Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 1979-08-24 CASEY & KING ATTORNEYS AT LAW 306 N . TIOGA STREET P. O . BOX 767 ITHACA , N . Y. 14BSO EDWARD J . CASEY (ISSS - 1967) TELEPHONE AR 3- SS77 EDWARD W. KING AREA CODE 607 August 24 , 1979 Town of Ithaca Planning Board Town Hall East Seneca Street Ithaca , NY 14850 Re : Swanson Sub -division Compton Road Gentlemen : I represent Gustav A . Swanson in the matter of his application to split off a one + acre unimproved building lot , and a one + acre small parcel containing an existing dwelling , both on the south side of Compton Road ( and Compton Road Extension ) out of his 80 -acre par - cel 45 - 1 - 1 . 2 . The small dwelling has existed at the easterly end - of Compton Road since the early 1960s and is designated No . 155 Compton road on the Survey made August 4 , 1966 , a reduced copy of which is sub - mitted herewith , such improved parcel being shown as " B" thereon . Lot " A" thereon is unimproved . Re : Environmental Assessment : no construction is contemplated by the Owner this minor sub -division request , the purpose being to sell off the improved Lot " B ". with its existing building , and to of - fer Lot " A " as a residential building lot under the R - 30 Zoning in effect there . It would be up to the purchaser of Lot " A " to decide what kind of residential building he would want to construct , and where upon that lot . That being the case , I can only point out general information on the Environmental Assessment Form. Them are conifers planted on Lot " A " ( 8�Llon'g the westerly side of Lot " B " ) , and a small ( usually dry ) creek runs along the southerly line of Lot " B " and perhaps in part along the southerly line of Lot " A " . But the lands are gently sloping westerly towards Danby Road , and present no severe grade or contour which would seem to be of significance in the matter of ad - ding a residential structure . Lot " A " ( the unimproved building lot ) presents no unusualefea - tures or problems for use as a single residential building lot , ex - cept Perhaps . for the fact that it is planted in conifers , and a con - struction site and yard area would have to be cleared and developed as a lawn and Yae.d area . Y very T 1 Edward W . Kin EWK : cah t � . Project # TOWN OF ITHACA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM To be completed and submitted by the applicant . Comments may be written next to the _ question or on additional paper . Date - yG ) s > q GENERAL INFORhATION nn 1 . Applicant GusT'6V A % 5W41VS04/ j9Y b "' K,Ne Phone _`/a ATry J6IuK6HCr 273- 97S"> 7 Address rrf fo, JU k JAI Q , 30 S Property owner (,Y'Yr -rAy t EvAbiE ./1vuld-Zoll Phone Address - �'o RT Co LL INS - , Co Lo . 2 . Location of Proposed Action (Write Address / Tax lot ; Attach USGS topographic map with affected lands outlined . ) JS`S` comp Toff 12e . Irf/Acg� At, K 5� r ark � S- ! - � • r', `' 'B 3 . Proposed Action U ( Vb & # " 1 m / L6T S( Q�_�OM p5ciy ►� (o1 1.S"X o20a '+ Aa� dor �LoNr� rNiN�t '6'V5r && Ywst' � GAkA&6 L6r " GNM1P�d --a LeAVING 4800%r 90 " UNIMPkDUED `To 46)95T,91 %50Vr - � . Activities and types . of operation resulting from the completion of the proposed • action . 12026 / 844- Ce, (sr9vc_ un . 1 (IF 61KE NOys& oN /or A r So tir a TrAf QT iy 71L P47 L`LZA -i�urr� . IDENTIFICATION OF PROPOSED ACTION Site plan & USGS map 5 , State the time schedules ' for the proposed action : P/.gNVV&p Planning - Construction Design , Documents Finished site work & grading AR 68AAeAty Preliminary site work wIYN-la MOS . 4LACR S)'-AX 6 . Describe the proposed construction techniques to be used if building or site ,y development is involved . Show locations and routes to be used on the site plan . / Grading and excavation including equipment vehicles and explosives to be used . U60 4 l-. 9 S I ma Trl L mod, 6- /*)/,/ Transportation of materials to site Disposal of waste: .materials Proposed chemical treatments , such as herbicides , dust control etc . Special techniques to overcome unusual conditions Me owayy AL c610/ 0 1 r/0eys h0*6Wj4/ 7 . Describe the type of proposed building and site materials to be used . Ate PAEsrvr P4 v Foundation �'Q pEVEtor Structure HVAC Energy sources Siding Insulation _ Windows and Glass Roofing Pavement Vegetative cover 8 . Total area directly modified by proposed action acres . 9 • Total area covered by impervious surfaces : ✓ 114 r N1 roofs 200460 sq .. fto parking acres roads _. acres 10 . Gross building sizes : J present total P'Zov sq . ft . no . of bldgs no . of fl.00rs /bldg ->_. proposed total s'q . ft . no . of bldgs no . of fl. 00rs /bldg future total sq . ft . no . of bldgs no . of floors /bldg 11aNumber of proposed dwelling units . Number of proposed commercial units IIYY Sizes of . units Sizes of units 1 Parking $ Existing " spaces proposed spaces Traffic generated / day (Note : Indirect Contamination Source Permit may be _ required ' if. 1000 spaces provided , 13 • Show proposed signs on site plan 41 /VC,;7 Size sq . fto height above ground : top :t . ; bottom ft . - Wording : 14 Show proposed lights and other poles on site plan . 0410A Height above ground ft . Total lumens 15 . Name potentially hazardous materials , such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives to be used or disposed during or after proposed action i Al 0 / 1E( Purpose of materials (Note : Permits are required from DEC and T . C . Health Dept . ) 16 . If the resulting activities are either commercial or industrial use , write the `materials to be transferred to / from the site , their frequency , and the mode of transportation . Imported materials _ frequency mode. Exported materials frequency mode 17 . Describe project history including controversy perceived by the developer , litigation , court decisions , etc . __ t A Ale h4:� 15y FQ COMMUNITY FACTORS AND IMPACTS 1 ' Designated zoning of the site of the proposed action R , 3 19 . Zoning changes or variances being requested AM 4/ � 2Q . Check if the site of the proposed action is . within or next . to the following Districts or Areas : Agricultural District Historic Preservation District Floodplain ( HUD designated) Unique Natural Area Freshwater Wetland 21 . Check which land uses describe the neighborhood character . Single-unit residential Recreation Multi-unit residential Agriculture Commercial Forestry Woodland Industrial Wildlife / Conservation Institutional Inactive Transportation Other 22 . Check which public services are being requested or provided . Sanitary Sewage M Gas Water Electricity Storm drainage Telephone • (Note : Permits may be required from municipality for hook-up . ) 23 . Check which transportation facilities will serve the site_ of the proposed action . State Highway Sidewalks On-street parking County Highway One-way traffic Off street parking Town Highway Two-way traffic Bus systems City / Village Street Traffic lights 1 24 . Number of existing buildings affected by the proposed action Show on the site plan . 25 . Name affected buildings or districts known to be historically or archeologically important or which are listed on the Register of Historic Buildings . D /V E Show on the site plan . NATURAL FACTORS AND IMPACTS 26 . Depth to bedrock at site of proposed action . ( Check more than one if necessary) NIA Up to four feet depth Four feet to ten feet Greater than ten feet If bedrock depth is less than ten feet check type of bedrock existing at site of proposed action Shale Thinly bedded shale and siltstone Siltstone or sandstone Limestone 3 28 . Check types of topographic features which describe or are found on the site . level or gently rolling plains hilltop hummocks with small . ponds hillside glens and gorges valley bottom 2g , Name the soils as identified in the Soil Survey of Tompkins County which are found on the part of the site proposed to be modified . Initials may be used . 30 . Briefly describe the nature and extent of proposed modification of existing slopes or soils or drainage Yes No 31 . Will any wetlands or adjacent areas be modified by the proposed action ? If so , designate on the site plan the wetlands which will be affected . (Note : "Wetlands ". : permit from administering agency required for alteration . ) ' 32 . Will any - streams be modified by the proposed action? If so , designate on the site plan which - streams - will be ' modified . (Note : "Dam" or " Disturbance " permit from DEC is required for modifications . ) waste Will any /materials or effluent be discharged into a stream or groundwaters ? If so , designate on the site plan the streams which will be .aff ected . (Note : SPDES permit from DEC is required for discharges . ) 34 . Do any of the following types of vegetation exist on the site of the proposed action ? " " cor /1 x' Stands of mature trees greater- than 30 feet tall . Ofs 7WC V1V1#11P2ov6b 4oi ' It Young tree . species less than 30 feet tall-. Shrubs Terrestrial plants up to two feet high Ferns , grasses , sedges , rushes Aquatic plants Crops 35 • Are any vegetative management techniques currently being practiced on the site of the proposed action ? 36 . X � Will any trees or shrubs be removed by the proposed action ? (6p 50 Q �� If so . designate on the site plan the area that is to be affected . BUIL- ol V� Noc O M ?-#C_ ONE- ZVi 37 , Are there any plans for revegetation ? If so , briefly explain . 38 . To your knowledge , . are there any rare , endangered or unusual vegetative species which are located on or near the site of the proposed action? If so , how are ' they distributed ? 39 • Will activity cause a change in or affect visual character of natural or / cultural landscape features ? C15xcaor 4s / llovxc oiv r�116 Swac o/NG Lor RAuLo ASa 4 Yes No To your knowledge , are there any significant wildlife habitats , migration routes or breeding areas located on or near the site that might be affected by - the proposed action ? 41.0 . To your knowledge , are there any rare , endangered , endemic or unusual wild- life species which are located on the- site of the proposed action? If so , how are they distributed ? 429 To your knowledge are there any known unique natural features on or near the site of the proposed action ? If so , briefly explain . 43 . Will any of the following emissions be produced by the proposed action or its resulting activities ? If so , describe the cause . Ashes Dust Fumes Odors Smoke Other emissions (Note : Air Quality Permits from DEC or T . C . Health Dept . may be required . ) t• Will there be changes to existing noise or vibration levels due to the proposed action or its resulting activities ? If so , describe the cause . SOCIO-ECONOMIC : FACTORS AND IMPACTS NIA- 45 . Number of employees during construction N Maximum number of employees present at the site at one time /� 46 . Number of employees during activities after completion N1 47 If resulting activities are for either industrial or commercial use , state the N employment shifts and number of employees in each shift . Shift Empl Shift ----- Empl _ Shift Empl Shift Empl 48 . If the resulting activities are for residential use , state the number of planned residents . Permanent / R9 21 Y Seasonal AY N 49 . Briefly describe the nature and amount of indirect growth anticipated as a result of the proposed action or resulting activities . 50 . Existing community or business or facilities or residential structures requiring relocation . 5 If the focus of resulting activities is for residential use , check if residence is intended for : low income segment high income segment families medium income segment H students r5elderly 52 . Will proposed activity substantially change the following socio-economic population distribution? Nom income ^' � '�✓E , ethnic background race 8 age 53 . State the current full assessed value : g Site �a 0 Buildin s 54 * State the probable full assessed value after completion of the proposed action . Site � 0, orig Buildings ©� Comments . 55 • In your judgement , will the proposed action result - in a significant environmental impact during construction and / or during use after completion? Governmental Agencies . 56 . Check the levels of government ana name the agencies having jurisdiction over the proposed ' action . Indicate the required permits by stating "yes " or "no " • if permit has been approved . ( The following pages of the advise on the types of actions *which require particular permits . ) Feder4l Permits National Pollution Discharge Elimination System . EPA, Region II , NYC Activities in navigable waters . Corps of Engineers , Buffalo 0 Other State Permits Certificate of Compatibility - and Public Need : PSC , DEC Albany (public Utilities ) Dam / Impoundment Construction or Repair : DEC - Envir . Quality Unit , Cortland Disturbance of Stream Bed / Fill of Navigable Waters : DEC -EQ . Unit , Cortland MA Incinerator Construction or Operation : DEC - EQ Unit , Syracuse. Indirect Air Contamination Source : DEC-EQ Unit , Syracuse Mining . DEC-Mineral Resources Bureau , Albany Pesticide Purchase , Use ( 7 permits ) : DEC , Pesticides Bureau , Albany Process , Exhaust , Ventilation. System Const . or Operation : DEC-EQ , Syracuse y Public Water Supply : DEC , Envir . Analysis , Albany (T . C . Health Dept . review) SPDES : DEC , Envir . Quality Unit , Syracuse (T . C . Health Dept . review) Stationary Combustion Installation : DEC-EQ Unit , Syracuse Wetlands /Adjac:ent Areas Alterations : DEC-EQ Unit , Cortland Other � --- County of Tompkins Driveways , culverts : Highway Dept . Hazardous Wastes : Health Dept . Institutional Use : Health Dept . -411A Mass Gatherings : Health Dept . Offensive Materials ( Scavenger Wastes ) : Health Dept . Public Utility Line Extension : Health Dept . • ,y Restaurant Use : Health Dept * y q Restricted Burning : Health Dept . ( DEC-EQ Unit review) Sanitary Facilities for Realty Subdivisions : Health Dept . (DEC-EQ review) Septic Tank Cleaner / Industrial Waste Collection : Health Dept . ( DEC-EQ review) Sewage Disposal System : Health Dept . Solid Waste Mgmt . Facility : Health Dept . (DEC-EQ. Unit review) vy q SPDES (Pollution Discharge ) : Health Dept . (DEC-EQ Unit review) Swimming Use : Health Dept . Temporary Residence ( Boarding House , Camp , Day Care , Hotel. , Motel , Mobile Home Park Health Dept . Water Supply (Public) : Health Dept . / Wetlands /Alterations : Wetlands Commission / County Clerk Other Town of Ithaca ,eVIA Blasting Public Utility Connection Building Permit Signs Street Opening Subdivision Extraction of Natural Materials Streets and Drainage Land Use Variance ti Wetlands Alteration Mobile Home Park Zoning Variance Multiple Residence Other .411AI Planned Unit Development 57 • Sources of Public funds ( if any ) for proposed action 58 . If federal review under NEPk is required , name agency / o � E Signature of Applicant ZE W"D U" hums- Art Signature of Reviewer Date Title Agency Address Date Reviewed 7 coro N T O W r m o VO Q ' r m m O �p C3.) UQ 0 llllt CD "~ N S 'L Q "�' \\1 r�\,- ` \V Gi\ / JI �'✓(jl'/',�� If 1� + ��` _��'� ✓- :2�—_�\� If- d 3 X11 1 (� 0 (� rl '' I rD rJ p)" O. 7 O C CL /300 -\ l Off 9 LID cr cc CD En ; r '• ()VII _ 1 O S ""11l = m 2 '/ ( �/ i!' � --- O n CD O. S �' 3 3 l C� Jc�S I! /J�f CD 0 LD3 OD ' (o o nZY CIL) :z /_�J SOS c l ^� `' Ofl !2 (n ?/�. pct f- } l I . l:,ly -- - o ' l: i f 02l CD I fill ollf— kl If 0 Ln vl O r'•`j'P T ORE . ° V 4, F?5.4D / ' . / ` If i���� p .1�/`! '! / // % /! ' I .��•il"ol d •)` �f•�' / � " / / l , ./ i p // J //f i J :JI �C LM m , / S IN If to TIN if 3pwAll I_ \, ~ ; , � �� • '_ , s l 10 Pit ir 11--,,--11If At If ICPYLo , / ! / ' J ! 1 r I of 0 1 if , , If l ^ if r / /l ; I!• : �I I ' . �. I f . �l/�l ' � { fre O� ` _\ \? ./ - � ..7 O r\ IF / / � r : � _ ( \ II — \ •� ,�\ 1 I \ �� -- �! . 1 / � �/ ` l f /tlr iIV \�\\ •';.\ J I. �� f' 1-... p` r 11 If V A. ! IIy \ i . ', o - F . tz � - '♦ ' i , o / f i` 1\\ / •T;'li i \/. .).. �� ' f \ l\ t . 0 PO IfO , 1 P � ` r, / IO 1Ni I/ I N -_ I / �'�/�/, i ( ( ; / i , i . 0 -Z,j ' \` IIV IjI � I ' / \ t ! 1 � � / ! •-� j1 \' '1 t , � llI ! � �' iIf � � � � � e ' Aro ^—_ / if JD 0 0, IFS 6 \ D —1 I! N . I r �i \\'�` l /� `i CO i li G II F �_ � ( I ; , , - ' �` / L /'. / ' O to �� '1'•'AN.- _ \ �L. � \� (' o, ? `)I � f•I I I I (7 Ir �\ .��S \r -j ! t J — III I I :I> (o V1 \ ( /\ I Q I / lA I / i'� , F'�. i \�+� \ .. p c� Jj �N- �.:� t `�\ • l � rr � Ii iI ' m If < < 'lIlf o ^, ollrl, o .-, fn < \ ( •, ` '., j CI : It o II CJ � r \ \ - ,: 1 In I 1 D . ii lil lilA I 'llf11 \ //;' i :0, � .. ._ ! •� � r.Yl -r=�• ? \o y� J� l � j 1 ZZ 0 3� s o ` N, A 3 � - GAS L / NE C � y O c - ` n ft I i � 0� � � a . e i 4r N iT w Of _ V� l AP?AP , -44 O P 7 c { � `� o a • M 3 � . - N � . o nk Val C Z .t ya • Z t•�S so 0 T . v • "1 Ca e � QO .rS3 '4-SW � v � • o cc • . o ro o c - - - ----- * REPORT of the ]Planning Board Chairman to the Town Board , August 13 , 1979 . I will not be in Town for the August 13 , 1979 , meeting of the Town of Ithaca Town Board , therefore , I am sending this report to the Supervisor , with a copy to the Town Clerk , in advance of your meeting , for its presentation at the meeting . 1 . The Planning Board met in regular session on July 10 , 1979 , with all members present . A Public Hearing was held . in connection with the consideration of Final Subdivision Approval for the Inlet Valley Land Co - Operative , Inc . , 171 Calkins Road . The Environmental Assessment Form presented by the developer was examined in great detail , amendments thereto made , and the Form approved by the Board unanimously , with Mr . Mazza abstaining . A great deal of discussion of the proposed roadway and drainage led to the forming by the Chair of an ad hoc Committee , comprised of Mr . James Baker , Mr . Bernard Stanton , and Mr . Montgomery May , to walk the land and present a report to the Board . The Public Hearing was duly adjourned to July 17 , 1979 , at 7 : 30 p . m . 2 . Again , on July 10 , 1979 , a Public Hearing was held to consider revision of the Town of Ithaca Water and Sewer Benefit Formula . Among the public there present were Otto Schoenfeld , Lagrand E . Chase , Ivar Jonson , Rocco P . Lucente , Evan N . Monkemeyer and Willis E . Hilker . They , as well as the public , participated in the discus - . Sion . The Planning Board members unanimously endorsed the proposed revision to the Benefit Formula and full/ 3upporl tdl 1 5 & &1QptA00r. by �1, Q Town Board . The results of that discussion have been forwarded to the Supervisor , as of July 17 , 1979 , and , I believe , are being set before you this evening . 3 . And finally , on July 10 , 1979 , a Public Hearing was held to consider Preliminary Subdivison Approval for a proposed 10 - lot subdivision backlot of Ridgecrest Road as presented by Mr . Lagrand E . Chase . Planning Board members Bronfenbrenner , Schultz and Aron , the ad hoc Committee appointed to walk the land , reported . Because of certain deficiencies in the E . A . F . the Public Hearing was adjourned to July 17 , 1979 , at 8 : 00 p . m . 4 . On July 17 , 1979 , the Public Hearing in the matter of the Inlet Valley Land Co - Operative , Inc . subdivision proposal was continued . The Board had the pleasure of having the Town Attorney present with whose guidance and expertise , together with lengthy discussion , the Planning Board arrived at a unanimous decision , Mr . Mazza abstaining , to grant Final Subdivison Approval . The Resolution granting final subdivision approval contains nine ( 9 ) carefully delineated conditions . 5 . And , on July 17 , 1979 , the Public Hearing in the matter of the Lagrand E . Chase subdivision proposal off Ridgecrest Road was continued . The EAF was examined in detail , amendments made , and unanimously approved by the Planning Board . After a 35 minute discussion , Preliminary Subdivision Approval , without condition , was granted . .to the proposed 10 - lot subdivison presented by Lagrand E . Chase . i ` •REPORT of Planning Board Chairman to Town Board , August 13 , 1979 . - 2 - - 6 . Again , on July 17 , 1979 , the Planning Board made recommendations of �\ approval by the Town Board for three signs : �t Is a . Citizens Savings Bank - variance required . b . Cortright Electric - no variance needed . . c . Millbrook - no variance needed . I believe that Mr . Bonnell will be presenting those sign applications to you at this meeting . 7 . And finally , on July 17 , 1979 , the Board discussed certain problem areas in the Environmental Assessment Form . It is my understanding that Mrs . Restaino and Mrs . Fuller have been putting this discussion together and are drafting certain proposed changes . i 8 . As a final note , I would like to add that the Planning Board was �e pleased to learn of the results of the matter heard by the Court in re the Ivar Jonson , Texas Lane , Subdivision . 9 . The Planning Board will next meet on September 4 , 1979 . We wish you all a good summer . of cc - Edward L . Bergen Lawrence P . Fabbroni