joshua R. Thomas, LE Staff Engineer Jeffrey J. Reed, P.E. Senior Associate Joshua R. Thomas, LE Staff Engineer Dean G. Mason, P.E. Mechanical Engineering Timothy W. Bolan, P.E. Electrical Engineering Matthew C. Fuller, P.E. Structural Engineering Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� �, BNw l . Scott D. Nostrand, P.E. Senior Vice President Johanna E. Duffy, CWB`p', PWS Senior Managing Environmental Scientist Charles A. White, P.E., LEED APO Senior Associate Rebecca A. Minas, MIEAust, CPEng Project Manager I Page 1 JEFFREY J. REED, P.E. PRROJECTMANAGER AND OFFllfA,ER III -CH RGIE jreed@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 21 Education: B.S., Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Cornell University,1999 M.E., Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Cornell University, 2001 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York Hazardous Waste Operations, Health and Safety (HAZWOPER) NYS Class A/B UST Operator SUMMARY As project manager and officer -in -charge, Mr. Reed will coordinate the day-to-day activities of the overall project and lead the environmental engineering design team. Mr. Reed has been involved in the design and installation of 25 fleet fueling station projects over the past 21 years. His engineering experience includes design of new state- of-the-art fleet fueling systems: tank monitoring, fuel management and fire suppression system; petroleum and chemical bulk storage and secondary containment systems; delivery vehicle transfer containment design; fueling canopies; assistance with NYSDEC petroleum and chemical bulk storage facility registrations; bulk storage tank closure design, sampling and assessment; construction administration and inspection; oversight of field staff; and regulatory reporting. I EII....IE AIN"IF II IROJIC-:C]F II.. KI�IEIRIIII. 114Cll. Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, Oswego County, Parish and Pulaski, New York B&L provided design, bidding, and construction oversight and assistance for the replacement of a underground storage tank fleet fueling stations at the County's highway garages. The Pulaski station was a complete replacement and relocation of the existing underground fueling system with a new aboveground fueling system for dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel. The Parish station was also a replacement of an underground system with an aboveground system, but also added E85 ethanol and biodiesel to the fueling options. Both systems included new protected aboveground tanks, underground piping, new dispensers including satellite dispensers for diesel fuel, new fire suppression, fuel management and tank Service Group Fuel Tank Replacement, SUNY Cortland, New York For this project, B&L provided design options for the replacement of an existing 2,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank with a similarly sized aboveground storage tank. The selected option was a new 2,000-gallon protected aboveground storage tank at a new location, new underground gasoline piping, new gasoline and diesel fuel dispensers on a new fueling island, new concrete fueling lanes, and new fire suppression system. The existing diesel fuel tank and underground piping was reused with the new diesel fuel dispenser. A loading dock adjacent to the new tank location was improved to serve as the delivery transfer containment area for the new gasoline tank. B&L provided construction oversight services for the project. Fleet Fueling System, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York B&L assisted Cornell University Facilities Services with the design, installation, permitting, and compliance requirements for the new fleet fueling system. Mr. Reed served as project manager, responsible for the design of a dual compartment above -ground storage tank and oversight of the environmental design team. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , �� N w l . DPW Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, Town of Greece, New York B&L provided the design, bidding assistance and construction oversight of a new fleet fueling facility including gasoline, diesel fuel, E85 ethanol and biodiesel capabilities. The new system replaced the Town's existing fueling station consisting of a 10,000-gallon diesel fuel underground storage tank (UST) and 5,000- gallon and 1,000-gallon gasoline USTs. The new fueling station included new underground tanks and piping, new fuel island and retail type mixing dispensers, new concrete fueling lanes, canopy foundations, and new fire suppression, tank monitoring and fuel management systems. B&L also conducted tank closure oversight, tank closure report preparation, and completed periodic construction oversight during construction. monitoring systems, and remote filling stations. The Parish site also involved delivery tanker transfer containment, bulk lube oil storage and pumping systems, and heated storage tanks for biodiesel and lube oils. The project included the remedial excavation and disposal of petroleum contaminated soils and onsite treatment of petroleum impacted groundwater. Mr. Reed served as project manager. Page 2 JOSHUA R. THOMAS, I.E. SSII ST° 1N"r PROJECT MANAGER jthomas@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 5 Education: B.S., Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2016 Professional Registrations: Intern Engineer, New York, 2017 Hazardous Waste Operations, Health and Safety (HAZWOPER) NYSDEC Erosion and Sediment Control Mr. Thomas will assist with leading the design team and coordinating day-to-day activities. Joshua specializes in environmental engineering design, responsible for preparing design drawings and specifications for fleet fueling station projects for petroleum bulk storage, as well as preparing the design of new state-of-the-art fleet fueling systems that include tank monitoring, fuel management, petroleum bulk storage and secondary containment systems, delivery vehicle transfer containment design, construction submittal review, inspection, and oversight. II II II,,,,IE ANT IPROJII Of EXPERIENCE II RIII NCE Bus Garage Fleet Fueling Station Replacement Project, King & King Architects, Holland Patent Central School District, New York Mr. Thomas served as the project manager and lead design engineer for a petroleum bulk storage tank replacement project at the Holland Patent Central School District Bus Garage. The project involved removal of one 10,000-gallon UST used to store diesel fuel and one 1,000 -gallon gasoline AST. Mr. Thomas conducted an engineering site visit to assess current fuel usage, site topography and drainage, and new fuel system layout options. The new fueling station was designed to include two new 5,000-galllon ASTs, underground piping and remote fuel island dispensers, dual sided concrete fueling lanes, canopy, and new fire suppression, tank monitoring and fuel management systems. The design required compliance with NYSDEC PBS regulations, NFPA, NYS Fire Code, and federal SPCC regulations. Mr. Thomas provided coordination between King and King Architects and District staff during the design and bidding of the project, and provided punch list and final inspections of the project for conformance with the design. Transportation Center Tank Replacement Project, March Associates, Architects & Planners, P.C., East Greenbush Central School District, New York Mr. Thomas served as the project manager and lead design engineer for a petroleum bulk storage tank replacement project at the East Greenbush Central School District Bus Garage. The project involved removal of two 4,000-gallon USTs used to store diesel fuel and gasoline. Mr. Thomas conducted an engineering site visit to assess current fuel usage, site topography and drainage, and new fuel system layout options. The new fueling station was designed to include two new 5,000-galllon ASTs, underground piping and remote fuel island dispensers, dual sided concrete fueling lanes, canopy, and new fire suppression, tank monitoring and fuel management systems. The design required compliance with NYSDEC PBS regulations, NFPA, NYS Fire Code, and federal SPCC regulations. Mr. Thomas provided coordination between March Associates and District staff during the design and bidding of the project. Bus Garage Fleet Fueling Station Upgrades, SEI Design Group, Sodus Central School District, New York B&L assisted SEI Design Group and the Sodus Central School District with the upgrades to an aging fleet fueling system and its components. The existing tank monitoring and fuel management systems were upgraded to be accessible from the new bus garage constructed during this project. B&L provided design services for closure and removal of underground diesel fuel and gasoline piping and associated dispenser sumps in accordance with NYSDEC regulations. The project involved replacement of the fuel island, its dispensers and underground product piping, concrete fueling lanes, and installation of a new canopy. Mr. Thomas served as the project manager throughout the design and construction phase and performed final inspections of the installations. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� ' � N�w � l I , Page 3 SCOTT D. NOSTRAND, P.E. ENGINEER OF RECORD snostrand@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 34 Education: B.S., Agricultural Engineering, Cornell University,1984 M.S., Animal Science, Cornell University, 1989 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York Hazardous Waste Operations, Health and Safety (HAZWOPER) NYSDOL, Asbestos Handling Certification, Project Designer MIGNEFAMM Mr. Nostrand is the director of B&L's Environmental Practice Area and oversees all the firm's environmental activities including environmental remediation and compliance, landfill monitoring, hazard mitigation planning, environmental permitting, stormwater, stream restoration, fuel systems design, industrial environmental compliance, air permitting and modeling, asbestos abatement, industrial wastewater pretreatment systems, and biosolids management. Mr. Nostrand oversees the design and management of petroleum and chemical bulk storage tanks, and design of replacement systems to meet regulatory mandates. Designs have included fleet fueling systems for petroleum products with capacities from 500 to 30,000 gallons. These systems incorporated fuel management systems, leak detection, and fire code compliance. Other designs include bulk storage containment, chemical bulk storage tanks, and loading area containment systems. Mr. Nostrand also oversees environmental compliance reporting for petroleum and chemical facilities, including the preparation of EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans, chemical bulk storage spill prevention reports, hazardous waste reduction plans, and environmental compliance audits. Icil IL,,,.Ili=,;AI�T iPIO�I T IL=,;Iir=irillc 1�1=; Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, Tompkins County, Ithaca, New York B&L provided environmental, structural, mechanical, electrical engineering, and construction administration for the replacement of the fleet fueling station at the County's highway garage. The project consisted of replacing the aging fleet fueling system station with a new state-of-the-art system to include both E85 ethanol and biodiesel fueling options. Mr. Nostrand served as officer -in -charge of all environmental engineering and environmental permitting components of this project. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , � N�w � l . Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, City of Ithaca, New York B&L assisted the City of Ithaca with the design, bidding, and construction of a replacement fleet fueling station at the City's Streets and Facilities Complex. The project consisted of closure and replacement of the aging underground fleet fueling system station with a new state-of-the-art fleet fueling station with new aboveground tanks. The new fueling station includes new protected UL 2085 listed aboveground storage tanks including overfill protection chambers, underground double wall piping and secondary containment sumps, new dispensers for diesel fuel and gasoline, new canopy and LED lighting, fuel management and tank monitoring leak detection systems, remote filling stations, and delivery tanker transfer containment. B&L also assisted the City with assessing and closing out a spill associated with the former USTs and fueling system which included soils borings, monitoring wells and laboratory analysis. Mr. Nostrand served as officer -in -charge and was the engineer of record responsible for quality control, schedule, and timely completion. Service Group Fuel Tank Replacement, SUNY Cortland, New York For this project, B&L provided design options for the replacement of an existing 2,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank with a similarly sized aboveground storage tank. The selected option was a new 2,000-gallon protected aboveground storage tank at a new location, new underground gasoline piping, new gasoline and diesel fuel dispensers on a new fueling island, new concrete fueling lanes, and new fire suppression system. The existing diesel fuel tank and underground piping was reused with the new diesel fuel dispenser. B&L provided construction oversight services for the project. Mr. Nostrand served as officer -in -charge responsible for quality assurance and control, schedule, and due diligence. Page 4 KYLE C. WILLIAMS, P.E. PE'TrzoO ,,,.IEUM ERR ,,,,IK STORAGE EINGIIINEIERIING kwilliams@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 16 Education: B.S., Environmental Engineering, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2005 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York Hazardous Waste Operations, Health and Safety (HAZWOPER) SUMMARY Mr. Williams' principal responsibilities are in the fields of air quality, noise monitoring and assessments, petroleum and chemical bulk storage system design and permitting, fleet fueling system design and construction oversight, spill prevention and control, solid and hazardous waste management, environmental investigations and remediation, and environmental audits and compliance assistance. Mr. Williams provides acoustical consulting and monitoring services for a wide variety of environmental noise projects on behalf of municipalities, public, and private clients. His experience includes conducting source sound level measurements, short and long-term community sound level surveys, and noise impact assessments and modeling for existing and proposed sources. Project experience includes completion of sound level monitoring, acoustical modeling and preparation of noise assessments for SEQRA and various permit applications for a variety of community noise issues including solid waste management facilities, commercial properties, HVAC equipment, natural gas transmission sites, and transportation facilities. IC II II,,,,IE,: Aiwr PROJECT EXPERIENCE II RIIC NC1E Fuel Distribution System, Tompkins County Highway Department Ithaca New York Transportation Center Fleet Fueling System Design, North Syracuse Central School District, New York Mr. Williams served as the design engineer for a new fleet fueling center. The project included 34,000 gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel storage in new protected UL 2085 listed aboveground storage tanks including overfill protection chambers, underground double wall piping and secondary containment sumps, new dispensers for diesel fuel and gasoline, fuel filtration system, new canopy and lighting, fuel management and tank monitoring leak detection systems, remote filling stations, and delivery tanker transfer containment. Mr. Williams served as the client contact and provided construction administration and management services. Spill Prevention and Control Program, Various Clients As engineer, Mr. Williams has prepared more than numerous spill prevention control and countermeasure (SPCC) plans and chemical spill prevention reports for compliance with federal and state regulation programs pertaining to spills and hazardous material storage. Mr. Williams has completed numerous containment system designs, has conducted the facility inspections and identified various compliance issues relating to SPCC, petroleum bulk storage, and chemical bulk storage regulations. He also provided clients with recommendations for improvements to maintain compliance with oil and chemical regulations. Mr. Williams completed preliminary designs, final designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, addenda and formal bid documents for the project, as well as provided construction oversight for the project that involved the removal of existing 22,000-gallon storage capacity fueling system, excavation and onsite treatment of petroleum contaminated soils, and the design and construction of a new ethanol (E-85) and bio-diesel (B-20) compatible fleet fueling system. Mr. Williams oversaw the construction activities and remedial design for UST removals and petroleum contaminated soils removals related to petroleum spills, including coordination with the County and NYSDEC for treatment of soils onsite utilizing bio piles. Service Group Fuel Tank Replacement, SUNY Cortland, New York Mr. Williams served as the design engineer for the replacement of an existing 2,000-gallon gasoline and diesel fuel underground storage tanks, both with similarly sized aboveground storage tanks. Mr. Williams designed the site, mechanical and environmental systems necessary for proper operation and compliance of this new state of the art system. Mr. Williams provided construction oversight, performed construction inspections, reviewed payment applications and performed final punch list and project closeout inspections. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , �1 w l . Page 5 DEAN G. MASON, P.E. F A CIIIIIFT IIIE S: MECHANICAIL.... I, �NGIINEER.l NG dmason@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 40 Education: A.S., Engineering Science, SUNY at Delhi, 1981 B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Syracuse University, 1991 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut, Maine, North Carolina, Delaware, Virginia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Florida, Oklahoma, Georgia Siw,IIMI'AIY As manager of the Facilities Practice Area, Mr. Mason is responsible for the design, engineering, specification, supervision, and management of various mechanical and facilities engineering projects. He has extensive expertise in the engineering and operation of various systems in many types of facilities. These include commercial, wastewater, solid waste, power generation facilities, industrial production, petroleum, and incineration. Mr. Mason oversees various new and renovated facilities for public works including salt storage facilities and facilities that house maintenance and highway vehicles and staff operations. Features have included underground fuel oil tanks, vehicle exhaust, power distribution, lightning protection and grounding system, wash bays, concrete floors, drive-thru maintenance bays, overhead crane, embedded steel floor plating, pressurized tube system, vehicle exhaust system, secure parts storage, second floor storage mezzanine with elevator, waste oil space heater and in -floor radiant heating, and solar panel installation. II II II,,,,E: ANT IN OJ II O f EXPERIENCE Petroleum Release Remediation and Fleet Fueling Upgrades at the Pulaski Highway Garage, Town of Pulaski New York Closure and Replacement of T&R Center Fuel System Design, Cornell University, New York B&L provided design and installation support services for a new fleet fueling station. The project design consists of a dual compartment aboveground storage tank which stores 6,000 gallons of diesel fuel and 2,000 gallons of gasoline. Fueling station equipment included an electronic dispenser for gasoline and diesel fuel; fire suppression; a tank gauging and monitoring system; and a security camera system. B&L assisted with the permitting and compliance requirements and prepared a tank closure report and updated the petroleum bulk storage registrations for the new modified system. Mr. Mason was the facilities manager responsible for facilities planning and design. Fueling Stations, Fueling Station Replacement, Tompkins County, Ithaca, New York B&L provided environmental, structural, mechanical, electrical engineering, and construction administration for replacement of the fleet fueling station at the County's highway garage. The project consisted of replacing the aging fleet fueling system station with a new state-of-the- art system to include both E85 ethanol and biodiesel fueling options. Mr. Fuller was the structural engineer responsible for the structural engineering review and design. After a petroleum release at the Pulaski highway garage, B&L oversaw the emergency spill response measures, conducted subsurface and groundwater investigations, prepared a site investigation report, and prepared remedial action recommendations. B&L designed the remedial alternative and subsequently designed fleet fueling and underground piping upgrades to the existing fueling system. The project included new underground double containment fuel piping, upgrades to the tank monitoring system, new fueling island, fire suppression and cathodic protection refurbishment for two underground storage tanks. Mr. Mason was the facilities manager responsible for facilities planning and design. Multi -Agency Green Fleet Fueling, Monroe County, New York B&L assisted the County with the feasibility assessment and selection of potential fleet fueling station sites, and provided design, bidding, and construction oversight of the fuel stations for each site including traffic flow, alternative fuel storage and dispensing systems, transfer containment, fuel management system, tank monitoring system, electrical service, canopy, fire suppression, and site improvements. The City and County now have the ability to fuel fleet vehicles on fuels such as ethanol, biodiesel, compressed natural gas, and propane. Mr. Mason was the officer -in -charge responsible for project oversight and quality control. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� ' �� N w l I , Page 6 TIMOTHY W. BOLAN, P.E. F A CIIII,,,,IFT IIIES: E],,,,IECTIII IIC „ ll,,,, ENGIINE'E�II�.IIING tbolan@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 35 Education: B.S., Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University,1987 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, North Carolina, Delaware, Virginia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Florida, Oklahoma, Georgia SI.,MIMI"MAIIY Mr. Bolan has extensive facility -related electrical design and electrical operations experience involving industrial, municipal, private, and federal clients. Mr. Bolan's facility design experience includes maintenance fueling storage and dispensing systems; water and wastewater treatment facilities; airport terminal designs; chiller and boiler replacement projects; computer networks; phone and PA system's; security system design for schools; industrial test stand design for 500 HP motors and compressors; and a 12,000 seat multi -purpose stadium. Tim is in charge of technical oversight for our facilities electrical design staff. Mr. Bolan's typical design responsibilities include: short circuit, voltage drop, protective device coordination, load/demand studies, energy conservation methods and recommendations, NEC/NFPA Code Compliance, life cycle analysis, drawing and specification development, cost estimating, and equipment selection. For this project, Tim will be responsible for providing an electrical engineering review for the fueling systems control and electrical engineering design. II II II,,,,IE ANT INROJI4 ur EXPERIENCE Closure and Replacement of T&R Center Fuel System Design, Cornell University, New York B&L provided design and installation support services for a new fleet fueling station. The project design consists of a dual compartment aboveground storage tank which stores 6,000 gallons of diesel fuel and 2,000 gallons of gasoline. Fueling station equipment included an electronic dispenser for gasoline and diesel fuel; fire suppression; a tank gauging and monitoring system; and a security camera system. A concrete fueling lane was also provided. B&L assisted with the permitting and compliance requirements and prepared a tank closure report and updated the petroleum bulk storage registrations for the new modified system. Mr. Bolan was responsible for the electrical engineering for this project. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , � N�w � l I , Multi -Agency Green Fleet Fueling, Monroe County, New York B&L assisted the County with the feasibility assessment and selection of potential fleet fueling station sites, and provided design, bidding, and construction oversight of the fuel stations for each site including traffic flow, alternative fuel storage and dispensing systems, transfer containment, fuel management system, tank monitoring system, electrical service, canopy, fire suppression, and site improvements. The City and County now have the ability to fuel fleet vehicles on fuels such as ethanol (E- 85), bio-diesel (B-20), compressed natural gas (CNG) and propane. Mr. Bolan was responsible for the electrical engineering for this project. Fleet Fueling System, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York B&L provided design and installation support services for a new fleet fueling station. The project design consisted of a dual compartment aboveground storage tank which stores 6,000 gallons of diesel fuel and 2,000 gallons of gasoline. Fueling station equipment included an electronic dispenser for gasoline and diesel fuel; fire suppression; a tank gauging and monitoring system; and a security camera system. A 20-foot by 42.5-foot concrete fueling lane was also provided directly adjacent to the tank area for access to the facilities. Mr. Bolan served as electrical engineer, responsible for technical oversight and electrical review. Service Group Fuel Tank Replacement, SUNY Cortland, New York B&L provided design options for the replacement of an existing 2,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tank (UST) with a similarly sized aboveground storage tank (AST). The selected option was a new 2,000 gallon protected aboveground storage tank at a new location, new underground gasoline piping, new gasoline and diesel fuel dispensers on a new fueling island, new concrete fueling lanes, and new fire suppression system. Mr. Bolan was responsible for the electrical engineering for this project. Page 7 MATTHEW C. FULLER, P.E. F A CIIIIIFTIIES: STR4.,I °f°LAR I..... ENMNEEI°PIING mfuller@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 34 Education: A.A.S., Civil Engineering Technology, SUNY at Delhi, 1984 B.S., Civil Engineering, Rochester Institute,1987 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, North Carolina, Delaware, Oklahoma, Georgia SUMMARY ARY Mr. Fuller's structural engineering skills have been utilized on projects encompassing the analysis and design of new and existing building structures; design of water, wastewater, and leachate storage tanks; rehabilitation of hydraulic structures; design of retaining and push walls; and structural design and analysis for superstructures and foundations. Mr. Fuller is proficient in state and federal building codes, structural assessments for buildings or facility structures. Mr. Fuller and his staff utilize RISA finite element modeling analysis and design software and other specialty software as applications are required. Matthew has been successful in incorporating both flexibility and ingenuity into structural design options by presenting clients with a number of different alternatives which examine cost constraints, project life, and options for replacement or rehabilitation to determine the most economically feasible alternatives for final design. Matt's responsibilities will include foundation and concrete design review for the fleet fueling system, and will provide a structural engineering review. II II II,,,,E: ANT PROJEur EXPERIENCE Fleet Fueling System, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York B&L provided design and installation support services for a new fleet fueling station. The project design consisted of a dual compartment aboveground storage tank which stores 6,000 gallons of diesel fuel and 2,000 gallons of gasoline. Fueling station equipment included an electronic dispenser for gasoline and diesel fuel; fire suppression; a tank gauging and monitoring system; and a security camera system. A 20-foot by 42.5-foot concrete fueling lane was also provided directly adjacent to the tank area for access to the facilities. Mr. Fuller served as structural engineer, responsible for foundation and concrete structural reviews, and final structural design plans. Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, Oswego County, Parish and Pulaski, New York B&L provided design, bidding, and construction oversight and assistance for the replacement of a underground storage tank fleet fueling stations at the County's highway garages. The Pulaski station was a complete replacement and relocation of the existing underground fueling system with a new aboveground fueling system for dispensing of gasoline and diesel fuel. The Parish station was also a replacement of an underground system with an aboveground system, but also added E85 ethanol and biodiesel to the fueling options. Both systems included new protected aboveground tanks, underground piping, new dispensers including satellite dispensers for diesel fuel, new fire suppression, fuel management and tank monitoring systems, and remote filling stations. Mr. Fuller was responsible for structural oversight, foundation and concrete structural review, and final design plans. Fleet Fueling Station Replacement, Tompkins County, Ithaca, New York B&L provided environmental, structural, mechanical, electrical engineering, and construction administration for replacement of the fleet fueling station at the County's highway garage. The project consisted of replacing the aging fleet fueling system station with a new state-of-the- art system to include both E85 ethanol and biodiesel fueling options. Mr. Fuller was the structural engineer responsible for the structural engineering review and design. DPW Fueling Station, City of Ithaca, New York B&L provided design and construction phase services for replacing the existing fleet fueling station with a new fueling station. The existing station consisted of a fueling island and canopy served by underground fuel storage tanks. The new fueling system is based on aboveground tanks and situated in a new location at the site. Mr. Fuller provided structural oversight and conducted a foundation and concrete engineering review. Section 2 w, Page 7 JOHANNA E. DUFFY, CWB°, PWS I,N IIR.ONMENT II..... PERMITTING/ SEQR jduffy@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 17 Education: A.A.S., Fisheries and Wildlife Technology, SUNY College of Agriculture and Technology, Cobleskill, 2002 B.T., Wildlife Management, SUNY College of Agriculture and Technology, Cobleskill, 2003 M.P.S., Wetland and Water Resources, SUNY ESF, 2009 Professional Registrations: Certified Wildlife Biologist Certification (CWB), The Wildlife Society; Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS), Society of Wetland Scientists; Hazardous Waste Operations, Health and Safety (HAZWOPER) SUMMARY ARY Ms. Duffy's experience and primary duties are associated with wetland site delineation and permitting, endangered and threatened species assessments and habitat surveys, ecological monitoring, environmental regulations, hazard mitigation, and hazardous waste and environmental site assessments. These services are performed for a wide spectrum of project types, ranging from bridge replacements to recreational trail planning efforts to solid waste facility expansion projects. Prior projects have required Ms. Duffy to coordinate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) Buffalo and New York Districts, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and the Adirondack Park Agency (APA). Ms. Duffy has also performed numerous SEQRA reviews for a variety of projects, including some that required the completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Additionally, she is experienced in NEPA processing, the Section 404 and Section 10 federal permit programs, and New York State's Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) regulations and permit requirements. ICII II,,,.IIi=:All"�T' PRO�iI OT II=:111"I°IIc I�O1=: Multi -Agency Green Fleet Fueling Stations, Monroe County, City of Rochester, New York B&L provided consulting services for the project encompassing architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, environmental, and electrical engineering, and construction inspection and contract administration services. Ms. Duffy completed ecological site visits for the VanLare and Mt. Reed sites to identify potential impacts to natural resources at both locations. The SEQR process to advance the alternative fueling sites was managed by Ms. Duffy, a short environmental assessment form was completed to support the County's review and compliance with the 6 NYCRR Part 617 regulations. Stormwater Control, Hydrology & Hydraulic Assessment, Ludlowville, New York Ms. Duffy was on the team for the developed a drainage study and design solution for the Tompkins County Planning Department to address recurring flooding and sediment loss in the Ludlowville area. The purpose of the study was to develop a watershed -based approach to address the drainage issues that incorporates community involvement, reduces runoff rates within the watershed, ensures adequate carrying capacity of the receiving tributary to Salmon Creek, reduces erosive velocities and corrects existing areas prone to erosion, avoids creating areas of new flooding during the periods of phased improvements, decreases flooding in areas where historic flooding has caused personal or public property damage, and eliminates or reduces road overtopping. B&L progressed the final design of the selected alternatives including, natural streambank stabilization and construction of upstream stormwater retention facilities. Pine Tree Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths, Tompkins County, Town of Ithaca, New York Tompkins County, the Town of Ithaca, and Cornell University retained B&L to design a multi -modal trail to connect existing municipal and Cornell campus trails. For this project, Ms. Duffy assisted the design team with the trail section layout, ensuring that impacts to natural resources were minimized. A wetland field delineation was completed and a preliminary jurisdictional review was coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Ms. Duffy spearheaded the environmental permitting effort for the project. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , �� N w l . Page 8 CHARLES A. WHITE, P.E., LEED APO SITE IPI..... AN REVIEW IIIE cwhite@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 26 Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Kentucky,1994 Professional Registrations: Professional Engineer, New York Accredited Professional: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) SUMMARY Mr. White has significant experience in the planning, design, and construction of transportation and civil engineering projects. He has played a key role on many design projects including; roadway design, site designs, stormwater and drainage projects, utility projects, and recreational trail projects, as well as many other related construction projects. His experience includes all project phases such as project development and planning, budgeting and grant application, design and permitting, bidding, oversight and construction administration, and project closeout. Mr. White has served as Town/Village designated Engineer in numerous local communities. His municipal background also provides significant additional experience in infrastructure planning, development, and management. II II II,,,,E:VAINT NROJEur EXPERIENCE Site Support Services, JDC Property Group, LLC., FedEx Ground Distribution Facility, Town of DeWitt, New York As project manager, B&L provided engineering services for the redevelopment of a portion of the former Magna -New Venture Gear site, into an approximately 150,000 square foot Federal Express Ground distribution and warehouse facility. The project included associated parking, driveway improvements, stormwater management measures, landscaping, lighting and signage. Preliminary Site Design Services for Various Buildings, Cortland County, New York Mr. White worked with Cortland County to develop preliminary site designs for a 30,000 square foot and 15,000 square foot public health building, as well as a 4,000 square foot Department of Motor Vehicles office. The site designs were intended to help the County identify specific target sites for such development and program those sites for specific uses. Section 2 Facility -Wide Modernization and U.S. Land Port of Entry, Alexandria Bay, New York B&L provided engineering and architectural design related services for the modernization and expansion of the U.S. Land Port of Entry at Alexandria Bay, New York. This project involved a complete reconstruction of the facility. B&L was responsible for the engineering design of site improvements, transportation improvements (roadways, parking, etc.), potable water supply system, wastewater collection and treatment, wetland mitigation and stormwater management. Mr. White supervised and coordinated the design team efforts for all highway and site design, drainage and stormwater design, site utility systems, landscape design, and environmental permitting and design. Bill and Melinda Gates Hall, Cornell University, Morphosis Architects, Ithaca, New York Cornell University's new CIS building consists of 108,000 S.F. of faculty offices, instruction halls, lab space, and program space for 480 CIS faculty, researchers, department staff and students. B&L was retained as part of a multi -disciplined team lead by Morphosis Architects as for schematic, design development, and construction document phase services related to the design for all site utilities (water, sewer, electric, steam, chilled water, telephone, data), site features such as retaining walls, stairways and drainage systems, and for the landscape development design. Our team provided sustainable site design contributions towards LEED Silver certification, and support of value engineering tasks. Mr. White was project manager. Preliminary Site Design Services for Various Buildings, Cortland County, New York Mr. White worked with Cortland County to develop preliminary site designs for a 30,000 square foot and 15,000 square foot public health building, as well as a 4,000 square foot Department of Motor Vehicles office. The site designs were intended to help the County identify specific target sites for such development and program those sites for specific uses. w Page 9 REBECCA A. MINAS, MIEAust, CPEng SITE IPL.... AN REVIEW rminas@bartonandloguidice.com Years of Experience: 18 Education: B.S., Environmental Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada,2013 Professional Registrations: Chartered Professional Engineer (MIEAust, CPEng), Australia SUMMARY Ms. Minas has extensive experience in civil and environmental engineering covering all project stages from identifying funding opportunities, initial planning and feasibility studies, to concept and detailed design, through to asset creation and contract management. Her career to date includes a strong focus on managing infrastructure projects of varied types and sizes for municipalities both large and small. Specific relevant areas of knowledge include: SEQR, environmental permitting, civil site design, subdivision and site plan review and stormwater management. Ms. Minas has assisted various planning and zoning boards with site plan review, assessing civil design and reviewing applications against the requirements of local code and state/federal regulations. Additionally, she has represented applicants through the planning board approval process, assisting them to navigate the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process and to obtain site plan approval. 101E II,,,, IE ANT NROJEur EXPERIENCE Restore Forward, Black Women's Blueprint, Town of Ava, New York Ms. Minas served as project manager responsible for design services in support of the development of a low - impact campground and retreat center in the Town of Ava. The project's site and civil design included internal roads and sidewalks, water supply and on -site wastewater treatment, stormwater management, landscaping, parking, lighting, and connection of on -site solar. Ms. Minas prepared the site plans and stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) in support of the application for a Special Use Permit, and assisted the client with representation at Town Planning Board meetings, and developed responses to the Town Board's technical questions. Site Plan Review, Towns of New Paltz, Plattekill, Camillus, and Sullivan, New York Ms. Minas was the town engineer responsible for reviewing developer's applications to the Planning Board and provide recommendations for site design improvements SEQR review for completion of short environmental assessment form (SEAF, Part 1 and 2) and development of full environmental assessment form (FEAF, Part 3), verifying environmental impacts from the proposed development, as required. She reviewed project Stormwater Management Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) against local stormwater laws and the requirements of the NYS DEC Stormwater Management Design Manual. Route 96 Corridor Pedestrian Study, Town of Ithaca, New York Serving as project manager and the engineer responsible for finalizing the design approval document (DAD) to identify potential sidewalk routes and other pedestrian improvements based on an investigation of pedestrian movements, right-of-way ownership, drainage, physical constraints and costs. Ms. Minas was also responsible for hosting meetings and public workshops with members of the community and project stakeholders, such as Town of Ithaca staff and elected officials. Substation Site Design, Central Hudson, Ulster and Orange Counties, New York Ms. Minas was project manager for the design of sub- station sites involving stormwater management systems, access roads, grading, fencing, pole and equipment considerations relative to general site engineering and regulatory permits and agency coordination efforts. Site Civil Design and SWPPP for Solar Facilities, ATLAS Renewables, LLC, Various Locations Ms. Minas provided engineering design support for the development of small-scale solar farms on sites at various locations in New York. The site and civil design included grading, access driveways, turnaround, and stormwater infrastructure. She prepared the SWPPP including site evaluation, erosion and sediment control, design calculations and review of hydrologic modelling. And developed site plans and narrative in support of the special use permit, as well as assisting with representation at planning board meetings and developing responses to technical questions from the Board. Section 2 . mmmr ��1 ".. �I� , �� N w l . Page 10 DU[3II Ih µ II�<s IL III IL..II1'Y II II: III IllgG STA704 IlYE&k 111 Ih �l°ZOJU I CT IIIII�III II III�I�II ICI��Il�flllllll' II L� PART A: DESIGN OPTION ANALYSIS: The Town of Ithaca Public Works Facility desires to replace the existing fleet fueling aboveground tank and pump system, with a new fleet fueling station. The existing fueling station consists of a dual -compartmented aboveground storage tank (AST) and will be utilized by the Town until the new fueling system is constructed. The new fueling system will be situated in a new location at the site with tank sizes to be recommended based on review of existing fleet fuel usage provided by the Town. It is our understanding that the Town would like to evaluate three site locations for the replacement fueling system. The evaluation of each site will include, the design layout of the station, ingress/egress routes to the station, and site grading and drainage considerations. The new station will be evaluated with a canopy, and the Town would like to review the associated costs and compliance issues relative to aboveground versus. underground storage tank options. The existing fuel master management system would be utilized with the new tanks and pumps. The Town will provide a DWG file that contains topographic information, wetland and stream locations, existing utility locations, and property boundaries. In general, the replacement fueling station project will encompass a new canopy and fueling island, new aboveground or underground tanks, new twin hose dispensers for each fuel for dual lane fueling compatibility, and new tank monitoring system. Section 3 METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE B&L is very experienced with the upgrade and replacement of municipal fleet fueling systems. Our goal is to fulfill the Town's project objectives by providing the most cost-effective solution and create a quality product. We will constantly strive to meet that objective. Our petroleum bulk storage tank design team has progressed over 20 projects in the past 5 years, and is a cohesive unit with Jeff Reed, P.E. as our lead design engineer. Due to this experience with fueling stations, we are confident in our ability to meet or exceed your project schedule. Our specific approach to this project is as follows: Scoping Phase B&L will perform a preliminary design site visit and meet with Town facility staff to review the project, existing equipment (e.g. fuel master fuel management system, alarm systems, electric supply) and features of each identified site location. At this meeting we will discuss various design layouts, the project schedule, and expectations, goals and objectives of each of the Town's departments involved in the project. A preliminary review of existing site subgrade conditions for the proposed new fuel station locations will also be discussed with site personnel. Based on the project location, it is surmised that the proposed new fuel station locations will be structurally suitable for construction; however, an allowance amount for geotechnical borings will be provided in Part B scope for the selected site location as required for the design of the pre-engineered canopy. Schematic Design Phase Following the preliminary design site visit and scoping meeting, B&L will review fleet fuel usage obtained from the Town and provide recommendations on storage tank sizes. The intent of this phase is to review various tank and fueling island layouts, and site design and drainage features for each alternative design option. w Page 1 Du' [3II Ih µ II�<s IL III IL..II1'Y II II: III IlllNG ST7II II' Il)E&k 111 Ih �l°ZOJU I CT Each option will include an opinion on probable design and construction cost following evaluation of accessibility for Town equipment and vehicles, security/tamper resistance, site lighting and canopy impacts, permitting requirements, environmental impacts, and local zoning requirements. Fire suppression is not required by code for the fleet fueling system desired at this site; however, various alarm requirements including emergency fuel shutoff switches and specification for high product level alarms will be provided for each option. Each option will also identify environmental compliance components to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) regulatory requirements. At a minimum, this will include the preparation of, or updating the facility Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan and consideration of fuel delivery transfer containment subject to an aboveground storage tank system. Underground storage tanks are not subject to this rule; however, they require additional inspection requirements that will be identified for long term consideration by the site. Cost analysis for the demolition of the existing storage tank roof structure, and removal and closure of the AST, dispenser, and all associated appurtenances will also be provided. It is assumed that the existing fuel island terminal (FIT) will be salvaged for re -use, based on the recent effort and money put it to the "gutting" and replacement of its components. The existing FIT can be incorporated with the new fuel station design for integration with the existing fuel management system software; however, this will be evaluated as part of the design options and associated costs. It may be in the best interest for the Town to provide a new fuel island terminal from the same manufacturer for compatibility with the existing fuel master fuel management system software currently being utilized. Meetings and Engineering Report pu B&L will meet with public works and engineering staff to review progress throughout the design option analysis Q .. �. scope. Based on review of the site and similar systems B&L has designed, we anticipate that the preferred site location will become known to Town engineering staff expediently. For that reason, we are including one progress meeting virtually with Town staff, one meeting onsite with Town staff, and one meeting with the public works committee to present the evaluation of the three site locations. If the additional one meeting requested in the RFP is necessary (assumed to be onsite), a $500 lump sum cost, in addition to the Part A fixed fee, will be charged to the Town. B&L will assist in presenting to the committee an executive summary of the draft engineering report and preferred site location for selection, along with State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) generic site assessment, listing applicability, and short form document requirements. A comprehensive engineering report documenting the evaluation of our findings, sealed by a professional engineer registered in New York State, will be prepared following the public works committee meeting and site selection. The report will outline the three locations and associated findings and recommendations previously coordinated with Town staff and committee. The engineering report will include information gathered for the site as part of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) document preparation and desktop screenings. Two revisions to the report will be provided. For purposes of this proposal, we have assumed a half work day (4 hours) for each revision to the report. All report submissions will be electronic deliverables. B&L will prepare a site plan drawing and rendering of the proposed site and fueling system layout to be submitted for Sketch Plan review by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board by July 26th (21 days prior to Planning Board Sketch Plan Review date), simultaneously with the issuance of the final draft engineering report and SEQR documentation. We have assumed a 2-Dimensional rendering of the site plan layout will suffice. A 3-D rendering could be available at added cost. Upon review, it is recommended that the project be progressed as an unlisted action in accordance with the 6 NYCRR Part 617 regulations. A coordinated review is not anticipated, given the lack of other involved agencies, so all SEQR steps can be progressed at a single Town Board meeting. We envision the Town undertaking the SEQR review and issuing a final determination of significance at the Town of Ithaca Board Presentation. B&L will prepare a short environmental assessment form (SEAF) and a resolution to assist the Town in satisfying their review requirements under the SEQRA. ....�mr j�l"..�I� Page 2 °Full 3II Ih µ II�<s IL III IL..III° 1( II II: III IlllNG STA704 IlYE&k 111 Ih �l°ZOJU I CT Time for B&L attendance to the planning board sketch plan review meeting is included. We will revise the report (assumed to be the first revision) following the recommendations provided from the Town staff and comments from the planning board meeting. B&L will assist in presenting the final (chosen) option to the Town Board, for which an additional meeting for B&L attendance has been included. The second revision to the engineering report will address Town of Ithaca Board member comments. PART B: DETAILED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARATION: B&L understands that Part B requires future authorization, and therefore the costs for this Part are based on our estimate of required hours and expenses, which may need to be adjusted based on the final design requirements identified during Part A. The following is an outline of our approach to the scope of Part B: Upon authorization by the City for a final design option, B&L will prepare and submit preliminary design plans (70% completion) and revised cost estimates for the demolition, removal and closure of the existing fuel system, and installation of the new fueling system chosen option. It is assumed that disturbance to the site will be less than 1 acre, and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will not be required. Erosion and sediment control details will be provided on the contract drawings. A demolition/building permit will be required. The technical specifications will direct the Contractor to obtain. No other permitting requirements are expected. • Geotechnical borings will be subcontracted through B&L and provided for use in the design delegation of the pre-engineered canopy and development of the next design deliverable. • Incorporate final comments from Town staff and provide advanced detail (95% completion) design plans for review and final design approval from the Town. "Bid Ready" final construction plans and bid documents will then be issued for bid advertisement by the Town for 2023 construction. B&L will provide the Town with an electronic CAD file of the design drawings. We have assumed the Town will provide and assemble all contract documents outside of the Design Drawings and Technical Specifications B&L is providing. NYSDEC petroleum bulk storage notification, tank removal and closure oversight, and any special inspections required by the contract documents will be coordinated with the Town during this phase; however, for purposes of this proposal, B&L involvement during the bid and construction phase is not included. Section 3 . mmr ��1 ".. �I� , �� N w l . Page 3 OW CAI: 7HACA,III NEW `HU•tlll �Illll l�llll 1 l�ll�ll�lC��lll III Action (Part A: Design Option Analysis) Date Notice to Proceed May 20, 2022 (A) Site Visit & General Review May 23 thru 27, 2022 (B) Evaluate 3 Proposed Fuel Station Locations May 30 thru July 8, 2022 (C) SEQR May 30 thru June 3, 2022 (D) Staff Meetings June 6 thru July 8, 2022 (E) Public Works Committee Review and Site Selection July 19, 2022 (F) Engineering Report July 26, 2022 (G) Planning Board Sketch Plan Review (Evening Meeting; Requires Submission 21 Days Prior) August 16, 2022 (H ) Engineering Report Revision 1 August 19, 2022 (1) Town of Ithaca Town Board Presentation August 22, 2022 (J) Engineering Report Revision 2, Final August 26, 2022 Action (Part B: Detailed Construction Drawings and Specifications Preparation) Date (A) Preliminary Design Plans (70% Completion) October 2022 (B) Geotechincal Borings October 2022 (C ) Advanced Detail (95% Completion) November 2022 (D) "Bid Ready" Final Construction Plans December 2022 Section w Page 1 DU[3II Ih µ WUR<s IL IIIIL..III° 1( II II: III IlllNG STA704 IlYE&k 111 Ih �l°ZOJU I CT 011�111 llll�ll�ll l�ll�lllC ��III�I ��II II'�I�II IC The following table's highlight the Fixed Fee's for Part A: Design Option Analysis and Part B: Design, Construction Drawings and Specifications. Within both tables are the Estimate of Hours for B&L staff. Section 5 . mmr ��1 ".. �I� �, N w l . Page 1 D Q 0 p 0 � (n Z OC Q m a- m N t0 It N rt' 00 2 cp U LU - — F- m to W co0 0 LL 6s 6s d. N co M O LL N 0 x > — d. 0 co O O 6s (0 to to to O N r m Ln O 0 Cl) M LO t0 N_ x — tf) d. 0 N Ln Ln LO 00 Q — O O EL} W N 77 O Q� —_ M _W EL} O - N r �- LO N LO O O O LO O O t0 Q i N 6s - O O �- O It N LO N O) 04 0 — to Z; ER O � �- Lf) t` �- LO N �- LO N LO t� 0 O Wz O O O rt' 0 X W 04 O IIq O O O UO ILq O O O O LO LO O Or O t0 M O O O IM ' to tR tR N to N N n - IU) tR N tR IU) tRto Im tRF-[[ uj W€€€€€IQ Z) O J UJ 0 O 0 > 0 O J uj N c c 0 Q F- tL .+ ++ cow ! o c 0 J 0 coi a o 2 0 O 3 y N N N NCL ` N C N y d O c 0 0 y •a E ++ E ! m cC ui E p y 3 w; c Ci M 3 c °o U y a y C F m = N O O N N O. R � td Cl) C O t� m p +.' W y to R ro � g � 4)) to c i .✓ 3 � l0 .n O 7 '++ ZT c ai m e G O c C O O C) u, in > w vi N a w a �+ F30 - w I— LL U) Q m U s u y W C9 g=_� W b C: 0 0 C: D od (n a) Z C) 0 m 0- CN OD 60 LU U) co 'o co 0 0) 0 60 EPr 0 co 0 U- 0 > 60 (0 CN co co C\l 0 9 U- 0 60 z 0 60 co N � Ln 0 z Ln 0 60 6H z < c') �2 60 z < CN z < m CN CN 60 U� C\l 0 N 0 cq 01 O 0 (q CN 60 60 (4 < > CN Nz U� (N 0 (N m C\l U) C)LU LU LU U) o Xz NLU 60 0 Lu C\l U) —j Lei 0) 0) D z Cl) O LU U) U) Q� 00 < 00 D Lu W< —1 U) LL o 0 —j 0 CL V) E -E a m 0 .2 FL 0 CL a o E 75 0 0 y ry -* L, a 0 m u 0 r cn M r U- 0 LL 0 0 W U) o 0 1 U. . CO Z a IM NON -COLLUSIVE CERTIFICATION By submission of this proposal, each Consultant and each person signing on behalf of any Consultant certifies, and in the case of a joint proposal each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, under penalty of perjury, that to the best of knowledge and belief- (1) The prices in this proposal have been arrived at independently without collusion, consultation, communication or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such I 1� prices with any other Consultant or with any competitor; (2) Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this proposal have not been knowingly disclosed by the Consultant and will not knowingly be disclosed by the Consultant prior to opening, directly or indirectly, to any other Consultant or to any competitor, and, (3) No attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Consultant to induce any other person, partnership or corporation to submit or not to submit a proposal for the purpose of restricting competition. Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. (Name of Corporation) by Title Scott D. Nostrand / Senior Vice President Barton:Log-Ltl ower o Lis , ten .. ........ F h e III t Solve. Exhibit C a� :.�. �I f"Bal-ton , .., October 11, 2022 Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Director of Engineering Town of Ithaca Public Works 114 Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, New York 14850 Re: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project Part B Design: Detailed Construction Drawings and Specifications File: 2071.004.001 Dear Mr. Thaete: Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C. (B&L), is pleased to provide this proposal for Professional Engineering Services related to Part B of the Public Works Facility Fueling Station Design Project to assist the Town with design and replacement of the existing fleet fueling station with a new fleet fueling station at location 4 (identified in the Engineering Report dated October, 2022, submitted under separate cover) located at the 114 Seven Mile Drive, Ithaca, NY 14850 public works facility. Project Understanding New Fueling Station: The public works facility desires to construct a new state-of-the-art fueling station utilizing an underground storage tank (UST) for diesel fuel and gasoline. The anticipated fuel storage will include one dual -compartment UST with a 3,000-gallon gasoline and a 5,000-gallon diesel fuel compartment. The Town desires the new tank to be a brine filled interstitial, double -wall fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) tank to be located within the vicinity of the existing fleet fueling station location. The scope of engineering services described herein is based on the following project components: AST Removal: Design the closure and removal of the existing dual compartmented aboveground tank comprised of a 3,000-gallon unleaded gasoline compartment and a 3,000-gallon diesel fuel compartment and its containment, dispensing equipment, and wooden roof structure. • New Fleet Fueling Station: UL 1316 listed, fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) UST; tank hold down system consisting of reinforced pre -cast concrete deadman anchors; concrete tank top pad; new fuel management system; tank monitoring system including inventory monitoring, leak monitoring, and overfill protection; underground secondary containment piping and sump system; concrete fuel island and two, single product, dual nozzle fuel dispensers, and associated concrete fueling lane(s); impact protection structures (bollards); a weather protective canopy with LED fuel station lighting; and, site work. Y he e'xpgu°@BC ce' 8:o �. 11sw " ^'"k�1 �C_'CC!"'CiDkPW gaLdk""YV�1laT; �n lsl !"'"��7€.„t�s�`r,uC`�'a"Pa .f�lcc.'s15,157 �r..+�.�0mf'ax,?5�'"��z1....�'`'052a f3upt`CeP7CdPla'm�LogGflchcu:..,..c'.G'ro ,�..�VG."�,}�7"wkJ P � Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Town of Ithaca Public Works, Director of Engineeringt October 11, 2022 p��+ mmllim,,,IIII II Page 2 Site work will include grading to promote positive drainage for integration of new slab on grade structures (tank top pad and concrete fuel lanes), asphaltic pavement restoration, and other related topsoil/seeding restoration. Provisions for any temporary aboveground tanks and dispensers will be the responsibility of the Town; however, we understand the existing fleet fueling station is planned to be utilized as new construction allows. We have based this proposal on the assumption that the proposed new fuel station location will be suitable for construction. In order to determine the adequacy and type of foundation needs for the canopy, geotechnical borings will be required. We have included costs for these borings and geotechnical report in this proposal. The geotechnical report and performance specifications for the pre-engineered canopy will be provided as part of the construction documents deliverable for eventual low bidder and respective manufacturer submittal. As discussed, construction phase related services, including submittal review, is not provided with this scope of services herein We have assumed that an independent inspector, as required by BCNYS, will be procured by the Town. We have not included time to assist the Owner with the procurement of these services; however, B&L is able to provide assistance via fee amendment. Scope of Engineering Services Petroleum Bulk Storage Assessment (Fixed Fee) B&L will review the petroleum bulk storage (PBS) tanks and containers at the facility for compliance with NYSDEC PBS regulatory (6 NYCRR Part 613) requirements and EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan requirements included in 40 CFR Part 112. Any deficiencies observed that require corrective actions will be presented to the Owner for consideration and inclusion in the project. Additional engineering and design services required to address corrective action items are unknown and outside the current scope of services, and will be provided following approval of a fee amendment. • The facility is currently subject to SPCC requirements; however, is not anticipated be subject to EPA SPCC Plan requirements upon completion of this project. A review of any SPCC related deficiencies will be provided as part of the PBS assessment that relate to SPCC rule (in case the facility becomes subject to the rule in the future). Desien Phase (Fixed Fee Conduct a design review meeting with DPW staff at the facility to review the details of the new fueling system requirements, desired equipment sizing, and to review the finalized location of the new fueling station equipment. • Design the civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical systems required to facilitate the installation of the new fueling station and equipment at the facility. Coordinate with manufacturers for performance specifications for pre-engineered structures and equipment (tank and canopy). 2071.004.001 DPW Facility Fueling Station Design Project - Part B Scope.docx Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Town of Ithaca Public Works, Director of Engineering October 11, 2022 Page 3 B 1L B&L will provide a load study based on emergency generator capacity, existing loads on generator power, existing loads on existing Building #114 panel board, existing loads on existing Salt Storage Building, and existing utility service connection to Building #114. The load study will verify whether or not the existing emergency generator can support the additional fuel island loads proposed to be added to emergency backup system. The load study will also verify whether or not existing Building #114 electrical capacity will be able to support removal of existing service to the Salt Storage Building for new feeder from Building #114 to Salt Storage Building. B&L will provide engineering support and coordination for removal of existing utility pole. B&L will provide design for new feeder to Salt Storage Building from Building #114. B&L will provide design for adding fuel island and associated fuel management systems to emergency backup system. • It is assumed that Building #114 has electrical capacity for the additional fuel island loads and feeding the Salt Storage Building, the generator has enough electrical capacity for the addition of the fuel island loads, and there is available space in the emergency backup system panel board for the additional breaker required to add the fuel island. • Provide design details for erosion and sediment controls (E&SC) to be implemented during construction. We assume a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will not be required for this project; however, we are available to provide via fee amendment. • Prepare 75% design drawing set for the construction of the new fueling system. Anticipated design drawings are: • Demolition and AST Closure Plan • Installation and Site Grading Plan • Fueling Station Details (2 sheets) • Erosion and Sediment Control and Restoration Details • Electrical Demolition Plan • Electrical Site Plan • Electrical Diagrams and Details (3 sheets) • We have included time for B&L to attend one meeting at the facility following the 75% design deliverable. • Significant design changes requested following preliminary drawing review and approval will be documented, upon which a fee amendment will be requested for re -design, if applicable. • Prepare and submit 95% design drawings and technical specifications for final review, along with final opinion of probable construction costs. • Incorporate final comments, and prepare final construction design drawings and specification deliverable. B&L deliverables will be electronic PDF versions of limited technical specifications and stamped design drawings. If hard copy sets are required, hard copy sets will be provided on a time and expense basis. 2071.004.001 DPW Facility Fueling Station Design Project - Part B Scope.docx Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Town of Ithaca Public Works, Director of Engineeringt October 11, 2022 p��+ mmllim,,,IIII II Page 4 • We have assumed that the existing electronic site plan and topographic survey (AutoCAD files) provided by Town for use in developing our base drawings are sufficient. • Assist with review of final EJCDC bid documents, including the Bid Form for lump sum and unit price bid items, and contract conditions with respect to 3rd party inspection requirements. Geotechnical Borings and Report (Lump Sum) B&L will procure a driller to install subsurface geotechnical soil borings in the area of the proposed canopy foundations. Dig Safely New York will be coordinated by the driller for the location and marking of public underground utilities. The Town will be responsible for the location, marking, and clearance of private owned buried utilities within the drilling work area. These are not covered by public utility locate services. Two (2) soil borings within the area of the proposed pre-engineered fuel island canopy system will be installed by the driller. Each borehole will be advanced to a minimum depth of twenty- five (25) feet, until practical refusal or bedrock is reached, with the most appropriate drilling method for the specific geologic conditions and will be continuously sampled using 2-inch split - spoon. The driller will provide a Geotechnical Report including boring logs with soil classification, blow count records, rock description and recovery percentages and depth to groundwater observations. We have assumed the geotechnical boring installation will be completed in one 8-hour day. • The Geotechnical Report will provide recommendations for the proposed foundation type and will be stamped by a New York State registered professional engineer or a professional geologist. Geotechnical Boring Assumptions • The Town will provide free and open access for the drill rig to the subsurface investigation area. • Town utilities not marked out by Dig Safely NY will be located and marked by a third party contractor. • Driller fee assumes one 8-hour day onsite. • If petroleum contamination is encountered during advancement of the geotechnical borings, B&L will notify appropriate Town personnel. • Drilling costs are estimated and subject to change based on driller availability and schedules beyond our control. 2071.004.001 DPW Facility Fueling Station Design Project - Part B Scope.docx Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Town of Ithaca Public Works, Director of Engineering October 11, 2022 Page 5 Technical Assumptions B 1L • Attendance at additional meetings beyond the meetings described herein will be provided on a time and expense basis in addition to the fee estimate below. • We have assumed any permitting requirements for the project will be addressed by the Town. • Town utilities not marked out by Dig Safely NY will be located and marked by the Town. Driller fee assumes 1 day onsite. Due to the unknown condition of the subsurface soils in the area, it is not possible to assess the level of engineering services which may be required. If additional engineering effort becomes necessary as a result of the findings of the investigation, a detailed scope of engineering services would be prepared at that time. • B&L will provide electronic technical specifications as described herein and design drawings as deliverables. • In the event that significant changes become necessary during the design process due to changes requested by the Town, B&L will notify the Town to negotiate an appropriate fee amendment at that time. • NYSDEC petroleum bulk storage pre -work notification, tank removal and closure oversight, and any special inspections required by the contract documents will be coordinated with the Town as part of this Part B Design scope; however, for purposes of this proposal, B&L involvement during the bid and construction phase is not included. Fee Estimate and Schedule B&L proposes to provide the above described scope of engineering services based on the fee schedule below. Project Task Fee Schedule Petroleum Bulk Storage Assessment (Fixed Fee) $2,500 Design Phase (Fixed Fee) $34,000 rGeotechnical Borings and Report (Fee Estimate) *$10,000 *Subcontracted services include a 15% administrative fee and are estimated based on quotations and contractor availability as of the date of this proposal. If subcontractor costs increase at the time of the fieldwork (due to availability, scheduling, or other reasons) which result in increased costs, the increased cost of these tasks including 15% markup will be invoiced accordingly. We will work diligently to meet the Town's project schedule in anticipation of construction in 2023, and aim to meet the 75% design deliverable within 6 weeks upon authorization, with 95% completion followed by final construction documents to be provided 2-3 weeks thereafter. 2071.004.001 DPW Facility Fueling Station Design Project - Part B Scope.docx Daniel C. Thaete, P.E. Town of Ithaca Public Works, Director of Engineering October 11, 2022 Page 6 B 1L Please contact myself or Josh Thomas if you wish to discuss the Scope of Services presented above or to clarify our approach. If this proposal meets with your approval, please countersign below and submit one copy for our records. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the Town of Ithaca Department of Public Works on this design project. Sincerely, BARTON & LOGUIDICE, D.P.C. Scott D. Nostrand, P.E. Senior Vice President SDN/jms Jeffrey J. Reed, P.E. Senior Associate Authorization Barton & Loguidice, D.P.C.., is hereby authorized by Town of Ithaca ("Owner") to proceed with the services described herein as an amendment to the existing Agreement. [Name and Title] Date 2071.004.001 DPW Facility Fueling Station Design Project - Part B Scope.docx TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: TOWN BOARD MEMBERS FROM: MICHAEL SMITH, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2022 RE: ANNUAL AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT INSPECTIONS - LAUGHING GOAT FIBER FARM — 1485 MECKLENBURG RD INDIAN CREEK FARM — 1408 TRUMANSBURG RD MARIA MENDEZ — 471 BOSTWICK RD Attached are copies of the completed Annual Monitoring & Inspection Reports for the Laughing Goat Fiber Farm (Lisa & Gary Ferguson, Sheffield Road), Indian Creek Farm (Stephen Cummins, Trumansburg Road), and the new conservation easement at 471 Bostwick Road with Maria Mendez. The Town's Policies and Procedures Manual for the Town of Ithaca Agricultural Land Preservation Program and the easements require an annual inspection to be completed by the Town, with the results reported to the Town Board. I conducted the site inspection for Laughing Goat Fiber Farm on September 15th, the site inspection for Indian Creek Farm on September 20th, and the site inspection for the Mendez property on October 3', and found all three properties to be in compliance with the terms of the easements. Along with the attached Annual Monitoring & Inspection Forms, there are several photos of each property and aerial maps with notes added. I have also included the farm brochure from Indian Creek Farm, since it easily shows where all the crops and other uses are this year. Copies of the reports were sent to all three landowners. The Indian Creek Farm report was also provided to NYS Department of Agriculture & Markets, as required by the easement. Please contact me at 273-1747 or email me at msmithL&town.ithaca.ny.us if you have any questions. Enc. Annual Monitoring & Inspection Report Agricultural Conservation Easement Town of Ithaca Date of Visit: September 15, 2022 Easement Name: Ferguson Agricultural Conservation Easement Address/Location of Property: East Side of Sheffield Road 285' South of Mecklenburg Road Tax Parcel No.(s): 28-1-1.3 Acres under CE: 42.35 acres Current Landowner: Lisa & Gary Ferguson Address: 1485 Mecklenburg Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone #: 607-273-9212 Other Contact Person: n/a Was the landowner contacted prior to visit? X Yes —No Has ownership changed since last inspection? Yes X No Was landowner consulted during visit? Yes X No Did landowner tour property also? Yes X No Description of Current Land Uses: Agricultural -goat, alpaca. and sheep farm _ The easement property contains open fields, pastures, woods, low brush areas, and a barn. There are also two camping/tent sites (picnic tables, fire pits, port -a potty, and one tent platform located on eats side of the hedgerow and solar panels n the northern end of the pert�[._ Describe current Agricultural activities (and any changes since the last inspection): No significant changes since the last inspection. Open fields have been cut or are in pasture this year. Portable electric animal fences/netting and small movable animal shelters are located in various locations around the prQpedy. New fencing as been installed at very southern end of the field. List all man-made alterations made since the last inspection visit: None. Same types, sizes and numbers of movable fences and shelters as in the past, 'lust in different locations. Do all changes comply with the terms of the easement? X Yes _ No Comments: This property is in compliance with the conservation easement. List any observed natural alterations, or alterations beyond landowner's control: None. Other observations, comments, and recommendations: None. Describe any contact and discussions with landowner during visit: None. Reminders for next monitoring visit: None. Attach as needed maps, photos, and illustrations. Name of Inspector (s): Michael Smith, Senior Planner Signature(s): _ Town of Ithaca 21.5 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 273-1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us April 16, 2013 Fcrgt.�soti Agricldlura� (Ionservatkni Easement 09/15/2022 AnnWd hisl-,)cc6on - Pliolos I — looking east from northwest corner of property, 2 — looking south from northwest corner of property 3 — looking east from Sheffield Rd over open fields 4 — looking east from Sheffield Rd at access drive and 5 — looking north from southwest comer of property 6 — looking at new fences at southern end of open field Phoo� tGtkeia by: Mkdhadr Sii�'iNh' Seidoi° ofhhact Fergus(mi Agricldlura� (Ionservatkni Easement 09/15/2022 AnnWd his�-,)cc6on - Pholos 7 — looking east at path in southern woods 9 — looking north from the southeast comer of the open field I I — looking north at one of the tent sites 8 — looking west within the woods 10 — looking north on east side of the hedgerow 12 — looking northwest at barn and solar panels from Phoo� tGtkeia by: Mkdhadr Sii�,iNh, Seidoi° ofhhact Annual Monitoring & Inspection Report Agricultural Conservation Easement Town of Ithaca Date of Visit:September 20, 2022 Easement Name: Indian Creek Farm Conservation Easement Address/Location of Property: 1408 Trumansburg Road Tax Parcel No.(s): 24.-1-25.21 Acres under CE: 41.658 acres Current Landowner: Stephen T. Cummins Address: 1408 Trumansburg Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone #: 607-227-6147 Other Contact Person: n/a Was the landowner contacted prior to visit? X Yes —No Has ownership changed since last inspection? Yes X No Was landowner consulted during visit? Yes X No Did landowner tour property also? Yes X No Description of Current Land Uses: U-pick woods two residences, severa pportinbarns and sheds, parking areas and access drive material and equipment storage, and a playground. Describe current Agricultural activities (and any changes since the last inspection): Ag activities include orchards, fruit and vegetable fields fruit tree nursery and farm stand. Anew high tunnel has been added since the last inspection. Some crops have been moved around the property. with additional crops outside the easement area on ad.lacent leased propedy. List all man-made alterations made since the last inspection visit: A new large high tunnel has _ been added to the south of the tree barn in the "Farm Area" (see photos). Recent tree/vegetatio clearing has occurred along the northern property line to the north of the pond. Do all changes comply with the terms of the easement? X Yes _ No Comments: This property is in compliance with the conservation easement. List any observed natural alterations, or alterations beyond landowner's control: None. Other observations, comments, and recommendations: None. Describe any contact and discussions with landowner during visit: None. Reminders for next monitoring visit: None. Attach as needed maps, photos, and illustrations. Name of Inspector (s): Michael Smith, Senior Planner Signature(s): _ � z 0' > 1821 y o Town of Ithaca 21.5 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 273-1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us April 16, 2013 ln(N,in Creek F,,irni AgricAdlund Corlservaflorl Flasenient 09/20/2022 AnnWd lrisl-,)cction - Photos 81 — looking south at main farm stand building 3 — looking southwest at access drive in orchards 5 — looking west at storage of large crates 2 — looking west at main residence 4 — looking north from Hayts Road at access drive 6 — looking north at rows of young nursery trees Phoo� tGtkein by: Mkdhadr SiiaiNh, Seidoi° ofhhact ln(N,in Creek F,,irni AgricAdlund Corlservaflorl Flasenient 09/20/2022 AnnWd lrisl-,)cction - Photos 7 — looking west at clearing along stream and north 9 — looking south at northern end of new high tunnel 11 — looking into new high tunnel 8 — looking east at clearing along stream and north 10 — looking north at new high tunnel 12 — looking north at southern end of new high tunnel Phoo� tGtkein by: Mkdhadr SiiaiNh, Seidoi° ofhhact > CO 13O 4 cd cn +J rn 4-4 cii > 0 3 cd cd U) 0 cq 44 4.j 0 O w ;-4 CU +4 :z 44 0 0 P4 4-4 cd 0 wm 0 134 w rn pizlq w EOn 10 134 • En 4J co 0 En I OJO ;-4 CU Cc$ 4-4 U) cd PC rn uluill rn >, -W 0 Z •0 :3 U �A —4 En '..4 41 0 CA En 4J 0 1-4 0 :Z 0 'LY134 rN 0 — 4-4W 0 C) 0 Cc$ P4 04 1104 >4 ch 0 b 4-J0 cd 0) co c; m rn 0 4-J 0 iii'm cd U) F-4 W 4-J cz 0 En 1-4 all 0 $-4 U 4 b +J 4-4 rn CZ 2 w co co En +J rg 4-4 cz eilluilm $-4 ro W 0) F-4 cz 5 %mo I 4r >4 .0 0 b.0 4 . . U 'o +J b.0 cd 44 0 co 4-J cd $-4 4-4 0 0) 0 lw 1.1 rn o g41 M 4M, W 0 En 4 -,0 $0 cu 4 0 0 Co 0 134 "0 4-4 Z 00 > ;-4 P4 0) CZ 4-J ;-4 .'.4 0 co Cc$ iluluili 0 co cd r�4 134 r�4 -0 U) 1-4 0 W U V al 0 o 0 m 0 4-4 -14 � Z >4 44,4-J 0 0 0 . Z Co 7ailluuqq co cz 0) 0 En 4-J 6" > o 4- 0 1-4 114 :z 1 0 $-4 o co 04 jIuu4 0 4"J +J 4-; +J 4-J 4 04 Q)• 0 P-4 t 1.4 It 0 01 4-4 -�4 0 W 0 "IT 4-J M U %mO F--4 $.4 ail 0 4-J CO +J 1-4 %.0 - 4-4 0) 1�4 co Et� co 4-J cd 4-J F-4 cz 4-4 0 U 0 11. 04 w co 0 co *r4 w W 0E-4 0 0 0 cz W F-4 cz 4-4 4 t� iF cd cz 0 0 co 4-J 4 4-J co co 0) 1�4 co 4-J 1�4 4-4 co co 4-J co 4-4 4-J cz 4-J U; lw ca PMN m 04 *PEI O 4J O -0 w 134 co c3W 0 O En m (U CO cl !;:; -0 Ok r. 40 a; A 1. (1) 0 134 $40 1�4 co a 0 ow 4 40 134 W) W 4-1 0 A 4-; 0 4� co 134 0 '- ::s > u jow z e% $4 4- :o:S cn 4- o 0 cc 4� o0) N 'w 0 m u 4� 04 a co 4, 0 4k- co co O co 0 co 0 PC >4 bj) 0 ,4 r (3) tt� 4 41 -0 0 m 0 40J En ps (1) .5 14 co 0 v 0 0 14 4.4 0 0 0 >4 A P4 co .P.4 to 0 N 0 0 m .w 0 A sW4 >, 00 0 — 0 'w 0 4-1 0 0 4o -1 .P4 0 1w A 4-1 Co U, SO Ei Cja 0 ` Z P4 o 4 0 CO 0 0 'o W U) >1 CO PC% 0 4i PC 0 m 4� r� C4� (3) .m 10 W cc cn F-4 W 4- ca En 0 ::s (1) co om pt Im 9 W 44� Pt U, 0 41 4 �b . aw M 43 V H lw �i H d nn id is e� w • cd 4) V • po1 3 0 x o � a 4-' ,Q � 4-Jv 4-J v 4 O v v, v O v 4p, M.q � PizbA v 0 .Q v T i 0 � , I a O +� O vi � 'O T-4 Ct >4 —4 O +.+ O 5 bA '—' En u Oas '� p er✓ i CO �"' a Cb 4-Jwu ~—, O v '� ~ CZ CU CZ , Cb m m u cz ( 4�+ 4.4 O � U v N .04 O l .Q En 04 CO bA d-+ O fy 4-J T..' O Q 'O as 0 CIO CC O 4-J v v 0)0 A as 4-0 Cn O C b0A 4J a .M 0 O lq Ln a�i lw N N a O En v W C 4-4 ,{J moo � v 0� Oy PIZ � wmm° m w v En .0 ¢I O ✓+ 14 O w U O Q v O r: � PC � u Cn CIO v�0i IJ cd En w � chi) 0)i rn y��4-4 ;-4 1.4 rw v �," 94 � 0 v CO ' w 'V ' cz �m � o � � i OCZ Hv O CO - 0 cz >" � bA °v F. En�bA 4 oO. iuu� '� W Ll '�-O0 a O�,� En l o CO O04 AIII � w CO �� 0 �0 ✓+ m +pI��� Ct O cz .Q v �4 ��v vP� 0) p 0 � U 0) O 1-4 >1 i� �° v W .i r CIO o LO 1-4 a s O 4 134 N 134 x A4 co w o o O 0v N cN O+ a yv W •04cn ba x v i+ CO rn y P4 a� Oa v0.' cz U WO ++ O O b0 v ago > z O., 0 4- O o O+ o v +' z� o tz 0 0 CO v cn Q H tIp fu CO a�i vi > . xO 0 4-' COr. 4-1 CO O Oa O O Oa Ek d ;4 d� 0 a+ 4 A A ro c3 0 0 x 'Oii .� O c CIO v v o � >44�4 • �O sa vi 0w w O to WAczU u 4) v 4- '0 N O W sa O O � WO O cn 'u v cn En �✓ o v a' VH 0 •PM1 ;-4CO"0 v 0 sa � CO+� 4 O O 4 o v O q°>4 +, Ccn 0 CIO vyi bbj) 0 0) rh >( m 0 0 0 Cd . 4-4 M O v � 0 ° O • as o O v c- 4.4 u S4 pn .� r. to O yy cn w 44 .0 W¢ c e uu cd .0 OP14 CIS O On N -' c ON P ' w .w p cd O cd cn 161 OR �uyp PPO ws O VI"w"m � N��II6111 � w vim a� 0 CIO c u cd lu u««� v Ili u O m ui m E O z4 O cn 'G y, O ' v 0 O cz w cc cn eP 5 v .0 � � c0 � .� 'C oCIO CIO 41 °� u 0 4b O cd .tom, a�'i O C1+ cH O O d bb E O _ v = v .Q rn v In, -„ s CIOa 3 >4 �, , I. + 4. 5 O w O �" cn O c > v sbrA >' v p, O > CIO ee ea =1 � u w a)Z (U IN y � Oa v +� d �+ cz 0 Annual Monitoring & Inspection Report Agricultural Conservation Easement Town of Ithaca Date of Visit: October 3 2022 Easement Name: Mallon Agricultural Conservation Easement Address/Location of Property: 471 Bostwick Road Tax Parcel No.(s): 32.-2-2.2 Acres under CE: 52.52 Current Landowner: Maria Mendez Address: 471 Bostwick Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone #: 607-279-0394 Other Contact Person: Was the landowner contacted prior to visit? X Yes —No Has ownership changed since last inspection? Yes X No Was landowner consulted during visit? Yes X No Did landowner tour property also? Yes X No Description of Current Land Uses: Approximately 12 acres of the property is being leased to _ Forever Green Farms to crow spruce trees. The remainder of the property is open fields and woods. There is also a residence. aaraa_e and shed located in the Farmstead Area. Describe current Agricultural activities (and any changes since the last inspection): Approximately 12 acres of the property is being leased to prow spruce trees, which are supplied to landscapers and wholesalers with the large balled and burlapped trees. It does not appear that most of the remaining open fields have been cut or mowed this season_ List all man-made alterations made since the last inspection visit: None. _ Do all changes comply with the terms of the easement? X Yes _ No Comments: This property is in compliance with the conservation easement. List any observed natural alterations, or alterations beyond landowner's control: Several trees located along the stream have fallen recently due to erosion of the banks. Other observations, comments, and recommendations: None. Describe any contact and discussions with landowner during visit: None. Reminders for next monitoring visit: None. Attach as needed maps, photos, and illustrations. Name of Inspector (s): Michael Smith. Senior Planner Signature(s):Af Town of Ithaca 21.5 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 273-1747 www.town.ithaca.ny.us April 16, 2013 M�,,ffluoA�cu]1uze]COnServafluoFloDemeo1— 10/83/2022AroTuo] loDPCcflOo- P11010S 81— looking east from end of driveway along Bostwick Road 2— looking south from the end of driveway towards 3— looking southwest at 4— looking west within woods 5— looking southeast at small 6oW h— looking southwest u1utree that has recently fallen M�,,ffluoA�cu]1uze]COnServafluoFloDemeo1— 10/83/2022AroTuo] loDPCcflOo- P11010S 7 — looking south at paths in woods 9— looking north insoutheast corner offield u1 planted I I — looking south at access lane and planted spruce trees 8— looking northwest bnwoods 10 — looking west at field of planted spruce trees 12— looking southwest at small shed W INO r� "r�j�il III y/ ! � ! � II !��/ �� ! Z✓ 9 �� o r a r /� aii� r rA� U 1O n S U,rd goo" 2otlu Item 7 MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 — : Authorization for the Town Engineer to issue a Sewer Exemption for 272 Enfield Falls Road, TP 33.-1-24.1; Whereas the Town Engineer received a request for a Sewer Exemption from Christa Nunez, The Learning Farm (Applicant), located at 272 Enfield Falls Road, TP 33.-1-24.1 which stated the financial difficulty to connect to municipal sewer, and Whereas the nearest town sewer main is approximately 1200+/- feet easterly down Enfield Falls Road and the estimated minimum cost to connect to this location is $240,000, which is substantially more than the estimated cost of $50,000 to install an onsite wastewater treatment system, and Whereas, the Town Engineer recommends the issuance of a Sewer Exemption for the parcel, now therefore be it Resolved, that pursuant to Town Code Section 214-6, the Town Board hereby finds that the Applicant has shown unusual and extreme practical difficulties in connecting to the public sewers for the reasons stated above and detailed in the Applicant's request to the Town, and be it further Resolved, that the Town Board authorizes the Town Engineer to issue an exemption from the Town Code Section 214-5 public sewer connection requirement for TP 33.-1-24.1 for the installation of a new, onsite wastewater treatment system associated with the Learning Farm Development, subject to the approval of the Tompkins County Health Department to design and installation of the onsite system. Moved: Seconded: Vote: KHtBA� INTERNATIONAL C.:....� ,, �i�, �„ 272 Enfield Falls Rd, Ithaca NY Anew educational and tourism project is to be built at 272 Enfield Falls Rd. The Town has requested that we detail the rationale for the proposed on -site sewage plan that has been created in lieu of construction of a connection to the municipal sewer system. The costs for that connection are detailed below. Please reference the attached map of the municipal water and sewer lines in the immediate area of the project. There is one option for connecting to this system, as shown by the red line, but it is not cost effective. One municipal sewer line is located down the road and approximately 1200' to the Southeast of the property, resulting in —1500' of trench and pipe required for connection. Assuming the cost to connect for approximately 1200' of sewer extension x $200/ft = $240,000 including the cost of manholes, etc. Based on the experience of the engineering team working on this project, the onsite sewage systems will cost less than $100,000 (probably closer to $50,000). Considering that the cost of the sewer connections would exceed the estimated cost for a traditional septic system by a factor of 4 or more, it is desired to get a waiver from the Town from your requirements to connect to municipal sewer as these connection requirements make the project financially infeasible. Additionally, the location is in an Ag Zone in a residential area where an extension of sewage systems may not be ideal, and sits directly across from Robert Treman State Park. We look forward to hearing back from you regarding this waiver request at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your time and attention to this matter. Regards, Christa Christa Nunez The Learning Farm cc: Stephen Maybee - Licensed Professional Engineer Scott Gibson - Environmental Engineer - City of Ithaca Alex Mergold - Licensed Professional Architect Item 08 MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD October 17, 2022 TB Resolution 2022 - : Consent Agenda Resolved that the Town Board approves and authorizes the payment of the audited vouchers in the Town of Ithaca Abstract No. 20 for FY-2022 as indicated below: VOUCHER NOS. 1153 - 1187 General Fund Town Wide 14,775.5 General Fund Part -Town 1,350.00 Highway Fund Town Wide DA 1,454.05 Highway Fund Part Town DB 116,936.92 Water Fund 8,552.57 Sewer Fund 2,023.27 Forest Home Lighting District 36.92 Glenside Lighting District 11.02 Renwick Heights Lighting District 18.41 Eastwood Commons Lighting District 25.79 Clover Lane Lighting District 3.45 Winner's Circle Lighting District 5.13 Burlei h Drive Lighting District 12.03 West Haven Road Lighting District 46.88 Coddin ton Road Lighting District 27.71 TOTAL 145,279.65 Moved: Seconded: Vote: ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHE GENERAL FUND TOWNWIDE TOWN OF ITHACA Page 1 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 To the Supervisor: I certify that the vouchers listed on this Abstract were audited by the Town Board on the above date and allowed in the amounts shown. You are hereby authorized to pay to each of the claimants the amount opposite their name. Date Town Clerk/Comptroller Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1153 ALTA EQUIPMENT NEW YORK LLC A7110.451 28.20 19247 INV # PI 1/4589/SWITCH # 5 10/18/2022 1154 ANGELO SAND & GRAVEL, INC. A8540.400 226.91 19248 VARIOUS INVOICES/TONS WASHED # 1 STONE FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC A7110.450 732.39 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC A8540.450 81.38 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1156 CAYUGA LUMBER INC A7110.441 282.66 19250 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1158 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC A1620.442 100.91 19252 INV # 4133699217/CARPET RENTAL 10/7/2022 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC A5132.441 17.46 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC A7110.440 3.64 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1160 CINTAS CORPORATION A1440.440 19.44 19253 INV # 5127376473/FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1160 CINTAS CORPORATION A7110.440 25.29 19253 INV # 5127376473/FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC A1620.447 1,687.74 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC A3310.454 1.26 19254 INV # 6351821580YELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC A5132.447 17.16 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC AS 182.447 623.42 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1163 CROSSROADS HIGHWAY SUPPLY, INC A5132.441 41.50 19256 INV # 23110/ALL VISITORS OFFICE SIGNS 10/18/2022 1 165 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 576 A8540.400 2,332.40 19238 INV # 1117669/HDPE PIPE 10/18/2022 1166 GREEN MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY A1620.441 2.43 19259 INV # S4149044.001/FLUORESCENT BULBS TH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1166 GREEN MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY A1620.441 70.34 19259 INV # S4149023.001/FLUORESCENT BULBS TH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHER GENERAL FUND TOWNWIDE TOWN OF ITHACA Page 2 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1166 GREEN MOUNTAIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY A5132.441 71.09 19259 INV # S4165447.001/LENOX STEP PWF MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1169 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES A3310.455 80.26 19261 A/C # 6035322540609785/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1169 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES A5132.441 143.85 19261 A/C # 6035322540609785/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1169 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES A7110.441 74.88 19261 A/C # 6035322540609785/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1169 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES A7110.459 15.98 19261 A/C # 6035322540609785/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1170 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC A7110.451 214.50 19262 INV # P42235/RODDER LINE HOSE # 59 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY A5132.441 107.98 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY A7110.459 25.80 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1172 PENN POWER GROUP A5132.441 310.00 19264 INV # 4400286/ANNUAL INSPECT & TESTING GENERATOR 10/18/2022 1175 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC A7110.451 91.71 19267 INV # 28011635/TIRES FOR # 66 10/18/2022 1176 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC A7110.451 117.38 19267 INV # 28011689/TIRES FOR # 21 10/18/2022 1178 SYRACUSE TIME & ALARM CO INC A5132.441 1,000.00 19269 INV # 148973/PREVENT MAINTEN AGREEMENT 10/18/2022 1179 THALER & THALER A 1420.402 27.00 19270 INV # 42802/SEPTEMBER LEGAL FEES 10/18/2022 1180 TOMPKINS COUNTY CLERK A1410.423 60.00 19271 NOTARY RENEWAL/PAULETTE ROSA 10/18/2022 1182 TRIPLE CITIES ACQUISITIONS LLC A7110.451 9.83 19273 INV # 1705540/0IL GUZZER DEGREASER FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1184 UPSTATE EQUIPMENT A7110.451 65.57 19275 INV # 03-175183/SHOCK SPRING # 44 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER A7110.451 41.14 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1187 ZEISER WILBERT VAULT INC A8540.400 6,024.00 19278 INV # 22008UCATCH BASIN, SHIMS, GRATES FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS GENERAL FUND PART TOWN TOWN OF ITHACA Page 3 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1179 THALER & THALER B 1420.402 1,350.00 19270 INV # 42802/SEPTEMBER LEGAL FEES 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHER - HIGHWAY TOWNWIDE TOWN OF ITHACA Page 4 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1153 ALTA EQUIPMENT NEW YORK LLC DA5130.451 15.19 19247 INV # PI 1/4589/SWITCH # 5 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC DA5142.450 1,139.27 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC DA5130.459 3.64 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1170 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC DA5130.451 115.50 19262 INV # P42235/RODDER LINE HOSE # 59 10/18/2022 1175 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC DA5130.451 49.38 19267 INV # 28011635/TIRES FOR # 66 10/18/2022 1176 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC DA5130.451 63.21 19267 INV # 28011689/T1RES FOR # 21 10/18/2022 1182 TRIPLE CITIES ACQUISITIONS LLC DA5130.451 5.29 19273 INV # 1705540/0I1, GUZZER DEGREASER FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1184 UPSTATE EQUIPMENT DA5130.451 35.31 19275 INV # 03-175183/SHOCK SPRING # 44 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER DA5130.451 22.16 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER DA5130.459 5.10 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHER HIGHWAY FUND PART TOWN TOWN OF ITHACA Page 5 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1153 ALTA EQUIPMENT NEW YORK LLC DB5130.451 136.67 19247 INV # P 11/45 89/SWITCH # 5 10/18/2022 1154 ANGELO SAND & GRAVEL, INC. DB5110.453 113.46 19248 VARIOUS INVOICES/TONS WASHED # 1 STONE FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC DB5110.450 651.01 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC DB51 12.450 610.32 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1157 CHEMTEK, INC, - DEPT # 348 DB5110.459 470.82 19251 INV # 422236/ORGANIC ASPHALT REMOVER 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC DB5130.459 37.11 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC DB5140.440 3.64 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1160 CINTAS CORPORATION DB5140.440 71.94 19253 INV # 5127376473/FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1165 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 576 DB5112.453 2,332.40 19258 INV # 1117669/HDPE PIPE 10/18/2022 1167 HANSON AGGREGATES INC DB5112.453 1,511.42 19260 INV # 4208974/TYPE 7 FOR BURNS WAY 10/18/2022 1167 HANSON AGGREGATES INC DB5112.453 10,537.80 19260 INV # 4208070/TYPE 7 FOR BURNS WAY 10/18/2022 1168 HANSON AGGREGATES INC DB5112.453 9,893.03 19260 INV # 4209938/TYPE 7 FOR BURNS WAY 10/18/2022 1169 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES DB5110.459 29.94 19261 A/C # 6035322540609785/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1170 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC D135130.451 1,039.50 19262 INV # P42235/RODDER LINE HOSE # 59 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY DB5110.459 254.97 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY DB5130.451 66.48 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY D135140.440 89.00 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY DB5140.459 25.99 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1174 SMITH INC —JC DB5130.451 168.96 19266 INV # 1638996frRI-PDXY SPRAYER FOR # 60 10/18/2022 1175 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC D135130.451 444.45 19267 INV # 28011635/TIRES FOR # 66 10/18/2022 1176 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC D135130.451 568.86 19267 INV # 28011689/TIRES FOR # 21 10/18/2022 1177 SUIT-KOTE CORPORATION DB5110.453 78,378.27 19268 INV # IN030385/2022 STONE & OIL 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS HIGHWAY FUND PART TOWN TOWN OF ITHACA Page 6 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1181 TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLAN D135130.200 329.99 19272 A/C # 6035301202907661/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1181 TRACTOR SUPPLY CREDIT PLAN 13135130.459 30.56 19272 A/C # 6035301202907661/MISC PARTS & TOOLS 10/18/2022 1182 TRIPLE CITIES ACQUISITIONS LLC D135130.451 47.63 19273 INV # 1705540/0I1. GUZZER DEGREASER FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1184 UPSTATE EQUIPMENT D135130.451 317.78 19275 INV # 03-175183/SHOCK SPRING # 44 10/18/2022 1185 W. CASE TREE SERVICE, LLC D135140.400 2,500.00 19276 INV # 0191/REMOVAL OF TREES 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER D135130.451 199.38 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER D135130.459 51.54 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 1187 ZEISER WILBERT VAULT INC DB5112.453 6,024.00 19278 INV # 220081/CATCH BASIN, SHIMS, GRATES FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS TOWN OF ITHACA DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 WATER FUND Page 7 of 17 NUMBER 020 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1153 ALTA EQUIPMENT NEW YORK LLC F8340.451 15.18 19247 INV # PI 1/4589/SWITCH # 5 10/18/2022 1154 ANGELO SAND & GRAVEL, INC. F8340.470 283.64 19248 VARIOUS INVOICES/TONS WASHED # 1 STONE FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1154 ANGELO SAND & GRAVEL, INC. F8340.471 283.64 19248 VARIOUS INVOICES/TONS WASHED # 1 STONE FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC F8340.450 447.57 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC F8340.440 3.64 19252 INV # 4133390082/WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1160 CINTAS CORPORATION F8340.440 36.94 19253 INV # 51273764731FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC F8340.447 688.96 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1162 CORNELL UNIVERSITY -FOREST HOME F8350.474 4,300.19 19255 INV # IT-R6113999-13023-120/17OREST HOME WATER 10/18/2022 1164 EMPIRE SAFETY TRAINING F8340.410 800.00 19257 INV # 497 1 /CONFINED SPACE TRAINING 1015 & 10/6 10/18/2022 1170 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC F8340.451 115.50 19262 INV # P42235/RODDER LINE HOSE # 59 10/18/2022 1171 NORTHEAST-ITHACA AGWAY F8340.471 10.26 19263 VARIOUS INVOICES/MISC PARTS & SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1173 S.C.L.I.W.C. F8340.470 181.50 19265 VARIOUS INVOICES/WORK DONE BY BP 10/18/2022 1173 S.C.L.I.W.C. F8340.471 605.00 19265 VARIOUS INVOICES/WORK DONE BY BP 10/18/2022 1173 S.C.L.I.W.C. F8340.476 599.18 19265 VARIOUS INVOICES/WORK DONE BY BP 10/18/2022 1175 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC F8340.451 49.39 19267 INV # 28011635/TIRES FOR # 66 10/18/2022 1176 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC F8340.451 63.21 19267 INV # 28011689/T1RES FOR # 21 10/18/2022 1182 TRIPLE CITIES ACQUISITIONS LLC F8340.451 5.29 19273 INV # 1705540/0I1- GUZZER DEGREASER FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1183 UDIG-NY INC F8340.400 6.00 19274 INV # 22090609/LATE DIG TICKET 10/18/2022 1184 UPSTATE EQUIPMENT F8340.451 35.32 19275 INV # 03-175183/SHOCK SPRING # 44 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER F8340.451 22.16 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAWTEN 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHER SEWER FUND TOWN OF ITHACA Page 8 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1153 ALTA EQUIPMENT NEW YORK LLC G8120.451 21.69 19247 INV # PI 1/4589/SWITCH # 5 10/18/2022 1154 ANGELO SAND & GRAVEL, INC. G8120.470 226.91 19248 VARIOUS INVOICES/TONS WASHED # I STONE FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1155 BUELL FUELS LLC G8120.450 406.89 19249 INV # 5827/UNLEADED FUEL DELIVERED 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1159 CINTAS CORP LOC 121 INC G8120.440 3.64 19252 INV # 41333900821WIPERS/MOPS/TOWELS 10/5/22 10/18/2022 1160 CINTAS CORPORATION G8120.440 40.83 19253 INV # 5127376473/FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10/18/2022 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC G8120.447 107.82 19254 INV # 63 518215 80 1 /ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 1164 EMPIRE SAFETY TRAINING G8120.410 800.00 19257 INV # 4971/CONFINED SPACE TRAINING 1015 & 10/6 10/18/2022 1170 JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC G8120.451 165.00 19262 INV # P42235/RODDER LINE HOSE # 59 10/18/2022 1175 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC G8120.451 70.55 19267 INV # 28011635/TIRES FOR # 66 10/18/2022 1176 STEVE SHANNON TIRE, INC G8120.451 90.30 19267 INV # 28011689/TIRES FOR # 21 10/18/2022 1182 TRIPLE CITIES ACQUISITIONS LLC G8120.451 7.56 19273 INV # 1705540/OIL GUZZER DEGREASER FOR STOCK 10/18/2022 1184 UPSTATE EQUIPMENT G8120.451 50.44 19275 INV # 03-175I83/SHOCK SPRING # 44 10/18/2022 1186 WINZER G8120.451 31.64 19277 INV # 452382/HARDWARE & SUPPLIES VEH MAINTEN 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS FOREST HOME LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 9 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL1-5182.447 36.92 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS TOWN OF ITHACA DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 GLENSIDE LIGHT DIST Page 10 of 17 NUMBER 020 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL2-5182.447 11.02 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS 11 RENWICK HGTS LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 11 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL3-5182.447 18.41 19254 INV # 6351821580 1 /ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS EASTWOOD COMMONS LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 12 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL4-5182.447 25.79 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACTOF AUDITED VOUCHERS CLOVER LANE LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 13 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL5-5182.447 3.45 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS WINNER'S CIRCLE LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 14 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL6-5182.447 5.13 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS BURLEIGH DRIVE LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 15 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL7-5182.447 12.03 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHEMS. WEST HAVEN ROAD LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 16 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL8-5182.447 46.88 19254 INV # 6351821580 1 /ELECTRIC 10/18/2022 ABSTRACT OF AUDITED VOUCHERS CODDINGTON ROAD LIGHT DIST TOWN OF ITHACA Page 17 of 17 TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DATE OF AUDIT: 10/17/2022 NUMBER 020 TOTAL CLAIMS: $145,279.65 Voucher # Claimant/Invoice/Description Account # Amount Check 1161 CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY INC SL9-5182.447 27.71 19254 INV # 63518215801/ELECTRIC 10/18/2022