Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 1990-01-090 C FILED TOWN OF ITHACA TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 9, 1990 The Town of Ithaca Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, January 9, 1990, in Town Hall, 126 East Seneca Street, Ithaca, New York, at 7 :30 p.m. PRESENT: Chairperson Carolyn Grigorov, James Baker, Stephen Smith, William Lesser, Robert Kenerson (arrived late), Susan Beeners (Town Planner), Erik Whitney (Acting Town Engineer), John C. Barney (Town Attorney), George Frantz (Assistant Town Planner) . ALSO PRESENT: Arel LeMaro, Ellio LeMaro, Thomas Niederkorn, Jo Perry, Carl Sgrecci, Chairperson Grigorov declared the meeting duly opened at 7:40 p.m. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: PROPOSED "SHALEBROOK" SUBDIVISION, PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF APPROXIMATELY SIX STAGES, WITH STAGE I PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF 23 LOTS PLUS OPEN SPACE ON 29± ACRES, 1138 TRUMANSBURG ROAD, TOWN OF ITHACA TAX PARCEL NO. 6 -27 -1 -11.2, 152± ACRES TOTAL, RESIDENCE DISTRICT R -15. RICHARD AND JO PERRY, OWNERS; THOMAS NIEDERKORN, Agent, Chairperson Grigorov opened the discussion on the above -noted matter at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Niederkorn approached the Board and appended maps to the bulletin board. Mr. Niederkorn stated that it is proposed to subdivide the Perry Farm, Shalebrook, into residential lots and townhouse clusters in approximately six stages, adding that the initial stage will involve 23 single family lots on approximately 29 acres of land. Mr. Niederkorn said that other stages will involve single family detached housing or attached townhouse clusters and an adult-community, Mr. Niederkorn stated that [indicating on map] one of the concerns the Planning Board has revolves around Riley Drive, which cuts across the Perry property from north to south. Mr. Niederkorn said that the Planning Board thought that Riley Drive should take on more of the characteristics of a neighborhood connector, meaning that the design would be more conducive to rapid movement of traffic, and bigger volumes of traffic. Mr. Niederkorn commented that that kind of road would tend to diminish the design objectives, and the environmental objectives that the Perrys were seeking for their farm, in that they did not want to have fast traffic; they want to create a small neighborhood. Mr. Niederkorn noted that a modified design has been completed which he thought accommodates both of the above objectives of the Town, the Planning staff, and the Perrys. Planning Board -2- January 9, 1990 • Mr. Niederkorn pointed out on the appended map how the Riley Road portion, which goes from north to south across the middle of the Perry Farm, could connect down "here" as a' neighborhood connector to Mecklenburg Road, and possibly farther south, if that is deemed appropriate, adding, it could extend farther to the north through an existing right -of -way that gives access to the backland, swing up close to the West Hill Fire Station, then swing back and possibly intersect with Route 96 at the entrance to the Hospital, where there is traffic light control. Mr. Niederkorn also stated that there could be a neighborhood service road, which is a very low scale, strictly access to abutting properties type of road, which would come off Riley Drive and swing up the hill to service "this portion of the Perry Farm, then swing farther to the south going through the Ceracche parcel, and make some connection somewhere else. Mr. Niederkorn pointed out on the map another neighborhood local road going down the hill, possibly opening up "this" section of land between the proposed subdivision and the Perry Farm, Mr. Niederkorn stated that he thought it seems to work alright from a broader neighborhood kind of context. Mr. Niederkorn stated that the other thing the developer was trying to do was to limit the access onto Riley Drive, since it is supposed to be a road that is designed more for carrying traffic than serving adjacent land, adding, the developer tried to limit the amount of activity that would interrupt that traffic carrying function, and in order to do that the • developer came up with two cul de sacs; one of them is a totally independent one which would serve "these" 12 lots, and would come in off Bundy Road. Mr. Niederkorn said that a second one would come off Riley Drive and swing down to the south, and would serve the additional 11 lots. Mr. Niederkorn noted that the cul de sacs are 1000 feet each. Mr. Niederkorn offered that there are 23 lots, and the smallest one is 32,400 sq. ft., adding that six of the lots are larger than 50,000 sq. ft., with the largest one being 70,000 sq. ft.; six of the lots are smaller than 40,000 sq. ft., commenting that the other 50% are in the 40,000- 50,000 sq. ft. range. Mr. Niederkorn said that the upper area is the one that would be attemped first, and that is the cul de sac that goes back into the woods, commenting that no more treec than were necessary would be destroyed. Mr. Niederkorn said that all of the lots ulould have some natilral tree growth on them. Mr. Niederkorn stated that there is one Tot Lot which is jast over one acre, and which is at a relatively flat area along Williams Brook; the area would be improved by the Perrys as a Tot Lot, with the intention being that it would be turned over to the Town as a recreation facility at some time. Mr. Niederkorn offered that in order to gain access to the Tot Lot from all the lots the developer has an access easement along "these" properties. William Lesser stated that he thought the project was well is designed. Mr. Lesser mentioned preserving a buffer. Mr. Lesser, referring to the Deed Restrictions, stated that amendments or modifications may be made by votes of at least 75% of the owners, but, Planning Board -3- January 9, 1990 • conceivably, he thought it was possible that the owners could get together and overturn an issue. Mr. Niederkorn said that there is sort of a natural kind of buffer. Ms. Beeners, referring to the Deed Restrictions, and also to the Short EAF, stated that it was a little misleading to have it called a single - family residential subdivision when an accessory apartment could be provided. Ms. Beeners referred to Page 2, Item No. 20, in the Deed Restrictions "Owners of vacant lots are responsible for clearing the lots and keeping them mowed on a regular basis." Ms. Beeners stated that she had pointed out to Mr. Niederkorn that the above Item No. 20 was a little contradictory to the vegetation conservation measures that are mentioned elsewhere. Ms. Beeners then referred to Page 3, Item No. 23, in the Deed Restrictions "All plans for location, architectural style and exterior building materials of the initial homes on each lot, subsequent additions and modifications, and storage structures must be approved by an Architectural Review Board before construction may begin. Excessive excavation and fill should be avoided and the natural slope of the land incorporated in the site plans. On Lots 6, 7, 18 and 19 no construction shall occur within 50 feet from the high. water mark of the creek bed." Ms. Beeners noted that Lots No. 6 and 7, as seen on the air photo, look like they are fairly densely wooded, noting that it is a similar situation to what was encountered at the Southwoods Subdivision, where the Planning • Board did put some restrictions on the set -back from the mini gorge, which were not to the developers liking because they did reduce the ability to look over into the gorge. Ms. Beeners wondered if 50 feet would be okay, commenting that there would have to be some more discussion on the matter and go out and do some field checks. Mr. Niederkorn stated that the 'difference between this proposal and Southwoods was that there is a recognized trail at Southwoods for wildlife from a wildlife sanctuary, adding that he recalled the purpose for that set -back was so the wildlife using that pathway would not be alarmed by anybody out on their deck. Mr. Niederkorn stated that he thought there would be some kind of acceptable solution for the set -back. Ms. Beeners, mentioning Riley Drive, stated that it does appear that the developer will only need to construct that up to the point of Joseph Place until some period of future development, commenting, for the park site there should be some kind of vehicular access for maintenance purposes to get a pick -up truck down fairly close within that access easement. Mr.. Sgrecci wondered if it would have to be right along the same path of where Riley Drive ends. Mr. Sgrecci commented that there already is a natural path farm road that leads right up there. Ms. Beeners responded that that sounds good. Acting Town Engineer Erik Whitney stated that from an engineering standpoint there are two things which one may want to consider in the later phases of development, one being the intersection at Bundy Road /Trumansburg Road, with the possibility of maybe putting a gentle • horizontal curve, and relocating the eastern end of Bundy Road in such a fashion that it would intersect perpendicular, which would be better for the project's future road, and would straighten out a Planning Board -4- January 9, 1990 • long- standing problem between the Town, the State, and also the fire trucks, adding, it would make that intersection for the proposed future road, and residence, a lot safer. Continuing, Mr. Whitney said that any sewerage from the proposed development would be going across Trumansburg Road and into the ancient 10" hospital line. Mr. Whitney noted that the Planning Board had, earlier, requested from the developer of Indian Creek Farm, some sort of per lot charge, because that line is going to have to be replaced in the very near future. Mr. Whitney said that the line had been replaced when the TB hospital was located there in 1933. Mr. Lesser, directing his comment to Ms. Beeners, wondered what happens when the Perrys want to develop the southerly portion, i.e., the extension of Riley Drive. Mr. Lesser wondered what the next steps were that the Town would have to do to seek permission to cross the adjacent properties and build the roads. Mr. Frantz thought it would be safe to project into the next decade or so, that the property to the south would be developed. Mr. Sgrecci wondered about the comment that Ms. Beeners had made as to the future use of the farm buildings. Ms. Beeners replied that she was just trying to point out a possible change in use that the Town might have to think about in the future, adding that the Planning Board has been very concerned about the loss of agricultural lands. Ms. Beeners offered that it would be great if a stable use, or • something, could be retained there, and fit in with the zoning requirements. Ms. Beeners stated she also wondered whether the barns were suitable for some other type of re -use such as: would they some day be apartments associated with the adult residential community. Mr. Sgrecci asked Ms. Beeners to explain what she meant by stating the consideration of the loss of agricultural lands that presently have access to public water and sewer facilities. Ms. Beeners responded, just generally looking at West Hill land use, this is about the only active farm within the present water and sewer service area that does have immediate access. Ms. Beeners wondered if the Riley Drive right -of -way could be off -set enough so that there could be a separate bikeway developed at some future date. Mr. Sgrecci said that that is possible, but he would have to talk to the engineer about that. Mr. Niederkorn stated that the developer would not like to cut every tree in that 60 -foot right -of -way if he did not have to, although the Town specs now require that all the trees be clear -cut in the 60 -foot right -of -way. Mr. Niederkorn commented that if that was necessary for utilities, then the developer would have no objection. Mr. Whitney stated that the specs are on the Town Supervisor's priority for re- examination. Mr. Whitney stated that a revised set should be out in February 1990, or March 1990, Chairperson Grigorov asked if there were any other comments. There being none, Chairperson Grigorov declared the matter of the "Shalebrook" Subdivision Sketch Plan Review duly closed at 8:25 p.m. • AGENDA ITEM: REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING IMPROVEMENT WORK PROGRAM. Planning Board -5- • At this point, Ms. Beeners referred to Town of Ithaca Newsletter #32, adding that mailed out on January 10, 1990. January 9, 1990 the Draft version of the a clean copy would be Ms. Beeners said that the Town Board intends to establish two new committees to aid in the comprehensive planning improvement effort. A Comprehensive Planning Committee, composed of members of the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals and community representatives, will spearhead the effort, adding that the committee will report to the Planning Board and Town Board and will, in cooperation with the planning staff, have initial responsibility for finalizing a work plan for specific and immediate planning process improvements and for guiding the comprehensive master plan effort. Ms. Beeners stated that a Conservation Advisory Council will be established, consistent with provisions of NYS law, charged with advising the Planning and other Boards on the environmental impact of proposed development, adding that the council will also serve as a resource to the Comprehensive Planning Committee on matters concerning the environment and open space and agricultural land preservation. Ms. Beeners stated that it was her understanding that the CPC would have two members of the Planning Board on the committee. Ms. Beeners stated that she.did not think there were any specific Planning Board slots designated, at this time, for the CAC, however, she would • think it fairly important if there were an interested Planning Board member to follow the process, actually, of indicating some interest to be on the committee. Ms. Beeners remarked that the CAC would be making recommendations to the Planning Board on the environmental review of projects, commenting, its other role would be to work toward completing a conservation open space index and a natural resources inventory. Ms. Beeners offered that because of the two roles of the CAC committee it would be appropriate if there was a Planning Board volunteer. Ms. Beeners noted that the procedure for both of the above committees, as outlined in the Newsletter, would be for people to write to the Town Supervisor and express their interest, so that the Town Board could appoint them at the Town Board meeting scheduled for February 12, 1990. Ms. Beeners stated that there will also be a Codes and Ordinances Committee, and it is her understanding that the C &O Committee would be by appointment, adding that she thought if there were interest from anyone on the Planning Board they should express that interest, adding that two Planning Board members are needed on the C &O Committee, Mr. Lesser stated that he would volunteer for the C &O Committee, as he had been on the C &O Committee in the past, and would be happy to again serve. Chairperson Grigorov stated that if there was a particular committee any of the Planning Board members were interested in it would be a good idea to state it. Ms. Grigorov noted that three members on the Board were absent tonight. Attorney Barney stated that the Town Board wants to have the committees formed by February 1990, and certainly by March 1990. Planning Board -6- January 9, 1990 At this point, Ms. Beeners reported that Mr. Karl Niklas was appointed to fill the vacancy on the Town Board. Chairperson Grigorov asked if there were anyone who wanted to express an interest in the Comprehensive Planning Committee, Ms. Grigorov stated that later on two people would be appointed to that. Chairperson Grigorov stated that she thought the CAC is pretty important, and commented that all of the committees would be reporting to the Planning Board very regularly, probably at a discussion meeting. Chairperson Grigorov stated that, as she sees it, the Planning Board is going to be held responsible for the Comprehensive Plan, and it should be discussed with the Committee that is doing the work. AGENDA ITEM: OTHER BUSINESS -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT -- SCHEDULING Ms. Beeners reported on the matter of the Association of Towns Meeting to be held in New York City, and which happens to be scheduled for February 18 -21, adding, the Town Board approved a certain number of slots. Ms. Beeners said that there are several Town Board members who would be attending the meeting, and noted that there were also two Planning Board slots that were approved. Ms. Beeners said that the Town Board is looking for volunteers from the Planning Board to attend the meeting, adding, there is a great training session for new Planning Board members. Chairperson Grigorov stated that she would not mind attending. Ms. Beeners brought up the matter of the Planning Board vacancy. Ms. Beeners stated that, because of the conflict with the date of the Association of Towns Meeting, she would recommend that the Planning Board Meeting of February 20, 1990 be changed to February 27, 1990. Mr. Baker announced that he would not be in attendance at any of the Planning Board Meetings from February 27, 1990 to April 1990. Ms. Beeners added that she would put the above matter on the Planning Board Agenda of January 23, 1990. At this time, Ms. Beeners referred to the matter of 1990 Priorities, which were reviewed by the Town Board January 8, 1990, and were approved, essentially, as a working list, not something that is set in stone for the entire year. Ms. Beeners stated that the list was basically drafted by the Town Supervisor who had asked for input from all of the Town staff. Ms. Beeners stated that Administrative and Review Fees is something that is a big priority item, and which she believed would be scheduled for a report at the Town Board Meeting in February. Ms. Beeners reported that she had presented the proposed work plan to the Town Board on January 8, 19900 Ms. Beeners stated that the Town Board passed a resolution to the Planning Board which • essentially was: "Whereas: the Inlet Valley Area is planned for water and sewer extensions in 1990 and, Whereas: development pressures are imminent in that area and the Town Board requests that the Planning Planning Board -7- January 9, 1990 • Board make recommendations on any planning studies, or other action items that should be conducted in that area." Ms. Beeners offered that the above is the gist of the resolution and legislation. Ms. Beeners felt that the Inlet Valley Area should really be scheduled for the next Planning Board work session type of meeting. Ms. Beeners mentioned the work pertaining to the Inlet Valley Area that was done by two Planning Department interns, Laura Marsh and Kevin Quist. Ms. Beeners stated that, actually, the two interns got into proposing some rezoning, adding that she felt this needed some refinements. Ms. Beeners stated that there is a lot of information on the critical areas of Inlet Valley for which development should be very severely limited, as well as draft site plan review improvements. Chairperson Grigorov commented that there is a lot of work planned in the 1990 priorities. Mr. Lesser commented that he agreed with Chairperson Grigorov. Mr. Lesser remarked that when one looks at just the things that are sort of scheduled to be done over the next three or four months, it is kind of overwhelming, and it is also pretty clear that the Board is operating in somewhat of a reduced capacity. Mr. Lesser suggested a slightly different approach in that, pick an area and try to put a lot more resources, a lot more groups behind it, and try to accomplish something, rather than to begin a whole range of aspects of a project simultaneously. Mr. Lesser noted that it can either be done comprehensively, and follow the whole thing sequentially through, or one can complete one aspect of it, and then start another. Mr. Lesser stated that he was a little leery of trying to undertake all of the • activities simultaneously. Mr. Lesser pointed out that that Ms. Beeners was, very correctly, talking about a two -year plan of work. Mr. Lesser wondered about environmentally sensitive areas, and how long it would take to put something together. Ms. Beeners responded that the area of environmentally sensitive areas, and natural resources, probably would be the most tangible and achievable thing to accomplish this year, adding, have that be codes, as well as some planning things, so that there could be an adopted open space index, certainly by the end of 1990. Ms. Beeners presented a general work schedule for the CPC, C &0, and CAC, and noted a few places where there would really have to be some kind of regularly occuring public information meetings. Ms. Beeners indicated that all three committees would be refining their work programs independently during the first month or so of their establishment. Ms. Beeners commented that also during the first three or four months, the planning staff should be able to present an information update dealing with, essentially, all the data available at the present time. Ms. Beeners stated that it appeared to her that in March of 1990 the Planning Board would probably see the Town Board authorize the retention of a consultant, with a consultant hopefully on board April 1, 19900 Ms. Beeners stated that she felt that by October of 1990 some master plan alternatives would be drawn up, considered, and developed into, essentially, a master plan, with review into 1991. Ms. Beeners stated that she was hoping to target September or October of 1991 for final adoption of a master plan and any policy plan elements that might be in it, adding, something that is really important in all of this is that it is expected to have a geographic information system that would be fairly.complete and usable Planning Board -8- January 9, 1990 • in refining the master plan draft about in January 1991, Ms. Beeners stated that the real intent was that after adoption of the master plan there could be some more specific work done as far as capital improvement programming, and means to identify impacts and assess impacts back on developers. Ms. Beeners said that, meanwhile, the C &O Committee would basically be going through some kind of a cycle of prioritizing a work .program, and transmitting drafts on some kind of a routine basis to the Planning Board, or Town Board, for adoption. Ms. Beeners said that the work of the C &0, and also the work of the CAC, should be cognizant of whatever results there might be coming out of the survey. Ms. Beeners stated that C &O Committee work is fairly predictable, there should be a package of modifications presented every few months, and, as master plan drafts were put together they would get a little more heavily into what there might be as possible major zoning changes. Ms. Beeners said that she hoped the CAC would be able to work on defining a budget application to the State, where about 20% reimbursement is available. and would be reviewing the information available on natural resources, and on conservation mechanisms. Ms. Beeners stated that she would think that the CAC would have to interact with the C &O Committee in possibly proposing some draft priority code work dealing with conservation. Ms. Beeners said that the main types of projects the CAC should probably deal with on the planning basis would be open space index conservation overlay, completing the stream corridor management plan, and starting up a preliminary update of the park and open space plan that could fit into • the master plan. Ms. Beeners stated that she has targeted December 1990 or January 1991 as adoption of an open space index. Ms. Beeners said that the CPC, under the arm of the Planning Board, would be the ones who would be trying to refine the whole multi - committee work program. Ms. Beeners offered that, given the responsibilities the existing planning staff has, and the type of work the technician position will have to be dealing with, there will be a lot of work for the planning staff. Ms. Beeners introduced John Czamanske, the current planning technician. Ms. Beeners noted that John has a Masters Degree in City and. Regional Planning, adding that John was recently involved in a comprehensive planning process in Chenango County, Ms. Beeners commented that a consultant would work, primarily, with the CPC, but would also have some impact on the types of work the other committees would do. Mr. Lesser wondered what the role of the consultant would be. Ms. Beeners responded, general advisement on how to conduct this type of a multi - faceted type of a program; the procedure and format for a master plan; draft language as requested, as far as codes go. Ms. Beeners stated that she sees it as a fairly broadly defined role. Mr. Lesser remarked that it almost sounds like an experienced staff person for the CPC, and which he thought would be very appropriate. Mr. Lesser commented that, if the consultant route is being considered, then the things that need to be done first are to think a lot about how the CPC is going to be structured, and how it would interact with the Planning Board, if, indeed, it is the Planning Board's responsibility, and, secondly, one needs to think about who that consultant is going to be. Attorney • Barney offered that the two main areas the C &O Committee would be working with would be the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivision .7 • Planning Board -9- January 9, 1990 Regulations, both of which require the Planning Board's review, and input, before the Town Board takes action on the Zoning Ordinance. [1990 Priorities attached hereto as Exhibit 11. Chairperson Grigorov wondered Conservation Advisory Council. At Smith volunteered to serve on the Chairperson Grigorov stated that she the CPC, about having two members on the this point, Board Member Stephen Comprehensive Planning Committee, would be interested in serving on Attorney Barney offered that it was under discussion to update the entire Personnel Manual for the Town. Ms. Beeners stated that the Town Board would be establishing the CPC and the CAC appointments at their February 12, 1990 meeting. The following memorandum to the Town Supervisor was drafted by the Planning Board. "MEMORANDUM TO: Shirley Raffensperger, Supervisor FROM: Planning Board RE: Suggested Organization of the Comprehensive Planning Committee -- Planning Board, January 9, 1990 DATE: January 11, 1990 The Planning Board recognizes the Comprehensive Planning Committee as the principal functioning body in the preparation of the Draft Comprehensive Plan; and recommends as follows: a. That the CPC consist of no more than six (6) members composed ideally of the Town Supervisor, the Chair of the Planning Board, or designee, the Chair of the Zoning Board of Appeals, or designee, and two (2) or three (3) public members, plus staff support as requested. b. That the CPC recommend to the Planning Board and Town Board on the selection of a consultant whose primary responsibility would be to work directly with the CPC. c. That the CPC consult with, report to, and make recommendations to the Planning Board as to the Comprehensive Plan Program and work schedule." At this point, James Baker expressed an interest of serving on the Conservation Advisory Council as the Planning Board representative. Planning Board -10- January 9, 1990 • It was the consensus of the Board that the Planning Board Meeting scheduled "for February 20, 1990 be moved ahead one week to February 27, 1990, because of the Association of Towns Meeting to be held in New York City February 18 -21, Ms. Beeners stated that the interviewing of potential candidates for the Planning Board vacancy is tentatively scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. on February 27, 1990. ADJOURNMENT Upon Motion, Chairperson Grigorov declared the January 9, 1990, meeting of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board duly adjourned at 11 :00 Pam* Respectfully submitted, Mary Bryant, Recording Secretary, Nancy M. Fuller, Secretary, Town of Ithaca Planning Board. t 0 DRAFT 1990 PRIORITIES Initiate work plan and implementation strategy for: 1) a comprehensive master plan document 2) concurrent strategic improvements to planning elements 3) revisions to codes 4) special studies Develop master calendar of regularly reoccurring tasks, procedures, obligations Develop compliance checklists - .4/90 Authorize student study. of Town Hall interior design, space:_ utilization - 2/90 Develop proposal for improved records management - 6/90 Consider administrative and review. fees, Planning,- zoning, Engineering, Legal - 2/90 �. - -- Consider increase in permit fees, consider fees for Temporary_. - - - Certificates of Occupancy. - 2/90 ' Revise interim road specifications 4/90. Complete Tnmensburg Road Sewer Extension agreement with City and Cornell University - 2/90 — complete conveyance, certain water mains and sewer lines,'by County and Hospital to Town of Ithaca - 1966 CB resolution, 1988 Dates. Drive negotiations Prepare plan for water tank security, hydrant testing and painting and ROW maintenance Prepare schedule for PRV vault and telemetering pit maintenance complete as-built-drawings for 1987 water and sewer projects Inlet Valley water and sewer construction - Summer '90 . r � GQ� -�y� �-'- �Q � � • wrJ� �� ✓5 br n..(�,�.. l�l (-vr u c�.Q. EXHIBIT 1 J i�r' t 0 DRAFT 1990 PRIORITIES Initiate work plan and implementation strategy for: 1) a comprehensive master plan document 2) concurrent strategic improvements to planning elements 3) revisions to codes 4) special studies Develop master calendar of regularly reoccurring tasks, procedures, obligations Develop compliance checklists - .4/90 Authorize student study. of Town Hall interior design, space:_ utilization - 2/90 Develop proposal for improved records management - 6/90 Consider administrative and review. fees, Planning,- zoning, Engineering, Legal - 2/90 �. - -- Consider increase in permit fees, consider fees for Temporary_. - - - Certificates of Occupancy. - 2/90 ' Revise interim road specifications 4/90. Complete Tnmensburg Road Sewer Extension agreement with City and Cornell University - 2/90 — complete conveyance, certain water mains and sewer lines,'by County and Hospital to Town of Ithaca - 1966 CB resolution, 1988 Dates. Drive negotiations Prepare plan for water tank security, hydrant testing and painting and ROW maintenance Prepare schedule for PRV vault and telemetering pit maintenance complete as-built-drawings for 1987 water and sewer projects Inlet Valley water and sewer construction - Summer '90 . r � GQ� -�y� �-'- �Q � � • wrJ� �� ✓5 br n..(�,�.. l�l (-vr u c�.Q. EXHIBIT 1 J