Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 2010-08-17Board Mi Baer, Jon Staff Pry Planner; attorney Call to Order Mr. Wilcox dE public hearing Persons to Christa Bissell about the bike the clearance about the brid There are a fE neighborhood that the road neighborhood. residency is at school student project to prod a number of p since June. M., She said they path. It has be of goods from Board membE overpass is nc new standard trucks to trave the East Hill needs to be v was done in V FILE DATE TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD MEETING Tuesday, August 17 2010 215 N. Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Present: Fred Wilcox, chair; Members: George Conneman, John Beach, Ellen Kevin Talty, Rod Howe, Hollis Erb Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Susan Ritter, Planner; Mike Smith, DeAugistine, Deputy Town Clerk; Kristin Taylor, Engineer; Susan Brock, the meeting duly opened at 7:03 p.m. and accepted the posting of the heard 137 Pine Tree Road, told the Board that people living on her road are upset and pedestrian path project. Their concern is that taking down the overpass so ✓ill be higher will facilitate larger trucks on the road. The neighbors didn't find out le up front — only that it was a bike path — so they researched it themselves. w things they feel have not been portrayed accurately. In February 2009, at a ocus group meeting, which none of the neighbors knew about, someone said eras populated mostly by grad students. It's actually a long -term, established The road has 49 houses, and only three are not owner occupied. The average gut 19 years. There are at least 15 children living on the street, not including high 3. They want to state that this will negatively impact them, and they want the ied in a way that doesn't bring large truck traffic to the road. They have spoken to ,ople in the County and Town and have written letters. They have been active Bissell wanted to state that the information in the Town record is not accurate. vere never told about the overpass — they were only told it was a pedestrian /bike .,n in the Cornell record that they want to get rid of that bridge to increase the flow loute 79 to 366, and that has been their agenda since before this project. commented that the reason the county and state decided to take down the to allow more height, but to increase the width of the shoulders; however, the >r the height of the replacement overpass is higher and this will allow larger e Pine Tree Road. The overpass is an abandoned railroad, and is now is part of ;creation Way. Passing under the overpass is very dangerous and the road lened. Speed -limit reduction was mentioned as a traffic - calming measure, as na. This is not an issue that will come before the Planning Board. Lucia Sciore, 124 Pine Tree Road, mainly wanted to reinforce what Ms. Bissell said. She understands that the project is not in the residential section, but that Pine Tree Road is not a truck route. The residents strongly support any way to reduce the speed on that road. AGENDA ITEM Continuation of consideration of a sketch plan for the proposed Vine Street Cottages project located on Mitchell and Vine Street's, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 59 -1 -1, 59 -1 -2, 59 -1 -3 and 59 -1 -4, High Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves the development of up to 22 PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 2 of 11 single - family houses and 10 attached townhouse units on 3.4 +/- acres. The proposal will also ' involve upgraded and new roads, new stormwater facilities, landscaping, a playground, and improved connections to the East Ithaca Recreation Way. Susan J. and Harold Mix, Owners; Agora Homesi and Development, LLC, Applicants. Toby Millman! Agora Homes, gave a quick summary of the plan. He responded to a question raised at the last meeting regarding the boundaries of the census track he used for his traffic data on people who bike and walk to work. It is everything west of Vine, north of Mitchell, east of Delaware, and south of Maple /Dryden Road. It does not include the grad- student apartments. Mr. Bosak commented that this is the type of development we should have. It provides proximity to services and alternative modes of transportation. It has believable TCAT service. The conversion from an industrial use to housing is a plus and the conversion of Vine to a real street is good. Regarding affordable housing, he said the houses are bigger than they have to be. If the reason it's a one -way street is that it provides parking on one side, then if they made the houses smaller, especially on Vine Street, they'd have enough frontage for parking on both sides and for gardens. Ms. Erb commented that turning Worth Street into a cul -de -sac is not a good idea. This would make it hard for garbage and recycling trucks and snow plows. She thought that Worth Street was designed I as one way because of the perceived necessity of deep lots and because of bump outs protecting the play area. She noted that the play area could be protected with speed tables and slow two -way traffic. There might be a couple of bump outs next to the playground, but a lot of parallel parking is not necessary. She particularly likes the style of the houses and features like garages in the back, the playground, sidewalks, street trees, and that it is next to the recreation way. She heard from neighbors that the current runoff situation from this triangle is bad, and stressed that additional runoff must be prevented. She sees the style of houses a good transition, but is concerned that the townhouses are all one color stroke, and would prefer it be broken ups. Mr. Millman responded to a question about the price of the homes: single family homes will be in the low $300,000s, and townhouses in the mid $200,000s. He would like to deliver smaller, lower -cost homes, but you need to be able to deliver just the right size home to cover the fixed costs. Right now the size and price of the homes is at the optimal point to make the deal work economically. Site contamination: it was an asphalt plant for many decades prior to being a trucking company. They did many borings. The only place they found actual contamination was in the southwest corner of a building that was a maintenance facility. Oil and petroleum products had been poured down a drain. This has been reported to the DEC and they have a DEC work plan to remediate the site. There is no evidence of the expansion of the contaminated area. Mr. Wilcox commented that Worth Street should be neither one way nor a cul -de -sac because of emergency access. The parking space problem in this neighborhood stems from Cornell students and workers parking on the street and walking to campus. Sufficient parking in the driveways is better than trying to put it along the road. Stormwater management is an issue. Vine Street is el ssentially a driveway right now serving the four homes. If the development is built and Worth is a two -way street, Vine Street will be used to access 20 units. Nine trips per day results in 180 car trips a day, which, when spread over a day, is one car every 4 minutes. Those will be bunched during peak hours. It's unlikely that the traffic will have a significant impact. He doesn't think 1900 square feet is very large. Mr. Talty likes the price. If you drop the price and the square footage, parents will buy them as student housing. At $300,000, it severely negates that type of issue. He wanted to know how they will remedi ate the oil spill and which land fill will be used. He also noted that 40 feet is PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 3 of 11 narrow for a lot because of the configuration of setback, driveway, house, setback, which will be pretty cramped. He commented that crawl spaces are typically 4 feet deep and that he does not like earth. They could increase the value of the houses with basements. Mr. Millman responded that they will excavate until they can't find any more contamination, then cart the soil off to a certified landfill. He said that basements are expensive, and they thought a better alternative would be attics, which will provide dry storage. The drainage is not worked out yet. Mr. Talty would like to know the recent sales price of homes in Belle Sherman -- he thinks it will be higher because of the elementary school. Responding to questions from Mr. Wilcox, Mr. Millman said there will be a homeowners association and deed restrictions -- whatever is necessary to enforce the approved site plan. They do not plan to require owner occupancy. Mr. Wilcox invited the public to speak. Larry Himes, 120 Vine Street, is in favor of making the Worth Street extension two way. Aside from making smaller houses, the lots could be shortened, leaving plenty of room. Regarding toxic remediation, there's a catch basin across the street from 108 Vine Street. Digging down four feet, they, will disturb everything down there, so any remediation needs to be made very precisely and very carefully. He spoke in favor of an owner - occupied restriction because little by little, single - family homes are being converted to rental properties in the Belle Sherman area. The properties; would still sell fine with such a restriction. Rod Steuteville spoke in favor of the development. It's walkable, well designed, and in a good location. He s uI ggested keeping Worth Street narrow if it is made two -way, which keeps traffic slower and safer. He argued in favor of some on- street parking spaces: it's an efficient way to provide parking; there's no pavement leading to it, only the space required for the car, so there's very little impervious surface; it's shared parking. He encouraged the Board to approve the project. Garrick Blalocl neighborhood and becausei and the schoc recreation way the city street Cornell Street equivalent to N It's a very wal That will chanc that you can't i can be done a He would like was a City prof James John, c that the density houses in an a 7 a.m., the str Because of the , 210 Cobb Street, is enthusiastically in favor of the project for two reasons: the loesn't need a trucking depot, which is an inappropriate use of the neighborhood, 's a thoughtful project, which will bring families who support the neighborhood It offers amenities to the neighborhood like the playground and access to the His only concern is what happens when you leave the development and enter in Worth Street? He encouraged all Board members to walk it. All the way from to Worth Street, there are no stop signs in the uphill east/west direction. It's itchell Street in terms of speed, but unlike Mitchell Street, there are no sidewalks. able neighborhood. It's been okay so far because Worth Street is a dead end. e with a neighborhood at the end and with Worth being two way. The problem is ;II your kids to stay off the street because there are no sidewalks. Two things that e to put in sidewalks and to put in stop signs, which would slow the traffic down. o see the Town work with the City to accomplish this. Several years ago, there osal to put in curbs and storm sewers, but this didn't happen. >rner of Pearl and Worth, spoke about density and traffic problems. He thinks is not comparable to the existing neighborhood. He pointed out that there are 15 9a that is at least as large as the area of the proposed development. Starting at ets are filled with parked cars left by people who work and study at Cornell. price of the houses, you will need two workers and probably two cars at each of PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 4 of 11 the houses. From his point of view, he would prefer that Worth Street extension be two -way and that there be fewer houses. He described how cars from the A and B lots will flow down Worth Street. He'd like the City to close the traffic from coming onto Worth Street. He's also worried about drainage. Some of the water drains into his yard. He's taken care of the problem, but it might get worse with the development. Mr. Bosak noted that there is no doubt that traffic will be increased, and that the Planning Board will be looking at traffic studies. He doesn't think that's related to the parking problem, because they already have a parking problem. He is surprised that the parking system used in other college towns is not implemented here. He suggested the neighbors go to the City with a petition. The City can declare their neighborhood a zone and only people with stickers for that zone get to park there. It was notedl that this is done in the Bryant Park neighborhood. Ms. Brock said it's an amendment to the Vehicle and Traffic law. Linda Caughey, 125 Pearl Street, commented that a cul -de -sac would prevent people from parking in the proposed new neighborhood. In the last 17 years, there have been five different owners of the house next door; all have said they will walk to work, none have, and they have all had two cars She's concerned that people from the proposed development will park their second cars in her neighborhood. Cornell has plans to take down the property on the other side of Maplewood, and she doesn't know what they will do with that property. The density of the proposed neighborhood is high. She is not sure the school district wants more kids since they are already concerned about the number of kids. She said that when Mr. Millman came to neighborhood meetings, he said that if they weren't in favor of the development, it wouldn't go forward. A lot of the neighbors do have concerns. They have no storm sewers and no curbs, even though the City promised to put them in. A lot of the homes in the neighborhood have practically no street side, so if you put in sidewalks, they will have no lawns. Ann Carson, 811 Mitchell Street, had comments on size and cost. Her house is 1400 sf, with two bedrooms and one bath; it sits on 1/5 of an acre and is assessed less than $200,000. The house nearby with 10 rooms could not sell for $300,000. She is dubious about the size and cost of the houses and the townhouses. Mr. Bosak agreed that it will be hard to move houses at that price, but Mr. Talty disagreed — the house on the corner of Belle Sherman and Elmwood sold at over $400,000. He thinks people will pay more to get less in Belle Sherman. Kathy Orr, 1241 Vine Street, pointed out that Clover Lane, directly opposite the new Worth Street extension, had to be posted No Parking on both sides of the street because it's outside the city even -odd parking system. Any parking along the Worth Street extension will be useless: students will park there in the fall and come back at Christmas break to pick up their cars. The Planning Board recommended that Worth Street be a two -way road. Mr. Bosak would like to get the message to the City about sidewalks and traffic calming. Ms. Erb agreed that there needs to be some form of traffic calming on the new portion of Worth Street besides sidewalks, the tree line, and street trees. Mr. Millman said that if the neighborhood is not happy, he is not happy; if there is an overwhelming concern about the project, they will not go forward. He is not in the business of forcing anything on anyone. He committed to reach out again to the Vine Street residents and others and talk through the issues to see if they can find solutions. He is also committed to working with the City to address traffic calming, stop signs, and sidewalks. Mr. Wilcox pi the Planning Planning Boy questions ab( SEAR Dete PB RESOL Chaffee 2 -1 56. -3 -16 Moved by WHEREAS: 1. This is Parcel No 6,341± sq be consoli Marchetto 2. This is an agency w 3. The Plani Environm the Town Chaffee, State," pr 4/9/10, ar 4. Town pl significe PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 5 of 11 Hinted out for the record that the applicant was provided with copies of the letters Board received from Kathy and David Orr and Sara Jane and David Hymes. The ird agreed that the density is appropriate for the area; some members had iut the size and cost of some of the units. Chaffee 2 -Lot Subdivision, 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road. ON No. 2010 -059: SEAR, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval, Subdivision Modification, 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road, Tax Parcel No. is Erb; seconded by Kevin Talty sideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2 -lot located at 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road (NYS Route 79), Town of Ithaca Tax 56 -3 -16, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves subdividing a are foot parcel from the northeast corner of 1584 Slaterville Road which will then lated with 1586 Slaterville Road. Scott & Ellen Chaffee, Owners; Katherine Applicant; and Misted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is acting as lead respect to Subdivision Approval; and g Board, on August 17, 2010, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short tal Assessment Form Part I, submitted by the applicant, and Part II prepared by anning staff, a survey map entitled "Boundary Survey and Lot Split for Ellen ott Chaffee, 1584 Slaterville Road, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York ared by Keystone Associates, Architects, Engineers and Surveyors, LLC, dated other application materials; and ing staff has recommended a negative determination of environmental with respect to the proposed Subdivision Approval; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance for the reasons set forth in the Environmental Assessment Form Part II referenced above, in accordance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act for the above referenced action as proposed, and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. A vote on the motion was as follows: AYES: Wilcox, 'Conneman, Beach, Bosak, Talty, Howe, Erb NAYS: None ABSTENTIONS: None PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 6 of 11 PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2 -16,t subdivision located at 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road (NYS Route 79), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.56 -3 -16, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves subdividing a +/- 6,341 square foot parcel from the northeast corner of 1584 Slaterville Road which will then be consolidated with 1586 Slaterville Road. Scott & Ellen Chaffee, Owners; Katherine Marchetto, Applicant. Mr. Wilcox opened public hearing at 8:47 p.m. Hearing no one, Mr. Wilcox closed the public hearing at 8:47 p.m. PB RESOLUTION No. 2010 -060: Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval, Chaffee 2- Lot Subdivision Modification, 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road, Tax Parcel No. 56.-3-16 Moved by Kevin Talty; seconded by Rod Howe WHEREAS: This is co n'I sideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2 -lot subdivision located at 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road (NYS Route 79), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel Noll 56 -3 -16, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves subdividing a 6,341+ square foot parcel from the northeast corner of 1584 Slaterville Road which will then be consolidated with 1586 Slaterville Road. Scott & Ellen Chaffee, Owners; Katherine Marchettoj Applicant; and 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as lead agency, with respect to Subdivision Approval, has on August 17, 2010, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I, submitted by the applicant, and Part II prepared by the Town Planning staff; and 3. The Planning Board, on August 17, 2010, has reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I, submitted by the applicant, and Part II prepared by the Town Planning staff, a survey map entitled "Boundary Survey and Lot Split for Ellen Chaffee, Scott Chaffee, 1584 Slaterville Road, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York State," prepared by Keystone Associates, Architects, Engineers and Surveyors, LLC, dated 4/9/10, and other application materials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed two -lot subdivision located at 1584 Slaterville Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 56. -3 -16, as shown on the map entitled "Boundary Survey and Lot Split for Ellen Chaffee, Scott Chaffee, 1584 Slaterville Road, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York State," prepared by Keystone Associates, Architects, Engineers and Surveyors, LLC, dated 4/9/10 subject to the following conditions: a. submission for signing by the Chairman of the Planning Board of an original or mylar copy of the most current plat and three dark -lined prints prior to filing with the Tompkins County Clerk's Office, and submission of a receipt of filing to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department; b. with sub PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 7 of 11 six months of this approval, consolidation of the 6,341± square foot parcel with the that holds 1586 Slaterville Road, and evidence of such consolidation to be :ted to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. A vote on the motion was as follows: AYES: Wilcox, Conneman, Beach, Bosak, Talty, Howe, Erb NAYS: None ABSTENTIONS: None Consideration of acceptance of the draft scoping document for the Environmental Impact Statement regarding the proposed Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) project located north lof the Pine Tree Road and Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) intersection, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 63- 1 -8.2, 63- 1 -2.2, 63 -1 -12, 63 -1 -3.1 and 63- 1 -3.3, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves construction of an underground accelerator tunnel (14- foot diameter land +/- 1 km long), a cryogenic facility, and an extension to the existing Wilson Laboratory ( +/- 185,000 gross square feet of building space). The project will also involve new stormwater facilities, parking, outdoor lighting, and landscaping. The Planning Board may also consider scheduling a public scoping session to hear public comments on the draft scoping document. Cornell University, Owner; Steve Beyers, P.E., Engineering Services Leader, Agent. Ms. Brock wanted the record to reflect that she has a conflict of interest, her husband being a co- principal investigator on the project. She took a seat in the audience and did not provide any advice on the matter. Mr. Bosak went through the document, correcting typos and grammatical errors and providing changes he would like made. PB RESOLUTION No. 2010 -061: SEOR — Setting Public Meeting for Draft Scoping Document, Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac, Tax Parcel No.'s 63- 1 -8.2, 63- 1 -2.2, 63 -1 -12, 63- 1 -3.1, and 63- 1 -3.3, Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) at Wilson Lab Entrance Moved by Jon Bosak; seconded by John Beach WHEREAS: 1. Based upo in applicant's revised sketch plan and revised project narrative, dated May 25, 2010, and reviewed by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board at its July 20, 2010 meeting, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board has determined that a SEQR positive declaration of environmental significance continues to apply to this project, and that a Draft Environmental Impact Study (DEIS) will be required; and 2. The Town of Ithaca Planning Board at its meeting on December 2, 2008, declared its intent to serve as lead agency to coordinate the environmental review for the proposed Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) project located north of the Pine Tree Road and Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) intersection, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 63- 1 -8.2, 63 -1- 2.2, 63 -1 -12, 63 -1 -3.1 and 63- 1 -3.3, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves construction of an underground accelerator tunnel (14 -foot diameter and +/- 1 km long), a cryogenic facility, and an extension to the existing Wilson Laboratory ( +/- 185,000 gross square feet of building space). The project will also involve new stormwater facilities, parking, outdoor lighting, and landscaping. (Engineering Services Leader), Agent; and PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 8 of 11 Cornell University, Owner; Steve Beyers, P.E. 3. The proposed project, which requires Site Plan and Special Permit Approval by the Planning Board, is la Type I action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, 6 NYCRR Part 617, I land Chapter 148 of the Town of Ithaca Code regarding Environmental Quality Review because the proposal involves the construction of a nonresidential facility with more than 25,000 square feet of gross floor area; and 4. A letter from Steve Beyers, dated October 3, 2008, has been received, in which the agent states that "...the Town, Cornell, and the community may be best served through a SEQR process utilizing a formal Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and review procedure, rather than through review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) alone." A Full Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1, has been submitted by the applicant for the above- described action; and 5. The Planning Board, having reviewed the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), Part 1, prepared by Cornell University, and Parts 2 and 3 of the Full EAF, prepared by Planning staff, established itself as lead agency to coordinate the environmental review of the proposed Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac, as described above, and issued a positive determination of environmental significance at its meeting on December 2, 2008, in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, also known as the New York Statel Environmental Quality Review Act, for the above referenced action as proposed, and confirmed that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared; and 6. Cornell University and the Town of Ithaca Planning Board have agreed that a public scoping meeting would be initiated to determine the scope and content of the DEIS; and 7. Cornell University has submitted a Draft Scoping Document for the Board's consideration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca has reviewed the Draft Scoping Document and hereby determines that the Draft Scoping Document for the Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac, as revised at its August 17, 2010 meeting, is adequate to proceed with a public scoping process; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Planning Board will hold a Public Scoping Meeting on September 21, 2010 to hear comments from the public and interested and involved agencies regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIS for the Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac, after distributing the Draft Scoping Document to potentially involved and interested agencies and the public. A vote on the m AYES: Wilcox, NAYS: None ABSTENTIONS AGENDA ITEM was as follows: neman, Beach, Bosak, Talty, Howe, Erb None PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 9 of 11 PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board regarding the proposed Stream Setback Law. Mr. Wilcox opened the public hearing at 9:14 p.m. The attornevlfor the Town returned to the table. Mr. Bosak had several concerns about the law, mostly regarding activities prohibited in Zone 2, including constructing shelters and blinds (including hunting blinds), removal of snow or ice (even that which is not contaminated by salt or other substances), cattle crossing restrictions, streambank stabilization, and agricultural composting. Ms. Ritter agreed that the streambank stabilization wording should be moved to Zone 1. Mr. Talty also had concerns regarding snow - removal restrictions, and described how this would create problems for developers. Since Mr. Bosak's concerns are lnot shared by the full Planning Board, he agreed to submit his comments in writing to the Town Board. Members of the public were invited to address the board. Steve BeyerslIives in the neighborhood that would be within a Zone 2 setback. He thinks it would be useful if the residents who live in the setback were notified so they could comment. He thinks this will be problematic for three of his five neighbors, whose houses and other buildings are within the setback zone. He stated that the law will be a real burden for existing residents if there are no grandfather provisions. Variances are not a quick process and might not be appropriate for simple things. He wa its to read it again and knows people and institutions in his neighborhood will want to see it. Even though there was public notice, a lot of people are not aware that it affects them. He also thinks the) Board has enough tools in the toolbox to prevent people from having any significant impact on the stream, especially for residential development, through the site plan approval process. Ms. Ritter responded that the law has changed to include grandfathering and that it is meant for improvements,) not existing structures and usage. Shirley Egan, C would be on the more time cone enough time fo effects it has. wondered whet found under se surprised to see like terraces or section regardii impaired. They are not distingL the Planning Bi vague and it se If the crossing i be able to rely they will impose if they have me safety measure property from ti are not tampen )rnell University associate counsel, commented that they did not realize that this agenda until today, so her comments are very preliminary. They would like dting with the departments at Cornell that will be impacted. There was not their map guru to replot everything in accordance to the new law to see what ie requested that they be given additional time to submit further comments. She er the Town will provide the landowners with a mapping of the basic minimums tion D6. Section D14 is very vague; it doesn't have standards. They were that a parking lot or space is prohibited even if it is pervious, whereas surfaces patios are prohibited only if they're impervious. She made a suggestion on the g the use of motorized wheelchairs to say "by" instead of "for" the mobility ound Section El 3a, crossings by utilities, troublesome. Overhead utility lines Shed from other types of lines that might cross the stream, and the proviso that and may limit the number, size, type, placement and construction of crossings is !ms difficult to justify it when there are no standards or criteria for them to do so. eets all the criteria set in the law, in the interest of fairness, the owner should 1 those standards and not be told by the Planning Board at the last minute that a limitation on the number of them they can have. It should be more predictable the conditions. F2 should have an exception for fences and walls that are and are necessary to protect people from injury or death and to protect �spass. Cornell has a lot of experimental plots and they like to make sure these i with. Also, streams can be dangerous, and a landowner might have a PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 10 of 11 legitimate interest in preventing access to those areas, so Cornell would like to see an exception for safety. She also thought that it's not necessary to eliminate grandfathering because the law is only prohibiting things that occur after the effective date of the ordinance. She was puzzled by the requirement in Section I that any proposed action, use, or structure that would be otherwise allowed if it were not within a streambank had to be the case before you could apply for a variance from the stream setback law. She said that this circumscribes the BZA's jurisdiction under state law and the owner's right to apply for a variance by state law. She requested the Town work on the language because even if that is not the intent, that's what it seems to say. Ms. Ritter said that there's not really a rush: this not the only public hearing for this law -- it was an opportunity for other boards to weigh in on the law. The Town Board will look at the comments and decide whether to send it back to the Codes and Ordinances committee. Then a revised law will go on the Web site and be publicized. Mr. Bosak said that very few people will know whether or not they're affected by the law. If the Town wants informed public input from people who will be impacted, we will need to do work making the maps available. An ordinary person will have a difficult time figuring out how far the areas extend on the existing map. People still might not weigh in, but they need to be properly notified. Mr. Wilcox closed the public hearing at.10:10. Ms. Erb thought it might be more useful to extend the lines on the map so they actually smear the correct areas, but are faint enough so people can trace their property lines underneath them. PB RESOLUTION No. 2010 -062: Recommendation to the Town Board Regarding the Addition of Stream Setback Provisions and Related Definitions to Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code Moved by Hollis Erb; seconded by George Conneman WHEREAS: The Codes and Ordinances Committee has completed work on the proposed local law amending Chapter 270 of the Town Code, entitled Zoning, by adding Stream Setback provisions and a proposed law amending Chapter 270 of the Town Code which adds definitions related to the Stream Setback provisions, and WHEREAS: The above - described amendments would restrict development and certain activities within la specific distance of a streams identified on the Town of Ithaca Stream Setback Map, and WHEREAS: The Town Board has reviewed the above - described proposed local laws at its meeting on August 17, 2010 and has referred this matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation, and WHEREAS: The Town of Ithaca Planning Board has held a public hearing on August 17, 2010 to consider comments from the public regarding this proposed law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board agrees that it is generally supportive of the proposed law but wishes the Town Board to consider some of the issues raised at the August 17, 2010 Planning Board meeting. AYES: Wilcox, Clonneman, Beach, Bosak, Talty, Erb NAYS: None .fly PB Minutes 08 -17 -2010 Page 11 of 11 ABSTENTIONS: None AGENDA ITEM Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2010: deferred Other Business Mr. Wilcox al nounced that Mr. Howe submitted his resignation effective at the end of this year. He has one year left on his term. Agenda item I for the September 7th meeting: • LoPinto 2 -lot subdivision on Elm Street Extension • CMC Lab addition • Holoc i uck / Cayuga Cliff supplemental DEIS information • College Crossing Final Site Plan approval Adjournment Upon motion by Mr. Wilcox, the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ora ueAUgi Fi Duty T TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Tuesday, August 17, 2010 AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Persons to be heard (no more than five minutes). 7:05 P.M. Continuation of consideration of a sketch plan for the proposed Vine Street Cottages project located onl Mitchell and Vine Street's, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 59 -1 -1, 59 -1 -2, 59 -1 -3 and 59 -1-4, High Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves the development of up to 22 single- family houses and 10 attached townhouse units on 3.4 +/- acres. The proposal will also involve upgraded and new roads, new stormwater facilities, landscaping, a playground, and improved connections to the East Ithaca Recreation Way. Susan J. and Harold Mix, Owners; Agora Homes and Development, LLC, 7:45 P.M. SEAR Determination: Chaffee 2 -Lot Subdivision, 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road. 7:45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2 -lot subdivision located at 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road (NYS Route 79), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.56 -3 -16, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves subdividing a +/- 6,341 square foot parcel from the northeast corner of 1584 Slaterville Road which will then be consolidated with 1586 Slaterville Road. Scott & Ellen Chaffee, Owners; Katherine Marchetto, Applicant. Aft I 8:00 P.M. Consideration of acceptance of the draft scoping document for the Environmental Impact Statement regarding the proposed Cornell University Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) project located north of the Pine Tree Road and Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) intersection, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 63- 1 -8.2, 63- 1 -2.2, 63 -1 -12, 63 -1 -3.1 and 63- 1 -3.3, Low Density Residential Zone. Thel proposal involves construction of an underground accelerator tunnel (14 -foot diameter and +/- 1 km long), a cryogenic facility, and an extension to the existing Wilson Laboratory ( +/- 185,000 gross square feet of building space). The project will also involve new stormwater facilities, parking, outdoor lighting, and landscaping. The Planning Board may also consider scheduling a public scoping session to hear public comments on the draft scoping document. Cornell University, Owner; Steve Beyers, P.E., Engineering Services Leader, Agent. 8:15 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board regarding the proposed Stream Setback Law. 7. Apprloval of Minutes: July 20, 2010 8. Other Business 9. Adjolurnment Jonathan Kanter, AICP Director of Planning 273 -1747 NOTE: IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE NOTIFY SANDY POLCE AT 273 -1747. (A quorum of four (4) members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business.) TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Tuesday, August 17, 2010 By direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, August 17, 2010, at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, N.Y., at the following times and on the following matters: 7:45 P.M 8:15 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2 -lot subdivision located at 1584 and 1586 Slaterville Road (NYS Route 79), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.56 -3 -16, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves subdividing a +/- 6,341 square foot parcel from the northeast corner of 1584 Slaterville Road which will then be consolidated with 1586 Slaterville Road. Scott & Ellen Chaffee, Owners; Katherine Marchetto, Applicant. Consideration of a Recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board regarding the proposed Stream Setback Law. Said Planning Board will at said times and said place hear all persons in support of such matters or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in . person. Individuals with visual impairments, hearing impairments orl other special needs, will be provided with assistance as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing. Jonathan Kanter, AICP Director of Planning 273 -1747 Dated: Monday, (August 9, 2010 Publish: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 WednesdaAugust '�1�1��3�CAi�J ®IJRfAI '. Town of Ithaca Planning Board Sign -in Sheet Date: August 17, 2010 Print Name Address e-mail L'i e, ✓��� �a V ►'i ��Ss I 'A me S CT Vk4C_ co-fPx J , CdcA, h d e� a9 L,-c_ ✓< � ZFPr S � I e b i sse� �x� o rye %/Q re, Mila, 6 /OT) C', oa� S/a le,- e %� CO rs C-a W a- �� ��1f U- U- TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I, Sandra Polce, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a Senior Typist for the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York; that the following Notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the I own of Ithaca and that said Notice has been duly published in the local newspaper, The Ithaca Journal. Notice of Public Hearings to be held by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in the Town of Ithaca Town Hall, � 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on Tuesday, August 17, 2010 „* -7-n(I n W4 ..e. ..t .�.�a Location of Sign Board used for Posting: Town Clerk Sign Board — 215 North Tio ate. Date of Posting Date of Public) August 9, 2010 August 11, 2010 Sandra Polce, Senior Typist Town of Ithaca STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF IOMPKINS) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 11`h day of August 2010. Notary Public I CONNIE F. CLARK Notary Public, State of New York No. 01CL6052878 Qualified in Tompkins County Commission Expires December 26, 20 /0 L