No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB Minutes 2009-07-13 Regular Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board Monday, July 13, zoog at 5:30 P.m . 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 1 . Call to Order 2 . Pledge of Allegiance 3 . Report of Tompkins County Legislature — Pam Mackesey 4 . Report of Ithaca Common Council — Eric Rosario 5 . 5 : 45 p . m . — Persons to be heard and Board Comments a . Board Comments - discuss cancelling the August 24th Study Session 6 . 5 : 55 p . m . Public Hearing re : A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE , TITLED "VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC , " BY ADDING A STOP SIGN AND REMOVING A YIELD SIGN AT THE PENNY LANE/LOIS LANE INTERSECTION a . Consider adoption 7 . 6 : 00 p . m . — Public Hearing re : A LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE a . Consider SEQR b . Consider adoption 8 . Presentation by Shaleshock re : Gas Drilling 9 . Consider revisions to the Town ' s Information Technology Policy 10 . Discuss proposed local law regarding fences and walls and consider referral to the Planning Board , Zoning Board and Conservation Board 11 . Consider Memo of project completion re : King Road East lateral sewer extension 12 . Discuss Bolton Point Road a . Order Calling for Public Hearing on Establishment of Bolton Road Project Water Improvement Area 13 . Consider Consent Agenda FINAL — July 81 2009 Page I of 2 a . Town of Ithaca Minutes b . Town of Ithaca Abstract c . Bolton Point Abstract d . Disposition List e . Appointment of Part time Project Assistant — Codes Enforcement 14 . Report of Town Committees 15 . Report of Town Officials 16 . Review of Correspondence 17 . Consider going into Executive Session 18 . Consider Adjournment FINAL — July 8, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Town of Ithaca Town Board Sign-In Sheet C zr Iy �1u.( Meeting Date: Monday, � , 2009 Please provide your contact information if you would like to be added to our e-mail list to receive Town Board Agendas in advance of meetings. Print Name e-mail AC f_j r C S �7 Cho e ( Au, 4 1444 n TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I , Karen M . Billings , being duly sworn , say that I am the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca Tompkins County, New York that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board 'of the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca and the notice has been duly published in the official newspaper, Ithaca Journal: ADVERTISEMENT: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 250 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled "Vehicles and Traffic, by Adding a Stop Sign and Removing a Yield Sign at the Penny Lane/Lois Lane Intersection Proposed Local Law Amending Lakefront Residential Zoning Requirements and Adding Related Definitions in Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code ( Location of Sign Board Used for Posting : To Clerk' s Office 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca , NY 14850 Date of Posting : Monday, June 29, 2009 Date of Publication : Wednesday, July 1 , 2009 Karen M . Billings Town Clerk , Town of Ithaca STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS : . TOWN OF ITHACA) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 1St day of July, 2009 . ljua AkL f Notary Public CARRIE WHITMORE Notary Public, State of New York i r : , ' ; . _ No . 01 WH6052877 Tioga County Commission Expires December 26,1LI0 ti 4 /r '-r moo I L E � 3 y ooe ool ' 'rte f :ithaca oumal corm' Wednesday, July 1, 20Q9 oo * .TOWN OF 1ITFI C e , NOTICE OF' ;I z ^ PUBLIC HEARINGS LByals05U. NOTICE IS •HEREBY Ithaca Code , GIVEN `that the• Town Board of the,. i n of.. Cap t of the '±pro`- Ithoca wJl hold :tw0 pposed local lawsare'on PC'. ! hearings omF $16 ' in the'=Town o erk's ay July_ 13;'' 'Office at 2=15 No�th =Tio ; 2009 fat its regular gam Street; Ithmda '-,Nyi LL ptmg� of the 'TTown : 'and < available fob re-`## Boord .in the Town,Hall view during n`ormal,l located: at 215C:Northd! busmess 'hours 'Mondayy,:, " tL 'Ai" through ' 'F.� iday 8:00 NY s f arn. to400pm , and o1 l 5 55-,p m purpose FURTHER NOTICE' IS: of r considering -""' ppro HEREBY GIVEN that„ at posed n Local - law ' such time::: h place ally' Amending Chapter 250 , persons interested n She of `the rTownf of; lthacdx . proposed l`noise ppermit Code, ;Titled t ”-Velitcles apphcahon; local law : and Traffic " by Adding •3 and ipprolect details may a Stop Stgnand*Remov . be heard; concerning:, mg a ,Yield t$ignaf the the same and , .- PennyLane/Lots ' Lanet FURTHERi NOTICE lS {{ Intersection and HEREBY "GIVEN { thatS 6 00 =p p m for„ thee upon request ossistan e purposev; of consid'erin'g # will be provided ter a pr opposed local laws sons with speaal needs: amendingg lakefront Res- Persons desiring ' Sssis- denhalZonmggreauire= lance must" makes *re oo merits and adding: r 16 qvest to ot o 6 Town Clerk, ed, defmihons m' Chap not .less •than 4& 'f ours lM Ater 270 'of the Town ` of' ipnor 10' j he time of-Ae- s , ` ": public heating ”" Karen, B�Iiings,. Town`Cle�k, ` Dated. Monday, .: t i f=June 29 2009 Publish VI/ednesday 4, K{d July 1 , 2009 . : § I t Ij : x 2 1feC � viY� - r 5 .. ^t lop ol o. . t t ; l FINAL Regular Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board 11! 71 r Monday, July 13 , 2009 at 5 : 30 p . m . Yn 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Present: Supervisor Engman ; Councilwoman Leary; Councilman Stein ; Councilman Goodman ; Councilman Levine ; Councilwoman Hunter; Councilman DePaolo Staff: Karen Billings , Town Clerk ; Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning ; Bruce Bates , Director of Code Enforcement ; Gene Redman , Acting Director of Public Works ; Judy Drake , Human Resources Specialist ; Susan Brock , Attorney for the Town ; Lisa Carrier- Titti , Network- Records Specialist . Others : County Legislator Pam Mackesey; Kim McKnight ; Bill Sonnensthul ; Janet Wagner; Catherin Wagner; Peter Kuhn ; Tina Wright , Tompkins Weekly. Call to Order: Supervisor Engman called the meeting to order at 5 : 30 p . m . , and led the assemblage in the pledge of allegiance . Agenda Item No . 3 - Report of Tompkins County Legislature Tompkins County Legislator Pam Mackesey was invited to giver her report . She reported that the County received its sales tax report for the second quarter of 2009 , and the trend is looking like the County will have a $2 million budget shortfall in 2009 . Food stamp applications have increased by 18 % over 2008 and family assistance is up 11 % with temporary ( TANF ) case assistance up 15 % . While the county' s unemployment is much lower than that of surrounding counties , Tompkins County is up 4 % over last year' s numbers . Legislator Mackesey finished up her report and asked board members if they had any questions . Councilman Stein thought that the County anticipated sales tax revenues being lower and asked if the shortfall was greater than anticipated . Legislator Mackesey responded that the shortfall is approximately $ 500 , 000 more than their recalculations estimated . Councilman Stein asked what sectors account for the fall in sales tax revenue and Legislator Mackesey explained that she was not sure what accounted for the overall shortfall , but that the room tax dropped 9 % from the previous year. She said that David Squires , Tompkins County Finance Director, could provide more detailed information . Supervisor Engman asked if the County had calculated what percentage decrease municipalities might expect . Legislator Mackesey did not know and said that David Squires would be able to provide the information to the Town as well . With no further questions , Supervisor Engman thanked Legislator Mackesey for her report . FF`IAL, — TB Minutes 7% 13/2009 Page 1 of 26 FINAL Agenda Item No . 4 - Report of Ithaca Common Council City of Ithaca Common Councilor Eric Rosario spoke about sales tax revenue and reported that if sales tax revenues for the City continue at current projections , the City will have an approximate shortfall of $ 850 , 000 through December. Placing a ban on outdoor smoking in public places is another topic the city is investigating . The city is concentrating its efforts on areas where children are concentrated ( parks and play areas ) , or areas that are difficult to escape from , such as the Commons . Councilman Rosario said the discussions are influenced by a Stanford University study released in May 2007 , regarding exposure to outdoor tobacco smoke , and the Common Councilors are using recommendations made by this study as a guide . With regard to picking a water supplier, Councilman Rosario stated that the City is a few steps closer to making its final decision . The City' s Board of Public Works voted last week and provided a formal recommendation to pursue the re-build option . It is possible that at the September meeting the Council will make a final decision . Councilman Rosario talked briefly about dredging , explaining that there are legal issues regarding ownership and responsibility . A public information meeting is planned for September. He said more detailed information about this is posted at the City of Ithaca ' s Web site and more information about the water supplier discussions and information . Common Council will be voting on the College Town Plan at its August 5th meeting . Councilman Rosario noted that there will be a lot of work in three key areas of implementation—transportation , incentive zoning , and fee in- lieu of parking . The City received 20 responses to its Comprehensive Plan RFQs , The City Comprehensive Plan Committee will meet August 6th to develop a short-list of the 20 responses . The RFQ was for a consultant to help the City with the first phase , which focuses on the development of a city-wide plan . The second phase will develop neighborhood specific plans and thematic plans . Councilman Rosario briefly talked about bike registration , stating that it is a law currently on the books , since the 1970 ' s7 but not currently being enforced because it is committee . It was sent to committee for modifications . Councilman DePaolo asked Councilman Rosario to explain the main justification for pursuing bike registration and Councilman Rosario responded that time spent looking for owners of recovered bikes ; resources involved in storing bikes as a couple of reasons . Councilman Stein asked where the City was thinking of banning smoking and where people would be able to smoke . City Councilman Rosario explained that they are looking at areas where children are likely to be concentrated such as playgrounds and areas such as outdoor dining . It would be looking at areas where they think the possibility of harm or exposure is greater. Councilman Stein asked if there are any FINAL — 1-B Minute , 7/13%2009 Page 2 of"M FINAL towns or cities that have outlawed smoking . Councilman Rosario said that the city of Calabasas , California banned smoking in all public places , indoor and out , and it was voted on unanimously. Supervisor Engman asked about the Water project and if it hinged on bonding and borrowing ; Councilman Rosario said that he does not know. Other Business Supervisor Engman introduced Gene Redman , Interim Director of Public Works , to the Board . He then directed the Board ' s attention to the Executive Session agenda item and explained that he was asking the Board to consider an Executive Session for two reasons : 1 ) to consider the employment history of a particular person , and 2 ) to consider acquisition of real estate . Supervisor Engman asked to add consideration of Justice Court Grant Application to the agenda ; placing it just before the consent agenda ( 12b ) . Agenda Item No . 5 = 5 : 45 p . m . — Persons to be heard and Board Comments Bill Sonnenstuhl thanked board members for paying such close attention to the . Northeast. He went on to say that the Northeast Ithaca Neighborhood Association contacted Cornell and is in the process of setting up a meeting to discuss the moratorium . The Association would like to jump start some of the negotiations that were going on earlier between Cornell and Mr. Lucente . They are also looking for creative ways to get the property turned over to the Lab of Ornithology. He invited the Town to participate in those discussions . Mr. Sonnenstuhl said that the Association is also setting up a meeting with the Lab of Ornithology since Mr. Fitzpatrick continues to have interest in the property. He stated that the Association was trying to be proactive and they look forward to the Town being involved . No Board comments . Agenda Item No . 6 - 5 : 55 p . m . Public Hearing re : A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE . TITLED "VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC , " BY ADDING A STOP SIGN AND REMOVING A YIELD SIGN AT THE PENNY LANE/ LOTS LANE INTERSECTION Supervisor Engman opened the public hearing and invited the public to address the Board . There being no one , . he closed the public hearing . Agenda Item 6 a - Consider adoption Councilman Stein moved and Councilman DePaolo seconded the proposed resolution . I INAL, — TB N imltes 7% 1 1%2009 Page i of 26 FINAL Councilman Stein stated that he , Supervisor Engman and Councilwoman Leary attended a meeting at Commonland about quality of life issues . Some of the issues discussed involve the Reservoir as a swimming place , drawing considerable pedestrian traffic to the reservoir through Commonland and the concurrent littering , noise , etc . Drivers are driving at speeds up to 50 mph down Penny Lane to get to the reservoir. Additionally there are parking issues , yet residents do not wish to prohibit parking . Councilman Stein said that he thinks adding a stop sign is a good thing to do . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Vote—carried unanimously. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009 419 : Resolution Adoptin_g "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, TITLED "VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC " BY ADDING A STOP SIGN AND REMOVING A YIELD SIGN AT THE PENNY LANE/LOIS LANE INTERSECTION" WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 8, 2009, the Town Board reviewed the above- described proposed local law amending the Town 's Vehicles and Traffic Chapter to provide for installation of a stop sign to replace a yield sign on the westbound approach of the Penny Lane and Lois Lane intersection, and WHEREAS, a resolution was duly adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca for a public hearing to be held by said Town on July 13, 2009 at 5:55 p. m. to hear all interested parties on the proposed local law entitled "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, TITLED "VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, " BY ADDING A STOP SIGN AND REMOVING A YIELD SIGN AT THE PENNY LANE/LOIS LANE INTERSECTION'; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal, and WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA ') and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been determined by the Town Board that adoption of the proposed local law is a Type II action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment, " and thus this action is not subject to review under SEQRA, NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local law entitled "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA FINAL, - TB Minutes 7/ 13 /2009 Page 4 of 26 FINAL CODE, TITLED "VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, " BY ADDING A STOP SIGN AND REMOVING A YIELD SIGN AT THE PENNY LANE/LOIS LANE INTERSECTION'; a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, and it is further RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law with the Secretary of State as required by law. MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman DePaolo VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 7 - 6 : 00 p . m . - Public Hearing re : A LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE Supervisor Engman opened the public hearing and invited the public to address the Board . There being no one , Supervisor Engman closed the public hearing . Agenda Item No . 7a - Consider SEAR (Attachment No . 1 ) Councilman Goodman moved and Councilman Stein seconded the SEAR resolution . Mr. Kanter made minor corrections to the resolved clause of the resolution . Board agreed to changes . Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried unanimously. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009420a : SEQR REGARDING A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE , LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE WHEREAS, this action is the enactment of a local law amending the Lakefront Residential Zoning requirements and adding related definitions in Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code; and WHEREAS, said proposed local law would, among other things, include definitions for the main terms expressed in the LR Zone provisions; extend the maximum allowable dock lengths from 30 feet to 40 feet, unless a water depth of 5 feet cannot be obtained, in which case dock length may be 50 feet, begin dock length measurements from the Ordinary High Water line; increase the maximum allowable dock square footage from 300 to 320 square feet or 320 feet plus 8 square feet for each additional foot in length if the structure is allowed to extend beyond 40 feet in length; limit the size of boatlifts; permit roofs on boatlifts with certain restrictions; permit FINAL — TB Minutes 7.1' 1322009 Page 5 of 26 FINAL accessory storage structures within 10 feet of the shoreline in certain situations; and clarify some sections of the existing LR Zone provisions; and WHEREAS, this is an Type I Action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is acting as Lead Agency in environmental review with respect to the enactment of this local law; and . WHEREAS, the Town Board, at a public hearing held on July 13, 2009, has reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form, Parts I and II for this action, prepared by Town Planning staff; RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act for the above referenced action as proposed, based on the information in the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I and for the reasons set forth in the Environmental Assessment Form, Part ll and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. MOVED: Councilman Goodman SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 7b - Consider adoption (Attachment No . 2 ) Councilman Goodman moved and Councilwoman Leary seconded the proposed resolution . Supervisor Engman noted that the County' s review letter was included in the Board ' s packet. With no discussion , Supervisor Engman called for a vote—carried . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 120b: Resolution Adoptin_g "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE" WHEREAS, based on its experiences in considering a number of special permit applications for docks and waterfront structures, the Town Planning Board on November 25, 2005 recommended that the Town reconsider the dimensions and sizes of docks specified in the Lakefront Residential Zone, and - WHEREAS, Town staff thereafter prepared an inventory of existing waterfront structures and lakefront conditions in the Town of Ithaca and researched regulations governing waterfront structures in, other New York municipalities, and FFNA1, - TB Minutes T1 IN09 Page 6 of 26 FINAL WHEREAS, the Town Codes and Ordinances Committee then prepared preliminary revisions to the Lakefront Residential Zone zoning provisions and solicited comments on the preliminary revisions from the Tompkins County Water Resources Council, the West Shore Homeowners Association, the Tompkins County Environmental Management Council, individual lakeshore residents, charter boat operators, dock builders, and others, and WHEREAS, the Codes and Ordinances Committee considered the comments it received on the preliminary revisions as well as Town staff recommendations and prepared for the Town Board's consideration a proposed LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, and WHEREAS, at its March 10, 2008 meeting, the Town Board heard a presentation from Town staff on the development of the proposed law, received comments on the proposed law from representatives of the West Shore Home Owner's Association, and referred the proposed law back to the Codes and Ordinances Committee to consider those comments, and WHEREAS, the Codes and Ordinances Committee thereafter further revised the proposed law to address comments by the West Shore Homeowner's Association, and sent the proposed law back to the Town Board for further consideration, and WHEREAS, the proposed law would have, among other things, included definitions for the main terms expressed in the Lakefront Residential Zone provisions, extended maximum allowable dock lengths from 30 feet to 50 feet, begun dock length measurements from the Ordinary High Water Line, limited the size of boatlifts, permitted roofs on boatlifts with certain restrictions, permitted accessory storage structures within 10 feet of the shoreline in certain situations, and clarified some sections of the existing Lakefront Residential zone provisions, and WHEREAS, at its June 9, 2008 meeting, the Town Board reviewed and discussed the proposed local law and referred the proposed law to the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals and Conservation Board for their recommendations, and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 16, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed, discussed and recommended adoption of the proposed local law with the modification that permitted dock lengths should be increased to 60 feet, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board held a public hearing on this matter and reviewed, discussed and recommended adoption of the proposed local law at its meeting on July 1, 2008, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board reviewed, discussed and recommended adoption of the proposed local law at its meeting on July 3, 2008, and FINAL, -'I'13 Minutes 7; 13; 1009 Page 7 of 26 FINAL WHEREAS, at its August 11 , 2008 meeting, the Town Board held a public hearing and received public comment on the proposed local law, and sent the proposed law back to the Codes and Ordinances Committee to consider the issues raised by public comment, and WHEREAS, at its August 20 and September 17, 2008 meetings, the Codes and Ordinances Committee considered the public 's comments and recommended further changes to the proposed law, including the inclusion of boat lifts and boat hoists in the calculation of the length of a dock, an increase in the maximum surface area of docks from 300 to 350 square feet, revisions to provisions regarding placement of moorings, and an increase in the permitted height of uncovered boat lifts and boat hoists from 8 to 15 feet, and WHEREAS, at its October 20, 2008 meeting, the Town Board held a public hearing on the proposed local law, made further revisions by deleting the provisions regulating the placement and numbers of moorings, and set a public hearing on the law to be held on November 10, 2008, and WHEREAS, at its November 10, 2008 meeting, the Town Board held a public hearing on the proposed local law, and sent the proposed law back to the Codes and Ordinances Committee to consider a modification recommended by the Tompkins County Planning Department through its General Municipal Law § 239 review and/or to address concerns raised by some Town Board members, and WHEREAS, at its November 19, 2008 meeting, the Codes and Ordinances Committee recommended the law be revised to incorporate the modification recommended by the Tompkins County Planning Department, which modification limits the length of dock extensions that are substantially parallel to the shoreline to no more than 29% of the length of the mean high water tie line of the waterfront lot, and WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2009 meeting, the Town Board held a public hearing on the revised proposed local law, considered the environmental significance of the proposed law, and made a negative determination of environmental significance under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA '), and WHEREAS, at its January 12, 2009 meeting, the Town Board amended the proposed law to decrease ( 1) the maximum length of piers, docks and wharves from 50 feet to 40 feet and (2) the maximum surface area of all piers, docks and wharves on a waterfront lot from 350 square feet to 320 square feet, and WHEREAS, at its February 9, 2009 meeting, the Town Board held a public hearing on the proposed local law, and sent the proposed law back to the Codes and Ordinances Committee to research the possibility of extending the length of piers, docks and wharves from 40 feet up to 50 feet if water depth at 40 feet is less than 5 feet, which could be inadequate to dock certain types of sailboats and other boats, and FINAL — TB Minutes 7% 13/2009 Page 8 ol' 36 FINAL WHEREAS, at its April 15, 2009 meeting, the Codes and Ordinance Committee discussed the changes requested by the Town Board and referred the law back to the Town Board for resolution of the dock extension/water depth issue, and WHEREAS, at its June 8, 2009 meeting, the Town Board amended the proposed law to (1) allow, where the water depth at the end of an existing or proposed 40-foot pier, dock or wharf is less than 5 feet, the length of such structures to extend the minimum additional length beyond 40 feet necessary to reach a water depth of 5 feet, but in no case could the length of such a structure exceed 50 feet, (2) increase the maximum surface area of piers, docks and wharves that are allowed to extend beyond 40 feet in length from 320 square feet to 320 square feet plus 8 square feet for each additional foot in length, and (3) specify additional application submission requirements for piers, docks and wharves that are extended beyond 40 feet as described above, and WHEREAS, at its June 8, 2009 Y p meeting, the Town Board duly adopted a 9 resolution fora public hearing to be held b said Town on Jul 13 2009 at 6:00 . m. to P 9 Y Y P hear all interested parties on the proposed local law entitled "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE'; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal, and WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said. proposed local law, or any part thereof, and WHEREAS, additional SEQRA review is needed because the revisions the Town Board made to the proposed local law after it made its negative determination of environmental significance on January 12, 2009 could increase the potential for adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, pursuant to SEQRA and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part ,617, adoption of said local law is a Type I Action for which the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, acting as lead agency in an environmental review with respect to adoption of this local law, has on July 13, 2009 made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II prepared by the Town 's Planning staff, NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local law entitled "A LOCAL LAW AMENDING LAKEFRONT RESIDENTIAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE", a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and it is further FINAL — TB Minutes 7/ 1 ' / 1009 Page 9 of 26 FINAL RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law with the Secretary of State as required by law. MOVED: Councilman Goodman SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary VOTE: Supervisor Engman, no; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, no; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried. Agenda Item No . 8 - Presentation by Shaleshock re : Gas Drilling — (Attachment # 3 , 4 and 5 ) Lisa Wright appeared before the Board on behalf of Shaleshock , Citizen ' s Action Coalition . She said that Shaleshock appreciates the opportunity to speak to the Ithaca Town Board about its concerns . Ms . Wright and Dr. Bill ( ? ) gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding gas drilling . Supervisor Engman stated that he is a member of the Tompkins County Council of Government subcommittee working on the issue . He has talked with Public Works and Planning Department staff about getting ready for what the Town needs to do . He said that they are awaiting some models that the County is working on regarding road weight limit legislation . TCCOG is hopeful that they can put something in place that is fairly . consistent throughout the County. Councilwoman Hunter asked if the County was inventorying natural resources for the purposes of this project . Supervisor Engman stated that the County was conducting an inventory and trying to find out which municipalities want them to construct their portfolio . He spoke with Planning staff and the Town can construct its own portfolio . Councilwoman Hunter asked if other municipalities are amenable to the offer of assistance . Supervisor Engman was not sure and explained that at the last TCCOG meeting everyone was urged to contact the County Planning Department in order to tell them what they wanted to do . Councilwoman Hunter asked about the timeline and if there is there draft legislation ? Supervisor Engman responded that they' re hoping to get it done this month , because they want to be ready when the DEC comes out with its regs . TCCOG ( ? ) wants to be able to write to DEC requesting to be an involved agency and to be able to identify to DEC the areas that need protection . Councilwoman Hunter asked about the status of the Congressman Hinchey legislation and Ms . Wright explained that it' s still in Committee and Dr. Bill added that they don 't know when it will come out of Committee . Councilwoman Hunter asked if there will be enough time to afford this area some protection and Ms . Wright responded that Broome County will begin in December, there ' s not enough time to protect them . The DEC will begin issuing permits December 31 , 2009 . Councilwoman Hunter asked why the ACLU is not involved in this pursuant to the non-committing property owners and E INA [ , - 1 `(3 4 rnute, % 1 .3.2009 Page 10 of . 6 FINAL banks/lenders not granting mortgages , etc. Dr. Bill responded that there is precedence in the Supreme Court with regard to the greater good ' and pipelines . Councilman Levine wanted to know if. the banks will still deny someone a mortgage on a property that has not given up surface rights , and Councilwoman Hunter asked about monitoring and responsibility of wells in place . Dr. Bill said that there are concerns about staffing at DEC , as there is not enough staff in place to handle current projects . Councilman Stein wanted to know "what is the bottom line?" And stated , "This is not the first time someone has tried to extract energy from the earth ; " asking , " Is this particular way of extracting oil more dangerous and does it produce more harm to the area ? " Ms . Wright responded that 3 to 3 . 5 million gallons of water are currently used to fract and the scale is greater than ever before . She stated that Shaleshock is concerned about the appropriateness of this occurring in this area . Dr. Bill commented that the revenue gains are offset by losses . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman thanked Dr. Bill and Lisa for their presentation . Agenda Item #9 — Consider revisions to the Town ' s Information TechnolM Policy Supervisor Engman introduced this item ; Councilwoman Hunter moved and Supervisor Engman seconded . Discussion : Councilman DePaolo wanted to know how a physical connection precludes potential contamination to the Network , if someone can connect wirelessly. ' Ms . Drake said that a person connecting wirelessly has to have a sign in ( approval ) , which provides control over wireless users . Councilman DePaolo asked for clarification on the definition of " Employees , " and Ms . Drake stated that for the purpose of this policy, all persons paid by the Town of Ithaca are considered "employees" After more discussion , language changes were made to the new wording , changing it from : " Use of hardware , including but not limited to laptops other than employer owned , physically connected to the Network is prohibited , " to : " Use of hardware , not authorized by the Network Administrator, including but not limited to laptops , is prohibited . " With all members of the Town Board in agreement, the item was approved , unanimously. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009= 121 : APPROVAL OF REVISIONS TO THE TOWN OF ITHACA AND SCLIWC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY WHEREAS, the Town Board adopted the Town of Ithaca and SCLIWC Information Technology Policy (IT Policy) in April 2008, and WHEREAS, the Records Management Advisory Board recommends the addition of the following language to item number two (2) of the IT Policy, Use of hardware, not authorized by the Network administrator, including but not limited to laptops, is prohibited, because `foreign ' external devices connected to the Town of Ithaca or Bolton Point's server can carry potentially damaging and invasive viruses, worms or other FINAL -- "113 Minutes 7 ' 13 :2009 � P41ge 1 1 of .16 FINAL external threats that could impair the Town 's server, along with every user's computer on the system; and WHEREAS, the revisions to the policy have been reviewed, edited and recommended by the Records Management Advisory Board, as the revised IT Policy, Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve of the recommended revised Information Technology Policy; and be it further RESOLVED, the Human Resources Manager is directed to update the policy in the Personnel Manual. MOVED: Councilwoman Hunter SECONDED: Supervisor Engman VOTE. Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 10 — Discuss proposed local law regarding fences and walls and consider referral to the Planning Board , Zoning Board and Conservation Board (Attach Memorandum and Draft Law) Supervisor Engman introduced this item ; Councilman Goodman moved the resolution and Councilwoman Leary seconded . Discussion : Councilman Goodman commented that the Codes and Ordinances Committee has developed a good draft to give to Planning and Zoning . He mentioned that there may be a few minor changes left to do , one change would be to put this draft in as a separate section of the Zoning Chapter, but he said this change can be made later as comments come in . Councilman DePaolo asked a question about Lakefront retaining walls and the potential inference that other state and federal agencies , such as the Army Corp of Engineers , do not have to be involved . With no further discussion the motion was approved , unanimously . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009 422: CONSIDER REFERRING A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW AMENDING FENCE AND WALL REQUIREMENTS AND ADDING RELATED DEFINITIONS IN CHAPTER 270 (ZONING) OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE TO THE PLANNING BOARD, ZONING BOARD AND CONSERVATION BOARD FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RESOLVED, the Town Board does hereby refer a proposed local law amending fence and wall requirements and adding related definitions in Chapter 270 (Zoning) of the Town of Ithaca Code to the Planning Board, Zoning Board and Conservation Board for review and recommendations. F1 N.11_, — 113 Minutes 7 % 131/2009 Page 12 01' 26 FINAL. MOVED: Councilman Goodman SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary VOTE. Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 11 — Consider Memo of project completion re : King Road East lateral sewer expansion (Attachment No. 6) Supervisor Engman introduced the memo from Dan Walker, which explains the King Road East sewer expansion and noted that this is just to advise that the project is completed , and came in under the [dollar] amount allocated . With no action to be taken on this item and no questions from the Board , Supervisor Engman moved on to the next item . Agenda Item No . 12 — Discuss Bolton Point Road Supervisor Engman explained that major changes have occurred since this item was placed on the agenda . A new Resolution was placed on the table , and the attorneys for Bolton Point advised the Bolton Point Commissioners that a public hearing was not needed , and they have determined that we are covered . Supervisor Engman drew board members attention to the packet in front of them called , "Town of Ithaca , Bond Resolution , Joint Project , " and the resolution included in the packet. Supervisor Engman went on to explain that in 1967 there was an agreement with the owner of the land that Bolton Point now sits that there would be a road built on her property. She passed away and another person inherited the property and she pursued the claim ; she passed away ; somebody else inherited the property and that gentleman decided to build a development ; demanded that Bolton Point build the road . He went to court . The court said that Bolton Point was in the wrong , and Bolton Point is required to build the road ; it was appealed to another, level and the next level said that Bolton Point has to build the . road , which is where we are today . Bolton Point has to build the road . There was $ 600 , 000 set aside for building the road ; that has not proven adequate . We are now looking at a total of $ 750 , 000 to be approved for bonding and all of the bonding materials are in place . They' re [the Bolton Point attorneys] looking for each of the municipalities connected with Bolton Point, right now, to simply agree to allow Bolton Point to issue $750 , 000 worth of serial bonds for the building of this road . Supervisor Engman moved the item and Councilman DePaolo seconded ; then Supervisor Engman called for discussion . Discussion : Councilman DePaolo asked whether or not the cost overruns being contested , . with regard to digging vs . hammering , are included with this estimate( ? ) . FIN NL — TB Minutes 7/ 11";2009 Page 1 i of 26 FINAL Supervisor Engman said that he thinks the number is sufficient to pay for everything , even if we don 't get that cost down . Supervisor Engman explained that there is a debate going on between the company constructing the road and the Bolton Point representatives as to whether they should be paid the total of extra money they want because they encountered harder rock than anticipated , and they have to use a different technology to remove very hard rock , than that used for shale . Supervisor Engman said the additional cost is in the range of $ 50 , 000 , and is still to be negotiated . Councilman DePaolo stated that Dan said it was $ 120 , 000 ; Supervisor Engman was surprised at the difference . Supervisor Engman said that his understanding is that the $ 750 , 000 should cover any contingencies to complete the project. Hearing no further questions or comments , Supervisor Engman called for a vote . Motion approved , unanimous . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009423 : A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $7509000 JOINT SERIAL BONDS OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA, THE VILLAGES OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS AND LANSING, AND THE TOWNS OF LANSING AND DRYDEN, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, STATE OF NEW YORK, TO PAY THE COST OF THE TOWN 'S SHARE OF A STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, held at the Town Hall, in Ithaca, New York, on the 13th day of July, 2009, at 5:30 o 'clock p. m. , Prevailing Time . The meeting was called to order by Town Supervisor, Herb Engman, and upon roll being called, all Town of Ithaca Town Board Members were present, as listed: PRESENT: Supervisor Engman; Councilwoman Leary; Councilman Stein; Councilman Goodman; Councilman Levine; Councilwoman Hunter; Councilman DePaolo. The following resolution was offered by Supervisor Engman, who moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman DePaolo, to wit: WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, in conjunction with the Villages of Cayuga Heights and Lansing, and the Towns of Lansing and Dryden, has heretofore determined and agreed to participate in the provision of a joint water project and to contract joint indebtedness therefor in accordance with Section 15. 00 of the Local Finance Law pursuant to an Agreement of Municipal Cooperation for Construction, Financing and Operation of an Inter-Municipal Water Supply and Transmission System (the "Intermunicipal Agreement'); and WHEREAS, the project hereinafter described has been determined to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, the implementation of which as proposed, it has been determined will not result in any significant environmental effects; and FINAL. — T13 Minutes 7% 13 /2009 Page 14 of 26 FINAL WHEREAS, all other conditions precedent to the financing of the capital project hereinafter described, have been performed; and WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital project under Article 12-C of the Town Law as an operational expense; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, if the within resolution in substantially identical form is adopted, approved and made effective by the other participants in the aforedescribed Intermunicipal Agreement as follows: Section 1 . For the specific object or purpose of paying the cost of (i) the reconstruction of the existing road; and (ii) and construction of new extension thereto at Bolton Point to be known as Bolton Road pursuant to a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement in settlement of the matter of Crossmore v. Town of Ithaca, Town of Lansing, Town of Dryden, Village of Lansing, Village of Cayuga Heights and Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission, Index No. 04-0752, Supreme Court, County of Tompkins in accordance with Opinions of the State Comptroller 82-354, 86- 43 and 86-87 and Opinions of the Attorney General Inf. 81 ( 1968), such cost being in addition to that to be paid with $600, 000 reserve fund monies of the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission and thus constituting the maximum estimated cost to this municipality, being a maximum estimated cost of $ 750, 000; there are hereby authorized to be issued $ 750, 000 joint serial bonds of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, together with the Towns of Dryden and Lansing and the Villages of Cayuga Heights and Lansing, all of the County of Tompkins, New York, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1 of Article VIII of the Constitution of the State of New York as amended and of Title 1A of the Local Finance Law. Section 2. It is hereby determined that the plan for the financing of said specific object or purpose is by the issuance of the $ 750, 000 joint serial bonds authorized to be issued pursuant to this bond resolution. The total amount of joint indebtedness to be contracted for said improvements is $ 750, 000 and the amount initially estimated to be allocated and apportioned to the Town of Ithaca is $392, 925. Section 3. For the purposes of Section 15. 10 of the Local, Finance Law relating to the allocation of joint indebtedness, the amount of joint indebtedness to be apportioned and allocated to each of said Towns and Villages, shall be in the same proportion as the consumption of water in each of the Towns of Dryden, Ithaca, and Lansing and the Villages of Cayuga Heights and Lansing shall bear to the total consumption of water for the entire joint water distribution facility, which is estimated to be, and for purposes of determining gross indebtedness of each of said municipalities in their respective debt statements pursuant to Section 15. 10 of the Local Finance . -Law and therefore the FINAL — "FB Minutes 7% 13:`2003 Page 15 of.16 FINAL amount to be allocated for the purpose of ascertaining each of the respective municipalities ' debt contracting powers, shall be as follows: Dryden $ 27, 975 3. 73 % Ithaca $ 392, 925 52. 39 % Lansing (Town) $ 112, 500 15. 48% Cayuga Heights $ 69, 525 9. 27% Lansing (Village) $ 143, 475 19. 13 % Nothing in this section shall be deemed to be in conflict with or to supersede the provisions of Section 5 of this resolution relating to. the annual apportionment of the amount of principal and interest on the bonds herein authorized to be issued as among said Towns and said Villages, nor the manner of collection and payment of the amounts of annual debt service provided to be apportioned annually by said Section 5. The Supervisors of said Towns and the Treasurers of said Villages are hereby authorized to act jointly to make application to the State Comptroller for the allocation and apportionment of said joint indebtedness in accordance with the provisions of this section and to perform all acts and furnish all information required in connection with such application . Section 4. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the aforesaid specific object or purpose is fifteen years, pursuant to subdivision 20(c) of paragraph a of Section 11 . 00 of the Local Finance Law. It is hereby further determined that the maximum maturity of the serial bonds herein authorized will exceed five years. Section 5. Subject to the provisions of the Local Finance Law and this section, the power to authorize the issuance of and to sell joint bond anticipation notes in anticipation of the issuance and sale of the joint serial bonds herein authorized, including renewals thereof, is hereby delegated to the Supervisor of the Town of Ithaca, the chief fiscal officer of said Town acting on his own behalf and on behalf of the chief fiscal officers of the Towns of Dryden and Lansing and the Villages of Cayuga Heights and Lansing. Such joint bond anticipation notes shall be of such terms, form and contents and shall be sold by said Supervisor in such manner as may be prescribed by a bond anticipation note certificate, as authorized by Section 30. 00 of the Local Finance Law; provided, however, that any bond anticipation notes so issued shall be the joint indebtedness of said Towns and said Villages and shall be executed in the names of the Town of Dryden, the Town of Ithaca, the Town of Lansing and the Village of Cayuga Heights and the Village of Lansing, and shall be signed by the Supervisor of the Town of Dryden on behalf of said Town and shall have affixed thereto the seal of the Town of Dryden, attested by the Town Clerk of said Town; shall be signed by the Supervisor of the Town of Ithaca on behalf of said Town and shall have affixed thereto the seal of the Town of Ithaca, attested by the Town Clerk of said Town; shall be signed by the Supervisor of the Town of Lansing on behalf of said Town and shall have affixed thereto the seal of the Town of Lansing, attested by the Town Clerk of said Town; shall be signed by the Treasurer of the Village of Cayuga Heights on behalf of said Village and shall have affixed thereto the seal of the Village of Cayuga Heights, attested by the Village Clerk of said Village, and shall be signed by the Treasurer of the Village of Lansing on behalf of said Village and shall have affixed thereto the seal of the Village of FINAL — TB B Minutes ?i 1 ' ,"7009 t'age 16 of 26 FINAL Lansing, attested by the Village Clerk of said Village . The chief fiscal officer of the Town of Ithaca to whom is hereby delegated the power to authorize the issuance of and to sell such joint bond anticipation notes, shall file an executed copy of each such bond anticipation note with the finance board of each of the aforesaid municipalities prior to the issuance of the bond anticipation note or notes authorized by such certificate . Section 6. The faith and credit of said Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York, said Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, said Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York, said Village of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York, and said Village of Cayuga Heights, Tompkins County, New York, are hereby jointly pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on said joint bonds as the same become due and payable. The principal of said joint bonds and the interest thereon shall be apportioned annually among said Towns and said Villages in accordance with the Intermunicipal Agreement hereinabove referred to in the recitals of this resolution, on the ratio which the consumption of water from the system in each of said municipalities bears to the full consumption from the entire inter-municipal water distribution facility, such ratio to be annually determined in accordance with the aforesaid Intermunicipal Agreement, the share of said principal and interest to be borne by the aforesaid Towns, shall be annually assessed, levied and collected within said Towns as follows: a) From the several lots and parcels of land in each of the Water District No. 1, and Snyder Hill, Monkey Run, Hall Road, Turkey Hill and Royal Road Water Districts of the Town of Dryden, in the manner provided by law. b) From the several lots and parcels of land in the existing Town of Ithaca Road Project Water Improvement Area in proportion as nearly as may be to the benefit which each lot or parcel of land therein will derive therefrom. c) From the several lots and parcels of land in the Consolidated Water District, in the Town of Lansing at the same time and in the same manner as other Town charges. The Village of Cayuga Heights shall annually levy and collect a tax sufficient to pay the share of said principal and interest to be borne by said Village, as the same may become due and payable, and the Village of Lansing shall annually levy and collect a tax sufficient to pay the share of said principal and interest to be borne by said Village, as the same may become due and payable . If not paid from the aforesaid sources, all the taxable real property in said Town of Dryden, and all the taxable real property in said Town of Ithaca, and all the taxable real property in said Town of Lansing, and all the taxable real property in said Village of Cayuga Heights, and all the taxable real property in said Village of Lansing shall be jointly subject to the levy of an ad valorem tax, without limitation as to rate or amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds as the same become due and payable. Section 7. The validity of such joint serial bonds and joint bond anticipation notes may be contested only if: 1) Such joint bonds are authorized for an object or purpose for which said Towns and said Villages are not authorized to expend money, or 2) The provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of publication of this resolution are not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding FINAL - TB Minute; 7,% 13'2009 Page 17 of 26 FINAL contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after the date of publication, or 3) Such joint bonds are authorized in violation of the provisions of the Constitution. Section 8. Upon the adoption of this resolution by each of the aforesaid Towns and the aforesaid Villages, and the publication thereof with the notice provided for herein, the Clerks of each such Town and each such Village shall file with the Clerk of each of the other Towns and of the Villages a certified copy of this resolution and a printer's affidavit or affidavits, as the case may be, of publication thereof with the required notice or notices, as the case may be . Section 9. Pursuant to Section 15. 00(m) of the Local Finance Law, the powers and duties of advertising such joint bonds for sale, conducting the sale and awarding the bonds, are hereby delegated to the Supervisor of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, who on his own behalf and on behalf of the chief fiscal officers of the Towns of Dryden and Lansing and the Villages of Cayuga Heights and Lansing shall advertise such bonds for sale, conduct the sale, and award the bonds in such manner as he shall deem best for the interests of the aforesaid Towns and Villages; provided, however, that in the exercise of these delegated powers, he shall comply fully with the provisions of the Local Finance Law and any order or rule of the State Comptroller applicable to the sale of municipal bonds. The receipt of said Supervisor shall be a full acquittance to the purchaser of such bonds, who shall not be obliged to see to the application of the purchase money. All other matters except as provided herein relating to the joint serial bonds herein authorized including the date, denominations, maturities and interest payment dates, within the limitations prescribed herein and the manner of execution of the same shall be determined by the Supervisor of the Town of Ithaca on behalf of the chief fiscal officers of the Towns of Ithaca, Dryden and Lansing and the Villages of Lansing and Cayuga Heights. Such bonds shall contain substantially the recital of validity clause provided for in Section 52. 00 of the Local Finance Law, and shall otherwise be in such form and contain such recitals, in addition to those required by Section 5 1 . 00 of the Local Finance Law, as said Supervisor shall determine consistent with the provisions of the Local Finance Law. Such joint serial bonds shall be in fully registered form and shall be signed in the name of each Town and Village by the manual signature of each respective chief fiscal officer and a facsimile of the corporate seal of each Town and Village shall be imprinted thereon and shall be attested by the manual signatures of each respective Town or Village Clerk. It is hereby determined that it is to the financial advantage of each of the Towns and Villages not to impose and collect from registered owners of such joint serial bonds charges for mailing, shipping and insuring bonds transferred or exchanged by the fiscal agent, and, accordingly, pursuant to paragraph c of Section 70. 00 of the Local Finance Law, no such charges shall be so collected by the fiscal agent. Section 10. Any obligation issued under authority of this resolution shall contain on its face a recital in substantially the following form: "This obligation evidences the joint indebtedness of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York, the Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York, the HNAL, -- TB Minutes 7% 13/2009 Page 18 of� 2b FINAL Village of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York, and the Village of Cayuga Heights, Tompkins County, New York. " Section 1 .1 . Upon this resolution taking effect and with respect to this Town, and the adoption and taking effect of similar resolutions of the respective Town Boards and Village Boards of Trustees of the aforesaid Towns and Villages, the same shall be published in full in, the official newspaper, together with a notice of the Town Clerk in substantially the form provided in Section 81 . 00 of the Local Finance Law. Section 12. This resolution shall take effect immediately. MOVED: Supervisor Engman SECONDED: Councilman DePaolo VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 12b — Consider Justice Court Resolution Supervisor Engman introduced this item stating that the Town Court is asking for permission to submit a grant application to the state for a Justice Court Assistance Program grant , and the application deadline is August 1 , 2009 . Councilwoman Hunter moved the resolution and Councilman Stein seconded . With no discussion , the resolution was approved , unanimous . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 124: JUSTICE COURT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS: in 2009 the NYS State Legislature once again established the Justice Court Assistance Program to assist towns and villages in the operation of its Justice Courts, and WHEREAS: the Chief Administrative Judge of the State 's Unified Court System is once again entertaining grant applications for the year 2009, and WHEREAS: the deadline date for application is August 1 , 2009, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: that this governing board of the Town of Ithaca authorizes and directs the Town Justices to complete and file the 2009 Justice Court Assistance Program Grant Application with the State of New York's Unified Court System MOVED: Councilwoman Hunter FINAL, - TB Minutes 7/ 13 /2009 Page 19 of 26 FINAL SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 13 — Consent Agenda Supervisor Engman introduced this item and asked if any board member would like to move any item off the Consent Agenda . Councilwoman Hunter asked to correct the June 11th minutes title as a Special Meeting ; not a Regular Meeting . With no further discussion , Councilman Stein moved the Consent Agenda and Councilman Levine seconded . Motion approved , unanimously. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009425: ConsentAgenda Items BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and/or adopts the resolutions for Consent Agenda Items: a. Town of Ithaca Minutes b. Town of Ithaca Abstract C. Bolton Point Abstract d. Disposition Listing e . Appointment of Part time Project Assistant — Code Enforcement MOVED. Councilman Stein . SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 125a : APPROVE MINUTES OF JUNE 8, 2009, JUNE 11 , 2009 AND JUNE 22, 2009 WHEREAS, the Town Clerk has presented the minutes for the Town Board meetings held on June 8, 2009, June 11 , 2009 and June 22, 2009 to the Town Board for its review and approval of filing; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Board does hereby approve for filing the minutes of the meetings held on June 8, 2009, June 11 , 2009 and June 22, 2009. FINAL, — TB Minutes 7/ 1 '1 '; ') 009 Page 20 of 16 FINAL MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE., Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried. - Unanimous. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 125b: TOWN OF ITHACA ABSTRACT WHEREAS, the following numbered vouchers have been presented to the Ithaca Town Board for approval of payment; and WHEREAS, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board, now therefore be it RESOLVED, that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers in total for the amounts indicated. VOUCHER NOS. 6955- 7082 General Fund Town wide $ 127, 910. 48 General Fund Part Town 5, 835. 69 Highway Fund Part Town 51, 950. 23 Water Fund 339, 166. 14 Sewer Fund 460, 442. 39 Fire Protection Fund 200, 984. 50 Forest Home Lighting District 124. 77 Glenside Lighting District 48. 71 Renwick Heights Lighting District 68. 82 Eastwood Commons Li hting District 154. 38 Clover Lane Lighting District 18. 45 Winner's Circle Lighting District 58. 07 Burleigh Drive Lighting District 62. 34 Westhaven Road Lighting District 193. 85 Coddin ton Road Lighting District 115. 32 TOTAL $ 1, 187, 134. 14 MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye. Motion Carried - Unanimous. FINAL — 111 Minutes 7/ 1 '/ 2009 Page 21 o FINAL TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 125c: BOLTON POINT ABSTRACT WHEREAS, the following numbered vouchers for the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission have been presented to the governing Town Board for approval of payment, and WHEREAS, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers. Voucher Numbers: 1061 - 1135 Check Numbers: 11686 - 11760 Operating Fund $ 53, 785. 20 Bolton Point Road Project $ 143, 506. 80 SCADA Project $ 21096, 74 TOTAL $ 199, 388. 74 MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye, Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 125d: Disposition List WHEREAS, the Town Clerk has presented a list of eligible records for disposition according to the SARA MU1 Schedule to the Town Board for its review and approval; now therefore be it RESOLVED, the Town Board does hereby approve the disposition of the listed records as presented at the July 13, 2009 Town Board meeting. • 1987 Construction Phase 11 Water and Sanitary Sewer Mains Unsuccessful Bids • 1989 Trumansburg Road Sewer Extension Unsuccessful Bids • 1999 Water Tank Painting Unsuccessful Bids FINAL -- TB Minutes 71. 3/209 Page 22 of 2G FINAL MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009- 125e — APPOINTMENT OF PART TIME PROJECT ASSISTANT- CODES ENFORCEMENT. WHEREAS, Director of Code Enforcement has determined a need for a short term temporary position to complete a data entry project and there is presently a vacancy in a Project Assistant position, which affords high school-college students the opportunity to gain work experience; and WHEREAS, the Director of Code Enforcement and Human Resources Manager has determined that Saskya Caicedo possesses the necessary knowledge and skills to satisfactorily perform the duties of the Project Assistant for the Code Enforcement Department and makes the recommendation for appointment, Now, therefore, be. it RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the appointment of Saskya Caicedo as part time Project Assistant, effective to July 13, 2009; and be it further RESOLVED, - this position is a part time position averaging 30 hours per week for 6 weeks, at the hourly wage of $ 7. 25, from account number B8010. 100. There are no benefits included with this appointment. , MOVED: Councilman Stein SECONDED: Councilman Levine VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Motion Carried - Unanimous. Agenda Item No . 14 — report of Town Committees Supervisor Engman introduced this item , asking if board members wished to hold this until the Study Session Meeting of July 27th ? Councilman DePaolo announced that the most recent Planning Committee Meeting was rescheduled to this coming Monday, July 20th at 4 : 30 p . m . in the Aurora Room , Councilman Stein reminded the board about FFNTAL — TB Minutes 7/ 13 X2009 Page 23 of 26 FINAL previous discussion deferred regarding the August 24th Study Session Meeting . Supervisor Engman apologized and recommended cancelling the August 24th Study Session Meeting , unless something major comes up . All board members agreed to cancel the August 24th Study Session . Councilwoman Hunter suggested a discussion about Committees structure , and budget( s ) needs to take place and asked when those conversations will happen . Supervisor Engman said that there are some Budget Committee sessions to discuss the Budget on the schedule , but we' re currently working on getting the department budgets in and it will be another month before we have anything to work on . Councilman Levine stated that the Budget Committee is meeting on July 22nd at Noon . Councilwoman Hunter reported that on Wednesday , the 15th , a meeting with the garden community will take place at Lindemann Creek . She said that they are hoping to establish a governing body for that project and that it is going very well so far; most of the plots are rented out , and it is quite lovely. She expressed that she is please that there is a great deal of participation and many people are using Town parkland on a daily basis . Councilwoman Hunter said that she has concerns about the 2010 budget , and would like to discuss a budget line for this . Councilwoman Hunter urged Town Board members to see the garden and said that she brought in some of the garden ' s yields , as there is a bumper crop of lettuce and kohlrabi . Councilwoman Hunter also mentioned that there is a lobby display depicting the garden as well . With no further reports of Town Committees , Supervisor Engman moved on to the next agenda item . Agenda Item No . 15 — Reports of Town Officials Supervisor Engman stated that Department Head reports are in the packets and asked if there was any further discussion . Jon Kanter wanted to confirm that the Forest Home Traffic Calming Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday , July 22"d at 7 p . m . , in the Forest Home Chapel. At that meeting the consultants should have their final design ready for review by the Forest Home community. With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman moved to the next agenda item . Agenda Item No . 16 — Review .of Correspondence Councilwoman Hunter asked Supervisor Engman if he answered the survey to Binghamton University , Supervisor Engman said that he had . Councilwoman Hunter asked what he said . Supervisor Engman said that he did not remember but could go back and look it up . With no further discussion about correspondence , Supervisor Engman moved to the next agenda item . Agenda Item No . 17 — Consider going into Executive Session FINAL, — T13 Minutes 7% 13'2009 Page 24 of 26 FINAL Supervisor Engman asked the Board members to consider going in to Executive Session , stating that there would be two items : ( 1 ) To discuss the employment history of a particular person and ( 2 . ) Discuss the acquisition of Real Estate . He went on to say that when the board comes out of Executive Session they will be asked to vote on Item No . 1 . Counsel Susan Brock commented that the portion of the Executive Session dealing with the acquisition of Real Property, for the record , is because publicity would substantially affect its value ; that' s the criteria . Supervisor Engman agreed . With no further discussion , Supervisor Engman asked for someone to move going in to Executive Session . Councilwoman Leary moved and Councilman Levine seconded ; Vote to go into Executive Session was unanimous . The Town Board moved to go in to Executive Session at 7 : 15 p . m . No further minutes recorded . The Town Clerk was asked to leave the board room . Councilwoman Hunter offered to take notes regarding the results of further actions by the board and submit that information to the Town Clerk , The Town Clerk responded that it was necessary for her to remain available in order to record any actions taken by the board after they return from Executive Session . Supervisor Engman cautioned that the Executive Session could go very late and recommended that the Town Clerk depart , saying that any further actions could be noted by Councilwoman Hunter. The following actions were taken and reported to the Town Clerk by Town Board Member Councilwoman Hunter: End Executive Session : Upon a motion by Councilwoman Hunter and seconded by Councilman Stein , the Town Board ended its Executive Session and returned to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Town Board . Agenda Item No . 12a = Consider approval of a disciplinary process enacted for a particular employee Upon a motion by Councilman DePaolo and seconded by Councilman Stein the Town Board approved this item . TB RESOLUTION NO. 2009= 126: DISCIPLINARY PROCESS ENACTED FOR A PARTICULAR EMPLOYEE BE IT RESOLVED, based on the review of the record of Margaret Kirchgessner, Recreation and Youth Coordinator, which included: • Disciplinary letter outlining the charges • Transcript from the hearing • Exhibits presented at the hearing • Attorney's post hearing briefs FINAL, - 'TB Minutes 7/ 13'2009 Page 25 of 26 FINAL • Report and recommendation of Hearing Officer Ms. Kirchgessner is guilty of charges 1 and 3 and not guilty of charge 2, and she is to be disciplined with the penalty often ( 10) days suspension without. pay. The ten days will be served in increments of 1 day per week starting the week of Monday, August 31 , 2009, and ending the week of Monday, November 2, 2009. MOVED: Councilman DePaolo SECONDED: Councilman Stein VOTE: Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine, aye; Councilwoman Hunter, aye; Councilman DePaolo, aye . Not voting- excused: Supervisor Engman . Motion Carried. Respectfully Submitted , Kar n K Billings 9 FINAL. - 1`13 Minutes '7% 1 3i1009 Page ) 6 of 2fi 617. 20 d ,/ Appendix A 0Itio r"► State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose : The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant . The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1 : Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 . Part 2 : Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ✓ Part 1 El Part 2 El Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF ( Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. * MC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared . * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Local Law Amending Lakefront Residential Zoning Requirements Name of Action Town of Ithaca Town Board Name of Lead Agency Herb Engman Town Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsi a Off icer i ad Agency Signature of Preparer ( If different from responsible officer) s J (,k, L k1 &7,,JUC . to Page 1 of 21 PART 1 --PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE : This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment . Please complete the entire form , Parts A through E . Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation . If information requiring such additional work is unavailable , so indicate and specify each instance . Name of Action Local Law amending Lakefront Residential Zoning requirements and adding related definitions in Chapter 270 of Town of Ithaca Code Location of Action (include Street Address , Municipality and County) All Lakefront Residential-Zoned properties along NYS Route 89 (Taughannock Boulevard) and NYS Route 34 (East Shore Drive) within the Town of Ithaca municipal boundary. Name of Applicant/Sponsor Town of Ithaca Address 215 North Tioga Street City / PO Ithaca State New York Zip Code 14850 Business Telephone (607) 273- 1747 Name of Owner (if different) various Address city / PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action : This action includes adopting a local law that amends the Lakefront Residential (LR) zoning requirements and adds related definitions in Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code . The proposed amendments to the LR Zone will, among other things, include definitions for the main terms expressed in the LR Zone provisions, extend the maximum allowable dock lengths from 30 feet to 40 feet, unless a water depth of 5 feet cannot be obtained, in which case dock length may be 50 feet, begin dock length measurements from the Ordinary High Water line, increase the maximum allowable dock square footage from 300 to 320 square feet or 320 feet plus 8 square feet for each additional foot in length if the structure is allowed to extend beyond 40 feet in length, limit the size of boatlifts, permit roofs on boatlifts with certain restrictions, permit accessory storage structures within 10 feet of the shoreline in certain situations, and clarify some sections of the existing LR Zone provisions . Page 2 of 21 -- 1 Please Complete Each Question Indicate N . A . if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: El Urban Industrial El Commercial l Residential (suburban) Rural ( non-farm) Forest Agriculture ID Other Cayuga Lake Waterfont, some wooded areas and vacant properties 2 . Total acreage of project area: 129. 5 acres. (includes +/-62 .4 acres on Taughannock Blvd., +/- 15 .2 acres on East Shore Dr., and remaining +/-51 .9 acres over Cayuga Lake that is Zoned LR) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland ( Non-agricultural ) N/A acres N/A acres Forested N/A acres N/A acres Agricultural ( Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc . ) N/A acres N/A acres Wetland ( Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24 , 25 of ECL) N/A acres N/A acres Water Surface Area (estimated acreage of LR Zone extending into lake) 51 .9 acres 51 .9 acres Unvegetated ( Rock, earth or fill) N/A acres N/A acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces N/A acres N/A acres Other ( Indicate type) Residential lakefront development (estimated acreage) 77 . 6 acres 77. 6 acres Taughannock Blvd-Hudson/Dunkirk, Lordstown soils and rock outcroppings. 3 . What is predominant soil type( s) on project site? East Shore Dr.- not mapped, no soils information found a. Soil drainage: 17 Well drained % of site Moderately well drained 100 % of site. MPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres ( see 1 NYCRR 370 ). 4 . Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑■ Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock varies ( in feet ) 5 . Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 00 - 10 % % M10 - 15 % 40 % ✓® 15 % or greater 60 % 6 . Is project substantiall contiguous to or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes n■ No 7 . Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes Mn No g , What is the depth of the water table? varies ( in feet ) 9 . Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑ Yes ❑N No 10 . Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑N Yes ❑ No (private property) Page 3 of 21 t 1 1 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E] Yes 0 No (see below) According to: F New York Natural Heritage Program has determined that the west side of the Cayuga Lake lakefront may contain rare plants, animals, and/or ificant ecological communities. Identify each species: The areas of concern lie west and southeast the developed portions of the Taughannock Boulevard lakeshore and are within the Tompkins County Unique Natural Areas (UNA) 97 and 98 , named "Indian Creek Gorge & Lake Slopes" and "The Hog Hole," respectively. UNA 97 is located on the west side of Taughannock Boulevard - the non-lakeshore side - and UNA 98 is located within the NYS Alan Treman Marine Park. 12 . Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? ( i. e. , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? nYes El No Describe: 13 . Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes No If yes, explain: Cayuga Lake is a shared natural resource that is used by the community as a recreation and open space area. 14 . Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E■ Yes E] No Views of Cayuga Lake from NYS Route 34 and NYS Route 89 15 . Streams within or contiguous to project area: There are many streams located on individual properties throughout the LR Zone area. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 . Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Cayuga Lake is contiguous. b. Size ( in acres): Surface area of Cayuga Lake is 66 .4 sq.miles, or 42,496 acres. Portion within the Town of Ithaca is approximately 51 .9 acres . Page 4 of 21 17 . Is the site served by existing public utilities? FE Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? N/A F Yes No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? N/A Yes RNo 18 . Is the site located in ffes ricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304 ? No 19 . Is the site located in or substantial ) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617 ? ❑ Yes Ei No 20 . Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes ®i No B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: N/A acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: N/A acres initially; N/A acres ultimately. C, Project acreage to remain undeveloped: N/A acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A ( if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: N/A ( upon completion of project )? h . If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially N/A N/A N/A N/A Ultimately N/A N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions ( in feet ) of largest proposed structure: N/A height; N/A width; N/A length . j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2 . How much natural material ( i. e. rock, earth, etc. ) will be removed from the site? N/A tons/cubic yards. 3 . Will disturbed areas be reclaimed E] Yes 17 No R N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? N/A Yes No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? N/A Yes No 4 . How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/A acres. Page 5 of 21 5 . Will any mature forest ( over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? FYes MO No 6 . If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: N/A months, ( including demolition) 7 . If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A ( number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 : N/A month N/A year, ( including demolition) c . Approximate completion date of final phase: N/A month N/A year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes No . N /A 8 . Will blasting occur during construction? 0 Yes M No N/A 9 . Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A ; after project is complete 10 . Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? M Yes ME No If yes, explain: 12 . Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes H1 No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc ) and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13 . Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes M No Type 14 . Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 17 Yes No If yes, explain: 15 . Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? IF] Yes ❑ No 16 . Will the project generate solid waste? 0 Yes Fol No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? N/A tons b. if yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑ Yes 0 No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E] Yes ® No N/A Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17 . Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑ Yes No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? N/A tons/ month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? N/A years. 18 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes F] No 19 . Will project routinely produce odors ( more than one hour per day)? Yes No 20 . Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Yes No 21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes No If yes, indicate type(s) 22 . If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/ minute. 23 . Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24 . Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25 . Approvals Required : Type Submittal Date Town Board Adoption 8/ 11 /08, 10/20 j08i City, Town, Village Board Yes No fl � o og, of Local Law Amendments 1 / 12/0912/9/0% 6/8/09, 7/ 13/09 Town of Ithaca Planning 7/ 1 /2008 City, Town, Village Planning Board L±j Yes No Board Recommendation to Town Board Town of Ithaca Zoning 6/ 16/2008 City, Town Zoning Board Yes No Board Recommendation to Town Board City, County Health Department Yes No Town of Ithaca 7/3/2008 Other Local Agencies El Yes . No Conservation Board Recommendation to TB Other Regional Agencies MYes M No State Agencies El Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies 1:1 Yes O No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? EYes F1 No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan Subdivision Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑ Resource management plan M Other Page 8 of 21 2 . What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Lakefront Residential (LR) 3 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A 4 . What is the proposed zoning of the site? The proposal does not include new zoning. The proposal includes an amendment to the existing Lakefront Residential Zone. 5 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A. The proposal will not result in changes to the residential development density. Changes will only apply to proposed docks, accessory structures, and boatlifts, etc. located within the Lakefront Residential Zone. 6 . Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? rE7 Yes No IiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliI 11111111111111,11111 MINIMUM iiiii Ill!!I 7 . What are the predominant land use(s ) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action? Residential is the predominant land use within 1 /4 mile of the proposed action (amending the LR Zone requirements) . However, other uses include educational, park land, marina, municipal sewage treatment plant, and commercial uses. Conservation Zoning is the most predominant zoning classification on the west side of Cayuga Lake within 1 %4 mile of the proposed action. Lakefront Commercial zoning is the most predominant zoning classification on the east side of the lake (followed by Medium Density Residential zoning, Multiple Residence zoning, and two Planned Development zones). 8 . Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? ©i Yes No 9 . If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A Page 9 of 21 10 . Will proposed action require any authorization( s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Yes ®■ No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services ( recreation, education, police, fire protection? El Yes El No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes El No 12 . Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes F1 No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. OYes No D . Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Town of Ithaca Town Board Date 7/ 13/09 Signature Title Town Supervisor If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information ( Read Carefully) ' ! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question : Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst . ! The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2 . The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations . But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response , thus . requiring evaluation in Part 3 . ! The impacts of each project, on each site , in each locality, will vary . Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance . They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question . ! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question . ! In identifying impacts , consider long term , short term and cumulative effects . Instructions (Read carefully) a . Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2 . Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b . Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers . C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2 )to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided , check column 2 . If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example , check column 1 . d . Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2 ) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance . Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e . If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If'a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible . This. must be explained in Part 3 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1 . Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, ( 15 foot M M Yes EI No rise per 100 foot of length ) , or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% . • Construction on land where the depth to the water table F r M Yes DNo is less than 3 feet. (Cayuga Lake shore) • Construction of paved parking area for 1 ,000 or more Yes ❑ No vehicles . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or r IN 0 r Yes [:] No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface . (shoreline cliffs) • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or rl 1:1 M Yes 17 No involve more than one phase or stage . • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove El ❑ M Yes E] No more than 1 , 000 tons of natural material ( i . e . , rock or soil ) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill . M Yes 0 No • Construction in a designated floodway. (Cayuga Lake) M M MYes r7No • Other impacts: Yes No Proposed local law amendment extends the allowable dock length for waterfront properties from 30 to 50 feet, measured from the ordinary high water line, increases overall surface area from 300 to 350 square feet, allows a maximum 308 square foot covered boatlift for properties, and allows accessory structures within 10 feet of the shore of Cayuga Lake if such accessory structures are on a property with a cliff or enbankment. 2 . Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? ( i . e . , cliffs , dunes , geological formations, etc . ) ENO MYES Specific land forms: ❑Yes [:] No Impact on Water 3 . Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? ( Under Articles 15 , 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) S NO ID YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body . ri [] Yes ID No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑ E] Yes ❑ No a protected stream . • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water 0 D Yes 0 No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland . 0 0 Yes 1:1 No Other impacts : ®e 0 Yes El No Cayuga Lake is a protected water body per NYS DEC classification 'A', which indicates a best usage for a source of drinking water, swimming and other recreation, and fishing. Proposed amendments are not anticipated to have any impacts on the Cayuga Lake. 4 . Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? .� NO rYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of 1:1 17 E] Yes 1:1 No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease . • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface Q 0 OYes ❑ No area . • Other impacts : 11 D 0 Yes 11 No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by . Impact Impact Project Change 5 . Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit . 1:1 D Yes El No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ 17 E] Yes 11 No have approval to serve proposed (project) action . • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater M M Yes r7 No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity . • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ Yes D No supply system . • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. El ❑ Yes 1:1 No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ Yes No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20, 000 gallons El n ❑ Yes No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into E 17 Yes ❑ No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions . • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or r7 ❑ Yes 11 No chemical products greater than 1 , 100 gallons . • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without El M Yes R No water and/or sewer services . • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses E] Yes No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities . . • Other impacts : E DYes 1:1 No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6 . Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns , or surface water runoff? M NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows Yes No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion . 1:1 0 E] Yes r7No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns . F7 M MYes r7No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated 13 M MYes Q No floodway. • Other impacts : E] Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON AIR 7 . Will Proposed Action affect air quality? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1 , 000 or more vehicle trips in any El ❑ MYes r7No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton E] Yes MNo of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs . per hour M M 17Yes r7No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU 's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land M MYes MNo committed to industrial use . • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of El E] Yes MNo industrial development within existing industrial areas . • Other impacts : Yes r7No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 . Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? M NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Q ❑ Yes ❑ No Federal list, using the site , over or near the site , or found on the site . Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. El El r7Yes r7No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, M r Yes No other than for agricultural purposes . • Other impacts : El El 0Yes No g . Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident E] Yes M No or migratory fish , shellfish or wildlife species . • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of 0 ❑ Yes 0 No mature forest (over 100 years of age ) or other locally important vegetation . • Other impacts : . 0 0 ❑ Yes E] No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 . Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ®i NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to El Yes 17 No agricultural land ( includes cropland , hayfields , pasture, vineyard , orchard , etc . ) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of 0 M E] Yes 0 No agricultural land . • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 El M E] Yes M No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2 . 5 acres of agricultural land . Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of Yes No agricultural land management systems (e . g . , subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches , strip cropping ) ; or create a need for such measures (e . g . cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . • Other impacts : El Yes No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? ( If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617 .20, Appendix B . ) NO �i YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses , or project components obviously different El [] Yes r7 No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural . • Proposed land uses , or project components visible to users of E 0 M Yes No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource . • Project components that will result in the elimination or El M Yes _ No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area . • Other impacts : El Yes 11 No Proposed amendments will permit boatlifts with roofs, but contain restrictions and limits on height, roof pitch, and second floors to mitigate the screening of important lake views from private lakefront properties and from Cayuga Lake users. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 , Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? El NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ 0 Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places . • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within n Yes E] No the project site . • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive r 0 Yes 0 No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts : El D El Yes El No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 . Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO n YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. M M r7 Yes 0 No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. M M M Yes n No • Other impacts : El ❑ Yes E] No The local law is authorizing people to extend the built environment over a shared natural resource, and the Town is mitigating the impacts by regulating the size of docks and boat hoists. IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14 . Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617 . 14(g )? NO YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? E] Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the Yes [] No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the M ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the 0 0 M Yes E] No resource? • Other impacts : 0 [] Yes ❑ No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15 . Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or D 0 0 Yes 0 No goods . • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems . D D 0 Yes D No • Other impacts : ❑ 0 0 Yes . 0 No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 . Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the D D 0 Yes [] No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an D 0 D Yes 0 No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use . • Other impacts : ❑ ❑ [] Yes D No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17 . Will there be objectionable odors , noise , or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [D NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1 , 500 feet of a hospital , school or other sensitive 0 D DYes 0 No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) . 0 D D Yes D No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ D DYes 0 No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures . • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a D 0 D Yes 0 No noise screen . • Other impacts: D 0 D Yes 0 No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large I Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18 . Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of 1:1 0Yes 0No hazardous substances ( i . e . oil , pesticides , chemicals, radiation , etc. ) in the event of accident or upset conditions , or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission . • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" M E] Yes r7No in any form (i .e . toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating , infectious, etc. ) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied M DYes 17No natural gas or other flammable liquids . • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other El 1:1 rYes rNo disturbance within 2 , 000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste . • Other impacts : 11 DYes 0No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19 . Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? NO ID YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in' which the M rYes rNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% . • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating 1:1 QYes rNo services will increase by more than 5 % per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or 0 rYes ID No goals . • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use . 0 0 DYes DNo • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities , M ❑ E]Yes rNo structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community M rYes ❑ No services (e .g . schools , police and fire, etc . ) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future El El F7 Yes No projects . • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. M Yes M No • Other impacts : Yes No 20 . Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts ? ®i NO ® YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 e rn }'y /�✓' / d-dDy' Q 7 W� rm . Y«. �T�ompl� ns kC u'Ift A✓ fi a ° Y bJ - JUL - 8 200 9 DEPARTM9ENTOF PLANNING Yy 121 East Cour-Street r' PLANNING / ENGINEERING 4th ac�a,�New�Yo k 14850 Edward C. Marx, AICP " _ , xm , { w4' Commissioner of Planning * Telephone (607) 274-5560 and Public Works Fax (607) 274-5578 July 7, 2009 Ms . Christine Balestra, Planner Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re : Review Pursuant to §239 —1, -m and —n of the New York State General Municipal Law Action : Zoning Amendment proposal for Lakefront Residential (LR) Zone, Town of Ithaca Dear Ms . Balestra : This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by the Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to §239 -1 and -m of the New York State General Municipal Law. The Department has reviewed the proposal, as submitted, and has determined that it has no negative inter- community, or county-wide impacts . The Department offers the following comments regarding the proposed project, which are not formal recommendations under General Municipal Law §239 -1 and —m: • The updated language limiting dock length to 40 feet, and up to 50 feet if a water depth of 5 feet is not reached at 40 feet, is an improvement from the previous version of the draft law. • As stated in our January 9, 2009 letter, the language in Section' (6) (k) (7) that an extension "shall not exceed eight feet in at least one dimension (length or width)" continues to be overly permissive and could result in construction of large "decks" rather than "docks" over the water. Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record. Sincerely, Edward C . Marx, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Public Works Inclusion through (Diversity I # 6w Can I Save money Unfortunately, once an underground aquifer is contaminated, it is all but and collect water samples impossible to clean it up . The best that Protecting myself? can be done is to identify as many of the No, not if you want the test results to stand contaminants as possible and develop Private Water up in court. Samples must be collected by long-term strategies for managing and an unbiased third party who uses accepted living with the risks . Supplies procedures and verifies the chain of Near custody for the sample . Typically samples 8e Where can I get are collected by someone from the certified Gas Well D r ' ' 10 n g testing lab . Baseline testing is like taking more information . out an insurance policy on your water. It ' s A more detailed information booklet i n not cheap, but it will pay big dividends if titled "Documenting Water your water is contaminated . In between Contamination from Gas Wells in NY New York State . baseline tests, property owners can monitor State" is available on the Community for contamination by collecting Science Institute website at "unofficial" samples on their own and www. communityscience . or By Stephen Penningroth, Ph.D. having them tested for several "red flag" Executive Director Community Science Institute indicators. See CSI booklet mentioned in #8 for details. This information is provided as a public # 7 . What happens if service by the Community Science Institute (CSI), a local nonprofit baseline testing indicates organization Community Science Institute whose mission is to monitor • my water is and protect natural resources, particularly Contaminated ? www.communityscience.org. water. CSI operates the largest state- CSI recommends contacting your town or certified water quality testing laboratory in village government, your county health 284 Langmuir Lab/Box 1044 95 Brown Road Tompkins County, located near the Ithaca department, and the NYState DEC Ithaca NY 14850 Voice/Fax 607 257 6606 airport . We currently partner with a Division of Water in Albany . Inform them Certified Water Testing network of 50 volunteers to monitor water of the results of the baseline tests and NYSDOH-ELAP #11790 quality in Cayuga Lake and its tributary request assistance in : a) Designing follow EPA Lab Code NY01518 streams. The CSI lab is certified to test up tests to identify all the contaminants in drinking water samples from private wells . your water, b) Assessing the health risks Stephen Penningroth Executive Director and environmental risks caused by the IaWcommunityscience org , Chi contaminants, and c) Seeking financial compensation from the gas company . April, 2009 Should I be worried 3 . What should I test radioactivity, and methane and ethane ($242 including shipping and handling) . about contamination of ray water for and what my water by a gas well ? does it cost? The total cost of baseline testing by CSI is Yes. There is solid evidence that gas wells It ' s not possible to know in advance $427 . In addition, CSI charges $60 for have contaminated drinking water supplies exactly which chemicals may get into collecting private water samples in in the past. While no systematic studies are your water. Contaminants could come Tompkins County. Volume discounts are available on the Marcellus Shale, from the drilling fluid, the hydraulic available . See the CSI booklet mentioned experience with old- style vertical gas wells fracturing fluid, underground metals and in 98 for an explanation of baseline tests. in Pennsylvania suggests there is roughly a radioactive materials released by the 1 % to 5% chance of contamination. Penn drilling and fracturing processes, or a # 4 .. When should I test State Cooperative Extension recommends combination of these sources . Testing for testing all wells, springs, ponds and all possible contaminants would cost my water? streams within 1 , 000 feet of a traditional thousands of dollars . CSI recommends baseline testing two to vertical gas well . Because horizontal wells twelve months before the well is drilled ; typically extend several thousand feet out Baseline testing is designed to provide within six months after the well is . from the drill pad, landowners further than evidence of contamination while completed; every time the well is 1 , 000 feet from the well head may also minimizing expense. If evidence of hydraulically fractured; every two years want to consider testing their water, contamination is found, follow-up tests for the 20- to 30 year life of the well ; and can identify as many of the pollutants as every two years for ten years after the well possible. Each certified lab approaches is abandoned and plugged. � ° How .can water ® n baseline testing differently, and my property become consumers decide which lab to use and # 5m Where should I have contaminated ? what to test for. try water tested ? There are several ways contamination by a Testing must be performed by a. gas well can occur. Some are related to CSI structures baseline testing as follows : commercial lab that is certified by the New carelessness and human error. Others are a) Tests performed by CSI lab in Ithaca: York State Department of Health — related to the extremely high pressures and pH, alkalinity, total dissolved solids, Environmental Laboratory Approval large volumes of fluid used for hydraulic chloride, conductivity, ammonia- Program (FLAP) . Only test results from an fracturing that can force fluids as well as nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, total Progra e(ELA lab are admissible in legal natural gas to move in unexpected suspended solids, turbidity, detergents, ings involving gas wells in New three other directions underground . There is also a total hardness and calcium ($ 185 ); and b) York.proceedings list of certified labs is available at possibility, remote but real, that the cement Tests subcontracted by CSI to her http ://www. wadsworth. orgAabcert/elap/co casing around the vertical or horizontal certified labs : Metals (barium, iron, mm. html . The CSI lab is listed under well hole will fail, allowing fluids and gas manganese; arsenic), gross alpha and beta Tompkins County, FLAP ID # 11790 . to escape. • • 46 HIDDEN COSTS PUBLIC HEALTH LAND, WATER; These. are tough times — many of us are How will releasing toxic chemicals into our & WILDLIFE struggling to make ends meet. With big surroundings affect us and our children ? As residents, farmers, hunters, fishermen— sign-up bonuses and promises of royalties, this land, water, and wildlife sustains our hopes are high. Is it too good to be true? Hydraulic-fracturing the Marcellus shale livelihoods and rural way of life. requires a specific chemical cocktail that We 're not telling anyone what to do. But includes: carcinogens (cancer-causing), Each time a Marcellus well gets fracked making a good decision means knowing the neurotoxins (damage nerves), it uses millions of gallons of our fresh facts, and understanding the hidden costs endocrine . disruptors (reproductive water, and gives us back millions of organ damage and birth defects) gallons of toxic waste to deal with. • Decreasing returns. . . Royalties may not Data at www. endocrinedisruption. com ➢ The World Bank says the next world be what they seem. As production war will be fought over water. quickly tapers off, so do the royalties. Radon, a radioactive gas, and heavy ➢ Private companies can take an metals such as mercury and arsenic, unlimited amount of water out of our • After drilling, land and home values exist safely deep in shale. Once shale is plummet. Most leases are "held by fractured, they' re brought to the surface. public lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands ➢ After drilling, some residents can production", meaning thet industrial operations continue for decades. Land The millions of gallons of sludge that light their tap or well water on fire . . . with active drilling is very hard to sell. flow back out of the well after fracking ➢ Water is precious. Do 4 we want to are considered by the US Dept of trade it away for short term gain? • Local jobs? Many jobs in the industry Energy to be the most toxic of any oil Current regulations allow up to 16 wells are highly specialized and have out-of- and gas product. Where will it go? per square mile, each one 5+ acres. state workers that travel with the drill Only a few hundred feet of buffer from rigs from site to site, country to country. Gas companies and the DEC want to homes, businesses, or streams required, inject these produced fluids into empty • Gas drilling is expensive for towns and gas wells, like the Malulla well in Van Drilling operations mean loud noises, municipalities, with increased costs for Etten NY. Few treatment facilities exist road repair, emergency services, and bright lights, cleared forests, and heavy local infrastructure . Who pays for this? • . Accidents occur frequently, and include toxins — wildlife is killed or scared off, making hunting and fishing difficult. documented water well contamination, • Economic growth? Side effects of toxic spills, and fatal explosions. drilling and bringing heavy industry to It' s not just about individual wells : a gas the rural landscape can economically 800 cases of water contamination from boom means loud compressor stations, pipeline digging, constant truck traffic, damage other local industries : gas drilling are documented in NM bright ' flares, explosions . . . 24/7 activity agriculture, wineries, and tourism. alone, a gas fire in VA burned for 3 days How much of the quick money leaves the Cancer, birth defects, infertility, fatal What do you love about this . area? What area? How many hidden costs remain? explosions. . . What price might we pay9 do you want to leave for your grandkids? • • 1 1 � r — fill rl .. • I MIMs sit — 4 , � ✓! ' I ' �.t 9 •,. '�i � .•F .'. J _ 't . ,h V"42' arliS".��h.�Y J 1 � • ' • ♦ 1 • • • . 1 �.».'^ ,:,�.a" . .Y- IMF , . '~ +-�4"2s�+s 1 • • — ._ _ • / v #nom : S '� 4 iY: u r ♦ • _ 1 • • ' • I / I ' I ' / I ' / li ? - toy Mai fill IF b Fir - • 111 • 11 I 1 1 • • • . • - 1 - 11 : I 111 / II ' / Vs Lease , hnform i 'j Information Non-coTi�enhonal as g Finding the Gas leases are public information. At the drilling and blasting are Tompkins County Clerk' s office and at coming soon to New York' s Gas Leases the Assessment Office, you can use free, Finger Lakes Region and in Your public computers to find out which private or state properties around you or, around Southern Tier. Neighborhood your favorite natural areas or state parks have been leased to gas companies. Find out how it will affect or Town What You Can Learn : your health, property values, family, community, and A Step-by-Step Guide • when each lease was signed and environment when it expires and Worried about : • if surface rights were given : the what you can do about it. right to drill, hydrofrack, and - • pollution of your air and build roads, pipelines, & other drinking water structures to get gas • continual compressor noise in • if long-term storage of toxic Shaleshock your neighborhood waste is allowed on the land • declining property values is an umbrella organization for Compulsory Integration concerned individuals and groups constant large truck traffic If at least 60% of the land area around you whose opinions about the being forced by NYS to sell your natural gas is leased, you can be forced by NYS into a Marcellus Shale drilling and spacing unit for drilling and blasting— blasting range from "None" to • tax increases to cover road even if you have not signed a lease. "It can be done safely . " damage & emergency services Although gas companies cannot set foot on your land, toxic chemicals under We invite you to join us : Use this citizens guide to find extremely high pressure can be injected out where the leases are under your property without your ww . shaleshock. org permission and your gas can be sucked out (607) 2 $04695 located, from the side (you will receive the minimum compensation). shaleshock08*yahoo. com Tompkins County Edition qpmpkins Count Clerk' s alphabetical 0which is easy to scan for y Tompkins Apty ' the name�you are looking for. � Office Assessment Office (7) Click "Display Document" for a list of Located : downstairs in the leases meeting your criteria. Located : Next to Dewitt Park, on the Tompkins County Courthouse (8) Double Click on any line of the file to 2"d Floor of the T . C . Annex Building, . 320 N. Tioga Street, Ithaca show the details . The left-hand page shows 128 E . Buffalo Street, Ithaca Flours : 9 : 00 am to 5 : 00 pm Mon—Fri basic data and the right-hand page is the Hours : 8 : 00 am to 4 : 30 pm Mon—Fri lease. You can page through ,the. lease to Note: You have to go through a metal detector see the terms . Double-clicking on the lease The T. C . Assessment Office has free, public to enter the courthouse. No cameras or makes it big enough to actually see . computers from which you can access both the recording devices are allowed, although they Clicking on the X in the upper right corner assessment database and the T. C . Clerk ' s will hold them for you and return them when returns the lease to its original size. database, which contains the gas leases . The you leave. Cell phones & computers are ok° computers are on your right as you enter. To Find Gas Leases , To find a property when you do not ( 1 ) From the desktop, double click on either know the name of the land owner: "Assessment Database" to get Image Mate Use any of the four computers to the (which contains the assessment data) or on left when you enter the office. "County Clerk Web" to get to the County In this case, you must first use the Tompkins Clerk' s database. County Assessment database. This can be ( 1 ) From the desktop, double click on accessed either at the T. C . Clerk ' s office or in "Enterprise Viewer" to get the County the T. C . Assessment office. (2) Follow the steps ;outlined earlier to retrieve Clerk EDMS Database: (This may already the information you desire. be on the screen. ) At the T.C. Clerk's Office, Note: The County Clerk database works (2) In the drop-down menu for "Document 1 slightly differently when accessed from the ( ) Close screens until you get•the desktop, Assessment Office instead of the Clerk ' s Class" choose "Deed. " then double click on "Image Mate Pro. " office. (3) In the drop-down menu for "Document (2) Type in the tax parcel number (a) In your result from Step (7) earlier, to get a Subclass" choose "Oil and Gas Lease. " (format: X. - 1 -X) or street address . It often listing that is alphabetized by name, click works best to omit the house number and on the column heading "Party/l ' OR' " to (4) Choose all towns, or the town you wish to use just the street name. You can search the sort. search in, resulting document for the correct house number. Click on enter or view. (b) Click on "view" at the left to seethe lease (5 ) Fill in a time frame, or use "any/all . " details . (3) This gives you the name of the owner of (6) If you are looking for a particular name, the tax parcel, or a list of names that you (c) To make the lease larger, click "Full Screen on the left-hand page. Click the X type that in. If you leave it blank, your can choose from for the correct address, in 'the upper right to exit full-screen mode. result in Step 7 will be a list of names in depending on what search criteria you used. Gas Leases in Tompkins County Who We Are Marcellus Shale . �°•w"�" The snalesnoar citimens action -o Coalition (SCAC) is a network of Finger Community Impacts, - I takes residents - farmers, landowners, Community Action J�-t '' townspeople and city dwellers - who want " ' to protect the land and water our livelihoods depend on. PresentMbri to Ithaca Town Board July 13, 2009 What We Do Review Of Marcellus Concerns Public Health Effects SCAC projects Include: • Pout Fp wuh ecpert • Deco research P M hissipt ERb= • Hidden cosh • Public Health Effects • ed�ucatk" naax9 . i=9 ee m�np OM • f J��an�wel a - p tNl6bte Values - 10 000+ gals. of carcinogens, tieurotmdns, • i �d " °^f N 5 Senate, U� • � - or* 1b 10 jobs disruptors per well empigmrrr1f Jobs are a�a� � w°� . lo°�"�,� l" ,�- n1o52 �' - Waste destined for injection wetls/wa0er tx • A=% ammema • P,alc rnr«nieam Le dift orarnpem, _ inaeued mw ra. cad - Road accidents, well contamination, fires, •• Uiteretlaeers baselift ( tesdny - mWtY wew uetierEe per w�dl 1� mr sWKC" efoosions, ewsure • v mUi,r nnDCl�lerre°a�jOe - mrwe • Air 4ralny lnvatrrnei a� 01ne - Air quality impairments • rase hon, true e. - Damaqe m men-anon _ Noise from tnxks, heavy equorrent, at drill • weDS10e ( - EmnaMC Caere a Tredmin heavy ayulgnent, at ddWr IoW murd io are Pmt ,mormaom uaery _ m o � (� N1°165o om t m site, and from compressors 24/7 Hidden Costs Whats Ahead For Us. . , 40 Acre Spadng (Jonas Feld, WY) Pied. • Hidden Costs _ - Diminished real estate values — Only 296local eriployrtient; jobs are imported, most profits exported — Increased co—stss for road repair, emergency P services, r� hazmat resporisei, increased Qtne - Damage to multi-0lllion dollar local industries (agriculture, wineries, tourism) 1 1 '�zs / u i iy6YIx7 7i�,*,,� XZt A„ �' � u. .Xy �.� k' dam' �'it^,°! \ 1 � v r 'l� f � �ya s ��� 4 �1� r} ' � � �«� .K�y>+.TAF11ffITty., . i� ; �F 4 { L-4 �/ XN Its 91 5L r _ Yom.. �.r f' � �~ 'T � " 1�t� r. � �� � } �r �+a� '�ir»•; 4 t: :➢ Q,y9 �� }x 4ti '�3HM9 k� E �2A�� {..�'�" ���� 3 �"�� : �tir r •� 6 t'�Pt9 pppppppppp J � mim `ea°°nr o m.,..® shale caht+, Risks,dR. TredeW Compulsory Integrations ---•-- rome �' . ■ akww.e ra. ® v rmaeaa - - . v orywmwn �� .:ub4�,- - Ice � _ • la.e• ® .. .•r.rm .. .>...r�..rw t ® �wm�� ®=raew wine■ . `•r. ,. 1?-Y: 9•afamaba:A�rD a1d+�D�•'�Blobyj 67a 0/bs MWroAA2fL035NM'[r Eaioa■yI • °ir" TCCOG's Gas Drilling Task Force: So, , , What Can Ithaca Town Folks Recommendations For Local Do? What Else? Officials: • work ageres ltys nuilnlutbn • lmdwstaw mxauon Follow recommendations of Sullivan Canty and TCCOG • Require Traffic studies for safe ingress and egress or local govt io w o`er larw assasmeot vs, sewvarKe tax gas drilling task for to: use (Em Ankle 23, Sm 303-2) ! Require mandatory funding of emergency personnel • many and speeb Grater training, (our emergency crews will need training and • Seek edrreee 5(a75 Fr kannkenw Wren (�a) • resources other Infrastructure) mmment paw from om wmdn Town boundaries am sensidn arm or w 61e aqufts; we may want �� equipment In controlling well fires or dealing • seer DIS $ahty naougb kec - MIN (cokoe� Tnno• I w m with drilling sibe accidents)POW auk matron ` bm w eed.si kow� • Establish weight limits laws for local wads and traffic • Require disclosure of the dremkats used In the fraddng • work m � kxm roads brake„ b�, ,, q ruks / regs taWred to the wdc routes we antidpate fluid for emergency personnel use odww.r pwra■r _ t Tawo a moo • write seismic drilling ordinances • Require Payment of foes for. - Owrwtlya wdea vaam • Require Mandatory mad performance bgndsfro s, e - mrauen aand �� brTO+rfie natural g Insurance and performance bontls fmm the - miWatmie ovesednq roes manaenance anon safety gas operators Wait. . .There's More! ...and Seek Involved Agency Status Recommended Resources: a•t■W Tmaa®rra • A ntlm xwww am y(gkko�jrdA9rft"ss Y°may° m° • Seek involved agency status from the DEC .�M :�,kq - WI yo so they can be included in any o �_ '•a - ust and odors coordinated review. This is what will help - smrrmwter manage am aquifer p amcdon - wFaadk proteerory aosia canard. Setatbo Corbel guide the DEC in making the kkb'J/wrv+aw�aaa - mask■ame =arngpamaona�oryaun�k2, wka conditions more protective of kcal �,�� �"r�°°`°°"b°°°a no setbado and Won mnbds on m rxrdai uses araa.■e+Fmmnm_smgfmxkq. - Areas for reomdmg WWII"w area as G Envir m ad Interests, or even denying certain permits ===M=W� ,r mare wore masw•vr - Treecuitlngordn that would have environmental impacts �o�rka•=T one a.krunDnvlop . that (ant be fbied w Mw* m 3 We Are All in This Together Shaleshock Citizens Action Coalition Tompkins County Worker's Center 115 The Commons Ithaca NY www.shaleshack.org Thank You Ithaca Town Board for inviting us thy. 4 Revenues from agriculture, f • whine , tourism e �m" �YFL� ynd� � la Aso l .. •_ _ _, �e �' I • _At- risk revenue from r rich .L agricultural lands and products - $ 155 Billion Potential gains 0 , upstate At- risk revenue from our economies from ., 20 ,;years of � attractions that bring visitors �� �_ extr`action -= x$22 Billion - $237 Billion 0 0 OF aim Sources USDA Nat'l Agricultural Statistics Service, NYS Dept. of Agriculture, stuffaboutstates.com, NYS Agricultural Statistics Service, U .S. Census Bureau, Adirondack '• Base Camp, Wilkes Barre/Scranton Times Leader. Full footnotes and calculation methods on following slide. _; Marcellus Shale : Gains , Risks , Tradeoffs Footnotes and Methodology El Gas Wells $22bn 1 February 25 , 2009 Times Leader, "Amid cheap gas , Pa . drillers carry on " . State is not seeing the same reduction in Marcellus Shale drilling as other areas . By Rory Sweeney rsweenev @timesleader.com Staff Writer http ://www .timesleader. com/news/hottopics/shale/Amid_cheap_gas_Pa_drillers_carry_on_02-25-2009. htmI The contribution value was computed using a 50 trillion cubic feet estimate of recoverable gas multiplied by 25% for the fraction in New York State ; $ 14 per 1000 cubic feet, the high price in summer 2008 ; 12.5%, royalty for land owners . Not included in the calculation were upfront lease payments , nor costs imposed on localities and landowners due to damage to infrastructure, loss of use of farmland or loss of potable water. Farm Receipts $48bn ' 2 National Agricultural Statistics Services - see New York State and Cash Receipts link( at URL below) $3 .65 billion annually over 20 years = $73 billion http ://www. nass . usda . gov/Statistics_by_State/New_York/Publications/County_Estimates/index.asp Dairy Products $39bn 3 Stuff about States . New York State, select dairy products. $ 1 .95 billion cash receipts in 2004 . Original source : NYS Dept. of { Agriculture . Cash receipts total $39 billion over 20 years . http ://stuffaboutstates . com/new.york/agriculture. htm Wildlife Watching Hunting and Fishing $32bn g $32bn 4 New York total annual Hunting and Fishing income : $1 .6 Billion . Wildlife Watching $ 1 .6 billion . From U .S. Fish & Wildlife Service New York 2006 National Survey of Fishing , Hunting , and Wildlife-Associated Recreation http ://www.census .gov/prod/www/abs/fishing .html Grapes and Wine 5 New York Agricultural Statistics Service, op . cit : $3.4 billion annually : New York's Grape, Grape Juice and Wine Industry Profile , Source , NY Agricultural Statistics , 2007-2008 Annual Bulletin , Table 34, over 20 years = $68 billion Tourism $ 173bn 6 "Tourism Impact in the Adirondacks . " The Marcellus Shale counties constitute about 17% of the $51 billion spent in New York in 2007 , or $8.67 billion per year ; this equals $ 173 billion over 20 years . http ://www.adirondackbasecamp ,com/2008/09/tourism-impact- adirondacks/ �A G li :' ly OF 1p TOWN OF ITHACA 215 N . Tioga Street , Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 IOLJA/ WWWAOwn . ithacamy . us TOWN CLERK 273- 1721 PUBLIC WORKS (Roads, Parks , Trails, Water &Sewer) 273- 1656 ENGINEERING 273- 1747 PLANNING 273- 1747 ZONING 273-1783 FAX (607) 273= 1704 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM FROM : Dan Walker TO : Town Board DATE : July 8 , 2009 RE : King Road East Sewer Extension The King Road East sewer extension has bee completed and the Final Payment requisition has been. prepared for the project. The final project cost for the construction contract with DPH Transportation and Excavating is $76,020.00 which is under the original Contract cost of $84,520.00. There was one Change order approved by the Town Engineer In the amount of $2,700.00, which was issued to cover the cost of connecting one of the properties to the sewer system when the existing septic system was in the route of the sewer line. The possible total contract cost would have been $ 87,220.00 with the addition of the change order. The actual final cost of the Unit Item Contract was lower than the Original Contract Sum because several of the actual quantities were less than the original estimated quantities because of minor field adjustments. The principal item that was not expended was Rock Excavation because no rock was actually encountered in the pipe trench, The Town did incur an additional cost of $270.00 for the purchase of trees to replace threes that were removed during the construction. The tree replacement was a condition of an easement for the sewer line that was granted by a property owner. I :\Projects\E King Rd\King Road East Sewer EXT\King Road East Sewer Completion memo.doc Dan Walker Page 1 7/8/2009 APPLIC D CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT Page 1 of 2 Pages Project: East King Rd. Sewer Extention Contractor: PAYMENT NO . 3 DPH Transportation & Excavating Final Owner: Town of Ithaca 281 Saben Rd. P .O . Box 545 Application Date : 6/21 /2009 215 North Tioga Street Spencer, New York 14886 Ithaca, New york 14850 Period Ending : 6/21 /2009 Application is made for payment, as shown below, in connection with the contract. Continuation Sheet is attached. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE----------------------$ $76.020.00 The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: COLUMN "J" ON CONTINUATION SHEET Original Contract Sum -------------$ $849520.00 RETAINAGE 0 %------$ $0.00 Net change by Change Orders :-------$ $2,700.00 Other Adjustments-----------------$ 0.00 . TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAI NAG E---------------------$ $76, 020.00 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE-------$ $87,220.00 The undersigned Contractor certifies that ( 1 ) all previous progress LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES payments received from the Owner on account of work done under the FOR PAYMENT------------------$ $549411 .25 Contract referred to above have been applied to discharge in full all obligations of Contractor incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through _3_ inclusive ; and (2) title to all materials and equiptment incorporated in said work or CURRENT PAYMENT DUE--------$ $21 ,608.75 otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to the Owner at time of payment free and clear of all liens,claims, security interests and encumbrances (except such as covered by Bond acceptable to Owner) . CONTRACTOR : By: Date: Payment of the above Amount DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended. REMARKS: By: Date: This certification is not negotiable, it is payable only to the payee named herin and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under their Contract. App ion d Certification For Payment Page 2 of 2 Page Project: East King Rd. Sewer Extention Contractor: DPH Transportation & Excavating Payment No: 3 Owner: Town of Ithaca 281 Saben Rd. P.O. Box 545 215 North Tioga Street Spencer, New York 14886 Period Ending: 6/21 /2009 Ithaca, New york 14850 Contract Amount Work Com feted to Date Total Completed Item Bid Item Discription Estimated Unit Unit Price Extended Quan. or Extended Stored and Stored to No. Quantity Total Percent Total Materials Date (J) A B C D E F G H G+H 1 Mobilization 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 100% $39000.00 $3,000.00 2 Maintenance and Protection of Traffic 1 LS $1500.00 $ 1 ,500.00 100% $1 ,500.00 $ 1 ,500.00 3 18 Inch SDR 35 Sewer Line under Vegetation 715 LF $48.00 $34,320.00 715 $343320.00 $347320.00 4 4' Diameter Precast Manhole 5 EA. $5,000.00 $259000.00 5 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 5 Rock Excavation 200 CY $50.00 $10,000.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 6 Special Gravel Backfill 100 CY $12.00 $19200.00 50 $600.00 $600.00 7 Manhole Frames and Covers 5 EA. $1 ,000.00 $5,000.00 5 $5,000.00 $52000.00 8 4 Inch Service Cleanout 5 EA. $500.00 $2,500.00 5 $29500.00 $2,500.00 9 4 Inch Service Lateral 100 LF $20.00 $2,000.00 70 $ 1 ,400.00 $1 ,400.00 lChanoe Order #1 1 LS $25700.00 $2,700.00 1 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 Page Total $87,220.00 $765020.00 $0.00 $763020.00 klo�adlo� A I 4ew 1 15 . 2aoef ( bWtil (/ T tt ' PcTTEti �tj3aog� M � �;, c> �> �> ► p� v'tt� � r ► ( r r> �r� . � JCL �FFr� b �, 45 /At �NG t=o.e kacsi i= o" 6llpklo CZcAJTY ADOY 157,eAlta.;v .¢ 1,3ouZ. 77)-e4 -,-- „ Aw Z,) . T(4C Cc?-y bit! ►V t T 7�� /�"l A ,v� / N . _7'�f _ /L� � _ % . �iSC�JSS Tl'ps oyo " e . 45 - 'f 5 ?'�auc _ .iv _.. �nr �e �s - ,` soa�,� wprt��r, l. N. F(:!" T7/6a u . FarZ .. %4 C44OJT PQopos��_ _ � - .�Quc�._°FQS7' .�c,u� •4PP ��rus auj FtCit - Not,5E _E�t3. 1✓! ?cMsti?s . Lc?I ?E Di � rl/ AdJK2 S . . 17c> ru oZ' 4-S_. ._ CAILP v��sTs-, ,T"r�� Y-'� r I�eor �d ��v Paz- �3� _ G'on��7�T•9�%v� .j. �r.� c,e.� 1"{...� � ,� I e-6k.. 71Y�C . --. ea e k)T 1'f fa AJ 466�� 011re4, 80TW AALII -VA c�r< ©�7"aJ�aa I�cQc �sr77 - t NSoiw _ _1s cam? azQdv7 01 . J Ul�Y 01 . _,,_ 6 A) -L e0 Ual4-TattJ� 3-A ie ._Z",P iw1�NG,_.AIPP 7rP.oug4Z s��rA)6 p hva . .04, /ti fWPCC,5�5 _ wow , ZH& Gtcy r "ACoEP . - — C?,��v,�1.t. - �i-11 144z�W5 !yq;rW445 116, L), . AMMAX/\ TWra, Ff V' a.4 V6clrva) (,y IN rGff� ' ITHACA FIRE DEPARTMENT BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS REPORT June 2009 PERSONNEL STAFFING LEVELS 1 Chief 2 Deputy Chiefs 5 Assistant Chiefs 8 Lieutenants 51 Fire Fighters 67 On duty personnel 0 Recruit Fire Fighters 1 Fire Fighter on Injury Leave 2 Fire Fighters on Administrative Leave ( 1 to return to full duty 6/ 11 / 09 ) 1 Fire Alarm Superintendent 1 Office Manager 1 Administrative Assistant 0 . 5 Financial Clerk Total employees as of 06/01 /09 — 73 . 5 Open positions — None MUTUAL AID CALLS — From : Cayuga Heights , Lansing , Newfield To : Trumansburg SELECTED CALLS — On 5/29/09 , A Shift made quick work of an electrical fire in the wall at 149 Grandview Court, SUPPORT 21 Vehicle work orders were written and 31 were closed . The two new Pierce Pumpers are on schedule for deliver in August . TRAINING — See Attached report f Submitted by : J . Thomas Dorman , Deputy Chief Date Printed : 6 / 4 / 09 Page 1 Monthly Training APS by Training Block June 2009 Commissioners Report Station : ALL Shift : ALL Training Block Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Hours 0.1 FIRE PROTECTION AND ORGANIZATION ( 124 . 5 103 .5 162.5 111 14 515 . 5 02 FIRE BEHAVIOR (FIRE CONTROL) 97 . 5 36 .5 134 03 EXTINGUISHERS 04 FIRE PREVENTION 56 24 120. 5 39 . 5 19 259 05 PERSONAL SAFETY AND PROTECTIVE E 236 90 . 5 266 - 41 . 5 14 648 06 ROPES AND KNOTS 07 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 28. 5 1 33 1 . 5 15 79 08 GROUND LADDER PRACTICES 18 85 . 5 103 . 5 09 HOSE PRACTICES 15 9 50 74 b 10 FORCIBLE ENTRY 5 5 11 VENTILATION 12 RESCUE 27. 5 128 .5 33 . 5 272 . 5 103 .5 565 . 5 13 SALVAGE AND OVERHAUL 13 5 . 5 18 . 5 ' 14 COMMUNICATIONS (FIRE ALARM) 16 35 22 . 5 8 81 . 5 15 FIRE PUMPS 5 .5 5 . 5 16 AERIAL LADDERS AND ELEVATED DEVIC 32 16 16 . 5 2 25 . 5 92 17 FIRE STREAMS AND HYDRAULICS (WATE 47 47 18 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND RADIATION 150 14 74 238 19 NATURAL COVER FIRE FIGHTING 3 3 20 EMS (FIRST AID) 1 2 5 . 5 8 . 5 21 FIRE AND ARSON INVESTIGATION Totals by Month 805 455 773 . 5 561 .5 299 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 2894 Prepared : 6/2/09 Page 1 Monthly Training Hours by Training Block June 2009 Commissioners Report Station: @ Shift : @ Training Block Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Hours 22 DETECTION , NOTIFICATION & SUPPRESS 16 . 5 16 . 5 23 APPARATUS - DRIVING , OPERATION AND 226 207 209 171 149 . 5 962 :5 24 MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE 19 . 5 47 11 77 . 5 25 ICS/NIMS 12 6 1 . 5 19 . 5 26 OUTSIDE TRAINING 54 258 - 144 4 48 508 27 NYS FIRE ACADEMY COURSES 48 305 55 122 530 28 Out of state training / seminars 50 192 242 30 WELLNESS / FITNESS Totals by Month 1152 . 5 979 1487 . 5 793 821 . 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5233 . 5 Prepared : Adbb= �. e APPARATUS MILEAGE 5/09 ENG HOURS 5 /09 ! MILEAGE 6/09 ENG HRS 6/09 MAY MILEAGE MAY ENG HRS NYSI DUE LOF DATE LOF MILES - ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------ -------- ------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------- 901 45592 : 8960 : 46430 ! 9065 838 ! 105 : 3 /31 / 10 ; 4/ 15 /09 ; 45122 902 : 102832 ; 9875 ; 102923 : 9885 91 10 11 /30/09 ; 3/9/09 ; 102571 — — — — ------------ --------------- =--- — 903 -- ---- -- - ---- --- ----- ----- 3687--------- -- w----: -.102161 — 37013 10233 141 � ' 8/31 /08 3/ 13 /09 ; . — 36231 904 30027 ' 9682 , 30027 9683 0 ; 1 9/ 1 /08 ; 9/7/07 : 29918 ------. -- -- ---- — --- --------- ----------- ------------------------------- ;------ --------------- -- ---- ---- --- ----- 905—•-- ---- - -------- - -------- -- — 537 ----- -------- --------- -- 4631 ; — 542 8 ; 4673 483 : 42 12/ 1 /07 : 12/ 16/09 : 51803 _ -- ---- --------------- --- ----- ;------- ------------------ 57 ; 6/3.1 /08 ; 2/ 10/09; 92998 909 , . : 00S 94645 : OOS 4238 ` — 32888 7833 41552 . 5/31 / 10 : 2/6/09 ; 30465 — ------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------I-- -------------------------- -- ---- ----------- ------ 933 ! 49734 6057 : 50256 ; 6124 522 : 67 5/31 / 10 ; 1 / 14/09 ' 49412 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------;-------------- ---------p-------- ------------ 939 ! 49501 : 6020 : 49505 -- 6022 ... . — — — — 4' Z' 6/30/09 ` — , --------- - 3 /2/09 48561 — .. ... . . '•------------ - --------- --- =-- ----- ------ ----- -------- 941 10976 , 599 ; 11221 ; 611 245 ; 12 5/31 /09 : 2/ 17/09 : 10172 ------------------------ •----——————------ — 942 ; 2031 ; 2071 : 40 0 :. 7/31 /09 : ----- — 943 -- 2809 _152 ; 2817 — 53 8 ' 1 — 3/28/09 ` 8/9/05 ' 52750 — — — — — --------------------- 944 55398 ; 6857 : 55422 ; 6859 24 2 ; 2/ 1 / 10 : 2/ 18/09 ; 55323 -- -- - --- ---- ------- --- - -----------------------+------- ---- ----------- --- ---..-------------------------- '--------"--- ---"--'- ---'--------- -------'----------- ------------ ----- ----- ---- -------- ----------------.....----------------------- --:-- ---- -------------------•----------..-....--- -_... ------------- 945 1474; 1869 ; 395 : 0 10/31 /09 : 4/ 10/09 ; ---- ----------------- -------------------•----------------... ------ -------------------- ----------------------...----------•------------------ 947 , 555 ; 906 ' 351 ; 0 948 75997 ; 76002 ; 5 0 9/ 1 /08 ' 9/ 11 /07 ; 64519 --- ---- - ---- - ---949 --- --- 2659 : —. .... ----------- 228, 2661 228 2 0 7/ 1 /07 ; 7/27/06 ; 75587 — -------------------•- ------ ... ... ---------- --- --------------- — ------ --- ---------------... — ------ --------- d- ----- ------- -----------..... — ------- ------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ 6 7/ 1 /09 10/ 13/08 : 11790 — ------------------------- — — 963 22898 : 24837 ------- ---- ---- -------- - ---- - — — 634 0 : 9/30--- 9 12/23/08 ; 11795 625 ; 14154 •. 631 127 3713 815 : 0 ; 3/31 / 10 ; 2/2/09 ; 20161 — ;: — — ............ ....... — -------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------- - ------------------d--------- ------------ ------ ------ 964 ; 33667 ; 3402 : 34505 ; 3491 838 : 89 10/31 /09 ; 2/29/09 31478 965 : 4974 ; 511' 1 . 137 . 0 10/31 /09 ; 10/ 13/08 : 3351 CIJN OF ITHACA A- •;.e 310 West Green Street Ithaca New York 14850- 5497 ? •► . He f�i pep — ��®�y OFFICE Or `rl-lE Fllzr CIA uF, r- ����® 'I 'elel) 11 ( 11e : 607/272 - 1. 23 <i Fax : 607/272 - 2793 .11111C 9th , 2009 Board of. 14i1'C Commissioners Ithaca Fn'e Del)al'tllicllt 310 w Green St Ithaca , NY 14850 1:)ear Board Members : Tile I011owlllo is the Pire Marshal ' s report for May 2009 . Code Enlorcement Division : Tl1C Codes Enforcement Division received 18 complaints in the month May . there were 1 5 complaints closed out, and 26 coml) laintS i'ClllaIll open lol' May and pl'CVIOLIS 111011t11S . The Code 1_Ail'orcement Division performed 90 inspections or re - inspections . " there were 104 violations cited . The Code Enforcement Division issued : 10 operating permits for assembly occupancies ; 1 operatinb permit for hazardous occupancy ; 10 certilicates of' coml) liancc for fire and l) rol)erty maintenance lllsj)ectiolls ; I certificate Of compliance 101' altCl'iat1VC SLlppl'CSSI011 system installations #, and 3 certificates of compliance for fife alarm system installations . 1' il4C fllvestloatloll Unit : I here were 2 fife investloatlons Ierformed by the T' il'e Investigation Unit Im fires that occurred at 150 Triphammer Road in the City of Ithaca and 149 Grandview Court in the City of Ithaca . Public Education : There was on 6 public education events performed and 3 lire drills witnessed by the department in May . THere were 7 Child Safety Seat Inspections performed in May Parking Tickets `there were 12 parl: ino tickets iSSLICd by the Fire Prevention Bureau in May . 3 violations were Im prohibit parking areas , I handicap parking violation , and 8 violations were issued for parking in a Lire zone . ..All i.(luai (.) pi)ortunitV I nil1lo)'cr with :1 conunitnicnt ro workfOrce diversification . " patio Fire Marshal ' s Report for May ? 009- Page 2 Respectfully SUbmitted , C Thomas Parsons_ _ . .. Deputy Fire Chief / Dire Marshall Situation Type Summary BFC Report - 01 JAN 09 through 31 MAY 09 Prepared 6/9/2009 Page 1 # of F. S . Civ. F.S . Civ. Situation Type Dollar Loss Incid's Injury Injury Death Death 100 Fire ; other 2 0 0 0 0 111 Building fire 31 , 145 17 0 1 0 0 113 Cooking fire , confined to container 11360 17 0 0 0 0 114 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimne 2 0 0 0 0 118 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 500 12 0 0 0 0 131 Passenger vehicle fire 4 , 500 4 0 0 0 0 132 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 2 0 0 0 0 140 Natural vegetation fire , other 11500 7 0 0 0 0 . 141 Forest, woods or wildland fire 1 0 0 0 0 143 Grass fire 1 0 0 0 0 150 Outside rubbish fire, other 3 0 0 0 0. 151 Outside rubbish , trash or waste fire 1 0 0 0 0 160 Special outside fire , other 17000 1 0 0 0 0 240 Explosion (no fire) , other 1 0 0 0 0 300 Rescue , emergency medical call (EMS) cal 51 0 0 0 0 311 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 100 0 0 0 0 321 EMS call , excluding vehicle accident wit 636 0 0 0 0 322 Vehicle accident with injuries 41 0 0 0 0 323 Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Pe 11 0 0 0 0 342 Search for person in water 1 0 0 0 0 353 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevat 1 0 0 0 0 361 Swimming/recreational water areas rescue 1 0 0 0 0 400 Hazardous condition , other 33 0 0 0 0 410 Flammable gas or liquid condition , other 1 0 0 0 0 411 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 10 0 0 0 0 412 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 9 0 0 0 0 413 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 3 0 0 0 0 421 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 2 0 0 0 0 423 Refrigeration leak 1 0 0 0 0 424 Carbon monoxide incident 13 0 0 0 0 440 Electrical wiring/equipment problem , of 1 0 0 0 0 442 Overheated motor 2 0 0 0 0 443 Light ballast breakdown 5 0 0 0 0 444 Power line down 4 0 0 0 0 445 Arcing , shorted electrical equipment 6 0 0 0 0 460 Accident, potential accident, other 11 0 0 0 0 ' 461 Building or structure weakened or collap 2 0 0 0 0 463 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 18 0 0 0 0 481 Attempt to burn 1 0 0 0 0 Service Call , other 83 0 0 0 0 Person in distress , other 4 0 0 0 0 511 Lock-out 5 0 0 0 0 520 Water problem , other 6 0 0 0 0 521 Water evacuation 2 0 0 0 0 522 Water or steam leak 10 0 0 0 0 550 Public service assistance, other 8 0 0 0 0 551 Assist police or other governmental agen 15 0 0 0 0 552 Police matter 2 0 0 0 0 553 Public service 1 0 0 0 0 554 Assist invalid 1 0 0 0 0 555 . Defective elevator, no occupants 1 0 0 0 0 561 Unauthorized burning 3 0 0 0 0 571 Cover assignment , standby, moveup 3 0 0 0 0 600 Good intent call , other 36 0 0 0 0 611 Dispatched & canceled en route 48 0 0 0 0 Authorized controlled burning 2 0 0 0 0 6 Prescribed fire 1 0 0 0 0 650 Steam , other gas mistaken for smoke , oth 2 0 0 0 0 651 Smoke scare , odor of smoke 21 0 0 0 0 653 Barbecue , tar kettle 2 0 0 0 0 671 Hazmat release investigation w/ no hazma 2 0 0 0 0 700 False alarm or false call , other 13 0 0 0 0 710 Malicious , mischievous false call , other 8 0 0 0 0 711 Municipal alarm system , malicious false 8 0 0 0 0 712 Direct tie to FD , malicious/false alarm 11 0 0 0 0 714 Central station , malicious false alarm 15 0 0 0 0 715 Local alarm system , malicious false alai 1 0 0 0 0 730 System malfunction , other 28 0 0 0 0 731 Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 17 0 0 0 0 733 Smoke detector activation due to malfunc 29 0 0 0 0 734 Heat detector activation due to malfunct 5 0 0 0 0 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 27 0 0 0 0 7 CO detector activation due to malfunctio 2 0 0 0 0 740 Unintentional transmission of alarm , oth 165 0 0 0 0 741 Sprinkler activation , no fire - unintent 6 10 0 0 0 743 Smoke detector activation , no fire - uni 227 0 0 0 0 Situation Type Summary BFC Report - 01 JAN 09 through 31 MAY 09 Prepared 6/9/2009 Page 2 # of F . S . Civ. F. S . Civ. 9 Situation Type Dollar Loss Incid's Injury Injury Death Death 744 Detector activation , no fire - unintenti 12 0 0 0 0 745 Alarm system sounded , no fire - unintent 16 0 0 0 0 746 Carbon monoxide detector activation , no 1 0 0 0 0 813 Wind storm , tornado/hurricane assessment 6 0 0 0 0 900 Special type of incident, other 1 0 0 0 0 Total for all incidents 409005 1881 0 1 0 0 • Situation Type Graphs BFC Report - 01 JAN 09 through 31 MAY 09 Number of Incidents by Situation Type 0 Incidents 0 400 300 200 100 0 32 74 74 31 50 30 61 Code : Description Code : Description 32 EMS call , excluding vehicle ac 30 Rescue , emergency medical call 74 Smoke detector activation, no 61 Dispatched & canceled en route 74 Unintentional transmission of All Others 31 Medical assist, assist EMS cre 50 Service Call , other ItDollar Loss by Situation Type 0 Loss 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 11 13 14 11 16 11 32 Code : Description Code : Description 11 Building fire 11 Trash or rubbish fire , contain 13 Passenger vehicle fire 32 EMS call , excluding vehicle ac 14 Natural vegetation fire, other All Others 1 Cooking fire, confined to cont 16 Special outside fire , other 2009 REVENUE SUMMARY BY ACCOUNT MAY Revised PCT Remaining REVENUE YTD REVENUE Collected REVENUE Average Mthly Projected ---- ---- . ----------------------------------- ----------------- ........ ...... ------ ------- ---------------- Fire Code Inspection ; 1565 ; $38,000 --- - ---------- ---------------------- -$8,838 ------ ---------- 23 �-------------- ------ $29 ,-1- 62-------------- -- - , 768----------- -- ----- 2. 1 , 2.10----- - -- ---------------------------------=------------------�-- $ Home & Comm Services ----- ' 2189 : '$ ----------------------------- 54 0 _�54 $ � j ........... .................. ---------------- ------ ------ -------------------------------------------- ------ ------- Public Safety Services ; 2260 ; $ 1 , 800 $6, 646 369 -$4, 846 $ 1 , 329 15 950 ------------------ --- - ----------------- -------- -------------------------------------- FireProtectiveServices }2262 ' $3, 100, 000 $671 ,363 22 � $2 , 428 , 637 $ 134, 273 $ 1 , 611 , 272 ------ --- Rental of Real Property --------------------------- ------- --- ----- ---- --------------- 2410-------' $3 , 000 $9,650 322 -$6 650 $1- ,930 $23, 160 ----------- ---------------------- ------------------------ ----------- Rental of Equipment ; 2414 $0 $� $ $0 0� $0 ---------------------------------------- --------------------- = - Public Safety Permits ; 2550 ;$6 , 500 $3, 920 60% $2, 580 $784 ------------------------ $9 , 408 ----------------- Fines & Forfeited Bail '•. 2610 ; $8 ,000 $515 6% $7,48 -------- ------ ----------- $ 103---------- ---------------- $ 1:, 236 Minor Sales ; 2655 ; $ 100 $0 0� ........... ----------------------- ------- --------- -------------- ------------------< $0 ---------------------------------- --- ------------------------------ ----- ------------------------------- $ 100---------------------- ��--------------------- Sale of Equipment ; 2665 $0 $0 0 % $p -- ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------ - ----+ -- - -- -- -- --------------- ---- ------ ---------------------------------- --------------------------------------- nsurance Recoveries ' 2680 ; $3 , 000 $5 ,491 183 -$2 , 491 $ 1 , 098 $ 13 , 178 ---- Other Compensation for Loss ; 2690 ----------- -------------=------------------ $50-------- ------------- - $�---------- --------------------- ------- $50---- ------------ �---- --------- � Refund Prior Year Expense ; 2701 ; $200 $0 0% $200 $0 $0 --- - Gifts & Donations 2705 -$709 ,012 $0 0% ------------ --------- $709 ,012 ----------- -$0 -------------------------------- --- ----------------------------- Unclassified Revenue ;2770 ; $5, 000 $64 1 � $4 936 $ 13 $ � 54 ------------------ - ........... ; -------------------------------- Home & Community Service-- ----- 3989-- i $� = $� $0 $0 $0 09 ; $3,874,662 ; $ 7061541 8. 2� $3; 168, 121 $ 1411308 1 $ 11695, 69 8 MAY 2009 Budget Program Account Balances so H 5 5 ° 54 ' y - ---- o 5 r C) 5 56 57 v v .- u0 w0 `u u cv y ate° , 0 in C N y 0 H y C £ O > . O C N N 6 C 0) C4 u a _ = a - E ! o u ° ° _ Q y ° .0 u m ; Admin 394,634 105 201 ,770 I 13,386 N i _ ' 2,623 ! 6,023 °--•------- 17 5 i 15,634 Staff 4,71 $674 110 144,498 220,958 26 745 ' 1 38 0 990 ° 61 --------- -- 10 708 ! •----••--....... ---- 828,594 ; 0 _..._.. -•- •-- •. . 52,478 107.717 O - 267 705 370:000 125 ----- i - 32° Overtime 15,602 0 ' 0 2t761 ,979 6,000 458 218,414 12,814 629 -------------- -- 48,784 i 0 Furn & Fixtures 0 205 p 302,699 Office Equip 0 210 8% 0 ' - - p ; Y Other Equip,---- -----------------46,200 225 p - - i ------i ----- --- - --------• - 0 0% i 0 0 ! 38,200 i 1 ,371 --- -----• -------•--------- - --------• -•-•--- .. 0% Telephone 13,639 405 8,378 i - --------- ° 39,571 -- - -••---- 113,304 - Ufilites 410 -----,-------------- ' ------ -O i - z 63,422 . 8,378 39% 0 63,422 69,067 Clothes 8,400 415 0 39,024 Gas & Oil 73,500_ -420- i - ; ----------- 65 -----•--•---�--:----•------ ,016 i Office Expen 9,000 425 2,930 j i ---------- O1 57 300 48,844 435 --------------- j --------• - 5 6 -- 32% Contracts (8,II60) 44,990 --- ----------- Staff Devel 55,000 --440 ---w.............M-• -------•--------- ----- -----•-------- 600 r ........--- 3-430 ----------ft.... . . ------ . 1 ,000 ,801 - --- 0 36,729 i 0 °- 34 % Travel 4d5 3,857 i ------------ --------------- Insurance 113,600 455 ( ,490) : .f,.36-8- -•---------- .7% 801 3 57,581 . , 36,665 ° - ......--••--------- ' Prgm Suppi 460 5, 107 1 ,600 -•------•-------• ( 1 ,59 78 - 9,813 - 88% 464 57t581 800 470 +-----•----------- Rental 3 6 ' -... 2,206 i -••-----•-••--- ---.......... ---- 6 ; 33o363 48,500 475 ---•--•--- Prop Maint -------------- ............ - 2,206 _ _ 21 % -- ---•--•----- °• i i --,--- 175,000 ------------------• 3 " - 5 052 i Equip Maint 476 7,497 i --- r ;--•--.-----•--- O 7, 130 35,052 i 78"935 3,500 -----•.. 287 Equip Parts 74,650 477 -------- -•----------------- ; 62,525 i 97 062 45% Bldg Maint 18,800 480 --------•--•--•- 6% --- 6,482,210 : 2 370 , 2 525 ' 1 6 355 433,71 .7 ; 245 451 ------- 2, 6 8% 145,482 ; 16 1 2 33t 49,700 - -- 88,307 202,305 17 721 included is dedicated to Johnson Controls - 0 ;` 1 ,000 3,988333 0 38% - ... -. o 2009 Accounts.xls 613109 Statistical Summary Board Report - January 1 , 20,09 - May 31 , 2009 There are 38 , 596 records in the Incidents Table , Between Thursday , January 1 , 2009 and Sunday, Ma 311 2009 there were 1 , 881 incidents . Currently there are an average of 12 . 46 incidents per day. Average response time for the department is 4 . 76 minutes . The average duration of an incident is 19 . 0 minutes . Incidents by Hour of the Day 100 Runs 80 60 f p 40 20 O O O . N r N N N O O CO O O O O N CO Incidents by Day of the Week 300 250 Runs 200 n . . z 150 100 9t 4 50 0 SUN MON TUE W® THU FRI SAT Dollar Loss by Hour of the Day . 14000 12000 7 Loss 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 O r N M V LO M W M O7 V LO M I� M O 0 r N 0 0 O 0 0 O O O 0 O O T T T T T T T T T N N N N Statistical Summary Board Report - January 1 , 2009 - May 31 , 2009 There are 38, 596 records in the Incidents Table . Between Thursday, January 1 , 2009 and Sunday, May 31 , 2009 there were 1 , 881 incidents . Currently there are an average of 12 .46 incidents per day. Average response time for the department is 4 . 76 minutes . The average duration of an incident is 19 . 01 minutes . Dollar Loss by Day of the Week 14000 12000 ® Loss 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Incidents by First Responding Unit R % 500 - Runs 400 300 200 100 �t 0 O •- (D d' C\1 to CO L r C ) C7 W LO �t CO N O O O O O O C7 NT d O d C ) (O (0 d CA C� CA 0) C ) 0) CA M Cn CA CA 6l Average Response Time by Unit 7 6 Min . 5 4 3 2 0 - rn° rn° 0 c`to 0 0 ((i � T v o �v °i coo rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn Statistical Summary ' Board Report - . May 1 , 2009 - May 31 ,. 2009 There are 38 , 596 records in the Incidents Table . Between Friday, May 1 , 2009 and Sunday; May 31 , 2009 there were 461 . incidents . Currently there are an average of 14 . 87 incidents per day . Average response time for the department is 4 . 59 minutes , The average duration of an incident is 16 . 99 minute Incidents by Hour of the Day 30 Runs 25 r 20 15 a 3 10 5 4 . 0 n (D r N CO � LO CO r� CO O O r N Cr) qtt . LO CO t� 00 O O . r N C`0 O . O O O O O O O O O T T r r T T T T T T N N N N Incidents by Day, of the Week 80 Runs 60 f. 40 a , 20 a 0 b a SUN MCN TUE WED THU FRI SAT Dollar Loss by Hour of the Day 10000 Loss 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 O N ,CY LO CO � CO O M r UD C r r N r O O N CY)O O O O O O O N N N Statistical Summary Board Report May 1 , 2009 - May 31 , 2009 There are 38 , 596 records in the Incidents Table , Between Friday, May 1 , 2009 and Sunday , May 31 , 2009 there were 461 incidents , Currently there are an average of 14 . 87 incidents per day. Average response time for the department is 4 . 59 minutes . The average duration of an incident is 16 . 99 minutes . Dollar Loss by Day of the Week 10000 Loss 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Incidents by First Responding Unit 160 140 Runs 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 ' 909 901 906 964 902 905 933 945 941 903 Average Response Time by Unit 6 5 4 ,s K 3 2 Will 1 0 ; 909 901 906 964 . 902 . 905 933 945 941 903 I Training center use DATE : Organization : Organization Contact Contact number Building Used Time of day Hours of Use 4/4/09 Aurora Fire Dept, Mark Bailey 315-730-2491 whole 800 5 . 00 1 /25/09 Cayuga Heights Fire Matt Abbinanti 592-3355 whole 1900 3 . 00 2/25/09 Cayuga Heights Fire Matt Abbinanti 592-3355 whole 1900 3 .00 2/28/09 Cayuga Heights Fire Matt Abbinanti 592-3355 whole 800 8 . 00 4/25/09 Cayuga Heights Fire Joe Lisi 592-4462 whole 800 8 . 00 4/30/09 Cayuga Heights Fire David Wolfe 342-6793 whole 1900 3 . 00 1 /3/09 City of Ithaca - HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 class 800 4 . 00 1 /27/09 City of Ithaca - HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 class 800 4 .00 2/10/09 City of Ithaca - HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 class 800 4 . 00 4/2/09 City of Ithaca - HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 Class 800 8 . 00 11 /13/09 City of Ithaca- HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 Class 800 8 .00 2/18/09 City Of Ithaca _HR Andy Olmetti 327-0693 class 800 4 . 00 6/20/09 Cortland County Fire Brian Pendell 279-3583 whole 700 10. 00 10/24/09 Cortland County Fire Brian Pendell 279-3583 whole 700 10. 00 6/6/09 Danby Fire District Ross Borden 592-7293 burn 800 7 .00 9/12/09 Danby Fire District Ross Borden 592-7293 burn 800 7 . 00 8/13/09 Ithaca City School District Judy Hoffman 229-2098 Class 730 5 .00 8/18/09 Ithaca City School District Judy Hoffman 229-2098 Class 730 5 .00 3/6/09 Ithaca Fire Dept . Jim Crowley 272-1234 Rope 900 3 .00 3/21 /09 Ithaca Fire Dept , Dan Tier 272-1234 class 800 9 . 00 5/18/09 Ithaca Fire Dept. Rob Covert 272 4234 Class 800 8 . 00 5/19/09 Ithaca Fire Dept, Rob Covert 272-1234 Class 800 8 . 00 5/20/09 Ithaca Fire Dept . Rob Covert 272-1234 Class 800 8 .00 5121 %09 Ithaca Fire Dept. Rob Covert 272-1234 Class 800 8 .00 5/22/09 Ithaca Fire Dept, Rob Covert 272-1234 Class 800 8 . 00 4/18/09 Lansing FireDept. Tom Dorwood 351-2375 whole 800 7 . 00 5/15/09 Morse Emerson Frank Woods 266-5024 whole 900 8 . 00 118/09 Tompkins DOER Beth harrington 257-3888 class 1800 3 . 00 1 /20/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 2/9/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 2/10/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 2/17/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 2/18/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 . 2/21 /09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 800 7 .00 2/24/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 .00 2/26/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 Prepared by AC Weldon 6/9/2009 1 Training center use 3/3/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/5/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/10/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/12/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/19/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/23/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/24/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/30109 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 3/31 /09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4/6/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4/7/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4/14/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4115/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4/21 /09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 4122/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 5009 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher. 227-5001 whole 800 7 . 00 5/4/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/5/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/7/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/12/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/12/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/13/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 .00 5/14/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Basher 227-5001 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/20/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 . 00 5/28/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 .00 6/1 /09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 . 00 6/2/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 . 00 6/17/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645. whole 1900 3 . 00 6/18/09 Tompkins DOER Tom Smith 229-6645 whole 1900 3 .00 5/31/09 Vertical access Mike 227-1250 Rope Tower 800 8 . 00 6/1 /09 Vertical access Mike 227 4250 Rope Tower 800 8 . 00 6/2/09 Vertical access Mike 227 4250 Rope Tower 800 8 . 00 6/3/09 Vertical access Mike 227 4250 Rope Tower 800 8 . 00 614/09 Vertical access Mike 227-1250 Rope Tower 800 8 . 00 Total Hours 335 .00 Prepared by AG Willis B . Sheldon 6/9/2009 Page 2 Ithaca Fire Department Printed : 14 : 23 : 45 ' Report Period VFF Duty Hours List 06 / 09 / 09 Date Start : 05 / 01 / 09 Date End 05 / 31 / 09 Name Badge Credit ALEXANDER PAUL 04359 100 BAKER LYMAN 03258 100 CANTONE FRANK 04413 . 00 CORNELIUS DAVID 03883 3 . 00 GILLIGAN WILLIAM 04188 100 GOULD JOHN 04301 100 LONGO ROBERT 04153 100 MAAS DANIEL 04193 3 . 00 ROGERS JAMES 03793 000 TEETER GARY 03607 . 00 WILBUR RICHARD 04212 100 Ithaca Fire Department Printed : 14 : 23 : 08 Report Period VFF Duty Hours List 06 / 09 / 09 Date Start : 01 / 01 / 09 i t e , End 05 / 31 / 09 e Badge Credit X ANDER PAUL 04359 400 BAKER LYMAN 03258 100 CANTONE FRANK 04413 9 . 00 CORNELIUS DAVID 03883 8 . 25 GILLIGAN WILLIAM 04188 35 . 50 GOULD JOHN 04301 100 LONGO ROBERT 04153 100 MAAS DANIEL 04193 35 . 75 ROGERS , , JAMES 03793 4 . 25 TEETER GARY 03607 100 WILBUR RICHARD 04212 2 . 50 MICHAEL A. ARCURI 127 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 24TH DISTRICT, NEW YORK WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202-225-3665 COMMITTEE ON RULES 202-225-1891 FAX A Q' COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION ® � 4gre�� of the �teb tate� 10 UTIC315-793-8146, NY 1T ANDINFRASTRUCTURE 800-235-2525 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE f �Q �y } ( , 315-798-4099 FAX AND TECHNOLOGY woos of � epre,5entatibez (ON LEAVE) Wagbitigtott, X20515-3224 June 3 , 2009 Ithaca Fire Department 310 West Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850-5424 Dear Chief, I am writing to inform you of the availability of federal ffunding for the construction of new fire stations or modifications of existing stations . This week, the U . S . Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced the availability of up to $210 million, nationwide, in funding under the FY2009 Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grant program, which was created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Bill) . The Fire Station Construction Grant program is a competitive grant program , with no local match requirement, that provides funding assistance directly to fire departments on a competitive basis to build new or modify existing fire stations in order for departments to enhance their response capability and protect the community they serve from fire and fire-related hazards . Generally, the program is designed to fund projects that enhance firefighter safety, including (but not be limited to) the replacement of condemned structures or rehabilitation of unhealthy structures, or projects that improve the fire department ' s response capabilities and enhance public safety . Applications for these funds must be submitted via FEMA ' s online "e-grant" application no later than P.M. on Friday, July 10, 2009. However, in order to submit the application, applicants must first complete a registration proce.4 that inc des obtaining a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. This process can take several weeks, and extensions of the app ' -1tion deadline are not given, so I encou ,_Qe you uegm this process as soon as possible. Please visit � ict . gov/government/grant/arra/index . shtm for complete information . In addition, I have designated Peter Scalise, of my district office staff, as the 24th Congressional District ' s Economic Recovery Coordinator. I recommend you contact Mr. Scalise by calling 315 -793 -8146 with any questions or concerns regarding the funding application process . In addition, if you submit a request for . funding through New York State, and would like a letter of support from me, please direct those requests to Mr. Scalise as well . Sincerely,Michael A . Arcuri co -; �Member of Congress ` ' c PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER TOWN CLERK ' S MONTHLY An AGENDA .# 15 r TOWN OF IT HACA NEW YORK > JUNE, 2009 THE SUPERVISOR : PAGE I suant to Section 27, Subd I of the Town Law, I hereby make the following statement of all fees and moneys received me in connection with my office during the month stated above, excepting only such fees and moneys the application payment of which are otherwise provided for by Law : A 1255 25 MARRIAGE LICENSES NO. 09027 TO 09051 402. 50 4 MISC. COPIES 44 .65 13 TAX SEARCH 65 .00 7 MARRIAGE TRANSCRIPT 70.00 1 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP REG 20.00 TOTAL TOWN CLERK FEES 602. 15 A 1557 1 SPCA IMPOUND FEES 30.00 TOTAL A1557 30.00 A2090 6 COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOT 110.00 TOTAL A2090 110000 A2191 3 PARK USE FEE 40.00 TOTAL A2191 40.00 4 3 NOTE CARDS - YOUTH PROG 30.00 TOTAL A2194 30900 A2544 DOG LICENSES 11091 .08 TOTAL A2544 11091.08 B2110 4 ZONING BOARD MTG 400.00 TOTAL B2110 400.00 B2111 23 BUILDING PERMIT 6,435 .00 4 BUILDING PERMIT EXTENSIN 582 .50 1 FIRE SAFETY INSPECTIONS 80.00 2 TEMP CERTIFICATE OCCUP 850.00 7 OPERATING PERMIT 700.00 TOTAL B2111 89647.50 B2115 1 SITE PLAN INIT. APL. FEE 100.00 5 SITE PLAN FINAL PLAN 1 ,930.00 2 ADD. MTG. FEE AGENDA PRO 60.00 2 ADD. MTG . FEE P.H . PROCE 100.00 1 SPECIAL PERMITS 100.00 TOWN CLERK' S MONTHLY REPORT JUNE, 2009 page 2 TOTAL B2115 2,290.00 TA61 3 PARK SECURITY DEPOSIT 150.00 TOTAL TA61 150.00 TA62 1 COMFORT STATION DEPOSIT 100.00 TOTAL TA62 100.00 1 y TOWN CLERK' S MONTHLY REPORT V UNE, 2009 e3 DISBURSEMENTS PAID TO SUPERVISOR FOR GENERAL FUND 1 903 23 PAID TO SUPERVISOR FOR PART TOWN FUND 1 1 , 337 .50 PAID TO COUNTY TREASURER FOR DOG LICENSES 153 .92 PAID TO AG & MARKETS FOR DOG LICENSES 15 .00 PAID TO NYS HEALTH DEPT FOR MARRIAGE LICENSES 517 .50 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 13,927J5 * * TOWN CLERKS OFFICE RECEIVED 6 FOIL REQUESTS DURING THE MONTH OF JUNE 20090 JULY 11 2009 - SUPERVISOR HER OT J . ErMAN STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, TOWN OF ITHACA I, KAREN BILLINGS , being duly sworn, says that I am the Clerk of the TOWN OF ITHACA that the foregoing is a full and true statement of all Fees and moneys received by me during month above stated, excepting only such Fees the application and payment of which are otherwise provided for law. Subscribed and sworn to before me this kA Town Clerk day of J1 20 mvw ttU U1 Notary Public CARRIE WHITMORE Notary Public, State of New York No , 01 WH6052877 " Tioga County Commission Expires December 26,, 0 TOWN OF ITHACA Public Works Department Month of June—Board Report July 13, 2009, Meeting Roads: • Paving of Helen's Way, Sharlene Drive, and Landmark Drive was completed and shoulder material was installed . • Ditching was done on Bundy Road, Elm Street Ext., and Coy Glen Roads . • Catch basins on Coy Glen Road and Elm Street Ext. were vacuumed out. A catch basin on Winston Court was repaired . • Hot patching work was done to prepare roads which will be surface treated in August. • Roadside mowing continued . • Sign work was done. Graffiti was removed on dangerous curves signs on Sand Bank Road . • Trees were planted on Helen's Way. • Several failed sections of Sand Bank Road were excavated out, drainage installed, and then repaved. • Trees along Compton Road were trimmed back in preparation for surface treating in early August. • We installed a stabilized construction entrance at our fill site on Sand Bank Road. • Culverts on Bundy Road were jet rodded after ditch cleaning was finished . Parks, Trails, and Preserves: ■ Don Ten Kate's memorial playground work continued . A three day work project to plant trees and flowers and spread Fibar mulch was completed by Eagle Scout candidate, Andrew Sternglass and members of his troop . Final grading, top soiling and seeding around the new playground, and restoration of old playground (now removed) area remains to be finished . The memorial bench and plaque will be installed prior to our public dedication service in early August ■ Regular grounds maintenance and trail trimming continued . There was no break in the action because of the higher than normal rainfall in June. ■ GPS work on all park, trail, and preserve sites was continued by our intern, Greg Colucci . Posting of property lines will follow the data collection phase of this project. Hundreds of digital photos were taken to be linked to our database. ■ A community service project at West Hill Community Garden was done on Saturday, June 13, 2009, under the direction of Todd Carver, Youth Pastor at the Assembly of God Church next to Tutelo Park. They installed weed control fabric under the deer fence and mulched the entire periphery of the fence, along with interior walking paths between garden plots. ■ Babe Ruth Women's softball league rented Valentino Field for several games ' after the Cal Ripken league season ended . ■ Honness Lane Walkway extension was begun. ■ Warren Road Walkway easements were worked on, landowners with landscaping issues were dealt with, and saw cutting of pavement finished prior to getting the State's approvallo begin the project. NYSEG has begun moving their utility poles. ■ Weekly site inspections were done . Trees which fell at several sites were cut up and removed. Newly planted trees with gator bags were refilled with water several times. Flower plantings at Town Hall continued . ■ The old play structure at Salem Park was dismantled and layout of the new structure was started . ■ Ryan McGory's memorial bench with attached plaque was installed at Tutelo Park. Water: ♦ A hydrant extension was installed on Perry Lane and the associated valve was repaired . ♦ We repaired a water service shutoff at 124 Honness Lane. ♦ Joe Slater continued working on the design for the Triphammer Road T-Main replacement which Bolton Point has scheduled. Sewer: ► A total of 83 Dig Safely New York mark outs for Town sanitary sewer were done . ► Location of sewer manholes on West Hill continued . We collected GPS data on them, cleared brush around them, and checked for needed repairs . ► The East King Road sewer extension project was closed out. We are working on the as-built drawings for that project. July Projects 1 , Complete Honness Lane Walkway. 2. Complete Don's playground . 3. Continue roadside mowing and regular grounds maintenance . 4. Hydrant painting, brush trimming and weeding around road signs, and weed eating under guiderails. 54 Start Warren Road Walkway , 6 . Patch roads for surface treating. T Sign work. 8 . Begin installation of Salem Park playground . ghk 1y OFIT� TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 215 NORTH TIOGA STREET, ITHACA, N .Y . 14850 4�� W El Ito¢ Jonathan Kanter, - Director of Planning FAX (607) 273-1704 Planning Director' s Report for July 13 , 2009 Town Board Meeting DEVELOPMENT REVIEW June 2 , 2009 Planning Board Meeting: Sherwood 2-Lot Subdivision, 254 Dubois Road : The Planning Board granted Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2-lot subdivision located at 254 Dubois Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 23 - 1 - 13 , Low Density Residential Zone. The proposal includes subdividing +/- 1 . 32 acres from the western side of 254 Dubois Road (Tax Parcel No . 23 - 1 - 13 ), including a portion of the pond, which will then be consolidated with 258 Dubois Road (Tax Parcel No. 23 - 1 - 12) . Donald Sherwood & Anne Ouellette, Owners/Applicants , La Tourelle Yellow Barn Conversion, 1152 Danby Road : The Planning Board granted Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed conversion of the Yellow Barn at the La Tourelle Resort property located at 1152 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 36- 1 - 4 . 5 , Planned Development Zone No . 1 . The project involves converting the existing mixed use yellow barn from 3 apartments, a resort maintenance area, and hotel storage to a mixed use building with 2 apartments, a 3 bedroom hotel suite, 2 resort related offices, a resort maintenance area, and hotel storage. One new accessible parking space is proposed on the east side of the barn. Walter J . Wiggins, Owner/Applicant; Scott D . Wiggins, Managing Director, Agent, Ithaca College Temporary Residence Hall, 953 Danby Road : The Planning Board discussed a sketch plan for the proposed Ithaca College Temporary Residence Hall (Terrace Site) located on the Ithaca College campus at 953 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. ' s 41 - 1 -30 . 2 and 42- 1 - 13 : 1 , Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves placing a 2 story temporary modular residence hall building to the southeast of the existing Terrace buildings . The building would accommodate approximately 100 students and will remain in place for at least 4 years . Ithaca College, Owner/Applicant; Richard Couture, Associate Vice-President of Facilities , Agent. June 16 , 2009 Planning Board Meeting: Tomlinson 2-Lot Subdivision, 175 Culver Road : The Planning Board granted Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2- lot subdivision located at 175 Culver Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 31 -6- 1 .24, Low Density Residential Zone . The proposal involves subdividing the +/- 8 . 667 acre parcel into 2 lots consisting of one +/- 3 . 162 acre parcel, containing the existing house, and a +/- 5 . 505 acre vacant parcel . Ephriam M. Tomlinson, Owner/Applicant; Tamme Steenhuis , Agent. i TawnrafllthacaPuretttng7trtc�r IZ a July, ;13,x 2009 aWZt 13a(tlil Eetiiig ` x Verizon Cell Tower Application, 651 Five Mile Drive: The Planning Board heard a preliminary report from Bill Johnson, the consultant hired by the Board to review and make recommendations regarding the Verizon Cell Tower application. Review of the proposal is scheduled to continue at the July 7`i' Planning Board meeting . June 30, 2009 Special Planning Board Meeting: Cayuga Heights School Age Program at St. Catherine of Siena Church, 302 St. Catherine Circle : The Planning Board granted a Special Permit for the proposed Cayuga Heights School Age Program at St. Catherine of Siena Church, located at 302 Saint Catherine Circle, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 71 - 1 - 10, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves temporarily using a portion of the existing church building (meeting rooms and restrooms) for the childcare / summer camp program. St. Catherine of Siena Church, Owner; Cayuga Heights School Age Program, Applicant; Michael Collins , Director, Agent. Kasonic Builders Contractor 's Business, 635 Elmira Road : The Planning Board granted a Special Permit and Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval to allow Kasonic Builders , LLC to convert the existing buildings at 635 Elmira Road into new offices and storage in conjunction with their contractor' s business, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No . 35 - 1 -21 , Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zone. The project involves creating space in the existing buildings for offices , record storage, blueprint storage, and storage of various construction materials and equipment. Thomas & Mary McGuire, Owner; Kasonic Builders, LLC , Applicant ; Barry Kasonic, Agent. Lakeside Nursing Home Modifications, 1229-31 Trumansburg Road: The Planning Board heard a presentation regarding the proposed modifications to the Lakeside Nursing Home located at 1229-31 Trumansburg Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 26-4-46 . 1 , Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves a change in use/occupancy to convert a portion of the Nursing Home to an Assisted Living Program and Adult Day Care facility. The project also involves exterior modifications including new entry- way canopies , the relocation of the loading dock to the back of the building, and re-paving and adding additional parking . Lakeside Nursing Home, Inc . , Owner; Mark Farchione, LNH Operating Co. , LLC , Applicant; Kristin E. Gutenberger, Agent. After opening the public hearing on the proposal , the Board requested additional information from the applicant, kept the public hearing open, and will continue consideration of the proposal at an upcoming meeting. Ithaca College Temporary Residence Hall, 953 Danby Road : The Planning Board granted Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for the proposed Ithaca College Temporary Residence Hall (Terrace Site) located on the Ithaca College campus at 953 Danby Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. ' s 41 - 1 -30. 2 and 42 - 1 - 13 . 1 , Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal involves placing a 2 story temporary modular residence hall building to the southeast of the existing Terrace buildings . The building would accommodate approximately 100 students and will remain in place for at least 4 years . Ithaca College, Owner/Applicant; Richard Couture, Associate Vice-President of Facilities, Agent. 2 =o. ri of Ithucc3X�lut3ntng F.�arectar's Repvxt , 8 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECTS/FUNCTIONS The following have been accomplished over the past month. Codes and Ordinances Committee (COQ : The Committee met on June 17 , 2009 and completed review of proposed amendments to the Zoning provisions regarding fence height and setback and continued review of public comments received on the draft Stream Setback Law. The next COC meeting is scheduled for July 15 , 2009 . Tentative agenda items include further review of comments received and possible revisions regarding the Stream Setback Law and possibly review of the Sign Chapter of the Town Code. Planning Committee: The Committee met on June 11 , 2009 and continued discussion regarding a letter submitted to the Town Board from the Ithaca West Hill Community Group (referred to the Planning Committee for discussion). The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled for Thursday, June 11 , 2009 at 4 : 30 p. m. [editor' s note: may be re-scheduled] . Tentative agenda items include continuation of discussion regarding the letter submitted to the Town Board from the Ithaca West Hill Community Group and continuation of discussion regarding Draft Technical Report #4 of the Route 96 Corridor Management Study, Comprehensive Plan .Committee: The Committee met on June 25 , 2009 and discussed a summary of the Residents ' Survey that had been prepared by staff, and began review and discussion regarding the goal and objective sections of the 1993 Plan in Chapter III. The next meeting of the Committee is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, July 23 , 2009 at 7 : 00 p. m. to continue review and discussion regarding the 1993 Plan Goals and Objectives . Conservation Board: The Conservation Board met on June 4, 2009 and continued discussion on invasive plant policy (especially swallow-wort), discussed the Coy Glen area and work on a proposed Conservation Zone for Coy Glen, and had committee reports and updates . The July meeting of the Conservation Board will be cancelled. The next meeting of the Conservation Board is scheduled for August 6, 2009, ITCTC Policy/Planning Committee : The Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council (ITCTC) Policy and Planning Committees met at a joint meeting on June 16, 2009 . Agenda items included a report on the ITCTC Long Range Transportation Plan update (due by the end of this year), and a report on the Way2Go Program of Cooperative Extension (providing a one-stop location for transportation information and to help individuals plan for their transportation needs). Trail Committee: The Trail Committee met on June 25 , 2009 . The Committee continued discussion regarding results of the survey that was conducted of residents who live near existing trails to gauge perceptions and needs regarding the trail system, and also discussed next steps for the West Hill trails that are in the planning stages (e. g. , contacting residents in possible trail areas . The next meeting of the Trail Committee is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, July 23 , 2009 at 11 :00 a. m. Agricultural Planning Grant : Planning staff met with representatives from Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County to discuss arrangements for surveying farmers in the Town of Ithaca, which will form the basis of additional data collection and report preparation on the 3 Townaf°Ittta�a Plu �lrc � rectvr s�R�part .Zuly�13� 2�9 Taw B rl'=�eeting �. � Town' s Agriculture and Farmland Protection Plan. Cooperative Extension also indicated that it will be setting up a meeting (on Thursday, July 16th at 11 : 30 a. m. ) inviting all of the. towns in Tompkins County that are preparing municipal farmland protection plans (Ithaca, Lansing and Ulysses) . Forest Home Traffic Calming — Phase I : Planning and Engineering staff continue to coordinate efforts to advance the Forest Home Traffic Calming Phase I project that was approved by ITCTC in the TIP amendment. The Phase I project includes six entrance features and four mid-block speed tables to help slow down traffic in the Forest Home neighborhood. McFarland Johnson was approved by the Town Board as the consultant for the design/engineering of the traffic calming improvements . Cornell confirmed in a letter to Supervisor Engman that they will share in the funding of both design and construction of the project. Staff met with the project manager from McFarland Johnson and a representative from NYS Department of Transportation (DOT) to go over project details, requirements and timing. Staff has been in contact with the President of the Forest Home Improvement Association regarding the project and is in the process of setting up a public meeting in Forest Home (tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, July 22nd at 7 : 00 p . m. at the Forest Home Chapel) to go over preliminary designs with the community. It is anticipated that the Town Board will be asked to consider approval of the traffic calming design at the working meeting on July 27th. 2010 Budget Worksheets : The Planning Department prepared and submitted preliminary 2010 Budget worksheets to the Supervisor and Budget Officer. Holochuck Homes Draft EIS Review : Holochuck Homes submitted its preliminary draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS ) for the 106 unit townhouse proposal located off of Trumansburg Road/Route 96, and Planning and Engineering staff reviewed the DEIS , met with representatives of the Holochuck Homes development team and provided comments and suggestions to incorporate into the DEIS for formal submission to the Planning Board . The revised DEIS is expected to be submitted to the Planning Board on or around July 21st Scenic Resources Report: Shannon Stone, Planning Intern, has been working on the scenic resources analysis since the beginning of June and is making good progress . Much of the field work, photography and GIS mapping has been completed, and is being assembled into a report format. It is anticipated that Shannon will work on this through the middle of August when we hope to have a draft report completed and available for review and discussion. Meeting with Cayuga Heights Officials to Discuss a Possible Trail to Boynton Middle School : The Planning Director met with representatives from Cayuga Heights to discuss a possible trail/walkway to connect portions of Cayuga Heights with the Boynton Middle School (located in the Town of Ithaca) . This could be a coordinated effort between the Town and Village. A next step for the Town would be to discuss this at a meeting of the Trail Committee and possibly Public Works Committee. We will be getting more details soon on this possible proposal . Gateway Trail — Scoping Report : A draft scoping report was prepared by Planning staff and submitted to DOT for their review and comments . This is a necessary step toward receiving the approvals from DOT in order to begin design/engineering work on the trail project. 4 Regular Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board , July 13 , 2009 Human Resources Report for June Personnel and Employee Relations Committees : The Personnel Committee continues . update discussions of the restructuring of Public Works . An update was provided on the search for the Director of Public Works . The Employee Relations committee review items from the Suggestion Boxes . They discussed the bottled water and coffee purchased by the Town . The Communication Survey that was done earlier in 2009 was discussed . It was discussed that reporting out occur more regularly with a clear message. Year End Luncheon was from SAC needs to occ g y g discussed , with the representatives to go back and get more information . (see attached ) Training and Development: The June 4" Brainteaser program titled "Writing it Right" was distributed to staff. The program was a sellout, so a second session was offered for July 7th I attended the national Human Resources conference that was held in New Orleans , June 28- July 1St Personnel — Civil Service : All the seasonal positions for Public Works have been filled and most have started . The youth groups have been decided upon and will start July 6th . As we have traditionally, we hired a youth to work at Town Hall for an hour every day doing errands and other light office work. The Highway Superintendent search committee has decided to re-open the application period until July 2"d . Committee will be meeting July 91h to review the applications . Gene Redman was made Interim Highway Superintendent effective June 28th Budget worksheets were completed and handed into the Budget Officer and Town Supervisor. Performance reviews were distributed and are due back by the end of July. Commercial Insurance ( Ithaca Agency — NYMIR Insurance Company) : No new claims to report. Workers' Compensation ( Public Employers Risk Management Assoc — PERMA) : No new claims to report. Health and/or Dental Insurance : I continue to attend the committee meeting of TCCOG on the Health Benefit Consortium . RFP's were sent out for a Third Party Administrator. I have been serving on the sub-committee that has been reviewing the RFP responses . Disability Insurance: No new claims to report. Submitted By: Judith C . Drake , PHR , Human Resources Manager EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, June 8 , 2009 , 1 : 00 to 2 : 00 pm Aurora Conference Room DRAFT NOTES Those present:, Pat Leary, Tee Ann Hunter, Paulette Terwilliger, Kristin Taylor, , Joe Slater, Mike Beach and Judy Drake, as staff support. 1 . Comments : None . May minutes and Rep Notes approved . 2 . Suggestion Box : Town Hall : long mirror in employee ' s ladies room —Done Town Hall : Eliminate bottled water —employees responded that they wanted to keep the bottled water. Cost of buying coffee and bottled water was discussed PWF : Cups needed — this comment was unclear so reps were going to look into it. Year end lunch survey results were discussed . No clear direction so representatives will try to get more information for the next meeting . 3 . Update from Representatives : Group went through an update and status check on old business items . ■ Communication Survey — Department Heads need to share information with staff especially what comes out of SAC meetings better. ■ PWF : New Microwaves — Done Items that went to another committee : ■ Truck bay temperature ( PWC ) — was not discussed at PWC yet ■ larger TV @ PWF ( Budget) — not yet discussed- Lisa looking into projector for training instead of a larger TV ■ . Scanning documents ( RMAB ) —not yet discussed , but both Xerox copiers at Town Hall have scanning capability. ■ Working from home ( Pers . ) — will be discussed more after PW Director position is filled . Next meeting : Monday, July 13 , 2009 , 1 : 00 — 2 : 00 pm , Aurora Conf, Rm 1 Town of Ithaca Personnel Committee Wednesday, June 3 , 2009 Draft Notes Present: Tee Ann Hunter, Pat Leary, Peter Stein , Herb Engman and Judy Drake 1 . Comments : Pat wants notes to be less cryptic as they serve as a good reminder of what happened and why. Meeting dates were discussed because the dates now come after the mail out packet has gone out . July 1St meeting was postponed until July 15th . The meeting date was changed for future meetings to the Monday before the Town Board meeting : Au ust . 3rd , August 31 st (9/7 is Labor Day) , October 5th , November 2nd and November 30 from 4 : 30 to 6 : 00 pm . 2 . Update Discussion on PWD restructuring ■ Discuss Senior Civil Engineer position : Committee in favor of revised pay scale structure with the P+ classification as discussed in the May meeting . Resolution will go to June TB meeting . ■ Update on the restructuring transition : Herb gave an update on the meetings that he had with the engineering staff on the division of duties . There was also a large meeting with the Engineering and PW staff where the duties and office layout was discussed . Staff has already begun making changes on processes to have better coordination . Staff wanted to get going on the transition and not wait for the new person to start . Creig and Kristin will be moved to PWF and Dan will be staying at TH . Dan will start working on long term planning for infrastructure and cleaning up of past items . There was discussion regarding projects that are time crucial and making sure they don 't fall through the cracks during the transition period . ■ Update on the search process for the Director of Public Works The search has been re-advertised . The new deadline for resume filing is July 2nd ■ Discuss Pay for Interim Highway Superintendent There is the need to have the Deputy Highway Superintendent , Gene Redman , assume the duties of the Highway Superintendent , The Highway Superintendent position is an exempt position so Gene will be classified as exempt versus hourly during the interim appointment. The committee discussed a pay increase for the additional responsibility taken on during the temporary assignment. The committee agreed on the hiring minimum for the S classification . Resolution will go to the TB at the June meeting . Other items : ■ Herb updated committee on meetings that have been and will be held with the employees at each location . Topics included : Health consortium , gate at TH , engineering staff relocation , Director of PW recruitment and budget. ■ Update was given on the management training that all the managers and assistant managers attended , including Bolton Point . The morning was on conducting performance reviews . The afternoon was on coaching and disciplinary actions under Civil Service and union contracts . ■ Herb discussed his goal of having a 360 degree performance review done on himself by the Department Heads and Town Board members . In the future that could be extended to the public . The goal would also include having them done on the Department Heads . 3 . Executive Session to discuss the personnel history of a particular person and an update on collective bargaining negotiations . Meeting adjourned . Next Meeting : Wednesday, July 15 , 2009 from 4 : 30 pm to 6 : 00 pm ° FIT� TOWN OF ITHACA _ - 9 215 N . Tioga Street, Ithaca, N . Y . 14850 1821 4 www . town . ithaca. ny.us TOWN CLERK 273- 1721 HIGHWAY (Roads, Parks, Trails, Water &Sewer) 273- 1656 ENGINEERING 273- 1747 PLANNING 273- 1747 ZONING 273- 1783 To : Herb Engman, Supervisor Town of Ithaca Peter Stein, Councilperson Pat Leary, Councilperson Tee Ann Hunter, Councilperson Bill Goodman, Councilperson Eric Levine, Councilperson Rich De Paolo Councilperson From: Marnie Kirchgessner, Recreation and Youth Coordinator June, 2009 Activity Report June was an incredible month and there is much to report. As I intend to compile extensive detailed information on both the community garden project and student work initiative program I will just give you a few highlights as of June 30, 2009 , Student Work Initiative Program • 104 identified youth contacts : • 24 stipend placements made ; • 15 assisted with work placements • 24 known additional youth placed by network partners • 3 declined work for other reasons —g—_8-non-res1dents referred to other programs • 7 pending start dates • The balance 23 are have not completed application process or. have followed up . • As I began a wait list at 90 youth I am now trying to determine how much funding is still available for continued placements . West Hill Community Garden at Linderman Creek • Out of 86 available plots all were assigned • Only 4 of the plots were not under active cultivation • 6 additional plots were planted in communal sweet corn and 8 with Buckwheat ; 1 was deemed to wet to plant. • 3 youth under the age of 10 have their own individual children ' s garden space that they are actively cultivating. • Of the 86 plots assigned. 74 are low income families residing in subsidized housing • As many as 20 families speak little or no English Network/Record Specialist Report July 13 , 2009 Website o Updates ■ Stormwater Forms ■ Zoning Board of Appeals minutes ■ Web Site Redesign o No movement on this item in June. Network • The Network/Records Specialist gave a presentation at the June Records Management Advisor Board Committee meeting on the pros/cons of email hosting through Time Warner versus email hosting in -house . The RMAB agreed to move our .email hosting in house . • New computers set up for Public Works working supervisors . • Decision was made to move forward with replacing the Court office m20i Xerox machine (whose lease expires this month) with the proposed Xerox Phaser 3635M . The Phaser 3635M will provide increased productivity, ease of use and a cost savings to the Town . Additional % June Records Management Advisor Board ( RMAB) • Network/Record Specialist and Human Resource Manger, asked for an addition to the TOI Information Technology Policy, Item No. 2. o Use of hardware, including but not limited to laptops other than employer owned, physically connected to the network is prohibited, because 'foreign' external devices connected to the Town of Ithaca or Bolton Point's server can carry potentially damaging and invasive viruses , worms or other external threats that could impair the . Town's server, along with every user' s computer on the system ; o Lisa to attend 7/23 Town Board meeting to answer any questions regarding this resolution . Town of Ithaca Codes Department Monthly Activity Report - June 2009 Category Description Entries Building Permit Inspection In the Field inspection tied to a building permit 88 Building Permit Consultation In -office or in-field consultation w/project managers or contractors, regarding building projects 20 Building Permit Review Review and processing of building permits 57 Complaint New New complaint investigation 13 Investigation Complain t Follow- Up Processing of complaints 8 Continuing Education Training , seminars , CEU 's g Fire Incident Investigation Fire Incident Investigation following dispatched call 4 Fire Safety/Operating Fire Safety inspection for and/or operating permit, 4 Permit Inspection Processing of notes and issuance of permit, Fire Safety/Operating Processing of Fire Safety re-inspection notes and 4 Permit Re- Inspection -issuing operating ermit/follow-u Legal Processing Order to Remedy, issuing Appearance 3 Tickets , and actual court appearances Meeting Attendance at Departmental meetings , Board 42 meetings , Committee meetings and Staff meetings , etc. Miscellaneous Counter service , phone calls not associated with 31 an active file. Stormwater Pollution 1 Prevention Plan Review Field Inspection/Report Zoning Board of Appeals Review and research of ZBA applications . 2 Addresses 911 All related work for address changes 4 Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Received in June Date Recd Fee BP # .Street Name Status 6/2/2009 $200.00 8337 Eastern Heights Dr 6/3/2009 $25.00 8339 Pennsylvania Ave 6/3/2009 $60.00 8338 Elm St. Ext Pending 6/4/2009 $60.00 8340 Danby Rd 6/9/2009 $25.00 8341 East Shore Dr 6/9/2009 $60.00 8343 Grant Egbert Blvd 6/9/2009 $70.00 8344 Flora Brown Dr 6/9/2009 $550. 00 8342 Southwoods Dr Pending - ZBA 6/10/2009 $45.00 8359 Danby Rd 6/10/2009 $550. 00 8358 Textor Circle 6/10/2009 $2,000.00 8357 Textor Circle 6/11 /2009 $70.00 18360 Rachel Carson Way Pending 6/12/2009 $25.00 8363 Campus Rd 6/12/2009 $550.00 8361 Briarwood Dr pending 6/15/2009 $60.00 8364 Pine Tree Rd Pending 6/15/2009 $1 ,000.00 8362 Hayts Rd Pending 6/18/2009 $25.00 8365 King Rd W Pending 6/19/2009 $25.00 8366 Danby Rd a 6/24/2009 $45.00 8367 King Rd E 6/26/2009 $200.00 8369 Fairway Dr Pending 6/30/2009 $200.00 8368 Coddington Rd Pending ,:`��^S`�Yf�Y'+':�;:N'�.Y,YS�ki ^�:6'23.Y!YZ'sx'a,:9AA �ffib;: 4%5�1"3�4:�' %3�=SkN3�tlffi'L.'9r.«°MkC.4r2#.ASi U.'Y�S�✓r"°«.✓.$II±K£'„1.�"PRX.'h.�YMh.: dNX55l-?D•&?9&TM.:ydf6GEXkc�'lr Fw. qF.trJ�2 's'� ' 9a,.7S u'+`.�N:Tu: . "$i...,.✓Y53Y-.9tT%.i2.,:..kib Wednesday, July 08, 2009 Page 1 of 1 i Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Issued in June Date Last name Street Number Street Name Description 6/3/2009 LaTourelle 1150 Danby Rd Build storage shed 6/3/2009 LaTourelle 1150 Danby Rd Modifications and improvements 6/3/2009 LaTourelle 1150 Danby Rd Main building improvements 6/5/2009 Lucente 105 Briarwood Dr Deck 6/5/2009 Richards 1058 Danby Rd Repair Chimmney 6/5/2009 Lucente 108 Briarwood Dr Deck 6/5/2009 Lucente 110 Briarwood Dr Sundeck 6/5/2009 IC Campus Cent 113 Campus Center W Renovations to Campus Center - Interior 6/5/2009 Towers Concour 147 Tower Skyline Dr Interior renovations and window glazing at 6111 /2009 Merrill Family Sa 1000 East Shore Dr Dock replacements 6/12/2009 Thompson 107 Park Ln Interior renovation , deck addition and repair 6/15/2009 Suite 133 950 Danby Rd Demise wall to increase space 6/17/2009 Terrace 4 100 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6117/2009 Terrace 3 98 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 lacovelli 227 Pennsylvania Ave Tear down existing house 6/17/2009 Terrace 1 123 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 10 112 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Riley Robb Hall 718 Campus Rd Tent permit 6/17/2009 Terrace 12 116 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 2 119 Tower. Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 11 114 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 9 110 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 8 108 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 7 106 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 6 104 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/17/2009 Terrace 5 102 Tower Skyline Dr Fire Alarm Upgrade 6/18/2009 Messing 110 Blackstone Ave New 2-family residence Wednesday, July 08, 2009 Page 1 of 2 Date Last name Street Number .Street Name Description 6/18/2009 East Tower 143 Tower Skyline Dr Fire alarm system upgrade 6/19/2009 West Tower 151 Tower Skyline Dr Fire alarm system upgrades 6/24/2009 Howe 173 King Rd E Reside house 6/24/2009 Dillingham Hall 953 Danby Rd Remove temporary met tower 6/25/2009 Terrace 7 106 Flora Brown Dr Renovate office space 6/26/2009 Marchell 22 Eastern Heights D Add master suite and playroom over existin 6/26/2009 Williams Hall 131 Textor Circle Renovations to Williams Hall 6/30/2009 Eastman Hall 416 Grant Egbert Blvd Convert living space to office space ••.'�u`F.KSiM"u1£a4Lffia P^..YSvY.a,.r✓'�Y.e°Y�h<o9'2'IMDWET.,'^ Stu<Y.�Yw�FU'a � Ym"e�.8.r29b JP"'n,�2ih%,�kb•. Yf..1Fu":4*#AYAPiR-v9.„,.«.wn n a°a�:dF^w�Yl�'Yh`^,J,•YYwSe�YY e'^.*G 'd'Pt�ifS ; tw�J'uY.<eb.«.:.< <.xa.+5 d., s.3M .3a�J., ..r.LA, a3'�b'fu �. , .•.K.'�E&'l%+J"b Wednesday, July 08, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Town of Ithaca Code Department Certificates of Occupancy Issued in June Date BP # Last name Street Number Street Name 5/17/2005 6341 BOCES 555 Warren Rd 5/12/2006 6596 Sherman 503 Warren Rd 6/22/2006 6641 Monastery 201 Tibet Dr 5/18/2007 6855 Monastery 201 Tibet Dr 5/29/2007 6859 Vrabel 209 King Rd W 6/13/2007 6883 Park 125 Simsbury Dr 6/14/2007 68.84 Partners 109 Larisa Ln 6/26/2007 6894 Brenner 133 Glenside Rd 8/5/2008 8112 Center Cardiology Dept 101 Harris B. Dates Dr 9/3/2008 8138 Builders 305 Old Gorge Rd 10/2/2008 8171 Nichols 106 Holly Creek Ln 11 /26/2008 8219 Hirasuna 1 Rocky Ln 1 /27/2009 8239 Pitzer 941 Taughannock Blvd 2/20/2009 8248 Primet 950 Danby Rd 3/4/2009 8252 JAMNA Hospitality 654 Elmira Rd 5/20/2009 8320 Perelstein 209 Christopher Ln Wednesday, July 08, 2009 Page 1 of [ tit Town ' of Ithaca Codes Department Complaints Received Month of June DATE STREET NUMBER STREET NAME COMPLAINT TYPE DISPOSITION 6/1 /2009 110 Pennsylvania Ave property maintenance Pending 6/1 /2009 110 Pennsylvania Ave property maintenance Pending - ck/Sept 6/2/2009 154 Compton Rd property maintenance Closed 6/3/2009 694 Coddington Rd Other Abated 6/3/2009 1150 Danby Rd sign Pending v 6/5/2009 921 Taughannock Blvd Fire Pending 6/5/2009 803 Coddington Rd Occupancy Pending 6/16/2009 203 Muriel St Property Maintenance Pending 6/18/2009 881 .5 Taughannock Blvd Building Code Pending 6/18/2009 881 .5 Taughannock Blvd Occupancy Pending 6/24/2009 106 Southwoods Dr Fill Pending 6/30/2009 129 Burleigh Dr Building Code Pending +CYY.:✓"flies'4�u &YI£uf� .atl�L44iRfi�i$a` ..{2'?'may. . . .. Y��'i�'+y�WP,„3. f..o�'$�Q4.. ..>J:✓'J' aa `.."/vu'°Jx'»�`°�'I .o. Li..�:+Ta:V'S«. .'+Jl' USX`f.'P� Wl4`N. . v°.��. i%:d:��.�.A`✓$T�G$S�Y.'l�'A'1$XSP3 ['i%.kl Wednesday, July 08, 2009 Page I of I 0710112009 TOWN OF ITHACA 08 :43 : 32 B21 I I - B2111 Transaction Report For the period 06/01 /2009 through 06/30/2009 Type . Date Comment Name Quantity Fee 111 I . BP 06/02/2009 57 .- 1 -8 .97 , BP #8337 RAWLINGS 1 200 .00 CONSTRUCTION 2 . BP 06/03/2009 29 .-8- 1 MAINS POPE % 8338 1 60.00 3 . BP 06/03/2009 54. -5-45 IACOVELLI BROS % 8339 1 25 .00 4 . BP 06/04/2009 39. - 1 - 14, BP #8340 WILLIAMS % HEARTH & 1 60.00 HOME 5 . 13P 06/05/2009 41 . - 1 -30. 2 DIFFERENCE DUE IC FIRE ALARMS % 8335 , 36 1 500'.00 6. 13P 06/09/2009 19 .-2-29 CU MERRILL DOCKS % 8341 1 25 .00 7 . BP 06/09/2009 46.- 1 - 15 . 38 WESTVIEW PRTNRS % 8342 1 550.00 8 . BP 06/09/2009 41 . - 1 -30. 2 ICTHACA COLLEGE % 8343 1 60.00 9. BP 06/09/2009 41 .- I -30. 2 ITHACA COLLEGE % 8344 1 70.00 10. BP 06/ 10/2009 41 .- 1 -30.2 HOLT IC JOB HALL % 8357 1 21000 .00 1 l .BP 06/ 10/2009 41 .- I -30. 3 IC WILLIAMS HALL % 8358 1 550.00 12 . 13P 06/ 10/2009 39.- 1 - 1 . 2 SHBC STE 133 % 8359 1 45 .00 13 . 13P 06/ 11 /2009 36. -2-45 IACOVELLI % 8315 l 100 .00 14 . 13P 06/ 11 /2009 21- 1 . 11 . 132 HAMMOND % 8049 1 60 .00 15 . BP 06/ 12/2009 70.- 10-29, BP #8361 LUCENTE, ROCCO 1 550.00 16. 13P 06/ 12/2009 TENT PERMIT-CAMPUS RD/IUDD CU E WING RILEY ROBB 1 25 .00 FAL HALL I. BP 06/ 15/2009 24.- 1 -32.39 -32.4 BP #8362 BAYLES , ERNIE - BONAMIE 1 11000 .00 BP 06/ 16/2009 58-2- 10 BP#8364 ROBERT & NANCY COOKE 1 60.00 BP 06/ 18/2009 39.- 1 - 1 - VORHIS/MORELAND % 8365 1 25 .00 BP 06/ 19/2009 43 .- 1 -4 IC TOWER % 8366 1 25 .00 BP 06/24/2009 44. -2-8 . 2 HOWE % 8367 1 45 .00 22 . BP 06/26/2009 66.-3-3 . 523 TBS CONST % 8369 1 200.00 23 . 13P 06/30/2009 BP # 8368 HENDRICK - TP # 49- 1 -4 1 200 .00 23 69435.00 24 . B PE 06/09/2009 73 .- 1 - 1 .31 BOCES #25 % 6341 1 50.00 25 . B PE 06/ 11 /2009 23 . - 1 - 11 . 132 HAMMOND % 8049 1 87 .50 26 . B PE 06/ 11 /2009 28.- 1 -26. 82 WHITE % 8360 l 70.00 27 . BPE 06/ 19/2009 43 .-2- 10 NAMGYAL % 6910 1 375 .00 4 582.50 28 . FSI 06/ 16/2009 33 .-3-2. 1 ITHACA BEER CO - 09024 _ 1 80.00 1 80.00 29 . OP 06/08/2009 218 , 108q 202, 1 16 SAPSUCKER LUCENTE I 200.00 30. OP 06/ 10/2009 33 .-3-2. 8 612 ELMIRA RD TOOL & 1 100.00 DIE 31 . OP 06/ 11 /2009 24.- 1 -34.621 , 272 HAYTS RD BLIZZARD, JOEL 1 50.00 32 . OP 06/ 17/2009 101 BUNDY RD CLARE BRIDGE COTTAGE 1 100.00 33 . OP 06/ 18/2009 70.- 10-3 . 16 YAHG CUI - 124 1 50.00 SAPSUCKER RD P 06/25/2009 33 . -3-6 JANINA HOSPITALITY 1 100 .00 OP 06/26/2009 CAYUGA HGTS SCH AGE 1 100 .00 PROG 7 700.00 . TCO 06/03/2009 24. -3-2. 1 , BP #8112 CMC 1 500 .00 O 0 37 . TCO 06/26/2009 37 .- 1 - 17. 12 S & J GENERAL % 8171 1 350.00 2 850.00 Page: l '7 Type Date Comment Name Quantity Fee Total for B Fund : 37 89647.5 Total Sales 37 89647. Page: I 0710112009 TOWN OF ITHACA 08 :43 :02 B2110 - 132110 Transaction Report For the period 06/01 /2009 through 06/30/2009 Type Date Comment Name Quantity Fee Blow- B2110 LZBM 06/05/2009 35 . - 1 -21 MCGUIRE % KASONIC 1 100.00 BUILDERS 2 . ZBM 06/05/2009 43 .- 1 -3 .5 , - 3 . 6 MONTESSORI SCHOOL % l 100.00 TROWBRIDGE 3 . ZBM 06/08/2009 WHITETAIL DR -- PIGEONS CHEN 1 100.00 4 . ZBM 06/ 19/2009 46. - 1 - 15 . 38 WESTVIEW PARTNERS BP 1 100.00 #8342 4 400.00 Total for B Fund : 4 400.00 Total Sales 4 400900 Page: l