HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 2007-11-06FILE
DATE
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2007
215 NORTH TIOGA STREET
ITHACA, NY 14850
7:00 p.m.
PRESENT
Chairperson: Fred Wilcox
Board Members: Eva Hoffmann, George Conneman, Rod Howe, Larry Thayer, Kevin
Talty and Susan Riha. Alternate Board Member: Hollis Erb.
STAFF: Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning; Dan Walker, Town Engineer; Susan
Ritter, Assistant Director of Planning; Mike Smith, Environmental Planner; Susan Brock,
Attorney for the Town; Paulette Neilsen, Deputy Town Clerk.
OTHERS.
David Lieb, Cornell University
Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf LLP
Tim Peer, Cornell University
Ed Wilson, Cornell University
John Keefe, Cornell University
Rick Couture, Ithaca College
Bill Ferguson, Ithaca College
Doug Brittain, 135 Warren Road
Bruce Brittain, 135 Warren Road
Trevor Pinch, Forest Home
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Wilcox declares the meeting duly opened at 7:05 p.m., and accepts for the
record Secretary's Affidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearings
in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on October 30, 2007 and October 29, 2007 together
with the properties under discussion, as appropriate, upon the Clerks of the City of
Ithaca and the Town of Danby, upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning,
upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Public Works, and upon the applicants
and /or agents, as appropriate, on October 30, 2007,
Chairperson Wilcox states the Fire Exit Regulations to those assembled, as required by
the New York State Department of State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control.
Chairperson Wilcox announces the first agenda item at 7.04p.m.
PERSONS TO BE HEARD
There was no one wishing to address the Board at this time.
Chairperson Wilcox announces the next agenda item at 7.05p.m.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 2
TGEIS
Presentation and discussion regarding the Cornell Transportation- focused
Generic Environmental Impact Statement (T- GEIS), focusing on the internal
meetings with Cornell faculty, staff and students regarding possible mitigation
strategies. David Lieb, Cornell University and Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge & Wolf,
LLP, Presenters.
David Lieb, Cornell University and Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf LLP
Presentation given. The entire presentation can be seen at www.TGEISproject.org
(Attachment 1)
Questions /Comments from the Board
Board Member Howe — Can you share what kind of feedback you did get from those
meetings.
Mr. Lieb — Yeah. We got very positive feedback, we got good questions. I was very
impressed with how engaged the Assemblies were and the types of questions they
asked. A lot of it was on specifics that were not ... we don't' have yet. We're looking in
general directions here and seeing if they're the right ones, but, the fact that the
questions were saying 'okay, that's great. Where are you going to go ?' I thought that
was a good endorsement as was the fact that the University Assembly has passed a
resolution supporting the TIMS strategies as has the GPSA, and the Student Assembly
is voting on a resolution this Thursday and I believe the Employee Assembly, at last
check, was penning one.
Ms. Wolf — And I will just add to that. As David just said, it was an overwhelmingly
positive endorsement. I think that we then also got a lot of sort of personal preference
kind of requests and in general, however, I think that the message that we got, was that
there needs to be a lot of flexibility. Give us as much flexibility as possible because, for
one thing, one mode doesn't work all the time. Just for an example, we heard people
say, "I like to bike but, I can't bike all year round. Would you consider a half -year bus
pass so I wouldn't have to buy..." So, flexibility was definitely a major theme in terms of
the programs, design programs that have lots of options.
Chairperson Wilcox — I was going to ask what questions the students and graduate
students ask, but I think that answered that question.
You referred to delivery of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement in November
...yes ... Do you want to estimate when Town Staff will receive it? I'll let you pick a
month...
Ms. Wolf — Well, we are ... boy, it's taken a long time hasn't it ... we are closing in on
it ... we are working very hard on it, it's really, it's a lot of work and we had a lot of
analysis, a lot of input, a lot of comments from a lot of different groups who are
PB 11-6-07
Pg. 3
reviewing it ... It's going to be late in the month, but we hope to have it on your doorstep
this month. But it will be late in the month.
Chairperson Wilcox— So when I'm on the radio tomorrow morning and they ask me, I'll
say December. That way, if it comes in in November, you beat it right.
Ms. Wolf.— It will probably be a little pre- Christmas gift...
Board Member Conneman — Kathryn has heard me ask this before but I'll ask it for
everybody...) believe in bicycles, that's fine, but the question is, the rules of the road. I
wish you had been here to see the guy who cut in front of me tonight ... What plan do
you have to provide safety for bicycles because cars are always accused of being the
person, the people who really do it, but the bicyclists don't stop for stop signs on
campus and I invite you to come to work with me some morning and I will show you at
the corner of Warren and ... the road that goes through Forest Home and Tower Road,
how they go through, bicyclists all the time ... how are you going to get around that
because I'm concerned about safety.
Ms. Wolf — Yeah, George, as illustrated by this slide, you are not the only one to point
this out. This is really, this is a valid concern, it's a real concern. You're absolutely
right. We've, it's, it is identified as part of the Comprehensive Bicycle Program that
we've outlined and that is a component of it. One of the. things that we have talked
about, and we did a lot of research on what's being done on other campus' and
something that a lot of other campus' have is something called, they call it different
things, but the idea is sort of an ambassador, bicycle ambassadors and these people
are like work -study students or people who are really out there visibly and really seeing
people who maybe aren't obeying the rules of the road and trying to educate them in a
really visible fashion. So that's one example of some of the kinds of things that are
being discussed as possibilities. I think we recognize that that's a problem and it's a
tough one, no question, but we recognize it and we have made some proposals on how
to address that.
Board Member Thayer — It seems like our emphasis should be on park- and -ride more
than bicycles. Ithaca isn't very bike - friendly. Not only the weather but the hills. So it
seems the emphasis really should be placed on park- and -ride.
Mr. Lieb — Yeah, I think you're right and a lot of it depends on distance and direction of
approach as well. But there are...we have an idea about where would be logical
locations for park- and -ride lots in general terms anyway, .to intercept traffic on its way to
the urban core. Definitely a vital piece of making this all work. And then finding the
right connections to the park- and -ride lots and then from the park- and -ride lots to
campus. But a good park- and -ride can have amenities associated that are beneficial to
cyclists. It can have amenities with it that are handy for people who had errands to run
on the way to and from work. Can be good meeting places for vanpools or carpools.
So they really can serve many of the purposes and address many of the issues that we
are talking about here. I think what we are talking about is becoming much more multi-
(inaudible) Talking about finding ways for people to get efficiently
and making the right connections. People don't want to bring a
want to get to campus, they want access, they want ease
efficiency and they want it to be expeditious. So, if we make
competitive in that regard so that it is as good or better when tal
for a community.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 4
where they need to go
car to campus. They
of access, they want
changes, it has to be
<en as a whole picture
Board Member Riha — Did you consider in the Plan, catalyzing more residential growth
in the Town and /or at least closer in the County as opposed to the 40% that are outside
the County and coming in? Because if most of the growth occurs closer, then it seems
like...
Ms. Wolf — We certainly talk about, there's a whole section where we look at the link
between land -use and transportation. And there's no question that having development
occur that is transit - friendly, that is located along transit routes, that's very important. It
could be located further out, but if it's along a transit route or in a nodal fashion, that
also can me transit friendly. In addition, there is some discussion of having increased
housing closer in. The Cornell Master Plan has identified the East Hill Plaza area as a
possible location for residential, so I think that is also. one piece of it and certainly the
County's Comprehensive Plan really is based on the concept of nodal development and
I think that we very much support that and advocate for that as part of this project as
well
Board Member Howe — Is there a part of the plan that is addressing, not commuters,
but, Cornell brings visitors everyday to its campus for meetings, for conferences, and
they never know where to park and it's always a challenges. So is that somehow being
factored into it, how you communicate to visitors to the campus where they might, how
they might easily get access to campus? Is that being factored in at all?
Mr. Lieb — I would say that's somewhat tangential to the work that we've done here.
We're looking at really mostly looking at the impact on the community. surrounding the
campus and most of that happens during peak hour commuting.
Ms. Wolf — But we did characterize it. We definitely did, I think, a pretty thorough
inventory of who are the major visitor groups, what kinds of activities generate the
largest amounts of visitors and then also, what might be some strategies to better
manage that. So, David's right. It is not the same level, but it is definitely addressed.
Board Member Conneman — It had two objectives, the way that I remember it, when you
presented it ... One was, that you would try to reduce, try to get rid of people in their cars.
Fewer cars ... The other one was to get cars out of neighborhoods.. Be neighborhood
friendly, be a good neighbor. What in the report covers that. I mean, do you do
anything that says let's get people out of Forest Home, for example?
Ms. Wolf — We do, in fact. Well, I think there is sort of a two -part answer there. The first
part is that, I think, first and foremost, the intent is that by strengthening, by creating
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 5
strong alternatives, if people are choosing alternative modes, that means they are not
driving through the neighborhoods, okay ... so that ... that's primary method of mitigating
impacts to neighborhoods. Let's get them into the Park and Ride lots so that they are
leaving their cars outside the urban core and they are not driving into the urban core
and if we've got express bus service from the Park and Ride lots to campus and
downtown, that becomes attractive and can be really effective. So that's the real
emphasis. Let's have really good programs that incentivise people to choose
alternatives.
In addition to that, we did, in some specific locations, look at some specific mitigation
strategies such as possible road reconfigurations that would encourage traffic flow in
certain directions and, for example, realigning Pleasant Grove Road so that it has a
more direct connection to campus as opposed to a direct connection to Forest Home,
that would be a more deliberate turn off of Pleasant Grove to go into Forest Home. So
we have also looked at some of those strategies.
Chairperson Wilcox — I guess we look forward to the end of November.
Chairperson Wilcox announces the next agenda item at 7:49p.m.
SEAR Determination
Ithaca College Emergency Alarm System, 953 Danby Road
Rick Couture,
Associate
Director
for
Facilities, 953
Danby Road
Bill Ferguson,
Associate
Director
of
Public Safety,
953 Danby Road
Mr. Couture — We are here tonight to seek permission to install an emergency
notification system on our campus, as most, I think everyone in the room is aware that
the tragic events down at Virginia Tech have made many colleges and universities
across the country look at methods or ways to provide proper communication and
notification to its constituencies during emergency times and we have tried to institute a
couple of different programs to do that. One is a communication system. We've hired
an outside consultant to come in and install a computer program so that we could notify
people via their cell phones and emails when an emergency occurs and the other
program that we would like to seek permission for is to install a couple of emergency
sirens located on our campus. One would be on the top of our campus center building
and most of you folks are familiar with that, and the second one would be located off up
near our soccer field and College Circle Road. And this system is basically this is a 4-
speaker system that is mounted on a pole and it emits a rather loud siren sound, I
guess, for lack of a better term to describe it, and our intent is to only use that for
extreme emergency situations to let our campus community know that there is a
problem or a situation that they need to be made aware of.
I would certainly be happy to answer any questions that we can regarding the system
and the... basically, the sirens and I think everyone has a packet of information showing
what they look like. They are mounted on poles ... the one on top of the campus center
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 6
would be mounted on top of a 10 -foot pole and the one up by the wood field, will
actually be mounted on a 60 -foot pole that will be buried 10 feet into the ground, so it
will not exceed the height of 50 feet from grade level. And again, I think it's important to
emphasize that we only intend to use those under very extreme emergency situations.
They will not be like a public address system that we will be using to announce football
games or anything.
Chairperson Wilcox — Did you see the County's comments on this? The only comment
from the County Planning Department was a recommendation that the College should
limits its use to emergencies to avoid impact to nearby property owners.
Mr. Ferguson — Absolutely.
Alternate Member Erb — I am very glad that you are thinking of it only being used in
extreme emergency, but, every system that I have ever heard of, always wants to
"check" itself a few times a year. So how often do you intend to do that? And what kind
of community notification do you expect to do? In other words, the practice siren.
Mr. Ferguson — We anticipate testing it at least once per semester. We haven't really
devised a plan to notify the community, but once the emergency tone goes of it is
followed by a pretext message which describes it as a test, we're testing the emergency
system, this is only a test. So that would be done twice a year. We are also looking at
an upgrade of the system that would allow us to poll the siren so we don't, actually have
to do an audible test to make sure that they are operating.
Alternate Member Erb — I understand that your text - messaging system would then tell
people it's okay. But I am wondering about prior notification to people about we're
going to have a test at 10:00 in the morning on such and such a date that also might
reach the few neighbors who are also going to be able to hear this and who won't be
tied into your text messaging system.
Mr. Ferguson — Right. We have to devise a plan on how to contact those neighbors.
Mr. Couture -- But certainly, we would take a look at the best way to do that, absolutely.
Board Member Hoffmann — It might also be something that hearing a siren going off like
that might also concern people who pass by in cars, or bicycles or walking, and it would
be harder to notify them, you can't send out any notice, .So it would be a good idea to
think about how to make them less frightened if it happens.
Mr. Ferguson — Well the sounds
the volunteer fire department sii
communities so, we don't want
people realize that it's not one
library of different tones that are
out,
that these sirens will make are not much different than
-ens that we are all familiar with hearing ir4the various
it to sound exactly like a fire department siren so that
of the departments, but there are a series... there's a
available to use, depending on what we decide to pick
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 7
Board Member Hoffmann — You sent along some very useful information about different
noise levels of different activities and I didn't find anywhere how loud the sirens will be
or the voice messages would be, in decibels...
Mr. Couture — If you have a chance to look at this sheet, that describes the system. It
says Whalen 2004 on top of it ... under system features, it indicates that at 100 feet, the
sound level is 118 decibels. It's the Whalen 2904, I'm sorry...
Board Member Hoffmann — I have one that looks like...
(talking over each other. Mr. Ferguson gets everyone on the same page)
Mr. Ferguson — On the specifications for each of the sirens, on the bottom of the page is
the acoustic performance for each of the sirens and as you get farther away from the
siren, the decibel level does drop. For example, the 2904 siren, at 2,800 feet, it's 7
decibel range and then at 5,600 feet, it's 60 decibels. So they do have the specs listed
on both the 2903 and the 2904.
Board Member Hoffmann — I still don't see it, but I believe you that that's what it says.
(Fred shows Eva)
Chairperson Wilcox — While Eva is looking at that. A couple of changes I'd like to make
to the short environmental assessment form. Number 3 is the tax parcel number, it
shows 41 -1-30.2, we need to add 42 -1 -13.2, those are the two parcels referred to in the
public hearing notice and I assume those are the two parcels, one out near ( ?).
Number 12, Does any aspect of the proposed action have a valid permit? We need to
check yes, the text is there, we just need to check it. Those are the only changes, as I
said, the copy you have was not signed, and Rick has now signed it.
Board Member Hoffmann — That's actually something that I was going to bring up and I
will bring it up under Other Business later on ... Very often, both the EAF and the EIS
form, the longer form, will have a signature, but it's unreadable and there is no place for
people to print their name. This one actually has a place for the applicant or the
sponsor to print or type their name, but some of the other forms don't have that. But we
can talk about that later. But I think it's important to know who's signature it is if you
can't read it, which often happens.
Chairperson Wilcox — Any other discussion on the environmental impact?
Board Member Howe — I'll move the SEQR.
Chairperson Wilcox — So moved by Rod Howe, seconded by Larry Thayer. Susan.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 8
Ms. Brock — I have some clarifications in the first whereas clause. The last sentence
states "one pole will be mounted on the roof of the campus center" and then in
Parentheses, it says "10 feet above roof' I propose adding to the beginning of the
parenthetical, "top of pole" 10 feet above pole. And then it goes on and says "and the
second will be mounted on a wooden pole." Well, the second pole won't be mounted on
a wooden pole, the second will be mounted on the ground. And then the parenthetical,
it should state "top of pole, 50 feet above grade."
Chairperson Wilcox —
discussion...
Acceptable gentlemen? Okay. There being no further
ADOPTED RESOLUTION. PB RESOLUTION No. 2007 - 114
SEAR
Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval
and Special Permit
Ithaca College Emergency Alarm System
953 Danby Road
Tax Parcel No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2
Town of Ithaca Planning Board
November 6, 2007
Motion made by Rod Howe, seconded by Larry Thayer.
WHEREAS:
1. This action is consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and
Special Permit for the proposed emergency mass notification alarm system on
the Ithaca College Campus, 953 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s
41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal
involves installing two mass communication poles to deliver emergency warnings
and messages to the College campus community. One pole will be mounted on
the roof of the Campus Center (top of pole 10 feet above roof) and the second
will be mounted on the ground (top of pole 50 feet above grade) between Wood
Field and College Circle Road. Ithaca College, Owner /Applicant; Richard
Couture, Agent, and
2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is acting
as Lead Agency in environmental review with respect to Site Plan Approval and
Special Permit, and
3. The Planning Board, on November 6, 2007, has reviewed. and accepted as
adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I, submitted by
the applicant, and Part II prepared by Town Planning staff, a campus map
illustrating the system locations, specification sheets describing the proposed
system, and other application materials, and
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 9
4. The Town Planning staff has recommended a negative determination of
environmental significance with respect to the proposed Site Plan Approval and
Special Permit;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes a negative determination of
environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental. Quality
Review for the above referenced actions as proposed, based on the information in the
EAF Part I and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Part II, and, therefore, a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be required.
A vote on the motion was as follows:
AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, Talty and Riha
NAYS: None
The motion passed unanimously.
Chairperson Wilcox announces the next agenda item at 7:52p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for
the proposed mass notification system on the Ithaca College Campus, 953 Danby
Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 41 =1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density
Residential Zone. The proposal involves installing two mass communication
poles to deliver emergency warnings and messages to the College campus
community. One pole will be mounted on the roof of the Campus Center (10 feet
above roof) and the second will be mounted on a wooden pole (50 feet high)
between Wood Field and College Circle Road. Ithaca College, Owner /Applicant,
Richard Couture, Agent.
Chairperson Wilcox — Ladies and gentlemen, this is your opportunity to address the
Planning Board on this particular agenda item. If you wish to address the Board, we
ask that you raise your hand, we'll call on you, come up to the microphone, we ask that
you provide your name and address and we'll be very interested to hear what you have
to say this evening.
There being no one. I will close the public hearing at 7:53p.m.
Any questions?
Board Member Talty — I have a general question. My question is, to the best of your
knowledge, is there, is this a proactive measure or is there legislation underway to make
this mandatory for college and university campus' across the country?
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 10
Mr. Ferguson — I don't believe that there is any legislation pending on this issue. We
looked at what other colleges and universities were doing across the country in
response to the particular incident at Virginia Tech and some other institutions and we
needed a method by which to notify visitors to the campus, who are not part of our
computerized notification system. In the summer we run many camps with children and
we have many events on campus with visitors to campus and we needed some way to
notify those folks of any pending emergency on campus.
Board Member Talty — Thank you.
Chairperson Wilcox — With regard to the language, excuse me, with regard to the
statement in the Tompkins County Department of Planning's letter, does anybody have
any interest in including that language in the resolution? Hollis is nodding her head...
Common sense? I am looking at Susan...
Ms. Brock — You want to further modify it so that the condition reads "the notification
system..." Actually, I think we should say, "The applicant shall limit its use of the
loudspeakers to emergencies and routine testing no more than..." ...once per semester
or so many times per year...?
Chairperson Wilcox — Three times per year... I would say... You've got two semesters
plus you've got a summer school? So..
Mr. Couture — That would be great, absolutely.
Ms. Brock — Okay.
Chairperson Wilcox —'Can you read that one more time.
Ms. Brock — Sure. "The applicant shall limit its use of the loudspeakers to .emergencies
and routine testing" I'm sorry, let's say "emergencies, and to routine testing not to
exceed...
Alternate Member Erb — Three routine tests per year.
Ms. Brock — I'm sorry let's... "The applicant shall limit its use of the loud speakers to
emergencies and up to three routine tests per year." ...to avoid, yeah, we don't need the
rest of that sentence, I think it would end right there. And we will put that in the
resolution, well, I guess you don't have it on the table yet...
Chairperson Wilcox — Nope, I'm about ready to do it. Would someone like to move the
resolution as drafted ... moved by George Conneman, seconded by Kevin Talty.
Ms. Brock — So we can make it a condition of the Preliminary and Final Site Plan
Approval, at the end of the language that we have right now, instead of a. period, make
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 11
that a comma, and state, subject to the following condition: The applicant shall limit its
use of the loudspeakers to emergencies and up to three routine tests per year.
Chairperson Wilcox — Change acceptable George and Kevin. Okay. Any further
discussion?
Board Member Hoffmann — And the language about the poles is changed as well?
Ms. Brock — Right. In the first whereas clause, the same changes that we made for the
SEQR resolution, do you want those read again?
Board Member Hoffmann — No, as long as we know that we are changing them to be
the same as in the SEQR.
Chairperson Wilcox — Any further discussion... there being none...
ADOPTED RESOLUTION: PB RESOLUTION No. 2007 - 115
Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval
& Special Permit
Ithaca College Emergency Alarm System
953 Danby Road"
Tax Parcel No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2
Town of Ithaca Planning Board
November 6, 2007
Motion made by George Conneman, seconded by Kevin Talty.
WHEREAS:
1. This action is consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and
Special Permit for the proposed emergency mass notification alarm system on the
Ithaca College Campus, 953 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 41 -1 -30.2
and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves installing two
mass, communication poles to deliver emergency warnings and messages. to the
College campus community. One pole will be mounted on the roof of the Campus
Center (top of pole 10 feet above roof) and the second will be mounted on the ground
(top of pole 50 feet above grade) between Wood Field and College Circle Road, Ithaca
College, Owner /Applicant; Richard Couture, Agent, and
2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as
lead agency in environmental review with respect to Site Plan Approval and Special
Permit has, on November 6, 2007, made a negative determination of environmental
significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental
Assessment Form Part .I, submitted by the applicant, and a Part 11 prepared by Town
Planning staff, and .
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 12
3. The Planning Board, at a Public Hearing held on November 6, 2007, has
reviewed and accepted as adequate application. materials for the proposed emergency
mass notification alarm system including a campus map illustrating the system
locations, specification sheets describing the proposed system, and other application
materials.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Planning Board hereby grants Special Permit for the proposed installation of
the Ithaca College emergency mass notification alarm system, finding that the
standards of Article XXIV Section 270 -200, Subsections A L, of the Town of Ithaca
Code, have been met,
AND THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Site Plan
Approval for the proposed Ithaca College emergency mass notification alarm system
located on the Ithaca College Campus, 953 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel
No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density Residential Zone, as shown on a
campus map illustrating the system locations, specification sheets describing the
proposed system, and other application materials, subject to the following condition:
The Applicant shall limit its use of the loudspeakers to emergencies and up to three (3)
routine tests per year.
A vote on the motion was as follows:
YES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, Talty and Riha
NAYS: None
The motion passed unanimously.
Chairperson Wilcox announces the next agenda item at 7:59p.m.
SEQR Determination
East Hill Plaza — Conversion of Former Rite Aid Location, 323 Pine Tree Road.
Maria Menard, Ms. Brock Ashley Management, 95 Brown Road
Pamela Kingsbury, 202 East State Street
Kevin Snyder, Chief Financial Officer, Cayuga Press, 3215 South Main St., Cortland
Ms. Menard — So we are all here in consideration of the conversion, as we put it, for the
former Rite Aid space. The former Rite Aid space is, as most of us might know here,
left the East Hill Plaza and constructed a new facility across the street and it has left us
with a 7,000 square foot space in the East Hill Plaza for almost 11 months now. We
have secured two suitable tenants and we are here to ask consideration to propose
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 13
splitting up that 7,000 square feet. Some of the changes, mostly to the space, are to
the storefront. I believe you have all been presented with plans that separate the
Cayuga Press business and operation in the front of the store and Sedgewick Business
Furniture in the back. Again, the storefront I think there's some revised drawings there,
and also, proposed signage for the Cayuga Press as well and I have brought the
architect here, Pamela Kingsbury, for any questions you may have and also, Cayuga
Press, as they will be the main tenant occupying 4,445 square feet of the front piece of
the Plaza.
Chairperson Wilcox — Questions? And we will try to stick to the environmental
questions, but I know how that works.
Board Member Hoffmann — I'm just curious to know in what ways these two businesses
can serve the local community?
Ms. Menard — Well, I would like to have that opportunity to ask Cayuga Press to answer
that question for you because there is certainly a long history of Cayuga Press in the
Ithaca area and I think that he could best represent that answer for you.
Mr. Snyder — Due to the need for expansion, Cayuga Press has relocated to Cortland
where we operate our printing and production facility. We have a sales office on
Hanshaw Road but we are looking to relocate in a closer proximity to Cornell which is
one of our larger customers, for that operation. The East Hill opportunity arose an we'd
like to maintain a sales office, market our promotional and customized printing of T-
shirts and garments and open up a copy center in that facility. We'd also like it to be an
opportunity to support the rest of our Ithaca customers as well. The majority of our
customers are located in Ithaca.
Alternate Member Erb — Excuse me, when you say copy center, do you mean walk in
off the street with..
Mr. Snyder — Correct.
Alternate Member Erb — Okay.
Chairperson Wilcox — Eva, you're pondering.
Board Member Hoffmann — I still don't have a good idea of what you sell, other than T-
shirts and copy services.
Mr. Snyder — Well, we're a printer. We print anything that you can print on. We have a
number of customers in the Ithaca area, most notably Cornell, that has files that they
send to us and we use these PDF files to print whatever they need to have printed, and
Cornell's design team is located in that Plaza. So it makes it much easier for us to
exchange these files and have them delivered back to our Cortland facility as well as
facilitate delivering of product to Cornell and some of our other local customers.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 14
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. So I hear that you're, you Ire ... a big job of yours is
serving Cornell, but how about the community around there?
Mr. Snyder — I guess I don't understand...
Board Member Hoffmann — The people who live around that area who use this
shopping center.
Mr. Snyder — Well, we also recognize the need that that area doesn't have a copy
center. A lot of the Cornell community is, specifically graduate students, may not have
transportation and it's more difficult for them to get downtown to use the larger box
stores ... Kinkos and places like that, so they can have a copy center at their disposal in
closer range for walking or riding their bicycle.
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. Thank you.
Chairperson Wilcox — If you wonder why the questions are being asked, I will tell you
why ... The zoning in this area is community commercial zone and the intent is to have
businesses which serve that community, and that is where the questions are coming
from, there is a reason they are being asked.
Mr. Menard — I think, wasn't the Gnoman Copy Center, was probably the closest copy
center, that was on Eddy Street in Cornell, which has then since relocated so there is a
need, I think, for a copy center in the area. Again, very close not only for the student
access but there's many professionals as well that like to have a copy center to access
rather than going to the downtown district.
Board Member Hoffmann — You also had a copy center when there were several
businesses in the former bowling facility. There was a Mail and More Store, and they
had copying services too and we lost that.
Chairperson Wilcox — Having a consumer oriented walk -in area to serve the needs,
whether it's a copy center, possibly buying paper, I am not saying that you have to do
that, is important. It is much more important than deciding to locate a sales office here
that doesn't serve the community other than Cornell.
Ms. Brock — Fred, in the community commercial zone, printer is listed as one of the
permitted uses. It doesn't say printer as long as it serves the community, it says printer.
(laughter) So I think the questions are fair to some extent, but the Board can not take
this that far. It's a permitted use.
Board Member Hoffmann — Well I am wondering and I'm thinking about the effects on
trying to plan for this area. Planning for transportation, planning for all kinds of things
that's gong on right now and...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 15
Ms. Brock — The Town Board has made the determination that this is an appropriate
use and...
Board Member Hoffmann — Yes, and I am aware of that, and I am still asking for it to be
a use which is useful for the community.
Board Member Talty — Is there a whole litany of different uses?
Board Member Hoffmann — They can have a use but they can slant it so that it's useful
for the community.
Alternate Member Erb — Including office...
Chairperson Wilcox — Thought we can't require it.
Board Member Hoffmann — No. But we can suggest.
Chairperson Wilcox — Kevin has the floor...
Board Member Talty — My question was, is there a whole litany of different businesses
that have been determined by the Town Board that are acceptable to go into that
particular center?
Ms. Brock — Yes. To go into that type of zone. Into the community commercial zone.
Board Member Talty — I'm not asking you to read those off, I'm just asking if there are a
lot of them.
Alternate Member Erb — Well, I'll ask. Does it include a Sedwick Furniture store that
isn't selling furniture there?
Ms. Brock — One of the things on the list is furniture and appliance sales and service...
Mr. Kanter — One of the others is offices, so yes.
Alternate Member Erb — Okay. I actually had the same question about it in my head
too, and pulled out my map to double check.
Mr. Kanter — Can I give a little commentary here. I know, I agree with the question line
that Eva was taking because we have seen East Hill Plaza change from primarily a
retail oriented shopping center to now 50% of it is occupied by Cornell office space and
administration and at some point, the viability of it as a shopping center is going to
disappear if Cornell keeps using it for office space, so I think there is a legitimate
concern about the viability of it as a community oriented chopping center. On the other
hand, Cornell is now proposing a huge conversion of that area into something
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 16
completely different. The East Hill Village Concept in the Master Plan, that's likely that
someday in the future that whole shopping center is going to be totally different.
Board Member Hoffmann — Right, but as I have understood the presentations of that, for
that area and the Master Plan, it was still to contain a component of businesses to serve
that area as well as the one that already exists. So it wasn't, as I understood it anyway,
I hope somebody will tell me if I am wrong, it is not going to change to a campus
community without any businesses or businesses that serve the local community.
Mr. Kanter — I think we will be ... we have scheduled a presentation for Cornell to come
in at our late November meeting to talk about the Master Plan so I think we will be able
to hear a lot more about that then.
Chairperson Wilcox — Do you want to raise a question Susan?
Board Member Riha — This is still the SEQR right?
Chairperson Wilcox — I know, but there is a visual aspect.
Board Member Riha — So I had a question; because I drove over there this morning,
about the facade and the changing of the facade because it looked like, from this plan
where you have existing and then proposed storefront drawing A202, that the bottom
part of the fagade is still going to be very much as it was and when I looked at the rest
of that whole group of stores, they had the fagade that was similar to the Laundromat on
the left and so it seemed like it would be awfully nice, if you were redoing the front
fagade, to match that whole area, because then you would get that whole kind of
cohesive look.
Ms. Kingsbury —There is an intent to match it to the best of our ability given certain
parameters. What we're going to do, we are going to enlarge the windows vertically
and we are going to enlarge them towards the concrete sidewalk so that the sills line up
with the adjacent lines. We've asked to maintain the original window opening rather
than widening it simply because there is a telephone there that we don't want to
relocate and that also gives us an opportunity to move an existing mailbox that would be
in front of the windows over to wall space, so that would be beneficial for us. The, we're
going to be using the similar aluminum window frame materials that you have in the
adjacent laundromat, we're going to be painting the existing brick white so it emulates
the existing brick that's on the adjacent store front...
Board Member Riha — But there's no way that you can lower that existing brick to be at
the same level as the rest of the existing brick? You know, I like the idea of having a
window at that (inaudible) but then this, the rest of this brick rises up ... (Susan Riha
shows the architect what she is talking about)
Ms. Kingsbury This is existing brick over concrete block backup so it would be costly
to reconstruct that whole fagade to bring that level down. We think that, since this is a
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 17
red brick now and this is an off -white stucco and this is white brick that if we paint this
white it will blend in more with the existing.
Board Member Riha — I agree that it will blend in better, it just seems like all of the rest
of the stores have gone with that similar ... the rest of the buildings have gone with that
similar fagade...
Chairperson Wilcox — Just to make sure that I am clear, I am looking at this photograph
as touched up by the applicant and it does in fact show the telephone booth and it does
show the mailbox. Is this the issue Susan, where this red color sort of stops ... Can we
see it on here?
Board Member Riha - Well what I was thinking is, (inaudible) ... M &T Bank fagade, I
admit, is a little weird right, but all the rest over here have the same fagade as this store
here, along that and so it just seemed, oh, if you lowered this across the whole thing, I
agree, they said they are going to paint it, which will certainly make it look better and the
window will come down and be at more of that same level, but then it seemed like, oh, if
they could keep that line going straight across, then it would blend in with the whole set
of buildings going out to ... but you're saying that it just would cost too much money...
Ms. Kingsbury — It would, we would have to reconstruct the whole storefront to do that.
As I say, it's brick on concrete block backup and it's also got some (inaudible) so it's an
11 inch thick wall, it's a pretty substantial wall...
Alternate Member Erb — I was concerned about what paint color it was going to be and I
am happy that it's going to be a color that blends in. Although it is of course, one of the
ugliest strip buildings around.
Board Member Riha — But it's not like the fagade is that great.
Chairperson Wilcox — Is this about lipstick on a pig sort of thing...
Alternate
Member
Erb — Yeah
it's
a little bit: I
have
a question in that we
have been
told
about the
Cayuga
Press sign
but
we haven't
been
told anything about
signage on
the
back of the building for the furniture store.
Ms. Menard — The only proposed signage on the back of the Sedgwick is they're, again,
there is an elevations plan here that shows you the door, that will have a hollow door
with the (inaudible, papers rustling) and as well as lighting and there will be a sign for
their entrance back there., probably very near to the same color of the fagade. But you
are correct, it is not present on the drawing.
Alternate Member Erb — I would want to know about the sign.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah. Details on the sign would be important, size, color, etc.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 18
Board Member Talty — Illumination.
Board Member Hoffmann — Or not.
Ms. Menard — I think that there would not be any illumination on the sign itself, outside
of the light fixture above the door. The sign, again, probably near something like your
nametags here, with the black and then white lettering. Bronze in color, probably
preferred.. .
Chairperson Wilcox — Roughly that size? Roughly
Ms. Menard — I am going to say the size of a normal no- parking sign that you would
find, what is it....
Chairperson Wilcox — I glanced over at Susan and asked her to draft some language...
Board Member Howe — I'll move the SEQR resolution.
Chairperson Wilcox — So moved by Rod Howe, seconded by Kevin Talty. Any other
discussion with regard to the environmental review? Susan, any changes? Okay.
There being no further discussion...
ADOPTED RESOLUTION: PB RESOLUTION No. 2007 - 1.16
SEAR
Preliminary and Final Site Plan
East Hill Plaza
Conversion of Former Rite Aid Space
323 Pine Tree Road
Tax Parcel No. 62 -2 -1.121
Town of Ithaca Planning Board, November 6, 2007
Motion made by Rod Howe, seconded by Kevin Talty.
WHEREAS:
1. This action is consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the
proposed conversion of the former Rite Aid space in the East Hill Plaza located
at 323 Pine Tree Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62 -2- 1.121, Community
Commercial Zone. The proposal involves splitting the former Rite Aid space into
two new rental units for Cayuga Press, Inc. and Sedgwick Furniture. Cornell
University Real Estate Department, Owner /Applicant; Maria B. Maynard,
Property Manager, Agent, and
2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board is acting
as Lead Agency in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to this
project, and
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 19
3. The Planning Board, on November 6, 2007, has reviewed and accepted as
adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I, submitted by
the applicant, and Part II prepared by Town Planning staff, drawings titled "Site
Plan" (0714 T100), "Floor Plan" (0714 A100), "Existing Storefront Conditions"
(0714 A200), "North Elevation" (0714 A203), dated 10/3/07, "Proposed Storefront
Elevation Scheme" (0714 A202), revised 10/29/07, prepared by Kingsbury
Architecture LLC, and other application materials, and
4. The Town Planning staff has recommended a negative determination of
environmental significance with respect to the proposed project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby makes
of environmental significance in accordance with Article
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York Sta
Review for the above referenced actions as proposed, based
EAF Part I and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Part I
Environmental Impact Statement will not be required.
A vote on the motion resulted as follows:
a
8
to
0
I,
negative determination
of the Environmental
Environmental Quality
n the information in the
and, therefore, a Draft
AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, Talty, and Riha.
NAYS: None
The motion passed unanimously.
Chairperson Wilcox announced the next agenda item at 8:15p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed
conversion of the former Rite Aid location in the East Hill Plaza located at 323
Pine Tree Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62 -2- 1.121, Community
Commercial Zone. The proposal involves splitting the former Rite Aid space into
two new rental units for Cayuga Press, Inc. and Sedgwick Furniture. Cornell
University Real Estate Department, Owner /Applicant; Maria B. Maynard, Property
Manager, Agent.
Chairperson Wilcox — Ladies and Gentlemen, any questions with regard to Site Plan?
There being none, I will give the public a chance to speak.
Once again, this is a public hearing this evening. If you wish to address the Planning
Board on this particular agenda item, we invite up to the microphone, have a seat, give
us your name and address and we'll be very interested to hear what you have to say
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 20
this evening. As I look around the room, I do not see any hands raised. There being no
one, I will close the public hearing at 8:17p.m. and bring the matter back to the Board.
Do we have any questions with regard to site plan at this point? There being...
Board Member Hoffmann — I just want to be sure that we do get somebody to look over
the signs, both the one indicated on the front fagade, which we don't know anything
about other than what we see in the picture, and the one in the back.
Chairperson Wilcox — So you would like more details on the Cayuga Press sign in the
front?
Board Member Hoffmann — Yes. For instance, what color it is going to be....it could be
the same kind of bright pink that the P &C put up...
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah, yeah, obviously our preference for signage is that is
consistent with the laundromat and the M &T bank and ...
Alternate Member Erb — And I would like to know for sure that the paint that was going
to be applied is not going to be something garish. That it was going to be a blending in
paint.
Chairperson Wilcox — I think they have actually stated that it would be...
Board Member Hoffmann — Right, but we want that in the resolution too.
Chairperson Wilcox — Alright, that the paint not be garish... laughter ... I will let Susan try
and come up with something there....
Alright, will someone like to move the motion as drafted?
Board Member Thayer — I'll move the motion...
Chairperson Wilcox — So moved by Larry Thayer, seconded by George...
Board Member Hoffmann — It looks, on the second page of the resolution, as if there
was an intent to add something else ... it says permit, and ... do you have some
suggestions?
Mr. Smith — No, it was just copy and pasting, carried the and over...
Chairperson Wilcox — Welcome Michael...
Mr. Kanter — We heard from the Code Enforcement Officer that there is a likelihood that
a sprinkler would need to be installed in the rear office space because of the change of
use classification and there's a possibility that the applicant may apply for a sprinkler
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 21
variance. That's a, this is a sprinkler requirement in the Town's own sprinkler code,
versus the state building code and so we understand that the applicant may be applying
for a variance from the sprinkler law. So it would probably be good to include, in the
conditions...
Chairperson Wilcox — Standard language ... our approval subject to the granting of any
necessary variances...
Ms. Menard — We did ask that question to the Planning Board in our initial planning, to
apply for a variance for the sprinkler system. We have since changed our mind,
realizing again that any expansion or other conversions from the Plaza is to protect it for
code, sprinkler code. There has been and will be a sprinkler system in there and one
that is actually going to be large enough to expand to protect the rest of the Plaza that is
non- sprinklered at this time. And that is actually in the works at this time.
Mr. Kanter — So I don't think you have relayed that to our Code Enforcement Officer yet.
Ms. Menard — We will convey that to Kristie, yes.
Chairperson Wilcox — We have nothing in the plans in front of us that says there is a
sprinkler system to be installed.
Mr. Walker — The building permit will require it because of the occupancy so as long as
you say they meet all the other requirements of other permits from the Town, you're
covered.
Mr. Kanter — So I think now that we have heard that and it's on public record, and if they
change their minds and decide that they can't do the sprinkler system, they won't get a
building permit until they apply for a variance...
Chairperson Wilcox — We are driving the Attorney for the Town crazy...
Mr. Kanter — Hey, it's fine tuning on the spot stuff here...
Board Member Hoffmann — I can't see that it hurts anything to put it in the resolution
anyway.
Chairperson Wilcox — What, specifically?
Board Member Hoffmann — To put something about sprinklers being required ... if they
are going to do it anyway...
Mr. Kanter — I wouldn't know how to word that, because it's a building code issue...
Chairperson Wilcox — As opposed to a Planning Board issue...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 22
Ms. Brock — I think I have some language...
Chairperson Wilcox — Okay, alright...
Mr. Walker — I think the only language you need is that any...
Ms. Brock — I've got-it...
Chairperson Wilcox — Shhh, she trumped you on this one...
Mr. Walker — Maybe...
Chairperson Wilcox — Susan, what do you have Susan...
Ms. Brock — One of the conditions can be "receipt of any necessary sprinkler variances
for the Cayuga Press Inc., space if sprinklers meeting the New York State Building
Code are not installed."
Mr. Kanter — It's actually not Cayuga Press space that's really...
Mr. Walker — It's for the other space and it's not NYS Building Code, it's Town Sprinkler
Law requires. it.
Ms. Menard — The sprinkler system will be installed in both locations, just so you know,
and again, to a size, it will be able to expand off into...
Mr. Walker — I think that the only language we would need there is that "any
construction done to do these office spaces shall meet Town requirements, Zoning
requirements and Building Code requirements.
Ms. Brock — But that's required for every project...
Chairperson Wilcox — and we don't put that in there...
Ms. Brock -- ...and we never say that...
Mr. Walker — Right, but Eva asked for it, so...
Chairperson Wilcox — Right, but the point is, the plans don't show anything about the
sprinkler system, that's why...
Mr. Walker — You're not approving the construction plans...
Mr. Kanter — And usually you wouldn't see a sprinkler plan...
Chairperson Wilcox — You're right, we would simply discuss the fact that...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 23
Mr. Kanter — This simply came up because I had a discussion with the Code Officer
indicating that as of today, her knowledge was that a sprinkler would be required and
that the applicant was not prepared to build one. We now hear from the applicant that
that has changed, so I don't think the resolution needs to address it.
Chairperson Wilcox — Okay. Good. What do you have Susan?
Ms. Brock — Add to the resolved on page 2, paragraph 2, we have paragraph a, which is
the first condition, add another condition, paragraph b, "submission of details of the
proposed signs for Cayuga Press Signs and Sedgewick Furniture, including location,
sizes, colors and appearance, that demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning that the signs comply with Town of Ithaca Sign Law and are consistent with
other similar signs in East Hill Plaza.
Chairperson Wilcox — Who moved it and seconded it ... I lost track... satisfactory
gentlemen? ... all right ... any other changes?
Board Member Hoffmann — What about the change on the facade?
Chairperson Wilcox — Oh yeah, we want something that the colors... they' re not garish...
Board Member Hoffmann — Well that the colors...
Alternate Member Erb — There was a suggestion that the color, the brick be painted a
color to blend with the neighboring walls.
Chairperson Wilcox — With the walls of the rented units on either side.
Alternate Member Erb — Because I looked through it and I had that as a written down
question to ask, I mean, I don't see that they stated what color it's going to be, in writing.
Ms. Brock — Could you say that again.
Alternate Member Erb — Bricks to be painted a color to match the fronts of the adjacent
businesses.
Ms. Menard — Can I just interject there, because I...one of the neighboring tenants is
the M &T Bank and that is a gray stone color. Our intention is to blend in with the brick,
which is consistent throughout the Plaza below the store front windows, and that is
white, so it is our intention there to blend that in and will be as close to that white in
color as possible. But again, when you say the adjacent, M &T Bank is a different color.
Alternate Member Erb — Just say paint it white.
Board Member Riha — Well, it's not exactly...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 24
Chairperson Wilcox — They have to pick an off -white that matches the faded white
...no ... laughter.
..
Ms. Brock — So you want, bricks to be painted white to match the painted bricks in the
rest of the Plaza?
Ms. Menard — Just for clarification, again, I'm sorry, but the bricks aren't actually painted
white, it's a veneer of the brick style that is white in color.
Ms. Brock — So they're not painted? It's veneer?
Ms. Menard — They are not painted. We are going to paint the existing storefront brick
of the East Hill, of the Rite Aid, to match the white brick that's below the rest of the
storefronts.
Chairperson Wilcox — Let's try to get away from being too specific. We want the
facade...
Alternate Member Erb — To blend...
Chairperson Wilcox — To blend with the fagade of the units to the west.
Ms. Menard — the brick type face...
Chairperson Wilcox — the units to the west are the ... is the laundromat, right, and the
Judd Falls Wine, that's what we want, we want the fagade to blend with the facades to
the west.
Board Member Hoffmann — But it sounds as if we are saying that we want the fagade to
be identical in color to the ones to the west, but I would also hope that it would blend
and harmonize with the fagade to the east.
Board Member Riha — It will, it's just the immediate fagade to the east is this weird little
hunk of M &T Bank and then all the rest are similar to the fagade to the west...
Chairperson Wilcox -- I also want to avoid the use of the work "identical ". It can not be
identical.
Board Member Hoffmann — Right. I think that is what we are asking is closer to that
than something that blends. Blends is very, what does it mean really...
Board Member Thayer — Not garish.... laughter...
Chairperson Wilcox — touche.
Board Member Hoffmann — That's true, that's what we want right...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 25
Ms. Brock — Is there only one color on the fagade?
Ms. Menard —That is correct, until you get to the Wings Over Ithaca, which is a barn -
face board, and they you have the M &T Bank which is the only other storefront that has
a different style.
Ms. Brock — The fagade color shall blend wit the...
Ms. Menard — Brick face type, I would say, because it is, a brick -face type.
Ms. Brock — So, shall blend with the brick -face type of the fagade to the west?
Ms. Menard — Yes.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yes. You alright with that George?
Ms. Brock — So that would be condition c.
Chairperson Wilcox — Any further discussion? There being none...
ADOPTED RESOLUTION: PB RESOLUTION No. 2007 - 117
Preliminary and Final Site Plan
East Hill Plaza
Conversion of Former Rite Aid Space
323 Pine Tree Road
Tax Parcel No. 62 -2 -1.121
Town of Ithaca Planning Board, November 6, 2007
Motion made by Larry Thayer, seconded by George Conneman.
WHEREAS:
1. This action is consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the
proposed conversion of the former Rite Aid space in the East Hill Plaza located at 323
Pine Tree Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62 -2- 1.121, Community Commercial
Zone. The proposal involves splitting the former Rite Aid space into two new rental
units for Cayuga Press, Inc. and Sedgwick Furniture. Cornell University Real Estate
Department, Owner /Applicant; Maria B. Maynard, Property Manager, Agent, and
2. This is an Unlisted. Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as
lead agency in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to the project has,
on November 6, 2007, made a negative determination of environmental significance,
after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment
Form Part I, submitted by the applicant, and a Part II prepared by Town Planning staff,
and
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 26
The Planning Board, at a Public Hearing held on November 6, 2007, has reviewed and
accepted as adequate, drawings titled "Site Plan" (0714 T100), "Floor Plan" (0714
A100), "Existing Storefront Conditions" (0714 A200), "North Elevation" (0714 A203),
dated 10/3/07, "Proposed Storefront Elevation Scheme" (0714 A202), revised 10/29/07,
prepared by Kingsbury Architecture LLC, and other application materials, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby waives certain requirements for
Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval, as shown on the Preliminary and Final Site
Plan Checklists, having determined from the materials presented that such waiver will
result in neither a significant alteration of the purpose of site plan control nor the policies
enunciated or implied by the Town Board, and
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary and Final Site Plan
Approval for the proposed conversion of the former Rite Aid space in the East Hill Plaza
as described on drawings titled "Site Plan" (0714 T100), "Floor Plan" (0714 A100)1
"Existing Storefront Conditions" (0714 A200), "North Elevation" (0714 A203),. dated
10/3/07, "Proposed Storefront Elevation Scheme" (0714 A202), revised 10/29/07,
prepared by Kingsbury Architecture LLC, subject to the following conditions:
a. submission of one set of the final site plan drawings on mylar; vellum, or paper,
signed and sealed by the registered land surveyor, engineer,. architect, or
landscape architect who prepared the site plan materials, prior to issuance of a
building permit, and
b. submission of details of the proposed signs for Cayuga Press, Inc. and
Sedgewick Furniture, including location, sizes, colors and appearance, that
demonstrate to the. satisfaction of the Director of Planning that' the signs comply
with the Town of Ithaca Sign Law and are consistent with other similar signs in
East Hill Plaza, and
c. facade color to blend with the brick -face type of facade to the west.
A vote on the motion was as follows:
AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, Talty and Riha
NAYS: None
The motion passed unanimously.
Chairperson Wilcox announced the next agenda item at 8:31p.m.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 27
PUBLIC HEARING
Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Cornell University
Animal Health Diagnostic Center located off Caldwell Road in the northeast
corner of the College of Veterinary Medicine Complex, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel
No.'s 67 =1 -10.2 and 67 -1 -10.4, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal
includes the demolition of several small cinder block buildings for the
construction of a new +/= 126,000 square foot, +/- 70 foot tall, facility to include
laboratories (rated with Biological Safety Levels of 2 and 3) and office space. The
primary use of the facility will be for veterinary disease diagnostic programs
associated with necropsy and histopathology, and will also include teaching
programs and other research and support activities. The building will be
physically connected to the existing Schurman Hall, associated with the
Veterinary College. The project will consolidate 70 existing parking spaces
currently scattered throughout the site, and add approximately 8 new spaces (4
handicapped spaces and 4 short -term drop -off spaces). The project will also
include development of new stormwater management facilities. Cornell
University, Owner /Applicant; John M. Keefe, Agent.
Chairperson Wilcox — Hollis, anything you'd like to say at this point...
Alternate Member Erb — Well we discussed a few meetings ago that we have worked
out that I do not have a conflict of interest regarding this project because I have no, I will
not gain from it.
Chairperson Wilcox — You are a professor in the College of Veterinary Medicine,
Alternate Member Erb — I am a Professor in the College of Veterinary Medicine and in
fact, am a member of the same Department as the employees of the AHDC.
Chairperson Wilcox — Hollis is the alternate tonight. She does not have the right to vote,
since we are all here, but she does have the right to ask questions.
Ms. Brock — Well, she will be able to vote if any other member does not.
Chairperson Wilcox — That's correct, if some other member does not vote or abstains,
Hollis will be able to vote.
The floor is yours gentlemen, name and address please.
John Keefe, Humphreys Service Building, Cornell
Bruce Akey, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, Upper Tower Road, Cornell
Mr: Keefe — Since it's been a few months since we were here with the Preliminary
Review and the SEAR, we would like to take a few minutes and review what the facility
does as well as the location and some of the elevations. I will also have the final
elevations here, you have those in your packet also. I'll identify any changes since the
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 28
Site Plan Review and I would like to take a few minutes and go through those conditions
that were placed during the Site Plan Review and how we have remediated any of those
questions. And I will be followed by Dr. Akey.
Dr. Akey — Thank you. As John said, I will try to be brief about this because you have
heard most of this before, but, just to remind you what the function of the building is, we
are an Animal Health Diagnostic Center, a laboratory. Our function is to provide
diagnostic testing services for all species of animals except one, which is the one sitting
around the tables up here and out in the audience. Other than that, there is no creature
too big or too small or too onerous for us to test, and we do about 100, about 900,000
tests a year. Everything ranging from your pets, and you know, horses to whatever you
might have to insects, I mean, you name it, it's amazing the stuff that comes in.
Why do we do this, well, because we are trying to protect the animal health and by
extension, human health in the State of New York because some 60% or better of the
diseases that animals have, can be human diseases as well.
We are a founding member of a national network of laboratories that do testing for these
types of diseases and we are the only such facility in the entire State of New York and
actually, many of the State in the Northeast have no such equipment facilities and
instead rely on our facility to provide testing to protect their animals as well.
We have over 5,000 veterinary practices throughout the country as our clients, but the
majority of our clients are here in New York State and as I said, we provide these
comprehensive diagnostic, veterinary diagnostic testing, as well as some educational
activities, as John mentioned, for veterinary students, outreach to producers and
veterinaries throughout the State.
Why do we need a new building? The current facility dates back to approximately the
mid70's, At the time we had far fewer people working the Diagnostic Center than we do
now, and in some of our laboratories at the time that that facility was built, had about 9
total people in that part of the laboratory. The same facilities now house about 25/26
people in the same facility. The facilities are outdated, they are very cramped and
crowded, you know, we are forced to put refrigerators and freezers anywhere we can
find a space for them anymore ... So, we are just physically running out of room and
running out of the capabilities we need to do the work that we need to do there.
We currently are spread out among 11 or so different locations, not only within the
College of Veterinary Medicine but we have facilities out near the airport, facilities up
near Snyder Hill on campus and this new building will allow us to consolidate those
people all together in that building. And we also have a critical need because of
developments over the past 5 -10 years for more bio- safety level 3 space. Bio- safety
level 3 space allows us to work safely with organisms that ... we never know what may
come through the door for us. Those organisms are things that can surprise us
sometimes, show up unexpectedly and we need to be able to work with them safely
when they do show up unexpectedly as well as provide some research space for the
PB I1 -6 -07
Pg. 29
University as a whole to work with those types of organisms and this new facility will
allow us to do that as well.
And with that, I think I will turn it back over to John.
Mr. Keefe — This is actually the exact same slide we had the last time. The building has
not changed, it remains about 126,000 square feet. It's a 3 -story structure with a
mechanical penthouse over a portion of that 3- stories.
Just a quick orientation to where the building is being proposed and that's in the
northeast corner of the veterinary complex... that's Caldwell Road running here, Route
366 and then Campus Road down here. That's the entire Vet School Complex right
there.
In this slide, we superimposed the proposed building on top of the existing buildings. As
you can see, there are a number of existing buildings, six in fact, they are 1956, 1954
cinder block buildings which the State will demolish prior to our project coming on
board. Things we positively note is the building is being pulled back from the wooded
tree -line. We are going to open this area up into vegetative area and also, this area
down here, which is currently a dirt field, will be grass and planted with trees. These
three trailers that are rather unsightly in this area will be removed at the end of the
project and the unimproved parking lot in this are will be improved and paved.
This just sort of gives you a quick sketch of what the site plan looks like. One of the key
aspects of the building is a connector, an all- weather connector to Shurman Hall
because three departments within the Health Diagnostic Center will remain in Shurman
Hall and this will provide an all- weather connector between the other departments as
well as those three there. We will develop, as I said, the parking lot in this area, we are
increasing the green areas in here with some spaces for drop -off and some spaces for
handicap parking.
This shows both the south, the east elevations. The only change that we have made to
this facade since the preliminary site plan review is that we've eliminated two of the
stacks in this location, and when I show you the roof plan you'll see where that is, and
we've reduced all stack heights to 10 foot above the top of the roof level and that was a
result, as we completed our wind /wake analysis, it told us we did not have to go,
remember, I mentioned 18 feet at the time, we did not have to do that, we can hold
them down to 10 feet.
Since the coloration of this did not come out exactly like we liked, I brought the exact
colorations over here (sample board with actual pieces of each component) I brought
the exact colorations over here for you to take a look at.
Chairperson Wilcox — Kudos, on the record. Kudos.
Mr. Keefe — What we have here is, this
then this is the coloration of the darker
coping on the building. This is the metal
at the top here and the screening around
is the color you asked for the last time,
nimbus gray and hopefully that blends we
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 30
is the coloration of the lighter color brick and
colored. brick. This would be the cast stone
panel which you see a little bit up in this area
some of the fans up here. And this right here
That is the color of the stacks itself. It is a
I into the environment.
Chairperson Wilcox — Nimbus gray? As in clouds?
Mr. Keefe — I didn't pick the color...
Alternate Member Erb — And that appears non - reflective, both.of those.
Mr. Keefe — That's correct. And then again, the other elevations from the north and
south.
Since there was some discussion on the roof plan last time, I got the roof plan. We
ended up with now, like I said, we dropped the two stacks that were right here. The two
that remain are approximately 24- inches in diameter. The ones over here are about 3
foot 4 inches diameter. These are 2 foot diameter and the two stacks here are only 18
inches in diameter. And that's the extent of the stacks on the building.
These are some of the conditions from the preliminary site plan review. and some of
them are, obviously, will remain in the final site plan review, should we get approved this
evening. We did receive the height variance from the ZBA on October 22"d
Submission of necessary permits, certainly, again, will most likely be a condition.
We had three lights on the, original submission in preliminary site plan review which
were non - compliant with the Town Code. We have since replaced those three lights,
having 100% cut -offs on all three lights. I provided those details in the packet.
The Operation and Maintenance Plan for the stormwater facilities . are also in your
packet and that was developed by our Environmental Compliance Office and that's for
the underground retention storage facilities we have indicated on the plans. Now, the
Operation and Maintenance Agreement, which was a condition before occupancy of the
building, I am unsure at this time exactly where that is. It's been written and presented
to the Town and I don't know if its been signed at this time.
Construction traffic routing, that was a restriction on us to prevent any traffic going north
on Caldwell Road and we will certainly require our contractors to abide by that.
Demolition permits for the buildings. Any demolition, certainly, that we do as part of this
project will be permitted through the Town.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 31
Erosion and sediment control plan. We provided that in the preliminary review. After
further discussion, the plan seemed to be adequate enough and I provided that for you
again for you to take a look at.
The noise modeling that we had at the preliminary site plan review indicated that the
generator would not be compliant with NYS Department of Environmental Compliance
requirements of not increasing over 6 decibels. So we ran that model again using both
attenuation on the muffler of the, on the exhaust of the generator as well as the
containment around the generator itself, and those results have been provided and all
those are under 6 decibels, are 6 decibels or under.
And finally, the color of the roofstacks, that's the color I brought over there to give you
an idea what that's going to look like.
Finally, again, the plan is to, hopefully, after approvals, to go out for bid in the January
to march time frame and begin construction, probably March, most likely April 2008 with
the approximately 26 month completion of the building.
Chairperson Wilcox — Questions?
Board Member Hoffmann — I apologize if these are questions that have been answered
before, I missed a meeting, but, I was wondering about the traffic, taking away debris
from the demolition and other construction traffic. It says it's suppose to go out to Route
366 and not go north on Caldwell Road, but where does it go once it gets out to Route
366?
Mr. Keefe — That depends upon ... we would not be able to answer that, it would be on
State routes, because we don't have an exact plan or pattern of that traffic leaving from
Route 366. Depending on where the fill site is going to be. There's actually, we did a
revised calculation on that and there's approximately only 1,500 cubic yards that we feel
will be removed from the site.
Board Member Hoffmann — Is that for the buildings that are covered by the Town
permits, or does it also include the demolition that will happen under the State's
auspices?
Mr. Keefe —That does include the demolition under the State auspices. A lot of that
material will actually be used as structural fill under the building itself.
Chairperson Wilcox — The Board's concern, when they were here for preliminary
approval was where the trucks go and the bottom line is, you don't go into Forest Home.
That's the bottom line.
Board Member Hoffmann — Right, but there are also other parts of town where we don't
want a lot of that traffic...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 32
Chairperson Wilcox — Well, you're right, but we got them out onto the state highway,
that was the key, to get them onto the state highway.
Board Member Hoffmann — And the other question that I have, unless someone else
wants to follow -up on what I just talked about ... was, it talks about a final windwake
analysis. Could you tell me a little bit more about the results of that?
Mr. Keefe — Yes. What we do is we do a numerical analysis of the exhaust first and that
basically tells you how high your exhaust should be relative to the top of the building.
Then we take the, basically we had our consultants, RWDI, they build a scale model of
the building as well as, I believe, it's up to 10 square miles around, they then use smoke
and wind direction analysis to determine where and how high your stacks should be and
in actuality, the biggest reason they do that is they want to make sure that any of our
exhaust is reintrained into our building itself or that those exhausts are going to be
reintrained into an adjoining building. And that's one of the primary reasons we do that.
Board Member Hoffmann — I missed how far of an area you covered. How far from the
chimney did you say the analysis was done?
Mr. Keefe — Actually they look out about 10 square miles.
Board Member Hoffmann — Ten square miles?
Mr. Keefe — Yes.
Alternate Member Erb — You said there would be something like 1,500 cubic yards of
debris that might be removed?
Mr. Keefe — That's correct and that's less than we presented at the preliminary.
Alternate Member Erb — That's good. Just translate that into truck loads.for me.
Mr. Keefe — I would imagine most trucks carry 20 cubic yards so...
Chairperson Wilcox — How about 10...
Mr. Walker — Well, 10 -15 depending on...
Chairperson Wilcox — We use 10. Ten's been our normal rule of thumb.
Mr. Walker — Depending on the weight of the materials.
Mr. Keefe — So it's 150 trips.
Chairperson Wilcox — Let's say 150 max. Dan, any comments you want to make on the
erosion and sedimentation control?
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 33
Mr. Walker — No, the plan looks good and we will be monitoring it closely as
construction begins.
Chairperson Wilcox — Susan, any comments? Nothing additional? Anything over here?
If not, I will give the public a chance to speak.
Trevor Pinch, 112 Crest Lane
I am also here representing the Forest Home Improvement Association of which I'm the
Vice - President and I have a little statement from the Forest Home Improvement
Association I'd like to read out at some point, but I'd like to preface my comments just
by telling you a little bit about what we are concerned about with this application and...
I've lived in Forest Home for 15 years and over that period of time, our peaceful hamlet
has become more and more noisy and some of the sources of the noise are rather
mysterious. For instance, last night, just to show you how concerned we are about this,
there was sort of a noise that sounded like a jet aircraft from Ithaca Airport but coming
from the Cornell direction. We have heard this noise several times over the summer, it's
been disturbing a number of us and I actually went out a 5:00 in the morning in my
dressing gown in my car and drove around and it's very hard to pin down the source of
this noise because it's, coming here at ground level, you have to be higher up, but I
have guesses where it is, but I don't want to go into that, I just wanted to raise the issue
of noise. And what we are most concerned about, then, is the noise that this new
facility will be producing because Forest Home is directly across the valley from where
this new facility will be located, so, I will just read our little statement and this will get you
the flavor of our comment.
"While we appreciate Cornell's reaching out to us last spring about plans for the
AHDC, we are still not satisfied that we know enough about the noise that the
building will produce in our neighborhood to be comfortable with a final site plan
approval. Our understanding of the noise impact report issued by consultants
engaged by Cornell, and of the response given to us by project leader John
Keefe when we asked for an assurance that Cornell would incorporate the
consultants' recommended mitigation measures, is that the steady state noise
emitted by the building would be greater than all other noise sources combined.
Moreover, the consultants' readings were taken on Fairway Drive and Forest
Home Drive, and we are concerned that the noise may be even greater on
Crest Lane and Halcyon Hill which are directly opposite the proposed site. Until
we can be satisfied that the building will not in fact become the dominant noise
producer in our neighborhood we ask the Planning Board to delay or condition
final site plan approval."
So that's our statement, and let me just say a couple of things about the tests that were
done on the noise. I've read the report and I myself, I also, I should declare am a
Professor.at Cornell and actually teach a course on sound studies to do with noise and
noise abatement and the tests were done at two sites and one of the sites is on
Fairview Drive, which not at the crest of the hill. Our street Crest Lane is right on the
crest of the hill and that's where you would expect most noise to be, across the valley.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 34
So, I am puzzled as to why the tests were done at not the best location for picking up
the noise. And also, another comment about the tests is that they were done in the
summer and the noise is much, you hear noise much more in the winter period, partly
because many of the trees don't have leaves on. So this made me worried about the
particular tests that were done in this case as well. So that's basically our statement.
Thank you very much indeed.
Chairperson Wilcox — Before you leave, will you be replacing Darcy as the President
soon?
Mr. Pinch — Yes, I, well, that depends on elections, so...
Chairperson Wilcox —Thank you.
Bruce Brittain, 135 Warren Road
First, I'd like to say that I support the mission of the proposed Animal Health Diagnostic
Center. Second, there aren't quite enough handouts to go around. And third, I do have
some concerns about the visual and noise impacts of this facility.
As far as visual impacts go, Doug and I were unable to attend the, your public hearing
on August 21St, but did send the top photograph and a memo, so I'm not sure if you've
seen that photograph before or not. But in any case, I also took this to the ZBA meeting
and presented that to them and if memory serves me correctly, Mr. Keefe told the ZBA
that the existing building in the center of this photograph is 2- stories tall. It's actually a
1 -story building. So, I'm not sure how much that would have influenced the ZBA's
decision, but I, just for the record, I wanted to clarify that is in fact a 1 -story building and
not a 2 -story building.
Chairperson Wilcox — Before oyou go on. How tall is the building? Can you ... what I
don't want to get into is it 10 foot 20 foot, 1 -story, 2- story... the question is how tall is
that building.
Mr. Brittain — Fifteen eight.
Chairperson Wilcox — That's more precision than I expected.
Mr. Bruce Brittain — Well, let me ask Doug, he has a better...
Mr. Doug Brittain — Sixteen eight.
Mr. Bruce Brittain — The second photograph there represents Doug's and my's best
guess as to the visual mass of that building based on scaling the height off of Schurman
Hall and off of the existing building there and trying to line it up with what we understand
to be the front facade of that building, which will be set back considerably further than
the existing building there. We had hoped that there could be some balloons floated to
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 35
actually determine that, but absent that, this is our best guess of the visual impact of
that structure, which we give you as a "for your information."
On to noise. Noise impacts. Doug and I did look through the noise impact assessment
that was conducted by Erwin, Williams, Davies and Erwin dated July 25, 2007. 1 also
read through the minutes of the August 21s' Planning Board and I believe that Mr. Keefe
said a 6db increase in noise level was "very, very small" and that the building would not
have any noise problems at all and I think it needs to be pointed out that that's Mr.
Keefe's conclusion. Nothing that I have found in the RWDI report supports that
assertion. I should also point out that I used to teach a course at Cornell titled 'The
Ambient Environment' about half of which dealt with acoustics and Doug used to work
at the sound lab at Chrysler, so we do know a little bit about acoustics. So I am not
going to bore you to tears teaching you about acoustics. Sound is measured on log
scale which makes addition difficult. It's not straightforward and that may be where
some of the confusion came from.
One person talking is 60 — 65dba and if you look at figure 4, that shows that
conversation face -to -face, 65dba. Two people talking, doubles the sound energy, so if
you go up to figure 3, doubling sound energy is a 3db difference and it's a just
perceptible difference. It does, it's not a linear addition, so 60 — 65 doubled does not
become 120 — 130 which is the threshold of pain, on figure 4. Well, depends who is
talking,...
Board Member Riha — Fred, I just say, at some point, we need clarification, because my
recollection was, from the original discussion, we're only talking about the noise that
comes from the generators that would only be on in emergency cases when the power
fails. Right. So this is not noise that you would normally be having at all. So that was
my understanding, that it would only happen when there's power failure in the area.
Mr. Bruce Brittain — If you give me a second, I'll get to that. Thank you. The, my review
of the minutes of the August 21St meeting also indicated there was confusion between a
sound that is 6db and an increase in sound that is 6db and there's a big difference
between the two. If we go to 5db because it's easier, it's on these charts, a 5db, if you
look at figure 4, a 5db increase is a noticeable increase but a 5db sound, looking at
figure 4, 5db sound is very quiet, that's were the rustling of leaves came from. But a
5db increase is clearly noticeable. So the analogy that Doug came up with, we all drive
15 mph, which is relatively slow, but a 15mph increase is a big increase. So if traffic is
going 35 and you blast by at 50 which is a 15mph increase, that's a big increase and
that's enough to get you a speeding ticket.
Now if you look at the report, now I am getting back to what you were talking about.
The steady noise state noise in the facility and it's measured in R1 and R2. So now
we're on to figure 5. The steady state of the sound of the facility, so figure 5, if you look
in the nighttime column, predicted facility dba, it's 49 and 41 depending on the two
receptor locations. This is quite loud. Forty -nine or forty -one, you look back to figure 4,
that's inside an office, that's not rustling of leaves. So you were told before that the
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 36
sound of this facility or the sound of the facility with the generator would be no louder
than the rustling of leaves. It will be, it will be a noticeable increase in Forest Home. If
you look at the existing nighttime sound level, so, again, in the nighttime column,
ambient dba, R1 and R2 is 45 and 37. So this predicted facility, so let's just look at R1.
The predicted facility noise is going to be 49, existing is 45. So that's louder. This
facility will be louder than all existing, all other sounds combined, in Forest Home. This
one building. That's a big increase. Now, together, these two, the 45 plus the 49 add to
50, it's not, addition is not linear, these are log scales remember, but the change, so
now the last column, Figure 5, the change is 5dba increase. So this is without the
generator, just the sound of the building, a 5dba increase. Now, if you go back to
Figure 3, 5dba increase change in sound level is clearly noticeable. So this building will
be clearly noticeable at night in Forest Home. In fact, it's, given that it's louder, this
building will be the dominant sound. Five dba is clearly noticeable, also, if you look at
figure 3, 5dba increase, that's a tripling of sound energy. So 2/3 of the sound energy in
Forest Home will be from this one building without the generator, if you add the
generator, you're up to 6db, that's quadrupling... So 3/ , when the generator is running,
3/ of the sound in Forest Home at this receptor site will be from that building.
Cornell's Master Plan indicates further construction at this site and in fact this building is
designed to be expanded. The concern is not only, will this building triple the sound
level there, that will become the new baseline. So, if they say, five years from now, let's
build a new building, our old baseline was existing sound level, it will now be 3 -times
the sound energy, they will be able to come in again with the 5db increase, it will now be
9 -times the sound level, I'm sorry, 9 -times the sound energy in Forest Home from that
school.
I also wanted to follow up with what Trevor said about Fairway Drive. Crest Lane and
(inaudible) are both closer to the Vet School than Fairway Drive is and Fairway has a
higher ambient noise level. Part of it is the construction that's been going on this
summer during the day, part of it is the golf course maintenance. The driving range is
directly adjacent to Fairway Drive and that gets mowed during the night so as not to
interfere with patrons' use of the golf course. So I think, had the consultants chosen a
receptor location on either Halcyon or Crest there would have been a lower existing
ambient level as well as a greater increase, just due to the proximity of the building.
So, just to make a long story short ... it looks like the University, yes, they're going to be
able to, with the generator running, to bring the increase down to 6dba, which is the
States requirement and, but it looks like they are doing the minimum, legally, that they
have to and it, it would seem to me that, we would prefer to have a good neighbor policy
to do more than the absolute minimum. Further noise mitigation options are well worth
pursuing. It should be possible to somehow silence that fan noise from the exhaust
stacks and we ask that the Board, that you do stipulate that the University do more to
reduce the sound of this building. And that's where I will stop and I thank you.
Chairperson Wilcox — Bruce, can I ask you a question. Help me understand one thing.
There's the change in energy level, and then there's the change in apparent loudness.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 37
Is there a correlation between them? Because I am looking at Figure 3, and even you,
think, misspoke a couple times when you meant to say change in energy level and...
Mr. Bruce Brittain - Sound is a log scale ... it is ... acousticians have regretted the way
that they chose to record it, but, you can measure the energy level, which is the first
column there, you can measure the sound level in db or dba, and then you can talk
about, you know, what does it sound like; does it sound like it's doubled, does it sound
like it's tripled, is it barely noticeable. This table was trying to tie together all of the,
three of the different ways of measuring sound.
Chairperson Wilcox — Is this a table you took from a standard text?
Mr. Bruce Brittain — This is from my text book.
Chairperson Wilcox — Your own?
Mr. Bruce Brittain — Well, the text book I taught out of. So it's a bit dated now, sadly,
but, yes.
Chairperson Wilcox — I, ummmm .... I care about the change in apparent loudness
because I can hear that, right? Do I care about the change in energy level necessarily?
Mr. Bruce Brittain — Being humans we would care about the change in apparent
loudness, but the change in energy level is also important and I think Doug was going to
talk more about that.
Chairperson Wilcox — Okay. Anybody else? Questions with this? Doug you go next.
Doug Brittain, 135 Warren Road
Nice to see you all again. Nice to see some new faces. I wondered why you weren't
voting, but now I know why. Okay. Yeah, Bruce mentioned that I used to work for
Chrysler at the sound lab. It was actually the Sound and Vibration Department, but, to
any of you who own 4- cylinder Chryslers back in the loccoca era, I would like to
apologize. One thing we learned though, in the lab, is that engineers can routinely,
predictably, repeatedly, judge a 3db difference subjectively. If it's 3db and it gets worse, .
we all rate it, oh, it's a half point worse than it was, or it's a half point better, or, which is
our smallest objective division, but 3db, you can hear. Sixteen db even management
can hear. So, yes, sound is a little bit awkward and even people who have worked with
it, so I think sound energy, as you were saying, why does it matter ... I will show you.
(Mr. Brittain brought a number of empty quart containers to use as a demonstration.)
Display number one. Let us pretend that this represents the amount of noise that we
currently have in Forest Home at night, because that's When the problem is worst. So
we have 1 quart of low -fat noise in Forest Home now. This is all the noise, that includes
all the rustling of leaves, all the dogs barking, all the golf courses being mowed, all the
airplanes that come over between 7am and 7pm, and there are several of them, it
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 38
includes the traffic, it includes the creek, it includes the noise that already washes over
Forest Home from Cornell, this is everything. This is it. This is all the noise.
The sound of the new facility, the ventilation fans, etc., that operate 24/7/365, is this
much sound. So that's what we will end up with. (Added 1 1 believe) It's an emergency,
and the generator comes on, this is what we have, (added 3 more I believe) quadrupling
the amount of sound energy, that's a 6db increase, that's what they were aiming for,
that's why they mitigated the generator, because, without the muffler, without the
enclosure, the generator was doing that (adds more cartons). Now you're over 6db's.
So what they did was they put a muffler and an enclosure on the diesel generator,
boom, half the noise energy gone. That's nice. This runs sometimes, sometimes it
doesn't. But this is, now, the new noise that we will have in Forest Home.
Chairperson Wilcox — I'm sorry ... wait... that will be the new amount of noise energy...
Mr. Doug Brittain — New amount of noise energy.
Chairperson Wilcox — Not necessarily the new amount of loudness.
Mr. Doug Brittain — Right. The loudness will be 6db, it'll be a couple of clicks louder,
you will hear it, you will be able to hear the difference. But, what will the dominant noise
be. Will it.be the birds, and the dogs, and the traffic, and the golf course and the
airplanes? No. It will be the building. The building will be, depending on whether the
generator is running, 2 or 3 times as loud as everything else combined. So, this one
building becomes THE dominant noise in Forest Home. Even if this were gone, you
might not be able to tell the difference, but Forest Home will sound like the ADHC, that's
Forest Home, so, at night, during the daytime we have more traffic, so this becomes a
lower percentage of the increase, but this is sort of to let you know where the sound
energy. in Forest Home is coming from.
So, what I think everyone would like to do is not run the generator much. That sounds
good. It might be nice if they would do with the ventilation fans what they already did
with the diesel generator, which is try to mitigate the noise, to make it quieter, and then
the building, potentially, could be only double the amount of sound energy that is in
Forest Home and you would be able to hear the difference, you would be able to hear
the building, but it wouldn't drown out everything else quote as much.
Now, as Bruce said, if this is considered the acceptable new 6db baseline, and then,
because Cornell, in 5 years say, oops, we need another building. What they're going to
do is say, hey, we can do 6db again, and that's quadrupling. And so they are going to
start....we are going to put all of these ... and the new sound in. Forest. Home, which they
will tell you, this isn't too bad, it's within State requirements, and this will be the amount
of sound in Forest Home when the next building goes up. And this is what we have
now, and in 5 or 10 years, they will come along and they will want to do this.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 39
So, I think part of the purpose of a Planning Board is to sort of look ahead and I think, if
this gets in, there are long -term consequences. Not just this noise, but what it means
for the next step. I don't know if you can legally say, this is the baseline for the Vet
School from now on. But, the more noise they add now, the more noise they will be
able to add later and still be only 6db at a time.
So, this is a concern. The suggestion would be, of course, to add a few, a few of these
we could get away with, but they can do more, and I think all we have to do is ask them.
Just as they did with the generator, I think it would be a good neighbor policy to try and
keep Forest Home from getting too bad and I would hope and suggest that you would
consider doing that.
And I think that's pretty much it. So thank you for your attention, and if anybody wants
some empty milk bottles, I'd be happy to oblige.
Chairperson Wilcox — Questions for Doug?
Board Member Riha — No, no, l guess my question is more for... Jonathan...
Chairperson Wilcox—. For us ... okay....
Board Member Riha — So, I am trying to get this straight, about this 6 decibels ... is there
some law that says you can increase the noise by 6 decibels, of what? So even if it's
screaming loud, you can build a building that goes 6 more decibels? That's the part I
didn't understand. I mean, presumably you have to keep ... the Whole thing has to stay
under a certain decibel rating, or not?
Chairperson Wilcox — We can ask the applicant.
Board Member Riha — I'm confused.
Board Member Thayer — I can hear sound, but can I hear sound energy?
Board. Member Riha —Well, I mean, it looks like these decibels are still going to be under
60 decibels. At your location...
Board Member Thayer — I'm confused.
Mr. Keefe — Okay. Do you want me to explain in a little more detail the study we did
and explain how we came up with some of the...
Board Member Riha — Well I think I understand that. What I don't understand is what
are the regulations. What are you required to do. I mean, obviously you couldn't
generate 130 decibels.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 40
Mr. Keefe – With a lack of regulations, I had the, our consultants, base their findings on
what the NYS Department of Environmental Compliance says.
Board Member Riha – Yeah, what's that?
Mr. Keefe – Yeah, it's anything with an increase of 6 decibels or less, is not considered
perceptible. It's right in the handbook and the handbook is quoted in their study here.
And that's what we used as the bottom line guideline.
Board Member Riha – Okay, yeah, so I can see their point. It's like, if you keep
saying ... if you keep doing six more decibels and six more decibels, it's going to add up
to perceptible.
Mr. Keefe – The study we did was a worst -case study, obviously and the study includes
running the generator to get the 6- decibel increase and you pointed out that the
generator will only be run during emergency situations so that's correct in that response.
Board Member Riha – So then is Table 2 saying that's without the generator? The first
part of Summary of Noise, the impact will be ... that's .what I don't exactly get here. It
says the generator is off and the ambient is 52, the predicted facility's 49 during the
daytime, so then when you add those two together...
Mr. Keefe –This is actually including the generator unmitigated, so it didn't have a
muffler on the generator exhaust and we did not have an enclosure on it.
Board Member Riha – But that's the generator off.
Mr. Keefe – Maybe I am looking at a different Table 2...
Board Member Riha –That very first...
Alternate Member Erb – The first two rows are generator off, the second two rows are
unmitigated but on.
Board Member Riha – But so it says, right now you're hearing 52 decibels at _your test
site, well 52 or 43 and that the predicted facility is going to generate 49 and 41 at those
two sites?
Mr. Keefe — That's correct.
Board Member Riha – And so then, when you add the two together....
Mr. Keefe – You get 54...
Board Member Riha – Right, so there is going to be a 2- decibel increase during the
daytime and potentially 5 during the night.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 41
Mr. Keefe — And also at night we had them do again, worst case, with all the fans
running but in actuality, we will turn all our fans at half speed because of unoccupied
modes.
Board Member Riha — Right. So the issue then, to me, it comes down to, although they
have a point about what's going to happen in the future, but the issue comes down to
whether these 54 and 45, 50 and 42, are really bothersome, relative to the 49 and
40 ... what is there now, right.
Alternate Member Erb — Do you have any modeling work that includes fans at half
speed on an ordinary night?
Mr. Keefe — No we don't.
Board Member Talty — Do you concur with their presentation?
Mr. Keefe — i have to rely on what our consuitants advise because i am not an
acoustical engineer and not clearly understanding the change in energy level and
versus change in sound level, so I can't comment on that.
Board Member Riha —The guidelines seem weird, because I see their point. Every time
you go back, it's six more decibels. It seems like there should be some absolute decibel
level.
Mr. Keefe It is also not including the fact that we are going to be shutting down a lot of
fans when the diagnostic lab shuts down itself, too.
Board Member Riha — That's a good point.
have some old kind of buildings there...
I was wondering about that. Because you
Mr. Keefe — Yes and they are some older type fans there that are noisier than the newer
fans that we will be installing because the diagnostic lab itself will cease to function as
that....
Board Member. Riha — So you can potentially reduce the ambient.
Mr. Keefe — That's correct.
Board Member Hoffmann — I have a slightly different question. What you have in your
report seems to me deals mainly with generators in the building with exhaust fans and
things like that and I wanted to ask you if this building is going to be air-conditioned?
Mr. Keefe —The building itself, yes, will have temperature controls to cool in the summer
and then to hear in the winter, certainly, but I wouldn't call it air conditioned. I guess it is
because air handling does condition the air as it enters the building.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 42
Board Member Hoffmann — I have a little trouble hearing you. Can you try to speak a
little more slowly.
Mr. Keefe — The building will have a series of what we call air - handling units and these
are units that are inside the mechanical penthouse. They draw air in and they condition
that air inside the building before it is distributed into the building. So it's not like an
external air conditioner on the building itself, it's a unit that's within the penthouse of the
building.
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. The reason I ask that question is, just a few years
ago, the Baker Laboratory, as part of the Veterinary School, on Hungerford Hill, was
renovated and added to, and in the process of doing that, I think they must have added
a new air conditioning and venting system. I live very close, and in the summer, ever
since they started using that building, I have heard this very irritating high pitch noise
and it is on hot days, more noticeable, more often. So I am wondering if there's going to
be something similar here that will add to the noise level, above and beyond what you
have reported from your mechanical systems.
Mr. Keefe —The noise survey itself did include the noise that would come from the air
handling units, 1,2,3, and 4, were included in the noise modeling.
Board Member Hoffmann — Could you say that again for me...
Mr. Keefe — The noise modeling not only included the ... it included the generators, all
the exhaust, it also included the sound of the air handling unit itself, which you referred
to, you called an air conditioner.
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. So that was included here, that would not be an
added and there wouldn't be any additional other noises like this very high pitched noise
that I hear from the Baker Laboratory,
Mr. Keefe — I certainly can't answer that because I don't know what you're hearing from
the Baker Lab.
Board Member Hoffmann — Yeah, well it's something new since that building was
renovated and added to. I've lived there since 1969 and it's just happened in the past
years since that was done and I am concerned that something else like that might
happen in this building too, that's why I asked.
Chairperson Wilcox — Why is everyone looking at me....laughter....l will tell you that
wrote down two words... compelling or confusing...
Board Member Thayer — That's what I said...
Chairperson Wilcox — Compelling or confusing...
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 43
Board Member Thayer — We're still in the public hearing, right...
Chairperson Wilcox — The public hearing is still open, yes it is.
Board Member Howe — Certainly I think that if there is further mitigation for the noise, it's
worth asking that question, but I agree, I think you've described it accurately.
Chairperson Wilcox — It's up to the applicant to address the questions, and if they can't
address them tonight, which I don't expect that they could address them'tonight, I mean,
we're still trying to digest this and I'm not sure ... at least I'm still trying to digest it, there
may be people here smarter than me ... there likely are ... I'm still trying to digest this and
I'm not sure that I can. I probably need someone who can ... and thank you for the quart
bottles, but, again, that's energy not how I hear it, so I think it exaggerates the impact,
which is unfortunate, but, I know what you're trying to measure.
I like the idea of potentially mitigating sound for the exhaust stacks ... I know, it will cost
you money right ... is coming up with a way to mitigate the sounds of the exhaust stacks
similar to the way they were able to mitigate the sound of the emergency generators.
Which, in fact, they cut the increase in sound by roughly half.
Board Member Riha — Those are two different things.
Chairperson Wilcox — They are two different things?
Board Member Riha — Generators and exhaust fans, yeah.
Chairperson Wilcox — But the exhaust fans contribute to the noise... Frankly, I'm not
concerned about the emergency generators and the noise. Pardon me, I'm not
concerned. They're purpose is to come on only when necessary and if they're on, we
have a black -out condition, we have something else going on and I'm not sure the
concern is noise, the concern at that point is we don't have electricity, the food in the
refrigerator, the street lights don't work, my phone does work but other things might not
work. And hopefully the emergency generator only comes on when necessary and that
doesn't happen very often. I'm more concerned about the increase in the noise that the
building generates just from the exhaust stacks which is the primary source of noise,
and if the information that Bruce and Doug have provided and the charts that they
provided, and the information we have from the applicant, a 6db increase, is going to be
heard. It's marked as noticeable and is the fact that it's noticeable, is that an issue,
number one, and number two, the issue of it raises the ambient level that much higher
so that then the next building comes along and you have a new baseline. Your point
about exhaust fans in that vicinity that will no longer operate because they will be in
buildings that will be demolished, is a point well taken and may well have an impact of
lowering the, I don't want to say noise increase, the increase in apparent loudness.
Because that to me is the key. So maybe we want some more information and put this
off to another busy meeting.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 44
Board Member Talty — I was concerned that was brought up about leaves on the trees
versus leaves not on the trees, because there is no question that there are mitigating
circumstances given data in the summer and data in the winter that we should take
under advisement.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah, but do we start listing them... I mean if there are no leaves
on the trees, I assume that' travels more easily from one place to another because it
doesn't have leaves on the trees. On the other hand, when you don't have the leaves
on the trees, you're not running your air conditioning systems, as often, and do the air
conditioning systems make more noise than the heating systems.
Board Member Talty — But air conditioning system wasn't part of the play here.
Board Member Riha — It's the Lake Source Cooling... they're venting part of the...
Board Member Talty — This isn't part of the play, Fred, I mean, it's...
Alternate Member Erb — It's piped chilled water...
Chairperson Wilcox — And no noise?
Mr. Keefe — The modeling was done irrespective of vegetation. So it didn't really bring
vegetation into it, whether it was there or not there. But, it models what that sound
would be based on elevation changes and topography but not vegetation.
Alternate Member Erb — You know, then Cornell was asking to put the playing fields
behind the Reese Tennis Courts and some of the neighbors on Honness Lane and I
were asking about the potential to put in a new tree line, we were told emphatically that
a tree line would not buffer any noise so it was irrelevant.
Board Member Talty — That is true.
Board Member Hoffmann — I was just going to make that point. And the other thing is, I
am irritated by the noise coming from the Baker Lab in the.summer, when I am out,
when I have my windows open so that I hear the noise more, and in the winter, they
probably don't operate that system and I don't hear it and my windows are closed, I'm
not out there so much.
Board Member Talty — That's true, but we don't know if this particular system is going to
be anywhere near that particular system. And let's face it, there's plenty ... when the
system is 90% active is three - quarters of the year. It may not be the .summertime when
we are active outside, but it's still three - quarters of the year.
Board Member Riha — I guess what I would ... the only information I'm missing, maybe
you have it, what would be the general noise level around the Town. I mean, Forest
Home might be a wonderfully quiet place and I'm sure everybody wants it to stay that
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 45
way, but we live in a society where there's businesses and traffic and so on, so we all
have to put up with a fair amount of noise. I mean, I live less than a mile from the
airport, you know, and so, are my noise levels a lot less than this or is this an unusual
noise level?
Mr. Kanter — Well, I can't speak to the actual levels, but I can comment a little bit about
types of noise. I mean, for instance, when a jet plane goes by, it's a very loud noise. It
starts off quiet, gets very loud and then goes away and then it's gone for a while. A
building which has a ventilation system is going to be pretty much constant. So you're
going to have, whatever the level is, it's going to be there pretty much whenever the
system is running.
Board Member Riha — Yeah, I work on the top floor of Bradfield so ... I hear noise
continuously, and I am sure it is above this decibel level, all day while working, so is this
like unusual of, if you are inside a building, that kind of noise...
Mr.
Kanter —
Actually
that's a good question. Whether the noise
levels,
the noise levels
are
probably
going to
be louder from this building from outside of
it than
inside, so...
Board Member Talty — What's the median speed of the fans and the stacks? You said
that sometimes they are going to be on full blast, sometimes they are going to be on
half speed, what's the median speed, year round?
Mr. Keefe — I can't comment on the exact speed. They are designed to run at a certain
speed. There are different size fans. But, what the speed if the fan is, depends on how
many changes per hour we are doing inside the building. When we're operating during
the daytime, we run about 6 -8 air changes an hour. So, you are completely changing
the air in the room 6 -8 times. At night, we turn that back to half that capacity, which is
about 3 -4 air changes per hour. So you can imagine, whatever speed that fan is
running at, it's running at half the speed during the nighttime.
Board Member Talty — Okay, that's 6 -8 times during the day. What is the capacity that
is being utilized at that time? Is it 100 %?
Mr. Keefe — No, it will not be 100% of the fans...
Board Member Talty — Is it 80 %? Because then I can, if you say it's half that, at night
then if it goes at 80 %, now it's 40 % ... If it's 60 it goes to 30...that's a big difference...
Mr. Keefe — And it depends on the fan. Each of the fans works a different system so it
wouldn't, might not be operating all the time and in certain cases, the main, the three
main fans are designed with an n +1 redundancy, so they are actually designed, that you
could, if you lost one fan, you could run two at full speed, to do that same at three, so
you are assuming they are running at 66% of the actual speed.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 46
Alternate Member Erb — Are these fans the primary source of an increase in the
background noise level from outside the building?
Mr. Keefe — Other than the generator, that's correct.
Alternate Member Erb — yeah, generator off...
Board Member Conneman — Can you run the fans slower?
Mr. Keefe — We are running them slower than their maximum capacity, on a normal
basis. We do that to have, redundancy in case we have a critical failure in one, we can
still operate two. So they are, as you said, we're running at 66 %.
Board Member Talty — I know but you're ... what is the standardization of it .... what's the
standard speed, not if one fails and the other one has to kick on...
Mr. Keefe — 60 %...60% of maximum.
Board Member Talty — Okay, that's what I'm asking...
Chairperson Wilcox — I think he was thinking you were asking RPM's...
Board Member Talty — I just want to know what's the standard. So you're telling me that
at nighttime, or downtime, it can run as slow as 30 %?
Mr. Keefe — That's correct.
Board Member Riha — And this noise modeling was done at running at 100 %?
Mr. Keefe — That's correct.
Board Member Talty — That's big information.
Board Member Conneman — A long time ago, when I was Associate Dean in charge of
classrooms in the College of Agriculture /Life Sciences, in new Comstock, we. had a
noisy classroom and everybody complained about it, and I went down there and you
know, you looked at this place ... you know, if you had more carpeting on the floor it
would help. But what they did was, they slowed the fan down and what a difference it
made. Now, I'm not an engineer and the people that slowed it down weren't engineers,
it was some kid who came and solved the problem, so, I mean ... you can run things
slower and get some results. I don't' know what. It seems to me we need a lot more
information about this.
Dr. Akey — One of the things that keeps being asked is, you know, how noisy is it out
there anyway and this actually, these charts actually show the ambient decibel levels
that were measured at those two locations, where they were measured. That's what the
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 47
ambient dba is with the generator off at location R1, location R2, so, it's 52 and 43
during the daytime and it's 45 and 37 at night, with no generator involved, so those are
the actual, as I understand it, those are the actual measurements of the existing level of
noise at those locations.
Board Member Conneman — But is that really measured or is that modeled?
Dr. Akey — No sir. Those are the actual measurements, correct me if I am wrong John,
they actually took measuring devices out to the two locations and measured the current
ambient noise level at those...
Board Member Conneman — It says modeling on the ... if I am reading the same table
that you are...
Chairperson Wilcox — I think the modeling refers to the impact...
Dr. Akey — The modeling is for the predicted facility and the, for the predictions.
Board Member Talty — Is there a way to disseminate what the current noise level is and
how much the current building is putting in to that? Because I think you had a valid
point before, that once you eliminate your current facility, I mean, you should almost
back that out ... is there a way to back that out of the current data that you have given
us?
Alternate Member Erb — May I point out that that would assume that the current facility
is going to be taken out of operation.
Board Member Talty — Well, that's what we've been hearing, that's what I thought we
have been hearing all along.
Board Member Thayer — They are taking those buildings down...
Alternate Member Erb — Well, there are nasty old barn type buildings that are going to
be taken down. But, the existing Diagnostic Lab facility would probably have more
ventilation on it than these cinder block buildings that are the ones that are going to be
leveled.
Dr. Akey — Well, I don't know that that's a correct assumption, and we don't know what
the existing building is going to use, to be used for, once we move out.
Alternate Member Erb — That's true.
Dr. Akey — We don't know if it's going to be converted to classrooms and offices or it's
going to be lab space ... we don't know what's going to be done with it: So, yes, the only
correct assumption is that the buildings to be demolished, whatever sound they create
is certainly going to be gone, and we can't say, at this point, hcvVI much sound is going
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 48
to be changed form the existing diagnostic lab because we don't know what's going to
happen to that building.
Alternate Member Erb — But it is true that there must be some ventilation on those
buildings because some of them have animals in them right now, as well as people.
Dr. Akey — Absolutely, the ones that are going to be knocked down...
Alternate Member Erb -- ...so there has to be at least a little...
Mr. Keefe — And they are all external type of units that are providing...
Alternate Member Erb — Right, the nastier units.
Mr. Keefe — Right, they are on top of the building, you can see them.
Board Member Talty — So I just want to know, do we now have more questions now
than when we started about an hour ago?
Chairperson Wilcox — Would one ... would one of you like to take 2 or 3 minutes and
expand upon, or make some general ... or add some comments? I am looking at Doug
and Bruce ... I've watched your body ... I have watched your reaction, physically to the
discussion, is there anything you would like to just state, because I haven't closed the
public hearing quite yet, I want to give you one more chance to ... in fact, what I will do is
I will just ask you to take the microphone, that way I don't have to shuffle people
around, if you don't mind...
Chairperson Wilcox -Your reaction to what's been said or anything else you would like
to add to what you provided before...
Mr. Brittain — Okay. The modeling was done, I believe, normal full operational mode,
which is the fans at 67% not the fans at 100 %. So if we run the fans at half of that, it's
running at half of what they modeled, not a third of what they modeled..
Sound is not going to be strictly proportional to the speed of the fan. The frequency of
the noise, because of lot of this is the blades going around, if they go around half as
fast, it will drop an octave, the pitch, so, reducing the sound level and lowering the air
flow are not, I mean, obviously, if you turn off the fans, they are related, but you can
reduce the noise without reducing the air flow and so that's, I think, what I would like to
see explored. Not to interfere with their facility, but to make it more neighbor friendly.
What did I forget? I think that's mostly it ... thank you.
Chairperson Wilcox — All right. Thank you. I will close the public hearing at 9:38p.m.
All right ... what Is our pleasure ... let me try to get a consensus here.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 49
Alternate Member Erb — It seems to me that a lot of what our concern is, is what
happens in the future when we establish a new baseline because in fact, what's being
presented to us falls within the guidelines that we would ordinarily work with. And what
we have hasn't taken into consideration that set of nasty small buildings that are going
to be taken out of operation, which are going to have to contribute in some positive way
to lowering the ambient noise.
Board Member Hoffmann — But that's what we are assuming. I am surprised actually,
that the applicants consultants didn't take that into account.
Chairperson Wilcox — We have no evidence that they did...
Board Member Hoffmann — We don't know whether they did or not and I think it's safer
not to make assumptions.
Chairperson Wilcox — Well wait a minute, let's step back ... they measured the ambient
noise, right, they measured, the modeled the noise from the building, and, I hate to say
added the two together, you can't add them together, I understand that, but that, it's
those two measurements which they used, which formed the basis of the work that they
needed to do to get the total change as measured by dba, to be 6 or less.
Board Member Hoffmann — Anyway, I prefer not to sit here and have us make
assumptions, but have the applicants come back to us with the actual explanation of
what was done.
Chairperson Wilcox —Well they've given us an explanation of what was done. The
question is, what else might we need if the consensus is we need more information, or
the consensus is we want them to do more, or the consensus is we want them to test
then when the leaves are not on the trees, or we want them to come back and tell us
how many fans are they getting rid of in the. demolished buildings and therefore, how
many, what is the, bear with me here, what is the change in energy level or the negative
change in energy level and how does that translate into the apparent loudness. You
know, do we, we have the applicant saying, I believe I heard the applicant say, that the
noise levels are modeled with the fans operating at 60 %, 1 believe that's what they
said...
Board Member Talty — that's not what I thought I heard...
Mr. Keefe —The fans were modeled, if you look at...
Chairperson Wilcox — Oh, I'm sorry, you said the fans are modeled at 100 % ... right ... we
have one or more of the ... I think we had Doug say that the noise Was modeled using
the fans at 60% 1 believe he said ... 67 % ... so we have worst case ... the numbers that we
were provided represent worst case, which is the fans operating at 100% speed, will
there be less, I'm sorry, back over here, will there be less energy, sound energy, with
the fans running at 60% or 67% or 60% which is the normal operating level. I agree that
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 50
there will be a definite difference in pitch, but will there be less sound energy, and what
is that, and how much less energy... okay ... that's.where I am going...
Board Member Hoffmann — Yeah, I understand all you are saying but I just wanted to
clarify that the only thing I was referring to when I was talking about just making
assumptions, had to do with whether the consultants had considered the loss of noise
from the buildings that were going to be removed and it sounded as if the applicants
hadn't really thought about that or the consultants hadn't talked about that..
Chairperson Wilcox —Let's ask the applicants directly.
Dr. Akey — Well, the modeling figures are meant to represent what it would be with the
new building in place, so, if the new building is in place, then the old buildings that are
being demolished are gone, so, the model ... I infer from that, not assume, that the model
numbers say this is the sound level with the new building in place and therefore, the old
buildings that were demolished are no longer there so their sound has essentially been
subtracted out and now what the model numbers say are this is how much noise you
can expect with a new building in place, replacing all those old nasty buildings.
Board Member Talty — Before you are 100% of that assertion, do you want time to
check that to make sure that that is indeed correct.
Mr. Keefe —That is correct. Predicated (inaudible) is just this building itself...
Board Member Conneman — But it seems to me if we had a case like this that dealt with
traffic, we would say to you, go out, come back and get us another report that covers
the questions that have been raised tonight: That's what I think we would say, and we
probably understand traffic, so we can make that statement more precisely, but I don't
think you have proved or unproved anything. If all of these things are sort of muddled in
my opinion.
Dr. Akey = I guess we are struggling with what else we would do because, again, if the
modeling numbers are for the new building in place and therefore the old buildings are
gone, I think that answers the question that you were asking before. So I guess we
need clarification on what else we are required to do.
Board Member Riha — Because then we would have to say, oh, these aren't acceptable
noise levels...
Chairperson Wilcox— I should point ... it may be possible, if 4 members of this Board are
in favor of approving what you have presented now and going ahead, so I am still trying
to get a consensus from this Board.
Board Member Riha — And I am trying to clarify well, is this an acceptable noise level. It
seems to fall within the 6 decibel guideline, but can we just say no, we want less noise?
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 51
Board Member Thayer — It says the change is 5dba at night, and then, you come down
to the chart, and it says 5 is clearly noticeable... Well, if it's quiet and a bird chirps, that's
clearly noticeable, you know. I mean, it doesn't mean anything, it really doesn't bean
anything, and only 2 -dba's change in the daytime. I mean, I am certainly comfortable
with that.
Board Member
Hoffmann —But
there is a difference
between constant noise. Have you
all noticed that
there is a noise
coming from some of
the lamps up here?
Board Member Talty — Sure, it's a hum...
Board Member Hoffmann — A steady background noise...
Board Member Thayer — Occasionally...
Board Member Hoffmann — And it can be very annoying...
Board Member Riha — I've worked in Bradfield Hall for 30 years and I am sure the
decibel level there must be a lot bigger than this... probably 80 decibels...
Board Member Hoffmann — Well, I feel sorry for you, having to work under those
conditions...
Board Member Riha — Yeah, but I am sure a lot of people at Cornell do, so that's what I
am trying to get to, what are acceptable noise levels ... I am sure, in a perfect world, we
would all want it to be quiet, but that's what I don't understand. What's, it seems like we
are saying, oh, the only regulations are that you can't build a building that is 6 decibels
higher, but that seems a little strange that there's no cut off limit...
Chairperson Wilcox — Right because if you keep compounding that...
Board Member Riha — That's true. So that's what I don't grasp. Is there any guidance
that says...or is it up to every Planning Board to decide, this is okay or not...
Ms. Brock — Your Town Code has considerations that you are supposed to look at when
you are considering site plan approval, and it's a qualitative standard rather than a
quantitative standard, in this regard. One of the considerations is compatibility of the...:
(tape change) ... One of the considerations is compatibility of the project with the
surrounding neighborhood, including protection of adjacent properties in the general
public against noise.
Board Member Riha — Yes. So that's why it would be nice to have a little information on
what's ... take 10 neighborhoods in Ithaca, what would it be a lot less noisier than this?
Mr. Kanter— Everyone would be different.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 52
Board Member Riha — Yeah, and would this fall within the mean or the median. Some
would be higher than this, right?
Chairperson Wilcox — With a standard deviation...
Board Member Riha — I mean so that's where I ... I'm mean ... that's where I ... as I said in
an ideal world we would all like to not have.
Mr. Kanter — There is no standard, really that we ever have used or that I know of that
we could use.
Ms. Brock — I do have to question rregarding the existing facilities that will be destroyed,
whether the noise from those facilities was taken out because in the table in the
consultant's report, you see the ambient noise and it says that comes from actual
measurements and its there constant throughout the entire analysis they do. It doesn't
indicate ambient noise, which we measure and then subtracted out the ambient noise
that comes from the facilities that will be demolished. To me that indicates that's that
and then they added the noise from the predicted facility unless there's. -..and they don't
say we subtracted the existing.., maybe it said it somewhere in the text.
Board Member Talty — On the coattails of that, you would have given us a measurement
of what the current facility's output is.
Mr. Keefe — You've got to remember four of those buildings are barns. There's nothing
currently there.
Board Member Talty — Either way. Either by themselves or accumulatively that
documentation or data has not been presented. Henceforth it might be in everyone's
best interest to place that phone call tomorrow to see if indeed the people who did this
data or study has indeed measured the current facilities.
Mr. Keefe — When they did the ambient testing of the noise levels, those facilities were
there so they were up and running.
Board Member Talty — I understand what you are saying.
Alternate Member Erb — The point is, has the building been added on top of that or have
they in fact added the new building and at the same time already taken away what
might have come from...
Mr. Keefe — It's not an additive or subtractive thing. What is there right now is the
ambient that they measured. What is predicted to be there when they build a new
building and demolish the old building is what is in the model. So you are not adding or
subtracting. You're saying this is what's there now and the predictive model says this is
the level that will be there with the new building replaced and the old buildings gone.
Board Member Talty — Okay.
something in writing from the
the ambient current noise is.
What has not been collected.
Ms. Brock -- We have that.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg, 53
Then I'm going to make it very clear then. I would like
person who conducted that study indicating exactly what
Exactly what that constitutes. What has been collected.
That is what I want.
Chairperson Wilcox — Don't we know that?
Board Member Talty — It actually says the old facility is included?
Chairperson Wilcox — Ambience is measured.
Board Member Talty — I understand that. I want to know if all of that noise, which you
are telling me yes, including the old facility, if the old facility or "ties" have been
measured? Has that been subtracted out in the studies going forward of the current
documentation that exist for the current ambient noise. Did I make that clear? Here is
the total noise package. This little corner is your current facilities. I want to know what
that measurement is. Is there a way to do that?
Mr. Keefe — No. We could model it. That would be about it because you can't isolate
that one little block and try to find out what the decibels of that one little block ... (not
audible).
Mr. Kanter — You see, those two monitoring points were remote points. And so they are
not picking up this building was this and this was this. It is a collective.
Board Member Talty — That's. correct. So if I tear down the facility and I take this piece
of paper and I go like this (tearing paper), right? Now that piece of paper now looks like
this (holding up paper), right? Okay, now you are going to build something new, right?
Okay. I don't know how much more visual I can get, but that's what I want. I want to
know what chunk is going to be missing when you tear down the facility or facilities.
Chairperson Wilcox — Which would have to be modeled.
Board Member Talty — Okay.
Chairperson Wilcox — Now, let's suppose you know that.
Board Member Talty —Okay,
Chairperson Wilcox — Is that what you need to make a decision?
Board Member Talty - Yes.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg, 54
Board Member Riha — So what are you looking for? Less than 2 decibels or less than
5? That's what I don't understand. What are we....
Board Member Talty — I want to know what the new data is going to be. I want to know
what the new data is going to be.
Board Member Howe — But I think what they really need is that ... (not audible)...
Board Member Riha - ...some criteria...
Board Member Howe - ...because they may be able to mitigate to some extent this.
Board Member Riha — But we don't even know what it is we should be asking for:
Board Member Howe — Right.
Dr. Akey - Well, there is essentially a mitigation in here because the model, as John
said, was run supposing all the fans were running at 100% capacity and we will not be
running them at 100% capacity. We will already be mitigating what you see in this
model because normally the 3 main fans will operate at 67 %.
Board Member Talty — Is there going to be a governor on those units?
Mr. Keefe — What they'll use is what they call a variable- frequency drive so they only run
as fast as they need to be run depending upon...
Board Member Talty — I understand. So what you are telling me, they could operate at
90% if the need is there. Right?
Dr. Akey — Yes, but there is an entire building control system to control the air
exchanges that we program in and say we want 6 exchanges an hour or 8 exchanges
an hour and that system, as I understand it, governs what is going on with that.
Board Member Talty — That's correct. So at any time you can override that based upon
the demand. So it could go from say a constant 67 if the need is there it may kick up to
a 90. That's what you are telling me. It's all based upon need.
Mr. Keefe — And the design need is the 67% level so to want to run it faster to waste
energy would be something we wouldn't want to do.
Board Member Riha — It looks to me like they've already got the worst -case scenario
here because they are running full speed. They say they haven't used...haven't
included sound attenuation from ducts...(not audible)...so they probably didn't account
for the fans they are going to take out. So this looks like to me the worst, the most
sound that you are ever going to get from these fans.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 55
Board Member Thayer — Was Cornell in session June 11 cn?
Mr. Keefe — No.
Board Member Thayer — So when Cornell is in session I would think that there would be
quite a bit more ambient noise.
Mr. Keefe — More ambient noise. That's correct.
Mr. Walker — And it was very dry so the waterfall wasn't running very hard.
Chairperson Wilcox — Is that fact or speculation?
Mr. Walker — May and June are very dry months so the stream flow is very low.
Chairperson Wilcox — Generally May and June are dry, not specifically to that date. You
just happened to pull that out of your head. Okay.
Mr. Walker — I don't know the water flow for that date, but I know that we were getting
close to drought conditions at that point.
Board Member Riha —Yeah. It was a very dry.'..
Mr. Walker — And those all make differences in ambient noise.
Board Member Talty — Sure.
Mr. Walker — Now, if you look at the different frequencies and different people hear at
different frequencies. There is a whole lot of... and I'm not an acoustical engineer,
some of these frequencies cancel each other out. Sometimes the noises cancel each
other out. The diameter of the exhaust cancel things out. How many fans are going to
be running? Did you run this with all the fans running?
Mr. Keefe — That's correct.
Mr. Walker — But you are not going to be running... you've got one fan that is not even
there yet. It won't even be there that medical digester.
Mr. Keefe — That was actually one of the things that we eliminated. The diameter of the
stack is more critical for noise attenuation than the fans because the fans are mounted
low and its really the air movement that is generating the noise. So if you use larger
diameter stacks, you are going to reduce, I'm assuming, some of the noise, too. I'm
getting outside my,.Yrn civil engineer, too, so I'm getting outside the range.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 56
Board Member Thayer — So you said two fans come on when one is shut off or down?
So we are including those two fans in this figure, also. But it is never run unless the
other one isn't run.
Mr. Keefe — Right.
Mr. Walker — Its fairly relative because... we've got a decibel meter some place in the
building. We could have it in here. We are probably around 60 or 70 decibels all the
time in here when we are talking. So if you're uncomfortable with the noise that is in
here ... I mean when Hollis speaks we're all uncomfortable [laughing].
Alternate Member Erb — Oh, I'm so sorry.
Mr. Walker — That's 90 decibels and when George speaks we're down to 30 decibels.
So, you know.
Board Member Talty — At times.
Mr. Walker — At times. Its all relative. Is 50 decibels unreasonable to have in a
neighborhood? That is all related. The kid next door with the electric guitar and he
cranks it up all the way and...
Chairperson Wilcox — And at nighttime when you have mitigation measures such as
closing your windows. In fact people generate noise at nighttime by running their air
conditioners and...
Mr. Walker — In fact, if you took all the noise away, you would probably. be
uncomfortable.
Board Member Talty — That's probably true.
Chairperson Wilcox - I don't know about that. Each to his own.
d
Board Member Talty - If you take someone from the city and put them in the country...
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah. You might miss it. We need to make a decision, don't we.
Yeah. Are you comfortable with where we are right now? I'm in favor of where we are
right now.
Board Member Talty — I'm not real comfortable.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah. I sense that.
Board Member Conneman — I'm not either.
Board Member Thayer — What more can we ask? That's the question.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 57
Chairperson Wilcox — I have 3 -3 right now.
Board Member Howe — Is there any way to say after the building is completed there be
a 6 -month check in? I don't know. Some way to say we want to...we can't make them
change anything, but I think for future use it would be good to somehow track this
because of that compounding issue. I'm basically in favor of moving forward, but I think
this is an important issue and I don't want to lose the discussion we just had and learn
from it and somehow factor it in to something moving forward.
Chairperson Wilcox — You would want to know the ambient sound level once they
finish?
Board Member Riha — Right.
Board Member Thayer — Then what are you going to do? Tear it down.
Board Member Riha — No.
Board Member Howe — No, but we have now data to compare it to...
Board Member Riha — To what they predicted.
Board Member Thayer — Well, that's true.
Board Member Howe — I don't know that it changes anything because there is already
regulations that anything in the future that gets built you still have to keep within that 6
decibel.
Chairperson Wilcox — As its been said, we can't continue to allow 6- decibel increases.
Can we commit them? I mean, the idea of having the ambient sound level re- measured
when they are completed, which could be two years down the road, roughly, again not
as a means to say you are one decibel too loud, tear down the building or you need to
put some sort of baffles or something to mitigate the noise. But its ... to compare what
we wound up with in terms of the change in ambient noise versus what was predicted.
It would be useful both for us and for the applicant.
Mr. Walker — Fred?
Chairperson Wilcox — Yes, sir.
Mr. Walker — Just a question.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah.
Mr. Walker — Isn't this kind of a SEQR question? Isn't this an environmental review
question?
Mr. Kanter — Well it would have started out as that, but as
site -plan consideration that the Board has to consider. I
that you have new information now and reopen SEQR,
where we are because this is such a subjective area tha
say that. Its like with visual and aesthetics. Beauty is in
noise. Sound is in the ear of the beholder.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 58
Susan mentioned, it is also a
mean one could always say
but I don't know that that is
I don't know that you could
the eye of the beholder with
Mr. Walker — Based on the professional evaluation that we have from these sound
people, it is within State guidelines for allowable...
Chairperson Wilcox — And as I said, their modeling was worse case. You would still like
something?
Board Member Howe — If it seems reasonable. If it seems too farfetched to just request
that there be an ambient level testing once the building is completed. I just think it
would be useful information ... (not audible)...
Alternate Member Erb — ...explicitly. ..that information...
Chairperson Wilcox — Say yes.
Mr. Keefe — Yes.
Chairperson Wilcox — Very good.
Alternate Member Erb — And brought back to us in a presentation that includes the...
Chairperson Wilcox — Oh, we don't need a presentation. Do you want a presentation?
Alternate Member Erb — No, but I mean, I'm not going to hold onto this, but I would like
to see the new ambient...
Chairperson Wilcox — The old ambient, the new ambient, the predicted, what we wound
up with.
Alternate Member Erb — Yes. Side by side.
Board Member Hoffmann — Yeah. And I agree with you, Rod, it would be useful for
when other projects come in and we get this kind of situation again, then we know and
with the experience of some of you who live in that area and knowing what you
subjectively hear as a difference if one can in fact hear a difference fairly easily with a
change from 3 to 6 decibel then that would be useful, I think.
Chairperson Wilcox — Would someone like to move the motion?
Board Member Thayer— I will.
P$ 11 -5 -07
Pg. 59
Chairperson Wilcox — So moved by Larry. Seconded by Susan. We have a change.
Ms. Brock — So do you want this particular change?
Chairperson Wilcox — Absolutely and they've agreed to it, which was crucial. I'm not
sure we could legally ask you to do it, but thank you for agreeing to do it.
Mr. Keefe — I think it is an interesting point and I would like to do it.
Chairperson Wilcox — As a project manager, you would want to know. I understand
that.
Board Member Thayer — Its kind of like lake source measuring continuing.
[laughing]
Chairperson Wilcox — How did we get to lake source?
Board Member Conneman — Don't go there.
Board Member Talty — That was funny. That was good.
Chairperson Wilcox — What we have asked for is when the building gets completed and
in operation that the ambient sound levels be measured at the same two locations and
that...
Alternate Member Erb — At the same time of year, excuse me.
Board Member Talty — Same month.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah. Same month. Same location and that the Town be
provided with a report, which shows the ambient condition as initially measured, the
new ambient condition with the facility operating and a comparison with what was
modeled. And that could be just columns. I don't know...l'm not sure we need
descriptive text. Did you get that?
Board Member Riha — Yeah. That works.
Ms. Brock — And I didn't see anything in the submission that actually stated Cornell
would be implanting the mitigations for the emergency generator. There were
recommendations made by the consultant, but I didn't see anything that actually said
Cornell will be doing this. So I had actually previously drafted a condition that
addresses that, which would be "g. An acoustical enclosure and combustion exhaust
silencer as described in the September 28th, 2007 final report by the applicant's
consultants shall be installed for the emergency generator."
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg, 60
Chairperson Wilcox — Acceptable Larry and Susan? Yes. Okay. All right. Any further
discussion? You had your hand up before when I stopped you.
Alternate Member Erb — I would like to make a comment that although I think the
applicant did a good job in showing us how to mitigate below the guide ... to the
guidelines or below with the worst -case scenario. It became evident during this
discussion that actually being able to present also the model of what typical operation
would do might have enhanced this discussion. Because if we had found out that it was
considerably below the 6 decibel change, it might have changed the tenor of this
discussion and I just wanted to state that.
Chairperson Wilcox — For the record we have a letter from the fire department dated
November 5th and they are very comfortable with the design. All right. I have a motion
and second. Any further discussion? All those in favor please raise your hand. Okay.
I have 1, 2, 3, 41 51 6 in favor. Opposed? One opposed. That's Kevin. There are no
abstentions. The motion is passed. We thank everybody. Thank you all.
PB RESOLUTION No. 2007 — 118:_Final Site Plan Approval, Cornell University
Animal Health Diagnostic Center, Caldwell Road, Tax Parcel No.'s 67 -1 -10.2 and
67 -1 -10.4
Motion made by Larry Thayer and seconded by Susan Riha.
WHEREAS:
1. This action is consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Cornell
University Animal Health Diagnostic Center located off Caldwell Road in the
northeast corner of the College of Veterinary Medicine Complex, Town of Ithaca
Tax Parcel No.'s 67 -1 -10.2 and 67 -1 -10.4, Low Density Residential Zone. The
proposal .includes the demolition of several small cinder block buildings for the
construction of a new +/- 126,000 square foot, +/- 70 foot tall, facility to include
laboratories and office space. The primary use of the facility will be for veterinary
disease diagnostic programs associated with necropsy and histopathology, and
will also include teaching programs and other research and support activities.
The building will be physically connected to the existing Schurman Hall,
associated with the Veterinary College. The project will consolidate 70 existing
parking spaces, and add approximately 8 new spaces (4 handicapped spaces
and 4 short term drop off spaces). The project will also include development of
new stormwater management facilities. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant;
John M. Keefe, Agent, and
2. The proposed actions, which include site plan approval and special permit by the
Planning Board and a height variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals, are Type
I actions pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, 6 NYCRR Part
617, and Town of Ithaca Code, Chapter 148, Environmental Quality Review, for
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 61
which the Planning Board at its August 21, 2007 meeting issued a negative
determination of environmental significance, and
3. The Planning Board, at a meeting on August 21, 2007, granted Preliminary Site
Plan Approval and Special Permit with conditions for the proposal, and
4. The Zoning Board of Appeals, on October 22, 2007, did issue a height variance
for the proposed project, and
5. The Planning Board, at a Public Hearing held on November 6, 2007, has
reviewed and accepted as adequate, a document containing plans, details, and
other information, titled "Animal Health Diagnostic Center — Town of Ithaca Final
Site Plan Review" date stamped October 12, 2007, submitted by Cornell
University, and other application materials, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Final Site Plan Approval for the
construction of the proposed Cornell University Animal Health Diagnostic Center located
off Caldwell Road in the northeast corner of the College of Veterinary Medicine
Complex, as shown on the plans and details contained in the document titled "Animal
Health Diagnostic Center — Town of Ithaca Final Site Plan Review" date stamped
October 12, 2007, submitted by Cornell University, subject to the following conditions:
a. Submission of one set of the final site plan drawings on mylar, vellum, or
paper, signed and sealed by the registered land surveyor, engineer, architect,
or landscape architect who prepared the site plan materials, prior to issuance
of a building permit, and
b. Submission of record of application for and approval status of all necessary
permits from any county, state, and /or federal agencies with receipt of all
necessary permits required before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and
c. Submission of a stormwater "Operation, Maintenance, and Reporting
Agreement" between the property owner and the Town of Ithaca, either as a
specific agreement for this project or included in a broad agreement to cover
all campus stormwater facilities, satisfactory to the Attorney for the Town and
the Town Engineer, prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, and
d. All demolition and construction traffic shall access the site from Caldwell
Road by way of NYS Route 366 (Dryden Road), and shall not travel
northwest of the project site on Caldwell Road, and
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 62
e. Structures demolished as part of this project will be required to obtain
individual demolition permits from the Town of Ithaca Building Department,
and
f. That the ambient sound levels be measured after the facility is constructed
and in use at the same two locations and in the same month and that the
Town be provided with a report that shows the ambient condition as initially
measured, the new ambient condition with the facility operating and a
comparison with what was modeled, and
g. An acoustical enclosure and an exhaust silencer as described in the
September 28, 2007 final report by the applicant's consultants shall be
installed for the emergency generator.
A vote on the motion was as follows:
AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, and Riha
NAYS: Talty
The motion passed 6 to 1.
Chairperson Wilcox — Do we want to give 15, 20 minutes to...?
Board Member Talty — How do we know?
Chairperson Wilcox — Because we are going to give them 15 minutes.
Board Member Talty � That works. Well, ask them if that works.
Chairperson Wilcox — I know that they have been waiting patiently, but can we give
them 15 minutes.
Board Member Talty — Is it going to take you longer than 15 minutes?
Male voice — We can try...
Board Member Talty — Because in 15 minutes there is going to be a little bell that goes
off.
Chairperson Wilcox — Yeah. I'm going to cut you off in 15 minutes.
Board Member Talty — All right. I'm all right then, Fred.
Chairperson Wilcox — Ladies and gentlemen, at 10:08 p.m... (reads agenda item)
PB 11 -6 -a7
Pg. 63
SKETCH PLAN
Review of a sketch plan for the proposed Cornell University Combined Heat and
Power Plant project located to the south of the Central Heating Plant on Dryden
Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 63 -1 -5, 63 -1 -8.1 and 63- 1 -8.2, City of Ithaca
Tax Parcel No.'s 65 -3 -1.2 and 65- 3 -1.1, Light Industrial and Low Density
Residential Zones. The proposed addition will occupy a footprint of
approximately 17,000 square feet and includes two partial levels plus a
mechanical penthouse. The addition will house two combustion turbine
generators which will be matched with a dual- pressure heat recovery steam
generator. The project will also include new emergency diesel generators, an
aqueous ammonia storage facility, and other site improvements. The project site
is split between the City and Town of Ithaca. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant;
Tim Peer, P.E., Agent.
Chairperson Wilcox — Gentlemen, name and address please. The floor is yours.
Ed Wilson, Cornell University
Tim Peer, Cornell University, Humphrey Service Building
Chairperson Wilcox — Thank you for being patient. Thank you for waiting.
Mr. Wilson — We appreciate your time. Good evening. We are here for sketch plan
review and we are here to get your comments and feedback on our plan for renewal of
Cornell's central heating plant. I think you are aware in your discussion packet that due
to the approval processes, we are working a parallel path with both the City and the
Town. For our diagram you can see here the City /Town line exactly kind of cuts through
both the existing heating plant and our addition. More of the addition is in the Town
than in the City, but we had the sketch plan review with the City on the 23`d of October.
We here now will be proceeding through the next steps. We started, initiated the SEQR
to review the environmental impact. NYS DEC has taken on as lead agency role, which
you have been notified of and we are pleased to say that even though they have a
complicated process in here, ..(not audible)... permit. We did get a negative declaration
from NYS DEC today.
How does combined heat and power work? We will give you a brief discussion, kind of
like how I talked to you earlier this year. What we are planning to install are two
combustion,. .(not audible) ... they are basically a stationary engine, fire and natural gas.
There is an article from Tompkins Weekly. It is connected to a generator and generates
electricity. We utilize the waste heat in what is called a heat- recover steam generator.
It generates steam using the waste heat. No additional fuel is fired. That steam is
taken off into some existing steam turbines to generate some additional electricity and a
low grade is then sent through a distribution network to heat buildings on campus. As
that heat is removed, it condenses back to water and comes back into the cycle and
goes through that. Now there are two of those units so it will be generating about 30
megawatts for those two units. There are also a couple of emergency diesel generators
that will be used for emergency start up if we were to lose all of our power. There will
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 64
also be some additional equipment for both emission controls and for using some
steam. We don't have quite the capacity to use it all. We generally will only generate
enough steam to basically provide the heating needs for campus. The benefits it
provides is it basically does renew our heating plant. We see the building expansions
on campus even though we have an aggressive energy - conservation program. We are
going to need some additional steam capacity over what we presently do. This should
meet our steam needs for the next 10 to 20 years of expected growth on campus. It
provides fuel flexibility. We will continue to use coal as one of our fuels, but our coal
use will drop at about half and then we will primarily be burning natural gas with fuel oil
as a back up fuel if some way our gas supply were interrupted.
The coal -truck traffic should be reduced. Right now we receive about 2500 truck loads
of coal annually, about 65,000 tons. And we expect with this project our coal use will
drop to about half, cutting about 12 or 13 trucks of coal from coming into the area. We
will also be able to provide emergency power from campus. So with these units in
service if we had a regional electric grid outage again, we would be able with our
emergency generators to start our facility up, put the larger units on. Re- electrify
campus and at the same time provide enough steam for all of campus. So we become
somewhat of an island of our own. It also does provide for emissions reductions, saying
that we will be burning less coal and we will be producing more of our electricity
ourselves, 85% instead 'of the existing 15% that we do. We will be generating all of that
energy at about a 75% efficiency rate. Now generally electricity that you buy off the grid
for your homes, as we do presently, is probably generated at about 33% efficiency. So
overall if you look at all the numbers in New York State, about 1/3 less energy will have
to be consumed to make the energy that we presently use today. So due to less fuel
being combusted, there are significantly less emissions being put into the atmosphere.
So let me turn it over to Tim Peer, our project manager. He will go over some of the
details and the site layouts and then we will be free to answer any questions you may
have.
Tim Peer, Project Manager
Just really quickly, we talked about this before. This is the site that has been historically
used for utility and essential physical plant operations for the university. So certainly
this addition is within the nature of the existing facilities there. It's fairly well hidden from
the standpoint of between the grades and the other structures. It's not visible except for
a few small windows and it is in an area that is generally not accessible to the general
community at large because there are security issues associated with this operation.
The building addition itself has what I would call 2 primary elements. There is the main
building that will hold the primary equipment for this process and then there will be a
small building addition on the corner of that shown here on this elevation that will be
used for new office space and locker rooms and such for the staff in this building.
Okay?
The footprint for the process part of the building is about 1500 to 1600 square feet.
Then the footprint for the office portion of it is about 2500 square foot, 2- stories tall. The
general look of it is utilitarian in nature. There's sort of a mixed bag of different sidings
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 65
and textures there, but we are working to make it look as good as we can. A couple of
the other features on this site are, of course, it will have stacks that come with it. I
would like to point out that relative to the elevation of this parking lot on Route 366,
those new stacks will be about 185 feet above that elevation. The existing stacks are
225 so they are quite tall. The height of the stacks is actually designed to optimize
dispersion associated with the emissions that come from that stack. So the stack height
in particular is modeled and approved by the DEC in the air - permit application. Okay?
So it will be made of carbon steel, painted. There is a fairly limited color selection
because it is a specialized paint for high temperature applications, but we are looking at
a light gray -type color to sort of minimize the...
Chairperson Wilcox — I'm sorry. You said 185 feet versus 225 for the existing?
Mr. Peer — Yes. Here somewhere in the back of the facility there will be a pair of
emergency diesel generators. These are the outdoor enclosures shown there. One of
the other components is there will be an aqueous ammonia storage and off - loading
facility that will be an area here behind this little facility. The aqueous ammonia storage
will be, actually it will be 19% aqueous ammonia. It will be about a 12,000- gallon
storage tank and the aqueous ammonia is required for the emission controls that on this
for the...for a process called select catalytic reduction, which reduces oxides of
nitrogen.
Chairperson Wilcox — How does the ammonia get from the storage tank to the where it's
needed? With a bucket or what?
Mr. Peer— It will be piped directly. Inside containment.
Chairperson Wilcox — I assume through underground?
Mr. Peer — And the whole area will comply with New York State regulations for bulk
chemical storage. And we have been talking to the fire department about this.
Chairperson Wilcox — And clearly the City is concerned about that because it happens
to be. within the City, but I'm sure we in the Town would be concerned about the
ammonia stored there.
Mr. Peer — Yes. [pause] There is a small...over here is the existing oil unloading dock,
which you may remember from the site plan approval that we did for the yard project.
We moved that. We have a new one. So that little building is still standing there, but
we are going to tear it down and there we will locate an air cool condenser. So its just a
way for us to reject some heat in the steam system to help deal with transients with the
starting and stopping of this new equipment because the steam that is generated from
the heat recovery steam generators comes on and off in big chunks. So we need a
system to help us smooth that out. Okay?
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 66
Just a few quick statements about noise. I'm sure you are very excited to hear about
noise.
Chairperson Wilcox — You're fine.
Mr. Peer — The project does include. a number of noise abatement features, including
enclosures and silencers and we have a fairly complete noise study that was part of our
LEAF (long environmental assessment form). So if you have any questions on noise,
will try to answer them, but...okay:
So from a visual and a site vegetation impact, I probably don't need to talk. more about
the visual impacts, but there will be a number of existing trees there that will have to be
removed in this area and we will certainly quantify that in our site plan package and tell
you exactly what the trees are, you know, if there is anything there of significance. And
we do intent to restore a small green areas, but it's a fairly limited area to do any sort of
significant landscaping just because of the nature of the work that goes on there.
Chairperson Wilcox — Speaking for the board, do what you can to try to mitigate the loss
of greenery in that area. Do what you can. We will push you hard to do as much as
you can to mitigate the loss. We agree. You are going to lose some trees. Okay? Do
what you can to try to plant some trees in the vicinity. Some place close. Okay? Am
clear here? Are we okay? Rod?
[several talking at once]
Chairperson Wilcox -- I agree it's an odd area, but it is also not a particularly nice area.
We don't expect it to look like some of the other areas that we deal with, but you can't
come in and say we have taken down these trees, tough. At least let us know that you
have tried to do something to mitigate. Okay? That's all I'm saying.
Board Member Thayer — You can't see it from the road, actually. Right?
Mr. Peer — Very limited viewpoints from the road. As you go down Maple Ave area you
can get a quick shot up through the parking lot, but only if you are rubbernecking.
Alternate Member Erb - ...(not audible) ... that the tree consumes for us doesn't depend
on whether we can see it.
Mr. Peer — Hollis, it is interesting to point out that the emissions reductions associated
with this project adds up to many, many, many trees. I think that's...
Alternate Member Erb — May I ask if you are committing to the stacks on the generator
being no taller...on the two generators being no taller than that?
Mr. Peer — Yes. That is what was modeled in our air impact quality analysis.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 67
Alternate Member Erb — Okay because in your LEAF you only committed to them being
less than 100 feet tall.
Mr. Wilson — That might have been the emergency diesel generators.
Alternate Member Erb — Yeah, two stacks on the emergency generator.
Mr. Wilson — These two right here. They're in here.
Alternate Member Erb — And less than 100 feet means 99 and a half until you show me
something else.
Mr. Peer — It will not be higher than what's shown on that drawing. That is what we
modeled with the DEC.
Mr. Wilson — There was a question about where the Town and City line is. That is
shown in your packet of drawings.
Mr. Kanter — I was just wondering if you could again point to where the Town /City line is.
Mr. Wilson — It goes right along the back side of these parking spaces, straight line right
up through and across the road.
Chairperson Wilcox — Most of the building is in the Town.
Mr. Wilson = That is correct.
Mr. Kanter — The ammonia facility is in the City.
Chairperson Wilcox — Ammonia facility is in the City. Some of the building is in the City.
Alternate Member Erb — The ammonia pipeline is in the Town.
Mr. Wilson — The ammonia pipeline's pretty much, l believe, in the City.
Alternate Member Erb — Oh.
Chairperson Wilcox — Eva?
Board Member Hoffmann — I have a question about the towers, too. Why is it that these
towers don't need to be as tall as the other ones?
Mr. Wilson — We actually try to make the towers sized such that you get the right
velocity to help the dispersion of the gases. The volume of gases ... (not audible) ... are
smaller than the volume that would be leaving our existing older stacks and they are
sized such that you disperse the emissions so there is no level of significant impact
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 68
achieved in any of the surrounding land areas. So they have to look at the topography
of the area and then get the stack heights such that you get the proper dispersion. And
at that height...
Board Member Hoffmann — I guess I still don't understand why the other ones have to
be so much higher to disperse properly than these are.
Mr. Peer — It's the gas velocity. The velocity coming out of these stacks is much higher.
Board Member Hoffmann — Oh. I see.
Chairperson Wilcox — Smaller volume?
Mr. Wilson — It's a smaller diameter. The existing stacks are roughly 12 feet in diameter
and these are 6.
Board Member Hoffmann — And that is regardless of the wind speeds around?
Mr. Wilson — That is correct.
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. Interesting.
Chairperson Wilcox — When were the original stacks built?
Mr. Wilson — Original stacks ... the plant was built in 1922 and I believe the one stack
was part of the original installation as far as I know.
Chairperson Wilcox — So the question is, how good was the modeling back then?
don't think you need to answer it, but...
Mr. Wilson — It was probably (not audible). We have modeled the facility in the past for
other permit reasons so the existing stacks have been modeled in the past.
Chairperson Wilcox — I wanted to get in that you are doing a presentation Thursday
night at the Best Western between 6 and 8 if anybody wants to go. I don't know
whether everybody got a copy of this or not.
Mr. Kanter — It's on the natural gas pipeline.
Chairperson Wilcox— Yup, which is an important element of this. Yes?
Board Member Hoffmann — Okay. I also have a question about the ammonia. Could
you repeat again how this aqueous ammonia is needed and how it will be used?
Mr. Wilson — Basically there is an environmental control that is called a electric catalytic
reduction process where you have a gridwork of catalysts and you spray ... you take
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 69
liquid ammonia, you vaporize it, and put an ammonia gas in and along with the nitrogen
oxides, it reacts in the catalysts material and causes ... (not audible) ... to come out. It
takes the nox out of our emissions so that we come from ... we get about a 90% removal
in nox emissions. So it is a chemical process. The catalyst makes the process work,
but is not consumed and it needs the ammonia to make that process happen. So and
as we said, 19% aqueous ammonia, we've found it ... some of the industrial- strength
ammonia products that you buy for cleaning purposes are as high as 30% ammonia. So
is relatively strong ammonia. Its stronger than your standard ammonia that you buy
down at the grocery store, but it's a liquid ammonia. It would have odor. Otherwise it
will be contained and follow all of the proper chemical bulk storage guidelines.
Board Member Riha — So the nox would contribute to both greenhouses gases and
...(not audible)...so that is why they have to get it out, but I'm wondering if it would be
any stronger than what would be used in agriculture.
Mr. Wilson — I believe it is about the same strength as...l believe it is commercial grade
instead of agriculture grade. So I think its more pure .... (not audible) ... basically then
nitrogen oxides come into the catalyst and out comes nitrogen, which is a common
component of air and water.
Board Member Hoffmann And are there such large amounts of this ammonia needed
that you need to have this big storage capacity there?
Mr. Wilson — We basically size the tank so that you can go weeks in between getting
deliveries and when you do get a delivery you can receive the whole volume. Typically
you probably get a 6- or 7,000- gallon load of ammonia. You would want a tank large
enough so you could go down to 2, 31 4,000 gallons left and still be able to take a full
load of ammonia when it was to be delivered. So it's kind of the sizing of the tank.
Board Member Riha — At least my experience in Ag Counts is the issue is when they
deliver. If there is any leakage then if you are in the vicinity then ... (not audible)...
Board Member Hoffmann — Now I understand that ammonia in a gas form is more
damaging, more dangerous than in a liquid form. So you are changing it from a liquid
form to a gas in order to have this process happen. Are there safeguards to make sure.
that nothing goes wrong?
Mr. Wilson — You basically take the liquid ammonia, aqueous ammonia, into the facility
into a heater and a gas of fire. Then it is a short length of pipe from there to actually
going in just before the catalyst and the hersig. So we minimize the length of which
gaseous ammonia will exist. And there are facilities that you can buy gaseous ammonia
and do that, but this is a safer way to have the product do what you are intending to
have it do by getting it delivered in an aqueous form, low strength. You have a spill, a
concern that you have of course, but you can contain that, as opposed to having a
storage device that is holding a lot gaseous ammonia.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 70
Board Member Riha — So this is the kind of thing that would be required for any new
power facility?
Mr. Wilson — Pretty much so to control... basically all combustion has some. Nitrogen
oxide emissions and pretty much the law now and the regulations require a percentage
reduction. And through a process like this you can get close to 90% reduction in
nitrogen oxides.
Chairperson Wilcox — 20 minutes are up since they started. Any other questions?
Hollis?
Alternate Member Erb — Can I just point out that if a 5 decibel matters in one
neighborhood does is matter in another neighborhood?
Chairperson Wilcox — Is that a rhetorical question?
Board Member Riha — Well, they said there was going to be no increase.
Alternate Member Erb — No. They said there would be 5 decibels.
Mr. Kanter — It kind of depends on the location and what is around it. So this plant
doesn't have much in the way of a neighborhood around it.
Board Member Hoffmann — But there might be more of a neighborhood around it in the
future if Cornell goes ahead with this East Hill Village or whatever they call it.
Chairperson Wilcox — We're not going there tonight.
Board Member Thayer — That is for sure.
Chairperson Wilcox — I thank you for waiting. I thank you for your patience. Is there
anything else you want to bring to our attention tonight?
Mr. Kanter — Do you want to point out the memo we got from Joann over at the City that
indicated some concerns?
Chairperson Wilcox — Jonathan did get something from Joann Cornish, which was
essentially... summarize the concerns that the City expressed to you when you were
presenting before them two weeks ago. And visual simulations, the aqueous ammonia,
materials, view. I can't see that those also wouldn't be concerns for this board as well.
Mr. Kanter — And actually Tom Parsons from the fire department indicated and has
been in discussion with Cornell about what he would like to see in terms of the ammonia
transport and storage and containment.
Chairperson Wilcox — We all set. Thank you very much.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 71
Board Member Thayer — Thanks for your patience. We appreciate it.
Chairperson Wilcox — We have to do minutes. I'll move minutes of October 2 "d. Do I
have a second? Kevin.
Calls for vote. Board Member Hoffmann abstains. Alternate Member Erb substitute
voted for Board Member Hoffmann.
PB RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 119: Adoption of Minutes - October 2, 2007, Town of
Ithaca Planning Board
MOTION made by Fred Wilcox, seconded by Kevin Talty.
WHEREAS:
The Town of Ithaca Planning Board has reviewed the draft minutes from October 2,
2007, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
The Town of Ithaca Planning Board approves the minutes, with corrections, to be the
final minutes of the meeting on October 2, 2007.
A vote on the motion resulted as follows:
AYES: Wilcox, Conneman, Thayer, Howe, Talty, Riha and Erb.
NAYS: None
ABSTENTIONS: Hoffmann
The Motion passed.
Chairperson Wilcox — Our next meeting is the 27th. It was moved from the 20th. We are
not going to go over the agenda. Thank you very much.
Mr. Kanter — Correct.
Chairperson Wilcox — I wanted to talk about the Henry subdivision, which we approved .
two weeks ago. That's coming back and is getting interesting, but I'm not going to talk
about it tonight. Eva, you wanted to talk about the SEQR-form. You mentioned that a
the beginning. We are going to push that off. No [to Paulette]. I don't have the minutes
from October 16th. I have not seen them. Did anybody see them? I didn't get them in
my packet. I only got the 2 "d. So I crossed it off. Did anybody see the minutes of
October 16th?
Alternate Member Erb — You mean the ones also labeled October 2"d?
Chairperson Wilcox — I only got October 2nd in my packet.
PB 11 -6 -07
Pg. 72
Ms. Neilsen — Oh, is it a typo.
Alternate Member Erb — I have two labeled October 2"d, but they are different.
Chairperson Wilcox — Oh, I didn't get two
Board Member Thayer — Me, too.
I only got one set labeled October 2nd
Ms. Neilsen — Well, I know I have them done.
Chairperson Wilcox — So we will deal with them at the next meeting. Do I a motion to
adjourn? So moved by Kevin. We are adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Thank you.
Paulette Neilsen
Deputy Town Clerk
Attachment 1
Sustainable Transportation:
Managing Cornell's Impact
on Our Community
Thanks for the chance to meet with you today, and to share a
preview of a couple of documents that are about to "go
public," so to speak, from a project that will affect every one
of us who works and studies at Cornell.
r ansportation -Fo entaldlmpact
,eneric Environm
_statement (OEiS)
travel Survey Results
xECUTNE SUMNOV
erect f;n
neR �.r11�4�- f11
!C' -YEAR TIMS
These two documents, the Transportation- Focused Generic
Environmental Impact Statement (or t- LEIS)...
...and the Ten -Year Transportation Impact Mitigation
Strategies or TIMS document, come at a critical time for the
Cornell community.
Beginning now, we need to move more people with fewer
vehicles.
These documents are based on data that you and I supplied
about our travel habits and preferences through a travel
survey that was completed by faculty, staff, and students in
2005. They look ahead to a time of potential population
growth at Cornell University —when an institution with a
national reputation for making smart transportation choices
will be challenged to do even more in the context of Cornell's
commitment to sustainability.
2
We share transportation space
with surrounding
communities.
There are important choices to be made about how we travel,
and how our transportation needs and patterns impact the
Cornell campus and surrounding communities.
I hope you'll take the next few minutes to study our analysis
of the survey findings. Tell us if we heard you right, and if the
strategies and actions we propose are the best possible ways
to make sustainable transportation a part of Cornell's future.
People in the surrounding communities are anxious to know
how we intend to manage our transportation impacts. And
whether all of us —the students, faculty, and staff of the
university —are in agreement on our strategies and actions.
Q
What's the problem?
We're all commuters
Before we talk about the survey — and the generic
environmental impact statement and the mitigation strategies
— and where we go from here, let's try to remember why all
this was necessary.
Except for those who live on campus —we're all commuters.
All that movement requires transportation— whether by car or
bus, foot, bicycle or skateboard. And that's the problem: all
that commuting has significant impacts on the environment
and on the communities we pass through on the way to
campus.
That's what the whole process has been about; we weren't
looking at transportation within the bounds of campus.
rd
Every year there are more of us
To make things even more interesting, the numbers of "us"
who are commuting is increasing — probably not the number
of undergraduate students, which is projected to stay
relatively stable —but more likely graduate students,
researchers, and employees who will work and study at a
dynamic Cornell University.
How can we change
our commuting habits?
r
rt
For the past 17 years, Transportation Demand Management
programs have taken Cornell's responsibility to reduce the
impact of its transportation needs very seriously. As Cornell
continues to grow and the number of commuters increases,
that responsibility becomes an imperative —for a socially and
environmentally responsible and sustainable institution, for
you, and for every member of the Cornell community.
11
I r"
Overall Strategy:
Move more people
with fewer vehicles
That brings us back to the first document that we are in the
midst of preparing: The Transportation- Focused Generic
Environmental Impact Statement, which includes the Cornell
travel survey results, as well as some predicted scenarios of
what traffic to the campus and through the surrounding
communities might be like in the future as Cornell's
population grows.
7
Baseline of current travel habits and patterns
The 2005 travel survey that provided data to the t -LEIS
about what it might take for Cornell community members to
change their commuting habits was a good baseline. One
finding from the travel survey is especially encouraging:
Forty -five percent of Cornell employees do not drive to work
alone —in single- occupancy vehicles, or SOVs.
Gauge interest
and preference
for transportation options
So, we know already that 45 percent of employees come to
campus in other ways— compared to a national average of
only 25 percent. However, if the university continues to
grow —as good as this is —it isn't good enough. If 55% of new
people drive SOVs to campus, the impacts could be serious.
9
The survey gave us the clearest picture yet of how far
and from where commuters travel to get to the Cornell
campus.
This series of maps illustrates just how many and how
far.
The red line surrounds what we call the "destination
area" this encompasses the campus which is reached
through the surrounding communities.
...this is the border of the City of Ithaca
...surrounded by the the town
...which is in turn surrounded by the county and its 13
municipalities.
10
,5
... you see that approximately 25 percent of Cornell
employees live and commute from outside of Tompkins
County.
11
25"'.
... Approximately 40 percent live withii
County, but outside of the City and To
12
25%
... About 20 percent live within the Town of Ithaca.
13
1111, ��
... and about 15 percent live within the City of Ithaca
itself.
Already 40 percent of all employees who live in the city
use alternate methods of transportation. We need to be
creative to enable that type of participation from those
who live in rural areas.
14
55 percent of Cornell employees
drive alone to campus
17 percent carpool or share a ride
14 percent use public transit
9 percent walk
3 percent of employees bike to work
Employees are great at joining carpools and ride - shares,
they're frequent users of public transit, and about 12 percent
of employees bike or walk to work.
For many they are responding to incentives that have made
Cornell University a national leader in alternative
transportation— incentives like the OmniRide program. They
have learned that although they aren't paying parking fees,
those fees may have been the smallest expense associated
with SOV commuting.
15
Only 19 percent of grad students
drive alone to campus
i - 37 percent ride the bus
t
31 percent walk
and 4 percent bike
And about those bus - riding, walking, bike - riding graduate
students —fewer than a fifth of them drive alone to campus.
Our graduate and professional students have different
commuting patterns, depending on when they're teaching
classes or taking classes, conducting research, or working in
the library. So a good transportation plan has to broaden in
scope to accommodate their needs and expectations, as
well.
16
The vast majority of commuting undergrads walk to campus.
And through transit incentives, are discovering the
convenience of taking the bus.
17
75 percent of all single- occupancy vehicle trips
are made by Cornell employees
The significant finding from the survey is that 75 percent of
the drivers of single- occupancy vehicles to campus are
employees. This is the same constituency that is likely to be
growing as Cornell University grows. So we asked you: What
will it take to keep more single- occupancy vehicles away from
campus and the surrounding communities?
I
Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV)
drivers say they might:
walk if they lived closer
bike to campus under "right conditions"
take the bus if it stopped near home and
had more frequent service
join a carpool or vanpool
And you told us, in very specific terms but also with some
rather big "ifs ".
For instance, those of you who live close enough say you
would consider walking, if there were more sidewalks. Others
would walk if there were a more affordable range of housing
available, closer to campus.
The same goes for bicycling under the "right conditions."
Cyclists told us what they need to ride safely.
You told us, too, that transit would be more appealing if it was
connected to convenient park and ride lots, and if it ran close
to where you live, more frequently, and longer hours.
And that you would join car or vanpools, if it was convenient
and cost effective.
19
The Good News:
We have a high level of interest in alternative modes.
80 percent of SOV employees would consider the bus.
50 percent might carpool, and 1/3 would consider vanpools.
40 percent of SOV employees might bike.
Given the high level of interest in our area for using alternatives,
the question before us is: What changes or incentives could
motivate a shift toward sustainable transportation at Cornell?
We have a highly motivated constituency. You're not afraid to tell
us what you need and what we ought to do about it. The
communities surrounding the Cornell campus never hesitate to
express their feelings, either.
This brings us to the TIMS —the Ten -year Transportation Impact
Mitigation Strategies. We've responded with some innovative
strategies and action plans that can make a growing Cornell
University a low- impact neighbor.
There's never been a better time to get behind this draft action
plan you helped create —and to tell the greater Ithaca community:
This is what a sustainable Cornell University needs to do.
20
TIMS = cohesive set
of program strategies
to reduce the number of
single- occupancy vehicles
traveling through
residential neighborhoods
around the Cornell campus
pA��S
qa
10 -YEAR TIMS
X41
4
The Ten -Year Transportation Impact Mitigation Strategies or
TIMS is being produced —based on the t -GEIS findings
—and, when complete, will serve as an operational plan for
Cornell Transportation Services over the next five to ten
years, directing these ongoing enhancements and incentives.
But, it's important to note that Cornell will continue to provide
parking and to accommodate SOV commuters —this is an
effort to encourage, not force, transportation alternatives by
expanding and improving these options.
21
Bike Center
The TIMS will include a kind of transportation planners' wish
list. But we plagiarized a bit. This really is your wish list too
—your needs and expectations for greater sustainability at
Cornell and in the neighborhoods that surround it, expanded
and developed by some of the best transportation planners in
the business.
22
Community Park - and -Ride
Free parking
Express service to Cornell and downtown
Additional incentives for Co z611 co mm uters
Encourage other employers to do the same
Peripheral park- and -ride lots are great places for single -
occupancy vehicles to stay while we're at Cornell.
With more of these lots in strategic locations, there is an
opportunity to intercept Cornell -bound commuter traffic outside
the urban core and reduce traffic impacts on the adjacent
neighborhoods, while reducing the demand for parking on
campus.
As I'm sure you'd remind us, park- and -ride lots need frequent,
direct, and extended public transit to be effective.
23
Improve pedestrian
network in areas adjacent t6_4
h and leading to campus—
for example, by ...
r•
�I
More of us might join all the undergraduate walkers if
improvements to the pedestrian network were implemented.
Despite all the hills, Ithaca really is a marvelous place to
walk.
Nevertheless, a few things could be better.
We need more sidewalks and safer pedestrian crossings.
And through t -LEIS community open houses, we have a
better idea of where.
E
... providing pedestrian linkages to transit.
Ideally, between our buses and our feet, there ought to be
practically no place in Ithaca we can't reach. When it's time to
take a load off your feet and take a seat on the bus —we
need easier ways to make that transition, linking sidewalks,
neighborhoods, and facilities to transit.
25
q
11r 1-
Multi -use Trails
It
~ V 1
i�
K_ i
Besides sidewalks, multi -use trails can increase pedestrian
and bicycle access.
For example, the old railroad bed between the East Ithaca
Recreation Way and Varna could be developed to link that
community and the campus.
26
develop more bike lanes,
and dedicated bike routes. . .
educate cyclists, pedestrians and
drivers about
"rules of the road."
We can do more to encourage cycling, too.
One approach to a more robust bicycle culture on campus
and in the community is to educate cyclists, motorists, and
pedestrians about their rights and their responsibilities to
each other.
27
Create a strong "cycling culture"
both on and off campus, for example:
by enhancing the on- campus
bicycle network and amenities...
Building a strong cycling culture can be aided, too, by the
creation of full- featured bike centers or bike stairs.
A staircase, like the one on the right, enables cyclists to roll,
rather than carry their bikes up and down the steps.
Strengthen public transit for the Cornell community and the
greater Ithaca area —for example:
improve frequency and coverage;
increase visibility and functionality of primary stops;
encourage other employers to coordinate with TCAT.
Cornell University has long been a partner and a friend in
public transit on campus and in the greater Ithaca area.
If nearly 14 percent of Cornell employees and 40 percent of
graduate students regularly use transit for their commute
now, then it follows that with improved transit there's potential
for a substantial increase in those numbers.
29
Improve and expand existing Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) programs —for example:
vanpool, carshare, and telecommuting programs ...
comprehensive set of incentives ...
alternative transportation.
A good TDM program has allowed us to provide information
and incentives to commuters, to encourage them to choose
alternatives to single- occupancy vehicles.
However, the TIMS identifies strategies to improve and
expand our TDM programs for example by examining
telecommuting, paying people to leave their cars at home,
and by adding vanpooling and carsharing to the mix.
IN
Upgrade safety and capacity of multiple forms of travel
work with local and state agencies ...
improve near - campus intersections.
Our initial efforts can be policy changes and program
enhancements, but there may be changes in the roadway
systems surrounding and leading to campus that will help as
well.
Cornell owns most of the streets on the central campus, and
can have a direct effect on them. However, all those roads
and intersections we use the way to work, or from campus to
the mall, or from the residence halls to the lake —are in areas
where Cornell's neighbors take traffic rather seriously.
This is another opportunity for Cornell University to be a good
neighbor and a partner —by participating in improvements to
intersections and roadways in the surrounding communities.
31
Ongoing monitoring
will measure effectiveness
of new program efforts
In the TIMS we have some strategies —or at least a working
draft of the strategies —to mitigate the impact of our growth,
and to make Cornell University the sustainable endeavor we
all hope it can be. And which President Skorton through the
Presidents' Climate Commitment has committed us to be.
Although t -LEIS far predated this agreement —the benefits
gained through the TIMS will directly accrue to this
commitment to sustainability.
And it doesn't stop with this process. The TIMS is designed
to be a living document, with regular updates, likely at five -
year intervals, to be certain we are meeting our goals, or to
revise our strategies to meet or exceed them.
32
Opportunities for t -GEIS and TIMS Involvement
Sept. 1S ............University Neighborhood Council
Sept. 19 .......
.......................Employee Assembly
Sept. 20 .........
........................Student Assembly
Sept. 24 .. .......................Graduate
& Professional
Students Assembly
Sept. 26 .........
.....................University Assembly
Oct.- Nov
..............Draft t -GEIS to Town of Ithaca
Clearly, we have some challenging work ahead of us. So far, with your
help we've learned a lot about the travel patterns and behaviors of the
Cornell community.
So how can you, individually, and as a leader at Cornell, support this
sustainable transportation effort?
As an individual, you can do your part for sustainability by participating
in the programs that are growing out of this process.
As an assembly, you need to tell the administration and local
community that sustainable transportation options are important to
Cornellians and that you endorse this plan of action.
33
PL-1
WA
The Ultimate Goal for Sustainability:
Reduce single- occupancy vehicle trips—
Move people not cars to campus.
For more information and
to give us feedback visit:
www.tGEISproject.org
The ultimate goal is to get ep ople, not cars, to campus. Then to help
every one of us move about campus, conveniently and expeditiously.
And to get us safely home at the end of the day, with minimal impact
on the communities we pass through.
That is the transportation part of Cornell's commitment to
sustainability. It starts with you and me and the choices we make,
beginning today.
Before you get behind the t -GETS and the Transportation Impact
Mitigation Strategies, I know you must have some questions. Please,
feel free to ask them now!
My colleagues are here to take note of your comments, questions,
and suggestions. Also, if there are questions you think of later, or
want to share in a less public forum, please visit our website
tgeisproject.org and drop us an email.
34
I-
; 'I X
, NZ4
;rM
-rill
, ri,
ARNOW.
All
"Now
u
e
f: 1( 3
TABLE 2 Subjective Effect of Changes in Sound Characteristics
Change in Change in Change in
Energy Level Sound Level Apparent Loudness
26% 1 dB Insignificant
Doubling 3 dB Just perceptible
Tripling 5 dB Clearly noticeable
Ten Times 10 dB Twice as loud (or i )
100 Times 20 dB Much louder (or quieter)
FIt4eL)QF o4
TABLE 3 Comparison of Intensity, Sound Pressure Level,
and Common Sounds
Relative Energy Intensity
(units) Decibels' Loudness
1003000,0000000,000
140
Jet aircraft and artillery fire
10,0007000,0009000
130
Threshold of pain
12000,00020002000
120
1007000,0003000
110
Near elevated train
10,000,000,000
100
Inside propellor plane
1,000,0002000
90
Full symphony or band
10010001000
80
Inside auto at high speed
10200%000
70
1,000,000
60
Conversation, face - to-face
1009000
50
Inside general office
102000
40
Inside private office
1,000
30
Inside bedroom
100
20
Inside empty theater
10
10
I
0
Threshold of hearing
aSPL as measured on A- weighted network of standard sound level meter.
FPi OM : �e E R4E 5J 1.. F 60u r�4 b, rJ c(S� Ar4 � v I SJZAN-171 a rte!
cor ll`90" . v.�r -J t�l�sTR�.,.l� Rr=10* rP-- OWbop I `h7b
T.4 hip 2! Snmmary of Noise impact Modeline Results (Unmitigated) CA MlDG rt-D..
F!l4ujZE &
Table 4: Summary of Noise Impact Modelimm Results (with generator mitigation in place)
Daytimet't
Nighttimetlt
Receptor
Ambient
Predicted
Total
Change
Ambient
Predicted
Tom
Night -
Change
Generator On - Combustion Exhaust Stack 10 ft Above Grade [21
(dBA)121
Facility
Daytime
(dBA) 131
(dBA) t2l
FdBAty
time
(dBAY31
6
R2
dBA)
42
46
3
37
(dBA)
43
Generator Off
R1
52
49
54
2
45
49
50
5
R2
43
41
45
2
37
41
42
5
F!l4ujZE &
Table 4: Summary of Noise Impact Modelimm Results (with generator mitigation in place)
Notes: I') Ambient data measured at receptor locations during the week of June 11, 2007.
PI Results assume that the emergency generator may be operated during both daytime and nighttime hours. This
assumption will be confirmed with the University.
r'3 The measurement and analysis results assume that daytime hours are between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, and that
nighttime hours are between 7:00 pm and 7:00 am.
MOM : F'1r1A.i_ ZED moor NOISEs.. /MPAcrr ^4t: �SMEj%JT
A N MA j. pWAb.,7;L4 D t ^c of Odfsrlcs Grw%%i -r1cF2�
TZDw4A,r4 VJ /1.L1 AMS 'DAB l t�.�t �•-1
Jv&.*l Z 6 Zoo?
Daytime 131
Nighttime [3)
Receptor
Ambient
(dBA)t11
Predicted
Facility
(dBA)
Total
Daytime
(dBA)
Change
(dBA)
Ambient
(dBA)III
Predicted
Faty
(dBA)
Total
Night -
time
(dBA)
Change
(dBA)
Generator On - Combustion Exhaust Stack 10 ft Above Grade [21
R1
52
50
54
2
45
50
51
6
R2
43
42
46
3
37
42
43
6
Generator On - Combustion Exhaust Stack 10 ft Above Roott-t
R1
52
49
54
2
45
49
51
6
R2
43
42
46
3
37
42
43
6
Notes: I') Ambient data measured at receptor locations during the week of June 11, 2007.
PI Results assume that the emergency generator may be operated during both daytime and nighttime hours. This
assumption will be confirmed with the University.
r'3 The measurement and analysis results assume that daytime hours are between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm, and that
nighttime hours are between 7:00 pm and 7:00 am.
MOM : F'1r1A.i_ ZED moor NOISEs.. /MPAcrr ^4t: �SMEj%JT
A N MA j. pWAb.,7;L4 D t ^c of Odfsrlcs Grw%%i -r1cF2�
TZDw4A,r4 VJ /1.L1 AMS 'DAB l t�.�t �•-1
Jv&.*l Z 6 Zoo?
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD
215 North Tioga Street
Ithaca, New York 14850
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
AGENDA
7:00 P.M. Persons to be heard (no more than five minutes).
7:05 P.M. Presentation and discussion regarding the Cornell Transportation- focused Generic
Environmental Impact Statement (T- GEIS), focusing on the internal meetings with Cornell
faculty, staff and students regarding possible mitigation strategies. David Lieb, Cornell
University and Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP, Presenters.
7:30 P.M. SEQR Determination: Ithaca College Emergency Alarm System, 953 Danby Road.
7:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and
Special Permit for the proposed mass notification system on the Ithaca College Campus, 953
Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density
Residential Zone. The proposal involves installing two mass communication poles to deliver
emergency warnings and messages to the College campus community. One pole will be
mounted on the roof of the Campus Center (10 feet above roof) and the second will be
mounted on a wooden pole (50 feet high) between Wood Field and College Circle Road.
Ithaca College, Owner /Applicant; Richard Couture, Agent.
7:45 P.M. SEQR Determination: East Hill Plaza — Conversion of Former Rite Aid Location, 323 Pine
Tree Road.
7:45 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the
proposed conversion of the former Rite Aid location in the East Hill Plaza located at 323
Pine Tree Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62- 2- 1.121, Community Commercial Zone.
The proposal involves splitting the former Rite Aid space into two new rental units for
Cayuga Press, Inc. and Sedgwick Furniture. Cornell University Real Estate Department,
Owner /Applicant; Maria B. Maynard, Property Manager, Agent.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Cornell
University Animal Health Diagnostic Center located off Caldwell Road in the northeast
corner of the College of Veterinary Medicine Complex, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 67-
1 -10.2 and 67 -1 -10.4, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal includes the demolition
of several small cinder block buildings for the construction of a new +/- 126,000 square foot,
+/- 70 foot tall, facility to include laboratories (rated with Biological Safety Levels of 2 and
3) and office space. The primary use of the facility will be for veterinary disease diagnostic
programs associated with necropsy and histopathology, and will also include teaching
programs and other research and support activities. The building will be physically
connected to the existing Schuman Hall, associated with the Veterinary College. The project
will consolidate 70 existing parking spaces currently scattered throughout the site, and add
approximately 8 new spaces (4 handicapped spaces and 4 short term drop off spaces). The
project will also include development of new stormwater management facilities. Cornell
University, Owner /Applicant; John M. Keefe, Agent.
8:15 P.M. Review of a sketch plan for the proposed Cornell University Combined Heat and Power
Plant project located to the south of the Central Heating Plant on Dryden Road, Town of
Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 63 -1 -5, 63 -1 -8.1 and 63- 1 -8.2, City of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 65 -3-
1.2 and 65- 3 -1.1, Light Industrial and Low Density Residential Zones. The proposed
addition will occupy a footprint of approximately 17,000 square feet and includes two partial
levels plus a mechanical penthouse. The addition will house two combustion turbine
generators which will be matched with a dual - pressure heat recovery steam generator. The
project will also include new emergency diesel generators, an aqueous ammonia storage
facility, and other site improvements. The project site is split between the City and Town of
Ithaca. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant; Tim Peer, P.E., Agent.
9. Persons to be heard (continued from beginning of meeting if necessary).
10. Approval of Minutes: October 2, 2007 and October 16, 2007.
11. Other Business:
12. Adjournment.
Jonathan Kanter, AICP
Director of Planning
273 -1747
NOTE: IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE NOTIFY
SANDY POLCE AT 273 -1747.
(A quorum of four (4) members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business.)
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
By direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings
will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, November 6, 2007, at 215 North Tioga
Street, Ithaca, N.Y., at the following times and on the following matters:
7:30 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the
proposed mass notification system on the Ithaca College Campus, 953 Danby Road,
Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and 42 -1 -13.2, Medium Density Residential
Zone. The proposal involves installing two mass communication poles to deliver
emergency warnings and messages to the College campus community. One pole will be
mounted on the roof of the Campus Center (10 feet above roof) and the second will be
mounted on a wooden pole (50 feet high) between Wood Field and College Circle Road.
Ithaca College, Owner /Applicant; Richard Couture, Agent.
7:45 P.M. Consideration of Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed conversion
of the former Rite Aid location in the East Hill Plaza located at 323 Pine Tree Road,
Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62 -2- 1.121, Community Commercial Zone. The proposal
involves splitting the former Rite Aid space into two new rental units for Cayuga Press,
Inc. and Sedgwick Furniture. Cornell University Real Estate Department,
Owner /Applicant; Maria B. Maynard, Property Manager, Agent.
8:00 P.M. Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Cornell University Animal
Health Diagnostic Center located off Caldwell Road in the northeast corner of the
College of Veterinary Medicine Complex, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 67 -1 -10.2
and 67 -1 -10.4, Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal includes the demolition of
several small cinder block buildings for the construction of a new +/- 126,000 square
foot, +/- 70 foot tall, facility to include laboratories (rated with Biological Safety Levels
of 2 and 3) and office space. The primary use of the facility will be for veterinary disease
diagnostic programs associated with necropsy and histopathology, and will also include
teaching programs and other research and support activities. The building will be
physically connected to the existing Schuman Hall, associated with the Veterinary
College. The project will consolidate 70 existing parking spaces currently scattered
throughout the site, and add approximately 8 new spaces (4 handicapped spaces and 4
short term drop off spaces). The project will also include development of new stormwater
management facilities. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant; John M. Keefe, Agent.
Said Planning Board will at said time and said place hear all persons in support of such matter or objections
thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual impairments, hearing
impairments or other special needs, will be provided with assistance as necessary, upon request. Persons
desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing.
Jonathan Kanter, AICP
Director of Planning
273 -1747
Dated: Monday, October 29, 2007
Publish: Wednesday, October 31, 2007
;Wednesday, October,31, 2007 f THE ITHACA JOURNAL
TOWN OF ITHACA
PLANNING BOARD '
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday,"
November 6,'2007
By direction of the Chair- i
Person . of the Planning t
board, NOTICE IS HEREBY 1
GIVEN that Public Hearings '___ _
will be held byy the Planning ! 8:00 P M. Consideration
Board of the•Town'of Ithaca 'I of Final Site Plan Approval
on Tuesdayy November 6; :j for -the proposed Cornell
2007; at 215 North Tiogo University Animal Health Di
Street, Ithaca, N.Y. at the ' agnostic Center located off 1
following times -and on the I Caldwell Road in the north -!
following matters: east corner of the College
7:30 P.M. Consideration , Of' Veterinary Medicine i
of Preliminary and Final Complex, Town of Ithaca!
Site 'Plan Approval and Tax Parcel No.'s 67 -1 -10.21
Special Permit for the pro- and 67.1 -10.4, Low Density'
posed mass notification sys- Residential Zone. The pro-
tern on the Ithaca College ; pasaI includes the demoli.'
Campus 953 Danby Road, I tion of several 'small cinder'
Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel block buildings for the -con
No.'s 41 -1 -30.2 and'42 -1 struction of a new +/
:13.2, Medium Density Resi -S 126 000 square foot, +/
dential Zone. The'proposoli 70 foot tall; facility to, in
involves installing two mass r elude laboratories (rated;,
communication poles to de-r with Biological Safety Lev -i
sliver emergency warningels of 2 and 3 and office I
sE j
;and messages to ,the Col space.' The primary use of
;lege campus community. {'the facility will be for ve.teri- i
'One pole will be mounted( nary disease diagnostic!
on the roof of the Campus programs associated with
'Center (10 feet above roof) f necropsy and!
and the second will be histopathology, and will al-'
mounted on a wooden pole) so. include teaching pro- 9
(50 feet, high) between( grams and other research,
Wood Field and College' and support activities. The -
;Circle Road. Ithaca Col- building- will be physically'
lege, Owner /Applicant; Ri. connected to the existing I
chard Couture, Agent. - Schuman Hall, associated'
7:45 P.M. Consideration I with the Veterinary College. i
of Preliminary. and Final" The project will consolidate)
Site Plan Approval for the ` 70 existing parking spaces'
pproposed conversion of the ! currently scattered through - p
!former. Rite Aid location in out, the site, and add ap- "I
the East Hill Plaza located proximately 8 new spaces I
at. 323 Pine 'Tree Road, ' 4 handicapped spaces ,
Town of 'Ithaca Tax Parcel ( and 4 .short term drop off I
'No. 62:2- 1:121, Communi-: )spaces l- The project will,ol
ty Commercial Zone.' The so include development of !
proposal involves splitting new stormwater manage
the former Rite Aid space ment facilities. Cornell Uni- ,
into two new rental units for ;versify, Owner /Applicant;
Cayyuga Press, Inc: and John M. Keefe, Agent.
Sedgwick Furniture.+ Car- Said Rlannin Board will
nell Universiy Real - Estate g
Department, Owner/ Appli -'at said time and said place;
cant; Maria B. Maynard, hear all persons in support'
Property Manager, Agent. __- Of m Personrsobrjae�tioanps j
Pear by agent or in person.
ndividuals with visual im.
pairments,,hearing impair-
ments or other special
needs; will be provided
with assistance as necesso-
ry upon request. Persons
desiring assistance must
make such a request not
less than 48 hours. prior to ;
the time of the ,public
hearing.
Jonathan Kanter, AICP 1
Director of Planning I
273 -1747
Dated: Monday, i
October 29, 2007 ,
Publish: Wednesday,
October 31, 2007
Town of Ithaca
Planning Board
215 North Tioga Street
November 6, 2007
7:00 p.m.
PLEASE SIGN4N
Please Print Clearly, Thank You
Name
�LLLL��
vi 11LLTC
s0 N
M n\rA A M O S-0i
,�)Mq
Gt ►' r IN1 c�-�, ►,�n�v
I ~
i(
it
Address
l)
e
i4
{1
C.L')
TOWN OF ITHACA
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION
I, Sandra Polce, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a Senior Typist for the Town of
Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York; that the following Notice has been duly posted on the sign
board of the Town of Ithaca and that said Notice has been duly published in the local newspaper,
The Ithaca Journal.
Notice of Public Hearings to be held by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in the Town of Ithaca
Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on Tuesday, November 6, 2007
commencing at 7:00 P.M., as per attached.
Location of Sign Board used for Posting: Town Clerk Sign Board — 215 North Tio a Street.
Date of Posting:
Date of Publication
October 29, 2007
October 31, 2007
Sandra Polce, Senior Typist
Town of Ithaca
STATE OF NEW YORK) SS:
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 31 S` day of October 2007.
Notary Public
CONNIE F. CLARK
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01 CL6052878
Qualified in Tompkins County
Commission Expires December 26, 20 f�