Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 2000-03-07TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2000 The Town of Ithaca Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, March 7, 2000, in Town Hall, 126 East Seneca Street, Ithaca, New York, at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT: Fred Wilcox, Chairperson; Eva Hoffmann, Board Member; James Ainslie, Board Member; Tracy Mitrano, Board Member; Larry Thayer, Board Member; Rod Howe, Board Member; Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning; John Barney, Attorney for the Town; George Frantz, Assistant Town Planner. EXCUSED: George Conneman, Board Member. ALSO PRESENT: David Herrick, TG Miller; Joni Carroll, Cornell University; Jean Reese, Cornell University; Warren Allmon, PRI; Scott Whitham, Historic Ithaca; Stacie Ross, WHCU; Lauren Bishop, Ithaca Journal; Katherine Davis, Cornell Daily Sun; Bill Wendt, Cornell University; Peter Eliason, Cornell University; David Bouldin, 208 Forest Home Drive; Doug & Bruce Brittain, 135 Warren Road; Elizabeth Harness, Newscenter 7; Collie White, Newscenter 7; Joel Harlan, Dryden; Shirley Egan, Cornell Counsel; John Gutenberger, Cornell University; John Kiefer, Cornell University; Kathy Wolf, Trowbridge & Wolf. Chairperson Wilcox declared the meeting duly opened at 7:37 p.m., and accepted for the record the Secretary's Affidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearings in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on February 28, 2000, and March 1, 2000, together with the properties under discussion, as appropriate, upon the Clerks of the City of Ithaca and the Town of Danby, upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning, upon the Tompkins County Commissioner of Public Works, and upon the applicants and /or agents, as appropriate, on March 1, 2000. (Affidavit of Posting and Publication is hereto attached as Exhibit #1.) Chairperson Wilcox read the Fire Exit Regulations to those assembled, as required by the New York State Department of State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control. AGENDA ITEM: PERSONS TO BE HEARD. Chairperson Wilcox opened this segment of the meeting at 7:37 p.m., and asked if any member of the public wished to be heard. With no persons present to be heard, Chairperson Wilcox closed this segment of the meeting at 7:38 p.m. AGENDA ITEM: Brief update regarding plan modifications for the Paleontological Research Institution's proposed Museum of the Earth, 1259 Trumansburg Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 24- 3 -3.1, Residence District R -30. Warren Allmon, Executive Director, Paleontological Research Institution, Owner /Applicant; David Herrick, TG Miller P.C., Agent. Chairperson Wilcox opened this segment of the meeting at 7:38 p.m. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 2 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED David Herrick, TG Miller, stated that they left their sketch plan presentation last November with some very good comments and ideas from board members. They have discussed them with PRI and have come up with some alternative site designs that enhance the internal traffic circulation and some of the intersection relationships with Route 96. The cover letter outlines the significant changes. They always refine the site design elements from one phase to the next. They have completed and submitted a draft traffic assessment report. They hired SRF Associates from Rochester to look at regional and internal traffic issues. It was suggested by many that the intersection with Route 96 be realigned so that there is additional cueing length between the PRI driveway and the light at the hospital. It has been moved about 100 feet. It is about 400 feet separation from the signal to the entrance and exit drive. The move also improves the sight distance. There is a visibility problem looking to the north with the hedgerow and plantings. Shifting the driveway to the south has enhanced the sight distance to the point that it is in excess of what is required. They started the process with 4 parking lots that were single loaded bays. The focus was to pitch the lots into the hillside in a way that would mask them from view from Trumansburg Road. One of the comments received was to consider double loading to reduce the number of lots. It would also reduce the amount of disturbance to the site. They looked at it and considered it. They have gone back to a plan with 3 double loaded bays as opposed to four single loaded bays. The end result is keeping the parking spaces the same. It reduces the amount of disturbed area by 10 %. Another issue was turning around. They are providing dedicated no parking zones. There is an area at the end of the parking areas for cars to turn around. Board Member Thayer asked if it would be better to link the parking lots together. Mr. Herrick stated that the current design does not preclude it from happening. The consultants felt that they would be adding more asphalt. It is not a new concept. There are many parking lots around this area designed this way. Board Member Ainslie stated that he does not like the idea that people will have to back -up to get out. turn Mr. Kanter stated that with the turning around area, it will give people a chance to make a wide Board Member Ainslie stated that he does not want to have people put the car into reverse. Chairperson Wilcox stated that they are trying to balance the ease of driving and the safety of driving. The berms have been created to shield the view of the parking lot. If connector roads are run from one parking area to the next, they are going to cut through the berms. It will do something to the view shed. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 3 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Hoffmann stated that anyone who parks will need to put the car in reverse to back in or out of the space. Mr. Herrick stated that the same number of movements would be made. They have not precluded the ability to tie them together. They do not desire the situation at this time. Board Member Ainslie asked how many parking spaces are there for the handicapped. Mr. Herrick responded that there are four parking spaces. They have created the access drives to be in and out so that circulation between parking lots does not require a circuitous route. The final issue was that an emergency access be considered for the neighboring property. They have looked at it and provided a proposed route. It could also serve as a pedestrian way to the hospital. Chairperson Wilcox stated that this could be a wonderful addition to Ithaca and Tompkins County. Board Member Ainslie asked if they have adequate room for the piling of snow. Mr. Herrick stated that as someone drives into the lots, to the right is a large retaining wall that supports the berms. To the left would be a pavement surface that blends in naturally with grass. The area to the left can be for snow storage. It can also be piled in the no parking area. Board Member Hoffmann asked if they have given any thought to pivoting one of the buildings. Mr. Herrick responded that there has not been a change. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for Cornell University's proposed North Campus Residential Initiative, located on the west side of Pleasant Grove Road and south side of Jessup Road on all or parts of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No's. 67- 1 -1.1, 68 -1- 11.1, 68 -1 -11.2, and 68 -1 -12.2, in the R -30 Residence District, comprising approximately 14.1 acres of land. The overall project in both the City and Town of Ithaca is proposed to consist of new dormitories to house up to 560 new students, a new "community commons" dining hall /student activities center, a new road connecting the existing South Balch Drive to Pleasant Grove Road, a new parking lot, three new soccer fields, tennis courts and basketball courts, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant; Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf, Landscape Architects, Agent. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he needs to ask each member of the board to disclose whether or not they have an affiliation with Cornell University. Board Member Howe stated that he works for Cornell Cooperative Extension, which is affiliated with Cornell University. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 4 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Thayer stated that he did not have an affiliation with Cornell University. Board Member Ainslie stated that his daughter -in -law that works at Cornell University. Board Member Mitrano stated that she has a 12 hour appointment in the School of Human Ecology. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she does volunteer work at the Johnson Art Museum. Her husband works at Cornell University. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he has no affiliation with Cornell University. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the board has granted Preliminary Approval for this site plan. It is appropriate for the board to focus on whether or not Cornell has sufficiently fulfilled the conditions set forth in the Preliminary Approval and if the Final site plan conforms to the Preliminary site plan. It would be appropriate for the board if necessary to decide if an identifiable error was made, changed circumstances that might significantly alter the previous decision, or if there is new information that was not available. The purpose of final site plan is not to review the project again. Kathy Wolf, Trowbridge & Wolf, stated she is looking at the conditions applied to the preliminary approval. She would like to go through the conditions. The first condition is the completion and signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between the State Historic Preservation office and Cornell University. It has been executed. Board Member Hoffmann asked if it is the letter of resolution. Ms. Wolf responded yes. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she does have questions regarding the letter. See Attachment #1. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he would like to hold questions until the end of the presentation. Ms. Wolf stated that the second requirement was the receipt of evidence satisfactorily to the Director of Planning and the Attorney for the Town that the relocation of the Cradit -Moore House to the site in Cayuga Heights complies with all requirements of the Village of Cayuga Heights, including copies of building permits. A copy of the minutes of the Village of Cayuga Heights meeting that they attended, whereby the Board of Trustees agreed that it was acceptable to relocate the house to the Pleasant Grove Road site, they gave Brent Cross authority to issue a building permit. See Attachment #2. They have applied for the building permit. It is their intention to bring the building permit to the Town prior to requesting a permit to relocate the house. They do intend to comply with the condition as stated. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 5 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED The next requirement was prior to final site plan approval the receipt of deed restrictions acceptable to the Attorney for the Town. They were submitted to the Attorney for the Town in early February. Attorney Barney stated that he has reviewed them and they are o.k. Ms. Wolf stated that condition e is the completion of a Phase II archeological investigation of the existing Cradit -Moore House grounds. The phase II investigation consists of two parts. The first part is to do a more extensive dig immediately around the house with the test holes spaced more frequently. It is scheduled to occur within the next two weeks. The second part is that after the house is relocated then there would be further digging under the house. They have also scheduled for the archeologist to be on site at the time of the move. Carl Stearns is also overseeing it. Ms. Wolf stated that all of the traffic calming measures are marked on the plans. The speed limit signs are not shown on the construction documents. The University's Transportation Department installs the traffic control signs. They are shown on the colored plan. It will be posted at 25 mph. Mr. Frantz suggested that they not grade under the drip line of trees. The grading plans have shown some grading under the drip line of the red pines. The red pines are the trees that are in question. Mr. Frantz recommended that it be a condition that they not grade under the pines. By regrading some of the slopes along the edge and making it steeper, they were able to avoid grading under the drip line of the majority of the red pines. There are four trees where it was not possible to avoid grading under the drip line. They investigated how they might address the issue. The elevation of the road is dropping and is lower than the existing grade. One possibility to minimize the grading under the four pines would be to locate a retaining wall at the curve line. In general it is not considered an ideal solution from a safety standpoint. This would also eliminate a shoulder. Shoulders on a road are constructed for a reason. The retaining wall is not ideal in that location. The primary concern is to screen any lighting for the Observatory. They scheduled a meeting with representatives from the Observatory. They went through the detailed design phase. The red pines have lost their lower branches. The main concern of the Observatory is cars coming down the drive that will be aiming headlights directly at the Observatory. They are happy that the road is depressed. It is felt that the red pines are not beneficial because they are branched up high. To directly respond to the concerns of the Observatory, Cornell is proposing to add 50 additional trees that were not on the preliminary site plan. They will range in size from 6 to 10 feet. The intention is that the trees be predominantly Austrian pines. They tend to hold their lower branches. They would then provide a strong buffer in front of and behind the pines. They would specifically address the issue of on coming headlights. The University felt that this is a preferred solution to installing a retaining wall that would only be serving 4 trees. The pines are planted close together. If four trees are removed on the north side, the whole north side of that row has dead branches. Even though they would not have to take out 7 trees for the regrading, they suggest that the 7 trees be removed. The 50 trees address the concerns of the Observatory. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 6 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED The next condition was that the site plan be revised to show the 104 -space parking lot. The number of cars is equal to the existing condition. They have also shown the area set -aside for 26 future parking spaces if needed. It is shown as a lawn at this point. Signage was another issue at preliminary approval. The yellow dots on the diagram represent existing signage. Cornell has standards for their signage that were developed a number of years ago in consultation with each of the surrounding municipalities. The new signs for this project will be consistent with those standards. Two new signs are proposed. One is proposed to be modified. Currently at the intersection of South Balch and Thurston there is a directional sign to Helen Newman Hall. It will be modified and enlarged so that it includes directions to the Community Commons. There is a proposed DOT sign north of the new entrance to the project. It will be one of the green signs. There is an existing DOT signage north of George Jessup Road. There will be another DOT sign past George Jessup Road that is directing people to the new campus road. There will be a new Cornell standard sign at the entrance. Board Member Hoffmann stated that on page 3 of the SHPO and Cornell University Resolution, See Attachment #2, it talks about protection of, trimming and arborist's care for two years, of trees agreed upon and flagged to remain. She is wondering if two years is enough time to see what would happen to some of the trees and if they will survive. They discussed not grading under the drip line of trees. She can see how the situation by the Observatory has been taken care of, but is looks to her as if there is some steep grading south of the maples that will remain on the Moore House site. How will that be handled and how will it affect the trees? Will one know after two years if they will survive or not? Ms. Wolf stated that as plans have progressed, it has been the assessment of the landscape architect that there are two additional trees on the Moore House site that have a chance of making it. They have to grade under the drip line if they want to leave them, but they will probably survive. They have been included. The first tree does not have too much grading under the drip line. The second tree has more extensive grading. Due to the age of the trees the roots are probably not going to be as affected. The tree is well stabilized. It has an extensive root system in all directions. Board Member Hoffmann stated that there are some trees in the row of trees just north where grading is required. Ms. Wolf responded that only the tree at the very end will actually need grading under the drip line. There will be a tree well there to protect the roots. A number of the trees do have tree wells to protect the root systems. Board Member Hoffmann asked if the two maple trees do not make it, is two years enough to tell with such old trees. Should it be extended longer for those particular trees? If they do not survive, will other trees be planted to replace them? Ms. Wolf replied that an arborist is not going to have an impact on if the trees survive. It does not do anything to ensure that the tree will survive. Once the regrading is done, the roots need to be PLANNING BOARD PAGE 7 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED pruned properly at that time. There will be additional care to make sure that they are watered well. After that, additional pruning is not going to do anything to extend the life of the tree. She does not think that the University would have a problem to agreeing to replace the trees if they were to die. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the very first word in that sentence is retention. It makes her wonder if there is a question as to whether they will be retained after two years. Ms. Wolf stated that the resolution is standard SHPO language. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the language could be modified to make it clear. It is important to keep the old trees as long as possible. Retaining them for two years is not enough. Attorney Barney asked if Board Member Hoffmann was talking about the SHPO agreement with Cornell. Board Member Hoffmann responded yes. Attorney Barney stated that he is not sure the agreement is easily modified. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he is not sure that they can ask at this point. The condition states the completion of signing of a memorandum of understanding satisfactory to the Director of Planning and Attorney for the Town. Is the letter satisfactory to the Director of Planning and the Attorney for the Town? Attorney Barney responded that it is. Mr. Kanter stated that it is satisfactory to him and the Town has received a signed version of the agreement. It has been executed. Chairperson Wilcox stated that there is a question in his mind as to whether the board can go back and change the condition that they have met. Mr. Frantz stated that he does not think the board can change the resolution. It is between SHPO and Cornell. Board Member Hoffmann asked if there could be an additional understanding between Cornell University and the Town of Ithaca. Mr. Kanter stated that a condition could be added to the resolution. Board Member Hoffmann stated that on page 4, b3, it talks about the northeast and south elevations to be maintained. It does not mention anything about the west elevation. Why is that? PLANNING BOARD PAGE 8 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Ms. Wolf stated that there was an enclosed porch on the west elevation. They are suggesting that it was done later and is not historically significant. They are asking for it to be removed. Board Member Hoffmann stated that it does not talk about the western elevation elsewhere. Ms. Wolf stated that they do talk about the porch. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she understands that the porch will not be included in the move. She hopes that the rest of the elevation is maintained at least on the historic section of the building. Ms. Wolf stated that the covenant covers it. Attorney Barney asked what is a Certified Nursery Professional. Ms. Wolf stated that some nurserymen are certified and some are not. Attorney Barney asked who certifies them. Ms. Wolf replied that the National Nurserymen's Association certifies them. It is a recognized term Board Member Hoffmann stated that on page 6, point D mentions the cost of the mitigation measures. It states that Cornell has committed up to $40,000. She thought that they were told that Cornell would pay for the entire cost of the relocation. She understood that as including the moving of the house, preparing the site, and repairing the site. It does not state that in this statement. John Kiefer, Cornell University, stated that Cornell intends to provide all the financial resources required to relocate the Moore House. Ms. Wolf stated that the document states SHPO's requirements. Cornell is going above and beyond the requirements. They are meeting regularly with Historic Ithaca and the contractor to figure out what the costs are. They are currently negotiating to determine what additional monies might be required. Board Member Hoffmann stated it does not quite say that in the letter. Attorney Barney stated that Board Member Hoffmann is reading from the unsigned version. The signed version states that Cornell shall be responsible for ensuring that the building is carefully moved and impacts are properly mitigated. There are no amounts indicated. Section D has been changed to read that; "the relocation has been determined to be the best mitigation scenario for this property. Cornell shall be responsible for ensuring that the building is carefully moved and impacts are appropriately mitigated." It is an obligation on Cornell's part to ensure that it is carefully moved and the impacts are mitigated whatever the cost. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 9 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Chairperson Wilcox stated that when the board met on January 5t", they had a letter from Harold Craft stating that Cornell would make an additional commitment to the Town of Ithaca that the relocation will be done according to these standards and with sufficient resources to accomplish them by offering to post a bond sufficient to cover the cost of the off -site preservation. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she does feel better hearing that. She is wondering whether or not there needs to be a specific statement about what is to be included in that. Attorney Barney stated that he did not see a problem in the language of the agreement. Chairperson Wilcox asked who was hired to do the archeological investigation. Ms. Wolf responded that it is the Rochester Museum of Science. Board Member Thayer stated that it is not clear who is paying for the new basement and the renovations to the house. Is it Historic Ithaca's obligation? Mr. Kiefer stated that it is the intent of Cornell that Historic Ithaca will not have any out of pocket expenses as a result of their involvement in the project. There will be two sources of funding for the project. One will be from Cornell and the other will be the sale of the Moore House. Board Member Thayer stated that before the house can be relocated it needs a basement, foundation, roof and the site needs fill. Who is paying for that? Mr. Kiefer responded that they intend to have an agreement with Historic Ithaca. Cornell will provide funds as part of that agreement. Board Member Thayer asked if Historic Ithaca would have to pay Cornell back when they sell the house. Mr. Kiefer stated that Historic Ithaca would be working to find an owner for the house. When that happens some of that money will be made available to do landscaping and work on the site. If they get into a situation where cash flow is required, Cornell University will pay for it. They do not expect Historic Ithaca to take money out of their bank account or borrow money from the bank. Board Member Thayer stated that it is going to cost more than the originally stated $40,000. Is it in writing that there will be no out of pocket expense for Historic Ithaca? Attorney Barney stated that Cornell is assuming that it will occur. It carries through to the renovation and setting up the house. Board Member Hoffmann stated that some of the items would need to be done after there is a new owner. It says clearly that some of the landscaping would be done according to the wishes of the owner. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 10 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Thayer stated that he was thinking of the physical placement of the building, which must take place beforehand. Board Member Ainslie asked if there is any asbestos in the Moore House. Mr. Kiefer stated that there is a little. They do intend to remove it this month. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the next document that she has questions about is the letter regarding ongoing maintenance of the house. It is not complete in the version that the board received from Shirley Egan to John Barney. See Attachment #3. It states in the cover letter that some material will be inserted when it is available about the description of the future site. Attorney Barney stated that he does think that they have the description now. Chairperson Wilcox asked if Attorney Barney had reviewed the document. Attorney Barney stated that he has reviewed the deed. He has not reviewed the description itself Board Member Hoffmann stated that page 2 talks about various hook -ups. It does not mention cable hook -up. It is practically essential today. Board Member Thayer stated that the utilities are going to be underground so the cable should be put in with the other utilities. Attorney Barney stated that the statement of "any other underground utility" covers it. Ms. Wolf stated that they would have a cable hook -up. Board Member Hoffmann stated that in the last paragraph of the Indenture, it talks about exterior appurtenances including garage. She thought that the garage was not going to be moved. Mr. Kiefer stated that SHPO made it optional. From their perspective the garage was not historically significant. It is a nice building and it does add to the house. It would be nice for the new owner to have. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the breezeway would not be moved. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the date July 1, 2000 does not seem like a possible date. The new foundation would need to be prepared before the house could be moved. Mr. Kiefer stated that a rough dimension is taken for the building sill plate. The contractor then puts in a spread footer. The house is then brought in and set down over the footer. The foundation walls are then built in a custom manner so that they fit the sill plate. Through experience people have PLANNING BOARD PAGE 11 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED learned that they are unable to make a good drawing that describes the dimensions of the sill plate for the older homes. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the site would be built up except for the location of the basement. Mr. Kiefer stated that there would be no fill done until the house is in place on its foundation. The fill will then be brought in. Attorney Barney stated that in response to Board Member Hoffmann's concern, it does not matter if July 1, 2000 is a doable date. The Town only cares if there is a date. It is between Cornell and Historic Ithaca. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the next comment deals with the revisions to the parking lot. In the lighting plan there is a post light with four units on it. It is to be located at the easternmost end. She is wondering if such a big light is necessary in that location until and if the additional parking spaces are built. Ms. Wolf stated that the intention is to make sure that the entrance is well lit. Board Member Hoffmann asked if there are lights along the road. Ms. Wolf responded that there are lights along the road. There is an issue of retrofitting the fixture later. Mr. Kiefer stated that they are 20 -foot poles. They might be able to move a quad fixture. He is not sure which two lamps would be removed. They did go to that design because they did not want to have a lot of lights around the perimeter and then in the middle of the parking lot. Board Member Hoffmann stated that on the plan it looks as if there is another light at the entrance. Board Member Thayer stated that it is a good location for the light. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she would prefer to see fewer lights. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she does have questions regarding the signs. Looking at the drawings of the signs that the board received, it refers to Central Campus, Community Commons, Helen Newman Hall, and Balch Hall. It does not say Cornell University. Ms. Wolf stated that there is a small shield on the sign. Board Member Hoffmann stated that there was one sign that stated Welcome to Cornell University. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 12 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Ms. Wolf stated that in general the strategy is to place one of those signs from each incoming direction. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she feels that this sign should be specifically noticeable. She would like the sign to reflect that the new road is the main road to campus from Pleasant Grove Road. It is the purpose of the road. Chairperson Wilcox asked if it does not do that by saying Central Campus. Board Member Hoffmann stated that it is very important. Ms. Wolf stated that people would have passed three signs that say Cornell University by the time they get to the new road. Board Member Thayer asked if the sign is larger than what is allowed under the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Frantz stated that this sign is not to serve as a sign identifying this as a main entrance to campus. Jessup Road as a main entrance is much better than this proposed road. His understanding was that they just wanted to let the public know that at this point they can turn right and get to Central Campus. This sign meets that particular need. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the purpose of this road was to direct most of the traffic coming from the north on Pleasant Grove Road that is going to Cornell campus so it would take the new road rather than go through Forest Home. It is important that the sign makes it clear that this is the road to do that on. Some people might do it on Jessup Road. Eventually if there is another road and another North Entrance, it will take over that main function. For the time being, she felt that this road would be a big player in that scenario. Mr. Frantz stated that he does not recall any discussion of it being the main entrance. The idea is to give people the information. He has always felt that Jessup Road is the better road to take to get to the main campus than the new road. The idea is for people who miss the sign on Jessup Road there is another opportunity for them to get to Central Campus. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the problem with using Jessup Road is that people would then need to go through a residential area. They are trying to avoid traffic through residential areas. Ms. Wolf stated that the sign does direct people to the Central Campus. There is a lot of research done to decide how high the letters need to be based upon the speed limit. This is taken into consideration in the design of the sign. Board Member Thayer stated that he thinks the sign says what it needs to say. He would like to see it at its maximum size. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 13 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Mr. Kanter stated that it is close to being at the maximum size. Board Member Howe stated that he would like to encourage the ongoing discussion about the North Campus Gateway. He does realize that there are meetings taking place. Board Member Hoffmann asked if the sign at the other end of the new road might have some more information on it as to where it leads as well. It might give a direction to A -Lot. Chairperson Wilcox asked Board Member Hoffmann to state her comments as recommendations because the sign is in the City. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the sign could provide more helpful information. Does anyone else have any ideas on how to improve the sign? •• Chairperson Wilcox stated that he does not want to discuss the sign. The City has done their Chairperson Wilcox opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. Doug Brittain, 135 Warren Road, stated that traffic has been a big concern. He is surprised to see the metered parking increased by over 30 %. He sees it as a violation of the spirit from the January 4t" meeting. Metered parking at the end of the road means that people are likely to drive through Forest Home to get there. According to the draft Environmental Impact Statement they do not need the parking. He has highlighted a paragraph from the draft Environmental Impact Statement that explains the need for metered parking. See Attachment #4. About half the people who drive to Central Campus to find parking during the day and use metered parking will instead use the bus. In the evening off -peak, anyone can park anywhere. It does not matter. The metered parking is for daytime use. They do summarize the proposed daytime off -peak. They estimate that bus service will reduce traffic to Helen Newman by 12 vehicles per hour. During the worst time of day, there will be 8 fewer people coming to park in the parking lot. Cornell has increased the parking lot. If more parking spaces are provided, then people are not going to ride the bus. Mr. Brittain stated that he does hope that the road speed limit will be posted at 25 mph. He would like to make sure that it is not posted at 10 or 15 mph. It is not to be posted as a sidewalk. The bicycle lane does stop. It needs to continue. He does think it is great that the sign states Central Campus. It is a standard sign. This is not a standard road. On page 118 of the draft Environmental Impact Statement it states that the majority of traffic on Jessup and Forest Home Drive will be diverted to the new road. This is supposed to be the largest use road for east west traffic. It will require effort to get people to use it. It does not mean that a large sign is required. Cornell does have concrete monuments low to the ground that say Cornell University. It does not block the view and it is not ugly. Everyone knows that it is Cornell University. It does require more than a standard sign. Most of North Campus is now accessible via the new road. Traffic needs to be routed that way. Trucks coming out of Central Campus also need to be directed away from residential neighborhoods. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 14 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Bruce Brittain, 135 Warren Road, stated that Cornell has agreed to post signs to instruct truck drivers around Forest Home and Cornell Heights. This is necessary, but is not sufficient. There does need to be some enforcement for violators who will choose to drive through the residential communities. If Cornell does not anticipate a lot of violations then they should agree to help with the enforcement. It is important that Cornell University be involved with the enforcement. There is a weight limit in Forest Home. The bus pull -off is not shown on the construction drawings. It was a requirement by the City. If there is no pull -off and there are 168 buses a day, traffic is going to stop for a long period of time in front of Helen Newman. He is pleased that there are going to be restrictions put on the house, the restoration, and the maintenance of the house. Cornell is going to claim credit for restoring the house. They do need to be there with financial support. He does appreciate the verbal intents stated. There does need to be something in writing. Mr. Brittain stated that he would like to support the comments of Board Member Conneman in his memo to the board and Mr. Kanter. See Attachment #5. Cornell should aggressively pursue a new campus entrance off Pleasant Grove Road and work to reduce traffic in Forest Home. It is an important part of this project. He is afraid that interest in it may dwindle without some encouragement. Mr. Brittain also supports benchmark traffic counts being taken. It does not matter who it is done by. Forest Home has taken traffic counts in the past, but unfortunately they are limited to two -hour counts. They cannot do 24 -hour, 7 -day a week counts, which is what needs to be done. Joel Harlan, Dryden, stated that he knows that the board is going to approve the project. Money talks, the citizens do the walking and go without. It is a proven fact. Look at what happened to Southwest Park. It was denied Wide Water. They are trying to tear Southwest Park apart. They are trying to tear apart Inlet Island and West End. Pyramid Mall is seeing the expansion. The anti - developers are rebelling against progress. You cannot stop the progress at Cornell. Where is the equalization? There are moratoriums in the Town of Ithaca and in Collegetown. People tried to defeat Burger King, but Cornell keeps growing. They have an 80,000 square foot building they want to put in Sapsucker Woods in a residential area. Chairperson Wilcox asked Mr. Harlan to restrict his comments to the North Campus Residential Initiative. Mr. Harlan stated that they couldn't stop Cornell. The board does not have the guts to back Cornell down. They are in a pinch. When the Moratorium ends, do not put in another one. Let the Town grow. Businesses need to be brought in. Cornell is not waiting for us. Smart growth is for the smart heads, meaning the college kids. Smart growth for the community is no growth at all. Do not let the anti - developers persuade another moratorium. It is not right if the colleges are allowed to grow. It is going to send a wild message through the County if this project is approved. Chairperson Wilcox asked Mr. Harlan to restrict his comments. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 15 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Mr. Harlan stated that he is giving examples of what is going on in the community. There is no equalization. They are running businesses out of Town and the campuses run it. The campuses are running wild with growth. People are going out of Town to go shopping. The stores are running out after them. They are closing their doors. Ithaca College and Cornell University have their way. The taxpayer pays for it. Let the businesses come in. Do not let the anti - developers persuade you. Scott Whitham, Executive Director of Historic Ithaca, stated that Historic Ithaca and Cornell University has been meeting on a weekly basis to work out the details of how to move the structure. They are working with a contractor that Historic Ithaca has had a long- standing relationship with. They trust the contractor to put numbers together for the move. The contractor has been working with his sub - contractors to get the numbers. They have also put together the costs for Historic Ithaca for overhead and project management, bank fees, attorney fees, and realtor fees. They are in negotiations with Cornell regarding the costs. He has not seen any documents of any covenant. The attorney for Historic Ithaca has received them. They are getting close to the agreement. Attorney Barney asked if the attorney has seen the ground lease. Shirley Egan, Cornell University Counsel, stated that she sent it to him February 24th Mr. Whitham stated that there will be an up front number that they will ask from Cornell. They are in the process of finding a buyer for the house. The owner will come in with a certain number into the process so that the two numbers will hopefully be seamless. Attorney Barney asked if there is a buyer. Mr. Whitham responded no. They have just begun the process. Chairperson Wilcox asked if Mr. Whitham would describe the negotiations with Cornell as proceeding forward. Mr. Whitham stated that they have been working with the contractor to get the prices down so that they seem reasonable. There are a few outstanding pieces. Chairperson Wilcox stated that Mr. Whitham sounds hopeful and confident that there will be no problems. Mr. Whitham stated that he has not seen a contract. They are still in the process, but everything is going well. Chairperson Wilcox closed the public hearing at 9:16 p.m. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he read the letter from Board Member Conneman. When this board adopted the Statement of Findings, it did indicate that there is a potential for small to moderate impact on traffic flows. The board did acknowledge the fact that traffic engineer's work can be less PLANNING BOARD PAGE 16 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED than precise. Assumptions must be made and the board must come to the best conclusion that they can. This board wisely held to the small to moderate impact. Board Member Ainslie stated that when the board first discussed this project, people were buying fuel for a $1.20 per gallon. Now it is $1.60 per gallon. This might encourage more people to take the bus. Chairperson Wilcox asked where the location of the speed limit signs are. They are on drawing L1. Ms. Wolf showed the board the location of the speed limit signs. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the bus pull -off in the City has come up a number of times. Ms. Wolf stated that there was a meeting about two weeks ago with the Ithaca - Tompkins Transit. They agreed upon locations for two bus stops. They will both be located in the City. One will be traveling in the eastbound direction. It is intended to service the buildings. In the westbound direction it will be located in front of Balch Hall. The thought is that most pedestrians are headed to that area. The next step is to take it to the City of Ithaca Board. They have to review and approve the location. It was a condition of their approval that a bus pull -off is provided. The University agreed to it, but needed to consult with Ithaca Transit to come up with a location that everyone would agree to. It will be two bus pull -offs. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the board would like a condition that says when the bus pull - offs are approved that copies of the revised drawings are provided to the board. Mr. Frantz stated that he spoke with City staff on this issue. He has two resolutions from the Planning and Development Board. They are not showing up on all the drawings because the City wanted to make sure that they were o.k. with TCAT and that the Codes Committee would review it. The City did have a condition that there would be one bus pull -off. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the bus pull -off indicated on the L1 drawing would be removed. Ms. Wolf stated that is the original suggested location. It will be removed and relocated. Board Member Howe stated that there was an issue raised regarding additional metered parking. Ms. Wolf responded that they do not understand where the numbers came from. Cornell has not proposed metered parking yet. They have not decided how many metered parking spaces that they want. There are wood ballards at the end of the parking lot to prevent cars from going down the hill that were thought to be parking meters. It is possible that some of the posts will be used for that. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 17 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED There has been no proposal made for the number of metered parking spaces. It has not been decided. Chairperson Wilcox stated that in existing conditions there are 35 metered parking spaces. It might be reasonable to have the number remain at 35. Bill Wendt, Cornell University Transportation, stated that there is a various array of ways of providing short -term parking. Certain permits that staff have provide short -term privileges versus metered parking. They try to manage parking as best they can to accommodate faculty and staff that need to be there. At times there are reasons to manage parking differently. Chairperson Wilcox stated that it is not unreasonable to think that metered spaces would have a higher turnover. A higher turnover would mean more vehicle trips. The board wants to mitigate as much vehicle traffic as possible. Metered spaces means traffic. Attorney Barney stated that if Cornell could produce a parking permit that said thou shall not park more than two hours in 15 parking spaces of Lot Y, it would accomplish the same thing. The Town is getting a little micromanaging in telling Cornell what they should or should not be able to do with their parking spaces. The board is picking one device, but the same thing could be accomplished through other devices. The concern should be the design and the layout. He is not sure that they should be telling Cornell they can have 35, but not 36 metered parking spaces. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the board has dealt with a parking lot in general as a way to mitigate traffic in Cornell in the terms of number of spaces. The number of approved spaces has been cut down. It was appropriate on the part of the board. If the board can take further actions to help mitigate traffic through the adjoining neighborhoods then it is a good thing. Attorney Barney stated that it would be unreasonable to have Cornell come back before the board because they would like to have 38 metered parking spaces. They would need to make an application to justify increasing it 5 spaces. Mr. Frantz stated that traffic impacts are not determined by whether or not a parking lot is metered or not metered. The traffic impacts of this project are based on the size of the buildings and the uses within them and how those uses attract people. He does not see a difference in 35 metered parking spaces or 40 metered parking spaces. The prime determinant of how much traffic this project is going to generate are the activities that are going to take place in Community Commons and Helen Newman Hall. It is independent of the metered spaces. Chairperson Wilcox stated that Mr. Frantz is correct up to a point. Marginal increases in traffic occur as a result of whether the spaces are metered. Use invites traffic. The number of metered parking spaces has an effect on marginal increases or decreases in traffic. Mr. Frantz stated that he has never seen any literature on this matter. All the literature he has read and the training he has had is based on the fact that it is the land use that determines the PLANNING BOARD PAGE 18 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED amount of traffic. If they are metered people are still going to use them. If they are not metered it is going to be the same amount of use. Chairperson Wilcox stated that if they are not metered people are going to park their car there for a longer period of time. Mr. Frantz stated that people are parking their cars there to use the facilities. They are going to use the facilities based on whatever they are doing there, not how long they are going to have to pay for parking. Mr. Kanter stated that there could be a 15- minute meter, a 2 -hour meter, versus a long -term meter. The fact that it is metered does not tell you anything either. It is often the case in cities where you have different zones for different lengths of time. It is more of a matter of convenience for visitors. It does go back to the use of the buildings. It is not that the metered spaces attract the traffic. Attorney Barney stated that he is not sure that the board wants to tie their hands and say that Cornell can only do one type of parking. In the grand scheme of the things, Cornell might feel that they could reduce traffic flow by another method or by increasing a particular type of parking. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she thinks that the spaces that are available without meters tend to be filled with cars that are on campus all day. The metered spaces are mainly for two - hour periods. It means that you have to go back and put in more money if you are staying longer. The metered spaces have more cars coming and going than the non - metered spaces. Board Member Hoffmann stated that in a memo from Mr. Frantz, it mentions that counts were made at peak times, but the peak times for employees. Peak time for student activities is not 8:00 a.m. or 5:00 p.m. There are many students who do make a trip around 5:00 p.m. when the parking spaces that are limited free up for the day. It is very hard to get a parking space on campus after 5:00 p.m. in some of the lots that are restricted during the day, but are open at night. Mr. Frantz stated that he discussed that in the May 18, 1999 letter that the Town Board and Planning Board sent to the City. It is more around 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. when there is that massive influx of vehicular traffic into campus as students go back to the library to study. It is not new. It is an issue that has been raised and discussed before. It is one of the reasons why the new road is now a through road. Mr. Kanter stated that the Planning Board's Findings Statement addressed this issue in saying there is not going to be a reduction in traffic. It is likely to be a small to moderate impact. Board Member Howe asked if there is any way that the board could make a resolution asking the Town to do some benchmarking of traffic in Forest Home or communities nearby. This way a year from now after the North Campus Residential Initiative project is done the Town has their own data to refer back to. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 19 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Mr. Kanter stated that it is possible. This was discussed at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting as to whether this should be a condition of approval. It was agreed that it would be difficult to do. An appropriate course of action could be for this board to indicate to the Town Board that the Planning Board would like to see on -going follow -up traffic counts. His preference would be if the board decides to do that it not be set up solely to track what happens with the North Campus Residential Initiative project, but rather to take the comprehensive on updated counts in the general area. There are other areas as well that are more significant in terms of changes. The East Hill Plaza is an area of concern. There are many things happening in the Village of Lansing that could be significant factors in traffic through Forest Home and the surrounding neighborhoods. There are a lot of other places that need some updating. The Ithaca Tompkins County Transportation Council has shown a lot of interest in this general area as well. They just finished the Northeast Area Transportation Study. It covered a lot of the same areas. There have been some observations on the need to continue with that program. clock Board Member Thayer asked if the Town owns or has access to a traffic hose, counter and Mr. Kanter stated that the Town does have old ones. Mr. Frantz stated that until the early 1990s the Town was doing traffic counts throughout the Town. They were very old counters. There is good base data now between the NESTS study and the draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project. It would not be that hard to set up a bi- annual program to set out the counters. If the Town does not have them, the Transportation Council has them. Traffic counts could be taken every two years to monitor impacts of development. They could isolate the impacts of some developments to some degree. Board Member Thayer stated that it could be done, but the Town should not stipulate that it is Cornell's responsibility with the other entire development happening. Mr. Frantz stated that it would be a good investment on the part of the Town of Ithaca. The data could always be used for a number of planning purposes. Mr. Kanter stated that Cornell does participate in the Metropolitan Policy Organization. They have been active in working with the Town on the Transportation Committee. Cornell would have an interest in assisting the Town and the MPO in any efforts for traffic counts. Board Member Howe stated that he would like to add to the resolution that Cornell does what they can to make sure that construction traffic does not go into the neighborhood homes and that the 5 -ton weight limit is enforced. Ms. Wolf stated that Cornell has a contract with the contractor that will be doing this project. Written into the contract is that construction vehicles, including delivery and refuge haulage trucks, shall not travel through the village of Forest Home. This has been discussed with the contractor. This is in their contract. It is clear that this be enforced with the contractors. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 20 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Chairperson Wilcox asked who would be in charge of enforcement in Forest Home. It would probably be the County Sheriff's Department. Attorney Barney stated that the Cornell Safety Division might have the ability to enforce it because it adjoins some of their property. Ms. Egan stated that she consulted with some of her colleagues. They are really only authorized to enforce the law on Cornell University property. Their jurisdiction ends with the property line. If they are in pursuit of someone who has committed a crime on Cornell University property and they are following them into other areas, then they can make an arrest. It would be difficult to have any police agency try to enforce a civil contract. Attorney Barney stated that there is a Town 5 -ton weight limit in Forest Home. This was researched 10 years ago. There is some provision in the State Law dealing with Cornell or colleges in general that college peace officers have the authority to enforce laws on the University's property and on roads adjacent to their property. Ms. Egan stated that if they were violating an actual law, then they could enforce it. They cannot write a ticket for violating a civil contract. Mr. Frantz stated that he inventoried the regulatory signs that prohibit vehicles with weigh over 5 tons from driving through Forest Home. It might be appropriate to have the University place one of these signs at any construction site exit onto Pleasant Grove Road. It would alert the drivers to the fact that it is not just a contractual obligation, but it is the law that there is a 5 -ton weight limit in Forest Home. Is the construction exit gate going to be at the Pleasant Grove Apartments driveway? Mr. Kiefer responded that the gate would move as the work progresses. At some points during construction there will be construction entrances off Pleasant Grove Road. Mr. Frantz stated that the only sign on Pleasant Grove Road is to the north closer to Jessup Road. It alerts drivers on Pleasant Grove Road to the fact that there is a weight limit restriction '/2 mile ahead. Since Pleasant Grove Road is a County highway, there is no weight limitation. The sign is also at the end of Warren Road where it intersects Forest Home Drive. He did not see any signs north towards the golf courses. Mr. Wendt stated that if additional signs are needed along Pleasant Grove Road, he and Town staff could talk with Ward Hungerford. If there are any reasons to post signs on Cornell property he will make the commitment to allow the signs which are needed to be posted. They do understand the seriousness that occurs with construction and people that are temporary residents of the campus. They do have weekly meetings with the contractors. They offer services for moving people by bus to the construction sites. It is a problem for the campus. The additional traffic cannot be tolerated on the campus as it cannot be tolerated in the residential neighborhoods. Chairperson Wilcox asked if anyone had any additions to the resolution. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 21 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Attorney Barney stated that he does have some additions. He is not sure if the letter from Mr. Craft is sufficient in the view of the concerns about financing. He suggests a condition be added that receipt requires, for approval by the Director of Planning and the Attorney for the Town, of a written commitment from Cornell to provide all financing necessary to effect the moving and restoration of the Cradit -Moore House in accordance with the letter of resolution between Cornell, New York State Office of Parks, Restoration and Historic Preservation and the Dormitory Authority. The second item has not been discussed. Ms. Egan sent him the ground lease. He did not have a chance to read it until recently. He does have a number of concerns. The understanding of the board is that it is a 99 -year lease. The lease submitted is a 7 -year lease with the right by Cornell to terminate the remaining on one -year notice. The understanding of this board was that the improvements on the property would be bought back by Cornell at fair market value. The lease that Cornell submitted is that it would be bought back at 80% of the fair market value. There are several items that he would like to work out with Cornell Counsel. He would like to have a condition that there be receipt for approval by the Director of Planning and the Attorney for the Town prior to the issuance of any building permits of the form of the 99 -year ground lease for the property on which the Cradit- Moore House will be located. The last addition would be the receipt of the revised drawings approved by the City of Ithaca to show the approved bus pull -offs. Mr. Frantz asked if they would like the bus pull -off change to show on L1 or on all the sheets. Chairpersons Wilcox stated that having it show on L1 would be sufficient. Mr. Frantz stated that it was the retention, protection of, trimming and arborists care for 2 -year of trees on the existing Moore House site to remain after location of the structure. There was discussion of including language in the site plan approval from the SHPO agreement. Ms. Egan stated that she is concerned about the comments made by Attorney Barney regarding the ground lease. The ground lease is a 99 -year ground lease. They have two kinds of ground leases at Cornell. One is for 99 years and the other if for 35 years. In all of the ground leases, Cornell after a certain amount of time can give notice to a tenant that it would like to buy the place back because it would like to use it. They have been widely marketed. They sell well with this provision. Seven years was chosen because it is the average amount of time that a home owner owns their home. Houses turn over that frequently. When houses do turn over under the ground lease, they will offer the entire 35 or 99 year ground lease. As a matter of being polite to people, if they knew that they wanted the house for something, at the time of when the owner wanted to sell, Cornell would say no that they wanted to buy it from them instead. The ground lease program had to be presented to the Cornell University Board of Trustees. The purpose behind the ground lease is that nothing is forever. They believe that Cornell will be around for a long time. Land that is put into the ground lease program is land that they want to have long term control over. They would not put it in a 99 -year ground lease if they were not fairly sure that they wanted to exercise that privilege. They have the ability to give adequate notice and buy the house back. It is standard process. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 22 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Attorney Barney stated that the marketability of a piece of property that is only available assuredly for a 7 -year period, beyond that Cornell can say if they give a year's notice the occupants must vacate, is not the same thing as with a 99 -year lease. He wanted to make sure that the board was aware of it. If the board is comfortable with it, then it is fine. What was represented to the board from day one is that it was a 99 -year lease. It is not a 99 -year lease. It is a 7 -year lease from a legal standpoint. This is not what was represented to the board. It is a problem if the board is expecting a 99 -year lease. Ms. Egan stated that these are highly marketable. They have never exercised one of these. Attorney Barney stated that maybe true, but the day that someone signs the lease Cornell could say that they wanted the property back in 7 years. People would then need to be compensated. Another provision that is troublesome is limiting the additions to no more than 20% of the value of the house, discounting it because the property improvements are on a leased property as opposed to giving 100% of the fair market value. There are many things that are different from what was represented to the board. Ms. Egan stated that they did not write a special lease for this deal. Chairperson Wilcox stated that this might be important enough to have a special lease written. The board did agree to the proposed change. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she couldn't remember hearing anything about the other ground leases that Cornell has or anything about the 7 years. She always remembers hearing it was a 99 -year lease. She is very surprised. The board is hearing this for the first time. Board Member Ainslie asked if Historic Ithaca understands the 7 years. Ms. Egan stated that she did send the ground lease to their attorney. Ms. Egan stated that she is concerned because she would rather have the terms out in the open to the board. She does not want Cornell trying to get a building permit and Attorney Barney has said that he did not approve the ground lease. Cornell is then stuck without an avenue of recourse because it was left in the hands of one person who has already said he did not like it. The ground leases are the same. It does reflect the fact that this is a property that Cornell is willing to sell outright to someone. They do not put something on the 99 -year lease program unless they think it will be needed. She would rather have the board discuss it now rather than leave it to one person later. At the very least, she would like to have a contingency that this be hung up on a date that would keep them from starting construction. Board Member Thayer asked if and when the property becomes available that Cornell have the first option of refusal. Attorney Barney stated that it is in the lease. They do have a 15 -day time period to exercise that first refusal. A clause like that is difficult for the seller. If someone is trying to sell real property and someone wants to buy the house here is an offer. If the seller tells the potential buyer that they PLANNING BOARD PAGE 23 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED have to wait 15 days before they can accept the offer. By the time the 15 days are up, the buyer probably bought a different house. He would never permit his client to have that kind of right of first refusal placed on it. Mr. Whitham stated that Historic Ithaca chose their attorney and their realtor on their familiarity with Cornell University land leases. He knows that the attorney has received it. The attorney has not reviewed it and responded back. It is an issue that has been talked about between the realtor and the attorney. This would potentially lower the cost of the property and make it more difficult to sell it. They are looking forward to discussing it with their realtor and attorney. Board Member Ainslie asked what situation might arise where Cornell would give one -year notice to take the property back and resell it. Ms. Egan responded that it is not to take it back and resell it. It would be because Cornell needed it for something. Cornell might have a new President whose field is historic preservation and they would really want to live in the house. Board Member Ainslie asked if Cornell would do that even if the people who bought it from Historic Ithaca really wanted to stay there. Ms. Egan stated that she couldn't say what the administration would decide faced with something like that. The University is not just going to take the house back to be mean or because they thought they could sell it. Attorney Barney stated that under the lease they are not obliged to relocate them. Cornell could ask somebody to leave after 7 years. Legally they have the right. Ms. Egan stated that the ground lease program does give people ownership. For an area like this where people are used to conventional means of owning things it was difficult for people to understand. It has been around more. In Hawaii it is very common. There are very few people who actually own the land their house is on. Otherwise Cornell would only be able to go into short term leases where the owners did not have the equity at all. This was thought to be much better as far as giving people a stake in something. On one hand Attorney Barney is saying that people cannot sell the house for as much because it is on a ground lease. They also do not have to buy it for as much. It is very attractive to people who want to get into the housing market. Housing in Ithaca is very expensive. It is a plus. Board Member Ainslie asked for what percent less would this house sell on a leased property rather than on real property. Ms. Egan stated that it is written into the ground lease. They did some studies on this. It is thought to be about 20 %. They did not pay for the land. When they bought it, they bought it for less. They were also able to get into it cheaper. Board Member Thayer asked if Cornell pays for the taxes on the land. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 24 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Ms. Egan responded that the owner would pay property taxes. Board Member Thayer asked if the deed is Cornell's for the land. Attorney Barney stated that the title is Cornell's. Ms. Egan stated that the underlying title is Cornell's. Then there is a ground lease and then they have title to the improvements. They are the owners of the house, not the renter. Attorney Barney stated that once the improvements are made, they must remain. They cannot be removed. Board Member Thayer stated that Historic Ithaca is going to be the owner of the house. If Historic Ithaca is comfortable with the lease and the Town receives it in writing, then he is comfortable with it. Board Member Hoffmann stated that this is something that would have been helpful for the board to know about earlier. Chairperson Wilcox stated that this is a unique situation. Historic Ithaca is the one that must be comfortable with the proposed land lease. They are the ultimate buyers of the property. Board Member Thayer stated that if Historic Ithaca cannot get a buyer then the house is Cornell's. Board Member Ainslie asked if Historic Ithaca would be required to tell the purchaser of the house about the ground lease. Attorney Barney responded yes. Chairperson Wilcox stated that changing it from the Town's responsibility to come up with a lease the Town is comfortable with, to hearing from Historic Ithaca that they are comfortable does not change the dynamics. Board Member Thayer stated that it could be a condition in the resolution. Chairperson Wilcox stated that the board was comfortable with the 99 -year land lease. There was no question. It was like owning the land. No one took exception to it. Suddenly the board hears about some of the provisions. He would like to keep the verbiage the Attorney Barney suggested. Attorney Barney and Mr. Kanter know and understand what the board wants. Language must be submitted that meets their approval. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 25 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Hoffmann asked what about some of the other things that Attorney Barney hinted at that were problems. Are there other items? Chairperson Wilcox stated that he does not want to write the legal document. Board Member Hoffmann stated that she does hear that there are other problems. Attorney Barney stated that he would like to discuss this with Ms. Egan. It is unfair to Ms. Egan to just be finding out the concerns at the meeting. There maybe reasonable explanations for some of the terms. Then there might not be as many concerns as he thinks that there are. He does not have a problem with putting another flash point where it needs to be completed by. When does Cornell University plan on moving the building? Mr. Kiefer stated that another possibility would be the permit to relocate the house. Attorney Barney stated that it is reasonable. Mr. Whitham stated that their attorney and realtor are familiar with Cornell University ground leases. The variable might be the eventual selling process. He is looking forward to hearing from their attorney. Mr. Kanter stated that the Town's concerns might not be the same as Historic Ithaca's concerns. It might cause a problem for the deal to be made. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the Town's concern is not only with the initial passing of this property to Historic Ithaca, but they have to think about the future owners. Board Member Mitrano stated that Mr. Whitham is keeping it in mind. The value of the house goes down and the house becomes a great buy. More people might be interested in buying it. If there were some way that the Town can proceed with this, while holding the issues open giving the attorney for Historic Ithaca time to talk with his clients, Attorney Barney and Ms. Egan, it would be appropriate. Attorney Barney stated that he and Mr. Kanter could look at it. They can come back to the board if they come to an impasse. Chairperson Wilcox stated that they also want to be accommodating to Historic Ithaca. If they were not concerned about a specific clause that may concern the Town, then the Town would need to agree. Mr. Kanter stated that they would also need to be looking after the interest of the house. He does not think that they want to be seeing the house moved again. It is not the intent, but it could happen that way. If Cornell decides they need the property, then it would cause problems. The house might not be able to be moved a number of times. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 26 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Mitrano stated that it is not moving the house. It is who is going to own it. Chairperson Wilcox asked if the board wanted to pursue metered parking spaces and the number. Chairperson Wilcox stated that he did not want to pursue it. The North Campus Gateway is a concern. It is not a condition that needs to be met. Mr. Frantz stated that in the findings of the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals, they all state that while the north entrance is not a mitigating measure for this project, it is a very desirable initiative and should be pursued. It has been said by the Planning Board before. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the Town needs to do everything possible to reduce traffic on South Pleasant Grove Road and to investigate creative traffic calming devices. Board Member Mitrano asked how vague language works in the resolution. If someone makes an allegation that Cornell is not doing enough because someone thought they should do more. Mr. Frantz stated that it is not an action item. Chairperson Wilcox stated that it is a reaffirmation that the board feels that it is important. Mr. Frantz stated that he drafted a separate resolution regarding traffic counts. It could state that the Planning Board requests that the Town Board establish a program in coordination with the Ithaca Tompkins County Transportation Council to monitor traffic in the East Hill neighborhoods and other neighborhoods within the Town that maybe impacted by new development. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -17- Final Site Plan Approval Proposed Cornell University North Campus Residential Initiative. MOTION made by Larry Thayer, seconded by James Ainslie. WHEREAS: 1. This action is the Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for that portion of the proposed Cornell University North Campus Residential Initiative located within the Town of Ithaca, to be located on the west side of Pleasant Grove Road and south side of Jessup Road on all or parts of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No's. 67- 1 -1.1, 68 -1 -11.1, 68 -1 -11.2, and 68 -1 -12.2, in the R -30 Residence District comprising approximately 14.1 acres of land. The overall project in both the City and Town of Ithaca is proposed to consist of new dormitories to house up to 560 new students, a new "community commons" dining hall /student activities center, a new road connecting the existing South Balch Drive to Pleasant Grove Road, a new parking lot, three new soccer fields, four tennis courts and two basketball courts, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Cornell University, Owner /Applicant; Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf, Landscape Architects, Agent, and PLANNING BOARD PAGE 27 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED 2. This is a Type I Action for which the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has been designated to act as Lead Agency in environmental review, and 3. The City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review for said North Campus Residential Initiative and pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 has: 1) made a positive determination of environmental significance; and 2) overseen the preparation, completion and acceptance of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and a Final Environmental Impact Statement; and 3) issued its own Findings Statement with regard to said Project, and 4. The Town of Ithaca Planning Board, at Public Hearings on October 19, 1999 and at a regular meeting on November 2, 1999, heard verbal comments and reviewed written comments on the proposed project from members of the public, reviewed an application submission and a draft Statement of Findings for the proposed project, and discussed in detail the proposed project, and S. The Town of Ithaca Town Board, on December 13, 1999 did rezone the subject property from MR- Multiple Residence District to R -30 Residential District, which allows as Special Approval educational uses such as those proposed by the applicant, and 6. The Planning Board, at a subsequent Public Hearing on January 4, 2000, accepted additional public comment, and at an adjourned meeting on January 5, 2000 further reviewed and discussed the proposed project, comments from the public and other information, and 7. The Planning Board, acting as an Involved Agency with regard to site plan approval, pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617, on January 5, 2000 did adopt its own Findings Statement with regard to said Project, and 8. The Planning Board on January 5, 2000 did grant Preliminary Site Plan Approval, with conditions, for the proposed project, and 9. The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, acting pursuant to Article XIV Sect. 77 of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance did on February 9, 2000 grant Special Approval, with conditions, for the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Final Site Plan Approval for that portion of the proposed Cornell University North Campus Residential Initiative located within the Town of Ithaca, as proposed in a series of drawings entitled "Final Site Plan Review Submission to the Town of Ithaca" dated February 25, 2000 and including drawings entitled "North Campus Residential Initiative Site Plan" dated February 24, 2000; "Landscape Materials Plan" (Sheet L- 1, L -2) dated February 24, 2000; "Grading Plan" (Sheet L -3, L -4) dated February 24, 2000; "Planting Plan" (L -5, L -6) dated February 24, 2000; "Site Details" (Sheet L -8 through Sheet L- 17) all dated February 24, 2000; "Site Layout Plan" (Sheet C3), "Preliminary Utility Plan" PLANNING BOARD PAGE 28 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED (Sheet C4), "Misc. Plan" (Sheet C6), "Detail Sheet" (Sheet C7, C8), and "Profiles" (Sheet C9), all dated February 24, 2000; and "Electrical Site Plan (Lighting) (Sheet SE -2, dated October 15, 1999, said drawings being revised versions of drawings submitted by the applicant in a drawing set dated December 22, 1999, and other application materials, subject to the following conditions: a. preservation of the Cradit -Moore house shall be an integral part of the overall North Campus Residential Initiative project, such preservation to include relocation of the house to the site proposed on Pleasant Grove Road and refurbishing of the house in accordance with good historical preservation practices, including any requirements imposed by the State Historic Preservation Office; b. approval by the Attorney for the Town of any deed restrictions and any other documentation that would assure the Cradit -Moore House will be maintained in accordance with good preservation standards, prior to the issuance of any permits to relocate the house; C. receipt and approval by the Attorney for the Town and the Director of Planning of a written commitment from Cornell to provide all financing necessary to effect the moving and restoration of the Cradit -Moore House in accordance with the letter of resolution between Cornell University, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, prior to issuance of any building permits; d. receipt and approval by the Director of Planning and Attorney for the Town of the form of the 99 -year ground lease for the property on which the Cradit -Moore House will be located, prior to issuance of any permit for the moving of the Cradit -Moore House; e. receipt by the Town of Ithaca Building Department of copies of any building permits which may be required by the Village of Cayuga Heights to relocate the Moore House, prior to issuance of any permits required by the Town of Ithaca to move the house; f. completion of a Phase 2 archaeological investigation of the existing Cradit -Moore House grounds, prior to the commencement of any earth disturbance activity within the area identified as "Approximate Limit of Perceived Yard Space in the Moore House's Existing Condition" shown on the map entitled "Existing Conditions Moore House Site, Sheet 1 of 3'; dated September 29, 1999; g. submission of detailed sizing and final material specifications of all required improvements, subject to review and approval by the Town Engineer, prior to the issuance of any building permits; h. submission of an original or mylar copy of the drawing entitled "North Campus Residential Initiative Site Plan'; and Sheets L -3, L -4, L -5, L -6, C -3, C -4 and SE -2 to be retained by the Town of Ithaca; PLANNING BOARD PAGE 29 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED retention, protection of, trimming and arborist's care, for 2 years, of trees on the existing Cradit -Moore House site flagged to remain after the relocation of that structure; j. receipt of a copy of the drawing entitled "North Campus Residential Initiative Site Plan" dated February 24, 2000, revised to show locations of any proposed bus pull -offs as approved by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That it is the desire of the Planning Board that the development of a formal North Campus entranceway, while not an explicit part of the North Campus site plan, be continued to be aggressively pursued by the numerous involved agencies. AYES: Wilcox, Ainslie, Mitrano, Thayer, Howe. NAYS: Hoffmann. ABSENT. None. The MOTION was declared to be carried. AGENDA ITEMS: APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 4, 2000 & JANUARY 5, 2000. Chairperson Wilcox opened this segment of the meeting at 10:32 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -19 - Approval of Minutes — January 4. 2000 & January 5. 2000. MOTION by Fred Wilcox, seconded by Larry Thayer. RESOLVED, that the Planning Board does hereby approve and adopt the January 4, 2000 and the January 5, 2000 as the official minutes of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board for the said meeting as presented with grammatical corrections. THERE being no further discussion, the Chair called for a vote. AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Ainslie, Mitrano, Thayer, Howe. NA YS: NONE. ABSTENTION: NONE. The MOTION was declared to be carried. Chairperson Wilcox closed this segment of the meeting at 10:33 p.m. AGENDA ITEM: OTHER BUSINESS. Chairperson Wilcox opened this segment of the meeting at 10:34 p.m. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 30 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Chairperson Wilcox asked if anyone had an issue with the letter from Old Hundred. They are trying and they are making progress. Board Member Ainslie stated that they do have the sheeting off. They are near completion. Board Member Howe asked if they could make a motion for the proposed traffic resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -18 - Planning Board Recommendation to Town Board To Establish a System of Regular Traffic Counts. MOTION made by Fred Wilcox, seconded by Tracy Mitrano. RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby requests that the Town Board establish a program, in coordination with and if appropriate with the assistance of the Ithaca- Tompkins County Transportation Council, of regular traffic counts to monitor traffic volumes on roads within East Hill neighborhoods and other neighborhoods within the Town that may be impacted by new development. AYES: Wilcox, Hoffmann, Ainslie, Mitrano, Thayer, Howe. NAYS: None. The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously. Board Member Howe asked if the board could be updated on the moratorium and the work on the rezoning. He has lost track of where the Town is. Mr. Kanter stated that at the next meeting the board would be given an opportunity to make a recommendation to the Town Board on various aspects of it. The Codes and Ordinances Committee recommended to the Town Board an adoption of an interim local law since the moratorium is expiring that would address certain things covered in the moratorium. There would be a limitation on the size of businesses not to exceed 25,000 square feet. It would also prohibit drive - through businesses. This would be a temporary measure. They are trying to coordinate it with the Comprehensive Plan recommendations. There is a lot of work that still needs to be done for a recommendation. Board Member Hoffmann stated that the P &C sign is going to be a light box. On the Burger King lot, she thought that the three utility poles would be removed. They seem to have been removed, but now there is a new utility pole. It is next to the tree that was saved just south of the restaurant. The utility pole connects to a light pole in the group of the trees in the northwestern end of the lot. It must have been there before. It mainly lights the gas station area. Is there anything new about the Liquor Store sign? There is an empty bit of signboard over the drug store sign. The signs could be moved to the right to allow the Liquor Store to have a bigger sign. Attorney Barney stated that if Board Member Hoffmann has issues with the site plan then she needs to sit down with Mr. Frost and go over the site plan. PLANNING BOARD PAGE 31 MARCH 7, 2000 APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED - JUNE 6, 2000 - APPROVED - APPROVED - APPROVED Board Member Hoffmann stated that she feels the board made a mistake in creating a hardship for the Liquor Store. Attorney Barney stated that the Town couldn't tell someone to change their site plan. Mr. Kanter stated that the owners of the stores are having negotiations for the signs. Board Member Hoffmann asked if the board has seen where the snow is being piled. They are now piling the snow near the dentist office. Board Member Ainslie stated that they said that the snow would be hauled away. Chairperson Wilcox stated that Cornell University gave the Town a letter stating that they would remove the snow. Attorney Barney stated that the board could discuss the site plan with Mr. Frost or Mr. Kanter. If there are violations then it should go through Mr. Frost. Once the Planning Board has approved something, it is the responsibility of Building and Zoning. Mr. Kanter stated that there is a proposal to remodel the former CFCU space. The board could ask the question at that time. The snow is being piled where their customers would park their cars. AGENDA ITEM: ADJOURNMENT: Upon MOTION, Chairperson Wilcox declared the March 7, 2000 meeting of Town of Ithaca Planning Board duly adjourned at 10:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Carrie L. Coates, Deputy Town Clerk. �r ��r LETTER OF RESOLUTION AMONG TOWN OF ITHACA THE NEW YORK STATE PLANNING, ZONfNG, ENGINEFRING OFFICE OF PARKS , RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION, CORNELL UNIVERSITY and THE DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK REGARDING THE CORNELL UNIVERSITY NORTH CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL INITIATIVE WHEREAS, the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (" DASNY" ) will provide funding assistance to construct the North Campus Residential Initiative (" the NCRI" ) on the campus of Cornell University ("the University" ) in the City and Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York; and WHEREAS, the University is responsible for project planning, and the University and DASNY have consulted with the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP" ) under Section 14 . 09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law to assess the impact of this undertaking on historic resources; and WHEREAS, the NCRI proposal places new dormitories substantially contiguous to Balch and Clara Dickson Halls, which are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, and impacts the Moore House, which is also eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, in order to construct replacement playing fields and recreational facilities associated with these dormitories; and WHEREAS, the University has sought public comment and consulted both the City and Town of Ithaca, and cannot identify options that would avoid impacting the setting of the Moore House, and has worked with Historic Ithaca, a local not-for-profit organization, to develop and fund a proposal that carefully relocates the Moore House in an appropriate new setting, provides new utilities to the site, and repairs the structure' s exterior shell to protect the building; and WHEREAS, OPRHP has reviewed these studies and concurs with the University' s findings; ATTACHMENT #1 . I 1 y L r NOW, THEREFORE', in accordance ,with the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law, the University, DASNY and OPRHP agree that the relocation of the Moore House and the construction of . new dormitories substantially contiguous to Balch and Clara Dickson Halls may proceed subject to the stipulations set forth below. STIPULATIONS I ' A. The Moore House shall be relocated by a building mover with a minimum of 5 years experience in the relocation of historic properties . The . OPRHP shall be provided with at least 10 days notice, and afforded an opportunity to monitor the move. The relocation should be monitored by Mr. Stearns ' or another preservation consultant. The Moore House shall . be relocated to Pleasant Grove Road between #168 and #176 . The building will be oriented so that the front elevation faces, is generally parallel to and overlooks the road. The relocation will also include the following work items. All parts of the structure will be placed on a new concrete or masonry foundation with exterior stone facing above grade having the appearance of existing stonewhere visible from the road and appropriate footing drains; the replacement of deteriorated sills; the construction of a driveway from the house to the road; complete hook-ups to water, septic or sewer, electric and telephone utilities . 1) The retention and relocation shall not include the back porch which was enclosed in 1950, or the tool shed, unless a purchaser of the property commits to paying for either or both. 2) The retention and relocation of the 1938 garage with storage loft above is optional . 3) The preparation for the move shall include (at "old site" ) : a. Archeological coverage for all below-grade disturbance. Also, provide additional Phase II archeological investigations at the site, including 1 the excavation of an additional 90-100 shovel tests 2 r placed at 5-m (16=ft) intervals within the 10-m (33 ft) shovel test grid already established to identify the presence of any subsurface features (refuse, middens, outbuildings, gardens, etc. ) and the excavation of larger archeological test units under the south wing of the house, following relocation the house. b. The Moore House and its current ("old" ) setting shall be archivally , documented to local significance (HABS Level III) : (1) Drawings: sketch plan. (2) Photographs: minimum 3" x 5" negative photographic views of exterior and interior views . (3) Written data: architectural data form. (4) Documentation enumerated above will be provided for OPRHP review in draft form; once accepted, archival copies will be provided to the following regional historic and research repositories: (a) The Dewitt Historical Society of Tompkins County 401 East State Street Ithaca, New York 14850 607-273-8284 b) Finger Lakes Library System 314 North .Cayuga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 607-273-4074 4 ) The rehabilitation after the move of the existing house site shall include (at "old site" ) : a. Capping of all site utilities - and restoration of site. Cellar hole shall be filled and area graded, seeded and landscaped according to siteplan as approved by OPRHP. b. Retention, protection of, trimming and arborist' s care, for two years, of trees agreed upon and flagged to remain. 3 r B. The Moore House shall be rehabilitated in accordance with "The Secretary of the Interior' s Standards for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings." 1) The roof shall be repaired - in its existing configuration. Existing shingles will be removed, any deteriorated rafters or sheathing will be replaced,.., and new 25-year 3-tab asphalt roof shingles (color selected by future owner) will be installed. New half-round gutters will be installed at all roof areas . 2) Two existing chimneys will be reconstructed above the roof, or braced at full height for the move, to serve the furnace/heating, stove and fireplace. Appropriate locations include the location of the existing chimneys at the house' s north elevation and within the building' s south wing. Brick shall have little color variation and mortar will be cream or white, achieved through the use of lime and white (vs. gray) Portland cement. The house shall 'be provided with a new heating plant, new plumbing, and new electric underground service and branch circuits . 3) All existing north, east and south elevations shall be maintained as configured. Existing historic windows, siding and trim materials will be repaired where they are damaged, missing or removed. In kind replacement means required new elements will match their historic counterparts with respect to material, finish and all dimensions, profiles, configurations and visual/reflective qualities . New materials will be primed, historic material will be prepared for refinishing, ' and all surfaces will be repainted. Metal or vinyl windows, siding, soffit, fascia or, panning will not be installed. 4 ) Significant interior features shall be retained and repaired. Significant features include the material, finish and appearance of wall and ceiling, surfaces, chair rail .and trim. Any proposal for changes to the interior , should also respect the floor plan (the specific configuration, including window, door and stair location, and all dimensions, including ceiling height) . Only proposed changes in existing floor plans and additions need to be provided for OPRHP review and approval. 4 f 5) Any new insulation placed anywhere in the building must include a proper vapor barrier on the warm (heated) side, achieved through one of the following: a) foil faced insulation; b) bituminous- (tar) coated Kraft-faced insulation; c) a polyethylene membrane; d) a "vapor barrier paint" or other coating which provides a "perm rated" of 1. 0 or less . 6) Site grading, shrubs, grass areas (door yard spaces) and trees. are an integral part of historic landscapes in Upstate New York. They distinguish residential and agricultural areas, and provide the immediate setting for historic houses . Planting that recall conditions at the Moore House' s historic location will be planted. While the new work should reflect the general relationship (distance and- location) of existing trees to the house and each other, specific locations shall be determined by the future owner. All work shall be performed by Certified Nursery Professionals registered with the New York State Nursery and Landscape Association, Inc. Trees will be a mix, matching species and number found at the house' s current location to the extent allowed by the dimensions of the new lot. All planting must be Certified Nursery Stock: Collected planting will not be permitted. Trees shall be a minimum of 4" - 6" DBH (diameter at breast height) and B & B (balled and burlapped) stock. The plant pit shall equal 30" plus the ball diameter, and the tree must be fertilized after installation; wrapping and staking will occur at the discretion of the Certified Nursery Professional . The intent of this work is to have a well stabilized, healthy tree after two years; The Certified Nursery Professional will perform other work deemed necessary during installation to achieve this goal. The future owner -,gill be provided with written maintenance guidelines, including the removal of wrapping and staking if it occurs. C. The property will be transferred with protective interior and exterior covenants to Historic Ithaca. Once rehabilitated according tc the Secretary of the Interior' s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Pro erties, it will 5 r be transferred with protective interior and exterior covenants to a new owner. v D. Mitigation generally equals 3-5% of a project' s total cost, but can go as high as 7% . The FEIS (Final Environmental Impact Statement) states that Cornell has committed up to $40, 000 . 00 or approximately 0 . 050 of the $75, 075, 000. 00 in bonds requested from DASNY, for the relocation and rehabilitation of the Moore House. Relocation has been determined to be the best mitigation scenario for this property. Cornell shall be responsible for ensuring that the building is carefully moved and impacts are appropriately mitigated. EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT and implementation of its stipulations evidences that DASNY and the University have afforded OPRHP the opportunity to comment on this undertaking and considered its impacts pursuant to Section 14 . 09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation the Law. Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Date U By: (Authorized Signature) Cornell University Daae By: Harold D. Craft, Jr. Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Signature) Office of Parks, Recreation .& Historic Preservation Date By: (Authorized Signature) 6 r c 0 2 5 Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 17, 2000 TOWN OF ITHACA Village of Cayuga Heights PLANNING 70N!Nt,. FNGINEERING Board of Trustees Present: Mayor Anderson; Trustees, Dunning, Fleming, Kira, Bisogni, Kusse, and Meinhardt: Treasurer Silber; Attorney Tyler; Supt. of PW Cross; Police Chief Lansing; Fire Chief DiVenti; Clerk Kord. Others: Frank Collyer; Jean Reese, John Kiefer, Kathy Wolf, Andrea Dutcher, and John Gutenberger of Cornell Univ_; Jared Bisogni, and Bill Mackenzie, Ithaca High School students. Mayor Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM and opened the meeting to the Privilege of the Floor. John Kiefer of Cornell University asked to speak relative to the North Campus Residential Initiative. He had requested permission to subdivide a parcel of Comell owned land located on Pleasant Grove Road for the purpose of moving the Cradit-Moore House to that location. At present the rear portion of the "mother" parcel includes a lot under ground lease on which is situated the dwelling owned and occupied by Eric Patterson and T. Forbes. This parcel would be located between properties owned by John Homa and Robert Petrillose. He pointed out that the Cradit- Moore house would be donated to Historic Ithaca on a Cornell 99-Year Ground Lease with funding provided for moving the house. Historic Ithaca will prepare the site, which includes adding approximately 6 feet of fill to the site, execute the relocation and perform maintenance on the house. They will then sell the house as a single-family residence subject to the 99-year lease of the home lot from Cornell. The deed will have protective covenants to preserve both the inside aud outside of the house. He noted that some tree trirrunirig, as well as temporary overhead wire removal would be necessary at the time of the house relocation in May. He also pointed out that a couple of trees on the parcel will be cut down to accommodate the house, however the site plan includes plantings similar to those existing at the present location of the house. Zoning Officer Cross pointed out that there are no zoning violations in the plan under the present zoning ordinance, if the two improved parcels were subdivided out by separate titles in the future, and that since Cornell will remain the owner of the land, no subdivision is necessary under Section 13. (More than One Building on a Lot) of the Village Zoning Ordinance. It was the consensus of the Board to allow Zoning Officer Cross to issue the permit. There is on file with the Village Clerk Cornell's 11/30199 letter to the N.Y.S. Dormitory Authority (DASNY) outlining conditions Cornell will satisfy in completing the project. DASNY is to provide financing with State Historic Preservation Office over sight (SHPO). Frank CoK"ortiroll, equested an ate on the req ding fro ornell University for of the F ouse Project. Mayport at a letter of request been sent aski for a yearly contni tion. spo ed asking for more in ation from th illage, specifically ropertiethe Village Fire Dep ent and the n ber of calls in t past 5 yeaormation is being co cted by Mayor derson and Fire C ' DiVeenti and to Cornell shortly. 1 ATTACHMENT #2 CORNELL U N I V E R S 1 T Y Office of University Counsel 300 CCC Building,Garden Avenue Telephone:607255-5124 and Secretary of the Corporation Ithaca,New York 14853-2601 Facsimile:60725]-2794 (not for service of Impers) February 9, 2000 John C. Barney, Esq. 2D Town Attorney, Town of Ithaca Seneca Building West, Suite 400 F B 2 5 119 East Seneca Street Ithaca, New York 14850 TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING, ZONING, ENGINEERING RE: Cradit-Moore House Agreements Dear John: Enclosed please find two documents regarding the Cradit-Moore House, pursuant to the Preliminary Site Plan Approval. The first is a draft Declaration of Covenants. The second is a draft deed to Historic Ithaca for the transfer of the Moore House. After considerable thought, we determined that a stand-alone declaration of covenants was the most effective method for ensuring that the restrictions run with the house and the land of the future site. This document, to be recorded with the County Clerk, is intended to control in any subsequent transactions. Additionally, this stand-alone document preserves the covenants in the possible event that Cornell owns both the Moore House and land again in the future. The draft Deed -- Estate in Fee Simple on Condition follows our usual format for a deed to improvements subject to a ground lease. It attempts to separate the present location at 128 Pleasant Grove from the future Moore House site. As a result, the description of the house does not describe the Iand on which it is presently located, but refers to the lease of its future site. I do not yet have the description from T. G. Miller, so it will be inserted once available. If you have any questions regarding either document, please do not hesitate to call. I welcome any suggestions you may have. Very truly yours, Shirley K. Egan Associate University Counsel SKE:kI/nhp Enclosures �1 ATTACHMENT #3 l bcc: (w/Enclosures) Joni Carroll Jean Reese John Kiefer John Gutenberger Kathy Wolf Tom LiVigne 2 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, Cornell University, an education corporation chartered by the State of New York, c/o Real Estate Department, Box DH — Real Estate, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 (hereinafter "Cornell"), is the owner of a house, known as the Cradit-Moore House (hereinafter "Moore House"), described as follows: ALL the buildings and improvements consisting of an approximately 2,000 square foot two-story wood frame and clapboard structure, known as the Cradit-Moore House, with an asphalt shingled roof resembling a modified Greek Revival-gabled main block and side wing. Exterior appurtenances include garage, six over six double hung windows, a front door with transom and sidelights and Greek Revival eave and corner trim, an exterior porch added in 1950. The original structure, built in 1817 with substantial renovations in 1938, is currently located at 128 Pleasant Grove Road; and WHEREAS, the Moore House is currently eligible.for listing on the state historical register; and WHEREAS, Cornell may remove and relocate the Moore House pursuant to the final site plan approval of the North Campus Residential Initiative, issued by the Town of Ithaca on , as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Cornell intends to relocate or provide for the relocation of the Moore House; and. WHEREAS, Cornell is the present fee owner of land to which the Moore House is being relocated, hereinafter referred to as "subject premises," situate at [address], Village of Cayuga Heights, State of New York, and more particularly, the subject premises are bounded and described as follows: [alternatively - as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof:] [Metes and bounds description] ; and WHEREAS, Cornell intends to provide for maintenance of the historical eligibility of the Moore House through the proper transport and renovation of the house and the development and landscaping of the subject premises through this Declaration of Covenants; Cornell University, its successors, lessees and assigns in fee ownership of the Moore House and the subject premises, hereinafter collectively "Owner," declares as follows: A. As to the Moore House: 1. Owner covenants and agrees to move and renovate the Moore House in accordance with the requirements contained in the Moore House, Draft of Proposed Mitigative Measures, dated September 21, 1999], as set forth in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof, to mitigate the impacts of moving and renovating, including HABS III and photographic documentation, the final copies of which will be provided to the Dewitt Historical Society of Tompkins County and the Finger Lakes Library System; 2. Owner covenants and agrees to rehabilitate the Moore House in accordance with "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings," including, but not limited to, repairing and/or replacing exterior areas consistent with historical counterparts and modern construction practices. Repairs and replacement may be made to the roof, rafters, sheathing, gutters, chimneys, windows, siding, trim and molding. The repairs and replacement will not include metal or vinyl windows, siding, soffit, fascia or panning; 3. Owner covenants and agrees to rehabilitate the Moore House in accordance with "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings," including, but not limited to repairing and/or replacing interior areas consistent with historical counterparts and modern construction practices, including wall and ceiling surfaces, insulation, chair rail and trim, and preservation of the floor plan; 4. Owner covenants to maintain of the Moore House in accordance with the state and national historical preservation laws and guidelines, including but not limited to "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings." B. As to the subject premises: 1. Owner will perform certain alterations to the subject premises, in accordance with the requirements contained in the (Moore House, Draft of Proposed Mitigative Measures, dated September 21, 19991, as set forth in Exhibit "C", including addition of fill, site grading and planting of shrubs, grass and trees that reflect the historical conditions of the Moore House's original location, in a manner that ensures the survival of any plantings for at least two years; 2. Owner will prepare and maintain the subject premises for the Moore House through the construction of a foundation specifically for the Moore House, a driveway from the Moore House to the road and provide complete hook-ups to water, septic, sewer, electric and 2 . Y telephone utilities and any other underground utility work associated with the relocation of the Moore House including, but not limited to, underground hIeating,- plumbing, drainage and electric services; 3. Neither the subject premises nor any part of the same shall at any time be used for any purpose except as grounds for the Moore House; 4. No building or structure shall at any time be erected or permitted on said premises other than the Moore House, unless otherwise agreed by Historic Ithaca, its successor in interest, if any, or any other local historical preservation organization, if Historic Ithaca or its successor no longer exist and Cornell, including any appurtenances or additional structures including, but not limited to, a barn, animal shelter, shed, garage, fencing, or paddock; C. The covenants shall run with the land and the Moore House respectively. The covenants in Subdivision A shall run with the Moore House regardless of where it may be located unless it is destroyed by fire or other casualty beyond use as a historical building, as determined by Historic Ithaca, its successor in interest, if any, or any other local historical preservation organization if Historic Ithaca or its successor no longer exists, is condemned or taken by eminent domain, denied recognition as a historical building or is substantially altered by an Act of God or any other act not in violation of this Declaration, such that the building forfeits its status as a historical building listed on either the New York State or National Registers of Historic Places, or is no longer eligible for listing on either Register of Historic Places, in which case this restriction shall be void as to Moore House. The covenants in Subdivision B shall run with the subject premises if and so long as the Moore House is located on the subject premises and the covenants in Subdivision A are in effect; WITNESSEgH:: Cornell University hereby declares, that the Moore House and subject premises shall be held, sold, and conveyed subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth herein, and in "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings," the obligations under such constituting a covenant running with the land. Such covenants shall be binding on all parties having any right, title, or interest in the Moore House and subject premises whether by ground lease, lease, or fee transfer; their heirs, successors, and assigns. All subsequent owners shall be deemed to covenant by acceptance of a deed or ground lease, whether or not it shall be expressed in the deed or ground lease, to be bound by the obligations of this Declaration of Covenants and documents annexed hereto. .V 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cornell University has hereunto set its hand and seal on this day of February, 2000. CORNELL UNIVERSITY BY: HAROLD D. CRAFT, JR. Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) On the day of February, in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared HAROLD D. CRAFT, JR., personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as the Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Cornell University, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument by authority of the Board of Trustees of said Cornell University. Notary Public 1 4 DMFF Deed--Estate in Fee Simple on Condition THIS I91�DE�TZ1RE MADE the day of , Two Thousand BETWEEN CORNELL UNIVERSITY, an education corporation chartered by the State of New York, c/o Real Estate Department,.Box DH - Real Estate, Ithaca, New York, 14853, party of the first part, and HISTORIC ITHACA, INC., a not-for-profit corporation, located in the County of Tompkins, State of New York, at 120 North Cayuga Street, Ithaca, New York, 14850, party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of One and 00/100 ($1.00) dollar, lawful money of the United States, and other good and valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto the party of the second part, and assigns all the improvements currently located at 128 Pleasant Grove Road, but to be removed to the below described parcel, upon express condition that a certain Ground Lease between the grantor and grantee be and remain in full force and effect without default or other termination as provided therein, and filed concurrently herewith, but in any event for not more than ninety-nine (99) years, which estate is in Fee Simple on Condition and subject to the right of reacquisition by the grantor or its successors, which right is a future interest, ALL the buildings and improvements erected and described as follows: An approximately 2,000 square foot two-story wood frame and clapboard structure, known as the Cradit-Moore House, with an asphalt shingled roof resembling a modified Greek Revival gabled main block and side wing. Exterior appurtenances include garage, six over six double hung windows, a front door with transom and sidelights and Greek Revival.eave and corner trim, an exterior porch added in 1950. The original structure, built in 1817 with substantial renovations in 1938, is currently located at 128 Pleasant Grove Road. i TOGETHER with the appurtenances, fixtures and all the estate-and rights of the party of the first part in and to said buildings and improvements. EXCLUDING the plot, piece or parcel of land ;where the buildings and improvements are presently erected -known as 128 Pleasant Grove Road, the foundation, trees, and any other fixture to the land that is not specifically conveyed herein. SUBJECT NONETHELESS to all the terms and conditions set forth in a "Declaration of Covenants" executed the day of , 2000 by the Grantor herein and recorded the day of , 2000 in the office of the Tompkins County Clerk in Liber of Deeds at Page TO HAVE .AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns for the estate in Fee Simple on Condition herein granted forever on the condition that the party of the second part remove the said Cradit-Moore House, and other improvements from its present location on or before July 1, 2000, to the following described premises, which premises are subject to a certain Ground Lease to be filed concurrently herewith: -AND the party of the first part covenants that it has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to r be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. Page 2 e . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officer the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: CORNELL UNIVERSITY BY: HAROLD D. CRAFT, JR. Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) On the day of , in the year 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared HAROLD D. CRAFT, JR., personally known to me or.proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity as the Vice President for Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Cornell University, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument by authority of the Board of Trustees of said Cornell University. Notary Public SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN RESERVE THIS SPACE FOR USE OF RECORDING OFFICE Page 3 . sr r 21 vehicles entered and 18 vehicles exited the permit lot in the time frame. Similarly, 18 vehicles entered and 20 vehicles exited the metered lot. Existing traffic during the daytime off-peak at other locations where counts were taken are illustrated on Figure III.D.8.A—3: Off-Peak Hour Traffic Counts and are summarized as follows: Judd Falls Road/Forest Home Drive Intersection • eastbound on Forest Home Drive east of Judd Falls Road: 236 v.p.h. • westbound on Forest Home Drive west of Judd Falls Road: 34 v.p.h. • southbound on Judd Falls Road: 252 v.p.h. Forest Home Drive/Warren Road Intersection • northbound on Forest Home Drive north of Warren Road: 142 v.p.h. • southbound on Forest Home Drive south of Warren Road: 141 v.p.h. • northbound on Warren Road: 145 v.p.h. Forest Home Drive/Pleasant Grove Road Intersection northbound on Pleasant Grove Road north of Forest Home Drive: 191 v.p.h. • southbound on Forest Home Drive south of Pleasant Grove Road: 150 v.p.h. • westbound on Forest Home Drive: 268 v.p.h. Proposed Daytime Off-peak The 35 space metered parking lot will remain and the existing traffic pattern to this parking lot will continue. The pedestrian and transit oriented design of the project will result in a reduction of vehicular traffic to the site, especially during the daytime off- peak. The bus route is designed to bring users from central campus directly to the front door of Helen Newman Hall. Buses from central campus will stop at Helen Newman Hall approximately every ten minutes. The continuous, direct bus service to Helen Newman Hall will be faster than driving to Helen Newman Hall from central campus. It also eliminates the risk of losing one's parking space upon return,which is further incentive for using the bus.As a result,it is anticipated that the convenience created by the new bus routes and bus stop locations on South Balch Drive and at Helen Newman Hall will increase transit use and reduce vehicular traffic among users of Helen Newman Hall.The greatest reduction in vehicular trips will be those arriving from the south. During this hour the volume of traffic entering South Balch Drive from the south was documented as 25 vehicles per hour. It is probable that half of that traffic(say 12 v.p.h) will resort to the convenience provided by the new bus service. Of the 13 vehicles still accessing South Balch Drive from the south,50%will still enter South Balch Drive to access the meter lot and 50%, or 7 vehicles,will be diverted to the proposed lot. 2 Revision Avo 5/14199 Off-Peak Trak and Impact Supplemental Information c� ATTACHMENT #4 �, \ 1� Corresponding departures to the south would similarly be reduced and diverted(28 x 0.5 x 0.5 =7 v.p.h.). During this off-peak hour the volume of traffic accessing South Balch Drive from the north represents 39%of the total traffic on South Balch Drive. It is assumed that 39%of the traffic currently entering the permit lot is arriving from the north. It is anticipated that all of this traffic (0.39 x 21 =8 v.p.h)will be diverted to the new lot(via George Jessup, Pleasant Grove). Corresponding departures diverted to the new lot would equal 7 v.p.h. (0.39 x 18). Combined with the traffic diverted from the south,the total number of vehicles diverted to the new parking lot during this time interval will be 15 v.p.h. This represents a worse case scenario that assumes that vehicle trips arriving from the north will not be reduced by improved bus service. In fact,there is likely to be some reduction in trips from the north as well. Users of the community commons have been projected to generate 4 additional vehicles during this time period. Combined with the traffic diverted from the current permit lot, the total number of vehicles accessing the new parking lot off of Pleasant Grove Road during this time interval will be 19 v.p.h.Assuming a worse case scenario, since 60%of vehicles currently access South Balch Drive from the south,then 60%of 19 vehicles= 11 v.p.h. arriving from the south. Figure III.D.8.A—3: Off-Peak Hour Traffic Counts documents that 191 vehicles are currently traveling north on Pleasant Grove Road during this interval. The worse case result of this project would be adding 1 I vehicles to the existing 191 v.p.h. in this location. In fact, it is anticipated that the majority of users driving to Helen Newman Hall will continue to prefer the Thurston/Wait/Triphammer/George Jessup Road/Pleasant Grove Road route. This is due to the shorter travel times on that route. The travel time is a function of operating speed and distance traveled. Travel time from the Thurston Avenue/Forest Home Drive intersection to the new access drive off of Pleasant Grove Road is as follows: North on Thurston: 1.68 minutes (4,524 feet) East on Forest Home: 2.45 minutes (5,649 feet) This assumes travel at the posted speeds and does not take into account delay at intersections or the one-way bridge. Some users will choose the Forest Home Drive/Judd Falls Road/Pleasant Grove Road route. Summary of Proposed Daytime Off-peak: Bus service is estimated to reduce vehicular traffic to Helen Newman Hall.by 12 v.p.h. during the daytime off-peak • 15 existing v.p.h.will be diverted from South Balch Drive to the new parking lot off of Pleasant Grove Road • 4 additional v.p.h.will be generated by new uses in the Community Commons 3 _ 1 2 "nag Revision Two 5114199 Off-Peak Traffic and Impact Supplemental Information MAR 6 2000 February 23,2000 TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING,ZONING, ENGINEERING Mr. Jonathan Kanter Ithaca Town Planner 126 East Seneca Street Ithaca,New York 14850 Dear Jon, I understand that Cornell University(CU)will seek final site plan approval for the North Campus Residential Initiative(NCRI) from the Town of Ithaca Planning board on March 7th Unfortunately,I have a prior commitment on that date and will be unable to attend the Board meeting. Therefore, I am writing to you with the views and perspectives that I would present at the meeting if I were present. I have attended all of the public hearings and Board deliberations and I have read all the materials submitted by Cornell and others. I also attended the February 9th meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). My concerns relate to traffic in Forest Home (FH) and the plan to move the Cradit-Moore(C- M)house but I will concentrate my remarks on the traffic problem. Traffic Although some changes have been made in the traffic plan to address some of the concerns of Forest Home residents, I am still of the opinion that not enough has been done. Depreciating one community(FH)to enhance another community (NCRI) is not a very nice policy: 1. At the BZA meeting, Cornell talked more about eventually adding the additional 26 parking spots than they did about a possible new entrance to the University north of the A-lot, and making Pleasant Grove Road less of a through road. I also understand that Cornell has said-that they were not going to pay for a new entrance. 2. I don't know whether Cornell service vehicles and trucks (and buses) use Judd Falls Road routinely for travel but when the suggestion was made that CU issue a policy statement to its maintenance employees not to use Judd Falls Road for travel (except in emergencies)the idea was dismissed out of hand. 3. The report of the Cornell hired traffic engineer is suspect with its conclusion that the new road between Pleasant Grove Road and Helen Newman would reduce traffic flow in Forest Home. Counts were made at"peak times", i.e.,peak times for employees. As the former Associate Dean for Academic Programs in Ag & Life Sciences, I know that peak time for students activities is not 8 a.m. or 5 .� P.M.!!! ATTACHMENT #5 �� 4. Although CU may be unable to affect traffic generated through Forest Home (the airport or Marriott or Lansing may be responsible)it seems to me that Cornell should be asked to make extensive benchmark traffic counts in and around Forest Home. Let's at least have some data to help make decisions and have perspectives on traffic in the future. Before the Planning Board approves the final site plan,I believe that Cornell should agree to: a. Aggressively pursue a new campus entrance off of Pleasant Grove and do everything possible to reduce the traffic on"South"Pleasant Grove Road. Creative traffic calming devices should be investigated. b. Agree to extensive benchmark traffic counts in and around Forest Home. Community I believe in community and want to encourage Cornell to look for ways to blend with the community around it. Perhaps Forest Home should be designated a historic community,held up as an example of the past, and improved with Cornell's help. It could become a stop for future Cornellians and their parents during orientation, and a center of community open houses. In Summary I hope my fellow members of the Planning Board on March 7`h will ask Cornell to establish community support principles and make a commitment to try building new relationships. f Please ask them to: 1. Address the traffic problems in Forest Home by a vigorous commitment to jreducing traffic with a new campus entrance,benchmark traffic counts, employee directives, and Pleasant Grove Road changes. f 2. Work on an action plan with the Forest Home Community to make it special. Very truly yours, I George J. Co eman Member, Town of Ithaca Planning Board GJC/fsb Cc: Hunter Rawlings Fred Wilcox Bruce Brittain TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD 126 East Seneca Street Ithaca,New York 14850 J Tuesday,March 7,2000 AGENDA 7:30 P.M. Persons to be heard(no more than five minutes). 7:35 P.M. Brief update regarding plan modifications for the Paleontological Research Institution's proposed Museum of the Earth, 1259 Trumansburg Road,Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.24-3-3.1, Residence District R-30. Warren Allmon,Executive Director,Paleontological Research Institution, Owner/Applicant;David Herrick,T.G. Miller P.C.,Agent. 7:50 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for Cornell University's proposed North Campus Residential Initiative, located on the west side of Pleasant Grove Road and south side of Jessup Road on all or parts of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No's. 67-1-1.1, 68-1- 11.1,68-1-11.2,and 68-1-12.2, in the R-30 Residence District,comprising approximately 14.1 acres of land. The overall project in both the City and Town of Ithaca is proposed to consist of new dormitories to house up to 560 new students,a new"community commons"dining hall/student activities center,a new road connecting the existing South Balch Drive to Pleasant Grove Road, a new parking lot,three new soccer fields,tennis courts and basketball courts,and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Cornell University, Owner/Applicant;Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf,Landscape Architects,Agent. 4. Persons to be heard(continued from beginning of meeting if necessary). 5. Approval of Minutes: January 4,2000;January 5,2000(in packets). 6. Other Business. 7. Adjournment. Jonathan Kanter,AICP Director of Planning 273-1747 NOTE:IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD IS UNABLE TO ATTEND,PLEASE NOTIFY MARY BRYANT AT 273-1747. (A quorum of four(4)members is necessary to conduct Planning Board business.) i TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Tuesday,March 7,2000 By direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday,March 7,2000, at 126 East Seneca Street,Ithaca,N.Y., at the following time and on the following matter: 7:50 P.M. Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval for Cornell University's proposed North Campus Residential Initiative, located on the west side of Pleasant Grove Road and south side of Jessup Road on all or parts of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No's. 67-1-1.1, 68-1-11.1, 68-1-11.2, and 68-1- 12.2, in the R-30 Residence District, comprising approximately 14.1 acres of land. The overall project in both the City and Town of Ithaca is proposed to consist of new dormitories to house up to 560 new students,a new"community commons"dining hall/student activities center, a new road connecting the existing South Balch Drive to Pleasant Grove Road, a new parking lot, three new soccer fields, tennis courts and basketball courts, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Cornell University, Owner/Applicant;Kathryn Wolf,Trowbridge and Wolf,Landscape Architects,Agent. Said Planning Board will at said time and said place hear all persons in support of such matter or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual impairments, hearing impairments or other special needs, will be provided with assistance as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of the public hearing. Jonathan Kanter,AICP Director of Planning 273-1747 Dated:Monday,February 28,2000 Publish:Wednesday,March 1,2000 The Ithaca Journal Wednesday, March 1, 2000 TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Tuesda March 7 B direction of the Chairperson of the Planning Board, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by Ike Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday, March 7, 2000, at 126 East Seneca Street, 41-oca, NY, at the following time and on the following matter: 7:50 P.M- Consideration of Final Site Plan Approval For Cornell University s proposed North Campus Residential Ini- Iiative, located on the west side of Pleasant Grave Road and south sine of Jessup Road on all or parts of Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No's, 67.1-1 .1 , b8.1-11 .1, 68-1.11.2 and 68.1-12.2, in the R-30 Residence District, compeising approximately 14.1 acres of land.The over- all project in both the City and Town of Ithoco is pro- posed to consist of new dor- mitories to house up to 560 new students,a new"commu- nity commons" dining hall/ student activities center, a new road connecting the ex- isting South Balch Drive to Pleasant Grove Road, a new parking lot,three new soccer Fields, tennis courts and bas- ketball courts, and 'bicycle and pedestrian facilities.Cor- nell University, Owner( Applicant; Kathryn Wolf, Trowbridge and Wolf, Land- scape Architects, Agent. Said Planning Board wilt at said time and said place hear all persons in support of such matter or objections thereto. Persons may appear by agent or in person. Individuals with visual impoir- ments, hearing impairments or other special needs, will be provided with assistonce as necessary, upon request. Persons desiring assistance must make such a request not less than 48 hours prior to the time of theppublic hearing Jona#hon Kanter,AICP Director of Nanning 273.1747 Dated: Monday, February 28, 2000 March 1, 2.000 J TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARb ATTENDANCE SHEET DATE: March 7, 2000 PLEASE PRINTYOUR NAME PLEASE PRINTADDRE551AFFILIATION (Please PRINT to ensure accuracy in official minutes) 4 7 ,L . Ftl TC- rr T TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I, Sandra Polce being duly sworn, depose and say that I am a Senior Typist for the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County,New York; that the following Notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town of Ithaca and that said Notice has been duly published in the local newspaper, The Ithaca Journal. Notice of Public Hearings to be held by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in the Town of Ithaca Town Hall, 126 East Seneca Street, Ithaca, New York, on Tuesday, March 7, 2000 commencing at 7:30 P.M., as per attached. Location of Sign Board used for Posting: Bulletin Board, Front&Entrance of Town Hall. Date of Posting : February 28, 2000 Date of Publication: March 1, 2000 Sandra Polce, Senior Typist Town of Ithaca. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 1 st day of March 2000. Ck Notary Public " OF 7AH KELLEY ._ Notary' Public:State of New York No. 01 KE60-out 3 - rQualified.an Schuyler County� CommissionExpires May 17t 20..... ,f,